CN111325460A - Archive quality evaluation method, evaluation device, and computer-readable storage medium - Google Patents
Archive quality evaluation method, evaluation device, and computer-readable storage medium Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111325460A CN111325460A CN202010098979.6A CN202010098979A CN111325460A CN 111325460 A CN111325460 A CN 111325460A CN 202010098979 A CN202010098979 A CN 202010098979A CN 111325460 A CN111325460 A CN 111325460A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- archive
- information
- file
- determining
- item
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 50
- 238000013441 quality evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 26
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title abstract description 15
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 claims description 37
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 claims description 37
- 238000001303 quality assessment method Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000012797 qualification Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 48
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 17
- 206010013700 Drug hypersensitivity Diseases 0.000 description 8
- 201000005311 drug allergy Diseases 0.000 description 8
- 208000014674 injury Diseases 0.000 description 8
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000008733 trauma Effects 0.000 description 8
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 description 7
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 description 7
- 230000002068 genetic effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000005180 public health Effects 0.000 description 5
- 201000011510 cancer Diseases 0.000 description 4
- 208000028571 Occupational disease Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 230000011218 segmentation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000001356 surgical procedure Methods 0.000 description 3
- 208000028782 Hereditary disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 208000026350 Inborn Genetic disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 208000024556 Mendelian disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 206010028980 Neoplasm Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000036210 malignancy Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06395—Quality analysis or management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
- G06F16/93—Document management systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/26—Government or public services
Abstract
The invention provides an archive quality evaluation method, an evaluation device and a computer readable storage medium, wherein the archive quality evaluation method comprises the following steps: responding to the file calling request, and determining at least one file corresponding to the file request in a file database; determining a matching instruction corresponding to at least one archive file; the qualified archive file quantity in at least one archive file is determined according to the matching instruction, the scheme defined in the application automatically acquires at least one archive file and automatically determines the qualification rate of at least one archive file, the evaluation work of the archive quality is automatically completed, the labor is saved, and the evaluation efficiency of the archive quality is effectively improved.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of file quality evaluation, and particularly relates to a file quality evaluation method, a file quality evaluation device and a computer-readable storage medium.
Background
The data quality is an important index for measuring public health service, the data quality of the public health system is related to whether the public health system can be used for effectively monitoring and managing the public health service, the resident health file service is one kind of service in basic public health service, the evaluation of the data quality of the current health file service is finished by workers in a manual mode, as the group of the health file service is all residents, and as the number of people is large, a large amount of manpower is consumed in the mode of manually evaluating the quality of the health file service data, and the evaluation efficiency is low.
Disclosure of Invention
The present invention is directed to solving one of the technical problems of the prior art or the related art.
In view of the above, the first aspect of the present invention provides a method for evaluating quality of an archive.
A second aspect of the present invention provides an archive quality evaluation apparatus.
A third aspect of the invention provides a computer-readable storage medium.
The archive quality evaluation method provided by the first aspect of the invention comprises the following steps:
responding to the file calling request, and determining at least one file corresponding to the file request in a file database; determining a matching instruction corresponding to at least one archive file; and determining the quantity of qualified archive files in at least one archive file according to the matching instruction.
In the design, at least one archive file corresponding to the archive request is determined in the archive database in response to the archive calling request, for example, the quality evaluation of the resident health archive is required, all archive files of the resident health archive or part of the resident health archive files are acquired, the matching instruction corresponding to the resident health archive file is determined, the quantity of qualified archive files in at least one archive file is determined through the matching instruction, it can be understood that whether one archive file is a qualified archive file is determined according to the matching instruction, so that the quantity of qualified archive files of the acquired resident health archive files can be determined, the evaluation work of the archive quality is automatically completed, compared with the scheme of manually evaluating the archive quality, the mode of automatically evaluating the data quality in the application saves labor, and under the condition of more archive files, the quality of the file can be efficiently evaluated, and the evaluation efficiency of the quality of the file is effectively improved.
In addition, according to the archive quality evaluation method in the above technical solution provided by the present invention, the following additional technical features may also be provided:
in one possible design, determining the number of qualified archive files in at least one archive file according to the matching instruction specifically includes: determining a preset matching condition in the matching instruction; acquiring at least one item of fill-in information of each archive file in at least one archive file; determining a matching result of at least one item of filling information according to a preset matching condition; and determining the quantity of qualified archive files in at least one copy according to the matching result.
In the design, each archive file has at least one filling information, the filling information may have the conditions of missing filling or filling errors and the like, a preset matching condition in a matching instruction is determined, a matching result of the at least one filling information is determined according to the preset matching condition, namely whether the at least one filling information meets the preset matching condition is determined, the matching number of the at least one filling information and the preset matching condition in any archive file is determined, and therefore whether any archive file is a qualified archive file is determined.
It can be understood that when the matching number of the at least one filling information and the preset matching condition in any archive file is small, that is, the number of the filling errors of the at least one filling information is large, so as to determine that the archive file is an unqualified archive file, the matching number of the at least one filling information and the preset matching condition is defined as a condition whether any archive file is a qualified archive file.
For example, when the number of the at least one filling information in a certain archive file is greater than or equal to 9, that is, the number of the filling information in the archive file matching the preset matching condition is 9 or 10, the archive file is determined to be a qualified archive file, or when the number of the filling information in the archive file matching the preset matching condition is directly defined to 10, that is, the archive file is determined to be a qualified archive file when the at least one filling information in the archive file matches the preset matching condition.
In a possible design, before determining a matching result of the at least one item of fill-in information of each archive file and the preset matching condition, the method further includes: and replacing the information format of the filling information with a preset format.
In the design, different filling modes may exist in the same filling information item of different archive files due to different filling formats or filling modes of at least one filling information item of different residents, in the application, before the matching result of the at least one filling information item and the preset matching condition is determined, the information format of the at least one filling information item is replaced by the preset format, and the information format of the at least one filling information item in each archive file is modified into a uniform format, so that the filling information item in the preset format is conveniently identified, the identification efficiency and the identification accuracy of the filling information item are improved, and the evaluation efficiency and the evaluation accuracy of the quality of the archive are improved.
In one possible design, the archive quality evaluation method further includes: determining a non-qualified archive file according to a matching result of at least one item of filling information; marking the unqualified archive files and determining the archive numbers of the unqualified archive files; and outputting prompt information corresponding to the file number.
In the design, according to at least one item of matching result of filling information, the non-qualified archive files are determined, and the non-qualified archive files are identified, so that the non-qualified archive files can be distinguished from a plurality of archive files, the archive numbers of the non-qualified archive files are determined, and the prompt information corresponding to the archive numbers is output, so that a worker or a user can be timely reminded of processing the non-qualified archive files, and the data quality of the archive files is improved.
In one possible design, the profile information includes: personal information, time information, payment information, and disease information.
In the design, the archive information comprises personal information, time information, payment information and disease information, so that the archive information contains more contents, all aspects of information of a user can be embodied more comprehensively, and comprehensive statistics on the user information is facilitated.
In a possible design, the step of determining a matching result of at least one item of fill-in information according to a preset matching condition, where the fill-in information is first feature information, specifically includes: the filling information is a blank item, and the filling information is determined not to accord with the preset matching condition; and the filling information is a non-blank item, and the filling information is determined to meet the preset matching condition.
In the design, when the filling information is the first characteristic information, the mode of determining whether the at least one filling information is matched with the preset matching condition is to judge whether the filling information is a blank item, when the filling information is a non-blank item, namely, the filling information is filled with content, the filling information is determined to be in accordance with the preset matching condition, when the filling information is a blank item, namely, the filling information is not filled with content, namely, the filling information is determined to be not in accordance with the preset matching condition, and the matching process of the at least one filling information and the preset matching condition is realized.
In a possible design, the step of determining the matching result of the at least one item of fill-in information according to a preset matching condition, where the fill-in information is the second characteristic information, specifically includes: and determining a matching result according to whether the filling information is preset filling information.
In the design, when the filling information is the second characteristic information, the mode of determining whether the at least one filling information is matched with the preset matching condition is to determine whether the filling information is the preset filling information, when the filling information is the preset filling information, the filling information is determined to be in accordance with the preset matching condition, when the filling information is not the preset filling information, the filling information is determined not to be in accordance with the preset matching condition, and the matching process of the at least one filling information and the preset matching condition is realized.
The filling information is divided into the first characteristic information and the second characteristic information, different judgment conditions are limited for the first characteristic information and the second characteristic information, so that the matching process of the filling information and the preset matching conditions can be more accurately realized, the matching accuracy of at least one item of filling information and the preset matching conditions is improved, and the evaluation accuracy of the quality of the file is further improved.
In one possible design, before obtaining at least one archive file, the method further includes: at least one archive file is downloaded through the data interface.
In the design, at least one archive file is downloaded through the data interface, so that the acquisition process of at least one archive file is realized, and the archive quality of at least one archive file can be evaluated.
In one possible design, downloading at least one archive file via the data interface specifically includes: determining an interface type of a data interface; determining the type of the archive file according to the interface type; and downloading at least one file according to the type of the file.
In the design, before downloading at least one archive file, the interface type of the data interface is determined, and the type of the archive file is determined according to the interface type, so that when data quality evaluation needs to be carried out on different types of archive files, different data interfaces correspond to different archive file types, for example, when resident health files need to be evaluated, the resident health archive files are downloaded at the data interfaces corresponding to the resident health files, and the acquisition of the resident health archive files is realized.
According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided an archive quality estimation apparatus including: the file quality evaluation device has all the beneficial effects of the file quality evaluation method defined in any one of the above technical schemes, and is not described herein again.
According to an aspect of the third aspect of the present invention, there is provided a computer-readable storage medium, on which a profile quality evaluation program is stored, the profile quality evaluation program, when executed by a processor, implementing the steps of the profile quality evaluation method according to any one of the above aspects.
Additional aspects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention.
Drawings
The above and/or additional aspects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent and readily appreciated from the following description of the embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings of which:
FIG. 1 is a flow chart illustrating a method for archival quality assessment provided by an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating a method for archival quality assessment provided by another embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 illustrates a flow chart of a method for archival quality assessment provided by yet another embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating a method for archival quality assessment provided by yet another embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating a method for archival quality assessment provided by yet another embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 6 is a flow chart illustrating a method for archival quality assessment provided by yet another embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 7 is a flow chart illustrating a method for archival quality assessment provided by yet another embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
In order that the above objects, features and advantages of the present invention can be more clearly understood, a more particular description of the invention will be rendered by reference to the appended drawings. It should be noted that the embodiments and features of the embodiments of the present application may be combined with each other without conflict.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention, however, the present invention may be practiced in other ways than those specifically described herein, and therefore the scope of the present invention is not limited by the specific embodiments disclosed below.
The archival quality assessment method provided according to some embodiments of the first aspect of the present invention is described below with reference to fig. 1-7.
The method for evaluating the quality of an archive, as shown in fig. 1, includes:
step S102, responding to the file calling request, and determining at least one file corresponding to the file request in a file database;
step S104, determining a matching instruction corresponding to at least one archive file;
and step S106, determining the quantity of qualified archive files in at least one archive file according to the matching instruction.
In this embodiment, at least one archive file corresponding to the archive request is determined in the archive database in response to the archive call request, for example, quality evaluation of the resident health archive is required, all or part of the resident health archive files of the resident health archive are acquired, a matching instruction corresponding to the resident health archive file is determined, the number of qualified archive files in the at least one archive file is determined by the matching instruction, it can be understood that whether one archive file is a qualified archive file is determined according to the matching instruction, so that the number of qualified archive files of the acquired resident health archive file can be determined, evaluation of the archive quality is automatically completed, compared with a scheme of manually evaluating the archive quality, the manner of automatically evaluating the data quality in the present application saves labor, and in case of a large number of archive files, the quality of the file can be efficiently evaluated, and the evaluation efficiency of the quality of the file is effectively improved.
In the above embodiment, as shown in fig. 2, the method for evaluating quality of an archive provided in this embodiment includes:
step S202, responding to the file calling request, and determining at least one file corresponding to the file request in a file database;
step S204, determining a matching instruction corresponding to at least one archive file;
step S206, determining a preset matching condition in the matching instruction;
step S208, at least one item of fill-in information of each archive file in at least one archive file is obtained;
step S210, determining a matching result of at least one item of filling information according to a preset matching condition;
in step S212, the number of qualified archive files in at least one archive file is determined according to the matching result.
In the embodiment, each archive file has at least one filling information, the filling information may have missing filling or filling errors, and the like, a preset matching condition in the matching instruction is determined, a matching result of the at least one filling information is determined according to the preset matching condition, that is, whether the at least one filling information meets the preset matching condition is determined, and the matching number of the at least one filling information and the preset matching condition in any archive file is determined, so that whether any archive file is a qualified archive file is determined.
It can be understood that when the matching number of the at least one filling information and the preset matching condition in any archive file is small, that is, the number of the filling errors of the at least one filling information is large, so as to determine that the archive file is an unqualified archive file, the matching number of the at least one filling information and the preset matching condition is defined as a condition whether any archive file is a qualified archive file.
For example, when the number of the at least one filling information in a certain archive file is greater than or equal to 9, that is, the number of the filling information in the archive file matching the preset matching condition is 9 or 10, the archive file is determined to be a qualified archive file, or when the number of the filling information in the archive file matching the preset matching condition is directly defined to 10, that is, the archive file is determined to be a qualified archive file when the at least one filling information in the archive file matches the preset matching condition.
In the embodiment, the information format of at least one filling information is replaced by a preset format, and different filling modes may exist in the same filling information item of different archive files due to the fact that different residents have different filling modes for the at least one filling information item.
For example, after acquiring the resident health profile, at least one item of the resident health profile is written in advance, including: the term "health record code", "date of filing", "date of birth", "household registration address", "permanent type", "medical expense payment means other", "genetic medical history", "genetic history disease name", "disability condition other disability", "past history disease", "time of confirmed diagnosis of past history disease", "past history disease malignancy", "past history disease occupational disease", "past history operation name", "past history trauma name", "past history blood transfusion", "past blood transfusion reason", "family history other", "drug allergy history", "other" and the like.
The method comprises the steps of utilizing a data dictionary to carry out coding conversion on values of data items such as a medical expense payment mode, a hereditary medical history, a standing type, a disability condition, a past history disease, a past history operation, a past history trauma, a past history blood transfusion, a family history and a drug allergy history, finding a corresponding numerical value code according to a numeric value string, converting the character string type into a calculable numerical value type, for example, converting the medical expense payment mode into a town basic medical insurance, converting into 2 according to the data dictionary, converting into 2 according to the standing type into a non-citizen household type, and converting into 2 according to the data dictionary.
The values of data items such as 'filing date', 'birth date', 'past history disease diagnosis time' and the like are cleaned, and the character string type is converted into a calculable date type, for example, the 'birth date' value is '1990-12-12', and the 'filing date' value is '2019-5-11'.
Cleaning the value of the household address, performing word segmentation according to the rule of 'administrative division + street + house number + room number', and converting the 'administrative division' into 'administrative division code' by using a data dictionary, for example, the value of the household address is 'Guangdong Shenzhen City Longhua district Meilonglu', the value of the household address is 'Guangdong Shenzhen City Longhua district + Meilonglu', and the administrative division code is '111111'.
The value of the health file code is cleaned, and word segmentation is performed according to the rule of the administrative division, the township division, the village and the filing number, for example, the value of the health file code is 44030910812345678, the word segmentation is 440309-.
In the above embodiment, as shown in fig. 3, the method for evaluating quality of an archive provided in this embodiment further includes:
step S302, according to the matching result of at least one item of filling information, determining a non-qualified archive file;
step S304, marking the unqualified archive files, and determining the archive numbers of the unqualified archive files;
step S306, outputting the prompt information corresponding to the file number.
According to the matching result of at least one item of filling information, the non-qualified archive files are determined, and the non-qualified archive files are identified, so that the non-qualified archive files can be distinguished from a plurality of archive files, the archive numbers of the non-qualified archive files are determined, and the prompt information corresponding to the archive numbers is output, so that a worker or a user can be timely reminded of processing the non-qualified archive files, and the data quality of the archive files is improved.
In the above embodiment, the profile information includes: personal information, time information, payment information, and disease information.
In the embodiment, the profile information comprises personal information, time information, payment information and disease information, so that the profile information contains more contents, thereby more comprehensively representing various information of the user and being beneficial to comprehensively counting the user information.
The personal information includes: health file code, household address, standing type.
The time information includes: date of filing, date of birth, time of confirmed diagnosis of disease in past history.
The payment information includes: medical fee payment mode, medical fee payment mode and the like.
The disease information includes: hereditary history, hereditary history disease name, disability condition, other disabilities of the disability condition, past history disease malignancy, past history disease occupational disease, past history surgery name, past history trauma name, past history blood transfusion name, past blood transfusion reason, family history other, drug allergy history other.
In the above embodiment, as shown in fig. 4, the method for evaluating quality of an archive provided in this embodiment includes:
step S402, at least one item of filling information of each archive file in at least one archive file is obtained;
step S404, replacing the information format of at least one item of filling information with a preset format;
step S406, the filling information is a blank item, wherein the filling information is the first feature information, if yes, step S406 is executed, and if no, step S408 is executed;
step S408, determining that the filling information meets the preset matching condition;
step S410, determining the matching quantity of at least one item of filling information of any archive file in at least one archive file and a preset matching condition;
step S412, if the matching number is greater than or equal to the preset value, executing step S414, otherwise, executing step S410;
step S414, determining any archive file as a qualified archive file;
in step S416, the qualified number of archive files in at least one archive file is determined.
In this embodiment, when the filling information is the first feature information, determining whether the at least one filling information matches the preset matching condition is to determine whether the filling information is a blank item, when the filling information is a non-blank item, that is, when the filling information is filled with content, determining that the filling information meets the preset matching condition, and when the filling information is a blank item, that is, when the filling information is not filled with content, that is, determining that the filling information does not meet the preset matching condition, thereby implementing the matching process of the at least one filling information and the preset matching condition.
The first feature information includes: health record coding, medical expense payment method other, hereditary disease name, disability condition other disabilities, past disease diagnosis time, past disease malignant tumor, past disease occupational disease, past operation name, past trauma name, past blood transfusion reason, family history other, drug allergy history other.
In the above embodiment, as shown in fig. 5, the method for evaluating quality of an archive provided in this embodiment includes:
step S502, at least one item of filling information of each archive file in at least one archive file is obtained;
step S504, replacing the information format of at least one item of filling information with a preset format;
step S506, the filling information is preset filling information, wherein the filling information is second characteristic information, if yes, step S508 is executed, and if no, step S506 is executed;
step S508, determining that the filling information meets the preset matching condition;
step S510, determining the matching quantity of at least one item of filling information of any archive file in at least one archive file and a preset matching condition;
step S512, the matching number is greater than or equal to the preset value, if yes, step S514 is executed, and if no, step S510 is executed;
step S514, determining any archive file as a qualified archive file;
in step S516, the qualified number of archive files in at least one archive file is determined.
In this embodiment, when the filling information is the second feature information, determining whether the at least one filling information matches the preset matching condition is to determine whether the filling information is the preset filling information, when the filling information is the preset filling information, determining that the filling information conforms to the preset matching condition, and when the filling information is not the preset filling information, determining that the filling information does not conform to the preset matching condition, thereby implementing a matching process of the at least one filling information and the preset matching condition.
The second characteristic information includes: filing date, birth date, household registration address, standing type, medical expense payment mode, hereditary disease history, disability condition, past disease, past surgery, past trauma, past blood transfusion, family history and drug allergy history.
The filling information is divided into the first characteristic information and the second characteristic information, different judgment conditions are limited for the first characteristic information and the second characteristic information, so that the matching process of the filling information and the preset matching conditions can be more accurately realized, the matching accuracy of at least one item of filling information and the preset matching conditions is improved, and the evaluation accuracy of the quality of the file is further improved.
Specifically, r1 is calculated for the data item "medical expense payment method" of the personal basic information in the health record, and whether the value is "8" is judged, if not "8", r1 is 1, if "8", the data item "other than medical expense payment method" is acquired, and whether the value is null is judged, if null, r1 is 0, otherwise, r1 is 1. For example, if the value of "medical payment method" is 2, r1 is 1.
R2 is calculated for the data item of the ' genetic medical history ' of the personal basic information in the health record, whether the value is ' 2 ' is judged, if not, ' r2 is 1, if ' 2 ', the data item of the ' genetic medical history disease name ' is acquired, whether the value is null is judged, if null, r2 is 0, otherwise, r2 is 1. For example, if the "genetic history" value is 2 and the "genetic history disease name" value is null, r2 is 0.
R3 is calculated according to the 'birth date' data item of the personal basic information in the health record, whether the value is earlier than the 'filing date' is judged, if the value is earlier than the 'filing date', r3 is 0, otherwise r3 is 1. For example, if the "birth date" is "1990-12-12" earlier than the "filing date" or "2019-5-11", r3 is 1.
The r4 is calculated for the 'standing type' data item of the personal basic information in the health record, if the 'administrative division code' of the household address is the same as the 'administrative division code' of the health record number, the value of the 'standing type' data item is judged, if the value is 1, the r4 is 1, otherwise the r4 is 0, if the 'administrative division code' of the household address is different from the 'administrative division code' of the health record number, the value of the 'standing type' data item is judged, if the value is 2, the r4 is 1, otherwise the r4 is 0. For example, if the value of the "administrative division code" of the household address is "440309", the value of the "administrative division code" of the health file number is "440309", and the value of the "permanent type" is 2, r4 is 0.
The method comprises the steps of calculating r5 aiming at a data item of the basic personal information in the health record, judging whether the value is 8, if not, obtaining r5 to be 1, if the value is 8, obtaining a data item of other disabilities in the disability condition, judging whether the value is null, if so, obtaining r5 to be 0, and otherwise, obtaining r5 to be 1. For example, if the "disability condition" is 1, r5 is 1.
R6 is calculated for a data item of ' previous history diseases ' of personal basic information in a health file, if the data item of ' previous history diseases ' is taken as ' 1 ', r6 is 1, if the data item of ' previous history diseases ' is not taken as ' 1 ', a data item of ' previous history diseases diagnosis time ' is acquired, whether the data item of ' previous history diseases ' is empty is judged, if the data item of ' previous history diseases ' is empty, r6 is 0, otherwise r6 is 1, if the data item of ' previous history diseases ' is taken as ' 6 ', a data item of ' previous history diseases malignant tumors ' is acquired, whether the data item of ' previous history diseases ' is empty is judged, if the data item of ' previous history diseases ' is empty, r6 is 0, otherwise r6 is 1, if the data item of ' previous history diseases ' is 12 ', a data item of ' previous history diseases ' is acquired, whether the data item of ' previous history diseases ' is empty is judged, r6 is 0, otherwise r6 is 1. For example, if the value of "past history disease" is 1, r6 is 1.
R7 is calculated according to the data item of the 'past history operation' of the personal basic information in the health record, whether the value is '2' is judged, if not, '2' is judged, r7 is 1, if '2' is judged, the data item of the 'past history operation name' is acquired, whether the value is null is judged, if null, r7 is 0, otherwise, r7 is 1. For example, if "past surgery" is 1, r7 is 1.
The r8 is calculated according to the data item of the 'past history trauma' of the personal basic information in the health record, whether the value is '2' is judged, if not, '2' is judged, r8 is 1, if '2' is judged, the data item of the 'past trauma name' is obtained, whether the value is null is judged, if null, r8 is 0, otherwise, r8 is 1. For example, if the value of "history trauma" is 1, r8 is 1.
R9 is calculated according to the data item of 'transfusion in past history' of the personal basic information in the health record, whether the value is '2' is judged, if not, '2' is judged, r9 is 1, if '2' is judged, the data item of 'reason for past transfusion' is acquired, whether the value is null is judged, if null, r9 is 0, otherwise, r9 is 1. For example, if the value of "previous Stent transfusion" is 1, r9 is 1.
R10 is calculated according to the data item of the ' family history ' of the personal basic information in the health record, whether the value is ' 12 ' is judged, if not, ' r10 is 1, if ' 12 ', the data item of the ' other family history ' is acquired, whether the value is null is judged, if null, r10 is 0, otherwise, r10 is 1. For example, if the "family history" value is 1, r10 is 1.
R11 is calculated according to the data item of the ' drug allergy history ' of the personal basic information in the health record, whether the value is ' 5 ' is judged, if not, ' r11 is 1, if ' 5 ', the data items of the ' other drug allergy histories ' are acquired, whether the value is null is judged, if null, r11 is 0, otherwise, r11 is 1. For example, if the value of "drug allergy history" is 1, r11 is 1.
Calculating r-r 1 × r2 × r3 × 0r4 × 1r5 × 2r6 × 3r7 × 4r8 × 5r 8655 r9 × 6r10 × 7r11, if r-1, then marking as qualified health file, if r-0, then marking as unqualified health file, for example, r-1 × 80 × 91 × 0 × 1 7371 1 × 1 × 1 × 1 × 1 × 1 × 1, if r-0, then marking as unqualified health file.
And finally counting the total number of qualified health files. For example, the total number of qualified health records is 96.
In the above embodiment, as shown in fig. 6, the method for evaluating quality of an archive provided in this embodiment includes:
step S602, downloading at least one archive file through a data interface;
step S604, at least one item of fill-in information of each archive file in at least one archive file is obtained;
step S606, replacing the information format of at least one filling information with a preset format;
step S608, determining the matching result of at least one item of filling information of each archive file and the preset matching condition;
step S610, determining the matching quantity of at least one item of filling information of any archive file in at least one archive file and a preset matching condition;
step S612, if the matching number is greater than or equal to the preset value, executing step S614, and if not, executing step S610;
step S614, determining any archive file as a qualified archive file;
in step S616, the qualified number of archive files in at least one archive file is determined.
In this embodiment, the at least one archive file is downloaded through the data interface, so that the process of acquiring the at least one archive file is realized, and the archive quality of the at least one archive file can be evaluated.
In the above embodiment, as shown in fig. 7, the method for evaluating quality of an archive provided in this embodiment includes:
step S702, determining the interface type of the data interface;
step S704, determining the type of the archive file according to the interface type;
step S706, downloading at least one archive file according to the type of the archive file;
step S708, at least one item of fill-in information of each archive file in at least one archive file is obtained;
step S710, replacing the information format of at least one item of filling information with a preset format;
step S712, determining the matching result of at least one item of fill-in information of each archive file and the preset matching condition;
step S714, determining the matching number of at least one item of filling information of any archive file in at least one archive file and a preset matching condition;
step S716, if the matching number is greater than or equal to the preset value, then step S718 is executed, and if not, then step S714 is executed;
step S718, determining any archive file as a qualified archive file;
in step S720, the qualified number of archive files in at least one archive file is determined.
In this embodiment, before downloading at least one archive file, the interface type of the data interface is determined, and the type of the archive file is determined according to the interface type, it can be understood that, when data quality evaluation needs to be performed on different types of archive files, different data interfaces correspond to different types of archive files, for example, when a resident health profile needs to be evaluated, the resident health profile file is downloaded at the data interface corresponding to the resident health profile, so as to achieve acquisition of the resident health profile file.
According to an embodiment of the second aspect of the present invention, there is provided an archive quality evaluation apparatus including: the present invention provides a method for evaluating file quality, which comprises a memory, a processor and a computer program stored in the memory and capable of running on the processor, wherein the computer program is executed by the processor to implement the steps of the file quality evaluation method defined in any of the above embodiments.
According to an embodiment of the third aspect of the present invention, there is provided a computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon an archive quality evaluation program, which when executed by a processor implements the steps of the archive quality evaluation method as in any of the above embodiments.
In the present invention, the term "plurality" means two or more unless explicitly defined otherwise. The terms "mounted," "connected," "fixed," and the like are to be construed broadly, and for example, "connected" may be a fixed connection, a removable connection, or an integral connection; "coupled" may be direct or indirect through an intermediary. The specific meanings of the above terms in the present invention can be understood by those skilled in the art according to specific situations.
In the description herein, the description of the terms "one embodiment," "some embodiments," "specific embodiments," etc., means that a particular feature, structure, material, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment or example is included in at least one embodiment or example of the invention. In this specification, the schematic representations of the terms used above do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment or example. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, materials, or characteristics described may be combined in any suitable manner in any one or more embodiments or examples.
The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention and is not intended to limit the present invention, and various modifications and changes may be made by those skilled in the art. Any modification, equivalent replacement, or improvement made within the spirit and principle of the present invention should be included in the protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. An archive quality evaluation method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
responding to a file calling request, and determining at least one file corresponding to the file request in a file database;
determining a matching instruction corresponding to the at least one archive file;
and determining the quantity of qualified archive files in the at least one archive file according to the matching instruction.
2. The archive quality evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein the determining the number of qualified archives in the at least one archive according to the matching instruction specifically comprises:
determining a preset matching condition in the matching instruction;
acquiring at least one item of fill-in information of each archive file in the at least one archive file;
determining a matching result of the at least one item of fill-in information according to the preset matching condition;
and determining the quantity of qualified archive files in the at least one archive file according to the matching result.
3. The archive quality estimation method according to claim 2, characterized by further comprising:
determining a non-qualified archive file according to a matching result of the at least one item of filling information;
marking the non-qualified archive files, and determining the archive numbers of the non-qualified archive files;
and outputting prompt information corresponding to the file number.
4. The archive quality estimation method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the archive information includes: personal information, time information, payment information, and disease information.
5. The archive quality assessment method according to claim 2, wherein the at least one item of fill-in information is first feature information, wherein the step of determining the matching result of the at least one item of fill-in information according to the preset matching condition specifically comprises:
filling information is a blank item, and the filling information is determined not to accord with the preset matching condition;
and determining that the filling information conforms to the preset matching condition if the filling information is a non-blank item.
6. The archive quality evaluation method according to claim 5, wherein the filling information is second feature information, and the step of determining the matching result of the at least one filling information according to the preset matching condition specifically comprises:
and determining the matching result according to whether the filling information is preset filling information.
7. The archive quality assessment method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, further comprising, before the step of determining at least one archive file corresponding to the archive request in an archive database:
and downloading the at least one archive file through a data interface.
8. The archive quality assessment method according to claim 7, wherein the step of determining at least one archive file corresponding to the archive request in the archive database specifically comprises:
determining an interface type of the data interface;
determining the type of the archive file according to the interface type;
and downloading the at least one archive file according to the type of the archive file.
9. An archive quality evaluation device characterized by comprising:
a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor;
the computer program, when executed by the processor, implements the archival quality assessment method of any of claims 1-8.
10. A computer-readable storage medium, on which an archive quality evaluation program is stored, which, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the archive quality evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 8.
Priority Applications (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010098979.6A CN111325460A (en) | 2020-02-18 | 2020-02-18 | Archive quality evaluation method, evaluation device, and computer-readable storage medium |
| PCT/CN2020/079602 WO2021164083A1 (en) | 2020-02-18 | 2020-03-17 | Archive quality evaluation method and device, and computer readable storage medium |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010098979.6A CN111325460A (en) | 2020-02-18 | 2020-02-18 | Archive quality evaluation method, evaluation device, and computer-readable storage medium |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN111325460A true CN111325460A (en) | 2020-06-23 |
Family
ID=71172749
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010098979.6A Pending CN111325460A (en) | 2020-02-18 | 2020-02-18 | Archive quality evaluation method, evaluation device, and computer-readable storage medium |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN111325460A (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2021164083A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN114639143B (en) * | 2022-03-07 | 2024-04-16 | 北京百度网讯科技有限公司 | Portrait archiving method, device and storage medium based on artificial intelligence |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20150066865A1 (en) * | 2013-08-27 | 2015-03-05 | Bank Of America Corporation | Archive information management |
| CN108447534A (en) * | 2018-05-18 | 2018-08-24 | 灵玖中科软件（北京）有限公司 | A kind of electronic health record data quality management method based on NLP |
| CN108985187A (en) * | 2018-06-27 | 2018-12-11 | 广州市南方人力资源评价中心有限公司 | A kind of method that automatic quality inspection is realized in self verification of digital archive |
| CN110136788A (en) * | 2019-05-14 | 2019-08-16 | 清华大学 | It is a kind of based on the case history quality detecting method, device, equipment and the storage medium that detect automatically |
Family Cites Families (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP6780244B2 (en) * | 2015-12-25 | 2020-11-04 | 富士通株式会社 | Judgment method, judgment program and judgment device |
| US10755804B2 (en) * | 2016-08-10 | 2020-08-25 | Talix, Inc. | Health information system for searching, analyzing and annotating patient data |
| CN107729576A (en) * | 2017-11-28 | 2018-02-23 | 北京筑业志远软件开发有限公司 | The management method and system of archives |
| CN108564991A (en) * | 2018-04-13 | 2018-09-21 | 重庆医科大学附属儿童医院 | Digitization coding case history wrong identification system based on ICD and its recognition methods |
| CN108389606A (en) * | 2018-05-08 | 2018-08-10 | 灵玖中科软件（北京）有限公司 | A kind of the data quality control system and its control method of electronic medical record homepage |
| CN109543957A (en) * | 2018-10-27 | 2019-03-29 | 平安医疗健康管理股份有限公司 | The method and apparatus for generating medical record quality inspection report based on data processing |
| CN110556173A (en) * | 2019-08-09 | 2019-12-10 | 刘丽丽 | intelligent classification management system and method for inspection report |
-
2020
- 2020-02-18 CN CN202010098979.6A patent/CN111325460A/en active Pending
- 2020-03-17 WO PCT/CN2020/079602 patent/WO2021164083A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20150066865A1 (en) * | 2013-08-27 | 2015-03-05 | Bank Of America Corporation | Archive information management |
| CN108447534A (en) * | 2018-05-18 | 2018-08-24 | 灵玖中科软件（北京）有限公司 | A kind of electronic health record data quality management method based on NLP |
| CN108985187A (en) * | 2018-06-27 | 2018-12-11 | 广州市南方人力资源评价中心有限公司 | A kind of method that automatic quality inspection is realized in self verification of digital archive |
| CN110136788A (en) * | 2019-05-14 | 2019-08-16 | 清华大学 | It is a kind of based on the case history quality detecting method, device, equipment and the storage medium that detect automatically |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| WO2021164083A1 (en) | 2021-08-26 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| WO2018129914A1 (en) | Assisted hospital decision-making system and method | |
| CN108389621B (en) | Method and system for detecting data quality of first page of medical record | |
| JP5067375B2 (en) | Disease name input support program, method and apparatus | |
| US20050251422A1 (en) | System and method for near real-time coding of hospital billing records | |
| Montaquila et al. | Statistical and practical issues in the design of a national probability sample of births for the Vanguard Study of the National Children's Study | |
| CN107767253B (en) | Tax information management platform, method and system | |
| CN111325460A (en) | Archive quality evaluation method, evaluation device, and computer-readable storage medium | |
| CN111260090A (en) | Garbage classification credit integral construction system and method based on block chain | |
| CN111899821A (en) | Method for processing medical institution data, method and device for constructing database | |
| WO2018129913A1 (en) | System and method for assisting doctor in diagnosis and treatment | |
| CN111899822A (en) | Medical institution database construction method, query method, device, equipment and medium | |
| CN111581304B (en) | Method for automatically drawing family map based on social population familial relationship | |
| CN113517078A (en) | Wisdom medical platform based on 5G communication | |
| CN116303641B (en) | Laboratory report management method supporting multi-data source visual configuration | |
| CN105808735B (en) | Data processing method and device | |
| CN116228298A (en) | Big data analysis method and system based on NB-IOT water meter metering information | |
| CN114219245B (en) | Rural power index evaluation method and device based on big data and storage medium | |
| CN114373552A (en) | Emergency management method, system and equipment for food poisoning and infectious diseases | |
| CN112734369A (en) | Engineering cost management system based on big data | |
| CN114842980B (en) | WiFi (wireless fidelity) matching-based contact tracking pre-screening method for infectious disease susceptible people | |
| KR100928401B1 (en) | Medical record information database management method and database accordingly | |
| CN111310429B (en) | Method and system for realizing customizable form | |
| CN116564538B (en) | Hospital information real-time query method and system based on big data | |
| CN102034015B (en) | Based on genomic warning system | |
| CN112488109B (en) | Method and device for identifying livestock and poultry identification codes and computer readable storage medium |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20200623 |
|
| WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication |