CN111255435A - Method for calculating shale content of complex reservoir - Google Patents
Method for calculating shale content of complex reservoir Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111255435A CN111255435A CN202010052702.XA CN202010052702A CN111255435A CN 111255435 A CN111255435 A CN 111255435A CN 202010052702 A CN202010052702 A CN 202010052702A CN 111255435 A CN111255435 A CN 111255435A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- reservoir
- gamma
- content
- shale content
- logging
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 16
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 18
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000010219 correlation analysis Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 10
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 3
- VDHRJLNOQQQFNZ-UHFFFAOYSA-O [n'-[3-[1-[2-[4-[4-[4-[2-[4-[3-[[amino(azaniumyl)methylidene]amino]propyl]triazol-1-yl]acetyl]piperazin-1-yl]-6-[2-[2-(2-prop-2-ynoxyethoxy)ethoxy]ethylamino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]piperazin-1-yl]-2-oxoethyl]triazol-4-yl]propyl]carbamimidoyl]azanium;chloride Chemical compound [Cl-].N1=NC(CCCN=C([NH3+])N)=CN1CC(=O)N1CCN(C=2N=C(N=C(NCCOCCOCCOCC#C)N=2)N2CCN(CC2)C(=O)CN2N=NC(CCCN=C(N)[NH3+])=C2)CC1 VDHRJLNOQQQFNZ-UHFFFAOYSA-O 0.000 description 2
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012417 linear regression Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000941 radioactive substance Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052770 Uranium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000013475 authorization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010835 comparative analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002821 scintillation proximity assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- JFALSRSLKYAFGM-UHFFFAOYSA-N uranium(0) Chemical compound [U] JFALSRSLKYAFGM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B47/00—Survey of boreholes or wells
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B49/00—Testing the nature of borehole walls; Formation testing; Methods or apparatus for obtaining samples of soil or well fluids, specially adapted to earth drilling or wells
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/02—Agriculture; Fishing; Forestry; Mining
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Geophysics (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Marine Sciences & Fisheries (AREA)
- Animal Husbandry (AREA)
- Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
- Analysing Materials By The Use Of Radiation (AREA)
- Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
Abstract
A method for calculating the mud content of a complex reservoir includes the first step of calculating the mud content of a whole well section by using a natural gamma empirical formula, the second step of calculating △ SP value, the third step of identifying a conventional reservoir and a high-gamma reservoir, the fourth step of establishing an explanation model of natural gamma GR and the mud content SH of the conventional reservoir, and the fifth step of establishing an explanation model based on e△spGR well logging reconstruction of the dynamic correction factor; sixthly, carrying out shale content calculation on the complex reservoir, wherein example calculation results show that shale content calculation is carried out on the complex reservoir; the method can accurately evaluate the content of the shale of the complex reservoir, is easy to popularize, lays an important foundation for the explanation of reservoir parameters, and has important application prospect and economic value.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of oil and gas field exploration, in particular to a shale content calculation method for a complex reservoir stratum.
Background
The method mainly comprises the following steps of calculating the shale content by using a natural gamma curve (SIMAR, 2013), mainly adopting a natural energy spectrum curve to calculate the shale content, mainly adopting a uranium-depleted natural gamma curve and a time difference AC, a compensation density DEN and a compensation neutron CNL to carry out linear regression, finally adopting an empirical formula to calculate the shale content, adopting a GR, SP, CNL-DEN and a logging resistivity RT combined method to obtain a minimum value, calculating the shale content of the high-low-interaction reservoir (which is common to the reservoirs, a patent authorization publication No. CN103809217B) ③, a natural potential compact GR, a method for calculating the shale content by using GR and SP combined with the radioactive substance (application No. 2018111384501), calculating the shale content of the high-permeability stratum by using a gamma curve containing high-earth pore space C, a GR-GR, a GR-GR combined with the natural potential compact GR, a pore space GR combined with the radioactive substance, a GR and a GR combined with the smallest gamma curve, a pore space curve, a resistivity GR combined with a pore space curve, a porosity curve.
Therefore, because the existing method for calculating the shale content of the reservoir with high gamma content has the common defect that the AC or CNL is not subjected to permeability or porosity correction, the problem that the shale content of the pore or permeability reservoir is explained to a higher degree is caused.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to overcome the defects of the prior art, the invention aims to provide a shale content calculation method for a complex reservoir, which is characterized in that on the basis of high-gamma reservoir identification, logging parameters of a conventional reservoir are adopted, and on the basis of porosity or permeability correction of acoustic wave time difference AC and compensated neutron CNL, a shale content calculation model which is not influenced by reservoir radioactivity is constructed.
In order to achieve the purpose, the technical scheme of the invention is as follows:
a complicated reservoir shale content calculation method comprises the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps: calculating the mud content of the whole well section by using a natural gamma empirical formula
Wherein GR is a natural gamma value of a certain depth logging, SHV is a argillaceous index, GMIN is a natural gamma GR value of sandstone, GMAX is a natural gamma GR value of most of mudstones, SH is a argillaceous content, and CC is an empirical index of the argillaceous content;
step two, calculating △ SP value
△ SP is logging SP abnormal amplitude difference, the larger the amplitude difference is, the lower the reservoir shale content is, otherwise, the higher the reservoir shale content is, the SPminLogging SP values, SP, for sandstonemaxThe SP value of the mudstone is the logging natural potential value of a certain depth;
step three: identifying conventional and high gamma reservoirs
Utilizing natural gamma GR and acoustic wave time difference AC logging to identify a high gamma reservoir, wherein logging response characteristics show that the GR of the high gamma reservoir is more than 100API, and the AC is less than 240 us/m; the GR of the conventional reservoir is less than 100, and the AC is generally less than 240 us/m;
step four: establishing general reservoir GR and SH explanation model
According to the correlation analysis, establishing a natural gamma GR <100API layer shale content power function explanation model:
SH=b0*GRb1(4)
in the formula: b0 and b1 are constants;
step five: establishment based on e△SPDynamic correction factor corrected GR log reconstruction
Introducing correction e△SPDynamic as a correction factor for permeability or porosity of reservoir AC and CNL, establishing GR and PIVI E in conventional reservoir section△SP、PE、CNL/e△SPEstablishing a regression model:
GR=a+b*PIVI*e△SP+c*PE+d*CNL/e△SP(5)
in the formula: GR is the natural gamma value of logging, PIVI is 3.048 105/AC,e△spThe correction factor is a dynamic correction factor, the lithologic photoelectric cross section of PE is provided, CNL is a compensation neutron, and a, b, c and d are equation coefficients which are constants;
step six: shale content calculation of complex reservoir
And (3) calculating the shale content in the conventional reservoir (GR <90API) and the interval AC >240us/m by adopting the formula (1) and the formula (2), reconstructing a GR curve by utilizing the formula (5) in the fifth step in the high-gamma reservoir interval, and then calculating the shale content of the high-gamma reservoir by utilizing the formula (4) in the fourth step.
The invention has the beneficial effects that:
the invention is a method for calculating the shale content of a complex reservoir, and introduces e△spAnd the pores or permeability of the AC and the CNL are dynamically corrected, so that the problem of high calculated content of the argillaceous substances caused by the development of the pores of the reservoir in the prior art is effectively solved. In addition, the prior art needs a large amount of sample test analysis data as a basis for calculating the argillaceous content, and the reliability of an interpretation model is greatly influenced by the amount and the representativeness of the sample data. The model established by the invention is mainly based on the logging data of the conventional reservoir stratum to directly establish an explanation model, the experimental data of the test sample does not influence the reliability of the established model, and certainly, the test data of a small amount of samples can be adopted for verification. Therefore, it is easy to popularizeParticularly in areas where the sample test data is relatively deficient. Therefore, the method has the advantage of accurately evaluating the shale content of the complex reservoir, lays an important foundation for the interpretation of reservoir parameters, and has important application prospect and economic value.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of shale content calculation for a complex reservoir.
FIG. 2 is a model of calculation of the shale content in the example.
FIG. 3 is a graph of the calculation results of the shale content of the complex reservoir in the example.
Detailed Description
The following examples are given to illustrate specific applications of the present invention.
Referring to fig. 1, a method for shale content of a complex reservoir comprises the following steps:
a complicated reservoir shale content calculation method comprises the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps: calculating the mud content of the whole well section by using a natural gamma empirical formula
Calculating the shale content by using the two empirical formulas, wherein GR is a natural gamma value of a certain depth logging, SHV is a shale index, GMIN is a natural gamma GR value of sandstone, GMAX is a natural gamma GR value of most of mudstones, SH is the shale content, CC is a shale content empirical index, and CC is 2.0 for an old stratum;
step two, calculating △ SP value
In the formula: in order to log the abnormal amplitude difference of the SP, the larger the amplitude difference is, the lower the shale content of the reservoir is, otherwise, the higher the shale content of the reservoir is, the SPminLogging SP values, SP, for sandstonemaxAnd (3) obtaining the SP value of the mudstone, wherein the SP value is the logging natural potential value of a certain depth.
Step three: identifying conventional and high gamma reservoirs
And identifying a high-gamma reservoir by using GR and AC logging, wherein the logging response characteristics show that the GR of the high-gamma reservoir is generally larger than 100API, the AC is generally smaller than 240us/m, the GR of the conventional reservoir is smaller than 100, and the AC is generally smaller than 240 us/m.
Step four: establishing general reservoir GR and SH explanation model
According to the correlation analysis, a natural gamma GR <100API layer shale content power function interpretation model is established, b0 is 0.027, b1 is 1.606 (table 1 and figure 2), and the correlation R is 0.89, so that the correlation is high.
SH=0.027*GR1.606(4)
TABLE 1 model totalization and parameter evaluation
Dependent variable sh
The argument is GR.
Step five: establishment based on e△SPDynamic correction factor corrected GR log reconstruction
At present, GR reconstruction mainly utilizes direct linear regression of parameters such as AC, CNL and DEN, and the principle is that the larger the parameter values are, the larger GR is, just as the AC or CNL is in the reservoir development interval, the larger the GR is, as described in the technical background of the invention, the larger the AC or CNL is. To this end, the invention introduces a correction e△SPAs a dynamic correction factor for permeability or porosity of reservoir AC and CNL, the better the reservoir pores are, the more obvious the AC or CNL is corrected, and the corrected AC or CNL becomes smaller, so that the GR value constructed is also smaller, the natural color of the reservoir is reduced, and systematic errors caused by pore development can not be brought to the shale content explanation. Mudstone AC is generally larger than sandstone AC values, but the data is not very different. To amplify the speed difference of two lithologies, a PIVI parameter (PIVI-3.048-10) is specifically introduced5/AC, where AC units us/ft), the difference in mudstone and sandstone wave velocities is large, so the PIVI difference will be relatively large. In the conventional reservoir section, G is establishedR and PIVI, DEN, PE, CNL/e△SP、AC、SH、PIVI*e△spCorrelation analysis (table 2).
TABLE 2 correlation analysis of Natural Gamma GR with other parameters
From Table 1, e is not performed△SPCalibration, poor correlation of AC and CNL with GR, poor correlation of AC with GR-0.124, AC passing e△SPAfter correction, the correlation is increased to 0.843, the correlation is increased by 0.721, and the effect is obvious. AC through PIVI (3.048 x 10)5AC) calculation conversion, the wave velocity difference between mudstone and sandstone is amplified, the correlation with GR is improved, and R is 0.137, but is poor, which is mainly caused by reservoir development pores. Through e△SPAfter correction of the correction factor, PIVI e△SPThe correlation with GR is improved from 0.134 to 0.865, the correlation is improved by 0.731, the correction effect is good, and CNL/e△SPThe GR correlation is improved from 0.741 to 0.863, the correlation is increased by 0.122, the correlation is increased by one order of magnitude, and the correction effect is good. Therefore, GR and PIVI are preferred△SP、PE、CNL/e△SPRegression model was established (table 3):
TABLE 3 regression model parameters
GR=76.757-0.008*PIVI*e△SP+11.008*PE+1.4166*CNL/e△SP(5)
In the formula: GR is the natural gamma value of logging, PIVI is 3.048 105/AC,e△spFor dynamic correction factor, the lithologic photoelectric section of PE, CNL is a compensation neutron, and a, b, c and d are equation coefficients, where a is 76.757, b is-0.008, c is 11.008, and d is 1.4166;
TABLE 4 model correlation Table
Model (model) | R | Square of R | Adjusted R square |
1 | .912 | .831 | 0.831 |
The correlation of the model is up to 0.912 based on e△SPThe correction factor corrected GR log reconstruction model was reliable (table 4).
Step six: shale content calculation of complex reservoir
And calculating the shale content in the conventional reservoir (GR <100API) or the interval AC >240us/m by adopting the formula 1 and the formula 2, reconstructing a GR curve by utilizing the formula 5 in the fifth step in the high-gamma reservoir interval, and then calculating the shale content of the high-gamma reservoir by utilizing the formula 4 in the fourth step.
Taking a149 well as an example, through analysis of the shale content SH in core analysis by a comparative analysis (shown in figure 3 and table 5), the conventional method has the defects that the error of the shale content of a high-gamma reservoir is larger, the average absolute error is 30.19 percent, the relative error is 87.7 percent, the average absolute error of the invention is 0.99 percent, the relative error is 3.83 percent, the absolute error is reduced by 29.2 percent compared with the conventional method, and the relative error is reduced by 83.87 percent. The method has obviously higher precision for calculating the shale content of the complex reservoir compared with the traditional method and has good calculation effect.
TABLE 5 shale content SH calculation error analysis (A149 well)
Claims (1)
1. A complicated reservoir shale content calculation method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps: calculating the mud content of the whole well section by using a natural gamma empirical formula
Wherein GR is a natural gamma value of a certain depth logging, SHV is a argillaceous index, GMIN is a natural gamma GR value of sandstone, GMAX is a natural gamma GR value of most of mudstones, SH is a argillaceous content, and CC is an empirical index of the argillaceous content;
step two, calculating △ SP value
△ SP is logging SP abnormal amplitude difference, the larger the amplitude difference is, the lower the reservoir shale content is, otherwise, the higher the reservoir shale content is, the SPminLogging SP values, SP, for sandstonemaxThe SP value of the mudstone is the logging natural potential value of a certain depth;
step three: identifying conventional and high gamma reservoirs
Utilizing natural gamma GR and acoustic wave time difference AC logging to identify a high gamma reservoir, wherein logging response characteristics show that the GR of the high gamma reservoir is more than 100API, and the AC is less than 240 us/m; the GR of the conventional reservoir is less than 100, and the AC is generally less than 240 us/m;
step four: establishing general reservoir GR and SH explanation model
According to the correlation analysis, establishing a natural gamma GR <100API layer shale content power function explanation model:
SH=b0*GRb1(4)
in the formula: b0 and b1 are constants;
step five: establishment based on e△SPDynamic correction factor corrected GR log reconstruction
Introducing correction e△SPDynamic as a correction factor for permeability or porosity of reservoir AC and CNL, establishing GR and PIVI E in conventional reservoir section△SP、PE、CNL/e△SPEstablishing a regression model:
GR=a+b*PIVI*e△SP+c*PE+d*CNL/e△SP(5)
in the formula: GR is the natural gamma value of logging, PIVI is 3.048 105/AC,e△spThe correction factor is a dynamic correction factor, the lithologic photoelectric cross section of PE is provided, CNL is a compensation neutron, and a, b, c and d are equation coefficients which are constants;
step six: shale content calculation of complex reservoir
And (3) calculating the shale content in the conventional reservoir (GR <90API) and the interval AC >240us/m by adopting the formula (1) and the formula (2), reconstructing a GR curve by utilizing the formula (5) in the fifth step in the high-gamma reservoir interval, and then calculating the shale content of the high-gamma reservoir by utilizing the formula (4) in the fourth step.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010052702.XA CN111255435B (en) | 2020-01-17 | 2020-01-17 | Method for calculating shale content of complex reservoir |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010052702.XA CN111255435B (en) | 2020-01-17 | 2020-01-17 | Method for calculating shale content of complex reservoir |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN111255435A true CN111255435A (en) | 2020-06-09 |
CN111255435B CN111255435B (en) | 2021-09-07 |
Family
ID=70943943
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202010052702.XA Active CN111255435B (en) | 2020-01-17 | 2020-01-17 | Method for calculating shale content of complex reservoir |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN111255435B (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112130226A (en) * | 2020-09-22 | 2020-12-25 | 中国地质大学(北京) | Surface water invasion type reservoir stratum identification method and system |
CN112541523A (en) * | 2020-11-17 | 2021-03-23 | 中海油田服务股份有限公司 | Method and device for calculating mud content |
CN113189658A (en) * | 2021-05-11 | 2021-07-30 | 中国石油天然气集团有限公司 | Method and device for calculating content and porosity of reservoir interstitial |
CN114482995A (en) * | 2022-03-10 | 2022-05-13 | 西南石油大学 | Fine determination method for argillaceous content of fine-grain sediment |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20040236513A1 (en) * | 2001-10-24 | 2004-11-25 | Tutuncu Azra Nur | Use of cutting velocities for real time pore pressure and fracture gradient prediction |
CN101354362A (en) * | 2008-07-21 | 2009-01-28 | 中国石化集团华北石油局 | Method for analyzing x-ray fluorescence shale content in petroleum well drilling |
WO2009108432A1 (en) * | 2008-02-28 | 2009-09-03 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Rock physics model for simulating seismic response in layered fractured rocks |
CN104570127A (en) * | 2013-10-09 | 2015-04-29 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method for simultaneously inverting porosity and shaliness by using seismic wave velocity |
CN104880736A (en) * | 2014-12-29 | 2015-09-02 | 上海新漫传感技术研究发展有限公司 | Natural gamma-ray spectral logging instrument and operating method thereof |
CN106223942A (en) * | 2016-08-26 | 2016-12-14 | 中国石油新疆油田分公司勘探开发研究院 | A kind of Conglomerate Reservoir shale content computational methods based on Well logging curve reconstruction |
CN109779624A (en) * | 2019-03-11 | 2019-05-21 | 西安石油大学 | Crack-hole type carbonate reservoir method is evaluated based on karst parametric synthesis |
US20190300401A1 (en) * | 2018-04-02 | 2019-10-03 | Conocophillips Company | Decomplexation of chelated hardness at high ph |
-
2020
- 2020-01-17 CN CN202010052702.XA patent/CN111255435B/en active Active
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20040236513A1 (en) * | 2001-10-24 | 2004-11-25 | Tutuncu Azra Nur | Use of cutting velocities for real time pore pressure and fracture gradient prediction |
WO2009108432A1 (en) * | 2008-02-28 | 2009-09-03 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Rock physics model for simulating seismic response in layered fractured rocks |
CN101354362A (en) * | 2008-07-21 | 2009-01-28 | 中国石化集团华北石油局 | Method for analyzing x-ray fluorescence shale content in petroleum well drilling |
CN104570127A (en) * | 2013-10-09 | 2015-04-29 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method for simultaneously inverting porosity and shaliness by using seismic wave velocity |
CN104880736A (en) * | 2014-12-29 | 2015-09-02 | 上海新漫传感技术研究发展有限公司 | Natural gamma-ray spectral logging instrument and operating method thereof |
CN106223942A (en) * | 2016-08-26 | 2016-12-14 | 中国石油新疆油田分公司勘探开发研究院 | A kind of Conglomerate Reservoir shale content computational methods based on Well logging curve reconstruction |
US20190300401A1 (en) * | 2018-04-02 | 2019-10-03 | Conocophillips Company | Decomplexation of chelated hardness at high ph |
CN109779624A (en) * | 2019-03-11 | 2019-05-21 | 西安石油大学 | Crack-hole type carbonate reservoir method is evaluated based on karst parametric synthesis |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
魏钦廉等: "鄂尔多斯盆地富县地区三叠系延长组泥质含量计算方法", 《地下水》 * |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112130226A (en) * | 2020-09-22 | 2020-12-25 | 中国地质大学(北京) | Surface water invasion type reservoir stratum identification method and system |
CN112130226B (en) * | 2020-09-22 | 2021-07-16 | 中国地质大学(北京) | Surface water invasion type reservoir stratum identification method and system |
CN112541523A (en) * | 2020-11-17 | 2021-03-23 | 中海油田服务股份有限公司 | Method and device for calculating mud content |
CN112541523B (en) * | 2020-11-17 | 2023-02-28 | 中海油田服务股份有限公司 | Method and device for calculating mud content |
CN113189658A (en) * | 2021-05-11 | 2021-07-30 | 中国石油天然气集团有限公司 | Method and device for calculating content and porosity of reservoir interstitial |
CN114482995A (en) * | 2022-03-10 | 2022-05-13 | 西南石油大学 | Fine determination method for argillaceous content of fine-grain sediment |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN111255435B (en) | 2021-09-07 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN111255435B (en) | Method for calculating shale content of complex reservoir | |
CN103792338B (en) | A kind of determination method and apparatus of content of organic carbon of hydrocarbon source rock | |
CN109725016B (en) | Nuclear magnetic resonance laboratory measurement method for rock core containing heavy oil and asphaltene | |
CN106468172A (en) | A kind of Oil in Super-low Permeability sandstone oil reservoir low-resistance reservoir log interpretation method | |
CN104656162A (en) | Method for determining content of uranium and organic carbon in uranium-rich hydrocarbon-source rocks | |
CN107780923B (en) | Method for establishing and simulating water saturation model based on argillaceous correction | |
CN110727035A (en) | Low-permeability strong heterogeneous gas reservoir gas-water layer identification method | |
CN104533400A (en) | Method for reconstructing logging curve | |
CN105275456A (en) | Method for identifying high-quality shale by using logging information | |
CN109061752B (en) | Resistivity curve correction method for ash-containing texture layer | |
CN110955982A (en) | Metamorphic rock reservoir permeability calculation method and device and computer storage medium | |
CN103777245A (en) | Method of quantitative evaluation on oil and gas accumulation conditions based on seismic data | |
CN112796738A (en) | Stratum permeability calculation method combining array acoustic logging and conventional logging | |
CN106897531A (en) | A kind of method for quantitatively evaluating of hyposmosis limestone reservoir permeability | |
CN102169188A (en) | Method for surveying oil and gas based on Morlet spectrum | |
CN116641702A (en) | Shale gas reservoir dessert area identification method | |
CN103792575A (en) | Densified sandstone air layer identification evaluation method free from influence of frame | |
CN111812736A (en) | Method for evaluating gas content of compact sandstone anhydrous gas reservoir | |
Sun et al. | Comparison of transfer function models for well-aquifer system response to atmospheric loading | |
CN110208874B (en) | Method for identifying effective reservoir of tight sandstone reservoir | |
CN111241460B (en) | Complex compact reservoir porosity calculation method | |
CN112487620B (en) | Evaluation method of shale oil movable resource quantity | |
CN110688781B (en) | Well logging interpretation method for low-permeability heterogeneous gas reservoir | |
CN109655394B (en) | Nuclear magnetic resonance T2 spectrum permeability calculation method under constraint of throat structure parameters | |
CN106568918B (en) | Shale organic carbon content TOC prediction method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |