example 1
The soil to be tested is taken from uncontaminated bare red clay on the ground surface in Wuchuan county, collected soil samples are air-dried, ground and sieved by a 20-mesh sieve for later use. Selecting Pb (NO)3)2And preparing polluted soil by taking the tin powder as a polluted raw material, preparing the polluted raw material into a solution, adding Pb into the soil, mixing Pb with the soil according to the addition amount of 5000mg/kg, mixing Sn with the soil according to the addition amount of 2500mg/kg, and air-drying the mixture for later use after fully and uniformly stirring.
Zeolite and straw biochar (RS) are selected as main raw materials to prepare the repairing agent. The main components of the repairing agent are shown in the following table 1:
TABLE 1 major Components of Rehabitant
Composition (I)
|
Cement
|
Blast furnace slag
|
Natural zeolite
|
Biochar
|
1
|
1.3 parts by mass
|
1.7 parts by mass
|
1 part by mass
|
1 part by mass
|
2
|
1.3 parts by mass
|
1.7 parts by mass
|
1 part by mass
|
3 parts by mass |
The preparation of the cured samples was carried out as follows: first, deionized water is poured into the screened contaminated soil until the water content reaches 20% (i.e., the optimum water content of the soil). The soil and water were thoroughly mixed with an electric stirrer to form a homogeneous mixture. Secondly, the restoration agent is added to the soil-water mixture to form a mixture so that cement, blast furnace slag, and natural zeolite are added to account for 1.3%, 1.7%, and 1% of the total mixture's solid content, and biochar is added to account for 1%, and 3% of the total mixture's solid content, and the mixture is sufficiently stirred for about 6 minutes to achieve homogeneity. The mixture was then poured into a cylindrical mold of phi 50mm x H100 mm and compacted in three layers using a molding machine. Finally, the sample was carefully removed from the mold using a stripper and cured under standard conditions for 7d, 14d, 28 d. And carrying out unconfined compressive strength test and leaching concentration test on the sample, and carrying out freeze-thaw cycle test on the sample of 28 d.
The cured samples of 7D, 14D and 28D were subjected to an unconfined compressive strength test at a constant strain rate of 1%/min as specified in ASTM D4219. A certain amount of fresh soil was carefully sampled from the cracked sample, and then a leaching concentration test was performed. The unconfined compressive strength test results are shown in tables 2 and 3 below:
TABLE 21% unconfined compressive strength of biochar at various ages
Age of age
|
14d
|
28d
|
60d
|
90d
|
UCS(MPa)
|
0.98
|
1.86
|
2.37
|
2.29 |
TABLE 33% unconfined compressive strength of biochar at various ages
Age of age
|
7d
|
14d
|
28d
|
UCS(MPa)
|
2.54
|
3.84
|
4.74 |
The test results show that the unconfined compressive strength of the cured sample is increased along with the increase of the age, the unconfined compressive strength is increased along with the increase of the proportion of the biochar, and the strength of each age meets the 0.35MPa specified by the United states environmental protection agency on a refuse landfill site. The unconfined compressive strength of the added 3 percent of the biochar is respectively increased by 2.86MPa (292 percent) and 3.08MPa (186 percent) in 14d and 28d compared with the unconfined compressive strength of the added 1 percent. The reason is that the addition of the biochar promotes the hydration of cement, so that the strength of the soil body is enhanced, and in addition, the water absorption rate of the macroporous biochar is higher, so that the local water-cement ratio is reduced, a higher densification effect is generated, and the strength of the soil body is also improved.
The leaching concentration of heavy metals was evaluated using TCLP-EPA method 1311. TCLP extract (5.7ml CH)3COOH and 64.3ml of 1mol/L NaOH) was 4.93. + -. 0.05. The leaching concentration results are shown in tables 4 and 5 below:
table 41% heavy metal leaching concentration by biochar treatment
Maintenance time
|
28d
|
60d
|
90d
|
Pb leaching concentration (mg/L)
|
180.667
|
182.002
|
183.037
|
Sn Leaching concentration (mg/L)
|
1.604
|
12.194
|
14.257 |
Table 53% heavy metal leaching concentration by charcoal treatment
Maintenance time
|
14d
|
28d
|
Pb leaching concentration (mg/L)
|
139.461
|
155.608
|
Sn Leaching concentration (mg/L)
|
6.627
|
0.906 |
The results of the tests (table 4) show that the solidification rate of Pb by 1% biochar treatment was 96.39%, 96.36%, 96.34% at age 28 days, 60 days and 90 days, respectively, and the data show that the leaching concentration of Pb after 28 days had substantially stabilized. The solidification rate of Sn is 99.94 percent, 99.51 percent and 99.43 percent respectively at 28 days, 60 days and 90 days of age, the leaching concentration of Sn is slightly fluctuated between 60 days and 90 days, but the fixed total amount is still high, which shows that the durability of the formula is still good. The 3% biochar treatment at 14d had a Pb cure rate of 97.21% and a tin cure rate of 97.35%.
Therefore, the repairing agent can effectively fix the combined pollution of Sn and Pb in soil at the same time.
Comparative example 1
The repairing agent is prepared from blast furnace slag, zeolite and cement, and is used for efficiently repairing high-concentration heavy metal composite polluted soil of Pb and Sn. The main components of the repairing agent are as follows:
TABLE 6 major Components of Rehabitant
Cement
|
Blast furnace slag
|
Natural zeolite
|
2.3 parts by mass
|
1.7 parts by mass
|
1 part by mass |
The components and contents of the repairing agent are as follows:
TABLE 7 ingredients contained in the repairing agent and their contents
The soil to be tested is taken from uncontaminated bare red clay on the ground surface in Wuchuan county, collected soil samples are air-dried, ground and sieved by a 20-mesh sieve for later use. Selecting Pb (NO)3)2And preparing polluted soil by taking the tin powder as a polluted raw material, preparing the polluted raw material into a solution, adding the solution into the soil, mixing Pb and Sn with the soil according to the addition amount of 5000 mg/mg and 2500mg/kg respectively, fully stirring uniformly, and air-drying for later use.
The repairing agent is added into simulated polluted soil, so that cement, blast furnace slag and natural zeolite which are added account for 2.3 percent, 1.7 percent and 1 percent of the solid content of the total mixture are uniformly stirred to prepare a cylindrical sample with phi 50mm multiplied by H100 mm. And (3) curing the test sample under standard conditions after demoulding, measuring the unconfined compressive strength of the test sample when the test sample is cured for 7d, 14d, 28d, 90d and 180d, carefully sampling a certain amount of fresh soil from the cracked sample, then performing a TCLP test, and performing a freeze-thaw cycle test when the test sample is cured for 28 d.
The test results of unconfined compressive strength tests with a fixed strain rate of 1%/min for samples cultured for 7D, 14D, 28D, 90D and 180D as specified in ASTM D4219 are as follows:
TABLE 8 unconfined compressive strength at each age
The results show that the strength of the cured samples all increased with age, and the strength of each age satisfied 0.35MPa specified by the us epa for landfill sites. The unconfined compressive strength at 28d and 90d is reduced by 0.24MPa (12.90%) and 0.71MPa (31.00%) compared with that of the treatment of adding 1% of biochar; the unconfined compressive strength at 7d, 14d and 28d is reduced by 1.99MPa (78.35%), 2.59MPa (67.45%) and 3.12MPa (65.82%) compared with the treatment of adding 3% biochar. In general, the unconfined compressive strength of the cured sample of the formula is greatly reduced compared with that of the formula of the case one (added with the biochar), the curing effect is not ideal as that of the case 1, and the related standard is also met. Long-term tests of 90d and 180d are carried out at the same time, and the results show that the unconfined compressive strength of the sample slightly floats but basically tends to be stable after 28 days.
The leaching concentration of heavy metals was evaluated using TCLP-EPA method 1311. TCLP extract (5.7ml CH)3COOH and 64.3ml of 1mol/L NaOH) was 4.93. + -. 0.05. The leach concentration results are shown in table 9 below:
TABLE 9 heavy Metal Leaching concentration
The results of tests with no biochar added, with blast furnace slag, zeolite and cement only added, show (table 9): although the leaching concentration of heavy metal Pb is slightly increased along with the increase of the age, the fixation rate of lead in the soil to be repaired is still 94.96% even when the leaching concentration of lead reaches the maximum value in 90 days.
The combination of two indexes of unconfined compressive strength and leaching concentration finds that: the repairing agent does not contain biochar, the leaching concentration is not as stable as that of the biochar in the long-term maintenance process, the strength is not as high as that of the biochar, and the overall treatment effect does not reach the optimal effect.
Comparative example 2
The soil to be tested is taken from uncontaminated bare red clay on the ground surface in Wuchuan county, collected soil samples are air-dried, ground and sieved by a 20-mesh sieve for later use. Selecting Pb (NO)3)2And preparing polluted soil by taking the tin powder as a polluted raw material, preparing the polluted raw material into a solution, adding Pb into the soil, mixing Pb with the soil according to the addition amount of 5000mg/kg, mixing Sn with the soil according to the addition amount of 2500mg/kg, and air-drying the mixture for later use after fully and uniformly stirring.
The 4A zeolite is selected to replace natural zeolite to develop a repairing agent, and the repairing effect of the 4A zeolite on the heavy metal polluted soil is researched. The main components of the repairing agent are as follows:
TABLE 10 major ingredients of restoratives
The repairing agent is added into simulated polluted soil, so that cement, blast furnace slag and 4A zeolite account for 2.3 percent, 1.7 percent and 1 percent of the solid content of the total mixture after being added, and the mixture is uniformly stirred to prepare a cylindrical sample with phi 50mm multiplied by H100 mm. The samples were demolded for curing, and unconfined compressive strength tests were performed for sample curing at 14d, 28d, 60d, and 90d, respectively, and TCLP tests were performed for sample curing at 28 d. Table 11 below is the results of items relevant to the examination of 4A zeolite.
TABLE 114A Zeolite related indices
The cured samples of 14D, 28D, 60D and 90D were subjected to an unconfined compressive strength test at a set strain rate of 1%/min as specified in ASTM D4219. A certain amount of fresh soil was carefully sampled from the cracked sample, and then a leaching concentration test was performed. The unconfined compressive strength test results are given in table 12 below:
TABLE 12 unconfined compressive strength at each age
Age of age
|
14d
|
28d
|
60d
|
90d
|
UCS(MPa)
|
0.85
|
1.43
|
1.85
|
2.18 |
The test results show that the strength of the cured samples increases along with the increase of ages, and the strength of each age is greater than 0.5MPa, which meets the 0.35MPa specified by the United states environmental protection agency on refuse landfill sites. The strength of the soil body added with the 4A zeolite is lower than that of the soil body added with the straw biochar in all ages, and the strength of the soil body added with the 4A zeolite is respectively reduced by 0.13MPa (13.27%), 0.43MPa (23.12%), 0.52MPa (21.94%) and 0.11MPa (4.80%) compared with the strength of the soil body added with the 1% biochar in the ages of 14 days, 28 days, 60 days and 90 days. The 14d and 28d are respectively reduced by 2.99MPa (77.86%) and 3.31MPa (69.83%) compared with the group added with 3% of treatment. The unconfined compressive strength of the cured sample of the formulation is generally not as desirable as that of example 1.
The leaching concentration of heavy metals was evaluated using TCLP-EPA method 1311. TCLP extract (5.7ml CH)3COOH and 64.3ml of 1mol/L NaOH) was 4.93. + -. 0.05. The leach concentration results are given in table 13 below:
TABLE 13 heavy metal leach out concentration
The test results show that the effect of Pb and Sn after the addition of the 4A zeolite is better than that of the natural zeolite (the effect is better when the leaching concentration is smaller) but the effect is still not as good as that after the addition of the biochar in each age period.
The conclusion can be drawn by combining the test results: the repairing agent does not contain biochar, the leaching concentration is not as stable as that of the biochar in the long-term maintenance process, the strength is not as high as that of the biochar, and the overall treatment effect does not reach the optimal effect.
Comparative example 3
Soil was collected from southern lake wetland parks in inner Mongolia autonomous region and Haote City. The sampling depth is 0-20cm, the collected soil sample is air-dried, ground and sieved by a 20-mesh sieve for later use. The particle size of the soil was measured by a laser particle sizer, the liquid plastic limit value measured by the soil sample was combined, and according to the classification plastic diagram, the test soil used was low liquid limit Clay (CL), and the particle size analysis results are shown in table 14 below. The basic physicochemical properties of the soil are shown in Table 15 below.
TABLE 14 analysis results of particle size of soil
Particle size/mm
|
<0.005
|
0.005–0.075mm
|
0.075–2mm
|
Mass fraction/%
|
1.77
|
22.07
|
76.16 |
TABLE 15 basic physical Properties of the soil
Optimum moisture content (%)
|
Liquid limit (%)
|
Plastic limit (%)
|
Plastic limit index (%)
|
20
|
27.5
|
18.2
|
9.3 |
Preparing simulated polluted soil by selecting Pb (NO)3)2And preparing a solution by taking the tin powder as a pollution raw material, adding the solution into soil, mixing Pb with the soil according to the addition amount of 5000mg/kg, mixing Sn with the soil according to the addition amount of 2500mg/kg, and air-drying the mixture after fully and uniformly stirring the mixture for later use.
The main components of the repairing agent are shown in the following table 16:
TABLE 16 repair agent principal Components
The agents were mixed and stirred uniformly to prepare a restoration agent according to the formulation shown in table 16, the prepared restoration agent was added to the simulated contaminated soil so that cement, blast furnace slag, and biochar were added to account for 2.3%, 1.7%, and 1% of the total mixture in terms of solid content, and the mixture was mixed and stirred uniformly to prepare a cylindrical sample of phi 50mm × H100 mm. And (3) demolding the sample, curing, and performing unconfined compressive strength tests and heavy metal leaching toxicity tests when the sample is cured for 7d, 14d, 28d and 60d respectively.
The cured samples of 7D, 14D, 28D and 60D were subjected to an unconfined compressive strength test at a set strain rate of 1%/min as specified in ASTM D4219. A certain amount of fresh soil was carefully sampled from the 28d cracked sample and then subjected to the TCLP test. The unconfined compressive strength test results are given in table 17 below:
TABLE 17 unconfined compressive strength (MPa) at each age
The test results show (Table 17) that the strength of the cured specimens all increased with age. In general, the unconfined compressive strength of the cured sample of the formula is lower than that of the case 1, and is respectively reduced by 0.39MPa (20.97%) and 0.85MPa (35.86%) at 28d and 60d compared with the treatment of adding 1% of biochar. The reduction in the concentration of the additive was 2.03MPa (79.92%), 2.61MPa (67.97%), 3.27MPa (68.99%) at 7d, 14d and 28d, respectively, compared with the addition of the 3% treatment group
The leaching concentration of heavy metals was evaluated using TCLP-EPA method 1311. TCLP extract (5.7ml CH)3COOH and 64.3ml of 1mol/L NaOH) was 4.93. + -. 0.05. The leach concentration results are given in table 18 below:
table 18 heavy metal 28d leach concentration (mg.l)-1)
The test result shows thatAfter the polluted soil is treated by adding zeolite and only blast furnace slag, biochar and cement, Pb and Sn can be repaired, but the solidification rate of lead can only reach 95.72%, and the solidification rate of tin can only reach 98.46%. Leaching concentration of Pb is more than 1% biochar effect (180.667 mg.L)-1) The increase is 18.54 percent, and the leaching concentration of Sn is 22.94 times higher than the effect (1.604) of 1 percent of biochar; and the leaching concentration of Sn is more than that of the case where only zeolite, blast furnace slag and cement are added and no biochar is added (27.450 mg.L.)-1) The increase difference is 39.89%. The combination of unconfined compressive strength is generally lower than that of case 1 and the treatment of adding blast furnace slag, zeolite and cement, so that the ideal effect is not achieved.
Comparative example 4
Soil was collected from southern lake wetland parks in inner Mongolia autonomous region and Haote City. The sampling depth is 0-20cm, the collected soil sample is air-dried, ground and sieved by a 20-mesh sieve for later use. The particle size of the soil was measured by a laser particle sizer, the liquid plastic limit value measured by the soil sample was combined, and according to the classification plastic diagram, the test soil used was low liquid limit Clay (CL), and the particle size analysis results are shown in table 19 below. The basic physicochemical properties of the soil are shown in table 20 below.
TABLE 19 analysis results of particle size of soil
Particle size/mm
|
<0.005
|
0.005–0.075mm
|
0.075–2mm
|
Mass fraction/%
|
1.77
|
22.07
|
76.16 |
TABLE 20 basic physical Properties of the soil
Optimum moisture content (%)
|
Liquid limit (%)
|
Plastic limit (%)
|
Plastic limit index (%)
|
20
|
27.5
|
18.2
|
9.3 |
Preparing simulated polluted soil by selecting Pb (NO)3)2And preparing a solution by taking the tin powder as a pollution raw material, adding the solution into soil, mixing Pb with the soil according to the addition amount of 5000mg/kg, mixing Sn with the soil according to the addition amount of 2500mg/kg, and air-drying the mixture after fully and uniformly stirring the mixture for later use.
The main components of the repairing agent are shown in the following table 21:
TABLE 21 Repair agent principal Components
The repairing agent is prepared by mixing the above materials according to the formulation shown in Table 21, wherein the activating agents are CaO, MgO, and SiO2、Na2SO4The addition amount of the repairing agent accounts for 8 percent, 0.4 percent and 0.6 percent of the main repairing agent, and the prepared repairing agent is added into the simulated polluted soil to ensure thatThe cement and the biochar which are added account for 12 percent and 3 percent of the solid content of the total mixture. The mixture was stirred uniformly to prepare a cylindrical sample having a diameter of 50 mm. times.H 100 mm. And (3) demolding the sample, curing, and performing unconfined compressive strength tests and TCLP tests when the sample is cured for 7d, 14d, 28d and 60d respectively.
The cured samples of 7D, 14D, 28D and 60D were subjected to an unconfined compressive strength test at a set strain rate of 1%/min as specified in ASTM D4219. A certain amount of fresh soil was carefully sampled from the 28d fractured samples and then subjected to the leaching concentration test. The unconfined compressive strength test results are given in table 22 below:
TABLE 22 unconfined compressive strength (MPa) at each age
The test results show that the strength of the cured samples increases along with the increase of the age, and the cured samples meet the 0.35MPa specified by the United states environmental protection agency on the landfill site.
The leaching concentration of heavy metals was evaluated using TCLP-EPA method 1311. TCLP extract (5.7ml CH)3COOH and 64.3ml of 1mol/L NaOH) was 4.93. + -. 0.05. The leach concentration results are given in table 23 below:
table 23 leaching concentration (mg.l) of heavy metal 28d-1)
The test result shows that after the repairing agent is added, Pb and Sn can be cured, wherein the curing rate of lead reaches 95.66%, and the curing rate of tin reaches 85.95%. And the unconfined compressive strength of the soil body after solidification is increased, because the addition amount of cement and biochar is larger and reaches more than 15%, and a large amount of chemical reagents are added as an excitant, the unconfined compressive strength is higher. But from leachingFrom the viewpoint of concentration effect, the leaching concentration of Pb at 28 days was higher than that of the blast furnace slag and 1% biochar-treated group (180.667 mg.L.)-1) 20.18% higher, Sn leaching concentration ratio was added to blast furnace slag, 1% biochar treatment group (1.604 mg.L)-1) Higher by 20.9 times. For Sn, the leaching concentration of 28d was 27.98% higher than that after the treatment with zeolite, blast furnace slag and cement.
Therefore, the curing effect of the conventional method of adding a part of the activator, cement and biochar is higher than the curing effect of adding zeolite and biochar in strength, but the heavy metal leaching concentration effect is not as excellent as the effect of adding zeolite, biochar and the like of the present invention.
Comparative example 5
The soil to be tested is taken from uncontaminated bare red clay on the ground surface in Wuchuan county, collected soil samples are air-dried, ground and sieved by a 20-mesh sieve for later use. And (3) determining the particle size of the soil by using a laser particle sizer, combining the liquid plastic limit value determined by the soil sample, and adopting the test soil which is low liquid limit silt red clay according to a classification plastic diagram. The basic physical properties of the soil and the results of the particle size analysis are shown in tables 19 and 25 below:
TABLE 24 basic physical Properties of the soil
Air-dried moisture content (%)
|
Optimum moisture content (%)
|
Liquid limit (%)
|
Plastic limit (%)
|
Plastic limit index (%)
|
Natural dry density (g/cm)-3)
|
Maximum dry Density (g/cm)-3)
|
3.9
|
15.47
|
41.0
|
19.4
|
21.6
|
2.710
|
2.13 |
TABLE 25 analysis results of particle size of soil
Particle size/mm
|
<0.005
|
0.005-0.01
|
0.01-0.05
|
0.05-0.075
|
0.075-0.25
|
Mass fraction/%
|
5.31
|
18.23
|
57.22
|
10.62
|
8.62 |
Preparing simulated polluted soil by selecting Pb (NO)3)2And preparing a solution by taking the tin powder as a pollution raw material, adding the solution into soil, mixing Pb with the soil according to the addition amount of 5000mg/kg, mixing Sn with the soil according to the addition amount of 2500mg/kg, and air-drying the mixture after fully and uniformly stirring the mixture for later use.
The repairing agent is prepared by taking cement and blast furnace slag as components, and the main components are as follows
TABLE 26 repair Agents principal Components
The agents were mixed and stirred uniformly to prepare a repairing agent according to the formulation shown in table 26, the prepared repairing agent was added to the simulated contaminated soil so that cement and blast furnace slag were added to account for 2.3% and 1.7% of the total mixture in terms of solid content, and the mixture was stirred uniformly to prepare a cylindrical sample having a diameter of 50mm × H100 mm. And (4) demolding the sample, maintaining, respectively performing unconfined compressive strength tests and heavy metal leaching toxicity tests when the sample is maintained for 7d and 14 d.
The cured 7D and 14D specimens were subjected to an unconfined compressive strength test at a set strain rate of 1%/min as specified in ASTM D4219. A certain amount of fresh soil was carefully sampled from the cracked sample, and then a leaching concentration test was performed. The unconfined compressive strength test results are given in table 27 below:
TABLE 27 unconfined compressive strength (MPa) at each age
The test results show that the strength of the cured samples increases along with the increase of the age, and the cured samples meet the 0.35MPa specified by the United states environmental protection agency on refuse landfill sites.
The leaching concentration of heavy metals was evaluated using TCLP-EPA method 1311. TCLP extract (5.7ml CH)3COOH and 64.3ml of 1mol/L NaOH) was 4.93. + -. 0.05. The leach concentration results are given in table 28 below:
table 28 heavy metal 28d leach concentration (mg.l)-1)
The test results show that the curing rate of Pb does not reach 95% after 28 days of curing after only adding the cement and the blast furnace slag. Although the leaching concentration of Sn is not so large, the Sn leaching concentration is higher than the effect of the treatment of adding zeolite and 1% of biochar at the same time (1.604 mg.L)-1) 26.89 times higher than that of zeolite, blast furnace slag and cement without biochar (27.450 mg.L)-1) Increased by 62.99%, increased by 16.51% compared with the effect of adding biochar, blast furnace slag and cement without zeolite (38.401mg.L-1), and also compared with the effect of adding cement, biochar and part of excitant only (35.131 mg.L)-1) The increase is 27.35%. In general, the effect of treatment by adding only cement and blast furnace slag is better than that by adding zeolite and biochar in strength, but the effect of heavy metal leaching concentration is much higher than that by adding zeolite and biochar, and the effect is not ideal.
For the phenomenon that the strength of comparative example 4 and comparative example 5 is increased, the technical problem of the combined repair of heavy metals of tin and lead is solved, and the comparative example 4 and comparative example 5 can not be effectively completed, but the invention can be realized.
Comparative example 6
Preparing simulated contaminated soil, selecting Pb (NO3)2 and tin powder as contaminated raw materials, preparing a solution, adding the solution into the soil, mixing Pb with soil according to the addition amount of 50 mg/kg, mixing Sn with the soil according to the addition amount of 100 mg/kg, and air-drying the mixture for later use after fully and uniformly stirring.
The main components of the repairing agent are shown in the following table 29:
TABLE 29 repair Agents principal Components
The repairing agent is prepared by mixing and stirring the medicaments uniformly according to the formula shown in the table, the prepared repairing agent is added into simulated polluted soil, so that the added blast furnace slag and zeolite account for 15 percent and 5 percent of the solid content of the total mixture, and the mixture is uniformly mixed and stirred to prepare a cylindrical sample with phi 50mm multiplied by H100 mm. The samples were demolded and cured, and unconfined compressive strength tests were performed for samples cured at 7d, 14d, and 28d, respectively, and a TCLP test was performed.
The cured samples of 7D, 14D and 28D were subjected to an unconfined compressive strength test at a constant strain rate of 1%/min as specified in ASTM D4219. A certain amount of fresh soil was carefully sampled from the 28d fractured samples and then subjected to the leaching concentration test. The unconfined compressive strength test results are given in table 30 below:
TABLE 30 unconfined compressive strength (MPa) at each age
The test results show that the strength of the cured samples increases with the increase of ages, and the strength of each age meets the 0.35MPa specified by the United states environmental protection agency on refuse landfill sites. The unconfined compressive strength of the cured samples of the formula at 14d and 28d is respectively reduced by 0.11MPa (11.22%) and 0.42MPa (22.58%) after being treated by adding 1% of biochar.
The leaching concentration of heavy metals was evaluated using TCLP-EPA method 1311. The TCLP extract (5.7ml CH3 COOH and 64.3ml 1mol/L NaOH) had an initial pH of 4.93. + -. 0.05. The leach concentration results are shown in table 31 below:
table 31 leaching concentration (mg.l) of heavy metal 28d-1)
The test result shows that the Pb and Sn can be solidified and polluted after only adding blast furnace slag and zeolite, wherein the solidification rate of lead reaches 98.97%, and the solidification rate of tin reaches 99.99%. However, the initial concentration of the treated Pb is low, and the addition amount is up to 20%, whereas the formula disclosed by the invention is that the repairing agent prepared from cement or cement and biochar is added on the basis of blast furnace slag and zeolite, the total addition amount of all materials is only 5%, so that the Pb concentration can be treated up to 5000mg/kg, and the tin concentration can also be treated up to 2500 mg/kg.
Therefore, after cement and charcoal are removed, blast furnace slag cannot be effectively excited to achieve an ideal repairing effect. In combination with unconfined compressive strength, although blast furnace slag and zeolite have certain restoration capability on Pb and Sn composite contaminated soil, the effect of adding cement or cement and biochar on the basis of the two materials is not good.
The following conclusions are therefore drawn from the above case:
1. the repairing agent prepared from the biochar, the zeolite, the blast furnace slag and the cement serves as raw materials, and shows excellent effects on unconfined compressive strength and heavy metal leaching concentration when high-concentration Pb (5000 mg/kg) Sn (2500 mg/kg) compound contaminated soil is repaired at the same time.
2. The addition of zeolite or 4A zeolite, blast furnace slag and cement or biochar, blast furnace slag and cement can have a certain curing effect on heavy metals, but the effect on unconfined compressive strength and heavy metal leaching concentration is not as good as that of biochar.
3. The cement, the biochar and part of the excitant are added, the unconfined compressive strength is higher due to the large addition amount of the excitant and the action of the excitant, but the leaching concentration of heavy metal, particularly Sn, is more than 30 times higher than that of the biochar after 1 percent is added, and is also more than 27.98 percent higher than that of the biochar after zeolite, blast furnace slag and cement are added.
4. The addition of cement and blast furnace slag alone is not as effective in leaching heavy metals as the addition of zeolite or biochar.
5. Only blast furnace slag and zeolite are selected and added up to 20%, and low-concentration Pb (50 mg/kg) and Sn (100 mg/kg) can be repaired at the same time.
Finally, the implementation proves that the repairing agent material simultaneously added with the zeolite, the blast furnace slag, the biochar and the cement can effectively repair the heavy metal Sn polluted soil and the heavy metal Sn and Pb composite polluted soil, the repairing agent can be implemented only when the four components are simultaneously added, and the repairing agent can also be implemented under the condition of higher heavy metal concentration.