CN111176209B - Off-line planning method for feeding rate and rotating speed of cavity spiral milling - Google Patents

Off-line planning method for feeding rate and rotating speed of cavity spiral milling Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN111176209B
CN111176209B CN201910954306.3A CN201910954306A CN111176209B CN 111176209 B CN111176209 B CN 111176209B CN 201910954306 A CN201910954306 A CN 201910954306A CN 111176209 B CN111176209 B CN 111176209B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
speed
cutting
rotating speed
cutter
parameter
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201910954306.3A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN111176209A (en
Inventor
雷阳
丁烨
郑建明
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shanghai Jiaotong University
Original Assignee
Shanghai Jiaotong University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shanghai Jiaotong University filed Critical Shanghai Jiaotong University
Priority to CN201910954306.3A priority Critical patent/CN111176209B/en
Publication of CN111176209A publication Critical patent/CN111176209A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN111176209B publication Critical patent/CN111176209B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B19/00Programme-control systems
    • G05B19/02Programme-control systems electric
    • G05B19/18Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form
    • G05B19/19Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form characterised by positioning or contouring control systems, e.g. to control position from one programmed point to another or to control movement along a programmed continuous path
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B19/00Programme-control systems
    • G05B19/02Programme-control systems electric
    • G05B19/18Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form
    • G05B19/416Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form characterised by control of velocity, acceleration or deceleration
    • G05B19/4163Adaptive control of feed or cutting velocity
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30Nc systems
    • G05B2219/35Nc in input of data, input till input file format
    • G05B2219/35349Display part, programmed locus and tool path, traject, dynamic locus
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30Nc systems
    • G05B2219/36Nc in input of data, input key till input tape
    • G05B2219/36521Select by combination of detected force, acceleration, speed, work rate

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Numerical Control (AREA)

Abstract

The invention provides a method for offline planning of a feeding rate and a rotating speed of cavity spiral milling. First, a smooth helix of cubic spline curve is obtained. Discretizing the spline curve track equally according to parameters to obtain discrete parameter points; simulating the tool path track formed by the discrete points to obtain the radial cutting width of the discrete points; calculating a stable lobe graph, and establishing a corresponding relation between the rotating speed and the critical cutting depth; the radial cutting width and the corresponding relation between the rotating speed and the critical cutting depth at each parameter point are used for establishing a time-optimal feeding speed and rotating speed planning model at each parameter point, and the time-optimal feeding speed and rotating speed planning at each parameter point is obtained through forward planning and backward planning; fitting to obtain the speed and the rotating speed in the whole parameter interval; and finally, obtaining the position, the maximum feeding speed and the rotating speed of each tool location point, and outputting a corresponding NC code for actual machining aiming at a specific machine tool numerical control system. The method is suitable for high-speed milling of the cavity.

Description

Off-line planning method for feeding rate and rotating speed of cavity spiral milling
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of cavity, in particular to a cavity spiral milling machining feed rate and rotating speed offline planning method, and more particularly relates to a cavity spiral milling machining feed rate and rotating speed offline planning method which comprehensively meets the requirements of the kinematic performance, the mechanical performance and the stability of the machining process of a machine tool.
Background
The cavity milling is widely applied to the processing of aerospace wall plates and molds. The cavity milling is performed in a layer-by-layer processing mode, and due to the fact that the size of a part is large, long processing time is usually needed. Therefore, on the premise of ensuring high precision and high reliability, the method for machining the cavity of the die cavity has the important problems of obviously improving the machining efficiency and reducing the time required by machining.
At present, a commonly used feed rate optimization algorithm for cavity spiral milling is usually based on kinematic performance constraints of a machine tool, such as speed and acceleration, and influences of mechanical properties and stability of a machining process are not considered. If the cutting force in the machining process is too large, the cutter can be damaged, and the service life of the cutter is influenced; if flutter occurs in the machining process, the surface of a workpiece is corrugated, the machining quality and precision are reduced, even the machine tool and a cutter are damaged in serious cases, the machining cost is increased, and the machining efficiency is reduced.
The invention patent with publication number 108145222B discloses a milling method for a closed blisk cavity, which comprises the following steps: dividing a rough machining area of the cavity; step 2: determining to-be-processed area division; and step 3: planning a tool path; the milling method for the closed blisk cavity can accurately divide blocks, reduces machining allowance, is simple in cutter shaft vector solving, realizes five-axis numerical control machining of the efficient closed blisk cavity, improves machining quality and machining efficiency of the closed blisk, can be applied to milling machining of blisk blades and can also be applied to machining processes of other thin-wall large-overhang parts. However, the above patent has a problem of low processing efficiency.
Disclosure of Invention
Aiming at the defects in the prior art, the invention aims to provide an off-line programming method for the feeding rate and the rotating speed of cavity spiral milling.
The invention provides a method for offline planning of the feed rate and the rotating speed of cavity spiral milling, which comprises the following steps:
step 1: generating a smooth spiral line track in a cubic B-spline curve form according to the shape of the cavity and the diameter of the cutter;
and 2, step: carrying out equal-parameter discrete sampling on the spiral track to obtain discrete parameter points;
and step 3: obtaining the radial cutting width at each discrete parameter point through VERICUT simulation;
and 4, step 4: calculating a stable lobe graph by utilizing the maximum radial cutting width obtained by simulation, and establishing a corresponding relation between the rotating speed and the critical cutting depth;
and 5: forward planning, namely establishing a time-optimal feeding speed and rotating speed planning model for each parameter point by taking the motion speed of a machine tool, the acceleration of each axis, the height error of a curve, the maximum cutting force and the machining stability as constraints in the direction of increasing the parameter value, and solving the model by using a differential evolution algorithm to calculate the maximum feeding speed and the corresponding rotating speed at each discrete parameter point;
step 6: backward planning, namely establishing and solving a planning model of optimal time feeding speed and rotating speed along the direction of reducing the parameter values;
and 7: and performing fitting approximation on the speed and the rotating speed in the whole parameter interval, and utilizing spline curve interpolation to obtain the feeding speed and the rotating speed at each sampling point, so as to obtain the position, the maximum feeding speed and the rotating speed of each tool location point, and finally outputting the NC codes as the specific NC codes of the machine tool numerical control system.
Preferably, the step 1 comprises:
the method comprises the steps of solving an elliptic partial differential equation of the Dirichlet boundary condition by adopting a finite element method, generating a closed field curve with a closed equivalent according to the diameter of a cutter, generating a transition curve after equally dividing the field curve to obtain a group of spiral point rows, and fitting the spiral point rows by utilizing a cubic B-spline curve to obtain a cubic B-spline curve form smooth spiral line track.
Preferably, the step 2 includes:
and (3) equally dividing the whole parameter interval into N points, wherein u1 is 0, uN is 1, and substituting the three-time B-spline curve to obtain each discrete parameter point.
Preferably, the step 3 comprises:
and (3) taking the discrete parameter points obtained in the step (2) as tool positions, setting initial fixed rotating speed and fixed feed rate to generate initial NC codes, importing the codes into VERICUT for simulation, and obtaining the radial cutting width of each tool position after the simulation is finished so as to obtain the radial cutting width of each discrete point.
Preferably, the step 5 comprises:
let the cubic B-spline curve form smooth spiral trajectory be C (u), let κ (u) | survival of the eyesC u (u) | | represents the speed of the parameter, where () u Represents the derivative of the variable with respect to u, V (u) represents the feed rate;
the time-optimal objective function is
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000031
Wherein s is the chord length, v is the magnitude of the velocity, and u' is the derivative of the parameter u with respect to time;
the time-optimal objective function can be further expressed as:
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000032
wherein N is the number of sampling points;
setting the speed of the head and tail points to be zero, only establishing a time-optimal feed speed and rotating speed planning model for each discrete parameter point of i-2, 3, … and N-1, wherein the objective function is
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000033
While
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000034
Then can obtain
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000035
Stipulate () μ And (mu epsilon { x, y }) is a component of the vector in the mu direction, and the method for establishing the constraint of the acceleration of each axis of the machine tool comprises the following steps:
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000036
wherein () u Representing the derivative of the variable with respect to u, with V μ representing the speed of the machine axes, A μ Indicating acceleration of machine tool axesAnd (4) degree. The curve bow height error constraint can be expressed as
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000037
Wherein delta m For a given bow height error, T s For the interpolation period, ρ (u) is the radius of curvature of the spline curve at parameter u, and
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000038
dispersing the equations (4) and (5) as follows to obtain the limit constraint inequality of the movement speed and the acceleration of each axis of the machine tool
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000039
V in formula (7) max And
Figure RE-GDA00023682504900000310
respectively representing the feed speed limit of the machine tool and the acceleration limit of each shaft;
calculating the cutting force at each discrete parameter point in the cutting process according to the curvature and the radial cutting depth at each discrete parameter point; the cutting depth part of the milling cutter is axially dispersed into a plurality of layers, and the cutting force of the cutting edge infinitesimal is as follows:
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000041
wherein j is the cutter tooth number, and k is the cutter shaft direction disc number; dF t,j,k The unit tangential cutting force of the jth cutter tooth on the kth disc; dF r,j,k The unit radial cutting force of the jth cutter tooth on the kth disc; h is j,k For non-deformation thickness cutting, the feed rate per tooth of the cutter is f t A function of (a); k te And K re Is the edge cutting force coefficient, K, of the tool tc And K rc Is a shearing cutting forceA coefficient; phi is a j,k (t) is the contact angle of the jth cutter tooth on the kth disc, and the unit step function g (phi) j,k (t)) is used for indicating whether the current cutting element participates in cutting, and is defined as follows:
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000042
wherein phi st And phi ex The cutting angle and the cutting angle of the jth cutter tooth on the kth disc are represented by the following calculation formula:
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000043
wherein R is the curvature radius at the discrete parameter point, R is the cutter radius, and a is the radial cutting width at the discrete parameter point; k te 、K re 、K tc And K rc The cutting force coefficient can be obtained by milling a workpiece with a simple shape and the same material by using the same milling cutter, designing a cutting experiment of a specific processing parameter, recording corresponding cutting force data by using a dynamometer and finally calibrating by using a least square method;
the infinitesimal cutting force determined by the formula (8) is transformed into a tool coordinate system through coordinate transformation:
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000044
the instantaneous resultant forces acting in the two directions transverse to the tool are:
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000045
wherein N is t Number of teeth of knife, N A The number of the disks is axially discrete;
obtaining the maximum value of resultant force borne by the cutter at each discrete parameter point by the formula (8-12), wherein the maximum resultant force F is the feed rate F of each tooth t Is composed ofNumber, and feed rate per tooth f t The relationship between the feeding speed V and the rotating speed omega is as follows:
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000051
wherein N is t The number of the cutter teeth;
the maximum resultant force F at each discrete parameter point is thus a function of the feed speed V and the rotational speed omega, expressed as
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000052
The cutting force constraint is expressed as:
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000053
wherein F max The cutting force threshold is determined by the strength of the cutter teeth, the integral rigidity of the cutter and the maximum deformation of the cutter;
the correspondence of the rotational speed to the critical depth of cut has been established by step (4), and is denoted b lim (omega), the layer-by-layer processing of the cavity can set a certain cutting depth value b set Taking this value as the lower threshold of the critical cutting depth, the cutting force constraint is expressed as:
b lim (Ω(u i ))≥b set (15)
converting the nonlinear constraints of the equations (14) and (15) into penalty terms by an external penalty function method, and integrating the penalty terms into an objective function
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000054
Wherein F max As cutting force threshold, b set For the set layer-by-layer machining cutting depth value, a time optimal feed speed and rotating speed planning model comprising machine tool speed, acceleration of each axis, curve bow height error constraint, maximum cutting force constraint and machining process stability constraint can be constructed:
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000055
where σ is a penalty factor, P (V (u) i ),Ω(u i ) σ P (V (u) as defined in formula (16) i ),Ω(u i ) V) as a penalty including maximum cutting force constraint, process stability constraint max And
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000056
respectively the machine tool feed speed limit and the acceleration limit, omega, of each axis min And Ω max Is a defined range of rotational speeds;
since the cutting force constraint and the stability constraint in the equations (14) and (15) are both nonlinear constraints, the model is solved through a differential evolution algorithm; continuously solving and calculating along the direction of increasing parameter values to obtain the maximum feeding speed and the corresponding rotating speed at each discrete parameter point, and recording as { V } i *i * ,i=2,…,N-1}。
Preferably, the step 6 includes:
and continuously solving and calculating the maximum feeding speed and the corresponding rotating speed at each discrete parameter point by adopting a differential evolution algorithm along the direction of reducing the parameter values, wherein the calculated values are the final time optimal feeding speed and rotating speed planning result.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the following beneficial effects:
1. the invention provides a method for offline planning of a feeding rate and a rotating speed of cavity spiral milling, which meets the following 4 constraints: 1) constraining the motion speed of the machine tool and the acceleration of each shaft; 2) constraining the height error of the curve; 3) maximum cutting force constraint; 4) and (5) stability constraint of the processing process.
2. The method is suitable for high-speed milling of the cavity.
Drawings
Other features, objects and advantages of the invention will become more apparent upon reading of the detailed description of non-limiting embodiments with reference to the following drawings:
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow diagram of the process of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of a path of a rectangular cavity spiral milling cutter.
FIG. 3 is a graph of a stable lobe calculated using the maximum radial cut width.
FIG. 4 shows a flat-bottomed cylindrical milling cutter with a partial dispersion of the cutting depth in the axial direction of N A And the disk units with the same height.
Fig. 5 is a schematic view of a machining engagement area.
The figures show that:
1 is a cavity boundary, 2 is a spiral track outer boundary, 3 is a spiral track inner boundary, 4 is a smooth spiral line track in a cubic B-spline curve form, 5 is a flat-bottom cylindrical milling cutter, 6 is a cutting edge of a cutter, and 7 is a cutter path track;
omega is the rotational speed, b lim Is the critical depth of cut, R is the radius of curvature at the discrete parameter point, R is the radius of the tool, a is the radial cutting width at the discrete parameter point, φ st XOY is the tool coordinate system and Δ z is the height of the discrete disk element for the entry angle of the engagement zone.
Detailed Description
The present invention will be described in detail with reference to specific examples. The following examples will assist those skilled in the art in further understanding the invention, but are not intended to limit the invention in any way. It should be noted that it would be obvious to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit of the invention. All falling within the scope of the present invention.
As shown in fig. 1 to 5, the present invention provides a method for planning the feeding speed and the rotation speed with the time optimization as the target, that is, a feeding speed and rotation speed planning model with the constraints of the machine tool motion speed, the acceleration of each motion axis and the curve height error as the constraints is established at each discrete parameter point, and with the constraints of the maximum cutting force in the cutting process of the tool being smaller than the threshold value and the stability constraint of the critical depth of cut corresponding to the rotation speed being larger than the specified layer-by-layer cutting depth is established, so as to maximize the feeding speed at each parameter point. Because the acceleration at the parameter point is influenced by the speed of the adjacent parameter points, the parameter points are respectively planned in a forward process and a backward process, and finally, the optimal planning result is obtained. After the optimal speed and the optimal rotating speed of each parameter point are obtained, fitting approximation is carried out on the speed and the rotating speed in the whole parameter interval, the feeding speed and the rotating speed of each sampling point are obtained by spline curve interpolation, then the maximum feeding speed and the corresponding rotating speed of each tool position can be obtained, and finally the NC codes of the specific machine tool numerical control system are output.
The method specifically comprises the following steps:
1) and generating a smooth spiral line track in a cubic B-spline curve form according to the shape of the cavity and the diameter of the cutter.
2) And carrying out equal-parameter discrete sampling on the spline curve track to obtain each discrete parameter point.
3) And obtaining the radial cutting width at each discrete parameter point through VERICUT simulation.
4) And calculating a stable lobe graph by utilizing the maximum radial cutting width obtained by simulation, and establishing a corresponding relation between the rotating speed and the critical cutting depth.
5) And (6) planning in a forward direction. And (3) along the direction of increasing the parameter values, sequentially establishing a time-optimal feed speed and rotating speed planning model for each parameter point by taking the motion speed of the machine tool, the acceleration of each axis, the curve height error, the maximum cutting force and the machining stability as constraints. And solving the model by using a differential evolution algorithm to calculate the maximum feeding speed and the corresponding rotating speed at each discrete parameter point.
The cutting force threshold is determined by the strength of the cutter teeth, the integral rigidity of the cutter and the maximum deformation of the cutter.
And a certain cutting depth value is set for layer-by-layer processing of the cavity, and the value is used as a lower threshold of the critical cutting depth, namely, the stability of the processing process is ensured by the fact that the critical cutting depth corresponding to the rotating speed is larger than the lower threshold.
6) And (5) backward planning. And (4) establishing and solving a time-optimal feed speed and rotating speed planning model along the direction of reducing the parameter value.
The method of modeling along the direction of decreasing parameter values is substantially the same as step 5, and the maximum feeding speed of each parameter point obtained in step 5 is increased to be the upper limit of the speed of each parameter point.
7) And performing fitting approximation on the speed and the rotating speed in the whole parameter interval, and utilizing spline curve interpolation to obtain the feeding speed and the rotating speed at each sampling point, so as to obtain the position, the maximum feeding speed and the rotating speed of each tool location point, and finally outputting the NC codes of the specific machine tool numerical control system.
In the following embodiments, taking the rectangular cavity processing (fig. 2) as an example, a similar method can be applied to any cavity with a complicated single connected region shape and a single island. And the cutter is set to be a down-milling cutter.
1) And generating a smooth spiral line track in a cubic B-spline curve form according to the shape of the cavity and the diameter of the cutter.
Before the cavity is processed by spiral milling, spiral cutting needs to be carried out by taking a value which is not more than the radius of a cutter as a spiral radius, so that the inner boundary of a coverage area of a spiral milling cutter path is a circle obtained by projecting a spiral cutting path on a plane; in order to prevent over-cutting of the cavity boundary, the cavity shape needs to be biased inward by the radius of the cutter to obtain the outer boundary of the coverage area of the spiral milling cutter path.
Solving an elliptic partial differential equation of the Dirichlet boundary condition by adopting a finite element method, generating a closed equivalent field curve according to the diameter of a cutter, generating a transition curve after equally dividing the field curve to obtain a group of spiral point lines, and fitting the spiral point lines by utilizing a cubic B spline curve to obtain a cubic B spline curve form smooth spiral line track.
A specific generation process of a helical milling Tool Path in the form of a spline curve can be found in Bieterman M B, Sandstrom D R.A Curvilinerol-Path Method for Pocket Machining [ J ]. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering,2003,125(4):709 ]
2) And carrying out equal-parameter discrete sampling on the spline curve track to obtain each discrete parameter point.
Changing u to [0,1]]The whole parameter interval is equally divided into N points, wherein u 1 =0,u N 1, generationAnd putting the cubic B-spline curve to obtain each discrete parameter point.
3) The radial cutting width at each discrete point was obtained by vericu simulation.
And (3) taking the discrete parameter points obtained in the step (2) as tool location points, setting an initial fixed rotating speed and a fixed feed rate to generate a preliminary NC code, importing the preliminary NC code into VERICUT for simulation, and obtaining the radial cutting width of each tool location point after the simulation is finished so as to obtain the radial cutting width of each discrete point.
4) And calculating a stable lobe graph by utilizing the maximum radial cutting width obtained by simulation, and establishing a corresponding relation between the rotating speed and the critical cutting depth.
Because the larger the radial cutting width is, the smaller the corresponding critical cutting depth is at the same rotating speed, and if the processing at the point with the maximum radial cutting width is stable, the stability of the whole cavity processing process can be ensured. Therefore, the maximum value of the radial cutting width at each discrete point obtained in the step (3) is selected as the radial cutting width to establish a stable lobe graph, as shown in fig. 3.
The stable lobe plot may be created using either a single frequency method, which may be referenced in the literature [ Altintas Y, Budak E.analytical Prediction of Stability Lobes in Milling [ J ]. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology,1995,44(1):357 @ ], or a full dispersion method, which may be referenced in the literature [ Ding Y, Zhu L M, Zhuang X J, et al.A full-dispersion method for Prediction of compliance [ J ]. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacturing, 2010,50(5): 502-. The used tool modal parameters can be obtained through a hammering test, the cutting force coefficient can be obtained through milling a workpiece (such as a rectangular workpiece end mill) with a simple shape and the same material by using the same milling cutter, designing a cutting experiment (such as slotting) with specific processing parameters, recording corresponding cutting force data by using a dynamometer, and finally calibrating by using a least square method.
5) And (6) planning in a forward direction. And (3) along the direction of increasing the parameter values, sequentially establishing a time-optimal feed speed and rotating speed planning model for each parameter point by taking the speed, the acceleration, the curve height error, the maximum cutting force and the processing stability of each axis of the machine tool as constraints. And solving the model by using a differential evolution algorithm to calculate the maximum feeding speed and the corresponding rotating speed at each discrete parameter point.
Let C (u) be a cubic B-spline curve type smooth spiral line track, and let κ (u) | C u (u) | | represents the parameter velocity, where () u Represents the derivative of the variable with respect to u, and v (u) represents the feed rate. The time-optimal objective function is
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000091
Where s is the chord length, v is the magnitude of the velocity, and u' is the derivative of the parameter u with respect to time.
It is difficult to directly solve the formula (1), and isoparametric discrete sampling can be carried out on the parameter interval of the motion curve of the machine tool, so that the time-optimal objective function can be expressed as
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000092
Where N is the number of sample points.
Setting the speed of the head and tail points to be zero, only establishing a time-optimal feed speed and rotating speed planning model for each discrete parameter point of i-2, 3, … and N-1, wherein the objective function is
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000093
While
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000094
Then can obtain
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000095
Stipulated () μ (mu e { x, y }) is the component of the vector in the mu direction, and the constraint establishment method of the acceleration of each axis of the machine tool is as follows
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000096
Wherein () u Representing the derivative of the variable with respect to u, V μ Indicating the speed of each axis of the machine tool, A μ Representing the acceleration of each axis of the machine tool. The curve height error constraint can be expressed as
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000097
Wherein delta m For a given bow height error, T s For the interpolation period, ρ (u) is the radius of curvature of the spline curve at parameter u, and
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000098
solving for V (u) in view of the forward planning process i ) While the parameter is decreased toward the feeding speed V (u) of the adjacent discrete parameter point i-1 ) Knowing, however, the feed speed V (u) of the discrete parameter points adjacent in the direction of increasing parameter i+1 ) Unknown, therefore, the equations (4) and (5) are discretized into the constraint inequalities of the motion speed and the acceleration limit of each axis
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000101
V in formula (6) max And
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000102
respectively the machine tool feed speed limit and the acceleration limit of each axis. The derivation of the above formula can be found in the literature [ Dong W, Ding Y, Huang J, et al].Journal of Dynamic Systems,Measurement,and Control,2017,139(6):061012.].
And calculating the cutting force at each discrete parameter point in the cutting process according to the curvature and the radial cutting depth at each discrete parameter point. The milling cutter cutting depth portion is axially discretized into several layers as shown in fig. 4. The cutting edge infinitesimal cutting force can be expressed as:
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000103
wherein j is the cutter tooth number, and k is the cutter shaft direction disc number; dF t,j,k The unit tangential cutting force of the jth cutter tooth on the kth disc; dF r,j,k The unit radial cutting force of the jth cutter tooth on the kth disc; h is a total of j,k For non-deformation thickness cutting, the feed rate per tooth of the cutter is f t A function of (a); k te And K re Is the edge cutting force coefficient, K, of the tool tc And K rc Is the shear cutting force coefficient. Phi is a j,k And (t) is the contact angle of the jth cutter tooth on the kth disc. Unit step function g (phi) j,k (t)) is used for indicating whether the current cutting element participates in cutting, and is defined as follows:
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000104
wherein phi st And phi ex The cutting angle and the cutting angle of the jth cutter tooth on the kth disc are represented by the following calculation formula:
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000105
where R is the radius of curvature at the discrete parameter point, R is the tool radius, and a is the radial cut width at the discrete parameter point, as shown in fig. 5. The derivation process can be referred to as [ Zhang, l., Zheng, l., Zhang, z. -h., Liu, y.,&Li,Z.-Z. (2002).On cutting forces in peripheral milling of curved surfaces.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers,Part B:Journal of Engineering Manufacture,216(10), 1385–1398.]。K te 、K re 、K tc and K rc Equal cuttingThe force coefficient can be obtained by milling a workpiece with a simple shape (such as a rectangular workpiece) made of the same material by using the same milling cutter, designing a cutting experiment (such as slotting) with specific processing parameters, recording corresponding cutting force data by using a dynamometer, and finally calibrating by using a least square method.
The infinitesimal cutting force determined by the formula (8) is transformed into a tool coordinate system through coordinate transformation.
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000111
The instantaneous resultant forces acting in the two directions transverse to the tool are:
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000112
wherein N is t Number of teeth of knife, N A The number of axially discrete discs of the tool.
The maximum value of the resultant force on the cutter at each discrete parameter point can be obtained by the formula (8-12). The maximum resultant force F is the feed rate per tooth F according to the calculation process t As a function of, and the feed rate per tooth f t The relationship between the feeding speed V and the rotating speed omega is as follows:
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000113
wherein N is t The number of teeth is the number of teeth.
The maximum resultant force F at each discrete parameter point is thus a function of the feed speed V and the rotational speed Ω, which can be expressed as
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000114
The cutting force constraint can therefore be expressed as:
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000115
wherein F max Is the cutting force threshold determined by the strength of the cutter teeth, the overall stiffness of the cutter and the maximum deformation of the cutter.
The correspondence of the rotation speed to the critical depth of cut has been established by step (4), and this relationship is denoted b lim (omega), the layer-by-layer processing of the cavity can set a certain cutting depth value b set And taking the value as a lower threshold of the critical cutting depth, namely ensuring the stability of the machining process by using the critical cutting depth corresponding to the rotating speed to be larger than the lower threshold. The cutting force constraint can therefore be expressed as:
b lim (Ω(u i ))≥b set (15)
converting the nonlinear constraints of the equations (14) and (15) into penalty terms integrated into an objective function by an external penalty function method, and enabling the penalty terms to be integrated into the objective function
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000116
Wherein F max As cutting force threshold, b set For the set layer-by-layer machining cutting depth value, a time optimal feed speed and rotating speed planning model comprising machine tool speed, acceleration of each axis, curve bow height error constraint, maximum cutting force constraint and machining process stability constraint can be constructed:
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000121
where σ is a penalty factor (a very large positive number), P (V (u) i ),Ω(u i ) σ P (V (u) as defined in formula (16) i ),Ω(u i ) V) as a penalty including maximum cutting force constraint, process stability constraint max And
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000122
respectively the machine tool feed speed limit and the acceleration limit, omega, of each axis min And Ω max Is a defined range of rotational speeds.
Since the cutting force constraint and the stability constraint in equations (14), (15) are both nonlinear constraints, the model can be solved by a differential evolution algorithm. Continuously solving and calculating along the direction of increasing parameter values to obtain the maximum feeding speed and the corresponding rotating speed at each discrete parameter point, and recording as { V } i *i * ,i=2,…,N-1}。
6) And (5) backward planning. And establishing and solving a time-optimal feed speed and rotating speed planning model along the direction of reducing the parameter value.
Because the acceleration condition between the N-1 th parameter point and the Nth parameter point cannot be considered in the forward planning process, the feed speed and the rotating speed between the N-1 st parameter point and the 2 nd parameter point need to be corrected by adding the backward planning process.
The process of building the backward planning model is generally consistent with, but different from, forward planning. Firstly, the maximum feed speed V obtained in the step 5 needs to be increased i * For the upper speed bound of each parameter point, additionally solving V (u) in the backward planning process i ) While the parameter is increased toward the feeding speed V (u) of the adjacent discrete parameter point i+1 ) Knowing, and decreasing the feed velocity V (u) of the discrete parameter points adjacent thereto i-1 ) Unknown and thus the discrete mode of equation (4) differs.
The time optimal feed speed and rotating speed planning model which is constructed after adjustment and contains machine tool speed, acceleration of each axis, curve bow height error constraint, maximum cutting force constraint and machining process stability constraint is as follows:
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000131
where σ is a penalty factor (a very large positive number), P (V (u) i ),Ω(u i ) σ P (V (u) as defined in formula (16) i ),Ω(u i ) V) as a penalty including maximum cutting force constraint, process stability constraint max And
Figure RE-GDA0002368250490000132
respectively the machine tool feed speed limit and the acceleration limit of each axis, omega min And Ω max Is a defined range of rotational speeds.
And (5) continuously solving and calculating the maximum feeding speed and the corresponding rotating speed at each discrete parameter point by adopting a differential evolution algorithm along the direction of reducing the parameter value, wherein the calculated value is the final time optimal feeding speed and rotating speed planning result.
7) And performing fitting approximation on the speed and the rotating speed in the whole parameter interval, and utilizing spline curve interpolation to obtain the feeding speed and the rotating speed at each sampling point, so as to obtain the position, the maximum feeding speed and the rotating speed of each tool location point, and finally outputting the NC codes of the specific machine tool numerical control system.
The foregoing description of specific embodiments of the present invention has been presented. It is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to the specific embodiments described above, and that various changes or modifications may be made by one skilled in the art within the scope of the appended claims without affecting the spirit of the invention. The embodiments and features of the embodiments of the present application may be combined with each other arbitrarily without conflict.

Claims (6)

1. The off-line planning method for the feed rate and the rotating speed of cavity spiral milling machining is characterized by comprising the following steps of:
step 1: generating a cubic B-spline curve-form smooth spiral line track according to the shape of the cavity and the diameter of the cutter;
step 2: carrying out equal-parameter discrete sampling on the spiral track to obtain discrete parameter points;
and step 3: obtaining the radial cutting width of each discrete parameter point through simulation;
and 4, step 4: calculating a stable lobe graph by utilizing the maximum radial cutting width obtained by simulation, and establishing a corresponding relation between the rotating speed and the critical cutting depth;
and 5: forward planning, namely establishing a time-optimal feeding speed and rotating speed planning model along the direction of increasing the parameter values, and solving to obtain the maximum feeding speed and the corresponding rotating speed at each discrete parameter point;
step 6: backward planning, namely establishing a time-optimal feeding speed and rotating speed planning model along the direction of reducing the parameter values, and solving to obtain the maximum feeding speed and the corresponding rotating speed at each discrete parameter point;
and 7: fitting approximation is carried out on the maximum feeding speed and the rotating speed in the whole parameter interval, the feeding speed and the rotating speed at each sampling point are obtained by utilizing spline curve interpolation, and then the position, the maximum feeding speed and the rotating speed of each cutter point can be obtained.
2. The off-line cavity spiral milling machining feed rate and rotation speed planning method according to claim 1, wherein the step 1 comprises the following steps:
the method comprises the steps of solving an elliptic partial differential equation of the Dirichlet boundary condition by adopting a finite element method, generating a closed field curve with a closed equivalent according to the diameter of a cutter, generating a transition curve after equally dividing the field curve to obtain a group of spiral point rows, and fitting the spiral point rows by utilizing a cubic B-spline curve to obtain a cubic B-spline curve form smooth spiral line track.
3. The off-line cavity spiral milling machining feed rate and rotation speed planning method according to claim 1, wherein the step 2 comprises:
and (3) dividing the whole parameter interval into N points equally, wherein u1 is 0, uN is 1, and substituting the points into a cubic B spline curve to obtain each discrete parameter point.
4. The off-line cavity spiral milling machining feed rate and rotation speed planning method according to claim 1, wherein the step 3 comprises:
and (3) taking the discrete parameter points obtained in the step (2) as tool location points, setting an initial fixed rotating speed and a fixed feed rate to generate a preliminary NC code, importing the preliminary NC code into VERICUT for simulation, and obtaining the radial cutting width of each tool location point after the simulation is finished so as to obtain the radial cutting width of each discrete point.
5. The off-line cavity spiral milling machining feed rate and rotation speed planning method according to claim 1, wherein the step 5 comprises:
let the cubic B-spline curve form smooth spiral trajectory be C (u), let κ (u) | | C u (u) | | represents the speed of the parameter, where () u Represents the derivative of the variable with respect to u, V (u) represents the feed rate;
the time-optimal objective function is
Figure FDA0002368250480000021
Wherein s is the chord length, v is the magnitude of the velocity, and u' is the derivative of the parameter u with respect to time;
the time-optimal objective function can be further expressed as:
Figure FDA0002368250480000022
wherein N is the number of sampling points;
setting the speed of the head and tail points to be zero, only establishing a time-optimal feed speed and rotation speed planning model for each discrete parameter point of i-2, 3, …, N-1, wherein the objective function is
Figure FDA0002368250480000023
While
Figure FDA0002368250480000024
Then can obtain
Figure FDA0002368250480000025
Stipulated () μ (mu e { x, y }) is the component of the vector in the mu direction, and the constraint establishment method of the acceleration of each axis of the machine tool is as follows:
Figure FDA0002368250480000026
Figure FDA0002368250480000027
wherein () u Representing the derivative of the variable with respect to u, V μ Indicating the speed of each axis of the machine tool, A μ Representing the acceleration of each axis of the machine tool, and the curve height error constraint can be expressed as
Figure FDA0002368250480000028
Wherein delta m For a given bow height error, T s For the interpolation period, ρ (u) is the radius of curvature of the spline curve at parameter u, and
Figure FDA0002368250480000029
dispersing the equations (4) and (5) as follows to obtain the limit constraint inequality of the movement speed and the acceleration of each axis of the machine tool
Figure FDA0002368250480000031
V in formula (7) max And with
Figure FDA0002368250480000032
Respectively representing the feed speed limit of the machine tool and the acceleration limit of each shaft;
calculating the cutting force at each discrete parameter point in the cutting process according to the curvature and the radial cutting depth at each discrete parameter point; the cutting depth part of the milling cutter is axially dispersed into a plurality of layers, and the cutting force of the cutting edge infinitesimal is as follows:
Figure FDA0002368250480000033
wherein j is the cutter tooth number, and k is the cutter shaft direction disc number; dF t,j,k The unit tangential cutting force of the jth cutter tooth on the kth disc; dF r,j,k The unit radial cutting force of the jth cutter tooth on the kth disc; h is j,k For non-deformed thickness cutting, the feed rate per tooth of the cutter is f t A function of (a); k te And K re Is the edge cutting force coefficient, K, of the tool tc And K rc Is the shear cutting force coefficient; phi is a j,k (t) is the contact angle of the jth cutter tooth on the kth disc, and the unit step function g (phi) j,k (t)) is used for indicating whether the current cutting element participates in cutting, and is defined as:
Figure FDA0002368250480000034
wherein phi st And phi ex The cutting angle and the cutting angle of the jth cutter tooth on the kth disc are represented by the following calculation formula:
Figure FDA0002368250480000035
wherein R is the curvature radius at the discrete parameter point, R is the radius of the cutter, and a is the radial cutting width at the discrete parameter point; k te 、K re 、K tc And K rc The cutting force coefficient can be obtained by milling a workpiece with a simple shape and the same material by using the same milling cutter, designing a cutting experiment with specific processing parameters, recording corresponding cutting force data by using a dynamometer, and finally calibrating by using a least square method;
the infinitesimal cutting force determined by the formula (8) is transformed into a tool coordinate system through coordinate transformation:
Figure FDA0002368250480000036
the instantaneous resultant forces acting in the two directions transverse to the tool are:
Figure FDA0002368250480000041
wherein N is t Number of teeth of the knife, N A The number of the disks is axially discrete;
obtaining the maximum value of resultant force borne by the cutter at each discrete parameter point by the formula (8-12), wherein the maximum resultant force F is the feed rate F of each tooth t As a function of, and the feed rate per tooth f t The relationship between the feeding speed V and the rotation speed Ω is:
Figure FDA0002368250480000042
wherein N is t The number of the cutter teeth;
the maximum resultant force F at each discrete parameter point is thus a function of the feed speed V and the rotational speed omega, expressed as
Figure FDA0002368250480000043
The cutting force constraint is expressed as:
Figure FDA0002368250480000044
wherein F max The cutting force threshold is determined by the strength of the cutter teeth, the integral rigidity of the cutter and the maximum deformation of the cutter;
the correspondence of the rotational speed to the critical depth of cut has been established by step (4), and is denoted b lim (omega), the layer-by-layer processing of the cavity can set a certain cutting depth value b set Taking this value as the lower threshold of the critical cutting depth, the cutting force constraint is expressed as:
b lim (Ω(u i ))≥b set (15)
converting the nonlinear constraints of the equations (14) and (15) into penalty terms by an external penalty function method, and integrating the penalty terms into an objective function
Figure FDA0002368250480000045
Wherein F max As cutting force threshold, b set For the set layer-by-layer machining cutting depth value, a time optimal feed speed and rotating speed planning model comprising machine tool speed, acceleration of each axis, curve bow height error constraint, maximum cutting force constraint and machining process stability constraint can be constructed:
Figure FDA0002368250480000051
where σ is a penalty factor, P (V (u) i ),Ω(u i ) σ P (V (u) as defined in formula (16) i ),Ω(u i ) V) as a penalty including maximum cutting force constraint, process stability constraint max And with
Figure FDA0002368250480000052
Respectively the machine tool feed speed limit and the acceleration limit of each axis, omega min And Ω max Is a defined range of rotational speeds;
since the cutting force constraint and the stability constraint in the equations (14) and (15) are both nonlinear constraints, the model is solved through a differential evolution algorithm; continuously solving and calculating along the direction of increasing parameter values to obtain the maximum feeding speed and the corresponding rotating speed at each discrete parameter point, and recording as { V } i *i * ,i=2,…,N-1}。
6. The off-line cavity spiral milling machining feed rate and rotation speed planning method according to claim 1, wherein the step 6 comprises:
and continuously solving and calculating the maximum feeding speed and the corresponding rotating speed at each discrete parameter point by adopting a differential evolution algorithm along the direction of reducing the parameter values, wherein the calculated values are the final time optimal feeding speed and rotating speed planning result.
CN201910954306.3A 2019-10-09 2019-10-09 Off-line planning method for feeding rate and rotating speed of cavity spiral milling Active CN111176209B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910954306.3A CN111176209B (en) 2019-10-09 2019-10-09 Off-line planning method for feeding rate and rotating speed of cavity spiral milling

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910954306.3A CN111176209B (en) 2019-10-09 2019-10-09 Off-line planning method for feeding rate and rotating speed of cavity spiral milling

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN111176209A CN111176209A (en) 2020-05-19
CN111176209B true CN111176209B (en) 2022-09-23

Family

ID=70648713

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201910954306.3A Active CN111176209B (en) 2019-10-09 2019-10-09 Off-line planning method for feeding rate and rotating speed of cavity spiral milling

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN111176209B (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112985882B (en) * 2021-04-08 2023-04-11 江苏省检验检疫科学技术研究院 Automatic sampler for separating and sampling multiple parts of tyre
CN113791577B (en) * 2021-08-19 2023-07-21 五邑大学 Curve fitting method based on numerical control machining system, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN116257020A (en) * 2023-02-28 2023-06-13 广东机电职业技术学院 Control method and device of turning and milling composite control system

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101497140A (en) * 2009-02-26 2009-08-05 上海交通大学 Off-line planning method for cutting feed rate of five-shaft numerical control side milling machining
CN102528555A (en) * 2010-12-15 2012-07-04 上海工程技术大学 Geometry and mechanics integrated optimization information processing method of interference-free tool path on complex curved surface
CN102622489A (en) * 2012-03-26 2012-08-01 上海交通大学 Five-axis side milling cutting force predicting method based on ACIS platform
CN105527925A (en) * 2015-12-08 2016-04-27 上海交通大学 Complex curved surface five-axis flat-bottomed cutter strip-width-maximization machining feedrate offline programming method
JP2016162149A (en) * 2015-02-28 2016-09-05 国立大学法人神戸大学 Cutting force adaptive control method and cutting force adaptive control system
CN108515217A (en) * 2018-04-09 2018-09-11 吉林大学 A kind of ball-end milling free form surface surface topography emulation mode
JP2019089169A (en) * 2017-11-15 2019-06-13 Dmg森精機株式会社 Machine tool and method for setting cutting condition

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
TWI289092B (en) * 2005-01-18 2007-11-01 Univ Chung Yuan Christian Detecting and suppressing methods for milling tool chatter

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101497140A (en) * 2009-02-26 2009-08-05 上海交通大学 Off-line planning method for cutting feed rate of five-shaft numerical control side milling machining
CN102528555A (en) * 2010-12-15 2012-07-04 上海工程技术大学 Geometry and mechanics integrated optimization information processing method of interference-free tool path on complex curved surface
CN102622489A (en) * 2012-03-26 2012-08-01 上海交通大学 Five-axis side milling cutting force predicting method based on ACIS platform
JP2016162149A (en) * 2015-02-28 2016-09-05 国立大学法人神戸大学 Cutting force adaptive control method and cutting force adaptive control system
CN105527925A (en) * 2015-12-08 2016-04-27 上海交通大学 Complex curved surface five-axis flat-bottomed cutter strip-width-maximization machining feedrate offline programming method
JP2019089169A (en) * 2017-11-15 2019-06-13 Dmg森精機株式会社 Machine tool and method for setting cutting condition
CN108515217A (en) * 2018-04-09 2018-09-11 吉林大学 A kind of ball-end milling free form surface surface topography emulation mode

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
基于分层递阶模型的多轴加工过程分析与运动度量规划;张立强等;《上海交通大学学报》;20111115(第11期);全文 *
虚拟五轴侧铣加工过程建模与仿真分析;张立强等;《工程设计学报》;20110428(第02期);全文 *
螺旋铣孔工艺的切削稳定性及工艺参数规划;刘长毅 等;《中国机械工程》;20141130;第25卷(第22期);全文 *
镍基合金螺旋铣孔加工质量及动力学研究;王超;《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库 工程科技Ⅰ辑》;20190915(第09期);全文 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN111176209A (en) 2020-05-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN111176209B (en) Off-line planning method for feeding rate and rotating speed of cavity spiral milling
Soori et al. Accuracy analysis of tool deflection error modelling in prediction of milled surfaces by a virtual machining system
CN101497140B (en) Off-line planning method for cutting feed rate of five-shaft numerical control side milling machining
EP3213161B1 (en) Method for optimizing the productivity of a machining process of a cnc machine
CN102129232A (en) Five-axis side milling machining process parameter design method
CN105488282A (en) Cutting parameter segmentation and variable cutting depth optimizing method based on dynamic machining feature
CN113868805B (en) Method for calculating grinding track of rear tool face of straight edge of drill point
Tunç et al. Machining strategy development and parameter selection in 5-axis milling based on process simulations
CN117634057B (en) Spiral bevel gear time-varying meshing stiffness calculation method containing peeling fault
CN105414616A (en) Method for cutting force forecasting and stability judging in spiral hole milling process
WO2021038848A1 (en) Integrally bladed rotor manufacturing method, blade cutting program for same, and integrally bladed rotor
CN114186175A (en) Method for resolving dynamic characteristics of energy consumption of main cutting force of high-energy-efficiency milling cutter under vibration action
Kuts et al. Development of the internally cutting milling cutter model with radial advance for treatment of profiling rolls
Gdula Adaptive method of 5-axis milling of sculptured surfaces elements with a curved line contour
Calleja et al. Reliable manufacturing process in turbine blisks and compressors
WO2010134532A1 (en) Numerical control device
Chu et al. Generation of reciprocating tool motion in 5-axis flank milling based on particle swarm optimization
Ozturk et al. Analytical methods for increased productivity in five-axis ball-end milling
CN108746795B (en) Method for predicting flutter in numerical control milling of mold cavity
CN114861487B (en) Asymmetric milling process planning method
Shtehin et al. Stability of ball-end milling on warped surface: semi-analytical and experimental analysis
Rauch et al. Rough pocket milling with trochoidal and plunging strategies
US20140154470A1 (en) Machining method
CN108762080B (en) Four-axis rough machining axial flow type blisk cutter bottom edge cutting evaluation and feeding speed optimization method
Chlost et al. A new method of the positioning and analysis of the roughness deviation in five-axis milling of external cylindrical gear

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant