CN110909420B - Iterative calculation method for alignment of ship propulsion shafting considering bearing factors - Google Patents
Iterative calculation method for alignment of ship propulsion shafting considering bearing factors Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110909420B CN110909420B CN201911168541.4A CN201911168541A CN110909420B CN 110909420 B CN110909420 B CN 110909420B CN 201911168541 A CN201911168541 A CN 201911168541A CN 110909420 B CN110909420 B CN 110909420B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- alignment
- bearing
- position value
- fulcrum
- equivalent
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 53
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 38
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 238000012417 linear regression Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000009795 derivation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000002023 wood Substances 0.000 description 3
- 235000014443 Pyrus communis Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 125000004122 cyclic group Chemical group 0.000 description 2
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000000611 regression analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010921 in-depth analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02T—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
- Y02T90/00—Enabling technologies or technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
Landscapes
- Length Measuring Devices With Unspecified Measuring Means (AREA)
Abstract
Description
技术领域technical field
本发明涉及轴系校中技术领域,尤其涉及一种考虑轴承因素的船舶推进轴系校中迭代计算方法。The invention relates to the technical field of shaft alignment, in particular to an iterative calculation method for the alignment of ship propulsion shafts considering bearing factors.
背景技术Background technique
推进轴系校中是轴系设计、安装的重要组成部分,轴系校中质量的优劣,对保障轴系及主机的正常运转,以及对减少船体振动有着重要的影响。生产实践证明,校中质量不好的轴系,其运转时则会造成尾轴管轴承迅速磨损甚至烧坏,尾管密封元件异常磨损而导致泄漏,造成主机曲轴的臂距差超过允许的范围,破坏减速齿轮的正常啮合和轴承的正常工作,以及引起船体振动。The alignment of the propulsion shafting is an important part of the shafting design and installation. The quality of the alignment of the shafting has an important impact on ensuring the normal operation of the shafting and the main engine, as well as reducing the vibration of the hull. Production practice has proved that shafting with poor alignment quality will cause rapid wear or even burn out of the stern tube bearing during operation, abnormal wear of the stern tube seal element and lead to leakage, resulting in the arm distance difference of the main engine crankshaft exceeding the allowable range. , destroy the normal meshing of the reduction gear and the normal operation of the bearing, and cause the hull to vibrate.
由于螺旋桨的悬臂作用,靠近螺旋桨的尾管轴承承担的载荷较大,因此尾管轴承支承模型是关注的重点。校中计算中,水润滑型尾管后轴承的等效支点位置通常参考对铁梨木轴承的规定进行选取,尾管前轴承的支点位置通常取其中点,这种处理方法是否合理,值得深入分析。Due to the cantilever effect of the propeller, the stern tube bearing close to the propeller bears a larger load, so the stern tube bearing support model is the focus of attention. In the alignment calculation, the position of the equivalent fulcrum of the water-lubricated stern tube rear bearing is usually selected with reference to the regulations for the Tieli wood bearing, and the fulcrum position of the stern tube front bearing is usually taken as the midpoint. Whether this treatment method is reasonable is worth in-depth analysis. .
轴系校中计算常使用的方法有三种:有限元法、传递矩阵法以及三弯矩法。随着许多新材料的应用使得轴承的内衬弹性模量发生变化,同时现代船舶不断朝着大吨位发展的趋势,使得轴承的长径比不断增大等情况的发生,使得校中环境更加复杂。但现有的轴系校中方法如三弯矩法却没有考虑到船舶轴承的这些发展变化,而ANSYS有限元法虽然考虑了这些因素的变化,但其计算过程复杂,建模、网格划分等过程依赖使用者的经验,使得该方法的可重复性比较差,因此现有校中结果是否准确比较值得商榷。因此有必要寻找新的支点计算方法。There are three commonly used methods for shaft alignment calculation: finite element method, transfer matrix method and three bending moment method. With the application of many new materials, the elastic modulus of the inner lining of the bearing has changed. At the same time, the trend of modern ships is developing towards large tonnage, which makes the aspect ratio of the bearing continue to increase, which makes the school environment more complicated. . However, the existing shaft alignment methods, such as the three-bending moment method, do not take into account the development and changes of ship bearings, while the ANSYS finite element method considers the changes of these factors, but its calculation process is complex, modeling and meshing. The other process relies on the experience of users, which makes the repeatability of this method relatively poor. Therefore, it is questionable whether the existing calibration results are accurate or not. Therefore, it is necessary to find a new fulcrum calculation method.
发明内容SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
本发明的主要目的在于提供一种考虑轴承因素的船舶推进轴系校中迭代计算方法,旨在精确确定尾轴承的等效支点位置值。The main purpose of the present invention is to provide an iterative calculation method for the alignment of ship propulsion shafting considering bearing factors, aiming to accurately determine the position value of the equivalent fulcrum of the stern bearing.
为实现上述目的,本发明提供一种考虑轴承因素的船舶推进轴系校中迭代计算方法,包括以下步骤:In order to achieve the above purpose, the present invention provides an iterative calculation method for the alignment of ship propulsion shafting considering bearing factors, comprising the following steps:
S1,对轴段进行离散化并给出尾轴承等效支点的初始位置值Z(0);S1, discretize the shaft segment and give the initial position value Z (0) of the equivalent fulcrum of the stern bearing;
S2,利用三弯矩法对轴系进行校中计算获得尾轴承处轴颈转角;S2, use the three-bending moment method to align and calculate the shafting to obtain the journal rotation angle at the stern bearing;
S3,利用尾轴承等效支点计算公式,将上步所得的轴颈转角代入,计算得到新的等效支点位置值Z(k),k为迭代次数;S3, use the calculation formula of the equivalent fulcrum of the stern bearing, substitute the journal rotation angle obtained in the previous step, and calculate the new equivalent fulcrum position value Z (k) , where k is the number of iterations;
S4,当计算得到新的等效支点位置值Z(k)与迭代前的等效支点位置值Z(k-1)之间差值大于预设差值时,将Z(k)和Z(k-1)二者的平均值作为新的等效支点位置值,以下次计算尾轴承处轴颈转角的依据,并返回执行步骤S2;S4, when the difference between the new equivalent fulcrum position value Z (k) and the equivalent fulcrum position value Z (k-1) before the iteration is greater than the preset difference, compare Z (k) and Z ( k-1) The average value of the two is used as the new equivalent fulcrum position value, which is the basis for the next calculation of the journal rotation angle at the stern bearing, and returns to step S2;
S5,当计算得到新的等效支点位置值Z(k)与迭代前的等效支点位置值Z(k-1)之间差值小于或等于预设差值时,即迭代收敛满足预设条件,将Z(k)代入三弯矩法计算得到最终的校中计算结果。S5, when the difference between the new equivalent fulcrum position value Z (k) and the equivalent fulcrum position value Z (k-1) before the iteration is less than or equal to the preset difference, that is, the iterative convergence satisfies the preset The final alignment calculation result is obtained by substituting Z (k) into the three-bending moment method.
优选地,步骤S1中,Z(0)的取值范围为(1/4~1/3)L,其中L为尾轴承长度。Preferably, in step S1, the value range of Z (0) is (1/4~1/3)L, where L is the length of the stern bearing.
优选地,步骤S3中,计算得到新的等效支点位置值Z(k)时,根据轴颈转角、弹性模量和长径比计算得到。Preferably, in step S3, when the new equivalent fulcrum position value Z (k) is calculated, it is calculated according to the journal rotation angle, elastic modulus and aspect ratio.
优选地,尾轴承等效支点计算公式中利用有限元法计算不同轴承长径比、轴颈转角和内衬弹性模量时尾轴承等效支点位置,然后,利用线性回归分析法拟合得到支点系数。Preferably, in the calculation formula of the equivalent fulcrum of the stern bearing, the finite element method is used to calculate the position of the equivalent fulcrum of the stern bearing under different bearing length-diameter ratios, journal rotation angles and elastic modulus of the inner lining, and then the fulcrum is obtained by fitting the linear regression analysis method. coefficient.
优选地,步骤S3中,尾轴承弹性模量、长径比和转角与等效支点位置的关系为:Preferably, in step S3, the relationship between the elastic modulus, the aspect ratio and the rotation angle of the stern bearing and the position of the equivalent fulcrum is:
Z(k)=a(L/D)b(θ(k))cEd;Z (k) = a(L/D) b (θ (k) ) c E d ;
式中:Z(k)为第k次迭代计算得的尾轴承等效支点位置;L/D为尾轴承的长径比;θ(k)为第k次迭代计算得的轴颈转角;E为尾轴承内衬弹性模量;a、b、c、d为支点系数,支点系数通过线性回归分析法结合仿真数据拟合计算得到。Where: Z (k) is the equivalent fulcrum position of the stern bearing calculated at the k-th iteration; L/D is the length-diameter ratio of the stern bearing; θ (k) is the journal rotation angle calculated at the k-th iteration; E is the elastic modulus of the stern bearing lining; a, b, c, and d are the fulcrum coefficients, which are calculated by the linear regression analysis method combined with the simulation data.
优选地,步骤S5中,迭代收敛的判据为:Preferably, in step S5, the criterion for iterative convergence is:
式中:b为迭代收敛系数。where b is the iterative convergence coefficient.
优选地,步骤S5中,最终的校中计算结果包括:转角、挠度、弯矩、弯曲应力、转角以及支反力。Preferably, in step S5, the final alignment calculation result includes: rotation angle, deflection, bending moment, bending stress, rotation angle and support reaction force.
本发明提出的考虑轴承因素的船舶推进轴系校中迭代计算方法,与现有技术相比具有以下优点:Compared with the prior art, the iterative calculation method for the alignment of the ship propulsion shafting proposed by the present invention has the following advantages:
1、采用循环迭代校中方法,以迭代计算的方式解决了校中计算时主观假设的尾轴承支点位置与实际轴系状态不符的问题;1. The cyclic iterative alignment method is adopted to solve the problem that the position of the fulcrum of the stern bearing that is subjectively assumed in the alignment calculation does not match the actual shafting state by means of iterative calculation;
2、提出了考虑轴承因素的等效支点模型及其计算方法,在传统的等效支点模型的基础上将轴承因素考虑在内,分析了轴承长径比、内衬弹性模量和轴承处轴线转角与等效支点位置的关系,并给出其计算公式的推导过程;2. The equivalent fulcrum model and its calculation method considering bearing factors are proposed. On the basis of the traditional equivalent fulcrum model, bearing factors are taken into account, and the bearing length-diameter ratio, lining elastic modulus and bearing axis are analyzed. The relationship between the rotation angle and the position of the equivalent fulcrum, and the derivation process of its calculation formula is given;
3、采用本循环迭代校中方法,考虑到有限元法与传统三弯矩法在计算轴系校中时的缺点,可以精确的得到尾轴承支点位置值,解决了校中计算时主观假设的尾轴承支点位置与实际轴系状态不符的问题,进而可精确得到校中计算结果。3. Using this cycle iterative alignment method, considering the shortcomings of the finite element method and the traditional three-bending moment method in calculating the shaft alignment, the position value of the fulcrum of the stern bearing can be accurately obtained, which solves the subjective assumption in alignment calculation. The problem that the position of the fulcrum of the stern bearing does not match the actual state of the shaft system, and then the calculation result of the alignment can be accurately obtained.
附图说明Description of drawings
图1为本发明考虑轴承因素的船舶推进轴系校中迭代计算方法的流程示意图。FIG. 1 is a schematic flowchart of the iterative calculation method for the alignment of the ship propulsion shafting system according to the present invention considering bearing factors.
本发明目的的实现、功能特点及优点将结合实施例,参照附图做进一步说明。The realization, functional characteristics and advantages of the present invention will be further described with reference to the accompanying drawings in conjunction with the embodiments.
具体实施方式Detailed ways
应当理解,此处所描述的具体实施例仅仅用以解释本发明,并不用于限定本发明。It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are only used to explain the present invention, but not to limit the present invention.
参照图1,一种考虑轴承因素的船舶推进轴系校中迭代计算方法,包括以下步骤:Referring to Figure 1, an iterative calculation method for the alignment of ship propulsion shafting considering bearing factors, including the following steps:
S1,对轴段进行离散化并给出尾轴承等效支点的初始位置值Z(0);S1, discretize the shaft segment and give the initial position value Z (0) of the equivalent fulcrum of the stern bearing;
S2,利用三弯矩法对轴系进行校中计算获得尾轴承处轴颈转角;S2, use the three-bending moment method to align and calculate the shafting to obtain the journal rotation angle at the stern bearing;
S3,利用尾轴承等效支点计算公式,将上步所得的轴颈转角代入,计算得到新的等效支点位置值Z(k),k为迭代次数;S3, use the calculation formula of the equivalent fulcrum of the stern bearing, substitute the journal rotation angle obtained in the previous step, and calculate the new equivalent fulcrum position value Z (k) , where k is the number of iterations;
S4,当计算得到新的等效支点位置值Z(k)与迭代前的等效支点位置值Z(k-1)之间差值大于预设差值时(即新的等效支点位置值不满足收敛条件),将Z(k)和Z(k-1)二者的平均值作为新的等效支点位置值,以下次计算尾轴承处轴颈转角的依据,并返回执行步骤S2;S4, when the difference between the new equivalent fulcrum position value Z (k) and the equivalent fulcrum position value Z (k-1) before the iteration is greater than the preset difference (that is, the new equivalent fulcrum position value does not meet the convergence conditions), take the average value of Z (k) and Z (k-1) as the new equivalent fulcrum position value, and calculate the basis for the journal rotation angle at the stern bearing next time, and return to step S2;
S5,当计算得到新的等效支点位置值Z(k)与迭代前的等效支点位置值Z(k-1)之间差值小于或等于预设差值时,即迭代收敛满足预设条件,将Z(k)代入三弯矩法计算得到最终的校中计算结果。S5, when the difference between the new equivalent fulcrum position value Z (k) and the equivalent fulcrum position value Z (k-1) before the iteration is less than or equal to the preset difference, that is, the iterative convergence satisfies the preset The final alignment calculation result is obtained by substituting Z (k) into the three-bending moment method.
具体地,步骤S1中,Z(0)的取值范围为(1/4~1/3)L,其中L为尾轴承长度。Z(0)的取值范围参考对铁梨木轴承的规定进行选取的。参照CB/Z 388-2005标准,对于铁梨木轴承衬,其等效支点距轴承衬后端面的距离取在(1/4~1/3)L范围内,L为尾轴承长度。Specifically, in step S1, the value range of Z (0) is (1/4~1/3)L, where L is the length of the stern bearing. The value range of Z (0) is selected with reference to the regulations for iron pear wood bearings. Referring to the CB/Z 388-2005 standard, for the iron pear wood bearing lining, the distance between the equivalent fulcrum and the rear end face of the bearing lining is taken within the range of (1/4 ~ 1/3) L, where L is the length of the tail bearing.
步骤S2中,校中计算是利用三弯矩法在MATLAB程序下进行计算的,给定尾轴承的长径比、内衬弹性模量等输入参数,与初始等效支点位置Z(0)一起代入三弯矩法中进行校中计算,得到尾轴承处的轴颈转角。In step S2, the alignment calculation is performed under the MATLAB program using the three-bending moment method. Input parameters such as the length-diameter ratio of the stern bearing and the elastic modulus of the inner lining are given, together with the initial equivalent fulcrum position Z (0) . Substitute into the three-bending moment method for alignment calculation, and obtain the journal rotation angle at the stern bearing.
步骤S3中,计算得到新的等效支点位置值Z(k)时,根据轴颈转角、弹性模量和长径比计算得到。In step S3, when the new equivalent fulcrum position value Z (k) is calculated, it is calculated according to the journal rotation angle, elastic modulus and aspect ratio.
尾轴承等效支点计算公式中利用有限元法计算不同轴承长径比、轴颈转角和内衬弹性模量时尾轴承等效支点位置,然后,利用线性回归分析法拟合得到支点系数。In the calculation formula of the equivalent fulcrum of the stern bearing, the finite element method is used to calculate the position of the equivalent fulcrum of the stern bearing under different bearing length-diameter ratios, journal rotation angles and elastic modulus of the lining, and then the fulcrum coefficient is obtained by fitting the linear regression analysis method.
步骤S3中,尾轴承弹性模量、长径比和转角与等效支点位置的关系为:In step S3, the relationship between the elastic modulus, aspect ratio and rotation angle of the stern bearing and the position of the equivalent fulcrum is:
Z(k)=a(L/D)b(θ(k))cEd; (1)Z (k) = a(L/D) b (θ (k) ) c E d ; (1)
式中:Z(k)为第k次迭代计算得的尾轴承等效支点位置;L/D为尾轴承的长径比;θ(k)为第k次迭代计算得的轴颈转角;E为尾轴承内衬弹性模量;a、b、c、d为支点系数,支点系数通过线性回归分析法结合仿真数据拟合计算得到。where Z (k) is the equivalent fulcrum position of the stern bearing calculated at the k-th iteration; L/D is the length-diameter ratio of the stern bearing; θ (k) is the journal rotation angle calculated at the k-th iteration; E is the elastic modulus of the stern bearing lining; a, b, c, and d are the fulcrum coefficients, which are calculated by the linear regression analysis method combined with the simulation data.
步骤S5中,迭代收敛的判据为:In step S5, the criterion for iterative convergence is:
式中:b为迭代收敛系数。B可以取0.001。where b is the iterative convergence coefficient. B can be taken as 0.001.
步骤S5中,最终的校中计算结果包括:转角、挠度、弯矩、弯曲应力、转角以及支反力。In step S5, the final alignment calculation result includes: rotation angle, deflection, bending moment, bending stress, rotation angle and support reaction force.
步骤S3中的等效支点计算公式可以利用回归分析法推导而来,其具体的推导方式如下:The equivalent fulcrum calculation formula in step S3 can be derived by regression analysis, and its specific derivation method is as follows:
Z=a(L/D)bθcEd; (3)Z=a(L/D) b θ c E d ; (3)
对公式(3)做线性化处理,在等号两边取对数,得Linearize formula (3) and take the logarithm on both sides of the equal sign, we get
ln(Z)=ln(a)+b ln(L/D)+c ln(θ)+d ln(E) (4)ln(Z)=ln(a)+b ln(L/D)+c ln(θ)+d ln(E) (4)
则线性回归方程为Then the linear regression equation is
y=m+bx1+cx2+dx3 (5)y=m+bx 1 +cx 2 +dx 3 (5)
y=ln(Z),m=ln(a),x1=ln(L/D),x2=ln(θ),x3=ln(E) (6)y=ln(Z), m=ln(a), x 1 =ln(L/D), x 2 =ln(θ), x 3 =ln(E) (6)
对公式(5)运用回归分析法,求得各个支点位置偏差平方和为:Using the regression analysis method to formula (5), the squared sum of the deviations of the positions of each fulcrum is obtained as:
式中:n为样本容量;di为第i点的支点位置偏差;yi为第i点的支点位置测量值;为第i点的支点位置理论值。In the formula: n is the sample size; d i is the fulcrum position deviation of the ith point; y i is the measured value of the fulcrum position of the ith point; is the theoretical value of the fulcrum position of the i-th point.
越小,支点位置理论值与测量值越接近,取最小值的必要条件是 The smaller the value, the closer the theoretical value of the fulcrum position is to the measured value. The necessary condition for taking the minimum value is
整理得线性方程组为The system of linear equations is sorted as
上述方程组的矩阵形式为Ab=BThe matrix form of the above system of equations is Ab=B
待求系数矩阵为b=A-1B。The coefficient matrix to be determined is b=A -1 B.
上述公式中的待求系数矩阵是由仿真数据拟合计算得到。在仿真软件中输入L/D、θ及E的值,即可得到相应的Z值,改变不同的输入参数值,即可得到不同的Z值,由此得到大量的仿真数据,经计算就可求得待定系数a、b、c、d。The coefficient matrix to be determined in the above formula is obtained by fitting and calculating the simulation data. Input the values of L/D, θ and E in the simulation software to obtain the corresponding Z value, and change different input parameter values to obtain different Z values, thus obtaining a large amount of simulation data, which can be calculated by Obtain the undetermined coefficients a, b, c, and d.
本发明提出的考虑轴承因素的船舶推进轴系校中迭代计算方法,与现有技术相比具有以下优点:Compared with the prior art, the iterative calculation method for the alignment of the ship propulsion shafting proposed by the present invention has the following advantages:
1、采用循环迭代校中方法,以迭代计算的方式解决了校中计算时主观假设的尾轴承支点位置与实际轴系状态不符的问题;1. The cyclic iterative alignment method is adopted to solve the problem that the position of the fulcrum of the stern bearing that is subjectively assumed in the alignment calculation does not match the actual shafting state by means of iterative calculation;
2、提出了考虑轴承因素的等效支点模型及其计算方法,在传统的等效支点模型的基础上将轴承因素考虑在内,分析了轴承长径比、内衬弹性模量和轴承处轴线转角与等效支点位置的关系,并给出其计算公式的推导过程;2. The equivalent fulcrum model and its calculation method considering bearing factors are proposed. On the basis of the traditional equivalent fulcrum model, bearing factors are taken into account, and the bearing length-diameter ratio, lining elastic modulus and bearing axis are analyzed. The relationship between the rotation angle and the position of the equivalent fulcrum, and the derivation process of its calculation formula is given;
3、采用本循环迭代校中方法,考虑到有限元法与传统三弯矩法在计算轴系校中时的缺点,可以精确的得到尾轴承支点位置值,解决了校中计算时主观假设的尾轴承支点位置与实际轴系状态不符的问题,进而可精确得到校中计算结果。3. Using this cycle iterative alignment method, considering the shortcomings of the finite element method and the traditional three-bending moment method in calculating the shaft alignment, the position value of the fulcrum of the stern bearing can be accurately obtained, which solves the subjective assumption in alignment calculation. The problem that the position of the fulcrum of the stern bearing does not match the actual state of the shaft system, and then the calculation result of the alignment can be accurately obtained.
在实际的推进轴系校中当中,对于尾轴承支点位置的选取通常是参考经验数据取值,但这种方式得到的尾轴承支点位置与实际情况并不一定相符,本发明提出的循环迭代的校中方法便可很好的解决这个问题,得到更符合实际的尾轴承支点位置。此外,随着现代船舶的发展,轴承长径比等因素的变化使得校中环境更加复杂,对于这个问题,本发明综合考虑了轴承长径比、轴颈转角和轴承内衬弹性模量对轴承支点位置的影响,使得在不同因素条件下对轴承支点位置的选取更加方便准确。In the actual alignment of the propulsion shaft system, the selection of the stern bearing fulcrum position is usually based on empirical data, but the stern bearing fulcrum position obtained in this way is not necessarily consistent with the actual situation. The alignment method can solve this problem very well, and get a more realistic fulcrum position of the stern bearing. In addition, with the development of modern ships, the change of the bearing aspect ratio and other factors makes the alignment environment more complicated. For this problem, the present invention comprehensively considers the bearing aspect ratio, the journal rotation angle and the bearing lining elastic modulus to the bearing. The influence of the fulcrum position makes the selection of the bearing fulcrum position more convenient and accurate under different factors.
以上仅为本发明的优选实施例,并非因此限制本发明的专利范围,凡是利用本发明说明书及附图内容所作的等效结构变换,或直接或间接运用在其他相关的技术领域,均同理包括在本发明的专利保护范围内。The above are only preferred embodiments of the present invention, and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention. Any equivalent structural transformation made by using the contents of the description and drawings of the present invention, or directly or indirectly applied in other related technical fields, are the same. Included in the scope of patent protection of the present invention.
Claims (6)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201911168541.4A CN110909420B (en) | 2019-11-25 | 2019-11-25 | Iterative calculation method for alignment of ship propulsion shafting considering bearing factors |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201911168541.4A CN110909420B (en) | 2019-11-25 | 2019-11-25 | Iterative calculation method for alignment of ship propulsion shafting considering bearing factors |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN110909420A CN110909420A (en) | 2020-03-24 |
CN110909420B true CN110909420B (en) | 2022-10-04 |
Family
ID=69819416
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201911168541.4A Active CN110909420B (en) | 2019-11-25 | 2019-11-25 | Iterative calculation method for alignment of ship propulsion shafting considering bearing factors |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN110909420B (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112861283B (en) * | 2021-02-20 | 2022-02-01 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | Method and system for calculating coupling characteristic of crankshaft and bearing |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2010143353A (en) * | 2008-12-18 | 2010-07-01 | Hitachi Zosen Corp | Method for evaluating shafting alignment in marine vessel |
JP2012006596A (en) * | 2011-10-07 | 2012-01-12 | Hitachi Zosen Corp | Method and device for evaluating shaft system alignment in ship |
CN103810305A (en) * | 2012-11-07 | 2014-05-21 | 中国舰船研究设计中心 | Alignment computing method of propeller shaft system of ship |
KR20170022095A (en) * | 2015-08-19 | 2017-03-02 | 대우조선해양 주식회사 | Thruster mounting method for ship and jig for determination of alignment thereof |
CN108920814A (en) * | 2018-06-28 | 2018-11-30 | 武汉理工大学 | Method is determined based on the reamer centering of shafting of marine shafting alignment calculation software |
-
2019
- 2019-11-25 CN CN201911168541.4A patent/CN110909420B/en active Active
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2010143353A (en) * | 2008-12-18 | 2010-07-01 | Hitachi Zosen Corp | Method for evaluating shafting alignment in marine vessel |
JP2012006596A (en) * | 2011-10-07 | 2012-01-12 | Hitachi Zosen Corp | Method and device for evaluating shaft system alignment in ship |
CN103810305A (en) * | 2012-11-07 | 2014-05-21 | 中国舰船研究设计中心 | Alignment computing method of propeller shaft system of ship |
KR20170022095A (en) * | 2015-08-19 | 2017-03-02 | 대우조선해양 주식회사 | Thruster mounting method for ship and jig for determination of alignment thereof |
CN108920814A (en) * | 2018-06-28 | 2018-11-30 | 武汉理工大学 | Method is determined based on the reamer centering of shafting of marine shafting alignment calculation software |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN110909420A (en) | 2020-03-24 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Nagtegaal et al. | Some computational aspects of elastic‐plastic large strain analysis | |
CN106446367A (en) | Arc length method nonlinear finite element analysis-based disc burst speed prediction method | |
CN101201284A (en) | Error compensation model and algorithm implementation of high-precision pressure sensor | |
CN110909420B (en) | Iterative calculation method for alignment of ship propulsion shafting considering bearing factors | |
CN105678015B (en) | A kind of Multidisciplinary systems pneumatic structure coupling optimum design method of hypersonic three-dimensional wing | |
CN109359330B (en) | A method and model for describing three stages of creep deformation of high temperature materials | |
CN113505506A (en) | Design method of wheel disc dangerous part crack propagation simulation piece | |
CN107992647A (en) | A kind of local parallel dimension chain error acquisition methods influenced by geometry | |
Zhang | Application of finite element analysis in structural analysis and computer simulation | |
CN108491640B (en) | A Multiaxial Fatigue Life Prediction Model | |
Lu et al. | A review of stochastic finite element and nonparametric modelling for ship propulsion shaft dynamic alignment | |
CN115758557A (en) | Method and device for calculating envelope space of blow-molded pipeline of intercooler of passenger car | |
CN112432746B (en) | Method for determining swing load coupling degree of helicopter blade | |
CN113806987A (en) | Multi-objective optimization design method for propulsion system and electronic equipment | |
CN111444644B (en) | Industrial robot complete machine rigidity optimization method based on finite element technology | |
CN109543249B (en) | Two-stage plane four-bar mechanism and parameter design method | |
CN102759505B (en) | Auxiliary device for compression test of plate material and determination method of flow stress curve | |
CN106932164B (en) | A Pneumatic Data Correction Method Based on Aerodynamic Derivative Identification Results | |
CN113534254B (en) | Frequency domain feedforward compensation method for seismic simulation vibration table based on power exponent method | |
CN115070731B (en) | A geometric error calibration method, system and electronic equipment for parallel mechanism | |
CN104699912A (en) | Strength calculation method of hub and spindle connecting bolt of wind generator set | |
CN111428190B (en) | Real-time hybrid simulation self-adaptive compensation method based on frequency domain evaluation index | |
CN107292047A (en) | A kind of complex panel thickness of the shell fast optimal design method based on maximum displacement | |
CN114638067A (en) | A Nonlinear Finite Element Modeling Method for Rubber Bearing Creep Analysis | |
CN111027145A (en) | Rigidity simulation method and device of bearing type opening cover in full-machine model |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |