CN110796901A - An air traffic situation risk hot spot identification method - Google Patents
An air traffic situation risk hot spot identification method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110796901A CN110796901A CN201911064956.7A CN201911064956A CN110796901A CN 110796901 A CN110796901 A CN 110796901A CN 201911064956 A CN201911064956 A CN 201911064956A CN 110796901 A CN110796901 A CN 110796901A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- aircraft
- risk
- air traffic
- traffic situation
- sub
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 22
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 15
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003936 working memory Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft
- G08G5/50—Navigation or guidance aids
- G08G5/56—Navigation or guidance aids for two or more aircraft
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0635—Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/40—Business processes related to the transportation industry
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
Abstract
本发明公开了一种空中交通态势风险热点识别方法,该方法共有四个步骤:首先采集航空器综合航迹航迹数据,获取空中交通态势中每一时刻的航空器信息;其次基于航空器间位置关系,建立空中交通态势网络;然后搜索网络模型中社团结构,形成初始热点子区域;最后对初始热点子区域进行验证、综合后形成空中交通态势风险热点。采用本方法可以自动识别空中交通态势中风险热点区域所相关的航空器,且占用资金较少,评估方法简单、快速、易用。
The invention discloses a method for identifying risk hotspots of air traffic situation. The method has four steps: firstly, the comprehensive track data of aircraft is collected, and the aircraft information at each moment in the air traffic situation is obtained; secondly, based on the positional relationship between the aircrafts, The air traffic situation network is established; then the community structure in the network model is searched to form the initial hotspot sub-region; finally, the initial hotspot sub-region is verified and synthesized to form the air traffic situation risk hotspot. By adopting the method, the aircrafts related to the risk hotspot areas in the air traffic situation can be automatically identified, and the funds are occupied less, and the evaluation method is simple, fast and easy to use.
Description
技术领域technical field
本发明涉及空中交通管理领域,特别涉及一种基于网络社团结构思想的空中交通态势风险热点识别方法。The invention relates to the field of air traffic management, in particular to an air traffic situation risk hot spot identification method based on the idea of network community structure.
背景技术Background technique
管制员在实际的空中交通管制工作中为了减小工作记忆的总量,经常会依据航空器距离其他航空器的空间间隔将航空器分成不同的风险程度。相互距离越近、越易发生冲突的航空器被认为是风险更大的航空器,并根据空间位置划分为不同的组。这种特殊的航空器组反映了空域中一些局部、高风险区域,也可称为风险热点区域。风险热点区域越多、规模越大、存在的时间越长,相应的空中交通态势风险程度更高。目前,管制员主要通过肉眼观察雷达屏幕,人工通过判断雷达屏幕上航空器之间的间隔来识别风险热点区域。这种人工识别方法效率低下,不但容易出错识别出错误热点,还增加了管制员的工作负荷,最终影响空中交通安全水平。因此,空中交通管理运行中,非常需要通过自动化系统实现风险热点区域的自动识别。In order to reduce the total amount of working memory in the actual air traffic control work, the controller often divides the aircraft into different risk levels according to the space distance between the aircraft and other aircraft. Aircraft that are closer to each other and more prone to collisions are considered more risky aircraft and are divided into different groups based on spatial location. This particular group of aircraft reflects some localized, high-risk areas in the airspace, also known as risk hotspots. The more risk hotspots, the larger the scale and the longer the existence time, the higher the corresponding air traffic situation risk. At present, the controller mainly observes the radar screen with the naked eye, and manually identifies the risk hotspot by judging the distance between the aircraft on the radar screen. This manual identification method is inefficient, and it is not only easy to identify wrong hot spots, but also increases the workload of the controller, which ultimately affects the level of air traffic safety. Therefore, in the operation of air traffic management, it is very necessary to realize automatic identification of risk hotspots through automated systems.
发明内容SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
针对当前缺乏空中交通态势风险热点自动识别方法的现状,本发明提出一种空中交通态势风险热点识别方法,实现了空中交通态势中风险热点区域的自动识别。Aiming at the current lack of an automatic identification method for air traffic situation risk hotspots, the present invention proposes a method for identifying risk hotspots in air traffic situations, which realizes automatic identification of risk hotspots in air traffic situations.
该方法共有四个步骤:首先采集航空器综合航迹航迹数据,获取空中交通态势中每一时刻的航空器信息;其次基于航空器间位置关系,建立空中交通态势网络;然后搜索网络模型中社团结构,形成初始热点子区域;最后对初始热点子区域进行验证,综合形成空中交通态势风险热点。The method consists of four steps: first, collect the comprehensive track data of the aircraft, and obtain the aircraft information at each moment in the air traffic situation; secondly, based on the positional relationship between the aircraft, establish the air traffic situation network; then search for the community structure in the network model, The initial hotspot sub-area is formed; finally, the initial hotspot sub-area is verified to comprehensively form the air traffic situation risk hotspot.
本发明采取的技术方案是:一种空中交通态势风险热点识别方法,该方法通过计算机系统辅助实现,所述计算机系统主要由客户端/服务器构成,其特征在于,步骤如下:The technical scheme adopted by the present invention is: a method for identifying air traffic situation risk hotspots, the method is assisted by a computer system, and the computer system is mainly composed of a client/server, and is characterized in that the steps are as follows:
步骤1、引接并处理航空器航迹数据:根据原始数据发送频率,实时接收航空器综合航迹数据,包括每一时刻航空器的经度、纬度、高度、速度、航向信息;Step 1. Lead and process the aircraft track data: According to the original data transmission frequency, receive the aircraft comprehensive track data in real time, including the aircraft's longitude, latitude, altitude, speed, and heading information at each moment;
步骤2、根据步骤1的结果建立空中交通态势网络模型:首先设定水平距离阈值为S1,垂直距离阈值为S2,在每一时刻,以航空器为节点,航空器间的空间位置关系用边来表示,构建网络模型;设当前时刻为t, 该时刻空中交通态势中航空器总数为n,计算所有航空器之间的空间距离,生成n×n的航空器水平距离矩阵D1、垂直距离矩阵D2以及该时刻空中交通态势所对应的网络的邻接矩阵A,若两架航空器的水平距离小于等于S1且垂直距离小于S2,即航空器i、航空器j 间存在接近关系,则a i,j =1,否则a i,j =0,以a i,j 为邻接矩阵A的元素,即可建立t 时刻的空中交通态势网络模型;Step 2. Establish an air traffic situation network model according to the results of Step 1: first, set the horizontal distance threshold as S1 and the vertical distance threshold as S2. At each moment, take the aircraft as a node, and the spatial position relationship between the aircraft is represented by edges , build a network model; set the current moment as t , the total number of aircraft in the air traffic situation at this moment is n , calculate the spatial distance between all aircraft, and generate n × n aircraft horizontal distance matrix D1, vertical distance matrix D2 and the air The adjacency matrix A of the network corresponding to the traffic situation, if the horizontal distance between two aircraft is less than or equal to S1 and the vertical distance is less than S2, that is, there is a close relationship between aircraft i and aircraft j , then a i,j = 1, otherwise a i, j = 0, taking a i, j as the elements of the adjacency matrix A, the air traffic situation network model at time t can be established;
步骤3、搜索每一时刻网络模型中社团结构,形成初始风险热点子区域:首先生成1×n的访问标记数组Flag,该标记数组中每个元素的初值为0,后续过程可细分为如下步骤:Step 3. Search the community structure in the network model at each moment to form the initial risk hotspot sub-region: First generate a 1× n access tag array Flag, the initial value of each element in the tag array is 0, and the subsequent process can be subdivided into Follow the steps below:
步骤3.1 在邻接矩阵A中搜索一个顶点V i 满足Flag(i)=0,若搜索失败,即所有航空器都被访问,则转至步骤4,否则设置Flag(i)=1,以节点V i 为起始点搜索建立初始风险热点,标记为C;Step 3.1 Search for a vertex V i in the adjacency matrix A that satisfies Flag( i )=0. If the search fails, that is, all aircraft are visited, go to step 4, otherwise set Flag( i )=1, and take the node V i Establish an initial risk hotspot for the starting point search, labeled C ;
步骤3.2 如果对于所有顶点V j (0<j, j≤n, j≠i) 都有a i,j =0,即该航空器节点没有邻接航空器,则返回步骤3.1重新选取新的节点,否则继续;Step 3.2 If there is a i,j = 0 for all vertices V j (0<j, j≤n, j≠i), that is, the aircraft node has no adjacent aircraft, then go back to step 3.1 to reselect a new node, otherwise continue ;
步骤3.3 创建新的风险热点子区域,标记为c,初始值c={V i };Step 3.3 Create a new risk hotspot sub-region, marked as c , with initial value c ={ V i };
步骤3.4 搜索节点V i 所有未被访问的邻接航空器集合V ’={V ’ i,...,V ’ j },更新风险热点子区域c=c∪V ’,设置相应节点的访问标记为1;Step 3.4 Search all unvisited adjacent aircraft sets V ' = { V ' i ,..., V ' j } of node V i , update the risk hotspot sub-region c = c ∪ V ' , and set the visit mark of the corresponding node as 1;
步骤3.5 搜索V ’中所有未被访问航空器的邻接航空器集合V ’’= {V ’’ i , ..., V ’’ j },更新风险热点子区域c=c∪V ’’,设置相应节点的访问标记为1,递归搜索,最终生成第k个风险热点子区域c k =c,返回步骤3.1;Step 3.5 Search all the adjacent aircraft sets V ' ' = { V '' i , ..., V '' j } in V ', update the risk hotspot sub-region c = c ∪ V '' , set the corresponding The access mark of the node is 1, and the recursive search is performed to finally generate the kth risk hotspot sub-region ck = c , and return to step 3.1;
步骤4 对初始热点子区域进行验证形成空中交通态势热点:首先删除节点数量小于3的初始风险热点子区域,进一步将这些初始风险热点子区域进行综合,则构建出t 时刻空中交通态势中的风险热点C(t),即C(t) = {c(t)1, c(t)2,..., c(t) i ,...,c(t) k } ,其中c(t) i 是C(t) 中第i 个风险热点子区域。Step 4 Verify the initial hotspot sub-regions to form air traffic situation hotspots: first delete the initial risk hotspot sub-regions with the number of nodes less than 3, and further integrate these initial risk hotspot sub-regions to construct the risk in the air traffic situation at time t Hot spot C ( t ), i.e. C ( t ) = { c ( t ) 1 , c ( t ) 2 ,..., c ( t ) i ,..., c ( t ) k } , where c ( t ) ) i is the ith risk hotspot sub-region in C ( t ).
本发明产生的有益效果是:采用基于网络社团结构思想的空中交通态势风险热点识别方法,可以自动、快速识别空中交通态势中风险热点区域所相关的航空器,单个扇区内风险热点识别时长小于2秒,该方法不受人为因素影响,能够有效减小管制员人工判断这些风险热点区域所带来的工作负荷,不额外增加管制员工作负荷,且占用资金较少,评估方法简单、快速、易用,评估结果易于理解,从而提高航空运输安全水平。The beneficial effects of the invention are: adopting the air traffic situation risk hot spot identification method based on the network community structure idea, can automatically and quickly identify the aircraft related to the risk hot spot area in the air traffic situation, and the risk hot spot identification time in a single sector is less than 2 Second, this method is not affected by human factors, and can effectively reduce the workload caused by the controller's manual judgment of these risk hotspots, does not increase the controller's workload, and occupies less funds, and the evaluation method is simple, fast and easy. The evaluation results are easy to understand, thereby improving the level of air transport safety.
附图说明Description of drawings
图1为本发明的基本步骤流程;Fig. 1 is the basic step process flow of the present invention;
图2为本发明空中交通态势中风险热点示意图。FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of risk hot spots in the air traffic situation of the present invention.
具体实施方式Detailed ways
以下结合附图及实施例对本发明做进一步说明。The present invention will be further described below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments.
一种空中交通态势风险热点识别方法,共包括以下具体步骤,如图1所示:An air traffic situation risk hot spot identification method includes the following specific steps, as shown in Figure 1:
步骤1、引接并处理航空器航迹数据:根据原始数据发送频率,实时接收航空器综合航迹数据,包括每一时刻空域中所有航空器的经度、纬度、高度、速度、航向信息;Step 1. Lead and process aircraft track data: According to the transmission frequency of the original data, receive the aircraft comprehensive track data in real time, including the longitude, latitude, altitude, speed and heading information of all aircraft in the airspace at each moment;
步骤2、根据步骤1的结果建立空中交通态势网络模型:首先设定水平距离阈值为S1,垂直距离阈值为S2。在每一时刻,以航空器为节点,航空器间的空间位置关系用边来表示,构建网络模型。设当前时刻为t, 该时刻空中交通态势中航空器总数为n,计算所有航空器之间的空间距离,生成n×n的航空器水平距离矩阵D1、垂直距离矩阵D2以及该时刻空中交通态势所对应的网络的邻接矩阵A。若两架航空器的水平距离小于等于S1且垂直距离小于S2,即航空器i、航空器j 间存在接近关系,则a i,j =1,否则a i,j =0。进一步以a i,j 为邻接矩阵A的元素,即可建立t 时刻的空中交通态势网络模型。举例:如果设定水平距离阈值S1=20千米,垂直距离阈值S2=600米,航空器i、航空器j 之间的水平距离为15千米且垂直距离为500米,则航空器i和航空器j 之间存在接近关系,即a i,j =1;如果航空器i和航空器j 之间的水平距离为15千米且垂直距离为1000米,则航空器i和航空器j 之间不存在接近关系,即a i,j =0。实际应用时,可对民航局发布的间隔标准进行适当放大后设定。Step 2. Establish an air traffic situation network model according to the results of Step 1: first, set the horizontal distance threshold as S1 and the vertical distance threshold as S2. At each moment, taking the aircraft as a node, the spatial positional relationship between the aircraft is represented by an edge, and a network model is constructed. Let the current time be t , the total number of aircraft in the air traffic situation at this time is n , calculate the spatial distance between all aircraft, and generate n × n aircraft horizontal distance matrix D1, vertical distance matrix D2 and the corresponding air traffic situation at this moment. The adjacency matrix A of the network. If the horizontal distance between the two aircraft is less than or equal to S1 and the vertical distance is less than S2, that is, there is a close relationship between aircraft i and aircraft j , then a i,j = 1, otherwise a i,j = 0. Further, taking a i,j as the elements of the adjacency matrix A, the air traffic situation network model at time t can be established. Example: If the horizontal distance threshold S1=20 kilometers, the vertical distance threshold S2=600 meters, the horizontal distance between aircraft i and aircraft j is 15 kilometers and the vertical distance is 500 meters, then the distance between aircraft i and aircraft j is 500 meters. There is a proximity relationship between aircraft i , j = 1; if the horizontal distance between aircraft i and aircraft j is 15 kilometers and the vertical distance is 1000 meters, there is no proximity relationship between aircraft i and aircraft j , that is, a i,j = 0. In practical application, the interval standard issued by the Civil Aviation Administration can be appropriately enlarged and set.
步骤3、搜索每一时刻网络模型中社团结构,形成初始风险热点子区域:首先生成1×n的访问标记数组Flag,该标记数组中每个元素的初值为0,后续过程可细分为如下步骤:Step 3. Search the community structure in the network model at each moment to form the initial risk hotspot sub-region: First generate a 1× n access tag array Flag, the initial value of each element in the tag array is 0, and the subsequent process can be subdivided into Follow the steps below:
步骤3.1 在邻接矩阵A中搜索一个顶点V i 满足Flag(i)=0。若搜索失败,即所有航空器都被访问,则转至步骤4。否则设置Flag(i)=1,以节点V i 为起始点搜索建立初始风险热点,标记为C。Step 3.1 Search for a vertex V i in the adjacency matrix A to satisfy Flag( i )=0. If the search fails, ie all aircraft are visited, go to step 4. Otherwise, set Flag( i )= 1 , and take the node Vi as the starting point to search and establish the initial risk hot spot, marked as C .
步骤3.2 如果对于所有顶点V j (0<j, j≤n, j≠i) 都有a i,j =0,即该航空器节点没有邻接航空器,则返回步骤3.1重新选取新的节点,否则继续。Step 3.2 If there is a i,j = 0 for all vertices V j (0<j, j≤n, j≠i), that is, the aircraft node has no adjacent aircraft, then go back to step 3.1 to reselect a new node, otherwise continue .
步骤3.3 创建新的风险热点子区域,标记为c,初始值c={V i }。Step 3.3 Create a new risk hotspot sub-region, labeled c , with initial value c = { V i }.
步骤3.4 搜索节点V i 所有未被访问的邻接航空器集合V ’={V ’ i,...,V ’ j },更新风险热点子区域c=c∪V ’,设置相应节点的访问标记为1。Step 3.4 Search all unvisited adjacent aircraft sets V ' = { V ' i ,..., V ' j } of node V i , update the risk hotspot sub-region c = c ∪ V ' , and set the visit mark of the corresponding node as 1.
步骤3.5 搜索V ’中所有未被访问航空器的邻接航空器集合V ’’= {V ’’ i , ..., V ’’ j },更新风险热点子区域c=c∪V ’’,设置相应节点的访问标记为1,递归搜索,最终生成第k个风险热点子区域c k =c,返回步骤3.1。Step 3.5 Search all the adjacent aircraft sets V ' ' = { V '' i , ..., V '' j } in V ', update the risk hotspot sub-region c = c ∪ V '' , set the corresponding The access of the node is marked as 1, recursively search, and finally generate the kth risk hotspot sub-region ck = c , and return to step 3.1 .
步骤4 对初始热点子区域进行验证形成空中交通态势热点:首先删除节点数量小于3的初始风险热点子区域;进一步将这些初始风险热点子区域进行综合,则构建出t 时刻空中交通态势中的风险热点C(t),即C(t) = {c(t)1, c(t)2,..., c(t) i ,...,c(t) k } ,其中 c(t) i 是C(t) 中第i 个风险热点子区域。Step 4 Verify the initial hotspot sub-regions to form air traffic situation hotspots: first delete the initial risk hotspot sub-regions with the number of nodes less than 3; further integrate these initial risk hotspot sub-regions to construct the risk in the air traffic situation at time t Hot spot C ( t ), i.e. C ( t ) = { c ( t ) 1 , c ( t ) 2 ,..., c ( t ) i ,..., c ( t ) k } , where c ( t ) ) i is the ith risk hotspot sub-region in C ( t ).
图2给出了某时刻空中交通态势风险热点自动识别结果示意图,该空中交通态势有10架航空器,映射的网络模型中有10个节点。设水平距离阈值S1=20千米,垂直距离阈值S2=600米,计算节点之间的水平距离和垂直距离,并与S1和S2进行比较。该态势中的风险热点包括两个热点子区域,记为风险热点子区域1和风险热点子区域2。风险热点子区域1中包括N3、N5、N6三个节点,分别对应P3、P5、P6三架航空器,N3与N5、N3与N6、N5与N6的水平距离分别为18、14、12,垂直距离分别为300、300、0。风险热点子区域2中包括N8、N9、N10三个节点,分别对应P8、P9、P10三架航空器,N8与N9、N8与N10、N9与N10的水平距离分别为17、11、10,垂直距离分别为400、100、500。该态势中其他4个航空器N1、N2、N4、N7则不属于风险热点。Figure 2 shows a schematic diagram of the automatic identification results of air traffic situation risk hotspots at a certain time. There are 10 aircraft in this air traffic situation, and there are 10 nodes in the mapped network model. Set the horizontal distance threshold S1 = 20 kilometers, the vertical distance threshold S2 = 600 meters, calculate the horizontal distance and vertical distance between nodes, and compare with S1 and S2. The risk hotspots in this situation include two hotspot sub-areas, denoted as risk hotspot sub-area 1 and risk hotspot sub-area 2. Risk hotspot sub-area 1 includes three nodes N3, N5, and N6, corresponding to three aircrafts P3, P5, and P6 respectively. The horizontal distances between N3 and N5, N3 and N6, and N5 and N6 are The distances are 300, 300, 0, respectively. The risk hotspot sub-area 2 includes three nodes N8, N9, and N10, corresponding to the three aircrafts P8, P9, and P10 respectively. The horizontal distances between N8 and N9, N8 and N10, and N9 and N10 are The distances are 400, 100, 500 respectively. The other four aircraft N1, N2, N4, and N7 in this situation are not risk hotspots.
Claims (1)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201911064956.7A CN110796901A (en) | 2019-11-04 | 2019-11-04 | An air traffic situation risk hot spot identification method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201911064956.7A CN110796901A (en) | 2019-11-04 | 2019-11-04 | An air traffic situation risk hot spot identification method |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN110796901A true CN110796901A (en) | 2020-02-14 |
Family
ID=69442565
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201911064956.7A Pending CN110796901A (en) | 2019-11-04 | 2019-11-04 | An air traffic situation risk hot spot identification method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN110796901A (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN111951613A (en) * | 2020-07-24 | 2020-11-17 | 北京航空航天大学 | Wide-area airspace security situation assessment method based on air-ground coordination |
CN114124461A (en) * | 2021-10-26 | 2022-03-01 | 南京航空航天大学 | Air traffic risk hot spot identification method, key aircraft identification method and system |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN106357461A (en) * | 2016-11-04 | 2017-01-25 | 中国民航大学 | Measuring method for air traffic display complexity |
CN106548661A (en) * | 2016-11-29 | 2017-03-29 | 中国人民解放军国防科学技术大学 | A kind of aerial avoiding collision based on status predication |
CN106777875A (en) * | 2016-11-18 | 2017-05-31 | 中国民航大学 | A kind of air traffic Complexity Measurement method based on double-deck multistage network model |
CN106846919A (en) * | 2017-01-16 | 2017-06-13 | 南京航空航天大学 | A kind of four-dimensional dynamic track prediction method based on ADS B information updatings |
CN106997693A (en) * | 2017-04-14 | 2017-08-01 | 四川九洲空管科技有限责任公司 | A kind of aircraft anticollision proof of algorithm method of testing and system |
CN108122434A (en) * | 2017-12-19 | 2018-06-05 | 四川航空股份有限公司 | A kind of flight monitoring method and device |
US20180225976A1 (en) * | 2017-02-06 | 2018-08-09 | Architecture Technology Corporation | Automated real-time clearance analysis for air traffic |
CN109887341A (en) * | 2019-03-01 | 2019-06-14 | 中国民航大学 | A Fast Detection Method of Flight Conflict Based on Adjacent Grid |
-
2019
- 2019-11-04 CN CN201911064956.7A patent/CN110796901A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN106357461A (en) * | 2016-11-04 | 2017-01-25 | 中国民航大学 | Measuring method for air traffic display complexity |
CN106777875A (en) * | 2016-11-18 | 2017-05-31 | 中国民航大学 | A kind of air traffic Complexity Measurement method based on double-deck multistage network model |
CN106548661A (en) * | 2016-11-29 | 2017-03-29 | 中国人民解放军国防科学技术大学 | A kind of aerial avoiding collision based on status predication |
CN106846919A (en) * | 2017-01-16 | 2017-06-13 | 南京航空航天大学 | A kind of four-dimensional dynamic track prediction method based on ADS B information updatings |
US20180225976A1 (en) * | 2017-02-06 | 2018-08-09 | Architecture Technology Corporation | Automated real-time clearance analysis for air traffic |
CN106997693A (en) * | 2017-04-14 | 2017-08-01 | 四川九洲空管科技有限责任公司 | A kind of aircraft anticollision proof of algorithm method of testing and system |
CN108122434A (en) * | 2017-12-19 | 2018-06-05 | 四川航空股份有限公司 | A kind of flight monitoring method and device |
CN109887341A (en) * | 2019-03-01 | 2019-06-14 | 中国民航大学 | A Fast Detection Method of Flight Conflict Based on Adjacent Grid |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
HONGYONG WANG 等: "Empirical analysis of aircraft clusters in air traffic situation networks", 《PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS》 * |
王红勇 等: "基于复杂网络的空中交通态势风险评估方法", 《中国安全科学学报》 * |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN111951613A (en) * | 2020-07-24 | 2020-11-17 | 北京航空航天大学 | Wide-area airspace security situation assessment method based on air-ground coordination |
CN111951613B (en) * | 2020-07-24 | 2021-08-31 | 北京航空航天大学 | Wide-area airspace security situation assessment method based on air-ground coordination |
CN114124461A (en) * | 2021-10-26 | 2022-03-01 | 南京航空航天大学 | Air traffic risk hot spot identification method, key aircraft identification method and system |
CN114124461B (en) * | 2021-10-26 | 2022-08-19 | 南京航空航天大学 | Air traffic risk hot spot identification method, key aircraft identification method and system |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
KR102273559B1 (en) | Method, apparatus, and computer readable storage medium for updating electronic map | |
US11481666B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for acquiring information | |
JP6850325B2 (en) | Obstacle distribution simulation methods, devices, terminals, storage media, and programs based on probability plots | |
CN113473398B (en) | Mobile phone signaling data stop point identification method, device and storage medium | |
CN114445565B (en) | Data processing method, device, electronic device and computer readable medium | |
CN110796901A (en) | An air traffic situation risk hot spot identification method | |
KR20190143832A (en) | Method for testing air traffic management electronic system, associated electronic device and platform | |
CN113139258A (en) | Road data processing method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
CN107659978B (en) | Method and apparatus for identifying wireless access point | |
CN109189304A (en) | A kind of map edit method and device | |
CN111653115B (en) | Task dividing method and device and storage medium | |
CN117765708A (en) | Slope instability prediction method and device based on map image analysis technology | |
CN116050775A (en) | Method, device, processor and readable storage medium for realizing patrol, prevention and control garrison route design based on spatial kernel density algorithm | |
CN110569546A (en) | Traffic cell division method and device | |
KR102467860B1 (en) | A computer program for performing a method of diagnosing the safety of a facility stored in a computer-readable recording medium and a facility safety diagnosis system using the same | |
JP7232727B2 (en) | Map data management device and map data management method | |
CN114252869B (en) | Multi-base-station cooperative sensing method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
CN115979299A (en) | Accuracy checking method and device based on map data conversion | |
CN117135741A (en) | Building positioning methods, devices, electronic equipment and storage media | |
CN113987098A (en) | High-precision map road boundary updating method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
CN112729302A (en) | Navigation method and device for inspection robot, inspection robot and storage medium | |
CN114124461B (en) | Air traffic risk hot spot identification method, key aircraft identification method and system | |
CN118885632B (en) | A method for updating urban physical areas based on ArcGIS platform | |
EP4242590A1 (en) | Map verification method and related apparatus | |
US11928978B2 (en) | Airport mapping database using a node-edge network of geospatial objects |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication | ||
WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20200214 |