CN110766472A - Evaluation method for construction engineering cost operation - Google Patents
Evaluation method for construction engineering cost operation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110766472A CN110766472A CN201911039704.9A CN201911039704A CN110766472A CN 110766472 A CN110766472 A CN 110766472A CN 201911039704 A CN201911039704 A CN 201911039704A CN 110766472 A CN110766472 A CN 110766472A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- unit
- module
- drawings
- evaluation
- construction
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0201—Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
- G06Q30/0206—Price or cost determination based on market factors
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/08—Construction
Abstract
The invention discloses an evaluation method for construction cost calculation of building engineering, and particularly relates to the field of construction cost calculation. The invention analyzes the drawings and the parameters by finding the same module and the difference module, finds out the drawings of the same part and the drawings of different parts, equally divides the drawings of the same part into a plurality of parts, extracts one part of the drawings and the drawings of different parts to carry out parallel evaluation, then multiplies the evaluation result of the extracted part by the number of parts and combines the evaluation results of the drawings of different parts to output the total cost evaluation, and the invention can effectively improve the evaluation speed integrally.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of engineering cost operation, in particular to an evaluation method for construction engineering cost operation.
Background
The engineering cost is one of the main bases for evaluating the rationality and investment benefits of total investment and subentry investment, and when evaluating the rationality of land price, building installation products and equipment price, the engineering cost data must be utilized, and when evaluating the repayment capacity, profit-making capacity and macroscopic benefits of construction projects, the engineering cost is also the important basis for evaluating the management level and operational achievement of building installation enterprises.
In the prior art, construction drawings used for construction engineering cost calculation are large, so that cost calculation evaluation efficiency is low.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to overcome the above defects in the prior art, embodiments of the present invention provide an evaluation method for construction cost calculation, in which a drawing and parameters are analyzed by finding a same module and a difference module, a drawing of the same part and a drawing of different parts are found, the drawing of the same part is divided into multiple parts, one part of the drawing and the drawing of different parts are extracted for parallel evaluation, and then the evaluation result of the extracted part is multiplied by the number of parts and combined with the evaluation results of the drawings of different parts to output an overall cost evaluation.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention provides the following technical scheme: an evaluation method for construction engineering cost operation comprises a central processing module, wherein a construction drawing importing module and a parameter importing module are arranged at the input end of the central processing module, a finding module and a difference module are arranged at the connecting end of the central processing module, a cost evaluation module is arranged at the connecting end of the finding module and the difference module, a report generation module is arranged at the connecting end of the cost evaluation module, a model uploading module is arranged at the output end of the central processing module, a model building module is further arranged at the connecting end of the central processing module, the central processing module comprises a central processing unit, the construction drawing importing module comprises a structure construction drawing importing unit, an equipment construction drawing importing unit and a construction drawing importing unit, the parameter importing module comprises a parameter importing unit, the finding module comprises a finding unit, and the difference module comprises a difference unit, the construction cost evaluation module comprises a construction cost evaluation unit, the report generation module comprises a report generation unit, the model uploading module comprises a model uploading unit and a server, and the model establishing module comprises a model establishing unit and a data labeling unit;
further comprising the steps of:
step one, importing parameters;
importing parameter data required by the project cost evaluation into a system;
step two, importing a construction drawing;
importing the corresponding structure construction drawing, equipment construction drawing and building construction drawing into a system, and combining three different drawings into a comprehensive drawing;
step three, analyzing parameters and a construction drawing;
analyzing the construction drawing and the parameters led into the system, finding out parts with the same structure and parts with different structures, and binding the corresponding parameters with drawings of the structures of all the parts;
step four, evaluating the manufacturing cost;
processing the drawings with the parameters bound in the third step, extracting one drawing from the drawings with the same structure, simultaneously carrying out parallel evaluation on the drawings with different structures and the one drawing, multiplying the evaluation result of the independently extracted drawing by the number of parts, and outputting the total cost evaluation;
step five, generating a report;
generating a cost evaluation report according to the cost evaluation output in the step four;
step six, generating a model;
firstly, establishing a three-dimensional model according to the three imported construction drawings, and then labeling the structural layers of all the layers according to the cost evaluation result output in the fourth step;
step seven, uploading the model;
and uploading the model generated in the step six to a server for storage.
In a preferred embodiment, the step one is specifically to import the parameter data required for the engineering cost evaluation into the central processing unit through the parameter import unit, and simplify and process the parameter data.
In a preferred embodiment, the second step is to import the structure construction drawing through the structure construction drawing import unit, import the equipment construction drawing through the equipment construction drawing import unit, import the building construction drawing through the building construction drawing import unit, compare the elevation and the size of the structure construction drawing and the building construction drawing, and combine the three different drawings into a comprehensive drawing having information of the structure drawing, the building drawing and the equipment drawing at the same time after keeping consistency.
In a preferred embodiment, the third step is to analyze the synthetic drawing in the second step and the parameters imported in the first step by using the finding unit and the difference unit, find and classify parts with the same structure and parts with different structures on the synthetic drawing, and then bind the corresponding parameters and drawings of structures of the parts together.
In a preferred embodiment, the fourth step is to process the drawings with the parameters bundled in the third step by a cost evaluation unit, divide part of the drawings with the same structure into a plurality of parts, each part of the drawings has the same structure and parameters, extract one part of the drawings from the plurality of parts of the drawings, evaluate the drawings with different structures and the one part of the drawings in parallel, multiply the evaluation result of the independently extracted drawings by the number of parts, and output the total cost evaluation.
In a preferred embodiment, the fifth step is specifically that a cost evaluation report is generated by the report generation unit according to the cost evaluation result output in the fourth step, and the generated cost evaluation report is divided into three types of evaluation results, namely a bottom layer evaluation result, a standard layer evaluation result and a top layer evaluation result.
In a preferred embodiment, the sixth step is specifically that a three-dimensional model is established by the model establishing unit according to the three imported construction drawings, and then the bottom layer, the standard layer and the top layer are respectively labeled by the data labeling unit according to the cost evaluation results output in the fourth step, so that parameters and evaluation result data can be simultaneously viewed on the three-dimensional model.
In a preferred embodiment, the seventh step is specifically to upload the model generated in the sixth step to a server for storage through a model uploading unit.
The invention has the technical effects and advantages that:
1. the method analyzes the drawings and the parameters by finding the same module and the difference module, finds out the drawings of the same part and the drawings of different parts, equally divides the drawings of the same part into a plurality of parts, extracts one part of the drawings and the drawings of different parts to carry out parallel evaluation, then multiplies the evaluation result of the extracted part by the number of parts and combines the evaluation results of the drawings of different parts to output the overall cost evaluation, so that the method can effectively improve the evaluation rate as a whole, and has higher evaluation efficiency compared with the prior art;
2. according to the invention, a three-dimensional model is established through the model establishing unit, and then the evaluation results of the bottom layer, the standard layer and the top layer of the three-dimensional model are respectively marked through the data marking unit according to the cost evaluation results output in the fourth step, so that a user can directly check parameters and evaluation result data on the three-dimensional model at the same time, and the evaluation results are combined with the three-dimensional model, and compared with the prior art, the expression is more visual;
3. according to the method, the model generated in the step six is uploaded to the server through the model uploading unit, so that the imported parameters, the model, the drawing and the evaluation result can be stored at the same time, single data can be effectively prevented from being lost, data safety is improved, and the method is safer compared with the prior art.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of the system of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a block diagram of the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a flow chart of the method of the present invention.
The reference signs are: the system comprises a central processing module 1, a construction drawing importing module 2, a parameter importing module 3, a common finding module 4, a difference module 5, a construction cost evaluating module 6, a report generating module 7, a model uploading module 8, a model establishing module 9, a central processing unit 10, a structure construction drawing importing unit 11, an equipment construction drawing importing unit 12, a building construction drawing importing unit 13, a parameter importing unit 14, a common finding unit 15, a difference unit 16, a construction cost evaluating unit 17, a report generating unit 18, a model uploading unit 19, a server 20, a model establishing unit 21 and a data labeling unit 22.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
The method for evaluating construction cost of building engineering shown in fig. 1-3 comprises a central processing module 1, wherein the input end of the central processing module 1 is provided with a construction drawing importing module 2 and a parameter importing module 3, the connecting end of the central processing module 1 is provided with a finding module 4 and a difference module 5, the connecting end of the finding module 4 and the difference module 5 is provided with a construction cost evaluating module 6, the connecting end of the construction cost evaluating module 6 is provided with a report generating module 7, the central processing module 1 comprises a central processing unit 10, the construction drawing importing module 2 comprises a structure construction drawing importing unit 11, an equipment construction drawing importing unit 12 and a construction drawing importing unit 13, the parameter importing module 3 comprises a parameter importing unit 14, the finding module 4 comprises a finding unit 15, and the difference module 5 comprises a difference unit 16, the construction cost evaluation module 6 comprises a construction cost evaluation unit 17, and the report generation module 7 comprises a report generation unit 18;
further comprising the steps of:
step one, importing parameters;
importing parameter data required by the project cost evaluation into a system;
the first step is specifically that parameter data required for engineering cost evaluation is imported into the central processing unit 10 through the parameter import unit 14, and the parameter data is simplified and processed;
step two, importing a construction drawing;
importing the corresponding structure construction drawing, equipment construction drawing and building construction drawing into a system, and combining three different drawings into a comprehensive drawing;
the second step is specifically that a structure construction drawing is guided in through a structure construction drawing guiding-in unit 11, an equipment construction drawing is guided in through an equipment construction drawing guiding-in unit 12, a building construction drawing is guided in through a building construction drawing guiding-in unit 13, then the elevation and the size of the structure construction drawing and the building construction drawing are compared, and after the difference is kept, three different drawings are combined into a comprehensive drawing which simultaneously has a structure drawing, a building drawing and equipment drawing information;
step three, analyzing parameters and a construction drawing;
analyzing the construction drawing and the parameters led into the system, finding out parts with the same structure and parts with different structures, and binding the corresponding parameters with drawings of the structures of all the parts;
step three is specifically to analyze the comprehensive drawing in step two and the parameters imported in step one through a finding unit 15 and a difference unit 16, find and classify parts with the same structure and parts with different structures on the comprehensive drawing, and then bind the corresponding parameters and the drawings of the structures of the parts together;
step four, evaluating the manufacturing cost;
processing the drawings with the parameters bound in the third step, extracting one drawing from the drawings with the same structure, simultaneously carrying out parallel evaluation on the drawings with different structures and the one drawing, multiplying the evaluation result of the independently extracted drawing by the number of parts, and outputting the total cost evaluation;
the fourth step is specifically that the drawings with the parameters after being bundled in the third step are processed through a cost evaluation unit 17, then part of the drawings with the same structure are equally divided into a plurality of parts, the structure and the parameters of each part of the drawings are identical, then one part of the drawings is extracted from the plurality of parts of the drawings, meanwhile, the drawings with different structures and the one part of the drawings are evaluated in parallel, then the evaluation result of the independently extracted drawings is multiplied by the number of parts, and the total cost evaluation is output;
step five, generating a report;
generating a cost evaluation report according to the cost evaluation output in the step four;
the fifth step is specifically that a cost evaluation report is generated by the report generation unit 18 according to the cost evaluation result output in the fourth step, and the generated cost evaluation report is divided into three types of evaluation results of a bottom layer, a standard layer and a top layer.
The implementation mode is specifically as follows: when the method is used, firstly, parameter data required by engineering cost evaluation is imported into a central processing unit 10 through a parameter import unit 14, the parameter data is simplified and processed, then, a structure construction drawing, an equipment construction drawing and a building construction drawing are respectively imported through a structure construction drawing import unit 11, an equipment construction drawing import unit 12 and a building construction drawing import unit 13, then, the elevation and the size of the structure construction drawing and the building construction drawing are compared, after the consistency is kept, three different drawings are combined into a comprehensive drawing simultaneously provided with structure drawing, building drawing and equipment drawing information, the comprehensive drawing in the second step and the parameters imported in the first step are analyzed through a finding unit 15 and a difference unit 16, the parts with the same structure and the parts with different structures are found on the comprehensive drawing, and then, corresponding parameters are bound with the drawings of the structures of all the parts, the method comprises the steps of processing bundled drawings with parameters through a cost evaluation unit 17, dividing part of drawings with the same structure into a plurality of parts, wherein the structure and the parameters of each part of drawing are the same, extracting one part of drawing from the plurality of parts of drawing, simultaneously carrying out parallel evaluation on drawings with different structures and the one part of drawing, multiplying the evaluation result of the independently extracted drawing by the number of parts, outputting the total cost evaluation, generating a cost evaluation report through a report generation unit 18 according to the cost evaluation result output in the fourth step, and dividing the generated cost evaluation report into a bottom layer evaluation result, a standard layer evaluation result and a top layer evaluation result.
According to the evaluation method for the construction cost calculation shown in fig. 1-3, the method further comprises a model building module 9, wherein the model building module 9 comprises a model building unit 21 and a data labeling unit 22;
step six, generating a model;
firstly, establishing a three-dimensional model according to the three imported construction drawings, and then labeling the structural layers of all the layers according to the cost evaluation result output in the fourth step;
the sixth step is specifically that a three-dimensional model is established through the model establishing unit 21 according to the three imported construction drawings, then the bottom layer, the standard layer and the top layer are respectively marked through the data marking unit 22 according to the cost evaluation results output in the fourth step, and parameters and evaluation result data can be simultaneously viewed on the three-dimensional model.
The implementation mode is specifically as follows: when the method is used, a three-dimensional model is established through the model establishing unit 21 according to the imported structure construction drawing, the equipment construction drawing and the building construction drawing, then the evaluation results of the bottom layer, the standard layer and the top layer of the three-dimensional model are respectively marked through the data marking unit 22 according to the cost evaluation result output in the step four, so that a user can directly check parameters and evaluation result data on the three-dimensional model at the same time, the evaluation result is combined with the three-dimensional model, the evaluation result is expressed more vividly, and the problem that the evaluation result expression is not vivid enough in the prior art is specifically solved by the implementation mode.
According to the evaluation method for the construction cost calculation shown in fig. 1-3, the method further comprises a model uploading module 8, wherein the model uploading module 8 comprises a model uploading unit 19 and a server 20;
step seven, uploading the model;
uploading the model generated in the sixth step to the server 20 for storage;
specifically, the model generated in the sixth step is uploaded to the server 20 for storage through the model uploading unit 19.
The implementation mode is specifically as follows: when the method is used, the model generated in the step six is uploaded to the server 20 through the model uploading unit 19, so that the imported parameters, the model, the drawing and the evaluation result can be stored at the same time, the loss of single data can be effectively prevented, and the data security is improved.
The working principle of the invention is as follows:
referring to the attached drawings 1-3 of the specification, when the method is used, firstly parameters are led in through a parameter leading-in module 3, then construction drawings are led in through a construction drawing leading-in module 2, then drawings and parameters are analyzed through a same module 4 and a difference module 5, parts with the same structure and parts with different structures are found on a comprehensive drawing, then corresponding parameters are bound with the drawings of the structures of all the parts, the bound drawings with the parameters are processed through a cost evaluation module 6, the parts with the same structure are divided into a plurality of parts, the structures and the parameters of all the parts of the drawings are the same, then one part of the drawing is extracted from the plurality of parts of the drawings, meanwhile, the parts of the drawings with different structures are evaluated in parallel, the evaluation result of the independently extracted drawings is multiplied by the number of the parts of the drawings, the total cost evaluation is output, and a cost evaluation report is generated through a report generation unit 18 according to the cost evaluation result output in the four steps The generated cost evaluation report is divided into three evaluation results of a bottom layer, a standard layer and a top layer, so that the evaluation rate can be effectively improved as a whole;
referring to the attached drawings 1-3 of the specification, when the method is used, a three-dimensional model is built through the model building unit 21 according to the imported structure construction drawing, the equipment construction drawing and the building construction drawing, then the evaluation results of the bottom layer, the standard layer and the top layer of the three-dimensional model are respectively marked through the data marking unit 22 according to the cost evaluation result output in the fourth step, so that a user can directly check parameters and evaluation result data on the three-dimensional model at the same time, and the evaluation result is combined with the three-dimensional model, so that the evaluation result expression is more visual;
referring to the accompanying fig. 1-3 of the specification, when the present invention is used, the model generated in the step six is uploaded to the server 20 through the model uploading unit 19, so that the imported parameters, the model, the drawing and the evaluation result can be simultaneously stored, the loss of single data can be effectively prevented, and the data security is improved.
And finally: the above description is only for the purpose of illustrating the preferred embodiments of the present invention and is not to be construed as limiting the invention, and any modifications, equivalents, improvements and the like that are within the spirit and principle of the present invention are intended to be included in the scope of the present invention.
Claims (8)
1. An evaluation method for construction cost calculation comprises a central processing module (1), and is characterized in that: the construction drawing guiding device is characterized in that a construction drawing guiding-in module (2) and a parameter guiding-in module (3) are arranged at the input end of the central processing module (1), a finding module (4) and a difference module (5) are arranged at the connecting end of the central processing module (1), a construction cost evaluation module (6) is arranged at the connecting end of the finding module (4) and the difference module (5), a report generation module (7) is arranged at the connecting end of the construction cost evaluation module (6), a model uploading module (8) is arranged at the output end of the central processing module (1), a model establishing module (9) is further arranged at the connecting end of the central processing module (1), the central processing module (1) comprises a central processing unit (10), and the construction drawing guiding-in module (2) comprises a structure construction drawing guiding-in unit (11), an equipment construction drawing guiding-in unit, the parameter importing module (3) comprises a parameter importing unit (14), the identity finding module (4) comprises an identity finding unit (15), the difference module (5) comprises a difference unit (16), the construction cost evaluation module (6) comprises a construction cost evaluation unit (17), the report generation module (7) comprises a report generation unit (18), the model uploading module (8) comprises a model uploading unit (19) and a server (20), and the model establishing module (9) comprises a model establishing unit (21) and a data labeling unit (22);
further comprising the steps of:
step one, importing parameters;
importing parameter data required by the project cost evaluation into a system;
step two, importing a construction drawing;
importing the corresponding structure construction drawing, equipment construction drawing and building construction drawing into a system, and combining three different drawings into a comprehensive drawing;
step three, analyzing parameters and a construction drawing;
analyzing the construction drawing and the parameters led into the system, finding out parts with the same structure and parts with different structures, and binding the corresponding parameters with drawings of the structures of all the parts;
step four, evaluating the manufacturing cost;
processing the drawings with the parameters bound in the third step, extracting one drawing from the drawings with the same structure, simultaneously carrying out parallel evaluation on the drawings with different structures and the one drawing, multiplying the evaluation result of the independently extracted drawing by the number of parts, and outputting the total cost evaluation;
step five, generating a report;
generating a cost evaluation report according to the cost evaluation output in the step four;
step six, generating a model;
firstly, establishing a three-dimensional model according to the three imported construction drawings, and then labeling the structural layers of all the layers according to the cost evaluation result output in the fourth step;
step seven, uploading the model;
and uploading the model generated in the step six to a server (20) for storage.
2. The evaluation method for construction cost calculation according to claim 1, characterized in that: the first step is specifically that parameter data required for engineering cost evaluation is imported into a central processing unit (10) through a parameter import unit (14), and the parameter data is simplified and processed.
3. The evaluation method for construction cost calculation according to claim 1, characterized in that: and the second step is specifically that the structure construction drawing is guided in through the structure construction drawing guiding-in unit (11), the equipment construction drawing is guided in through the equipment construction drawing guiding-in unit (12), the building construction drawing is guided in through the building construction drawing guiding-in unit (13), then the elevation and the size of the structure construction drawing and the building construction drawing are compared, and after the three different drawings are kept consistent, the three different drawings are combined into a comprehensive drawing simultaneously provided with the structure drawing, the building drawing and the equipment drawing information.
4. The evaluation method for construction cost calculation according to claim 1, characterized in that: and step three, specifically, analyzing the comprehensive drawing in the step two and the parameters imported in the step one by a finding unit (15) and a difference unit (16), finding parts with the same structure and parts with different structures on the comprehensive drawing, classifying the parts, and then binding the corresponding parameters and the drawings of the structures of all parts together.
5. The evaluation method for construction cost calculation according to claim 1, characterized in that: and step four, processing the drawings with the parameters after being bundled in the step three by a cost evaluation unit (17), dividing part of the drawings with the same structure into a plurality of parts, wherein the structure and the parameters of each part of the drawings are the same, extracting one part of the drawings from the plurality of parts of the drawings, evaluating the drawings with different structures and the one part of the drawing in parallel, multiplying the evaluation result of the independently extracted drawings by the number of parts, and outputting the total cost evaluation.
6. The evaluation method for construction cost calculation according to claim 1, characterized in that: and the fifth step is that a cost evaluation report is generated by a report generation unit (18) according to the cost evaluation result output in the fourth step, and the generated cost evaluation report is divided into three types of evaluation results of a bottom layer, a standard layer and a top layer.
7. The evaluation method for construction cost calculation according to claim 1, characterized in that: and step six specifically, a three-dimensional model is established through the model establishing unit (21) according to the three imported construction drawings, then the bottom layer, the standard layer and the top layer are respectively marked through the data marking unit (22) according to the construction cost evaluation result output in the step four, and parameters and evaluation result data can be simultaneously viewed on the three-dimensional model.
8. The evaluation method for construction cost calculation according to claim 1, characterized in that: and the seventh step is specifically that the model generated in the sixth step is uploaded to a server (20) for storage through a model uploading unit (19).
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911039704.9A CN110766472A (en) | 2019-10-29 | 2019-10-29 | Evaluation method for construction engineering cost operation |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911039704.9A CN110766472A (en) | 2019-10-29 | 2019-10-29 | Evaluation method for construction engineering cost operation |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN110766472A true CN110766472A (en) | 2020-02-07 |
Family
ID=69334153
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201911039704.9A Withdrawn CN110766472A (en) | 2019-10-29 | 2019-10-29 | Evaluation method for construction engineering cost operation |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN110766472A (en) |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111476599A (en) * | 2020-03-21 | 2020-07-31 | 浙江大有实业有限公司电力承装分公司 | Intelligent engineering cost method with automatic settlement function |
| CN111882206A (en) * | 2020-07-25 | 2020-11-03 | 广州城市职业学院 | Application value evaluation method for building information model adopted in building engineering |
| CN112070560A (en) * | 2020-09-18 | 2020-12-11 | 苏宇航 | Building engineering cost evaluation management system based on big data analysis |
-
2019
- 2019-10-29 CN CN201911039704.9A patent/CN110766472A/en not_active Withdrawn
Cited By (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111476599A (en) * | 2020-03-21 | 2020-07-31 | 浙江大有实业有限公司电力承装分公司 | Intelligent engineering cost method with automatic settlement function |
| CN111882206A (en) * | 2020-07-25 | 2020-11-03 | 广州城市职业学院 | Application value evaluation method for building information model adopted in building engineering |
| CN111882206B (en) * | 2020-07-25 | 2023-11-07 | 广州城市职业学院 | Application value evaluation method for building information model used in building engineering |
| CN112070560A (en) * | 2020-09-18 | 2020-12-11 | 苏宇航 | Building engineering cost evaluation management system based on big data analysis |
| CN112070560B (en) * | 2020-09-18 | 2021-03-16 | 广东省建筑工程监理有限公司 | Building engineering cost evaluation management system based on big data analysis |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN110766472A (en) | Evaluation method for construction engineering cost operation | |
| Weber et al. | M2DDM–a maturity model for data-driven manufacturing | |
| CN107169575A (en) | A kind of modeling and method for visualizing machine learning training pattern | |
| CN106682036A (en) | Data exchange system and exchange method thereof | |
| CN103605609A (en) | Automatic test framework applicable to cloud computing | |
| CN108132868A (en) | A kind of data monitoring method, device, computing device and storage medium | |
| CN105302115B (en) | Train network application layer control software automated testing method | |
| CN110348109A (en) | The method and terminal device of three-dimensional artificial training data processing | |
| CN112256937A (en) | Information analysis system based on computer | |
| CN107038664A (en) | Curricula method for pushing, device, storage medium and processor | |
| SE0300353D0 (en) | Method and system for managing energy information | |
| US10142198B2 (en) | Node-centric analysis of dynamic networks | |
| CN114429364A (en) | Business data management method and device, storage medium and electronic equipment | |
| CN103838937A (en) | Energy consumption simulation modeling system | |
| CN106651513B (en) | Quotation method and device for circuit board orders | |
| CN103345533B (en) | A kind of date storage method and device | |
| CN106651173A (en) | Big data-based multi-dimensional Chinese patent medicine full industry supply chain performance analysis system | |
| CN103207804A (en) | MapReduce load simulation method based on cluster job logging | |
| CN104268698B (en) | A kind of method that ranking is carried out to power grid enterprises' operation monitoring business datum | |
| CN105224327A (en) | A kind of embedded equipment variable exchanges transport address off-line distribution method | |
| CN108682047B (en) | Three-dimensional building model file conversion method and system | |
| CN109523031B (en) | Big data intelligent machine learning system for deep analysis | |
| CN109871302A (en) | Cloud computing application identification device and method based on resource overhead statistics | |
| CN107705100B (en) | Management system for traffic engineering construction progress | |
| CN104731900A (en) | Hive scheduling method and device |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| WW01 | Invention patent application withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20200207 |
|
| WW01 | Invention patent application withdrawn after publication |