CN110752037A - Evaluation method and device, computer readable medium and electronic device - Google Patents
Evaluation method and device, computer readable medium and electronic device Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110752037A CN110752037A CN201911011508.0A CN201911011508A CN110752037A CN 110752037 A CN110752037 A CN 110752037A CN 201911011508 A CN201911011508 A CN 201911011508A CN 110752037 A CN110752037 A CN 110752037A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- test question
- option
- evaluation
- question
- test
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
- G16H50/00—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics
- G16H50/30—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics for calculating health indices; for individual health risk assessment
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
- G09B7/06—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the multiple-choice answer-type, i.e. where a given question is provided with a series of answers and a choice has to be made from the answers
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Educational Technology (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Electrically Operated Instructional Devices (AREA)
Abstract
The embodiment of the disclosure provides an evaluation method and device, a computer readable medium and electronic equipment, and belongs to the technical field of computers. The evaluation method comprises the following steps: displaying a first test question and a first option and a second option thereof at a first client, wherein the first option of the first test question is associated with a second test question, and the second option of the first test question is associated with a third test question; responding to a confirmation instruction of a first option of the first test question, displaying the second test question and a first option and a second option thereof on the first client side, wherein the first option of the second test question is associated with a fourth test question, and the second option of the second test question is associated with a fifth test question; responding to a confirmation instruction of a first option of the second test question, and displaying the fourth test question and a plurality of options thereof on the first client; displaying a first evaluation report at the first client in response to a confirmation instruction of the target option of the fourth test question. The technical scheme of the embodiment of the disclosure can complete correct evaluation based on the multi-stage cascade test questions.
Description
Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to the field of computer technologies, and in particular, to an evaluation method and apparatus, a computer-readable medium, and an electronic device.
Background
The ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and health, International Classification of health) scale is formally named by the world health organization at 54 th world health Association of 5/22/2001 and is an internationally used Classification standard. The classification system provides state classification capable of uniformly and standardly reflecting all functions and disabilities related to human health, is used as an important health index, and is widely applied to aspects of health care, prevention, population survey, insurance, social security, labor, education, economy, social policy, general law establishment and the like.
Most of the existing assessment scale tools only support the triggering of single-stage cascade of test questions. When a more complex logic is encountered, normal triggering cannot be completed, so that a correct evaluation result cannot be obtained.
It is to be noted that the information disclosed in the above background section is only for enhancement of understanding of the background of the present disclosure, and thus may include information that does not constitute prior art known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
Disclosure of Invention
An object of the embodiments of the present disclosure is to provide an evaluation method and apparatus, a computer-readable medium, and an electronic device, so as to overcome, at least to some extent, the problem that normal triggering of complex logic cannot be completed in a gauge evaluation process in the related art.
Additional features and advantages of the disclosure will be set forth in the detailed description which follows, or in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the disclosure.
According to an aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided an evaluation method including: displaying a first test question and a first option and a second option thereof at a first client, wherein the first option of the first test question is associated with a second test question, and the second option of the first test question is associated with a third test question; responding to a confirmation instruction of a first option of the first test question, displaying the second test question and a first option and a second option thereof on the first client side, wherein the first option of the second test question is associated with a fourth test question, and the second option of the second test question is associated with a fifth test question; responding to a confirmation instruction of a first option of the second test question, and displaying the fourth test question and a plurality of options thereof on the first client; displaying a first evaluation report at the first client in response to a confirmation instruction of the target option of the fourth test question.
According to an aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided an evaluation apparatus including: the system comprises a first test question display module, a second test question display module and a third test question display module, wherein the first test question display module is configured to display a first test question and a first option and a second option thereof on a first client side, the first option of the first test question is associated with the second test question, and the second option of the first test question is associated with the third test question; the second test question display module is configured to respond to a confirmation instruction of a first option of the first test question, and display the second test question and a first option and a second option of the second test question on the first client side, wherein the first option of the second test question is associated with a fourth test question, and the second option of the second test question is associated with a fifth test question; a fourth test question display module configured to display the fourth test question and a plurality of options thereof on the first client in response to a confirmation instruction for the first option of the second test question; a first report display module configured to display a first evaluation report at the first client in response to a confirmation instruction of the target option of the fourth test question.
According to an aspect of the present disclosure, a computer-readable medium is provided, on which a computer program is stored, which when executed by a processor implements the evaluation method of any of the above embodiments.
According to an aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided an electronic device including: one or more processors; a storage device for storing one or more programs which, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to implement the evaluation method of any of the embodiments described above.
The technical scheme provided by the embodiment of the disclosure can have the following beneficial effects:
in the technical solutions provided by some embodiments of the present disclosure, on one hand, by displaying a first test question and a first option and a second option thereof on a first client, the first option of the first test question is associated with a second test question, and the second option of the first test question is associated with a third test question; responding to a confirmation instruction of a first option of the first test question, displaying the second test question and a first option and a second option thereof on the first client side, wherein the first option of the second test question is associated with a fourth test question, and the second option of the second test question is associated with a fifth test question; in response to a confirmation instruction of the first option of the second test question, the fourth test question and a plurality of options thereof are displayed on the first client, so that the multi-stage cascade of the test questions can be realized, and the method is suitable for correct triggering of complex logic; on the other hand, in response to the confirmation instruction for the target option of the fourth test question, a first evaluation report may be displayed at the first client, that is, a correct evaluation result may be generated based on normal triggering of the multi-stage cascade of test questions.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the disclosure.
Drawings
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments consistent with the present disclosure and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the disclosure. It is to be understood that the drawings in the following description are merely exemplary of the disclosure, and that other drawings may be derived from those drawings by one of ordinary skill in the art without the exercise of inventive faculty. In the drawings:
fig. 1 shows a schematic diagram of an exemplary system architecture of an evaluation method or evaluation apparatus to which embodiments of the present disclosure may be applied;
FIG. 2 schematically shows a flow diagram of an evaluation method according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 3 schematically shows a flow chart of an evaluation method according to another embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 4 schematically illustrates a flow chart of an evaluation method according to yet another embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 5 schematically illustrates a flow chart of an evaluation method according to yet another embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 6 schematically illustrates a schematic diagram of a cascade path setup panel according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 7 schematically illustrates a flow chart of an evaluation method according to yet another embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 8 schematically illustrates a flow chart for gauge logic according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 9 schematically illustrates a flow chart of an evaluation method according to yet another embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 10 schematically illustrates a diagram of an evaluation report and evaluation conclusion generated at node 1, according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 11 schematically illustrates a diagram of an evaluation report and evaluation conclusion generated at node 2, according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 12 schematically illustrates a diagram of an evaluation report and evaluation conclusion generated at node 3, according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 13 schematically illustrates a diagram of an evaluation report and evaluation conclusion generated at node 4, according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 14 schematically illustrates a diagram of an evaluation report and evaluation conclusion generated at node 5, according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 15 schematically shows a block diagram of an evaluation device according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;
FIG. 16 illustrates a schematic structural diagram of a computer system suitable for use in implementing the electronic device of an embodiment of the present disclosure.
Detailed Description
Example embodiments will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings. Example embodiments may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the examples set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the concept of example embodiments to those skilled in the art.
Furthermore, the described features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. In the following description, numerous specific details are provided to give a thorough understanding of embodiments of the disclosure. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that the subject matter of the present disclosure can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, devices, steps, and so forth. In other instances, well-known methods, devices, implementations, or operations have not been shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of the disclosure.
The block diagrams shown in the figures are functional entities only and do not necessarily correspond to physically separate entities. I.e. these functional entities may be implemented in the form of software, or in one or more hardware modules or integrated circuits, or in different networks and/or processor means and/or microcontroller means.
The flow charts shown in the drawings are merely illustrative and do not necessarily include all of the contents and operations/steps, nor do they necessarily have to be performed in the order described. For example, some operations/steps may be decomposed, and some operations/steps may be combined or partially combined, so that the actual execution sequence may be changed according to the actual situation.
The following detailed description of exemplary embodiments of the disclosure refers to the accompanying drawings.
Fig. 1 shows a schematic diagram of an exemplary system architecture of a test method or a test apparatus to which embodiments of the present disclosure may be applied.
As shown in fig. 1, the system architecture 100 may include terminal devices 101, 102, 103, a network 104, and a server 105. The network 104 serves as a medium for providing communication links between the terminal devices 101, 102, 103 and the server 105. Network 104 may include various connection types, such as wired, wireless communication links, or fiber optic cables, to name a few.
The user may use the terminal devices 101, 102, 103 to interact with the server 105 via the network 104 to receive or send messages or the like. The terminal devices 101, 102, 103 may be various electronic devices having display screens and supporting web browsing, including but not limited to smart phones, tablet computers, laptop portable computers, desktop computers, and the like.
The server 105 may be a server that provides various services, such as a background management server that provides support for devices operated by users using the terminal apparatuses 101, 102, 103. The background management server can analyze and process the received data such as the request and feed back the processing result to the terminal equipment.
The terminal device 102 (or the terminal devices 101 and 103) may provide, for example, a first client, and display, at the first client, a first test question and a first option and a second option thereof, where the first option of the first test question is associated with a second test question, and the second option of the first test question is associated with a third test question; responding to a confirmation instruction of a first option of the first test question, displaying the second test question and a first option and a second option thereof on the first client side, wherein the first option of the second test question is associated with a fourth test question, and the second option of the second test question is associated with a fifth test question; responding to a confirmation instruction of a first option of the second test question, and displaying the fourth test question and a plurality of options thereof on the first client; displaying a first evaluation report at the first client in response to a confirmation instruction of the target option of the fourth test question.
The terminal device 103 (which may also be the terminal devices 101, 102) may for example provide a second client at which the cascade path setup panel is displayed; and responding to an input instruction of the cascade path setting panel, and generating test questions, options thereof and trigger conditions in the multistage cascade path.
It should be understood that the number of terminal devices, networks and servers in fig. 1 is only illustrative, and the server 105 may be a physical server or may be composed of a plurality of servers, and there may be any number of terminal devices, networks and servers according to actual needs.
Fig. 2 schematically shows a flowchart of an evaluation method according to an embodiment of the present disclosure, and a method provided by the embodiment of the present disclosure may be processed by any electronic device with computing processing capability, such as the server 105 and/or the terminal devices 101, 102, and 103 in the above embodiment of fig. 1, in the following embodiment, the terminal device 102 is taken as an execution subject for illustration, but the present disclosure is not limited thereto.
As shown in fig. 2, the evaluation method provided by the embodiment of the present disclosure may include the following steps.
In step S210, a first test question, a first option and a second option thereof are displayed on a first client, the first option of the first test question is associated with a second test question, and the second option of the first test question is associated with a third test question.
In the embodiment of the present disclosure, an application scenario in which the method is applied to ICF scale evaluation is taken as an example for illustration, but the present disclosure is not limited thereto, and may be applied to any other application scenario in which evaluation is required. A developer of the ICF scale evaluation tool may perform cascade setting of test questions in advance through a second client (for example, on the terminal device 103, but the present disclosure is not limited thereto, and may be any electronic device), may convert the ICF scale logic into cascade setting through the cascade path setting panel, and may associate the option of the test question with other test questions by setting each specific test question and each option corresponding to the test question, so that a plurality of test questions connected in series form a multi-stage cascade path.
For example, the two-level cascade is used as an example for explanation, and it is assumed that the first test question has two options: the first option and the second option, meanwhile, the first option of the first test question is also supposed to be associated with the second test question, namely, if the first option of the first test question is selected by the meter responder, the second test question and the option thereof are jumped and displayed; if the second option of the first test question is associated with the third test question, i.e. if the quantity answering person selects the second option of the first test question, the third test question and the options thereof are skipped and displayed for the quantity answering person to answer the next test question. In analogy, the second test question may also have a first option and a second option, the first option of the second test question may be set to be associated with a fourth test question, and the second option of the second test question may be set to be associated with a fifth test question; the third test question may also have a first option and a second option, the first option of the third test question may be set to be associated with a sixth test question, and the second option of the third test question may be set to be associated with a seventh test question. And if the fourth test question, the fifth test question, the sixth test question and the seventh test question respectively have a plurality of options, and the scale responder selects any one of the options, the corresponding evaluation score and the measurement result can be obtained, namely the evaluation of the scale is finished. Forming a two-stage cascade path by the first test question, the second test question and the fourth test question; the first test question, the second test question and the fifth test question form another two-stage cascade path; the first test question, the third test question and the sixth test question form another two-stage cascade path; the first test question, the third test question and the seventh test question form another two-stage cascade path.
As another example, taking three-level cascading as an example, assume that the first question has two options: the first option and the second option, meanwhile, the first option of the first test question is also supposed to be associated with the second test question, namely, if the first option of the first test question is selected by the meter responder, the second test question and the option thereof are jumped and displayed; if the second option of the first test question is associated with the third test question, i.e. if the quantity answering person selects the second option of the first test question, the third test question and the options thereof are skipped and displayed for the quantity answering person to answer the next test question. In analogy, the second test question may also have a first option and a second option, the first option of the second test question may be set to be associated with a fourth test question, and the second option of the second test question may be set to be associated with a fifth test question; the third test question may also have a first option and a second option, the first option of the third test question may be set to be associated with a sixth test question, and the second option of the third test question may be set to be associated with a seventh test question; the fourth test question may also have a first option and a second option, the first option of the fourth test question may be set to be associated with the eighth test question, and the second option of the fourth test question may be set to be associated with the ninth test question; the fifth test question also has a first option and a second option, the first option of the fifth test question can be set to be associated with the tenth test question, and the second option of the fifth test question can be set to be associated with the eleventh test question; the sixth test question also has a first option and a second option, the first option of the sixth test question can be set to be associated with the twelfth test question, and the second option of the sixth test question can be set to be associated with the thirteenth test question; the seventh test question may also have a first option and a second option, the first option of the seventh test question may be set to be associated with the fourteenth test question, and the second option of the seventh test question may be set to be associated with the fifteenth test question. The first test question, the second test question, the third test question, the fourth test question, the fifth test question, the sixth test question, the thirteenth test question, the fourteenth test question and the fifteenth test question are assumed to have a plurality of options, and when the scale responder selects any one of the options, the corresponding assessment score and the measurement result can be obtained, namely the scale assessment is finished. The first test question, the second test question, the fourth test question and the eighth test question form a three-level cascade path; the first test question, the second test question, the fourth test question and the ninth test question form another three-level cascade path; the first test question, the second test question, the fifth test question and the tenth test question form another three-level cascade path; the first test question, the second test question, the fifth test question and the eleventh test question form another three-level cascade path; the first test question, the third test question, the sixth test question and the twelfth test question form a third-level cascade path; the first test question, the third test question, the sixth test question and the thirteenth test question form a third three-level cascade path; the first test question, the third test question, the seventh test question and the fourteenth test question form a three-level cascade path; the first test question, the third test question, the seventh test question and the fifteenth test question form a three-level cascade path.
In the above description, although two options are provided for each test question, the number of options provided for each test question is not limited in the present disclosure, and the number of options provided for different test questions may be the same or different. The specific content and form of each test question and each option corresponding to each test question can also be designed according to actual requirements, and the disclosure does not limit the content and form.
In step S220, in response to a confirmation instruction for the first option of the first test question, the second test question and the first option and the second option thereof are displayed on the first client, where the first option of the second test question is associated with the fourth test question, and the second option of the second test question is associated with the fifth test question.
In the embodiment of the disclosure, when the meter responder selects a certain option of a certain test question, which is exactly a test question pre-configured in a certain cascade path, the meter responder triggers the cascade function of the cascade path while selecting the option, and displays the originally hidden test question behind the test question for further answering.
Here, also taking the above-mentioned two-stage cascade path as an example, when the first client receives a confirmation instruction (for example, clicking to select the first option of the first test question) of the quantity responder to the first option of the first test question, the first client may display the originally hidden second test question and the first option and the second option thereof in response to the confirmation instruction. At this time, the first test question and its options may be continuously displayed on the first client, and the first option for displaying the first test question has been selected, for example, the display may be reduced on the left side of the first client. In other embodiments, when the user selects the first option of the first test question, the user may also directly skip the page, skip and display the second test question and its options, and at this time, may hide the related content of the first test question.
In step S230, in response to the confirmation instruction for the first option of the second test question, the fourth test question and the options thereof are displayed on the first client.
For example, if the first option of the second test question is selected by the meter responder, the first client may display the fourth test question and multiple options thereof, which are originally hidden, in response to the confirmation instruction of the first option of the second test question, for further answering.
In step S240, in response to the confirmation instruction of the target option of the fourth test question, a first evaluation report is displayed at the first client.
For example, it may be assumed that the fourth test question has more than two options, when any one of the table respondents is selected, the table measurement operation is completed, and the system generates a corresponding first evaluation report according to the current response path selected by the table respondent, for example, different evaluation scores corresponding to the options of the fourth test question may be pre-configured, and different evaluation score segments correspond to different measurement results. For example, the evaluation scores corresponding to the options selected by the scale responder for each test question may be calculated by integrating the options selected by the scale responder for the current answering path, and assuming that the first option of the first test question corresponds to a score, the first option of the second test question corresponds to a score, and the first option of the fourth test question corresponds to a score, the evaluation scores of the answering path may be obtained by summing the scores corresponding to the first options of the first test question, the second test question, and the fourth test question. For another example, different test questions may be set to have different weights, the scores of the options on the current answering path are combined with the weights of the corresponding test questions to perform weighted summation, and the like. The embodiment of the present disclosure does not limit the specific calculation manner of the evaluation score.
For another example, as described in the above three-stage cascade path, in response to the confirmation instruction for the target option of the fourth test question, other subsequent test questions may be triggered and displayed for further answering, and a corresponding first evaluation report may be generated according to the final answering path.
In an exemplary embodiment, the first evaluation report may include a first evaluation report and a first evaluation conclusion, the first evaluation report may be generated according to the first test question and the first option thereof, the second test question and the first option thereof, and the fourth test question and the target option thereof, the first evaluation conclusion may include a first evaluation score and a corresponding first measurement result, and the first evaluation score may be determined according to the target option of the fourth test question. In other embodiments, the first evaluation report and the first evaluation conclusion may be integrated together.
In the embodiment of the disclosure, the scale evaluation tool can generate the corresponding evaluation report and conclusion according to the preconfigured report and conclusion extraction rule. Here, the normally triggered current answering path is taken as the first test question, the second test question and the fourth test question for example, the correspondingly generated first evaluation report may include the contents of the first test question and the first option thereof, the second test question and the first option thereof, the fourth test question and the target option thereof, and the first evaluation score in the first evaluation conclusion may be determined by the target option of the last test question in the current answering path. It will be appreciated that the content and score of the corresponding generated first evaluation report may be adaptively changed when the spreadsheet responder selects a different response path.
In an exemplary embodiment, the method may further include: deriving the first evaluation report in response to a request to derive the first evaluation report; and/or printing the first evaluation report in response to a print request for the first evaluation report.
For example, after the first evaluation report and the first evaluation conclusion are confirmed by the meter responder, the submit button may be clicked, and then, the printing and exporting operations may be performed on the first evaluation report and the first evaluation conclusion, where the printing and exporting range may be set to include no test questions belonging to the current answering path, no test questions triggered by the cascade path, that is, hidden and undisplayed test questions, and only the displayed test questions may be printed and exported.
In an exemplary embodiment, the method may further include: and displaying the answer completion degrees of the first test question, the second test question and the fourth test question at the first client.
Here, assuming that the current answering path is the first test question, the second test question and the fourth test question, in the answering process of the scale responder, the system calculates the completion degree of answering according to the answering progress, and displays the completion degree of answering at the first client, for example, when the first test question is completed, the completion degree of answering is displayed to be 33%, when the second test question is completed, the completion degree of answering is displayed to be 67%, and when the fourth test question is completed, the completion degree of answering is displayed to be 100%.
According to the evaluation method provided by the embodiment of the disclosure, on one hand, a first test question and a first option and a second option thereof are displayed on a first client, the first option of the first test question is associated with a second test question, and the second option of the first test question is associated with a third test question; responding to a confirmation instruction of a first option of the first test question, displaying the second test question and a first option and a second option thereof on the first client side, wherein the first option of the second test question is associated with a fourth test question, and the second option of the second test question is associated with a fifth test question; in response to a confirmation instruction of the first option of the second test question, the fourth test question and a plurality of options thereof are displayed on the first client, so that the multi-stage cascade of the test questions can be realized, and the method is suitable for correct triggering of complex logic; on the other hand, in response to the confirmation instruction for the target option of the fourth test question, a first evaluation report may be displayed at the first client, that is, a correct evaluation result may be generated based on normal triggering of the multi-stage cascade of test questions.
Fig. 3 schematically shows a flow chart of an evaluation method according to another embodiment of the present disclosure.
As shown in fig. 3, the evaluation method provided by the embodiment of the present disclosure may include the following steps.
In step S310, in response to a confirmation instruction for the second option of the first test question, hiding the second test question and the first option and the second option thereof, and the fourth test question and the options thereof at the first client.
In the embodiment of the present disclosure, the two-stage cascade in the above embodiment is also taken as an example. The method comprises the steps that a first test question, a first option and a second option of the first test question are displayed on a first client, the first option of the first test question is associated with a second test question, and the second option of the first test question is associated with a third test question; responding to a confirmation instruction of a first option of the first test question, displaying the second test question and a first option and a second option thereof on the first client side, wherein the first option of the second test question is associated with a fourth test question, and the second option of the second test question is associated with a fifth test question; and responding to a confirmation instruction of the first option of the second test question, and displaying the fourth test question and a plurality of options thereof on the first client.
For example, it is assumed that the scale responder has already answered the first test question and the second test question according to the normal answer path, but when answering the fourth test question, the scale responder suddenly wants to change the answer of the first test question, changes the first option of the first test question into the second option, and then may select the second option of the first test question, and the system automatically cancels the first option of the first test question, and at this time, the system may automatically perform the backtracking of the cascade path, and empty and hide and display all the test questions (here, assumed as the fourth test question) triggered by the first option of the first test question from the first client.
In step S320, the third test question and the first option and the second option thereof are displayed on the first client, the first option of the third test question is associated with a sixth test question, and the second option of the third test question is associated with a seventh test question.
For example, when the user of the schedule chooses the second option of the first test question again, the hidden third test question is triggered and displayed for further response.
In step S330, in response to a confirmation instruction for the first option of the third test question, a sixth test question and a plurality of options thereof are displayed on the first client.
For example, when the user selects the first test question, the answer path is changed, and the answer path is changed from the original first test question, the original second test question and the original fourth test question to the original first test question, the original third test question and the original sixth test question.
It should be noted that, although the above example is described by taking the answer of the first test question as an example, the disclosure is not limited thereto, and when the scale responder has already made a plurality of cascaded test questions, if it finds that there is a problem in the answer of any one of the previous test questions, the scale responder may reselect the answer of any one of the previous test questions when the scale responder needs to reselect, for example, the scale responder may also reselect the answer of the second test question, and at this time, the cascade path of the first test question, the second test question and the fifth test question may be triggered. When the test questions are selected, the system automatically backtracks the cascade arrangement, all the test questions triggered by the selected test questions and the answers of other test questions triggered by all the triggered test questions are automatically emptied and hidden, the test questions and the answers before the selected test questions can still be kept, for example, if the answer of the second test question is selected, the answer of the first test question can be kept. And then displaying the cascade test questions triggered after the reselection for continuously answering on the new cascade path.
In step S340, in response to a confirmation instruction of the target option of the sixth test question, a second evaluation report is displayed at the first client.
For example, it may be assumed that the sixth test question has more than two options, when any one of the list respondents is selected, the current list measurement operation is completed, and the system generates a corresponding second evaluation report according to the current answering path selected by the list respondent, for example, different evaluation scores corresponding to the options of the sixth test question may be pre-configured, and different evaluation score sections correspond to different measurement results.
In an exemplary embodiment, the second evaluation report may include a second evaluation report and a second evaluation conclusion, the second evaluation report may be generated according to the first test question and the second option thereof, the third test question and the first option thereof, and the sixth test question and the target option thereof, the second evaluation conclusion may include a second evaluation score and a second measurement result corresponding thereto, and the second evaluation score may be determined according to the target option of the sixth test question.
Namely, when the answer of the test questions is changed by the user of the equivalent table, the cascade path of the answer is changed, at the moment, the test questions on the answer path are changed, the evaluation scores and the measurement results are also changed, and according to the changes, the system can automatically generate an updated second evaluation report and a second evaluation conclusion.
In an exemplary embodiment, the method may further include: deriving the second evaluation report in response to a request to derive the second evaluation report; and/or printing the second evaluation report in response to a print request for the second evaluation report. That is, the printed and exported scope does not include hidden test questions, i.e., test questions that are not triggered by the cascade path, nor answered test questions that are cleared and hidden due to changes caused by reselection.
In an exemplary embodiment, the method may further include: and displaying the answer completion degrees of the first test question, the third test question and the sixth test question at the first client. That is, when the answer of the test question that has been answered before is selected, the system will automatically recalculate the answer completion.
According to the evaluation method provided by the embodiment of the disclosure, when complex cascade logic appears in the scale, multi-level cascade can be set in the evaluation scale, when a specific option condition is met, the test question combination of a specific cascade path is triggered, the normal triggering and backtracking of the multi-level cascade are supported, the interaction change of other scale functions (such as report generation and completion calculation) is supported, and a comprehensive solution is provided. When the answer of the answered test question is reselected, the system can automatically trigger the path change after the reselection, correct test question backtracking is carried out, and information such as change evaluation scores and answer completion degrees and the like corresponding to the path change is automatically carried out, so that correct generation of an evaluation report and an evaluation conclusion can be ensured, correct output of export and printing of the evaluation report can be ensured, output of what you see is what you answer evaluation report and conclusion under multi-level cascade is realized, the meter can be completely electronized, and actual requirements are met.
Fig. 4 schematically shows a flow chart of an evaluation method according to yet another embodiment of the present disclosure.
As shown in fig. 4, the evaluation method provided by the embodiment of the present disclosure may include the following steps.
In step S410, in response to a confirmation instruction for a first option of the first test question, the first test question is set to a completed state.
In the embodiment of the present disclosure, the two-stage cascade in the above embodiment is also taken as an example. Suppose that a first test question and a first option and a second option thereof are firstly displayed at a first client, the first option of the first test question is associated with a second test question, and the second option of the first test question is associated with a third test question. When the user selects the first option of the first test question, the user sets the first test question to be in a completion state, which indicates that the test question is answered completely.
In step S420, in response to a cancel instruction for a first option of the first test question, the first test question is changed from the completed state to an uncompleted state.
In the embodiment of the present disclosure, in response to a confirmation instruction for a first option of the first test question, the second test question and a first option and a second option thereof are displayed at the first client, the first option of the second test question is associated with a fourth test question, and the second option of the second test question is associated with a fifth test question; and responding to a confirmation instruction of the first option of the second test question, and displaying the fourth test question and a plurality of options thereof on the first client.
For example, if the scale responder already answers the first test question and the second test question according to the normal answering path, but when answering the fourth test question, the scale responder suddenly wants to cancel the first option of the first test question (for example, click the first option of the first test question again), at this time, the system may automatically change the first test question from the completed state to the incomplete state.
It is understood that the meter responder can cancel the answer of any test question that has been answered before during the answering process, and at this time, the system will automatically change the state of the corresponding test question to the unfinished state.
In step S430, the second test question and the first option and the second option thereof, and the fourth test question and the options thereof are hidden at the first client.
In an exemplary embodiment, the method may further include: and changing the answer completion degree of the first test question, the second test question and the fourth test question displayed on the first client.
In the embodiment of the disclosure, when one test question is changed from a complete state to an incomplete state, that is, when the test question is cancelled, the system may automatically trace back the cascade setting, clear and hide all the test questions triggered by the test question and the answers of other test questions triggered by all the triggered test questions, the answers of the test questions before the test question may be retained, the evaluation score and the answer completion degree are automatically recalculated, and the content in the evaluation report may be changed correspondingly.
Taking the above-mentioned cancellation of the first test question as an example, the second test question already answered and the fourth test question triggered by the second test question are hidden, and at this time, the answer completion degree returns to zero again. Then, a new answering path and answering completion degree can be determined according to the re-answering of the table responder.
According to the assessment method provided by the embodiment of the disclosure, when the answer of the answered test question is cancelled, the system can automatically trigger the path change after cancellation, correct test question backtracking is carried out, and information such as the change assessment score and the answer completion degree and the like corresponding to the path change is automatically carried out, so that correct generation of an assessment report and an assessment conclusion can be ensured, meanwhile, the export of the assessment report and the correct output of printing can be ensured, the output of the what you see is what you answer assessment report and the conclusion under multi-level cascade is realized, the meter can be completely electronized, and actual requirements are met.
Fig. 5 schematically shows a flow chart of an evaluation method according to yet another embodiment of the present disclosure. The method provided by the embodiment of the present disclosure may be processed by any electronic device with computing processing capability, for example, the server 105 and/or the terminal devices 102 and 103 in the embodiment of fig. 1 described above, and in the following embodiment, the terminal device 103 is taken as an execution subject for example, but the present disclosure is not limited thereto.
As shown in fig. 5, the evaluation method provided by the embodiment of the present disclosure is different from the above embodiments in that the following steps may be further included.
In step S510, a cascade path setting panel is displayed at the second client.
In step S520, in response to the input instruction to the cascade path setting panel, the test questions, the options thereof, and the trigger conditions in the multistage cascade path are generated.
This is illustrated below with reference to fig. 6. Fig. 6 schematically illustrates a schematic diagram of a cascade path setup panel according to one embodiment of the present disclosure.
As shown in fig. 6, a trigger attribute for the test question may be edited in the panel, for example, setting the current test question as "are you considering hurting oneself now? "and set the first option of the current test question equal to" yes ", the next test question associated with the first option of the current test question is set as" whether you have considered how you would harm oneself? ".
Fig. 7 schematically shows a flow chart of an evaluation method according to yet another embodiment of the present disclosure. The method provided by the embodiment of the present disclosure may be processed by any electronic device with computing processing capability, for example, the server 105 and/or the terminal devices 102 and 103 in the embodiment of fig. 1 described above, and in the following embodiment, the terminal device 102 is taken as an execution subject for example, but the present disclosure is not limited thereto.
As shown in fig. 7, the evaluation method provided by the embodiment of the present disclosure takes two-stage cascading as an example, and may include the following steps.
In step S701, topic 1 and its option 1 and option 2 are displayed on the first client, where it is assumed that the first level of concatenation is topic 1 associated with topic 2 for topic 1 and topic 2 for topic 1 associated with topic 3.
In step S702, it is determined whether option 1 of topic 1 is selected; if yes, go to step S703; if not, the process goes to step S710.
In step S703, if the meter responder selects option 1 of topic 1, then topic 2 and its options 1 and 2 are continuously displayed on the first client, where it is assumed that the second level is cascaded to option 1 of topic 2 and is associated with topic 4, and option 2 of topic 2 is associated with topic 5.
In step S704, it is determined whether option 1 of title 2 is selected; if yes, go to step S705; if not, the process goes to step S706.
In step S705, if the table responder selects option 1 of topic 2, topic 4 and its multiple options continue to be displayed on the first client.
In step S706, if the table responder selects option 2 of question 2, question 5 and its multiple options continue to be displayed on the first client.
In step S707, it is determined whether the answer to question 1 is changed to option 2; if yes, go to step S708; if not, the process goes to step S717.
In step S708, if the answer to question 1 is changed to option 2, the answer to question 2 is cleared, and question 2 and question 4 or question 2 and question 5 are hidden.
In step S709, the evaluation score and the answer completion degree are recalculated, and the process jumps to step S710.
In step S710, if option 2 of topic 1 is selected, topic 3 and its options 1 and 2 are displayed on the first client, where it is assumed that the second level of concatenation is topic 1 associated with topic 6 of topic 3 and option 2 of topic 3 associated with topic 7.
In step S711, it is determined whether option 1 of title 3 is selected; if yes, go to step S712; if not, the process goes to step S713.
In step S712, if option 1 of topic 3 is selected, topic 6 and the options thereof continue to be displayed on the first client.
In step S713, if option 2 of topic 3 is selected, topic 7 and its multiple options continue to be displayed on the first client.
In step S714, it is determined whether option 1 of topic 1 has been cancelled; if yes, go to step S715; if not, the process goes to step S717.
In step S715, if option 1 of question 1 has been cancelled, the answers to questions 1 and 3 are emptied, and question 3 and question 6 or question 3 and question 7 are hidden.
In step S716, the evaluation score and the answer completion degree are recalculated, and a jump is made to step S701 to display question 1.
In step S717, an evaluation report in which some of the test questions that have been answered but are cleared due to the path change are not included in the evaluation report and an evaluation conclusion that is also independent of the answers to these cleared test questions are generated based on the answer paths.
In step S718, the evaluation report and the evaluation conclusion are exported and/or printed, and only the questions in the question path and the options selected by the questions are output.
Other contents in the embodiments of the present disclosure may refer to the other embodiments described above.
FIG. 8 schematically shows a flow chart of gauge logic according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. The method provided by the embodiment of the present disclosure may be processed by any electronic device with computing processing capability, for example, the server 105 and/or the terminal devices 102 and 103 in the embodiment of fig. 1 described above, and in the following embodiment, the terminal device 103 is taken as an execution subject for example, but the present disclosure is not limited thereto.
Taking the (7) d510 wash of the ICF scale as an example, the following test questions and trigger conditions among the test questions are included:
1. can you bathe by oneself? Comprises body washing, hand washing, foot washing, face washing and hair washing.
① best score 0
② fail to meet 2
2. Do you need to look at or remind others when bathing?
① is connecting to 3
② No. 4
3. How does you know how well when bathing? Is it safe? Can be successfully completed?
① has high efficiency and safety, and can successfully finish the separation of 1 minute
② has the advantages of general efficiency and safety, and almost can finish the 2-point division
③, the efficiency is poor, the safety is poor, and 3 points can not be basically finished
4. Do you wash their face or feet?
① can connect 5
② not to connect to 6
5. How do you wash their face or feet? Is it safe? Can be successfully completed?
① has high efficiency and safety and can successfully finish the operation of 4 minutes
② has the advantages of general efficiency and safety, and almost can be finished with the result of 5 points
③, has poor efficiency and safety and can not basically finish the division of 6
6. Can you cooperate when you have a bath? Such as extending the arm.
③ can connect to 7
④ No. 10 points
7. With help of others, how does you have a bath like efficiency? Is it safe? Can be successfully completed?
① has high efficiency and safety, and can be successfully finished for 7 minutes
② has the advantages of general efficiency and safety, and almost 8 points of completion
③, the efficiency is poor, the safety is poor, and 9 minutes can not be basically finished
As shown in fig. 8, the meter logic provided by the embodiment of the present disclosure may be completed by the cascade path setting panel setting displayed by the second client.
In step S801, evaluation of the toilet itself is started.
In step S802, question 1 is given first, and the content of question 1 is "do you bathe by themselves? Comprises body washing, hand washing, foot washing, face washing and hair washing. ", if [ can ] is selected, proceed to step S803; if [ unable ] is selected, the process jumps to step S804.
In step S803, if [ can ] of topic 1 is selected, the corresponding evaluation score is set to 0.
In step S804, if question 1 is selected [ unable ], then a jump is made to question 2, and the content of question 2 is "do you only need someone else to look at or remind when bathing? ", if [ yes ] is selected, proceed to step S805; if no, go to step S809.
In step S805, if question 2 is selected [ yes ], then a jump is made to question, and the content of question 3 is "how efficient you have a bath? Is it safe? Can be successfully completed? ", if option 1 of question 3 is selected, go to step S806; if option 2 of topic 3 is selected, go to step S807; if option 3 of title 3 is selected, the process proceeds to step S808.
In step S806, if option 1 of topic 3 is selected, i.e., "high efficiency, high safety, and successful completion", the corresponding evaluation score is set to 1.
In step S807, if option 2 of topic 3 is selected, i.e., "efficiency is general, security is general, and completion is almost impossible", the corresponding evaluation score is set to 2.
In step S808, if option 3 of topic 3 is selected, i.e., "efficiency is poor, safety is poor, and completion is substantially not achieved", the corresponding evaluation score is set to 3.
In step S809, if question 2 [ no ] is selected, then jump to question 4, the content of question 4 is "can you wash their face or feet? ", if [ energy ] of the topic 4 is selected, proceed to step S810; if [ unable ] of topic 4 is selected, the process jumps to step S814.
In step S810, if [ can ] of topic 4 is selected, then jump to topic 5, the content of topic 5 is "how efficient you wash their face or feet? Is it safe? Can be successfully completed? ", if option 1 of question 5 is selected, proceed to step S811; if option 2 of question 5 is selected, go to step S812; if option 3 of title 5 is selected, the process proceeds to step S813.
In step S811, if option 1 of question 5 is selected, i.e., "high efficiency, high safety, and smooth completion", the corresponding evaluation score is set to 4.
In step S812, if option 2 of question 5 is selected, i.e., "efficiency is general, safety is general, and completion is almost impossible", the corresponding evaluation score is set to 5.
In step S813, if option 3 of question 5, i.e., "efficiency is poor, safety is poor, and completion is substantially impossible", is selected, the corresponding evaluation score is set to 6.
In step S814, if [ cannot ] of topic 4 is selected, then jump to topic 6, and the content of topic 6 is "can you match when someone else helps you take a bath? Such as extending the arm. "if [ energy ] of the topic 6 is selected, go to step S816; if [ unable ] of topic 6 is selected, the process proceeds to step S815.
In step S815, if [ unable ] of topic 6 is selected, the corresponding evaluation score is set to 10 points.
In step S816, if [ can ] of topic 6 is selected, then a jump is made to topic 7, and the content of topic 7 is "how does you have bath with help of others? Is it safe? Can be successfully completed? ", if option 1 of topic 7 is selected, go to step S817; if option 2 of topic 7 is selected, go to step S818; if option 3 of topic 7 is selected, the process proceeds to step S819.
In step S817, if option 1 of topic 7 is selected, i.e., "high efficiency, high security, and successful completion", the corresponding evaluation score is set to 7.
In step S818, if option 2 of topic 7 is selected, i.e., "efficiency is general, safety is general, and completion is almost impossible", the corresponding evaluation score is set to 8.
In step S819, if option 3 of topic 7 is selected, i.e., "efficiency is poor, safety is poor, and completion is substantially not achieved", the corresponding evaluation score is set to 9.
Fig. 9 schematically shows a flow chart of an evaluation method according to yet another embodiment of the present disclosure. The method provided by the embodiment of the present disclosure may be processed by any electronic device with computing processing capability, for example, the server 105 and/or the terminal devices 102 and 103 in the embodiment of fig. 1 described above, and in the following embodiment, the terminal device 102 is taken as an execution subject for example, but the present disclosure is not limited thereto.
As shown in fig. 9, the evaluation method provided by the embodiment of the present disclosure may include the following steps. Here, the cascade path set in fig. 8 is exemplified.
In step S901, the evaluation of the toilet itself is started.
In step S902, title 1 and its options 1 and 2 are displayed at the first client.
In step S903, if the meter responder selects option 1 [ can ] of question 1, question 1 is displayed on the first client, the node 1 is reached to generate an evaluation report and an evaluation conclusion, and question 1 and option 1 thereof are displayed in the evaluation report.
In step S904, if the table responder selects option 2 [ unable ] of topic 1, then topics 1 and 2 are displayed on the first client.
In step S905, if the table responder selects option 1 [ yes ] of topic 2, topics 1 and 2 and 3 are displayed on the first client.
In step S906, node 2 is reached, and a corresponding evaluation report and evaluation conclusion are generated according to the selection of the option of question 3, and option 2 of question 1, option 1 of question 2, and the selected corresponding option of question 3 are displayed in the evaluation report.
In step S907, if option 2 [ no ] of option table responder option 2, then topics 1 and 2 and 4 are displayed at the first client.
In step S908, if the table responder chooses option 1 [ can ] of topic 4, then topics 1 and 2 and 4 and 5 are displayed at the first client.
In step S909, node 3 is reached, and a corresponding evaluation report and evaluation conclusion are generated based on the selection of the option of question 5, and option 2 of question 1, option 2 of question 2, option 1 of question 4, and the corresponding option selected for question 5 are displayed in the evaluation report.
In step S910, if the table responder chooses option 2 [ unable ] of topic 4, then topics 1 and 2 and 4 and 6 are displayed at the first client.
In step S911, if the table responder picks option 1 [ can ] of option 6, then topics 1 and 2 and 4 and 6 and 7 are displayed at the first client.
In step S912, node 4 is reached, and a corresponding evaluation report and evaluation conclusion are generated according to the selection of the choice of question 7 by the scale responder, and option 2 of question 1, option 2 of question 2, option 2 of question 4, and the corresponding choice of the selected question 7 are displayed in the evaluation report.
In step S913, if option 2 of question 6 of the question responder is [ unable ], the node reaches node 5, a corresponding evaluation report and an evaluation conclusion are generated, and option 2 of question 1, option 2 of question 2, option 2 of question 4, and option 2 of question 6 are displayed in the evaluation report.
It should be noted that when the option corresponding to the question is reselected, the question of the new path is displayed, all questions triggered by the reselected question and other questions triggered by the triggered questions are hidden, the answer is cleared, the evaluation score and the answer completion degree are corrected, and when the new answering path reaches the node, the evaluation conclusion and the report are updated according to the new current path.
Fig. 10 schematically shows a diagram of an evaluation report and an evaluation conclusion generated at node 1 according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
As shown in fig. 10, the evaluation score in the evaluation conclusion generated by the node 1 is 0, and the measurement result is completely self-care. The evaluation report includes the following contents:
self-0 point of toilet
1. Self-walking bathing
Can be used for
FIG. 11 schematically shows a diagram of an evaluation report and an evaluation conclusion generated at node 2 according to one embodiment of the present disclosure.
As shown in fig. 11, the evaluation score in the evaluation conclusion generated by the node 2 is 1, and the measurement result is basically self-care. The evaluation report includes the following contents:
1 point of washing
1. Self-walking bathing
Can not
2. Only need to take care or remind for bathing
Is that
3. Efficiency, safety and completion of bathing
High efficiency, high safety and smooth completion
Or the evaluation score in the evaluation conclusion generated by the node 2 is 2, and the measurement result is basically self-care. The evaluation report includes the following contents:
2 points of washing
1. Self-walking bathing
Can not
2. Only need to take care or remind for bathing
Is that
3. Efficiency, safety and completion of bathing
The efficiency is general, the safety is general, and the operation can be almost finished
Or the evaluation score in the evaluation conclusion generated by the node 2 is 3, and the measurement result is basically self-care. The evaluation report includes the following contents:
wash itself 3 points
1. Self-walking bathing
Can not
2. Only need to take care or remind for bathing
Is that
3. Efficiency, safety and completion of bathing
Poor efficiency and safety and basically can not be finished
FIG. 12 schematically shows a diagram of an evaluation report and an evaluation conclusion generated at node 3 according to one embodiment of the present disclosure.
As shown in fig. 12, the evaluation score in the evaluation conclusion generated by the node 3 is 4 points, and the measurement result is partially self-care. The evaluation report includes the following contents:
toilet self 4 points
1. Self-walking bathing
Can not
2. Only need to take care or remind for bathing
Whether or not
4. Self-washing face or feet
Can be used for
5. Efficiency, safety and completion of washing face or feet
High efficiency, high safety and smooth completion
Or the evaluation score in the evaluation conclusion generated by the node 3 is 5 points, and the measurement result is partially self-care. The evaluation report includes the following contents:
5 points of washing
1. Self-walking bathing
Can not
2. Only need to take care or remind for bathing
Whether or not
4. Self-washing face or feet
Can be used for
5. Efficiency, safety and completion of washing face or feet
The efficiency is general, the safety is general, and the operation can be almost finished
Or the evaluation score in the evaluation conclusion generated by the node 3 is 6 points, and the measurement result is partially self-care. The evaluation report includes the following contents:
wash itself 6 points
1. Self-walking bathing
Can not
2. Only need to take care or remind for bathing
Whether or not
4. Self-washing face or feet
Can be used for
5. Efficiency, safety and completion of washing face or feet
Poor efficiency and safety and basically can not be finished
FIG. 13 schematically illustrates an evaluation report and evaluation conclusion generated at node 4 according to one embodiment of the present disclosure.
As shown in fig. 13, the evaluation score in the evaluation conclusion generated by the node 4 is 7, and the measurement result is that assistance is needed. The evaluation report includes the following contents:
wash itself 7 points
1. Self-walking bathing
Can not
2. Only need to take care or remind for bathing
Whether or not
4. Self-washing face or feet
Can not
6. Assist others in bathing
Can be used for
7. Other people assist bathing efficiency, safety and completion
High efficiency, high safety and smooth completion
Or the evaluation score in the evaluation conclusion generated by the node 4 is 8, and the measurement result is that assistance is needed. The evaluation report includes the following contents:
wash itself 8 points
1. Self-walking bathing
Can not
2. Only need to take care or remind for bathing
Whether or not
4. Self-washing face or feet
Can not
6. Assist others in bathing
Can be used for
7. Other people assist bathing efficiency, safety and completion
The efficiency is general, the safety is general, and the operation can be almost finished
Or the evaluation score in the evaluation conclusion generated by the node 4 is 9, and the measurement result is that assistance is needed. The evaluation report includes the following contents:
9 points of washing
1. Self-walking bathing
Can not
2. Only need to take care or remind for bathing
Whether or not
4. Self-washing face or feet
Can not
6. Assist others in bathing
Can be used for
7. Other people assist bathing efficiency, safety and completion
Poor efficiency and safety and basically can not be finished
Figure 14 schematically illustrates a diagram of an evaluation report and an evaluation conclusion generated at node 5, according to one embodiment of the present disclosure.
As shown in fig. 14, the evaluation score in the evaluation conclusion generated by the node 5 is 10 scores, and the measurement result is incapability. The evaluation report includes the following contents:
10 points of the toilet
1. Self-walking bathing
Can not
2. Only need to take care or remind for bathing
Whether or not
4. Self-washing face or feet
Can not
6. Assist others in bathing
Can not
According to the evaluation method provided by the embodiment of the disclosure, when complex cascade logic appears in the scale, multi-level cascade can be set in the evaluation scale, when a specific option condition is met, the test question combination of a specific cascade path is triggered, the normal triggering and reselection of the multi-level cascade or backtracking during cancelling operation is supported, the interaction change of other scale functions (such as report generation and completion calculation) is supported, and a comprehensive solution is provided. When the answer of the answered test question is reselected or cancelled, the system can automatically trigger the path change after the reselection, correct test question backtracking is carried out, and information such as change evaluation scores and answer completion degrees and the like corresponding to the path change is automatically carried out, so that correct generation of an evaluation report and an evaluation conclusion can be ensured, and meanwhile, the export of the evaluation report and the correct output of printing can be ensured, the output of the what you see is what you answer evaluation report and the conclusion under multi-level cascade is realized, the meter can be completely electronized, and the actual requirement is met. The technical scheme provided by the embodiment of the disclosure can be applied to a special rehabilitation system, a medical care and long-term care system, an elderly care system and the like, so that comprehensive informatization of the ICF scale is realized, and mobile interconnection analysis is supported.
Embodiments of the apparatus of the present disclosure are described below, which may be used to perform the above-described evaluation methods of the present disclosure.
Fig. 15 schematically shows a block diagram of an evaluation device according to one embodiment of the present disclosure. The apparatus provided in the embodiment of the present disclosure may be implemented by any electronic device with computing processing capability, for example, the server 105 and/or the terminal devices 102 and 103 in the embodiment of fig. 1 described above, and in the following embodiment, the implementation of the terminal device 102 is taken as an example for illustration, but the present disclosure is not limited thereto.
As shown in fig. 15, the evaluation apparatus 1500 according to the embodiment of the present disclosure may include a first test question display module 1510, a second test question display module 1520, a fourth test question display module 1530, and a first report display module 1540.
The first test question display module 1510 may be configured to display a first test question and a first option and a second option thereof on the first client, where the first option of the first test question is associated with a second test question, and the second option of the first test question is associated with a third test question. The second test question display module 1520 may be configured to display the second test question and the first option and the second option thereof at the first client in response to a confirmation instruction for the first option of the first test question, the first option of the second test question being associated with a fourth test question, and the second option of the second test question being associated with a fifth test question. The fourth test question display module 1530 may be configured to display the fourth test question and the plurality of options thereof at the first client in response to the confirmation instruction for the first option of the second test question. The first report displaying module 1540 may be configured to display the first evaluation report at the first client in response to the confirmation instruction of the target option of the fourth test question.
In an exemplary embodiment, the evaluation apparatus 1500 may further include: a first report export module and/or a first report printing module. Wherein the first report derivation module may be configured to derive the first evaluation report in response to a request for derivation of the first evaluation report. The first report printing module may be configured to print the first evaluation report in response to a print request for the first evaluation report.
In an exemplary embodiment, the first evaluation report may include a first evaluation report and a first evaluation conclusion, the first evaluation report may be generated according to the first test question and the first option thereof, the second test question and the first option thereof, and the fourth test question and the target option thereof, the first evaluation conclusion may include a first evaluation score and a corresponding first measurement result, and the first evaluation score may be determined according to the target option of the fourth test question.
In an exemplary embodiment, the evaluation apparatus 1500 may further include: the first answer completion display module may be configured to display the answer completion of the first test question, the second test question, and the fourth test question at the first client.
In an exemplary embodiment, the evaluation apparatus 1500 may further include: an answer re-selection module configured to hide the second test question and the first option and the second option thereof and the fourth test question and a plurality of options thereof at the first client in response to a confirmation instruction for the second option of the first test question; a third test question display module, configured to display the third test question and a first option and a second option thereof on the first client, where the first option of the third test question is associated with a sixth test question, and the second option of the third test question is associated with a seventh test question; a sixth test question display module, which may be configured to respond to a confirmation instruction of the first option of the third test question, and display the sixth test question and a plurality of options thereof on the first client; a second evaluation report display module may be configured to display a second evaluation report at the first client in response to a confirmation instruction of the target option of the sixth test question.
In an exemplary embodiment, the evaluation apparatus 1500 may further include: a second report export module and/or a second report printing module, wherein the second report export module may be configured to export the second evaluation report in response to an export request for the second evaluation report. The second report printing module may be configured to print the second evaluation report in response to a print request for the second evaluation report.
In an exemplary embodiment, the second evaluation report may include a second evaluation report and a second evaluation conclusion, the second evaluation report may be generated according to the first test question and the second option thereof, the third test question and the first option thereof, and the sixth test question and the target option thereof, the second evaluation conclusion may include a second evaluation score and a second measurement result corresponding thereto, and the second evaluation score may be determined according to the target option of the sixth test question.
In an exemplary embodiment, the evaluation apparatus 1500 may further include: the second answer completion display module may be configured to display the answer completion of the first test question, the third test question, and the sixth test question at the first client.
In an exemplary embodiment, the evaluation apparatus 1500 may further include: the test question state setting module can be configured to respond to a confirmation instruction of a first option of the first test question and set the first test question into a completion state; a test question state changing module configured to change the first test question from the completed state to an uncompleted state in response to a cancel instruction for a first option of the first test question; the test question backtracking module may be configured to hide the second test question and the first option and the second option thereof, and the fourth test question and a plurality of options thereof at the first client.
In an exemplary embodiment, the evaluation apparatus 1500 may further include: the answer completion changing module may be configured to change the answer completion of the first test question, the second test question, and the fourth test question displayed at the first client.
In an exemplary embodiment, the evaluation apparatus 1500 may further include: a path setting panel display module that may be configured to display a cascaded path setting panel at the second client; and the cascade path generating module can be configured to respond to an input instruction of the cascade path setting panel to generate test questions, options and triggering conditions thereof in the multistage cascade path.
For details which are not disclosed in the embodiments of the apparatus of the present disclosure, please refer to the embodiments of the above-described evaluation method of the present disclosure for the respective functional modules of the evaluation apparatus of the exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure correspond to the steps of the above-described evaluation method.
Referring now to FIG. 16, shown is a block diagram of a computer system 1600 suitable for use in implementing an electronic device of an embodiment of the present disclosure. The computer system 1600 of the electronic device shown in fig. 16 is only an example, and should not bring any limitations to the function and scope of use of the embodiments of the present disclosure.
As shown in fig. 16, the computer system 1600 includes a Central Processing Unit (CPU)1601 which can perform various appropriate actions and processes in accordance with a program stored in a Read Only Memory (ROM)1602 or a program loaded from a storage part 1607 into a Random Access Memory (RAM) 1603. In the RAM 1603, various programs and data necessary for system operation are also stored. The CPU 1601, ROM 1602, and RAM 1603 are connected to each other via a bus 1604. An input/output (I/O) interface 1605 is also connected to the bus 1604.
The following components are connected to the I/O interface 1605: an input portion 1606 including a keyboard, a mouse, and the like; an output portion 1607 including a display device such as a Cathode Ray Tube (CRT), a Liquid Crystal Display (LCD), and a speaker; a storage portion 1608 including a hard disk and the like; and a communication section 1609 including a network interface card such as a LAN card, a modem, or the like. The communication section 1609 performs communication processing via a network such as the internet. The driver 1610 is also connected to the I/O interface 1605 as needed. A removable medium 1611 such as a magnetic disk, an optical disk, a magneto-optical disk, a semiconductor memory, or the like is mounted on the drive 1610 as necessary, so that a computer program read out therefrom is mounted in the storage portion 1607 as necessary.
In particular, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure, the processes described above with reference to the flowcharts may be implemented as computer software programs. For example, embodiments of the present disclosure include a computer program product comprising a computer program embodied on a computer readable medium, the computer program comprising program code for performing the method illustrated in the flow chart. In such embodiments, the computer program may be downloaded and installed from a network via the communication portion 1609, and/or installed from the removable media 1611. The above-described functions defined in the system of the present application are executed when the computer program is executed by the Central Processing Unit (CPU) 1601.
It should be noted that the computer readable media shown in the present disclosure may be computer readable signal media or computer readable storage media or any combination of the two. A computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any combination of the foregoing. More specific examples of the computer readable storage medium may include, but are not limited to: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a Random Access Memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. In the present disclosure, a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. In contrast, in the present disclosure, a computer-readable signal medium may include a propagated data signal with computer-readable program code embodied therein, for example, in baseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagated data signal may take many forms, including, but not limited to, electro-magnetic, optical, or any suitable combination thereof. A computer readable signal medium may also be any computer readable medium that is not a computer readable storage medium and that can communicate, propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. Program code embodied on a computer readable medium may be transmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited to: wireless, wire, fiber optic cable, RF, etc., or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
The flowchart and block diagrams in the figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present disclosure. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems which perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
The modules described in the embodiments of the present disclosure may be implemented by software, or may be implemented by hardware, and the described modules may also be disposed in a processor. Wherein the names of the modules do not in some cases constitute a limitation of the module itself.
As another aspect, the present application also provides a computer-readable medium, which may be contained in the electronic device described in the above embodiments; or may exist separately without being assembled into the electronic device. The computer readable medium carries one or more programs which, when executed by the electronic device, cause the electronic device to implement the evaluation method as described in the above embodiments.
For example, the electronic device may implement the following as shown in fig. 2: step S210, displaying a first test question and a first option and a second option thereof on a first client, wherein the first option of the first test question is associated with a second test question, and the second option of the first test question is associated with a third test question; step S220, responding to a confirmation instruction of the first option of the first test question, displaying the second test question and the first option and the second option thereof on the first client, wherein the first option of the second test question is associated with a fourth test question, and the second option of the second test question is associated with a fifth test question; step S230, in response to the confirmation instruction for the first option of the second test question, displaying the fourth test question and a plurality of options thereof on the first client; step S240, in response to the confirmation instruction for the target option of the fourth test question, displaying a first evaluation report at the first client.
As another example, the electronic device may implement the various steps shown in fig. 3-5 and 7-9.
It should be noted that although in the above detailed description several modules of the device for action execution are mentioned, this division is not mandatory. Indeed, the features and functionality of two or more of the modules described above may be embodied in one module, in accordance with embodiments of the present disclosure. Conversely, the features and functions of one module described above may be further divided into embodiments by a plurality of modules.
Through the above description of the embodiments, those skilled in the art will readily understand that the exemplary embodiments described herein may be implemented by software, or by software in combination with necessary hardware. Therefore, the technical solution according to the embodiments of the present disclosure may be embodied in the form of a software product, which may be stored in a non-volatile storage medium (which may be a CD-ROM, a usb disk, a removable hard disk, etc.) or on a network, and includes several instructions to enable a computing device (which may be a personal computer, a server, a touch terminal, or a network device, etc.) to execute the method according to the embodiments of the present disclosure.
Other embodiments of the disclosure will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the disclosure disclosed herein. This application is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the disclosure following, in general, the principles of the disclosure and including such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice within the art to which the disclosure pertains. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the disclosure being indicated by the following claims.
It will be understood that the present disclosure is not limited to the precise arrangements described above and shown in the drawings and that various modifications and changes may be made without departing from the scope thereof. The scope of the present disclosure is limited only by the appended claims.
Claims (12)
1. An evaluation method, comprising:
displaying a first test question and a first option and a second option thereof at a first client, wherein the first option of the first test question is associated with a second test question, and the second option of the first test question is associated with a third test question;
responding to a confirmation instruction of a first option of the first test question, displaying the second test question and a first option and a second option thereof on the first client side, wherein the first option of the second test question is associated with a fourth test question, and the second option of the second test question is associated with a fifth test question;
responding to a confirmation instruction of a first option of the second test question, and displaying the fourth test question and a plurality of options thereof on the first client;
displaying a first evaluation report at the first client in response to a confirmation instruction of the target option of the fourth test question.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
deriving the first evaluation report in response to a request to derive the first evaluation report; and/or
Printing the first evaluation report in response to a print request for the first evaluation report;
the first evaluation report comprises a first evaluation report and a first evaluation conclusion, the first evaluation report is generated according to the first test question and the first option thereof, the second test question and the first option thereof, the fourth test question and the target option thereof, the first evaluation conclusion comprises a first evaluation score and a first measurement result corresponding to the first evaluation score, and the first evaluation score is determined according to the target option of the fourth test question.
3. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
and displaying the answer completion degrees of the first test question, the second test question and the fourth test question at the first client.
4. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
hiding the second test question and a first option and a second option thereof and the fourth test question and a plurality of options thereof at the first client in response to a confirmation instruction of the second option of the first test question;
displaying the third test question and a first option and a second option thereof on the first client, wherein the first option of the third test question is associated with a sixth test question, and the second option of the third test question is associated with a seventh test question;
responding to a confirmation instruction of the first option of the third test question, and displaying a sixth test question and a plurality of options thereof on the first client;
and responding to a confirmation instruction of the target option of the sixth test question, and displaying a second evaluation report at the first client.
5. The method of claim 4, further comprising:
deriving the second evaluation report in response to a request to derive the second evaluation report; and/or
Printing the second evaluation report in response to a print request for the second evaluation report;
the second evaluation report comprises a second evaluation report and a second evaluation conclusion, the second evaluation report is generated according to the first test question and the second option thereof, the third test question and the first option thereof, the sixth test question and the target option thereof, the second evaluation conclusion comprises a second evaluation score and a second measurement result corresponding to the second evaluation score, and the second evaluation score is determined according to the target option of the sixth test question.
6. The method of claim 4, further comprising:
and displaying the answer completion degrees of the first test question, the third test question and the sixth test question at the first client.
7. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
setting the first test question to be in a finished state in response to a confirmation instruction of a first option of the first test question;
changing the first test question from the completed state to an uncompleted state in response to a cancel instruction for a first option of the first test question;
and hiding the second test question and a first option and a second option thereof, and the fourth test question and a plurality of options thereof at the first client.
8. The method of claim 7, further comprising:
and changing the answer completion degree of the first test question, the second test question and the fourth test question displayed on the first client.
9. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
displaying a cascade path setting panel at the second client;
and responding to an input instruction of the cascade path setting panel, and generating test questions, options thereof and trigger conditions in the multistage cascade path.
10. An evaluation device, comprising:
the system comprises a first test question display module, a second test question display module and a third test question display module, wherein the first test question display module is configured to display a first test question and a first option and a second option thereof on a first client side, the first option of the first test question is associated with the second test question, and the second option of the first test question is associated with the third test question;
the second test question display module is configured to respond to a confirmation instruction of a first option of the first test question, and display the second test question and a first option and a second option of the second test question on the first client side, wherein the first option of the second test question is associated with a fourth test question, and the second option of the second test question is associated with a fifth test question;
a fourth test question display module configured to display the fourth test question and a plurality of options thereof on the first client in response to a confirmation instruction for the first option of the second test question;
a first report display module configured to display a first evaluation report at the first client in response to a confirmation instruction of the target option of the fourth test question.
11. A computer-readable medium, on which a computer program is stored which, when being executed by a processor, carries out the evaluation method according to one of claims 1 to 9.
12. An electronic device, comprising:
one or more processors;
storage means for storing one or more programs which, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to carry out the evaluation method according to any one of claims 1 to 9.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201911011508.0A CN110752037A (en) | 2019-10-23 | 2019-10-23 | Evaluation method and device, computer readable medium and electronic device |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201911011508.0A CN110752037A (en) | 2019-10-23 | 2019-10-23 | Evaluation method and device, computer readable medium and electronic device |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN110752037A true CN110752037A (en) | 2020-02-04 |
Family
ID=69279510
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201911011508.0A Pending CN110752037A (en) | 2019-10-23 | 2019-10-23 | Evaluation method and device, computer readable medium and electronic device |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN110752037A (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN115344149A (en) * | 2021-04-28 | 2022-11-15 | 欧姆龙株式会社 | Recording medium, analysis support method, and analysis support system |
Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103810150A (en) * | 2012-11-09 | 2014-05-21 | 中国银联股份有限公司 | Automatic relation nestable questionnaire generating method and device |
CN104572136A (en) * | 2015-02-15 | 2015-04-29 | 奚峰 | Graphical questionnaire generation method and graphical questionnaire generation system |
CN104699973A (en) * | 2015-03-19 | 2015-06-10 | 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 | Method and device for controlling logic of questionnaires |
CN107516003A (en) * | 2016-06-15 | 2017-12-26 | 九日生行动健康科技股份有限公司 | Dynamic questionnaire survey method |
CN108847283A (en) * | 2018-04-19 | 2018-11-20 | 中国人民解放军第二军医大学 | Personalized health management method and system |
CN109036559A (en) * | 2018-06-28 | 2018-12-18 | 科菲(上海)医药科技有限公司 | Body heath's question and answer appraisal procedure and system based on artificial intelligence |
CN109325868A (en) * | 2018-09-03 | 2019-02-12 | 中国平安人寿保险股份有限公司 | Questionnaire data processing method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
-
2019
- 2019-10-23 CN CN201911011508.0A patent/CN110752037A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103810150A (en) * | 2012-11-09 | 2014-05-21 | 中国银联股份有限公司 | Automatic relation nestable questionnaire generating method and device |
CN104572136A (en) * | 2015-02-15 | 2015-04-29 | 奚峰 | Graphical questionnaire generation method and graphical questionnaire generation system |
CN104699973A (en) * | 2015-03-19 | 2015-06-10 | 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 | Method and device for controlling logic of questionnaires |
CN107516003A (en) * | 2016-06-15 | 2017-12-26 | 九日生行动健康科技股份有限公司 | Dynamic questionnaire survey method |
CN108847283A (en) * | 2018-04-19 | 2018-11-20 | 中国人民解放军第二军医大学 | Personalized health management method and system |
CN109036559A (en) * | 2018-06-28 | 2018-12-18 | 科菲(上海)医药科技有限公司 | Body heath's question and answer appraisal procedure and system based on artificial intelligence |
CN109325868A (en) * | 2018-09-03 | 2019-02-12 | 中国平安人寿保险股份有限公司 | Questionnaire data processing method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN115344149A (en) * | 2021-04-28 | 2022-11-15 | 欧姆龙株式会社 | Recording medium, analysis support method, and analysis support system |
TWI818462B (en) * | 2021-04-28 | 2023-10-11 | 日商歐姆龍股份有限公司 | Analysis support program, analysis support method and analysis support system |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP4060565A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for acquiring pre-trained model | |
US11106981B2 (en) | System for refining cognitive insights using cognitive graph vectors | |
US11062094B2 (en) | Systems and methods for automatically detecting sentiments and assigning and analyzing quantitate values to the sentiments expressed in text | |
US20200250378A1 (en) | Methods and apparatuses for identifying a user intent of a statement | |
US20180075335A1 (en) | System and method for managing artificial conversational entities enhanced by social knowledge | |
KR20210150622A (en) | User-progammable automated assistant | |
CN111552880B (en) | Knowledge graph-based data processing method and device, medium and electronic equipment | |
CN107741976B (en) | Intelligent response method, device, medium and electronic equipment | |
JP2017174062A (en) | Purchase behavior analyzing device and program | |
US9697057B2 (en) | Automated transfer of user data between applications utilizing different interaction modes | |
US12069019B2 (en) | Topic overlap detection in messaging systems | |
US10636000B2 (en) | Ascertaining the engagement ability of a user in an online environment | |
Valtolina et al. | Visual design of dialogue flows for conversational interfaces | |
US20200380020A1 (en) | Enhanced multi-workspace chatbot | |
CN110752037A (en) | Evaluation method and device, computer readable medium and electronic device | |
CN116484880A (en) | Information processing method, information processing device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
US20200090284A1 (en) | Socially-enabled motivational predisposition prediction | |
Bublyk et al. | Decision Support System Design For Low-Voice Emergency Medical Calls At Smart City Based On Chatbot Management In Social Networks. | |
CN110580648A (en) | financial information processing method and device based on artificial intelligence | |
US20210103619A1 (en) | Interactive device | |
Aljaber et al. | Evaluation of mobile health education applications for health professionals and patients | |
CN113298277B (en) | Continuous reservation information pushing method and device based on target and electronic equipment | |
CN113010784B (en) | Method, apparatus, electronic device and medium for generating prediction information | |
CN117493531B (en) | Training material generation method, training material generation equipment and storage medium | |
CN116050427B (en) | Information generation method, training device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20200204 |