CN110622911A - Selection method capable of simultaneously improving pig feed efficiency and growth speed - Google Patents
Selection method capable of simultaneously improving pig feed efficiency and growth speed Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110622911A CN110622911A CN201910820228.8A CN201910820228A CN110622911A CN 110622911 A CN110622911 A CN 110622911A CN 201910820228 A CN201910820228 A CN 201910820228A CN 110622911 A CN110622911 A CN 110622911A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- weight
- gain
- ewg
- breeding
- body weight
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000010187 selection method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 9
- 238000009395 breeding Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 54
- 230000001488 breeding effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 54
- 230000037396 body weight Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 42
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 39
- 241000282887 Suidae Species 0.000 claims abstract description 36
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 230000002068 genetic effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 235000019786 weight gain Nutrition 0.000 claims description 22
- 230000004584 weight gain Effects 0.000 claims description 22
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 17
- 235000021050 feed intake Nutrition 0.000 claims description 16
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000037406 food intake Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 235000012631 food intake Nutrition 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000010171 animal model Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 235000021052 average daily weight gain Nutrition 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000013178 mathematical model Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000013011 mating Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 235000016709 nutrition Nutrition 0.000 claims description 3
- 241001179707 Penthe Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000004873 anchoring Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000021316 daily nutritional intake Nutrition 0.000 claims description 2
- 208000012868 Overgrowth Diseases 0.000 claims 2
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 235000019750 Crude protein Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 244000144980 herd Species 0.000 description 3
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005303 weighing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 241000255969 Pieris brassicae Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006027 corn-soybean meal Substances 0.000 description 1
- QTCANKDTWWSCMR-UHFFFAOYSA-N costic aldehyde Natural products C1CCC(=C)C2CC(C(=C)C=O)CCC21C QTCANKDTWWSCMR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000019621 digestibility Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000029087 digestion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012214 genetic breeding Methods 0.000 description 1
- ISTFUJWTQAMRGA-UHFFFAOYSA-N iso-beta-costal Natural products C1C(C(=C)C=O)CCC2(C)CCCC(C)=C21 ISTFUJWTQAMRGA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002035 prolonged effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004003 subcutaneous fat Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000003442 weekly effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01K—ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
- A01K67/00—Rearing or breeding animals, not otherwise provided for; New or modified breeds of animals
- A01K67/02—Breeding vertebrates
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Environmental Sciences (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Animal Husbandry (AREA)
- Biodiversity & Conservation Biology (AREA)
- Fodder In General (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to a selection method capable of simultaneously improving the efficiency and the growth speed of pig feed, which is characterized by comprising the following steps: the selection method for improving the pig feed efficiency and the growth speed simultaneously by utilizing the properties of the super-growth body weight comprises the steps of basic conditions of selection, measurement index and data processing, estimation of breeding value, calculation of comprehensive selection index, selection and matching of backup breeding pigs and verification. Simple and practical, has good selection effect, can be used for phenotype selection of simultaneous determination groups, can also compare and select different determination groups according to heritability and genetic correlation, and can be used for directly selecting and improving the feed efficiency and growth speed of swinery.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to a selection method capable of simultaneously improving the efficiency and the growth speed of pig feed, belonging to the field of genetic breeding of breeding pigs.
Background
With the energy crisis becoming more serious, the feed efficiency of pigs is always a problem of special attention of breeding industry and pig breeding enterprises. The traditional method for evaluating the Feed efficiency of pigs is represented by Feed Conversion Rate (FCR), namely Feed-meat ratio (Feed/Gain) or meat-meat ratio (Gain/Feed), and although FCR can evaluate the Feed efficiency of different groups more intuitively, the traditional method has defects in breeding selection. Residual Feed Intake (RFI) is also a trait that assesses the feed efficiency of animals, and is the difference between the actual feed intake of an animal and the estimated feed intake for growth and maintenance needs. The feed efficiency of the pigs can be effectively improved by reducing the RFI of the pigs, but the RFI has the defects that the RFI is independently selected, the feed intake and the growth speed of the pigs are reduced, the feed efficiency is improved, and the marketing day age is prolonged.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a selection method capable of simultaneously improving the efficiency and the growth speed of pig feed, which is a simple and practical technical method with good selection effect for improving the efficiency and the growth speed of pig feed, and can directly select and improve the feed efficiency and the growth speed of swinery. The method adopts a simple and practical selection character, namely, the Excess Weight Gain (EWG), wherein the excess weight gain refers to the difference value between the actual weight gain and the predicted weight gain (actual feed intake/group FCR), the predicted weight gain can be obtained by the ratio of the feed intake of a pig individual to the group FCR, and can be used for directly selecting and improving the growth rate and the feed efficiency of a pig group.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention is realized by the following technical scheme: a selection method capable of simultaneously improving the efficiency and the growth speed of pig feed is characterized by comprising the following specific steps:
firstly, establishing a selected basic condition;
(1) the measurement of the pigsty and the measurement column should be carried out according to the GB/T17824.1.
(2) The detection equipment comprises a pig free ingestion recording system, a living body backfat determinator, an electronic scale, a platform scale and the like, and the data determination equipment can be subjected to metrological verification to meet the specified precision requirement and is managed and used by a specially-assigned person;
(3) there are professional assay technicians;
(4) the feed meets the nutritional requirements of various pigs, and the determination environment is basically consistent;
(5) the complete record of the measured file is needed, and the system environment factors influencing the character performance are marked up: year, season, location, operator, etc.;
(6) the tested pigs are healthy, have uniform body and weight, are clearly numbered, have more than three generations of pedigree records, and accord with the breed characteristics;
(7) the pig farm production management technology is executed according to the GB/T17824.2;
(8) the pig farm environment management is executed according to the GB/T17824.3;
secondly, measuring production performance indexes;
(1) daily gain: the initial weight is 27 kg-35 kg, the final weight is 90 kg-115 kg, and the average daily weight gain (g/d) in the measuring period is measured;
(2) backfat thickness: measuring the back fat thickness (mm) of the living body at the point P2 when the weight of the pig reaches 90 kg-115 kg;
(3) food intake: recording feed intake (kg) per pig during the measurement period;
(4) weight gain in the determination period: weight gain (kg) = end weight (kg) measurement — start weight (kg) measurement;
thirdly, sorting the measured data;
in the actual measurement, the weight selection of the test sample starts within the range of 27-35 kg, the measurement is finished when the weight reaches 90-110 kg, when the daily gain is calculated, the weight of the test sample of an individual is corrected to 30kg, the weight correction to 100kg is finished, and then the corrected daily gain is calculated; similarly, synchronously correcting the day age of 30kg of body weight and the day age of 100kg of body weight, and converting the correction of the living back fat thickness into the 100kg of body weight and the living back fat thickness;
fourthly, calculating the weight of the super-increased body;
(1) predicting the weight gain: predicting the absolute value of the weight gain (kg) = actual food intake (kg) ÷ population FCR;
(2) super-increasing body weight: excess growth body weight (kg) = actual growth body weight (kg) -predicted growth body weight (kg);
fifthly, estimating a breeding value by using an animal model BLUP method;
(1) super-growth weight breeding value estimation model EBVEWG= ADG-Group-Pen-Litter-b 1 (ADFI) -b 2 (BF) -e, and the Estimated Breeding Value (EBV) of the excess growth body weight was calculated according to the modelEWG) Wherein:
ADG-correcting average daily gain, and correcting the daily gain to 30-100 kg stage daily gain as a covariate;
group-measuring batch effect, fixing effect;
pen-the effect of the column, the anchoring effect;
litter-the effects of nests, random effects;
ADFI-average daily food intake;
BF-correcting backfat thickness, correcting backfat to 100kg, as covariate;
EBVEWGsuper-gain weight estimation breeding value;
e-random error;
(2) the backfat thickness breeding value estimation model is EBVBF= BFA-Group-Offwt-e, calculating the Estimated Breeding Value (EBV) of the backfat thickness according to the modelBF) Wherein:
EBVBF-backfat thickness estimation breeding value;
BFA-correcting backfat thickness, correcting backfat to 100kg body weight;
group-batch effect, fixed effect;
offwt — end of body weight measurement as covariate;
e is a random error;
sixthly, calculating a comprehensive selection index;
calculating a comprehensive selection index of Z-EBV ═0.8EBVEWG-0.2EBVBFIn order to improve the feed efficiency and the growth speed of the pigs on the premise of not changing the back fat thickness (BF), the selection weight of the comprehensive breeding value selection index to EWG and BF is 0.8 and 0.2; (Note that backfat thickness is a negative choice, and therefore a minus sign)
Seventhly, selecting, reserving, matching and detecting the backup breeding pigs;
sorting according to the Z value, selecting the first 10 percent of reserve boars as the boars to be detected and sows with the genetic relationship less than 5 percent for breeding, making breeding records and farrowing records, and detecting the reserved boars after normal farrowing of a batch of sows;
sorting according to the Z value, selecting the first 60 percent of replacement gilts as boars with the genetic relationship less than 5 percent of the sows to be detected, making mating records and farrowing records, and detecting the replacement gilts as breeding sows after normal farrowing.
The animal model BLUP method is used for calculating a mathematical model established by the super-growth body weight estimated breeding value, and the parthenocarpic BLUP method is used for estimating the breeding value EBV of the super-growth body weight of each pigEWGMeanwhile, the genetic correlation between EWG and ADG and BF and the estimated heritability of EWG, ADG and BF are obtained.
The invention has the advantages of simplicity, practicability and good selection effect, can be used for phenotype selection of simultaneous determination groups, and can also compare and select different determination groups according to heritability and genetic correlation;
TABLE 1 genetic correlation between EWG heritability and traits
The EWG heritability is 0.46, belongs to a high heritability character, has high genetic correlation (0.79) with daily gain, so that the breeding of the swinery by utilizing the property of super-increased weight can obtain larger selection reaction, and the growth speed and the feed efficiency of the swinery can be directly improved by selection.
Detailed Description
The invention is further described with reference to the following examples: a selection method capable of simultaneously improving the efficiency and the growth speed of pig feed is characterized by comprising the following specific steps:
1. establishing basic conditions for breeding
(1) The measurement of the pigsty and the measurement column should be carried out according to the GB/T17824.1.
(2) The detection equipment comprises a pig free ingestion recording system, a living body backfat determinator, an electronic scale, a platform scale and the like, and the data determination equipment can be subjected to metrological verification to meet the specified precision requirement and is managed and used by a specially-assigned person;
(3) there are professional assay technicians;
(4) the feed meets the nutritional requirements of various pigs, and the determination environment is basically consistent;
(5) the complete record of the measured file is needed, and the system environment factors influencing the character performance are marked up: year, season, location, operator, etc.;
(6) the tested pigs are healthy, have uniform body and weight, are clearly numbered, have more than three generations of pedigree records, and accord with the breed characteristics;
(7) the pig farm production management technology is executed according to the GB/T17824.2;
(8) the pig farm environment management is executed according to the GB/T17824.3;
2. determination of production Performance indicators
(1) Determination of daily gain
Measuring when the individual weight reaches 27-35 kg, finishing measuring when the weight reaches 90-110 kg, and simultaneously recording the weighing date and the weighing amount;
(2) measurement of feed intake
Recording the feed consumption of each pig during the measurement;
(3) measurement of backfat thickness
And (5) measuring the back fat thickness of the living body when the body weight reaches 90-110 kg and the measurement is finished. Measuring the average value of two points of backfat thicknesses of the left sides of the 3 rd to 4 th costal vertebrae and the 4 th reciprocal sacral vertebra and 5cm away from the back center line by adopting an A ultrasonic method;
3. collating measured data
In the actual measurement, the weight selection of the test sample starts within the range of 27-35 kg, the measurement is finished when the weight reaches 90-110 kg, when the daily gain is calculated, the weight of the test sample of an individual is corrected to 30kg, the weight correction to 100kg is finished, and then the corrected daily gain is calculated; similarly, the age of day up to 30kg body weight and the age of day up to 100kg body weight were also corrected in synchronization. The calculation formula is as follows:
the average daily gain (g) = (end weight kg-test weight kg) ÷ (measurement period days d) × 1000g daily gain correction formula is as follows (refer to "third pig breeding" in chinese pig breeding adults, 2001):
corrected daily gain (g) = (70 kg × 1000 g/kg) ÷ (up to 100kg corrected age d-up to 30kg corrected age d);
the correction formula for day ages of 30kg in the formula is as follows:
30kg of day age (d) = measured test day age d + [ (30 kg-measured test body weight kg) × b ]
The b values are respectively: duroc =1.536, long white =1.565, large white = 1.550;
the correction formula for day ages of 100kg in the formula is as follows:
correction of day-to-day age measurement- [ (actual body weight-100)/CF ]
The CF calculation formula is as follows:
CF = (measured body weight kg ÷ measured age in days) x 1.826040 (boar)
CF = (measured body weight kg/measured day of age d) × 1.714615 (sow)
The daily age of up to 100kg body weight was measured, along with the measurement of the 100kg body weight in vivo backfat thickness. Scanning and measuring the thickness of skin and subcutaneous fat between the 3 rd to 4 th ribs from the last to the back of the body and 5cm away from the back center line by adopting an A-type ultrasonic measuring instrument, namely backfat thickness, unit: mm; after measurement, the measurement was converted into the 100kg body weight in vivo backfat thickness according to the following calibration formula:
corrected backfat thickness = measured backfat thickness × CF
Wherein: CF = a/{ a + [ B × (lining weight-100) ] }
A and B are given in Table 2;
TABLE 2 correction of backfat thickness A and B values
4. Calculating the weight of the superincreased body
(1) Predicting the weight gain: predicting the absolute value of the weight gain (kg) = actual food intake (kg) ÷ population FCR;
(2) super-increasing body weight: excess growth body weight (kg) = actual growth body weight (kg) -predicted growth body weight (kg);
5. method for estimating breeding value by using animal model BLUP method
The breeding value EBV of the super-growth body weight of each boar is estimated by a program for estimating the breeding value by a parthenocarpic BLUP method in MTDFREML softwareEWGAnd estimated breeding value EBV of backfat thicknessBF;
Super-growth weight breeding value estimation model EBVEWG= ADG-Group-Pen-Litter-b 1 (ADFI) -b 2 (BF) -e, and the Estimated Breeding Value (EBV) of the excess growth body weight was calculated according to the modelEWG);
The backfat thickness breeding value estimation model is EBVBF= BFA-Group-Offwt-e, calculating the Estimated Breeding Value (EBV) of the backfat thickness according to the modelBF);
5. Calculating the comprehensive selection index as Z-EBV ═ 0.8EBVEWG-0.2EBVBFIn order to improve the feed efficiency and the growth rate of the pigs on the premise of not changing the back fat thickness (BF), the selection weights of 0.8 and 0.2 are applied to the EWG and the BF by the comprehensive breeding value selection index. (Note that backfat thickness is a negative choice, and therefore a minus sign)
6. Selection, matching and verification of reserve boars
Sorting according to the Z value, selecting the first 10 percent of reserve boars as the boars to be detected and sows with the genetic relationship less than 5 percent for breeding, making breeding records and farrowing records, and detecting the reserved boars after normal farrowing of a batch of sows;
sorting according to the Z value, selecting the first 60 percent of replacement gilts as boars with the genetic relationship less than 5 percent of the sows to be detected, making mating records and farrowing records, and detecting the replacement gilts as breeding sows after normal farrowing.
Example 1
In the junge No. 1 group of the original pig farm of Jilin university, 60 piglets are randomly selected and divided into 2 batches (with limited measuring equipment), 30 piglets are selected in each batch, alternate measurement is carried out on a limiting column, and the alternate measurement is carried out every 2 weeks. The measurement is started from about 90 days old of the young boar, the weekly feed intake and weight gain of each boar are recorded during the measurement, the measurement is finished when the weight reaches about 110kg, and the back fat thickness is measured by using a pig carcass lean rate ultrasonic determinator piglog105 supplied by SFK in Denmark when the measurement is finished. Of these, 3 boars were eliminated for health reasons during the test period. Feeding corn-soybean meal type daily feed with Digestion Energy (DE) of 13.6MJ/Kg and Crude Protein (CP) of 16.6%. Mathematical model of Average Daily Gain (ADG) in pigs: ADG = Group + Pen + Litter + b1 (ADFI) + b2 (BF) + EBVEWG+ e. Wherein the lot (Group) is a fixed factor, the field (Pen) and the Litter (Litter) are random factors. And (4) correcting the average daily gain to 30kg of the initial measurement, and correcting the average daily gain and the backfat thickness of 100kg of the final weight to 100kg of the backfat thickness of the boar. Breeding value EBV of pig with super-increased body weightEWGIs the residual of the multivariate regression equation for Average Daily Gain (ADG) of pigs with respect to Average Daily Feed Intake (ADFI) and backfat thickness (BF). The breeding value EBV of the super-growth body weight of each boar is estimated by a program for estimating the breeding value by a parthenocarpic BLUP method in MTDFREML softwareEWGAnd simultaneously obtaining the genetic correlation between the EWG and the ADG and BF and the estimated heritability of the ADG and the BF. And obtaining the Feed Conversion Rate (FCR) of each boar according to the ratio of feed intake to weight gain.
As shown in Table 3, the initial weight average of the 57-head boar was 31kg, the final weight average was 106.5kg, the average daily feed intake during the measurement period was 2369g, the average daily weight gain was 908g, the average backfat thickness during the final measurement was 17mm, the feed conversion ratio (feed-meat ratio) during the measurement period of the whole group was 2.61, the apparent digestibility of crude protein was 0.8, and the standard deviation of the super-growth body weight breeding value was 34.7. Further analysis revealed that the genetic differences between the first 10 individuals with high EWG and the first 10 individuals with low EWG exceeded 3.5 standard deviations.
TABLE 3 mean and standard deviation of the respective traits
The heritability of each trait is related to the inheritance between traits, and as shown in table 4, the data on the diagonal line in the table is the heritability of the trait, and the other data is the inheritance between two traits.
TABLE 4 heritability of individual traits and genetic associations between traits
The heritability of EWG, FCR, ADG, BF in a herd of herd number 1 boars was 0.46, 0.33, 0.45, 0.14, respectively. It was demonstrated that EWG and FCR both belong to the intermediate heritability trait and ADG to the high heritability trait. The correlation coefficients between EWG and ADFI, ADG, BF are-0.01, 0.79, -0.17, respectively. Indicating that EWG is not essentially genetically related to daily feed intake, has a low correlation to BF, is highly genetically related to the presence of daily gain, and is also highly genetically related to the presence of FCR. Correlation coefficients between the FCR and ADFI, ADG and BF are respectively 0.55, -0.65 and-0.11, and the FCR and the ADG have high negative correlation and the BF has lower negative correlation. The correlation coefficients between ADG and ADFI and BF were 0.65 and 0.12, respectively. The correlation coefficient between ADFI and BF is 0.2. The correlation between backfat thickness and several production traits was low in the army group No. 1.
There is a large genetic difference in the weight gain EWG in a herd number 1 boar population, and therefore the EWG can be used as a selection trait to improve both feed efficiency and growth rate of pigs.
Claims (3)
1. A selection method capable of simultaneously improving the efficiency and the growth speed of pig feed is characterized by comprising the following specific steps:
firstly, establishing a selected basic condition;
(1) the measurement of the pigsty and the measurement column are carried out according to the GB/T17824.1;
(2) the detection equipment comprises a pig free ingestion recording system, a living body backfat determinator, an electronic scale and a platform scale, the data determination equipment is calibrated by metering to meet the specified precision requirement, and a specially-assigned person is responsible for management and use;
(3) there are professional assay technicians;
(4) the feed meets the nutritional requirements of various pigs, and the determination environment is basically consistent;
(5) the complete record of the measured file is needed, and the system environment factors influencing the character performance are marked up: year, season, location, operator;
(6) the tested pigs are healthy, have uniform body and weight, are clearly numbered, have more than three generations of pedigree records, and accord with the breed characteristics;
(7) the pig farm production management technology is executed according to the GB/T17824.2;
(8) the pig farm environment management is executed according to the GB/T17824.3;
secondly, measuring production performance indexes;
(1) daily gain: the initial weight is 27 kg-35 kg, the final weight is 90 kg-115 kg, and the average daily weight gain (g/d) in the measuring period is measured;
(2) backfat thickness: measuring the back fat thickness (mm) of the living body at the point P2 when the weight of the pig reaches 90 kg-115 kg;
(3) food intake: recording feed intake (kg) per pig during the measurement period;
(4) weight gain in the determination period: weight gain (kg) = end weight (kg) measurement — start weight (kg) measurement;
thirdly, sorting the measured data;
in the actual measurement, the weight selection of the test sample starts within the range of 27-35 kg, the measurement is finished when the weight reaches 90-110 kg, when the daily gain is calculated, the weight of the test sample of an individual is corrected to 30kg, the weight correction to 100kg is finished, and then the corrected daily gain is calculated; similarly, synchronously correcting the day age of 30kg of body weight and the day age of 100kg of body weight, and converting the correction of the living back fat thickness into the 100kg of body weight and the living back fat thickness;
fourthly, calculating the weight of the super-increased body;
(1) predicting the weight gain: predicting the absolute value of the weight gain (kg) = actual food intake (kg) ÷ population FCR;
(2) super-increasing body weight: excess growth body weight (kg) = actual growth body weight (kg) -predicted growth body weight (kg);
fifthly, estimating a breeding value by using an animal model BLUP method;
(1) super-growth weight breeding value estimation model EBVEWG= ADG-Group-Pen-Litter-b 1 (ADFI) -b 2 (BF) -e, and the Estimated Breeding Value (EBV) of the excess growth body weight was calculated according to the modelEWG) Wherein:
ADG-correcting average daily gain, and correcting the daily gain to 30-100 kg stage daily gain as a covariate;
group-measuring batch effect, fixing effect;
pen-the effect of the column, the anchoring effect;
litter-the effects of nests, random effects;
ADFI-average daily food intake;
BF-correcting backfat thickness, correcting backfat to 100kg, as covariate;
EBVEWGsuper-gain weight estimation breeding value;
e-random error;
(2) the backfat thickness breeding value estimation model is EBVBF= BFA-Group-Offwt-e, calculating the Estimated Breeding Value (EBV) of the backfat thickness according to the modelBF) Wherein:
EBVBF-backfat thickness estimation breeding value;
BFA-correcting backfat thickness, correcting backfat to 100kg body weight;
group-batch effect, fixed effect;
offwt — end of body weight measurement as covariate;
e is a random error;
sixthly, calculating a comprehensive selection index;
calculating the comprehensive selection index as Z-EBV ═ 0.8EBVEWG-0.2EBVBFTo achieve without changingThe feed efficiency and the growth speed of the pigs are improved on the premise of changing the back fat thickness (BF), so the selection weight of the comprehensive breeding value selection index to EWG and BF is 0.8 and 0.2;
seventhly, selecting, reserving, matching and detecting the backup breeding pigs;
sorting according to the Z value, selecting the first 10 percent of reserve boars as the boars to be detected and sows with the genetic relationship less than 5 percent for breeding, making breeding records and farrowing records, and detecting the reserved boars after normal farrowing of a batch of sows;
sorting according to the Z value, selecting the first 60 percent of replacement gilts as boars with the genetic relationship less than 5 percent of the sows to be detected, making mating records and farrowing records, and detecting the replacement gilts as breeding sows after normal farrowing.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the Excess Weight Gain (EWG) is the difference between the actual Weight Gain and the predicted Weight Gain, the predicted Weight Gain being equal to the ratio of the actual feed intake of the individual to the population FCR, the actual feed intake per population FCR absolute.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the BLUP method is used to calculate the over-growth body weight estimated breeding value and the mathematical model is used to estimate the over-growth body weight estimated breeding value EBV of each pig by the BLUP methodEWGMeanwhile, the genetic correlation between EWG and ADG and BF and the estimated heritability of EWG, ADG and BF are obtained.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201910820228.8A CN110622911A (en) | 2019-09-01 | 2019-09-01 | Selection method capable of simultaneously improving pig feed efficiency and growth speed |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201910820228.8A CN110622911A (en) | 2019-09-01 | 2019-09-01 | Selection method capable of simultaneously improving pig feed efficiency and growth speed |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN110622911A true CN110622911A (en) | 2019-12-31 |
Family
ID=68969881
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201910820228.8A Pending CN110622911A (en) | 2019-09-01 | 2019-09-01 | Selection method capable of simultaneously improving pig feed efficiency and growth speed |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN110622911A (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112528180A (en) * | 2020-12-16 | 2021-03-19 | 河北农业大学 | Sheep feed intelligent analysis selection platform |
CN113591287A (en) * | 2021-07-19 | 2021-11-02 | 中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所 | Method for evaluating weight of yellow cattle in western Hunan province |
CN113790757A (en) * | 2021-09-15 | 2021-12-14 | 山东农业大学 | Method for measuring long-hair rabbit productivity and application thereof |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030104392A1 (en) * | 2001-11-27 | 2003-06-05 | En-Chung Lin | Detection of growth performance of pigs |
KR20040049758A (en) * | 2002-12-07 | 2004-06-12 | 대한민국(진주산업대학교총장) | Early selection analysis method for gene of pigs with quality meat |
CN103461278A (en) * | 2013-09-27 | 2013-12-25 | 韦露 | Method for breeding pig breeds of Meiling black pigs |
CN107182927A (en) * | 2017-06-20 | 2017-09-22 | 山东农业大学 | A kind of breeding method of the white pig breed system of Quality type |
CN109385481A (en) * | 2018-10-10 | 2019-02-26 | 江苏农牧科技职业学院 | Application and its selection of serpinA3 the and vitronectin gene in Soviet Union's ginger boar breeding |
-
2019
- 2019-09-01 CN CN201910820228.8A patent/CN110622911A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030104392A1 (en) * | 2001-11-27 | 2003-06-05 | En-Chung Lin | Detection of growth performance of pigs |
KR20040049758A (en) * | 2002-12-07 | 2004-06-12 | 대한민국(진주산업대학교총장) | Early selection analysis method for gene of pigs with quality meat |
CN103461278A (en) * | 2013-09-27 | 2013-12-25 | 韦露 | Method for breeding pig breeds of Meiling black pigs |
CN107182927A (en) * | 2017-06-20 | 2017-09-22 | 山东农业大学 | A kind of breeding method of the white pig breed system of Quality type |
CN109385481A (en) * | 2018-10-10 | 2019-02-26 | 江苏农牧科技职业学院 | Application and its selection of serpinA3 the and vitronectin gene in Soviet Union's ginger boar breeding |
Non-Patent Citations (4)
Title |
---|
上海畜牧兽医学会: "《国外养猪新技术》", 31 August 1979, 科学技术文献出版社 * |
乔春生: "《养猪生产管理实务》", 31 August 2009, 湖南科学技术出版社 * |
全国畜牧总站组: "《全国生猪遗传改良计划工作手册》", 30 November 2013, 中国农业大学出版社 * |
蔡飞翔: "提高军牧1号白猪饲料效率的测定与选择", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库农业科技辑》 * |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112528180A (en) * | 2020-12-16 | 2021-03-19 | 河北农业大学 | Sheep feed intelligent analysis selection platform |
CN113591287A (en) * | 2021-07-19 | 2021-11-02 | 中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所 | Method for evaluating weight of yellow cattle in western Hunan province |
CN113790757A (en) * | 2021-09-15 | 2021-12-14 | 山东农业大学 | Method for measuring long-hair rabbit productivity and application thereof |
CN113790757B (en) * | 2021-09-15 | 2022-07-19 | 山东农业大学 | Method for measuring long-hair rabbit productivity and application thereof |
US11672237B2 (en) | 2021-09-15 | 2023-06-13 | Shandong Agricultural University | Method for measuring productivity of angora rabbit and its application |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Sonesson et al. | Genetic parameters and trends of meat quality, carcass composition and performance traits in two selected lines of large white pigs | |
Berg et al. | Muscle: bone ratio and fat percentage as measures of beef carcass composition | |
CN110622911A (en) | Selection method capable of simultaneously improving pig feed efficiency and growth speed | |
Wen et al. | Feed efficiency measures and their relationships with production and meat quality traits in slower growing broilers | |
Gispert et al. | Relationships between carcass quality parameters and genetic types | |
Doeschl-Wilson et al. | The relationship between body dimensions of living pigs and their carcass composition | |
Miller et al. | Effects of milk yield on biological efficiency and profit of beef production from birth to slaughter | |
Li et al. | Predicting corn digestible and metabolizable energy content from its chemical composition in growing pigs | |
Déru et al. | Genetics of digestive efficiency in growing pigs fed a conventional or a high‐fibre diet | |
McPhee et al. | Selection in pigs for increased lean growth rate on a time-based feeding scale | |
Saintilan et al. | Phenotypic and genetic relationships between growth and feed intake curves and feed efficiency and amino acid requirements in the growing pig | |
Nguyen et al. | Genetic parameters and responses of performance and body composition traits in pigs selected for high and low growth rate on a fixed ration over a set time | |
Yan et al. | Relationships between feeding behaviors and performance traits in slow-growing yellow broilers | |
CN109924166B (en) | Breeding method of high-quality chickens with low abdominal fat rate | |
Peña et al. | Use of serial ultrasound measures in the study of growth-and breed-related changes of ultrasonic measurements and relationship with carcass measurements in lean cattle breeds | |
Lopez et al. | Estimation of genetic parameters and accuracy of genomic prediction for production traits in Duroc pigs. | |
Blunn et al. | The relation between average daily gain and some carcass measurements | |
Pinheiro et al. | Phenotypic and genetic parameters compared during repeated measures of longissimus muscle area and subcutaneous fat thickness in Nelore cattle | |
Grona et al. | An evaluation of the USDA standards for feeder cattle frame size and muscle thickness | |
Tang et al. | Effect of breed, sex and birth parity on growth, carcass and meat quality in pigs | |
KR20230055449A (en) | Yorkshire maternal pig line development method with excellent growth and reproductive characteristics | |
Safari et al. | Comparative study of growth patterns for three Strains of broiler chickens using mathematical models | |
Eyþórsdóttir | Growth and carcass characteristics of Icelandic lambs-a review | |
Schinckel et al. | Evaluation of the growth of backfat depth, loin depth, and carcass weight for different sire and dam lines | |
Mohammadi et al. | Genetic evaluation of growth traits in Iranian Kordi Sheep using random regression model with homogeneous and heterogeneous residual variances |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication | ||
WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20191231 |