CN110502303B - Method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium for evaluating ability of old people - Google Patents
Method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium for evaluating ability of old people Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110502303B CN110502303B CN201910769292.8A CN201910769292A CN110502303B CN 110502303 B CN110502303 B CN 110502303B CN 201910769292 A CN201910769292 A CN 201910769292A CN 110502303 B CN110502303 B CN 110502303B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- evaluation
- item
- evaluated
- example graph
- capability
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 37
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 271
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 32
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 claims description 25
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 16
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 25
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 19
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 13
- 238000001990 intravenous administration Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000037213 diet Effects 0.000 description 5
- 235000005911 diet Nutrition 0.000 description 5
- 238000012854 evaluation process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 208000019505 Deglutition disease Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 235000011837 pasties Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 230000009747 swallowing Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000032683 aging Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003287 bathing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002354 daily effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001802 infusion Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000015110 jellies Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000008274 jelly Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 206010012289 Dementia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000001174 ascending effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001055 chewing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009194 climbing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003203 everyday effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007667 floating Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002496 gastric effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000968 intestinal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000012054 meals Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000006996 mental state Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035764 nutrition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000016709 nutrition Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 208000020016 psychiatric disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007306 turnover Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003462 vein Anatomy 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/44—Arrangements for executing specific programs
- G06F9/451—Execution arrangements for user interfaces
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/26—Government or public services
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
- G16H10/00—ICT specially adapted for the handling or processing of patient-related medical or healthcare data
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
- Y02P90/30—Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- User Interface Of Digital Computer (AREA)
Abstract
A method, apparatus, electronic device and storage medium for evaluating the ability of an elderly person, the method in one embodiment comprising: acquiring a current to-be-evaluated item in the old person capacity evaluation items, displaying an evaluation interface corresponding to the previous to-be-evaluated item, and setting a reference example diagram trigger control on the evaluation interface, wherein each capacity selection item corresponds to the current to-be-evaluated item; when an example graph evaluation instruction is received through a reference example graph trigger control, an example graph evaluation interface corresponding to a current item to be evaluated is obtained and displayed, wherein the example graph evaluation interface comprises sub-options corresponding to capability options, example graphs corresponding to the sub-options and evaluation scores; receiving a capability assessment confirmation instruction through an example graph assessment interface, wherein the capability assessment confirmation instruction carries a sub-selection item and a corresponding assessment score; the assessment score is determined as a capability assessment score value corresponding to the capability selection item. According to the embodiment of the application, the accuracy and the evaluation efficiency of the capacity evaluation of the old are improved.
Description
Technical Field
The present application relates to the field of computer technology, and in particular, to a method for evaluating the ability of an elderly person, an apparatus for evaluating the ability of an elderly person, an electronic device, and a computer readable storage medium.
Background
With the increasing degree of population aging in China, the public is strongly concerned about the problem of aged people, and in the population aging process, the increase of the number of the aged people and the increase of the population proportion of the aged people needing care inevitably lead to the increase of the demands of the whole society for sanitary and aged service. By evaluating the ability of the elderly and providing care services matching the ability of the elderly based on their ability, it is an important development direction for hygiene and care services.
Currently, the ability of the elderly is evaluated by manually filling out an offline form, and registering the relevant ability of the elderly on the form. In this evaluation mode, the correlation capability has no clear evaluation standard, and the evaluation result is limited by the experience and quality of the evaluation personnel, and has low accuracy and low efficiency.
Disclosure of Invention
Based on this, it is necessary to provide a method of evaluating the ability of the elderly, an apparatus for evaluating the ability of the elderly, an electronic device, and a computer-readable storage medium to improve the accuracy and evaluation efficiency of the ability evaluation of the elderly.
A method of assessing the ability of an elderly person, the method comprising:
acquiring a current item to be evaluated in the old person capacity evaluation items and an evaluation interface corresponding to the current item to be evaluated, and displaying the evaluation interface, wherein a reference example diagram trigger control and each capacity selection item corresponding to the current item to be evaluated are arranged on the evaluation interface;
when an example graph evaluation instruction is received through the reference example graph trigger control, an example graph evaluation interface corresponding to the current item to be evaluated is obtained and displayed, wherein the example graph evaluation interface comprises sub-options corresponding to the capability option, example graphs corresponding to the sub-options and corresponding evaluation scores;
receiving a capability assessment confirmation instruction through the example graph assessment interface, wherein the capability assessment confirmation instruction carries a sub-selection item and a corresponding assessment score;
the evaluation score is determined as a capability evaluation score value corresponding to the capability selection item.
An apparatus for assessing the ability of an elderly person, the apparatus comprising:
the current evaluation interface determining module is used for acquiring a current item to be evaluated in the old person capacity evaluation items and an evaluation interface corresponding to the current item to be evaluated, displaying the evaluation interface, and setting a reference example diagram trigger control and each capacity selection item corresponding to the current item to be evaluated on the evaluation interface;
An example graph interface determining module, configured to obtain and display an example graph evaluation interface corresponding to the current item to be evaluated when an example graph evaluation instruction is received through the reference example graph trigger control, where the example graph evaluation interface includes sub-options corresponding to the capability option, an example graph corresponding to each sub-option, and a corresponding evaluation score;
the option determining module is used for receiving a capability evaluation confirmation instruction through the example graph evaluation interface, wherein the capability evaluation confirmation instruction carries a sub-option and a corresponding evaluation score;
and the evaluation score determining module is used for determining the evaluation score as a capability evaluation score value corresponding to the capability selection item.
An electronic device comprising a memory storing a computer program and a processor implementing control of execution of the steps of the method as described above when the computer program is executed.
A computer readable storage medium having stored thereon a computer program which, when executed by a processor, performs the steps of controlling the execution of a method as described above.
Based on the embodiment scheme, the capacity evaluation is carried out on each item to be evaluated in the capacity evaluation items of the aged through a human-computer interaction mode, in the process of carrying out the evaluation, the sub-options corresponding to each capacity selection item corresponding to the current item to be evaluated and the example graph corresponding to each sub-option can be set on the example graph evaluation interface through displaying the example graph evaluation interface corresponding to the current item to be evaluated, so that the evaluator does not need abundant experience and expertise, the evaluator can be helped to evaluate the capacity of the aged rapidly and accurately through the example graph of the example graph, and the accuracy and evaluation efficiency of the capacity evaluation of the aged are improved.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method of assessing the ability of an elderly person in one embodiment;
FIG. 2 is an interface schematic of an assessment interface in one embodiment;
FIG. 3 is an interface schematic of an example graph evaluation interface in one embodiment;
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of an interface display of a logic correction failure in one embodiment;
FIGS. 5a-5d are schematic diagrams of graphical representations of statistical analysis results generated in some specific examples;
FIG. 6 is a schematic block diagram showing an apparatus for evaluating the ability of the elderly in one embodiment;
fig. 7 is an internal structural diagram of an electronic device in one embodiment.
Detailed Description
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present application more apparent, the present application will be further described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings and examples. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the present application.
For the purpose of quickly and accurately evaluating the ability of the elderly, the evaluation process may be performed by any device that can perform man-machine interaction, such as a personal computer, a tablet computer, a smart phone, etc. In some embodiments, in the evaluation process, only the human-computer interaction device may be involved, where the human-computer interaction device needs to obtain and embed an old person's ability evaluation questionnaire in advance, where relevant items to be evaluated are set in the old person's ability evaluation questionnaire. The human-computer interaction device can acquire and store the senile evaluation questionnaire in various possible modes, for example, the senile evaluation questionnaire is acquired from a server, the senile ability evaluation questionnaire is set to the human-computer interaction device through a third party device interface, and the mode of acquiring the senile ability evaluation questionnaire by the human-computer interaction device is not limited. In some embodiments, in the evaluation process, the human-computer interaction device and the background server may be involved at the same time, at this time, the background server may set and store an old person evaluation file, and in the evaluation process, the human-computer interaction device is used as a terminal for implementing a human-computer interaction function, obtains a project to be evaluated from the server and displays a relevant interface, obtains each instruction sent by a user based on the human-computer interaction interface, and transmits each instruction to the background server for processing. For ease of understanding, in the following embodiments, the evaluation process is described by taking a process performed by the human-computer interaction device as an example.
Referring to fig. 1, the method of evaluating the ability of the elderly in one embodiment mainly includes the following steps S101 to S104. The method can be executed on any personal computer interaction device.
Step S101: acquiring a current item to be evaluated in the old person capacity evaluation items and an evaluation interface corresponding to the current item to be evaluated, and displaying the evaluation interface, wherein a reference example diagram trigger control and each capacity selection item corresponding to the current item to be evaluated are arranged on the evaluation interface.
The senile ability evaluation item refers to an item for evaluating the senile ability, and the type and content of the specific senile ability evaluation item can be determined by combining the senile ability to be evaluated. For example, in some embodiments, the senior citizen ability assessment program may include activities of daily living, mental states, perceptive sense and communication, social engagement ability, and the like. Each of the senior citizen ability assessment items may further include sub-ability assessment items, for example, activities of daily living may further include: feeding ability, bathing ability, dressing ability, walking ability on level ground, climbing stairs ability, etc. In some embodiments, the senior citizen ability assessment items may also be items that directly assess the relevant ability, including eating ability, bathing ability, finishing ability, dressing ability, level ground walking ability, ascending and descending stairs ability, and the like.
In one embodiment, before acquiring the current item to be evaluated among the senior citizens' ability assessment items, the method may further include the steps of:
receiving a senior citizen ability assessment instruction;
and acquiring a preset senile ability evaluation questionnaire according to the senile ability evaluation instruction, and acquiring a senile ability evaluation item from the preset senile ability evaluation questionnaire.
Therefore, when the ability of the old people is required to be evaluated, a preset ability evaluation questionnaire of the old people can be obtained from the server, or the ability evaluation questionnaire of the old people stored or built-in by the man-machine interaction device can be directly obtained, and all the ability evaluation items of the old people can be obtained from the ability evaluation questionnaire of the old people. And then obtaining the current item to be evaluated from all the old people ability evaluation items. It can be understood that the current item to be evaluated refers to the old people ability evaluation item which is currently required to be evaluated.
In one embodiment, after receiving the senile ability assessment instruction, before obtaining the preset senile ability assessment questionnaire, a personal information input interface may be further obtained and displayed, so as to remind an assessment person to fill relevant personal information of an assessment object (the assessed senile person, which is also referred to as an assessment object in the relevant embodiment of the application) in the personal information input interface, for example, information such as a name, a gender, an age, an identification card number, a ethnicity, an address, an emergency contact, a marital status, a living situation, a medical fee payment mode, an economic source, a disease diagnosis, an unexpected event within about 30 days, and the like, so as to facilitate registration. In one embodiment, after the preset senile ability assessment questionnaire is obtained, or after the senile ability assessment is finished, a personal information input interface is obtained and displayed to input the relevant personal information of the assessment object. In one embodiment, after receiving the senile ability assessment instruction, or after obtaining a preset senile ability assessment questionnaire, the first personal information input interface may be firstly obtained and displayed to input personal information such as name, gender, age, identification card number, ethnicity and the like of the assessment object, and after ending the senile ability assessment, the second personal information input interface may be displayed to input other relevant information such as contact information of the emergency contact. The embodiment of the application does not specifically limit the time for inputting the related personal information and the form of a specific personal information input interface.
Wherein, in one embodiment, the above-described reference example graph trigger controls may be disposed at any suitable location of the evaluation interface. Taking the example that only one reference example diagram trigger control is provided, the reference example diagram trigger control can be arranged beside the display content of the current item to be evaluated. Where multiple reference example graph triggers are provided, the reference example graph triggers may be located alongside the associated individual capability choices.
In some embodiments, a capability selection item selection control may be further provided on the evaluation interface, where each capability selection item selection control corresponds to each capability selection item. Therefore, when the experience of the evaluator is rich and the expertise is strong, the evaluator can directly select and determine the capacity selection item corresponding to the current to-be-evaluated item based on the capacity selection item selection control without referring to the example diagram. In some embodiments, the evaluation scores corresponding to the capability choices may also be displayed on the evaluation interface at the same time, where the evaluation scores may be set corresponding to the capability choices selection control, and the corresponding setting relationship may be one-to-one correspondence, or one evaluation score corresponds to a plurality of capability choices selection control.
In some embodiments, when a selection instruction is received through the capability option selection control, the capability option selection control corresponding to the selection instruction is highlighted, so as to remind the user that the capability option corresponding to the capability option selection control has been selected. In some embodiments, when the evaluation score corresponding to the capability option is further displayed on the evaluation interface, the evaluation score may be simultaneously highlighted when the capability option selection control corresponding to the selection instruction is highlighted, so as to remind the user of the score corresponding to the capability option. In some embodiments, when the evaluation interface does not display the evaluation score corresponding to the capability option, and the capability option selection control corresponding to the selection instruction is highlighted, the evaluation score of the capability option corresponding to the capability option selection control may also be obtained at the same time, and the evaluation score is displayed at a corresponding position, so as to remind the user of the score corresponding to the capability option selected by the user. The corresponding location herein may be any possible location, such as a location corresponding to a capability selection item selection control corresponding to a selection instruction, a fixed location of a display interface (e.g., above, below, or other locations of the display interface, etc.), and so forth.
When the capability selection item selection control corresponding to the selection instruction is highlighted, any possible method can be adopted for highlighting, for example, the capability selection item selection control corresponding to the selection instruction is highlighted, and a selected identifier is displayed at a position corresponding to the capability selection item selection control corresponding to the selection instruction; or when the capacity selection item selection control corresponding to the selection instruction is highlighted, displaying the selected identification at the position corresponding to the capacity selection item selection control corresponding to the selection instruction. At the same time as highlighting, the highlighting color may also be set, which may be a highlighting color, to distinguish from other capability selection item selection controls.
Taking the current item to be evaluated as "eating" capability as an example, an interface schematic of the evaluation interface in one embodiment is shown in FIG. 2. In the illustration of fig. 2, in addition to the display of the current item to be evaluated as "eating" capability, a related explanation of the current item to be evaluated is displayed alongside the display of the current item to be evaluated: "means the process of delivering food from a container to the mouth, chewing, swallowing, etc. with a cutlery utensil.
Referring to fig. 2, a reference example diagram trigger control is provided on the evaluation interface, where the reference example diagram trigger control displays words such as "eating judgment reference diagram" so as to remind the user that the reference diagram for judging eating ability can be viewed by clicking the space.
Referring to fig. 2, on the evaluation interface, a capability selection control corresponding to each capability selection item of the current item to be evaluated, "eating" is further provided, where different capability selection items may correspond to different problem items, such as "whether there is a swallowing disorder", "whether tube feeding or intravenous diet is required", "whether other people need to assist in eating", and the like, which are shown in fig. 2, and the different capability selection control is applied respectively. In the adjacent corresponding positions of each question item, prompt words such as "single selection", "multiple selection" and the like can be further provided for prompting whether the question item can only select one item of the relevant capability choices or can select multiple items of the relevant capability choices. On the other hand, the capability selection item selection control of the corresponding capability selection item of the problem item may be displayed at the relevant position of the problem item, such as below the problem item shown in fig. 2, for example, below the problem item "whether there is a swallowing disorder", there is displayed "no swallowing disorder", "food is sent to the mouth with little reaction, or the mouth must be opened to eat the food", "the swallowing situation is bad, the caretaker cannot grasp how much the elderly has to eat the mouth to the bottom", "the caretaker needs to feed the food, and the eating is the capability selection item selection control of specially prepared food, such as a stirred food, a pasty food, a jelly food, etc. Similarly, below the question item "whether tube feeding or intravenous diet is required" there are displayed "no tube feeding or intravenous diet is required", "tube feeding diet is required, nutrient supply via nasogastric or gastric tube (gastrostomy), intestinal tube, etc", "intravenous diet is required, nutrient supply via vein, such as drip, intravenous high calorie infusion, etc" and the like capability selection controls. Similarly, under the question item "whether or not other people need to assist in eating", there is shown that "there is a hindrance to the actions of not needing other people to assist in eating", "eating is not flexible, or the use of auxiliary tableware cannot be smooth", "will be reduced while eating is not done to a certain extent", "the caretaker starts to eat", "needs to assist by others when needed", "needs to be induced by others, prompt actions to complete eating", "needs to assist in peeling, removing fishbone, cutting food, uncapping, replacing tableware, putting food on a spoon, etc. can complete eating", etc. are selected. Wherein, in some embodiments, referring to fig. 2, at a relevant position adjacent to a problem item, explanatory information relevant to the corresponding problem item is displayed, for example, the explanation information relevant to whether or not the problem item needs to assist in eating by others, as shown in fig. 2, refers to that the caretaker needs to send food to the mouth. It will be appreciated that in other embodiments, the associated interpretation information may be displayed at other locations associated therewith.
While fig. 2 illustrates setting a reference example diagram trigger control as an example, it will be appreciated that in other embodiments, a corresponding reference example diagram trigger control may be set for each capability option or a sub-option of each capability option, so as to view each capability option or a reference example diagram corresponding to a sub-option of each capability option.
Step S102: and when an example graph evaluation instruction is received through the reference example graph trigger control, acquiring and displaying an example graph evaluation interface corresponding to the current item to be evaluated, wherein the example graph evaluation interface comprises sub-options corresponding to the capability option, example graphs corresponding to the sub-options and corresponding evaluation scores.
As described above, the number of reference example graph trigger controls set in the evaluation interface may be one or more.
When the number of the reference example graph trigger controls set in the evaluation interface is one and the example graph evaluation instruction is received through the reference example graph trigger control, the obtained example graph evaluation interface corresponding to the current to-be-evaluated item may include sub-options corresponding to all the capability choices corresponding to the current to-be-evaluated item, example graphs corresponding to the sub-options, and corresponding evaluation scores. Namely, in the example graph evaluation interface, all sub-options corresponding to the capacity selection options of the current to-be-evaluated item, the example graph corresponding to each sub-option and the corresponding evaluation score are displayed. It can be understood that, in the case that the sub-options and the example graphs corresponding to all the capability choices of the current item to be evaluated are more, all the sub-options and the example graphs may not be displayed in one page in the example graph evaluation interface, and at this time, the sub-options and the example graphs may be displayed in a paging or partially hidden manner by paging, a drop-down frame, or the like. Taking paging display as an example, when receiving an instruction of a next page, sub-options of the next page, an example diagram corresponding to the sub-options, and a corresponding evaluation score may be acquired and displayed. Taking the drop-down frame mode as an example, when the drop-down frame is dragged or slid, sub-options corresponding to the position of the drop-down frame after dragging or sliding, an example graph corresponding to the sub-options and a corresponding evaluation score can be obtained and displayed.
Taking the number of reference example graph trigger controls set in the evaluation interface shown in fig. 2 as an example, an example graph evaluation interface displayed after clicking the reference example graph trigger control in one embodiment may be as shown in fig. 3.
Referring to fig. 3, in the exemplary graph evaluation interface, sub-options corresponding to the corresponding capability choices are displayed. Under the ability selection item of ' no need of others to assist eating ', the sub-selection items which are correspondingly arranged are ' when eating alone, almost no food drop condition ', ' although having a mental disorder (dementia), the user can eat the food stably and well ', ' while riding a wheelchair every day, the user can eat the food himself. In some embodiments, the sub-options may not need to have a strict correspondence with the capability options, but rather there may be various sub-options, i.e. an example graph for one, for a certain evaluation score, i.e. the sub-options and their example graph directly correspond to the evaluation score of the response. As shown in fig. 3, in this example graph evaluation interface, an evaluation score of 5 corresponds to an example graph of a plurality of sub-options, such as: "can eat by oneself only by placing meal. Although the hand is easy to turn over, the situation that food falls exists in many cases, the hand can eat chopped, smashed and beaten into pasty food by oneself, or the hand can feel laborious when eating, the caretaker needs to remind to eat, and the caretaker needs to use auxiliary tools, the hand can assist to complete the food, the caretaker can assist to eat as long as the hand is aside, the food can be sent to the mouth to complete the food, the food is not reacted even being sent to the mouth, and the voice prompt is needed, otherwise, the mouth can not be opened to eat the food, the swallowing situation is poor, and the caretaker can not grasp the amount of the old people to eat at one time. It is generally necessary to eat specially prepared foods such as a stirred food, a pasty food, a jelly food, etc. Accordingly, in the example graph evaluation interface shown in fig. 3, an evaluation score of 0 corresponds to an example graph of a plurality of sub-options, such as: "eating via nasogastric tube, gastrostomy, enterostomy, etc." intravenous nutrition (drip, intravenous high calorie infusion, etc) ". It will be appreciated that in other embodiments, other arrangements may be adopted in the example graph evaluation interface, so long as an example graph is set in the example graph evaluation interface, through which the relevant capability of the corresponding capability selection item can be intuitively viewed and experienced, and the example graph can correspond to a certain evaluation score.
In the case that the number of the reference example graph triggering controls set in the evaluation interface is multiple, each reference example graph triggering control may correspond to one capability selection item, for example, one reference example graph triggering control corresponds to one capability selection item. At this time, when the example graph evaluation instruction is received through the reference example graph trigger control, the obtained example graph evaluation interface corresponding to the current item to be evaluated may include a sub-option corresponding to the capability option corresponding to the corresponding reference example graph trigger control, an example graph corresponding to each sub-option, and a corresponding evaluation score.
In one embodiment, an example graph uploading control may be further provided on the example graph evaluation interface, and when an example graph uploading instruction is received through the example graph uploading control, an uploaded example graph picture is obtained and stored in association with a corresponding sub-option. Therefore, by setting the example graph uploading control, the related example graph pictures can be conveniently uploaded to enrich the example graph pictures, and provide references for subsequent capability assessment.
Step S103: and receiving a capability assessment confirmation instruction through the example graph assessment interface, wherein the capability assessment confirmation instruction carries a sub-selection item and a corresponding assessment score.
On the above example graph evaluation interface, "determine", "confirm select" etc. Guan Kongjian may be provided, which the user may instruct to determine the selection of the relevant sub-option by clicking on the relevant control to issue a capability evaluation confirm instruction. After receiving the capability assessment confirmation instruction, the sub-options selected by the user and the corresponding assessment scores can be used as related capability sub-options and corresponding assessment scores obtained by the user assessing the current item to be assessed.
In some embodiments, since a plurality of different sub-options and corresponding example graphs are provided on the example graph evaluation interface, for inexperienced users, or based on different habits of users, during the evaluation, the user may continuously click on different sub-options to issue a selection instruction, that is, after the example graph evaluation interface receives a selection instruction for an example graph corresponding to one of the sub-options (referred to as a first sub-option in the embodiment of the application and distinguished from a sub-option selected later), the selection of the first sub-option is cancelled when a selection instruction for an example graph corresponding to another sub-option (referred to as a second sub-option in the embodiment of the application) is received. That is, on the same example graph evaluation interface, when only one sub-option can be selected, the mechanism is used to ensure that the user intelligently selects one sub-option and the corresponding evaluation score. And when the capability assessment confirmation instruction is received, determining the sub-option and the corresponding assessment score corresponding to the last received selection instruction as the sub-option and the assessment score which are finally selected. It will be appreciated that in other embodiments, where the capability choices of related items to be evaluated may allow for the simultaneous selection of multiple different sub-choices for different items to be evaluated, the multiple sub-choices selected and the corresponding evaluation scores are directly used as the final sub-choices and evaluation scores to be selected without employing the above mechanism. In some embodiments, the same evaluation score may be set to allow for the simultaneous selection of multiple different sub-options. In other embodiments, other different settings may be made.
In one embodiment, after receiving the capability assessment confirmation instruction through the example graph assessment interface, before determining the assessment score as the capability assessment score value corresponding to the capability selection item, the method may further include the steps of:
acquiring an evaluated item with a verification relation with the current item to be evaluated, and acquiring a secondary index selection item of the evaluated item and a corresponding secondary index evaluation score value;
and carrying out logic correction on the capacity selection item and the evaluation score, carrying out logic correction on the secondary index selection item corresponding to the evaluated item and the corresponding secondary index evaluation score value, and when the logic correction passes, entering the step of determining the evaluation score as the capacity evaluation score value corresponding to the capacity selection item.
Wherein, when the logic correction fails, the submission evaluation failure information can be given. To alert the user to the logic correction failure, the current item to be evaluated or the evaluated item needs to be re-evaluated again.
For example, in one embodiment, assuming that the evaluated item "b.1.9 walks on level ground" of the person under evaluation has a score of "0" and depends entirely on others ", while the current item" b.1.10 walks up and down stairs "has a score of" 10 ", the person under evaluation can walk up and down stairs independently, at this time, the evaluation result is submitted, a logic correction result is displayed, and a conflict is displayed. According to logic, the system can independently walk up and down stairs but cannot independently walk horizontally, so that the system can report a logic correction result after correcting the situation, and meanwhile, the system is not allowed to submit an evaluation. An interface display diagram based on a logic correction failure in a specific example of this embodiment is shown in fig. 4. As can be seen from fig. 4, the interface with failed logic correction can be displayed in a floating manner, and under the interface with failed logic correction, the capability selection item with logic conflict and the corresponding sub-selection item, namely the sub-selection item selected for the current item to be evaluated and the evaluated item, are displayed at the same time, so that the user can check the reason of the logic conflict, and can select the correct sub-selection item accordingly.
Step S104: the evaluation score is determined as a capability evaluation score value corresponding to the capability selection item.
In one embodiment, after determining the evaluation score as the capability evaluation score value corresponding to the capability option, the method may further include the steps of:
and obtaining the next item to be evaluated which is not yet evaluated in the old person capacity evaluation items, taking the next item to be evaluated as the current item to be evaluated, returning to obtain an evaluation interface corresponding to the current item to be evaluated, and displaying the evaluation interface.
Therefore, by repeating the steps, the capacity evaluation items of the old people can be evaluated item by item until all the items to be evaluated of the current user are evaluated.
In one embodiment, after all the to-be-evaluated items of the old people capability evaluation items of the current user are evaluated, the capability selection items and the corresponding capability evaluation score values corresponding to the to-be-evaluated items may be further obtained, and the old people capability evaluation result of the current user may be obtained based on the capability selection items and the corresponding capability evaluation score values corresponding to the to-be-evaluated items. Further, risk prevention prompt information for the current user can be generated and displayed based on the old people ability evaluation result of the current user. On the other hand, after the old person's ability evaluation result of the current user is obtained, the old person's ability evaluation result may also be generated into a graph, and the generated graph may be displayed.
In some embodiments, after obtaining the senile ability evaluation result of the current user, the method may further include the steps of:
obtaining the senile ability evaluation results of all selected users;
and carrying out statistical analysis on the senile ability evaluation results of all selected users to obtain statistical analysis results, and displaying the statistical analysis results in a chart mode.
Thus, by selecting the senile ability evaluation result of a certain user group, statistical analysis can be performed on the senile ability evaluation result of the selected user group to obtain statistical characteristics of the senile ability of the selected user group. In some embodiments, graphs of the statistical analysis results obtained are shown in fig. 5 a-5 d. It will be appreciated that in other embodiments, other events may be analyzed to obtain other statistical analysis results and corresponding charts.
The selection of the users may be performed in combination with actual needs, for example, based on addresses, the results of evaluating the senile abilities of all users in a certain area are selected, so that the statistical situation of the senile abilities in the area can be obtained, and based on the institution where the senile people are located, the results of evaluating the senile abilities of all users in a certain institution (for example, a certain pension service institution) are selected, so that the overall statistical situation of the senile abilities in the institution can be obtained. It will be appreciated that other alternatives may be used in other embodiments based on the actual circumstances.
In some embodiments, the results of evaluating the senile abilities of all users to be counted may be recorded and evaluated at a human-computer interaction terminal executing the method for evaluating the senile abilities. In some embodiments, after the current man-machine interaction terminal obtains the senile ability evaluation result of the user to be evaluated, the obtained senile ability evaluation result may be sent to a background server or other computer devices. The background server or other computer equipment can obtain the senile ability evaluation results of the users recorded by the human-computer interaction terminals returned by the different human-computer interaction terminals, so that all or part of the senile ability evaluation results can be subjected to statistical analysis to obtain statistical analysis results.
Referring to fig. 6, an apparatus for evaluating the ability of the elderly in one embodiment includes:
the current evaluation interface determining module 601 is configured to obtain a current item to be evaluated in the old person ability evaluation items, and an evaluation interface corresponding to the current item to be evaluated, and display the evaluation interface, where a reference example diagram trigger control and each ability selection item corresponding to the current item to be evaluated are set on the evaluation interface;
An example graph interface determining module 602, configured to, when an example graph evaluation instruction is received through the reference example graph trigger control, acquire and display an example graph evaluation interface corresponding to the current item to be evaluated, where the example graph evaluation interface includes sub-options corresponding to the capability option, an example graph corresponding to each sub-option, and a corresponding evaluation score;
an option determining module 603, configured to receive a capability assessment confirmation instruction through the exemplary graph assessment interface, where the capability assessment confirmation instruction carries a sub-option and a corresponding assessment score;
an evaluation score determination module 604 is configured to determine the evaluation score as a capability evaluation score value corresponding to the capability option.
In one embodiment, the current evaluation interface determining module 601 is further configured to receive an senile ability evaluation instruction before acquiring a current item to be evaluated in a senile ability evaluation item; and acquiring a preset senile ability evaluation questionnaire according to the senile ability evaluation instruction, and acquiring a senile ability evaluation item from the preset senile ability evaluation questionnaire.
In one embodiment, the evaluation interface is further provided with capability selection item selection controls, where each capability selection item selection control corresponds to each capability selection item. The current evaluation interface determining module 601 is further configured to, when a selection instruction is received through the capability option selection control, highlight the capability option selection control corresponding to the selection instruction.
In one embodiment, the capability selection item selection control corresponding to the selection instruction is highlighted, including at least one of the following:
highlighting the capacity selection item selection control corresponding to the selection instruction;
displaying a selected identifier at a position corresponding to the capacity selection item selection control corresponding to the selection instruction;
and displaying the evaluation score corresponding to the capability selection item selection control at the position corresponding to the capability selection item selection control corresponding to the selection instruction.
In one embodiment, the reference example graph trigger control is disposed alongside the display content of the current item under evaluation.
In one embodiment, in the evaluation interface, the reference example graph triggers the number of controls to be one. The example graph interface determining module 602 is further configured to, when the example graph evaluation instruction is received by referring to an example graph trigger control, obtain an example graph evaluation interface corresponding to the current item to be evaluated, where the example graph evaluation interface includes sub-options corresponding to all capability options corresponding to the current item to be evaluated, example graphs corresponding to the sub-options, and corresponding evaluation scores.
In one embodiment, in the evaluation interface, the number of the reference example graph triggering controls is multiple, and each reference example graph triggering control corresponds to one capability selection item. The example graph interface determining module 602 is further configured to, when the example graph evaluation instruction is received through the reference example graph trigger control, obtain an example graph evaluation interface corresponding to the current item to be evaluated, where the example graph evaluation interface includes sub-options corresponding to the capability options corresponding to the reference example graph trigger control, example graphs corresponding to the sub-options, and corresponding evaluation scores.
In one embodiment, an example graph upload control is provided on the example graph evaluation interface. The example diagram interface determining module 602 is further configured to obtain an uploaded example diagram picture when an example diagram upload instruction is received through the example diagram upload control, and store the obtained example diagram picture in association with a corresponding sub-option.
In one embodiment, the example graph interface determining module 602 is further configured to cancel, after the example graph evaluation interface receives the selection instruction for the example graph corresponding to the first sub-option and receives the selection instruction for the example graph corresponding to the second sub-option, select the first sub-option, and determine, when the capability evaluation confirmation instruction is received, the sub-option and the corresponding evaluation score corresponding to the last received selection instruction as the final selected sub-option and evaluation score.
In one embodiment, the option determining module 603 is further configured to, after receiving a capability assessment confirmation instruction through the exemplary graph assessment interface, obtain an assessed item having a verification relationship with the current item to be assessed, and obtain a secondary indicator selection item of the assessed item and a corresponding secondary indicator assessment score value before determining the assessment score as a capability assessment score value corresponding to the capability selection item; and carrying out logic correction on the capacity selection item and the evaluation score, carrying out logic correction on the secondary index selection item corresponding to the evaluated item and the corresponding secondary index evaluation score value, and when the logic correction passes, entering the step of determining the evaluation score as the capacity evaluation score value corresponding to the capacity selection item.
In one embodiment, the option determination module 603 is further configured to give the commit evaluation failure information when the logic correction fails.
In one embodiment, the current evaluation interface determining module 601 is further configured to, after the evaluation score determining module 604 determines the evaluation score as a capability evaluation score value corresponding to the capability selection item, obtain a next item to be evaluated that has not yet been evaluated in the capability evaluation items of the elderly, and use the next item to be evaluated as a current item to be evaluated, return to the step of obtaining an evaluation interface corresponding to the current item to be evaluated, and display the evaluation interface.
In one embodiment, the system further includes a capability analysis module, configured to obtain a capability selection item and a corresponding capability evaluation score value corresponding to each item to be evaluated after all items to be evaluated of the old person capability evaluation items are evaluated, obtain an old person capability evaluation result of the current user, and generate and display risk prevention prompt information for the current user based on the old person capability evaluation result of the current user. And (5) graphically displaying the senile ability evaluation result.
In one embodiment, the system further comprises a statistical analysis module, configured to obtain the senile ability evaluation results of all the selected users after obtaining the senile ability evaluation results of the current user;
and carrying out statistical analysis on the senile ability evaluation results of all selected users to obtain statistical analysis results, and displaying the statistical analysis results in a chart mode.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the control process of the control system according to the above embodiment may be implemented by a computer program for instructing relevant hardware, where the computer program may be stored in a non-volatile computer readable storage medium, and the computer program may implement the flow of the embodiments of the methods as described above when executed. Any reference to memory, storage, database, or other medium used in the various embodiments provided herein may include non-volatile and/or volatile memory. The nonvolatile memory can include Read Only Memory (ROM), programmable ROM (PROM), electrically Programmable ROM (EPROM), electrically Erasable Programmable ROM (EEPROM), or flash memory. Volatile memory can include Random Access Memory (RAM) or external cache memory. By way of illustration and not limitation, RAM is available in a variety of forms such as Static RAM (SRAM), dynamic RAM (DRAM), synchronous DRAM (SDRAM), double Data Rate SDRAM (DDRSDRAM), enhanced SDRAM (ESDRAM), synchronous Link DRAM (SLDRAM), memory bus direct RAM (RDRAM), direct memory bus dynamic RAM (DRDRAM), and memory bus dynamic RAM (RDRAM), among others.
Thus, in one embodiment, there is also provided a computer readable storage medium having stored thereon a computer program which, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the method as described above.
Accordingly, the embodiments of the present application also provide an electronic device comprising a memory and a processor, the memory storing a computer program, the processor implementing the steps of the method of any of the embodiments described above when the computer program is executed.
The electronic device may be any device capable of implementing man-machine interaction processing. An internal block diagram of an electronic device in one embodiment may be as shown in fig. 7. The electronic device includes a processor, a memory, and possibly a network interface connected by a system bus. Wherein the processor of the electronic device is configured to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the electronic device includes a nonvolatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system and a computer program. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of the operating system and computer programs in the non-volatile storage media. The network interface of the electronic device is used for communicating with an external terminal through a network connection. The computer program is executed by a processor to implement the method as described above.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the structure shown in fig. 7 is merely a block diagram of a portion of the structure associated with the present application and is not limiting of the electronic device to which the present application is applied, and that a particular electronic device may include more or fewer components than shown, or may combine certain components, or have a different arrangement of components.
The technical features of the above embodiments may be arbitrarily combined, and all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are not described for brevity of description, however, as long as there is no contradiction between the combinations of the technical features, they should be considered as the scope of the description.
The above examples merely represent a few embodiments of the present application, which are described in more detail and are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention. It should be noted that it would be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and improvements could be made without departing from the spirit of the present application, which would be within the scope of the present application. Accordingly, the scope of protection of the present application is to be determined by the claims appended hereto.
Claims (10)
1. A method of assessing the ability of an elderly person, the method comprising:
acquiring a current item to be evaluated in the old person capacity evaluation items and an evaluation interface corresponding to the current item to be evaluated, and displaying the evaluation interface, wherein a reference example diagram trigger control and each capacity selection item corresponding to the current item to be evaluated are arranged on the evaluation interface; when a plurality of reference example diagram trigger controls are arranged, the reference example diagram trigger controls are arranged beside related capacity selection items and are used for respectively checking the reference example diagrams of the capacity selection items; when an example graph evaluation instruction is received through the reference example graph trigger control, an example graph evaluation interface corresponding to the current item to be evaluated is obtained and displayed, wherein the example graph evaluation interface comprises sub-options corresponding to the capability option, example graphs corresponding to the sub-options and corresponding evaluation scores;
receiving a capability assessment confirmation instruction through the example graph assessment interface, wherein the capability assessment confirmation instruction carries a sub-selection item and a corresponding assessment score;
Acquiring an evaluated item with a verification relation with the current item to be evaluated, and acquiring a secondary index selection item of the evaluated item and a corresponding secondary index evaluation score value;
carrying out logic correction on the capacity selection item and the evaluation score, and carrying out logic correction on the secondary index selection item corresponding to the evaluated item and the corresponding secondary index evaluation score value;
when the logic correction fails, displaying an interface of logic correction failure, and simultaneously displaying a capacity selection item with logic conflict and a corresponding sub-selection item, so that a user can check the reason of the logic conflict and reselect the correct sub-selection item;
determining the evaluation score as a capability evaluation score value corresponding to the capability selection item when a logic correction passes;
acquiring a next item to be evaluated which is not yet evaluated in the old person capacity evaluation items, taking the next item to be evaluated as a current item to be evaluated, returning to the step of acquiring an evaluation interface corresponding to the current item to be evaluated, and displaying the evaluation interface until all the items to be evaluated are evaluated;
after all the items to be evaluated of the old person capacity evaluation items are evaluated, acquiring capacity selection items and corresponding capacity evaluation score values corresponding to the items to be evaluated, and acquiring an old person capacity evaluation result of the current user based on the capacity selection items and the corresponding capacity evaluation score values corresponding to the items to be evaluated.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the assessment interface is further provided with capability option selection controls, each capability option selection control corresponding to each capability option;
and when a selection instruction is received through the capability selection item selection control, highlighting the capability selection item selection control corresponding to the selection instruction.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein in the evaluation interface, the number of the reference example graph trigger controls is one, and when the example graph evaluation instruction is received through the reference example graph trigger control, the obtained example graph evaluation interface corresponding to the current item to be evaluated includes sub-options corresponding to all capability choices corresponding to the current item to be evaluated, example graphs corresponding to the sub-options, and corresponding evaluation scores.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the number of reference example graph trigger controls in the assessment interface is a plurality, each corresponding to a capability selection item;
when the example graph evaluation instruction is received through the reference example graph trigger control, an example graph evaluation interface corresponding to the current to-be-evaluated item is obtained, wherein the example graph evaluation interface comprises sub-options corresponding to the capability options corresponding to the corresponding reference example graph trigger control, example graphs corresponding to the sub-options and corresponding evaluation scores.
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein an example graph uploading control is arranged on the example graph evaluation interface, and when an example graph uploading instruction is received through the example graph uploading control, an uploaded example graph picture is obtained and stored in association with a corresponding sub-option.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the method further comprises:
and generating and displaying risk prevention prompt information aiming at the current user based on the old people ability evaluation result of the current user.
7. An apparatus for assessing the ability of an elderly person, the apparatus comprising:
the system comprises a current evaluation interface determining module, a current evaluation interface determining module and a current evaluation interface determining module, wherein the current evaluation interface determining module is used for acquiring a current to-be-evaluated item in the capacity evaluation items of the old people, and an evaluation interface corresponding to the current to-be-evaluated item, and displaying the evaluation interface, a reference example graph triggering control is arranged on the evaluation interface, and each capacity selection item corresponding to the current to-be-evaluated item, wherein when one reference example graph triggering control is arranged, the reference example graph triggering control is arranged beside the display content of the current to-be-evaluated item, and when a plurality of reference example graph triggering controls are arranged, the reference example graph triggering control is arranged beside each related capacity selection item, and is used for respectively checking a reference example graph of each capacity selection item, and also used for acquiring the next to-be-evaluated item which is not yet evaluated in the capacity evaluation items of the old people, and taking the next to-be-evaluated item as the current to-be-evaluated item, and returning to acquire the evaluation interface corresponding to the current to-be-evaluated item, and displaying the evaluation interface until all to-be-evaluated items are completed;
An example graph interface determining module, configured to obtain and display an example graph evaluation interface corresponding to the current item to be evaluated when an example graph evaluation instruction is received through the reference example graph trigger control, where the example graph evaluation interface includes sub-options corresponding to the capability option, an example graph corresponding to each sub-option, and a corresponding evaluation score;
the option determining module is used for receiving a capability assessment confirmation instruction through the example graph assessment interface, wherein the capability assessment confirmation instruction carries a sub-selection item and a corresponding assessment score, acquiring an assessed item with a verification relation with the current item to be assessed, and acquiring a secondary index selection item of the assessed item and a corresponding secondary index assessment score value; carrying out logic correction on the capacity selection item and the evaluation score, and carrying out logic correction on the secondary index selection item corresponding to the evaluated item and the corresponding secondary index evaluation score value; when the logic correction fails, displaying an interface of logic correction failure, and simultaneously displaying a capacity selection item with logic conflict and a corresponding sub-selection item, so that a user can check the reason of the logic conflict and reselect the correct sub-selection item;
And the evaluation score determining module is used for determining the evaluation score as a capability evaluation score value corresponding to the capability selection item when the logic correction passes.
8. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the current assessment interface determination module is further configured to highlight a capability option selection control corresponding to the selection instruction when a selection instruction is received through the capability option selection control.
9. An electronic device comprising a memory and a processor, the memory storing a computer program, characterized in that the processor, when executing the computer program, performs the control of the execution of the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 6.
10. A computer readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, characterized in that the computer program, when being executed by a processor, carries out the steps of controlling the execution of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 6.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910769292.8A CN110502303B (en) | 2019-08-20 | 2019-08-20 | Method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium for evaluating ability of old people |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910769292.8A CN110502303B (en) | 2019-08-20 | 2019-08-20 | Method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium for evaluating ability of old people |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN110502303A CN110502303A (en) | 2019-11-26 |
| CN110502303B true CN110502303B (en) | 2023-07-11 |
Family
ID=68588805
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910769292.8A Active CN110502303B (en) | 2019-08-20 | 2019-08-20 | Method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium for evaluating ability of old people |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN110502303B (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112614590A (en) * | 2020-12-10 | 2021-04-06 | 浙江大学 | Machine learning-based elderly disability risk prediction method and system |
| CN113723836A (en) * | 2021-09-02 | 2021-11-30 | 卫宁健康科技集团股份有限公司 | Endowment management method and system, computer equipment and storage medium |
Citations (16)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102030023A (en) * | 2006-10-02 | 2011-04-27 | 通用电气公司 | Method for optimizing railroad train operation for a train including multiple distributed-power locomotives |
| CN103150608A (en) * | 2013-02-08 | 2013-06-12 | 同济大学 | Regional emergency evacuation capability assessment system |
| CN105205765A (en) * | 2015-07-08 | 2015-12-30 | 奥美之路(北京)健康科技股份有限公司 | Old people exercise ability evaluation model |
| CN105264813A (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2016-01-20 | 美国亚德诺半导体公司 | Quadrature error detection and correction |
| CN106295155A (en) * | 2016-08-03 | 2017-01-04 | 董碧蓉 | Senile inpatients medical health assessment system and method |
| CN106599542A (en) * | 2016-11-11 | 2017-04-26 | 中南大学 | Comprehensive ability assessment method and assessment system for old people |
| CN107194144A (en) * | 2017-04-05 | 2017-09-22 | 深圳前海合泰生命健康技术有限公司 | A kind of method and device for assessing scale |
| CN107634818A (en) * | 2016-07-18 | 2018-01-26 | 英特尔Ip公司 | Use the decoding device and method of context redundancy |
| CN108538391A (en) * | 2018-01-05 | 2018-09-14 | 成都朗力养老产业发展有限公司 | A kind of assessment of elderly and the disabled's integration capability and modernization system |
| CN108682443A (en) * | 2018-04-02 | 2018-10-19 | 乐成老年事业投资有限公司 | A kind of capability assessment method and its equipment |
| CN108763419A (en) * | 2018-05-24 | 2018-11-06 | 郑州云海信息技术有限公司 | A kind of method, apparatus and computer storage media of migration process |
| CN109388926A (en) * | 2017-08-14 | 2019-02-26 | 三星电子株式会社 | Handle the method for biometric image and the electronic equipment including this method |
| CN109445578A (en) * | 2018-10-12 | 2019-03-08 | 上海陈天桥脑疾病研究所 | A kind of cognitive ability assessment system and method |
| CN109565289A (en) * | 2016-08-11 | 2019-04-02 | 瑞典爱立信有限公司 | It is selected based on the error correcting code of target information length and target parity check length |
| CN109840670A (en) * | 2017-11-27 | 2019-06-04 | 韩国发明振兴会 | The system and method assessed the system and method for patent and construct patent assessment model |
| CN110024422A (en) * | 2016-12-30 | 2019-07-16 | 英特尔公司 | The name of Internet of Things and block chained record |
Family Cites Families (9)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6948070B1 (en) * | 1995-02-13 | 2005-09-20 | Intertrust Technologies Corporation | Systems and methods for secure transaction management and electronic rights protection |
| US20040073466A1 (en) * | 2002-10-10 | 2004-04-15 | Qwest Communications International Inc. | Systems and methods for evaluating telecommunications projects |
| US8923806B2 (en) * | 2008-03-14 | 2014-12-30 | William J. Johnson | System and method for presenting application data by data processing system(s) in a vicinity |
| CN107688911A (en) * | 2017-09-13 | 2018-02-13 | 北京有心科技有限公司 | A kind of the elderly looks after need assessment method, system and equipment |
| CN108447562B (en) * | 2018-02-28 | 2021-09-10 | 李赛一 | User exercise capacity assessment method and system |
| CN108876130A (en) * | 2018-06-06 | 2018-11-23 | 姜涵予 | Capability assessment method, device and electronic equipment |
| CN109820476B (en) * | 2018-12-05 | 2023-07-21 | 上海邦邦机器人有限公司 | Balancing capability assessment method, device and system applying same |
| CN109767066A (en) * | 2018-12-13 | 2019-05-17 | 重庆金融资产交易所有限责任公司 | Enterprise's ability to ward off risks appraisal procedure, device and storage medium |
| CN114724714A (en) * | 2019-05-20 | 2022-07-08 | 合肥工业大学 | Patient cognitive ability monitoring system and method based on user space |
-
2019
- 2019-08-20 CN CN201910769292.8A patent/CN110502303B/en active Active
Patent Citations (16)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102030023A (en) * | 2006-10-02 | 2011-04-27 | 通用电气公司 | Method for optimizing railroad train operation for a train including multiple distributed-power locomotives |
| CN103150608A (en) * | 2013-02-08 | 2013-06-12 | 同济大学 | Regional emergency evacuation capability assessment system |
| CN105264813A (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2016-01-20 | 美国亚德诺半导体公司 | Quadrature error detection and correction |
| CN105205765A (en) * | 2015-07-08 | 2015-12-30 | 奥美之路(北京)健康科技股份有限公司 | Old people exercise ability evaluation model |
| CN107634818A (en) * | 2016-07-18 | 2018-01-26 | 英特尔Ip公司 | Use the decoding device and method of context redundancy |
| CN106295155A (en) * | 2016-08-03 | 2017-01-04 | 董碧蓉 | Senile inpatients medical health assessment system and method |
| CN109565289A (en) * | 2016-08-11 | 2019-04-02 | 瑞典爱立信有限公司 | It is selected based on the error correcting code of target information length and target parity check length |
| CN106599542A (en) * | 2016-11-11 | 2017-04-26 | 中南大学 | Comprehensive ability assessment method and assessment system for old people |
| CN110024422A (en) * | 2016-12-30 | 2019-07-16 | 英特尔公司 | The name of Internet of Things and block chained record |
| CN107194144A (en) * | 2017-04-05 | 2017-09-22 | 深圳前海合泰生命健康技术有限公司 | A kind of method and device for assessing scale |
| CN109388926A (en) * | 2017-08-14 | 2019-02-26 | 三星电子株式会社 | Handle the method for biometric image and the electronic equipment including this method |
| CN109840670A (en) * | 2017-11-27 | 2019-06-04 | 韩国发明振兴会 | The system and method assessed the system and method for patent and construct patent assessment model |
| CN108538391A (en) * | 2018-01-05 | 2018-09-14 | 成都朗力养老产业发展有限公司 | A kind of assessment of elderly and the disabled's integration capability and modernization system |
| CN108682443A (en) * | 2018-04-02 | 2018-10-19 | 乐成老年事业投资有限公司 | A kind of capability assessment method and its equipment |
| CN108763419A (en) * | 2018-05-24 | 2018-11-06 | 郑州云海信息技术有限公司 | A kind of method, apparatus and computer storage media of migration process |
| CN109445578A (en) * | 2018-10-12 | 2019-03-08 | 上海陈天桥脑疾病研究所 | A kind of cognitive ability assessment system and method |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| 基于J2EE和ArcIMS的地质灾害危险性评估项目备案系统;陈玲;陈锁忠;黄宇;周良辰;;地球信息科学(第06期);第92-97页 * |
| 软件研发成本度量在电信IT系统建设中的探索和实践;李铁坚;方智;苗成;;企业技术开发(第01期);第61-64页 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN110502303A (en) | 2019-11-26 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Huang et al. | The effectiveness of telemedicine on body mass index: A systematic review and meta-analysis | |
| US8756074B2 (en) | Systems and methods for providing a real-time health risk assessment | |
| CN110739038B (en) | Medicine distribution system based on medical advice | |
| JP3631744B2 (en) | Health management system and health management method | |
| CN103959295A (en) | First emergency response device | |
| EP4145462A1 (en) | Care plan administration using thresholds | |
| US20130132110A1 (en) | Dementia care support method, dementia information output apparatus, and dementia care support system | |
| CN110033866B (en) | Health reminding method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| Bakogiannis et al. | A Patient-Oriented App (ThessHF) to improve self-care quality in heart failure: from evidence-based design to pilot study | |
| CN110502303B (en) | Method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium for evaluating ability of old people | |
| CN109300017B (en) | Policy recommendation method, device, server and storage medium based on data analysis | |
| US20030074224A1 (en) | Health care support system, pet-type health care support terminal, vital data acquisition device, vital data acquisition Net transmission system, health care support method, and portable information terminal with camera | |
| Bartholomew et al. | Managing diabetes in pregnancy using cell phone/internet technology | |
| WO2021195072A1 (en) | Fully autonomous medical solution (mydoctor) | |
| JPWO2005091195A1 (en) | Health management system | |
| CN102682193A (en) | Health care device, method and graphical user interface for health care | |
| US20160078183A1 (en) | Electronically predicting corrective options based on a sensed physiological characteristic | |
| CN110782986A (en) | Intelligent tongue diagnosis data processing system and method | |
| US20180121838A1 (en) | Systems and methods for coordinating the flow of events in a health care setting using a workflow module | |
| JP2020035365A (en) | Intervened content estimation device, method and program | |
| US20120035955A1 (en) | Care service management system and method thereof | |
| CN114067940A (en) | Health management method and storage medium | |
| Zaharieva et al. | Continuous glucose monitoring versus self-monitoring of blood glucose to assess glycemia in gestational diabetes | |
| US20140228648A1 (en) | Pet scale kiosk with interactive client information software | |
| US20150081328A1 (en) | System for hospital adaptive readmission prediction and management |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |