CN110411866B - Method for predicting coating interface shear strength through drop hammer impact performance - Google Patents
Method for predicting coating interface shear strength through drop hammer impact performance Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN110411866B CN110411866B CN201910680458.9A CN201910680458A CN110411866B CN 110411866 B CN110411866 B CN 110411866B CN 201910680458 A CN201910680458 A CN 201910680458A CN 110411866 B CN110411866 B CN 110411866B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- coating
- shear strength
- drop hammer
- interface
- hammer impact
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N3/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
- G01N3/24—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress by applying steady shearing forces
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N3/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
- G01N3/30—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress by applying a single impulsive force, e.g. by falling weight
- G01N3/303—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress by applying a single impulsive force, e.g. by falling weight generated only by free-falling weight
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N3/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
- G01N3/40—Investigating hardness or rebound hardness
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)
Abstract
A method for predicting the shear strength of a coating interface through drop hammer impact performance comprises the following steps: (1) performing nano indentation test on the coating to respectively obtain the Young modulus of the coating and the Young modulus of the substrateE cAndE spoissonRatio of(ii) a (2) Performing drop hammer impact test to obtain the critical speed of cracking of the coating interfacev maxAnd finding the critical loadF max(ii) a (3) Establishing a critical loadF maxAnd the thickness of the coatingtThe interface shear strength of the coating is obtained through a fitted curveThe predicted value of (2). According to the invention, the interface shear strength of the coating can be rapidly predicted by establishing the relationship between the shear strength and the impact property.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to a method for predicting the shear strength of a coating interface through the drop hammer impact performance, belonging to the technical field of coating detection.
Background
The shear strength of the coating and the substrate directly affects the strength and toughness of the coating and finally determines the service performance of the coating, so that accurate assessment of the interfacial shear strength plays an important role in engineering material development and application.
The traditional method for testing the shear strength of the coating interface mainly comprises a press-in method and a drawing method, wherein the press-in method specifies that the thickness of the coating is 0.8-1.1 mm, and the coating is not suitable for a coating with a small thickness; the drawing method can measure the shear strength by the shear failure of the coating, but the data points are scattered. Therefore, how to provide a simple and accurate method for predicting the interfacial shear strength aiming at the shear damage mechanism caused by the drop hammer impact of the coating becomes an urgent need in the field of current shear failure.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to solve the problem of shear strength dispersion caused by a drawing test and simply and conveniently realize high-efficiency prediction of the shear strength, and provides a method for predicting the shear strength of a coating interface through drop hammer impact performance.
The method comprises the following steps of predicting the shear strength of a coating interface through drop hammer impact performance, and respectively carrying out drop hammer impact tests on coatings with different thicknesses to obtain the cracking critical load of the coating interface; and establishing a relation between the critical load and the coating thickness, and obtaining a slope through fitting a curve to obtain a predicted value of the interface shear strength.
A method for predicting the shear strength of a coating interface through drop hammer impact performance comprises the following steps:
(1) nanoindentation test
Selecting coatings with different thicknesses as nanoindentation samples to perform nanoindentation test to obtain Young modulus E of the coatings and the substrate with different thicknessescAnd EsA value;
(2) drop hammer impact test
Respectively carrying out drop hammer impact tests on coatings with different thicknesses to obtain critical impact energy of interface cracking and critical velocity vmaxAnd the measured Young's modulus Ec、EsAnd poisson ratio vc、νsSubstituting the following formulaIn the method, the critical load F of the cracking of the coating interface is obtainedmax:
Where ρ is the density of the coating, coefficientνcV and vsRespectively the Poisson's ratio of the coating and the substrate, and R is the radius of a falling ball;
(3) interfacial shear strength prediction
Bringing the critical load into the following formula, establishing a critical load FmaxAnd the relation between the thickness t of the coating and the slope is obtained by fitting a curve, so that a predicted value of the interface shear strength tau is obtained:
the coatings with different thicknesses are coatings with the thickness of 200-800 mu m obtained by changing different hot spraying time.
The surface of the nano indentation sample needs to be subjected to uniform polishing treatment, and then the indentation test is carried out by selecting the required loading condition.
The drop hammer impact test is to carry out drop hammer impact test on the coating by adjusting the height of the drop hammer to change impact energy.
The method has the advantages that the method is a method for rapidly estimating the shear strength of the interface based on the drop hammer impact performance of the coating; the method solves the problem of shear strength dispersion caused by the drawing test, and realizes the high-efficiency prediction of the shear strength simply and conveniently. The method is convenient to implement, simple to operate and capable of being widely applied to different coatings.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method for predicting the shear strength of a coating interface;
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional SEM image of an amorphous coating of example 1;
FIG. 3 is the results of predicting the interfacial shear strength of the amorphous coating in example 1;
FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional SEM image of the crystalline coating of example 2;
FIG. 5 shows the results of predicting the interfacial shear strength of the crystalline coating in example 2.
Detailed Description
A specific embodiment of the present invention is shown in fig. 1.
The embodiment of the invention relates to a method for predicting the shear strength of a coating interface through drop hammer impact performance, which comprises the following steps:
(1) performing nano indentation test on the coating to respectively obtain the Young modulus E of the coating and the substratecAnd EsPoisson ratio vcV and vs;
(2) Performing drop hammer impact test to obtain the critical speed v of the coating interface crackingmaxAnd calculating a critical load Fmax;
(3) Establishing a critical load FmaxAnd (4) obtaining a predicted value of the interfacial shear strength tau of the coating through a fitted curve according to the relation between the coating thickness t and the coating.
Example 1
In this embodiment, the interfacial shear strength of the amorphous coating is predicted, and the 200-800 μm thick coating is tested, as shown in fig. 2, which is a cross-sectional SEM image of the intermediate amorphous coating.
Step one, carrying out nano indentation experiments on coatings with different thicknesses to obtain Young modulus E of the coatings and the substratecAnd EsThe value is obtained.
Step two, performing drop hammer impact test to obtain critical load F of cracking of the coating interfacemax。
Step three, according to the critical load FmaxThe interface shear strength tau of the coating is predicted in relation to the coating thickness t. FIG. 3 shows the relationship between the predicted values and the values of the drawing experiment.
Example 2
In the embodiment, the interfacial shear strength of the crystal coating is predicted, and the coating with the thickness of 200-800 mu m is tested; a cross-sectional SEM image of the medium crystal coating is shown in fig. 4.
Step one, carrying out nano indentation experiments on coatings with different thicknesses to obtain Young modulus E of the coatings and the substratecAnd EsThe value is obtained.
Step two, performing drop hammer impact test to obtain critical load F of cracking of the coating interfacemax。
Step three, according to the critical load FmaxThe interface shear strength tau of the coating is predicted in relation to the coating thickness t. Fig. 5 shows the relationship between the predicted values and the values of the drawing experiment.
The foregoing embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles and capabilities of the present invention, and not all statements thereof which as a matter of departure from the scope of the invention may be had by the following examples without the use of inventive faculty.
Claims (4)
1. A method for predicting the shear strength of a coating interface through drop hammer impact performance is characterized in that the method obtains the cracking critical load of the coating interface by respectively carrying out drop hammer impact tests on coatings with different thicknesses; establishing a relation between the critical load and the coating thickness, and obtaining a slope through a fitting curve to obtain an interface shear strength predicted value;
the method comprises the following steps:
(1) nanoindentation test
Selecting coatings with different thicknesses as nanoindentation samples to perform nanoindentation test to obtain Young modulus E of the coatings and the substrate with different thicknessescAnd EsA value;
(2) drop hammer impact test
Respectively carrying out drop hammer impact tests on coatings with different thicknesses to obtain critical impact energy of interface cracking and critical velocity vmaxAnd the measured Young's modulus Ec、EsAnd poisson ratio vc、νsSubstituting the formula to obtain the critical load F of the cracking of the coating interfacemax:
Where ρ is the density of the coating, coefficientνcV and vsRespectively the Poisson's ratio of the coating and the substrate, and R is the radius of a falling ball;
(3) interfacial shear strength prediction
Bringing the critical load into the following formula, establishing a critical load FmaxAnd the relation between the thickness t of the coating and the slope is obtained by fitting a curve, and then the predicted value of the interface shear strength tau is obtained:
2. the method for predicting the interfacial shear strength of the coating through the drop hammer impact performance as claimed in claim 1, wherein the coatings with different thicknesses are coatings with the thickness of 200-800 μm obtained by changing different thermal spraying times.
3. The method for predicting the interfacial shear strength of the coating through the drop hammer impact performance according to claim 1, wherein the surface of the nano indentation sample is subjected to a uniform polishing treatment, and then the indentation test is performed by selecting the required loading conditions.
4. The method for predicting the interfacial shear strength of the coating through the drop hammer impact performance according to claim 1, wherein the drop hammer impact test is carried out on the coating by adjusting the height of the drop hammer to change the impact energy.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201910680458.9A CN110411866B (en) | 2019-07-26 | 2019-07-26 | Method for predicting coating interface shear strength through drop hammer impact performance |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201910680458.9A CN110411866B (en) | 2019-07-26 | 2019-07-26 | Method for predicting coating interface shear strength through drop hammer impact performance |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN110411866A CN110411866A (en) | 2019-11-05 |
CN110411866B true CN110411866B (en) | 2021-08-20 |
Family
ID=68363418
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201910680458.9A Active CN110411866B (en) | 2019-07-26 | 2019-07-26 | Method for predicting coating interface shear strength through drop hammer impact performance |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN110411866B (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112268794B (en) * | 2020-09-29 | 2021-08-31 | 中国科学院金属研究所 | Method for determining optimal anti-armor-piercing microstructure state of metal material |
CN113945469B (en) * | 2021-10-13 | 2023-10-27 | 江西省科学院应用物理研究所 | Method for measuring maximum contact stress of coating through tensile property |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH08136429A (en) * | 1994-11-11 | 1996-05-31 | Nec Corp | Shock destructive test method and device |
CN101236152A (en) * | 2008-03-03 | 2008-08-06 | 中国科学院力学研究所 | Bullet impact method for testing coating/ thin film basal body interface bond strength |
CN104655384A (en) * | 2013-11-22 | 2015-05-27 | 珠海格力电器股份有限公司 | Shear-resistant strength detection device and method for integrated air deflector |
CN104729991A (en) * | 2015-03-25 | 2015-06-24 | 中国矿业大学 | Method for measuring thickness and bonding strength of thin coating |
CN204666488U (en) * | 2015-06-01 | 2015-09-23 | 中国人民解放军装甲兵工程学院 | A kind of pendant equipment that falls measuring anchoring strength of coating |
CN109556959A (en) * | 2018-12-12 | 2019-04-02 | 航天科工防御技术研究试验中心 | A kind of method for quantitative measuring of coating material system bond strength |
-
2019
- 2019-07-26 CN CN201910680458.9A patent/CN110411866B/en active Active
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH08136429A (en) * | 1994-11-11 | 1996-05-31 | Nec Corp | Shock destructive test method and device |
CN101236152A (en) * | 2008-03-03 | 2008-08-06 | 中国科学院力学研究所 | Bullet impact method for testing coating/ thin film basal body interface bond strength |
CN104655384A (en) * | 2013-11-22 | 2015-05-27 | 珠海格力电器股份有限公司 | Shear-resistant strength detection device and method for integrated air deflector |
CN104729991A (en) * | 2015-03-25 | 2015-06-24 | 中国矿业大学 | Method for measuring thickness and bonding strength of thin coating |
CN204666488U (en) * | 2015-06-01 | 2015-09-23 | 中国人民解放军装甲兵工程学院 | A kind of pendant equipment that falls measuring anchoring strength of coating |
CN109556959A (en) * | 2018-12-12 | 2019-04-02 | 航天科工防御技术研究试验中心 | A kind of method for quantitative measuring of coating material system bond strength |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
Experimental and FEM Studies on Mechanical Properties of Single-lap Adhesive Joint with Dissimilar Adherends Subjected to Impact Tensile Loadings;Lijuan Liao 等;《Adhesion & Adhesives》;20131231;第44卷;第1-22页 * |
热喷涂涂层结合强度的冲击测量法;姜祎 等;《中国表面工程》;20170630;第30卷(第3期);第131-138页 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN110411866A (en) | 2019-11-05 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN110411866B (en) | Method for predicting coating interface shear strength through drop hammer impact performance | |
CN108920792B (en) | Friction stir welding component fatigue life prediction method based on small crack propagation | |
US10222343B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for testing residual stress in coatings | |
Zhao et al. | Measuring elastoplastic properties of thin films on an elastic substrate using sharp indentation | |
CN109870258B (en) | Instrumented spherical indentation detection method for plane random residual stress | |
Xiao et al. | Evaluation and criterion determination of the low-k thin film adhesion by the surface acoustic waves with cohesive zone model | |
Kim et al. | Note: A single specimen channel crack growth technique applied to brittle thin films on polymer substrates | |
CN110940582B (en) | Method for predicting fatigue strength of metal material through tensile test | |
JP4962353B2 (en) | Cross-cut test method and cross-cut test apparatus | |
Esteves et al. | Measurements for stress sensing of composites using tailored piezospectroscopic coatings | |
Li et al. | Surface asperity evolution and microstructure analysis of Al 6061T5 alloy in a quasi-static cold uniaxial planar compression (CUPC) | |
Zhou et al. | The evaluation of Young's modulus and residual stress of copper films by microbridge testing | |
Fujii et al. | Quasistatic and dynamic mechanical properties of Al–Si–Cu structural films in uniaxial tension | |
Skordaris | Temperature-dependent fatigue strength of diamond coating-substrate interface quantified via the shear failure stress | |
Gan et al. | Scale and temperature dependent creep modeling and experiments in materials | |
CN113945469A (en) | Method for measuring maximum contact stress of coating through tensile property | |
Caton et al. | Use of small fatigue crack growth analysis in predicting the SN response of cast aluminium alloys | |
Kren | Determination of the critical stress intensity factor of glass under conditions of elastic contact by the dynamic indentation method. | |
Maughan et al. | Critical Issues in MEMS Property Measurement and Variation Measured by Nanoindentation: Error Sources and Uncertainty | |
JPH01316632A (en) | Device and method for evaluating mechanical property of thin film | |
JPH0674951A (en) | Creep damage evaluating method for ferrite heat resistant steel | |
Pejman et al. | Numerical study of interfacial crack growth effects on nanoindentation mechanical properties in presence of pre-existing defect | |
Gdoutos et al. | Indentation Testing | |
Kim et al. | The assessment of the fracture behavior in spin-on organosilicates by nanoindentation and nanoscratch tests | |
Ginga et al. | Cohesive fracture measurement technique for free-hanging thin films using highly stressed superlayer |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |