CN110134069A - Numerically-controlled machine tool self-diagnosing method and system - Google Patents

Numerically-controlled machine tool self-diagnosing method and system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN110134069A
CN110134069A CN201910381330.2A CN201910381330A CN110134069A CN 110134069 A CN110134069 A CN 110134069A CN 201910381330 A CN201910381330 A CN 201910381330A CN 110134069 A CN110134069 A CN 110134069A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
error
procedure
processing
standard
self
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201910381330.2A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN110134069B (en
Inventor
李勇
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Suzhou Jinlibao Electronic Technology Co.,Ltd.
Original Assignee
Jiangsu Jinlibao Electronic Technology Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Jiangsu Jinlibao Electronic Technology Co Ltd filed Critical Jiangsu Jinlibao Electronic Technology Co Ltd
Priority to CN201910381330.2A priority Critical patent/CN110134069B/en
Publication of CN110134069A publication Critical patent/CN110134069A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN110134069B publication Critical patent/CN110134069B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B19/00Programme-control systems
    • G05B19/02Programme-control systems electric
    • G05B19/18Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form
    • G05B19/406Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form characterised by monitoring or safety
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/02Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Numerical Control (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a kind of numerically-controlled machine tool self-diagnosing method and systems, it is related to machine tooling, when being included in error beyond standard, first runs software self-test, including carrying out system emulation operation with identical process and parameter, whether test overall error is complied with standard, and processing flow is decomposed, by each step of system emulation, whether testing procedure error is complied with standard;After software self-test passes through, carry out actual processing detection, including carrying out actual processing with identical process and parameter, the error after the completion of each procedure of processing is detected in process, and respectively compared with the standard error of each step, and former and later two procedure of processings are decomposited, it is processed respectively, detects overall error compared with the standard error of the process.First software is detected, determines the specific steps that error occurs.Actual processing detection is just carried out after software self-test, improves detection efficiency.Entire scheme more can intuitively determine the specific steps that error generates, convenient to overhaul.

Description

Numerically-controlled machine tool self-diagnosing method and system
Technical field
The present invention relates to lathe process, more specifically, it relates to a kind of numerically-controlled machine tool self-diagnosing method and system.
Background technique
Numerically-controlled machine tool is the abbreviation of numerically-controlled machine tool, is a kind of automated machine tool equipped with program control system.The control System processed, which can be handled logically, has control coding or other symbolic instruction regulated procedures, and is decoded, with code Digital representation, numerical control device is inputted by information carrier.Various control signals are issued by numerical control device through calculation process, are controlled The movement of lathe, shape and size by drawing, automatically processes part.
Currently, application No. is 201410605568.6 Chinese patents to disclose a kind of numerically-controlled machine tool product machining state Self-diagnosing method, it is comprising steps of one, product processing scheme inputs;Two, product processing and machining state diagnosis: defeated according to institute Enter processing scheme, multiple products are processed to rear by elder generation, process is as follows: 201, product processing starting;202, product is processed And actual processing state-detection;203, product completes the process judgement;204, product actual processing state obtains;205, product is practical Machining state diagnosis: the actual processing status information of obtained current institute's converted products carries out pair with inputted processing scheme Than judging between actual processing status information and the processing scheme with the presence or absence of in place of difference.
Although this diagnostic method can determine converted products whether symbol processing request, can not show that product is asked The concrete reason of topic, could be improved.
Summary of the invention
In view of the deficiencies of the prior art, the present invention intends to provide a kind of numerically-controlled machine tool self-diagnosing method and be System, the specific link for facilitating determining processing problems to occur.
To achieve the above object, the present invention provides the following technical scheme that
A kind of numerically-controlled machine tool self-diagnosing method, including
When error exceeds standard, first runs software self-test, including system emulation operation is carried out with identical process and parameter, it surveys Whether examination overall error complies with standard, and processing flow is decomposed, and by each step of system emulation, whether testing procedure error It complies with standard;
After software self-test passes through, actual processing detection is carried out, including actual processing is carried out with identical process and parameter, added The error after the completion of each procedure of processing is detected during work, and respectively compared with the standard error of each step, and decompose Former and later two procedure of processings out, are processed respectively, detect overall error compared with the standard error of the process.
By adopting the above technical scheme, when there is error, first software is detected, specifically, on the one hand carrying out overall Whether the simulation run of process, test overall error comply with standard, and whether the error on the other hand testing each step respectively meets Standard, so that it is determined that the specific steps that error occurs.Actual processing detection is just carried out after software self-test, improves detection effect Rate.Actual processing detection includes re-working detection and decomposing processing detection, and re-working detection includes practical each processing step Detection after rapid precisely determines source of error, and by decomposing processing detection, distinguishes former and later two procedure of processings to detect It influences, to determine source of error, entire scheme more can intuitively determine the specific steps that error generates, convenient to overhaul.
It further, further include recording each process of self-test and corresponding error-detecting size.
By adopting the above technical scheme, each process of self-test and corresponding error-detecting size are recorded, is facilitated subsequent Error analysis.
Further, further include the error-detecting size added up based on each procedure of processing, calculate being averaged for the procedure of processing Error, if mean error is greater than standard error, judges that the processing walks by the mean error of the procedure of processing compared with standard error Rapid failure.
By adopting the above technical scheme, average mode is calculated by constantly accumulative detection, evades accidental error, enhancing detection Accuracy.
Further, further include the mismachining tolerance of former and later two procedure of processings based on decomposition, calculate two procedure of processing mistakes Mean error afterwards, by the mean error of the procedure of processing compared with standard error, if mean error is greater than standard error, judgement Two procedure of processing errors are excessive.
By adopting the above technical scheme, the mismachining tolerance of former and later two procedure of processings is calculated, it is determined whether due to previous step Error cause the error of second step excessive, thus more accurate lookup error producing cause.
Second aspect provides a kind of numerically-controlled machine tool self-diagnosable system, including processor and memory, the memory storage There is instruction set to call for locating processor to implement function such as:
When error exceeds standard, first runs software self-test, including system emulation operation is carried out with identical process and parameter, it surveys Whether examination overall error complies with standard, and processing flow is decomposed, and by each step of system emulation, whether testing procedure error It complies with standard;
After software self-test passes through, actual processing detection is carried out, including actual processing is carried out with identical process and parameter, added The error after the completion of each procedure of processing is detected during work, and respectively compared with the standard error of each step, and decompose Former and later two procedure of processings out, are processed respectively, detect overall error compared with the standard error of the process.
By adopting the above technical scheme, when there is error, first software is detected, specifically, on the one hand carrying out overall Whether the simulation run of process, test overall error comply with standard, and whether the error on the other hand testing each step respectively meets Standard, so that it is determined that the specific steps that error occurs.Actual processing detection is just carried out after software self-test, improves detection effect Rate.Actual processing detection includes re-working detection and decomposing processing detection, and re-working detection includes practical each processing step Detection after rapid precisely determines source of error, and by decomposing processing detection, distinguishes former and later two procedure of processings to detect It influences, to determine source of error, entire scheme more can intuitively determine the specific steps that error generates, convenient to overhaul.
Further, the processor, which also passes through, calls described instruction collection to implement function such as:
Based on the error-detecting size that each procedure of processing adds up, the mean error of the procedure of processing is calculated, by the procedure of processing Mean error compared with standard error, if mean error be greater than standard error, judge the procedure of processing failure.
By adopting the above technical scheme, each process of self-test and corresponding error-detecting size are recorded, is facilitated subsequent Error analysis.
Further, the processor, which also passes through, calls described instruction collection to implement function such as:
Based on the error-detecting size that each procedure of processing adds up, the mean error of the procedure of processing is calculated, by the procedure of processing Mean error compared with standard error, if mean error be greater than standard error, judge the procedure of processing failure.
By adopting the above technical scheme, average mode is calculated by constantly accumulative detection, evades accidental error, enhancing detection Accuracy.
Further, the processor, which also passes through, calls described instruction collection to implement function such as:
The mismachining tolerance of former and later two procedure of processings based on decomposition calculates the mean error after two procedure of processings, by this The mean error of procedure of processing is compared with standard error, if mean error is greater than standard error, judges that two procedure of processings are missed Difference is excessive.
By adopting the above technical scheme, the mismachining tolerance of former and later two procedure of processings is calculated, it is determined whether due to previous step Error cause the error of second step excessive, thus more accurate lookup error producing cause.
In conclusion the invention has the following advantages:
1. first detecting to software when there is error, the simulation run of overall process is on the one hand carried out, tests overall error Whether comply with standard, whether the error on the other hand testing each step respectively complies with standard, so that it is determined that the tool that error occurs Body step;
2. just carrying out actual processing detection after software self-test, detection efficiency is improved, actual processing detection includes adding again Work detection and decomposition processing detection, re-working detection includes the detection after each procedure of processing of reality, precisely determines that error is former Cause, and by decomposing processing detection, to detect the influence for distinguishing former and later two procedure of processings, to determine source of error, entirely Scheme more can intuitively determine the specific steps that error generates, convenient to overhaul;
3. calculating average mode by constantly accumulative detection, evades accidental error, enhance the accuracy of detection.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 is the flow diagram of numerically-controlled machine tool self-diagnosing method in the present invention;
Fig. 2 is the functional block diagram of numerically-controlled machine tool self-diagnosable system in the present invention.
In figure: 1, processor;2, memory.
Specific embodiment
With reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments, the present invention will be described in detail.
This specific embodiment is only explanation of the invention, is not limitation of the present invention, those skilled in the art Member can according to need the modification that not creative contribution is made to the present embodiment after reading this specification, but as long as at this All by the protection of Patent Law in the scope of the claims of invention.
Embodiment 1
A kind of numerically-controlled machine tool self-diagnosing method, referring to Fig.1, including step S101 to step S102.
Step S101: when error exceeds standard, first runs software self-test, including be with identical process and parameter System simulation run, whether test overall error complies with standard, and processing flow is decomposed, and passes through each step of system emulation, surveys Whether the rapid error of try complies with standard.
Error in step S101 exceeds standard, refers to error of the work pieces process after the completion compared with standard size, right The specific detection of workpiece is referring to application No. is 201410605568.6 patents of invention.Software self-test refers to the control of lathe Device operation emulation inspection software processed, the procedure simulation processing of idle running identical parameters, identical process.Finally compare overall error with Whether the error of standard overall error and each step complies with standard, if not being inconsistent standardization, output error exceed standard the step of Discrepancy Report.If all complying with standard into next step.
Step S102: actual processing detection is carried out, including actual processing is carried out with identical process and parameter, in process Error after the completion of the middle each procedure of processing of detection, and respectively compared with the standard error of each step, and decomposite front and back Two procedure of processings, are processed respectively, detect overall error compared with the standard error of the process.
In step s 102, actual processing detection includes re-working workpiece according to the identical processing method of workpiece, herein In addition the procedure of processing of workpiece is decomposed into the combination of former and later two procedure of processings by the specific error for detecting processing in the process, first After complete former and later two steps and calculate error respectively, to judge influence of the preceding first-order error to rear first-order error.Above-mentioned mistake Difference is not compared with the standard error of the step and feedback result, carries out analyzing last output result.
In addition, numerically-controlled machine tool self-diagnosing method further includes recording each process of self-test and corresponding error-detecting is big It is small.
Based on the error-detecting size that each procedure of processing adds up, the mean error of the procedure of processing is calculated, by the processing The mean error of step, if mean error is greater than standard error, judges the procedure of processing failure compared with standard error.By not Disconnected accumulative detection calculates average mode, evades accidental error, enhances the accuracy of detection.
Numerically-controlled machine tool self-diagnosing method further includes the mismachining tolerance of former and later two procedure of processings based on decomposition, calculates two Mean error after procedure of processing, by the mean error of the procedure of processing compared with standard error, if mean error is greater than mark Quasi- error judges that two procedure of processing errors are excessive.Calculate the mismachining tolerance of former and later two procedure of processings, it is determined whether due to The error of previous step causes the error of second step excessive, thus more accurate lookup error producing cause.
Embodiment 2
A kind of numerically-controlled machine tool self-diagnosable system, referring to Fig. 2, including processor 1 and memory 2, memory 2 is stored with instruction set confession Locating processor 1 is called to implement function such as:
When error exceeds standard, first runs software self-test, including system emulation operation is carried out with identical process and parameter, it surveys Whether examination overall error complies with standard, and processing flow is decomposed, and by each step of system emulation, whether testing procedure error It complies with standard;
After software self-test passes through, actual processing detection is carried out, including actual processing is carried out with identical process and parameter, added The error after the completion of each procedure of processing is detected during work, and respectively compared with the standard error of each step, and decompose Former and later two procedure of processings out, are processed respectively, detect overall error compared with the standard error of the process.
Based on the error-detecting size that each procedure of processing adds up, the mean error of the procedure of processing is calculated, by the processing The mean error of step, if mean error is greater than standard error, judges the procedure of processing failure compared with standard error.
Based on the error-detecting size that each procedure of processing adds up, the mean error of the procedure of processing is calculated, by the processing The mean error of step, if mean error is greater than standard error, judges the procedure of processing failure compared with standard error.
The mismachining tolerance of former and later two procedure of processings based on decomposition calculates the mean error after two procedure of processings, By the mean error of the procedure of processing compared with standard error, if mean error is greater than standard error, this two processing steps are judged Rapid error is excessive.
The above is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, protection scope of the present invention is not limited merely to above-mentioned implementation Example, all technical solutions belonged under thinking of the present invention all belong to the scope of protection of the present invention.It should be pointed out that for the art Those of ordinary skill for, several improvements and modifications without departing from the principles of the present invention, these improvements and modifications It should be regarded as protection scope of the present invention.

Claims (8)

1. a kind of numerically-controlled machine tool self-diagnosing method, it is characterised in that: including
When error exceeds standard, first runs software self-test, including system emulation operation is carried out with identical process and parameter, it surveys Whether examination overall error complies with standard, and processing flow is decomposed, and by each step of system emulation, whether testing procedure error It complies with standard;
After software self-test passes through, actual processing detection is carried out, including actual processing is carried out with identical process and parameter, added The error after the completion of each procedure of processing is detected during work, and respectively compared with the standard error of each step, and decompose Former and later two procedure of processings out, are processed respectively, detect overall error compared with the standard error of the process.
2. numerically-controlled machine tool self-diagnosing method according to claim 1, it is characterised in that: further include recording each process of self-test And corresponding error-detecting size.
3. numerically-controlled machine tool self-diagnosing method according to claim 2, it is characterised in that: further include based on each procedure of processing Accumulative error-detecting size, calculates the mean error of the procedure of processing, by the mean error and standard error of the procedure of processing Compare, if mean error is greater than standard error, judges the procedure of processing failure.
4. numerically-controlled machine tool self-diagnosing method according to claim 2, it is characterised in that: further include the front and back two based on decomposition The mismachining tolerance of a procedure of processing calculates the mean error after two procedure of processings, by the mean error of the procedure of processing with Standard error compares, if mean error is greater than standard error, judges that two procedure of processing errors are excessive.
5. a kind of numerically-controlled machine tool self-diagnosable system, it is characterised in that: including processor (1) and memory (2), the memory (2) instruction set is stored with to call for locating processor (1) to implement function such as:
When error exceeds standard, first runs software self-test, including system emulation operation is carried out with identical process and parameter, it surveys Whether examination overall error complies with standard, and processing flow is decomposed, and by each step of system emulation, whether testing procedure error It complies with standard;
After software self-test passes through, actual processing detection is carried out, including actual processing is carried out with identical process and parameter, added The error after the completion of each procedure of processing is detected during work, and respectively compared with the standard error of each step, and decompose Former and later two procedure of processings out, are processed respectively, detect overall error compared with the standard error of the process.
6. numerically-controlled machine tool self-diagnosable system according to claim 5, it is characterised in that: the processor (1) also passes through tune It is implemented function such as with described instruction collection:
Based on the error-detecting size that each procedure of processing adds up, the mean error of the procedure of processing is calculated, by the procedure of processing Mean error compared with standard error, if mean error be greater than standard error, judge the procedure of processing failure.
7. numerically-controlled machine tool self-diagnosable system according to claim 6, it is characterised in that: the processor (1) also passes through tune It is implemented function such as with described instruction collection:
Based on the error-detecting size that each procedure of processing adds up, the mean error of the procedure of processing is calculated, by the procedure of processing Mean error compared with standard error, if mean error be greater than standard error, judge the procedure of processing failure.
8. numerically-controlled machine tool self-diagnosable system according to claim 6, it is characterised in that: the processor (1) also passes through tune It is implemented function such as with described instruction collection:
The mismachining tolerance of former and later two procedure of processings based on decomposition calculates the mean error after two procedure of processings, by this The mean error of procedure of processing is compared with standard error, if mean error is greater than standard error, judges that two procedure of processings are missed Difference is excessive.
CN201910381330.2A 2019-05-08 2019-05-08 Self-diagnosis method and system of numerical control machine tool Active CN110134069B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910381330.2A CN110134069B (en) 2019-05-08 2019-05-08 Self-diagnosis method and system of numerical control machine tool

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910381330.2A CN110134069B (en) 2019-05-08 2019-05-08 Self-diagnosis method and system of numerical control machine tool

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN110134069A true CN110134069A (en) 2019-08-16
CN110134069B CN110134069B (en) 2022-05-31

Family

ID=67576896

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201910381330.2A Active CN110134069B (en) 2019-05-08 2019-05-08 Self-diagnosis method and system of numerical control machine tool

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN110134069B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113009894A (en) * 2021-03-04 2021-06-22 联想(北京)有限公司 Manufacturing method and production system of matching part

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102221825A (en) * 2010-12-29 2011-10-19 东莞市冠辉五金有限公司 Numerical control processing method and control system for die manufacture
CN104166373A (en) * 2014-08-06 2014-11-26 上海理工大学 Online detecting method and system for numerical control machine tool machining error
CN104615082A (en) * 2014-12-19 2015-05-13 北京理工大学 Rail coupling error real-time compensation device and method in cutting process
CN105629879A (en) * 2014-10-31 2016-06-01 西安扩力机电科技有限公司 Self-diagnosis method for product machining state for numerical control machine tool
CN105974886A (en) * 2016-06-28 2016-09-28 华中科技大学 Health monitoring method for numerical control machine tool

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102221825A (en) * 2010-12-29 2011-10-19 东莞市冠辉五金有限公司 Numerical control processing method and control system for die manufacture
CN104166373A (en) * 2014-08-06 2014-11-26 上海理工大学 Online detecting method and system for numerical control machine tool machining error
CN105629879A (en) * 2014-10-31 2016-06-01 西安扩力机电科技有限公司 Self-diagnosis method for product machining state for numerical control machine tool
CN104615082A (en) * 2014-12-19 2015-05-13 北京理工大学 Rail coupling error real-time compensation device and method in cutting process
CN105974886A (en) * 2016-06-28 2016-09-28 华中科技大学 Health monitoring method for numerical control machine tool

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113009894A (en) * 2021-03-04 2021-06-22 联想(北京)有限公司 Manufacturing method and production system of matching part

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN110134069B (en) 2022-05-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN101470426B (en) Fault detection method and system
EP3605366A1 (en) Method and apparatus thereof used in engineering for checking deduction of components in bim modeling
US20070220330A1 (en) Computer-Supported Diagnostic System, Based on Heuristics and System Topologies
CN105116870A (en) Fault analysis method, device and system of air conditioning unit
CN112025766B (en) Robot system health self-checking method and device and electronic equipment
US8074123B2 (en) Multi-CPU failure detection/recovery system and method for the same
CN110134069A (en) Numerically-controlled machine tool self-diagnosing method and system
CN109142979B (en) Method and device for detecting abnormal state of power distribution network
CN108763005B (en) Memory ECC fault error reporting method and system
CN114789468A (en) Automatic fault detection and repair system, method, equipment and terminal
CN109871307A (en) A kind of automated testing method being accurately positioned starting matter of time
CN116107794B (en) Ship software fault automatic diagnosis method, system and storage medium
CN106950609B (en) Method, device and system for detecting assembly components on product line
CN116909904A (en) Software function automatic test method based on high-flow high-concurrency condition
CN116449802A (en) Control system fault diagnosis device, method and computer program product
KR20170123389A (en) System and method for human error probability calculation of nuclear generating station
CN103678136B (en) Data race false positive reduction method based on control flow
CN113110297B (en) Method for preventing origin from being used wrongly in numerical control machining process
CN112598816B (en) Vehicle data acquisition method and device and vehicle diagnosis system
CN113127277B (en) Equipment testing method and device, electronic equipment and readable storage medium
CN116307534B (en) Engineering measurement data processing method based on cloud computing
WO2024139359A1 (en) Program memory overflow early warning method and system, electronic device, and computer storage medium
CN113704088B (en) Process tracing method, process tracing system and related device
Khalil et al. An experimental comparison of software diagnosis methods
CN115983780A (en) Processing method and device for rail transit data tool and electronic equipment

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant
TR01 Transfer of patent right

Effective date of registration: 20230105

Address after: No. 9 Jujin Road, Taiping Street Industrial Park, Xiangcheng District, Suzhou City, Jiangsu Province, 215000

Patentee after: Suzhou Jinlibao Electronic Technology Co.,Ltd.

Address before: 224700 zhudun Road, private science and technology entrepreneurship Park, Jianhu County, Yancheng City, Jiangsu Province

Patentee before: Jiangsu Jinlibao Electronic Technology Co.,Ltd.

TR01 Transfer of patent right
PE01 Entry into force of the registration of the contract for pledge of patent right

Denomination of invention: Self diagnostic methods and systems for CNC machine tools

Granted publication date: 20220531

Pledgee: Zhejiang Tailong Commercial Bank Co.,Ltd. Suzhou Xiangcheng Branch

Pledgor: Suzhou Jinlibao Electronic Technology Co.,Ltd.

Registration number: Y2024980025300