CN109858827A - Visualization comparative approach, system, electric terminal and the storage medium of subject level - Google Patents
Visualization comparative approach, system, electric terminal and the storage medium of subject level Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN109858827A CN109858827A CN201910129430.6A CN201910129430A CN109858827A CN 109858827 A CN109858827 A CN 109858827A CN 201910129430 A CN201910129430 A CN 201910129430A CN 109858827 A CN109858827 A CN 109858827A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- school
- index
- ranking
- unit
- single item
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000012800 visualization Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 50
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 23
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 23
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims description 91
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 16
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000004220 aggregation Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 206010020675 Hypermetropia Diseases 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000005055 memory storage Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000012827 research and development Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 abstract description 7
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000011089 mechanical engineering Methods 0.000 description 14
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 13
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005611 electricity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000802 evaporation-induced self-assembly Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Visualization comparative approach, system, electric terminal and the storage medium of the application offer subject level, the same subjects of two the compared schools respective ranking in each index of one group of index can be intuitively presented in the application, show school, every institute leading indicators and lagging indicator and its it is leading and fall behind degree；Can also the ranking of indices of the intuitive judgment school subject point be above ranking corresponding to Datum identifier again below ranking corresponding to Datum identifier, and can intuitive judgment be higher or lower than the degree of ranking corresponding to Datum identifier, the relative mistake between other schools is understood away from having qualitative leap with advantage for school's discipline construction and planning department.
Description
Technical field
This application involves educational assessment technical fields, more particularly to visualization comparative approach, system, the electricity of subject level
Sub- terminal and storage medium.
Background technique
Subject is the cell of university, is the basic unit of university's carrying personnel training, scientific research and community service function,
It is also the key point that comprehensive strength and standard for running a school improve in university.
Currently, mainly having numeric sorting and divided rank two with the method compared to the disciplinary assessment that China university is carried out
Kind: the disciplines ranking of the disciplinary assessment of numeric sorting such as third party's University Rank institutions conduct, in this evaluation method, row
Name ranking is the comparison result to subject level；Second is divided rank, Ministry of Education's degree and postgraduate education in 2017
Center there is doctor or master's degree to award the whole nation according to the first level discipline bore of " conferment of degree and personnel training subject catalogue "
The first level discipline for giving power is assessed, and the subject that ranking is preceding 70% is divided into 9 grades of announcements: A+, A, A-, B+, B, B-, C+, C,
C-, in this evaluation form, the grade of subject is the comparison result to subject level.
But either numeric sorting or divided rank are related to more even if being mostly multiple index evaluation in the prior art
A evaluation index, but final result is usually single dimension, is more concerned about the general performance and precedence of subject, can not intuitively show pair
Subject more corresponding than school in the performance on every single index and the gap between other schools, for school's discipline construction and
It is little away from helping with advantage that planning department understands the relative mistake between other schools.
Apply for content
In view of the foregoing deficiencies of prior art, the visualization side for being designed to provide subject level of the application
Method, system, electric terminal and storage medium can not intuitively show the corresponding subject of comparison school each in the prior art for solving
The technical issues of performance on single index and the gap between other schools.
In order to achieve the above objects and other related objects, the first aspect of the application provides a kind of visualization of subject level
Comparative approach comprising: the index system of subject level of the building for evaluating unit of running a school；Obtain at least two it is to be compared
Performance situation of the unit of running a school in each single item evaluation index of the index system, determines that unit of running a school to be compared exists accordingly
Ranking in each single item evaluation index in default group, so that the unit of running a school to be compared is for each single item evaluation index
It is successively ranked up by its ranking；With each single item evaluation index for the first dimensional view, and with the list of running a school to be compared
Position is the second dimensional view, visualization output doing based on multiple single item evaluation indexs for the ranking results of each single item evaluation index
Learn the comparison result information of the subject level of unit.
In some embodiments of the application first aspect, at least two units of running a school to be compared of the acquisition are in institute
The performance situation in each single item evaluation index of index system is stated, mode includes: from unit and/or the third party authority's machine of running a school
Structure obtains the performance situation of the unit in each single item evaluation index of running a school to be compared.
In some embodiments of the application first aspect, which comprises base is set in visual view
Fiducial mark is known, the horizontal difference between Datum identifier of the subject for showing unit of respectively running a school.
In some embodiments of the application first aspect, which comprises according to unit of running a school in the index
General performance situation in system determines the overall ranking of the unit in default group of running a school, and using the overall ranking as base
Fiducial mark is known, and visualization exports difference results letter of the unit between the ranking and overall ranking in each single item evaluation index of running a school
Breath；And/or level of aggregation is chosen from default group and meets the unit of running a school of preset requirement with determining selected unit of running a school
Intermediate value ranking in every evaluation index, and identified on the basis of the intermediate value ranking, visualization output runs a school unit each
Difference results information between ranking in single item evaluation index and intermediate value ranking.
In some embodiments of the application first aspect, the index system includes one or more index sets；Respectively
The index set includes one or more single item evaluation indexs；Each single item evaluation index includes that one or more height evaluations refer to
Mark.
In some embodiments of the application first aspect, the index system includes any in following index set
Kind or multiple combinations: talent of high caliber's index set comprising any one or more of combination of following single item evaluation index: senior
Academic authority, middle age leading expert, a young top-notch outstanding person and international well-known scholar；Wherein, senior academic authority includes such as again
Lower subsystem assessment indicator: academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and/or member of Chinese Academy of Engineering；Middle age leading expert includes that following son evaluation refers to again
Mark: the Changjiang river scholar professor invited specially and/or national scientifical fund for outstanding people winner；A young top-notch outstanding person includes that following son is commented again
Any one or more of combination of valence index: the outstanding young science fund winner of country, " young thousand people plan " those selected,
" ten thousand people plan " youth top-notch personnel and young the Changjiang river scholar；International well-known scholar includes following subsystem assessment indicator again: love is thought
Only your the high farsighted only peace height of scholar and/or section that drawn is drawn scientist；Scientific research project index set comprising following single item evaluation refers to
Mark: young project in great key project and/or face；Wherein, great key project includes appointing in following subsystem assessment indicator again
One or more combinations: state key research and develop planning item, 973 planning items, Nsfc Major Projects and
State natural sciences fund key project；Young project includes following subsystem assessment indicator again on face: state natural sciences fund face
Upper project and/or state natural sciences fund youth's project；Achievement is won a prize index set comprising following single item evaluation index:
The great reward of country；Wherein, national great reward includes any one or more of combination of following subsystem assessment indicator again: country is certainly
So science prize, national technical invention award and National Prize for Progress in Science and Technology；Academic paper index set comprising following individual event is commented
Valence index: International Periodicals paper and/or international top journal article；Talent cultivation index set comprising following single item evaluation
Index: the academic talent is brought up.
In some embodiments of the application first aspect, which comprises enable ranking ranking and evaluation index point
Not Wei one of horizontal axis and the longitudinal axis and another one, to constitute two-dimensional coordinate system；It is visualized and is exported by the two-dimensional coordinate system
The comparison result information of the subject level of unit of running a school based on multiple single item evaluation indexs.
In order to achieve the above objects and other related objects, the second aspect of the application provides a kind of visualization of subject level
Comparison system comprising: index system establishment module, for constructing the index body of the subject level for evaluating unit of running a school
System；Ranking determining module refers to for obtaining at least two units of running a school to be compared in each single item evaluation of the index system
The performance situation put on determines ranking of the unit in each single item evaluation index in default group of running a school to be compared accordingly,
So that the unit of running a school to be compared is successively ranked up for each single item evaluation index by its ranking；Visualization output mould
Block is used for each single item evaluation index as the first dimensional view, and is commented with the unit of running a school to be compared for each individual event
The ranking results of valence index are the second dimensional view, the subject water of run a school unit of the visualization output based on multiple single item evaluation indexs
Flat comparison result information.
In order to achieve the above objects and other related objects, the third aspect of the application provides a kind of computer-readable storage medium
Matter, is stored thereon with computer program, and the computer program realizes the visualization of the subject level when being executed by processor
Comparative approach.
In order to achieve the above objects and other related objects, the fourth aspect of the application provides a kind of electric terminal, comprising: place
Manage device and memory；The memory is used to execute the memory storage for storing computer program, the processor
Computer program, so that the terminal executes the visualization comparative approach of the subject level.
As described above, visualization comparative approach, system, electric terminal and the storage medium of the subject level of the application, tool
Have following the utility model has the advantages that the same subject of two compared schools can be intuitively presented in each index of one group of index in the application
Respective ranking, show school, every institute leading indicators and lagging indicator and its it is leading and fall behind degree；It can also be intuitive
Judge that the ranking of the indices of the school subject point is above ranking corresponding to Datum identifier again below fiducial mark
Know corresponding ranking, and energy intuitive judgment is higher or lower than the degree of ranking corresponding to Datum identifier.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 is shown as the flow diagram of the horizontal visualization comparative approach of subject in one embodiment of the application.
Fig. 2 is shown as the interface schematic diagram that the visualization of subject level in one embodiment of the application is compared.
Fig. 3 is shown as the interface schematic diagram that the visualization of subject level in one embodiment of the application is compared.
Fig. 4 is shown as the structural schematic diagram of the horizontal visualization comparison system of subject in one embodiment of the application.
Fig. 5 is shown as the structural schematic diagram of electric terminal in one embodiment of the application.
Specific embodiment
Illustrate presently filed embodiment below by way of specific specific example, those skilled in the art can be by this specification
Disclosed content understands other advantages and effect of the application easily.The application can also pass through in addition different specific realities
The mode of applying is embodied or practiced, the various details in this specification can also based on different viewpoints and application, without departing from
Various modifications or alterations are carried out under spirit herein.It should be noted that in the absence of conflict, following embodiment and implementation
Feature in example can be combined with each other.
It should be noted that with reference to attached drawing, attached drawing describes several embodiments of the application in described below.It should
Understand, other embodiments also can be used, and mechanical group can be carried out without departing substantially from spirit and scope
At, structure, electrical and operational change.Following detailed description should not be considered limiting, and the application
The range of embodiment only limited by the claims for the patent announced.Term used herein is merely to description is specific
Embodiment, and it is not intended to limit the application.The term of space correlation, for example, "upper", "lower", "left", "right", " following ", " under
Side ", " lower part ", " top ", " top " etc. can be used in the text in order to elements or features shown in explanatory diagram and another
The relationship of one elements or features.
In this application unless specifically defined or limited otherwise, term " installation ", " connected ", " connection ", " fixation ",
Terms such as " fixings " shall be understood in a broad sense, for example, it may be being fixedly connected, may be a detachable connection, or be integrally connected；
It can be mechanical connection, be also possible to be electrically connected；It can be directly connected, can also indirectly connected through an intermediary, it can be with
It is the connection inside two elements.For the ordinary skill in the art, above-mentioned art can be understood as the case may be
The concrete meaning of language in this application.
Furthermore as used in herein, singular " one ", "one" and "the" are intended to also include plural number shape
Formula, unless there is opposite instruction in context.It will be further understood that term "comprising", " comprising " show that there are the spies
Sign, operation, element, component, project, type, and/or group, but it is not excluded for one or more other features, operation, element, group
Presence, appearance or the addition of part, project, type, and/or group.Term "or" and "and/or" used herein are interpreted as including
Property, or mean any one or any combination.Therefore, " A, B or C " or " A, B and/or C " mean " it is following any one:
A；B；C；A and B；A and C；B and C；A, B and C ".Only when the combination of element, functions or operations is inherently mutual under certain modes
When repulsion, it just will appear the exception of this definition.
Subject is the cell of university, is the basic unit of university's carrying personnel training, scientific research and community service function,
It is also the key point that comprehensive strength and standard for running a school improve in university.The prior art passes through third party's University Rank institutions conduct
Disciplines ranking carries out subject assessment of levels by the disciplinary assessment that responsible educational institution carries out.But either the third-party institution opens
The disciplinary assessment that the disciplines ranking of exhibition or responsible educational institution carry out is related to multiple evaluations even if being mostly multiple index evaluation
Index, but final result is usually single dimension, is more concerned about the general performance and precedence of subject, can not intuitively show comparison school
Corresponding subject is in the performance on every single index and the gap between other schools, for school's discipline construction and planning department
It is little away from helping with advantage that door understands the relative mistake between other schools.
It is present in variety of problems in the prior art in view of above-mentioned these, the visualization that the application provides subject level is compared
Method, system, electric terminal and storage medium, it is desirable to provide one kind can be based on each single index come more multiple lists of running a school
The subject of position is horizontal, and comparison result information is exported with visual means, intuitively shows the subject water between unit of running a school
Adjustment is different, understands the relative mistake between other schools away from having flying for matter with advantage for school's discipline construction and planning department
Jump.
As shown in Figure 1, showing the flow diagram for the visualization comparative approach that subject is horizontal in one embodiment of the application.It needs
It is noted that the method can be applied to controller, and such as: ARM controller, FPGA controller, SoC controller, DSP control
Device or MCU controller etc..The method can also be applied to include memory, storage control, one or more processing lists
First (CPU), Peripheral Interface, RF circuit, voicefrequency circuit, loudspeaker, microphone, input/output (I/O) subsystem, display screen, its
He exports or the computer of the control components such as equipment and outside port；The computer include but is not limited to as desktop computer,
Laptop, tablet computer, smart phone, smart television, personal digital assistant (Personal Digital
Assistant, abbreviation PDA) etc. PCs.The method applies also for server, the server can according to function,
The many factors such as load are arranged in one or more property servers, can also be by server cluster structure be distributed or concentration
At.
In this present embodiment, the visualization comparative approach of the subject level includes step S11, step S12 and step
S13。
In step s 11, the index system of subject level of the building for evaluating unit of running a school.Specifically, the finger
Mark system includes one or more index sets；Each index set includes one or more single item evaluation indexs；Each individual event
Evaluation index includes one or more subsystem assessment indicators.
In one embodiment, the unit of running a school is appointing in the unit of running a school of each preset kind in a country
Anticipate an institute；The preset kind includes: primary school, middle school, university or research institute.The area can be certain in a country
A region, such as province, city, the county of China etc., are also possible to transnational, such as Asia etc..Certainly, in order in same level
It is evaluated, is compared between unit it is still further preferred that same type in a country is run a school, the system of education of country variant is very
There may be very big difference, in this way when relatively index may just be difficult to it is general；But it is if close in certain systems of education
The same type of country run a school between unit, index can it is general if, then it is also feasible for comparing.
In one embodiment, unit of running a school can be according to own situation user-defined counter system, i.e., autonomous selective goal system
In index set, single item evaluation index, subsystem assessment indicator.
In one embodiment, unit of running a school can be issued existing suitable for subject assessment of levels according to the third-party institution
More objective index system.In order to facilitate the understanding of those skilled in the art, the index body in an embodiment shown now in conjunction with table 1
System is to be further explained explanation.
Table 1: China's preferably disciplines ranking assessment indicator system
It should be understood that providing above table for illustrative purpose, and above table is not to be construed as limiting
Property processed.Likewise, the index system can not carry on the back additionally or alternatively including other feature or including less feature
From scope of the present application.
In step s 12, at least two units of running a school to be compared are obtained to refer in each single item evaluation of the index system
The performance situation put on determines ranking of the unit in each single item evaluation index in default group of running a school to be compared accordingly,
So that the unit of running a school to be compared is successively ranked up for each single item evaluation index by its ranking.
In one embodiment, the default group can be in the whole country all run a school unit or the whole provinces, complete
All units etc. of running a school within the scope of city or the whole county.
In one embodiment, at least two units of running a school to be compared of the acquisition are commented in each individual event of the index system
Performance situation in valence index, mode include: from running a school unit and/or third party authoritative institution obtains described to be compared do
Learn performance situation of the unit in each single item evaluation index.Such as: from the school official website for unit of running a school or database, Department of Science and Technology etc.
Data are collected in the website of authoritative institution or database and are cleared up.
Unit of running a school to be compared can be two and be also possible to more, for convenience of understanding, hereafter with A school and B
For school, the subjects of mechanical engineering for comparing two schools is horizontal, collects index number from the official website or database of A school and B school
According to, or from the website of the authoritative institutions such as the Department of Science and Technology or database achievement data is collected, so that it is determined that the mechanical engineering of A school
The performance situation of subject and the subjects of mechanical engineering of B school in each evaluation index, concrete outcome are as shown in table 2.
Table 2:A school and B school subjects of mechanical engineering achievement data and ranking
It should be understood that providing above table for illustrative purpose, and above table is not to be construed as limiting
Property processed.Likewise, the data and score of the index system and each index can additionally or alternatively include other feature or
Including less feature, and without departing from scope of the present application.
In step s 13, with each single item evaluation index for the first dimensional view, and with the unit of running a school to be compared
Ranking results for each single item evaluation index are the second dimensional view, visualization output running a school based on multiple single item evaluation indexs
The comparison result information of the subject level of unit.
In one embodiment, it enables ranking ranking and evaluation index is respectively one of horizontal axis and the longitudinal axis and another one, with
Constitute two-dimensional coordinate system；Run a school unit of the output based on multiple single item evaluation indexs is visualized by the two-dimensional coordinate system
The comparison result information of section's level.
It is illustrated now in conjunction with Fig. 2, in Fig. 2, using ranking ranking as horizontal axis, using evaluation index as the longitudinal axis, draws A
The horizontal comparison diagram of subject in school and B school subjects of mechanical engineering.Wherein, the peak of ranking ranking is 1, the smaller table of ranking ranking
Show that ranking is more forward, the right side for being more close to figure is shown as in Fig. 2.
Can intuitively and clearly be found out by visually analyzing, the subjects of mechanical engineering of A school senior academic authority,
The individual events such as middle age leading expert, a young top-notch outstanding person, great key project, international top journal article, the academic talent of achievements are commented
Performance in valence index is not as good as B school, and young project, the great reward of country and International Periodicals on international well-known scholar, face
Performance in the single item evaluations index such as paper is better than B school.
Therefore, using the visualization comparative approach of subject level provided by the present application, two can be intuitively presented and compare
The same subject in school respective ranking in each index of one group of index can show the leading indicators of school, every institute and fall
Index afterwards, or even connecting degree that is leading and falling behind can be very clear, so for school's discipline construction and planning department
It solves the relative mistake between other schools away from having qualitative leap with advantage.
In one embodiment, which comprises Datum identifier is set in visual view, for showing list of respectively running a school
The horizontal difference between Datum identifier of the subject of position.
The exhibition method of the Datum identifier can be reference line, be also possible to datum mark, and the application is not construed as limiting this.
Ranking corresponding to reference line can be set to the overall ranking of a certain subject point of a school, also can be set to following destination name
It is secondary；A reference value can be set to intermediate value of all subject points of the specific level of a certain subject in a certain index, for example, mechanical engineering
Subject is cited as the intermediate value of middle age leading expert's quantity of all subject points of A+ in disciplinary assessment or subjects of mechanical engineering exists
In disciplines ranking it is all rank preceding 5% subject point middle age leading expert's quantity intermediate value.
In one embodiment, which is determined according to general performance situation of the unit in the index system of running a school
Overall ranking in default group, and identified on the basis of the overall ranking, visualization output runs a school unit in each individual event
The difference results information between ranking and overall ranking in evaluation index.
As shown in figure 3, the 4th is ranked in certain year China's preferably disciplines ranking in A school, China of the B school in certain year
The 1st is ranked in best disciplines ranking, the dotted line for being parallel to the longitudinal axis with one in figure indicates the reference line of A school, and parallel with one
The reference line of B school is indicated in the solid line of the longitudinal axis.
Can intuitively and clearly be found out by visually analyzing, the subjects of mechanical engineering of A school senior academic authority,
Middle age leading expert, the ranking brought up in the single item evaluations indexs such as the academic talent are not so good as the overall ranking of A school, and pull out in youth
A sharp outstanding person, international well-known scholar, great key project, young project on face, the great reward of country, international top journal article,
Ranking in the single item evaluations index such as International Periodicals paper is better than the overall ranking of A school.In addition, the mechanical engineering of A school
The synthesis of ranking and B school of the section in the single item evaluations indexs such as middle age leading expert, a young top-notch outstanding person, great key project
Ranking maintains an equal level, and the ranking in remaining single item evaluation index is then not so good as the overall ranking of B school.
In one embodiment, that chooses that level of aggregation meets preset requirement from default group runs a school unit selected by determination
Intermediate value ranking of the unit in every evaluation index of running a school taken, and identified on the basis of the intermediate value ranking, visualization output
Difference results information of the unit of running a school between the ranking and intermediate value ranking in each single item evaluation index.
As shown in figure 3, the A school and B school in the present embodiment are cited as A+ in Ministry of Education's fourth round disciplinary assessment,
All subject points for being cited as A+ in disciplinary assessment by subjects of mechanical engineering are worth on the basis of the intermediate value of each index dimension, see
Examine the level whether performance of the two schools subjects of mechanical engineering on each single index reaches reference data value.
Can intuitively and clearly be found out by visually analyzing, the subjects of mechanical engineering of A school senior academic authority,
Performance in the single item evaluations index such as middle age leading expert and the academic talent of achievements is not up to the median level of A+ subject, and in state
Performance in the single item evaluations indexs such as the well-known scholar in border, International Periodicals paper then obviously exceeds the median level of A+ subject, at it
The median level of performance and A+ subject in his index maintains an equal level.Young project, country are heavy on the whole for the subjects of mechanical engineering of B school
Performance greatly in the single item evaluations index such as reward is not up to the median level of A+ subject, and top-notch in middle age leading expert, youth
Performance in the single item evaluations indexs such as an outstanding person, great key project, international top journal article is then obviously beyond in A+ subject
Value is horizontal, and the performance in other indexs and the median level of A+ subject maintain an equal level.
Therefore, the application this can be learned by way of Datum identifier is arranged in visual view with intuitive judgment
The ranking of the indices of this subject point of school is above ranking corresponding to Datum identifier again below corresponding to Datum identifier
Ranking, and can intuitive judgment be higher or lower than Datum identifier corresponding to ranking degree.
Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that: realize that all or part of the steps of above-mentioned each method embodiment can lead to
The relevant hardware of computer program is crossed to complete.Computer program above-mentioned can store in a computer readable storage medium
In.When being executed, execution includes the steps that above-mentioned each method embodiment to the program；And storage medium above-mentioned include: ROM,
The various media that can store program code such as RAM, magnetic or disk.
As shown in figure 4, showing the structural schematic diagram for the visualization comparison system that subject is horizontal in one embodiment of the application.Institute
Stating visualization comparison system includes: index system establishment module 41, ranking determining module 42 and visualization output module 43.
Index system establishment module 41 is used for the index system for constructing the subject level for evaluating unit of running a school.Row
Name determining module 42 is used to refer to for obtaining at least two units of running a school to be compared in each single item evaluation of the index system
The performance situation put on determines ranking of the unit in each single item evaluation index in default group of running a school to be compared accordingly,
So that the unit of running a school to be compared is successively ranked up for each single item evaluation index by its ranking.Visualize output module
43 are used for each single item evaluation index as the first dimensional view, and with the unit of running a school to be compared for each single item evaluation
The ranking results of index are the second dimensional view, and the subject of run a school unit of the visualization output based on multiple single item evaluation indexs is horizontal
Comparison result information.
It should be noted that visualization comparison system provided in this embodiment is square compared with the visualization being provided above
Method, embodiment is similar, and so it will not be repeated.It is further to note that it should be understood that the division of the modules of system above only
It is only a kind of division of logic function, can be completely or partially integrated on a physical entity in actual implementation, it can also be with object
It is separated in reason.And these modules can be realized all by way of processing element calls with software；It can also be all with hardware
Form realize；It can be realized in the form of part of module calls software by processing element, the shape that part of module passes through hardware
Formula is realized.For example, visualization output module can be the processing element individually set up, also can integrate in a certain of above system
It is realized in a chip, in addition it is also possible to be stored in the form of program code in the memory of above system, by above system
Some processing element calls and executes the function of the above visualization output module module.The realization of other modules is similar therewith.
Furthermore these modules completely or partially can integrate together, can also independently realize.Processing element described here can be
A kind of integrated circuit, the processing capacity with signal.During realization, each step of the above method or the above modules can
To be completed by the instruction of the integrated logic circuit of the hardware in processor elements or software form.
For example, the above module can be arranged to implement one or more integrated circuits of above method, such as:
One or more specific integrated circuits (Application Specific Integrated Circuit, abbreviation ASIC), or,
One or more microprocessors (digital signal processor, abbreviation DSP), or, one or more scene can compile
Journey gate array (Field Programmable Gate Array, abbreviation FPGA) etc..For another example, when some above module passes through place
When managing the form realization of element scheduler program code, which can be general processor, such as central processing unit
(Central Processing Unit, abbreviation CPU) or it is other can be with the processor of caller code.For another example, these modules
It can integrate together, realized in the form of system on chip (system-on-a-chip, abbreviation SOC).
As shown in figure 5, showing the structural schematic diagram of electric terminal in one embodiment of the application.The electronics that this example provides is whole
End, comprising: processor 51, memory 52, transceiver 53, communication interface 54 and system bus 55；Memory 52 and communication interface
54 connect with processor 51 and transceiver 53 and complete mutual communication by system bus 55, and memory 52 is based on storing
Calculation machine program, communication interface 54 and transceiver 53 are used for and other equipment are communicated, and processor 51 is for running computer journey
Sequence makes electric terminal execute each step of the horizontal visualization comparative approach of subject as above.
System bus mentioned above can be Peripheral Component Interconnect standard (Peripheral Component
Interconnect, abbreviation PCI) bus or expanding the industrial standard structure (Extended Industry Standard
Architecture, abbreviation EISA) bus etc..The system bus can be divided into address bus, data/address bus, control bus etc..
Only to be indicated with a thick line in figure, it is not intended that an only bus or a type of bus convenient for indicating.Communication connects
Mouth is for realizing the communication between database access device and other equipment (such as client, read-write library and read-only library).Storage
Device may include random access memory (Random Access Memory, abbreviation RAM), it is also possible to further include non-volatile deposit
Reservoir (non-volatile memory), for example, at least a magnetic disk storage.
Above-mentioned processor can be general processor, including central processing unit (Central Processing Unit,
Abbreviation CPU), network processing unit (Network Processor, abbreviation NP) etc.；It can also be digital signal processor
(Digital Signal Processing, abbreviation DSP), specific integrated circuit (Application Specific
Integrated Circuit, abbreviation ASIC), field programmable gate array (Field-Programmable Gate Array,
Abbreviation FPGA) either other programmable logic device, discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components.
In conclusion the application provides visualization comparative approach, system, electric terminal and the storage medium of subject level,
The same subjects of two the compared schools respective ranking in each index of one group of index can intuitively be presented, show every
The leading indicators and lagging indicator of school, institute and its leading and backward degree；It can also the intuitive judgment school subject point
The rankings of indices be above ranking corresponding to Datum identifier again below ranking corresponding to Datum identifier, and can be straight
See the degree that judgement is higher or lower than ranking corresponding to Datum identifier.So the application effectively overcome it is in the prior art
Various shortcoming and have high industrial utilization value.
The principles and effects of the application are only illustrated in above-described embodiment, not for limitation the application.It is any ripe
Know the personage of this technology all can without prejudice to spirit herein and under the scope of, carry out modifications and changes to above-described embodiment.Cause
This, those of ordinary skill in the art is complete without departing from spirit disclosed herein and institute under technical idea such as
At all equivalent modifications or change, should be covered by claims hereof.
Claims (10)
1. a kind of visualization comparative approach of subject level characterized by comprising
The index system of subject level of the building for evaluating unit of running a school；
At least two performance situations of the unit in each single item evaluation index of the index system of running a school to be compared are obtained, according to
With ranking of the unit in each single item evaluation index in default group of running a school that determination is to be compared, so that described to be compared is done
Unit is learned successively to be ranked up for each single item evaluation index by its ranking；
With each single item evaluation index for the first dimensional view, and referred to the unit of running a school to be compared for each single item evaluation
Target ranking results are the second dimensional view, the subject level of run a school unit of the visualization output based on multiple single item evaluation indexs
Comparison result information.
2. the visualization comparative approach of subject level according to claim 1, which is characterized in that described to obtain at least two
Performance situation of the unit in each single item evaluation index of the index system of running a school to be compared, mode include:
From running a school unit and/or third party authoritative institution obtains and described to be compared runs a school unit in each single item evaluation index
Show situation.
3. the visualization comparative approach of subject level according to claim 1, which is characterized in that the described method includes:
Datum identifier is set in visual view, the horizontal difference between Datum identifier of the subject for showing unit of respectively running a school.
4. the visualization comparative approach of subject level according to claim 3, which is characterized in that the described method includes:
Determine that the unit of running a school is comprehensive in default group in the general performance situation in the index system according to unit is run a school
Ranking is closed, and is identified on the basis of the overall ranking, visualization exports ranking of the unit in each single item evaluation index of running a school
Difference results information between overall ranking；And/or level of aggregation is chosen from default group and meets running a school for preset requirement
Unit is marked on the basis of the intermediate value ranking with determining selected intermediate value ranking of the unit in every evaluation index of running a school
Know, visualization exports difference results information of the unit between the ranking and intermediate value ranking in each single item evaluation index of running a school.
5. the visualization comparative approach of subject level according to claim 1, which is characterized in that the index system includes
One or more index sets；Each index set includes one or more single item evaluation indexs；Each single item evaluation index packet
Include one or more subsystem assessment indicators.
6. the visualization comparative approach of subject level according to claim 5, which is characterized in that the index system includes
Any one or more of combination of following index set:
Talent of high caliber's index set comprising any one or more of combination of following single item evaluation index: senior academic authority,
Middle age leading expert, a young top-notch outstanding person and international well-known scholar；Wherein, senior academic authority includes following son evaluation again
Index: academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and/or member of Chinese Academy of Engineering；Middle age, leading expert included following subsystem assessment indicator: the Changjiang river again
Scholar professor invited specially and/or national scientifical fund for outstanding people winner；A young top-notch outstanding person includes following subsystem assessment indicator again
Any one or more of combination: the outstanding young science fund winner of country, " young thousand people plan " those selected, " Wan Renji
Draw " young top-notch personnel and young the Changjiang river scholar；International well-known scholar includes following subsystem assessment indicator again: Elsevier is high
Drawn the farsighted only peace height of scholar and/or section and is drawn scientist；
Scientific research project index set comprising following single item evaluation index: young project in great key project and/or face；Its
In, great key project includes any one or more of combination of following subsystem assessment indicator again: state key research and development planning item,
973 planning items, Nsfc Major Projects and state natural sciences fund key project；Young item on face
Mesh includes following subsystem assessment indicator again: state natural sciences fund general project and/or state natural sciences fund youth's project；
Achievement is won a prize index set comprising following single item evaluation index: the great reward of country；Wherein, country is great rewards again
Including any one or more of combination of following subsystem assessment indicator: National Prize for Natural Sciences, national technical invention award and country
The progress prize in science and technology；
Academic paper index set comprising following single item evaluation index: International Periodicals paper and/or international top periodical opinion
Text；
Talent cultivation index set comprising following single item evaluation index: the academic talent is brought up.
7. the visualization comparative approach of subject level according to claim 1, which is characterized in that the described method includes:
It enables ranking ranking and evaluation index is respectively one of horizontal axis and the longitudinal axis and another one, to constitute two-dimensional coordinate system；Its
In, the ranking ranking indicates the index ranking of the corresponding subject of unit of running a school and participates in the Board Lot of running a school of the disciplines ranking
The ratio between；
The ratio of the subject level of run a school unit of the output based on multiple single item evaluation indexs is visualized by the two-dimensional coordinate system
Compared with result information.
8. a kind of visualization comparison system of subject level characterized by comprising
Index system establishment module, for constructing the index system for evaluating the subject level for unit of running a school；
Ranking determining module refers to for obtaining at least two units of running a school to be compared in each single item evaluation of the index system
The performance situation put on determines ranking of the unit in each single item evaluation index in default group of running a school to be compared accordingly,
So that the unit of running a school to be compared is successively ranked up for each single item evaluation index by its ranking；
Output module is visualized, is used for each single item evaluation index as the first dimensional view, and run a school with described to be compared
Unit is the second dimensional view for the ranking results of each single item evaluation index, and visualization output is based on multiple single item evaluation indexs
The comparison result information of the subject level for unit of running a school.
9. a kind of computer readable storage medium, is stored thereon with computer program, which is characterized in that the computer program quilt
Processor realizes the visualization comparative approach of the level of subject described in any one of claims 1 to 7 when executing.
10. a kind of electric terminal characterized by comprising processor and memory；
The memory is for storing computer program；
The processor is used to execute the computer program of the memory storage, so that the terminal executes such as claim 1
To the visualization comparative approach of the level of subject described in any one of 7.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910129430.6A CN109858827A (en) | 2019-02-21 | 2019-02-21 | Visualization comparative approach, system, electric terminal and the storage medium of subject level |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910129430.6A CN109858827A (en) | 2019-02-21 | 2019-02-21 | Visualization comparative approach, system, electric terminal and the storage medium of subject level |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN109858827A true CN109858827A (en) | 2019-06-07 |
Family
ID=66898521
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201910129430.6A Pending CN109858827A (en) | 2019-02-21 | 2019-02-21 | Visualization comparative approach, system, electric terminal and the storage medium of subject level |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN109858827A (en) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111383145A (en) * | 2019-11-12 | 2020-07-07 | 上海软科教育信息咨询有限公司 | Subject layout and subject layout comparison method, system, terminal and medium |
| CN112989070A (en) * | 2020-06-17 | 2021-06-18 | 浙江大学 | Core periodical quantitative evaluation system and method based on computer system |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN105260963A (en) * | 2015-11-13 | 2016-01-20 | 苏州中科知图信息科技有限公司 | Subject accomplishment evaluation system |
| CN106294298A (en) * | 2016-07-27 | 2017-01-04 | 北京工商大学 | The data visualization sorted based on many attributes analyzes methods and applications |
| WO2017017405A1 (en) * | 2015-07-29 | 2017-02-02 | Pupilasset Limited | Progress and attainment assessment system and method |
| CN107122902A (en) * | 2017-04-26 | 2017-09-01 | 于海峰 | A kind of school's standard for running a school evaluation method and evaluation system |
| US20170300941A1 (en) * | 2016-04-13 | 2017-10-19 | Quayshawn Spencer | Academic ranking system and method |
-
2019
- 2019-02-21 CN CN201910129430.6A patent/CN109858827A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2017017405A1 (en) * | 2015-07-29 | 2017-02-02 | Pupilasset Limited | Progress and attainment assessment system and method |
| CN105260963A (en) * | 2015-11-13 | 2016-01-20 | 苏州中科知图信息科技有限公司 | Subject accomplishment evaluation system |
| US20170300941A1 (en) * | 2016-04-13 | 2017-10-19 | Quayshawn Spencer | Academic ranking system and method |
| CN106294298A (en) * | 2016-07-27 | 2017-01-04 | 北京工商大学 | The data visualization sorted based on many attributes analyzes methods and applications |
| CN107122902A (en) * | 2017-04-26 | 2017-09-01 | 于海峰 | A kind of school's standard for running a school evaluation method and evaluation system |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111383145A (en) * | 2019-11-12 | 2020-07-07 | 上海软科教育信息咨询有限公司 | Subject layout and subject layout comparison method, system, terminal and medium |
| CN112989070A (en) * | 2020-06-17 | 2021-06-18 | 浙江大学 | Core periodical quantitative evaluation system and method based on computer system |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Hou et al. | An analysis of mobility in global rankings: making institutional strategic plans and positioning for building world-class universities | |
| Phillips | How to think about statistics | |
| Hupe | The thesis of incongruent implementation: Revisiting Pressman and Wildavsky | |
| Johnes et al. | Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher education institutions using data envelopment analysis | |
| Shaw et al. | Student experience of final-year undergraduate research projects: an exploration of ‘research preparedness’ | |
| Lee et al. | Comparative evaluation of performance of national R&D programs with heterogeneous objectives: A DEA approach | |
| Haseena et al. | Aspects of Quality in Education for the Improvement of Educational Scenario. | |
| Murcia et al. | Enhancing strategic management using a “quantified VRIO”: Adding value with the MCDA approach | |
| CN109636690A (en) | Learning effectiveness comprehensive scoring method based on online learning behavior data of learner | |
| Mazi et al. | Dreams and realities: The world-class idea and Saudi Arabian higher education | |
| Applasamy et al. | Measuring happiness in academic environment: A case study of the School of Engineering at Taylor's University (Malaysia) | |
| Peers | Statistics on women in engineering | |
| CN109784688A (en) | Level of education visual evaluating method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN109858827A (en) | Visualization comparative approach, system, electric terminal and the storage medium of subject level | |
| Shaikh et al. | Factors affecting work-life balance of women working in NGOs of Pakistan | |
| Liu et al. | A neutral cross-efficiency measurement for general parallel production system | |
| CN106960398A (en) | The rational appraisal procedure of college entrance will and device | |
| Nozari et al. | Using Numerical Taxonomy and Combined Bulls-Eye–Shapley Weighting Method in Order to Ranking Websites of Iranian Universities by Three-Parameter Interval Gray Numbers | |
| Zhang et al. | Quantifying transport safety success at the regional level: A guide to policy and practice on investment for G20 | |
| Muller et al. | Regional innovation capacities in new member states: A typology | |
| Manske et al. | Managing knowledge diversity: towards automatic semantic group formation | |
| Zhao et al. | Measurement and analysis of collaboration ability: The collaborative rate, collaborative breadth and collaborative depth | |
| Fauzi et al. | Benchmarking the User Experience of SIONLAP (Sistem Informasi Online Laboratorium Pendidikan) an IT-based Laboratory Management System | |
| Karimi et al. | Performance of the libraries in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences based on the EFQM model | |
| Costa et al. | Measurement of well-being in territories: An application for Italian Provinces |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20190607 |