CN109543950A - A kind of sponge urban planning area ecological suitability evaluation analysis method based on GIS - Google Patents
A kind of sponge urban planning area ecological suitability evaluation analysis method based on GIS Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN109543950A CN109543950A CN201811246264.XA CN201811246264A CN109543950A CN 109543950 A CN109543950 A CN 109543950A CN 201811246264 A CN201811246264 A CN 201811246264A CN 109543950 A CN109543950 A CN 109543950A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- factor
- suitability
- sponge
- sponge urban
- construction
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 71
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 24
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 102
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 42
- 239000000872 buffer Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 32
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 31
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 claims description 30
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims description 15
- 239000003643 water by type Substances 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 244000025254 Cannabis sativa Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000010606 normalization Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000001235 sensitizing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000012732 spatial analysis Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000003139 buffering effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 3
- 241000209094 Oryza Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000007164 Oryza sativa Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013278 delphi method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000513 principal component analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011002 quantification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000009566 rice Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 206010063659 Aversion Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000006424 Flood reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035558 fertility Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000012010 growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008595 infiltration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001764 infiltration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005065 mining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013486 operation strategy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008447 perception Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008635 plant growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004451 qualitative analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004445 quantitative analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001932 seasonal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010206 sensitivity analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004162 soil erosion Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/26—Government or public services
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Road Paving Structures (AREA)
- Instructional Devices (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention is a kind of sponge urban planning area ecological suitability evaluation analysis method based on GIS, according to its conservation and restoration, urban construction demand chooses elevation, the gradient, water and soil balance, 9 factors such as water conservation establish System of Comprehensive Evaluation, pass through the spatial analysis of ArcGIS platform, the construction suitability pattern of land used is successively disclosed by single-factor research and multiple-factor comprehensive study using Factors Weighting method, and according to comprehensive construction be suitable for index (CSI) delimit sponge urban construction subregion, obtain sponge urban planning and construction Ecological Suitability calculated result, and result is divided into sponge construction child care area, sponge builds buffer area, sponge Development control area area.This ecological suitability evaluation analyzes result and for sponge urban planning provides scientific basis in the ad hoc planning in sponge city, and sponge urban construction suitability evaluation, which is conducive to draw ecological map bottom in construction range, constructs important sponge facility focuses the consruction on area, instructs built by separate periods timing.
Description
Technical field
The present invention is a kind of sponge urban planning area ecological suitability evaluation analysis method based on GIS, is suitable for difference
The sponge Urban Planning of dimensional area belongs to sponge city planning design technical field.
Background technique
Rainfall in China is often accompanied by heavy rainfall at apparent seasonal variety, summer and autumn.In recent years, many cities are in summer and autumn
All suffer from season waterlogging take place frequently, the problems such as rainwater resource is largely lost, ecological environment destruction, rain is constructed in urban construction
Big vast management system is very urgent.
City sponge urban construction suitability evaluation is still in research and discovery at present, ecological suitability evaluation research
Method mainly includes traditional evaluation method such as composite index law, Field Using Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment, analytic hierarchy process (AHP), Principal Component Analysis,
Since sponge urban planning is related to that content is extensive, the requirement to basic data is high, and is directed to the city and area of different characteristics
Domain, analysis method also have multifarious.It is also required for a kind of sponge of the analysis method assessment planning region of comprehensive innovation
Urban construction Ecological Suitability.This evaluation method combines the integrated use of GIS technology to adopt in sponge eco-environmental sensitivity analysis
With analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and expert graded, choose sensitive factor, give each sensitive factor weight assignment, by ArcGIS platform into
Row space overlapping obtains sponge ecological sensitivity comprehensive evaluation result.
Summary of the invention
The purpose of the present invention is to provide a kind of sponge urban planning area ecological suitability evaluation analysis side based on GIS
Method, for planning region, the condition of comprehensive assessment sponge urban construction.
To achieve the goals above, technical scheme is as follows: a kind of sponge urban planning area based on GIS is raw
State suitability evaluation analysis method, it is characterised in that method includes the following steps:
Quick evaluation points are selected, the single sensitive factor of sponge urban construction is influenced in disjunctive programming area；
Sensitive factor weight assignment and marking, determine to the determinative sensitive factor of evaluation conclusion as rigidity because
Son, other are spring factor；
Normalized is handled single-factor index using method for normalizing, obtains single Factor Weight assignment；
The compound evaluation of CSI method carries out the compound evaluation of multiple-factor using suitable sex index CSI method；
Whether evaluation analysis has the condition for carrying out sponge urban construction according to evaluation result judgement planning region and builds
If emphasis.
Further, the sensitive factor includes Elevation factor, slope factor, remittance flow factor, the low-lying land factor, water
The domain buffer area factor, the construction buffer area factor, the massif ecological sensitivity factor, water ecology sensitivity factor, ecological resistance because
Son.
Further, sensitive factor weight assignment and marking include: that the Elevation factor is obtained by digital terrain model,
Single-factor scoring is carried out with the absolute elevation value size of pixel, if the exhausted degree height value of certain pixel is bigger, is indicated locating for it
Construction difficulty and feasibility of the area based on geographical risk are lower, then progress sponge urban construction adaptability score in the region is got over
It is low；Slope factor carries out single-factor scoring with the value of slope size of pixel, and the gradient is bigger, and ecological sensitivity is higher, manually
Structures build difficulty and feasibility is lower, and sponge urban construction suitability is higher；The gradient, which is greater than at specified value, unconditionally fits
Preferably；Remittance flow factor, determines confluence amount with the drainage direction of landform, confluence amount is bigger, and more suitable layout sponge facility is more wanted
Retain the critical process of original underlying surface, sponge urban construction suitability score is higher；The low-lying land factor, with the draining of landform
Direction and sub-basin peak level determine low-lying land；Receiving basin peak level is more than at practical elevation under flooded condition
Potential flood floods that risk is larger, and sponge urban construction suitability score is higher；In the determining each sub-basin catchment area of draining flow direction
It is interior, sponge urban construction suitability highest scoring；The waters buffer area factor, according to water head site space length and upper rule
The blue line range drawn determines；Apart from status water source apart from smaller, protection requirement and sensibility based on environmental functional are higher, sea
Continuous urban construction suitability score is higher；Within the scope of planning blue line, sponge urban construction suitability highest scoring；Construction
The buffer area factor, construction difficulty are accordingly evaluated according to the complexity and economy actually built, and city is opened
Hair earlier built-up areas Development control area intensity it is bigger, be more difficult to carry out sponge urban construction, in contrast, Urban New District then have compared with
Big sponge urban construction space, sponge urban construction suitability are higher；The massif ecological sensitivity factor, according to grass glade
Coverage condition, soil, massif can be divided into pole sensitizing range, sensitizing range, more sensitive area, insensitive region, and sensibility is got over
Height, sponge urban construction suitability score more reduce；Water ecology sensitivity factor considers the subregion of ecological sensitivities at different levels
And buffer distance, sensitivity grade is higher, buffer distance is smaller, and safeguard measure is more important, and sponge urban construction suitability is got over
It is high；The Ecological Suitability factor, ecological Resistance Value is smaller, and the otherness in soil and each species suitability degree habitat is smaller, sponge city
It is higher to build suitability.
Further, normalized, using normalization means:
In above formula, VminAnd VmaxValue respectively minimum to corresponding evaluation goal suitability highest and suitability；?
Normalized index value V outnAfterwards, by result multiplied by 10, thus for each single-factor, optimum condition obtains 10 points,
It is least suitable for that situation obtains 0 point.
Further, the measuring method of the compound evaluation of CSI method is as follows:
In formula, i and I are respectively indicated with specific value collection
The spring factor and stiffness factor value of conjunction, wmFor the weighted value of m-th of spring factor, M is the number of spring factor, to obtain
To each factor relative weighting be weighted analysis after, finally obtained CSI is higher, and sponge urban construction suitability is higher；Again
Sponge urban construction Suitability division delimited according to related implementation experience, wherein spring factor include Elevation factor, the gradient because
Son, remittance flow factor, the low-lying land factor, the waters buffer area factor, construction the buffer area factor, the massif ecological sensitivity factor, water
The body ecological sensitivity factor and ecological resistance factor, stiffness factor include the low-lying land factor, the waters buffer area factor, water body life
State sensitivity factor.
The invention has the following advantages that
1) invention is by GIS platform to elevation, the gradient, confluence amount, low-lying land, waters and the buffering that will plan area
Area, construction buffer area, massif ecological sensitivity, water ecology sensibility, ecological drag data progress are rationally generally changed and are coupled,
Construct suitability evaluation system；
2) each evaluation points chosen in the invention can realize dynamic setting, can influence sponge city according to target area
An important factor for construction, chooses other evaluation points and is evaluated, meanwhile, rigidity or the selected of spring factor can also be due to needs
Change, the suitability under different zones different situations can be evaluated；
3) analysis made according to evaluation method, the clear sponge urban construction suitability for intuitively evaluating city.Root
According to sponge child care area, sponge builds buffer area, and the exploitation in sponge Development control area area Directed by divisions sponge city different in this way is built
If.Export that result is vivid, intuitive multiplicity, operation strategies are extensive.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 is this method ecological suitability evaluation and analytical technology route schematic diagram.
Fig. 2 is this method ecological suitability evaluation flow chart.
Specific embodiment
Sponge urban construction suitability evaluation of the invention first distinguishes assignment to single-factor, inputs sponge urban construction phase
The single-factor index of pass is (quasi- to choose elevation, the gradient, confluence amount, low-lying land, waters buffer area, construction buffer area, massif ecology
9 factors such as sensibility, water ecology sensibility, ecological resistance) and evaluation marking is carried out, then built by compound evaluation delimitation
If Suitability division.In the compound evaluation of multiple-factor, using " suitability index method " (the synthesis rating method for belonging to relative quantification)
To analyze, evaluate the single-factor and multiple-factor index value of each grid cell.In order to be suitable for preferably being built to region on the whole
Intensity grade provides relatively reasonable Comprehensive Assessment.After being weighted analysis with obtained each factor relative weighting, final
The CSI arrived is higher, and sponge urban construction suitability is higher；Sponge urban construction delimited further according to related implementation experience is suitable for
Property subregion.
The selection of technical method is paid much attention in suitability evaluation, can not only efficiently obtain evaluation result in this way, also
It can ensure that evaluation result is more scientific, reasonable.Sponge urban construction suitability evaluation can be regarded as one group of variable according to certain
The new opinion rating that is formed after rule combination, can be divided into according to variable rule of combination: grade combined method, Factors Weighting method,
Compound standard law, heuristic logic rule combined method, is gradually superimposed the means such as evaluation assessment at the Return Law.This evaluation method will with because
Sub- weighting method is basic model, is suitable for successively personality by the construction that single-factor research and multiple-factor comprehensive study disclose land used
Office.
Sponge urban construction suitability evaluation uses mainly using GIS as operating platform using sponge urban construction condition as base
The suitability classification of the combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis of plinth analyzes its adaptive condition that is, according to each attribute of evaluation unit, compared with
Reasonably to evaluate suitable degree of original land used in every aspect to exploitation sponge city function.Sponge urban construction is suitable
Property evaluation first to single-factor distinguish assignment, then by compound evaluation delimit build Suitability division；It will be according to sponge the idea of the city
It introduces specific single-factor index and evaluation of programme is (quasi- to choose elevation, the gradient, confluence amount, low-lying land, waters and buffer area, build
If 9 factors such as buffer area, massif ecological sensitivity, water ecology sensibility, ecological resistances), it is compound in this, as multiple-factor
The basis of evaluation.Compound evaluation uses suitability index method, has special decision to evaluation conclusion in view of some single-factor regions
Effect, using this kind of factor as " stiffness factor ", and design synthesis is suitable for exponentiation algorithm, show that sponge urban construction is suitable accordingly
Suitable property and its subregion.
Specifically, a kind of sponge urban construction suitability evaluation analysis method, it is characterised in that this method includes five streams
Journey:
Sensitive factor is chosen:
Sponge ecological sensitivity is under the ecological element comprehensive function being closely related in local area ecological with water as a result, relating to
And the protection to existing resources such as rivers and lakes, forest greenery patchess, potential diameter flow path and the control of water storage area, flood and geology
The risk-aversions such as disaster, biology is inhabited and the reparation of the functions such as environmental services etc..The specific factor can include: river, wetland,
Water head site, the area Yi Lao, diameter flow path, disposal precinct, elevation, the gradient and all kinds of geological disasters distribution, vegetation distribution, soil benefit
With type, biological habitat distribution and migrate gallery etc. ".
This method, with simplicity, hierarchy, convenient for the principle of scientific algorithm rapid in GIS, is chosen high according to science
Journey, the gradient, confluence amount, low-lying land, waters and buffer area, construction buffer area, massif ecological sensitivity, water ecology sensibility,
9 sensitive factors such as ecological resistance.
Sensitive factor weight assignment:
(1) Elevation factor
It is obtained by digital terrain model.Elevation directly affects the integrated degree of ecology corridor and natural skeleton.With pixel
Absolute elevation value (unit: rice) is if size carries out single-factor scoring --- and the exhausted degree height value of-certain pixel is bigger, indicate it
Construction difficulty and feasibility of the their location based on geographical risk are lower, and artificial construction condition is weaker, and ecological sensitivity is higher,
It is bigger to carry out sponge urban construction difficulty, then it is higher to carry out sponge urban construction adaptability score for the region.
(2) slope factor
The gradient is the important factor for influencing vegetation growth, water and soil conservation, is come with value of slope (unit: degree) size of pixel
Single-factor scoring is carried out, the gradient is steeper, and plant growth is more impacted, and soil erosion, geological disaster are more easy to happen, and ecology is quick
Perception is higher.The gradient is bigger, and artificial works build difficulty and feasibility is lower, and urban architecture, structures etc. develop element structure
The risk built is higher, and sponge urban construction suitability is higher；The gradient is greater than at specified value.(3) remittance flow factor
Sponge city requirement cuts down storm runoff by dispersion, the control of small-scale source and purifies initial rainwater, mitigates
Underground system load should strengthen ground facility infiltration, net work energy in confluence amount general goal thus, reinforce the integrated control of rainwater.Originally it grinds
Study carefully and confluence amount is determined with the drainage direction of landform (unit: 1), confluence amount is bigger, and more suitable layout sponge facility will more retain
The critical process of original underlying surface, sponge urban construction suitability score are higher.
(4) low-lying land: sponge city requirement reduces the urban waterlogging risk in exceeded period, and development & construction should be avoided thus
It is collected at hypsography low-lying.This research determines low-lying land with the drainage direction of landform and sub-basin peak level；Overflowing shape
Receiving basin peak level is more than that flood risk larger for potential flood at practical elevation under state, sponge urban construction suitability score compared with
It is high；In the determining each sub-basin catchment area of draining flow direction, sponge urban construction suitability highest scoring.
(5) waters buffer area: original water environment and aquatic ecosystem are safeguarded in sponge city requirement development & construction.For identification
The important potential Ecological safety pattern in water system periphery, by the space length (unit: rice) and upper planning of basis and water head site
Blue line range；Apart from status water source apart from smaller, protection requirement and sensibility based on environmental functional are higher, and sponge city is built
If suitability score is higher；Within the scope of planning blue line, sponge urban construction suitability highest scoring.
(6) buffer area is built
Construction difficulty is accordingly evaluated according to the complexity and economy actually built.City development
Built-up areas (old town) Development control area intensity is bigger earlier, is more difficult to carry out sponge urban construction, in contrast, Urban New District
Then there is biggish sponge urban construction space, construction suitability is higher.
(7) the massif ecological sensitivity factor
Consider the distribution of ecology background, massif ecological sensitivity is according to great influences such as grass glade coverage condition, soil
Factor, comprehensively considers the achievement of correlative study report, and massif can be divided into " extremely sensitive " region, " sensitivity " region, " more sensitive "
Region, " insensitive " regional sensitivities are higher, and sponge urban construction suitability score successively reduces.
(8) water ecology sensitivity factor
Consider the subregion and buffer distance of ecological sensitivities at different levels, sensitivity grade is higher, buffer distance is smaller, protection
Measure is more important, and sponge urban construction suitability is higher.
(9) the Ecological Suitability factor
It is given a mark with the ecological Resistance Value in empirical studies as foundation；Ecological Resistance Value is smaller, soil and each species suitability degree
The otherness in habitat is smaller, and sponge urban construction suitability is higher.
Normalized:
In single pollution assessment, in order to eliminate due to index unit and the difference of the order of magnitude to appraisal bring not
Just, this method will do nondimensionalization to single-factor index result (index value) V obtained, will specifically use normalization means:
In above formula, VminAnd VmaxValue respectively minimum to corresponding evaluation goal suitability highest and suitability；?
Normalized index value V outnAfterwards, by result multiplied by 10.Thus for each single-factor, optimum condition obtains 10 points,
It is least suitable for that situation obtains 0 point.
The compound evaluation of multiple-factor
Compound evaluation uses suitability index method, has special decision to make evaluation conclusion in view of some single-factor regions
With using this kind of factor as " stiffness factor ", and design synthesis is suitable for exponentiation algorithm, show that sponge urban construction is suitable for accordingly
Property and its subregion.
In the compound evaluation of multiple-factor, divided using " suitability index method " (the synthesis rating method for belonging to relative quantification)
Analyse, evaluate the single-factor and multiple-factor index value of each grid cell.In order to which the suitable degree on ground is preferably built to region on the whole
Grade provides relatively reasonable Comprehensive Assessment, and this method takes comprehensive evaluation index --- and-comprehensive construction is suitable for index
(CSI), measuring method is as follows:
In formula, i and I are respectively indicated with specific value collection
The spring factor of conjunction is (quasi- to choose elevation, the gradient, confluence amount, low-lying land, waters and buffer area, construction buffer area, massif ecology
9 factors such as sensibility, water ecology sensibility, ecological resistance) and stiffness factor value it is (quasi- to include low-lying land, waters buffering
Area, water ecology sensibility)；i(0,10)mIndicate that m-th of factor 0 assigns to 10 points of total head domain, I { 10 }jkK-th of expression rigid
The codomain that sex factor 10 divides.Since influence degree of each factor evaluation index to system is different, integrated to system
Evaluation includes index weightsThe determination method of weight mainly has Principal Component Analysis, step analysis
Method, Delphi method (or Experts consultation method) etc.；This evaluation method will determine single-factor using Delphi method (Experts consultation method)
Between weight coefficient.After obtained each factor relative weighting, all elastic factor score is multiplied weight addition and is summed, then and
Stiffness factor score maximizing together, finally obtains CSI score value.Obtained CSI is higher, and sponge urban construction suitability is got over
It is high；Sponge urban construction Suitability division delimited further according to related implementation experience.
CSI factorial analysis table
Comprehensive evaluation analysis:
Sponge urban construction suitability evaluation is conducive to draw the ecological map bottom built in range, constructs important sponge
Facility focuses the consruction on area, instructs built by separate periods timing.
Planning is divided into sponge child care area, sponge buffering by the appropriate building criteria for classifying in the similar landforms place of reference pair
Area, sponge development zone:
It builds child care area: being contained with waters, flood passage channel, blue line periphery, green line periphery, low-lying land, water source in construction child care area
Increase soil fertility, based on soil and water conservation region.Future increases sponge urban construction dynamics, and most basic " big sponge " facility in protection city is real
Existing scale.
It builds buffer area: being mostly suitable for building area based on abrupt slope, water catchment area, ecological sensitive areas and calamity source area
Outlying area.Strengthen sponge urban construction on construction area periphery, non-construction area suitably increase the density of sponge urban facilities with
Function.
Development control area area: based on the buffer area that few with built area periphery limiting factor, ecological element lacks, sponge city
Development volue is smaller.Mining inetesity and construction density are controlled, optimizes built-in system pattern, adds sponge city in part place
Facility.
By single pollution assessment, multiple-factor overlay analysis determines the CSI lattice of urban planning range according to phase weighted etc.
Office.It can understand the sponge urban construction suitability for intuitively evaluating city.According to sponge child care area, sponge construction buffering
Area, the development & construction in sponge Development control area area Directed by divisions sponge city different in this way.
Claims (5)
1. a kind of sponge urban planning area ecological suitability evaluation analysis method based on GIS, it is characterised in that this method includes
Following steps:
Quick evaluation points are selected, the single sensitive factor of sponge urban construction is influenced in disjunctive programming area；
Sensitive factor weight assignment and marking determines to the determinative sensitive factor of evaluation conclusion as stiffness factor,
He is spring factor；
Normalized is handled single-factor index using method for normalizing, obtains single Factor Weight assignment；
The compound evaluation of CSI method carries out the compound evaluation of multiple-factor using suitable sex index CSI method；
Evaluation analysis determines whether planning region has the side of the condition and construction that carry out sponge urban construction according to evaluation result
Emphasis.
2. a kind of sponge urban planning area ecological suitability evaluation analysis method based on GIS as described in claim 1, special
Sign is, the sensitive factor include Elevation factor, slope factor, converge flow factor, the low-lying land factor, waters buffer area because
Son, the construction buffer area factor, the massif ecological sensitivity factor, water ecology sensitivity factor, ecological resistance factor.
3. a kind of sponge urban planning area ecological suitability evaluation analysis method based on GIS as described in claim 1, special
Sign is sensitive factor weight assignment and marking includes: that the Elevation factor is obtained by digital terrain model, with the absolute of pixel
Height value size carries out single-factor scoring, if the exhausted degree height value of certain pixel is bigger, indicates that its their location is based on geography
The construction difficulty and feasibility of risk are lower, then it is lower to carry out sponge urban construction adaptability score for the region；Slope factor, with
The value of slope size of pixel carries out single-factor scoring, and the gradient is bigger, and ecological sensitivity is higher, artificial works build difficulty and
Feasibility is lower, and sponge urban construction suitability is higher；The gradient is greater than at specified value；Remittance flow factor, with ground
The drainage direction of shape determines confluence amount, and confluence amount is bigger, and more suitable layout sponge facility will more retain the key of original underlying surface
Process, sponge urban construction suitability score are higher；The low-lying land factor, with the drainage direction of landform and sub-basin peak level
Determine low-lying land；Receiving basin peak level is more than potential flood larger, sponge city of flooding risk at practical elevation under flooded condition
It is higher that city builds suitability score；In the determining each sub-basin catchment area of draining flow direction, sponge urban construction suitability is obtained
Divide highest；The waters buffer area factor is determined according to the space length with water head site and the blue line range of upper planning；Apart from status
Water source is apart from smaller, and protection requirement and sensibility based on environmental functional are higher, and sponge urban construction suitability score is higher；?
Within the scope of planning blue line, sponge urban construction suitability highest scoring；The buffer area factor is built, construction difficulty is according to actually building
If complexity and economy accordingly evaluated, Development control area intensity in built-up areas is got over earlier for city development
Greatly, it is more difficult to carry out sponge urban construction, in contrast, then there are biggish sponge urban construction space, sponge city in Urban New District
It is higher to build suitability；The massif ecological sensitivity factor, according to grass glade coverage condition, soil, massif can be divided into extremely quick
Sensillary area domain, sensitizing range, more sensitive area, insensitive region, sensibility is higher, and sponge urban construction suitability score more drops
It is low；Water ecology sensitivity factor considers the subregion and buffer distance of ecological sensitivities at different levels, and sensitivity grade is higher, buffers
Apart from smaller, safeguard measure is more important, and sponge urban construction suitability is higher；The Ecological Suitability factor, ecological Resistance Value is smaller,
The otherness in soil and each species suitability degree habitat is smaller, and sponge urban construction suitability is higher.
4. a kind of sponge urban planning area ecological suitability evaluation analysis method based on GIS as described in claim 1, special
Sign is, normalized, using normalization means:
In above formula, VminAnd VmaxValue respectively minimum to corresponding evaluation goal suitability highest and suitability；Return obtaining
The one index value V changednAfterwards, by result multiplied by 10, thus for each single-factor, optimum condition obtains 10 points, least
Suitable situation obtains 0 point.
5. a kind of evaluation method of sponge urban construction Ecological Suitability as described in claim 1, which is characterized in that CSI method
The measuring method of compound evaluation is as follows:
In formula, i and I respectively indicate spring factor and stiffness factor value with specific value set, i (0,10)mIt indicates m-th
The factor 0 assigns to 10 points of total head domain, I { 10 }jkIndicate the codomain that k-th of stiffness factor 10 divides；wmFor the power of m-th of spring factor
Weight values, M are the number of spring factor, and after being weighted analysis with obtained each factor relative weighting, finally obtained CSI is got over
Height, sponge urban construction suitability are higher；Sponge urban construction Suitability division delimited referring again to CSI value.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811246264.XA CN109543950A (en) | 2018-10-24 | 2018-10-24 | A kind of sponge urban planning area ecological suitability evaluation analysis method based on GIS |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811246264.XA CN109543950A (en) | 2018-10-24 | 2018-10-24 | A kind of sponge urban planning area ecological suitability evaluation analysis method based on GIS |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN109543950A true CN109543950A (en) | 2019-03-29 |
Family
ID=65845266
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811246264.XA Pending CN109543950A (en) | 2018-10-24 | 2018-10-24 | A kind of sponge urban planning area ecological suitability evaluation analysis method based on GIS |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN109543950A (en) |
Cited By (15)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110334864A (en) * | 2019-07-03 | 2019-10-15 | 洛阳市规划建筑设计研究院有限公司 | A method of more rule unification Urban-rural space subregion based on GIS delimited |
| CN110458440A (en) * | 2019-08-06 | 2019-11-15 | 南京信息工程大学 | A kind of ecology endowment suitability quantification overall analysis system |
| CN110472882A (en) * | 2019-08-21 | 2019-11-19 | 河南大学 | City development land suitability evaluation method based on principal component analysis |
| CN111178738A (en) * | 2019-12-24 | 2020-05-19 | 上海市政工程设计研究总院（集团）有限公司 | Comprehensive evaluation method for ecological land |
| CN111950823A (en) * | 2019-05-15 | 2020-11-17 | 河南理工大学 | Rural residential point regulation and control classification method based on space suitability and internal characteristics |
| CN111967757A (en) * | 2020-08-12 | 2020-11-20 | 软通智慧科技有限公司 | Method, device, equipment and storage medium for determining urban livable scheme |
| CN112036627A (en) * | 2020-08-25 | 2020-12-04 | 合肥工业大学 | Land use layout optimization method based on land use current situation graph preprocessing |
| CN112749907A (en) * | 2021-01-15 | 2021-05-04 | 北京智数时空科技有限公司 | Spatial feature analysis method and device of cultural ecosystem |
| CN112884271A (en) * | 2021-01-04 | 2021-06-01 | 江苏开放大学（江苏城市职业学院） | Method for evaluating technical facilities of sponge urban plants |
| CN113139159A (en) * | 2021-04-22 | 2021-07-20 | 中国水利水电科学研究院 | Evaluation method of watershed ecological sensitivity |
| CN113327042A (en) * | 2021-06-07 | 2021-08-31 | 中国矿业大学 | Rapid division method for restoration requirements of regional ecological system |
| CN113654589A (en) * | 2021-07-14 | 2021-11-16 | 苏交科集团(江苏)安全科学研究院有限公司 | Real-time monitoring system for safety demonstration city construction |
| CN116628950A (en) * | 2023-04-23 | 2023-08-22 | 深圳市新西林园林景观有限公司 | Sponge city space planning data analysis system and method thereof |
| CN117172423A (en) * | 2023-10-26 | 2023-12-05 | 北京中联世建建设规划设计有限公司 | Municipal engineering mapping method based on satellite remote sensing technology |
| CN117541085A (en) * | 2024-01-10 | 2024-02-09 | 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 | Cross-border protection priority region identification method |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101894120A (en) * | 2010-01-06 | 2010-11-24 | 北京师范大学 | Method for evaluating regional ecological sensitivity |
| CN103177338A (en) * | 2013-03-19 | 2013-06-26 | 东南大学 | Space dividing method facing city zoning plan |
| CN105205283A (en) * | 2015-10-14 | 2015-12-30 | 广西大学 | Rule modeling method integrating city design indexes and construction control indexes |
| CN106600028A (en) * | 2016-10-31 | 2017-04-26 | 上海市政工程设计研究总院（集团）有限公司 | Sponge city planning space control data analysis system and method |
| CN107886216A (en) * | 2017-10-12 | 2018-04-06 | 天津大学 | A kind of land carrying capacity analysis method based on Evaluation of Land Use Suitability |
-
2018
- 2018-10-24 CN CN201811246264.XA patent/CN109543950A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101894120A (en) * | 2010-01-06 | 2010-11-24 | 北京师范大学 | Method for evaluating regional ecological sensitivity |
| CN103177338A (en) * | 2013-03-19 | 2013-06-26 | 东南大学 | Space dividing method facing city zoning plan |
| CN105205283A (en) * | 2015-10-14 | 2015-12-30 | 广西大学 | Rule modeling method integrating city design indexes and construction control indexes |
| CN106600028A (en) * | 2016-10-31 | 2017-04-26 | 上海市政工程设计研究总院（集团）有限公司 | Sponge city planning space control data analysis system and method |
| CN107886216A (en) * | 2017-10-12 | 2018-04-06 | 天津大学 | A kind of land carrying capacity analysis method based on Evaluation of Land Use Suitability |
Cited By (21)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111950823A (en) * | 2019-05-15 | 2020-11-17 | 河南理工大学 | Rural residential point regulation and control classification method based on space suitability and internal characteristics |
| CN110334864A (en) * | 2019-07-03 | 2019-10-15 | 洛阳市规划建筑设计研究院有限公司 | A method of more rule unification Urban-rural space subregion based on GIS delimited |
| CN110334864B (en) * | 2019-07-03 | 2022-02-01 | 洛阳市规划建筑设计研究院有限公司 | GIS-based multi-specification-in-one urban and rural space partition method |
| CN110458440A (en) * | 2019-08-06 | 2019-11-15 | 南京信息工程大学 | A kind of ecology endowment suitability quantification overall analysis system |
| CN110472882A (en) * | 2019-08-21 | 2019-11-19 | 河南大学 | City development land suitability evaluation method based on principal component analysis |
| CN110472882B (en) * | 2019-08-21 | 2023-07-28 | 河南大学 | Urban development land suitability evaluation method based on principal component analysis |
| CN111178738A (en) * | 2019-12-24 | 2020-05-19 | 上海市政工程设计研究总院（集团）有限公司 | Comprehensive evaluation method for ecological land |
| CN111967757A (en) * | 2020-08-12 | 2020-11-20 | 软通智慧科技有限公司 | Method, device, equipment and storage medium for determining urban livable scheme |
| CN111967757B (en) * | 2020-08-12 | 2023-12-26 | 北京软通智慧科技有限公司 | Method, device, equipment and storage medium for determining urban livability scheme |
| CN112036627A (en) * | 2020-08-25 | 2020-12-04 | 合肥工业大学 | Land use layout optimization method based on land use current situation graph preprocessing |
| CN112884271A (en) * | 2021-01-04 | 2021-06-01 | 江苏开放大学（江苏城市职业学院） | Method for evaluating technical facilities of sponge urban plants |
| CN112749907A (en) * | 2021-01-15 | 2021-05-04 | 北京智数时空科技有限公司 | Spatial feature analysis method and device of cultural ecosystem |
| CN113139159A (en) * | 2021-04-22 | 2021-07-20 | 中国水利水电科学研究院 | Evaluation method of watershed ecological sensitivity |
| CN113327042A (en) * | 2021-06-07 | 2021-08-31 | 中国矿业大学 | Rapid division method for restoration requirements of regional ecological system |
| CN113327042B (en) * | 2021-06-07 | 2023-09-29 | 中国矿业大学 | Quick division method for regional ecological system restoration requirements |
| CN113654589A (en) * | 2021-07-14 | 2021-11-16 | 苏交科集团(江苏)安全科学研究院有限公司 | Real-time monitoring system for safety demonstration city construction |
| CN116628950A (en) * | 2023-04-23 | 2023-08-22 | 深圳市新西林园林景观有限公司 | Sponge city space planning data analysis system and method thereof |
| CN116628950B (en) * | 2023-04-23 | 2024-01-30 | 深圳市新西林园林景观有限公司 | Sponge city space planning data analysis system and method thereof |
| CN117172423A (en) * | 2023-10-26 | 2023-12-05 | 北京中联世建建设规划设计有限公司 | Municipal engineering mapping method based on satellite remote sensing technology |
| CN117172423B (en) * | 2023-10-26 | 2024-01-23 | 北京中联世建建设规划设计有限公司 | Municipal engineering mapping method based on satellite remote sensing technology |
| CN117541085A (en) * | 2024-01-10 | 2024-02-09 | 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 | Cross-border protection priority region identification method |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN109543950A (en) | A kind of sponge urban planning area ecological suitability evaluation analysis method based on GIS | |
| CN106228610B (en) | In conjunction with the restoration of the ecosystem partition method of dominant eco-function and ecological degradation degree | |
| Eskandari et al. | An integrated multi criteria approach for landfill siting in a conflicting environmental, economical and socio-cultural area | |
| Jia et al. | LID-BMPs planning for urban runoff control and the case study in China | |
| Leman et al. | GIS-based integrated evaluation of environmentally sensitive areas (ESAs) for land use planning in Langkawi, Malaysia | |
| Dai et al. | Assessment and zoning of eco-environmental sensitivity for a typical developing province in China | |
| CN106372807A (en) | County region based resource environment carrying capacity evaluation method | |
| Khamehchiyan et al. | Identification of hazardous waste landfill site: a case study from Zanjan province, Iran | |
| CN106096253A (en) | A kind of method delimiting lake buffer strip scope | |
| Ibrahim et al. | Identification of vulnerable areas to floods in Kelantan River sub-basins by using flood vulnerability index | |
| CN111210142A (en) | Landscape integrated management unit dividing method | |
| CN106600028A (en) | Sponge city planning space control data analysis system and method | |
| Saha et al. | Identification of potential sites for water harvesting structures using geospatial techniques and multi-criteria decision analysis | |
| Khzr et al. | Runoff estimation using SCS-CN and GIS techniques in the Sulaymaniyah sub-basin of the Kurdistan region of Iraq | |
| Durga Rao et al. | Spatial expert support system in selecting suitable sites for water harvesting structures—a case study of song watershed, Uttaranchal, India | |
| Ardahanlıoğlu et al. | GIS-based approach to determine suitable settlement areas compatible with the natural environment | |
| Ardakani et al. | Selecting potential locations for groundwater recharge by means of remote sensing and GIS and weighting based on Boolean logic and analytic hierarchy process | |
| Lai et al. | Waterlogging risk assessment based on self-organizing map (SOM) artificial neural networks: a case study of an urban storm in Beijing | |
| Rohina et al. | Site selection for constructing groundwater dams through Boolean logic and AHP method (case study: watershed of Imamzadeh Jafar Gachsaran) | |
| Bekar et al. | Analysis of the contribution of rainwater recycling (RWR) to the campus area of KTU, Trabzon Turkey | |
| Duraiswami et al. | Geospatial mapping of potential recharge zones in parts of Pune city | |
| Jafari et al. | Landfill siting for municipal waste: a case study in Ardebil | |
| Arianpour et al. | Locating flood spreading suitable sites for groundwater recharging through multi criteria modeling in GIS (case study: Omidieh-Khuzestan) | |
| Mahanta | Water resources of the Northeast: state of the knowledge base | |
| Haziq et al. | Identification of Suitable Sites for Rainwater Harvesting Using GIS in Kandahar Province, Afghanistan |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20190329 |