CN109508897A - Based on double-deck multifactor power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning evaluation method - Google Patents
Based on double-deck multifactor power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning evaluation method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN109508897A CN109508897A CN201811449265.4A CN201811449265A CN109508897A CN 109508897 A CN109508897 A CN 109508897A CN 201811449265 A CN201811449265 A CN 201811449265A CN 109508897 A CN109508897 A CN 109508897A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- evaluation
- multifactor
- power grid
- pipe gallery
- deck
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 76
- 238000013210 evaluation model Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 18
- 238000013139 quantization Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 18
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000005611 electricity Effects 0.000 description 5
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000567 combustion gas Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000010865 sewage Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009423 ventilation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004880 explosion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004744 fabric Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000017525 heat dissipation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003447 ipsilateral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009428 plumbing Methods 0.000 description 1
- -1 plumbing Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008929 regeneration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011069 regeneration method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000013589 supplement Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/067—Enterprise or organisation modelling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/06—Energy or water supply
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/08—Construction
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention relates to Power System Planning and urban planning field, more particularly to based on double-deck multifactor power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning evaluation method, following steps: the primary data of power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning scheme is read, and enters the multifactor evaluation model of basal layer；The various safety evaluatio factors of programme are judged, are passed through if judging, output scheme to safety program scheme collection；Conversely, not passing through the multifactor evaluation of basal layer then；Safety program scheme collection is initialized, into the collaboration multifactor evaluation model of layer；In the collaboration multifactor evaluation model of layer, marking quantization is carried out to the various compatibility factors of evaluation of safety program scheme, fitness value is obtained, and be compared with compatibility threshold value, determines final evaluation result.The present invention considers that the influence factor of actual complex establishes evaluation model and carries out multifactor evaluation to programme in power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to Power System Planning and urban planning field, more particularly to based on the double-deck multifactor power grid with it is comprehensive
Close piping lane collaborative planning evaluation method.
Background technique
City Buried Pipeline carries the transportation work of the substance in entire city, the energy and information, is entire urban development
Driving source.With quickly propelling for China's urbanization, the construction of underground utilities and development scale are being incrementally increased.Underground is comprehensive
Piping lane refers in Urban Underground for concentrating the municipal administration pipe such as laying electric power, communication, radio and television, water supply, draining, heating power, combustion gas
The public tunnel of line.Underground pipe gallery system can not only make full use of urban underground space, and it is tight to alleviate Urban spatial recourses
And traffic jam issue, also greatly facilitate the maintenance and maintenance of the urban operating mechanisms such as electric power, communication, combustion gas, plumbing, drop
The maintenance cost of expense and utilities pipeline that low road surface is repeatedly overhauled, maintain road surface integrality and all kinds of pipelines it is durable
Property, convenient for the laying of various pipelines, increase and decrease, maintenance and daily management.It can be seen that underground pipe gallery is basic to the people's livelihood is met
Demand and the city integrated bearing capacity of raising play more important role, and the development of underground pipe gallery is modern city hair
The important component of exhibition.Compared with traditional system of laying, power circuit enters corridor and is conducive to improve reliability of operation, safety
And service life；Urban ground soil and the underground space are utilized to saving, urban carrying capacity is improved and plays a key effect,
Piping lane is built significant with urban development.But then, power grid and pipe gallery surface see it is relatively independent
Two complicated systems, in the case where there is power circuit to enter corridor demand, the importance of power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning is not
It says and explains, power circuit, which enters corridor, to be had the characteristics that disposable, investment is big, standard is high, be related to multidisciplinary coordination, therefore is advised cooperateing with
Need programme to carry out multifactor evaluation during drawing, under the basic condition for meeting safety, with judge power grid with it is comprehensive
Close the compatibility of piping lane collaborative planning.
Power grid with the basic task of pipe gallery collaborative planning evaluation model is cooperateed with for what planning and designing personnel submitted
Programme carries out multifactor evaluation using model, obtains the compatibility threshold value of each programme, after being adjusted optimization, most
End form is at optimal case collection, on this basis according to an expert view, final evaluation result is obtained, so that programme be enable to expire
Sufficient power grid security reliability service requirement, adapts to electric power development and urban development needs, while keeping energy resources optimal with economy
Change configuration.
Power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning problem be one non-linear, the multistage, more influence factors complex optimization ask
Topic.Currently, for the evaluation of power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning not yet formed it is a kind of generally acknowledge general assessment indicator system, comment
The difference of valence selecting index and the difference of evaluation criterion will cause the difference of evaluation result, therefore, the selection of evaluation index and
The determination of evaluation criterion is most important, and it is improper to select, and easily causes final appraisal results not accurate enough, to influence Practical Project
Implementation.
Summary of the invention
To solve the above problems, the present invention is proposed based on double-deck multifactor power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning evaluation side
Method meets the requirement of safety evaluatio factor in basal layer first, secondly need to meet wanting for compatibility factor of evaluation in collaboration layer
It asks, by the double-deck mutual iteration, is effectively formed evaluation result.
Based on double-deck multifactor power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning evaluation method, comprising the following steps:
The primary data of power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning scheme is read, and enters the multifactor evaluation model of basal layer；
The various safety evaluatio factors of programme are judged, are passed through if judging, output scheme to safety is advised
Draw scheme collection；Conversely, not passing through the multifactor evaluation of basal layer then；
Safety program scheme collection is initialized, into the collaboration multifactor evaluation model of layer；
In the collaboration multifactor evaluation model of layer, marking amount is carried out to the various compatibility factors of evaluation of safety program scheme
Change, obtains fitness value, and be compared with compatibility threshold value, determine final evaluation result.
Preferably, it includes: that power circuit enters corridor pair that the various safety evaluatio factors to programme, which judge,
The evaluation of power grid power supply reliability.
Preferably, it includes: adjacent lines and electric power that the various safety evaluatio factors to programme, which judge,
The evaluation that influences each other of route.
Preferably, it includes: to judge whether through the school power grid N-1 to the evaluation of power grid power supply reliability that the power circuit, which enters corridor,
It tests.
Preferably, it includes: to judge whether through the school power grid N-2 to the evaluation of power grid power supply reliability that the power circuit, which enters corridor,
It tests.
Preferably, the evaluation that influences each other of the adjacent lines and power circuit includes: to judge adjacent lines and power line
Whether road safe distance meets the requirements.
Preferably, it includes: according to electricity that the various compatibility factors of evaluation to safety program scheme, which carry out marking quantization,
Line of force road enters the matching of corridor front and back transmission capacity and marking.
Preferably, it includes: according to electricity that the various compatibility factors of evaluation to safety program scheme, which carry out marking quantization,
Line of force road path planning and the connecting of gallery planning and marking.
Preferably, it includes: that power circuit enters maximum before and after corridor that the power circuit, which enters the matching of corridor front and back transmission capacity,
Conveying capacity difference.
Preferably, the power circuit path planning and the connecting of gallery planning include: power circuit path and synthesis
Piping lane path registration.
By using the present invention, following effect may be implemented: considering in power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning practical multiple
Miscellaneous influence factor establishes evaluation model and carries out multifactor evaluation to programme.
Detailed description of the invention
The present invention will be further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments.
Fig. 1 is the flow diagram of the embodiment of the present invention；
Fig. 2 is the safety evaluatio Factor system figure of the embodiment of the present invention；
Fig. 3 is the compatibility factor of evaluation system figure of the embodiment of the present invention.
Specific embodiment
Below in conjunction with attached drawing, technical scheme of the present invention will be further described, but the present invention is not limited to these realities
Apply example.
The embodiment of the present invention proposes to exist first based on double-deck multifactor power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning evaluation method
Basal layer meets the requirement of safety evaluatio factor, secondly need to be in the requirement for cooperateing with layer to meet compatibility factor of evaluation, by double
The mutual iteration of layer, is effectively formed evaluation result.
As shown in Figure 1, present implementation specifically includes the following steps:
Step 1 reads the primary data of power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning scheme, and comments into basal layer is multifactor
Valence model；
The primary data includes data corresponding to safety evaluatio factor and compatibility factor of evaluation, in step 2
With three in can be described in detail.
Step 2 judges the various safety evaluatio factors of programme, passes through if judging, output scheme is extremely
Safety program scheme collection；Conversely, not passing through the multifactor evaluation of basal layer then；
As shown in Fig. 2, safety evaluatio factor, it includes two-stage evaluation index: I grades of indexs include that power circuit enters corridor pair
The evaluation of power grid power supply reliability, the evaluation that influences each other of adjacent lines and power circuit；II grades of indexs include whether to pass through power grid
Whether whether N-1 verification met by power grid N-2 verification, power circuit into corridor basic principle, adjacent lines and power circuit peace
Whether full distance meets the requirements, power circuit enters corridor mode (independent tank or total cabin).Wherein, I grades of indexs include II grades of indexs.
The factor of evaluation of layer based on safety evaluatio factor does not pass through basal layer if a factor evaluation therein does not pass through
Multifactor evaluation.
Whether verified by power grid N-1 and refers to that (such as route generates electricity any one element in electric system under normal operating mode
Machine, transformer etc.) fault-free or because failure disconnect after, whether electric system is able to maintain stable operation and normal power supply, other yuan
Part not overload, voltage and frequency are within the allowable range.
Whether verified by power grid N-2 and refers to that (such as route generates electricity any two element in electric system under normal operating mode
Machine, transformer etc.) fault-free or because failure disconnect after, whether electric system is able to maintain stable operation and normal power supply, other yuan
Part not overload, voltage and frequency are within the allowable range.
Whether power circuit meets into corridor basic principle: urban development facility amount is big in principle, the place of contradiction concentration is equal
It need to carry out pipeline and enter corridor, specifically include that high-density development area, the region that pipeline enters and leaves frequently, dilatation possibility is big, pipeline is concentrated
The road of laying.Judge power circuit enters whether corridor region belongs to above-mentioned zone.
Whether adjacent lines meet the requirements with power circuit safe distance: when the communications cable uses cable, it is contemplated that high pressure
Power cable may generate interference to the signal of communication cable, therefore 110kV and the above power cable should not be ipsilateral with communication cable
Arrangement；Power pipeline has the performance requirement of waterproof, while mutual when avoiding failure between power cable and water supply, regeneration water pipeline
It influences, influence of the corrosivity, imflammable gas for avoiding rain sewage from generating to power cable, power pipeline and water supply, recycled water
Or rain sewage should not be arranged with cabin.When electric compartment and heat distribution pipeline, gas pipeline face cabin arrangement, neighboring walls should be taken effectively
Heat-insulated, cooling, explosion precaution.Judge whether the arrangement of power circuit meets above-mentioned requirements.
Power circuit enters corridor mode (independent tank or total cabin): when power cable quantity is more, usually by power cable
It is set in independent tank, electricity is guaranteed by temperature sensing cable, gravity-flow ventilation, auxiliary force ventilation, fire compartment and monitoring system
Power cable running safety.Judge that power circuit enters whether corridor mode meets above-mentioned requirements.
Step 3 initializes safety program scheme collection, into the collaboration multifactor evaluation model of layer；
Multifactor evaluation problem is divided into bilayer, wherein the multifactor evaluation model of basal layer is the safety for needing preferentially to meet
Property factor of evaluation, and cooperate with the multifactor evaluation model of layer include compatibility factor of evaluation, be conducive to meet safety evaluatio because
The situation of element goes down to seek the optimal case of other factors of evaluation, can be suitably used for comprising complicated multifactor power grid and pipe gallery
Collaborative planning evaluation model.
Step 4, in the collaboration multifactor evaluation model of layer, to the various compatibility factors of evaluation of safety program scheme into
Row marking quantization, obtains fitness value, and be compared with compatibility threshold value, determines final evaluation result.
As shown in figure 3, compatibility factor of evaluation includes two-stage evaluation index: I grades of indexs include the warp that power circuit enters corridor
Ji property, power circuit enter connecting, the power circuit of the reasonability of corridor cost sharing, power circuit path planning and gallery planning
Enter the harmony that the matching of transmission capacity, power circuit before and after corridor enter corridor timing and related construction；II grades of indexs include
Comprehensive construction cost, social synthesis's benefit, power circuit enter corridor cost, each interests side's cost sharing degree of balance, cost sharing machine
Satisfaction processed, power circuit path and pipe gallery path registration, substation's outlet and pipe gallery plan conformity, electric power
Route enters corridor front and back maximum transmission capacity difference, built route enters corridor timing and pipe gallery construction time cooperation degree, plotted line
Road enters corridor and pipe gallery builds time cooperation degree.Wherein, I grades of indexs include II grades of indexs.
Comprehensive construction cost: including first construction cost and operational and administrative expenses, due to pipe gallery inconvenience built by separate periods,
The pipeline type, quantity and respective tube diameter for being included in pipe gallery directly affect pipe gallery form of fracture and size, thus determine
Determine cost；Since the life cycle of pipe gallery is generally considered as 50-75, maintenance cost, running cost etc. also can not
Ignore.Marking quantization is carried out according to comprehensive construction cost.
Social synthesis's benefit: traffic caused by abatement is constructed repeatedly is stagnated, and engineering public hazards (noise, vibration, pollution are prevented
Deng), it improves infrastructure and expands and updating maintenance efficiency, improve urban environment and comfort level, road and city along raising
The assets value in lower municipal administration synthesis pipe gallery space improves city guard against disaster.Marking quantization is carried out according to social synthesis's benefit.
Power circuit enters corridor cost: i.e. power circuit enters the construction cost and management cost that corridor generates.According to power circuit
Enter corridor cost and carries out marking quantization.
Each interests side's cost sharing degree of balance: power circuit enters corridor project there are relevant benefit main bodys numerous, project yield
It is smaller and not clear enough, complex without stablizing recyclable cash flow, interest relations, each interests side of measurement share at
This when, mainly uses game theoretical model to be shared, and is assessed depending on Interest Main Body enthusiasm.According to each interests side's cost sharing
The degree of balance carries out marking quantization.
Cost sharing mechanism satisfaction: using each interests side self and mutually evaluation, Pyatyi give a mark mechanism, reject highest with
Minimum score, evaluation result take mean value.
Power circuit path and pipe gallery path registration: i.e. power circuit path with pipe gallery path spatially
Registration, registration is higher, and construction cost is smaller with running wastage.It is overlapped according to power circuit path with pipe gallery path
Degree carries out marking quantization.
Substation's outlet and pipe gallery plan conformity: substation's outlet direction and transmission line circuit number and synthesis are referred mainly to
Piping lane plan conformity.Outlet direction and piping lane plan conformity are higher, then scope of construction item and cost are smaller；Transmission line circuit number is inclined
More, planning fails to reach " appropriate advance ", and transmission line circuit number is on the low side, is the redundancy for generating resource.According to substation's outlet with
Pipe gallery plan conformity carries out marking quantization.
Power circuit enters maximum transmission capacity difference before and after corridor: power circuit, which enters, is changed to cable by overhead line behind corridor, if cloth
It is improper to set, and is also easy to produce heat dissipation problem, and in addition power circuit need to cooperate pipe gallery path, and line length changes, then conveys
Ability can change, and conveying capacity difference is Δ S=S1-S2, Δ S is smaller, then the adaptability that power circuit enters corridor planning is got over
It is good.Maximum transmission capacity difference carries out marking quantization before and after entering corridor according to power circuit.
Built route enters corridor timing and pipe gallery and builds time cooperation degree: in view of built route there may be change its course with
Dilatation need to analyze built route and enter corridor and pipe gallery construction time cooperation degree, and time cooperation degree is higher, then construction volume and construction
Cost is smaller, smaller to social influence.Enter corridor timing according to built route to give a mark with pipe gallery construction time cooperation degree
Quantization.
Planning route enters corridor and pipe gallery builds time cooperation degree: the construction opportunity that planning route enters pipe gallery needs to tie
Underground space planning is closed, time cooperation degree is higher, then construction volume and construction cost are smaller, smaller to social influence.According to planning
Route enters corridor and pipe gallery construction time cooperation degree carries out marking quantization.
In the collaboration multifactor evaluation model of layer, the various compatibility factors of evaluation of above-mentioned safety program scheme are beaten
It is quantization, fitness value is calculated in conjunction with items marking result.It is compared, is determined with compatibility threshold value by fitness value
Final evaluation result.Wherein, compatibility threshold value is that the synthesis of fitness value under the clear weight of every compatibility factor of evaluation is commented
Valence result.
Those skilled in the art can make various modifications to described specific embodiment
Or supplement or be substituted in a similar manner, however, it does not deviate from the spirit of the invention or surmounts the appended claims determines
The range of justice.
Claims (10)
1. based on double-deck multifactor power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning evaluation method, which comprises the following steps:
The primary data of power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning scheme is read, and enters the multifactor evaluation model of basal layer；
The various safety evaluatio factors of programme are judged, are passed through if judging, output scheme to safety program side
Case collection；Conversely, not passing through the multifactor evaluation of basal layer then；
Safety program scheme collection is initialized, into the collaboration multifactor evaluation model of layer；
In the collaboration multifactor evaluation model of layer, marking quantization is carried out to the various compatibility factors of evaluation of safety program scheme,
Fitness value is obtained, and is compared with compatibility threshold value, determines final evaluation result.
2. it is according to claim 1 based on double-deck multifactor power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning evaluation method, it is special
Sign is that it includes: that power circuit enters corridor to power grid power supply that the various safety evaluatio factors to programme, which judge,
Reliability evaluation.
3. it is according to claim 1 based on double-deck multifactor power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning evaluation method, it is special
Sign is that the various safety evaluatio factors to programme carry out the phase that judge includes: adjacent lines with power circuit
Mutually influence evaluation.
4. it is according to claim 2 based on double-deck multifactor power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning evaluation method, it is special
Sign is that it includes: to judge whether to verify by power grid N-1 to the evaluation of power grid power supply reliability that the power circuit, which enters corridor,.
5. it is according to claim 2 based on double-deck multifactor power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning evaluation method, it is special
Sign is that it includes: to judge whether to verify by power grid N-2 to the evaluation of power grid power supply reliability that the power circuit, which enters corridor,.
6. it is according to claim 3 based on double-deck multifactor power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning evaluation method, it is special
Sign is, the evaluation that influences each other of the adjacent lines and power circuit include: judge adjacent lines and power circuit safety away from
From whether meeting the requirements.
7. it is according to claim 1 based on double-deck multifactor power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning evaluation method, it is special
Sign is that it includes: to enter according to power circuit that the various compatibility factors of evaluation to safety program scheme, which carry out marking quantization,
The matching of transmission capacity and marking before and after corridor.
8. it is according to claim 1 based on double-deck multifactor power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning evaluation method, it is special
Sign is that it includes: according to power circuit road that the various compatibility factors of evaluation to safety program scheme, which carry out marking quantization,
Connecting and marking of the diameter planning with gallery planning.
9. it is according to claim 7 based on double-deck multifactor power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning evaluation method, it is special
Sign is that the matching that the power circuit enters corridor front and back transmission capacity includes: that power circuit enters maximum transmission capacity before and after corridor
Difference.
10. it is according to claim 8 based on double-deck multifactor power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning evaluation method, it is special
Sign is that the connecting of the power circuit path planning and gallery planning includes: power circuit path and pipe gallery path
Registration.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811449265.4A CN109508897B (en) | 2018-11-30 | 2018-11-30 | Power grid and comprehensive pipe rack collaborative planning evaluation method based on double-layer multi-factor |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811449265.4A CN109508897B (en) | 2018-11-30 | 2018-11-30 | Power grid and comprehensive pipe rack collaborative planning evaluation method based on double-layer multi-factor |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN109508897A true CN109508897A (en) | 2019-03-22 |
| CN109508897B CN109508897B (en) | 2021-02-19 |
Family
ID=65751381
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201811449265.4A Active CN109508897B (en) | 2018-11-30 | 2018-11-30 | Power grid and comprehensive pipe rack collaborative planning evaluation method based on double-layer multi-factor |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN109508897B (en) |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110472814A (en) * | 2019-06-26 | 2019-11-19 | 国网浙江省电力有限公司宁波供电公司 | A kind of performance evaluation method of electric power piping lane |
| CN111859295A (en) * | 2020-07-15 | 2020-10-30 | 中国安全生产科学研究院 | Quantitative risk evaluation method for oil pipeline |
| CN117436767A (en) * | 2023-12-15 | 2024-01-23 | 云南师范大学 | Assessment method, system and storage medium based on near-remote coupling coordination model |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH06176037A (en) * | 1992-12-02 | 1994-06-24 | Toshiba Corp | Operator entrance controller |
| CN108074043A (en) * | 2018-01-04 | 2018-05-25 | 贵州大学 | A kind of mating Electric power network planning method of city integrated piping lane |
| CN108154272A (en) * | 2017-12-29 | 2018-06-12 | 上海电力学院 | A kind of increment distribution network planning method for adapting to increment distribution network service and decontroling |
-
2018
- 2018-11-30 CN CN201811449265.4A patent/CN109508897B/en active Active
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPH06176037A (en) * | 1992-12-02 | 1994-06-24 | Toshiba Corp | Operator entrance controller |
| CN108154272A (en) * | 2017-12-29 | 2018-06-12 | 上海电力学院 | A kind of increment distribution network planning method for adapting to increment distribution network service and decontroling |
| CN108074043A (en) * | 2018-01-04 | 2018-05-25 | 贵州大学 | A kind of mating Electric power network planning method of city integrated piping lane |
Cited By (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110472814A (en) * | 2019-06-26 | 2019-11-19 | 国网浙江省电力有限公司宁波供电公司 | A kind of performance evaluation method of electric power piping lane |
| CN111859295A (en) * | 2020-07-15 | 2020-10-30 | 中国安全生产科学研究院 | Quantitative risk evaluation method for oil pipeline |
| CN111859295B (en) * | 2020-07-15 | 2023-06-02 | 中国安全生产科学研究院 | Quantitative risk evaluation method for oil pipeline |
| CN117436767A (en) * | 2023-12-15 | 2024-01-23 | 云南师范大学 | Assessment method, system and storage medium based on near-remote coupling coordination model |
| CN117436767B (en) * | 2023-12-15 | 2024-04-09 | 云南师范大学 | Assessment method, system and storage medium based on near-remote coupling coordination model |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN109508897B (en) | 2021-02-19 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN107784410B (en) | Regional energy Internet integrated system and method for optimizing configuration and operation thereof | |
| CN109508897A (en) | Based on double-deck multifactor power grid and pipe gallery collaborative planning evaluation method | |
| Deshpande et al. | A breakeven cost analysis framework for electric road systems | |
| Kosse | Rebuilding Ukraine's infrastructure after the war | |
| Coban et al. | Daily electricity demand assessment on the example of the Turkish road transport system–a case study of the development of electromobility on highways | |
| Rabinowitz et al. | Assessment of factors in the reduction of BEV operational inconvenience | |
| Connolly | eRoads: A comparison between oil, battery electric vehicles, and electric roads for Danish road transport in terms of energy, emissions, and costs | |
| Zia et al. | Energy management in Lucknow city | |
| Grosso et al. | Modelling urban transport sector: a methodology based on OSeMOSYS model generator | |
| Vakhitova et al. | Directions of the region transport infrastructure development in the context of its competitiveness | |
| Saxe et al. | The net greenhouse gas impact of the Jubilee line extension in London, UK | |
| Logan et al. | Challenges of Implementing Electric and Hydrogen Public Transport | |
| Zhao et al. | Economic analysis of using a renewable wind power system at a signalized intersection | |
| Sambito et al. | Energy, water and environmental balance of a complex water supply system | |
| Batty et al. | The circumvention of barriers to urban rail energy efficiency | |
| Southworth et al. | Transit greenhouse gas emissions management compendium | |
| Pesce | A CBA-based analysis for the retrofit of a reference district | |
| Maza-Ortega et al. | EV International Landscape | |
| Zhang et al. | Planning of electric vehicle charging infrastructure under the Background of Big Data | |
| Chuan | Infrastructure development in China | |
| Gago | Electric vehicles: Case study for Spain | |
| Wang et al. | An integrated framework for flexible refined products supply chain | |
| Ermes et al. | Identification of today’s and tomorrow’s mobility patterns in the Rhenish coal-mining area | |
| Zhou et al. | Low-Carbon Transition (Peaking) of Chinese Cities: The Case of Beijing | |
| Gao et al. | Evaluation of urban subway line scheme—An empirical study of Wuhan city |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |