CN109408840B - PCB (printed Circuit Board) online review method and device - Google Patents

PCB (printed Circuit Board) online review method and device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN109408840B
CN109408840B CN201710710070.XA CN201710710070A CN109408840B CN 109408840 B CN109408840 B CN 109408840B CN 201710710070 A CN201710710070 A CN 201710710070A CN 109408840 B CN109408840 B CN 109408840B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
review
pcb
view scene
reviewer
scene information
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201710710070.XA
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN109408840A (en
Inventor
王隆峰
乔志
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Maipu Communication Technology Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Maipu Communication Technology Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Maipu Communication Technology Co Ltd filed Critical Maipu Communication Technology Co Ltd
Priority to CN201710710070.XA priority Critical patent/CN109408840B/en
Publication of CN109408840A publication Critical patent/CN109408840A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN109408840B publication Critical patent/CN109408840B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/30Circuit design
    • G06F30/39Circuit design at the physical level
    • G06F30/398Design verification or optimisation, e.g. using design rule check [DRC], layout versus schematics [LVS] or finite element methods [FEM]

Abstract

The embodiment of the invention provides a PCB (printed Circuit Board) online review method and device, belonging to the field of electronic communication. The method comprises the following steps: according to an instruction for reading the review opinions of the problem components in the PCB image, obtaining the review opinions submitted by a reviewer on the problem components in the PCB image and the current view scene information of the PCB image correspondingly presented when the review opinion is submitted by the reviewer on the problem components; presenting a view scene corresponding to the problem component submitted with the review opinion by the reviewer according to the view scene information; acquiring a review reply input after a designer modifies a question component according to a review comment corresponding to the question component in the view scene; and acquiring the confirmation index of the review response of the reviewer to the designer. The method realizes automatic skip positioning of the problem component, is accurate in positioning, avoids workload of manual positioning, further improves review efficiency, reduces labor cost and shortens development cycle of products.

Description

PCB (printed Circuit Board) online review method and device
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of electronic communication, in particular to a PCB (printed circuit board) graph online review method and device.
Background
The PCB is an electronic drawing for guiding the processing of a printed board, belongs to a common design drawing of an electronic product, and generally needs experts in each field to review after the PCB is designed, so that the quality of the drawing is ensured.
The prior art evaluation method for the PCB picture comprises the following steps: firstly, each reviewer reviews the PCB according to personal experience and design specifications, records generated review opinions, and finally summarizes the review opinions of each reviewer to obtain final review opinions; secondly, the PCB designer modifies the PCB pictures one by one according to the final review opinions; and finally, the reviewer confirms the PCB picture to ensure that all the review opinions of the reviewer are modified.
In addition, when a problem is found, the position of the problem is recorded in the review suggestion through the text description in the conventional review technology. The PCB diagram is generally formed by stacking a plurality of viewing layers. Such as signal layers, power layers, screen layers, solder masks, steel mesh layers, mounting layers, etc. The viewing layers of the type described above are further divided into top layers, bottom layers, intermediate layers, and the like. Due to the superposition of a plurality of view layers, when all the views are superposed, the PCB is messy, and the review work can not be carried out basically, so that a reviewer generally needs to open 2 to 5 of the view layers for superposition to form a view scene during review. Thus, upon the reviewer finding the problem, in addition to recording the problem location, there is also a layer of view in which the problem is recorded and a layer of view contained in the view scene that is needed to facilitate viewing of the problem.
And after the review opinions of the reviewers are submitted and summarized, the designer starts to modify the PCB. Firstly, a designer needs to position according to the description position of the review opinions or search according to the described component position number and the component name; secondly, in order to facilitate observation, a designer needs to open a corresponding viewing layer according to the description of the review opinions, and adjust a proper amplification scale and display transparency; and finally, finding the problem component described by the review comments to modify.
After the designers modify all the evaluation opinions, the evaluation people use the same method to locate the problem position and then confirm whether the evaluation opinions are modified in place.
The positioning and displaying of the review opinions are performed by searching, searching and manual setting according to the information described by the characters, which inevitably consumes a lot of time. In addition, the word description is inevitably ambiguous in description or understanding, so that it is not easy to accurately position the problem location and reasonably display the view scene to which the problem belongs during problem modification and problem confirmation, thereby causing problem modification errors. Therefore, in the evaluation process, the problem positioning consumes a lot of time, and the positioning is easy to deviate, which causes the problems of high labor cost and long development period of electronic products.
Disclosure of Invention
In view of the above, an object of the embodiments of the present invention is to provide a method and an apparatus for online review of PCB drawings, so as to improve the above-mentioned problems.
In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a method for online review of a PCB diagram, where the method includes: according to an instruction for reading the review opinions of the problem components in the PCB image, obtaining the review opinions submitted by a reviewer on the problem components in the PCB image and the current view scene information of the PCB image correspondingly presented when the review opinion is submitted on the problem components by the reviewer; presenting a view scene corresponding to the problem component submitted with the review opinion by the reviewer according to the view scene information; acquiring a review reply which is input after a designer modifies the question component according to a review opinion corresponding to the question component in the view scene; and obtaining a confirmation instruction of a review reply of the reviewer to the designer.
In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a method for online review of a PCB diagram, where the method includes: acquiring review opinions submitted by a reviewer on each problem component in a PCB (printed Circuit Board) image and recording current view scene information of the PCB image, which is correspondingly presented by each problem component when the reviewer submits the review opinions on each problem component; and performing associated storage on the review opinions corresponding to the problem components and the current view scene information of the PCB correspondingly presented by the problem components.
In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides an online review device for a PCB image, where the device includes: the response module is used for acquiring the review opinions submitted by the reviewers on the problem components in the PCB image and the current view scene information of the PCB image correspondingly presented when the reviewers submit the review opinions on the problem components according to the instruction for reading the review opinions of the problem components in the PCB image; the view scene restoration module is used for presenting a view scene corresponding to the review opinion submitted by the reviewer to the problem component according to the view scene information; the review reply module is used for acquiring review replies input after a designer modifies the question components in the view scene according to review opinions corresponding to the question components; and the review confirmation module is used for acquiring a confirmation instruction of the review reply of the reviewer to the designer.
In a fourth aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides an apparatus for online review of a PCB image, where the apparatus includes: the view scene recording module is used for acquiring review opinions submitted by a reviewer on each problem component in the PCB image and recording the current view scene information of the PCB image correspondingly presented by each problem component when the review opinion is submitted by the reviewer on each problem component; and the storage module is used for storing the review opinions corresponding to the problem components in a correlation manner with the current view scene information of the PCB image correspondingly presented by the problem components.
The embodiment of the invention has the beneficial effects that:
the embodiment of the invention provides a PCB (printed circuit board) image online review method, which comprises the steps of firstly obtaining review opinions submitted by a reviewer on problem components in a PCB image and current view scene information of the PCB image correspondingly presented when the review opinions are submitted by the reviewer on the problem components according to an instruction for reading the review opinions of the problem components in the PCB image, then presenting a view scene corresponding to the review opinions submitted by the reviewer on the problem components according to the view scene information, then obtaining review answers input after the problem components are modified by the designer according to the review opinions corresponding to the problem components in the view scene, and finally obtaining a confirmation instruction of the reviewer on the review of the designer to complete review.
Additional features and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by the practice of the embodiments of the invention. The objectives and other advantages of the invention will be realized and attained by the structure particularly pointed out in the written description and claims hereof as well as the appended drawings.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, the drawings needed to be used in the embodiments will be briefly described below, it should be understood that the following drawings only illustrate some embodiments of the present invention and therefore should not be considered as limiting the scope, and for those skilled in the art, other related drawings can be obtained according to the drawings without inventive efforts.
Fig. 1 is a flowchart of a PCB diagram online review method according to a first embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a PCB diagram online review method according to a second embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a PCB diagram online review device according to a third embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 4 is a block diagram of a PCB diagram online review device according to a fourth embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. The components of embodiments of the present invention generally described and illustrated in the figures herein may be arranged and designed in a wide variety of different configurations. Thus, the following detailed description of the embodiments of the present invention, presented in the figures, is not intended to limit the scope of the invention, as claimed, but is merely representative of selected embodiments of the invention. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments of the present invention without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
It should be noted that: like reference numbers and letters refer to like items in the following figures, and thus, once an item is defined in one figure, it need not be further defined and explained in subsequent figures. Meanwhile, in the description of the present invention, the terms "first", "second", and the like are used only for distinguishing the description, and are not to be construed as indicating or implying relative importance.
The PCB online review method provided by the embodiment of the invention is applied to terminal equipment, the terminal equipment comprises the PCB online review device provided by the embodiment of the invention, and the PCB online review device is installed on the terminal equipment in the form of application software or a program.
First embodiment
Referring to fig. 1, fig. 1 is a flowchart of a PCB diagram online review method according to a first embodiment of the present invention, where the method specifically includes the following steps:
step S110: according to the instruction for reading the review opinions of the problem components in the PCB image, the review opinions submitted by a reviewer on the problem components in the PCB image and the current view scene information of the PCB image, which is correspondingly presented when the review opinion is submitted by the reviewer on the problem components, are obtained.
Taking the example that the PCB graph online review device is installed on the terminal device in the form of application software, the user can log in the application through the user name, wherein each user has a respective role according to the user name, and the application can assign different permissions to each role according to the user name, wherein the roles include: administrator, reviewer, designer. The administrator has the authority to create the review, close the review, delete the review opinions and designate the reviewer/designer; the reviewer submits the review opinions, selects the type and the grade of the review opinions and closes the authority of the review opinions; the designer has the right to submit review responses, change the status of the questions.
Before the review, an administrator can log in an administrator interface of the application to create a review, the created review comprises designer names, PCB (printed circuit board) picture names, review rounds and the like, and other non-designers are defaulted as reviewers. Then the designer and the reviewer log in respectively, and enter the corresponding PCB picture review according to the PCB picture name and the review round number.
When a reviewer revives, firstly, a proper view scene is modulated according to the review requirement, secondly, a problem component corresponding to the review suggestion is selected and highlighted, and the corresponding review suggestion is input to the problem component, wherein the problem component generally comprises a device, a bonding pad, a signal copper wire, a copper sheet, a silk screen, a via hole and the like.
When a reviewer submits review opinions to the problem components, recording current view scene information of the PCB, and associating and storing the review opinions corresponding to the problem components and the current view scene information of the PCB, which is correspondingly presented by the problem components, to a set public network storage disk.
The view scene information comprises a view layer, a view scaling, transparency and problem component coordinates contained in the PCB.
When the designer reads the review opinions, the PCB image online review responds to the instruction for reading the review opinions of the problem components in the PCB image so as to obtain the review opinions submitted by the reviewer on the problem components in the PCB image and the current view scene information of the PCB image correspondingly presented when the reviewer submits the review opinions on the problem components, namely the view scene information correspondingly stored in the review opinions of the problem components.
In addition, the reviewer can also perform operations such as review comment grade selection, review comment type selection, review comment closing, review comment display, review reply display, review comment selection, review comment export and the like during review.
Step S120: and presenting a view scene corresponding to the review opinion submitted by the reviewer to the problem component according to the view scene information.
The method comprises the steps of firstly, obtaining view scene information corresponding to a review opinion of a problem component when a designer reads the review opinion of the problem component, and setting a current PCB (printed Circuit Board) according to the view scene information to present a view scene corresponding to the review opinion submitted by the reviewer to the problem component, namely, the view scene restoration is realized. The view scene restoration comprises the steps of reproducing the view layer, the view scaling and the transparency contained in the PCB when the review comments are submitted by the reviewer, jumping to the coordinates of the problem component, and highlighting the problem component, so that the effect of automatically positioning the problem is achieved.
Step S130: and acquiring a review reply which is input after a designer modifies the question component according to the review opinion corresponding to the question component in the view scene.
And after the problem component is found, modifying the problem component according to the text description of the review opinions of the problem component, inputting and submitting the review answer after the designer finishes modifying, and storing the review answer and the review opinions in a public network storage disc in a correlation manner.
And repeating the steps until the designer completely modifies the review opinions.
Step S140: and obtaining a confirmation instruction of the review reply of the reviewer to the designer.
And the reviewer reads the review response submitted by the designer from the public network storage disk, acquires view scene information correspondingly stored in the review comment when the reviewer selects a certain review comment, and sets the current PCB according to the view scene information to realize view scene restoration. The view scene restoration comprises the steps of reproducing the view form, the view scaling ratio and the transparency of the PCB when the reviewer submits the review opinions, jumping to the coordinates of the question component, highlighting the question component, finding the question component, checking by the reviewer according to the review answer of the question component, and closing the review opinions if the review opinions are confirmed to be modified, namely confirming the review answer of the designer. Until all of the reviews for all problem components confirm that the modifications have been made and all shut down.
The following describes a PCB diagram online review method provided by an embodiment of the present invention with a specific example.
The example is described in terms of a PCB diagram online review method provided by the embodiment of the present invention implemented on the PCB Design software Allegro of the american Design electronics company (cadence Design System).
The Allegro design software provides an interface for secondary development, and relevant information such as a view layer, a view scaling, a selected component position, transparency, component highlight and the like contained in the current PCB can be acquired by calling the interface; and the view layer, the view scaling, the transparency, the component highlight and the like contained in the current PCB image can be set through the interface. Further, the display interface can jump to the set coordinates of the PCB by setting. The application of the interface is realized by calling Allegro system functions through TCL scripting language.
The operation flow and the implementation principle are described in detail below. Firstly, the PCB image online review device, i.e. the corresponding application or program on the terminal device, needs to be started. The corresponding TCL script can be started by inputting a preset (in this case, review) Command into a Command column of Allegro design software. And then popping up a dialog box on a display interface of the terminal equipment, wherein the dialog box requires to input a user name and a password, the user name and the password are managed through a configuration file, and an administrator account and the password can be set as admin/admin by default.
After logging in an account of an administrator, entering an administrator interface, wherein the administrator can create review in the interface, and the created review comprises information such as designer names, PCB names, review rounds and the like; the designer name is entered and others who are not designers default to be reviewers. Thus, when the designer/reviewer enters the review, the roles can be distinguished, and different permissions can be assigned to different roles.
And logging in by the designer and the reviewer, and selecting to enter the corresponding PCB image for review according to the PCB name and the number of rounds of review. When the reviewer finds and submits the review opinions, firstly, the appropriate view scene is adjusted, secondly, the problem component corresponding to the review opinions is selected and highlighted in the PCB image, and finally, the review opinions are input and submitted.
Wherein, the reviewer can click the 'add' button on the interface in the review interface to set the filtering condition, i.e. set the type of the problem component.
When the reviewer clicks the problem component, the problem component is highlighted, meanwhile, a piece of review information is automatically created in the interface, the reviewer selects the first-level problem, the second-level problem and the grade in the review information, and then the reviewer fills out the review opinions. And finally, clicking to submit, and storing the review information, the review opinions and the view scene information in a preset public network storage space in an associated manner.
To explain further, the review information, the review opinions, the review responses and the view scene information are stored in a related way, the storage format is a common text format (. Txt file), the review information, the review opinions, the review responses and the view scene information are stored according to a set sequence, different contents are distinguished by using specific spacers, and the specific spacers are generally distinguished by that the review information, the review opinions and the review responses do not use symbol combinations.
When the designer reads the review opinions of the problem components, the designer selects and clicks one review opinion in the interface, the view scene is automatically restored, the complex layer and the display effect of the PCB are directly filtered, the included view layer, the view scaling, the problem position, the transparency and the problem component are highlighted, the review opinion is suitable for observation, and the effect of automatically positioning the review opinions is actually achieved. For example, clicking on a review comment with the problem location being problem component 1 highlights the problem component 1 and zooms in and fixes the view near the problem component 1 and closes the irrelevant overlay.
And then the designer can modify the problem component, after the modification is finished, a review reply can be input in the corresponding interface, the review checks whether the problem component is modified or not again, and if the modification is correct, the review comment is closed, and the review is finished.
The first embodiment of the invention provides a method for online reviewing of a PCB (printed circuit board), which comprises the steps of firstly obtaining review opinions submitted by a reviewer on problem components in the PCB and current view scene information of the PCB correspondingly presented when the review opinions are submitted by the reviewer on the problem components according to an instruction for reading the review opinions of the problem components in the PCB, then presenting a view scene corresponding to the review opinions submitted by the reviewer on the problem components according to the view scene information, then obtaining review responses input after the designer modifies the problem components in the view scene according to the review opinions corresponding to the problem components, and finally obtaining a confirmation instruction of the review of the reviewer on the designer to complete the review responses.
Second embodiment
Referring to fig. 2, fig. 2 is a flowchart of a PCB diagram online review method according to a second embodiment of the present invention, where the method specifically includes the following steps:
step S210: obtaining a review opinion submitted by a reviewer to each problem component in a PCB (printed Circuit Board) image and recording current view scene information of the PCB image, which is correspondingly presented by each problem component when the review opinion is submitted to each problem component by the reviewer.
Step S220: and performing associated storage on the review opinions corresponding to the problem components and the current view scene information of the PCB correspondingly presented by the problem components.
And associating and storing the review opinions corresponding to the problem components and the current view scene information of the PCB correspondingly presented by the problem components to a set public network storage disk.
For the specific implementation process of the above steps, please refer to the related explanations in the first embodiment of the present invention, and for brevity of description, the details are not repeated herein.
In the method for online reviewing of the PCB image according to the second embodiment of the present invention, the review opinions submitted by the reviewer on each problem component in the PCB image and the review opinions submitted by the reviewer on each problem component are obtained, the current view scene information of the PCB image, which is correspondingly presented by each problem component, is recorded, and then the review opinions corresponding to each problem component and the current view scene information of the PCB image, which is correspondingly presented by each problem component, are stored in an associated manner, so that the workload of manual recording is reduced, and the review efficiency is improved.
Third embodiment
Referring to fig. 3, fig. 3 is a block diagram of a PCB diagram online review device 100 according to a third embodiment of the present invention, the device includes: a response module 110, a view scene restoration module 120, a review reply module 130, and a review validation module 140.
The response module 110 is configured to obtain, according to the instruction for reading the review comments of the problem components in the PCB image, the review comments submitted by the reviewer for the problem components in the PCB image and the current view scene information of the PCB image, which is correspondingly presented when the review reviewer submits the review comments for the problem components.
And the view scene restoration module 120 is configured to present, according to the view scene information, a view scene corresponding to the review comment submitted by the reviewer to the problem component.
And a review reply module 130, configured to obtain a review reply input after a designer modifies the question component according to the review comment corresponding to the question component in the view scene.
And the review confirmation module 140 is used for acquiring a confirmation instruction of a review reply of the reviewer to the designer.
By one approach, the view scene restoration module 120 includes: the device comprises a view scene information acquisition unit and a restoration unit.
And the view scene information acquisition unit is used for acquiring view scene information corresponding to the review opinions of the problem component when the designer reads the review opinions of the problem component.
And the restoring unit is used for setting the current PCB according to the view scene information so as to present a view scene corresponding to the problem component submitted with the review opinion by the reviewer.
By one way, the view scene information comprises a view layer, a view scaling, a transparency and problem component coordinates contained in the PCB diagram.
Fourth embodiment
Referring to fig. 4, fig. 4 is a block diagram illustrating a PCB diagram online review device 200 according to a fourth embodiment of the present invention, the device including: a view scene recording module 210 and a storage module 220.
The view scene recording module 210 is configured to obtain review opinions submitted by a reviewer on each problem component in the PCB image, and record current view scene information of the PCB image, which is correspondingly presented by each problem component when the review opinion is submitted by the reviewer on each problem component.
The storage module 220 is configured to store the review comments corresponding to the problem components in association with the current view scene information of the PCB diagram, which is presented correspondingly to the problem components.
The storage module 220 is specifically configured to associate and store the review opinions corresponding to the problem components and the current view scene information of the PCB image, which is correspondingly presented by the problem components, in a preset public network storage space.
It is clear to those skilled in the art that, for convenience and brevity of description, the specific working process of the apparatus described above may refer to the corresponding process in the foregoing method, and will not be described in too much detail herein.
In summary, an embodiment of the present invention provides an online review method for a PCB image, which includes obtaining a review comment submitted by a reviewer for a problem component in the PCB image and current view scene information of the PCB image correspondingly presented when the review comment is submitted by the reviewer for the problem component according to an instruction for reading the review comment of the problem component in the PCB image, then presenting a view scene corresponding to the review comment submitted by the reviewer for the problem component according to the view scene information, obtaining a review reply input after the designer modifies the problem component in the view scene according to the review comment corresponding to the problem component, and finally obtaining a confirmation instruction for the review reply of the reviewer for the designer to complete review.
The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention and is not intended to limit the present invention, and various modifications and changes may be made by those skilled in the art. Any modification, equivalent replacement, or improvement made within the spirit and principle of the present invention should be included in the protection scope of the present invention. It should be noted that: like reference numbers and letters refer to like items in the following figures, and thus, once an item is defined in one figure, it need not be further defined and explained in subsequent figures.
The above description is only for the specific embodiments of the present invention, but the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto, and any person skilled in the art can easily conceive of the changes or substitutions within the technical scope of the present invention, and all the changes or substitutions should be covered within the scope of the present invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the present invention shall be subject to the protection scope of the claims.
It is noted that, herein, relational terms such as first and second, and the like may be used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. Also, the terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Without further limitation, an element defined by the phrase "comprising a … …" does not exclude the presence of another identical element in a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises the element.

Claims (8)

1. A PCB graph online review method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
according to an instruction for reading the review opinions of the problem components in the PCB image, obtaining the review opinions submitted by a reviewer on the problem components in the PCB image and the current view scene information of the PCB image correspondingly presented when the review opinion is submitted on the problem components by the reviewer, wherein the view scene information comprises a view layer, a view scaling ratio, transparency and problem component coordinates contained in the PCB image;
presenting a view scene corresponding to the problem component submitted with the review opinion by the reviewer according to the view scene information;
acquiring a review reply which is input after a designer modifies the question component according to a review opinion corresponding to the question component in the view scene;
and obtaining a confirmation instruction of a review reply of the reviewer to the designer.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein presenting a view scene corresponding to a reviewer submitting a review comment to the problem component according to the view scene information comprises:
obtaining view scene information corresponding to the review opinions of the problem component when a designer reads the review opinions of the problem component;
and setting a current PCB (printed Circuit Board) according to the view scene information so as to present a view scene corresponding to the problem component submitted by a reviewer.
3. A PCB graph online review method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
acquiring review opinions submitted by a reviewer on each problem component in a PCB (printed Circuit Board) diagram and recording current view scene information of the PCB diagram correspondingly presented by each problem component when the reviewer submits the review opinions on each problem component, wherein the view scene information comprises a view layer, a view scaling ratio, transparency and a problem component coordinate contained in the PCB diagram;
performing associated storage on the review opinions corresponding to the problem components and the current view scene information of the PCB correspondingly presented by the problem components;
when a designer reads the review opinions of the problem components in the PCB image, obtaining the relevant and stored review opinions corresponding to the problem components and the current view scene information of the PCB image correspondingly presented by the problem components;
and presenting a view scene corresponding to the question component submission review opinions of the reviewer according to the view scene information.
4. The method according to claim 3, wherein storing the review opinions corresponding to the problem components in association with the current view scene information of the PCB image presented corresponding to the problem components comprises:
and associating and storing the review opinions corresponding to the problem components and the current view scene information of the PCB correspondingly presented by the problem components into a preset public network storage space.
5. An online review device for PCB (printed circuit board), which is characterized by comprising:
the response module is used for acquiring review opinions submitted by a reviewer on the problem components in the PCB image and current view scene information of the PCB image correspondingly presented when the reviewer submits the review opinions on the problem components according to an instruction for reading the review opinions of the problem components in the PCB image, wherein the view scene information comprises a view layer, a view scaling ratio, transparency and problem component coordinates contained in the PCB image;
the view scene restoration module is used for presenting a view scene corresponding to the review opinion submitted by the reviewer to the problem component according to the view scene information;
the review reply module is used for acquiring a review reply which is input after a designer modifies the question component according to the review comments corresponding to the question component in the view scene;
and the review confirmation module is used for acquiring a confirmation instruction of the review reply of the reviewer to the designer.
6. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the view scene restoration module comprises:
the view scene information acquisition unit is used for acquiring view scene information corresponding to the review opinions of the problem component when the designer reads the review opinions of the problem component;
and the restoring unit is used for setting the current PCB according to the view scene information so as to present a view scene corresponding to the problem component submitted with the review opinion by the reviewer.
7. An online review device for PCB (printed circuit board), which is characterized by comprising:
the view scene recording module is used for acquiring review opinions submitted by a reviewer on each problem component in the PCB image and recording the current view scene information of the PCB image correspondingly presented by each problem component when the review opinion is submitted by the reviewer on each problem component, wherein the view scene information comprises a view layer, a view scaling ratio, transparency and a problem component coordinate contained in the PCB image;
the storage module is used for storing the review opinions corresponding to the problem components in a correlation manner with the current view scene information of the PCB image correspondingly presented by the problem components;
the view scene restoration module is used for acquiring the review opinions corresponding to the various problem components stored in a related manner and the current view scene information of the PCB image correspondingly presented by the various problem components when a designer reads the review opinions of the problem components in the PCB image; and presenting a view scene corresponding to the review opinion submitted by the reviewer to the problem component according to the view scene information.
8. The apparatus according to claim 7, wherein the storage module is specifically configured to store the review opinions corresponding to the problem components and the current view scene information of the PCB diagram correspondingly presented by the problem components in a preset public network storage space in an associated manner.
CN201710710070.XA 2017-08-17 2017-08-17 PCB (printed Circuit Board) online review method and device Active CN109408840B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201710710070.XA CN109408840B (en) 2017-08-17 2017-08-17 PCB (printed Circuit Board) online review method and device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201710710070.XA CN109408840B (en) 2017-08-17 2017-08-17 PCB (printed Circuit Board) online review method and device

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN109408840A CN109408840A (en) 2019-03-01
CN109408840B true CN109408840B (en) 2022-11-08

Family

ID=65455246

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201710710070.XA Active CN109408840B (en) 2017-08-17 2017-08-17 PCB (printed Circuit Board) online review method and device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN109408840B (en)

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1459716A (en) * 2002-05-22 2003-12-03 华为技术有限公司 Automatic checking device of printed-wiring board designing and its method
CN106815433A (en) * 2017-01-16 2017-06-09 盛科网络(苏州)有限公司 The method for replacing via automatically according to rule setting

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1889115A (en) * 2006-07-27 2007-01-03 华为技术有限公司 Computer-assisted designing products on-line estimating and examining system and method
CN101655881A (en) * 2009-05-15 2010-02-24 上海闻泰电子科技有限公司 PCB design method and system automatically leading in design rule
TWI432699B (en) * 2009-07-03 2014-04-01 Koh Young Tech Inc Method for inspecting measurement object
CN102073775B (en) * 2011-01-18 2012-08-08 西安电子科技大学 Method for checking electric fitting data of printed circuit board
CN102214261B (en) * 2011-07-11 2014-03-12 西安电子科技大学 Method for automatic check of process data of printed circuit board
CN103823882A (en) * 2014-03-03 2014-05-28 深圳市百能信息技术有限公司 Method and system for automatically auditing PCB project files
CN106934546A (en) * 2017-03-13 2017-07-07 山东省计算中心(国家超级计算济南中心) The data transmission method and system of a kind of preposition estimating and examining system of Government Projects

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1459716A (en) * 2002-05-22 2003-12-03 华为技术有限公司 Automatic checking device of printed-wiring board designing and its method
CN106815433A (en) * 2017-01-16 2017-06-09 盛科网络(苏州)有限公司 The method for replacing via automatically according to rule setting

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN109408840A (en) 2019-03-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Ohme et al. Mobile data donations: Assessing self-report accuracy and sample biases with the iOS Screen Time function
CN103729285B (en) A kind of webpage test method, equipment and system
CN111178705B (en) Item evaluation method, item evaluation device, item evaluation apparatus, and storage medium
CN107591051B (en) Autonomous learning platform
CN108628944B (en) Online job entry method, client, server, computer device, and medium
US20200372067A1 (en) Interfaces, systems, and methods for rating media content
CN108805694A (en) Credit consultation method of servicing, device, equipment and computer readable storage medium
US20230153871A1 (en) Reduced Bias Submission Review System
WO2009024765A1 (en) Agent communications tool for coordinated distribution, review, and validation of call center data
Janicki et al. Obstacles and opportunities in deploying model‐based GUI testing of mobile software: a survey
WO2016179403A1 (en) Systems, methods and devices for call center simulation
CN111080229A (en) Item processing method, item processing device, server, equipment and readable storage medium
Farney et al. Web analytics strategies for information professionals: a LITA guide
US20220129491A1 (en) Method for supporting agent and computing device thereof
CN109408840B (en) PCB (printed Circuit Board) online review method and device
Husser et al. To click, type, or drag? Evaluating speed of survey data input methods
US11587190B1 (en) System and method for the tracking and management of skills
Sohl Comparing two heuristic evaluation methods and validating with usability test methods: applying usability evaluation on a simple website
US20150304269A1 (en) System and method
CN112712421A (en) Method, equipment and storage medium for automatically downloading running bill
Zha Improving the usability of mobile application user review collection
JP6828287B2 (en) Information processing equipment and information processing programs
US20170083297A1 (en) Online discussing system with compiling program function and method thereof
Kuric et al. Cognitive abilities and visual complexity impact first impressions in five-second testing
US20230376167A1 (en) Intelligent adjustment of documents via machine learning

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant