CN109165804A - A kind of operating cost appraisal procedure, device and electronic equipment - Google Patents
A kind of operating cost appraisal procedure, device and electronic equipment Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN109165804A CN109165804A CN201810677493.0A CN201810677493A CN109165804A CN 109165804 A CN109165804 A CN 109165804A CN 201810677493 A CN201810677493 A CN 201810677493A CN 109165804 A CN109165804 A CN 109165804A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- operating cost
- operating
- operating process
- parameter value
- user
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0633—Workflow analysis
Abstract
The embodiment of the invention provides a kind of operating cost appraisal procedure, device and electronic equipments.This method comprises: exporting default test assignment after detecting that user completes the first operating process of operating cost to be assessed；After detecting that user completes default test assignment, the test score value that user completes default test assignment is obtained；Using test score value as the assessment parameter value of the operating cost of the first operating process, the operating cost of the first operating process is assessed.Using the embodiment of the present invention, it is capable of the operating cost of accurately evaluation operation process.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to field of computer technology, set more particularly to a kind of operating cost appraisal procedure, device and electronics
It is standby.
Background technique
Currently, being simple or complicated to investigate operating process to be investigated often through the mode of questionnaire survey.Into
And the height of the operating cost of the operating process is determined according to Questionnaire results.Wherein, the operating cost of operating process is
For reflecting that user executes the complexity of the operating process.Wherein, operating process more easily performs, then the operating process
Operating cost is lower；Operating process is more difficult to execute, then the operating cost of the operating process is higher.
For example, for VIP (Very Important Person, advanced member) process of purchase in video website,
Questionnaire inquires that user thinks that the VIP process of purchase is simple or complicated by inquiry.When Questionnaire results are most of
When user thinks the VIP process of purchase complexity, it is determined that the operating cost of VIP process of purchase is high.It is on the contrary, then it is assumed that VIP purchase
The operating cost of process is low.
But questionnaire survey is usually present the case where falseness answers or inaccurately answers, and leads to not accurately assess
The operating cost of operating process.
Summary of the invention
The embodiment of the present invention is designed to provide a kind of operating cost appraisal procedure, device and electronic equipment, with can
The accurately operating cost of evaluation operation process.Specific technical solution is as follows:
In a first aspect, the embodiment of the invention provides a kind of operating cost appraisal procedure, this method may include:
After detecting that user completes the first operating process of operating cost to be assessed, default test assignment is exported；
After detecting that user completes default test assignment, the test score value that user completes default test assignment is obtained；
Using test score value as the assessment parameter value of the operating cost of the first operating process, to the behaviour of the first operating process
It is assessed as cost.
Optionally, in embodiments of the present invention, default test assignment may include: hearing test task；Hearing test is appointed
Business is used for: test user presets the numeration accuracy of multiple numbers of play rules in preset audio, satisfaction, as hearing
The test score value of test assignment.
Optionally, in embodiments of the present invention, in preset audio, multiple numbers that meet default play rules are as follows:
The digital set played before each preset signals sound in preset audio；Wherein, preset signals sound is in preset audio
Occur with predeterminated frequency.
Optionally, the step of user completes the test score value of default test assignment is obtained, may include:
The number for determining number in multiple numbers, accurately being remembered by user, as the first number；
Numeration accuracy is calculated using the first number and the corresponding total number of multiple numbers, and numeration accuracy is used as and is used
The test score value of family completion hearing test task.
Optionally, assessment parameter value of the score value as the operating cost of the first operating process will be being tested, grasped to first
After making the step of the operating cost of process is assessed, this method can also include:
Obtain the assessment parameter value of the operating cost of the second operating process；
Utilize the assessment of the operating cost of the assessment parameter value and the second operating process of the operating cost of the first operating process
Parameter value compares, and obtains the comparing result of the operating cost of the first operating process and the operating cost of the second operating process.
Optionally, the operating cost of the assessment parameter value and the second operating process of the operating cost of the first operating process is utilized
Assessment parameter value compare, obtain the comparison of the operating cost of the first operating process and the operating cost of the second operating process
As a result the step of may include:
Utilize the assessment of the operating cost of the assessment parameter value and the second operating process of the operating cost of the first operating process
Parameter value compares, and obtains assessment parameter value comparison result；
When it is equal for assessing parameter value comparison result, determine that user completes the completion parameter value of the first operating process, with
And user completes the completion parameter value of the second operating process；Completing parameter includes: to complete duration or completion rate；
Compared using the corresponding completion parameter value of the first operating process and the corresponding completion parameter value of the second operating process
It is right, obtain the comparing result of the operating cost of the first operating process and the operating cost of the second operating process.
Second aspect, the embodiment of the invention provides a kind of operating costs to assess device, the apparatus may include:
Output module, for after detecting that user completes the first operating process of operating cost to be assessed, output to be default
Test assignment；
First obtains module, for obtaining user and completing default test after detecting that user completes default test assignment
The test score value of task；
Evaluation module, for assessment parameter value of the score value as the operating cost of the first operating process will to be tested, to
The operating cost of one operating process is assessed.
Optionally, in embodiments of the present invention, default test assignment may include: hearing test task；Hearing test is appointed
Business is used for: test user presets the numeration accuracy of multiple numbers of play rules in preset audio, satisfaction, as hearing
The test score value of test assignment.
Optionally, in preset audio, multiple numbers that meet default play rules are as follows: each preset in preset audio
The digital set played before signal sound；Wherein, preset signals sound occurs in preset audio with predeterminated frequency.
Optionally, in embodiments of the present invention, the first acquisition module specifically can be used for:
The number for determining number in multiple numbers, accurately being remembered by user, as the first number；
Numeration accuracy is calculated using the first number and the corresponding total number of multiple numbers, and numeration accuracy is used as and is used
The test score value of family completion hearing test task.
Optionally, in embodiments of the present invention, which can also include:
Second obtains module, for that will test assessment parameter of the score value as the operating cost of the first operating process
Value after assessing the operating cost of the first operating process, obtains the assessment parameter of the operating cost of the second operating process
Value；
Comparison module, the behaviour of assessment parameter value and the second operating process for the operating cost using the first operating process
The assessment parameter value for making cost compares, and obtains the operating cost of the first operating process and the operating cost of the second operating process
Comparing result.
Optionally, in embodiments of the present invention, comparison module may include:
First comparing unit, assessment parameter value and the second operating process for the operating cost using the first operating process
The assessment parameter value of operating cost compare, obtain assessment parameter value comparison result；
Determination unit, for when it is equal for assessing parameter value comparison result, determining that user completes the first operating process
It completes parameter value and user completes the completion parameter value of the second operating process；Completing parameter includes: to complete duration or completion
Rate；
Second comparing unit, for corresponding using the corresponding completion parameter value of the first operating process and the second operating process
It completes parameter value to be compared, obtains the comparison knot of the operating cost of the first operating process and the operating cost of the second operating process
Fruit.
The third aspect, the embodiment of the invention also provides a kind of electronic equipment, including processor, communication interface, memory
And communication bus, wherein processor, communication interface, memory complete mutual communication by communication bus；
Memory, for storing computer program；
Processor when for executing the program stored on memory, realizes any of the above-described operating cost appraisal procedure
Method and step.
Fourth aspect, the embodiment of the invention also provides a kind of computer readable storage medium, the computer-readable storages
Instruction is stored in medium, when it runs on an electronic device, so that electronic equipment executes any of the above-described operating cost and comments
Estimate the method and step of method.
5th aspect, the embodiment of the invention also provides a kind of computer program products comprising instruction, when it is in electronics
When being run in equipment, so that electronic equipment executes the method and step of above-mentioned realization any of the above-described operating cost appraisal procedure.
In embodiments of the present invention, after the first operating process of operating cost to be assessed being completed detecting user,
Export default test assignment.Also, after detecting that user completes default test assignment, acquisition user completes the default test and appoints
The test score value of business.Then, using the test score value as the assessment parameter value of the operating cost of the first operating process, to
The operating cost of one operating process is assessed.In this way, the test score value that can use default test assignment is come to operation stream
The operating cost of journey is assessed, make it possible to objectively, the operating cost of accurately evaluation operation process.
Detailed description of the invention
In order to more clearly explain the embodiment of the invention or the technical proposal in the existing technology, to embodiment or will show below
There is attached drawing needed in technical description to be briefly described.
Fig. 1 is a kind of flow chart of operating cost appraisal procedure provided in an embodiment of the present invention；
Fig. 2 is the structural schematic diagram that a kind of operating cost provided in an embodiment of the present invention assesses device；
Fig. 3 is the structural schematic diagram of a kind of electronic equipment provided in an embodiment of the present invention.
Specific embodiment
Following will be combined with the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and technical solution in the embodiment of the present invention is described.
In order to solve the problems in the existing technology, the embodiment of the invention provides a kind of operating cost appraisal procedure,
Device and electronic equipment.
Operating cost appraisal procedure provided in an embodiment of the present invention is illustrated first below.
Referring to Fig. 1, this method be may include steps of:
S101: after detecting that user completes the first operating process of operating cost to be assessed, default test assignment is exported；
Inventor has found in the implementation of the present invention, and user is allowed to be sequentially completed first task and second task,
If the completion difficulty of first task is smaller (i.e. operating cost is smaller), the effect that user completes the second task is got over
It is good., whereas if the completion difficulty of first task is bigger (i.e. operating cost is higher), then user completes the effect of the second task
Fruit is poorer.
Based on this, when first task are as follows: the first operating process is executed, furthermore, it is desirable to the operation to the first operating process
When cost is assessed, after the first operating process being completed detecting user, exports default test assignment and user is allowed to execute.
Wherein, which is second task.
Wherein, it in order to improve the accuracy assessed the operating cost of the first operating process, can be executed in user
Before first operating process, user is prompted to be primarily focused in the first operating process.
Assuming that the first operating process of operating cost to be assessed are as follows: VIP (the Very Important in video website
Person, advanced member) process of purchase.It wherein, usually may include: to log in video website, click in the VIP process of purchase
VIP buys button, the selection operation such as VIP set meal and payment.Certainly, which may be: in video website
The search routine for searching for film, is not limited thereto certainly.
So, electronic equipment can determine use after detection user completes the last one operation in the VIP process of purchase
The VIP process of purchase is completed at family, can export default test assignment at this time.It is of course also possible to detecting that user starts the VIP
After process of purchase preset duration (such as 10 minutes), the default test assignment is exported.Wherein, which is greater than user just
The time-consuming of the VIP process of purchase is completed in normal situation.
Wherein, default test assignment can be hearing test task.Wherein, which is used for: test user
Test to the numeration accuracy of multiple numbers in preset audio, meeting default play rules, as hearing test task
Score value.
Specifically, in the preset audio, multiple numbers that meet default play rules can be with are as follows: it is every in preset audio
The digital set played before a preset signals sound.
For example, the preset signals sound can be " serge " sound, the sound which is played are as follows: 1,2,3,
Serge, 6,4, serge, 10,14, serge.Wherein it is possible to which the playing interval that every two character in played sound is arranged is 2 seconds.It is somebody's turn to do
In example, multiple numbers in the preset audio, meeting default play rules are as follows: 3,4 and 14.Wherein, when user hears one
After a preset signals sound " serge ", need to input a number hearing, before the preset signals sound " serge " to electronic equipment.
Wherein, number is remembered to user in order to avoid the preset signals sound occurred at random to impact, can also be arranged pre-
If signal sound occurs in preset audio with predeterminated frequency.For example, in the preset audio, the signal sound of appearance in every 10 seconds,
This is reasonable.
Certainly, default test assignment may be search capacity test assignment.Wherein, which uses
In: test user within a specified time, finds the number of element in default picture, to meet preset condition, as lookup
The test score value of aptitude tests task, this is also rational.
S102: it after detecting that user completes default test assignment, obtains user and completes testing for default test assignment
Score value；
It is assuming that default test assignment is hearing test task, and in preset audio, meet default play rules it is multiple
Number is according to playing order successively are as follows: 3,4,14,5 ..., 8 and 10 numbers such as 1.Also, user completes the hearing test and appoints
After business, 3,4,14 and 5 this first four number has successfully been remembered.
In this example, the number 4 that can determine number in 10 numbers, accurately being remembered by user, as first
Number.Then, numeration accuracy 40% is calculated using the first number 4 and the corresponding total number 10 of multiple number, and will numeration
Accuracy 40% completes the test score value of hearing test task as user.
It is understood that then showing that user completes default test assignment (i.e. when the test score value being calculated is higher
Second task) effect it is better, the operating cost of the first operating process (i.e. first task) is smaller.Conversely, when calculating
The test score value arrived is lower, then show user complete default test assignment effect it is poorer, the operation of the first operating process at
This is higher.
S103: using test score value as the assessment parameter value of the operating cost of the first operating process, to the first operation stream
The operating cost of journey is assessed.
Wherein, the operating cost of operating process is for reflecting that user executes the complexity of the operating process.For
For user, user can only be expressed according to the impression of itself execute the operating process operating cost it is low or high, and can not
The operating cost of expression is how many.
In order to carry out accurate evaluation to the operating cost of the first operating process using numerical value, the can be calculated
After test score value corresponding to one operating process, test score value the commenting as the operating cost of the first operating process is utilized
Estimate parameter value.In turn, the operating cost of first operating process is assessed using the assessment parameter value.
Assuming that the test score value that user completes default test assignment is 40%.So, the test score value is being utilized
40% as assessment parameter value after, can with assess parameter value 40% (i.e. numerical value) come the operating cost to the first operating process into
Row assessment.
Specifically, those skilled in the art can preset: when test score value is more than or equal to 80%, by operating cost
It is denoted as 1 (i.e. the assessed value of operating cost is 1)；It tests score value and is more than or equal to 60% and when less than 80%, operating cost is remembered
It is 2；It tests score value and is more than or equal to 40% and when less than 60%, operating cost is denoted as 3；It tests score value and is more than or equal to 20%
And when less than 40%, operating cost is denoted as 4；When testing score value less than 20%, operating cost is denoted as 5.
Certainly, those skilled in the art can also preset: when test score value is X%, operating cost being denoted as 1-
X%, this is all reasonable.Wherein, X is less than or equal to 1.
Wherein, the number that operating cost is denoted as is bigger, then shows that operating cost is higher.Conversely, then showing that operating cost is got over
It is low.Both the above mode is merely illustrative, and the setting means of those skilled in the art is not limited to both modes.
In this way, can not need to use and appoint by default test assignment come the operating cost of accurately evaluation operation process
The physiological characteristics acquisition instruments such as what eye movement, brain electricity and skin pricktest, cost is relatively low for the operating cost of evaluation operation process.
In addition, not needing to subtract by way of questionnaire survey or access and investigation come the operating cost of evaluation operation process yet
Rosenthal effect (i.e. questionnaire survey person answer multiple questionnaire person influence) and the Huo Sangxiao during questionnaire survey are lacked
(influence of the i.e. interviewed user to interview promoter) is answered, so that assessment result obtained is more objective, accurate.Moreover, avoiding
It is false to answer or inaccurately answer and so that the operating cost determined is inaccurate and happen.
In embodiments of the present invention, after the first operating process of operating cost to be assessed being completed detecting user,
Export default test assignment.Also, after detecting that user completes default test assignment, acquisition user completes the default test and appoints
The test score value of business.Then, using the test score value as the assessment parameter value of the operating cost of the first operating process, to
The operating cost of one operating process is assessed.In this way, the test score value that can use default test assignment is come to operation stream
The operating cost of journey is assessed, make it possible to objectively, the operating cost of accurately evaluation operation process.
There may be different schemes for VIP process of purchase in video website:
The process of purchase of Scenario A are as follows: log in video website on computers, click VIP purchase button, selection VIP set
Meal and payment.
The process of purchase of option b are as follows: log in video website on computers, click VIP purchase button (clicks VIP purchase to press
The two dimensional code of computer display selection set meal after button), scan the two-dimensional code that (mobile phone show VIP set after scanning the two-dimensional code using mobile phone
Meal), selection VIP set meal and payment.
For the two schemes, each scheme can only be determined respectively by the subjective feeling of user in the prior art
Operating cost height, and can not accurately determine which scheme operating cost is lower, i.e., can not be directly to two schemes
Operating cost compares.
In order to which the operating cost for accurately determining which scheme in option A and option b is lower, can be obtained based on the above method
Obtain the assessment parameter value of the operating cost of option A and option b.And it assume that, as the behaviour for obtaining option A based on the above method
When making the assessment parameter value of cost, the operating process of option A is the first operating process.When based on above method acquisition option b
When the assessment parameter value of operating cost, the operating process of option b is the second operating process.
Wherein it is possible to which the assessment of the operating cost of the assessment parameter value and option b of the operating cost of directly Utilization plan A is joined
Numerical value compares.It is of course also possible to use the operating cost being calculated according to the assessment parameter value of option A and option b
Counter value compares, and this is also rational.
For example, the assessment parameter value of the operating cost of option A is 40%, the assessment parameter of the operating cost of option b
Value is 80%.Since assessment parameter value is higher, show that the completion effect of default test assignment is better, and the behaviour of the first operating process
It is lower to make cost.At this point it is possible to which the operating cost for accurately determining option b is lower than the operating cost of option A.
In another example the assessment parameter value of the operating cost of option A is 40%, the assessment parameter value of the operating cost of option b
It also is 40%.At this point, can also determine that user completes the completion parameter value of option A and the completion parameter of user's completion option b
Value.Wherein, completing parameter may include: to complete duration or completion rate.
Wherein, the completion duration that user completes option A refers to: the user A that starts to carry into execution a plan is default to electronic equipment output
Duration between at the time of test assignment.In addition, it is assumed that user just no longer executes after only carrying out second operation in option A
Subsequent step, then the completion rate that can determine that user completes option A is 50%.
The completion parameter of Scenario A and option b is completion duration, also, a length of 2 minutes when the completion of option A, scheme
A length of 3 minutes when the completion of B.At this point it is possible to determine that the completion duration of option A is less than the completion duration of option b.Due to option b
Time cost it is higher, thus can determine option A operating cost be lower than option b operating cost.
The completion parameter of Scenario A and option b is completion rate, also, the completion rate of option A is 1, the completion of option b
Rate is 80%.At this point it is possible to determine that the completion rate of option A is higher than the completion rate of option b.Since completion rate is reflected for executing
The execution wish of option A and option b, also, the completion rate the low, shows that execution wish is lower, the execution wish the low, shows to grasp
It is higher to make cost.It can thus determine that the operating cost of option A is lower than the operating cost of option b.
In addition, since the completion parameter value of option A and option b can reflect out defect present in scheme.For example, most
User carry into execution a plan B completion rate be 50%, then then showing that the step among option b is arranged unreasonable.In another example more
Number users carry into execution a plan B completion duration it is longer, then then showing to be arranged not simple and easy enough in option b process step.Cause
This, the completion parameter value that the completion parameter value and user that user can also be completed to option A complete option b is shown, with
Allow technical staff according to the completion parameter value of option A and completion option b to improve to option A and option b.
It to sum up, can be to objective, accurately evaluation operation process operating cost using the embodiment of the present invention.Moreover, also
The operating cost of different operating processes can be compared by quantized value (assessment parameter value and completion parameter value etc.), be mentioned
It is high to compare accuracy.
Corresponding to above method embodiment, the embodiment of the invention also provides a kind of operating costs to assess device, referring to figure
2, the apparatus may include:
Output module 201, for after detecting that user completes the first operating process of operating cost to be assessed, output to be pre-
If test assignment；
First obtains module 202, for obtaining user and completing default survey after detecting that user completes default test assignment
The test score value of trial business；
Evaluation module 203, it is right for assessment parameter value of the score value as the operating cost of the first operating process will to be tested
The operating cost of first operating process is assessed.
Using device provided in an embodiment of the present invention, the first behaviour of operating cost to be assessed can be completed detecting user
After making process, default test assignment is exported.Also, after detecting that user completes default test assignment, obtains user and complete to be somebody's turn to do
The test score value of default test assignment.Then, using the test score value as the assessment of the operating cost of the first operating process
Parameter value assesses the operating cost of the first operating process.In this way, can use the test score value of default test assignment
The operating cost of operating process is assessed, make it possible to objectively, the operating cost of accurately evaluation operation process.
Optionally, in embodiments of the present invention, default test assignment may include: hearing test task；Hearing test is appointed
Business is used for: test user presets the numeration accuracy of multiple numbers of play rules in preset audio, satisfaction, as hearing
The test score value of test assignment.
Optionally, in preset audio, multiple numbers that meet default play rules can be with are as follows: it is each in preset audio
The digital set played before preset signals sound；Wherein, preset signals sound occurs in preset audio with predeterminated frequency.
Optionally, in embodiments of the present invention, the first acquisition module 202 specifically can be used for:
The number for determining number in multiple numbers, accurately being remembered by user, as the first number；
Numeration accuracy is calculated using the first number and the corresponding total number of multiple numbers, and numeration accuracy is used as and is used
The test score value of family completion hearing test task.
Optionally, in embodiments of the present invention, which can also include:
Second obtains module, for that will test assessment parameter of the score value as the operating cost of the first operating process
Value after assessing the operating cost of the first operating process, obtains the assessment parameter of the operating cost of the second operating process
Value；
Comparison module, the behaviour of assessment parameter value and the second operating process for the operating cost using the first operating process
The assessment parameter value for making cost compares, and obtains the operating cost of the first operating process and the operating cost of the second operating process
Comparing result.
Optionally, in embodiments of the present invention, comparison module may include:
First comparing unit, assessment parameter value and the second operating process for the operating cost using the first operating process
The assessment parameter value of operating cost compare, obtain assessment parameter value comparison result；
Determination unit, for when it is equal for assessing parameter value comparison result, determining that user completes the first operating process
It completes parameter value and user completes the completion parameter value of the second operating process；Completing parameter includes: to complete duration or completion
Rate；
Second comparing unit, for corresponding using the corresponding completion parameter value of the first operating process and the second operating process
It completes parameter value to be compared, obtains the comparison knot of the operating cost of the first operating process and the operating cost of the second operating process
Fruit.
Corresponding to above method embodiment, the embodiment of the invention also provides a kind of electronic equipment, referring to Fig. 3, the electronics
Equipment includes processor 301, communication interface 302, memory 303 and communication bus 304, wherein processor 301, communication interface
302, memory 303 completes mutual communication by communication bus 304；
Memory 303, for storing computer program；
Processor 301 when for executing the program stored on memory 303, realizes that any of the above-described operating cost is commented
Estimate the method and step of method.
In embodiments of the present invention, electronic equipment can complete the first operation of operating cost to be assessed detecting user
After process, default test assignment is exported.Also, after detecting that user completes default test assignment, it is pre- that acquisition user completes this
If the test score value of test assignment.Then, join the test score value as the assessment of the operating cost of the first operating process
Numerical value assesses the operating cost of the first operating process.In this way, the test score value that can use default test assignment is come
The operating cost of operating process is assessed, make it possible to objectively, the operating cost of accurately evaluation operation process.
The communication bus that above-mentioned electronic equipment is mentioned can be Peripheral Component Interconnect standard (Peripheral Component
Interconnect, PCI) bus or expanding the industrial standard structure (Extended Industry Standard
Architecture, EISA) bus etc..The communication bus can be divided into address bus, data/address bus, control bus etc..For just
It is only indicated with a thick line in expression, figure, it is not intended that an only bus or a type of bus.
Communication interface is for the communication between above-mentioned electronic equipment and other equipment.
Memory may include random access memory (Random Access Memory, RAM), also may include non-easy
The property lost memory (Non-Volatile Memory, NVM), for example, at least a magnetic disk storage.Optionally, memory may be used also
To be storage device that at least one is located remotely from aforementioned processor.
Above-mentioned processor can be general processor, including central processing unit (Central Processing Unit,
CPU), network processing unit (Network Processor, NP) etc.；It can also be digital signal processor (Digital Signal
Processing, DSP), it is specific integrated circuit (Application Specific Integrated Circuit, ASIC), existing
It is field programmable gate array (Field-Programmable Gate Array, FPGA) or other programmable logic device, discrete
Door or transistor logic, discrete hardware components.
Corresponding to above method embodiment, the embodiment of the invention also provides a kind of computer readable storage medium, the meters
It is stored with instruction in calculation machine readable storage medium storing program for executing, when it runs on an electronic device, so that electronic equipment execution is any of the above-described
The method and step of item operating cost appraisal procedure.
The computer program stored in computer readable storage medium provided in an embodiment of the present invention is by the place of electronic equipment
After managing device execution, after electronic equipment can complete the first operating process of operating cost to be assessed detecting user, output is pre-
If test assignment.Also, after detecting that user completes default test assignment, the survey that user completes the default test assignment is obtained
Try score value.Then, it using the test score value as the assessment parameter value of the operating cost of the first operating process, is operated to first
The operating cost of process is assessed.In this way, the test score value that can use default test assignment carrys out the behaviour to operating process
Assessed as cost, make it possible to objectively, the operating cost of accurately evaluation operation process.
Corresponding to above method embodiment, the embodiment of the invention also provides a kind of, and the computer program comprising instruction is produced
Product, when it runs on an electronic device, so that electronic equipment executes above-mentioned realization any of the above-described operating cost appraisal procedure
Method and step.
After computer program provided in an embodiment of the present invention is executed by the processor of electronic equipment, electronic equipment can examined
After measuring the first operating process that user completes operating cost to be assessed, default test assignment is exported.Also, detecting user
After completing default test assignment, the test score value that user completes the default test assignment is obtained.Then, by the test score value
The assessment parameter value of operating cost as the first operating process, assesses the operating cost of the first operating process.In this way,
The test score value of default test assignment be can use to assess the operating cost of operating process, it is objective to make it possible to
The operating cost of ground, accurately evaluation operation process.
In the above-described embodiments, can come wholly or partly by software, hardware, firmware or any combination thereof real
It is existing.When implemented in software, it can entirely or partly realize in the form of a computer program product.Computer program product
Including one or more computer instructions.When loading on computers and executing computer program instructions, all or part of real estate
Raw process or function according to the embodiment of the present invention.Computer can be general purpose computer, special purpose computer, computer network,
Or other programmable devices.Computer instruction may be stored in a computer readable storage medium, or from a computer
Readable storage medium storing program for executing to another computer readable storage medium transmit, for example, computer instruction can from a web-site,
Computer, server or data center by wired (such as coaxial cable, optical fiber, Digital Subscriber Line (DSL)) or wireless (such as
Infrared, wireless, microwave etc.) mode transmitted to another web-site, computer, server or data center.Computer
Readable storage medium storing program for executing can be any usable medium or include one or more usable medium collection that computer can access
At the data storage devices such as server, data center.Usable medium can be magnetic medium, (for example, floppy disk, hard disk, magnetic
Band), optical medium (for example, DVD) or semiconductor medium (such as solid state hard disk Solid State Disk (SSD)) etc..
It should be noted that, in this document, relational terms such as first and second and the like are used merely to a reality
Body or operation are distinguished with another entity or operation, are deposited without necessarily requiring or implying between these entities or operation
In any actual relationship or order or sequence.Moreover, the terms "include", "comprise" or its any other variant are intended to
Non-exclusive inclusion, so that the process, method, article or equipment including a series of elements is not only wanted including those
Element, but also including other elements that are not explicitly listed, or further include for this process, method, article or equipment
Intrinsic element.In the absence of more restrictions, the element limited by sentence "including a ...", it is not excluded that
There is also other identical elements in process, method, article or equipment including the element.
Each embodiment in this specification is all made of relevant mode and describes, same and similar portion between each embodiment
Dividing may refer to each other, and each embodiment focuses on the differences from other embodiments.Especially for device,
For electronic equipment, computer readable storage medium and computer program product embodiments, since it is substantially similar to method reality
Example is applied, so being described relatively simple, the relevent part can refer to the partial explaination of embodiments of method.
Claims (13)
1. a kind of operating cost appraisal procedure, which is characterized in that the described method includes:
After detecting that user completes the first operating process of operating cost to be assessed, default test assignment is exported；
After detecting that user completes the default test assignment, the test score that user completes the default test assignment is obtained
Value；
Using the test score value as the assessment parameter value of the operating cost of first operating process, to first operation
The operating cost of process is assessed.
2. the method according to claim 1, wherein the default test assignment includes: hearing test task；Institute
Hearing test task is stated to be used for: test user to the numerations of multiple numbers in preset audio, meeting default play rules just
True rate, the test score value as the hearing test task.
3. according to the method described in claim 2, it is characterized in that, in the preset audio, meet default play rules
Multiple numbers are as follows: the digital set played before each preset signals sound in the preset audio；Wherein, described pre-
If signal sound occurs in the preset audio with predeterminated frequency.
4. according to the method described in claim 2, it is characterized in that, the survey for obtaining user and completing the default test assignment
The step of trying score value, comprising:
The number for determining number in the multiple number, accurately being remembered by user, as the first number；
Numeration accuracy is calculated using first number and the corresponding total number of the multiple number, and the numeration is correct
Rate completes the test score value of the hearing test task as user.
5. method according to any of claims 1-4, which is characterized in that using the test score value as described in
The assessment parameter value of the operating cost of first operating process, the step of assessment the operating cost of first operating process
Later, the method also includes:
Obtain the assessment parameter value of the operating cost of the second operating process；
Utilize the assessment parameter value of the operating cost of first operating process and the operating cost of second operating process
Assessment parameter value compares, and obtains the operating cost of first operating process and the operating cost of second operating process
Comparing result.
6. according to the method described in claim 5, it is characterized in that, the operating cost using first operating process
The assessment parameter value of assessment parameter value and the operating cost of second operating process compares, and obtains first operation stream
The step of comparing result of the operating cost of journey and the operating cost of second operating process, comprising:
Utilize the assessment parameter value of the operating cost of first operating process and the operating cost of second operating process
Assessment parameter value compares, and obtains assessment parameter value comparison result；
When the assessment parameter value comparison result is equal, determine that user completes the completion parameter of first operating process
Value and user complete the completion parameter value of second operating process；The completion parameter includes: to complete duration or completion
Rate；
Using the corresponding completion parameter value of first operating process and the corresponding completion parameter value of second operating process into
Row compares, and obtains the comparing result of the operating cost of first operating process and the operating cost of second operating process.
7. a kind of operating cost assesses device, which is characterized in that described device includes:
Output module, for after detecting that user completes the first operating process of operating cost to be assessed, exporting default test
Task；
First obtains module, completes described preset for after detecting that user completes the default test assignment, obtaining user
The test score value of test assignment；
Evaluation module, for using the test score value as the assessment parameter value of the operating cost of first operating process,
The operating cost of first operating process is assessed.
8. device according to claim 7, which is characterized in that the default test assignment includes: hearing test task；Institute
Hearing test task is stated to be used for: test user to the numerations of multiple numbers in preset audio, meeting default play rules just
True rate, the test score value as the hearing test task.
9. device according to claim 8, which is characterized in that in the preset audio, the default play rules of satisfaction
Multiple numbers are as follows: the digital set played before each preset signals sound in the preset audio；Wherein, described pre-
If signal sound occurs in the preset audio with predeterminated frequency.
10. device according to claim 8, which is characterized in that the first acquisition module is specifically used for:
The number for determining number in the multiple number, accurately being remembered by user, as the first number；
Numeration accuracy is calculated using first number and the corresponding total number of the multiple number, and the numeration is correct
Rate completes the test score value of the hearing test task as user.
11. the device according to any one of claim 7-10, which is characterized in that described device further include:
Second obtains module, for joining using the test score value as the assessment of the operating cost of first operating process
Numerical value after assessing the operating cost of first operating process, obtains commenting for the operating cost of the second operating process
Estimate parameter value；
Comparison module, assessment parameter value and second operating process for the operating cost using first operating process
The assessment parameter value of operating cost compare, obtain first operating process operating cost and second operation stream
The comparing result of the operating cost of journey.
12. device according to claim 11, which is characterized in that the comparison module includes:
First comparing unit, assessment parameter value and second operation for the operating cost using first operating process
The assessment parameter value of the operating cost of process compares, and obtains assessment parameter value comparison result；
Determination unit, for determining that user completes first operation stream when the assessment parameter value comparison result is equal
The completion parameter value of journey and user complete the completion parameter value of second operating process；The completion parameter includes: to complete
Duration or completion rate；
Second comparing unit, for utilizing the corresponding completion parameter value of first operating process and second operating process pair
The completion parameter value answered is compared, and obtains the operating cost of first operating process and the operation of second operating process
The comparing result of cost.
13. a kind of electronic equipment, which is characterized in that including processor, communication interface, memory and communication bus, wherein processing
Device, communication interface, memory complete mutual communication by communication bus；
Memory, for storing computer program；
Processor when for executing the program stored on memory, realizes method step as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 6
Suddenly.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201810677493.0A CN109165804A (en) | 2018-06-27 | 2018-06-27 | A kind of operating cost appraisal procedure, device and electronic equipment |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201810677493.0A CN109165804A (en) | 2018-06-27 | 2018-06-27 | A kind of operating cost appraisal procedure, device and electronic equipment |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN109165804A true CN109165804A (en) | 2019-01-08 |
Family
ID=64897358
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201810677493.0A Pending CN109165804A (en) | 2018-06-27 | 2018-06-27 | A kind of operating cost appraisal procedure, device and electronic equipment |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN109165804A (en) |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20040049366A1 (en) * | 2002-09-09 | 2004-03-11 | Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd | Usability evaluation support apparatus |
| US20160034274A1 (en) * | 2009-05-29 | 2016-02-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Complexity reduction of user tasks |
| CN105701015A (en) * | 2016-01-11 | 2016-06-22 | 西安交通大学 | Availability evaluation method of smartphone human-computer interface on the basis of user model |
| CN108009076A (en) * | 2017-11-29 | 2018-05-08 | 大陆汽车投资（上海）有限公司 | The assessment of vehicle-mounted user interface and optimization method |
-
2018
- 2018-06-27 CN CN201810677493.0A patent/CN109165804A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20040049366A1 (en) * | 2002-09-09 | 2004-03-11 | Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd | Usability evaluation support apparatus |
| US20160034274A1 (en) * | 2009-05-29 | 2016-02-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Complexity reduction of user tasks |
| CN105701015A (en) * | 2016-01-11 | 2016-06-22 | 西安交通大学 | Availability evaluation method of smartphone human-computer interface on the basis of user model |
| CN108009076A (en) * | 2017-11-29 | 2018-05-08 | 大陆汽车投资（上海）有限公司 | The assessment of vehicle-mounted user interface and optimization method |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Jaspers | A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: methodological aspects and empirical evidence | |
| US20140278738A1 (en) | Systems and methods for unified scoring | |
| Grant et al. | Selection and use of content experts for instrument development | |
| EP2206464A1 (en) | Computerized test apparatus and methods for quantifying psychological aspects of human responses to stimuli | |
| MacDorman et al. | An improved usability measure based on novice and expert performance | |
| CN109739768A (en) | Search engine evaluating method, device, equipment and readable storage medium storing program for executing | |
| CN109918504A (en) | One kind is goed over examination papers methods of marking and system | |
| CN110286938A (en) | For exporting the method and apparatus for being directed to the evaluation information of user | |
| Carlson | Criteria for family assessment in research and intervention contexts. | |
| KR20140115525A (en) | Design brand value evaluating and verificating system and method | |
| AU2020100135A4 (en) | Method, system and apparatus for evaluating sensory assessors’ concentration ability | |
| CN109165804A (en) | A kind of operating cost appraisal procedure, device and electronic equipment | |
| US20140276197A1 (en) | Apparatus and method for determining treatment endpoints for allergen testing | |
| US20200185110A1 (en) | Computer-implemented method and an apparatus for use in detecting malingering by a first subject in one or more physical and/or mental function tests | |
| Georgsson et al. | Revisiting heuristic evaluation methods to improve the reliability of findings | |
| CN110174711A (en) | Terminal device and its foreign bodies detection evaluation of result method, computer storage medium | |
| KR101878359B1 (en) | System and method for detecting mutiple-intelligence using information technology | |
| CN115798659A (en) | Quality control method, quality control system, analyzer and computer storage medium | |
| US20130211848A1 (en) | User interface for collecting association information | |
| CN107463491A (en) | A kind of terminal software method of testing, terminal to be measured and computer-readable recording medium | |
| US10735534B2 (en) | Information processing apparatus | |
| CN109559065A (en) | Technical ability cognitive diagnosis method and device | |
| CN109993529A (en) | Method and device for evaluating decentralized application program and electronic equipment | |
| CN112486808B (en) | System testing method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| JP2020107186A (en) | Evaluation device, evaluation method, and program |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |