CN109145522B - Feeding system servo optimization method based on scalable dynamic performance evaluation function - Google Patents

Feeding system servo optimization method based on scalable dynamic performance evaluation function Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN109145522B
CN109145522B CN201811265249.XA CN201811265249A CN109145522B CN 109145522 B CN109145522 B CN 109145522B CN 201811265249 A CN201811265249 A CN 201811265249A CN 109145522 B CN109145522 B CN 109145522B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
optimization
servo
evaluation function
performance evaluation
function
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201811265249.XA
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN109145522A (en
Inventor
杨勇
牛福洲
沈晔湖
蒋全胜
刘威
彭璇
张元晶
马振武
殷振
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Beijing Hengyi Zhihui Technology Co.,Ltd.
Original Assignee
Suzhou University of Science and Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Suzhou University of Science and Technology filed Critical Suzhou University of Science and Technology
Priority to CN201811265249.XA priority Critical patent/CN109145522B/en
Publication of CN109145522A publication Critical patent/CN109145522A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN109145522B publication Critical patent/CN109145522B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20Design optimisation, verification or simulation

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Feedback Control In General (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a feeding system servo optimization method based on a scalable dynamic performance evaluation function, which comprises the following steps: establishing a servo simulation model of a feeding system based on MATLAB; determining a servo parameter optimization variable of a feed drive; constructing an extensible dynamic performance evaluation function for servo optimization of a feeding system, selecting a corresponding response characteristic index evaluation function according to certain dynamic response performances to be comprehensively considered, and substituting the response characteristic index evaluation function into the extensible dynamic performance evaluation function in combination with actual optimization requirements to obtain a target evaluation function for servo optimization; based on an intelligent optimization algorithm, the performance optimization of the feeding system is realized through servo parameter optimization and oriented to the constructed target evaluation function. By constructing the scalable dynamic performance evaluation function of the servo optimization and based on the scalability of the dynamic response characteristic index evaluation function, the real-time adjustment and the further integration of the servo optimization target evaluation function can be conveniently realized, thereby realizing the performance optimization of the servo system as required.

Description

Feeding system servo optimization method based on scalable dynamic performance evaluation function
Technical Field
The invention relates to a feeding system servo optimization method, in particular to a feeding system servo optimization method based on a scalable dynamic performance evaluation function.
Background
At present, a servo parameter optimization method of a feeding system generally aims at improving the dynamic response characteristic of the servo system and carries out setting optimization on servo control parameters by means of an intelligent optimization search algorithm. According to different optimization design problems, the selection modes of the dynamic response characteristic evaluation index functions are different, and the commonly used response characteristic evaluation index functions include IAEI, ISE, ITAE, ITSE, ISTAE, ISTS and the like. When the different response characteristic evaluation indexes are selected as target functions to carry out servo control parameter setting optimization, the obtained closed-loop control effects of the system are different. If servo parameter setting optimization is carried out according to the ITAE criterion, transient response oscillation is concerned more, the transient response oscillation performance is smaller after the system optimization, but the attention to the response speed of the system is less; when servo parameter setting optimization is carried out according to the ISE criterion, a system usually has a high response speed, but the system has high oscillation performance and poor relative stability.
It can be seen that in the existing research on the optimization of the servo parameters of the feeding system by taking the selected response characteristic evaluation index as a target function and based on an intelligent optimization search algorithm, the response characteristic evaluation index function is single, and the optimization of the control effect of a certain aspect of the system can only be realized; and the selected response characteristic evaluation index target function can not be conveniently adjusted in real time and further integrated according to the performance optimization requirement of the system, so as to achieve the performance optimization of the servo system according to the requirement.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to: aiming at the problem that the existing feeding system servo optimization method cannot realize simultaneous optimization of multiple aspects of the performance of a servo system and real-time optimization on demand, the invention provides a feeding system servo optimization method based on an extensible dynamic performance evaluation function.
The technical scheme is as follows: the invention discloses a feeding system servo optimization method based on a scalable dynamic performance evaluation function, which comprises the following steps of:
(1) Establishing a servo simulation model of a feeding system based on MATLAB;
(2) Determining a servo parameter optimization variable of a feed drive;
(3) Constructing a servo-optimized extensible dynamic performance evaluation function of the feeding system, selecting respective corresponding response characteristic index evaluation functions according to certain dynamic response performances to be comprehensively considered by the feeding system, combining actual optimization requirements of the feeding system, and substituting the functions into the extensible dynamic performance evaluation function to obtain a servo-optimized target evaluation function;
(4) Based on an intelligent optimization algorithm, the performance of the feeding system is optimized by servo parameter optimization in the direction of the constructed target evaluation function.
By constructing the scalable dynamic performance evaluation function of the servo optimization, the real-time adjustment and the further integration of the servo optimization target evaluation function can be conveniently realized on the basis of the scalability of the dynamic response characteristic index evaluation function according to the actual optimization requirement, so that the performance of the servo system can be conveniently optimized as required.
In the step (2), the servo parameter optimization variables include position loop gain, velocity loop gain, current loop gain, and integration time.
In the step (3), the expression of the scalable dynamic performance evaluation function SOEF for the servo optimization of the feeding system is as follows:
Figure BDA0001844751430000021
in the formula, the performance evaluation index SPI of the feeding system is a response characteristic index evaluation function, n is the number of the performance evaluation indexes SPI of the system, and w is the number of the performance evaluation indexes SPI of the system i Scalability factor in a scalable dynamic performance evaluation function for a single performance evaluation index, w i Has a value of 0 or 1,f i For system performance evaluation index SPI i The influence coefficient of (c).
Specifically, when a performance evaluation index SPI does not affect the scalable dynamic performance evaluation function SOEF, w i =0, i.e. the performance evaluation index is not taken into account in the optimization of the response characteristics of the feed system; when a certain performance evaluation index SPI has an influence on the scalable dynamic performance evaluation function SOEF, w i =1, i.e. the performance evaluation index is taken into account in the optimization of the response characteristics of the feed system; when w is i When =1, by f i To further control the SPI i The degree of influence on the overall evaluation function. f. of i The value of (b) can be any positive number, and the value of (b) can be selected to be a positive integer in general for convenient calculation; f. of i The larger the value is, the performance evaluation index SPI is represented i The greater the influence on the overall evaluation function, so it is correctBody evaluation function or dynamic performance optimization requirement emphasizes certain performance evaluation index SPI i The corresponding system performance evaluation index influence coefficient f i Larger values may be taken.
In the step (3), the dynamic response performance of the feeding system may include overshoot and transient oscillation response performance, and the corresponding response characteristic index evaluation function is preferably:
Figure BDA0001844751430000031
in the above formula, phi s To displace a set value, phi a Is the actual value of the displacement; a represents overshoot balance coefficient, b represents transient oscillation balance coefficient, and the values of a and b are arbitrary positive numbers p 0 Is in the form of p 1 t is a linear function or p of the time variable t 2 t 2 With respect to the time variable t, where p 1 Coefficient representing a linear function of time, p 2 Coefficients representing a quadratic time function; p is a radical of 0 、p 1 、p 2 The value is positive, and usually, for convenience of calculation, the value is selected to be a positive integer.
The overshoot trade-off coefficient a and the transient oscillation trade-off coefficient b have the following priorities: preference for positive number p 0 Then, choose the shape as p 1 t as a function of time, and finally selecting the form p 2 t 2 Is a quadratic function of time. When the overshoot phenomenon is emphasized more on the optimization requirement of the overshoot and transient oscillation response performance, the priority of the value of the corresponding overshoot weighing coefficient a is higher than that of the transient oscillation weighing coefficient b, and the values of a and b meet p 0 >p 1 >p 2 (ii) a For example, if a takes on a positive number p 0 The value of b is selected to be p 1 A time function of t or the form p 2 t 2 Of a quadratic time function of, correspondingly, p 0 >p 1 Or p 0 >p 2 (ii) a If a takes the form of p 1 t as a function of time, and b is chosen to be p 2 t 2 Of a quadratic time function of, while p 1 >p 2 . On the contrary, when the transient oscillation phenomenon is emphasized more on the optimization requirement of the overshoot and transient oscillation response performance, the priority of the value of the corresponding transient oscillation weighing coefficient b is higher than that of the overshoot weighing coefficient a, and the values of a and b meet p 0 >p 1 >p 2 . After the value types (positive number, primary function or quadratic function) of a and b are determined according to optimization requirements and value priorities, corresponding p can be processed according to actual optimization conditions 0 、p 1 Or p 2 Is adjusted by the value of p 0 、p 1 Or p 2 The larger the value of (a) is, the larger the value of the corresponding coefficient a or b is, indicating that the overshoot corresponding to the coefficient a or the transient oscillation corresponding to the coefficient b has a greater influence on the dynamic performance optimization result at the selected priority, and vice versa.
When the overshoot and transient oscillation response performance is optimized, and the importance degrees of the optimization requirements of the overshoot phenomenon and the transient oscillation phenomenon are the same or similar, the values of the corresponding overshoot weighing coefficient a and the transient oscillation weighing coefficient b are the same priority. For example, a and b may be shaped as p at the same time 2 t 2 The quadratic time function of (2) can also be taken simultaneously as p 1 A time function of t or a positive number p 0
Has the advantages that: compared with the prior servo optimization method of the feeding system, the invention has the beneficial effects that: the method for optimizing the servo of the feeding system can simultaneously realize the control effect optimization of the system in multiple aspects based on the scalability of the objective function by constructing the scalable dynamic performance evaluation function of the servo optimization according to the actual optimization requirement, and can conveniently realize the real-time adjustment and further integration of the objective function of the servo optimization of the feeding system, thereby conveniently realizing the performance optimization of the servo system as required.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a current loop transfer function;
FIG. 2 is a MATLAB-based feed drive system simulation modeling;
FIG. 3 is an optimization iteration curve of the scaling objective evaluation function SOEF in the servo optimization process in the embodiment;
FIG. 4 is a step response curve corresponding to the optimized servo parameters in the embodiment.
Detailed Description
The technical scheme of the invention is further explained by combining the attached drawings.
According to the feeding system servo optimization method based on the scalable dynamic performance evaluation function, the scalable target evaluation function is constructed through servo optimization, the scalability of the target function is evaluated based on the response characteristic, and the real-time adjustment and the further integration of the servo optimization target function can be conveniently realized according to the actual optimization requirement, so that the performance of the servo system can be conveniently optimized as required.
The method specifically comprises the following steps:
(1) Establishing a servo simulation model of a feeding system based on MATLAB;
(2) Determining a servo parameter optimization variable of a feed drive;
(3) Constructing a servo-optimized extensible dynamic performance evaluation function of the feeding system, selecting respective corresponding response characteristic index evaluation functions according to certain dynamic response performances to be comprehensively considered by the feeding system, combining actual optimization requirements of the feeding system, and substituting the functions into the extensible dynamic performance evaluation function to obtain a servo-optimized target evaluation function;
(4) Based on an intelligent optimization algorithm, the performance of the feeding system is optimized by servo parameter optimization in the direction of the constructed target evaluation function.
The optimization method of the invention is further explained by taking a certain machine tool feed driving system as an example and combining the attached drawings and an embodiment.
The method comprises the following steps: establishing servo simulation model of feeding system based on MATLAB
In general, the servo control of the feeding system usually adopts a classical cascade control method, which includes a current loop, a speed loop and a position loop. Transfer function methods are currently used to build feed system servo simulation models because the current loop is contained within the velocity loop and the velocity loop is contained within the position loop. Therefore, when a transfer function method is adopted to carry out simulation modeling on the servo control of the feeding system, firstly, a current loop is modeled, and then, a speed loop is further modeled, and finally, a position loop is modeled. The following modeling process is described in terms of this step.
The current loop mainly comprises a current regulator, a servo motor and the like, wherein the current controller is a PI controller and has the function of enabling the armature winding current of the servo motor to accurately track a current instruction in real time. The current loop controller transfer function may be expressed as K i (1+1/(T i s)), where K) is i For current loop gain, T i Is the current loop integration time. The transfer function model of armature circuit armature voltage and armature current of the servo motor can be obtained according to the control correlation theory as
Figure BDA0001844751430000051
In the formula e 0 Is a counter potential of K e ω(K e Is the back emf coefficient, ω is the output speed); i.e. i q Is armature current, u q Is armature voltage, L a Is inductance factor, R a Is the resistivity, s is the laplace operator. From the equation (1), it can be seen that the armature circuit of the servo motor has a time constant L a /R a The first-order inertia element.
The torque equation of the servo motor is
M T =K T i q (2)
In the formula K T As a coefficient of torque, M T Is the output torque.
The current loop is a follow-up system, current regulation is realized according to feedback errors of given current and actual current, and a current loop transfer function structure diagram can be obtained by integrating transfer functions and equations of all links, as shown in fig. 1, wherein i set The Δ i current feedback error is the current setpoint.
The speed loop also employs a PI controller, which is expressed as K in terms of a transfer function p (1+1/(T n s)), where K) is p For the gain of the speed loop, T n The velocity loop integration time. Speed regulationThe pitch ring is mainly composed of links such as a speed ring controller, a current closed loop and mechanical transmission.
The position loop adjuster adopts P adjustment and is expressed by a transfer function as K v s,K v Is the position loop gain.
A simulation model of the feed drive system is constructed based on MATLAB, a model schematic diagram of the simulation model is shown in fig. 2, wherein the mechanical transmission link modeling can be performed by simplifying the mechanical transmission link into an equivalent rotation rigid body, and can also be performed by a state space method, and the state space method is used for modeling in the embodiment. In FIG. 2, φ s To displace a set value, phi a Is the actual value of the displacement.
According to the servo control system and the servo motor model corresponding to the researched machine tool, the technical parameters adopted in the modeling process are as follows: position loop gain K v =25s -1 Velocity loop gain K p =27.3N · m · s/rad, velocity loop integration time T n =60ms, current loop gain K i =12.157V/A, current loop integration time T i 2ms, inductance factor L a =3.1mH, resistivity R a =0.075 Ω, back emf coefficient K e = 1.67V/(rad/s), torque coefficient K T =2.72N·m/A。
Step two: determining a servo parameter optimization variable of a feed drive;
generally, a cascaded PID control is adopted in a servo control system to optimize the gain and the integral time of a position loop, a speed loop and a current loop, but because the control parameters of the current loop can be obtained by a motor manufacturer and can be adjusted without a complex servo simulation model, three parameters of the gain and the integral time of the speed loop and the gain of the position loop are selected as optimization variables of servo parameters to optimize.
Step three: constructing a scalable dynamic performance evaluation function of the servo optimization of the feeding system;
defining response characteristic Evaluation Index functions (such as IAEI, ISE, ITAE and the like mentioned in the background) as System Performance Evaluation indexes (SPI), and constructing a Scalable Objective Evaluation Function (SOEF) of the servo dynamic response characteristics of the feeding System, wherein the Scaling Objective Evaluation Function (SOEF) comprises:
Figure BDA0001844751430000061
in formula (3), n is the number of system performance evaluation indexes SPI, w i Scalability factor, w, in the overall evaluation function for a single performance evaluation index i =0 or 1, as can be seen from formula (3) if w i The scalability coefficient is set to 0, and the corresponding performance evaluation index SPI does not have any influence on the overall evaluation function SOEF, i.e., the performance evaluation index is not considered in the optimization process of the response characteristic of the feeding system; if w i If the scalability coefficient is set to 1, the corresponding performance evaluation index SPI will have an influence on the overall evaluation function, i.e., the performance evaluation index is considered in the optimization process of the response characteristic of the feed system, and therefore, the scalability selection of the system optimization objective function can be achieved by selecting the scalability coefficient.
f i For system performance evaluation index SPI i When w is i If 1, can be measured by f i Value size to further control SPI i The degree of influence on the overall evaluation function. f. of i The value can be any positive number, and the value f can be a positive integer in general for convenient calculation i The larger the value is, the performance evaluation index SPI is represented i The larger the influence degree on the overall evaluation function is, so when the overall evaluation function or the dynamic performance optimization requirement emphasizes a certain performance evaluation index, the corresponding system performance evaluation index influence coefficient f i A larger value may be desirable.
The dynamic response performances of the feeding system, such as response speed, overshoot and transient oscillation, are comprehensively considered in the embodiment. Therefore, the ITSE criterion is selected to evaluate the response speed of the system and is used as the SPI 1 (ii) a Further, the formula (4) is selected as SPI 2 To evaluate overshoot and transient oscillation of the system:
Figure BDA0001844751430000071
in the formula (4), phi s To displace a set value, phi a Is the actual value of the displacement; a represents overshoot balance coefficient, b represents transient oscillation balance coefficient, and the values of a and b are arbitrary positive numbers p 0 Is in the form of p 1 t is a linear function or p of the time variable t 2 t 2 With respect to the time variable t, where p 1 Coefficient representing a linear function of time, p 2 Coefficients representing a quadratic time function; p is a radical of 0 、p 1 、p 2 The value is positive, and usually, the value is selected to be a positive integer for convenient calculation.
The overshoot trade-off coefficient a and the transient oscillation trade-off coefficient b have the following priorities: preference for positive numbers p 0 Then choose the shape as p 1 t is a time function of, and finally is selected to be p 2 t 2 A quadratic time function of (c). When the overshoot phenomenon is emphasized to the optimization requirement of the overshoot and transient oscillation response performance, the priority of the value of the corresponding overshoot weighing coefficient a is higher than that of the transient oscillation weighing coefficient b, and the values of a and b meet p 0 >p 1 >p 2 (ii) a For example, if a takes on a positive number p 0 The value of b is selected to be p 1 A time function of t or the form p 2 t 2 The second order time function of (a), correspondingly,
p 0 >p 1 or p 0 >p 2 (ii) a If a takes the form of p 1 t as a function of time, b is chosen to be p 2 t 2 Of a quadratic time function of, while p 1 >p 2 . On the contrary, when the transient oscillation phenomenon is emphasized more on the optimization requirement of the overshoot and transient oscillation response performance, the priority of the value of the corresponding transient oscillation weighing coefficient b is higher than that of the overshoot weighing coefficient a, and the values of a and b meet p 0 >p 1 >p 2 . After the value types (positive number, primary function or quadratic function) of a and b are determined according to optimization requirements and value priorities, corresponding p can be subjected to actual optimization conditions 0 、p 1 Or p 2 Is adjusted by the value of p 0 、p 1 Or p 2 The larger the value of (a) is, the larger the value of the corresponding coefficient a or b is, indicating that the overshoot corresponding to the coefficient a or the transient ringing corresponding to the coefficient b has a greater influence on the dynamic performance optimization result at the selected priority, and vice versa.
When the overshoot and transient oscillation response performance is optimized, and the optimization requirements of the overshoot phenomenon and the transient oscillation phenomenon are the same or similar in importance degree, the values of the corresponding overshoot weighing coefficient a and the transient oscillation weighing coefficient b are the same priority. For example, a and b may be shaped as p at the same time 2 t 2 The quadratic time function of (2) can also be taken simultaneously as p 1 A time function of t or a positive number p 0
According to the practical optimization requirements corresponding to the feeding system researched by the embodiment, namely, the dynamic response performances of the feeding system, such as response speed, overshoot and transient oscillation, are comprehensively considered, and w is defined 1 =w 2 =1 (which means that the response speed, overshoot, and transient oscillation of the system are considered at the same time), the response speed of the system is more emphasized when the dynamic performance is optimized, so f 1 =100,f 2 =1(f 1 Compared with f 2 Take a larger value to indicate that the response speed of the system is more emphasized when dynamic performance is optimized). In constructing SPI 2 When the overshoot and transient oscillation of the system are evaluated, the overshoot balance coefficient a is preferably selected to be the positive integer p because the overshoot phenomenon is more emphasized in the example 0 Selecting the transient oscillation trade-off coefficient b as p 2 t 2 The quadratic function of (2), in this example, p is chosen 0 =100,p 2 =25, so obtained SPI 2 =∫[100e o +25t 2 e s ]dt,
Figure BDA0001844751430000081
General purpose SPI 1 、SPI 2 And (3) substituting the formula (3) to obtain a target evaluation function of servo optimization:
Figure BDA0001844751430000082
step four: based on an intelligent optimization algorithm, the performance optimization of the feeding system is realized through servo parameter optimization and oriented to the constructed target evaluation function.
Based on an intelligent optimization algorithm, selecting a position loop gain K v Velocity loop gain K p Integral time T of velocity loop n For optimizing variables, the formula (5) is used as an optimization objective function to comprehensively evaluate the response speed, the overshoot and the transient oscillation of the system, the servo control parameters are optimized, the iterative process of objective function evolution is shown in figure 3, and finally the optimized parameters of the servo controller are K v =38s -1 ,K p =24Nm·s/rad,T n =19ms, the step response curves before and after optimization are as shown in fig. 4, and it can be seen from the graph that the dynamic response performance of the entire servo control system is good by using the optimized servo control parameters, the response speed of the system is fast (the rise time is 0.038 s) and has no overshoot, the adjustment time is 0.092s, the adjustment time is short, and the stability of the system is good, i.e., no longer time oscillation. These are consistent with preset dynamic performance optimization requirements.
On the basis of optimization of the embodiment, if the energy consumption in the system response process is further increased, the energy consumption is taken as an evaluation index SPI 3 Then, by definition w, with the aid of formula (3) 1 =w 2 =w 3 =1 and passes f according to actual requirements 3 Control SPI 3 The influence degree of the overall dynamic response evaluation function SOEF is substituted into the formula (3), so that the selected response characteristic evaluation index target function can be conveniently adjusted in real time and further integrated, and the performance of the servo system can be optimized as required.
It can be seen that the dynamic performance after the optimization by the method of the invention is obviously improved compared with that before the optimization. The optimization process is a continuously improved process, and in actual operation, values of parameters in the evaluation function can be further adjusted according to feedback of the optimization result, so that a better to optimal dynamic performance optimization result is obtained. For example according to f mentioned above i Value rule (f) i The performance evaluation index SP is represented by the larger the value isI i The larger the influence degree on the overall evaluation function is, when the overall evaluation function or the dynamic performance optimization requirement emphasizes a certain performance evaluation index, the corresponding system performance evaluation index influence coefficient f i May take a larger value), and p 0 、p 1 、p 2 Value rule (p) 0 、p 1 、p 2 The larger the value is, the larger the corresponding coefficient a or b is, which indicates that the overshoot phenomenon corresponding to the coefficient a or the transient oscillation phenomenon corresponding to the coefficient b has larger influence on the dynamic performance optimization result under the selected priority, and vice versa), and the p is readjusted 0 、p 1 、p 2 、f i And (5) optimizing the value.
For example: if it is desired to further increase the response speed of the system of this embodiment, f can be further increased 1 The value of (d); if the response speed and overshoot are found to meet the optimization requirement, but the transient oscillation phenomenon is further controlled, p can be further increased 2 The numerical value of (c).

Claims (5)

1. The feed system servo optimization method based on the scalable dynamic performance evaluation function is characterized by comprising the following steps of:
(1) Establishing a servo simulation model of a feeding system based on MATLAB;
(2) Determining a servo parameter optimization variable of a feed drive;
(3) Constructing a servo-optimized extensible dynamic performance evaluation function of the feeding system, selecting respective corresponding response characteristic index evaluation functions according to certain dynamic response performances to be comprehensively considered by the feeding system, combining actual optimization requirements of the feeding system, and substituting the functions into the extensible dynamic performance evaluation function to obtain a servo-optimized target evaluation function;
(4) Based on an intelligent optimization algorithm, aiming at the constructed target evaluation function, the performance optimization of the feeding system is realized through servo parameter optimization;
in step (3), the expression of the scalable dynamic performance evaluation function SOEF of the feed system servo optimization is as follows:
Figure FDA0003929008620000011
in the above formula, the feed system performance evaluation index SPI is a response characteristic index evaluation function, and n is the number of the system performance evaluation indexes SPI; w is a i Scalability factor in a scalable dynamic performance evaluation function for a single performance evaluation index, w i Has a value of 0 or 1; f. of i For system performance evaluation index SPI i The influence coefficient of (a);
the dynamic response performance of the feeding system comprises overshoot response performance and transient oscillation response performance, and the corresponding response characteristic index evaluation function is as follows:
Figure FDA0003929008620000012
in the above formula, phi s To displace a set value, phi a Is the actual value of the displacement; a represents overshoot balance coefficient, b represents transient oscillation balance coefficient, and the values of a and b are arbitrary positive numbers p 0 Is in the form of p 1 A linear function or form of t with respect to a time variable t 2 t 2 With respect to the time variable t, where p 1 Coefficient representing a linear function of time, p 2 Coefficient representing a quadratic time function, p 0 、p 1 、p 2 Are all positive numbers.
2. The scalable dynamic performance evaluation function-based feed system servo optimization method of claim 1, wherein in step (2), the servo parameter optimization variables comprise position loop gain, velocity loop gain, current loop gain and integration time.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the feeding system servo optimization method based on the scalable dynamic performance evaluation function is performed when a performance evaluation index SPI does not affect the scalable dynamic performance evaluation function SOEF,w i =0, i.e. the performance evaluation index is not taken into account in the optimization of the response characteristics of the feed system; when a certain performance evaluation index SPI has an influence on the scalable dynamic performance evaluation function SOEF, w i =1, i.e. the performance evaluation index is taken into account in the optimization process of the response characteristics of the feed system; when w is i When =1, by f i To further control the SPI i The degree of influence on the overall evaluation function.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the overshoot trade-off factor a and the transient oscillation trade-off factor b have the following priorities: preference for positive numbers p 0 Then choose the shape as p 1 t as a function of time, and finally selecting the form p 2 t 2 A quadratic time function of (d); when the overshoot phenomenon is emphasized more on the optimization requirement of the overshoot and transient oscillation response performance, the priority of the value of the corresponding overshoot weighing coefficient a is higher than that of the transient oscillation weighing coefficient b, and the values of a and b meet p 0 >p 1 >p 2 (ii) a Conversely, when the transient oscillation phenomenon is emphasized more by the optimization requirement of overshoot and transient oscillation response performance, the priority of the value of the corresponding transient oscillation weighing coefficient b is higher than that of the overshoot weighing coefficient a, and the values of a and b meet p 0 >p 1 >p 2
5. The method of claim 4, wherein when the overshoot response performance and the transient oscillation response performance are optimized, and the overshoot response performance and the transient oscillation response performance are the same or similar in importance to the optimization requirements, the overshoot tradeoff coefficient a and the transient oscillation tradeoff coefficient b have the same priority.
CN201811265249.XA 2018-10-29 2018-10-29 Feeding system servo optimization method based on scalable dynamic performance evaluation function Active CN109145522B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201811265249.XA CN109145522B (en) 2018-10-29 2018-10-29 Feeding system servo optimization method based on scalable dynamic performance evaluation function

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201811265249.XA CN109145522B (en) 2018-10-29 2018-10-29 Feeding system servo optimization method based on scalable dynamic performance evaluation function

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN109145522A CN109145522A (en) 2019-01-04
CN109145522B true CN109145522B (en) 2023-04-07

Family

ID=64806486

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201811265249.XA Active CN109145522B (en) 2018-10-29 2018-10-29 Feeding system servo optimization method based on scalable dynamic performance evaluation function

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN109145522B (en)

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6876381B2 (en) * 2001-01-10 2005-04-05 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. System and method for providing a scalable objective metric for automatic video quality evaluation employing interdependent objective metrics
WO2009096169A1 (en) * 2008-01-29 2009-08-06 Panasonic Corporation Motor control characteristic evaluation device and motor control characteristic presentation method
CN102929207B (en) * 2012-11-09 2015-01-21 西安交通大学 Optimization method of control parameters of servo system of numerical controlled machine tool
CN105103437B (en) * 2013-03-29 2018-05-15 松下知识产权经营株式会社 The service regulation method of motor drive
JP5810283B2 (en) * 2013-04-10 2015-11-11 パナソニックIpマネジメント株式会社 Motor drive device
JP6165585B2 (en) * 2013-10-11 2017-07-19 株式会社日立製作所 Control gain optimization system for plant controller
CN106208867A (en) * 2016-07-16 2016-12-07 沈阳航空航天大学 A kind of control system for permanent-magnet synchronous motor pid parameter optimization method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN109145522A (en) 2019-01-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN104300863B (en) A kind of adaptive sliding-mode observer method of varying load PMSM Speed
Dani et al. Performance evaluation of PID, LQR and MPC for DC motor speed control
US11029650B2 (en) Machine learning device, control system, and machine learning method
CN104980069B (en) A kind of brshless DC motor double loop speed-regulating system Multipurpose Optimal Method
CN110138293A (en) A kind of BP neural network optimization chaotic control method based on double-fed wind power system
CN113922724B (en) Permanent magnet synchronous motor control method
CN105305895A (en) Torque feedback and commutation compensation-based brushless motor control method
CN108964535A (en) A kind of control method for brushless direct current motor based on algorithm based on sliding mode prediction
CN109507873B (en) Bandwidth parameterization direct current speed regulation feedback control system
JP4015589B2 (en) Plant control equipment
CN109145522B (en) Feeding system servo optimization method based on scalable dynamic performance evaluation function
CN106877769A (en) A kind of method of servomotor plus of speed controller parameter self-tuning
Dubey et al. A PID controlled real time analysis of DC motor
CN110488600B (en) lQR optimized brushless DC motor speed regulation neural network PID controller
Deraz Genetic tuned PID controller based speed control of DC motor drive
CN106292285B (en) A kind of fuzzy adapted PI control device parameter determination method
CN113556073A (en) Implementation method for explicit model prediction control of permanent magnet synchronous motor
CN114977929A (en) Permanent magnet synchronous motor control and parameter optimization method based on load torque observation
CN106338911A (en) Expert PID control method applied to rotary electromechanical actuator servo system
CN113343592B (en) Intelligent control method for DQN (direct current) of permanent magnet synchronous motor of new energy aircraft
Shrivastva et al. Performance analysis of speed control of direct current (dc) motor using traditional tuning controller
CN110879526B (en) Fractional order controller and parameter setting method thereof
CN104238359A (en) Control method of large electromechanical mixed inertia system
Gao et al. Servo press drive using model predictive control of motor current
Tarczewski et al. Application of artificial bee colony algorithm to auto-tuning of linear-quadratic regulator for PMSM position control

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant
TR01 Transfer of patent right
TR01 Transfer of patent right

Effective date of registration: 20240428

Address after: 230000 b-1018, Woye Garden commercial office building, 81 Ganquan Road, Shushan District, Hefei City, Anhui Province

Patentee after: HEFEI WISDOM DRAGON MACHINERY DESIGN Co.,Ltd.

Country or region after: China

Address before: 215009 CREE Road, Suzhou hi tech Zone, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, No. 1

Patentee before: SUZHOU University OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Country or region before: China

TR01 Transfer of patent right
TR01 Transfer of patent right

Effective date of registration: 20240516

Address after: A5, 1st Floor, Building 12, No. 36 Zhongguancun South Street, Haidian District, Beijing, 100080

Patentee after: Beijing Hengyi Zhihui Technology Co.,Ltd.

Country or region after: China

Address before: 230000 b-1018, Woye Garden commercial office building, 81 Ganquan Road, Shushan District, Hefei City, Anhui Province

Patentee before: HEFEI WISDOM DRAGON MACHINERY DESIGN Co.,Ltd.

Country or region before: China