CN108921575A - A kind of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise green supplier discrimination method not known under incomplete information environment - Google Patents

A kind of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise green supplier discrimination method not known under incomplete information environment Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN108921575A
CN108921575A CN201810701697.3A CN201810701697A CN108921575A CN 108921575 A CN108921575 A CN 108921575A CN 201810701697 A CN201810701697 A CN 201810701697A CN 108921575 A CN108921575 A CN 108921575A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
supplier
index
green
value
potential
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
CN201810701697.3A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
李联辉
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
North Minzu University
Original Assignee
North Minzu University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by North Minzu University filed Critical North Minzu University
Priority to CN201810701697.3A priority Critical patent/CN108921575A/en
Publication of CN108921575A publication Critical patent/CN108921575A/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/018Certifying business or products

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a kind of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise green supplier discrimination methods not known under incomplete information environment.Initially set up the stratification index system of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise green supplier identification;Obtain the index value of the potential green supplier of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise;The index value of potential green supplier is handled using degree of membership;Consider that green supplier recognizes the mutual influence relationship of index at different levels in stratification index system, construct green supplier's identification network analytical framework of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise, judge of the expert to index importance is indicated using Trapezoid Fuzzy Number, the evaluation result of multidigit expert is integrated using coarse boundary interval, thus the different degree of parameter;Potential green supplier is recognized based on two rank weighted evidence theoretical models, obtains classic green supplier.The present invention is using convenient, it is easy to accomplish, it is provided a method not know the identification of the green supplier under incomplete information environment.

Description

A kind of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise green supplier not known under incomplete information environment distinguishes Knowledge method
Technical field
The present invention relates to greening supply chain planning field, specially a kind of bearing system not known under incomplete information environment Make enterprise Green supplier discrimination method.
Background technique
Bearing is a kind of important spare part in contemporary mechanical equipment.Its major function is to support mechanical rotary body, is reduced Coefficient of friction in its motion process, and guarantee its rotating accuracy.Bearing mnanufacture plays important angle in entire national economy Color.With the enhancing of global environmental consciousness, Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise is faced with more stringent environmental requirement.Greening supply chain is Inevitable choice as Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise response environment problem.Greening supply chain planning includes green supplier's identification, green The links such as product design, green production, green marketing and waste recovery.Green supplier's identification is in the upper of entire supply chain Trip, the influence to environmental protection and save the cost can be transmitted to each section in downstream by supply chain.
In greening supply chain planning process, various factors becomes the relationship between supplier and Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise It is complicated and fuzzy.The greening supply chain planning of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise must be continuously improved, to adapt to environment complicated and changeable.? Under this background, green supplier's identification plays extremely important in terms of reducing cost, improving product quality and the market competitiveness Effect.By effective identification to supplier, timely adjustable strategies can promote the green of entire supply chain, develop in a healthy way. As it can be seen that green supplier's identification plays conclusive effect in greening supply chain planning, entire supply chain directly decide Competitiveness.The rise of internet is that the green supplier's identification of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise implementation is provided convenience, but faces numerous confessions Quotient is answered, Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise still can not quickly select the green supplier for meeting self-demand, how fast and effeciently implement green Color supplier identification becomes the critical issue in Modern Green supply chain planning.
Urgent problem to be solved mainly includes in current green supplier identification:(1) in the reality of green supplier identification In work, the information of supplier is not clear enough, often smudgy, or even loses.Deterministic identification model has been unable to meet The needs of increasingly complicated identification environment.(2) green supplier's identification is a complicated decision problem, and index is mutually closed Connection.In parameter different degree, the core concept of traditional analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is will to establish isolated, level index system. Upper layer element is only considered to the dominating role of bottom element, and the element in same layer is considered mutually independent.So And the relationship between these indexs is often interdependence, also provides feedback effects sometimes.Therefore, traditional step analysis Method can not handle the mutually influence relationship of the complexity between index, and the different degree of acquisition is unscientific.(3) important in solution index When spending, used at present is the judgement that expert is described with perfect number to index relative importance, cannot reflect practical thinking Ambiguity and subjectivity indicate that the judgement of expert is more reasonable with fuzzy number.After introducing fuzzy number and indicating expert judgments, such as What analysis and processing fuzzy number bring inaccuracy and inconsistency are also the problem for needing to solve.
Summary of the invention
For solve Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise in green supplier identification supplier information is indefinite, index mutually influences and special The fuzzy problem of family's thinking, the present invention provides a kind of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise greens not known under incomplete information environment Supplier's discrimination method.Initially set up the stratification index system of green supplier's identification;Obtain the finger of potential green supplier Scale value;The index value of potential green supplier is handled using degree of membership;Consider that green supplier recognizes in stratification index system The mutual influence relationship of indexs at different levels is constructed the network analysis frame of green supplier's identification, is indicated using Trapezoid Fuzzy Number special Judge of the family to index importance, the evaluation result of multidigit expert is integrated using coarse boundary interval, thus parameter Different degree;Potential green supplier is recognized based on two rank weighted evidence theoretical models, classic green is obtained and supplies Answer quotient.
The technical scheme is that:
A kind of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise green supplier discrimination method not known under incomplete information environment, feature It is, includes the following steps:
Step 1:Establish the stratification index system of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise green supplier identification;
Indicate that green supplier recognizes general objective with AO, AO includes four first class index:Product attribute C1, internal competition power C2, external competitive power C3With collaboration capabilities C4
C1Including four two-level index:Monovalent C1,1, critical size error C1,2, service C1,3, degree of flexibility C1,4;C1,1、 C1,2Belong to metered dose, C1,3、C1,4Belong to qualitative type;
C2Including three two-level index:Innovation ability C2,1, manufacturing capacity C2,2, adaptability C2,3;C2,1、C2,2、C2,3Belong to In qualitative type;
C3Including four two-level index:Economic environment C3,1, geographical environment C3,2, social environment C3,3, legal environment C3,4; C3,1、 C3,2、C3,3、C3,4Belong to qualitative type;
C4Including four two-level index:Technology compatibility C4,1, culture compatibility C4,2, information platform compatibility C4,3, reputation C4,4;C4,1、C4,2、C4,3、C4,4Belong to qualitative type;
Step 2:Obtain the index value of the potential green supplier of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise;
For metered dose index C1,1、C1,2, directly acquire the index value of potential green supplier;
For qualitative type index C1,3、C1,4、C2,1、C2,2、C2,3、C3,1、C3,2、C3,3、C3,4、C4,1、C4,2、C4,3、 C4,4, by After manager investigates the actual conditions of potential green supplier, marking is provided as index value;
If performance of the potential green supplier in certain index is completely specified, index value exact value table Show;If potential performance of the green supplier in certain index be it is uncertain, which is indicated with section;If Potential performance of the green supplier in certain index is totally unknown, then the index value be it is incomplete, with null value table Show;
Step 3:The index value of the potential green supplier of potential Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise is handled using degree of membership;
There is potential green supplier of M family, successively uses x1,x2,...,xMIt indicates;Potential green supplier xrIn index Cj,lOn Index value vr,(j,l)It indicates, wherein r=1,2 ..., M, j=1,2 ..., N, l=1,2 ..., nj;Standardization index value v′r,(j,l)Calculation method be:If index Cj,lBelong to income class index, then v 'r,(j,l)=vr,(j,l)/max{v1,(j,l), v2,(j,l),...,vM,(j,l)};If index Cj,lBelong to cost class index, then v 'r,(j,l)=min { v1,(j,l),v2,(j,l),..., vM,(j,l)}/vr,(j,l);C1,1、C1,2Belong to cost class index, C1,3、C1,4、C2,1、C2,2、C2,3、C3,1、 C3,2、C3,3、C3,4、 C4,1、C4,2、C4,3、C4,4Belong to income class index;
Score value, which is arranged, is:π1=0.1, π2=0.3, π3=0.5, π4=0.7, π5=0.9, it is corresponding in turn to comment:It is very poor G1, difference G2, medium G3, good G4, fine G5;G1、G2、G3、G4、G5Corresponding standardization index value successively uses v '(j,l)(G1), v′(j,l)(G2),v′(j,l)(G3),v′(j,l)(G4),v′(j,l)(G5) indicate, calculation method is:
v′(j,l)(G1)=min { v '1,(j,l),v′2,(j,l),...,v′M,(j,l),
v′(j,l)(G5)=max { v '1,(j,l),v′2,(j,l),...,v′M,(j,l),
Index value belongs to comment GuDegree of membership βuIt indicates, using degree of membership βuTo handle potential green supplier xr's In index Cj,lOn index value vr,(j,l), the value of utility τ that is obtained after processingr,(j,l)It indicates;If vr,(j,l)Equal to accurate Value χ1Or it is equal to section [χ12], if v '(j,l)(Gp)≤χ1≤v′(j,l)(Gp+1) or v '(j,l)(Gp)≤χ1≤χ2≤v′(j,l) (Gp+1), wherein p=1,2,3,4, then τr,(j,l)pπpp+1πp+1;If v '(j,l)(Gp)≤χ1≤v′(j,l)(Gp+1) and v '(j,l) (Gp+1)≤χ2≤v′(j,l)(Gp+2), wherein p=1,2,3, then τr,(j,l)pπpp+1πp+1p+2πp+2;If v '(j,l)(Gp)≤ χ1≤v′(j,l)(Gp+1) and v '(j,l)(Go)≤χ2≤v′(j,l)(Go+1), wherein p=1,2,3,4, o=1,2,3,4, and o > p+1, Then τr,(j,l)pπpp+1πp+1+...+βoπoo+1πo+1
Step 4:Consider that Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise green supplier recognizes the mutual influence of index at different levels in stratification index system Relationship, the network analysis frame of building Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise green supplier identification;
Control layer element is AO;Network layer includes following element group:C1,C2,…,CN, wherein N=4;Element group CiIncluding ElementWherein i=1,2 ..., N, niIndicate CiThe element number for being included, then n1=4, n2=3, n3=4, n4 =4;Each element group mutually influences, and the element for including in each element group also mutually influences;
Step 5:Judge of the expert to index importance is indicated using Trapezoid Fuzzy Number, is collected using coarse boundary interval At the evaluation result of multidigit expert, thus the different degree of parameter;
Step 5.1:Using control layer elements A O as criterion, with element group CjElements Cj,lFor secondary criterion, wherein j=1, 2 ..., N, l=1,2 ..., nj, i=1,2 ..., N;
According to element group CiIncluded element is to Cj,lInfluence degree, carry out element group CiThe indirect advantage of included element Compare;Q experts are shared, the reciprocal jdgement matrix of Trapezoid Fuzzy Number that wherein expert k is provided isHave:
Here, k=1,2 ..., q,It indicates " to be directed to Elements Cj,l, Elements Ci,hCompared to Elements Ci,gIndirect advantage score ", Wherein g, h=1,2 ..., niAnd g ≠ h;It is a Trapezoid Fuzzy Number, is expressed as WithIt is positive real number and satisfaction
To the reciprocal jdgement matrix of Trapezoid Fuzzy NumberIt carries out consistency check and goes to step 5.2 if qualified; If unqualified, by k pairs of expertIt is adjusted;The reciprocal jdgement matrix of the Trapezoid Fuzzy Number of other experts is held The same operation of row, until the reciprocal jdgement matrix of q Trapezoid Fuzzy Number passes through consistency check;
Step 5.2:By Ek,i,(j,l)Dismantling is four matrixes:
Step 5.3:Based on A1,i,(j,l),A2,i,(j,l),...,Aq,i,(j,l), construct group decision matrixIts InFor aggregate form,ForIts coarse boundary interval isWhereinForGatheringIn coarse lower limit value and coarse upper limit value;
Step 5.4:Set of computationsCoarse boundary intervalArithmetic average form WhereinFor setCoarse lower limit value and thick Rough upper limit value;
Step 5.5:Construct coarse jdgement matrixBy EAi,(j,l)Dismantling is coarse lower limit value MatrixWith coarse upper limit value matrix
Step 5.6:For EAi,(j,l),-And EAi,(j,l),+, the feature vector for corresponding to maximum eigenvalue is calculated, respectively:WhereinRespectively For VAi,(j,l),-、VAi,(j,l),+Value in h dimension, h=1,2 ..., ni
Step 5.7:Building setWherein
Step 5.8:Similarly, forIt repeats to walk Rapid 5.3, to step 5.7, are gathered
Step 5.9:Calculate vectorWherein:
Step 5.10:By vectorSwitch toWhereinωi,(j,l)For CiMiddle element is to Cj,lStandardization influence degree vector;
Step 5.11:Step 5.1 is repeated to step 5.10, until calculating
Step 5.12:Construct matrixHave:
Wherein, Ωi,jColumn vector be ωi,(j,l)
Step 5.13:Step 5.1 is repeated to step 5.12, calculates all Ωi,j, wherein j=1,2 ..., N, i= 1,2,...,N;The hypermatrix Ω under control layer elements A O is constructed, is had:
Step 5.14:According to C under control layer elements A O1,C2,...,CNTo CjInfluence degree, carry out C1,C2,...,CN Indirect advantage compare, using the method as step 5.1 to step 5.11, obtain relative Link Importance matrix Ψ= (ψi,j)N×N, have:
Wherein column vector ψ,j=[ψ1,j2,j,...,ψN,j]TFor C1,C2,...,CNTo CjStandardization influence degree to Amount;
Step 5.15:Calculate the weighted type of hypermatrix ΩHaveWherein i=1,2 ..., N, j=1, 2,...,N;
Step 5.16:It is rightSquaring operations are executed, until converging to stable stateI.e.
Step 5.17:It takesAny one column, as network layer all elements Different degree vector, be expressed as:
Step 5.18:Calculate each element group C in network layer1,C2,...,CNDifferent degree, wherein CjDifferent degree beIt, will under the premise of guaranteeing different degree proportionate relationshipDifferent degreeIt amplifies, makes It is amplifiedMiddle maximum value is 0.95;It is right respectively using same methodDifferent degree Different degreeDifferent degreeC1, C2..., CNDifferent degree θ12,...,θNIt amplifies;
Step 6:The potential green supplier of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise is distinguished based on two rank weighted evidence theoretical models Know, obtains classic green supplier;
Step 6.1:Potential green supplier has M, successively usesIt indicates;Define potential green supply quotient setFor identification framework Θ, i.e.,With power set 2ΘIndicate the set of all subsets in Θ, hereIt is independent mutually, 2ΘIn element number be 2M;For anyDefinition meetsWith's Set function mass:2Θ→ [0,1] is the basic probability assignment function on identification framework Θ;For anyDefinition meets'sFor burnt member;
In index Cj,lOn, calculate burnt memberWeighting basic probability assignment functional valueWherein s=1, 2 ..., M, M+1, hereCalculation be:
Step 6.2:It is successively calculated by step 6.1It will It is inputted as evidence, carries out evidence fusion:
Wherein
Step 6.3:It is calculated using the method for step 6.2First rank evidence Fusion is completed;
Step 6.4:In index C1On, calculate burnt memberWeighting basic probability assignment functional value Calculation be:
Step 6.5:It is calculated using the method for step 6.4It will It is inputted as evidence, carries out evidence fusion:
Wherein
Second-order evidence fusion is completed;
Step 6.6:It pressesIt is right from big to smallIt is ranked up, arrange first place is Classic green supplier.
The beneficial effects of the invention are as follows:
(1) index value that potential green supplier is handled using degree of membership, solves the green supply of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise The indefinite problem of supplier information in quotient's identification;
(2) consider that green supplier recognizes the mutual influence relationship of index at different levels in stratification index system, construct bearing system The green supplier's identification network analytical framework for making enterprise solves the problems, such as that index mutually influences in green supplier's identification;
(3) judge of the expert to index importance is indicated using Trapezoid Fuzzy Number, is integrated using coarse boundary interval The evaluation result of multidigit expert, thus the different degree of parameter, based on two rank weighted evidence theoretical models come to potential green Supplier recognizes, and obtains classic green supplier, solves the ambiguity of expert's thinking in green supplier's identification Problem;
(4) this method is using convenient, it is easy to accomplish.
Detailed description of the invention
Fig. 1 is that a kind of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise green supplier not known under incomplete information environment provided by the invention distinguishes The flow chart of knowledge method;
Fig. 2 is that a kind of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise green supplier not known under incomplete information environment provided by the invention distinguishes The green supplier of knowledge method recognizes stratification index system schematic diagram;
Fig. 3 is that a kind of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise green supplier not known under incomplete information environment provided by the invention distinguishes Green supplier's identification network analytical framework schematic diagram of knowledge method.
Specific embodiment
The description present invention combined with specific embodiments below, so that advantages and features of the invention can be easier to by this field skill Art personnel understanding, so as to make a clearer definition of the protection scope of the present invention.
Embodiment:
To Mr. Yu's Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise, there are three potential bearing retainer suppliersIt is required that being supplied from this three Classic green supplier is picked out in quotient.
Implementation steps are as follows:
Step 1:Establish the stratification index system of green supplier's identification;
Indicate that green supplier recognizes general objective with AO, AO includes four first class index:Product attribute C1, internal competition power C2, external competitive power C3With collaboration capabilities C4
C1Including four two-level index:Monovalent C1,1, critical size error C1,2, service C1,3, degree of flexibility C1,4;C1,1、 C1,2Belong to metered dose, C1,3、C1,4Belong to qualitative type;
C2Including three two-level index:Innovation ability C2,1, manufacturing capacity C2,2, adaptability C2,3;C2,1、C2,2、C2,3Belong to In qualitative type;
C3Including four two-level index:Economic environment C3,1, geographical environment C3,2, social environment C3,3, legal environment C3,4; C3,1、 C3,2、C3,3、C3,4Belong to qualitative type;
C4Including four two-level index:Technology compatibility C4,1, culture compatibility C4,2, information platform compatibility C4,3, reputation C4,4;C4,1、C4,2、C4,3、C4,4Belong to qualitative type;
Step 2:Obtain the index value of potential green supplier;
For metered dose index C1,1、C1,2, directly acquire the index value of potential green supplier;
For qualitative type index C1,3、C1,4、C2,1、C2,2、C2,3、C3,1、C3,2、C3,3、C3,4、C4,1、C4,2、C4,3、 C4,4, by After manager investigates the actual conditions of potential green supplier, marking is provided as index value;
If performance of the potential green supplier in certain index is completely specified, index value exact value table Show;If potential performance of the green supplier in certain index be it is uncertain, which is indicated with section;If Potential performance of the green supplier in certain index is totally unknown, then the index value be it is incomplete, with null value table Show;
The index value of the potential green supplier of three got is as shown in the table:
In C1,1On the unit of index value be:Member indicates the unit price of supplied retainer;In C1,2On index value Unit is:Mm indicates the critical dimension errors value of supplied retainer;Index value in remaining index is manager Marking;
Step 3:The index value of potential green supplier is handled using degree of membership;
C1,1、C1,2Belong to cost class index, C1,3、C1,4、C2,1、C2,2、C2,3、C3,1、C3,2、C3,3、C3,4、C4,1、C4,2、 C4,3、C4,4Belong to income class index;The standardization index value of three potential green suppliers is as shown in the table:
Score value, which is arranged, is:π1=0.1, π2=0.3, π3=0.5, π4=0.7, π5=0.9, it is corresponding in turn to comment:It is very poor G1, difference G2, medium G3, good G4, fine G5;With the index value v ' that standardizes1,(1,1)=0.0023, v '2,(1,1)=0.0669, v′3,(1,1)For=1.0000, calculate: v′(,1)(G1)=0.0023, v '(1,1)(G5)=1.0000, v '(1,1)(G2)= 0.2517, v '(1,1)(G3)=0.5011, v '(1,1)(G4)=0.7506; π1=0.1, π2=0.3, π3=0.5, π4=0.7, π5 =0.9;So for v '2,(1,1)=0.0669, calculating degree of membership is β1=0.7410, β2=0.2590, then τ2,(1,1)1π12π2=0.1518;
The value of utility of three potential green suppliers calculate for:
Step 4:Consider that green supplier recognizes the mutual influence relationship of index at different levels in stratification index system, building green The network analysis frame of supplier's identification;
Control layer element is AO;Network layer includes following element group:C1,C2,…,CN, wherein N=4;Element group CiIncluding ElementWherein i=1,2 ..., N, niIndicate CiThe element number for being included, then n1=4, n2=3, n3=4, n4 =4;Each element group mutually influences, and the element for including in each element group also mutually influences;
Step 5:Judge of the expert to index importance is indicated using Trapezoid Fuzzy Number, is collected using coarse boundary interval At the evaluation result of multidigit expert, thus the different degree of parameter;
Step 5.1:Using control layer elements A O as criterion, with element group C2Elements C2,1For secondary criterion, according to element group C1 Included element is to C2,1Influence degree, carry out element group C1The indirect advantage of included element compares;4 experts are shared, The reciprocal jdgement matrix of the Trapezoid Fuzzy Number provided is followed successively by:
Respectively to E1,1,(2,1),E2,1,(2,1),E3,1,(2,1)And E4,1,(2,1)Consistency check is carried out, is passed through, step is executed 5.2;
Step 5.2:By Ek,1,(2,1)Dismantling is four matrixes: WithWherein k=1,2,3,4;WithFor, have:
Step 5.3:Based on A1,1,(2,1),A2,1,(2,1),A3,1,(2,1),A4,1,(2,1), construct group decision matrix For:
WithFor, it calculates:
Coarse boundary interval be
Coarse boundary interval be
Coarse boundary interval be
Coarse boundary interval be
Step 5.4:Set of computationsCoarse boundary intervalArithmetic average form be
Step 5.5:Construct coarse jdgement matrixFor:
By EA1,(2,1)Dismantling is coarse lower limit value matrixWith coarse upper limit value matrix
Step 5.6:ForWithCalculate the feature for corresponding to maximum eigenvalue Vector, respectively:VA1,(2,1),-=[0.71,0.44,0.45,0.30]T、VA1,(2,1),+=[0.65,0.49,0.47, 0.34]T
Step 5.7:Construct set GA1,(2,1)={ 0.68,0.47,0.46,0.32 };
Step 5.8:Similarly, for:
B1,1,(2,1),B2,1,(2,1),B3,1,(2,1),B4,1,(2,1),
C1,1,(2,1),C2,1,(2,1),C3,1,(2,1),C4,1,(2,1),
D1,1,(2,1),D2,1,(2,1),D3,1,(2,1),D4,1,(2,1),
Step 5.3 is repeated to step 5.7, obtains GB1,(2,1)={ 0.73,0.51,0.66,0.58 };GC1,(2,1)= {0.82,0.67,0.73,0.69};GD1,(2,1)={ 0.95,0.77,0.83,0.75 };
Step 5.9:Calculate outgoing vector ω1,(2,1)=[0.38,0.29,0.31,0.28]T
Step 5.10:By vector ω1,(2,1)=[0.38,0.29,0.31,0.28]TSwitch to ω1,(2,1)=[0.30,0.23, 0.25,0.22]T
Step 5.11:Step 5.1 is repeated to step 5.10, is calculated:
ω1,(2,2)=[0.28,0.41,0.17,0.14]T,
ω1,(2,3)=[0.33,0.34,0.13,0.20]T
Step 5.12:Construct matrixHave:
Step 5.13:Step 5.1 is repeated to step 5.12, calculates all Ωi,j, wherein j=1,2,3,4, i=1, 2,3,4;The hypermatrix Ω under control layer elements A O is constructed, is had:
Step 5.14:According to C under control layer elements A O1,C2,C3,C4To CjInfluence degree, carry out C1,C2,C3,C4Between The advantage of connecing compares, wherein j=1, and 2,3,4;Using the method as step 5.1 to step 5.11, relative Link Importance square is obtained Battle array Ψ=(ψi,j)4×4, have:
Step 5.15:Calculate the weighted type of hypermatrix ΩHaveWherein i=1,2,3,4, j=1,2,3, 4;
Step 5.16:It is rightSquaring operations are executed, until converging to stable stateI.e.Here as t=4 Converge to stable state
Step 5.17:It takesAny one column, as network layer all elements C1,1,C1,2,C1,3,C1,4,C2,1,C2,2, C2,3,C3,1,C3,2,C3,3,C3,4,C4,1,C4,2,C4,3,C4,4Different degree vector:
θ=[0.12,0.11,0.10,0.09,0.06,0.06,0.07,0.05,0.04,0.04,0.04,0 .06,0.05, 0.05,0.06]T
Step 5.18:Calculate each element group C in network layer1,C2,C3,C4Different degree θ1234For:0.42,0.19, 0.17,0.22;
Under the premise of guaranteeing different degree proportionate relationship, by C1,1,C1,2,C1,3,C1,4Different degree θ1,11,21,31,4 It is enlarged into:0.95,0.87, 0.79,0.71;By C2,1,C2,2,C2,3Different degree θ2,12,22,3It is enlarged into:0.95,0.87, 0.79,0.71;By C3,1,C3,2,C3,3,C3,4Different degree θ3,13,23,33,4It is enlarged into:0.95,0.87,0.79, 0.71;By C4,1,C4,2,C4,3,C4,4Different degree θ4,14,24,34,4It is enlarged into: 0.95,0.87,0.79,0.71;It will C1,C2,C3,C4Different degree θ1234It is enlarged into:0.95,0.87,0.79,0.71;
Step 6:Potential green supplier is recognized based on two rank weighted evidence theoretical models, is obtained classic Green supplier;
Step 6.1:Potential green supplier has 3, successively usesIt indicates;Define potential green supply quotient setFor identification framework Θ, i.e.,With power set 2ΘIndicate the set of all subsets in Θ, hereMutually It is mutually independent, 2ΘIn element number be 23;For anyDefinition meetsWithSet function mass:2Θ→ [0,1] is the basic probability assignment function on identification framework Θ;For anyDefinition meets 'sFor burnt member;
In index C1,1On, calculate burnt memberWeighting basic probability assignment functional valueFor:
Step 6.2:It is successively calculated by step 6.1It obtains:
It willIt is inputted as evidence, carries out evidence fusion, obtain It arrives:
Step 6.3:It is calculated using the method for step 6.2It obtains:
First rank evidence fusion is completed;
Step 6.4:In index C1On, calculate burnt memberWeighting basic probability assignment functional valueIt obtains:
Step 6.5:It is calculated using the method for step 6.4It obtains:
It willIt is inputted as evidence, carries out evidence fusion, obtain It arrives:
Mass (Θ)=0.5792;
Second-order evidence fusion is completed;
Step 6.6:It pressesIt is right from big to smallIt is ranked up, obtainsAs classic green supplier.

Claims (1)

1. a kind of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise green supplier discrimination method not known under incomplete information environment, which is characterized in that Include the following steps:
Step 1:Establish the stratification index system of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise green supplier identification;
Indicate that green supplier recognizes general objective with AO, AO includes four first class index:Product attribute C1, internal competition power C2, outside Portion competitiveness C3With collaboration capabilities C4
C1Including four two-level index:Monovalent C1,1, critical size error C1,2, service C1,3, degree of flexibility C1,4;C1,1、C1,2Belong to Metered dose, C1,3、C1,4Belong to qualitative type;
C2Including three two-level index:Innovation ability C2,1, manufacturing capacity C2,2, adaptability C2,3;C2,1、C2,2、C2,3Belong to qualitative Type;
C3Including four two-level index:Economic environment C3,1, geographical environment C3,2, social environment C3,3, legal environment C3,4;C3,1、 C3,2、C3,3、C3,4Belong to qualitative type;
C4Including four two-level index:Technology compatibility C4,1, culture compatibility C4,2, information platform compatibility C4,3, reputation C4,4; C4,1、C4,2、C4,3、C4,4Belong to qualitative type;
Step 2:Obtain the index value of the potential green supplier of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise;
For metered dose index C1,1、C1,2, directly acquire the index value of potential green supplier;
For qualitative type index C1,3、C1,4、C2,1、C2,2、C2,3、C3,1、C3,2、C3,3、C3,4、C4,1、C4,2、C4,3、C4,4, by managing After person investigates the actual conditions of potential green supplier, marking is provided as index value;
If potential performance of the green supplier in certain index be it is completely specified, which is indicated with exact value; If potential performance of the green supplier in certain index be it is uncertain, which is indicated with section;If potential Performance of the green supplier in certain index is totally unknown, then the index value be it is incomplete, indicated with null value;
Step 3:The index value of the potential green supplier of potential Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise is handled using degree of membership;
There is potential green supplier of M family, successively uses x1,x2,...,xMIt indicates;Potential green supplier xrIn index Cj,lOn finger Scale value vr,(j,l)It indicates, wherein r=1,2 ..., M, j=1,2 ..., N, l=1,2 ..., nj;Standardization index value v′r,(j,l)Calculation method be:If index Cj,lBelong to income class index, then v 'r,(j,l)=vr,(j,l)/max{v1,(j,l), v2,(j,l),...,vM,(j,l)};If index Cj,lBelong to cost class index, then v 'r,(j,l)=min { v1,(j,l),v2,(j,l),..., vM,(j,l)}/vr,(j,l);C1,1、C1,2Belong to cost class index, C1,3、C1,4、C2,1、C2,2、C2,3、C3,1、C3,2、C3,3、C3,4、C4,1、 C4,2、C4,3、C4,4Belong to income class index;
Score value, which is arranged, is:π1=0.1, π2=0.3, π3=0.5, π4=0.7, π5=0.9, it is corresponding in turn to comment:Very poor G1, it is poor G2, medium G3, good G4, fine G5;G1、G2、G3、G4、G5Corresponding standardization index value successively uses v '(j,l)(G1),v′(j,l)(G2), v′(j,l)(G3),v′(j,l)(G4),v′(j,l)(G5) indicate, calculation method is:
v′(j,l)(G1)=min { v '1,(j,l),v′2,(j,l),...,v′M,(j,l),
v′(j,l)(G5)=max { v '1,(j,l),v′2,(j,l),...,v′M,(j,l),
Index value belongs to comment GuDegree of membership βuIt indicates, using degree of membership βuTo handle potential green supplier xrIn index Cj,lOn index value vr,(j,l), the value of utility τ that is obtained after processingr,(j,l)It indicates;If vr,(j,l)Equal to exact value χ1Or it waits In section [χ12], if v '(j,l)(Gp)≤χ1≤v′(j,l)(Gp+1) or v '(j,l)(Gp)≤χ1≤χ2≤v′(j,l)(Gp+1), wherein p =1,2,3,4, then τr,(j,l)pπpp+1πp+1;If v '(j,l)(Gp)≤χ1≤v′(j,l)(Gp+1) and v '(j,l)(Gp+1)≤χ2≤ v′(j,l)(Gp+2), wherein p=1,2,3, then τr,(j,l)pπpp+1πp+1p+2πp+2;If v '(j,l)(Gp)≤χ1≤v′(j,l) (Gp+1) and v '(j,l)(Go)≤χ2≤v′(j,l)(Go+1), wherein p=1,2,3,4, o=1,2,3,4, and o > p+1, then τr,(j,l)pπpp+1πp+1+...+βoπoo+1πo+1
Step 4:Consider that Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise green supplier recognizes the mutual influence relationship of index at different levels in stratification index system, Construct the network analysis frame of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise green supplier identification;
Control layer element is AO;Network layer includes following element group:C1,C2,…,CN, wherein N=4;Element group CiIncluding elementWherein i=1,2 ..., N, niIndicate CiThe element number for being included, then n1=4, n2=3, n3=4, n4=4;Respectively Element group mutually influences, and the element for including in each element group also mutually influences;
Step 5:Judge of the expert to index importance is indicated using Trapezoid Fuzzy Number, is integrated using coarse boundary interval more The evaluation result of position expert, thus the different degree of parameter;
Step 5.1:Using control layer elements A O as criterion, with element group CjElements Cj,lFor secondary criterion, wherein j=1,2 ..., N, L=1,2 ..., nj, i=1,2 ..., N;
According to element group CiIncluded element is to Cj,lInfluence degree, carry out element group CiThe indirect odds ratio of included element Compared with;Q experts are shared, the reciprocal jdgement matrix of Trapezoid Fuzzy Number that wherein expert k is provided isHave:
Here, k=1,2 ..., q,It indicates " to be directed to Elements Cj,l, Elements Ci,hCompared to Elements Ci,gIndirect advantage score ", Wherein g, h=1,2 ..., niAnd g ≠ h;It is a Trapezoid Fuzzy Number, is expressed as WithIt is positive real number and satisfaction
To the reciprocal jdgement matrix of Trapezoid Fuzzy NumberIt carries out consistency check and goes to step 5.2 if qualified;If no Qualification, by k pairs of expertIt is adjusted;The reciprocal jdgement matrix of the Trapezoid Fuzzy Number of other experts is executed same Sample operation, until the reciprocal jdgement matrix of q Trapezoid Fuzzy Number passes through consistency check;
Step 5.2:By Ek,i,(j,l)Dismantling is four matrixes:
Step 5.3:Based on A1,i,(j,l),A2,i,(j,l),...,Aq,i,(j,l), construct group decision matrixWhereinFor aggregate form,ForIts coarse boundary interval isWhereinForGatheringIn coarse lower limit value and coarse upper limit value;
Step 5.4:Set of computationsCoarse boundary intervalArithmetic average form WhereinFor setCoarse lower limit value and thick Rough upper limit value;
Step 5.5:Construct coarse jdgement matrixBy EAi,(j,l)Dismantling is coarse lower limit value matrixWith coarse upper limit value matrix
Step 5.6:For EAi,(j,l),-And EAi,(j,l),+, the feature vector for corresponding to maximum eigenvalue is calculated, respectively:WhereinRespectively For VAi,(j,l),-、VAi,(j,l),+Value in h dimension, h=1,2 ..., ni
Step 5.7:Building setWherein
Step 5.8:Similarly, forRepeat step 5.3 To step 5.7, gathered
Step 5.9:Calculate vectorWherein:
Step 5.10:By vectorSwitch toWherein ωi,(j,l)For CiMiddle element is to Cj,lStandardization influence degree vector;
Step 5.11:Step 5.1 is repeated to step 5.10, until calculating
Step 5.12:Construct matrixHave:
Wherein, Ωi,jColumn vector be ωi,(j,l)
Step 5.13:Step 5.1 is repeated to step 5.12, calculates all Ωi,j, wherein j=1,2 ..., N, i=1, 2,...,N;The hypermatrix Ω under control layer elements A O is constructed, is had:
Step 5.14:According to C under control layer elements A O1,C2,...,CNTo CjInfluence degree, carry out C1,C2,...,CNIt is indirect Advantage compares, and using the method as step 5.1 to step 5.11, obtains relative Link Importance matrix Ψ=(ψi,j)N×N, have:
Wherein column vector ψ 'j=[ψ1,j2,j,...,ψN,j]TFor C1,C2,...,CNTo CjStandardization influence degree vector;
Step 5.15:Calculate the weighted type of hypermatrix ΩHaveWherein i=1,2 ..., N, j=1,2 ..., N;
Step 5.16:It is rightSquaring operations are executed, until converging to stable stateI.e.
Step 5.17:It takesAny one column, as network layer all elements Different degree vector, be expressed as:
Step 5.18:Calculate each element group C in network layer1,C2,...,CNDifferent degree, wherein CjDifferent degree be It, will under the premise of guaranteeing different degree proportionate relationshipDifferent degreeIt amplifies, makes amplifiedMiddle maximum value is 0.95;It is right respectively using same methodDifferent degree Different degreeDifferent degreeC1,C2,...,CNDifferent degree θ12,...,θNIt amplifies;
Step 6:The potential green supplier of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise is recognized based on two rank weighted evidence theoretical models, is obtained Obtain classic green supplier;
Step 6.1:Potential green supplier has M, successively usesIt indicates;Define potential green supply quotient setFor identification framework Θ, i.e.,With power set 2ΘIndicate the set of all subsets in Θ, hereIt is independent mutually, 2ΘIn element number be 2M;For anyDefinition meetsWith's Set function mass:2Θ→ [0,1] is the basic probability assignment function on identification framework Θ;For anyDefinition meets'sFor burnt member;
In index Cj,lOn, calculate burnt memberWeighting basic probability assignment functional valueWherein s=1,2 ..., M, M+ 1, hereCalculation be:
Step 6.2:It is successively calculated by step 6.1It will It is inputted as evidence, carries out evidence fusion:
Wherein
Step 6.3:It is calculated using the method for step 6.2First rank evidence fusion is complete At;
Step 6.4:In index C1On, calculate burnt memberWeighting basic probability assignment functional valueMeter Calculation mode is:
Step 6.5:It is calculated using the method for step 6.4It will It is inputted as evidence, carries out evidence fusion:
Wherein
Second-order evidence fusion is completed.
Step 6.6:It pressesIt is right from big to smallIt is ranked up, arranges the as optimal of first place Elegant green supplier.
CN201810701697.3A 2018-06-30 2018-06-30 A kind of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise green supplier discrimination method not known under incomplete information environment Withdrawn CN108921575A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810701697.3A CN108921575A (en) 2018-06-30 2018-06-30 A kind of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise green supplier discrimination method not known under incomplete information environment

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810701697.3A CN108921575A (en) 2018-06-30 2018-06-30 A kind of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise green supplier discrimination method not known under incomplete information environment

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN108921575A true CN108921575A (en) 2018-11-30

Family

ID=64422538

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201810701697.3A Withdrawn CN108921575A (en) 2018-06-30 2018-06-30 A kind of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise green supplier discrimination method not known under incomplete information environment

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN108921575A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110009415A (en) * 2019-04-02 2019-07-12 青海师范大学 The reputation prediction technique of new seller in a kind of e-commerce system

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110009415A (en) * 2019-04-02 2019-07-12 青海师范大学 The reputation prediction technique of new seller in a kind of e-commerce system

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Skibniewski et al. Evaluation of advanced construction technology with AHP method
CN109063976A (en) Intelligence manufacture capability maturity evaluation method based on Fuzzy AHP
CN103514259B (en) Abnormal data detection and modification method based on numerical value relevance model
CN103577888B (en) Method for optimization of product design schemes
CN107480856A (en) Based on the sale of electricity company power customer appraisal procedure for improving similarity to ideal solution ranking method
CN106228286A (en) A kind of data analysing method for the assessment of artificial customer service work quality
CN101540018A (en) Method and system for evaluating degree of application of enterprise information technology
CN104881003A (en) Effectiveness evaluation method for metering production facilities
CN109146611A (en) A kind of electric business product quality credit index analysis method and system
Ilangkumaran et al. Machine tool selection using AHP and VIKOR methodologies under fuzzy environment
Zhao et al. Enterprise human resource management index based on fuzzy system
Yin et al. Application of bootstrap-DEA with fuzzy computing in performance evaluation of forklift leasing supplier
Mbugua et al. Identification and Ranking of Key Performance Indicators in Building Construction Projects in Kenya
Zhuang et al. Examining antecedents, consequences, and contingencies of proactive environmental strategy
CN108921575A (en) A kind of Bearing Manufacturing Enterprise green supplier discrimination method not known under incomplete information environment
Shen Construction of performance evaluation system of human resource management in port foreign trade enterprises
Cattin et al. FURTHER BEYOND CONJOINT MEASUREMENT: TOWARD A COMPARISON OF METHODS.
CN116051055A (en) Digital project management system
Guan The quantitative evaluation on the advertisement design effects with fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy information
CN105931133A (en) Distribution transformer replacement priority evaluation method and device
CN106651462A (en) Evaluation method for second-hand device
Mahalik et al. Efficiency Measurement Using DEA and AHP: a case study on Indian ports.
CN110232527A (en) A kind of evaluation method of Highway Construction Project quality credit
CN116012037B (en) Method and device for replacing market price by intelligent material price, electronic equipment and medium
Aje et al. Assessment of factors affecting bid-no-bid decision of construction contractors in Nigeria

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
WW01 Invention patent application withdrawn after publication
WW01 Invention patent application withdrawn after publication

Application publication date: 20181130