CN108805406A - Air defence weapon system Object Threat Evaluation method - Google Patents

Air defence weapon system Object Threat Evaluation method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN108805406A
CN108805406A CN201810411954.XA CN201810411954A CN108805406A CN 108805406 A CN108805406 A CN 108805406A CN 201810411954 A CN201810411954 A CN 201810411954A CN 108805406 A CN108805406 A CN 108805406A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
target
threat
interception
value
urgency level
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201810411954.XA
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
郝小宁
王晓辉
周永伟
闫怀德
高恒
毛宇飞
张军
王延暴
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Xian Electronic Engineering Research Institute
Original Assignee
Xian Electronic Engineering Research Institute
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Xian Electronic Engineering Research Institute filed Critical Xian Electronic Engineering Research Institute
Priority to CN201810411954.XA priority Critical patent/CN108805406A/en
Publication of CN108805406A publication Critical patent/CN108805406A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0637—Strategic management or analysis, e.g. setting a goal or target of an organisation; Planning actions based on goals; Analysis or evaluation of effectiveness of goals
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10—Services
    • G06Q50/26—Government or public services
    • G06Q50/265—Personal security, identity or safety

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to a kind of air defence weapon system Object Threat Evaluation method, the factor that threat assessment considers mainly has：Target may attack strategic point, Target Type, target interception urgency level.By the value of each principal element of calculating, then by linear weighted function, air threat priority is calculated, target danger level is divided according to Threat later.

Description

Air defence weapon system Object Threat Evaluation method
Technical field
The invention belongs to weapon system design fields, and in particular to a kind of air defence weapon system Object Threat Evaluation method.
Background technology
The threat degree of target of air attack refers to target under conditions of not fought by air defense, to its object of attack into Extent of the destruction caused by row is possible when invading successful possibility and invading successfully.Object Threat Evaluation is fought according to higher level Resolution, operation prediction scheme, the target information for safeguarding strategic point situation and tracking, assess the process of targets'threat size.Target prestige Side of body assessment result is the Main Basiss of the operational commandings aid decisions such as target interception sequence, Target Assignment, Fire Distribution.
Whenever a country anti-null resource it is always limited, but be necessary for numerous defendance strategic points and carry For air defense coverage, and to launch air raids be dynamic, flexible and changeable, when air strike side defendance strategic points certain to anti-short side of mustering superior forces are assaulted When, especially in, air attack in force form into columns into when attacking, air defense firepower unit or tactical unit often face the target of saturation Quantity.For that purpose it is necessary to point " order of importance and emergency ", System Combat Effectiveness is improved by rational Target Assignment or Fire Distribution, it is excellent The target of first selection attack threat level high (i.e. value is big), to ensure that the potential threat that defensive range is subject to is minimum.
Traditional Object Threat Evaluation algorithm, the general threat judged to weapon position.It is anti-to short range or even part intermediate range Empty weapon system, this threat assessment algorithm is simple and effective, practical.But for medium-long range weapon system, deployment point from Farther out (generally higher than 20km) by defendance strategic point or covering area, since such weapon killing area frontal width and depth are larger, The strategic point safeguarded may have several, and its significance level also differs.Object Threat Evaluation algorithm traditional at this time is just difficult To meet the above demand.
Invention content
Technical problems to be solved
In order to avoid the shortcomings of the prior art, the present invention proposes a kind of new Object Threat Evaluation method, fit simultaneously Demand for short range and medium-long range air defence weapon system.
Technical solution
A kind of air defence weapon system Object Threat Evaluation method, it is characterised in that steps are as follows：
Step 1：The importance grade in strategic point is attacked using the possibility of target to assess the threat degree of target；Described wants The importance grade on ground is determined by higher level's command system or this grade of command system, is bound as prewar, value range be 1~ 10；
Step 2：The target type provided according to sensor, quantifies target type, provides target type quantized value WTT：
Large-scale target：WTT=10；
Jamming target：WTT=10；
Multiple targets：WTT=10；
Medium-sized target：WTT=8；
Precision target：WTT=6；
Helicopter：WTT=4；
Cruise missile：WTT=3；
Air-to-ground guided missile：WTT=7；
Target type is unknown：WTT=2；
Step 3：Calculate target interception urgency level Wtime；The target interception urgency level arrives in firepower list by plane with target The time length on first emitter region boundary is evaluated；It is divided into and closes on flight and from two kinds of situations of remote flight：
To closing on airbound target, target interception urgency level quantifies as the following formula
In formula, Δ t=15s, k1=6.73e-5；
To from remote airbound target, target interception urgency level quantifies as the following formula
In formula, Δ t=6s, k2=105；
Step 4：Calculate air threat priority W：
W=(ωob·Wob+ωTT·WTT+ωtime·Wtime)·kTC·10
In formula,
WobTo safeguard strategic point importance；
WTTFor target type quantized value；
WtimeFor target interception urgency level quantized value；
ωobTo safeguard the weight coefficient of strategic point grade, value 0.4；
ωTTFor the weight coefficient of target type, value 0.2；
ωtimeFor the weight coefficient of target interception urgency level, value 0.4；
Step 5：Divide target danger level
According to current furnished weapon system division methods both at home and abroad, the psychological bearing capability and mesh of people are considered The stability for marking threat sequercing is divided, as shown in the table using 9 grades of threat levels：
Advantageous effect
A kind of air defence weapon system Object Threat Evaluation method proposed by the present invention, advantageous effect and feature are as follows：
1) computational methods are simple, and real-time is high；
2) it is suitable for a variety of weapon system application scenarios.
Specific implementation mode
In conjunction with embodiment, the invention will be further described：
The threat degree of target of air attack is related to many uncertain factors and is difficult to the qualitative factor quantified, both domestic and external anti- Empty combat experience shows that the factor considered when the threat assessment to target should not be too many, principal element need to only be taken into account ?.Each factor is compared, is screened, important, relatively independent factor is extracted, the principal element as threat assessment. In the present invention, the factor that threat assessment considers mainly has：It is urgent that target may attack strategic point, Target Type, target interception Degree.By the value of each principal element of calculating, then by linear weighted function, air threat priority is calculated, is drawn later according to Threat Partial objectives for threat level.
Below by taking certain weapon system as an example, illustrate the embodiment of the invention：
1) the importance grade W in the possibility attack strategic point of target is usedobTo assess the threat degree of target.Strategic point it is important Degree grade is determined by higher level's command system or this grade of command system, is bound as prewar, WobValue range is 1~10；
2) target type provided according to sensor, quantifies target type, provides target type quantized value WTT：
Large-scale target：WTT=10；
Jamming target：WTT=10；
Multiple targets：WTT=10；
Medium-sized target：WTT=8；
Precision target：WTT=6；
Helicopter：WTT=4；
Cruise missile：WTT=3；
Air-to-ground guided missile：WTT=7；
Target type is unknown：WTT=2.
3) target interception urgency level W is calculatedtime.Target interception urgency level arrives in Fire Unit emitter region side by plane with target The time length on boundary is evaluated.It is divided into and closes on flight and from two kinds of situations of remote flight：
To closing on airbound target, target interception urgency level quantifies as the following formula
In formula, Δ t=15s, k1=6.73e-5.
To from remote airbound target, target interception urgency level quantifies as the following formula
In formula, Δ t=6s, k2=105。
4) air threat priority W is calculated.
Targets'threat is calculated as follows：
W=(ωob·Wob+ωTT·WTT+ωtime·Wtime)·kTC·10
In formula,
WobTo safeguard strategic point importance；
WTTFor target type quantized value；
WtimeFor target interception urgency level quantized value；
ωobTo safeguard the weight coefficient of strategic point grade, value 0.4；
ωTTFor the weight coefficient of target type, value 0.2；
ωtimeFor the weight coefficient of target interception urgency level, value 0.4；
5) target danger level is divided
According to current furnished weapon system division methods both at home and abroad, the psychological bearing capability and mesh of people are considered The stability for marking threat sequercing is divided, as shown in the table using 9 grades of threat levels：

Claims (1)

1. a kind of air defence weapon system Object Threat Evaluation method, it is characterised in that steps are as follows：
Step 1：The importance grade in strategic point is attacked using the possibility of target to assess the threat degree of target；The strategic point Importance grade is determined by higher level's command system or this grade of command system, is bound as prewar, and value range is 1~10；
Step 2：The target type provided according to sensor, quantifies target type, provides target type quantized value WTT：
Large-scale target：WTT=10；
Jamming target：WTT=10；
Multiple targets：WTT=10；
Medium-sized target：WTT=8；
Precision target：WTT=6；
Helicopter：WTT=4；
Cruise missile：WTT=3；
Air-to-ground guided missile：WTT=7；
Target type is unknown：WTT=2；
Step 3：Calculate target interception urgency level Wtime；The target interception urgency level arrives in Fire Unit hair by plane with target The time length on the boundaries She Qu is evaluated；It is divided into and closes on flight and from two kinds of situations of remote flight：
To closing on airbound target, target interception urgency level quantifies as the following formula
In formula, Δ t=15s, k1=6.73e-5；
To from remote airbound target, target interception urgency level quantifies as the following formula
In formula, Δ t=6s, k2=105；
Step 4：Calculate air threat priority W：
W=(ωob·Wob+ωTT·WTT+ωtime·Wtime)·kTC·10
In formula,
WobTo safeguard strategic point importance；
WTTFor target type quantized value；
WtimeFor target interception urgency level quantized value；
ωobTo safeguard the weight coefficient of strategic point grade, value 0.4；
ωTTFor the weight coefficient of target type, value 0.2；
ωtimeFor the weight coefficient of target interception urgency level, value 0.4；
Step 5：Divide target danger level
According to current furnished weapon system division methods both at home and abroad, the psychological bearing capability and target prestige of people are considered The stability for coercing sequence is divided, as shown in the table using 9 grades of threat levels：
CN201810411954.XA 2018-05-03 2018-05-03 Air defence weapon system Object Threat Evaluation method Pending CN108805406A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810411954.XA CN108805406A (en) 2018-05-03 2018-05-03 Air defence weapon system Object Threat Evaluation method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810411954.XA CN108805406A (en) 2018-05-03 2018-05-03 Air defence weapon system Object Threat Evaluation method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN108805406A true CN108805406A (en) 2018-11-13

Family

ID=64093696

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201810411954.XA Pending CN108805406A (en) 2018-05-03 2018-05-03 Air defence weapon system Object Threat Evaluation method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN108805406A (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110135686A (en) * 2019-04-11 2019-08-16 零八一电子集团有限公司 Strategic point integrated campaign analogue system
CN111102882A (en) * 2019-11-28 2020-05-05 中国运载火箭技术研究院 Heterogeneous distributed detection information target identification optimization method based on threat assessment
CN113959269A (en) * 2021-11-17 2022-01-21 航天科工微电子系统研究院有限公司 Grid empennage kinetic energy interceptor for intensive formation
CN113703479B (en) * 2021-08-26 2022-05-17 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 Weapon configuration method and system based on high-density value and large depth
CN115545584A (en) * 2022-12-02 2022-12-30 中国兵器科学研究院 Air defense threat control method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102298728A (en) * 2011-08-17 2011-12-28 电子科技大学 Method for evaluating target threat degree
CN104933279A (en) * 2014-03-20 2015-09-23 上海机电工程研究所 Network combat target assignment method for air defense missile weapon system
CN106296031A (en) * 2016-08-22 2017-01-04 北京理工大学 A kind of Air Targets Threat appraisal procedure based on dynamic TOPSIS

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102298728A (en) * 2011-08-17 2011-12-28 电子科技大学 Method for evaluating target threat degree
CN104933279A (en) * 2014-03-20 2015-09-23 上海机电工程研究所 Network combat target assignment method for air defense missile weapon system
CN106296031A (en) * 2016-08-22 2017-01-04 北京理工大学 A kind of Air Targets Threat appraisal procedure based on dynamic TOPSIS

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
张肃: "空中目标威胁评估技术", 《情报指挥控制系统与仿真技术》 *
王连锋 等: "导弹阵地空袭目标威胁评估", 《指挥控制与仿真》 *

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110135686A (en) * 2019-04-11 2019-08-16 零八一电子集团有限公司 Strategic point integrated campaign analogue system
CN111102882A (en) * 2019-11-28 2020-05-05 中国运载火箭技术研究院 Heterogeneous distributed detection information target identification optimization method based on threat assessment
CN113703479B (en) * 2021-08-26 2022-05-17 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 Weapon configuration method and system based on high-density value and large depth
CN113959269A (en) * 2021-11-17 2022-01-21 航天科工微电子系统研究院有限公司 Grid empennage kinetic energy interceptor for intensive formation
CN115545584A (en) * 2022-12-02 2022-12-30 中国兵器科学研究院 Air defense threat control method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN108805406A (en) Air defence weapon system Object Threat Evaluation method
CN104266546A (en) Sight line based finite time convergence active defense guidance control method
CN107247879B (en) Large-scale air-space combat effectiveness evaluation method based on improved Lanchester equation
JP6209120B2 (en) Tactical support device, tactical support method, and tactical support program
CN110186328B (en) Missile distribution method and system for multi-target interception
Fowler The strategy of drone warfare
CN105426634B (en) A kind of early warning plane battlefield survivability Evaluation method
CN108507577A (en) A kind of mission planning method based on data-link and aircraft sensibility
Gillard Protection of civilians in the conduct of hostilities
CN108763652B (en) Target attack attempt identification method for self-propelled air defense weapon system
RU2413171C1 (en) Bullet for small arms cartridge
Lappin The IDF’s momentum plan aims to create a new type of war machine
Peng-jiao et al. Deployment optimization of air defense force deployment based on memetic algorithm
Haag Base Deformation of Full Metal–Jacketed Rifle Bullets as a Measure of Impact Velocity and Range of Fire
Sushentsov The Russian response to the RMA: military strategy towards modern security threats
Cai et al. Fire distribution in fleet air defense missile network collaboration
Chen et al. The evaluation method of air force attack airline
Zhao et al. Analysis of Factors Affecting Ammunition Demand Based on ISM
Cheng et al. Weapon target assignment problem solving based on Hungarian algorithm
CN204612600U (en) A kind of guided missile protective device
Liu et al. Firepower allocation of continuous multiple incoming targets
CN203203482U (en) Guided missile with variable-speed middle section
Haifeng et al. Survivability optimization of the Silo Group Deployment by Agent Modeling and Simulation
Zeng et al. Research on Anti Saturation Attack Model of SAM to ARM
CN202101607U (en) Lifting curtain type three-dimensional landmine net

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
WD01 Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication

Application publication date: 20181113

WD01 Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication