CN108536592B - Test task assignment method and device and server - Google Patents

Test task assignment method and device and server Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN108536592B
CN108536592B CN201810270770.6A CN201810270770A CN108536592B CN 108536592 B CN108536592 B CN 108536592B CN 201810270770 A CN201810270770 A CN 201810270770A CN 108536592 B CN108536592 B CN 108536592B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
test
test case
priority
time
execution
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201810270770.6A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN108536592A (en
Inventor
黄创盛
陈德明
高昊江
苏晓峰
袁海松
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Northking Information Technology Co ltd
Original Assignee
Northking Information Technology Co ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Northking Information Technology Co ltd filed Critical Northking Information Technology Co ltd
Priority to CN201810270770.6A priority Critical patent/CN108536592B/en
Publication of CN108536592A publication Critical patent/CN108536592A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN108536592B publication Critical patent/CN108536592B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
    • G06F11/3668—Software testing
    • G06F11/3672—Test management
    • G06F11/3684—Test management for test design, e.g. generating new test cases
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
    • G06F11/3668—Software testing
    • G06F11/3672—Test management
    • G06F11/3688—Test management for test execution, e.g. scheduling of test suites

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a test task assignment method, a test task assignment device and a server. Generating a test case set according to the obtained at least one test case; when a request for acquiring a test execution task, which is input by a test executive, is acquired, determining a priority result value of a test case corresponding to the test executive according to service data of the test executive and reference data of each test case of a test case set; and distributing the corresponding test cases to the test executive personnel according to the priority result value. The technical scheme of the embodiment of the invention solves the problems that the traditional test assignment method can possibly cause the increase of the test workload, the reduction of the test efficiency and the test quality, the occurrence of performance bottleneck and slow use, and achieves the effects of reasonably assigning the test tasks according to the characteristics of testers and the characteristics of a service system, reducing the test cost, improving the test efficiency and the test quality and processing the test tasks more quickly.

Description

Test task assignment method and device and server
Technical Field
The embodiment of the invention relates to a test technology, in particular to a test task assignment method, a test task assignment device and a server.
Background
And after the test system acquires the test task, the test task is assigned to a technician. The technician obtains the test task, edits and manages the test case by means of a test auxiliary tool popular in the industry, for example, a Quality Center (QC) or spreadsheet software Excel, and manages the execution condition of the test case. As the complexity of the business and the amount of test cases increase, the task of testing becomes a heavy task. Under the conditions of large test case quantity, complex service and large professional technical level difference of testers, more problems can be caused by unreasonable test task assignment.
The traditional test task assignment method is to directly assign a test task to a certain person or a certain group, and test case design and test case execution are carried out together without detailed division of labor. For example, conventional test task assignment methods directly assign test tasks including requirement analysis, test case design, and test case execution to a person. I.e. the analysis, designer and executive are one person. After the test task taker receives a test task related to a certain service, the test task taker is responsible for both analysis of test requirements and design of test cases and execution of the test cases. After the communication under the line is completed, the test task taker completes the requirement analysis, the test case design and the test case execution on line under the assistance of QC or other tools.
The prior art methods have the following drawbacks: (1) the professional level of the testers is uneven, and the service familiarity is also different. The traditional test allocation mode is carried out through offline communication and subjective judgment, so that the problems of uneven distribution and inaccurate judgment can occur, the test workload can be greatly increased, the test efficiency is reduced, and the test quality can be influenced; (2) when the usage amount of a traditional test system, such as QC, is large, the problems of performance bottleneck and slow usage can occur, and the architecture system of the whole test system is not beneficial to performing distributed lateral expansion.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention provides a test task assignment method, a test task assignment device and a server, which are used for reasonably assigning test tasks according to the characteristics of testers and the characteristics of a service system, reducing the test cost and improving the test efficiency and the test quality.
In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a test task assigning method, including:
generating a test case set according to the obtained at least one test case; the test case is established by a preset test designer according to a preset test requirement;
storing the test case suite to a task pool;
determining at least one corresponding test execution group for the test case set according to preset test executive personnel information, wherein the test execution group comprises at least one test executive personnel;
when a request for acquiring a test execution task, which is input by the test executive personnel, is acquired, determining a priority result value of the test case corresponding to the test executive personnel according to the service data of the test executive personnel and the reference data of each test case of the test case set;
and distributing the corresponding test case to the test executive personnel according to the priority result value.
In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present invention further provides a test task assigning apparatus, including:
the test case set acquisition module is used for generating a test case set according to the acquired at least one test case; the test case is established by a preset test designer according to a preset test requirement;
the case set storage module is used for storing the test case set to a task pool;
the executive determination module is used for determining at least one corresponding test executive group for the test case suite according to preset test executive information, and the test executive group comprises at least one test executive;
the priority determining module is used for determining a priority result value of the test case corresponding to the test executive personnel according to the service data of the test executive personnel and the reference data of each test case of the test case set when a request for obtaining a test executive task input by the test executive personnel is obtained;
and the test case dispatching module is used for dispatching the corresponding test case to the test executive personnel according to the priority result value.
In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present invention further provides a server, including:
one or more processors;
a storage device for storing one or more programs,
when the one or more programs are executed by the one or more processors, the one or more processors implement the test task dispatching method provided by the embodiment of the invention.
According to the technical scheme of the embodiment of the invention, the priority result value of the test case corresponding to the test executive personnel is determined according to the service data of the test executive personnel and the reference data of each test case of the test case set, and the corresponding test case is dispatched to the test executive personnel according to the priority result value, so that the problems that the traditional test dispatching method possibly causes the increase of the test workload, the reduction of the test efficiency and the test quality, the occurrence of performance bottleneck and slow use are solved, the test cost is reduced, the test efficiency and the test quality are improved, and the test task is processed more quickly.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a flowchart of a test task assignment method according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a test task assignment process according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a test task assignment method according to a second embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a graph of time priority provided by a second embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a test task assignment method according to a third embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 6 is a flowchart of a test task timeout recycling process according to a third embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 7 is a block diagram of a test task dispatching device according to a fourth embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 8 is a schematic structural diagram of a server according to a fifth embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The present invention will be described in further detail with reference to the accompanying drawings and examples. It is to be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the invention and are not limiting of the invention. It should be further noted that, for the convenience of description, only some of the structures related to the present invention are shown in the drawings, not all of the structures.
Example one
Fig. 1 is a flowchart of a test task dispatching method according to an embodiment of the present invention, where the embodiment is applicable to a situation where a test task is dispatched, and the method may be executed by a test task dispatching device, where the device is executed by software and/or hardware, and may be generally integrated in a server. The method specifically comprises the following steps:
101, generating a test case set according to at least one obtained test case; the test case is established by a preset test designer according to preset test requirements.
The test task is composed of a test design task and a test execution task. After obtaining the preset test requirements contained in the test task, the preset test designer analyzes the preset test requirements, for example, analyzes the test points contained in the preset test requirements, then designs test steps, adds or refers to test data, establishes test cases, and completes the test design task. Optionally, the preset test designer includes at least one test designer.
The test case is an example describing how to perform the test, and is composed of test steps and test data. And after the test executive personnel obtains the test case, the test case is executed to complete the test executive task.
The test case set can be composed of a plurality of test cases and is used for placing the test cases into the task pool in batches for the test executive personnel to acquire the test cases and execute the test cases. And adding the obtained at least one test case into one batch through condition screening to generate a test case set. Optionally, a condition field for condition screening is set according to a preset test requirement. Optionally, one test case may be multiplexed into a plurality of test case sets.
And 102, storing the test case set to a task pool.
After the test case set is generated, the test case set is stored in the task pool, so that the test cases are concentrated in the task pool, and the test cases are managed in a unified mode.
Optionally, the task pool adopts a micro-service architecture system. The microservice is a distributed software architecture, is suitable for distributed multi-node load balancing deployment, is convenient for horizontal expansion, and can increase node deployment according to specific modules when the performance is in bottleneck. The task pool is deployed by adopting a distributed architecture, distributed multi-node operation is supported, a plurality of micro services can be split according to modules, transverse expansion can be flexibly achieved, test tasks can be processed more quickly, and overall performance is improved.
And 103, determining at least one corresponding test execution group for the test case set according to the preset test execution personnel information, wherein the test execution group comprises at least one test execution personnel.
And determining at least one corresponding test execution group for the test case set according to the preset test execution personnel information. Each test executive team includes at least one test executive. And the test executive personnel is responsible for completing the test task corresponding to the test case set. When a corresponding test execution group is determined for the test case suite, if the test execution group is not established, at least one tester is selected to be stored as the test execution group (the group name of the test execution group needs to be input during storage), and the test execution group is corresponding to the test case suite.
And 104, when a request for acquiring a test execution task, which is input by the test executive personnel, is acquired, determining a priority result value of the test case corresponding to the test executive personnel according to the service data of the test executive personnel and the reference data of each test case of the test case set.
After at least one corresponding test executive person is determined for the test case set according to the preset test executive person information, the test executive person can input a request for obtaining a test executive task.
When a request for acquiring a test execution task, which is input by the test executive personnel, is acquired, a priority result value of the test case corresponding to the test executive personnel is determined by adopting a plurality of priority algorithms according to the service data of the test executive personnel and the reference data of each test case of the test case set until all the test cases of the test case set are determined to correspond to the priority result value of the test executive personnel.
The business data of the test executive at least comprises professional technical level values, test case difficulty sum and test case execution time sum. The reference data of the test case at least comprises: the method comprises the steps of presetting execution starting time and execution ending time of a test case set, difficulty of the test cases and current time for executing the currently processed test cases.
The priority algorithm includes at least: a use case priority algorithm, a time priority algorithm, a professional skill level priority algorithm, and an efficiency priority algorithm. Specifically, case priority refers to assigning a priority level to a test case when designing the test case. The test case with high level is executed preferentially. Optionally, after the test case set is generated, a priority level is assigned to the test case set in batches. The time-first means that when the test case set is generated, the execution planning time of the test case set is set, and whether the test case is executed preferentially or not is determined according to the time. The priority of the technical level refers to that whether the test cases with high difficulty or low difficulty are distributed is determined according to the technical level of the test executive. Wherein, the difficulty of the test case needs to be specified when the test case is designed. Optionally, if the difficulty level of the test case is not specified when the test case is designed, the difficulty level of the test case is generated by calculating the operation complexity level in the test step according to the number of the test steps. The efficiency priority is to determine whether to preferentially assign the test case to the test executive with high execution efficiency according to the speed of the test executive executing the test case.
The priority algorithms have a proportional weight relationship, and the priority result value of the test case corresponding to the test executive personnel can be calculated according to the service data of the test executive personnel and the reference data of each test case of the test case set through the corresponding operation formula.
And 105, distributing corresponding test cases to the test executive personnel according to the priority result values.
And obtaining the priority result values of all the test cases in the test case set corresponding to the test executors, and assigning the test case with the highest priority result value to the test executors. Optionally, if the priority result values of all the test cases in the test case set are the same, returning the test case created earliest to the test executive staff according to the test case creation sequence.
Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of a test task assignment process according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in fig. 2, after a test case set is generated by a preset test designer according to a test case 1 and a test case 2 … … established by a preset test requirement, the test case set is stored in a task pool. The test executor 1, 2 … …, corresponding to the test case set, may obtain the test execution task by inputting a request to obtain the test execution task. When a request for acquiring a test execution task, which is input by a test executive worker, is acquired, a preset algorithm or strategy is adopted, a priority result value of the test case corresponding to the test executive worker is determined according to business data of the test executive worker and reference data of each test case of a test case set, and a corresponding test case is distributed to the test executive worker according to the priority result value.
According to the test task assignment method provided by the embodiment, the priority result value of the test case corresponding to the test executive personnel is determined according to the service data of the test executive personnel and the reference data of each test case of the test case set, and the corresponding test case is assigned to the test executive personnel according to the priority result value, so that the problems that the workload of testing is increased, the testing efficiency and the testing quality are reduced, the performance bottleneck occurs and the use is slow in the conventional test assignment method are solved, the test task assignment is reasonably carried out according to the characteristics of the test personnel and the characteristics of a service system, the testing cost is reduced, the testing efficiency and the testing quality are improved, and the test task is processed more quickly.
Example two
Fig. 3 is a flowchart of a test task assignment method according to a second embodiment of the present invention, which is optimized based on the above embodiments. As shown in fig. 3, the method includes:
step 201, generating a test case set according to at least one obtained test case; the test case is established by a preset test designer according to preset test requirements.
Step 202, storing the test case set to a task pool.
And 203, determining at least one corresponding test execution group for the test case set according to the preset test execution personnel information, wherein the test execution group comprises at least one test execution personnel.
And 204, when a request for acquiring a test execution task, which is input by the test executive personnel, is acquired, screening out the test case set which can be acquired by the test executive personnel according to the test executive group to which the test executive personnel belongs and the preset test executive group on the test case set.
And each test case set is preset with a corresponding test execution group. Test executives in the test execution group can obtain a test case set. When a request for acquiring a test execution task, which is input by a test executive worker, is acquired, a test case set which can be acquired by the test executive worker is screened out by judging whether a test executive group to which the test executive worker belongs corresponds to a test executive group preset on the test case set.
And step 205, acquiring one test case in the test case set according to a preset sequence as a current processing test case.
The sequence of the test cases in the test case set is preset, and one test case in the test case set is obtained according to the preset sequence and serves as a current processing test case.
And step 206, determining a time priority weight value according to the execution starting time and the execution ending time of the preset test case set and the current time of executing the currently processed test case.
The value range of the time priority weight value is 0-1, and the execution starting time and the execution ending time of the test case set are used as time intervals. And when the test case set is generated, setting the execution starting time and the execution ending time of the test case set.
Optionally, determining a time-first weight value according to the execution start time and the execution end time of the preset test case set and the current time of executing the currently processed test case includes:
and when the current time for executing the current processing test case is less than or equal to the execution starting time of the preset test case set, the time priority weight value is 0.
And when the current time for executing the current processing test case is equal to the execution ending time of the preset test case set, the time priority weight value is 1.
And when the current time for executing the current processing test case is greater than the execution ending time of the preset test case set, the time priority weight value is 0.
When the current time for executing the current processing test case is greater than the execution starting time of the preset test case set and less than the execution ending time of the preset test case set, the time priority weighted value is the ratio of the difference value of the current time for executing the current processing test case minus the test starting time of the test case to the total execution time, wherein the total execution time is equal to the difference value of the execution ending time and the execution starting time of the preset test case set.
And step 207, determining the time priority according to the time priority weight value.
Wherein the time priority is the square of the time priority weight value.
Fig. 4 is a graph of a time priority according to a second embodiment of the present invention. The abscissa of fig. 4 is the current time at which the currently processed test case is executed, and the ordinate is the value of the time priority. As shown in fig. 4, when the current time for executing the currently processed test case is less than or equal to the execution start time of the preset test case set, the time priority is 0; when the current time for executing the current processing test case is greater than the execution starting time of the preset test case set and less than the execution ending time of the preset test case set, the time priority is a square value of a ratio of the difference value of the current time for executing the current processing test case minus the test starting time of the test case to the total execution time, and the parabola trend is presented; when the current time for executing the current processing test case is equal to the execution ending time of a preset test case set, the time priority weighted value is 1, and the time priority is 1; and when the current time for executing the current processing test case is greater than the execution ending time of the preset test case set, the time priority is 0.
And 208, determining the professional skill level priority according to the difficulty of the current processing test case and the professional skill level value of the test executive.
The value range of the professional technical level priority is 0-1, and the method is used for measuring the matching degree of the professional technical level of the test executive and the difficulty of processing the test case at present.
Optionally, determining the professional skill level priority according to the difficulty of processing the test case and the professional skill level value of the test executor at present, including:
calculating the professional skill level priority according to the following formula:
x3＝(9-|y1-y2|)/9
wherein x is3For professional technical level priority, y1For the difficulty of currently processing test cases, y1Has a value range of 1 to 10, y2For testing technical skill level, y, of the executive2The value range of (1) to (10). Alternatively, the expertise level of the test executive is assessed by the test executive or the test manager.
And 209, determining the efficiency priority according to the sum of the difficulty of the test cases of the test executive personnel and the sum of the execution time of the test cases, wherein the sum of the difficulty of the test cases is the sum of the difficulty of the test cases executed by the test executive personnel, and the sum of the execution time of the test cases is the sum of the execution time of the test cases executed by the test executive personnel.
When the test executive personnel executes the test cases, the difficulty and the execution time of each test case executed by the test executive personnel are recorded. The sum of the test case difficulty levels of the test executors is the sum of the difficulty levels of the test cases executed by the test executors. The sum of the execution times of the test cases of the test executors is the sum of the execution times of the test cases executed by the test executors.
Optionally, determining the efficiency priority according to the sum of the difficulty levels of the test cases of the test executors and the sum of the execution times of the test cases, including:
when the sum of the execution time of the test cases is 0, the efficiency priority is 0.5;
when the sum of the execution times of the test cases is larger than 0, the efficiency priority is equal to the ratio of the sum of the difficulty degrees of the test cases of the test executors to the sum of the execution times of the test cases, wherein when the ratio is larger than 1, the efficiency priority is 1.
Wherein the time unit is minutes, and the value range of the efficiency priority is 0-1.
And 210, determining a priority result value of the current processing test case corresponding to the test executive according to the preset priority of the current processing test case, the preset time priority, the preset professional technical level priority and the preset efficiency priority.
The method comprises the steps of obtaining the priority of a current processing test case according to the preset priority, obtaining the time priority corresponding to the current processing test case, the professional technical level priority and the efficiency priority of the current processing test case corresponding to a test executive through calculation, and then determining the priority result value of the current processing test case corresponding to the test executive through a preset priority algorithm.
Optionally, the priority result value is calculated according to the following formula:
Figure BDA0001612498360000121
wherein y is the priority result value of the current processing test case corresponding to the test executive, x1For a preset currently processed test case priority, x1Has a value range of 1 to 10, x2In the form of a time-first weight value,
Figure BDA0001612498360000122
as time priority, x3For technical level priority, x4In order to be a priority of the efficiency,k1in a predetermined proportion of professional technical level priority, k2For a predetermined ratio of efficiency priorities, k1+k2＝100％。
x1The preset priority level for the current processing test case is the priority level assigned to the test case when the test case is designed. Optionally, after the test case set is generated, a priority level is assigned to the test case set in batches. x is the number of1The value range is 1-10. 1 represents the lowest priority and 10 represents the highest priority.
x2For the time-first weight value corresponding to the currently processed test case,
Figure BDA0001612498360000123
and the time priority corresponding to the current processing test case. x is the number of2、
Figure BDA0001612498360000124
And y is calculated in several cases: 1) when the current time for executing the current processing test case is less than or equal to the execution starting time of the preset test case set, x2＝0，
Figure BDA0001612498360000125
y is 0; 2) when the current time for executing the current processing test case is equal to the execution ending time of the preset test case set, x2＝1，
Figure BDA0001612498360000126
y＝x1*(x3*k1+x4*k2) (ii) a 3) When the current time for executing the current processing test case is greater than the execution ending time of the preset test case set, x2＝0，
Figure BDA0001612498360000127
y is 0; 4) when the current time for executing the current processing test case is greater than the execution starting time of the preset test case set and less than the execution ending time of the preset test case set, x2To execute a currently processed test caseThe ratio of the difference of the test start time of the test case subtracted by the current time of the test case to the total execution time,
Figure BDA0001612498360000128
to obtain the square value of the ratio of the current time of executing the currently processed test case minus the test start time of the test case to the total execution time, as shown in fig. 4,
Figure BDA0001612498360000131
the device has a parabolic trend. At this time, the priority result value is calculated according to the following formula:
Figure BDA0001612498360000132
the above cases indicate that, when the current time for executing the currently processed test case has not reached the execution start time of the test case set or has elapsed the execution end time of the test case set, the priority result value is 0, which indicates that the test case is not allowed to be executed; when the current time for executing the current processing test case is between the execution start time and the execution end time of the preset test case set, the closer the current time for executing the current processing test case is to the execution end time, the higher the time priority of the test case is, and the square proportion is increased.
Calculate x according to the following equation3：
x3＝(9-|y1-y2|)/9
Wherein x is3For professional technical level priority, y1Is the difficulty, y, of the currently processed test case1Has a value range of 1 to 10, y2For the technical level value, y, of the test executive2The value range of (1) to (10).
x4For efficiency priority, when the sum of test case execution times is 0, x4Taking 0.5; when the sum of the execution time of the test cases is more than 0, x4Equal to the ratio of the total difficulty of the test cases of the test executive personnel to the total execution time of the test cases, whereinWhen the ratio is greater than 1, x41 is taken.
k1In a predetermined proportion of professional technical level priority, k2Is a preset proportion of efficiency priority. Setting k according to business requirements1And k2Guarantee k1+k2＝100％。
And step 211, returning to execute the operation of acquiring one test case in the test case set according to the preset sequence as the current processing test case until all test cases in the test case set are determined to correspond to the priority result values of the test executors.
After the priority result value of the current processing test case corresponding to the test executive is determined, other test cases in the test case set are sequentially obtained to serve as the current processing test case until all the test cases in the test case set are determined to correspond to the priority result value of the test executive.
And step 212, distributing corresponding test cases to the test executive personnel according to the priority result values.
Optionally, all the test cases in the obtained test case set are sorted according to the priority result values corresponding to the test executors, and the test case with the highest priority result value is assigned to the test executors, wherein if the priority result values of all the test cases in the test case set are the same, the test case created earliest is returned to the test executors according to the test case creation sequence sorting.
And obtaining the priority result values of all the test cases in the test case set corresponding to the test executors, and assigning the test case with the highest priority result value to the test executors. And if the priority result values of all the test cases in the test case set are the same, returning the test case which is created earliest to the test executive personnel according to the sequence of creating the test cases. When the priority result values of the same test case corresponding to at least two test executives are the same, the test case is dispatched according to a rule of first arriving and first obtaining, and the test case is preferentially distributed to the test executives which input the request for obtaining the test execution task first.
According to the test task assignment method provided by the embodiment, the priority result values of the current processing test cases corresponding to the test executors are determined according to the preset priority, time priority, professional technical level priority and efficiency priority of the current processing test cases, the priority result values are sequenced, and the test case with the highest priority result value is assigned to the test executors, so that the problems that the test workload is increased, the test efficiency and the test quality are reduced, and the performance bottleneck occurs and the use is slow in the conventional test assignment method are solved, the test tasks are reasonably assigned according to the characteristics of the testers and the characteristics of a service system, the test cost is reduced, the test efficiency and the test quality are improved, and the test tasks are processed more quickly.
EXAMPLE III
Fig. 5 is a flowchart of a test task assignment method according to a third embodiment of the present invention, which is optimized based on the foregoing embodiments. As shown in fig. 5, the method includes:
301, generating a test case set according to the obtained at least one test case; the test case is established by a preset test designer according to preset test requirements.
Step 302, storing the test case set to a task pool.
And 303, determining at least one corresponding test execution group for the test case set according to the preset test executive personnel information, wherein the test execution group comprises at least one test executive personnel.
And 304, when a request for acquiring a test execution task, which is input by the test executive personnel, is acquired, determining a priority result value of the test case corresponding to the test executive personnel according to the service data of the test executive personnel and the reference data of each test case of the test case set.
And 305, distributing corresponding test cases to the test executive personnel according to the priority result values.
And step 306, monitoring the test progress of the test cases distributed to the test executive personnel.
After the test cases in the task pool are dispatched to the test executive, the test progress of the test cases is monitored, the dispatch time of the test cases is recorded, and timing is started from the dispatch time of the test cases. For example, the test progress of the test case includes: the treatment is neutral and untreated.
And 307, after the first threshold time is reached, if the test case is monitored not to be processed by the test executive personnel, sending reminding information.
And judging whether the test execution task corresponding to the test case is overtime according to the first threshold time. And after the first threshold time is reached, if the test case is monitored not to be processed by the test executive personnel, sending reminding information. For example, the first threshold time is 2 hours, the time is counted from the dispatch time of the test case, and after 2 hours, if it is monitored that the test execution personnel does not process the test case, a prompt message is sent. Optionally, the reminding information includes a reminding mail and/or a reminding short message.
Or after the second threshold time is reached, if it is monitored that the test case is not processed by the test executive personnel, the test case is recycled to the task pool.
And judging whether the test execution task corresponding to the test case is overtime according to the second threshold time. And after the second threshold time is reached, if the test case is monitored not to be processed by the test executive personnel, the test case is recycled to the task pool.
Further, after the first threshold time is reached, if it is monitored that the test case is not processed by the test executive, sending a reminding message; and starting timing from the time when the first threshold value is reached, and recovering the test case to the task pool if the test executive personnel does not process the test case after the second threshold value is reached. For example, the first threshold time is 2 hours, the second threshold time is 4 hours, timing is started from the dispatching time of the test case, after 2 hours, it is monitored that the test case is not processed by the test executive, a reminding message is sent, then timing is started from the time when the first threshold time is reached, after 4 hours, it is monitored that the test case is not processed by the test executive, and the test case is recycled to the task pool. Optionally, after the test case is recycled to the task pool, the test case is dispatched again.
Fig. 6 is a flowchart of a test task timeout recycling process according to a third embodiment of the present invention. As shown in fig. 6, the process includes:
step 601, setting a threshold.
Wherein a threshold value is preset.
Step 602, reading the threshold value, and judging whether the time is out. If yes, go on to step 603; if not, whether the test execution task corresponding to the test case is overtime or not is continuously judged according to the threshold value.
And reading the threshold, and judging whether the test execution task corresponding to the test case is overtime or not after the test case in the task pool is dispatched to the test executive. And if the test execution task is not overtime, continuing to monitor the test progress of the test case.
Step 603, reminding by mail or short message.
If the test execution task is overtime, the test executive is reminded of overtime test execution task by sending an email or a short message. And starting timing from the threshold value, continuously monitoring the test progress of the test case, and recovering the test case to the task pool if the test executive personnel still does not process the test case after 4 hours.
In the test task assigning method provided by this embodiment, the test progress of the test case assigned to the test executive is monitored; after the first threshold time is reached, if it is monitored that the test case is not processed by the test executive personnel, sending reminding information; and/or after the second threshold time is reached, if the test executive personnel is monitored not to process the test cases, the test cases are recycled to the task pool, the problems that the workload of the test is increased, the test efficiency and the test quality are reduced, the performance bottleneck occurs and the use is slow in the traditional test assignment method are solved, the assignment of the test tasks is reasonably carried out according to the characteristics of the test personnel and the characteristics of the service system, the test cost is reduced, the test efficiency and the test quality are improved, the test tasks are processed more quickly, the test progress is automatically monitored, and the test cases are automatically recycled after time out.
Example four
Fig. 7 is a block diagram of a test task dispatching device according to a fourth embodiment of the present invention. As shown in fig. 7, the apparatus includes:
a use case set acquisition module 410, a use case set storage module 420, an executive determination module 430, a priority determination module 440, and a test case dispatch module 450.
The use case set acquiring module 410 is configured to generate a test use case set according to the acquired at least one test use case; the test case is established by a preset test designer according to a preset test requirement; a case set storage module 420, configured to store the test case set to the task pool; the executive determination module 430 is configured to determine at least one corresponding test execution group for the test case suite according to preset test executive information, where the test execution group includes at least one test executive; the priority determining module 440 is configured to determine, when a request for obtaining a test execution task, which is input by a test executor, a priority result value of the test case corresponding to the test executor according to the service data of the test executor and the reference data of each test case of the test case set; and the test case dispatching module 450 is configured to dispatch the corresponding test case to the test executive according to the priority result value.
According to the test task assigning device provided by the embodiment, the priority result value of the test case corresponding to the test executive personnel is determined according to the service data of the test executive personnel and the reference data of each test case of the test case set, and the corresponding test case is assigned to the test executive personnel according to the priority result value, so that the problems that the workload of testing is increased, the testing efficiency and the testing quality are reduced, the performance bottleneck occurs and the use is slow in the conventional test assigning method are solved, the test task is reasonably assigned according to the characteristics of the test personnel and the characteristics of a service system, the testing cost is reduced, the testing efficiency and the testing quality are improved, and the test task is processed more quickly.
On the basis of the above embodiments, the priority determining module 440 includes:
the test case set screening unit is used for screening the test case set which can be acquired by the test executive personnel according to the test executive group to which the test executive personnel belongs and the test executive group preset on the test case set;
the test case acquisition unit is used for acquiring one test case in the test case set according to a preset sequence to serve as a current processing test case;
the first determining unit is used for determining a time priority weight value according to the execution starting time and the execution ending time of a preset test case set and the current time of executing the currently processed test case;
the second determining unit is used for determining the time priority according to the time priority weight value;
the third determining unit is used for determining the professional skill level priority according to the difficulty of the current processing test case and the professional skill level value of the test executive;
a fourth determining unit, configured to determine an efficiency priority according to a total difficulty of the test cases of the test executor and a total execution time of the test cases, where the total difficulty of the test cases is a total difficulty of the test cases executed by the test executor, and the total execution time of the test cases is a total execution time of the test cases executed by the test executor;
a fifth determining unit, configured to determine, according to a preset priority of a currently processed test case, a time priority, a professional skill level priority, and the efficiency priority, a priority result value of the currently processed test case, which corresponds to a test executor;
and the return unit is used for returning and executing the operation of acquiring one test case in the test case set according to the preset sequence as the current processing test case until all the test cases in the test case set are determined to correspond to the priority result values of the test executors.
On the basis of the above embodiments, the first determination unit includes:
the first calculating subunit is used for taking the time priority weight value as 0 when the current time for executing the current processing test case is less than or equal to the execution starting time of the preset test case set;
the second calculating subunit is used for taking the time priority weight value as 1 when the current time for executing the current processing test case is equal to the execution ending time of the preset test case set;
the third calculation subunit is used for taking the time priority weight value of 0 when the current time for executing the current processing test case is greater than the execution ending time of the preset test case set;
and the fourth calculating subunit is configured to, when the current time for executing the currently processed test case is greater than the execution start time of the preset test case set and is less than the execution end time of the preset test case set, determine the time-first weight value as a ratio of a difference between the current time for executing the currently processed test case and the test start time of the test case to a total execution time, where the total execution time is equal to a difference between the execution end time of the preset test case set and the execution start time.
On the basis of the above embodiments, the third determination unit includes:
a fifth calculating subunit, configured to calculate the professional skill level priority according to the following formula:
x3＝(9-|y1-y2|)/9
wherein x is3For professional technical level priority, y1For the difficulty of currently processing test cases, y1Has a value range of 1 to 10, y2For testing technical skill level, y, of the executive2The value range of (1) to (10).
On the basis of the above embodiments, the fourth determination unit includes:
the sixth calculating subunit is used for taking the efficiency priority as 0.5 when the sum of the execution times of the test cases is 0;
and the seventh computing subunit is used for enabling the efficiency priority to be equal to the ratio of the sum of the difficulty degrees of the test cases of the test executors to the sum of the execution times of the test cases when the sum of the execution times of the test cases is larger than 0, wherein the efficiency priority is 1 when the ratio is larger than 1.
On the basis of the above embodiments, the fifth determination unit includes:
an eighth calculating subunit, configured to calculate a priority result value according to the following formula:
Figure BDA0001612498360000201
wherein y is the priority result value of the current processing test case corresponding to the test executive, x1For a preset currently processed test case priority, x1Has a value range of 1 to 10, x2In the form of a time-first weight value,
Figure BDA0001612498360000211
as time priority, x3For technical level priority, x4To efficiency priority, k1In a predetermined proportion of professional technical level priority, k2For a predetermined ratio of efficiency priorities, k1+k2＝100％。
On the basis of the above embodiments, the test case dispatching module 450 includes: and the priority sequencing subunit is used for sequencing the priority result values of all the test cases in the acquired test case set, which correspond to the test executors, and assigning the test case with the highest priority result value to the test executors, wherein if the priority result values of all the test cases in the test case set are the same, the earliest created test case is returned to the test executors according to the sequencing of the creation sequence of the test cases.
On the basis of the foregoing embodiments, the test task assigning apparatus provided in the embodiment of the present invention may further include:
the monitoring module is used for monitoring the test progress of the test cases distributed to the test executive personnel;
the information sending module is used for sending reminding information if the test case is monitored not to be processed by the test executive personnel after the first threshold time is reached; and/or
And the case recycling module is used for recycling the test cases to the task pool if the test case is monitored not to be processed by the test executive personnel after the second threshold time is reached.
The test task assigning device provided by the embodiment of the invention can execute the test task assigning method provided by any embodiment of the invention, and has corresponding functional modules and beneficial effects of the execution method.
EXAMPLE five
Fig. 8 is a schematic structural diagram of a server according to a fifth embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 8 illustrates a block diagram of an exemplary server 512 suitable for use in implementing embodiments of the present invention. The server 512 shown in fig. 8 is only an example and should not bring any limitation to the function and the scope of use of the embodiments of the present invention.
As shown in FIG. 8, the server 512 is in the form of a general purpose computing device. Components of server 512 may include, but are not limited to: one or more processors or processing units 516, a system memory 528, and a bus 518 that couples the various system components including the system memory 528 and the processing unit 516.
Bus 518 represents one or more of any of several types of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, an accelerated graphics port, and a processor or local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures. By way of example, such architectures include, but are not limited to, Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, micro-channel architecture (MAC) bus, enhanced ISA bus, Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) local bus, and Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus.
The server 512 typically includes a variety of computer system readable media. Such media can be any available media that is accessible by server 512 and includes both volatile and nonvolatile media, removable and non-removable media.
The system memory 528 may include computer system readable media in the form of volatile memory, such as Random Access Memory (RAM)530 and/or cache memory 532. The server 512 may further include other removable/non-removable, volatile/nonvolatile computer system storage media. By way of example only, storage system 534 may be used to read from and write to non-removable, nonvolatile magnetic media (not shown in FIG. 8, and commonly referred to as a "hard drive"). Although not shown in FIG. 8, a magnetic disk drive for reading from and writing to a removable, nonvolatile magnetic disk (e.g., a "floppy disk") and an optical disk drive for reading from or writing to a removable, nonvolatile optical disk (e.g., a CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, or other optical media) may be provided. In these cases, each drive may be connected to bus 518 through one or more data media interfaces. Memory 528 may include at least one program product having a set (e.g., at least one) of program modules that are configured to carry out the functions of embodiments of the invention.
A program/utility 540 having a set (at least one) of program modules 542, including but not limited to an operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, and program data, may be stored in, for example, the memory 528, each of which examples or some combination may include an implementation of a network environment. The program modules 542 generally perform the functions and/or methods of the described embodiments of the invention.
The server 512 may also communicate with one or more external devices 514 (e.g., keyboard, pointing device, display 524, etc.), with one or more devices that enable a user to interact with the server 512, and/or with any devices (e.g., network card, modem, etc.) that enable the server 512 to communicate with one or more other computing devices. Such communication may occur via input/output (I/O) interfaces 522. Also, the server 512 may communicate with one or more networks (e.g., a Local Area Network (LAN), a Wide Area Network (WAN) and/or a public network, such as the Internet) via the network adapter 520. As shown, the network adapter 520 communicates with the other modules of the server 512 via the bus 518. It should be appreciated that although not shown, other hardware and/or software modules may be used in conjunction with the server 512, including but not limited to: microcode, device drivers, redundant processing units, external disk drive arrays, RAID systems, tape drives, and data backup storage systems, among others.
The processing unit 516 executes various functional applications and data processing by running programs stored in the system memory 528, for example, to implement the test task assignment method provided by the embodiment of the present invention.
It is to be noted that the foregoing is only illustrative of the preferred embodiments of the present invention and the technical principles employed. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited to the particular embodiments described herein, but is capable of various obvious changes, rearrangements and substitutions as will now become apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention. Therefore, although the present invention has been described in greater detail by the above embodiments, the present invention is not limited to the above embodiments, and may include other equivalent embodiments without departing from the spirit of the present invention, and the scope of the present invention is determined by the scope of the appended claims.

Claims (8)

1. A test task dispatching method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
generating a test case set according to the obtained at least one test case; the test case is established by a preset test designer according to a preset test requirement;
storing the test case suite to a task pool;
determining at least one corresponding test execution group for the test case set according to preset test executive personnel information, wherein the test execution group comprises at least one test executive personnel;
when a request of a test execution task input by the test executive personnel is obtained, screening out a test case set which can be obtained by the test executive personnel according to a test execution group to which the test executive personnel belongs and a preset test execution group on the test case set;
acquiring one test case in the test case set according to a preset sequence to serve as a current processing test case;
when the current time for executing the currently processed test case is less than or equal to the preset execution starting time of the test case set, the time priority weight value is 0;
when the current time for executing the currently processed test case is equal to the preset execution ending time of the test case set, the time priority weight value is 1;
when the current time for executing the currently processed test case is greater than the preset execution ending time of the test case set, the time priority weight value is 0;
when the current time for executing the currently processed test case is greater than the preset execution starting time of the test case set and less than the preset execution ending time of the test case set, the time priority weighted value is the ratio of the difference value of the current time for executing the currently processed test case minus the test starting time of the test case to the total execution time, wherein the total execution time is equal to the preset difference value of the execution ending time and the execution starting time of the test case set;
determining time priority according to the time priority weight value;
determining professional skill level priority according to the difficulty of the current processing test case and the professional skill level value of the test executive;
determining an efficiency priority according to the sum of the difficulty of the test cases of the test executive personnel and the sum of the execution time of the test cases, wherein the sum of the difficulty of the test cases is the sum of the difficulty of the test cases executed by the test executive personnel, and the sum of the execution time of the test cases is the sum of the execution time of the test cases executed by the test executive personnel;
determining the priority result value of the current processing test case corresponding to the test executive according to the preset priority of the current processing test case, the time priority, the professional technical level priority and the efficiency priority;
returning to execute the operation of acquiring one test case in the test case set according to a preset sequence as the current processing test case until all the test cases in the test case set are determined to correspond to the priority result value of the test executive;
and distributing the corresponding test case to the test executive personnel according to the priority result value.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining a professional skill level priority based on the difficulty of the currently processed test case and the professional skill level value of the test executor comprises:
calculating the professional skill level priority according to the following formula:
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
in order to be a professional technical level priority,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
for the ease of processing the test case at the present time,
Figure 827389DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
the value range of (A) is 1-10,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
for the technical skill level value of the test executive,
Figure 416633DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
the value range of (1) to (10).
3. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the efficiency priority based on the sum of the difficulty levels of the test cases and the sum of the execution times of the test cases of the test executors comprises:
when the sum of the execution time of the test cases is 0, the efficiency priority is 0.5;
when the sum of the execution times of the test cases is larger than 0, the efficiency priority is equal to the ratio of the sum of the test case difficulty degrees of the test executors to the sum of the execution times of the test cases, wherein when the ratio is larger than 1, the efficiency priority is 1.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the priority result value of the current processing test case corresponding to the test executive according to a preset current processing test case priority, the time priority, the professional skill level priority and the efficiency priority comprises:
calculating the priority result value according to the following formula:
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE010
wherein the content of the first and second substances,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE012
for the priority result value of the current processing test case corresponding to the test executor,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE014
for a preset current process test case priority,
Figure 117742DEST_PATH_IMAGE014
the value range of (A) is 1-10,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE016
in the form of a time-first weight value,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE018
in order to be the priority of the time,
Figure 401699DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
in order to be a professional technical level priority,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE020
in order to be a priority of the efficiency,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE022
in proportion to the preset professional skill level priority,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE024
for a preset proportion of the efficiency priority,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE026
。
5. the method of claim 1, wherein assigning the corresponding test case to the test executive according to the priority result value comprises:
and sequencing the priority result values of all the test cases in the obtained test case set, which correspond to the test executant, and assigning the test case with the highest priority result value to the test executant, wherein if the priority result values of all the test cases in the test case set are the same, sequencing according to the creation sequence of the test cases and returning the earliest created test case to the test executant.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein after said assigning the corresponding test case to the test executive according to the priority result value, further comprising:
monitoring the test progress of the test cases assigned to the test executive personnel;
after the first threshold time is reached, if the test case is monitored not to be processed by the test executive personnel, sending reminding information; and/or
And after the second threshold time is reached, if the test case is monitored not to be processed by the test executive personnel, the test case is recycled to the task pool.
7. A test task assigning apparatus, comprising:
the test case set acquisition module is used for generating a test case set according to the acquired at least one test case; the test case is established by a preset test designer according to a preset test requirement;
the case set storage module is used for storing the test case set to a task pool;
the executive determination module is used for determining at least one corresponding test executive group for the test case suite according to preset test executive information, and the test executive group comprises at least one test executive;
the test case set screening unit is used for screening the test case set which can be acquired by the test executive personnel according to the test executive group to which the test executive personnel belongs and the test executive group preset on the test case set when the request of the test executive task input by the test executive personnel is acquired;
the test case acquisition unit is used for acquiring one test case in the test case set according to a preset sequence to serve as a current processing test case;
the first calculating subunit is used for taking the time priority weight value as 0 when the current time for executing the current processing test case is less than or equal to the execution starting time of the preset test case set;
the second calculating subunit is used for taking the time priority weight value as 1 when the current time for executing the current processing test case is equal to the execution ending time of the preset test case set;
the third calculation subunit is used for taking the time priority weight value of 0 when the current time for executing the current processing test case is greater than the execution ending time of the preset test case set;
the fourth calculating subunit is configured to, when the current time for executing the currently processed test case is greater than the execution start time of the preset test case set and less than the execution end time of the preset test case set, determine that the time-first weight value is a ratio of a difference value obtained by subtracting the test start time of the test case from the current time for executing the currently processed test case to a total execution time, where the total execution time is equal to the difference value between the execution end time and the execution start time of the preset test case set;
the second determining unit is used for determining the time priority according to the time priority weight value;
the third determining unit is used for determining the professional skill level priority according to the difficulty of the current processing test case and the professional skill level value of the test executive;
a fourth determining unit, configured to determine an efficiency priority according to a total difficulty of the test cases of the test executor and a total execution time of the test cases, where the total difficulty of the test cases is a total difficulty of the test cases executed by the test executor, and the total execution time of the test cases is a total execution time of the test cases executed by the test executor;
a fifth determining unit, configured to determine, according to a preset priority of a currently processed test case, a time priority, a professional skill level priority, and the efficiency priority, a priority result value of the currently processed test case, which corresponds to a test executor;
the return unit is used for returning and executing the operation of acquiring one test case in the test case set according to the preset sequence as the current processing test case until all the test cases in the test case set are determined to correspond to the priority result values of the test executors;
and the test case dispatching module is used for dispatching the corresponding test case to the test executive personnel according to the priority result value.
8. A server, characterized in that the server comprises:
one or more processors;
a storage device for storing one or more programs,
when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to implement a test task dispatching method as recited in any of claims 1-6.
CN201810270770.6A 2018-03-29 2018-03-29 Test task assignment method and device and server Active CN108536592B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810270770.6A CN108536592B (en) 2018-03-29 2018-03-29 Test task assignment method and device and server

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810270770.6A CN108536592B (en) 2018-03-29 2018-03-29 Test task assignment method and device and server

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN108536592A CN108536592A (en) 2018-09-14
CN108536592B true CN108536592B (en) 2021-09-14

Family

ID=63482418

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201810270770.6A Active CN108536592B (en) 2018-03-29 2018-03-29 Test task assignment method and device and server

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN108536592B (en)

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109377187A (en) * 2018-11-19 2019-02-22 中国银行股份有限公司 A kind of outsourcing human resource distribution method and device
CN110083528A (en) * 2019-03-19 2019-08-02 深圳壹账通智能科技有限公司 Distribution method, device, computer equipment and the storage medium of test assignment
CN110806974B (en) * 2019-10-12 2023-01-10 苏州浪潮智能科技有限公司 Method and device for realizing test, computer storage medium and terminal
CN111104320A (en) * 2019-12-15 2020-05-05 浪潮电子信息产业股份有限公司 Test method, device, equipment and medium
CN111104330A (en) * 2019-12-20 2020-05-05 广州品唯软件有限公司 Distributed test method, server and distributed test system
CN111522738A (en) * 2020-03-30 2020-08-11 拉扎斯网络科技（上海）有限公司 Test method and device of micro-service system, storage medium and electronic equipment
CN111539598B (en) * 2020-04-03 2022-04-15 联宝(合肥)电子科技有限公司 Test task allocation method, device and storage medium
CN112184085A (en) * 2020-11-05 2021-01-05 上海亿保健康管理有限公司 Task allocation method, device and equipment
CN112561245B (en) * 2020-11-27 2024-06-25 中广核工程有限公司 Collaborative management method, collaborative management device, computer equipment and storage medium

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106327087A (en) * 2016-08-26 2017-01-11 隆鑫通用动力股份有限公司 Test task assignment method
CN106485417A (en) * 2016-10-17 2017-03-08 南京国电南自电网自动化有限公司 Photovoltaic plant based on dynamic self-adapting task scheduling strategy moves O＆M method
CN107145442A (en) * 2017-04-27 2017-09-08 广东艾檬电子科技有限公司 A kind of method and device for testing application
CN107169639A (en) * 2017-04-27 2017-09-15 北京云测信息技术有限公司 A kind of test assignment distribution method and device

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2015135043A1 (en) * 2014-03-13 2015-09-17 Bugwolf Pty Ltd Evaluation system and method

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106327087A (en) * 2016-08-26 2017-01-11 隆鑫通用动力股份有限公司 Test task assignment method
CN106485417A (en) * 2016-10-17 2017-03-08 南京国电南自电网自动化有限公司 Photovoltaic plant based on dynamic self-adapting task scheduling strategy moves O＆M method
CN107145442A (en) * 2017-04-27 2017-09-08 广东艾檬电子科技有限公司 A kind of method and device for testing application
CN107169639A (en) * 2017-04-27 2017-09-15 北京云测信息技术有限公司 A kind of test assignment distribution method and device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN108536592A (en) 2018-09-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN108536592B (en) Test task assignment method and device and server
CN101346696B (en) Load distribution in client server system
US20080271032A1 (en) Data Processing Network
US20080244611A1 (en) Product, method and system for improved computer data processing capacity planning using dependency relationships from a configuration management database
CN107239336A (en) A kind of method and device for realizing task scheduling
CN110362611B (en) Database query method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN104750522B (en) The Dynamic Execution method and system of task or flow
CN110347602B (en) Method and device for executing multitasking script, electronic equipment and readable storage medium
CN113157379A (en) Cluster node resource scheduling method and device
CN111724037A (en) Operation resource allocation method and device, computer equipment and readable storage medium
CN111680085A (en) Data processing task analysis method and device, electronic equipment and readable storage medium
CN116467076A (en) Multi-cluster scheduling method and system based on cluster available resources
CN104346220B (en) A kind of method for scheduling task and system
CN110033144A (en) A kind of the dynamic self-adapting appraisal procedure and system of translation project risk
CN115185685B (en) Task scheduling method, device, computer equipment and storage medium
CN106961490A (en) A kind of resource monitoring method and system, a kind of home server
CN111639025A (en) Software testing method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN115033616A (en) Data screening rule verification method and device based on multi-round sampling
CN115169881A (en) Task allocation method and device and electronic equipment
CN115033377A (en) Service resource prediction method and device based on cluster server and electronic equipment
CN111651866B (en) Simulation execution method and system based on dynamic load migration and time synchronization
CN110737572B (en) Big data platform resource preemption test method, system, terminal and storage medium
CN113590317A (en) Scheduling method, device, medium and computing equipment of offline service
CN110908911A (en) Software testing method and device, electronic equipment and computer readable medium
WO2022120993A1 (en) Resource allocation method and apparatus for online scenario, and electronic device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant