CN108509674B - Improved hybrid MMC (modular multilevel converter) operation reliability evaluation model and method - Google Patents

Improved hybrid MMC (modular multilevel converter) operation reliability evaluation model and method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN108509674B
CN108509674B CN201810115615.7A CN201810115615A CN108509674B CN 108509674 B CN108509674 B CN 108509674B CN 201810115615 A CN201810115615 A CN 201810115615A CN 108509674 B CN108509674 B CN 108509674B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
reliability
igbt
formula
follows
diode
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
CN201810115615.7A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN108509674A (en
Inventor
余娟
冯斐
萨拉赫·卡莫
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Chongqing University
Original Assignee
Chongqing University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Chongqing University filed Critical Chongqing University
Priority to CN201810115615.7A priority Critical patent/CN108509674B/en
Publication of CN108509674A publication Critical patent/CN108509674A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN108509674B publication Critical patent/CN108509674B/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20Design optimisation, verification or simulation
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E60/00Enabling technologies; Technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Inverter Devices (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses an improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model and method based on multi-time scale heat damage, which mainly comprise the following steps: 1) and acquiring real-time data of the wind power transmission system. The real-time data mainly comprises wind speed, air temperature and equipment electrical parameters. 2) And establishing a reliability evaluation model of the hybrid MMC power device by utilizing the running characteristics of the hybrid MMC and a Miner's damage theory according to the original data. The power device of the wind power transmission system mainly comprises an insulated gate bipolar transistor IGBT and a crystal Diode. 3) And establishing a capacitor reliability evaluation model considering the voltage sharing of the fault SM according to the influence of the fault SM on the perfect SM capacitor. 4) And analyzing the loss distribution of the hybrid MMC device, thereby establishing an improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model considering SM multi-state. The method can be widely applied to the operation reliability evaluation of the hybrid MMC in the wind power and other renewable energy transmission grid connection.

Description

Improved hybrid MMC (modular multilevel converter) operation reliability evaluation model and method
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of wind power transmission, in particular to an improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model and method based on multi-time scale heat damage.
Background
The modular multilevel converter type high-voltage direct-current transmission (MMC-HVDC) is a power transmission mode which has great prospect for realizing the connection of a large-scale wind power station and a power grid. The Modular Multilevel Converter (MMC) has the characteristics of modular design, high output voltage quality and the like, is key equipment in the VSC-HVDC, and the operational reliability of the Modular Multilevel Converter (MMC) is related to the safe and stable operation of the VSC-HVDC. However, the MMC has large transmission power variation due to random fluctuation of wind speed, and junction temperature amplitude and fluctuation variation of a power device in the MMC are obvious due to power and air temperature fluctuation, so that the reliability of the MMC is greatly influenced. Meanwhile, along with the increasing of wind power transmission power, the voltage level of the MMC rises, MMC devices are increased gradually, and the influence of power frequency, switching frequency and other electrical parameters on the operation reliability of the MMC is increased due to the increase of the MMC devices. However, conventional equipment reliability evaluation based on statistical data ignores the influence of current operating conditions on equipment reliability, resulting in a large deviation of the reliability evaluation result from actual operation. Therefore, the influence of environmental factors and electrical parameters needs to be considered, and an MMC operation reliability evaluation model in the wind power transmission system needs to be researched.
In recent years, many researches are made on MMC reliability research at home and abroad, but MMC reliability is evaluated based on a device constant fault rate model, or the fault rate of an MMC device is corrected by introducing a voltage correction factor. However, since the failure rate of the power device is time-varying and does not satisfy the basic condition of the constant failure rate model, it is necessary to further study the MMC operation reliability evaluation model based on the failure mechanism of the power device. In engineering applications, the hybrid MMC becomes a practical application scheme at present due to its good dc fault ride-through capability and low cost.
Disclosure of Invention
The present invention is directed to solving the problems of the prior art.
The technical scheme adopted for achieving the purpose of the invention is that the improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model based on multi-time scale heat damage mainly comprises the following steps:
1) and acquiring real-time data of the wind power transmission system. The real-time data mainly comprises wind speed, air temperature and equipment electrical parameters.
2) And establishing a reliability evaluation model of the hybrid MMC power device by utilizing the running characteristics of the hybrid MMC and a Miner's damage theory according to the original data. The power device of the wind power transmission system mainly comprises an insulated gate bipolar transistor IGBT and a crystal Diode.
Further, the main steps of establishing the reliability evaluation model of the hybrid MMC power device are as follows:
2.1) calculating the multi-time scale junction temperature of the mixed MMC power device. The method mainly comprises the following steps:
2.1.1) determining the output power P of the fan of the wind power transmission systemWToutAnd a sampling time tnCorresponding to wind speed VtnThe relationship (2) of (c).
Output power P of ith fan of wind power transmission systemWTout,iAnd a sampling time tnCorresponding to wind speed VtnThe relationship of (a) is as follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000021
in the formula, PratedThe rated power of the fan. Vcutin、VratedAnd VcutoutRespectively cut-in wind speed, rated wind speed and cut-out wind speed. k is a radical ofpRepresenting the coefficients related to air density and fan area. N is a radical ofWTThe total number of the fans in the wind power transmission system. n is the total number of samples up to the current operating time. t is tnIs the sampling instant. VtnIs the wind speed. i is any fan. 1, …, NWT
Transport power P of hybrid MMCMMCoutAs follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000022
in the formula, NWTThe total number of the fans in the wind power transmission system. i is any fan. 1, …, NWT。PWTout,iAnd outputting power for the ith fan.
2.1.2) calculating to obtain the mixed MMC bridge arm current according to the formula 1.
A phase upper bridge arm current IauAnd phase A lower bridge arm current IadRespectively as follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000023
in the formula IdcIs a direct side current. I ismIs the ac side current peak.
Figure GDA0003220911930000024
Is the power factor angle. f. of0Is the fundamental frequency.
Direct side current IdcAs follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000025
in the formula of UdcIs the dc side voltage. PMMCoutIs the transport power of the hybrid MMC.
Peak value of AC side current ImAs follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000026
in the formula, PMMCoutIs the transport power of the hybrid MMC.
Figure GDA0003220911930000027
Is the power factor angle. U shapeacThe effective value of the AC side voltage.
2.1.3) calculating the average loss of the jth switching period of the IGBT of the upper bridge arm of the phase A.
Average loss of jth switching period of IGBT (insulated Gate Bipolar transistor) of upper bridge arm of A phase
Figure GDA0003220911930000028
As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000029
in the formula, Rce、UceoAnd τTThe IGBT forward on-resistance, the threshold voltage and the duty cycle, respectively. a isT、bTAnd cTFor simulating IGBT dynamic characteristic curveAnd (5) synthesizing parameters. U shaperatedThe rated voltage of the IGBT. f. ofswAnd ρTThe switching frequency and the temperature coefficient of the IGBT, respectively. j is an arbitrary switching period. j is 1, …, nsw。nswIs the total number of switching cycles in one fundamental frequency cycle. I isauIs the phase A upper bridge arm current. U shapedcIs the dc side voltage.
Number of switching cycles nswAs follows:
nsw=fsw/f0。 (7)
in the formula (f)swThe switching frequency of the IGBT. f. of0Is the fundamental frequency.
2.1.4) calculating the average loss of the j th switching period of the Diode
Figure GDA0003220911930000031
Average loss of the j-th switching period of the Diode
Figure GDA0003220911930000032
As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000033
in the formula: rd、UdAnd τDRespectively, Diode forward on-resistance, threshold voltage, and duty cycle. a isD、bDAnd cDParameters were fitted to the Diode dynamics curve. U shapeDIs a Diode rated voltage. f. ofdwAnd ρDRespectively, the switching frequency and the temperature coefficient of the Diode. I isauIs the phase A upper bridge arm current. U shapedcIs the dc side voltage.
2.1.5) calculating the junction temperature of the jth switching period of the IGBT in the hybrid MMC
Figure GDA0003220911930000034
The junction temperature
Figure GDA0003220911930000035
As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000036
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
Figure GDA0003220911930000037
is the sampling time tnThe corresponding air temperature.
Figure GDA0003220911930000038
The temperature difference of an RC parallel unit in the jth switching period IGBT junction-shell heat network of the ith order. r represents an arbitrary order. r is 1,2,3, 4.
Figure GDA0003220911930000039
The temperature difference of the RC parallel unit in the jth switching period IGBT shell-heat sink thermal network.
Figure GDA00032209119300000310
The temperature difference of the RC parallel unit in the jth switching period IGBT heat sink-environment thermal network. j is an arbitrary switching period. j is 1, …, nsw。nswIs the total number of switching cycles in one fundamental frequency cycle.
Temperature difference of RC parallel unit in jth switching period IGBT junction-shell network of nth order
Figure GDA00032209119300000311
As follows:
Figure GDA00032209119300000312
in the formula, RTjc,rIs the thermal resistance. Tau isTjc,rIs the thermal resistance RTjc,rThermal time constant of (2). T isswIs a switching cycle.
Figure GDA00032209119300000313
Is the temperature difference of the RC parallel unit in the j-1 switching period IGBT junction-shell heat network of the r-th order.e is the base of the natural log function and is about 2.71828. .
Figure GDA00032209119300000314
Average loss of the jth switching period of the IGBT of the upper bridge arm of the phase A. j is an arbitrary switching period. j is 1, …, nsw。nswIs the total number of switching cycles in one fundamental frequency cycle.
Temperature difference of RC parallel unit in jth switching period IGBT shell-heat sink network
Figure GDA00032209119300000315
As follows:
Figure GDA00032209119300000316
in the formula, RTchIs the thermal resistance. Tau isTchIs the thermal resistance RTchThermal time constant of (2). T isswIs a switching cycle.
Figure GDA00032209119300000317
Is the temperature difference of the RC parallel unit in the j-1 switching period IGBT shell-heat sink thermal network. e is the base of the natural log function and is about 2.71828. .
Figure GDA00032209119300000318
Average loss of the jth switching period of the IGBT of the upper bridge arm of the phase A. j is an arbitrary switching period. j is 1, …, nsw。nswIs the total number of switching cycles in one fundamental frequency cycle.
The jth switching period IGBT is the temperature difference of RC parallel units in the radiating fin-environment network
Figure GDA0003220911930000041
As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000042
in the formula, RhaIs the thermal resistance. Tau ishaIs the thermal resistance RhaThermal time constant of (2). T isswIs a switching cycle.
Figure GDA0003220911930000043
Is the cycle temperature difference of the RC parallel unit in the j-1 th switch IGBT thermal network. j is an arbitrary switching period. j is 1, …, nsw。nswIs the total number of switching cycles in one fundamental frequency cycle.
Figure GDA0003220911930000044
Average loss of the jth switching period of the IGBT of the upper bridge arm of the phase A.
Figure GDA0003220911930000045
Average loss is the j-th switching period of the A-phase upper bridge arm Diode.
2.1.6) calculating the junction temperature of the j-th switching cycle of the Diode in the hybrid MMC
Figure GDA0003220911930000046
The junction temperature
Figure GDA0003220911930000047
As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000048
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
Figure GDA0003220911930000049
is the sampling time tnThe corresponding air temperature.
Figure GDA00032209119300000410
The temperature difference of an RC parallel unit in a j-th switching period Diode junction-shell heat network of an r-th step. r represents an arbitrary order. r is 1,2,3, 4.
Figure GDA00032209119300000411
For the temperature of the RC parallel unit in the j switching period Diode shell-fin heat networkAnd (4) poor.
Figure GDA00032209119300000412
The temperature difference of the RC parallel unit in the jth switching period IGBT heat sink-environment thermal network.
j is an arbitrary switching period. j is 1, …, nsw。nswIs the total number of switching cycles in one fundamental frequency cycle.
Temperature difference of RC parallel unit in jth switching period Diode junction-shell network
Figure GDA00032209119300000413
As follows:
Figure GDA00032209119300000414
in the formula, RDjc,rIs the thermal resistance. Tau isDjc,rIs the thermal resistance RDjc,rThermal time constant of (2). T isdwIs a switching cycle.
Figure GDA00032209119300000415
Is the temperature difference of the RC parallel unit in the j-1 switching period Diode junction-shell heat network. j is an arbitrary switching period. j is 1, …, nsw。nswIs the total number of switching cycles in one fundamental frequency cycle.
Figure GDA00032209119300000416
Average loss is the j-th switching period of the A-phase upper bridge arm Diode.
Temperature difference of RC parallel unit in jth switching period Diode shell-fin network
Figure GDA00032209119300000417
As follows:
Figure GDA00032209119300000418
in the formula, RDchIs the thermal resistance. Tau isDchIs the thermal resistance RDchHot time ofA constant. T isswIs a switching cycle.
Figure GDA00032209119300000419
Is the temperature difference of the RC parallel unit in the j-1 switching period Diade shell-fin heat network.
Figure GDA00032209119300000420
Average loss is the j-th switching period of the A-phase upper bridge arm Diode. j is 1, …, nsw。nswIs the total number of switching cycles in one fundamental frequency cycle.
2.2) hybrid MMC power device multi-time scale reliability evaluation. The method mainly comprises the following steps:
2.2.1) calculating the cycle failure period number N corresponding to the low-frequency period of the IGBTTf_L. Number of cycles to failure NTf_LAs follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000051
in the formula, tonThe heating time is shown. U is 0.01 times the block voltage of the module. D is the diameter of the aluminum bonding wire. k is 9.3 × 1014。β1=-4.416。β2=1285。β3=-0.463。β4=-0.716。β5=-0.761。β6=-0.5。TTjmax_LAnd the maximum value of the low-frequency junction temperature of the IGBT. T isTjmin_LAnd the minimum value of the low-frequency junction temperature of the IGBT. I isLThe effective value of the current of the IGBT low-frequency aluminum bonding wire is obtained. e is the base of the natural log function and is about 2.71828. . Cycle failure period number N corresponding to IGBT fundamental frequency periodTf_FAs follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000052
in the formula, tonThe heating time is shown. U is 0.01 times the block voltage of the module. D is the diameter of the aluminum bonding wire. k is 9.3 × 1014。β1=-4.416。β2=1285。β3=-0.463。β4=-0.716。β5=-0.761。β6=-0.5。TTjmax_FAnd the maximum value of the junction temperature of the IGBT fundamental frequency. T isTjmin_FAnd the minimum value of the IGBT fundamental frequency junction temperature is obtained. I isFThe effective value of the current of the IGBT fundamental frequency aluminum bonding wire is obtained. e is the base of the natural log function and is about 2.71828. .
According to Miner's damage theory and formula (17), IGBT is in 0-tnTime of day life consumption CLT(tn) As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000053
in the formula, NTsum_LIs 0-tnThe total number of low frequency thermal cycles at that time. N is a radical ofT_L,gAnd NTf_L,gThe number of thermal cycles and the number of cycle failure cycles corresponding to the g-th low-frequency thermal cycle of the IGBT are respectively. N is a radical ofT_F,qAnd NTf_F,qAnd respectively obtaining the fundamental frequency thermal cycle times and the cycle failure cycles corresponding to the q-th sampling time interval T of the IGBT. n is the total number of samples up to the current operating time. N is a radical ofTsum_LIs the total number of low frequency thermal cycles.
IGBT sampling time tnMean time to failure MTTF corresponding to time interval TT(tn) As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000054
in the formula, CLT(tn) Is IGBT at 0-tnThe lifetime of the moment is consumed. T is the sampling time interval.
IGBT failure rate lambdaT(tn) As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000055
in the formula, MTTFT(tn) For the IGBT sampling time tnCorresponding to the average time to failure of time interval T.
IGBT reliability RT(tn)As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000056
in the formula, λT(tn) Is the IGBT failure rate. t is tnIs the sampling instant.
2.2.2) calculating the cycle failure number N corresponding to the low-frequency period of the DiodeDf_L. Number of cycles to failure NDf_LAs follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000057
in the formula, tonThe heating time is shown. U is 0.01 times the block voltage of the module. D is the diameter of the aluminum bonding wire. k is 9.3 × 1014。β1=-4.416。β2=1285。β3=-0.463。β4=-0.716。β5=-0.761。β6=-0.5。TDjmax_LIs the Diode low frequency junction temperature maximum. T isDjmin_LIs the Diode low frequency junction temperature minimum. I isDLThe effective value of the current of the Diode low-frequency aluminum bonding wire is obtained.
Number of cycle failure cycles N corresponding to the period of the Diode fundamental frequencyDf_FAs follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000061
in the formula, tonThe heating time is shown. U is 0.01 times the block voltage of the module. D is the diameter of the aluminum bonding wire. k is 9.3 × 1014。β1=-4.416。β2=1285。β3=-0.463。β4=-0.716。β5=-0.761。β6=-0.5。TDjmax_FIs the Diode fundamental frequency junction temperature maximum. T isDjmin_FIs the Diode fundamental frequency junction temperature minimum. I isDFThe effective value of the current of the Diode fundamental frequency aluminum bonding wire is obtained.
According to Miner's theory of injuryEquation (23), the Diade is between 0 and tnTime of day life consumption CLD(tn) As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000062
in the formula, NDsum_LIs a Diode at 0-tnTotal number of low frequency thermal cycles at the moment. N is a radical ofD_L,αAnd NDf_L,αThe number of thermal cycles and the number of cycle failure cycles corresponding to the alpha-th low-frequency thermal cycle of the Diode are respectively. N is a radical ofD_F,ωAnd NDf_F,ωThe thermal cycle number of the fundamental frequency and the cycle failure cycle number corresponding to the omega th sampling time interval T are respectively. n is the total number of samples up to the current operating time.
The Diode sampling time tnMean time to failure MTTF corresponding to time interval TD(tn) As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000063
in the formula, CLD(tn) Is a Diode at 0-tnThe lifetime of the moment is consumed. T is the sampling time interval.
Diade failure rate λD(tn) As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000064
in the formula, MTTFD(tn) For the moment t of the Diade samplingnCorresponding to the average time to failure of time interval T.
Diade reliability RD(tn) is as follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000065
in the formula, λD(tn) Is the Diode failure rate. e is a natural logarithmic functionAbout 2.71828. . t is tnIs the sampling instant.
3) And establishing a hybrid MMC capacitor reliability evaluation model considering the voltage sharing of the fault SM according to the influence of the fault SM on the perfect SM capacitor.
Further, the main steps of establishing the reliability evaluation model of the hybrid MMC capacitor are as follows:
3.1) calculating the capacitor reliability RC(tn) Namely:
Figure GDA0003220911930000071
in the formula, λcIs the capacitor failure rate. Ws0Is in an initial state. WsiSelf-healing energy corresponding to i SM faults. t is tnIs the sampling instant.
Self-healing energy WsiAs follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000072
UCicapacitor voltage for i SM faults. RCIs a sheet resistance. C is capacitance. And f (P) is a sandwich pressure related function. k is a radical ofcTo calculate the correlation coefficient of the self-healing energy. a is the capacitor correlation coefficient. And b is the resistance correlation coefficient.
3.2) according to the capacitor reliability RC(tn) The hybrid MMC capacitor reliability was evaluated.
4) And analyzing the loss distribution of the hybrid MMC device, thereby establishing an improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model considering SM multi-state.
Further, the main steps of establishing the hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model considering SM multi-state are as follows:
4.1) calculating the reliability of the SM multi-state. The SM main circuit consists of an IGBT, a Diode and a capacitor.
According to the combination relation of IGBT, Diode and capacitor in SM, CSSM reliability R under intact stateCSu(tn) As follows:
RCSu(tn)=RT1(tn)·RD1(tn)·RT2(tn)·RD2(tn)·RT3(tn)·RD3(tn)·RC(tn)。 (30)
in the formula, RT1(tn)、RT2(tn) And RT3(tn) Reliability of the first IGBT, the second IGBT and the third IGBT, respectively. RD1(tn)、RD2(tn) And RD3(tn) Reliability of the first, second and third Diode, respectively. Rc(tn) The reliability of the capacitor.
HBSM reliability R in good conditionHBu(tn) As follows:
RHBu(tn)=RT1(tn)·RD1(tn)·RT2(tn)·RD2(tn)·RC(tn)。 (31)
in the formula, RT1(tn)、RT2(tn) And RT3(tn) Reliability of the first IGBT, the second IGBT and the third IGBT, respectively. RD1(tn)、RD2(tn) And RD3(tn) Reliability of the first, second and third Diode, respectively. Rc(tn) The reliability of the capacitor.
Reliability R of CSSM under half fault conditionCSp(tn) As follows:
RCSp(tn)=RT1(tn)·RD1(tn)·RT2(tn)·RD2(tn)·(1-RT3(tn)·RD3(tn))·RC(tn)。 (32)
in the formula, RT1(tn)、RT2(tn) And RT3(tn) Reliability of the first IGBT, the second IGBT and the third IGBT, respectively. RD1(tn)、RD2(tn) And RD3(tn) Reliability of the first, second and third Diode, respectively. Rc (t)n) The reliability of the capacitor.
4.2) accounting for SM multistate hybrid MMC reliability
The reliability of the bridge arm is mainly divided into two cases.
The first case is: when neither CSSM nor HBSM damaged number exceeds its own redundancy number, iCS≤MCSAnd i isHB≤MHBMeanwhile, the hybrid MMC normally operates.
According to a binomial distribution probability formula, in the first case, the total CSSM reliability R of the upper bridge armCSs1(tn) As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000081
in the formula, NCSIs the baseline number of CSSM. RCSu(tn) The CSSM reliability in good condition. i.e. icsIs the number of CSSM damages. MCSIs the redundancy number of the CSSM.
In the first case, the total HBSM reliability R of the upper bridge armHBs1(tn) As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000082
in the formula, NHBThe baseline number for the HBSM. RHBu(tn) The HBSM reliability in the intact state. i.e. iHBIs the number of HBSM breakages. MHBIs the redundancy number of the HBSM.
Based on the series relation between CSSM and HBSM in bridge arm, the reliability R of single-phase upper bridge arm under the first conditionArm_u1(tn) As follows:
RArm_u1(tn)=RCSs1(tn)·RHBs1(tn)。 (35)
in the formula, RHBs1(tn) The total HBSM reliability for the upper arm in the first case. RCSs1(tn) The total CSSM reliability for the upper leg in the first case.
The second case is: when the CSSM defect number does not exceed the self-redundancy number, the HBSM defect number exceeds the self-redundancy number, and the good and half-fault CSSMs replace the damaged HBSM, i.e., iCS≤MCSAnd M isHB<iHB≤MHB+MCS-(iCS-iCSp) Meanwhile, the hybrid MMC normally operates. i.e. iCSpIs the CSSM half-fault number.
According to a polynomial distribution probability formula, the total CSSM reliability R of the upper bridge armCSs2(tn) As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000083
in the formula iCSpIs the CSSM half-fault number. N is a radical ofCSIs the baseline number of CSSM. RCSu(tn) The CSSM reliability in good condition. i.e. icsIs the number of CSSM damages. McsIs the redundancy number of the CSSM. RCSp(tn) Reliability of the half fault state CSSM.
Based on the serial connection relation of all HBSM in the bridge arms and according to a binomial distribution probability formula, the total HBSM reliability R of the upper bridge armHBs2(tn) As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000084
in the formula iCSpIs the CSSM half-fault number. i.e. icsIs the number of CSSM damages. N is a radical ofHBThe baseline number for the HBSM. RHBu(tn)The HBSM reliability in the intact state. i.e. iHBIs the number of HBSM breakages. MHBIs the redundancy number of the HBSM.
Based on the series connection of CSSM and HBSM in the bridge arm, the second caseReliability R of single-phase upper bridge arm under conditionArm_u2(tn) As follows:
RArm_u2(tn)=RCSs2(tn)·RHBs2(tn)。 (38)
in the formula, RHBs2(tn) The total HBSM reliability for the upper arm in the second case. RCSs2(tn) The overall CSSM reliability for the upper leg in the second case.
Reliability function R of single-phase upper bridge armArm_u(tn)As follows:
RArm_u(tn)=RArm_u1(tn)+RArm_u2(tn)。 (39)
in the formula, RArm_u1(tn) The single-phase upper arm reliability in the first case. RArm_u2(tn) The reliability of the single-phase upper bridge arm in the second condition.
Based on the symmetry of the mixed MMC and the series relation of each bridge arm, the reliability R (t) of the mixed MMCn) As follows:
R(tn)=RArm_u(tn)6。 (40)
in the formula, RArm_u(tn) Is a single-phase upper bridge arm reliability function.
A method for using an improved hybrid MMC operational reliability assessment model based on multi-time scale thermal damage, comprising the steps of:
I) data is input in the improved hybrid MMC operational reliability evaluation model. The data mainly comprises environmental parameters and mixed MMC and fan electrical parameters. The environmental parameters mainly comprise wind speed VtnAnd air temperature Ta,tn. The hybrid MMC and wind turbine electrical parameters mainly comprise switching frequency fswThe hybrid MMC comprises a direct current side rated voltage, an alternating current side rated voltage, a power factor, a modulation ratio and a duty ratio.
II) according to the input data, the improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model calculates the loss of the power device. I.e. calculating samplesTime tnAverage loss P of IGBT switching period in corresponding time interval TT,avgAnd the average loss P of the switching period of the DiodeD,avg
III) according to the input data, the improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model calculates the multi-time scale junction temperature of the power device.
Calculating the sampling time tnJunction temperature mean value T of IGBT fundamental frequency period within corresponding time interval TTjavg_FMaximum value TTjmax_FMinimum value TTjmin_FAnd effective value of current I of aluminum bonding wireF. Calculating 0-t according to the rain flow algorithmnMaximum T of junction temperature curve of IGBT low-frequency period at momentTjmax_LMinimum value TTjmin_LAnd effective value of current I of aluminum bonding wireL
IV) according to the input data, the improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model calculates the service life consumption, the average failure time and the failure rate of the power device and the multi-time scale.
Calculating the number N of low-frequency cyclic failure cycles of the IGBTTf_LAnd the number N of cycles of failure of fundamental frequency cycleTf_FThereby obtaining the IGBT at 0-tnTime of day life consumption CLT(tn) Sampling time tnMean time to failure MTTF corresponding to time interval TT(tn) Failure rate λT(tn) And degree of reliability RT(tn)。
Calculating the number N of low-frequency cycle failure cycles of the DiodeDf_LAnd the number N of cycles of failure of fundamental frequency cycleDf_FThus obtaining a Diode in the range of 0-tnTime of day life consumption CLD(tn) Sampling time tnMean time to failure MTTF corresponding to time interval TD(tn) Failure rate λD(tn) And degree of reliability RD(tn)。
V) according to the input data, the improved mixed MMC operation reliability evaluation model calculates the reliability R of the capacitorC(tn)。
VI) based on the input data, the improved hybrid MMC operational reliability assessment model calculates and accounts for the reliability of the SM multi-state hybrid MMCDegree R (t)n) Thereby evaluating the reliability of improving the operation of the hybrid MMC.
The technical effect of the present invention is undoubted. The invention focuses on researching the coupling relation between the reliability of the hybrid MMC and the wind speed, the air temperature and the internal parameters of the electrical equipment, comprehensively considers the influence of the environmental factors such as the wind speed, the air temperature, the power frequency and the like and the electrical parameters on the operation reliability of the hybrid MMC from the failure mechanism of a device, and can effectively reflect the influence of the environmental factors and the internal electrical parameters of the equipment on the operation reliability of the hybrid MMC. The method couples the operational reliability of the hybrid MMC with the environmental factors and the electrical parameters, optimizes the topology of the hybrid MMC from the operation angle on the basis of loss, accurately describes the relationship between the operational reliability of the hybrid MMC and the environmental factors and the electrical parameters, and improves the operational reliability level of the hybrid MMC. Based on the running characteristic of the hybrid MMC, the invention provides a measure for reusing the fault SM aiming at the problem that the loss distribution of the SM in the hybrid MMC is seriously uneven, thereby improving the utilization rate of the SM in the hybrid MMC and achieving the effect of improving the running reliability of the hybrid MMC. The method can be widely applied to the operation reliability evaluation of the hybrid MMC in the wind power and other renewable energy transmission grid connection.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a diagram of a hybrid MMC topology;
FIG. 2 is an HBSM topology;
FIG. 3 is a CSSM topology;
FIG. 4 is an annual wind speed data curve;
FIG. 5 is a plot of annual air temperature data;
FIG. 6 is a mixed MMC reliability curve before and after modification;
FIG. 7 is a hybrid MMC reliability curve;
FIG. 8 is an SM failure rate curve;
FIG. 9 is a graph of hybrid MMC reliability as a function of switching frequency and time.
Detailed Description
The present invention is further illustrated by the following examples, but it should not be construed that the scope of the above-described subject matter is limited to the following examples. Various substitutions and alterations can be made without departing from the technical idea of the invention and the scope of the invention is covered by the present invention according to the common technical knowledge and the conventional means in the field.
Example 1:
an improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model based on multi-time scale heat damage mainly comprises the following steps:
1) and acquiring real-time data of the wind power transmission system. The real-time data mainly comprises wind speed, air temperature and equipment electrical parameters.
2) And establishing a reliability evaluation model of the hybrid MMC power device by utilizing the running characteristics of the hybrid MMC and a Miner's damage theory according to the original data. The power device of the wind power transmission system mainly comprises an insulated gate bipolar transistor IGBT and a crystal Diode.
Further, the hybrid MMC topology mainly includes three a, b, c three phase cells.
The a-phase units are sequentially connected in series with NCSCSSM module and NHBAnd each HBSM module.
The b-phase units are sequentially connected in series with NCSCSSM module and NHBAnd each HBSM module.
The c-phase units are sequentially connected in series with NCSCSSM module and NHBAnd each HBSM module.
The HBSM is composed of power modules T1, T2, and a capacitor C.
The CSSM is comprised of power modules T1, T2, T3, and a capacitor C.
Preferably, the MMC topology structure may be an upper bridge arm and a lower bridge arm each formed by connecting N sub-modules and 1 bridge arm reactance L in series, where SM is formed by 2 switching devices and 1 energy storage capacitor. Each SM can be in 3 operative states of plunge, cut and latch.
Further, the main steps of establishing the reliability evaluation model of the hybrid MMC power device are as follows:
2.1) calculating the multi-time scale junction temperature of the mixed MMC power device. The method mainly comprises the following steps:
2.1.1) determining the output power P of the fan of the wind power transmission systemWToutAnd a sampling time tnCorresponding to wind speed VtnThe relationship (2) of (c).
Output power P of ith fan of wind power transmission systemWTout,iAnd a sampling time tnCorresponding to wind speed VtnThe relationship of (a) is as follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000111
in the formula, PratedThe rated power of the fan. Vcutin、VratedAnd VcutoutRespectively cut-in wind speed, rated wind speed and cut-out wind speed. k is a radical ofpRepresenting the coefficients related to air density and fan area. N is a radical ofWTThe total number of the fans in the wind power transmission system. n is the total number of samples up to the current operating time. t is tnIs the sampling instant. VtnIs the wind speed. i is any fan. 1, …, NWT
Transport power P of hybrid MMCMMCoutAs follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000112
in the formula, NWTThe total number of the fans in the wind power transmission system. i is any fan. 1, …, NWT。PWTout,iAnd outputting power for the ith fan.
2.1.2) calculating to obtain the mixed MMC bridge arm current according to the formula 1.
A phase upper bridge arm current IauAnd phase A lower bridge arm current IadRespectively as follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000113
in the formula IdcIs a direct side current. I ismIs the ac side current peak.
Figure GDA0003220911930000114
Is the power factor angle. f. of0Is the fundamental frequency.
Direct side current IdcAs follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000121
in the formula of UdcIs the dc side voltage. PMMCoutIs the transport power of the hybrid MMC.
Peak value of AC side current ImAs follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000122
in the formula, PMMCoutIs the transport power of the hybrid MMC.
Figure GDA0003220911930000123
Is the power factor angle. U shapeacThe effective value of the AC side voltage.
2.1.3) calculating the average loss of the jth switching period of the IGBT of the upper bridge arm of the phase A.
Average loss of jth switching period of IGBT (insulated Gate Bipolar transistor) of upper bridge arm of A phase
Figure GDA0003220911930000124
As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000125
in the formula, Rce、UceoAnd τTThe IGBT forward on-resistance, the threshold voltage and the duty cycle, respectively. a isT、bTAnd cTAnd fitting parameters for the IGBT dynamic characteristic curve. U shaperatedThe rated voltage of the IGBT. f. ofswAnd ρTThe switching frequency and the temperature coefficient of the IGBT, respectively. j is an arbitrary switching period. j is 1, …, nsw。nswIs the total number of switching cycles in one fundamental frequency cycle. I isauIs the phase A upper bridge arm current. U shapedcIs the dc side voltage.
Number of switching cycles nswAs follows:
nsw=fsw/f0。 (7)
in the formula (f)swThe switching frequency of the IGBT. f. of0Is the fundamental frequency.
2.1.4) calculating the average loss of the j th switching period of the Diode
Figure GDA0003220911930000126
Average loss of the j-th switching period of the Diode
Figure GDA0003220911930000127
As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000128
in the formula: rd、UdAnd τDRespectively, Diode forward on-resistance, threshold voltage, and duty cycle. a isD、bDAnd cDParameters were fitted to the Diode dynamics curve. U shapeDIs a Diode rated voltage. f. ofdwAnd ρDRespectively, the switching frequency and the temperature coefficient of the Diode. I isauIs the phase A upper bridge arm current. U shapedcIs the dc side voltage.
2.1.5) calculating the junction temperature of the jth switching period of the IGBT in the hybrid MMC
Figure GDA0003220911930000129
The loss of the hybrid MMC power device causes the junction temperature of the device to rise, and the junction temperature of the power module can be effectively calculated by constructing a foster heat network model.
The junction temperature is determined from the foster thermal network model
Figure GDA00032209119300001210
As follows:
Figure GDA00032209119300001211
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
Figure GDA00032209119300001212
is the sampling time tnThe corresponding air temperature.
Figure GDA00032209119300001213
The temperature difference of an RC parallel unit in the jth switching period IGBT junction-shell heat network of the ith order. r represents an arbitrary order. r is 1,2,3, 4.
Figure GDA00032209119300001214
The temperature difference of the RC parallel unit in the jth switching period IGBT shell-heat sink thermal network.
Figure GDA0003220911930000131
The temperature difference of the RC parallel unit in the jth switching period IGBT heat sink-environment thermal network. j is an arbitrary switching period. j is 1, …, nsw。nswIs the total number of switching cycles in one fundamental frequency cycle.
Temperature difference of RC parallel unit in jth switching period IGBT junction-shell network of nth order
Figure GDA0003220911930000132
As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000133
in the formula, RTjc,rIs the thermal resistance. Tau isTjc,rIs the thermal resistance RTjc,rThermal time constant of (2). T isswIs a switching cycle.
Figure GDA0003220911930000134
Is the temperature difference of the RC parallel unit in the j-1 switching period IGBT junction-shell heat network of the r-th order. e is the base of the natural log function and is about 2.71828. .
Figure GDA0003220911930000135
Average loss of the jth switching period of the IGBT of the upper bridge arm of the phase A. j is an arbitrary switching period. j is 1, …, nsw。nswIs the total number of switching cycles in one fundamental frequency cycle.
Temperature difference of RC parallel unit in jth switching period IGBT shell-heat sink network
Figure GDA0003220911930000136
As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000137
in the formula, RTchIs the thermal resistance. Tau isTchIs the thermal resistance RTchThermal time constant of (2). T isswIs a switching cycle.
Figure GDA0003220911930000138
Is the temperature difference of the RC parallel unit in the j-1 switching period IGBT shell-heat sink thermal network. e is the base of the natural log function and is about 2.71828. .
Figure GDA0003220911930000139
Average loss of the jth switching period of the IGBT of the upper bridge arm of the phase A. j is an arbitrary switching period. j is 1, …, nsw。nswIs the total number of switching cycles in one fundamental frequency cycle.
The jth switching period IGBT is the temperature difference of RC parallel units in the radiating fin-environment network
Figure GDA00032209119300001310
As follows:
Figure GDA00032209119300001311
in the formula, RhaIs the thermal resistance. Tau ishaIs the thermal resistance RhaThermal time constant of (2). T isswIs a switching cycle.
Figure GDA00032209119300001312
Is the cycle temperature difference of the RC parallel unit in the j-1 th switch IGBT thermal network. j is an arbitrary switching period. j is 1, …, nsw。nswIs the total number of switching cycles in one fundamental frequency cycle.
Figure GDA00032209119300001313
Average loss of the jth switching period of the IGBT of the upper bridge arm of the phase A.
Figure GDA00032209119300001314
Average loss is the j-th switching period of the A-phase upper bridge arm Diode.
Because the power frequency and other electrical parameters of different switching periods are different, the electrical parameters are reflected in the fundamental frequency junction temperature of a short time scale. 0-tnThe time instant comprises n sampling time intervals T, where TnCorresponding to a sampling time interval T having NT_FOne period of fundamental frequency (N)T_F=T×f0) The ith fundamental frequency period (i ═ 1, …, NT_F) And taking the temperature difference of the RC parallel unit as an iterative variable to obtain a junction temperature curve of the fundamental frequency period, and further obtain a junction temperature mean value T corresponding to the fundamental frequency periodTjavg_FMaximum value TTjmax_FMinimum value TTjmin_FAnd effective value of current I of aluminum bonding wireFAnd the method is used for evaluating the reliability of the IGBT fundamental frequency time scale. Assuming that the wind speed and air temperature are constant within a sampling time interval T, then N isT_FT of one fundamental frequency periodTjavg_F、TTjmax_F、TTjmin_FAnd IFAnd therefore, the junction temperature parameter of one fundamental frequency period can be extracted.
The wind speed and air temperature at different sampling time intervals T are different and are reflected in the low-frequency junction temperature of a long time scale. According to 0-tnMean value T of junction temperature of fundamental frequency of each sampling time interval T at momentTjavg_FObtaining N by rain flow algorithmTsum_LObtaining a low-frequency period junction temperature curve, and further obtaining a g-th low-frequency period junction temperature curve (g is 1, …, N)Tsum_L) Corresponding maximum value of junction temperature TTjmax_LMinimum value TTjmin_LAnd effective value of current I of aluminum bonding wireLAnd the method is used for evaluating the reliability of the IGBT low-frequency time scale.
2.1.6) calculating the junction temperature of the j-th switching cycle of the Diode in the hybrid MMC
Figure GDA0003220911930000141
The junction temperature
Figure GDA0003220911930000142
As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000143
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
Figure GDA0003220911930000144
is the sampling time tnThe corresponding air temperature.
Figure GDA0003220911930000145
The temperature difference of an RC parallel unit in a j-th switching period Diode junction-shell heat network of an r-th step. r represents an arbitrary order. r is 1,2,3, 4.
Figure GDA0003220911930000146
The temperature difference of the RC parallel units in the j switching period Diode shell-fin heat network.
Figure GDA0003220911930000147
The temperature difference of the RC parallel unit in the jth switching period IGBT heat sink-environment thermal network. j is an arbitrary switching period. j is 1, …, nsw。nswIs the total number of switching cycles in one fundamental frequency cycle. Because the temperature difference of the RC parallel unit in the jth switching period IGBT radiating fin-environment heat network and the temperature difference of the RC parallel unit in the jth switching period Diode radiating fin-environment heat network are equal in value, in order to simplify the calculation steps, the Diode junction temperature is calculated
Figure GDA0003220911930000148
In time, the temperature difference can be directly used
Figure GDA0003220911930000149
Temperature difference of RC parallel unit in jth switching period Diode junction-shell network
Figure GDA00032209119300001410
As follows:
Figure GDA00032209119300001411
in the formula, RDjc,rIs the thermal resistance. Tau isDjc,rIs the thermal resistance RDjc,rThermal time constant of (2). T isdwIs a switching cycle.
Figure GDA00032209119300001412
Is the temperature difference of the RC parallel unit in the j-1 switching period Diode junction-shell heat network. j is an arbitrary switching period. j is 1, …, nsw。nswIs the total number of switching cycles in one fundamental frequency cycle.
Figure GDA00032209119300001413
Average loss is the j-th switching period of the A-phase upper bridge arm Diode.
Temperature difference of RC parallel unit in jth switching period Diode shell-fin network
Figure GDA00032209119300001414
As follows:
Figure GDA00032209119300001415
in the formula, RDchIs the thermal resistance. Tau isDchIs the thermal resistance RDchThermal time constant of (2). T isswIs a switching cycle.
Figure GDA00032209119300001416
Is the temperature difference of the RC parallel unit in the j-1 switching period Diade shell-fin heat network.
Figure GDA00032209119300001417
Average loss is the j-th switching period of the A-phase upper bridge arm Diode. j is 1, …, nsw。nswIs the total number of switching cycles in one fundamental frequency cycle.
2.2) hybrid MMC power device multi-time scale reliability evaluation. In the reliability evaluation of the hybrid MMC power device, the influence of environmental factors such as wind speed and air temperature and electrical parameters such as power frequency on the reliability of the power device is quantified by taking the low-frequency junction temperature and the fundamental-frequency junction temperature of the power device into consideration, so that the reliability evaluation precision of the power device is improved.
The method mainly comprises the following steps:
2.2.1) calculating the cycle failure period number N corresponding to the low-frequency period of the IGBTTf_L. Number of cycles to failure NTf_LAs follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000151
in the formula, tonThe heating time is shown. U is 0.01 times the block voltage of the module. D is the diameter of the aluminum bonding wire. k is 9.3 × 1014。β1=-4.416。β2=1285。β3=-0.463。β4=-0.716。β5=-0.761。β6=-0.5。TTjmax_LAnd the maximum value of the low-frequency junction temperature of the IGBT. T isTjmin_LAnd the minimum value of the low-frequency junction temperature of the IGBT. I isLThe effective value of the current of the IGBT low-frequency aluminum bonding wire is obtained. e is the base of the natural log function and is about 2.71828. . Cycle failure period number N corresponding to IGBT fundamental frequency periodTf_FAs follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000152
in the formula, tonThe heating time is shown. U is 0.01 times the block voltage of the module. D is the diameter of the aluminum bonding wire. k is 9.3 × 1014。β1=-4.416。β2=1285。β3=-0.463。β4=-0.716。β5=-0.761。β6=-0.5。TTjmax_FAnd the maximum value of the junction temperature of the IGBT fundamental frequency. T isTjmin_FAnd the minimum value of the IGBT fundamental frequency junction temperature is obtained. I isFThe effective value of the current of the IGBT fundamental frequency aluminum bonding wire is obtained. e is the base of the natural log function and is about 2.71828. .
According to Miner's damage theory and formula (17), IGBT is in 0-tnTime of day life consumption CLT(tn) As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000153
in the formula, NTsum_LIs 0-tnThe total number of low frequency thermal cycles at that time. N is a radical ofT_L,gAnd NTf_L,gThe number of thermal cycles and the number of cycle failure cycles corresponding to the g-th low-frequency thermal cycle of the IGBT are respectively. N is a radical ofT_F,qAnd NTf_F,qAnd respectively obtaining the fundamental frequency thermal cycle times and the cycle failure cycles corresponding to the q-th sampling time interval T of the IGBT. n is the total number of samples up to the current operating time. N is a radical ofTsum_LIs the total number of low frequency thermal cycles.
Preferably, the Miner's damage theory mainly needs to calculate the damage caused by one cycle and N under the constant-amplitude loadTsum_LDamage caused by individual cycles, N under variable amplitude loadTsum_LDamage caused by one cycle.
IGBT sampling time tnMean time to failure MTTF corresponding to time interval TT(tn) As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000154
in the formula, CLT(tn) Is IGBT at 0-tnThe lifetime of the moment is consumed. T is the sampling time interval.
IGBT failure rate lambdaT(tn) As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000155
in the formula, MTTFT(tn) For the IGBT sampling time tnCorresponding to the average time to failure of time interval T.
IGBT reliability RT(tn) As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000156
in the formula, λT(tn) Is the IGBT failure rate. t is tnIs the sampling instant.
2.2.2) calculating the cycle failure number N corresponding to the low-frequency period of the DiodeDf_L. Number of cycles to failure NDf_LAs follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000161
in the formula, tonThe heating time is shown. U is 0.01 times the block voltage of the module. D is the diameter of the aluminum bonding wire. k is 9.3 × 1014。β1=-4.416。β2=1285。β3=-0.463。β4=-0.716。β5=-0.761。β6=-0.5。TDjmax_LIs the Diode low frequency junction temperature maximum. T isDjmin_LIs the Diode low frequency junction temperature minimum. I isDLThe effective value of the current of the Diode low-frequency aluminum bonding wire is obtained.
Number of cycle failure cycles N corresponding to the period of the Diode fundamental frequencyDf_FAs follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000162
in the formula, tonThe heating time is shown. U is 0.01 times the block voltage of the module. D is the diameter of the aluminum bonding wire. k is 9.3 × 1014。β1=-4.416。β2=1285。β3=-0.463。β4=-0.716。β5=-0.761。β6=-0.5。TDjmax_FIs the Diode fundamental frequency junction temperature maximum. T isDjmin_FIs the Diode fundamental frequency junction temperature minimum. I isDFThe effective value of the current of the Diode fundamental frequency aluminum bonding wire is obtained.
According to Miner's injury theory and equation (23), the Diode is at 0-tnTime of day life consumption CLD(tn) As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000163
in the formula, NDsum_LIs a Diode at 0-tnTotal number of low frequency thermal cycles at the moment. N is a radical ofD_L,αAnd NDf_L,αThe number of thermal cycles and the number of cycle failure cycles corresponding to the alpha-th low-frequency thermal cycle of the Diode are respectively. N is a radical ofD_F,ωAnd NDf_F,ωThe thermal cycle number of the fundamental frequency and the cycle failure cycle number corresponding to the omega th sampling time interval T are respectively. n is the total number of samples up to the current operating time.
The Diode sampling time tnMean time to failure MTTF corresponding to time interval TD(tn) As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000164
in the formula, CLD(tn) Is a Diode at 0-tnThe lifetime of the moment is consumed. T is the sampling time interval.
Diade failure rate λD(tn) As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000165
in the formula, MTTFD(tn) For the moment t of the Diade samplingnCorresponding to the average time to failure of time interval T.
Diade reliability RD(tn) is as follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000166
in the formula, λD(tn) Is the Diode failure rate. e is the base of the natural log function and is about 2.71828. . t is tnIs the sampling instant.
3) And establishing a hybrid MMC capacitor reliability evaluation model considering the voltage sharing of the fault SM according to the influence of the fault SM on the perfect SM capacitor.
Further, the main steps of establishing the reliability evaluation model of the hybrid MMC capacitor are as follows:
3.1) calculating the capacitor reliability RC(tn) Namely:
Figure GDA0003220911930000171
in the formula, λcIs the capacitor failure rate. Ws0Is in an initial state. WsiSelf-healing energy corresponding to i SM faults. t is tnIs the sampling instant.
Self-healing energy WsiAs follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000172
UCicapacitor voltage for i SM faults. RCIs a sheet resistance. C is capacitance. And f (P) is a sandwich pressure related function. k is a radical ofcTo calculate the correlation coefficient of the self-healing energy. a is the capacitor correlation coefficient. And b is the resistance correlation coefficient.
3.2) according to the capacitor reliability RC(tn) The hybrid MMC capacitor reliability was evaluated.
4) And analyzing the loss distribution of the hybrid MMC device, thereby establishing an improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model considering SM multi-state.
The hybrid MMC main circuit consists of three phase units, namely a phase unit, a phase unit and a phase unit, wherein each phase unit is divided into an upper bridge arm and a lower bridge arm, and each bridge arm is formed by connecting a plurality of SM in series. In order to take cost into consideration, the SM in each bridge arm comprises a half-bridge SM (HBSM) and an SM with direct current fault ride-through capability, and the single-clamping SM (CSSM) is selected as the SM with the direct current fault ride-through capability. Both SM main circuits consist of IGBTs, diodes (diodes) and capacitors. Meanwhile, in order to improve the reliability of the hybrid MMC, each bridge arm includes a redundant SM as a backup, and the embodiment adopts an active backup which is usually adopted in practice.
Further, the main steps of establishing the hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model considering SM multi-state are as follows:
4.1) calculating the reliability of the SM multi-state. The SM main circuit consists of an IGBT, a Diode and a capacitor.
According to the combination relation of IGBT, Diode and capacitor in SM, CSSM reliability R under intact stateCSu(tn) As follows:
RCSu(tn)=RT1(tn)·RD1(tn)·RT2(tn)·RD2(tn)·RT3(tn)·RD3(tn)·RC(tn)。 (30)
in the formula, RT1(tn)、RT2(tn) And RT3(tn) Reliability of the first IGBT, the second IGBT and the third IGBT, respectively. RD1(tn)、RD2(tn) And RD3(tn) Reliability of the first, second and third Diode, respectively. Rc(tn) The reliability of the capacitor.
HBSM reliability R in good conditionHBu(tn) As follows:
RHBu(tn)=RT1(tn)·RD1(tn)·RT2(tn)·RD2(tn)·RC(tn)。 (31)
in the formula, RT1(tn)、RT2(tn) And RT3(tn) Of a first IGBT, a second IGBT and a third IGBT respectivelyAnd (7) reliability. RD1(tn)、RD2(tn) And RD3(tn) Reliability of the first, second and third Diode, respectively. Rc(tn) The reliability of the capacitor.
At unpaired T3Before the module is added with a bypass switch, when T3And D3When any one of the devices fails, the entire CSSM is considered to have failed and immediately exits operation.
If it is at this time to T3The module carries out bypass processing, can make CSSM be in the half fault state who maintains voltage support function to the equivalence continues the operation for HBSM, and then promotes CSSM utilization ratio.
Reliability R of CSSM under half fault conditionCSp(tn) As follows:
RCSp(tn)=RT1(tn)·RD1(tn)·RT2(tn)·RD2(tn)·(1-RT3(tn)·RD3(tn))·RC(tn)。 (32)
in the formula, RT1(tn)、RT2(tn) And RT3(tn) Reliability of the first IGBT, the second IGBT and the third IGBT, respectively. RD1(tn)、RD2(tn) And RD3(tn) Reliability of the first, second and third Diode, respectively. Rc (t)n) The reliability of the capacitor.
4.2) accounting for SM multistate hybrid MMC reliability
The hybrid MMC bridge arm is formed by connecting a plurality of CSSM and HBSM in series.
Because both the complete CSSM and the half-fault CSSM can be equivalent to the HBSM, the voltage supporting function is maintained, and when the damage number of the HBSM is excessive, the condition that the complete CSSM and the half-fault CSSM replace the damaged HBSM exists, so that the hybrid MMC keeps normal operation.
Therefore, the bridge arm reliability can be divided into two cases, taking the single-phase upper bridge arm reliability as an example:
the reliability of the single-phase upper bridge arm is mainly divided into two cases.
The first case is: when neither CSSM nor HBSM damaged number exceeds its own redundancy number, iCS≤MCSAnd i isHB≤MHBMeanwhile, the hybrid MMC normally operates.
According to a binomial distribution probability formula, in the first case, the total CSSM reliability R of the upper bridge armCSs1(tn) As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000181
in the formula, NCSIs the baseline number of CSSM. RCSu(tn) The CSSM reliability in good condition. i.e. icsIs the number of CSSM damages. MCSIs the redundancy number of the CSSM.
In the first case, the total HBSM reliability R of the upper bridge armHBs1(tn) As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000182
in the formula, NHBThe baseline number for the HBSM. RHBu(tn) The HBSM reliability in the intact state. i.e. iHBIs the number of HBSM breakages. MHBIs the redundancy number of the HBSM.
Based on the series relation between CSSM and HBSM in bridge arm, the reliability R of single-phase upper bridge arm under the first conditionArm_u1(tn) As follows:
RArm_u1(tn)=RCSs1(tn)·RHBs1(tn)。 (35)
in the formula, RHBs1(tn) The total HBSM reliability for the upper arm in the first case. RCSs1(tn) The total CSSM reliability for the upper leg in the first case.
The second case is: when CSSM damage number does not exceed self redundancy number, and HBSM damage number exceeds self redundancy number, and good and half fault CSSMWhen displacing a damaged HBSM, i.e. iCS≤MCSAnd M isHB<iHB≤MHB+MCS-(iCS-iCSp) Meanwhile, the hybrid MMC normally operates. i.e. iCSpIs the CSSM half-fault number.
According to a polynomial distribution probability formula, the total CSSM reliability R of the upper bridge armCSs2(tn) As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000191
in the formula iCSpIs the CSSM half-fault number. N is a radical ofCSIs the baseline number of CSSM. RCSu(tn) The CSSM reliability in good condition. i.e. icsIs the number of CSSM damages. McsIs the redundancy number of the CSSM. RCSp(tn) Reliability of the half fault state CSSM.
Based on the serial connection relation of all HBSM in the bridge arms and according to a binomial distribution probability formula, the total HBSM reliability R of the upper bridge armHBs2(tn) As follows:
Figure GDA0003220911930000192
in the formula iCSpIs the CSSM half-fault number. i.e. icsIs the number of CSSM damages. N is a radical ofHBThe baseline number for the HBSM. RHBu(tn)The HBSM reliability in the intact state. i.e. iHBIs the number of HBSM breakages. MHBIs the redundancy number of the HBSM.
Based on the series relation between CSSM and HBSM in bridge arm, the reliability R of single-phase upper bridge arm under the second conditionArm_u2(tn) As follows:
RArm_u2(tn)=RCSs2(tn)·RHBs2(tn)。 (38)
in the formula, RHBs2(tn) The total HBSM reliability for the upper arm in the second case. RCSs2(tn) Total C of upper bridge arm in the second caseSSM reliability.
Reliability function R of single-phase upper bridge armArm_u(tn)As follows:
RArm_u(tn)=RArm_u1(tn)+RArm_u2(tn)。 (39)
in the formula, RArm_u1(tn) The single-phase upper arm reliability in the first case. RArm_u2(tn) The reliability of the single-phase upper bridge arm in the second condition.
Based on the symmetry of the mixed MMC and the series relation of each bridge arm, the reliability R (t) of the mixed MMCn) As follows:
R(tn)=RArm_u(tn)6。 (40)
in the formula, RArm_u(tn) Is a single-phase upper bridge arm reliability function.
Example 2:
a method for using an improved hybrid MMC operational reliability assessment model based on multi-time scale thermal damage, comprising the steps of:
1) data is input in the improved hybrid MMC operational reliability evaluation model. The data mainly comprises environmental parameters and mixed MMC and fan electrical parameters.
The environmental parameter mainly comprises wind speed
Figure GDA0003220911930000193
And air temperature
Figure GDA0003220911930000194
The hybrid MMC and wind turbine electrical parameters mainly comprise switching frequency fswThe hybrid MMC comprises a minimum cut-in wind speed, a maximum cut-off wind speed, a rated wind speed and the like, a direct current side rated voltage, an alternating current side rated voltage, a power factor, a modulation ratio, a duty ratio and the like.
2) And according to the input data, calculating the loss of the power device by the improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model.
I.e. calculating the sampling instant tnAverage IGBT switching period in corresponding time interval TLoss PT,avgAnd the average loss P of the switching period of the DiodeD,avg
3) And according to the input data, calculating the multi-time scale junction temperature of the power device by the improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model.
Calculating the sampling time tnJunction temperature mean value T of IGBT fundamental frequency period within corresponding time interval TTjavg_FMaximum value TTjmax_FMinimum value TTjmin_FAnd effective value of current I of aluminum bonding wireF
Calculating 0-t according to the rain flow algorithmnMaximum T of junction temperature curve of IGBT low-frequency period at momentTjmax_LMinimum value TTjmin_LAnd effective value of current I of aluminum bonding wireL
4) According to input data, the improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model calculates the service life consumption, the average failure time and the failure rate of the power device in consideration of multiple time scales.
Calculating the number N of low-frequency cyclic failure cycles of the IGBTTf_LAnd the number N of cycles of failure of fundamental frequency cycleTf_FThereby obtaining the IGBT at 0-tnTime of day life consumption CLT(tn) Sampling time tnMean time to failure MTTF corresponding to time interval TT(tn) Failure rate λT(tn) And degree of reliability RT(tn)。
Calculating the number N of low-frequency cycle failure cycles of the DiodeDf_LAnd the number N of cycles of failure of fundamental frequency cycleDf_FThus obtaining a Diode in the range of 0-tnTime of day life consumption CLD(tn) Sampling time tnMean time to failure MTTF corresponding to time interval TD(tn) Failure rate λD(tn) And degree of reliability RD(tn)。
5) According to the input data, the improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model calculates the reliability RC (t) of the capacitorn)。
6) According to the input data, the improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model calculates hybrid MMC reliability R (t) of SM multi-staten) Thereby improving the hybrid MMCThe reliability of the operation was evaluated.
Example 3:
a test for verifying an improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model based on multi-time scale thermal damage mainly comprises the following steps:
1) and configuring experimental parameters. In the embodiment, an FF1000R17IE4 model power module of Infineon company is used as a hybrid MMC power module, as shown in Table 1, and 2016-year wind speed and temperature data of Ireland Dublin are used as external working conditions of a wind farm and the hybrid MMC, so that the operational reliability of the hybrid MMC is evaluated based on the model provided by the invention. The annual data curves of the wind speed and the air temperature are shown in figures 2 and 3, and the mixed MMC and fan parameters are shown in table 2.
Figure GDA0003220911930000211
TABLE 1 thermal parameter Table for FF1000R17IE4 model Power Module
Parameter(s) Numerical value
Rated capacity of system 400MW
Network side voltage 220kV
Voltage on the direct current side 400kV
Reference number of HBSM 137
CSSM reference number 113
Reference failure rate of capacitor 1ⅹ10-8occ/hour
Reference voltage of capacitor 1.6kV
Output frequency 50Hz
Switching frequency 2kHz
Power factor 0.9
Modulation ratio 0.8
Fan capacity 2MW
Number of fans 200
Cut-in wind speed 3m/s
Rated wind speed 8.5m/s
Cut-out wind speed 16m/s
TABLE 2 hybrid MMC and Fan parameters
2) And (4) analyzing the thermal damage of the hybrid MMC power device. In order to verify the accuracy of the multi-time scale reliability evaluation model of the hybrid MMC power device, the low-frequency and fundamental frequency annual life consumption conditions of the power device are respectively obtained based on the reliability evaluation model of the power device, which is provided by the invention, by taking wind speed and air temperature annual data as input, and the specific table is shown in Table 3.
As can be seen from Table 3, although the low frequency lifetime was consumed at T1、T2、T3、D1And D2The medium ratio is large, but the consumption ratio of the life of the fundamental frequency is not negligible, and the consumption ratio is T2、D1And D3The percentage of the component (A) is respectively 16.39%, 25.06% and 67.82%, especially in D3In the middle, the consumption of the life of the fundamental frequency is dominant over the consumption of the low frequency. Therefore, compared with the reliability evaluation only considering the low-frequency service life consumption, the multi-time scale reliability evaluation model established by the invention can comprehensively take the influence of environmental factors and electrical parameters on the hybrid MMC power device into account, and lays a foundation for the operation reliability evaluation of equipment.
Figure GDA0003220911930000221
TABLE 3 hybrid MMC power device annual lifetime consumption
3) Improved measure to hybrid MMC reliability impact
As can be seen from Table 3, T3And D3The sum of the lifetime consumptions of (a) is up to 50.08% higher in CSSM lifetime consumption than in other devices, and thus, T is higher3The module is most vulnerable. The invention passes the fault T3Short-circuiting the modules to enable T3CSSM equivalent of module trouble is HBSM, continues to maintain voltage support function to promote CSSM utilization ratio, reach and promote mixed MMC reliability level.
To verify the impact of improved CSSM on hybrid MMC reliability proposed by the present invention, the SM multi-state-taking hybrid MMC operational reliability assessment is proposed based on the conventional model and the present inventionModel to obtain improved front and back mixed MMC reliability R1And R2See, in particular, fig. 4 and table 4.
As can be seen from FIG. 4, the improved reliability R of the hybrid MMC2Greater than reliability before improvement R1. As can be seen from Table 4, R is the time when the mixed MMC is operated for 15 years1And R20.7421 and 0.8838, respectively, in comparison to R1Improved mixed MMC reliability R2The improvement is 19.10%. And when the mixed MMC is 20 years, R1And R20.2018 and 0.4978, respectively, in comparison to R1The improved reliability R2 of the hybrid MMC is improved by 146.68%. Therefore, the reliability of the improved hybrid MMC is effectively improved, and the effectiveness of the improved measures is verified.
Time/year Reliability R1 Reliability R2 Percentage of reliability improvement
5 0.9999 0.9999 0.00%
10 0.9861 0.9935 0.75%
15 0.7421 0.8838 19.10%
20 0.2018 0.4978 146.68%
25 0.0113 0.1184 947.78%
30 0 0.0096
TABLE 4 MMC reliability Table with mix of front and rear
4) And (5) evaluating the operation reliability of the hybrid MMC.
In order to verify the effectiveness of the mixed MMC operation reliability model provided by the invention, the influence of the fluctuation of environmental factors such as wind speed and air temperature and the difference of electrical parameters of the mixed MMC such as switching frequency on the operation reliability of the mixed MMC is evaluated based on the reliability evaluation model provided by the invention.
4.1) analyzing the influence of environmental factors on the operation reliability of the hybrid MMC.
In order to analyze the influence of environmental factors such as wind speed, air temperature and the like on the reliability of the hybrid MMC, the hybrid MMC is operated according to a hybrid MMC operation reliability model and a conventional constant failure rate model provided by the text by reference numbers to respectively obtain the reliability R of the hybrid MMC1And R2See, in particular, fig. 5. At the same time, CSSM and HBSM failure rate curves are derived, as shown in fig. 6.
As can be seen from FIG. 5, the reliability of the hybrid MMC may be changed by the influence of environmental factors such as wind speed and air temperature. As shown in FIGS. 2 and 6, when the hybrid MMC is operated for 1000h and 500-h, the wind speed is high and is concentrated on 7-11m/s, the service life loss of the device is large, and the fault rates of HBSM and CSSM are concentrated on 0.9 multiplied by 10-6occ/hour and 1.8X 10-6occ/hour, mixed MMC decreased faster. When the hybrid MMC operates at 3500-4000h, the wind speed is low and is concentrated at 1-5m/s, the service life loss of the device is low, the fault rate of HBSM and CSSM is close to zero, and the reliability of the hybrid MMC is slowly reduced. Similarly, as shown in FIG. 3, during the period of 4000-. Therefore, the hybrid MMC operational reliability assessment model presented herein is in line with theoretical expectations. Furthermore, as can be seen from FIG. 5, since R2Not considering the changes of environmental factors such as wind speed, air temperature and the like, and R is measured at 1000h, 4000h and 7000h2And R1The relative errors respectively reach 41.38%, 34.45% and 82.36%, and the reliability difference is large. Therefore, the influence of environmental factors such as wind speed and air temperature on the reliability of the hybrid MMC needs to be taken into consideration.
4.2) analyzing the influence of the electrical parameters on the operation reliability of the hybrid MMC.
In order to analyze the influence of electrical parameters such as switching frequency on the operation reliability of the hybrid MMC, the reliability change condition of the hybrid MMC under different switching frequencies is obtained based on the operation reliability model of the hybrid MMC provided by the invention, and the concrete figure is shown in FIG. 7. Table 5 shows the reliability operation of the hybrid MMC at different switching frequencies for 900 h.
As can be seen from fig. 7, the higher the switching frequency, the faster the reliability of the hybrid MMC decreases. As can be seen from Table 5, when the switching frequency of the power device is increased from 1000Hz to 3000Hz at time 900h, the switching loss is increased, resulting in CSSM and HBSM failure rates of 6.91 × 10-7occ/hour and 1.56X 10-7occ/hour rose to 2.17X 10-6occ/hour and 1.63X 10-6occ/hour, the mixed MMC reliability is finally reduced from 0.715 to 0.2572. Therefore, the operation reliability evaluation model provided by the invention can effectively depict the influence of the switching frequency on the operation reliability of the hybrid MMC.
Figure GDA0003220911930000231
Table 5900 h-time mixed MMC operation reliability table under different switching frequencies
In conclusion, the mixed MMC operation reliability evaluation model considering the multi-time scale accumulated damage effect can accurately depict the influence of environmental factors such as wind speed and air temperature and electrical parameters such as switches on the operation reliability of the mixed MMC, the reliability of the mixed MMC is improved from the operation angle, and the reliability level of the improved mixed MMC is proved to be remarkably improved by constructing the corresponding mixed MMC reliability evaluation model considering the SM multi-state.

Claims (4)

1. A method for establishing an improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model based on multi-time scale heat damage is characterized by mainly comprising the following steps:
1) acquiring real-time data of a wind power transmission system; the real-time data mainly comprises wind speed, air temperature and equipment electrical parameters;
2) according to the real-time data, establishing a reliability evaluation model of the hybrid MMC power device by utilizing the running characteristics of the hybrid MMC and a Miner's damage theory; the power device of the wind power transmission system mainly comprises an Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT) and a crystal Diode (Diode);
3) establishing a mixed MMC capacitor reliability evaluation model considering the voltage sharing of the fault SM according to the influence of the fault SM on the intact SM capacitor;
4) analyzing loss distribution of the hybrid MMC device, and thus establishing an improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model considering SM multi-state;
the method mainly comprises the following steps of establishing an improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model considering SM multi-state:
4.1) calculating the reliability of the SM multi-state; the SM main circuit consists of an IGBT, a Diode and a capacitor;
according to the combination relation of IGBT, Diode and capacitor in SM, CSSM reliability R under intact stateCSu(tn) As follows:
RCSu(tn)=RT1(tn)·RD1(tn)·RT2(tn)·RD2(tn)·RT3(tn)·RD3(tn)·RC(tn); (1)
in the formula, RT1(tn)、RT2(tn) And RT3(tn) Reliability of the first IGBT, the second IGBT and the third IGBT respectively; rD1(tn)、RD2(tn) And RD3(tn) Reliability of the first, second and third Diode, respectively; rc(tn) Capacitor reliability;
HBSM reliability R in good conditionHBu(tn) As follows:
RHBu(tn)=RT1(tn)·RD1(tn)·RT2(tn)·RD2(tn)·RC(tn); (2)
in the formula, RT1(tn)、RT2(tn) Reliability of the first IGBT and the second IGBT respectively; rD1(tn)、RD2(tn) Reliability of the first and second diodes, respectively; rc(tn) Capacitor reliability;
reliability R of CSSM under half fault conditionCSp(tn) As follows:
RCSp(tn)=RT1(tn)·RD1(tn)·RT2(tn)·RD2(tn)·(1-RT3(tn)·RD3(tn))·RC(tn); (3)
in the formula, RT1(tn)、RT2(tn) And RT3(tn) Reliability of the first IGBT, the second IGBT and the third IGBT respectively; rD1(tn)、RD2(tn) And RD3(tn) Respectively, a first, a second and a third DiodeReliability; rc (t)n) Capacitor reliability;
4.2) accounting for SM multistate hybrid MMC reliability
The reliability of the bridge arm is mainly divided into two cases;
the first case is: when neither CSSM nor HBSM damaged number exceeds its own redundancy number, iCS≤MCSAnd i isHB≤MHBWhen the hybrid MMC normally operates;
according to a binomial distribution probability formula, in the first case, the total CSSM reliability R of the upper bridge armCSs1(tn) As follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000021
in the formula, NCSA reference number for the CSSM; rCSu(tn) CSSM reliability under intact condition; i.e. icsIs the number of CSSM defects; mCSRedundancy number for CSSM;
in the first case, the total HBSM reliability R of the upper bridge armHBs1(tn) As follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000022
in the formula, NHBA reference number for HBSM; rHBu(tn) HBSM reliability under intact state; i.e. iHBDamage number for HBSM; mHBRedundancy number for HBSM;
based on the series relation between CSSM and HBSM in bridge arm, the reliability R of single-phase upper bridge arm under the first conditionArm_u1(tn) As follows:
RArm_u1(tn)=RCSs1(tn)·RHBs1(tn); (6)
in the formula, RHBs1(tn) The total HBSM reliability of the upper bridge arm in the first case; rCSs1(tn) In the first caseThe total CSSM reliability of the lower and upper bridge arms;
the second case is: when the CSSM defect number does not exceed the self-redundancy number, the HBSM defect number exceeds the self-redundancy number, and the good and half-fault CSSMs replace the damaged HBSM, i.e., iCS≤MCSAnd M isHB<iHB≤MHB+MCS-(iCS-iCSp) When the hybrid MMC normally operates; i.e. iCSpIs the CSSM half fault number;
according to a polynomial distribution probability formula, the total CSSM reliability R of the upper bridge armCSs2(tn) As follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000023
in the formula iCSpIs the CSSM half fault number; n is a radical ofCSA reference number for the CSSM; rCSu(tn) CSSM reliability under intact condition; i.e. icsIs the number of CSSM defects; mcsRedundancy number for CSSM; rCSp(tn) Reliability for a half fault state CSSM;
based on the serial connection relation of all HBSM in the bridge arms and according to a binomial distribution probability formula, the total HBSM reliability R of the upper bridge armHBs2(tn) As follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000024
in the formula iCSpIs the CSSM half fault number; i.e. icsIs the number of CSSM defects; n is a radical ofHBA reference number for HBSM; rHBu(tn)HBSM reliability under intact state; i.e. iHBDamage number for HBSM; mHBRedundancy number for HBSM;
based on the series relation between CSSM and HBSM in bridge arm, the reliability R of single-phase upper bridge arm under the second conditionArm_u2(tn) As follows:
RArm_u2(tn)=RCSs2(tn)·RHBs2(tn); (9)
in the formula, RHBs2(tn) The total HBSM reliability of the upper bridge arm under the second condition; rCSs2(tn) The total CSSM reliability for the upper leg in the second case;
reliability function R of single-phase upper bridge armArm_u(tn)As follows:
RArm_u(tn)=RArm_u1(tn)+RArm_u2(tn); (10)
in the formula, RArm_u1(tn) The reliability of the single-phase upper bridge arm under the first condition; rArm_u2(tn) The reliability of the single-phase upper bridge arm under the second condition;
based on the symmetry of the mixed MMC and the series relation of each bridge arm, the reliability R (t) of the mixed MMCn) As follows:
R(tn)=RArm_u(tn)6; (11)
in the formula, RArm_u(tn) Is a single-phase upper bridge arm reliability function.
2. The method for establishing the improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model based on multi-time scale heat damage according to claim 1, wherein: the method mainly comprises the following steps of establishing the reliability evaluation model of the hybrid MMC power device:
1) calculating the multi-time scale junction temperature of the hybrid MMC power device; the method mainly comprises the following steps:
1.1) determining the output power P of the fan of the wind power transmission systemWToutAnd a sampling time tnCorresponding to wind speed VtnThe relationship of (1);
output power P of ith fan of wind power transmission systemWTout,iAnd a sampling time tnCorresponding to wind speed VtnThe relationship of (a) is as follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000031
in the formula, PratedRated power for the fan; vcutin、VratedAnd VcutoutRespectively the cut-in wind speed, the rated wind speed and the cut-out wind speed; k is a radical ofpRepresenting coefficients related to air density and fan area; n is a radical ofWTThe total number of fans in the wind power transmission system; n is the total number of sampling points until the current running time; t is tnIs the sampling time;
Figure FDA0003245978170000034
is the wind speed; i is any fan; 1, …, NWT
Transport power P of hybrid MMCMMCoutAs follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000032
in the formula, NWTThe total number of fans in the wind power transmission system; i is any fan; 1, …, NWT;PWTout,iOutputting power for the ith fan;
1.2) calculating to obtain a mixed MMC bridge arm current according to a formula 1;
a phase upper bridge arm current IauAnd phase A lower bridge arm current IadRespectively as follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000033
in the formula IdcIs direct current side current; i ismIs the ac side current peak;
Figure FDA00032459781700000414
is a power factor angle; f. of0Is the fundamental frequency;
direct side current IdcAs follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000041
in the formula of UdcIs a direct current side voltage; pMMCoutA transport power for a hybrid MMC;
peak value of AC side current ImAs follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000042
in the formula, PMMCoutA transport power for a hybrid MMC;
Figure FDA00032459781700000413
is a power factor angle; u shapeacThe effective value of the voltage at the alternating current side;
1.3) calculating the average loss of the jth switching period of the IGBT of the upper bridge arm of the phase A;
average loss of jth switching period of IGBT (insulated Gate Bipolar transistor) of upper bridge arm of A phase
Figure FDA0003245978170000043
As follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000044
in the formula, Rce、UceoAnd τTThe IGBT positive on-resistance, the threshold voltage and the duty ratio are respectively; a isT、bTAnd cTFitting parameters for the IGBT dynamic characteristic curve; u shaperatedRated voltage for IGBT; f. ofswAnd ρTThe switching frequency and the temperature coefficient of the IGBT are respectively; j is any switching period; j is 1, …, nsw;nswThe total number of switching cycles in a fundamental frequency cycle; i isauIs the A phase upper bridge arm current; u shapedcIs a direct current side voltage;
number of switching cycles nswAs follows:
nsw=fsw/f0; (18)
in the formula (f)swIs the switching frequency of the IGBT; f. of0Is the fundamental frequency;
1.4) calculating the average loss of the j-th switching period of the Diode
Figure FDA0003245978170000045
Average loss of the j-th switching period of the Diode
Figure FDA0003245978170000046
As follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000047
in the formula: rd、UdAnd τDRespectively, Diode forward on-resistance, threshold voltage and duty cycle; a isD、bDAnd cDFitting parameters for the dynamic characteristic curve of the Diode; u shapeDIs a Diode rated voltage; f. ofdwAnd ρDRespectively, the switching frequency and the temperature coefficient of the Diode; i isauIs the A phase upper bridge arm current; u shapedcIs a direct current side voltage;
1.5) calculating the junction temperature of the jth switching period of the IGBT in the mixed MMC
Figure FDA0003245978170000048
The junction temperature
Figure FDA0003245978170000049
As follows:
Figure FDA00032459781700000410
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
Figure FDA00032459781700000415
is the sampling time tnA corresponding air temperature;
Figure FDA00032459781700000411
the temperature difference of an RC parallel unit in an IGBT junction-shell thermal network in the jth switching period of the nth order; r represents an arbitrary order; r is 1,2,3, 4;
Figure FDA00032459781700000412
the temperature difference of RC parallel units in the jth switching period IGBT shell-radiating fin heat network is obtained;
Figure FDA0003245978170000051
the temperature difference of an RC parallel unit in the jth switching period IGBT radiating fin-environment thermal network is obtained; j is any switching period; j is 1, …, nsw;nswThe total number of switching cycles in a fundamental frequency cycle;
temperature difference of RC parallel unit in jth switching period IGBT junction-shell network of nth order
Figure FDA0003245978170000052
As follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000053
in the formula, RTjc,rIs the thermal resistance; tau isTjc,rIs the thermal resistance RTjc,rThermal time constant of (d); t isswIs a switching cycle;
Figure FDA0003245978170000054
is the temperature difference of RC parallel units in the ith order of switching period (j-1) IGBT junction-shell thermal network;
Figure FDA0003245978170000055
average loss of the jth switching period of the IGBT of the upper bridge arm of the phase A; j is any switching period; j is 1, …, nsw;nswThe total number of switching cycles in a fundamental frequency cycle;
temperature difference of RC parallel unit in jth switching period IGBT shell-heat sink network
Figure FDA0003245978170000056
As follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000057
in the formula, RTchIs the thermal resistance; tau isTchIs the thermal resistance RTchThermal time constant of (d); t isswIs a switching period
Figure FDA0003245978170000058
The temperature difference of RC parallel units in the j-1 switching period IGBT shell-radiating fin heat network;
Figure FDA0003245978170000059
average loss of the jth switching period of the IGBT of the upper bridge arm of the phase A; j is any switching period; j is 1, …, nsw;nswThe total number of switching cycles in a fundamental frequency cycle;
the jth switching period IGBT is the temperature difference of RC parallel units in the radiating fin-environment network
Figure FDA00032459781700000510
As follows:
Figure FDA00032459781700000511
in the formula, RhaIs the thermal resistance; tau ishaIs the thermal resistance RhaThermal time constant of (d); t isswIs a switching cycle;
Figure FDA00032459781700000512
is the cycle temperature difference of the RC parallel unit in the j-1 th switch IGBT thermal network; j is any switching period; j is 1, …, nsw;nswThe total number of switching cycles in a fundamental frequency cycle;
Figure FDA00032459781700000513
average loss of the jth switching period of the IGBT of the upper bridge arm of the phase A;
Figure FDA00032459781700000514
average loss of the jth switching period of the A-phase upper bridge arm Diode;
1.6) calculating the junction temperature of the Diode jth switching cycle in the mixed MMC
Figure FDA00032459781700000515
The junction temperature
Figure FDA00032459781700000516
As follows:
Figure FDA00032459781700000517
in the formula (I), the compound is shown in the specification,
Figure FDA00032459781700000521
is the sampling time tnA corresponding air temperature;
Figure FDA00032459781700000518
the temperature difference of an RC parallel unit in a j-th switching period Diode junction-shell heat network of an r-th order; r represents an arbitrary order; r is 1,2,3, 4;
Figure FDA00032459781700000519
the temperature difference of RC parallel units in the j switching period Diode shell-radiating fin heat network is obtained;
Figure FDA00032459781700000520
for the temperature difference of RC parallel unit in jth switching period IGBT heat sink-environment heat network(ii) a j is any switching period; j is 1, …, nsw;nswThe total number of switching cycles in a fundamental frequency cycle;
temperature difference of RC parallel unit in jth switching period Diode junction-shell network
Figure FDA0003245978170000061
As follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000062
in the formula, RDjc,rIs the thermal resistance; tau isDjc,rIs the thermal resistance RDjc,rThermal time constant of (d); t isdwIs a switching cycle;
Figure FDA0003245978170000063
is the temperature difference of the RC parallel unit in the j-1 switching period Diode junction-shell heat network; j is any switching period; j is 1, …, nsw;nswThe total number of switching cycles in a fundamental frequency cycle;
Figure FDA0003245978170000064
average loss of the jth switching period of the A-phase upper bridge arm Diode;
temperature difference of RC parallel unit in jth switching period Diode shell-fin network
Figure FDA0003245978170000065
As follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000066
in the formula, RDchIs the thermal resistance; tau isDchIs the thermal resistance RDchThermal time constant of (d); t isswIs a switching cycle;
Figure FDA0003245978170000067
is the temperature difference of RC parallel units in the j-1 switching period Diade shell-fin heat network;
Figure FDA0003245978170000068
average loss of the jth switching period of the A-phase upper bridge arm Diode; j is 1, …, nsw;nswThe total number of switching cycles in a fundamental frequency cycle;
2) evaluating the multi-time scale reliability of the hybrid MMC power device; the method mainly comprises the following steps:
2.1) calculating the cycle failure period number N corresponding to the low-frequency period of the IGBTTf_L(ii) a Number of cycles to failure NTf_LAs follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000069
in the formula, tonIs the heating time; u is 0.01 times of the blocking voltage of the module; d is the diameter of the aluminum bonding wire; k is 9.3 × 1014;β1=-4.416;β2=1285;β3=-0.463;β4=-0.716;β5=-0.761;β6=-0.5;TTjmax_LThe maximum value of the IGBT low-frequency junction temperature is obtained; t isTjmin_LThe minimum value of the IGBT low-frequency junction temperature is obtained; i isLThe effective value of the current of the IGBT low-frequency aluminum bonding wire is obtained;
cycle failure period number N corresponding to IGBT fundamental frequency periodTf_FAs follows:
Figure FDA00032459781700000610
in the formula, tonIs the heating time; u is 0.01 times of the blocking voltage of the module; d is the diameter of the aluminum bonding wire; k is 9.3 × 1014;β1=-4.416;β2=1285;β3=-0.463;β4=-0.716;β5=-0.761;β6=-0.5;TTjmax_FThe maximum value of the IGBT fundamental frequency junction temperature is obtained; t isTjmin_FJunction temperature of IGBT fundamental frequencyA minimum value; i isFThe effective value of the current of the IGBT fundamental frequency aluminum bonding wire is obtained;
according to Miner's damage theory and formula (17), IGBT is in 0-tnTime of day life consumption CLT(tn) As follows:
Figure FDA00032459781700000611
in the formula, NT_L,gAnd NTf_L,gRespectively corresponding thermal cycle times and cycle failure cycles of the IGBTs in the g-th low-frequency thermal cycle; n is a radical ofT_F,qAnd NTf_F,qRespectively corresponding to the q sampling time interval T of the IGBT, the fundamental frequency thermal cycle times and the cycle failure cycles; n is the total number of sampling points until the current running time; n is a radical ofTsum_LIs the total number of low frequency thermal cycles;
IGBT sampling time tnMean time to failure MTTF corresponding to time interval TT(tn) As follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000071
in the formula, CLT(tn) Is IGBT at 0-tnThe consumption of the lifetime at a moment; t is a sampling time interval;
IGBT failure rate lambdaT(tn) As follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000072
in the formula, MTTFT(tn) For the IGBT sampling time tnThe average time to failure of the corresponding time interval T;
IGBT reliability RT(tn)As follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000073
in the formula, λT(tn) Is the IGBT failure rate; t is tnIs the sampling time;
2.2) calculating the cycle failure period number N corresponding to the Diode low-frequency periodDf_L(ii) a Number of cycles to failure NDf_LAs follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000074
in the formula, tonIs the heating time; u is 0.01 times of the blocking voltage of the module; d is the diameter of the aluminum bonding wire; k is 9.3 × 1014;β1=-4.416;β2=1285;β3=-0.463;β4=-0.716;β5=-0.761;β6=-0.5;TDjmax_LIs the maximum value of the Diode low-frequency junction temperature; t isDjmin_LIs the minimum value of the Diode low-frequency junction temperature; i isDLThe effective value of the current of the Diode low-frequency aluminum bonding wire is obtained;
number of cycle failure cycles N corresponding to the period of the Diode fundamental frequencyDf_FAs follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000075
in the formula, tonIs the heating time; u is 0.01 times of the blocking voltage of the module; d is the diameter of the aluminum bonding wire; k is 9.3 × 1014;β1=-4.416;β2=1285;β3=-0.463;β4=-0.716;β5=-0.761;β6=-0.5;TDjmax_FIs the maximum value of the junction temperature of the Diode fundamental frequency; t isDjmin_FIs the minimum value of the junction temperature of the Diode fundamental frequency; i isDFThe effective value of the current of the Diade fundamental frequency aluminum bonding wire is obtained;
according to Miner's injury theory and equation (23), the Diode is at 0-tnTime of day life consumption CLD(tn) As follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000076
in the formula, NDsum_LIs a Diode at 0-tnTotal number of low frequency thermal cycles at the moment; n is a radical ofD_L,αAnd NDf_L,αRespectively corresponding thermal cycle times and cycle failure cycles of the alpha-th low-frequency thermal cycle of the Diode; n is a radical ofD_F,ωAnd NDf_F,ωRespectively corresponding to the omega th sampling time interval T, the fundamental frequency thermal cycle times and the cycle failure cycles; n is the total number of sampling points until the current running time;
the Diode sampling time tnMean time to failure MTTF corresponding to time interval TD(tn) As follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000081
in the formula, CLD(tn) Is a Diode at 0-tnThe consumption of the lifetime at a moment; t is a sampling time interval;
diade failure rate λD(tn) As follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000082
in the formula, MTTFD(tn) For the moment t of the Diade samplingnThe average time to failure of the corresponding time interval T;
diade reliability RD(tn) is as follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000083
in the formula, λD(tn) Is the rate of Diade failures; t is tnIs the sampling instant.
3. The method for establishing the improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model based on multi-time scale heat damage according to claim 1, wherein: the method mainly comprises the following steps of establishing a reliability evaluation model of the hybrid MMC capacitor:
1) calculating capacitor reliability RC(tn) Namely:
Figure FDA0003245978170000084
in the formula, λcIs the capacitor failure rate; ws0Is in an initial state; wsiSelf-healing energy corresponding to the i SM faults; t is tnIs the sampling time;
self-healing energy WsiAs follows:
Figure FDA0003245978170000085
UCicapacitor voltages corresponding to i SM faults; rCIs a thin film resistor; c is capacitance; (p) is a sandwich pressure related function; a is the capacitor correlation coefficient; b is a resistance correlation coefficient; k is a radical ofcCalculating the correlation coefficient of self-healing energy;
2) according to capacitor reliability RC(tn) The hybrid MMC capacitor reliability was evaluated.
4. A method for modeling an improved hybrid MMC operational reliability assessment model based on multi-time scale thermal damage according to any one of claims 1-3, and mainly comprising the steps of:
1) inputting data in an improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model; the data mainly comprises environmental parameters, mixed MMC and fan electrical parameters; the environmental parameter mainly comprises wind speed
Figure FDA0003245978170000087
And air temperature
Figure FDA0003245978170000086
The hybrid MMC and wind turbine electrical parameters mainly comprise switching frequency fswThe hybrid MMC has a direct current side rated voltage, an alternating current side rated voltage, a power factor, a modulation ratio and a duty ratio;
2) according to input data, the improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model calculates the loss of a power device; i.e. calculating the sampling instant tnAverage loss P of IGBT switching period in corresponding time interval TT,avgAnd the average loss P of the switching period of the DiodeD,avg
3) According to input data, the improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model calculates the multi-time scale junction temperature of the power device;
calculating the sampling time tnJunction temperature mean value T of IGBT fundamental frequency period within corresponding time interval TTjavg_FMaximum value TTjmax_FMinimum value TTjmin_FAnd effective value of current I of aluminum bonding wireF(ii) a Calculating 0-t according to the rain flow algorithmnMaximum T of junction temperature curve of IGBT low-frequency period at momentTjmax_LMinimum value TTjmin_LAnd effective value of current I of aluminum bonding wireL
4) According to input data, the improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model calculates the service life consumption, the average failure time and the failure rate of the power device and the multi-time scale;
calculating the number N of low-frequency cyclic failure cycles of the IGBTTf_LAnd the number N of cycles of failure of fundamental frequency cycleTf_FThereby obtaining the IGBT at 0-tnTime of day life consumption CLT(tn) Sampling time tnMean time to failure MTTF corresponding to time interval TT(tn) Failure rate λT(tn) And degree of reliability RT(tn);
Calculating the number N of low-frequency cycle failure cycles of the DiodeDf_LAnd the number N of cycles of failure of fundamental frequency cycleDf_FThus obtaining a Diode in the range of 0-tnTime of day life consumption CLD(tn) Sampling time tnMean time to failure MTTF corresponding to time interval TD(tn) Failure rate λD(tn) And degree of reliability RD(tn);
5) According to input data, the improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model calculates the reliability R of the capacitorC(tn);
6) According to the input data, the improved hybrid MMC operation reliability evaluation model calculates hybrid MMC reliability R (t) of SM multi-staten) Thereby evaluating the reliability of improving the operation of the hybrid MMC.
CN201810115615.7A 2018-02-06 2018-02-06 Improved hybrid MMC (modular multilevel converter) operation reliability evaluation model and method Expired - Fee Related CN108509674B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810115615.7A CN108509674B (en) 2018-02-06 2018-02-06 Improved hybrid MMC (modular multilevel converter) operation reliability evaluation model and method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810115615.7A CN108509674B (en) 2018-02-06 2018-02-06 Improved hybrid MMC (modular multilevel converter) operation reliability evaluation model and method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN108509674A CN108509674A (en) 2018-09-07
CN108509674B true CN108509674B (en) 2021-10-26

Family

ID=63374491

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201810115615.7A Expired - Fee Related CN108509674B (en) 2018-02-06 2018-02-06 Improved hybrid MMC (modular multilevel converter) operation reliability evaluation model and method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN108509674B (en)

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109149982B (en) * 2018-08-21 2020-01-31 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 Reliability evaluation method for power module of modular level converter
CN109917638B (en) * 2018-12-05 2020-08-18 重庆大学 MMC dynamic redundancy preventive maintenance method considering influence of operation conditions
CN109581178B (en) * 2018-12-21 2020-12-15 武汉合康电驱动技术有限公司 Method and equipment for determining junction temperature of IGBT module of voltage-type inverter
CN110261698B (en) * 2019-06-20 2021-10-08 重庆大学 Metallized film capacitor reliability evaluation method based on MMC converter valve application working condition
CN110880785B (en) * 2019-11-12 2022-06-17 东南大学 Active thermal control method of modular multilevel converter based on hybrid modulation strategy
CN111090940B (en) * 2019-12-17 2023-04-14 南方电网科学研究院有限责任公司 MMC sub-module crimping type IGBT short-term failure analysis method based on ANSYS
CN111199101B (en) * 2019-12-27 2022-04-22 西安交通大学 IGBT reliability analysis method based on MMC working condition device level degradation
CN112084651B (en) * 2020-09-07 2022-08-26 武汉大学 Multi-scale wind power IGBT reliability assessment method and system considering fatigue damage
CN114048908B (en) * 2021-11-15 2024-07-02 东北大学 Multi-time scale reinforcement interval optimization method for unified power grid-distributed heat supply network system

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105634259A (en) * 2015-05-26 2016-06-01 华北电力大学 Reliability analysis and redundancy configuration calculation method for hybrid modular multilevel converter
CN106202970A (en) * 2016-07-29 2016-12-07 南京工程学院 A kind of fault rate appraisal procedure of MMC
EP3197038A1 (en) * 2016-01-25 2017-07-26 North China Electric Power University Modular multilevel converter (mmc) topologies with voltage self-balancing capability
CN107341326A (en) * 2017-08-29 2017-11-10 中国南方电网有限责任公司电网技术研究中心 Service life evaluation method for modular multilevel converter
CN107508281A (en) * 2017-08-10 2017-12-22 西南交通大学 A kind of cophase supply system load flow controller dynamic reliability appraisal procedure

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105634259A (en) * 2015-05-26 2016-06-01 华北电力大学 Reliability analysis and redundancy configuration calculation method for hybrid modular multilevel converter
EP3197038A1 (en) * 2016-01-25 2017-07-26 North China Electric Power University Modular multilevel converter (mmc) topologies with voltage self-balancing capability
CN106202970A (en) * 2016-07-29 2016-12-07 南京工程学院 A kind of fault rate appraisal procedure of MMC
CN107508281A (en) * 2017-08-10 2017-12-22 西南交通大学 A kind of cophase supply system load flow controller dynamic reliability appraisal procedure
CN107341326A (en) * 2017-08-29 2017-11-10 中国南方电网有限责任公司电网技术研究中心 Service life evaluation method for modular multilevel converter

Non-Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
A Lifetime Extension Strategy for Power Devices in the Wind Power Converters Based on the Distribution Characteristics of Consumed Lifetime;Jun Zhang 等;《2017 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition》;20170518;第761-766页 *
Reliability Analysis and Redundancy Configuration of MMC With Hybrid Submodule Topologies;Jianzhong Xu 等;《IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS》;20160430;第31卷(第4期);第2720-2729页 *
Reliability Model of MMC Considering Periodic Preventive Maintenance;Biyang Wang 等;《IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER DELIVERY》;20160825;第32卷(第3期);第1535-1544页 *
同相供电系统潮流控制器可靠性建模与冗余分析;陈民武 等;《电网技术》;20171231;第41卷(第12期);第4022-4029页 *
风电变流器中功率半导体器件可靠性评估及其改善措施的研究;李高显;《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库 工程科技Ⅱ辑》;20160215(第2期);第C042-448页 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN108509674A (en) 2018-09-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN108509674B (en) Improved hybrid MMC (modular multilevel converter) operation reliability evaluation model and method
Sangwongwanich et al. Lifetime evaluation of grid-connected PV inverters considering panel degradation rates and installation sites
Formica et al. The effect of inverter failures on the return on investment of solar photovoltaic systems
CN108414856B (en) Service life evaluation method and device for submodule capacitor of modular multilevel converter
CN109917638B (en) MMC dynamic redundancy preventive maintenance method considering influence of operation conditions
Bollen et al. Future work on harmonics-some expert opinions Part I-wind and solar power
Awadallah et al. Impact of solar panels on power quality of distribution networks and transformers
CN106067680A (en) Improved the life-span of semiconductor by reducing the temperature change in semiconductor by means of reactive power
US20130207474A1 (en) Matrix connection device for photovoltaic panels and/or wind turbines
KR20120109551A (en) System for the electronic management of photovoltaic cells with adapted thresholds
Wang et al. Comparative analysis of the reliability of grid-connected photovoltaic power systems
Zhou et al. Lifetime estimation of electrolytic capacitors in a fuel cell power converter at various confidence levels
CN105093021B (en) Temperature rise test method of bridge arm reactor for modular multilevel converter
CN109347103A (en) A kind of receiving end power grid is outer by electric energy power analysis method
Sulaeman et al. Modeling and evaluating the capacity credit of PV solar systems using an analytical method
Kwofie et al. Post commission grid impact assessment of a 20 MWp solar PV grid connected system on the ECG 33 kV network in Winneba
Reddy et al. Impact Assessment of the simultaneous operation of photovoltaic and cogeneration power plants on the industrial distribution system
CN113783234B (en) Photovoltaic power generation PV configuration and power limit optimization method with maximum net increase power generation capacity
Smater et al. A framework for reliability and performance assessment of wind energy conversion systems
Rodrigues et al. Using photovoltaic systems to improve voltage control in low voltage networks
Li et al. Microgrid reliability evaluation based on condition-dependent failure models of power electronic devices
Perez et al. Application of energy storage elements on a PV system in the smart grid context
Mohan et al. Design approach for high power, medium voltage power conversion systems for wind turbines
Gomathy et al. Automatic monitoring and fault identification of photovoltaic system by wireless sensors
Imanaka et al. A simple control method of waterworks pump power consumption for demand response

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee

Granted publication date: 20211026

CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee