CN108039725B - Power distribution network distributed power supply planning model based on vector sequence optimization - Google Patents
Power distribution network distributed power supply planning model based on vector sequence optimization Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN108039725B CN108039725B CN201711251440.4A CN201711251440A CN108039725B CN 108039725 B CN108039725 B CN 108039725B CN 201711251440 A CN201711251440 A CN 201711251440A CN 108039725 B CN108039725 B CN 108039725B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- model
- node
- voltage
- distributed power
- constraint
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 35
- 238000013210 evaluation model Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 37
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- 238000012163 sequencing technique Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 238000001303 quality assessment method Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 66
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010248 power generation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005065 mining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007935 neutral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02J—CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
- H02J3/00—Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
- H02J3/38—Arrangements for parallely feeding a single network by two or more generators, converters or transformers
- H02J3/381—Dispersed generators
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02J—CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
- H02J3/00—Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
- H02J3/008—Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks involving trading of energy or energy transmission rights
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02J—CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
- H02J2203/00—Indexing scheme relating to details of circuit arrangements for AC mains or AC distribution networks
- H02J2203/20—Simulating, e g planning, reliability check, modelling or computer assisted design [CAD]
Abstract
A power distribution network distributed power supply planning model based on vector sequence optimization comprises a rough evaluation model, a precise evaluation model, a sequencing layering model and an optimal compromise scheme selection model, wherein the rough evaluation model is used for carrying out preliminary evaluation on all feasible solutions in a characterization set, the precise evaluation model is used for carrying out precise evaluation on all feasible solutions in the selected set, the rough evaluation model and the precise evaluation model both use voltage quality and investment cost of a distributed power supply as objective functions, constraint conditions comprise total power conservation constraint, node voltage constraint and DG permeability constraint, the sequencing layering model is used for carrying out sequencing layering on the characterization set according to the rough evaluation value and sequencing layering on the selected set according to the precise evaluation value, and the optimal compromise scheme selection model is used for selecting an optimal compromise scheme from a real enough good solution set. The design not only has higher accuracy, practicability and effectiveness, but also can effectively improve the voltage quality.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the field of power distribution network planning, and particularly relates to a power distribution network distributed power supply planning model based on vector sequence optimization.
Background
Distributed Generation (DG) is a system in which power generation modules are distributed on a small scale (small modules with a power generation of several KW to 50 MW) near the user side, and which can independently output electric energy. The distributed power supply is usually connected to a power distribution network to operate mainly, influences can be caused on multiple aspects such as the electric energy quality, the power supply reliability level, the network loss level and the relay protection configuration of each node of the power distribution network, and under the condition that the topological structure and the load distribution condition of the power distribution network are not taken into consideration, the influence degree of the distributed power supply on the power distribution network is mainly closely related to the installation position and the installation capacity of the distributed power supply, namely the location and the constant volume of a DG.
Optimization problems in the power system generally belong to multi-objective optimization problems, such as reactive power optimization, power system unit combination, site selection of a transformer substation, optimal planning of size and the like. The optimal planning problem of distributed power supplies in a power distribution system also belongs to the multi-objective optimization problem. In engineering practice, the optimization is widely applied. The theory of sequence optimization proposed by the theory of Qi professor in the beginning of the 90's 20 th century is an optimization method based on simulation, and is an effective algorithm for calculating characteristic problems of high dimension, complexity, long time consumption and the like. The theory of Vector Order Optimization (VOO) is innovatively proposed on the basis of order Optimization by the professor Zhao Qianchuan of the university of Qinghua. As a derivative theory of the order optimization theory, the vector order optimization has higher efficiency and more close to the practical utility of engineering in solving the multi-objective optimization problem. However, the existing optimization model only considers the cost factor, so that the accuracy is insufficient.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to overcome the problem of insufficient accuracy in the prior art and provides a power distribution network distributed power supply planning model based on vector sequence optimization with higher accuracy.
In order to achieve the above purpose, the technical scheme of the invention is as follows:
a power distribution network distributed power supply planning model based on vector sequence optimization comprises a rough evaluation model, an accurate evaluation model, a sequencing layering model and an optimal compromise scheme selection model;
the rough evaluation model is used for carrying out preliminary evaluation on all feasible solutions in the extracted characterization set, the accurate evaluation model is used for carrying out accurate evaluation on all feasible solutions in the selected set, the rough evaluation model and the accurate evaluation model both take voltage quality and investment cost of a distributed power supply as objective functions, and constraint conditions comprise total power conservation constraint, node voltage constraint and DG permeability constraint;
the sequencing layering model is used for sequencing and layering the characterization set according to the rough evaluation value and sequencing and layering the selected set according to the accurate evaluation value;
the optimal compromise scheme selection model is used for selecting an optimal compromise scheme from a true good enough solution set so as to obtain an optimal power distribution network distributed power supply planning scheme.
The rough evaluation model comprises a voltage quality rough model and an investment cost rough model;
the rough voltage quality model is as follows:
V＝v2
wherein V is a voltage quality index, V2Is a voltage stability index, N is the total number of system buses, M is the total number of load buses, PijIs the active power of node i to node j, XijReactance, Q, for the branch from node i to node jijIs reactive power of node i to node j, RijIs the resistance of the branch from node i to node j, ViIs the voltage quality of node i;
the coarse investment cost model comprises the following steps:
wherein C is the total investment cost, CDGInvestment cost per unit capacity of distributed power supply, SDGiIs the capacity of the distributed power supply installed at node i;
the accurate evaluation model comprises a voltage quality accurate model and an investment cost accurate model;
the accurate voltage quality model is as follows:
V＝ω1×v1+ω2×v2
in the formula, v1As an indication of voltage deviation, VirefIs the reference voltage of node i;
the investment cost accurate model is as follows:
in the formula, CbusA fixed investment cost for installing distributed power nodes.
The constraint conditions of the voltage quality rough model and the voltage quality accurate model comprise total power conservation constraint, node voltage constraint and DG permeability constraint;
the total power conservation constraint is:
in the formula, SijFor the flow power from node i to node j, Δ VijFor the voltage drop from node i to node j, ZijIs the impedance of the branch from node i to node j, SDGiFor power generated by a distributed power supply at node i, DjIs the total power of node j;
the node voltage constraint is:
Vimin≤Vi≤Vimax
in the formula, ViIs the voltage of node i, ViminIs the minimum voltage at node i, VimaxIs the maximum voltage at node i;
the DG permeability constraint is:
S∑DG＜SL
in the formula, S∑DGTotal capacity, S, allowed for distributed power L10% of the total capacity of the load of the power grid.
The sorting layering model adopts a pareto game theory to perform sorting layering, and sequentially comprises the following steps:
step a, correspondingly comparing the voltage quality assessment value and the investment cost assessment value of the first feasible solution with the voltage quality assessment value and the investment cost assessment value of the rest feasible solutions, and if both the two assessment values of the first feasible solution are superior to the rest feasible solution, rejecting the rest feasible solution;
step b, repeating the step a until the comparison of the last feasible solution and the rest feasible solutions is finished, and at the moment, eliminating the characteristic set thetaNThe remaining feasible solutions form a first layer feasible solution set;
step c, firstly, the first layer feasible solution set is selected from the initial characterization set thetaNRemoving to obtain a new characterization set, and then repeating the steps a and b to obtain a second layer of feasible solution set;
step d, repeating the step c until the characterization set theta is completedNLayering of all feasible solutions within.
The optimal compromise scheme selection model adopts a membership function to select a true good enough solution with the maximum membership value from a set of true good enough solutions as an optimal compromise scheme:
R＝{CM,CG}
wherein R is a set of factors, CMAs a voltage quality objective function, CGAs an objective function of investment cost, λi,jIs as followsDegree of offset between the j-th target value of i really good enough solutions and the optimal value of the j-th target, fi,jFor the ith target value which is really good enough to be solved,
and
respectively the maximum and minimum of the jth target, λiMembership of the ith really good enough solution, nobjIs a target number, ndesignIs the number of really good enough solutions.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the beneficial effects that:
1. the invention discloses a power distribution network distributed power supply planning model based on vector sequence optimization, wherein a rough evaluation model and an accurate evaluation model in the power distribution network distributed power supply planning model both take voltage quality and investment cost of a distributed power supply as objective functions, and simultaneously take total power conservation constraint, node voltage constraint and DG permeability constraint into consideration. Therefore, the invention has higher accuracy and comprehensiveness.
2. According to the power distribution network distributed power supply planning model based on vector sequence optimization, the sorting hierarchical model adopts the pareto game theory to perform sorting and layered mining, the problem that the voltage quality and the investment and charge consumption of the distributed power supply are inconsistent is fully considered in the design, the game among different dimension optimization targets is reflected while the efficiency of the vector sequence optimization algorithm is ensured, the advantages of the vector sequence optimization and the pareto game theory are fully combined, the overall coordination of multiple targets in the optimization process is realized, the accuracy of the method is further improved while the calculation efficiency of the vector sequence optimization algorithm is effectively ensured, and the method has high practicability and effectiveness. Therefore, the invention has higher practicability and effectiveness.
3. According to the optimal compromise scheme selection model in the power distribution network distributed power supply planning model based on vector sequence optimization, the membership function is adopted to select the real enough good solution with the largest membership value from the real enough good solutions as the optimal compromise scheme, the design is scientific and objective, the voltage quality can be effectively improved, and the cost is low. Therefore, the invention not only effectively improves the voltage quality, but also has low cost.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is an OPC graph obtained in example 1.
Detailed Description
The present invention will be described in further detail with reference to specific embodiments.
A power distribution network distributed power supply planning model based on vector sequence optimization comprises a rough evaluation model, an accurate evaluation model, a sequencing layering model and an optimal compromise scheme selection model;
the rough evaluation model is used for carrying out preliminary evaluation on all feasible solutions in the extracted characterization set, the accurate evaluation model is used for carrying out accurate evaluation on all feasible solutions in the selected set, the rough evaluation model and the accurate evaluation model both take voltage quality and investment cost of a distributed power supply as objective functions, and constraint conditions comprise total power conservation constraint, node voltage constraint and DG permeability constraint;
the sequencing layering model is used for sequencing and layering the characterization set according to the rough evaluation value and sequencing and layering the selected set according to the accurate evaluation value;
the optimal compromise scheme selection model is used for selecting an optimal compromise scheme from a true good enough solution set so as to obtain an optimal power distribution network distributed power supply planning scheme.
The rough evaluation model comprises a voltage quality rough model and an investment cost rough model;
the rough voltage quality model is as follows:
V＝v2
wherein V is a voltage quality index, V2Is a voltage stability index, N is the total number of system buses, M is the total number of load buses, PijIs the active power of node i to node j, XijReactance, Q, for the branch from node i to node jijIs reactive power of node i to node j, RijIs the resistance of the branch from node i to node j, ViIs the voltage quality of node i;
the coarse investment cost model comprises the following steps:
wherein C is the total investment cost, CDGInvestment cost per unit capacity of distributed power supply, SDGiIs the capacity of the distributed power supply installed at node i;
the accurate evaluation model comprises a voltage quality accurate model and an investment cost accurate model;
the accurate voltage quality model is as follows:
V＝ω1×v1+ω2×v2
in the formula, v1As an indication of voltage deviation, VirefIs the reference voltage of node i;
the investment cost accurate model is as follows:
in the formula, CbusA fixed investment cost for installing distributed power nodes.
The constraint conditions of the voltage quality rough model and the voltage quality accurate model comprise total power conservation constraint, node voltage constraint and DG permeability constraint;
the total power conservation constraint is:
in the formula, SijFor the flow power from node i to node j, Δ VijFor the voltage drop from node i to node j, ZijIs the impedance of the branch from node i to node j, SDGiFor power generated by a distributed power supply at node i, DjIs the total power of node j;
the node voltage constraint is:
Vimin≤Vi≤Vimax
in the formula, ViIs the voltage of node i, ViminIs the minimum voltage at node i, VimaxIs the maximum voltage at node i;
the DG permeability constraint is:
S∑DG＜SL
in the formula, S∑DGTotal capacity, S, allowed for distributed power L10% of the total capacity of the load of the power grid.
The sorting layering model adopts a pareto game theory to perform sorting layering, and sequentially comprises the following steps:
step a, correspondingly comparing the voltage quality assessment value and the investment cost assessment value of the first feasible solution with the voltage quality assessment value and the investment cost assessment value of the rest feasible solutions, and if both the two assessment values of the first feasible solution are superior to the rest feasible solution, rejecting the rest feasible solution;
step b, repeating the step a until the comparison of the last feasible solution and the rest feasible solutions is finished, and at the moment, eliminating the characteristic set thetaNThe remaining feasible solutions form a first layer feasible solution set;
step c, firstly, the first layer feasible solution set is selected from the initial characterization set thetaNRemoving to obtain a new characterization set, and then repeating the steps a and b to obtain a second layer of feasible solution set;
step d, repeating the step c until the characterization set theta is completedNLayering of all feasible solutions within.
The optimal compromise scheme selection model adopts a membership function to select a true good enough solution with the maximum membership value from a set of true good enough solutions as an optimal compromise scheme:
R＝{CM,CG}
wherein R is a set of factors, CMAs a voltage quality objective function, CGAs an objective function of investment cost, λi,jDegree of offset between jth target value and optimal value of jth target for ith really good solution, fi,jFor the ith target value which is really good enough to be solved,
and
respectively the maximum and minimum of the jth target, λiMembership of the ith really good enough solution, nobjIs a target number, ndesignIs the number of really good enough solutions.
The principle of the invention is illustrated as follows:
because under the condition that the installation number, the installation position and the installation capacity of the distributed power supplies are unknown, different distributed power supply arrangement schemes can have different influences on the voltage quality condition of each node in the power distribution network and corresponding investment cost, and meanwhile, for different distributed power supply arrangement schemes, the node voltage quality and the corresponding investment cost are different, namely, a game situation exists: for a plurality of distributed power supply arrangement schemes, some schemes can bring good improvement to the voltage quality of each node in the power distribution network, but high cost and budget can be generated, and the scheme is difficult to meet; although the cost of some schemes is within the acceptable range and even satisfactory, the corresponding benefits (improvement) brought to the voltages of the nodes in the power distribution network may be insignificant or even very little. In view of the above, the invention provides an evaluation model using the voltage quality and the investment cost of the distributed power supply in the power distribution network planning as an objective function based on the site selection and the volume fixing of the distributed power supply, gives consideration to the total power conservation constraint, the node voltage constraint and the DG permeability constraint, and simultaneously organically combines the pareto game theory and the vector sequence optimization, thereby realizing the overall coordination of multiple targets in the optimization process.
The voltage quality rough model adopted by the invention only considers the voltage stability index and uses the voltage stability index as the rough measurement of the voltage quality, and the investment cost rough model takes the purchase cost of the distributed power supply as the embodiment of the investment cost. The voltage quality accurate model considers the voltage deviation index and the voltage stability index at the same time, the index of the investment cost accurate model considers the purchase cost of the distributed power supply and the fixed cost of the arrangement point at the same time, and the main characteristics of the involved problems can be described in a more specific mode so as to be closer to the actual situation. The selection of these models allows good reliability of the evaluation results.
The indexes and parameters adopted by the invention are explained as follows:
voltage quality: the voltage quality measure consists of a voltage stability index and a voltage offset index. The voltage stability index reflects the voltage stability of the power distribution network, and the voltage deviation index can evaluate the power quality.
Investment cost: the investment cost is a key element and an important factor which are not negligible when the distribution network is planned and distributed, and the method mainly considers the purchase cost of DGs generated when the distributed power sources are distributed and the fixed cost for determining the nodes for distributing the distributed power sources.
Constraint of total power conservation: the sum of all input and output power should be equal to the total demand on the bus, and total power conservation is the basic condition for ensuring the stability of the distribution network.
Node voltage constraint: the drop in voltage should be between a maximum and a minimum voltage.
DG permeability constraint: namely, the constraint that the power sent by the distributed power supply accounts for the proportion of the load consumed by the whole power grid, and when the constraint is met, the penalty factor of the injection amount of the distributed power supply is 0.
Example 1:
a power distribution network distributed power supply planning model based on vector sequence optimization comprises a rough evaluation model and an accurate evaluation model, wherein the rough evaluation model comprises a voltage quality rough model and an investment cost rough model, the accurate evaluation model comprises a voltage quality accurate model and an investment cost accurate model, and the constraint conditions of the voltage quality rough model and the voltage quality accurate model comprise a total power conservation constraint, a node voltage constraint and a DG permeability constraint, wherein,
the rough voltage quality model is as follows:
V＝v2
wherein V is a voltage quality index, V2Is a voltage stability index, N is the total number of system buses, M is the total number of load buses, PijIs the active power of node i to node j, XijReactance, Q, for the branch from node i to node jijIs reactive power of node i to node j, RijIs the resistance of the branch from node i to node j, ViIs the voltage quality of node i;
the coarse investment cost model comprises the following steps:
wherein C is the total investment cost, CDGFor the investment cost of unit capacity of the distributed power supply, the embodiment takes 3500000 yuan/MVA, SDGiFor the capacity of the distributed power supply installed at the node i, 0.1MVA is taken in this embodiment;
the accurate voltage quality model is as follows:
V＝ω1×v1+ω2×v2
in the formula, v1As an indication of voltage deviation, VirefIs the reference voltage of node i;
the investment cost accurate model is as follows:
in the formula, CbusIn order to install the fixed investment cost of the distributed power node, 20000 elements/node are taken in the embodiment;
the total power conservation constraint is:
in the formula, SijFor the flow power from node i to node j, Δ VijFor the voltage drop from node i to node j, ZijIs the impedance of the branch from node i to node j, SDGiFor power generated by a distributed power supply at node i, DjIs the total power of node j;
the node voltage constraint is:
Vimin≤Vi≤Vimax
in the formula, ViIs the voltage of node i, ViminIs the minimum voltage at node i, VimaxIs the maximum voltage at node i;
the DG permeability constraint is:
S∑DG＜SL
in the formula, S∑DGTotal capacity, S, allowed for distributed power L10% of the total capacity of the load of the power grid.
In this embodiment, simulation analysis is performed by taking an IEEE 30 node distribution network system with a Matpower as an example, and the simulation analysis is performed sequentially according to the following steps:
step 1, establishing a power distribution network planning model containing a distributed power supply;
step 2, firstly, randomly extracting 1000 feasible solutions from the feasible domain to form a characterization set thetaNThen, a rough evaluation model is adopted to carry out the analysis on the characterization set thetaNPerforming preliminary evaluation on all feasible solutions in the hierarchy model, and then sequencing the hierarchy model to obtain a characterization set theta according to the rough evaluation valuesNSequencing and layering are carried out to obtain an OPC curve (see figure 1), wherein the sequencing and layering model adopts a pareto game theory to perform sequencing and layering, and the sequencing and layering model sequentially comprises the following steps:
step a, correspondingly comparing the voltage quality assessment value and the investment cost assessment value of the first feasible solution with the voltage quality assessment value and the investment cost assessment value of the rest feasible solutions, and if both the two assessment values of the first feasible solution are superior to the rest feasible solution, rejecting the rest feasible solution;
step b, repeating the step a until the comparison of the last feasible solution and the rest feasible solutions is finished, and at the moment, eliminating the characteristic set thetaNThe remaining feasible solutions form a first layer feasible solution set;
step c, firstly, the first layer feasible solution set is selected from the initial characterization set thetaNRemoving to obtain a new characterization set, and then repeating the steps a and b to obtain a second layer of feasible solution set;
step d, repeating the step c until the characterization set theta is completedNLayering of all feasible solutions within；
Step 3, determining the type of the problem to be optimized to be Neutral according to the OPC curve, and looking up the problem by a regression parameter table to obtain: z00.2176, p 0.9403, γ 0.9430 and η 1.0479, g 1 and k 1 are set, and then a ranked and layered characterization set Θ is taken according to the standard deviation of the error distribution of the rough evaluation result relative to the accurate evaluation resultNThe first S-2 layers of (a) contain 43 feasible solutions as the selected set S, and the probability that k true good enough solutions are contained in the selected set S is not lower than 95%, where S-2 is calculated by the following formula:
wherein s (k, g) denotes that s is a function of k, g, Z0Rho and gamma are regression parameters, eta is noise component, [ a ]]Represents a minimum integer not less than the number a;
step 4, accurately evaluating all feasible solutions in the selected set S by adopting an accurate evaluation model, then sequencing and layering the selected set S by the sequencing and layering model according to the accurate evaluation value according to the steps a-d, and taking 21 feasible solutions on the 1 st layer after sequencing and layering to form a true and good enough solution set;
and 5, calculating the membership degree of each true sufficient good solution by the optimal compromise scheme selection model by adopting a membership degree function (the result is shown in table 1), and selecting the true sufficient good solution (the distributed power supply arrangement scheme with the number of 248) with the maximum membership degree as an optimal compromise scheme, wherein the optimal compromise scheme is the finally obtained power distribution network distributed power supply planning scheme:
R＝{CM,CG}
wherein R is a set of factors, CMAs a voltage quality objective function, CGAs an objective function of investment cost, λi,jDegree of offset between jth target value and optimal value of jth target for ith really good solution, fi,jFor the ith target value which is really good enough to be solved,
and
respectively the maximum and minimum of the jth target, λiMembership of the ith really good enough solution, nobjIs a target number, ndesignIs the number of really good enough solutions.
TABLE 1 membership calculation results
The installation location and installation capacity of the distributed power arrangement scheme, No. 248, is shown in table 2:
table 2 optimal plan scheme DG installation position and installation capacity
In order to verify the validity of the model of the invention, the invention performs load flow calculation on the embodiment by means of a matpower tool to obtain the conditions of the voltages of the nodes in tables 3 and 4 before and after the distributed power supply arrangement by adopting the distributed power supply arrangement scheme with the number 248:
TABLE 3 initial power flow distribution and Voltage conditions at each node
TABLE 4 DG distribution of power flow and voltage at each node after installation
As can be seen from tables 3 and 4, after the distributed power supply arrangement scheme with the optimal compromise determined by vector order optimization and linear membership function is applied, the voltage distribution conditions of many nodes of the power distribution network in this embodiment are all improved to different degrees, and the voltage quality of the nodes in the power distribution network is improved.
Claims (3)
1. The utility model provides a distribution network distributed power planning model based on vector sequence optimization which characterized in that:
the planning model comprises a rough evaluation model, an accurate evaluation model, a sequencing layering model and an optimal compromise scheme selection model;
the rough evaluation model is used for performing preliminary evaluation on all feasible solutions in the extracted characterization set, the accurate evaluation model is used for performing accurate evaluation on all feasible solutions in the selected set, the rough evaluation model comprises a voltage quality rough model and an investment cost rough model, the accurate evaluation model comprises a voltage quality accurate model and an investment cost accurate model, the constraint conditions of the voltage quality rough model and the voltage quality accurate model comprise a total power conservation constraint, a node voltage constraint and a DG permeability constraint, wherein,
the rough voltage quality model is as follows:
V＝v2
wherein V is a voltage quality index, V2Is a voltage stability index, N is the total number of system buses, M is the total number of load buses, PijIs the active power of node i to node j, XijReactance, Q, for the branch from node i to node jijIs reactive power of node i to node j, RijIs the resistance of the branch from node i to node j, ViIs the voltage quality of node i;
the coarse investment cost model comprises the following steps:
wherein C is the total investment cost, CDGInvestment cost per unit capacity of distributed power supply, SDGiIs the capacity of the distributed power supply installed at node i;
the accurate voltage quality model is as follows:
V＝ω1×v1+ω2×v2
in the formula, v1As an indication of voltage deviation, VirefIs the reference voltage of node i;
the investment cost accurate model is as follows:
in the formula, CbusFor installing distributed power nodesFixed investment costs of (1);
the total power conservation constraint is:
in the formula, SijFor the flow power from node i to node j, Δ VijFor the voltage drop from node i to node j, ZijIs the impedance of the branch from node i to node j, SDGiFor power generated by a distributed power supply at node i, DjIs the total power of node j;
the node voltage constraint is:
Vimin≤Vi≤Vimax
in the formula, ViIs the voltage of node i, ViminIs the minimum voltage at node i, VimaxIs the maximum voltage at node i;
the DG permeability constraint is:
S∑DG＜SL
in the formula, S∑DGTotal capacity, S, allowed for distributed powerL10% of the total load capacity of the power grid;
the sequencing layering model is used for sequencing and layering the characterization set according to the rough evaluation value and sequencing and layering the selected set according to the accurate evaluation value;
the optimal compromise scheme selection model is used for selecting an optimal compromise scheme from a true good enough solution set so as to obtain an optimal power distribution network distributed power supply planning scheme.
2. The power distribution network distributed power supply planning model based on vector order optimization according to claim 1, characterized in that:
the sorting layering model adopts a pareto game theory to perform sorting layering, and sequentially comprises the following steps:
step a, correspondingly comparing the voltage quality assessment value and the investment cost assessment value of the first feasible solution with the voltage quality assessment value and the investment cost assessment value of the rest feasible solutions, and if both the two assessment values of the first feasible solution are superior to the rest feasible solution, rejecting the rest feasible solution;
step b, repeating the step a until the comparison of the last feasible solution and the rest feasible solutions is finished, and at the moment, eliminating the characteristic set thetaNThe remaining feasible solutions form a first layer feasible solution set;
step c, firstly, the first layer feasible solution set is selected from the initial characterization set thetaNRemoving to obtain a new characterization set, and then repeating the steps a and b to obtain a second layer of feasible solution set;
step d, repeating the step c until the characterization set theta is completedNLayering of all feasible solutions within.
3. The power distribution network distributed power supply planning model based on vector order optimization according to claim 1, characterized in that:
the optimal compromise scheme selection model adopts a membership function to select a true good enough solution with the maximum membership value from a set of true good enough solutions as an optimal compromise scheme:
R＝{CM,CG}
wherein R is a set of factors, CMAs a voltage quality objective function, CGAs an objective function of investment cost, λi,jDegree of offset between jth target value and optimal value of jth target for ith really good solution, fi,jFor the ith target value which is really good enough to be solved,
and
respectively the maximum and minimum of the jth target, λiMembership of the ith really good enough solution, nobjIs a target number, ndesignIs the number of really good enough solutions.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201711251440.4A CN108039725B (en) | 2017-12-01 | 2017-12-01 | Power distribution network distributed power supply planning model based on vector sequence optimization |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201711251440.4A CN108039725B (en) | 2017-12-01 | 2017-12-01 | Power distribution network distributed power supply planning model based on vector sequence optimization |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN108039725A CN108039725A (en) | 2018-05-15 |
| CN108039725B true CN108039725B (en) | 2021-04-09 |
Family
ID=62095258
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201711251440.4A Active CN108039725B (en) | 2017-12-01 | 2017-12-01 | Power distribution network distributed power supply planning model based on vector sequence optimization |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN108039725B (en) |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102868161A (en) * | 2012-10-23 | 2013-01-09 | 四川大学 | Optimization method of network variable structure with distributed type power supply distribution system |
| WO2014054108A1 (en) * | 2012-10-01 | 2014-04-10 | 富士通株式会社 | Power distribution management device, voltage determination method, and voltage determination program |
| CN105225000A (en) * | 2015-09-16 | 2016-01-06 | 三峡大学 | A kind of wind power probability model nonparametric probability method optimized based on Fuzzy Ordered |
| CN105719015A (en) * | 2016-01-19 | 2016-06-29 | 国网河北省电力公司电力科学研究院 | PEPSO-basedsiting and sizing method optimization method of distribution type power supply |
| CN107038292A (en) * | 2017-04-01 | 2017-08-11 | 三峡大学 | A kind of many output of wind electric field correlation modeling methods based on adaptive multivariable nonparametric probability |
Family Cites Families (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107944631B (en) * | 2017-12-01 | 2021-08-24 | 国家电网公司 | Power distribution network distributed power supply planning method based on vector sequence optimization |
-
2017
- 2017-12-01 CN CN201711251440.4A patent/CN108039725B/en active Active
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2014054108A1 (en) * | 2012-10-01 | 2014-04-10 | 富士通株式会社 | Power distribution management device, voltage determination method, and voltage determination program |
| CN102868161A (en) * | 2012-10-23 | 2013-01-09 | 四川大学 | Optimization method of network variable structure with distributed type power supply distribution system |
| CN105225000A (en) * | 2015-09-16 | 2016-01-06 | 三峡大学 | A kind of wind power probability model nonparametric probability method optimized based on Fuzzy Ordered |
| CN105719015A (en) * | 2016-01-19 | 2016-06-29 | 国网河北省电力公司电力科学研究院 | PEPSO-basedsiting and sizing method optimization method of distribution type power supply |
| CN107038292A (en) * | 2017-04-01 | 2017-08-11 | 三峡大学 | A kind of many output of wind electric field correlation modeling methods based on adaptive multivariable nonparametric probability |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| 基于向量序优化理论的大规模多目标机组组合问题研究;闫圆圆;《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库 工程科技Ⅱ辑》;20151215(第12期);第12-30页 * |
| 基于自适应变异粒子群算法的分布式电源选址与容量确定;叶德意等;《电网技术》;20110630;第35卷(第6期);第2页右栏第2段 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN108039725A (en) | 2018-05-15 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN107688879B (en) | Active power distribution network distributed power supply planning method considering source-load matching degree | |
| CN106253335B (en) | Power distribution network planning method with uncertain distributed power supply capacity and access position | |
| CN103177395B (en) | A kind of intelligent distribution network energy-saving and emission-reduction integrated evaluating method based on social expectation | |
| CN101635457B (en) | Electric network parameter estimation method based on parameter sensitivity of state estimation residual error | |
| CN105375472B (en) | A kind of intelligent distribution network low-carbon performance evaluation method | |
| CN101969198B (en) | Method for estimating electrical power system state with consideration of load static property | |
| CN107145707B (en) | Distribution network transformer planning method considering photovoltaic output uncertainty and life cycle cost | |
| CN105574617A (en) | Comprehensive optimization system for scheme of access of distributed power supplies and microgrid to power distribution system | |
| CN108122068A (en) | A kind of power distribution network risk-averse retailer method and system | |
| CN107947192A (en) | A kind of optimal reactive power allocation method of droop control type isolated island micro-capacitance sensor | |
| CN101609989B (en) | System for calculating power supply abundance of urban power network | |
| CN106532710A (en) | Microgrid power flow optimization method considering voltage stability constraint | |
| CN104933629A (en) | Power user equipment evaluation method based on interval level analysis and interval entropy combination | |
| CN106410784B (en) | Method for calculating sensitivity of active load of transformer substation to regional power grid active network loss | |
| CN107944631B (en) | Power distribution network distributed power supply planning method based on vector sequence optimization | |
| CN103530700B (en) | Urban distribution network saturation loading Comprehensive Prediction Method | |
| CN113239512A (en) | Toughness-considered screening method and system for AC/DC power distribution network planning scheme | |
| CN105574632A (en) | Method for evaluating comprehensive benefits of AC/DC hybrid urban distribution network | |
| CN106655152A (en) | Power distribution network state estimation method based on AMI measurement characteristics | |
| CN102280877B (en) | Method for identifying parameter of poor branch of power system through a plurality of measured sections | |
| Anuradha et al. | Voltage-loss sensitivity based approach for optimal DG placement in distribution networks | |
| CN106372440A (en) | Method and device for estimating self-adaptive robust state of distribution network through parallel computation | |
| CN103887823A (en) | Micro-grid connection position selection method based on fuzzy hierarchical analysis | |
| CN111293687B (en) | Distributed power source location and volume-fixing method based on three-dimensional particle swarm algorithm | |
| CN108428048A (en) | A kind of charging and conversion electric network operation evaluation method |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |