CN108038628B - Military exercise drill quantitative evaluation system - Google Patents
Military exercise drill quantitative evaluation system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN108038628B CN108038628B CN201711453156.5A CN201711453156A CN108038628B CN 108038628 B CN108038628 B CN 108038628B CN 201711453156 A CN201711453156 A CN 201711453156A CN 108038628 B CN108038628 B CN 108038628B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- evaluation
- data
- data acquisition
- task
- acquisition
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/26—Government or public services
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a military exercise drill quantitative evaluation system which mainly comprises an evaluation task configuration module, an evaluation data acquisition module and an evaluation result generation module; the evaluation task configuration module is used for creating and maintaining evaluation task information, acquiring attribute information of one or more evaluation objects, acquiring or importing a quantifiable evaluation index model and establishing an evaluation rule set; the evaluation data acquisition module executes a data acquisition task corresponding to each evaluation rule; and the evaluation result generation module traverses each evaluation object according to the hierarchical structure of the evaluation index model, and obtains each evaluation index value in the evaluation model through the step-by-step summary calculation of the final evaluation index according to the established evaluation rule and the acquired evaluation data to obtain a corresponding evaluation result. The system can solve the problem of quantitative evaluation of military exercise drilling.
Description
Technical Field
The invention provides a military exercise drill quantitative evaluation system, and belongs to the field of information technology and information systems.
Background
In the current military exercise drills in various forms, the exercise drill process tends to be actual combat, the result evaluation needs to give the final result success or failure or not to evaluate whether to complete a preset task, meanwhile, a scientific evaluation index system is used as a support, various ability indexes reflected in the exercise drill process are quantitatively evaluated, and the participating parties are guided to discover the own ability advantages, find out the ability weak links and the difference between the ability weak links and the expected standard, so that the exercise drill benefit is maximally exerted. Some military exercise drill evaluation systems in the prior art begin to explore and adopt quantitative evaluation methods, such as a method of inviting authoritative experts to subjectively score evaluation items in the drill process, but such evaluation systems do not really realize effective and objective quantitative evaluation, and the subjective tendency of the evaluation experts has great influence on the quantitative results. With the improvement of the technical level of battlefield information communication and the application of a large number of novel military equipment and intelligent sensors, the digitalization of battlefield environment, battlefield situation and exercise process is basically realized, and quantitative evaluation by utilizing a large number of exercise process data becomes an idea for constructing a novel evaluation system.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to meet the common requirement of quantitative evaluation of military exercise drill, provides a quantitative evaluation system which can customize, collect and generate index evaluation data for required battlefield environment, battlefield situation and exercise drill process data according to an evaluation index system, and solves the problem of quantitative evaluation of military exercise drill.
The purpose of the invention is realized by the following technical scheme:
a military exercise drilling quantitative evaluation system mainly comprises an evaluation task configuration module, an evaluation data acquisition module and an evaluation result generation module; wherein, the first and the second end of the pipe are connected with each other,
the evaluation task configuration module mainly comprises an evaluation task management unit, an evaluation object management unit, an evaluation index management unit and an evaluation rule management unit;
the evaluation task management unit is used for creating and maintaining evaluation task information;
the evaluation object management unit is used for collecting attribute information of one or more evaluation objects;
the evaluation index management unit is used for acquiring or importing a quantifiable evaluation index model, the evaluation index model is an evaluation index system with a hierarchical structure, and a final-stage evaluation index is a data acquisition index;
the evaluation rule management unit is used for establishing an association relation between an evaluation object and a final evaluation index of the evaluation index model and establishing an evaluation rule set;
the evaluation data acquisition module executes a data acquisition task corresponding to each evaluation rule;
and the evaluation result generation module traverses each evaluation object according to the hierarchical structure of the evaluation index model, and obtains each evaluation index value in the evaluation model through the step-by-step summary calculation of the final evaluation index according to the established evaluation rule and the acquired evaluation data so as to obtain a corresponding evaluation result.
Further, the attribute information of the evaluation object comprises an evaluation object category C i Evaluation object U i Evaluation object identification M i And data acquisition parameter P i 。
Further, the attribute information of each level of evaluation index in the evaluation index model of the present invention includes: the method comprises the following steps of (1) evaluating a parent index, a name and an index, a weight Q, a numerical standard and a collection configuration attribute; the numerical values of the first-level evaluation indexes and the middle-level evaluation indexes of the model are obtained by the layer-by-layer summary statistics of the final-level indexes.
Further, the effective option set of the index evaluation mode CM of the present invention is { "weighted sum", "weighted average", "maximum", "minimum" }; the effective option set of the index evaluation mode CM of the final-stage index is { 'automatic acquisition' }, the acquisition configuration attribute is associated with the evaluation data acquisition module, and the acquisition parameter information required by the evaluation data acquisition module is set.
Further, the evaluation rule set of the present invention
Defining dispatched pairs of evaluation objects U in evaluation task T i Last-stage index to be evaluated
The evaluation item of (1).
Furthermore, the assessment data acquisition module is composed of a battlefield data acquisition engine and a data acquisition assembly;
the battlefield data acquisition engine runs in an independent thread mode, and a thread timing cycle scheduling mode is adopted to drive the data acquisition assembly to execute a data acquisition task;
the data acquisition component comprises an Oracle acquisition component, a MySql acquisition component, a WebService acquisition component and an httpJson acquisition component, wherein the Oracle acquisition component and the MySql acquisition component are database acquisition components, and the acquired parameters are bound with parameters { evaluation object identification M i }, { data acquisition parameter P i }; the WebService acquisition component and the httpJson acquisition component are both application system acquisition components, and the acquired parameter binding parameter { evaluation object identifier M i }, { data acquisition parameter P i }。
Further, the data acquisition process of the data acquisition assembly of the invention is as follows:
in the first step, the task scheduling is started, and the unfinished evaluation rule set W' is inquired, wherein each evaluation rule W d Corresponding to a data acquisition task table;
secondly, traversing the data acquisition task list to create a data acquisition task T;
third step, according to W d Query to obtain evaluation index
Data acquisition configuration, evaluation object identification M i Data acquisition parameter P i Initializing an acquisition component instance according to data acquisition configuration;
fourthly, establishing connection between the data acquisition component example and an external application system or a database, submitting a data query request, and waiting for a request response;
fifthly, the data acquisition component receives the return information of the external system and executes data analysis and verification;
sixthly, the data acquisition component embodiment updates the task execution state according to the data verification result, stores the acquired data and the task state data into a database, and marks that the processing of the acquisition task is finished;
step seven, checking whether the acquisition task list has unprocessed acquisition tasks or not, and if so, continuing traversing to execute the acquisition tasks; otherwise, the task scheduling execution is finished.
Furthermore, the evaluation result generation module of the present invention further provides an evaluation result data query function, which includes a summary report of the evaluation results of all the evaluation objects and a detailed report of the evaluation result of each evaluation object.
Furthermore, the invention also comprises an evaluation information management module which mainly comprises a drilling exercise management unit, an evaluation task configuration data unit, an evaluation acquisition data unit, an evaluation result data unit, an organization management unit, a user authority management unit and an operation log management unit;
the exercise drill management unit provides exercise drill and stage mobile dictionary data maintenance functions, and the evaluation task configuration data unit provides record, query and management maintenance functions of evaluation task configuration data; the evaluation data acquisition unit provides the functions of recording, inquiring, managing and maintaining the automatically acquired data; the evaluation result data unit provides the functions of recording, inquiring, managing and maintaining the result data calculated by the evaluation result generating module; the organization management unit provides an organization dictionary data maintenance function; the user authority management unit provides a function of distributing system operation authority to the user according to roles; the operation log management unit provides the recording and inquiring functions of the user data operation log.
Advantageous effects
The invention relates to a military exercise drilling quantitative evaluation system, which is established with a quantitative evaluation system capable of automatically collecting battlefield data according to evaluation task requirements and conditions to form an evaluation result. The system has a complete evaluation task management function, a data acquisition engine and an evaluation data acquisition processing flow are designed, the customization acquisition and result generation of the required battlefield environment, battlefield situation and exercise and drill process data are realized, and the objective and real evaluation data are ensured; the system adopts a hierarchical quantitative evaluation model, can be used for quantitatively evaluating the overall operational capacity and each subentry capacity of the exercise drill, meets the requirement on the quantitative evaluation of the exercise drill, is beneficial to the participants to find the advantages of the abilities of the participants, find out weak links of the abilities and the gap between the weak links and the expected standard, and improves the exercise drill benefits.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a functional framework diagram of the whole system according to the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a diagram of the components of an evaluation task configuration module according to the present invention.
Fig. 3 is a view showing an evaluation model structure of the evaluation index management unit according to the present invention.
Fig. 4 is a flow chart of the evaluation task configuring each functional unit according to the present invention.
Fig. 5 is a block diagram of an evaluation data acquisition module according to the present invention.
FIG. 6 is a flow chart of a data collection engine executing a task schedule according to the present invention.
Fig. 7 is a block diagram showing the evaluation result generation module according to the present invention.
Fig. 8 is a block diagram of an evaluation information management module according to the present invention.
Detailed Description
The invention is described in detail below with reference to the figures and the specific examples.
As shown in fig. 1, a military exercise drill quantitative evaluation system is mainly composed of an evaluation task configuration module, an evaluation data acquisition module and an evaluation result generation module; wherein, the first and the second end of the pipe are connected with each other,
as shown in fig. 2, the evaluation task configuration module of the present invention is configured to manage an evaluation task, an evaluation object, an evaluation index, and an evaluation rule according to a performance drill evaluation requirement, and data generated by the evaluation task configuration is stored in a database through the evaluation information management module; the module mainly comprises an evaluation task management unit, an evaluation object management unit, an evaluation index management unit and an evaluation rule management unit.
The evaluation task management unit is used for creating and maintaining evaluation task information and is a function entrance of the whole evaluation task; the attribute information of the evaluation task T comprises the exercise/action, task identification, name, evaluation need and remarks.
The evaluation object management unit is used for collecting attribute information of one or more evaluation objects and attribute information packets of the evaluation objectsClass C of assessment objects i Evaluation target U i Evaluation object identifier M i Brief introduction information, data acquisition parameter P i Wherein the evaluation object class C i The effective data set of (1) is C = { "organization", "personnel", "custom object" }, and the data acquisition parameter P i Additional condition parameters relevant to the evaluation subject, such as "exercise stage =1", are required for data acquisition.
The evaluation index management unit is configured to collect or import a quantifiable evaluation index model, as shown in fig. 3, where the evaluation index model is an evaluation index system of a hierarchical structure, and attribute information of each level of evaluation index includes: the method comprises the following steps of belonging father indexes, names, index evaluation modes CM, weights Q, numerical standards and acquisition configuration attributes. The numerical values of the first-level evaluation indexes and the middle-level evaluation indexes of the model are obtained by the final-level index layer-by-layer summary statistics, and the effective option set of the corresponding index evaluation mode CM is { 'weighted sum', 'weighted average', 'maximum value' and 'minimum value' }; the effective option set of the index evaluation mode CM of the final-stage index is { "automatic acquisition" }, the acquisition configuration attribute is associated with a data acquisition assembly preset by the system, and parameter information required by the data acquisition assembly is set.
The evaluation index management unit corresponds to the first-level evaluation index in the evaluation index model
The method is a key capacity index, and is regarded as total-division comprehensive capacity evaluation (such as thousandths) when n =1, and when n =1>1, multi-index capability evaluation; intermediate level evaluation index
Is an index of capability decomposition; final evaluation index
In order to acquire the index of data, the acquisition of quantized data must be completed.
Evaluation rule management unit establishes evaluation object U i And evaluation model endGrade evaluation index
The incidence relation between the above-mentioned two kinds of data includes battlefield data acquisition rule, and the battlefield data acquisition rule can only establish Ui,
(CM = "automatic collection"), G 0 The association rules between. Forming evaluation rule sets by many-to-many association settings
To define the assigned pair of evaluation objects U in the evaluation task T i Index to be evaluated
The evaluation item of (1).
As shown in fig. 4, the specific working process of the module is as follows:
the method comprises the following steps: and an evaluation task is created by the evaluation task management unit, and the configuration task attribute information comprises the exercise/action, the task identification, the name, the evaluation need and notes.
Step two: the evaluation object management unit executes the configuration of the evaluation object, and sets the attribute information of the evaluation object including the evaluation object class C i Evaluation object name U i Evaluation object identification M i Profile information, data acquisition parameters P i 。
Step three: the evaluation index management unit imports a quantitative evaluation index model through input or an Excel file, and the setting of the attribute information of each level of evaluation index comprises the following steps: the method comprises the following steps of belonging father indexes, names, index evaluation modes CM, weights Q, numerical standards and acquisition configuration attributes.
Step four: the evaluation rule management unit executes the configuration of the evaluation rule and establishes an evaluation object U i Final evaluation index of evaluation model
The association relationship between them forms the evaluation rule set
Step five: and the evaluation rule management unit executes evaluation configuration integrity check, if the integrity condition is met, the evaluation task configuration is ended, otherwise, the evaluation rule management unit returns to continue executing the evaluation rule configuration, or the step two and the step three are returned to modify other configuration data.
As shown in fig. 5, the evaluation data acquisition module of the present invention provides an automatic data acquisition function, the data automatically acquired is from an external related application system and an external database, and the input data acquired by the data acquisition module is stored in the database through the evaluation information management module; the module mainly comprises a battlefield data acquisition engine and a data acquisition assembly.
The battlefield data acquisition engine runs in an independent thread mode, and drives the data acquisition component to execute a data acquisition task in a thread timing cycle scheduling mode, as shown in fig. 6, the execution flow is as follows: the first step, task scheduling is started, and the unfinished evaluation rule set W' is inquired at first, and each evaluation rule W d Corresponding to a data acquisition task; secondly, traversing the data acquisition task list and creating a certain data acquisition task T i Third step according to W d Query to obtain evaluation index
Collecting configuration attribute and evaluation object identification M i Data acquisition parameter P i Initializing an acquisition component instance according to the data acquisition configuration; fourthly, establishing connection between the data acquisition component example and an external application system or a database, submitting a data query request, and waiting for a request response; fifthly, the data acquisition component receives the return information of the external system and executes data analysis and verification; sixthly, the data acquisition component embodiment updates the task execution state according to the data verification result, andstoring the collected data and the task state data into a database, and marking that the collected task is processed and ended; seventhly, checking whether the acquisition task list has unprocessed acquisition tasks or not, and if so, continuously traversing and executing the acquisition tasks; otherwise, the task scheduling execution is finished.
The data acquisition components corresponding to the evaluation index management unit are respectively an Oracle acquisition component, a MySql acquisition component, a WebService acquisition component and an httpJson acquisition component, and the data acquisition components finish connection with an external database or an application system according to required acquisition parameters set by acquisition configuration attributes of each evaluation index and submit query requests to acquire evaluation data. The Oracle acquisition component and the MySql acquisition component are database acquisition components, the required acquisition parameters corresponding to the acquisition configuration attributes of each final-stage evaluation index comprise a database IP, a database name, a port, a user, a password and acquisition SQL, and a bindable parameter { evaluation object identifier M i }, { data acquisition parameter P i }; the WebService acquisition component and the httpJson acquisition component are application system acquisition components, acquisition parameters required by acquisition configuration attributes corresponding to each final-stage evaluation index are data acquisition service addresses, and parameters { evaluation object identification M) can be bound i }, { data acquisition parameters P i }。
As shown in fig. 7, the evaluation result generation module performs statistics and summarization on each evaluation index data of the evaluation object to generate a final evaluation result report; the module mainly comprises a data calculation unit and an evaluation result report unit.
And the data calculation unit of the evaluation result generation module traverses each evaluation object according to the hierarchical structure of the evaluation model, calculates the evaluation index values in the evaluation model by summarizing the evaluation indexes of the last stage step by step according to the setting of the evaluation rule and the evaluation acquisition data, and stores the evaluation index values in the evaluation result database.
The evaluation result report unit of the evaluation result generation module provides an evaluation result data query function, and comprises an evaluation result summary report of all evaluation objects and an evaluation result detail report of each evaluation object.
As shown in fig. 8, the system of the present invention further includes an evaluation information management module, configured to perform query access and maintenance management on the evaluation task configuration data, the evaluation collection data, the evaluation result data, and the organization data and the user right data related to the evaluation; the system mainly comprises a drilling exercise management unit, an evaluation task configuration data unit, an evaluation acquisition data unit, an evaluation result data unit, an organization management unit, a user authority management unit and an operation log management unit.
The exercise drill management unit provides dictionary data maintenance functions of exercise drills, stage actions and the like; the evaluation task configuration data unit provides the functions of recording, inquiring, managing and maintaining evaluation task configuration data; the evaluation data acquisition unit provides the functions of recording, inquiring, managing and maintaining the automatically acquired data; the evaluation result data unit provides the functions of recording, inquiring, managing and maintaining the result data calculated by the evaluation result generating module; the organization management unit provides an organization dictionary data maintenance function; the user authority management unit provides a function of distributing system operation authority for the user according to roles; the operation log management unit provides the recording and inquiring functions of the user data operation log.
In summary, the above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, and is not intended to limit the scope of the present invention. Any modification, equivalent replacement, or improvement made within the spirit and principle of the present invention should be included in the protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (3)
1. A military exercise drilling quantitative evaluation system is characterized by mainly comprising an evaluation task configuration module, an evaluation data acquisition module and an evaluation result generation module; wherein the content of the first and second substances,
the evaluation task configuration module mainly comprises an evaluation task management unit, an evaluation object management unit, an evaluation index management unit and an evaluation rule management unit;
the evaluation task management unit is used for creating and maintaining evaluation task information;
the evaluation object management unit is used for collecting attribute information of one or more evaluation objects;
the evaluation index management unit is used for acquiring or importing a quantifiable evaluation index model, the evaluation index model is an evaluation index system with a hierarchical structure, and a final-stage evaluation index is a data acquisition index;
the evaluation rule management unit is used for establishing an association relation between an evaluation object and a final evaluation index of the evaluation index model and establishing an evaluation rule set;
the evaluation data acquisition module executes a data acquisition task corresponding to each evaluation rule;
the evaluation result generation module traverses each evaluation object according to the hierarchical structure of the evaluation index model, and obtains each evaluation index value in the evaluation model through the step-by-step summary calculation of the final evaluation index according to the established evaluation rule and the collected evaluation data to obtain a corresponding evaluation result;
the assessment data acquisition module consists of a battlefield data acquisition engine and a data acquisition component;
the battlefield data acquisition engine runs in an independent thread mode, and a thread timing cycle scheduling mode is adopted to drive the data acquisition assembly to execute a data acquisition task; the process of executing the data acquisition task by the data acquisition component comprises the following steps:
in the first step, the task scheduling is started, and the unfinished evaluation rule set W' is inquired, wherein each evaluation rule W d Corresponding to a data acquisition task table;
secondly, traversing the data acquisition task list to create a data acquisition task T;
third step, according to W d Inquiring to obtain evaluation index
Data acquisition configuration and evaluation object identification M i Data acquisition parameter P i Initializing an acquisition component instance according to the data acquisition configuration;
fourthly, establishing connection between the data acquisition component example and an external application system or a database, submitting a data query request, and waiting for a request response;
fifthly, the data acquisition component receives the return information of the external system and executes data analysis and verification;
sixthly, the data acquisition component embodiment updates the task execution state according to the data verification result, stores the acquired data and the task state data into a database, and marks that the acquired task is processed and ended;
seventhly, checking whether the acquisition task list has unprocessed acquisition tasks or not, and if so, continuously traversing and executing the acquisition tasks; otherwise, the task scheduling execution is finished;
the attribute information of the evaluation object comprises an evaluation object class C i Evaluation object U i Evaluation object identifier M i And data acquisition parameter P i ；
The attribute information of each level of evaluation index in the evaluation index model comprises: the method comprises the following steps of (1) evaluating a parent index, a name and an index, a weight Q, a numerical standard and a collection configuration attribute; the numerical values of the first-level evaluation indexes and the middle-level evaluation indexes of the model are obtained by the layer-by-layer summary statistics of the final-level indexes;
the effective option set of the index evaluation mode CM is { "weighted sum", "weighted average", "maximum value", "minimum value" }; the effective option set of the index evaluation mode CM of the final-stage index is { 'automatic acquisition' }, the acquisition configuration attribute is associated with the evaluation data acquisition module, and the acquisition parameter information required by the evaluation data acquisition module is set;
the set of evaluation rules
Defining dispatched pairs of evaluation objects U in evaluation task T i Last-stage index to be evaluated
The evaluation item of (1).
2. The system for quantitative assessment of military exercise drill according to claim 1, wherein the data is dataThe acquisition component comprises an Oracle acquisition component, a MySql acquisition component, a WebService acquisition component and an httpJson acquisition component, wherein the Oracle acquisition component and the MySql acquisition component are both database acquisition components, and the acquired parameter binding parameter { evaluation object identifier M i }, { data acquisition parameter P i }; the WebService acquisition component and the httpJson acquisition component are both application system acquisition components, and the acquired parameter binding parameter { evaluation object identifier M i }, { data acquisition parameter P i }。
3. The military exercise drill quantitative evaluation system of claim 1, further comprising an evaluation information management module, which mainly comprises an exercise drill management unit, an evaluation task configuration data unit, an evaluation acquisition data unit, an evaluation result data unit, an organization management unit, a user authority management unit and an operation log management unit;
the exercise management unit provides exercise and stage mobile dictionary data maintenance functions, and the evaluation task configuration data unit provides recording, inquiring, managing and maintaining functions of evaluation task configuration data; the evaluation data acquisition unit provides the functions of recording, inquiring, managing and maintaining the automatically acquired data; the evaluation result data unit provides the functions of recording, inquiring, managing and maintaining the result data calculated by the evaluation result generating module; the organization management unit provides an organization dictionary data maintenance function; the user authority management unit provides a function of distributing system operation authority to the user according to roles; the operation log management unit provides the recording and inquiring functions of the user data operation log.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201711453156.5A CN108038628B (en) | 2017-12-28 | 2017-12-28 | Military exercise drill quantitative evaluation system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201711453156.5A CN108038628B (en) | 2017-12-28 | 2017-12-28 | Military exercise drill quantitative evaluation system |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN108038628A CN108038628A (en) | 2018-05-15 |
| CN108038628B true CN108038628B (en) | 2023-02-03 |
Family
ID=62097751
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201711453156.5A Active CN108038628B (en) | 2017-12-28 | 2017-12-28 | Military exercise drill quantitative evaluation system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN108038628B (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111144677B (en) * | 2018-11-06 | 2023-11-07 | 北京京东振世信息技术有限公司 | Efficiency evaluation method and efficiency evaluation system |
| CN109948885A (en) * | 2019-01-21 | 2019-06-28 | 三峡大学 | A kind of legal construction assessment system based on quantum Markov chain |
| CN110852478A (en) * | 2019-10-11 | 2020-02-28 | 南京智能仿真技术研究院有限公司 | Military exercise quantitative evaluation system |
| CN112288301A (en) * | 2020-11-05 | 2021-01-29 | 南京莱斯信息技术股份有限公司 | Multidimensional and multiscale command training evaluation system and method |
| CN113065984A (en) * | 2021-02-22 | 2021-07-02 | 中铁信(北京)网络技术研究院有限公司 | Intelligent detection and evaluation system and method for rail transit station emergency drilling information |
| CN116244590A (en) * | 2022-11-21 | 2023-06-09 | 中国人民解放军63921部队 | Data acquisition method and system for army training effect evaluation |
| CN115801599B (en) * | 2023-02-10 | 2023-05-19 | 中国电子科技集团公司第十五研究所 | Evaluation model construction method based on using section |
Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6604084B1 (en) * | 1998-05-08 | 2003-08-05 | E-Talk Corporation | System and method for generating an evaluation in a performance evaluation system |
| CN102521448A (en) * | 2011-12-09 | 2012-06-27 | 清华大学 | General evaluation platform for fighting efficiency of comprehensive electronic information system and implementation method thereof |
| CN105427032A (en) * | 2015-11-09 | 2016-03-23 | 河海大学 | Confrontation decision evaluation method for unmanned aerial vehicle |
| CN105608534A (en) * | 2015-12-23 | 2016-05-25 | 中国人民解放军海军航空工程学院 | Big data analysis based training assessment model construction method |
| CN106339971A (en) * | 2016-08-19 | 2017-01-18 | 贵州电网有限责任公司遵义供电局 | Emergency drilling management and assessment analysis system |
| CN107193639A (en) * | 2017-06-05 | 2017-09-22 | 北京航空航天大学 | A kind of multi-core parallel concurrent simulation engine system for supporting combined operation |
-
2017
- 2017-12-28 CN CN201711453156.5A patent/CN108038628B/en active Active
Patent Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6604084B1 (en) * | 1998-05-08 | 2003-08-05 | E-Talk Corporation | System and method for generating an evaluation in a performance evaluation system |
| CN102521448A (en) * | 2011-12-09 | 2012-06-27 | 清华大学 | General evaluation platform for fighting efficiency of comprehensive electronic information system and implementation method thereof |
| CN105427032A (en) * | 2015-11-09 | 2016-03-23 | 河海大学 | Confrontation decision evaluation method for unmanned aerial vehicle |
| CN105608534A (en) * | 2015-12-23 | 2016-05-25 | 中国人民解放军海军航空工程学院 | Big data analysis based training assessment model construction method |
| CN106339971A (en) * | 2016-08-19 | 2017-01-18 | 贵州电网有限责任公司遵义供电局 | Emergency drilling management and assessment analysis system |
| CN107193639A (en) * | 2017-06-05 | 2017-09-22 | 北京航空航天大学 | A kind of multi-core parallel concurrent simulation engine system for supporting combined operation |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| "关于体系作战效能评估指标体系构建方法的研究分析";丁剑飞 等;《指挥与控制学报》;20160930;第2卷(第3期);全文 * |
| "电子战仿真综合效能评估系统的设计与实现";黄胜鲁;《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库 信息科技辑》;20071115;第15-17、28-40页 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN108038628A (en) | 2018-05-15 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN108038628B (en) | Military exercise drill quantitative evaluation system | |
| Rowe et al. | Automated social hierarchy detection through email network analysis | |
| Jeffery et al. | Research information management: the CERIF approach | |
| JP2021099765A (en) | Method of optimizing data governance using ai | |
| CN103473672A (en) | System, method and platform for auditing metadata quality of enterprise-level data center | |
| CN104572122A (en) | Software application data generating device and method | |
| CN105718587A (en) | Network content resource evaluation method and evaluation system | |
| CN108197237A (en) | Visualization data, which collect, shows system | |
| CN107808356A (en) | Comprehensive quality evaluation system and method for evaluating comprehensive quality of students | |
| CN113872813B (en) | Full life cycle management method and system for carrier communication equipment | |
| CN105931079A (en) | Method and apparatus for diffusing seed users | |
| CN106681808A (en) | Task scheduling method and device | |
| CN106682099A (en) | Data storage method and device | |
| CN102779039A (en) | Development method of distributed simulation system facing system structure survey and based on byte order mark (BOM) | |
| Taleghani | Executive information systems development lifecycle | |
| Cheng et al. | Process and application of data mining in the university library | |
| CN113610677A (en) | Military training information system based on network mode and evaluation method thereof | |
| CN113539455A (en) | Hospital field evaluation system, device and method | |
| CN116089490A (en) | Data analysis method, device, terminal and storage medium | |
| CN114048396B (en) | NQI service recommendation method and system based on heterogeneous information network and deep learning | |
| CN116541166A (en) | Super-computing power scheduling server and resource management method | |
| CN109558522A (en) | Method for building up, device and the computer readable storage medium of enterprise network figure | |
| CN101140644A (en) | INTEDNET professional technology qualification reporting system | |
| CN101582133A (en) | Scheme evaluating system and method | |
| CN108038490A (en) | A kind of P2P enterprises automatic identifying method and system based on internet data |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |