CN107909346A - Design data processability review of product system - Google Patents

Design data processability review of product system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN107909346A
CN107909346A CN201711176384.2A CN201711176384A CN107909346A CN 107909346 A CN107909346 A CN 107909346A CN 201711176384 A CN201711176384 A CN 201711176384A CN 107909346 A CN107909346 A CN 107909346A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
technique
design data
module
data
technologist
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201711176384.2A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
郭长坡
王西雁
夏慧
周贺
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Beijing Power Machinery Institute
Original Assignee
Beijing Power Machinery Institute
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Beijing Power Machinery Institute filed Critical Beijing Power Machinery Institute
Priority to CN201711176384.2A priority Critical patent/CN107909346A/en
Publication of CN107909346A publication Critical patent/CN107909346A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10Office automation; Time management
    • G06Q10/103Workflow collaboration or project management
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/04Manufacturing
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/30Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a kind of design data processability review of product system, including:Receiving terminal, the receiving terminal are used to receive design data;Instruction triggers module;Check module, the inspection module is used to check whether director technologist completes to assign whether technique group leader, technique group leader complete to assign technique person, check whether technique person fills in the careful label result of design data, check refusal data whether in corresponding processability review of product registration card, check the information of auditor, the information of the auditor includes name, unit, examines the label time;Interface display module.The present invention realizes design department and examines label with technique division data all electronic;Realize batch data and assign technique group leader and technique person, simplify the mode of operation of director technologist and technique group leader;Realize the structured management of Processing examination registration card;Realize inspection of the design to the feedback opinion of technique person;Realize design data specific aim signature msu message.

Description

Design data processability review of product system
Technical field
The present invention relates to design data to audit technical field, more particularly to a kind of design data processability review of product system.
Background technology
It is by CAD (Computer Aided that traditional manufacturing industry design data, which examines label method, Design, CAD), the computer integrated manufacturing system such as computer-aided engineering (Computer Aided Engineering, CAE) it is soft Two-dimentional drawing is drawn in part, prints out papery two-dimensional engineering graphic, papery two-dimensional engineering graphic is transferred into all departments personnel examination & verification simultaneously Signature manually.
Design data examines label pattern, and the method because taking printing paper drawing to examine label, causes to consume a large amount of paper, and examines label During when have a corrupted or lost situation of paper drawing, the careful label of paper drawing need to manually be sent to all departments, and consumption is big Manpower is measured, and examines label excessive cycle, causes job schedule slow, when filing to paper drawing, wasting space storage, together When be difficult to preserve for a long time, so as to cause substantial amounts of historical data to be lost.
In addition, under task pattern, design data is examined to sign to be audited manually by papery and limited, and point of office Dissipate, it is difficult tracking enquiry positioning that conventional data, which examine label flow,.
The content of the invention
It is contemplated that one of technical problem in above-mentioned correlation technique is solved at least to a certain extent.
For this reason, an object of the present invention is to provide a kind of design data processability review of product system.The design data work Skill auditing system realizes design department and examines label with technique division data all electronic;Realize batch data and assign technique groups Long and technique person, simplifies the mode of operation of director technologist and technique group leader;Realize the structuring of Processing examination registration card Management;Realize inspection of the design to the feedback opinion of technique person;Realize design data specific aim signature msu message.
To achieve these goals, a kind of design data processability review of product system of disclosure of the invention, including:Receive End, the receiving terminal are used to receive design data;Instruction triggers module, so that designer passes through described instruction trigger module pair Director technologist is assigned so that director technologist audits design data, or so that designer is triggered by described instruction Module assigns technique person so that technique person audits design data, and/or so that director technologist passes through described instruction Trigger module, which grows technique groups, carries out batch appointment so that technique group leader audits design data, and/or so that technique group leader is led to Cross described instruction trigger module and batch appointment is carried out to technique person so that technique person audits design data;Check module, the inspection Look into module to be used to check whether director technologist completes to assign whether technique group leader, technique group leader complete to assign technique person, check Whether technique person fills in the careful label of design data as a result, checking refusal data whether in corresponding processability review of product registration card, Check the information of auditor, the information of the auditor includes name, unit, examines the label time;Interface display module, the interface Display module is used for the operation interface for showing the designer, director technologist, technique group leader and technique person.
Design data processability review of product system according to the present invention, realizes design department and technique division data all-electronin Change and examine label;Realize batch data and assign technique group leader and technique person, simplify the operation side of director technologist and technique group leader Formula;Realize the structured management of Processing examination registration card;Realize inspection of the design to the feedback opinion of technique person;Realize Design data specific aim signs msu message.
In addition, design data processability review of product system according to the above embodiment of the present invention can also have what is added as follows Technical characteristic:
Further, further include:Memory module, the memory module be used for store the receiving terminal, instruction triggers module, Check the relevant information of module, wherein, relevant information includes the information of processing procedure and the information of handling result.
Further, further include:Feedback information trigger module, the feedback information trigger module are used to judge in technique person Designer's processability review of product registration card is fed back to by feedback information trigger module when the design data is the data of refusal.
Further, further include:Processability review of product registration card creation module, for judging the design in the technique person When data are the data of refusal, processability review of product registration card is created.
The additional aspect and advantage of the present invention will be set forth in part in the description, and will partly become from the following description Obtain substantially, or recognized by the practice of the present invention.
Brief description of the drawings
The above-mentioned and/or additional aspect and advantage of the present invention will become in the description from combination accompanying drawings below to embodiment Substantially and it is readily appreciated that, wherein:
Fig. 1 is the structure chart of design data processability review of product system according to an embodiment of the invention;
Fig. 2 is the work flow diagram of design data processability review of product system according to an embodiment of the invention.
Embodiment
The embodiment of the present invention is described below in detail, the example of the embodiment is shown in the drawings, wherein from beginning to end Same or similar label represents same or similar element or has the function of same or like element.Below with reference to attached The embodiment of figure description is exemplary, and is only used for explaining the present invention, and is not considered as limiting the invention.
Design data processability review of product system according to embodiments of the present invention is described below in conjunction with attached drawing.
Fig. 1 is the structure chart of design data processability review of product system according to an embodiment of the invention.
As shown in Figure 1, design data processability review of product system 100 according to an embodiment of the invention, including:Receiving terminal 110th, instruction triggers module 120, inspection module 130 and interface display module 140.
Wherein, receiving terminal 110 is used to receive design data.
Specifically, when designer needs to be designed the examination & verification of data, designer can input design data Into design data processability review of product system 100, and the receiving terminal 110 of design data processability review of product system 100 be exactly for Receive these design datas.
Instruction triggers module 120 so that designer director technologist is assigned by instruction triggers module 120 with Director technologist is set to audit design data, or so that designer assigns technique person by instruction triggers module 120 So that technique person audits design data, and/or so that director technologist grows progress by instruction triggers module 120 to technique groups Batch assign so that technique group leader audit design data, and/or so that technique group leader by instruction triggers module 120 to technique Member carries out batch appointment so that technique person audits design data.Further, instruction triggers module 120 can press for instruction triggers Key.
Specifically, designer can be examined according to the quantity and type assignment of design data to each technologist Core, wherein, design data negligible amounts, these data can be audited by same technique person, then designer passes through instruction triggers Module 120 can directly assign technique person, i.e., this flow can skip director technologist and technique group leader automatically, directly by technique person Carry out technique and examine label;As design data quantity is more, and technique examination & verification cannot be carried out by same technique person, then designer needs to refer to Director technologist is sent, director technologist carries out processability review of product, and examining label flow when this design data proceeds to the progress of technique department During examination & verification, design data is individually assigned to multiple technique group leaders by director technologist, technique groups length carries out processability review of product, it The design data being assigned is assigned to corresponding technique person by multiple technique group leaders again afterwards, craftsmanship is finally carried out by technique person Examine.
Check that module 130 is used to checking whether director technologist to complete to assign technique group leader, whether technique group leader completes refers to Technique person is sent, checks whether technique person fills in the careful label of design data as a result, checking refusal data whether in corresponding craftsmanship Examine in registration card, check the information of auditor, the information of auditor includes name, unit, examines the label time.Wherein, auditor For director technologist, technique group leader, technique person.
In design data is assigned to some technique person this flow by designer, technique person is to corresponding design data Carry out examining label.Artificial technique person is audited, then, checks whether and has tasked technique person, the information of technique person is checked and whether fills out Write and examine label result.
Director technologist is assigned in designer, design data is assigned to technique group leader, technique group leader by director technologist Technique person is assigned, in this flow, auditor is director technologist, technique group leader and technologist, checks whether each appointment Whether complete, check whether director technologist, technique group leader and the information of technique person and technique person fill in and examine label result.
Wherein, when design data examine label by technique person, if design data has no problem, label is examined and are passed through, if Design data is refusal data, then examines label not by the way that formation process examines registration card, then checks that module 130 checks craftsmanship Examine registration card whether be technique person judge refusal data.
Further, check that module 130 can be embedded in design data by the handler of secondary development and examine label flow, When flow reaches some node, checked accordingly, for example, reaching the long node of technique groups in flow, technique group leader completes work After skill examination task, whether each technique group leader of systems inspection completes the appointment of the technique person for the data that need to each audit.
Interface display module 140 is used for operation circle for showing designer, director technologist, technique group leader and technique person Face.
Design data processability review of product system according to the present invention, realizes design department and technique division data all-electronin Change and examine label;Realize batch data and assign technique group leader and technique person, simplify the operation side of director technologist and technique group leader Formula;Realize the structured management of Processing examination registration card;Realize inspection of the design to the feedback opinion of technique person;Realize Design data specific aim signs msu message.
In certain embodiments, further include:Memory module, memory module are used to store receiving terminal 110, instruction triggers module 120th, the relevant information of module 130 is checked, wherein, relevant information includes the information of processing procedure and the information of handling result.This Sample can conveniently examine tracking and the Query Location of label task
Related data specifically, for example, the design data in receiving terminal 110 can be stored in memory module, instruction triggers Trigger flow process in module 120 can be stored in memory module, trigger flow process i.e. which Personnel Appointment of which time which A personnel carry out examining label, check that the testing result in module 130 can store in a storage module.
In certain embodiments, further include:Feedback information trigger module, feedback information trigger module are used to sentence in technique person Designer's processability review of product registration card is fed back to by feedback information trigger module when disconnected design data is the data of refusal.If Design answer opinion in processability review of product registration card in the flow that meter personnel can only retract technique person operates.To set Amended design data restarting flow is carried out examining label by meter personnel.Particularly, designer can will include design solution The design data for answering opinion directly returns again to and carries out examination & verification again to corresponding technique person.
Wherein, check that module 130 is additionally operable to check whether the design answer opinion in processability review of product registration card fills in, such as Fruit is not filled in, then cannot restart flow and be audited.
Further, further include:Processability review of product registration card creation module, for judging the design data in technique person For refusal data when, create processability review of product registration card.
It is worth noting that, director technologist can only assign technique group leader in batches, technique group leader can only assign technique person, if Meter personnel can assign director technologist or technique person.It is this in the case where limiting all operating rights of design data, have pin The technique examination & verification completed to data to property.
As shown in Fig. 2, the workflow of the design data processability review of product system of the present invention is:
Designer S20, the design data that designer initiates to examine as needed label flow in the light of actual conditions assign work Skill department for review personnel, as data only need single technique person to audit, then designer directly assigns technique person;As data need to be multiple Technique person audits, then designer need to assign director technologist;
Director technologist S21, director technologist carry out processability review of product S22, examination & verification stream after careful label task is received All data in journey, pass through as audited, then batch data are assigned to single (multiple) technique group leader, the technique group leader being assigned Using as the careful label personnel of downstream node;As audited not by the way that then flow is retired designer's node, by designer Director technologist is reassigned in member;
Technique group leader S23, after technique group leader receives careful label task, carries out processability review of product S24, audits by director's work Skill teacher is assigned to the data of oneself, passes through as audited, then the data being assigned is distributed to single (multiple) technique person, is allocated Technique person using as the careful label personnel of downstream node;As audited not by the way that then flow is retired director technologist section Point, technique group leader is reassigned by director technologist;
Technique person S25, after technique person receives careful label task, carries out processability review of product S26, the group leader's distribution of examination & verification technique To the data of oneself, and auditing result is carried out to allocated data and is filled in, if auditing result is approval, then completed craftsmanship and examine Look into;As auditing result for refusal, then be retired designer for the data creation processability review of product registration card being rejected, flow Member, designer record card information modification data according to processability review of product, and fill in design answer opinion, while restart stream Journey (flow at this time can skip director technologist and the long node of technique groups automatically, directly reach technique person's node).
In the description of the present invention, it is necessary to illustrate, unless otherwise clearly defined and limited, term " designer Member ", " director technologist ", " technique group leader ", " technique person ", " processability review of product ", " processability review of product registration card ", " design solution Answer opinion " it should be interpreted broadly, for example, it may be director technologist or supervisor technologist, or technique chief engineer.For For those of ordinary skill in the art, the concrete meaning of above-mentioned term in the present invention can be understood with concrete condition.
In the description of this specification, reference term " one embodiment ", " some embodiments ", " example ", " specifically show The description of example " or " some examples " etc. means specific features, structure, material or the spy for combining the embodiment or example description Point is contained at least one embodiment of the present invention or example.In the present specification, schematic expression of the above terms is not It must be directed to identical embodiment or example.Moreover, particular features, structures, materials, or characteristics described can be in office Combined in an appropriate manner in one or more embodiments or example.In addition, without conflicting with each other, the skill of this area Art personnel can be tied the different embodiments or example described in this specification and different embodiments or exemplary feature Close and combine.
Although the embodiment of the present invention has been shown and described above, it is to be understood that above-described embodiment is example Property, it is impossible to limitation of the present invention is interpreted as, those of ordinary skill in the art within the scope of the invention can be to above-mentioned Embodiment is changed, changes, replacing and modification.

Claims (4)

  1. A kind of 1. design data processability review of product system, it is characterised in that including:
    Receiving terminal, the receiving terminal are used to receive design data;
    Instruction triggers module, so that designer is assigned so that director director technologist by described instruction trigger module Technologist audits design data, or so that technique person is assigned by described instruction trigger module by designer so that work Performer audits design data, and/or so that director technologist, which grows technique groups by described instruction trigger module, carries out batch Assign so that technique group leader audit design data, and/or so that technique group leader by described instruction trigger module to technique person Batch appointment is carried out so that technique person audits design data;
    Check module, the inspection module be used to checking director technologist whether complete to assign technique group leader, technique group leader whether Complete to assign technique person, check whether technique person fills in the careful label of design data as a result, checking refusal data whether corresponding In processability review of product registration card, the information of auditor is checked, the information of the auditor includes name, unit, examines the label time;
    Interface display module, the interface display module are used to show the designer, director technologist, technique group leader and work The operation interface of performer.
  2. 2. design data processability review of product system according to claim 1, it is characterised in that further include:
    Memory module, the memory module are used to store the receiving terminal, instruction triggers module, the relevant information for checking module, Wherein, relevant information includes the information of processing procedure and the information of handling result.
  3. 3. design data processability review of product system according to claim 1, it is characterised in that further include:
    Feedback information trigger module, the feedback information trigger module are used to judge the design data for refusal in technique person Designer's processability review of product registration card is fed back to by feedback information trigger module during data.
  4. 4. design data processability review of product system according to claim 3, it is characterised in that further include:
    Processability review of product registration card creation module, for the technique person judge the design data for refusal data when, Create processability review of product registration card.
CN201711176384.2A 2017-11-22 2017-11-22 Design data processability review of product system Pending CN107909346A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201711176384.2A CN107909346A (en) 2017-11-22 2017-11-22 Design data processability review of product system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201711176384.2A CN107909346A (en) 2017-11-22 2017-11-22 Design data processability review of product system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN107909346A true CN107909346A (en) 2018-04-13

Family

ID=61847058

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201711176384.2A Pending CN107909346A (en) 2017-11-22 2017-11-22 Design data processability review of product system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN107909346A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110765596A (en) * 2019-10-10 2020-02-07 北京字节跳动网络技术有限公司 Simulation model modeling method and device for auditing process and electronic equipment
CN114358493A (en) * 2021-12-03 2022-04-15 北京能科瑞元数字技术有限公司 Integrated process quality execution closed-loop management system based on single data source

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030037315A1 (en) * 2001-08-13 2003-02-20 International Business Machines Corporation Automated audit methodology for design
CN102521446A (en) * 2011-12-09 2012-06-27 上海金曲信息技术有限公司 Verification method of electronic drawings
CN105373897A (en) * 2015-11-25 2016-03-02 北京荣之联科技股份有限公司 Graded examination and approval method and system
CN106570682A (en) * 2016-11-08 2017-04-19 广东柳道热流道系统有限公司 Production control method based on drawing inspection optimization

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030037315A1 (en) * 2001-08-13 2003-02-20 International Business Machines Corporation Automated audit methodology for design
CN102521446A (en) * 2011-12-09 2012-06-27 上海金曲信息技术有限公司 Verification method of electronic drawings
CN105373897A (en) * 2015-11-25 2016-03-02 北京荣之联科技股份有限公司 Graded examination and approval method and system
CN106570682A (en) * 2016-11-08 2017-04-19 广东柳道热流道系统有限公司 Production control method based on drawing inspection optimization

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
彭斌: "协同设计中基于工作流的审图管理系统研究", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库信息科技辑》 *

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110765596A (en) * 2019-10-10 2020-02-07 北京字节跳动网络技术有限公司 Simulation model modeling method and device for auditing process and electronic equipment
CN114358493A (en) * 2021-12-03 2022-04-15 北京能科瑞元数字技术有限公司 Integrated process quality execution closed-loop management system based on single data source

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Asuncion et al. An end-to-end industrial software traceability tool
Seebacher et al. A citation analysis of the research on manufacturing and supply chain flexibility
CN110287383A (en) A kind of field information method of inspection and device
US8732838B2 (en) Evaluating the effectiveness of a threat model
CN107203841A (en) The method of inspection and device of product quality
CN107506888A (en) A kind of general online service platform building appraisal procedure and system
CN108704312A (en) The test method and device of fine arts resource
CN107909346A (en) Design data processability review of product system
CN101753619A (en) Method and system for extending service model
CN113240351A (en) Business data consistency checking method and device, electronic equipment and medium
CN1278261C (en) Silicon intellectual property library management system and method and system for customerized disigning dedicated file thereof
CN114519084A (en) Block chain-based medical data inspection method, device, equipment and medium
Jiang et al. What are the characteristics of reopened pull requests? a case study on open source projects in github
Maro et al. Challenges of establishing traceability in the automotive domain
CN114896164A (en) Interface optimization method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
WO2022004714A1 (en) Information processing device
JP4268168B2 (en) Inspection management system, inspection management apparatus, and inspection management method
JP2007115038A (en) Printed board quality information management system
JP3909613B2 (en) Computer-readable recording medium recording design review processing system and design review processing program
CN114036068A (en) Update detection method, device, equipment and storage medium based on privacy security
Kuchař et al. Automatic allocation of resources in software process simulations using their capability and productivity
Yang et al. Towards a taxonomy of technical debt for COTS-intensive cyber physical systems
de Barros Paes et al. RUP extension for the software performance
CN116991364B (en) Software development system management method based on big data
CN113608779B (en) Service interface configuration method, device, equipment and storage medium

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20180413