CN107909346A - Design data processability review of product system - Google Patents
Design data processability review of product system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN107909346A CN107909346A CN201711176384.2A CN201711176384A CN107909346A CN 107909346 A CN107909346 A CN 107909346A CN 201711176384 A CN201711176384 A CN 201711176384A CN 107909346 A CN107909346 A CN 107909346A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- technique
- design data
- module
- data
- technologist
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 90
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 45
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 134
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 238000012550 audit Methods 0.000 claims description 17
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 2
- 241001269238 Data Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013524 data verification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
- G06Q10/103—Workflow collaboration or project management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/04—Manufacturing
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
- Y02P90/30—Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a kind of design data processability review of product system, including：Receiving terminal, the receiving terminal are used to receive design data；Instruction triggers module；Check module, the inspection module is used to check whether director technologist completes to assign whether technique group leader, technique group leader complete to assign technique person, check whether technique person fills in the careful label result of design data, check refusal data whether in corresponding processability review of product registration card, check the information of auditor, the information of the auditor includes name, unit, examines the label time；Interface display module.The present invention realizes design department and examines label with technique division data all electronic；Realize batch data and assign technique group leader and technique person, simplify the mode of operation of director technologist and technique group leader；Realize the structured management of Processing examination registration card；Realize inspection of the design to the feedback opinion of technique person；Realize design data specific aim signature msu message.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to design data to audit technical field, more particularly to a kind of design data processability review of product system.
Background technology
It is by CAD (Computer Aided that traditional manufacturing industry design data, which examines label method,
Design, CAD), the computer integrated manufacturing system such as computer-aided engineering (Computer Aided Engineering, CAE) it is soft
Two-dimentional drawing is drawn in part, prints out papery two-dimensional engineering graphic, papery two-dimensional engineering graphic is transferred into all departments personnel examination ＆ verification simultaneously
Signature manually.
Design data examines label pattern, and the method because taking printing paper drawing to examine label, causes to consume a large amount of paper, and examines label
During when have a corrupted or lost situation of paper drawing, the careful label of paper drawing need to manually be sent to all departments, and consumption is big
Manpower is measured, and examines label excessive cycle, causes job schedule slow, when filing to paper drawing, wasting space storage, together
When be difficult to preserve for a long time, so as to cause substantial amounts of historical data to be lost.
In addition, under task pattern, design data is examined to sign to be audited manually by papery and limited, and point of office
Dissipate, it is difficult tracking enquiry positioning that conventional data, which examine label flow,.
The content of the invention
It is contemplated that one of technical problem in above-mentioned correlation technique is solved at least to a certain extent.
For this reason, an object of the present invention is to provide a kind of design data processability review of product system.The design data work
Skill auditing system realizes design department and examines label with technique division data all electronic；Realize batch data and assign technique groups
Long and technique person, simplifies the mode of operation of director technologist and technique group leader；Realize the structuring of Processing examination registration card
Management；Realize inspection of the design to the feedback opinion of technique person；Realize design data specific aim signature msu message.
To achieve these goals, a kind of design data processability review of product system of disclosure of the invention, including：Receive
End, the receiving terminal are used to receive design data；Instruction triggers module, so that designer passes through described instruction trigger module pair
Director technologist is assigned so that director technologist audits design data, or so that designer is triggered by described instruction
Module assigns technique person so that technique person audits design data, and/or so that director technologist passes through described instruction
Trigger module, which grows technique groups, carries out batch appointment so that technique group leader audits design data, and/or so that technique group leader is led to
Cross described instruction trigger module and batch appointment is carried out to technique person so that technique person audits design data；Check module, the inspection
Look into module to be used to check whether director technologist completes to assign whether technique group leader, technique group leader complete to assign technique person, check
Whether technique person fills in the careful label of design data as a result, checking refusal data whether in corresponding processability review of product registration card,
Check the information of auditor, the information of the auditor includes name, unit, examines the label time；Interface display module, the interface
Display module is used for the operation interface for showing the designer, director technologist, technique group leader and technique person.
Design data processability review of product system according to the present invention, realizes design department and technique division data all-electronin
Change and examine label；Realize batch data and assign technique group leader and technique person, simplify the operation side of director technologist and technique group leader
Formula；Realize the structured management of Processing examination registration card；Realize inspection of the design to the feedback opinion of technique person；Realize
Design data specific aim signs msu message.
In addition, design data processability review of product system according to the above embodiment of the present invention can also have what is added as follows
Technical characteristic：
Further, further include：Memory module, the memory module be used for store the receiving terminal, instruction triggers module,
Check the relevant information of module, wherein, relevant information includes the information of processing procedure and the information of handling result.
Further, further include：Feedback information trigger module, the feedback information trigger module are used to judge in technique person
Designer's processability review of product registration card is fed back to by feedback information trigger module when the design data is the data of refusal.
Further, further include：Processability review of product registration card creation module, for judging the design in the technique person
When data are the data of refusal, processability review of product registration card is created.
The additional aspect and advantage of the present invention will be set forth in part in the description, and will partly become from the following description
Obtain substantially, or recognized by the practice of the present invention.
Brief description of the drawings
The above-mentioned and/or additional aspect and advantage of the present invention will become in the description from combination accompanying drawings below to embodiment
Substantially and it is readily appreciated that, wherein：
Fig. 1 is the structure chart of design data processability review of product system according to an embodiment of the invention；
Fig. 2 is the work flow diagram of design data processability review of product system according to an embodiment of the invention.
Embodiment
The embodiment of the present invention is described below in detail, the example of the embodiment is shown in the drawings, wherein from beginning to end
Same or similar label represents same or similar element or has the function of same or like element.Below with reference to attached
The embodiment of figure description is exemplary, and is only used for explaining the present invention, and is not considered as limiting the invention.
Design data processability review of product system according to embodiments of the present invention is described below in conjunction with attached drawing.
Fig. 1 is the structure chart of design data processability review of product system according to an embodiment of the invention.
As shown in Figure 1, design data processability review of product system 100 according to an embodiment of the invention, including：Receiving terminal
110th, instruction triggers module 120, inspection module 130 and interface display module 140.
Wherein, receiving terminal 110 is used to receive design data.
Specifically, when designer needs to be designed the examination ＆ verification of data, designer can input design data
Into design data processability review of product system 100, and the receiving terminal 110 of design data processability review of product system 100 be exactly for
Receive these design datas.
Instruction triggers module 120 so that designer director technologist is assigned by instruction triggers module 120 with
Director technologist is set to audit design data, or so that designer assigns technique person by instruction triggers module 120
So that technique person audits design data, and/or so that director technologist grows progress by instruction triggers module 120 to technique groups
Batch assign so that technique group leader audit design data, and/or so that technique group leader by instruction triggers module 120 to technique
Member carries out batch appointment so that technique person audits design data.Further, instruction triggers module 120 can press for instruction triggers
Key.
Specifically, designer can be examined according to the quantity and type assignment of design data to each technologist
Core, wherein, design data negligible amounts, these data can be audited by same technique person, then designer passes through instruction triggers
Module 120 can directly assign technique person, i.e., this flow can skip director technologist and technique group leader automatically, directly by technique person
Carry out technique and examine label；As design data quantity is more, and technique examination ＆ verification cannot be carried out by same technique person, then designer needs to refer to
Director technologist is sent, director technologist carries out processability review of product, and examining label flow when this design data proceeds to the progress of technique department
During examination ＆ verification, design data is individually assigned to multiple technique group leaders by director technologist, technique groups length carries out processability review of product, it
The design data being assigned is assigned to corresponding technique person by multiple technique group leaders again afterwards, craftsmanship is finally carried out by technique person
Examine.
Check that module 130 is used to checking whether director technologist to complete to assign technique group leader, whether technique group leader completes refers to
Technique person is sent, checks whether technique person fills in the careful label of design data as a result, checking refusal data whether in corresponding craftsmanship
Examine in registration card, check the information of auditor, the information of auditor includes name, unit, examines the label time.Wherein, auditor
For director technologist, technique group leader, technique person.
In design data is assigned to some technique person this flow by designer, technique person is to corresponding design data
Carry out examining label.Artificial technique person is audited, then, checks whether and has tasked technique person, the information of technique person is checked and whether fills out
Write and examine label result.
Director technologist is assigned in designer, design data is assigned to technique group leader, technique group leader by director technologist
Technique person is assigned, in this flow, auditor is director technologist, technique group leader and technologist, checks whether each appointment
Whether complete, check whether director technologist, technique group leader and the information of technique person and technique person fill in and examine label result.
Wherein, when design data examine label by technique person, if design data has no problem, label is examined and are passed through, if
Design data is refusal data, then examines label not by the way that formation process examines registration card, then checks that module 130 checks craftsmanship
Examine registration card whether be technique person judge refusal data.
Further, check that module 130 can be embedded in design data by the handler of secondary development and examine label flow,
When flow reaches some node, checked accordingly, for example, reaching the long node of technique groups in flow, technique group leader completes work
After skill examination task, whether each technique group leader of systems inspection completes the appointment of the technique person for the data that need to each audit.
Interface display module 140 is used for operation circle for showing designer, director technologist, technique group leader and technique person
Face.
Design data processability review of product system according to the present invention, realizes design department and technique division data all-electronin
Change and examine label；Realize batch data and assign technique group leader and technique person, simplify the operation side of director technologist and technique group leader
Formula；Realize the structured management of Processing examination registration card；Realize inspection of the design to the feedback opinion of technique person；Realize
Design data specific aim signs msu message.
In certain embodiments, further include：Memory module, memory module are used to store receiving terminal 110, instruction triggers module
120th, the relevant information of module 130 is checked, wherein, relevant information includes the information of processing procedure and the information of handling result.This
Sample can conveniently examine tracking and the Query Location of label task
Related data specifically, for example, the design data in receiving terminal 110 can be stored in memory module, instruction triggers
Trigger flow process in module 120 can be stored in memory module, trigger flow process i.e. which Personnel Appointment of which time which
A personnel carry out examining label, check that the testing result in module 130 can store in a storage module.
In certain embodiments, further include：Feedback information trigger module, feedback information trigger module are used to sentence in technique person
Designer's processability review of product registration card is fed back to by feedback information trigger module when disconnected design data is the data of refusal.If
Design answer opinion in processability review of product registration card in the flow that meter personnel can only retract technique person operates.To set
Amended design data restarting flow is carried out examining label by meter personnel.Particularly, designer can will include design solution
The design data for answering opinion directly returns again to and carries out examination ＆ verification again to corresponding technique person.
Wherein, check that module 130 is additionally operable to check whether the design answer opinion in processability review of product registration card fills in, such as
Fruit is not filled in, then cannot restart flow and be audited.
Further, further include：Processability review of product registration card creation module, for judging the design data in technique person
For refusal data when, create processability review of product registration card.
It is worth noting that, director technologist can only assign technique group leader in batches, technique group leader can only assign technique person, if
Meter personnel can assign director technologist or technique person.It is this in the case where limiting all operating rights of design data, have pin
The technique examination ＆ verification completed to data to property.
As shown in Fig. 2, the workflow of the design data processability review of product system of the present invention is：
Designer S20, the design data that designer initiates to examine as needed label flow in the light of actual conditions assign work
Skill department for review personnel, as data only need single technique person to audit, then designer directly assigns technique person；As data need to be multiple
Technique person audits, then designer need to assign director technologist；
Director technologist S21, director technologist carry out processability review of product S22, examination ＆ verification stream after careful label task is received
All data in journey, pass through as audited, then batch data are assigned to single (multiple) technique group leader, the technique group leader being assigned
Using as the careful label personnel of downstream node；As audited not by the way that then flow is retired designer's node, by designer
Director technologist is reassigned in member；
Technique group leader S23, after technique group leader receives careful label task, carries out processability review of product S24, audits by director's work
Skill teacher is assigned to the data of oneself, passes through as audited, then the data being assigned is distributed to single (multiple) technique person, is allocated
Technique person using as the careful label personnel of downstream node；As audited not by the way that then flow is retired director technologist section
Point, technique group leader is reassigned by director technologist；
Technique person S25, after technique person receives careful label task, carries out processability review of product S26, the group leader's distribution of examination ＆ verification technique
To the data of oneself, and auditing result is carried out to allocated data and is filled in, if auditing result is approval, then completed craftsmanship and examine
Look into；As auditing result for refusal, then be retired designer for the data creation processability review of product registration card being rejected, flow
Member, designer record card information modification data according to processability review of product, and fill in design answer opinion, while restart stream
Journey (flow at this time can skip director technologist and the long node of technique groups automatically, directly reach technique person's node).
In the description of the present invention, it is necessary to illustrate, unless otherwise clearly defined and limited, term " designer
Member ", " director technologist ", " technique group leader ", " technique person ", " processability review of product ", " processability review of product registration card ", " design solution
Answer opinion " it should be interpreted broadly, for example, it may be director technologist or supervisor technologist, or technique chief engineer.For
For those of ordinary skill in the art, the concrete meaning of above-mentioned term in the present invention can be understood with concrete condition.
In the description of this specification, reference term " one embodiment ", " some embodiments ", " example ", " specifically show
The description of example " or " some examples " etc. means specific features, structure, material or the spy for combining the embodiment or example description
Point is contained at least one embodiment of the present invention or example.In the present specification, schematic expression of the above terms is not
It must be directed to identical embodiment or example.Moreover, particular features, structures, materials, or characteristics described can be in office
Combined in an appropriate manner in one or more embodiments or example.In addition, without conflicting with each other, the skill of this area
Art personnel can be tied the different embodiments or example described in this specification and different embodiments or exemplary feature
Close and combine.
Although the embodiment of the present invention has been shown and described above, it is to be understood that above-described embodiment is example
Property, it is impossible to limitation of the present invention is interpreted as, those of ordinary skill in the art within the scope of the invention can be to above-mentioned
Embodiment is changed, changes, replacing and modification.
Claims (4)
- A kind of 1. design data processability review of product system, it is characterised in that including：Receiving terminal, the receiving terminal are used to receive design data；Instruction triggers module, so that designer is assigned so that director director technologist by described instruction trigger module Technologist audits design data, or so that technique person is assigned by described instruction trigger module by designer so that work Performer audits design data, and/or so that director technologist, which grows technique groups by described instruction trigger module, carries out batch Assign so that technique group leader audit design data, and/or so that technique group leader by described instruction trigger module to technique person Batch appointment is carried out so that technique person audits design data；Check module, the inspection module be used to checking director technologist whether complete to assign technique group leader, technique group leader whether Complete to assign technique person, check whether technique person fills in the careful label of design data as a result, checking refusal data whether corresponding In processability review of product registration card, the information of auditor is checked, the information of the auditor includes name, unit, examines the label time；Interface display module, the interface display module are used to show the designer, director technologist, technique group leader and work The operation interface of performer.
- 2. design data processability review of product system according to claim 1, it is characterised in that further include：Memory module, the memory module are used to store the receiving terminal, instruction triggers module, the relevant information for checking module, Wherein, relevant information includes the information of processing procedure and the information of handling result.
- 3. design data processability review of product system according to claim 1, it is characterised in that further include：Feedback information trigger module, the feedback information trigger module are used to judge the design data for refusal in technique person Designer's processability review of product registration card is fed back to by feedback information trigger module during data.
- 4. design data processability review of product system according to claim 3, it is characterised in that further include：Processability review of product registration card creation module, for the technique person judge the design data for refusal data when, Create processability review of product registration card.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201711176384.2A CN107909346A (en) | 2017-11-22 | 2017-11-22 | Design data processability review of product system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201711176384.2A CN107909346A (en) | 2017-11-22 | 2017-11-22 | Design data processability review of product system |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN107909346A true CN107909346A (en) | 2018-04-13 |
Family
ID=61847058
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201711176384.2A Pending CN107909346A (en) | 2017-11-22 | 2017-11-22 | Design data processability review of product system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN107909346A (en) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110765596A (en) * | 2019-10-10 | 2020-02-07 | 北京字节跳动网络技术有限公司 | Simulation model modeling method and device for auditing process and electronic equipment |
| CN114358493A (en) * | 2021-12-03 | 2022-04-15 | 北京能科瑞元数字技术有限公司 | Integrated process quality execution closed-loop management system based on single data source |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20030037315A1 (en) * | 2001-08-13 | 2003-02-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automated audit methodology for design |
| CN102521446A (en) * | 2011-12-09 | 2012-06-27 | 上海金曲信息技术有限公司 | Verification method of electronic drawings |
| CN105373897A (en) * | 2015-11-25 | 2016-03-02 | 北京荣之联科技股份有限公司 | Graded examination and approval method and system |
| CN106570682A (en) * | 2016-11-08 | 2017-04-19 | 广东柳道热流道系统有限公司 | Production control method based on drawing inspection optimization |
-
2017
- 2017-11-22 CN CN201711176384.2A patent/CN107909346A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20030037315A1 (en) * | 2001-08-13 | 2003-02-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automated audit methodology for design |
| CN102521446A (en) * | 2011-12-09 | 2012-06-27 | 上海金曲信息技术有限公司 | Verification method of electronic drawings |
| CN105373897A (en) * | 2015-11-25 | 2016-03-02 | 北京荣之联科技股份有限公司 | Graded examination and approval method and system |
| CN106570682A (en) * | 2016-11-08 | 2017-04-19 | 广东柳道热流道系统有限公司 | Production control method based on drawing inspection optimization |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 彭斌: "协同设计中基于工作流的审图管理系统研究", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库信息科技辑》 * |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN110765596A (en) * | 2019-10-10 | 2020-02-07 | 北京字节跳动网络技术有限公司 | Simulation model modeling method and device for auditing process and electronic equipment |
| CN114358493A (en) * | 2021-12-03 | 2022-04-15 | 北京能科瑞元数字技术有限公司 | Integrated process quality execution closed-loop management system based on single data source |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Asuncion et al. | An end-to-end industrial software traceability tool | |
| CN110287383A (en) | A kind of field information method of inspection and device | |
| CN109165856A (en) | Examine Dynamic Configuration, device and the storage medium of chain | |
| US8732838B2 (en) | Evaluating the effectiveness of a threat model | |
| CN107203841A (en) | The method of inspection and device of product quality | |
| CN107506888A (en) | A kind of general online service platform building appraisal procedure and system | |
| CN101753619B (en) | Method and system for extending service model | |
| CN107909346A (en) | Design data processability review of product system | |
| CN1278261C (en) | Silicon intellectual property library management system and method and system for customerized disigning dedicated file thereof | |
| CN114519084A (en) | Block chain-based medical data inspection method, device, equipment and medium | |
| Jiang et al. | What are the characteristics of reopened pull requests? a case study on open source projects in github | |
| CN113240351A (en) | Business data consistency checking method and device, electronic equipment and medium | |
| Maro et al. | Challenges of establishing traceability in the automotive domain | |
| JP6639334B2 (en) | Business process flow generation system, generation method and apparatus | |
| CN114896164A (en) | Interface optimization method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| JPWO2005038675A1 (en) | Printed circuit board design instruction support method and apparatus | |
| JP4268168B2 (en) | Inspection management system, inspection management apparatus, and inspection management method | |
| JP2007115038A (en) | Printed board quality information management system | |
| US20130268908A1 (en) | Via selection in integrated circuit design | |
| JP3909613B2 (en) | Computer-readable recording medium recording design review processing system and design review processing program | |
| Kuchař et al. | Automatic allocation of resources in software process simulations using their capability and productivity | |
| Yang et al. | Towards a taxonomy of technical debt for COTS-intensive cyber physical systems | |
| Barosani et al. | A review on 8D problem solving process | |
| CN116991364B (en) | Software development system management method based on big data | |
| CN113608779B (en) | Service interface configuration method, device, equipment and storage medium |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20180413 |