CN107316176A - The control method and device of declaration form processing - Google Patents
The control method and device of declaration form processing Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN107316176A CN107316176A CN201610270091.XA CN201610270091A CN107316176A CN 107316176 A CN107316176 A CN 107316176A CN 201610270091 A CN201610270091 A CN 201610270091A CN 107316176 A CN107316176 A CN 107316176A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- declaration form
- timestamp table
- policy information
- timestamp
- correcting
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
- G06Q10/103—Workflow collaboration or project management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/08—Insurance
Abstract
The present invention proposes a kind of control method of declaration form processing, and methods described includes：The declaration form for receiving the first system transmission corrects request, the corresponding timestamp table of the declaration form according to the declaration form corrects acquisition request, judge whether policy information of the declaration form in the first system is newest policy information according to the timestamp table, if, the first system is then allowed to correct the declaration form, receive the instruction of the preservation after the first system is corrected to the declaration form, the instruction renewal timestamp table is preserved according to described, judge whether that the timestamp table can be updated successfully, if so, then correcting generation according to corrects request slip.Said process realizes the parallel processing to declaration form, and corrects the validity that request slip ensure that declaration form modification by judging whether to be successfully generated.In addition, it is also proposed that a kind of control device of declaration form processing.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to computer disposal field, the control method and device of more particularly to a kind of declaration form processing.
Background technology
With the development of insurance business, the declaration form of insurance company is more and more, is protected in order to processing faster
Single, insurance company can typically set up multiple systems while handling numerous declaration forms.Traditional multiple systems
Data between system are separate, i.e., the data of one declaration form can only often have a system to handle.
If so causing to handle different declaration forms to also need to log in different systems, bother very much.If multiple
Data between system can be mutually in step, then different declaration forms can be just handled by a system, but
It is that multiple systems so often occur while handling the situation of a declaration form, causes to cause the dirty reading of data dirty
Write, so that the validity that declaration form is corrected can not be ensured.
The content of the invention
Based on this, in order to solve the above problems, it is proposed that a kind of easy and ensure that what declaration form corrected has
The method and apparatus of the declaration form processing of effect property.
A kind of control method of declaration form processing, the described method comprises the following steps：Receive what the first system was sent
Declaration form corrects request；The corresponding timestamp table of the declaration form according to the declaration form corrects acquisition request；According to institute
State timestamp table and judge whether policy information of the declaration form in the first system is newest policy information；If so,
The first system is then allowed to correct the declaration form；The first system is received to carry out the declaration form
Preservation instruction after correcting；The instruction renewal timestamp table is preserved according to described；Judging whether can be to institute
Timestamp table is stated to be updated successfully；If so, then correcting generation according to corrects request slip.
In one of the embodiments, it is described to judge the declaration form in the first system according to the timestamp table
Policy information include the step of whether be newest policy information：The declaration form is obtained according to the timestamp table
Number of times is corrected in the first system and second system；When the number of times of correcting in the first system is more than
In the second system when correcting number of times, then judge the policy information in the first system as newest policy information.
In one of the embodiments, it is described to be described first according to the timestamp table acquisition declaration form
System and second system in the step of correcting number of times after also include：When correcting number of times in the first system
It whether there is the declaration form in the second system equal to being checked in the second system when correcting number of times, then
Correct request slip, if it is not, then judging the policy information in the first system as newest policy information；When described
Number of times is corrected less than when correcting number of times, then judging in the first system in the second system in the first system
Policy information be not newest policy information.
In one of the embodiments, when the declaration form according to the declaration form corrects acquisition request is corresponding
Between stamp table the step of before also include：Judge that the corresponding timestamp table of the declaration form whether there is；If in the presence of,
Then enter the step of corresponding timestamp table of acquisition request declaration form is corrected according to the declaration form；If being not present,
New timestamp table is set up for the declaration form.
In one of the embodiments, it is described to judge whether the first system be to the timestamp table more
Newly successful step includes：It is newest change once to judge the versioning timestamp in the timestamp table
Time, if so, can be then updated successfully to the timestamp table, if it is not, then can not be to the timestamp table
It is updated successfully.
A kind of control device of declaration form processing, described device includes：Request receiving module, for receiving first
The declaration form that system is sent corrects request；Acquisition module, for protecting described in correcting acquisition request according to the declaration form
Single corresponding timestamp table；First judge module, for judging the declaration form according to the timestamp table
Whether the policy information in one system is newest policy information；Module is corrected, if for declaration form in the first system
In policy information be newest policy information, then allow the first system to correct the declaration form；Refer to
Receiving module is made, for receiving the instruction of the preservation after the first system is corrected to the declaration form；Update
Module, for preserving the instruction renewal timestamp table according to described；Second judge module, be for judgement
It is no the timestamp table to be updated successfully；Generation module, if for that can be updated to the timestamp table
Success, then correct generation according to and correct request slip.
In one of the embodiments, first judge module includes：Number of times acquisition module, for basis
The timestamp table obtains the declaration form and corrects number of times in the first system and second system；Judge mould
Block, for correcting whether number of times is more than in the second system in the first system when the declaration form
When correcting number of times, then judge the policy information in the first system as newest policy information.
In one of the embodiments, first judge module is additionally operable to work as correcting in the first system
Number of times be equal in the second system when correcting number of times, then check in the second system with the presence or absence of described
Declaration form corrects request slip, if it is not, then judge the policy information in the first system as newest policy information；When
Number of times is corrected less than when correcting number of times, then judgement first is in the second system in the first system
Policy information in system is not newest policy information.
In one of the embodiments, described device also includes：3rd judge module, for judging the guarantor
Singly corresponding timestamp table whether there is, if in the presence of entrance notifies acquisition module to be corrected according to the declaration form
The corresponding timestamp table of acquisition request declaration form, if being not present, new timestamp table is set up for the declaration form.
In one of the embodiments, second judge module is additionally operable to judge the version in the timestamp table
This timestamp is the newest change time once, if so, the timestamp table can be then updated successfully,
If it is not, can not be then updated successfully to the timestamp table.
The control method and device of above-mentioned declaration form processing, the declaration form sent by receiving the first system correct request,
The corresponding timestamp table of the declaration form according to declaration form corrects acquisition request, declaration form is judged according to the timestamp table
Whether the policy information in the first system is newest policy information, if so, then allowing the first system pair
The declaration form is corrected, and receives the preservation instruction after the first system is corrected to the declaration form, root
The instruction renewal timestamp table is preserved according to described, judges whether that the timestamp table can be updated successfully,
If so, then correcting generation according to corrects request slip.First determine whether declaration form letter of the declaration form in the first system
Whether breath is newest policy information, only when the policy information in the first system is newest policy information
The first system is allowed to modify declaration form, it is ensured that multiple systems each system pair in parallel processing declaration form
Declaration form, which is modified, to be carried out on the version of newest declaration form, further, by the way that judge whether can
Timestamp table is updated successfully and corrects request slip to judge whether to be successfully generated, is only successfully generated and corrects
Request slip just corrects success at last.Said process realizes the parallel processing to declaration form, and is by judgement
No can be successfully generated corrects the validity that request slip ensure that declaration form modification.
Brief description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is the control method flow chart of declaration form processing in one embodiment；
Fig. 2 be judge in one embodiment policy information in the first system whether be newest policy information side
Method flow chart；
Fig. 3 is to judge whether the method flow diagram that can be updated successfully to timestamp table in one embodiment；
Fig. 4 is the structured flowchart of the control device of declaration form processing in one embodiment；
Fig. 5 is the structured flowchart of the first judge module in one embodiment；
Fig. 6 is the structured flowchart of the control device of declaration form processing in another embodiment.
Embodiment
In order to make the purpose , technical scheme and advantage of the present invention be clearer, below in conjunction with accompanying drawing and reality
Example is applied, the present invention will be described in further detail.It should be appreciated that specific embodiment described herein is only
Only to explain the present invention, it is not intended to limit the present invention.
As shown in figure 1, in one embodiment it is proposed that a kind of control method of declaration form processing, this method
Comprise the following steps：
Step 102, the declaration form for receiving the first system transmission corrects request.
Specifically, the declaration form that server receives the first system initiation corrects request, declaration form, which corrects request, to be included
The number of policy of declaration form.Corresponding declaration form can be found according to number of policy, and then can be obtained and the declaration form phase
The other information of pass, such as, obtain the corresponding timestamp table of declaration form.
Step 104, the corresponding timestamp table of acquisition request declaration form is corrected according to declaration form.
In the present embodiment, the declaration form for receiving the first system transmission corrects request, and declaration form is extracted from the request
Number, timestamp table corresponding with the declaration form is searched according to the number of policy.Timestamp table is can for multiple systems
Designed with being corrected to declaration form simultaneously, be the essential information contingency table of multiple systems.Remember in timestamp table
Number of policy, historical record, versioning timestamp of declaration form modification of declaration form etc. have been carried, wherein, versioning timestamp
Refer to the time that declaration form latest edition updates, that is, the declaration form current the last time changed.
Step 106, judge whether policy information of the declaration form in the first system is newest declaration form according to timestamp table
Information, if so, then entering step 108, if it is not, then terminating.
In the present embodiment, correcting for declaration form must be for correcting that the up-to-date information of the declaration form is carried out, institute
With before correcting, it is necessary to judge whether policy information of the declaration form in the first system is newest policy information.When
Between the historical record of declaration form modification has been recorded in stamp table, declaration form can be obtained in each system according to the historical record
It is corresponding in system to correct number of times.Specifically, declaration form can be obtained in the first system and according to the timestamp table
Number of times is corrected in two system, wherein, second system refers to other systems in addition to the first system, it
Can be a system or multiple systems.Data between the first system and second system are desirable
Data syn-chronization is carried out, but if not real-time data synchronization between the first system and second system, but it is fixed
When data syn-chronization when, then the policy information that some systems will occur is not newest policy information.Pass through
Judge to correct number of times to determine whether the policy information in the first system is most in the first system and second system
Policy information in fresh information, only the first system just allows to be corrected when being newest policy information.
Step 108, it is allowed to which the first system is modified to declaration form.
Specifically, when policy information of the definite policy in the first system is newest policy information, then permitting
Perhaps the first system is corrected to the declaration form.Here modification refers to allow user to modify operation, still
Specifically whether successfully modified can also need to further be judged.
Step 110, the preservation instruction after the first system is corrected to declaration form is received.
Specifically, after the first system corrects declaration form, selecting that the content of modification is preserved or reported
Valency, server is received after the instruction of the preservation after the first system is corrected to declaration form, is instructed according to the preservation
The time gone in renewal time stamp table.
Step 112, according to preservation instruction renewal time stamp table.
Specifically, server is received after the instruction of the preservation after the first system is corrected to declaration form, due to right
Declaration form is corrected, so needing the time in timestamp table being updated, if can be successfully updated
Between stab table, then the time in timestamp table is replaced with to the time currently preserved.
Step 114, judge whether that timestamp table can be updated successfully, if so, then enter step 116, if
It is no, then terminate.
Specifically, judging that the time in timestamp table is the newest change time once, if so, explanation
During this modification the declaration form not by other systems or other people correct, can be to the timestamp table
Time be updated successfully, the time after timestamp table updates is that this corrects preservation successful time.If when
Between time in stamp table be not the newest change time once, illustrate during this modification by it
His system or other people update, so the time in timestamp has no longer been the newest change time once,
Declaration form is also no longer newest declaration form, so can not be updated successfully to the timestamp table, returns and updates failure
Information.
Step 116, request slip is corrected according to correcting generation.
If specifically, can be updated successfully to timestamp table, then the content generation corrected according to this is corrected
Request slip.Generation is corrected to be controlled before request slip to declaration form, and generation is corrected after request slip, according to this
Request slip is corrected to be controlled.Generation, which is corrected, submits core to protect application after request slip, after core guarantor's application passes through,
If not producing premium change, batch list is directly generated, if producing premium change, such as needs to pay the fees or move back
Take, then regenerate single in batch after the completion of payment or move back expense, and the information updating that this is corrected is on newest declaration form,
The number of times of correcting for updating newest declaration form simultaneously plus 1.
In the present embodiment, the declaration form sent by receiving the first system corrects request, and being corrected according to declaration form please
The corresponding timestamp table of acquisition declaration form is sought, policy information of the declaration form in the first system is judged according to timestamp table
Whether it is newest policy information, if so, then allowing the first system to correct the declaration form, receiving first is
Preservation after system is corrected to declaration form is instructed, and according to instruction renewal time stamp table is preserved, judging whether can
Timestamp table is updated successfully, if so, then correcting request slip according to correcting generation.First determine whether declaration form
Whether the policy information in one system is newest policy information, and the only policy information in the first system is most
Just the first system is allowed to modify declaration form during new policy information, it is ensured that multiple systems are protected in parallel processing
Each system is modified to declaration form when single is carried out on the version of newest declaration form, further, is led to
Cross to judge whether that timestamp table can be updated successfully and correct request slip to judge whether to be successfully generated, only
It is successfully generated and corrects request slip and just correct success at last.Said process realizes the parallel processing to declaration form,
And correct the validity that request slip ensure that declaration form modification by judging whether to be successfully generated.
As described in Figure 2, in one embodiment, guarantor of the declaration form in the first system is judged according to timestamp table
The step of whether single information is newest policy information includes：
Step 106a, obtains declaration form according to timestamp table and corrects number of times in the first system and second system.
Specifically, recorded in timestamp table declaration form modification historical record, including declaration form correct number of times,
Time, content of modification for correcting every time etc..Further obtained according to the corresponding timestamp table of the declaration form of acquisition
Declaration form corrects number of times in the first system and second system.Data between the first system and second system are
Need to carry out data syn-chronization, but if not real-time data synchronization between the first system and second system, and
When being that timing data is synchronous, then in the first system and second system correct number of times may occur it is inconsistent
Situation.In another embodiment, the data in the first system and second system can also carry out unidirectional same
Step, such as, the first system are new system, and second system is old system, is carrying out the mistake of new-old system handing-over
It is that new system has been reached the standard grade in journey, when old system is not offline, new-old system can be with concurrent modification, in this process
In, old system data has renewal, and meeting automatic synchronization is updated to new system, to ensure the accurate of new system data,
Corrected but if being done in new system, then will not be again by data syn-chronization to old system, that is to say, that data are same
Walk simply from old system to new system, but not from new system to old system, i.e. one-way synchronization.
Step 106b, when declaration form corrects whether number of times is more than correcting time in second system in the first system
During number, then judge the policy information in the first system as newest policy information.
Specifically, it is all newest that either still declaration form, which is corrected, in second system in the first system
That is done on the basis of declaration form corrects, and correcting every time can be single according to the content generation batch corrected after successfully examination ＆ verification passes through,
Then by the information updating corrected to newest declaration form, while update newest declaration form corrects number of times+1.First
Data between system and second system need to carry out data syn-chronization, but the first system and second system it
Between carry out data syn-chronization if not real-time, but timing data it is synchronous when, then the first system and second is
Correcting number of times and inconsistent situation may occur in system, if the first system to correct number of times fewer,
The declaration form for illustrating the first system is not newest declaration form, and now the declaration form can not be modified.If
The first system corrects number of times correcting often than second system, illustrates that the declaration form one of the first system is set to most
New declaration form, it is allowed to which the first system is corrected to declaration form.
As shown in Fig. 2 in one embodiment, declaration form is obtained in the first system and second according to timestamp table
In system the step of correcting number of times after also include：When the number of times of correcting in the first system is equal to second system
In number of times of correcting be, then into step 106c, when correcting number of times less than in second system in the first system
When correcting number of times, then into step 106d.
Step 106c, checks in second system and to correct request slip with the presence or absence of declaration form, if it is not, then judging the
Policy information in one system is newest policy information, if so, then entering step 106d.
Specifically, when correcting number of times equal in second system when correcting number of times in the first system, in addition it is also necessary to
Further check in second system and to correct request slip with the presence or absence of declaration form, if in the presence of having illustrated the declaration form
It is modified in second system, and generates and correct request slip, only this is correcting request slip
In processing, batch list is not generated also, that is to say, that, although the number of times of correcting of second system does not update also, but this
When the first system in the declaration form be not newest declaration form, so not allowing the first system to modify.
If being not present, illustrate declaration form or newest declaration form in the first system, it is allowed to which the first system is to the declaration form
Modify.
Step 106d, judges that the policy information in the first system is not newest policy information.
Specifically, when correcting number of times less than when correcting number of times, illustrating the in second system in the first system
Declaration form in one system is not updated to also newest, and it is not newest declaration form letter to judge the policy information in the first system
Breath.When correcting number of times equal in second system when correcting number of times in the first system, in addition it is also necessary to further inspection
Survey with the presence or absence of the request slip corrected in second system, if so, the then same guarantor judged in the first system
Single information is not newest policy information.
In one embodiment, also include before the step of obtaining declaration form corresponding timestamp table：Judge declaration form
Corresponding timestamp table whether there is, if in the presence of corresponding into acquisition request declaration form is corrected according to declaration form
The step of timestamp table, if being not present, new timestamp table is set up for declaration form.
Specifically, first having to judge that the corresponding timestamp table of the declaration form is before the timestamp table of declaration form is obtained
It is no to exist, have in corresponding timestamp table, timestamp table and load if carrying out modification to declaration form before
The number of policy of declaration form, historical record, the versioning timestamp of declaration form modification etc., versioning timestamp just refers to most
The nearly time once corrected to declaration form.If not carrying out modification to declaration form before, just without declaration form correspondence
Timestamp table, it is necessary to the versioning timestamp set up for declaration form in new timestamp table, and the timestamp table just
It is at the time of setting up the new timestamp table.Time subsequently in the new timestamp table goes renewal time
Stab table.
As shown in figure 3, in one embodiment, the step of judging whether that timestamp table can be updated successfully
Including：
Step 114a, it is the last change time to judge the versioning timestamp in timestamp table, if
It is that timestamp table can be then updated successfully, if it is not, can not be then updated successfully to timestamp table.
In the present embodiment, timestamp table mainly includes two fields of declaration form and timestamp, and versioning timestamp
It is exactly the timestamp field in timestamp table.Versioning timestamp just refers to the renewal time of declaration form latest edition.
Before correcting, it is that declaration form was most at that time to obtain the versioning timestamp in the corresponding timestamp table of declaration form, timestamp table
The nearly time once changed., it is necessary to judge that the versioning timestamp in timestamp table is not again when correcting preservation
It it is the last change time, because other systems are possible to the declaration form during this is corrected
Corrected, and generate and correct request slip, while have updated timestamp table.By judging to obtain originally
Versioning timestamp in the timestamp table taken is the last change time, if so, explanation is not by it
His system update, then can be updated successfully to timestamp table.Conversely, explanation is corrected by other systems,
This can not be updated successfully to timestamp table.Specifically, assume A and B two people respectively by X and
Y systems are modified to declaration form 1, and the information of declaration form 1 is all newest policy information in X and Y systems,
So A and B can now modify to declaration form 1, but be due to A modification speed ratio it is very fast, repair
Change and clicked save button, versioning timestamp or the last change time due to now system X,
So can be updated successfully to timestamp table, and generate and correct request slip.B goes to preserve to protecting again afterwards
During single 1 modification, because A operation have updated again timestamp table i.e. versioning timestamp and enter
Go renewal, so the versioning timestamp in Y systems has not been the last change time, therefore, this
When timestamp table can not be updated successfully.
As shown in figure 4, in one embodiment it is proposed that a kind of control device of declaration form processing, the device
Including：
Request receiving module 402, the declaration form for receiving the first system transmission corrects request.
Specifically, the declaration form that server receives the first system initiation corrects request, declaration form, which corrects request, to be included
The number of policy of declaration form.Corresponding declaration form can be found according to number of policy, and then can be obtained and the declaration form phase
The other information of pass, such as, obtain the corresponding timestamp table of declaration form.
Acquisition module 404, for correcting the corresponding timestamp table of acquisition request declaration form according to declaration form.
In the present embodiment, the declaration form for receiving the first system transmission corrects request, and declaration form is extracted from the request
Number, timestamp table corresponding with the declaration form is searched according to the number of policy.Timestamp table is can for multiple systems
Designed with being corrected to declaration form simultaneously, be the essential information contingency table of multiple systems.Remember in timestamp table
Number of policy, historical record, versioning timestamp of declaration form modification of declaration form etc. have been carried, wherein, versioning timestamp
Refer to the time that declaration form latest edition updates, that is, the declaration form current the last time changed.
First judge module 406, for judging that policy information of the declaration form in the first system is according to timestamp table
No is newest policy information.
In the present embodiment, correcting for declaration form must be for correcting that the up-to-date information of the declaration form is carried out, institute
With before correcting, it is necessary to judge whether policy information of the declaration form in the first system is newest policy information.When
Between the historical record of declaration form modification has been recorded in stamp table, wherein the historical record changed includes declaration form each
It is corresponding in system to correct number of times.Specifically, according to the timestamp table can obtain declaration form in the first system and
Number of times is corrected in second system, wherein, second system refers to other systems in addition to the first system,
It can be a system or multiple systems.Data between the first system and second system are to need
Carry out if not real-time data synchronization between data syn-chronization, but the first system and second system, but
When timing data is synchronous, so the policy information that some systems occur is not newest policy information.Pass through
Judge to correct number of times to determine whether the policy information in the first system is most in the first system and second system
Policy information in fresh information, only the first system just allows to be corrected when being newest policy information.
Module 408 is corrected, if being newest policy information for policy information of the declaration form in the first system, is permitted
Perhaps the first system is corrected to the declaration form.
Specifically, when policy information of the definite policy in the first system is newest policy information, then permitting
Perhaps the first system is corrected to the declaration form.Here modification refers to allow user to modify operation, still
Specifically whether successfully modified can also need to further be judged.
Command reception module 410, for receiving the instruction of the preservation after the first system is corrected to declaration form.
Specifically, after the first system corrects declaration form, selecting that the content of modification is preserved or reported
Valency, server is received after the instruction of the preservation after the first system is corrected to declaration form, is instructed according to the preservation
The time gone using the versioning timestamp in timestamp table in renewal time stamp table.
Update module 412, for according to preservation instruction renewal time stamp table.
Specifically, server is received after the instruction of the preservation after the first system is corrected to declaration form, due to right
Declaration form is corrected, so needing the time in timestamp table being updated, if can be successfully updated
Between stab table, then the time in timestamp table is replaced with to the time currently preserved.
Second judge module 414, for judging whether that timestamp table can be updated successfully.
Specifically, judging that the time in timestamp table is the newest change time once, if so, explanation
During this modification the declaration form not by other systems or other people correct, can be to the timestamp table
Time be updated successfully, the time after timestamp table updates is time that this is updated successfully.If timestamp
Time in table is not the newest change time once, illustrate be by other during this modification
Unite or other people update, so the time in timestamp has no longer been newest change time once, declaration form
Also no longer it is newest declaration form, so can not be updated successfully to the timestamp table, returns to the information for updating failure.
Generation module 416, if for that can be updated successfully to the timestamp table, generation is corrected according to
Correct request slip.
If specifically, can be updated successfully to timestamp table, then the content generation corrected according to this is corrected
Request slip.Generation is corrected to be controlled before request slip to declaration form, and generation is corrected after request slip, according to this
Request slip is corrected to be controlled.Generation, which is corrected, submits core to protect application after request slip, after core guarantor's application passes through,
If not producing premium change, batch list is directly generated, if producing premium change, such as needs to pay the fees or move back
Take, then regenerate single in batch after the completion of payment or move back expense, and the information updating that this is corrected is on newest declaration form,
Update newest declaration form simultaneously corrects number of times+1.
In the present embodiment, the declaration form sent by receiving the first system corrects request, and being corrected according to declaration form please
The corresponding timestamp table of acquisition declaration form is sought, policy information of the declaration form in the first system is judged according to timestamp table
Whether it is newest policy information, if so, then allowing the first system to correct the declaration form, receiving first is
Preservation after system is corrected to declaration form is instructed, and according to instruction renewal time stamp table is preserved, judging whether can
Timestamp table is updated successfully, if so, then correcting request slip according to correcting generation.First determine whether declaration form
Whether the policy information in one system is newest policy information, and the only policy information in the first system is most
Just the first system is allowed to modify declaration form during new policy information, it is ensured that multiple systems are protected in parallel processing
Each system is modified to declaration form when single is carried out on the version of newest declaration form, further, is led to
Cross to judge whether that timestamp table can be updated successfully and correct request slip to judge whether to be successfully generated, only
It is successfully generated and corrects request slip and just correct success at last.Said process realizes the parallel processing to declaration form,
And correct the validity that request slip ensure that declaration form modification by judging whether to be successfully generated.
As shown in figure 5, in one embodiment, the first judge module 406 includes：
Number of times acquisition module 406a, for obtaining declaration form in the first system and second system according to timestamp table
Correct number of times.
Specifically, recorded in timestamp table declaration form modification historical record, including declaration form correct number of times,
Time, content of modification for correcting every time etc..Further obtained according to the corresponding timestamp table of the declaration form of acquisition
Declaration form corrects number of times in the first system and second system.Data between the first system and second system are
Need to carry out data syn-chronization, but if not real-time data synchronization between the first system and second system, and
When being that timing data is synchronous, then in the first system and second system correct number of times may occur it is inconsistent
Situation.In another embodiment, the data in the first system and second system can also carry out unidirectional same
Step, such as, the first system are new system, and second system is old system, is carrying out the mistake of new-old system handing-over
It is that new system has been reached the standard grade in journey, when old system is not offline, new-old system can be with concurrent modification, in this process
In, old system data has renewal, and meeting automatic synchronization is updated to new system, to ensure the accurate of new system data,
Corrected but if being done in new system, then will not be again by data syn-chronization to old system, that is to say, that data are same
Walk simply from old system to new system, but not from new system to old system, i.e. one-way synchronization.
Determination module 406b, for correcting whether number of times is more than institute in the first system when the declaration form
State in second system when correcting number of times, then judge the policy information in the first system as newest policy information.
Specifically, it is all newest that either still declaration form, which is corrected, in second system in the first system
That is done on the basis of declaration form corrects, and correcting every time can be single according to the content generation batch corrected after successfully examination ＆ verification passes through,
Then by the information updating corrected to newest declaration form, while update newest declaration form corrects number of times+1.First
Data between system and second system need to carry out data syn-chronization, but the first system and second system it
Between carry out data syn-chronization if not real-time, but timing data it is synchronous when, then the first system and second is
Correcting number of times and inconsistent situation may occur in system, if the first system to correct number of times fewer,
The declaration form for illustrating the first system is not newest declaration form, and now the declaration form can not be modified.If
The first system corrects number of times correcting often than second system, illustrates that the declaration form one of the first system is set to most
New declaration form, it is allowed to which the first system is corrected to declaration form.
In one embodiment, the number of times of correcting that the first judge module is additionally operable to work as in the first system is equal to
In second system when correcting number of times, then check in second system and to correct request slip with the presence or absence of declaration form, if
It is no, then judge the policy information in the first system as newest policy information；When correcting number of times in the first system
It is not newest declaration form letter less than the policy information judged in second system when correcting number of times, then in the first system
Breath.
In the present embodiment, when correcting number of times equal in second system when correcting number of times in the first system,
Also need to further check in second system and to correct request slip with the presence or absence of declaration form, if in the presence of illustrating the guarantor
It is single to be modified in second system, and generate and correct request slip, only this corrects application
Single present, does not generate batch list also, that is to say, that, although the number of times of correcting of second system does not update also,
But now the declaration form in the first system has not been newest declaration form, so not allowing the first system to be repaiied
Change.If being not present, illustrate declaration form or newest declaration form in the first system, it is allowed to which the first system is to this
Declaration form is modified.When correcting number of times less than in second system when correcting number of times in the first system, explanation
Declaration form in the first system be not updated to also it is newest, judge the first system in policy information be not newest declaration form
Information.
As shown in fig. 6, in one embodiment, the control device of above-mentioned declaration form processing also includes：
3rd judge module 403, for judging that the corresponding timestamp table of declaration form whether there is, if in the presence of entering
Enter to notify acquisition module to correct the corresponding timestamp table of acquisition request declaration form according to declaration form, if being not present, for
Declaration form sets up new timestamp table.
Specifically, first having to judge that the corresponding timestamp table of the declaration form is before the timestamp table of declaration form is obtained
It is no to exist, have in corresponding timestamp table, timestamp table and load if carrying out modification to declaration form before
The number of policy of declaration form, historical record, the versioning timestamp of declaration form modification etc., versioning timestamp just refers to most
The nearly time once corrected to declaration form.If not carrying out modification to declaration form before, just without declaration form correspondence
Timestamp table, it is necessary to the versioning timestamp set up for declaration form in new timestamp table, and the timestamp table just
It is at the time of setting up the new timestamp table.Time subsequently in the new timestamp table goes renewal time
Stab table.
In one embodiment, the second judge module is additionally operable to judge that the versioning timestamp in timestamp table is not
It it is the newest change time once, if so, can be then updated successfully to timestamp table, if it is not, then can not be right
Timestamp table is updated successfully.
In the present embodiment, timestamp table mainly includes two fields of declaration form and timestamp, and versioning timestamp
It is exactly the timestamp field in timestamp table.Versioning timestamp just refers to the renewal time of declaration form latest edition.
Before correcting, it is that declaration form was most at that time to obtain the versioning timestamp in the corresponding timestamp table of declaration form, timestamp table
The nearly time once changed., it is necessary to judge that the versioning timestamp in timestamp table is not again when correcting preservation
It it is the last change time, because other systems are possible to the declaration form during this is corrected
Corrected, and generate and correct request slip, while have updated timestamp table.By judging to obtain originally
Versioning timestamp in the timestamp table taken is the last change time, if so, explanation is not by it
His system update, then can be updated successfully to timestamp table.Conversely, explanation is corrected by other systems,
This can not be updated successfully to timestamp table.Specifically, assume A and B two people respectively by X and
Y systems are modified to declaration form 1, and the information of declaration form 1 is all newest policy information in X and Y systems,
So A and B can now modify to declaration form 1, but be due to A modification speed ratio it is very fast, repair
Change and clicked save button, versioning timestamp or the last change time due to now system X,
So can be updated successfully to timestamp table, and generate and correct request slip.B goes to preserve to protecting again afterwards
During single 1 modification, because A operation have updated again timestamp table i.e. versioning timestamp and enter
Go renewal, so the versioning timestamp in Y systems has not been the last change time, therefore, this
When timestamp table can not be updated successfully.
Embodiment described above only expresses the several embodiments of the present invention, and it describes more specific and detailed,
But therefore it can not be interpreted as the limitation to the scope of the claims of the present invention.It should be pointed out that for this area
Those of ordinary skill for, without departing from the inventive concept of the premise, can also make it is some deformation and
Improve, these belong to protection scope of the present invention.Therefore, the protection domain of patent of the present invention should be with appended
Claim is defined.
Claims (10)
1. a kind of control method of declaration form processing, the described method comprises the following steps：
The declaration form for receiving the first system transmission corrects request；
The corresponding timestamp table of the declaration form according to the declaration form corrects acquisition request；
Judge whether policy information of the declaration form in the first system is newest declaration form according to the timestamp table
Information；
If so, then allowing the first system to correct the declaration form；
Receive the instruction of the preservation after the first system is corrected to the declaration form；
The instruction renewal timestamp table is preserved according to described；
Judge whether that the timestamp table can be updated successfully；
If so, then correcting generation according to corrects request slip.
2. according to the method described in claim 1, it is characterised in that described to be judged according to the timestamp table
The step of whether policy information of the declaration form in the first system is newest policy information includes：
The declaration form is obtained according to the timestamp table and corrects number of times in the first system and second system；
When correcting number of times more than when correcting number of times, then judging in the second system in the first system
Policy information in the first system is newest policy information.
3. method according to claim 2, it is characterised in that described to be obtained according to the timestamp table
The declaration form in the first system and second system the step of correcting number of times after also include：
When correcting number of times equal to when correcting number of times, then checking in the second system in the first system
Request slip is corrected with the presence or absence of the declaration form in the second system, if it is not, then judging in the first system
Policy information is newest policy information；
When correcting number of times less than when correcting number of times, then judging in the second system in the first system
Policy information in the first system is not newest policy information.
4. according to the method described in claim 1, it is characterised in that described that request is corrected according to the declaration form
Also include before the step of obtaining the declaration form corresponding timestamp table：
Judge that the corresponding timestamp table of the declaration form whether there is；
If in the presence of entering the step of correcting acquisition request declaration form corresponding timestamp table according to the declaration form；
If being not present, new timestamp table is set up for the declaration form.
5. according to the method described in claim 1, it is characterised in that described whether to judge the first system
The step of being updated successfully to the timestamp table includes：
It is the newest change time once to judge the versioning timestamp in the timestamp table, if so, then
The timestamp table can be updated successfully, if it is not, can not be then updated successfully to the timestamp table.
6. a kind of control device of declaration form processing, it is characterised in that described device includes：
Request receiving module, the declaration form for receiving the first system transmission corrects request；
Acquisition module, for the corresponding timestamp table of declaration form described in correcting acquisition request according to the declaration form；
First judge module, for judging declaration form of the declaration form in the first system according to the timestamp table
Whether information is newest policy information；
Module is corrected, if being newest policy information for policy information of the declaration form in the first system, is allowed
The first system is corrected to the declaration form；
Command reception module, for receiving the instruction of the preservation after the first system is corrected to the declaration form；
Update module, for preserving the instruction renewal timestamp table according to described；
Second judge module, for judging whether that the timestamp table can be updated successfully；
Generation module, if for that can be updated successfully to the timestamp table, generation batch is corrected according to
Change request slip.
7. device according to claim 6, it is characterised in that first judge module includes：
Number of times acquisition module, for obtaining the declaration form in the first system and the according to the timestamp table
Number of times is corrected in two system；
Determination module, for correcting whether number of times is more than described the in the first system when the declaration form
In two system when correcting number of times, then judge the policy information in the first system as newest policy information.
8. device according to claim 7, it is characterised in that first judge module is additionally operable to work as
Number of times is corrected equal to when correcting number of times, then checking described the in the second system in the first system
Request slip is corrected with the presence or absence of the declaration form in two system, if it is not, then judging the declaration form letter in the first system
Cease for newest policy information；When the number of times of correcting in the first system is less than correcting in the second system
During number of times, then judge that the policy information in the first system is not newest policy information.
9. device according to claim 6, it is characterised in that described device also includes：
3rd judge module, for judging that the corresponding timestamp table of the declaration form whether there is, if in the presence of,
The corresponding timestamp table of acquisition request declaration form is corrected according to the declaration form into notice acquisition module, if being not present,
Then new timestamp table is set up for the declaration form.
10. device according to claim 6, it is characterised in that second judge module is additionally operable to
It is the newest change time once to judge the versioning timestamp in the timestamp table, if so, then can
The timestamp table is updated successfully, if it is not, can not be then updated successfully to the timestamp table.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610270091.XA CN107316176A (en) | 2016-04-27 | 2016-04-27 | The control method and device of declaration form processing |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610270091.XA CN107316176A (en) | 2016-04-27 | 2016-04-27 | The control method and device of declaration form processing |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN107316176A true CN107316176A (en) | 2017-11-03 |
Family
ID=60185125
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610270091.XA Pending CN107316176A (en) | 2016-04-27 | 2016-04-27 | The control method and device of declaration form processing |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN107316176A (en) |
Cited By (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109285080A (en) * | 2018-09-04 | 2019-01-29 | 中国平安财产保险股份有限公司 | Policy information scroll processing method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN109727060A (en) * | 2018-11-29 | 2019-05-07 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Day exhibition expense processing method, device, equipment and readable storage medium storing program for executing |
| CN111179097A (en) * | 2019-11-28 | 2020-05-19 | 泰康保险集团股份有限公司 | Method and device for warranty correction, electronic equipment and storage medium |
| CN112132694A (en) * | 2020-09-28 | 2020-12-25 | 平安养老保险股份有限公司 | Policy and security case confirmation and verification method, device, equipment and storage medium |
| CN114399394A (en) * | 2022-01-14 | 2022-04-26 | 长城人寿保险股份有限公司 | Insurance contract data changing method and device |
Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN1407475A (en) * | 2001-08-24 | 2003-04-02 | 前锦网络信息技术(上海)有限公司 | Synchronous updating personnel resume database method based on internet |
| CN1549130A (en) * | 2003-05-06 | 2004-11-24 | 联想(北京)有限公司 | Method of document synchronization |
| CN101339642A (en) * | 2008-07-29 | 2009-01-07 | 李宝龙 | Multi-party interactive automatized electronic business system |
| CN101410773A (en) * | 2003-07-28 | 2009-04-15 | 索诺斯公司 | System and method for synchronizing operations among a plurality of independently clocked digital data processing devices |
| US20150081633A1 (en) * | 2012-05-28 | 2015-03-19 | Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited | Data synchronization method and device |
| CN104462477A (en) * | 2014-12-18 | 2015-03-25 | 深圳市科漫达智能管理科技有限公司 | Data synchronizing method, device and system based on timestamp |
-
2016
- 2016-04-27 CN CN201610270091.XA patent/CN107316176A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN1407475A (en) * | 2001-08-24 | 2003-04-02 | 前锦网络信息技术(上海)有限公司 | Synchronous updating personnel resume database method based on internet |
| CN1549130A (en) * | 2003-05-06 | 2004-11-24 | 联想(北京)有限公司 | Method of document synchronization |
| CN101410773A (en) * | 2003-07-28 | 2009-04-15 | 索诺斯公司 | System and method for synchronizing operations among a plurality of independently clocked digital data processing devices |
| CN101339642A (en) * | 2008-07-29 | 2009-01-07 | 李宝龙 | Multi-party interactive automatized electronic business system |
| US20150081633A1 (en) * | 2012-05-28 | 2015-03-19 | Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited | Data synchronization method and device |
| CN104462477A (en) * | 2014-12-18 | 2015-03-25 | 深圳市科漫达智能管理科技有限公司 | Data synchronizing method, device and system based on timestamp |
Cited By (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109285080A (en) * | 2018-09-04 | 2019-01-29 | 中国平安财产保险股份有限公司 | Policy information scroll processing method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN109285080B (en) * | 2018-09-04 | 2023-04-04 | 中国平安财产保险股份有限公司 | Policy information rolling processing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN109727060A (en) * | 2018-11-29 | 2019-05-07 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Day exhibition expense processing method, device, equipment and readable storage medium storing program for executing |
| CN109727060B (en) * | 2018-11-29 | 2024-04-02 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Day-to-day expense processing method, device, equipment and readable storage medium |
| CN111179097A (en) * | 2019-11-28 | 2020-05-19 | 泰康保险集团股份有限公司 | Method and device for warranty correction, electronic equipment and storage medium |
| CN112132694A (en) * | 2020-09-28 | 2020-12-25 | 平安养老保险股份有限公司 | Policy and security case confirmation and verification method, device, equipment and storage medium |
| CN112132694B (en) * | 2020-09-28 | 2024-04-09 | 平安养老保险股份有限公司 | Method, device, equipment and storage medium for confirming and checking policy and security case |
| CN114399394A (en) * | 2022-01-14 | 2022-04-26 | 长城人寿保险股份有限公司 | Insurance contract data changing method and device |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN107316176A (en) | The control method and device of declaration form processing | |
| US10621211B2 (en) | Language tag management on international data storage | |
| CN103514223B (en) | A kind of data warehouse data synchronous method and system | |
| EP2541413A1 (en) | Systems and Methods for Data Integrity Checking | |
| US11487714B2 (en) | Data replication in a data analysis system | |
| US20160092290A1 (en) | Processing data errors for a data processing system | |
| CN107609188B (en) | Data synchronization verification method based on golden gate | |
| CN109118358A (en) | The synchronization based on component of digital asset | |
| US10509639B2 (en) | Automatic software-update framework | |
| JP2021068470A (en) | Remote data synchronization method and apparatus for database | |
| CN104572976B (en) | Website data update method and system | |
| CN105787709A (en) | Method of synchronizing multiple system accounts | |
| CN108959374B (en) | Data storage method and device and electronic equipment | |
| CN105446909A (en) | Caching management method and system | |
| US9996576B2 (en) | Updating progression of performing computer system maintenance | |
| CN104090948A (en) | Method, device and system for processing mass data of nuclear power station | |
| CN104298761A (en) | Implementation method for master data matching between heterogeneous software systems | |
| US20160085659A1 (en) | Base Line for Code Analysis | |
| CN103684823A (en) | Weblog recording method, network access path determining method and related devices | |
| CN105630625A (en) | Method and device for detecting consistency between data copies | |
| US8498963B2 (en) | Method and system for data synchronization | |
| CN108024090A (en) | A kind of abnormal localization method and device for video monitoring platform | |
| CN116132625A (en) | Supervision method and device for transaction flow | |
| KR101415528B1 (en) | Apparatus and Method for processing data error for distributed system | |
| CN114371870A (en) | Code scanning and submitting method, code scanning server, client and server |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20171103 |