CN107290784A - A kind of method of quantitatively characterizing fault combination reliability - Google Patents

A kind of method of quantitatively characterizing fault combination reliability Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN107290784A
CN107290784A CN201710496060.0A CN201710496060A CN107290784A CN 107290784 A CN107290784 A CN 107290784A CN 201710496060 A CN201710496060 A CN 201710496060A CN 107290784 A CN107290784 A CN 107290784A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
fault
reliability
growth
segmentation
combination
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201710496060.0A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
王海学
付晓飞
刘海涛
杜庆龙
褚榕
柳少波
苏玉平
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Northeast Petroleum University
Original Assignee
Northeast Petroleum University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Northeast Petroleum University filed Critical Northeast Petroleum University
Priority to CN201710496060.0A priority Critical patent/CN107290784A/en
Publication of CN107290784A publication Critical patent/CN107290784A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01VGEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
    • G01V1/00Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
    • G01V1/28Processing seismic data, e.g. analysis, for interpretation, for correction
    • G01V1/30Analysis
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01VGEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
    • G01V2210/00Details of seismic processing or analysis
    • G01V2210/60Analysis
    • G01V2210/64Geostructures, e.g. in 3D data cubes
    • G01V2210/642Faults

Abstract

The present invention relates to a kind of method of quantitatively characterizing fault combination reliability, the method for this quantitatively characterizing fault combination reliability:Step 1: determining fault growth type and segmentation growing point:Obtain along the coordinate and upper lower burrs of a certain fault strike different layers position diverse location and cut section buried depth data;Fault throw distance Curve is drawn, and draws fault plane turn-off isogram, and the growth type and segmentation growing point of quantitative identification tomography;Step 2: the reliability of Quantitative Evaluation on Fault combination:Obtain 2 layer datas of transition shift and separation in segmentation growth fault superimposition centre;The reliability that growth quantitatively characterizing method accurately determines fault complexe is segmented using fault plane;Step 3: seismic profile Fine structural interpretation is verified:Result is corrected based on fault combination, with reference to seismic fine interpretation result, the engineering reliability is verified.The present invention is effectively reduced the uncertainty of fault interpretation.

Description

A kind of method of quantitatively characterizing fault combination reliability
Technical field
The present invention relates to petroleum exploration domain, and in particular to a kind of method of quantitatively characterizing fault combination reliability.
Background technology
Practice have shown that:Tomography is important construction in oilfield explorating developing process, research is primarily focused in recent years disconnected Split the effect in Hydrocarbon Formation Reservoirs.However, often ignoring a kind of important geological phenomenon in seismic interpretation --- Fault segmentation is given birth to It is long.The growth of extentional basin Fault segmentation has generality, and segmentation growth is that extentional basin fault development evolutionary process is essential Stage, main experienced three stages:Isolated nucleation stage, " being flexible coupling " stage and " Hard link " stage.Due to seismic resolution Rate is limited, and two fractures of common segmentation growth are construed as the phenomenon of a fracture.
The content of the invention
It is an object of the invention to provide a kind of method of quantitatively characterizing fault combination reliability, this quantitatively characterizing fault groups Closing the method for reliability is used to solve the problem of seismic interpretation has uncertain in the prior art.
The technical solution adopted for the present invention to solve the technical problems is:The side of this quantitatively characterizing fault combination reliability Method is by accurately determining the type of fault growth now and the raw website of segmentation, and then application fault plane segmentation growth quantitative assessment The reliability of method quantitatively characterizing fault combination, it is specific as follows:
Step 1: determining fault growth type and segmentation growing point;
(1)Based on 3-D seismics or structural map, obtain along a certain fault strike different layers position coordinate of diverse location and upper Lower wall cuts section buried depth data;
(2)Based on the layer data obtained according to step one, fault throw-distance Curve is drawn, and draw fault plane turn-off Isogram, and the growth type and segmentation growing point of quantitative identification tomography;
Step 2: the reliability of Quantitative Evaluation on Fault combination:
(1)Based on 3-D seismics or structural map, the transition shift and separation 2 in segmentation growth fault superimposition centre are obtained Individual layer data;
(2)The reliability that growth quantitatively characterizing method accurately determines fault complexe is segmented using fault plane;
Step 3: seismic profile Fine structural interpretation is verified:
Result is corrected based on fault combination, with reference to seismic fine interpretation result, the reliability of the technology is verified.
The invention has the advantages that:
1st, the present invention establishes a kind of fault plane segmentation growth connection quantitative identification standard, determines the correct of fault combination mode Property, so as to instruct seismic fine interpretation, the uncertainty of fault interpretation is effectively reduced, is effective reduction oil-gas exploration and development Risk provides the guidance of theoretical and method.
2nd, the present invention is from fault growth mechanism, based on a large amount of fields and precise seismic interpretation data, it is proposed that The method of quantitatively characterizing fault combination reliability, can be effectively applicable to correct the reasonability of extentional basin fault combination, be not required to Want the seismic interpretation expense of great number.
3rd, instant invention overcomes the limitation of seismic resolution during seismic interpretation, effectively tomography can be instructed correctly to solve Release, reasonable combination.And this technology is simple to operate, required expense is low, with good promotion prospect.
Brief description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is the step block diagram of the inventive method;
Fig. 2 is that typical fault throw-distance Curve determines fault pattern and segmentation growth point diagram;
Fig. 3 is that Daqing placanticline Tai Bei development zones F074 fault plane turn-off isopleth determines fault pattern and segmentation growth point diagram;
Fig. 4 is various combination tomography relational language grading mode figure;
Fig. 5 is fault plane segmentation growth different phase pattern and quantitative identification standard plate;
Fig. 6 is that structural belt typical tomography in Song-liao basin apricot hilllock corrects forward and backward fault interpretation result plan;
Fig. 7 is the typical earthquake section of checking correction reliability(Fig. 6 b are seen in survey line position).
Embodiment
The present invention is further illustrated below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings:
The method of this quantitatively characterizing fault combination reliability is by accurately determining the type of fault growth now and the raw station of segmentation Point, and then application fault plane is segmented the reliability of growth quantitative evaluation method quantitatively characterizing fault combination, with reference to Fig. 1, specifically It is as follows:
1st, fault growth type and segmentation growing point are determined
(1)As shown in figure 1, the present embodiment(The embodiment of the present invention is that secrecy is carried out)First in step S101, with dimensionally Based on shake data or structural map, acquisition cuts section buried depth along a certain fault strike Different Strata diverse location coordinate and upper lower burrs Data;
(2)Differentiate fault growth type and segmentation growing point using " two figures "
Based on step(1)The data of acquirement, draw " two figures of tomography(Turn-off-distance Curve and fault plane turn-off isopleth)”; It is that typical fault throw-distance Curve determines fault pattern and segmentation growth point diagram shown in Fig. 2, its low value area represents segmentation life Long tie point, 4 segmentation growing points of the mature fault, shows as 5 sections of connection growth characteristics.Fig. 3 is the too northern exploitation of Daqing placanticline F074 fault plane turn-off isopleth in area determines fault pattern and segmentation growth point diagram, and its " saddle " represents Fault segmentation growing point, F074 tomographies show as two-part growth characteristics.Therefore, can be effective using turn-off-distance Curve or fault plane turn-off isopleth Differentiate the growth type and segmentation growing point of tomography.
2nd, the reliability of Quantitative Evaluation on Fault combination
(1)Obtain evaluating
For " being flexible coupling " side row superimposition tomography, transition shift(D)Refer to the fault displcement sum of superimposition faulted section center two, Separation refers to the vertical range between the tomography of superimposition faulted section center two(Fig. 4 A);For Hard link tomography, transition shift is disconnected Layer A is with withering away(abandoned)Tomography B superimposition section center two fault displcement sum, separation refers to tomography A and extinction (abandoned)Distance between the tomography of tomography B superimposition section center two(Fig. 4 B);If due to seismic resolution limitation, disappeared The possible agensis of tomography B is died, transition shift is equal to displacement in the middle part of fault strike mutation section.
(2)Using the reliability of fault plane combined basis weight discrimination standard corrected tomography
Fault growth generally undergo it is isolated, be flexible coupling and 3 stages of Hard link;Based on transition shift(D)With separation(S)Two is big disconnected Layer relevant parameter, establishes fault plane combined basis weight discrimination standard(Fig. 5), when D/S is less than 0.27, faulted section is arranged in side In the superimposition stage-" being flexible coupling " stage, when D/S is between 0.27-1, in collapse stage-" being flexible coupling " stage is started, work as D/S During more than 1, fracture is in and is completely severed stage-" Hard link " stage(Fig. 5).
Xing Bei development zones 278+273 tomographies are original to be construed to two Hard link tomographies, 278 mature fault end extinction tomographies (Fig. 6 a).Quantitative identification standard is grown based on Fault segmentation, Xing Bei development zones 278+273 is broken in 3. number waypoint (Trace1021)D/S is 0.55(Table 1), two tomographies should be at " being flexible coupling " stage in Saar oil reservoir top surface --- start brokenly Split the stage.And 1., 2. and 4. a number segmentation growing point D/S values are all higher than 1(Table 1:Saar oil reservoir top surface 278+273 tomographies are changed Displacement and separation relation), in " Hard link " stage(Fig. 6).
Table 1
3rd, seismic profile Fine structural interpretation is verified
With reference to 3. number waypoint superimposition area seismic fine interpretation section, it was demonstrated that 278 and 273 fracture superimposition area's seismic reflections are continuous (Fig. 7), therefore, the tomography is made up of 278 tomographies and 273 fracture side row superimposition.
Using method proposed by the present invention, can with the reliability of effective execution seismic interpretation so that for disconnected circle Type division, Sealed harmonic drive lays the foundation, while the guidance of theoretical and method also is provided for the risk of effectively reduction oil-gas exploration and development, With good promotion prospect.
Above-mentioned technical proposal is one embodiment of the present invention, but described content is only to facilitate understand this hair It is bright and use embodiment, be not limited to the present invention.Any those skilled in the art to which this invention pertains, not Depart from disclosed herein spirit and scope on the premise of, can make in the formal and details of implementation any modification with Change, but the scope of patent protection of the present invention, still should be subject to the scope of the claims as defined in the appended claims.

Claims (1)

1. a kind of method of quantitatively characterizing fault combination reliability, it is characterised in that:
The method of this quantitatively characterizing fault combination reliability is by accurately determining the type of fault growth now and the raw station of segmentation Point, and then application fault plane is segmented the reliability of growth quantitative evaluation method quantitatively characterizing fault combination, it is specific as follows:
Step 1: determining fault growth type and segmentation growing point;
(1)Based on 3-D seismics or structural map, obtain along a certain fault strike different layers position coordinate of diverse location and upper Lower wall cuts section buried depth data;
(2)Based on the layer data obtained according to step one, fault throw-distance Curve is drawn, and draw fault plane turn-off Isogram, and the growth type and segmentation growing point of quantitative identification tomography;
Step 2: the reliability of Quantitative Evaluation on Fault combination:
(1)Based on 3-D seismics or structural map, the transition shift and separation 2 in segmentation growth fault superimposition centre are obtained Individual layer data;
(2)The reliability that growth quantitatively characterizing method accurately determines fault complexe is segmented using fault plane;
Step 3: seismic profile Fine structural interpretation is verified:
Result is corrected based on fault combination, with reference to seismic fine interpretation result, the reliability of the technology is verified.
CN201710496060.0A 2017-06-26 2017-06-26 A kind of method of quantitatively characterizing fault combination reliability Pending CN107290784A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201710496060.0A CN107290784A (en) 2017-06-26 2017-06-26 A kind of method of quantitatively characterizing fault combination reliability

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201710496060.0A CN107290784A (en) 2017-06-26 2017-06-26 A kind of method of quantitatively characterizing fault combination reliability

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN107290784A true CN107290784A (en) 2017-10-24

Family

ID=60099798

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201710496060.0A Pending CN107290784A (en) 2017-06-26 2017-06-26 A kind of method of quantitatively characterizing fault combination reliability

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN107290784A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109003285A (en) * 2018-07-30 2018-12-14 中国石油化工股份有限公司 The method of automatic identification geology isogram interrupting layer
CN113031066A (en) * 2021-01-24 2021-06-25 东北石油大学 Method for identifying hidden fault

Non-Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
FU XIAOFEI ET AL.: "Analysis of main controlling factors for hydrocarbon accumulation in central rift zones of the Hailar-Tamtsag Basin using a fault-caprock dual control mode", 《 SCIENCE CHINA(EARTH SCIENCES)》 *
YANG MINGHUI ET AL.: "Segment, Linkage, and Extensional Fault-Related Fold in Western Liaodong Bay Subbasin, Northeastern Bohai Sea, China", 《 JOURNAL OF CHINA UNIVERSITY OF GEOSCIENCES》 *
付晓飞,等: "断层分段生长定量表征及在油气成藏研究中的应用", 《中国矿业大学学报》 *
王海学,等: "断层分段生长定量判别标准的建立及其地质意义-以松辽盆地杏北开发区萨尔图油层为例", 《地质评论》 *
王海学,等: "断裂质量校正及其在油气勘探开发中的作用", 《中国矿业大学学报》 *
王海学,等: "裂陷盆地转换带形成演化及其控藏机理", 《地质科技情报》 *

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109003285A (en) * 2018-07-30 2018-12-14 中国石油化工股份有限公司 The method of automatic identification geology isogram interrupting layer
CN109003285B (en) * 2018-07-30 2022-12-06 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method for automatically identifying fault layer in geological contour map
CN113031066A (en) * 2021-01-24 2021-06-25 东北石油大学 Method for identifying hidden fault
CN113031066B (en) * 2021-01-24 2021-12-21 东北石油大学 Method for identifying hidden fault

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN104615803B (en) A kind of three-dimensional horizontal well well rail design method and system
Manzi et al. Application of 3D seismic techniques to evaluate ore resources in the West Wits Line goldfield and portions of the West Rand goldfield, South Africa
CN104632079B (en) Method for determining pre-target displacement of three-dimension horizontal well hole trajectory
WO2020029557A1 (en) Method for categorizing degree of disaster caused by diving leakage in shallow buried coal seam mining
CN103038670A (en) Processing geophysical data
Coleman et al. How, where, and when do radial faults grow near salt diapirs?
CN106501873B (en) A kind of method for recovering delta front foreset bed depositional dip based on rock core
CN105093307A (en) Lower palaeozoic tilted stratum true thickness calculation method
CN106842290B (en) plane representation method of torsion structure
CN107448197A (en) A kind of method of marine facies sandstone oil reservoir fluid-channeling channel space development quantitative judge
CN107290784A (en) A kind of method of quantitatively characterizing fault combination reliability
CN108487903A (en) A kind of gentle slope area oil gas advantage dust trajectory quantitatively portrays characterizing method
CN105551083A (en) Method for depicting relationship between horizontal well track and strata
CN105317427A (en) Representation method for describing old fault top surface structure diagram
CN103742143A (en) Dual-probe detection method of horizontal deformation caused by overburden failure by mining
Marra 2015 US Geological Survey assessment of undiscovered shale-gas and shale-oil resources of the Mississippian Barnett Shale, Bend arch–Fort Worth Basin, Texas
CN110703334B (en) Method for quickly explaining complex fault block oil field horizon
CN104251135A (en) Highly-deviated well space in-place method
Levorsen Convergence studies in the Mid-Continent region
Harris et al. Subseismic Fault Identification Using the Fault Likelihood Attribute: Application to Geosteering in the DJ Basin
CN105525925B (en) Containing the construction method for wasting reduction shield machine cutter damage in rib rock compound stratum
Cavinato et al. The new Col di Tenda tunnel between Italy and France: Integrated geological investigations and geophysical prospections for preliminary studies on the Italian side
CN106836187A (en) A kind of two brills one for strongly weathered sand-rock grab continuous wall trench underground construction method
CN106990450A (en) A kind of method for recovering fault development history of evolution
Racey et al. Chapter 6 Myanmar offshore petroleum overview

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
WD01 Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication

Application publication date: 20171024

WD01 Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication