CN107069682A - A kind of HVDC transmission line back-up protection method based on DC control system - Google Patents
A kind of HVDC transmission line back-up protection method based on DC control system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN107069682A CN107069682A CN201710304839.8A CN201710304839A CN107069682A CN 107069682 A CN107069682 A CN 107069682A CN 201710304839 A CN201710304839 A CN 201710304839A CN 107069682 A CN107069682 A CN 107069682A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- protection
- fault
- faults
- criterion
- area
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 45
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 28
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 37
- 238000010304 firing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 claims description 27
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 claims description 22
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 abstract description 5
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 15
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009499 grossing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001808 coupling effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007599 discharging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007257 malfunction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006855 networking Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010355 oscillation Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02H—EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS
- H02H7/00—Emergency protective circuit arrangements specially adapted for specific types of electric machines or apparatus or for sectionalised protection of cable or line systems, and effecting automatic switching in the event of an undesired change from normal working conditions
- H02H7/26—Sectionalised protection of cable or line systems, e.g. for disconnecting a section on which a short-circuit, earth fault, or arc discharge has occured
- H02H7/268—Sectionalised protection of cable or line systems, e.g. for disconnecting a section on which a short-circuit, earth fault, or arc discharge has occured for DC systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R31/00—Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
- G01R31/08—Locating faults in cables, transmission lines, or networks
- G01R31/081—Locating faults in cables, transmission lines, or networks according to type of conductors
- G01R31/085—Locating faults in cables, transmission lines, or networks according to type of conductors in power transmission or distribution lines, e.g. overhead
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y04—INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
- Y04S—SYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
- Y04S10/00—Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
- Y04S10/50—Systems or methods supporting the power network operation or management, involving a certain degree of interaction with the load-side end user applications
- Y04S10/52—Outage or fault management, e.g. fault detection or location
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Inverter Devices (AREA)
- Direct Current Feeding And Distribution (AREA)
Abstract
本发明涉及一种基于直流控制系统的高压直流输电线路后备保护方法,属于电力系统继电保护技术领域。高压直流系统中不同区域发生故障时直流控制侧会产生不同的响应,利用故障期间换流器触发角ɑ、逆变器关断角γ、两端阀侧到直流出线区域的差流ΔIre和ΔIinv的变化特征可以准确区分出区内外故障,换流器触发角ɑ响应可以识别出整流侧交流系统故障和对极线路故障,逆变侧关断角γ可以识别出逆变侧交流系统故障,而引入阀侧到直流出线区域的差流信号ΔIre和ΔIinv来识别阀侧到出线区域内故障。本发明动作可靠性高,动作速度快,抗过渡电阻能力强,可以满足远端故障。对于实际高压直流输电工程线路后备保护的配置具有重要参考意义。
The invention relates to a backup protection method for a high-voltage direct current transmission line based on a direct current control system, and belongs to the technical field of electric power system relay protection. When faults occur in different areas of the high-voltage DC system, the DC control side will produce different responses. During the fault period, the converter firing angle α, the inverter shutdown angle γ, the differential current ΔI re from the valve side to the DC outlet area at both ends, and The change characteristics of ΔI inv can accurately distinguish faults inside and outside the zone, the trigger angle α response of the converter can identify the faults of the AC system on the rectifier side and the fault on the opposite pole, and the turn-off angle γ on the inverter side can identify the faults of the AC system on the inverter side , and the differential flow signals ΔI re and ΔI inv from the valve side to the DC outlet area are introduced to identify faults in the valve side to the outlet area. The invention has high action reliability, fast action speed, strong anti-transition resistance capability, and can satisfy remote faults. It has important reference significance for the configuration of the backup protection of the actual HVDC transmission line.
Description
技术领域technical field
本发明涉及一种基于直流控制系统的高压直流输电线路后备保护方法,属于电力系统继电保护技术领域。The invention relates to a backup protection method for a high-voltage direct current transmission line based on a direct current control system, and belongs to the technical field of electric power system relay protection.
背景技术Background technique
目前,我国电力系统已经实现了全国联网、远距离、大容量输电。预计到2020年,我国建设的直流输电工程将达50余项,其中特高压直流输电工程约占60%。由于直流输电线路电压等级高,沿线地理环境复杂,因而其发生故障的概率也很高,严重影响到了直流输电系统的安全稳定性。At present, my country's power system has realized national networking, long-distance, large-capacity power transmission. It is estimated that by 2020, there will be more than 50 direct current transmission projects in my country, of which UHV direct current transmission projects account for about 60%. Due to the high voltage level of the DC transmission line and the complex geographical environment along the line, the probability of failure is also high, which seriously affects the safety and stability of the DC transmission system.
目前,直流输电线路主要保护方案包括行波保护、微分欠压保护、直流差动保护等[5],但其核心技术则主要掌握在少数国外生产厂家手中,保护构成原理、整定计算依据则仍未公开,导致我国直流输电系统在保护配置及整定、保护装置升级等方面常常处于被动局面,从而对我国交直流混联电力系统安全稳定性水平造成了很大程度的影响。 At present, the main protection schemes for DC transmission lines include traveling wave protection, differential undervoltage protection, DC differential protection, etc. Undisclosed, China's DC transmission system is often in a passive situation in terms of protection configuration, setting, and protection device upgrades, which has a great impact on the safety and stability of China's AC-DC hybrid power system.
高压直流输电系统一般采用微分欠压保护和纵连差动保护作为后备保护,但微分欠压保护欠压判据的动作特性与过渡电阻和直流控制系统参数等因素密切相关;纵联差动保护受控制系统影响较大并且为了躲避区外故障,其动作延时长达1.1s。HVDC transmission systems generally use differential undervoltage protection and longitudinal differential protection as backup protection, but the operating characteristics of differential undervoltage protection undervoltage criteria are closely related to factors such as transition resistance and DC control system parameters; longitudinal differential protection It is greatly affected by the control system and in order to avoid out-of-area faults, its action delay is as long as 1.1s.
发明内容Contents of the invention
本发明要解决的技术问题是提供一种基于直流控制系统的高压直流输电线路后备保护方法,高压直流系统中不同区域发生故障时直流控制侧会产生不同的响应,利用故障期间换流器触发角、逆变器关断角和两端阀侧到直流出线区域的差流变化特征可以准确区分出区内外故障,从而准确快速的对区内故障进行动作。The technical problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a backup protection method for HVDC transmission lines based on a DC control system. When faults occur in different areas of the HVDC system, the DC control side will produce different responses. , Inverter cut-off angle and the differential current change characteristics from the valve side of both ends to the DC outlet area can accurately distinguish the faults inside and outside the area, so that the faults in the area can be accurately and quickly acted on.
本发明的技术方案是:Technical scheme of the present invention is:
一种基于直流控制系统的高压直流输电线路后备保护方法,具体步骤为:A backup protection method for a high-voltage direct current transmission line based on a direct current control system, the specific steps are:
(1)直流系统中整流侧直流出线到逆变侧直流出线的区域为高压直流输电线路,发生在此区域内的故障为区内故障,保护动作,其余故障均为区外故障,保护不动作;(1) In the DC system, the area from the rectifier side DC outlet to the inverter side DC outlet is a high-voltage DC transmission line. The faults that occur in this area are internal faults, and the protection operates. The rest of the faults are external faults, and the protection does not operate. ;
(2)实时监测整流侧和逆变侧的差流信号,整流侧的差流信号为整流阀处电流与整流侧直流出线处电流之差,记为ΔIre;逆变侧的差流信号为逆变阀处电流与逆变侧直流出线处电流之差,记为ΔIinv;用这两个差流信号来检测直流输电系统中因故障而产生的电流自由分量,当ΔIre或ΔIinv大于差流保护动作电流门槛值Iset,则说明直流输电系统中有故障产生,启动后备保护,在保护闭锁结束后启动触发角α判据以进一步判断故障发生的区域;(2) Monitor the differential current signals on the rectification side and the inverter side in real time. The differential current signal on the rectification side is the difference between the current at the rectifier valve and the current at the DC outlet of the rectification side, which is recorded as ΔI re ; the differential current signal on the inverter side is The difference between the current at the inverter valve and the current at the DC outlet of the inverter side is recorded as ΔI inv ; use these two differential current signals to detect the current free component caused by faults in the DC transmission system, when ΔI re or ΔI inv is greater than The action current threshold value I set of the differential current protection indicates that there is a fault in the DC transmission system, the backup protection is started, and the trigger angle α criterion is started after the protection blocking is completed to further judge the area where the fault occurs;
(3)经过闭锁时间ts的闭锁以后,启动α判据,α判据的判别方法为:(3) After the blocking time t s is blocked, the α criterion is started, and the method of α criterion is as follows:
由直流输电系统的极控测量单位提取到整流侧触发角α的采样值,将采样值与设定的门槛值αset进行比较,若采样值α<αset不成立,判断属于区外故障,保护复位;若成立,则启动γ判据以进一步判断故障发生的区域;The sampling value of the trigger angle α on the rectification side is extracted from the extreme control measurement unit of the DC transmission system, and the sampling value is compared with the set threshold value α set . Reset; if established, start the γ criterion to further judge the area where the fault occurs;
(4)γ判据的判别方法为:(4) The discriminant method of γ criterion is:
由极控测量单位提取到逆变侧关断角γ的采样值,将采样值与设定的门槛值γset进行比较,若采样值γ>γset不成立,则判断属区外故障,保护复位;若成立,启动差流判据以进一步判断故障发生的区域;The sampling value of the turn-off angle γ of the inverter side is extracted from the extreme control measurement unit, and the sampling value is compared with the set threshold value γ set . If the sampling value γ>γ set is not established, it is judged to be an out-of-area fault and the protection is reset. ; If true, start the differential flow criterion to further judge the area where the fault occurs;
(5)差流判据判别方法为:(5) The discriminant method of differential flow criterion is:
对差流ΔIre和ΔIinv进行采样,判断差流ΔIre>Iset和ΔIinv>Iset是否成立,任何一式成立,可判断故障为相应区域故障,属区外故障,保护复位;如两式都不成立,则判定为区内故障。Sampling the differential current ΔI re and ΔI inv to judge whether the differential current ΔI re >I set and ΔI inv >I set is true. If any formula is established, it can be judged that the fault is a fault in the corresponding area, which is an external fault, and the protection is reset; if two If none of the formulas is established, it is judged as an internal fault.
步骤(3)所述闭锁时间ts判定具体为:The blocking time t s described in step (3) is specifically determined as:
为躲开故障后非线性元件产生的衰减自由分量对各物理量的干扰,同时与系统主保护配合,在保护启动后设置闭锁时间ts,取自由分量衰减为零所用时间和躲过主保护所用时间中数值大的一个作为闭锁时间ts。In order to avoid the interference of the attenuation free component produced by the nonlinear element on various physical quantities after the fault, and cooperate with the main protection of the system at the same time, set the blocking time t s after the protection starts, and take the time taken for the free component to decay to zero and the time used for avoiding the main protection The larger value among the times is taken as the blocking time t s .
步骤(3)所述α判据的动作整定值αset的整定方案为:The setting scheme of the action setting value α set of the α criterion described in step (3) is:
基于直流输电系统的实际参数搭建仿真模型,在仿真系统的整流侧交流线路和对极线路上设置各种极端情况下的故障,仿真得到各种极端故障情况下系统整流侧触发角出现的最大值αmax,整定αset=k1αmax,k1为可靠系数。Build a simulation model based on the actual parameters of the DC transmission system, set various extreme faults on the rectification side AC line and the opposite pole line of the simulation system, and obtain the maximum value of the firing angle on the rectification side of the system under various extreme fault conditions. α max , set α set = k 1 α max , k 1 is the reliability coefficient.
步骤(4)所述γ判据的动作整定值γset的整定方案为:The setting scheme of the action setting value γ set of the described γ criterion of step (4) is:
在仿真系统的逆变侧交流线路上设置各种极端情况下的故障,仿真得到各种极端故障情况下逆变侧关断角出现的最大值γmax,整定γset=k2γmax,k2为可靠系数。Faults under various extreme conditions are set on the AC line of the inverter side of the simulation system, and the maximum value γ max of the turn-off angle of the inverter side under various extreme fault conditions is obtained by simulation, and the setting γ set = k 2 γ max , k 2 is the reliability factor.
步骤(5)所述差流判据的设定方案具体为:The setting scheme of the differential flow criterion described in step (5) is specifically:
闭锁时间ts结束后,非线性元件释放的自由分量基本衰减至0,自由分量的干扰作用消失,如果此时差流信号ΔIre或ΔIinv仍然大于整定值,说明故障发生于差流信号保护的区域内,也就是整流阀或逆变阀到直流出线区域,此区域属于保护区外,故保护复位;如果差流信号小于整定值,则判定故障发生于高压直流输电线路内,保护动作。After the blocking time t s ends, the free component released by the nonlinear element basically decays to 0, and the interference effect of the free component disappears. If the differential current signal ΔI re or ΔI inv is still greater than the set value at this time, it means that the fault occurs in the differential current signal protection. In the area, that is, the area from the rectifier valve or inverter valve to the DC outlet, this area is outside the protection area, so the protection is reset; if the differential current signal is less than the set value, it is determined that the fault occurred in the high-voltage DC transmission line, and the protection operates.
本发明的原理是:Principle of the present invention is:
1、保护范围1. Scope of protection
本发明的保护范围是直流输电线路全长,而线路以外区域均为需要识别的区外故障,主要分为:对极线路故障、整流侧交流系统故障、逆变侧交流系统故障、整流侧出线故障、逆变侧出线故障5种。The scope of protection of the present invention is the entire length of the DC transmission line, and the area outside the line is an out-of-area fault that needs to be identified. It is mainly divided into: faults on opposite poles, faults on the AC system on the rectifier side, faults on the AC system on the inverter side, and outgoing lines on the rectifier side. There are 5 types of faults and inverter side outgoing faults.
2、保护启动2. Protection start
直流系统发生故障,后备保护应该不受故障距离、过渡电阻和故障类型影响快速准确的启动。由于所有故障都会导致系统电气量突变,从而进入电磁暂态过程导致各非线性元件释放自由分量,而ΔIre和ΔIinv差流判据的信号来自于平波电抗器两端电流,电磁暂态期间平波电抗器反复充放电将带来明显的呈衰减震荡的差流信号,并且差流信号对系统各故障不易受故障距离和过渡电阻影响,故本方案采用差流信号作为后备保护的启动型号。判断两侧差流ΔIre>Iset或ΔIinv>Iset是否成立,如成立,则启动本后备保护,在保护闭锁结束后启动触发角α判据;如不成立,则继续检测电气量。When the DC system fails, the backup protection should start quickly and accurately regardless of the fault distance, transition resistance and fault type. Since all faults will lead to a sudden change in the electrical quantity of the system, it will enter the electromagnetic transient process and cause the free components of each nonlinear element to be released, and the signals of the ΔI re and ΔI inv differential current criteria come from the current at both ends of the smoothing reactor, and the electromagnetic transient Repeated charging and discharging of the smoothing reactor during the period will bring obvious attenuating and oscillating differential current signals, and the differential current signals are not easily affected by fault distance and transition resistance for system faults, so this scheme uses differential current signals as the start-up of backup protection model. Judging whether the differential current on both sides ΔI re >I set or ΔI inv >I set is true, if it is true, start the backup protection, and start the trigger angle α criterion after the protection is blocked; if it is not true, continue to detect the electrical quantity.
式中ΔIre、ΔIinv分别为整流阀侧到送端直流出线和逆变阀侧到受端直流出线的差流信号Iset为差流保护动作电流门槛值,Iset=k1I0,k1为可靠系数,I0为区内故障闭锁结束后两侧差流信号中较大值。In the formula, ΔI re and ΔI inv are the differential current signals from the rectifier valve side to the DC outgoing line at the sending end and from the inverter valve side to the DC outgoing line at the receiving end. I set is the operating current threshold value of the differential current protection, I set = k 1 I 0 , k 1 is the reliability coefficient, and I 0 is the larger value of the differential current signals on both sides after the fault blocking in the zone ends.
3、保护闭锁3. Protection lock
电磁暂态过程的自由分量使电气量剧烈震荡,震荡过程持续大概300ms,此震荡对此后备保护的整定带来很大的干扰,故此后备保护方案应设置相关闭锁信号回避自由分量。考虑到直流系统发生换相失败后,应由直流系统进行换相失败诊断并由相关的保护动作,因此后备保护方案应设置相关闭锁信号从而和换相失败保护进行配合。由于需要和换相失败保护相互配合,将导致后备保护延时动作,延时时间由换相失败诊断时间决定,一般为200ms左右。后备保护的闭锁时间应该取两者中较大的一个,故此后备保护方案的闭锁时间取ts=300ms。The free component of the electromagnetic transient process makes the electrical quantity violently oscillate, and the oscillating process lasts for about 300ms. This oscillation brings great interference to the setting of the backup protection. Therefore, the backup protection scheme should set a relevant blocking signal to avoid the free component. Considering that after commutation failure occurs in the DC system, the commutation failure diagnosis should be performed by the DC system and the relevant protection actions should be taken. Therefore, the backup protection scheme should set a phase lock signal to cooperate with the commutation failure protection. Due to the need to cooperate with the commutation failure protection, it will lead to a delay in the action of the backup protection. The delay time is determined by the commutation failure diagnosis time, generally about 200ms. The blocking time of backup protection should take the larger one of the two, so the blocking time of this backup protection scheme is taken as ts=300ms.
4、触发角α判据4. Trigger angle α criterion
整流侧交流系统发生对称故障时,整流侧在定电流控制作用下迅速减小α角以抑制直流电流下降,整流侧最终运行于定αmin控制;整流侧交流系统发生对称短路故障时的故障特性为:α=αmin=5°。When a symmetrical fault occurs in the AC system on the rectifier side, the rectifier side rapidly reduces the α angle under the action of constant current control to suppress the DC current drop, and the rectifier side finally operates under the constant α min control; the fault characteristics of the AC system on the rectifier side when a symmetrical short-circuit fault occurs It is: α=α min =5°.
整流侧交流系统发生不对称故障时,整流器出口直流电流将持续波动进而导致直流侧控制方式在定电流控制和定αmin控制间不断切换继而导致α角不断波动,其最小值为α=αmin=5°、最大值αmax由故障类型决定,整流侧交流系统发生不对称短路故障时的故障特性为:α角在α=αmin=5°至αmax间持续波动。When an asymmetrical fault occurs in the AC system on the rectifier side, the DC current at the outlet of the rectifier will continue to fluctuate, resulting in the continuous switching of the control mode of the DC side between constant current control and constant α min control, resulting in constant fluctuations in the α angle, and its minimum value is α=α min = 5°, the maximum value α max is determined by the fault type, and the fault characteristic when an asymmetric short-circuit fault occurs in the AC system on the rectification side is: the α angle fluctuates continuously between α = α min = 5° and α max .
直流线路发生短路故障瞬间,整流侧直流电流增大而逆变侧直流电流减小。整流侧在定电流控制的作用下迅速增加α角以抑制直流电流。不考虑过渡电阻影响时,低压限流环节开始作用,直流电流整定值跟随直流电压而减小,整流侧最终运行于定电流(最小电流限制)控制,直流线路短路故障稳态时的故障特性为:α>αN。At the instant of a short-circuit fault on the DC line, the DC current on the rectifier side increases and the DC current on the inverter side decreases. The rectifier side rapidly increases the α angle under the action of constant current control to suppress the DC current. When the influence of transition resistance is not considered, the low-voltage current-limiting link starts to work, the DC current setting value decreases with the DC voltage, and the rectifier side finally operates under constant current (minimum current limit) control. The fault characteristics in the steady state of the DC line short-circuit fault are : α>α N .
对极线路故障,由于线路耦合效应,α角的变化趋势与本极线路故障时类似,但幅度相差甚大。Due to the line coupling effect, the opposite pole line fault, the change trend of α angle is similar to that of the local pole line fault, but the amplitude is quite different.
本方法采用触发角α来识别整流侧交流系统故障和对极线路故障。由极控测量单位提取到整流侧触发角α的采样值,判断采样值α<αset是否成立,如成立,可判断故障为整流侧交流系统故障或对极直流线路故障,属于区外故障,保护复位;如不成立,则启动γ判据。In this method, the trigger angle α is used to identify the fault of the AC system on the rectification side and the fault of the opposite pole line. The sampling value of the trigger angle α on the rectification side is extracted from the extreme control measurement unit, and it is judged whether the sampling value α<α set is established. If it is established, the fault can be judged to be a fault of the AC system of the rectification side or a fault of the opposite pole DC line, which is an out-of-area fault. The protection is reset; if not established, the γ criterion is started.
式中αset为α判据的动作整定值,αset=k2αmax,k2为可靠系数,αmax为整流侧交流系统各故障和对极系统故障中触发角α出现的最大值。In the formula, α set is the action setting value of α criterion, α set =k 2 α max , k 2 is the reliability coefficient, α max is the maximum value of the firing angle α in each fault of the AC system on the rectification side and the fault of the opposite pole system.
5、关断角γ判据5. Criterion of turn-off angle γ
逆变侧交流系统发生对称故障时,逆变侧始终为定γ角控制,在逆变侧交流母线电压降低的作用下导致γ角减小,由于逆变侧交流电压跌落幅度过大,定关断角控制器已无法消除γ角整定值与实际值之间的误差,导致γ角小于其额定值。逆变侧交流系统发生对称短路故障时的故障特性为:γ<γN。When a symmetrical fault occurs in the AC system of the inverter side, the inverter side is always controlled by a fixed γ angle, and the γ angle decreases due to the decrease of the AC bus voltage on the inverter side. The broken angle controller has been unable to eliminate the error between the γ angle setting value and the actual value, resulting in the γ angle being smaller than its rated value. When a symmetrical short-circuit fault occurs in the AC system on the inverter side, the fault characteristics are: γ<γ N .
逆变侧交流系统发生不对称故障时,逆变侧控制方式及γ角实际值变化趋势与逆变侧对称故障时相同。逆变侧交流母线发生不对称短路故障时的故障特性为:γ<γN。When an asymmetrical fault occurs in the AC system on the inverter side, the control mode of the inverter side and the change trend of the actual value of the γ angle are the same as those in the case of a symmetrical fault on the inverter side. The fault characteristics of the asymmetrical short-circuit fault on the AC bus on the inverter side are: γ<γ N .
直流线路发生短路故障时,逆变侧由定γ角控制转换为定电流控制,且在低压限流环节的作用下减小电流整定值,并最终使逆变侧运行于最小电流限制,此时,逆变侧定电流控制器整定值有所减小,输出的β角较正常运行时有所增大,逆变侧直流电流减小及β角增大都将导致关断角γ较正常运行时有所增大。直流线路发生不对称短路故障时的故障特性为:γ>γN。When a short-circuit fault occurs on the DC line, the inverter side is converted from constant γ-angle control to constant current control, and the current setting value is reduced under the action of the low-voltage current limiting link, and finally the inverter side operates at the minimum current limit. At this time , the setting value of the constant current controller on the inverter side decreases, the output β angle increases compared with normal operation, the decrease of the inverter side DC current and the increase of β angle will cause the cut-off angle γ increased. The fault characteristics of the asymmetrical short-circuit fault in the DC line are: γ>γ N .
本方法采用用关断角γ来区分逆变侧交流系统故障。由极控测量单位提取到逆变侧关断角γ的采样值,判断采样值γ<γset是否成立,如成立,可判断故障为逆变侧交流系统故障,属区外故障,保护复位;如不成立,启动差流判据。This method uses the cut-off angle γ to distinguish the faults of the AC system on the inverter side. The sampling value of the turn-off angle γ on the inverter side is extracted from the extreme control measurement unit, and it is judged whether the sampling value γ<γ set is established. If it is established, the fault can be judged to be an AC system fault on the inverter side, which is an out-of-area fault, and the protection is reset; If not, start the differential flow criterion.
式中γset为γ判据的动作整定值,γset=k3γmax,k3为可靠系数,γmax为逆变侧交流系统各故障中关断角γ出现的最大值。In the formula, γ set is the action setting value of γ criterion, γ set =k 3 γ max , k 3 is the reliability coefficient, and γ max is the maximum value of turn-off angle γ in each fault of the AC system on the inverter side.
6、差流判据6. Differential flow criterion
闭锁时间结束后,非线性元件释放的自由分量基本衰减至0,判断差流信号ΔIre<Iset和ΔIinv<Iset是否成立,如两者不全成立,则故障发生于两侧出线区域,如都成立则发生于区内,保护动作。After the blocking time is over, the free component released by the nonlinear element basically decays to 0, and judge whether the differential current signal ΔI re < I set and ΔI inv < I set are true. If both are not true, the fault occurs in the outgoing line area on both sides. If both are established, it will happen in the zone, and the protection action will be taken.
本发明的有益效果是:The beneficial effects of the present invention are:
1、本方法利用逆变侧关断角γ来识别逆变侧交流系统故障,而没有利用暂态电气量,避免了故障后暂态电气量受控制系统影响而使动作不可靠的问题;1. This method uses the turn-off angle γ of the inverter side to identify the fault of the AC system on the inverter side, and does not use the transient electrical quantity, which avoids the problem that the transient electrical quantity is affected by the control system after the fault and makes the action unreliable;
2、本保护应能在300ms左右可靠动作。直流纵差保护主要用于检测远端高阻接地故障,但其动作延时最长达1.1s。因而与直流纵差保护相比,本保护动作时间大幅提升;2. This protection should be able to operate reliably in about 300ms. DC differential protection is mainly used to detect remote high-resistance ground faults, but its action delay is up to 1.1s. Therefore, compared with the DC longitudinal difference protection, the action time of this protection is greatly improved;
3、整流侧触发角α及关断角γ动作趋势几乎不受故障距离的影响;本保护采用整流侧触发角α和关断角γ作为判据降低了故障距离对保护可靠性的影响。3. The action trends of the rectification side trigger angle α and cut-off angle γ are hardly affected by the fault distance; this protection uses the rectifier side trigger angle α and cut-off angle γ as criteria to reduce the impact of fault distance on protection reliability.
附图说明Description of drawings
图1是本发明实施例中云广±800kV特高压输电系统模型及故障分类图;图中f1~f6分别代表区内故障、对极线路故障、整流侧出线故障、逆变侧出线故障、整流侧交流系统故障、逆变侧交流系统故障;Figure 1 is the Yunguang ± 800kV UHV transmission system model and fault classification diagram in the embodiment of the present invention; f1 to f6 in the figure respectively represent faults in the area, faults on opposite poles, faults on rectifier side outlets, inverter side outlet faults, and rectification AC system failure on the inverter side and AC system failure on the inverter side;
图2是本发明不同过渡电阻时ɑ判据动作情况图;Fig. 2 is the α criterion action figure when different transition resistances of the present invention;
图3是本发明不同过渡电阻时γ判据动作情况图;Fig. 3 is the action situation figure of gamma criterion when different transition resistances of the present invention;
图4是本发明不同过渡电阻时整流侧差流判据ΔIre动作情况图;Fig. 4 is the operation situation diagram of the rectification side differential current criterion ΔI re when different transition resistances of the present invention;
图5是本发明不同过渡电阻时逆变侧差流判据ΔIinv动作情况图;Fig. 5 is a diagram of the action of the inverter side differential current criterion ΔI inv when different transition resistances are used in the present invention;
图6是本发明不同故障距离时ɑ判据动作情况图;Fig. 6 is a situation diagram of the α criterion action during different fault distances of the present invention;
图7是本发明不同故障距离时γ判据动作情况图;Fig. 7 is a diagram of the gamma criterion action situation when the present invention has different fault distances;
图8是本发明不同故障距离时整流侧差流判据ΔIre动作情况图;Fig. 8 is an action diagram of the differential current criterion ΔI re on the rectification side at different fault distances in the present invention;
图9是本发明不同故障距离时逆变侧差流判据ΔIinv动作情况图。Fig. 9 is a diagram of the action of the differential current criterion ΔI inv on the inverter side at different fault distances in the present invention.
具体实施方式detailed description
下面结合附图和具体实施方式,对本发明作进一步说明。The present invention will be further described below in combination with the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments.
实施例1:一种基于直流控制系统的高压直流输电线路后备保护方法,具体步骤为:Embodiment 1: A backup protection method for HVDC transmission lines based on a DC control system, the specific steps are:
(1)直流系统中整流侧直流出线到逆变侧直流出线的区域为高压直流输电线路,发生在此区域内的故障为区内故障,保护动作,其余故障均为区外故障,保护不动作;(1) In the DC system, the area from the rectifier side DC outlet to the inverter side DC outlet is a high-voltage DC transmission line. The faults that occur in this area are internal faults, and the protection operates. The rest of the faults are external faults, and the protection does not operate. ;
(2)实时监测整流侧和逆变侧的差流信号,整流侧的差流信号为整流阀处电流与整流侧直流出线处电流之差,记为ΔIre;逆变侧的差流信号为逆变阀处电流与逆变侧直流出线处电流之差,记为ΔIinv;用这两个差流信号来检测直流输电系统中因故障而产生的电流自由分量,当ΔIre或ΔIinv大于差流保护动作电流门槛值Iset,则说明直流输电系统中有故障产生,启动后备保护,在保护闭锁结束后启动触发角α判据以进一步判断故障发生的区域;(2) Monitor the differential current signals on the rectification side and the inverter side in real time. The differential current signal on the rectification side is the difference between the current at the rectifier valve and the current at the DC outlet of the rectification side, which is recorded as ΔI re ; the differential current signal on the inverter side is The difference between the current at the inverter valve and the current at the DC outlet of the inverter side is recorded as ΔI inv ; use these two differential current signals to detect the current free component caused by faults in the DC transmission system, when ΔI re or ΔI inv is greater than The action current threshold value I set of the differential current protection indicates that there is a fault in the DC transmission system, the backup protection is started, and the trigger angle α criterion is started after the protection blocking is completed to further judge the area where the fault occurs;
(3)经过闭锁时间ts的闭锁以后,启动α判据,α判据的判别方法为:(3) After the blocking time t s is blocked, the α criterion is started, and the method of α criterion is as follows:
由直流输电系统的极控测量单位提取到整流侧触发角α的采样值,将采样值与设定的门槛值αset进行比较,若采样值α<αset不成立,判断属于区外故障,保护复位;若成立,则启动γ判据以进一步判断故障发生的区域;The sampling value of the trigger angle α on the rectification side is extracted from the extreme control measurement unit of the DC transmission system, and the sampling value is compared with the set threshold value α set . Reset; if established, start the γ criterion to further judge the area where the fault occurs;
(4)γ判据的判别方法为:(4) The discriminant method of γ criterion is:
由极控测量单位提取到逆变侧关断角γ的采样值,将采样值与设定的门槛值γset进行比较,若采样值γ>γset不成立,则判断属区外故障,保护复位;若成立,启动差流判据以进一步判断故障发生的区域;The sampling value of the turn-off angle γ of the inverter side is extracted from the extreme control measurement unit, and the sampling value is compared with the set threshold value γ set . If the sampling value γ>γ set is not established, it is judged to be an out-of-area fault and the protection is reset. ; If true, start the differential flow criterion to further judge the area where the fault occurs;
(5)差流判据判别方法为:(5) The discriminant method of differential flow criterion is:
对差流ΔIre和ΔIinv进行采样,判断差流ΔIre>Iset和ΔIinv>Iset是否成立,任何一式成立,可判断故障为相应区域故障,属区外故障,保护复位;如两式都不成立,则判定为区内故障。Sampling the differential current ΔI re and ΔI inv to judge whether the differential current ΔI re >I set and ΔI inv >I set is true. If any formula is established, it can be judged that the fault is a fault in the corresponding area, which is an external fault, and the protection is reset; if two If none of the formulas is established, it is judged as an internal fault.
步骤(3)所述闭锁时间ts判定具体为:The blocking time t s described in step (3) is specifically determined as:
为躲开故障后非线性元件产生的衰减自由分量对各物理量的干扰,同时与系统主保护配合,在保护启动后设置闭锁时间ts,取自由分量衰减为零所用时间和躲过主保护所用时间中数值大的一个作为闭锁时间ts。In order to avoid the interference of the attenuation free component produced by the nonlinear element on various physical quantities after the fault, and cooperate with the main protection of the system at the same time, set the blocking time t s after the protection starts, and take the time taken for the free component to decay to zero and the time used for avoiding the main protection The larger value among the times is taken as the blocking time t s .
步骤(3)所述α判据的动作整定值αset的整定方案为:The setting scheme of the action setting value α set of the α criterion described in step (3) is:
基于直流输电系统的实际参数搭建仿真模型,在仿真系统的整流侧交流线路和对极线路上设置各种极端情况下的故障,仿真得到各种极端故障情况下系统整流侧触发角出现的最大值αmax,整定αset=k1αmax,k1为可靠系数。Build a simulation model based on the actual parameters of the DC transmission system, set various extreme faults on the rectification side AC line and the opposite pole line of the simulation system, and obtain the maximum value of the firing angle on the rectification side of the system under various extreme fault conditions. α max , set α set = k 1 α max , k 1 is the reliability coefficient.
步骤(4)所述γ判据的动作整定值γset的整定方案为:The setting scheme of the action setting value γ set of the described γ criterion of step (4) is:
在仿真系统的逆变侧交流线路上设置各种极端情况下的故障,仿真得到各种极端故障情况下逆变侧关断角出现的最大值γmax,整定γset=k2γmax,k2为可靠系数。Faults under various extreme conditions are set on the AC line of the inverter side of the simulation system, and the maximum value γ max of the turn-off angle of the inverter side under various extreme fault conditions is obtained by simulation, and the setting γ set = k 2 γ max , k 2 is the reliability factor.
步骤(5)所述差流判据的设定方案具体为:The setting scheme of the differential flow criterion described in step (5) is specifically:
闭锁时间ts结束后,非线性元件释放的自由分量基本衰减至0,自由分量的干扰作用消失,如果此时差流信号ΔIre或ΔIinv仍然大于整定值,说明故障发生于差流信号保护的区域内,也就是整流阀或逆变阀到直流出线区域,此区域属于保护区外,故保护复位;如果差流信号小于整定值,则判定故障发生于高压直流输电线路内,保护动作。After the blocking time t s ends, the free component released by the nonlinear element basically decays to 0, and the interference effect of the free component disappears. If the differential current signal ΔI re or ΔI inv is still greater than the set value at this time, it means that the fault occurs in the differential current signal protection. In the area, that is, the area from the rectifier valve or inverter valve to the DC outlet, this area is outside the protection area, so the protection is reset; if the differential current signal is less than the set value, it is determined that the fault occurred in the high-voltage DC transmission line, and the protection operates.
实施例2:如图1所示,±800kV特高压直流输电模型。该模型中,直流输送的额定功率为5000MW,额定电流为3125A,整流侧:交流系统的电压为525kV,短路比SCR=2.5/840,无功补偿容量为3000Mvar,直流滤波器为12/24/36三调谐滤波器,每极换流单元采用2个12脉动换流器串联连接组成,串联的电压按±(400+400)kV进行分配。逆变侧的无功补偿容量为3040Mvar,其他的参数与整流侧一致。直流输电线路全长为1500km(实际工程为1418km),控制系统是根据国际大电网会议组织(CIGRE)直流输电标准测试系统建立的。Embodiment 2: As shown in Figure 1, a ±800kV UHV DC transmission model. In this model, the rated power of the DC transmission is 5000MW, the rated current is 3125A, the rectification side: the voltage of the AC system is 525kV, the short-circuit ratio SCR=2.5/840, the reactive power compensation capacity is 3000Mvar, and the DC filter is 12/24/ 36 triple-tuned filters, each pole commutation unit is composed of two 12-pulse converters connected in series, and the voltage in series is distributed according to ±(400+400)kV. The reactive power compensation capacity of the inverter side is 3040Mvar, and other parameters are consistent with the rectification side. The total length of the direct current transmission line is 1500km (the actual project is 1418km), and the control system is established according to the test system of the direct current transmission standard of the International Conference on Large Power Grids (CIGRE).
如图1所示,f1~f6区域发生各种故障后对各判据进行统计,结果见表1-表4。As shown in Figure 1, after various faults occurred in the f1~f6 area, statistics were made on each criterion, and the results are shown in Table 1-Table 4.
表1 f1~f6区域各种故障下故障发生时刻差流信号统计Table 1 Statistics of differential current signals at the time of fault occurrence under various faults in areas f1 to f6
表2 f1、f3、f4区域故障下闭锁结束后差流信号统计Table 2 Statistics of differential current signals after the end of blocking under faults in f1, f3, and f4 areas
表3 f1、f2、f5区域各种故障下闭锁结束后α出现的最大值统计Table 3 Statistics of the maximum value of α after the end of the lockout under various faults in areas f1, f2, and f5
表4 f1、f6区域各种故障下闭锁结束后γ出现的最大值统计Table 4 Statistics of the maximum value of γ after the end of the lockout under various faults in areas f1 and f6
在对判据进行整定时,必须保证在区外发生任何故障本套保护方案都不会误动。所以在整定时应该以区外最不容易识别的故障为基准。对于启动判据,应该保证所有故障都能启动,对于α判据,应该保证能识别f2及f5区域内所有故障;对于γ判据,应该保证能识别f6区域内所有故障;对于差流判据,应该保证能识别f3、f4区域内所有故障;综上所述,α判据整定中αmax应取f2及f5区域内所有故障中控制系统可能输出的α角最大值;γ判据其整定值应按照f6区域内所有故障中可能出现的γ角最大值γmax进行整定;差流判据整定值计算应在考虑故障初期闭锁时间的基础上,按照f1短路故障时可能出现的差流最大值进行整定。整定结果见表5。When setting the criterion, it must be ensured that this set of protection schemes will not malfunction if any fault occurs outside the zone. Therefore, the most difficult to identify fault outside the area should be used as the benchmark when setting. For the starting criterion, it should be guaranteed that all faults can be started; for the α criterion, it should be guaranteed to identify all faults in the f2 and f5 regions; for the γ criterion, it should be guaranteed to be able to identify all the faults in the f6 region; for the differential flow criterion , it should ensure that all faults in f3 and f4 areas can be identified; in summary, in the setting of α criterion, α max should take the maximum value of α angle that the control system may output in all faults in f2 and f5 areas; the setting of γ criterion The value should be set according to the maximum value of γ angle γ max that may occur in all faults in the f6 area; the calculation of the setting value of the differential current criterion should be based on the initial blocking time of the fault, and the maximum differential current that may occur during a short-circuit fault of f1 value is adjusted. The setting results are shown in Table 5.
表5各判据整定值Table 5 The setting values of each criterion
以正极线路中点0.1s分别发生经20Ω、100Ω及200Ω短路故障为例进行说明,仿真结果见图7。Taking short-circuit faults of 20Ω, 100Ω and 200Ω at the midpoint of the positive line at 0.1s as an example, the simulation results are shown in Figure 7.
由图2-5可知,过渡电阻为20Ω、100Ω及200Ω时本保护均能正确动作。整流侧触发角α及关断角γ的动作程度随着过渡电阻的增大而呈下降趋势,并且其达到整定的时间有所增加,但在闭锁结束后,均大于整定值且保持稳定;过渡电阻在一定程度上限制了短路电流的自由分量,因而两侧差流振幅及衰减时间将随着过渡电阻的增加而减小,且在闭锁结束后,两侧差流判据均稳定与0附近。此外,本文通过大量仿真,得到了直流线路故障时本后备保护各判据正确动作的“临界”过渡电阻均大于300Ω。It can be seen from Figure 2-5 that the protection can operate correctly when the transition resistance is 20Ω, 100Ω and 200Ω. The action degree of the trigger angle α and cut-off angle γ on the rectifier side shows a downward trend with the increase of the transition resistance, and the time to reach the set value increases, but after the end of the blocking, they are both greater than the set value and remain stable; the transition The resistance limits the free component of the short-circuit current to a certain extent, so the amplitude and decay time of the differential current on both sides will decrease with the increase of the transition resistance. . In addition, through a large number of simulations, this paper has obtained the "critical" transition resistance of the correct action of each criterion of the backup protection when the DC line is faulty, all of which are greater than 300Ω.
以0.1s时距M端100km、600km、1400km正极线路金属性接地故障为例进行说明,仿真结果如图8所示。Taking the metallic grounding faults of 100km, 600km, and 1400km positive lines from the M terminal at 0.1s as an example, the simulation results are shown in Figure 8.
由图6-9可知,距离M端100km、600km、1400km正极线路金属性短路故障时,本保护均能正确动作。但随着故障距离的增加,故障初期直流电压2次谐波分量持续时间逐渐增大,但故障初期闭锁结束后均降低至0附近;整流侧触发角α及关断角γ动作趋势几乎不受故障距离的影响;故障距离越远,整流侧差流判据降至0附近所需的时间越长,而逆变侧差流判据降至0附近所需时间则随着故障距离的增加先增大后减小。It can be seen from Figure 6-9 that this protection can operate correctly when there is a metal short-circuit fault on the positive line 100km, 600km, and 1400km away from the M terminal. However, with the increase of the fault distance, the duration of the 2nd harmonic component of the DC voltage at the initial stage of the fault gradually increases, but after the initial blockage of the fault, it decreases to around 0; The influence of fault distance; the farther the fault distance is, the longer it takes for the rectifier side differential current criterion to drop to near 0, while the time required for the inverter side differential current criterion to fall to near 0 increases with the increase of fault distance. Decrease after increasing.
表4给出了图1中f2~f6在不同过渡电阻及故障位置条件下,本保护动作情况。由表4可知,本文所提直流线路后备保护在远端高阻接地故障时仍能可靠动作,同时考虑保护闭锁时间、数据传输时间及保护判据计算时间,本保护应能在300ms左右可靠动作。直流纵差保护主要用于检测远端高阻接地故障,但其动作延时最长达1.1s。因而与直流纵差保护相比,本保护动作时间大幅提升。Table 4 shows the protection actions of f2-f6 in Figure 1 under different transition resistance and fault location conditions. It can be seen from Table 4 that the DC line backup protection proposed in this paper can still operate reliably when the remote high-impedance grounding fault occurs. At the same time, considering the protection blocking time, data transmission time and protection criterion calculation time, the protection should be able to operate reliably in about 300ms . DC differential protection is mainly used to detect remote high-resistance ground faults, but its action delay is up to 1.1s. Therefore, compared with DC differential protection, the protection action time is greatly improved.
表6不同过渡电阻时保护动作情况Table 6 Protection actions under different transition resistances
以上结合附图对本发明的具体实施方式作了详细说明,但是本发明并不限于上述实施方式,在本领域普通技术人员所具备的知识范围内,还可以在不脱离本发明宗旨的前提下作出各种变化。The specific embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail above in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, but the present invention is not limited to the above embodiments. Variations.
Claims (5)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710304839.8A CN107069682B (en) | 2017-05-03 | 2017-05-03 | A backup protection method of HVDC transmission line based on DC control system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710304839.8A CN107069682B (en) | 2017-05-03 | 2017-05-03 | A backup protection method of HVDC transmission line based on DC control system |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN107069682A true CN107069682A (en) | 2017-08-18 |
CN107069682B CN107069682B (en) | 2019-02-05 |
Family
ID=59596917
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710304839.8A Active CN107069682B (en) | 2017-05-03 | 2017-05-03 | A backup protection method of HVDC transmission line based on DC control system |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN107069682B (en) |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107632574A (en) * | 2017-10-13 | 2018-01-26 | 国网山东省电力公司电力科学研究院 | A kind of distribution line automation process line control system and method |
CN107968385A (en) * | 2017-11-23 | 2018-04-27 | 华北电力大学(保定) | A kind of DC voltage guard method suitable for alternating current-direct current mixing power grid |
CN109449893A (en) * | 2018-10-23 | 2019-03-08 | 三峡大学 | A kind of HVDC transmission line guard method based on trigger angle control characteristic |
CN109672153A (en) * | 2018-12-26 | 2019-04-23 | 天津大学 | AC/DC interconnected system based on abc- α β variation exchanges differential protecting method |
CN109888744A (en) * | 2019-03-04 | 2019-06-14 | 华北电力大学(保定) | A kind of protection method of high voltage direct current transmission line |
CN109995005A (en) * | 2019-04-30 | 2019-07-09 | 华南理工大学 | A Longitudinal Protection Method for DC Transmission Lines Based on the Average Rate of Change of Trigger Angle |
CN110212567A (en) * | 2019-07-09 | 2019-09-06 | 江苏方天电力技术有限公司 | High voltage ac/dc serial-parallel power grid numerical simulation modeling method containing large-scale phase modifier |
CN110445103A (en) * | 2019-07-04 | 2019-11-12 | 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 | A kind of protection of direct current supply line method and system based on single-ended difference current accumulated amount |
CN111965481A (en) * | 2020-07-14 | 2020-11-20 | 华南理工大学 | High-voltage direct-current line fault detection method, system, device and storage medium |
CN112838610A (en) * | 2021-01-17 | 2021-05-25 | 昆明理工大学 | A ground fault analysis method of MMC converter station considering neutral point current based on two-port network |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105375447A (en) * | 2015-09-22 | 2016-03-02 | 昆明理工大学 | A three-phase reclosing time sequence setting method for reducing distance protection misoperation rate in alternating current and direct current systems |
-
2017
- 2017-05-03 CN CN201710304839.8A patent/CN107069682B/en active Active
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105375447A (en) * | 2015-09-22 | 2016-03-02 | 昆明理工大学 | A three-phase reclosing time sequence setting method for reducing distance protection misoperation rate in alternating current and direct current systems |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
张凌跃等: "基于直流控制系统的HVDC输电线路后备保护新方案", 《中国设备工程》 * |
韩军强: "交直流电力系统中重合时序对距离保护动作特性的影响分析", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库》 * |
Cited By (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107632574A (en) * | 2017-10-13 | 2018-01-26 | 国网山东省电力公司电力科学研究院 | A kind of distribution line automation process line control system and method |
CN107632574B (en) * | 2017-10-13 | 2020-05-12 | 国网山东省电力公司电力科学研究院 | A kind of distribution line automatic processing line control system and method |
CN107968385A (en) * | 2017-11-23 | 2018-04-27 | 华北电力大学(保定) | A kind of DC voltage guard method suitable for alternating current-direct current mixing power grid |
CN109449893A (en) * | 2018-10-23 | 2019-03-08 | 三峡大学 | A kind of HVDC transmission line guard method based on trigger angle control characteristic |
CN109672153A (en) * | 2018-12-26 | 2019-04-23 | 天津大学 | AC/DC interconnected system based on abc- α β variation exchanges differential protecting method |
CN109888744A (en) * | 2019-03-04 | 2019-06-14 | 华北电力大学(保定) | A kind of protection method of high voltage direct current transmission line |
CN109995005B (en) * | 2019-04-30 | 2021-02-19 | 华南理工大学 | A Longitudinal Protection Method for DC Transmission Lines Based on the Average Rate of Change of Trigger Angle |
CN109995005A (en) * | 2019-04-30 | 2019-07-09 | 华南理工大学 | A Longitudinal Protection Method for DC Transmission Lines Based on the Average Rate of Change of Trigger Angle |
CN110445103A (en) * | 2019-07-04 | 2019-11-12 | 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 | A kind of protection of direct current supply line method and system based on single-ended difference current accumulated amount |
CN110445103B (en) * | 2019-07-04 | 2023-08-18 | 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 | Direct-current transmission line protection method and system based on single-ended differential current accumulation |
CN110212567A (en) * | 2019-07-09 | 2019-09-06 | 江苏方天电力技术有限公司 | High voltage ac/dc serial-parallel power grid numerical simulation modeling method containing large-scale phase modifier |
CN111965481B (en) * | 2020-07-14 | 2021-10-26 | 华南理工大学 | High-voltage direct-current line fault detection method, system, device and storage medium |
CN111965481A (en) * | 2020-07-14 | 2020-11-20 | 华南理工大学 | High-voltage direct-current line fault detection method, system, device and storage medium |
CN112838610A (en) * | 2021-01-17 | 2021-05-25 | 昆明理工大学 | A ground fault analysis method of MMC converter station considering neutral point current based on two-port network |
CN112838610B (en) * | 2021-01-17 | 2023-12-15 | 昆明理工大学 | MMC converter station ground fault analysis method considering neutral point current based on two-port network |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN107069682B (en) | 2019-02-05 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN107069682A (en) | A kind of HVDC transmission line back-up protection method based on DC control system | |
CN106908693B (en) | A high-accuracy single-phase grounding line selection method for arc suppression coil grounding system | |
Chen et al. | Analysis of mixed inverter/rectifier multi-infeed HVDC systems | |
CN105044543B (en) | Reactor Fault method of discrimination after a kind of PT broken string | |
CN105207203B (en) | A kind of UHV transmission line highly resistance compensation method | |
CN107863762A (en) | A kind of direct current network earth fault ultrahigh speed Non-unit protection method | |
CN105262069B (en) | Hvdc transmission line longitudinal protection method based on failure DC component | |
CN103746350A (en) | High-sensitivity busbar differential protection method | |
CN105699842A (en) | Direct current near zone alternating current line phase-to-phase fault criterion used by stable control device | |
CN103795042B (en) | Pilot protection system and guard method thereof based on virtual transition impedance | |
CN109613422B (en) | A circuit breaker trip time control method for suppressing submerged supply current | |
CN110556783A (en) | zero sequence overcurrent protection method and device for transformer | |
CN107342582A (en) | A kind of smoothing reactor Parameters design of looped network shape flexible direct current power transmission system | |
CN107179482A (en) | Extra high voltage direct current transmission line fault recognition method based on current characteristic amount | |
CN103746400B (en) | A kind of last circuit breaker of high voltage direct current transmission and last line protection method | |
CN105259469A (en) | Direct current line fault identification method based on polar line voltage first order difference quadratic sum | |
CN103618296B (en) | Breaker fail protection blocking method | |
CN204858542U (en) | An active state neutral point grounding device | |
CN115276072A (en) | Method, device, terminal and medium for inhibiting subsequent commutation failure of direct current system | |
CN110165694A (en) | The electrically continuous commutation failure control method of inhibition high-voltage dc transmission based on harmonic detecting | |
CN110661239B (en) | Method for reclosing single-pole grounding fault of flexible direct-current power grid | |
CN108146261A (en) | The fault protecting method and device of electric vehicle rapid charging station | |
CN106374436B (en) | A kind of extra-high voltage direct-current filter middle-and high-voltage capacitor earth-fault protection method | |
CN108599116B (en) | Direct-current line protection method suitable for alternating-current and direct-current hybrid power distribution network | |
CN105182185A (en) | Line fault identification method based on directional current construction |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |