CN107038516B - Quantitative evaluation method for water-flooding development effect of medium-permeability complex fault block oil reservoir - Google Patents

Quantitative evaluation method for water-flooding development effect of medium-permeability complex fault block oil reservoir Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN107038516B
CN107038516B CN201610917476.0A CN201610917476A CN107038516B CN 107038516 B CN107038516 B CN 107038516B CN 201610917476 A CN201610917476 A CN 201610917476A CN 107038516 B CN107038516 B CN 107038516B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
evaluation
water
oil reservoir
development
oil
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201610917476.0A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN107038516A (en
Inventor
史毅娜
李中超
陈林媛
王自立
赵爱武
李长春
王君刚
万龙
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
China Petroleum and Chemical Corp
Exploration and Development Research Institute of Sinopec Zhongyuan Oilfield Co
Original Assignee
China Petroleum and Chemical Corp
Exploration and Development Research Institute of Sinopec Zhongyuan Oilfield Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by China Petroleum and Chemical Corp, Exploration and Development Research Institute of Sinopec Zhongyuan Oilfield Co filed Critical China Petroleum and Chemical Corp
Priority to CN201610917476.0A priority Critical patent/CN107038516B/en
Publication of CN107038516A publication Critical patent/CN107038516A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN107038516B publication Critical patent/CN107038516B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G06Q10/06395Quality analysis or management
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/02Agriculture; Fishing; Forestry; Mining
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02ATECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A10/00TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE at coastal zones; at river basins
    • Y02A10/40Controlling or monitoring, e.g. of flood or hurricane; Forecasting, e.g. risk assessment or mapping

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
  • Animal Husbandry (AREA)
  • Marine Sciences & Fisheries (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Investigation Of Foundation Soil And Reinforcement Of Foundation Soil By Compacting Or Drainage (AREA)
  • Earth Drilling (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a quantitative evaluation method for the water-flooding development effect of a medium-permeability complex fault block oil reservoir, and belongs to the field of oil field development oil reservoir engineering. On the basis of selecting factors influencing the water-flooding development effect of the medium-permeability complex fault-block oil reservoir, according to the influence degree of each factor on the development effect and the logic relation among the factors, the evaluation factors with relative independence and operability are determined, quantitative superposition and synthesis are carried out on the evaluation factors, an evaluation grade membership matrix capable of quantitatively evaluating the water-flooding development effect of the medium-permeability complex fault-block oil reservoir is established, and the purpose of quantitatively evaluating the water-flooding development effect of the medium-permeability complex fault-block oil reservoir is achieved. The method fully considers the common influence of each single factor on the oil reservoir, and the obtained unique quantitative evaluation result of the target oil reservoir can scientifically and accurately evaluate the water-flooding development effect of the medium-seepage complex fault-block oil reservoir, thereby providing objective basis for scientific decision of oil reservoir development and providing technical support for effective adjustment of oil reservoir development scheme.

Description

Quantitative evaluation method for water-flooding development effect of medium-permeability complex fault block oil reservoir
Technical Field
The invention relates to a quantitative evaluation method for the water-flooding development effect of a medium-permeability complex fault-block oil reservoir, belongs to the field of oil field development oil reservoir engineering, and particularly relates to the technical field of oil field development effect evaluation methods.
Background
The medium-permeability complex fault block oil reservoir is one of the main oil reservoir types of domestic sandstone oil reservoirs, and is characterized by complex structure, small oil-containing area of single fault block and small reserves. The oil reservoirs are generally developed in a water flooding mode, the well pattern adaptability is poor, flooding in broken blocks is serious, the residual oil at the corners of the broken blocks is rich, most of the oil reservoirs enter a high-water-content development stage at present, and the overall recovery ratio is low. How to quantitatively and accurately evaluate the water flooding development effect of the oil reservoir, and realize the benefit development of the oil reservoir, is an important content of concern and research of oilfield managers.
The main method for evaluating the conventional water flooding development effect comprises the following steps: (1) The development curve evaluation method is characterized in that development curves such as a water content-extraction degree curve, a water flooding index-extraction degree curve, a water storage rate-extraction degree curve and the like are commonly used, and the development effect is qualitatively evaluated through curve trend. Different development curves reflect the influence of different single factors on the development effect. In practical application, for the same oil reservoir, because the emphasis points of all single factors are different, mutually contradictory evaluation results can be obtained, so that the evaluation results cannot be applied; (2) The industry standard method is used for carrying out qualitative-semi-quantitative evaluation on the oil reservoir development effect according to the classification indexes according to the industry standard, and the oil reservoir development effect cannot be accurately evaluated due to the fact that the evaluation indexes are various and are difficult to take full accuracy, and the operability is poor; (3) According to the oil reservoir recovery ratio evaluation method, the oil reservoir recovery ratio is used as a basis for evaluating the oil reservoir development effect, and as the oil reservoir recovery ratio is a result predicted by utilizing the oil reservoir water drive characteristic curve, the accuracy of the result has strong dependence on the technical proficiency of oil reservoir engineers, the result predicted by different oil reservoir engineers of the same oil reservoir has larger difference, the artificially is stronger, and the development effect cannot be objectively and accurately reflected.
Application number 2015102223935 discloses a comprehensive evaluation method for the development effect of a water-flooding reservoir, which comprises the steps of grouping a plurality of water-flooding effect evaluation indexes from the perspective of fuzzy theory, introducing the indexes into an upper layer to form a hierarchical structure for layer-by-layer multi-level evaluation, dynamically adjusting and determining the index weight from the aspect of subjective and objective by utilizing a dynamic combination weighting method according to the actual production condition of an oil field, and comprehensively analyzing the evaluation result by utilizing a multiple fuzzy operator to obtain the final comprehensive evaluation result of the water-flooding effect. The evaluation method only evaluates according to the oil reservoir engineering indexes which embody the oil reservoir development characteristics, does not consider the development geological indexes which embody the oil reservoir self characteristics and the development economic indexes which embody the oil reservoir development benefits, and cannot comprehensively and accurately evaluate the water-flooding oil reservoir development effect.
Application number 2015101246658 discloses a method for evaluating water flooding development effect of a fracture-cavity type oil reservoir, which is limited to analysis of water flooding development effect of the fracture-cavity type oil reservoir and is not applicable to other oil reservoirs.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to overcome the defects of single consideration factor, manual and qualitative evaluation and low accuracy of the water flooding development effect in the prior art, and provides a quantitative evaluation method for the water flooding development effect of a medium-permeability complex fault-block oil reservoir.
On the basis of selecting factors influencing the water-flooding development effect of the medium-permeability complex fault-block oil reservoir, according to the influence degree of each factor on the development effect and the logic relation among the factors, the evaluation factors with relative independence and operability are determined, quantitative superposition and synthesis are carried out on the evaluation factors, an evaluation grade membership matrix capable of quantitatively evaluating the water-flooding development effect of the medium-permeability complex fault-block oil reservoir is established, and the purpose of quantitatively evaluating the water-flooding development effect of the medium-permeability complex fault-block oil reservoir is achieved.
The method specifically comprises the following steps:
1, selecting factors influencing the water-flooding development effect of the medium-permeability complex fault-block oil reservoir, and determining evaluation factors with relative independence and operability according to the influence degree of each factor on the development effect and the logic relationship among the factors.
1.1, selecting initial evaluation factors influencing oil deposit development according to the influence degree of oil deposit development factors on oil deposit development by utilizing development geology, oil deposit engineering, development management and development economic data related to oil deposit development;
1.2, screening evaluation factors with relative independence and operability as evaluation factors influencing oil deposit development according to the logical relation and the oil deposit engineering basic theory among the initial evaluation factors influencing the oil deposit development selected in the step 1.1 and combining with the current situation of oil deposit development. The following 8 evaluation factors are included: the water drive reserve control degree, the water drive reserve utilization degree, the water storage rate evaluation coefficient, the gas injection ratio, the comprehensive decline rate, the water content rise rate evaluation coefficient, the residual recoverable reserve oil extraction speed and the ton liquid cost evaluation coefficient.
And 2, establishing an evaluation grade membership matrix capable of quantitatively evaluating the water-flooding development effect of the medium-permeability complex fault block oil reservoir by utilizing the result of quantitatively superposing and synthesizing the evaluation factors which are screened out and influence the oil reservoir development.
2.1, determining the actual value of 8 evaluation factors by using an oil reservoir engineering method according to the current state of oil reservoir development;
2.1.1 extent of Water drive reserves control
Figure GDA0004091131730000021
L in the formula, the circumference of each oil sand body is km;
a-areas of oil sands, km 2
N i -geological reserves of oil sands, 10 4 t;
D-well spacing, km;
M i -the water drive control degree of each oil sand body, decimal;
m, developing unit water drive control degree, decimal;
2.1.2 extent of Water drive reserve utilization
L p /N=A+BL p
N OM =1/B
Figure GDA0004091131730000031
In which L P Cumulative liquid production, 10 4 t;
N-cumulative oil production, 10 4 t;
N OM Water drive control reserves, 10 4 t;
N P Geological reserves, 10 4 t;
R gm -the final recovery of the reservoir, decimal;
R PM -reserve utilization, decimal;
2.1.3 Water storage Rate evaluation coefficient
Figure GDA0004091131730000032
In E i -water retention under the ground, decimal;
ΔQ i stage-injection of water, 10 4 m 3
ΔQ w Stage extraction quantity, 10 4 m 3
Calculating recovery ratio
Figure GDA0004091131730000033
Figure GDA0004091131730000034
Mu in the middle R -oil-water viscosity ratio, decimal;
r-the extent of recovery, decimal;
Figure GDA0004091131730000035
2.1.4 injection to recovery ratio
Figure GDA0004091131730000036
IPR-injection ratio in the formula;
W i stage-injection of water, 10 4 m 3
Q o Stage oil production, 10 4 t;
Q w stage-Water yield, 10 4 m 3
B o -a volume coefficient;
γ o crude oil specific gravity, g/cm 3
2.1.5 comprehensive reduction Rate
Figure GDA0004091131730000041
Q in o1 -current year oil production with reduced daily output level at last year end, 10 4 t;
q o2 Check oil production in the current year, 10 4 t;
q o3 -New well annual oil production in the current year, 10 4 t;
2.1.6 Water cut-up evaluation coefficient
f' w =2.303·B'·N·f w ·(1-f w )
In B' — A-type water flooding curve LgW p Coefficients of linear regression =a '+b' ×n;
n-cumulative oil production, 10 4 t;
f w -comprehensive water content, decimal;
the expression of the actual water-containing rise rate is
Figure GDA0004091131730000042
F in w(i+1) -water content at time i+1;
f w(i-1) -the moisture content at time i-1;
R (i+1) -the extent of harvest at time i+1;
R (i-1) -the extent of extraction at time i-1;
Figure GDA0004091131730000043
Figure GDA0004091131730000044
definition of the calculation formula of F
Figure GDA0004091131730000051
In Deltaf i -the difference between the actual water cut increase rate and the theoretical water cut increase rate in the i th year;
M d ,N d k is respectively Deltaf i >0,<0, number of points=0;
the water content rising rate is evaluated by using an evaluation coefficient F of the water content rising rate, and the smaller the F value is, the higher the actual water content rising rate is close to the theoretical water content rising rate, so that the development effect is good; the larger the F value is, the worse the development effect is;
2.1.7 speed of oil recovery from residual recoverable reserves
Figure GDA0004091131730000052
In Q' o -oil production in the current year, 10 4 t;
N R The available reserves, 10 4 t;
N Upper part Accumulated oil production in last year, 10 4 t;
2.1.8 ton liquid cost evaluation coefficient
Figure GDA0004091131730000053
2.2, determining the threshold range of five evaluation grades of each factor in good, better, medium, worse and poor according to the industry standard of oilfield development level grading and combining with the development characteristics of medium-permeability complex fault block reservoirs;
2.3, determining the relation between the actual value of the evaluation factor and the threshold range by using membership functions of the evaluation factors and the threshold range of the evaluation grade, and establishing a fuzzy relation matrix I of the actual value of the evaluation factor and the threshold range;
2.4, establishing a quantitative matrix II of the mutual comparison relation of evaluation factors according to a 'Sady relative importance level table', determining the weight coefficient of each evaluation factor by using a method for solving the characteristic vector of the matrix through the matrix II, and establishing an evaluation factor weight coefficient matrix III;
and 2.5, performing fuzzy synthesis on the weight coefficient matrix III and the fuzzy relation matrix I to obtain an evaluation grade membership matrix IV for target oil reservoir development.
And 3, utilizing an evaluation grade membership matrix IV of the target oil reservoir development, and taking the evaluation grade of the maximum membership in the evaluation grade membership matrix IV of the target oil reservoir development as a quantitative evaluation result of the water flooding development effect of the medium-permeability complex fault block oil reservoir according to the principle of maximum membership.
The method has the advantages that on the basis of fully considering the common influence of each single factor on oil deposit development, 8 evaluation factors with relative independence and operability are selected for quantitative superposition and synthesis to form a unique quantitative evaluation result of oil deposit development, the evaluation process is simple and convenient and easy to operate, the obtained evaluation result can scientifically and accurately evaluate the water flooding development effect of the medium-seepage complex fault-block oil deposit, objective basis is provided for scientific decision of oil deposit development, technical support is provided for effective adjustment of an oil deposit development scheme, the basis of continuous stable yield of the oil deposit is tamped, and the purpose of improving the final recovery ratio of the oil deposit is achieved.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a technical scheme of the present invention;
fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of a triangle membership function.
Detailed Description
The following describes the embodiments of the present invention in further detail with reference to the evaluation example of the water flooding effect of the Pu city oilfield east sand second reservoir and the accompanying drawings, and as can be seen from fig. 1, the specific steps of the present invention are as follows:
1, selecting factors influencing the water flooding development effect of the oil deposit under the Pu urban oil field east region sand II, and determining evaluation factors with relative independence and operability according to the influence degree of each factor on the development effect and the logic relation among the factors.
1.1, utilizing development geology, oil deposit engineering, development management and development economic data related to oil deposit development under the second sand in the eastern region of the Pucheng oil field, and selecting initial evaluation factors which influence the water flooding development effect of the second sand in the eastern region according to the influence degree of oil deposit development factors on the oil deposit development, wherein the initial evaluation factors are shown in table 1;
TABLE 1 statistical table of initial evaluation factors affecting water-flooding effect of reservoir under sand two of east
Figure GDA0004091131730000061
Figure GDA0004091131730000071
1.2 according to the logical relation and the oil reservoir engineering basic theory between the initial evaluation factors which influence the water-flooding effect of the second oil reservoir in the east region and are selected in the step 1.1, the cause factors which have causal relation in the initial evaluation factors and are shown in the table 2 are removed, the redundant factors which have equivalence relation in the initial evaluation factors and are shown in the table 3 are removed, the process factors which have inheritance relation in the initial evaluation factors and are shown in the table 4 are removed, and the evaluation factors which have relative independence and operability are obtained to serve as the evaluation factors which influence the water-flooding effect of the second oil reservoir in the east region. 8 evaluation factors of the oil deposit development effect under the east China sand II are determined as shown in table 5.
TABLE 2 cause factors
Sequence number Factors of
1 Constructional features
2 Deposition type
3 Physical characteristics
4 Reservoir characterization
5 Fluid properties
6 Reserve characteristics
TABLE 3 superfluous factors
Figure GDA0004091131730000072
Figure GDA0004091131730000081
TABLE 4 Process factors
Sequence number Factors of
1 Comprehensive water content
2 Reserve characteristics
3 Residual recoverable reserve
4 Oil recovery rate from geological reserves
5 Water flooding condition
6 Single well control (residual) recoverable reserves
7 Density of well pattern
8 Layer-by-layer division
9 Injection and production correspondence rate
10 Percentage of water absorption thickness
11 Calibrating recovery ratio
TABLE 5 evaluation factors of Water flooding effect of reservoir under Dongdistrict sand two
Sequence number Factors of
1 Degree of water drive reserve control
2 Degree of water drive reserve
3 Water storage rate evaluation coefficient
4 Ratio of injection to production
5 Coefficient of water cut-up rate evaluation
6 Comprehensive reduction rate
7 Oil recovery rate from residual recoverable reserves
8 Ton liquid cost evaluation coefficient
And 2, establishing an evaluation grade membership matrix capable of quantitatively evaluating the water-flooding development effect of the oil deposit under the second sand in the east region by utilizing the result of quantitatively superposing and synthesizing the evaluation factors which are screened out and influence the development of the oil deposit under the second sand in the east region.
2.1 determining the actual value of the 8-term eastern region sand two-under-sand oil reservoir water-driving effect evaluation factors according to the eastern region sand two-under-sand oil reservoir development data from 1 st 1999 to 12 2015 by using an oil reservoir engineering method, as shown in table 6;
TABLE 6 actual values of reservoir Water flooding effect evaluation factors under Dongdistrict sand two
Figure GDA0004091131730000082
Figure GDA0004091131730000091
2.2, determining the threshold range of five evaluation grades of each evaluation factor in good, better, medium, worse and bad according to the industry standard of oilfield development level grading and combining the characteristics of oil deposit development under the second sand in the east region, as shown in table 7;
TABLE 7 evaluation factor threshold Range
Figure GDA0004091131730000092
2.3, determining the membership degree of the actual value of the water-flooding effect evaluation factor of the oil deposit under the second east sand in the evaluation level threshold range shown in table 8 by utilizing a triangle membership degree schematic diagram of each evaluation factor and the evaluation level threshold range shown in fig. 2, and establishing a fuzzy relation matrix I of the actual value of the water-flooding effect evaluation factor of the oil deposit under the second east sand in the threshold range;
TABLE 8 membership table for evaluation factors of water-flooding effect of oil reservoir under sand two east regions
Figure GDA0004091131730000093
Figure GDA0004091131730000101
Dongdistrict Shadi fuzzy relation matrix I
Figure GDA0004091131730000102
2.4 according to a 'Sadi relative importance level table' shown in table 9, determining a quantitative data table of the mutual comparison relation of evaluation factors shown in table 10, establishing a quantitative matrix II of the mutual comparison relation of the evaluation factors of the water flooding effect of the oil deposit under the second sand in the east region, determining the weight coefficient of each evaluation factor shown in table 11 by utilizing a method for solving the characteristic vector of the matrix through the matrix II, and establishing a weight coefficient matrix III of the evaluation factor of the water flooding effect of the oil deposit under the second sand in the east region;
table 9 table of relative importance of saidi
Scale with a scale bar Meaning of
1 The two elements have the same importance compared with each other
3 The former is slightly more important than the latter than the two elements
5 The former is significantly more important than the latter than the two elements
7 The former is of greater importance than the latter in comparison with the two elements
9 The former is extremely important compared with the latter in comparison with two elements
2,4,6,8 Intermediate value representing the above-mentioned adjacency judgment
Reciprocal count The latter is important than the former
Table 10 quantitative data table of comparative relationship between evaluation factors under Sha two in east China
Figure GDA0004091131730000103
Figure GDA0004091131730000111
Quantitative matrix II of comparative relation between evaluation factors under Dongdistrict Sha two
Figure GDA0004091131730000112
Table 11 evaluation factor weight coefficient
Figure GDA0004091131730000113
Factor weight coefficient matrix III for evaluating water-flooding development effect of oil reservoir under second sand in east China
A=(0.31460.18190.12520.11550.10440.09470.04470.0191)
And 2.5, carrying out fuzzy synthesis on the weight coefficient matrix III and the fuzzy relation matrix I to obtain an evaluation grade membership matrix IV of the water flooding development effect of the oil deposit under the second sand in the east region.
Matrix ivb=a×r
Figure GDA0004091131730000114
B=(0.58410.2759000.1400)
And 3, quantitatively evaluating the water-flooding development effect of the oil deposit under the second sand in the east region by utilizing an evaluation grade membership matrix IV of the water-flooding development effect of the oil deposit under the second sand in the east region.
According to the principle of 'maximum membership', the maximum 0.5841 in the evaluation grade membership matrix IV of the water flooding effect of the oil deposit under the second east region sand is positioned at the 'good' position, and the evaluation result of the water flooding effect of the oil deposit under the second east region sand of the Pucheng oil field can be determined to be 'good'.
The evaluation result of the water-flooding development effect of the oil deposit under the second sand in the east China is good, which indicates that the current water-flooding development effect of the oil deposit under the second sand in the east China is good, the design of the oil deposit development scheme is reasonable, and the current development scheme should be continuously implemented.
The evaluation result is consistent with the actual production condition of the oil reservoir site under the second sand in the east region, and the evaluation method is scientific and accurate.

Claims (3)

1. A quantitative evaluation method for the water-flooding development effect of a medium-permeability complex fault-block oil reservoir is characterized in that on the basis of selecting factors influencing the water-flooding development effect of the medium-permeability complex fault-block oil reservoir, evaluation factors with relative independence and operability are determined according to the influence degree of each factor on the development effect and the logic relation among the factors, quantitative superposition and synthesis are carried out on the evaluation factors, and an evaluation grade membership matrix capable of quantitatively evaluating the water-flooding development effect of the medium-permeability complex fault-block oil reservoir is established; the method comprises the following steps:
(1) Selecting factors influencing the water-flooding development effect of the medium-permeability complex fault-block oil reservoir, and determining evaluation factors with relative independence and operability according to the influence degree of each factor on the development effect and the logic relation among the factors;
(2) Establishing an evaluation grade membership matrix capable of quantitatively evaluating the water-flooding development effect of the medium-permeability complex fault block oil reservoir by utilizing the result of quantitatively superposing and synthesizing the screened evaluation factors influencing the oil reservoir development;
(3) Using an evaluation grade membership matrix IV of target oil reservoir development, and taking the evaluation grade of the maximum membership in the evaluation grade membership matrix IV of target oil reservoir development as a quantitative evaluation result of the water-flooding development effect of the medium-permeability complex fault-block oil reservoir according to the principle of maximum membership;
in the step (1), the evaluation factors with relative independence and operability are water drive reserve control degree, water drive reserve utilization degree, water storage rate evaluation coefficient, gas injection ratio, comprehensive reduction rate, water content rise rate evaluation coefficient, residual recoverable reserve oil extraction speed and ton liquid cost evaluation coefficient; the evaluation criteria for each evaluation factor were as follows:
1.1 extent of Water drive reserves control
M i =1-0.47·D·L 0.5 A 0.75
Figure FDA0004091131720000011
L in the formula, the circumference of each oil sand body is km;
a-areas of oil sands, km 2
N i -geological reserves of oil sands, 10 4 t;
D-well spacing, km;
M i -water driving and controlling of each oil sand bodyDegree of preparation, decimal;
m, developing unit water drive control degree, decimal;
1.2 extent of Water drive reserve utilization
L p /N=A+BL p
N OM =1B
Figure FDA0004091131720000012
In which L P Cumulative liquid production, 10 4 t;
N-cumulative oil production, 10 4 t;
N OM Water drive control reserves, 10 4 t;
N P Geological reserves, 10 4 t;
R gm -the final recovery of the reservoir, decimal;
R PM -reserve utilization, decimal;
1.3 Water storage Rate evaluation coefficient
Figure FDA0004091131720000021
In E i -water retention under the ground, decimal;
ΔQ i stage-injection of water, 10 4 m 3
ΔQ w Stage extraction quantity, 10 4 m 3
Calculating recovery ratio
Figure FDA0004091131720000022
Figure FDA0004091131720000023
Mu in the middle R Viscosity of oil and waterA fraction;
r-the extent of recovery, decimal;
Figure FDA0004091131720000024
1.4 injection to production ratio
Figure FDA0004091131720000025
IPR-injection ratio in the formula;
W i stage-injection of water, 10 4 m 3
Q o Stage oil production, 10 4 t;
Q w stage-Water yield, 10 4 m 3
B o -a volume coefficient;
γ o crude oil specific gravity, g/cm 3
1.5 comprehensive reduction Rate
Figure FDA0004091131720000031
Q in o1 -current year oil production with reduced daily output level at last year end, 10 4 t;
q o2 Check oil production in the current year, 10 4 t;
q o3 -New well annual oil production in the current year, 10 4 t;
1.6 Water cut-up evaluation coefficient
f′ w =2.303·B'·N·f w ·(1-f w )
In B' — A-type water flooding curve LgW p Coefficients of linear regression =a '+b' ×n;
n-cumulative oil production, 10 4 t;
f w Heald-a healdMixing the water and decimal;
the expression of the actual water-containing rise rate is
Figure FDA0004091131720000032
F in w(i+1) -water content at time i+1;
f w(i-1) -the moisture content at time i-1;
R (i+1) -the extent of harvest at time i+1;
R (i-1) -the extent of extraction at time i-1;
Figure FDA0004091131720000033
Figure FDA0004091131720000034
definition of the calculation formula of F
Figure FDA0004091131720000035
In Deltaf i -the difference between the actual water cut increase rate and the theoretical water cut increase rate in the i th year;
M d ,N d k is respectively Deltaf i >0,<0, number of points=0;
the water content rising rate is evaluated by using an evaluation coefficient F of the water content rising rate, and the smaller the F value is, the higher the actual water content rising rate is close to the theoretical water content rising rate, so that the development effect is good; the larger the F value is, the worse the development effect is;
1.7 oil recovery speed from residual recoverable reserves
Figure FDA0004091131720000041
In Q' o -oil production in the current year, 10 4 t;
N R The available reserves, 10 4 t;
N Upper part Accumulated oil production in last year, 10 4 t;
1.8 ton liquid cost evaluation coefficient
Figure FDA0004091131720000042
2. The quantitative evaluation method for the water-flooding development effect of the medium-permeability complex fault block oil reservoir is characterized in that evaluation factors with relative independence and operability for development of the oil reservoir of the target block are determined according to the following method:
(1) The initial evaluation factors influencing the oil deposit development are selected according to the influence degree of the oil deposit development factors on the oil deposit development by utilizing the development geology, the oil deposit engineering, the development management and the development economic data related to the oil deposit development;
(2) According to the logical relation and the oil reservoir engineering basic theory among the initial evaluation factors which are selected in the step (1) and influence the oil reservoir development, and combining with the current situation of the oil reservoir development, the evaluation factors with relative independence and operability are screened to be used as the evaluation factors which influence the oil reservoir development.
3. The quantitative evaluation method for the water-flooding development effect of the medium-permeability complex fault-block oil reservoir according to claim 1, wherein the method for establishing the evaluation grade membership degree capable of quantitatively evaluating the water-flooding development effect of the medium-permeability complex fault-block oil reservoir by utilizing the result of quantitatively superposing and synthesizing the evaluation factors which are screened out to influence the oil reservoir development comprises the following steps:
(1) Determining the actual value of 8 evaluation factors by using an oil reservoir engineering method according to the current state of oil reservoir development;
(2) According to the industry standard of oilfield development level classification, combining with the development characteristics of the medium-permeability complex fault block oil reservoir, determining the threshold range of five evaluation grades of each factor, namely good, better, medium, worse and worse;
(3) Determining the relation between the actual value of the evaluation factor and the threshold range by using membership functions of the evaluation factors and the threshold range of the evaluation level, and establishing a fuzzy relation matrix I of the actual value of the evaluation factor and the threshold range;
(4) According to a 'Sadi relative importance level table', establishing a quantitative matrix II of the mutual comparison relation of evaluation factors, determining the weight coefficient of each evaluation factor by a method for solving the characteristic vector of the matrix through the matrix II, and establishing an evaluation factor weight coefficient matrix III;
(5) And carrying out fuzzy synthesis on the weight coefficient matrix III and the fuzzy relation matrix I to obtain an evaluation grade membership matrix IV for target oil reservoir development.
CN201610917476.0A 2016-10-20 2016-10-20 Quantitative evaluation method for water-flooding development effect of medium-permeability complex fault block oil reservoir Active CN107038516B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201610917476.0A CN107038516B (en) 2016-10-20 2016-10-20 Quantitative evaluation method for water-flooding development effect of medium-permeability complex fault block oil reservoir

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201610917476.0A CN107038516B (en) 2016-10-20 2016-10-20 Quantitative evaluation method for water-flooding development effect of medium-permeability complex fault block oil reservoir

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN107038516A CN107038516A (en) 2017-08-11
CN107038516B true CN107038516B (en) 2023-06-06

Family

ID=59532958

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201610917476.0A Active CN107038516B (en) 2016-10-20 2016-10-20 Quantitative evaluation method for water-flooding development effect of medium-permeability complex fault block oil reservoir

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN107038516B (en)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107965301B (en) * 2017-10-26 2020-06-09 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Quantitative evaluation method for water injection process of digital oil field
CN108229811B (en) * 2017-12-29 2022-01-21 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Method for evaluating water injection effect of fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoir
CN109403962A (en) * 2018-10-15 2019-03-01 西南石油大学 Oil reservoir block Monitoring Indexes association analysis method
CN111550231B (en) * 2019-02-11 2022-03-04 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Evaluation method for perfection degree of basic well pattern of fracture-cavity oil reservoir
CN111734372B (en) * 2020-07-18 2022-08-19 森诺科技有限公司 Method for quantitatively evaluating influence of water injection temperature on different oil reservoir development effects
CN113969770B (en) * 2020-07-23 2024-07-16 中国石油化工股份有限公司 High-pressure energy storage-body-to-body release type volumetric water drive development method for side water reservoir water body
CN112267859B (en) * 2020-11-09 2022-10-04 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Periodic water injection reservoir screening quantitative evaluation method
CN115422789B (en) * 2022-11-07 2023-03-24 中国石油大学(华东) Prediction method and system for optimizing water drive recovery ratio of fault block oil reservoir in consideration of whole process

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104484556A (en) * 2014-11-28 2015-04-01 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Oil field development evaluation method

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104376420A (en) * 2014-11-20 2015-02-25 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Water breakthrough risk evaluation method and evaluation device for gas well with water gas reservoir

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104484556A (en) * 2014-11-28 2015-04-01 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Oil field development evaluation method

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
断块油藏井网调整效果评判体系和方法;贾祥军 等;《化学工程与装备》;20130131(第1期);第100-103页 *
特低丰度薄层油藏水平井开发效果评价体系研究;聂彬 等;《油气井测试》;20131031;第22卷(第5期);第14-17页 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN107038516A (en) 2017-08-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN107038516B (en) Quantitative evaluation method for water-flooding development effect of medium-permeability complex fault block oil reservoir
CN108843286B (en) Technical method for layered oil production well selection
CN110259444B (en) Water drive reservoir seepage field visual characterization and evaluation method based on flow field diagnosis
CN104134101A (en) Low-permeability reservoir natural gas productivity prediction method
CN105386751B (en) A kind of horizontal wellbore logging PRODUCTION FORECASTING METHODS based on reservoir model
CN106150477A (en) A kind of method determining single well controlled reserves
CN105930932B (en) The acquisition methods of shale gas-bearing formation standardization open-flow capacity based on gassiness index
CN104794361A (en) Comprehensive evaluation method for water flooding oil reservoir development effect
CN105134191A (en) Method for evaluating reserves of tight oil well
CN103912248A (en) Method for predicting water content of water-flooding oil field
CN106894800A (en) A kind of profile control well selection decision-making technique suitable for Offshore Heavy Oil Field oil reservoir
CN104712328B (en) The method of single flow unit producing status in Fast Evaluation Complex Reservoir
CN110533237A (en) A kind of sandstone reservoir oily PRODUCTION FORECASTING METHODS
KR20180026842A (en) Method for decline curve analysis according to cumulative production incline rate in unconventional gas field
CN112196513A (en) Longmaxi group shale gas well productivity prediction method based on horizontal well trajectory evaluation
CN116950654A (en) Low-permeability compact sandstone gas reservoir development effect evaluation method
CN107545102B (en) Method for predicting development index of steam assisted gravity drainage in newly developed area
CN117868790A (en) Sandstone gas reservoir horizontal well yield prediction method based on logging curve characteristic recombination
CN105718720A (en) Complex gas reservoir reserve quality classification comprehensive evaluation method
CN112765527B (en) Shale gas resource amount calculation method and system
CN106481315A (en) Land sandstone oil reservoir individual well recoverable reserves quickly determines model and method for building up
CN107355200A (en) One kind receives micron particles dispersion improving ecology well choosing method
CN116562428A (en) Fracturing construction parameter optimization method based on machine learning
CN114066166A (en) Cltobalite low-permeability reservoir CO2Miscible flooding screening method
CN111287739B (en) Residual oil distribution prediction method based on stratum crude oil viscosity

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant