CN106971270A - A kind of electronics use the appraisal procedure of applicability - Google Patents
A kind of electronics use the appraisal procedure of applicability Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106971270A CN106971270A CN201710201226.1A CN201710201226A CN106971270A CN 106971270 A CN106971270 A CN 106971270A CN 201710201226 A CN201710201226 A CN 201710201226A CN 106971270 A CN106971270 A CN 106971270A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- equipment
- represent
- adaptability
- task
- formula
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The technical field of the equipment performance easily influenceed the present invention relates to complex electromagnetic environment by electromagnetic signal, the appraisal procedure that a kind of electronics use applicability is disclosed, using to human engineering, use environment, using task, operational support and using the evaluation problem for the 5 subitem adaptability such as weaving into.Set up the level evaluation index system of 5 subitem adaptability, assuming that being separate between the key element of each level, so on the basis of relative importance between considering the similar key element of same level, the weighted sum model based on addition rule is selected to carry out the polymerization of the similar key element of same level, for the polymerization of 5 subitem adaptability, same model is also selected based on same thinking.The present invention can realize the comprehensive analysis to equipping multiple multiple influence factors of performance and its primary-slave relation is ranked up.
Description
Technical field
The technical field of the equipment performance easily influenceed the present invention relates to complex electromagnetic environment by electromagnetic signal, more particularly to one
Plant the appraisal procedure that electronics use applicability.
Background technology
At present, environmental factor, particularly complex electromagnetic environment are on the influence point of the equipment performance easily influenceed by electromagnetic signal
Analysis is always one of generally acknowledged problem.Current analysis method difinite quality is analyzed, single factor test quantitative analysis and single performance are multifactor
Quantitative analysis method.And actual equipment performance has a variety of, while being influenceed by multiple electromagnetic environment factors, current qualitative point
Analysis and single factor test quantitative analysis method can not all carry out comprehensive analysis to influence factor and its primary-slave relation be ranked up, unisexuality
The multifactor quantitative analysis of energy ignores the globality of equipment performance.Because electronics Operational Suitability is assessed, to be related to factor more,
Particularly relation of the people between loop, each key element is complicated, and increase assessment models sets up difficulty.
The content of the invention
It is an object of the invention to provide the appraisal procedure that a kind of electronics use applicability.It can realize multiple to equipping
The comprehensive analysis of the multiple influence factors of performance is simultaneously ranked up to its primary-slave relation.
For achieving the above object, the technical solution adopted by the present invention is as follows:
1st, a kind of electronics use the appraisal procedure of applicability, set up the level evaluation index of 5 subitem adaptability
System, it is assumed that be separate between the key element of each level, so relatively heavy between the similar key element of same level is considered
On the basis of the property wanted, the weighted sum model based on addition rule is selected to carry out the polymerization of the similar key element of same level, its step is such as
Under:
1), human engineering adaptability, electronics human engineering adaptability refers to electronics during operational exertion,
Those influence combatant, including maintenance personal using electronics efficiently accomplish using task system operatio, using safety,
The key elements such as man-machine interface, including operational exertion security, software and hardware man-machine interface, man-computer cooperation and man-machine protection;
(1) human engineering adaptability teaching index system, according to the key issue and its index decomposition of applicability, man-machine work
Journey adaptability teaching sets up evaluation index system, first respectively to operational exertion security, software and hardware man-machine interface, man-computer cooperation
Property and man-machine protection carry out test assessment, comprehensive assessment is then carried out on this basis;
(2) human engineering adaptability unit evaluation model
1. operational exertion safety evaluation model, electronics operational exertion security refers to during operational exertion,
Electronics can effectively suppress or avoid occurring causing casualties, equipment damage or other losses accident
Ability;Operational exertion security is mainly reflected in electronics and avoids the ability of accident and two aspects of ability of control hidden danger,
Therefore during electronics use the dangerous possibility occurred and the serious of consequence occurs for operational exertion safety evaluation
Measured in terms of property, its assessment models is
Ssaf=θsaf·(wsaf-1Ssaf-1+wsaf-2Ssaf-2+wsaf-3Ssaf-3+wsaf-4Ssaf-4) (1)
S in formulasafRepresent operational exertion safety evaluation achievement, θsafRepresent factor of influence, Ssaf-1~Ssaf-4Represent respectively
Dangerous, the serious level of disaster level is dangerous, the safety evaluation achievement that slight level is dangerous, slight level is dangerous, wsaf-1~wsaf-4Difference table
Show its weight;The possibility and the seriousness of generation consequence that the evaluation score of 4 kinds of danger classes occurs by danger carry out comprehensive
Close and weigh;
2. operational exertion man-computer cooperation assessment models, electronics system constitute it is complicated, with user of service, battlefield surroundings
Constitute typical human-machine ring system;Therefore the performance of electronics fighting efficiency, the both fight capability with electronics in itself
It is relevant, the ability and quality of commanding, operating personnel are more dependent upon, the combination of personnel and equipment architecture is again by environmental condition
Restriction;
It is to personnel's degree of fatigue, operation convenience and car in certain use time that operational exertion man-computer cooperation, which is assessed,
Noise size, exhaust gas concentration, the synthesis of oscillation intensity of interior environment;Operational exertion man-computer cooperation model is
Smm=θmm·(wmm-1Smm-1+wmm-2Smm-2+wmm-3Smm-3) (2)
S in formulammRepresent operational exertion man-computer cooperation evaluation score, θmmRepresent factor of influence, Smm-1、Smm-2And Smm-3Point
Not Biao Shi personnel's degree of fatigue, operation convenience and environment inside car evaluation score, wmm-1、wmm-2And wmm-3Represent that it is weighed respectively
Weight;
3. software and hardware man-machine interface assessment models, performance of the software and hardware man-machine interface to electronics fighting efficiency has certainly
Qualitative effect, includes the property grasped, accessibility and the operation difficulty of hardware man-machine interface, and software man-machine interface close friend
Property, robustness and operation difficulty;Software and hardware man-machine interface assessment models are
S in formulashmRepresent software and hardware man-machine interface evaluation score, Sshm-i(i=1,2 ..., 6) the man-machine boundary of hardware is represented respectively
The assessment of the property grasped in face, accessibility, the friendly of operation difficulty and software man-machine interface, robustness and operation difficulty into
Achievement, wshm-i(i=1,2 ..., 6) its weight is represented respectively;
4. man-machine Supportability Evaluation model, man-machine protection is in order to maintain the people required for electronics continuous firing
Power and personnel ensure, trained and training support, the synthesis of technical data key element;Man-machine Supportability Evaluation model is
Smms=wmms-1Smms-1+wmms-2Smms-2+wmms-3Smms-3 (4)
S in formulammsRepresent man-machine Supportability Evaluation achievement, Smms-1、Smms-2And Smms-3Personnel's guarantee, Ren Yuanxun are represented respectively
Practice the evaluation score for ensureing and being ensured with technological document, wmms-1、wmms-2And wmms-3Its weight is represented respectively;Wherein technological document is protected
Barrier is again by being checked and being evaluated in terms of the Qi Taoxing of technological document, readability, correctness, and its assessment models is
In formulaDifference presentation technology document integrity, readability, the evaluation score of correctness, Its weight is represented respectively;
(3) human engineering adaptability Integrated Evaluation Model, integrates equipment human engineering under single Task Action and adapts to first
The evaluation score of property, its model is
In formulaRepresent the evaluation score of electronics human engineering adaptability under ith Task Action, wsaf、wmm、
wshm、wmmsOperational exertion security, man-computer cooperation, software and hardware man-machine interface, the weight of man-machine protection are represented respectively;
Electronics human engineering adaptability teaching is to electronics human engineering adaptability under multiple Task Action
Comprehensive, its assessment models is
S in formulammcThe comprehensive assessment achievement of electronics human engineering adaptability is represented,Represent ith Task Action
The weight of lower electronics human engineering adaptability;
2) use environments adaptability, electronics use environment adaptability refers to electronics during operational exertion,
Adapt to use environment condition and the ability that can effectively work;
(1) use environment adaptability teaching index system, use environment include battlefield natural environment, joint fires environment,
Battle Field Electromagnetic, battlefield transportation environment, the physical compatibility of environment;According to the key issue and its index of Operational Suitability point
Solution, use environment adaptability teaching sets up evaluation index system;
(2) use environment adaptability unit evaluation model
1. battlefield natural environment adaptability teaching model, battlefield natural environment adaptability, refer to weaponry different
The degree normally used is able to maintain that close under the natural environmental condition of battlefield surroundings;Battlefield natural environmental condition varies,
Species is various, is divided into ground surface environment, weather environment, hydrological environment, empty day environment;Battlefield natural environment adaptability teaching model is
S in formulanecRepresent battlefield natural environment adaptability teaching achievement, Snec-iRepresent i-th kind of typical natural environment adaptability
Evaluation score, wnec-iThe weight of the typical natural environment in adaptability teaching is represented, n represents the sum of typical natural environment
Amount;
2. Battle Field Electromagnetic adaptability teaching model,
Equip intensive with frequency between ourselves and the enemy on future battlefield, the struggle of contention electromagnetic spectrum is extremely fierce and carries throughout,
Remove and be difficult to the natural electromagnetic phenomena that overcomes and complicated domestic electromagnetic signal, signal of communication between ourselves and the enemy, radar signal, lead
It is new general that a variety of electromagnetic waves such as boat positioning signal constitute sufficiently complex and severe Battle Field Electromagnetic, particularly electromagnetic pulse etc.
Read further using for weapon so that the residing Battle Field Electromagnetic of equipment more deteriorates, and various weaponrys are entirely being fought
It is on all the time not by electromagnetic interference and destruction from itself and opponent so that the fight capability of itself by
Stern challenge.Therefore, the Battle Field Electromagnetic adaptability to weaponry is estimated, for improve its battlefield survivability and
Fight capability tool is of great significance;Battle Field Electromagnetic adaptability teaching can be to weaponry background electromagnetic hoop
Border adaptability, electromagnetism compacting interference environmental suitability, electromagnetic deception interference environment adaptability and electromagnetism injure environmental suitability point
On the basis of not being estimated, comprehensive electromagnetic environment is built by the joint effect for considering these four environment, and to weapon
Equipment Battlefield electromagnetic environment adaptability carries out net assessment, and its assessment models is
S in formulaeecRepresent Battle Field Electromagnetic adaptability teaching achievement, Seec-1、…、Seec-4Background electromagnetic letter is represented respectively
Number environment, electromagnetism compacting interference environment, electromagnetic deception interference environment and electromagnetism injure the adaptability teaching achievement of environment,
weec-1、…、weec-4Its weight is represented respectively.
3. battlefield transportation environment adaptability teaching model
Battlefield transportation environment adaptability refers to weaponry in whole Campaign Process, passes through existing or plan public affairs
The means of transportation such as road, railway, water route and aviation implement a kind of motor-driven ability in battlefield.Battlefield transportation environment adaptability teaching model
For
Stec=wtec-1Stec-1+wtec-2Stec-2+wtec-3Stec-3+wtec-4Stec-4 (10)
S in formulatecRepresent battlefield transportation environment adaptability teaching achievement, Stec-1~Stec-4Highway, railway, water are represented respectively
The transportation environment adaptability teaching achievement such as road and aviation, wtec-1~wtec-4The fortune such as highway, railway, water route and aviation is represented respectively
Weight of the defeated environment in adaptability teaching;
4. evaluation on environment adjustability model is hit in battlefield, and Strike is the main purpose of confrontation on the battlefield, Strike bag
Include conventional hard destruction, soft compacting, information deception and core biochemistry strike;Hit evaluation on environment adjustability model in battlefield
Ssec=wsec-1Ssec-1+wsec-2Ssec-2 (11)
S in formulasecRepresent battlefield strike evaluation on environment adjustability achievement, Ssec-1Represent conventional Strike environmental suitability
Evaluation score, wsec-1Represent its weight, Ssec-2Represent core biochemistry strike evaluation on environment adjustability achievement, wsec-2Represent its weight;
5. physical compatibility assessment models, physical compatibility is primarily referred to as the parts such as the rack of weaponry, antenna whole
Individual armament systems meter and the matching capacity of appearance and size, weight etc. in assembling, its assessment models is
Sphc=wphc-1Sphc-1+wphc-2Sphc-2 (12)
S in formulaphcRepresent the physical compatibility evaluation score of equipment, Sphc-1Represent that the physical space size matching of equipment is commented
Estimate achievement, wphc-1Represent its weight, Sphc-2Represent the weight-matched evaluation score of equipment, wphc-2Represent its weight;
(3) use environment adaptability Integrated Evaluation Model, it is to multiple Task Action that equipment use environment applicability, which is assessed,
The synthesis of lower equipment use environment applicability, its assessment models is
S in formulaoecThe comprehensive assessment achievement of equipment use environment adaptability is represented,Represent to fill under ith Task Action
The evaluation score of standby use environment adaptability,Represent its weight.According to above-mentioned adaptability unit evaluation model,Calculation
Method is
In formulaRepresent that equipment Battlefield natural environment is adapted under ith Task Action respectively
Property, electromagnetic environment adaptability, transportation environment adaptability, strike environmental suitability, the evaluation score of physical compatibility, Its weight is represented respectively;
3) uses task compatibility, refers to combat forces using task to reach the task that the predetermined purpose of operation is undertaken,
Determined, and assigned in the form of combat order by higher level commander;By type, be divided into attack using task and defence using appoint
Business;
(1) task compatibility evaluation index system is used, weaponry refers to weaponry in work using task compatibility
Fight during use, fight integrity and the ability for continuing fight capability can be kept in the use task being continually changing;Root
According to the key issue and its index decomposition of Operational Suitability, weaponry is assessed using task compatibility and sets up evaluation index body
System;Test assessment analysis is carried out from two levels using task compatibility, is that the war using required by task is completed to equipment first
Bucket integrity and the fight capability that continues carry out test assessment analysis respectively, followed by comprehensive fight integrity and lasting operation energy
On the basis of the analysis of power test assessment, to carrying out comprehensive analysis assessment using task compatibility;
(2) task compatibility unit evaluation model is used
1. execution task rate assessment models are entirely capable of, be entirely capable of execution task rate refer to equipment be able to carry out it is all as defined in
The percentage that equipment possesses the time is usually accounted for the time of wartime mission;Being entirely capable of execution task rate assessment models is
S in formulactwRepresent that equipment is entirely capable of the evaluation score of execution task rate, fctw() represents that equipment is entirely capable of performing and appointed
The evaluation score conversion function of business rate, TctwRepresent that equipment is entirely capable of performing task time (hour), TtotalWhen representing that equipment possesses
Between (hour);
2. part can perform task rate assessment models, can partly perform task rate and refer to equip be able to carry out that it accepts flat
When and wartime mission in part, rather than the time of whole task account for the percentage that equipment possesses the time;Part, which can be performed, appoints
Business rate assessment models are
S in formulaptwRepresent that equipment part can perform the evaluation score of task rate, fptw() represents that equipment part can be performed and appointed
The evaluation score conversion function of business rate, TptwRepresent that equipment part can perform task time (hour);
3. task rate assessment models can be performed, can perform task rate refer to equip be able to carry out part or all of task when
Between account for equipment and possess the percentage of time;Task rate assessment models, which can be performed, is
S in formulattwRepresent that equipment can perform the evaluation score of task rate, fttw() represents that equipment can perform commenting for task rate
Estimate achievement conversion function, TttwRepresent that equipment can perform task time (hour), be that equipment is entirely capable of performing task time and part
Task time sum can be performed;
4. utilization rate assessment models are equipped, equipment utilization rate refers to be equipped in each related period, one day or one
Working hours or work times in individual use duty cycle;Equipment utilization rate assessment models are expressed as
Or
S in formulaeurRepresent the evaluation score of equipment utilization rate, feur() represents the evaluation score conversion letter of equipment utilization rate
Number, TpworkRepresent to be equipped in daily or one using the hours worked in duty cycle, TperiodExpression be equipped in daily or
Person one uses the hours worked possessed in duty cycle, NpworkExpression is equipped in daily or one using in duty cycle
Work times, NperiodRepresent to be equipped in daily or one using the work times possessed in duty cycle;
5. mission reliability assessment models
Mission reliability refers to be equipped in the stipulated time in the defined mission duration or entered after task status
It is interior, in upstate and the probability of its predetermined function can be completed;The basis of mission reliability is that the equipment in task time can
By property, mission reliability does not consider equipment Maintainability.For the equipment with exponential failure rule, mission reliability is defined as
T is Average Task Time in formula, and MTBCF average key time between failures is the task necessary function of equipment, is appointed
Don't fail to function be that system completes the function that must use of task, the Mean Time Between Replacement broken down;Then there is task can
It is by property assessment models
Srtw=frtw(MR) (21)
S in formulartwRepresent the evaluation score of equipment mission reliability, frtw() represent equipment mission reliability assessment into
Achievement converts function;
6. task rate assessment models are exited, equipment exits task rate and referred to due to one or more of task necessary function
Function is determined " can not work ", and the time percentage that equipment is exited from accepting for task.The task rate of exiting is commented
Estimating model is
S in formulaqtwRepresent that equipment exits the evaluation score of task rate, fqtw() represent equipment exit the assessment of task rate into
Achievement converts function, TqtwRepresent the working time number equipped before being exited from accepting for task;
(3) task compatibility Integrated Evaluation Model is used
1. equipment under task compatibility assessment models, single Task Action is intended for single use and uses task compatibility assessment models
For
Stasc=wtintStint+wtsusStsus (23)
S in formulatascRepresent that equipment uses the comprehensive assessment achievement of task compatibility, S under single Task Actiontint、StsusPoint
The evaluation score of fought using task integrity and lasting fight capability, w Biao Shi not equippedtint、wtsusIts weight is represented respectively;
Wherein using task fight integrity evaluation score StintComputation model be
Stint=wctwSctw+wptwSptw+wttwSttw (24)
W in formulactw、wptw、wttwRepresent be entirely capable of execution task rate, can partly perform task rate, task rate can be performed respectively
The weight of project;
Continue Operational Capability Assessment achievement S using tasktsusComputation model be
Stsus=weurSeur+wrtwSrtw+wqtwSqtw (25)
W in formulaeur、wrtw、wqtwRepresent equipment utilization rate, mission reliability respectively and exit the power of the projects such as task rate
Weight;
2. task compatibility Integrated Evaluation Model is used, multiple Task Action is polymerize, equipment is adapted to using task
The Integrated Evaluation Model of property is
S in formulataskComprehensive assessment achievement of the equipment using task compatibility is represented,Representing the equipment of ith task makes
With the evaluation score of task compatibility,Represent its weight;
4) operational supports adaptability
Operational support refers to the guarantee for directly serving in operation for meeting fight needs and organizing and implementing, including scouts
Information, warning, communication, confidential, message protection, target, engineering, traffic, camouflage, NBC protection, mapping navigation, meteoric water
Guarantee in terms of text, battlefield control, electromagnetic spectrum management, navigation, sonar, anti-dangerous lifesaving, navigator;Weaponry operational support,
Then refer to those to meet the various rows for directly serving in equipment deployment that weaponry is normally organized and implemented using needs
It is dynamic;
(1) operational support adaptability teaching index system, weaponry operational support adaptability refers to weaponry in work
Fight during use, according to the key issue and its index decomposition of Operational Suitability, operational support adaptability teaching, which is set up, to be assessed
Index system;Operational support applicability carries out test assessment analyses from two levels, first be to operation maintenance support adaptability,
Operational exertion ensures that adaptability and operational support resources adaptability carry out test assessment analysis respectively, and second is in summary three
On the basis of the analysis of person's test assessment, comprehensive analysis assessment is carried out to operational support adaptability;
(2) operational support adaptability unit evaluation model
1. operation maintenance support adaptability teaching model, operation maintenance support refers to during operational exertion, in order to protect
Technology and management activity that the intact technology status of weaponry is carried out are held and recover, and to ensure these activities effectively
Means of Ensuring necessary to implementing, includes combat maintenance maintenance, BDAR both and its repairing mode of equipment;Operation maintenance support
Adaptability teaching model is
Smsc=wmsc-1Smsc-1+wmsc-2Smsc-2+wmsc-3Smsc-3 (27)
S in formulamscRepresent operation maintenance support adaptability teaching achievement, Smsc-1、Smsc-2And Smsc-3Represent that battlefield is robbed respectively
Repair adaptability, wartime and repair adaptability and wartime maintenance adaptability teaching achievement, wmsc-1、wmsc-2And wmsc-3Represent that it is weighed respectively
Weight;
2. operational exertion ensures adaptability teaching model, and operational exertion ensures that adaptability teaching model is
Susc=wusc-1Susc-1+wusc-2Susc-2+wusc-3Susc-3+wusc-4Susc-4 (28)
S in formulauscRepresent that operational exertion ensures adaptability teaching achievement, Susc-1、Susc-2、Susc-3And Susc-4War is represented respectively
Field save oneself adaptability, ensure quantity adaptability, resource storage adaptability and battlefield conveying adaptability teaching achievement, wusc-1、
wusc-2、wusc-3And wusc-4Its weight is represented respectively;
3. operational support resources Supportability Evaluation model, includes the combat maintenance and maintenance personnel, maintenance of equipment
Instrument, the outfit of facilities and equipment, the supply of spare part equipment, maintenance training;Operational support resources adaptability teaching model
For
Ssoc=wsoc-1Ssoc-1+wsoc-2Ssoc-2+wsoc-3Ssoc-3+wsoc-4Ssoc-4+wsoc-5Ssoc-5 (29)
S in formulasocRepresent operational support resources adaptability teaching achievement, Ssoc-1、Ssoc-2、Ssoc-3、Ssoc-4With and Ssoc-5Point
Biao Shi not maintenance personnel, maintenance instrument, the outfit of facilities and equipment, the supply of spare part equipment, maintenance
The evaluation score of training, wsoc-1、wsoc-2、wsoc-3、wsoc-4And wsoc-5Its weight is represented respectively;
(3) operational support adaptability teaching mould is equipped under operational support adaptability Integrated Evaluation Model, single Task Action
Type is
Soscs=wmscSmsc+wuscSusc+wsocSsoc (30)
S in formulaoscsRepresent the comprehensive assessment achievement of equipment operational support adaptability under single Task Action, wmsc、wuscWith
wsocRepresent that operation maintenance support adaptability, operational exertion ensure the weight of adaptability and operational support resources adaptability respectively;
Multiple Task Action is polymerize, the Integrated Evaluation Model of equipment operational support adaptability is
S in formulaoscThe comprehensive assessment achievement of equipment operational support adaptability is represented,Represent to fill under ith Task Action
The evaluation score of standby operational support adaptability,Represent its weight;
5) is using weaving into adaptability, by organic whole in organizational system and formed by the belligerent alignment of forces attached troops to a unit;By class
Type, is divided into attack using weaving into and defend using weaving into;By scale, it is divided into campaign and weaves into and combat organization;By the pattern of operation, point
Weaved into be used in combination with contract using weaving into;By services and arms, it is divided into services using weaving into the arm of the services using weaving into;Weaponry
Use weave into, the ability to the other key elements of combat system-of-systems is realized by force composition's structure, the aspect of operational commanding relation two
Support;New Equipments and electronic information will assign new capabilities attribute for combat system-of-systems, traditional air defense, land on the island etc. and to fight
Mode will develop to the integrative operation mode such as air defense, electronic warfare, anti-ballistic, will directly trigger force composition's structure by traditional area
Domain mixed marshalling pattern, the structure of weaving into of weaponry uses the different attribute of air-defense anti-missile one, information and firepower one fiery
Power unit, diversification equip the shuffling intergration model of key element, and the operational commanding relation of weaponry also must fully adapt to information
It is turned into the characteristics of war is ageing by force, operation rhythm is fast;
(1) it is military according to the key issue and its index decomposition of Operational Suitability using adaptability teaching index system is weaved into
Device equipment use weaves into adaptability teaching and sets up evaluation index system;Test assessments are carried out using adaptability is weaved into from two levels
Analysis, first is to carry out test assessment analysis respectively to fight integrity and lasting fight capability, and second has been fought in synthesis
Good property and on the basis of continuing the analysis of fight capability test assessment, to carrying out comprehensive analysis assessment using weaving into adaptability;
(2) using adaptability unit evaluation model is weaved into, equipment is referred to using the Combat readiness weaved into adaptability
Under given force composition's structure, operational commanding relation, deployment is put into time and is used, simultaneously with the armament systems attached troops to a unit in organizational system
And the ability played a role;The metric parameter for integrity of fighting includes the deployment in organizational system, interconnecting property, electric and electromagnetism
Compatibility, using availability and use confidence level;The unit evaluation model related to Combat readiness has:
1. deployment property assessment models, deployment property refer to according to army using task, enemy's situation, battlefield surroundings and campaign property,
The equipment Safeguard of pattern needs, to the assessment of tasks for weaving into interior equipment support forces, the arrangement that troops organize into groups and configuration is made.Portion
Administration property assessment models be
Sdea=wcosScos+warsSars (32)
S in formuladeaRepresent deployment property evaluation score, ScosRepresent the net assessments of the patterns of warfare under different use tasks into
Achievement, SarsRepresent the net assessment achievement of different troops' marshallings and configuration, wcos、warsIts weight is represented respectively;Wherein ScosComment
Estimating model is
In formulaThe evaluation score of equipment fielding under i-th kind of patterns of warfare is represented,I-th kind of patterns of warfare of expression
Weight, n represents the total quantity of the patterns of warfare;
SarsAssessment models be
In formulaThe evaluation score of the marshalling of jZhong troops and the lower equipment fielding of configuration is represented,Represent jZhong troops
Marshalling and the weight of configuration, m represent the total quantity of troops' marshalling and configuration;
2. interconnecting property assessment models, interconnecting property refers to that weaponry is provided to other systems, unit or army
Operational instruction or information etc. service and received other systems, unit or the similar service of army, and exchange clothes based on this
Business effectively realizes the ability of cooperation;Its assessment models is
Siin=whinShin+witrSitr (35)
S in formulaiinRepresent the comprehensive assessment achievement of interconnecting property, ShinRepresent that weaponry is realized with other systems to interconnect
Net assessment achievement, SitrRepresent that weaponry realizes the net assessment achievement of intercommunication, w with other systemshin、witrDifference table
Show its weight;Wherein ShinAssessment models be
In formulaRepresent that weaponry realizes the evaluation score of interconnection with i-th of equipment in equipment architecture,Represent it
Weight, k represents to realize the total allowance amount of interconnection in equipment architecture with subject equipment;
SitrAssessment models be
In formulaRepresent that weaponry equips the evaluation score for realizing intercommunication with j-th in equipment architecture,Represent that it is weighed
Weight, k represents to realize the total allowance amount of intercommunication in equipment architecture with subject equipment;
3. electric compatible assessment models, electric compatibility refers to weaponry and power supply and the matching capacity of interface, bag
Include power supply type, current type, voltage range, frequency range, physical interface;Its assessment models is
S in formulaelcRepresent the electric compatible evaluation score of equipment, Selc-i(i=1,2 ..., 5) represent that equipment is used respectively
Power supply type, current type, voltage range, frequency range, the evaluation score of physical interface, welc-iRepresent the power of respective item
Weight;
4. Electro Magnetic Compatibility assessment models, Electro Magnetic Compatibility is the systems of all use electromagnetic spectrums work, equipment and filled
A kind of ability put, Electro Magnetic Compatibility generally includes electromagnetic design characteristic, anti-electromagnetic interference capability and the electromagnetic interference energy of equipment
Three aspects of power, its assessment models is
Semc=weldSeld+wajaSaja+wejaSeja (39)
S in formulaemcRepresent the Electro Magnetic Compatibility comprehensive assessment achievement of equipment, SeldRepresent the assessment of equipment electromagnetic design characteristic
Achievement, SajaRepresent the evaluation score of equipment anti-electromagnetic interference capability, SejaThe evaluation score of equipment electromagnetic interference capability is represented,
weld、waja、wejaIts weight is represented respectively;
The electromagnetic design characteristic of equipment mainly consider PCB design, filter design, shielding design, cable and connector design,
The factor of power supply characteristic, its assessment models is
S in formulaelc-i(i=1,2 ..., 5) equipment PCB design, filter design, shielding design, cable are represented respectively and are patched
Part design, the evaluation score of power supply characteristic, welc-iRepresent the weight of respective item;
Anti-electromagnetic interference capability refer to be equipped in worked in expected use environment and by it is unacceptable disturb,
Performance or the degree of damage are reduced, its assessment models is
Saja=waja-1Saja-1+waja-2Saja-2+waja-3Saja-3 (41)
S in formulaaja-1、Saja-2、Saja-3Represent that armament-related work frequency range, receiving sensitivity, reception characteristic refer to reception respectively
Out-of-band rejection, mirror image suppress and hand over the evaluation score of intermodulation suppression, waja-1、waja-2、waja-3Represent the weight of respective item;
Electromagnetic interference capability refers to that equipment passes through conduction or spoke to other use electromagnetic spectrums equipment in its working environment
Emission mode produces unnecessary effect, and its assessment models is
Seja=weja-1Seja-1+weja-2Seja-2+weja-3Seja-3 (42)
S in formulaeja-1、Seja-2、Seja-3Represent that armament-related work frequency range, transmission power, emission characteristics refer to harmonic wave pressure respectively
The evaluation score of system and transmitting attenuation outside a channel, weja-1、weja-2、weja-3Represent the weight of respective item;
5. availability assessment models, including the intrinsic reliability of system and factor of maintainability are used, and is expected with system
The relevant logistics support efficiency of life cycle;Its computation model is
Or
S in formulaavaRepresent the evaluation score using availability, fava() is represented using availability evaluation score conversion letter
Number, TworkRepresent up time, TtotalRepresent the total time that equipment possesses, Tshut-intWhen representing average down event interval
Between, that is, cause the average time equipped between inoperable event, Tshut-avaAverage downtime is represented, that is, is being stopped
After fortification part, in order that the average time that equipment returns to fully operational state and spent;
6. Credibility Assessment model is used, includes the inherent reliability and factor of maintainability of equipment, and perform with equipment
The task logistics support efficiency relevant with all times that may occur critical failure;Its computation model is
S in formuladepRepresent confidence level, fdep() represents that, using Credibility Assessment achievement conversion function, MTBCF represents task
The MTBF of necessity equipment function, critical failure not necessarily occurs in a subtask, but it will necessarily or
Task may be impacted, be reflected as the ratio of hours worked and critical failure number of times;MTTRF is that average function recovers
Time, is after occurring critical failure, in order that the average time that equipment returns to fully operational state and spent;It is included in
Critical failure administration time delay relevant with recovering function after occurring and logistic delay time, are reflected as critical failure
Reply total time and the ratio of critical failure number of times;
Equipment, using the lasting fight capability weaved into adaptability, is that army, equipment and the logistics in organizational system and attached troops to a unit are protected
Barrier property function, its metric parameter include organizational system in equipment average utilization, infrastructure protection, Software Support, after
Diligent reliability and commander's control protection;The unit evaluation model related to lasting fight capability has:
1. average utilization assessment models are equipped
Equipment average utilization is used in duty cycle as defined in referring to, equips the average life span unit for performing task
Number;Its computation model is
S in formularatRepresent equipment average utilization, frat() represents equipment average utilization evaluation score conversion function,
TworkRepresent armament-related work hourage, TprocRepresent the hours worked that equipment possesses;
2. infrastructure Supportability Evaluation model, its assessment models is
Sinf=winf-1Sinf-1+winf-2Sinf-2+winf-3Sinf-3+winf-4Sinf-4 (47)
S in formulainfRepresent the evaluation score of equipment infrastructure protection, Sinf-1、Sinf-2、Sinf-3、Sinf-4Represent respectively
Equipment handling and transportation characterization, infrastructure needs, the evaluation score for ensureing device requirement and supply guarantee demand, winf-1、
winf-2、winf-3、winf-4Represent the weight of respective item;
3. Software Support assessment models refer to be equipped under the force composition's structure equipped, operational commanding relation, maintain
Software maintenance, software maturity required for continuous firing, software resource guarantee, software security characteristic;Its assessment models
For
Ssof=wsof-1Ssof-1+wsof-2Ssof-2+wsof-3Ssof-3+wsof-4Ssof-4 (48)
S in formulasofRepresent the evaluation score of equipment software protection, Ssof-1、Ssof-2、Ssof-3、Ssof-4Equipment is represented respectively
Software maintenance, software maturity, software resource guarantee, the evaluation score of software security, wsof-1、wsof-2、wsof-3、wsof-4
Represent the weight of respective item;
4. logistics Reliability Evaluation Model, logistics degree of reiability is use and guarantee plan of the equipment according to regulation,
Under the force composition's structure, operational commanding relation equipped, the frequency for the maintenance carried out using defined logistical resources.
One metric parameter of logistics reliability is mean time between repairs (MTBM), i.e. all maintenance events (including planned dimension
Repair event and unscheduled maintenance event) between Mean Time Between Replacement.MTBM is defined as
MTBNM represents average unscheduled maintenance interval time in formula, is reflected as hours worked and unscheduled maintenance
The ratio of event times;MTBSM represents average planned maintenance interval time, is reflected as hours worked and planned maintenance thing
The ratio of piece number;Then there is the logistics Reliability Evaluation Model to be
Slog=flog(MTBM) (50)
S in formulalogRepresent the evaluation score of equipment logistics reliability, flog() logistics reliability assessment achievement converts letter
Number.
5. commander controls Supportability Evaluation model
Commander's control protection refers to be equipped under the force composition's structure equipped, operational commanding relation, maintains to continue work
Commander's control ability needed for making, generally comprises the key element, its assessment models such as the integrality for commanding control, accuracy, ageing
For
Sccs=wccs-1Sccs-1+wccs-2Sccs-2+wccs-3Sccs-3 (51)
S in formulaccsRepresent that equipment Command controls the evaluation score of protection, Sccs-1、Sccs-2、Sccs-3Represent that equipment refers to respectively
Wave control integrality, accuracy, ageing evaluation score, wccs-1、wccs-2、wccs-3Represent the weight of respective item.
(3) use and weave into adaptability Integrated Evaluation Model
1. equipment is using weaving into adaptability teaching model under single Task Action assessment models, single Task Action
Swovs=wintSint+wsusSsus (52)
S in formulawovsRepresent that equipment uses the comprehensive assessment achievement for weaving into adaptability, S under single Task Actionint、SsusPoint
Its evaluation score fought integrity and continue fight capability, w are not representedint、wsusIts weight is represented respectively;
Wherein fight integrity evaluation score SintComputation model be
W in formuladea、wiin、welc、wemc、wava、wdepDeployment property, electrically interconnecting property, compatibility, electromagnetism are represented respectively
Compatibility, the weight using the project such as availability and use confidence level;
Continue Operational Capability Assessment achievement SsusComputation model be
Ssus=wratSrat+winfSinf+wsofSsof+wlogSlog+wccsSccs (54)
W in formularat、winf、wsof、wlog、wccsEquipment average utilization, infrastructure protection, Software Support are represented respectively
Property, the weight of logistics reliability and commander's control project such as protection;
2. Integrated Evaluation Model, polymerize to multiple Task Action, and equipment uses the comprehensive assessment mould for weaving into adaptability
Type is
S in formulawovEquipment is represented using the comprehensive assessment achievement for weaving into adaptability,Represent to fill under ith Task Action
It is standby to use the evaluation score for weaving into adaptability,Represent its weight.
Due to using technical scheme as described above, the present invention has following superiority:
A kind of electronics use applicability appraisal procedure, mainly to human engineering, use environment, using task, make
With ensure and using weave into wait 5 itemize adaptability evaluation problem.Set up the level evaluation index body of 5 subitem adaptability
System, it is assumed that be separate between the key element of each level, so relatively important between the similar key element of same level is considered
Property on the basis of, select based on addition rule weighted sum model carry out the similar key element of same level polymerization.For 5 subitems
The polymerization of adaptability, same model is also selected based on same thinking.The present invention solves environmental factor, particularly complicated electricity
Magnetic environment is on the recognized problem of the impact analysis of equipment performance easily influenceed by electromagnetic signal.
Brief description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is man-machine engineering adaptability evaluation index system block diagram;
Fig. 2 use environment adaptability teaching index system block diagrams;
Fig. 3 uses task compatibility evaluation index system block diagram;
Fig. 4 operational support adaptability teaching index system block diagrams;
Fig. 5 is using weaving into adaptability teaching index system block diagram;
Embodiment
A kind of electronics use applicability appraisal procedure, mainly to human engineering, use environment, using task, make
With ensure and using weave into wait 5 subitem adaptability assessment, set up 5 itemize adaptability level evaluation index system,
Assuming that being separate between the key element of each level, so the relative importance between the similar key element of same level is considered
On the basis of, select the weighted sum model based on addition rule to carry out the polymerization of the similar key element of same level.Adapted to for 5 subitems
The polymerization of property, its step is as follows:
One, human engineering adaptability
Electronics human engineering adaptability refers to electronics during operational exertion, those influences combatant
(including maintenance personal) efficiently accomplishes the system operatio of the task of use using electronics, using key elements such as safety, man-machine interfaces,
Including operational exertion security, software and hardware man-machine interface, man-computer cooperation and man-machine protection.
(1) human engineering adaptability teaching index system
According to the key issue and its index decomposition of Operational Suitability, human engineering adaptability teaching can be set up such as Fig. 1 institutes
The evaluation index system shown, first respectively to operational exertion security, software and hardware man-machine interface, man-computer cooperation and man-machine guarantee
Property carry out test assessment, comprehensive assessment is then carried out on this basis.
(2) human engineering adaptability unit evaluation model
1. operational exertion safety evaluation model
Electronics operational exertion security refers to that during operational exertion electronics effectively can suppress or avoid
Occurs the ability that may cause the accidents such as casualties, equipment damage or other losses.The main body of operational exertion security
Present electronics avoid the ability of accident and two aspects of ability of control hidden danger, therefore operational exertion safety evaluation can be with
Measured during electronics use in terms of the seriousness of the dangerous possibility occurred and generation consequence, it is assessed
Model is
Ssaf=θsaf·(wsaf-1Ssaf-1+wsaf-2Ssaf-2+wsaf-3Ssaf-3+wsaf-4Ssaf-4) (1)
S in formulasafRepresent operational exertion safety evaluation achievement, θsafRepresent factor of influence, Ssaf-1~Ssaf-4Represent respectively
Dangerous, the serious level of disaster level is dangerous, the safety evaluation achievement that slight level is dangerous, slight level is dangerous, wsaf-1~wsaf-4Difference table
Show its weight.The possibility and the seriousness of generation consequence that the evaluation score of 4 kinds of danger classes can occur by danger are entered
Row is comprehensive to be weighed.
2. operational exertion man-computer cooperation assessment models
Electronics system constitutes complexity, and typical human-machine ring system is constituted with user of service, battlefield surroundings.Therefore it is electric
The performance of sub- Military Equipment Battling efficiency, both the fight capability with electronics in itself was relevant, was more dependent upon commanding, operating personnel
Ability and quality, the combination of personnel and equipment architecture restricted by environmental condition again.Therefore, the man-machine of electronics is improved
Associativity, man-machine protection etc., can effectively improve the fullfledged combat capability of electronics and keep it to continue fight capability.
It is to personnel's degree of fatigue, operation convenience and car in certain use time that operational exertion man-computer cooperation, which is assessed,
The synthesis of interior environment (noise size, exhaust gas concentration, oscillation intensity).Operational exertion man-computer cooperation model is
Smm=θmm·(wmm-1Smm-1+wmm-2Smm-2+wmm-3Smm-3) (2)
S in formulammRepresent operational exertion man-computer cooperation evaluation score, θmmRepresent factor of influence, Smm-1、Smm-2And Smm-3Point
Not Biao Shi personnel's degree of fatigue, operation convenience and environment inside car evaluation score, wmm-1、wmm-2And wmm-3Represent that it is weighed respectively
Weight.
3. software and hardware man-machine interface assessment models
Performance of the software and hardware man-machine interface to electronics fighting efficiency has decisive role, including hardware man-machine interface
The property grasped, accessibility and operation difficulty, and software man-machine interface friendly, robustness and operation difficulty etc..It is soft or hard
Part man-machine interface assessment models are
S in formulashmRepresent software and hardware man-machine interface evaluation score, Sshm-i(i=1,2 ..., 6) the man-machine boundary of hardware is represented respectively
The assessment of the property grasped in face, accessibility, the friendly of operation difficulty and software man-machine interface, robustness and operation difficulty into
Achievement, wshm-i(i=1,2 ..., 6) its weight is represented respectively.
4. man-machine Supportability Evaluation model
Man-machine protection be in order to maintain manpower required for electronics continuous firing and personnel to ensure, training and instruct
Practice the synthesis of the key elements such as guarantee, technical data.Man-machine Supportability Evaluation model is
Smms=wmms-1Smms-1+wmms-2Smms-2+wmms-3Smms-3 (4)
S in formulammsRepresent man-machine Supportability Evaluation achievement, Smms-1、Smms-2And Smms-3Personnel's guarantee, Ren Yuanxun are represented respectively
Practice the evaluation score for ensureing and being ensured with technological document, wmms-1、wmms-2And wmms-3Its weight is represented respectively.Wherein technological document is protected
Barrier is again by being checked and being evaluated in terms of the Qi Taoxing of technological document, readability, correctness, and its assessment models is
In formulaDifference presentation technology document integrity, readability, the evaluation score of correctness, Its weight is represented respectively.
(3) human engineering adaptability Integrated Evaluation Model
The evaluation score that human engineering adaptability is equipped under single Task Action is integrated first, and its model is
In formulaRepresent the evaluation score of electronics human engineering adaptability under ith Task Action, wsaf、wmm、
wshm、wmmsOperational exertion security, man-computer cooperation, software and hardware man-machine interface, the weight of man-machine protection are represented respectively.
Electronics human engineering adaptability teaching is to electronics human engineering adaptability under multiple Task Action
Comprehensive, its assessment models is
S in formulammcThe comprehensive assessment achievement of electronics human engineering adaptability is represented,Represent ith Task Action
The weight of lower electronics human engineering adaptability.
Two, use environment adaptability
Electronics use environment adaptability refers to electronics during operational exertion, adapts to use environment condition simultaneously
The ability that can effectively work.
(1) use environment adaptability teaching index system
Use environment generally comprise battlefield natural environment, joint fires environment, Battle Field Electromagnetic, battlefield transportation environment,
Physical compatibility of environment etc..According to the key issue and its index decomposition of Operational Suitability, use environment adaptability teaching can
Set up evaluation index system as shown in Figure 2.
(2) use environment adaptability unit evaluation model
1. battlefield natural environment adaptability teaching model
Battlefield natural environment adaptability, generally refers to weaponry in the different natural environmental conditions close to battlefield surroundings
Under be able to maintain that the degree normally used.Battlefield natural environmental condition varies, species is various, can be divided into ground surface environment,
Weather environment, hydrological environment, empty day environment etc..Different natural environments also has different degrees of to different types of weaponry
Influence, except being embodied in the use influence problem of weaponry, it is also possible to cause the fault rate of weaponry to rise, performance
The problems such as reduction, guarantee difficulty are increased.Battlefield natural environment adaptability teaching model is
S in formulanecRepresent battlefield natural environment adaptability teaching achievement, Snec-iRepresent i-th kind of typical natural environment adaptability
Evaluation score, wnec-iThe weight of the typical natural environment in adaptability teaching is represented, n represents the sum of typical natural environment
Amount.
2. Battle Field Electromagnetic adaptability teaching model
Equip intensive with frequency between ourselves and the enemy on future battlefield, the struggle of contention electromagnetic spectrum is extremely fierce and carries throughout,
Remove and be difficult to the natural electromagnetic phenomena that overcomes and complicated domestic electromagnetic signal, signal of communication between ourselves and the enemy, radar signal, lead
It is new general that a variety of electromagnetic waves such as boat positioning signal constitute sufficiently complex and severe Battle Field Electromagnetic, particularly electromagnetic pulse etc.
Read further using for weapon so that the residing Battle Field Electromagnetic of equipment more deteriorates, and various weaponrys are entirely being fought
It is on all the time not by electromagnetic interference and destruction from itself and opponent so that the fight capability of itself by
Stern challenge.Therefore, the Battle Field Electromagnetic adaptability to weaponry is estimated, for improve its battlefield survivability and
Fight capability tool is of great significance.
Battle Field Electromagnetic adaptability teaching can be to weaponry background electromagnetic signal environment adaptability, electromagnetism compressed dry
Environmental suitability, electromagnetic deception interference environment adaptability and electromagnetism is disturbed to injure on the basis of environmental suitability is estimated respectively,
Comprehensive electromagnetic environment is built by considering the joint effect of these four environment, and weaponry Battle Field Electromagnetic is adapted to
Property carry out net assessment, its assessment models is
S in formulaeecRepresent Battle Field Electromagnetic adaptability teaching achievement, Seec-1、…、Seec-4Background electromagnetic letter is represented respectively
Number environment, electromagnetism compacting interference environment, electromagnetic deception interference environment and electromagnetism injure the adaptability teaching achievement of environment,
weec-1、…、weec-4Its weight is represented respectively.
3. battlefield transportation environment adaptability teaching model
Battlefield transportation environment adaptability refers to weaponry in whole Campaign Process, passes through existing or plan public affairs
The means of transportation such as road, railway, water route and aviation implement a kind of motor-driven ability in battlefield.Battlefield transportation environment adaptability teaching model
For
Stec=wtec-1Stec-1+wtec-2Stec-2+wtec-3Stec-3+wtec-4Stec-4 (10)
S in formulatecRepresent battlefield transportation environment adaptability teaching achievement, Stec-1~Stec-4Highway, railway, water are represented respectively
The transportation environment adaptability teaching achievement such as road and aviation, wtec-1~wtec-4The fortune such as highway, railway, water route and aviation is represented respectively
Weight of the defeated environment in adaptability teaching.
4. evaluation on environment adjustability model is hit in battlefield
Strike is the main purpose of confrontation on the battlefield, and Strike includes conventional hard destruction, soft compacting, information deception
And core biochemistry strike etc..The combined operation Background Construction of modern all services and arms has gone out amalgamation, densification, the battlefield of precision
Environment is hit, on the one hand weaponry will incorporate the firepower environment of one's own side, on the one hand to overcome the restriction of enemy firepower environment, have
Effect ground preserves oneself, cooperates with the firepower strength of one's own side, maintains the normal of oneself to use, and it is solution to improve battlefield strike environmental suitability
Certainly one of method.Hit evaluation on environment adjustability model in battlefield
Ssec=wsec-1Ssec-1+wsec-2Ssec-2 (11)
S in formulasecRepresent battlefield strike evaluation on environment adjustability achievement, Ssec-1Represent conventional Strike environmental suitability
Evaluation score, wsec-1Represent its weight, Ssec-2Represent core biochemistry strike evaluation on environment adjustability achievement, wsec-2Represent its weight.
5. physical compatibility assessment models
Physical compatibility is primarily referred to as the parts such as the rack of weaponry, antenna in whole armament systems meter and assembling
The matching capacity of appearance and size, weight etc., its assessment models is
Sphc=wphc-1Sphc-1+wphc-2Sphc-2 (12)
S in formulaphcRepresent the physical compatibility evaluation score of equipment, Sphc-1Represent that the physical space size matching of equipment is commented
Estimate achievement, wphc-1Represent its weight, Sphc-2Represent the weight-matched evaluation score of equipment, wphc-2Represent its weight.
(3) use environment adaptability Integrated Evaluation Model
The applicability assessment of equipment use environment is the synthesis to equipping use environment applicability under multiple Task Action, and it is commented
Estimating model is
S in formulaoecThe comprehensive assessment achievement of equipment use environment adaptability is represented,Represent to fill under ith Task Action
The evaluation score of standby use environment adaptability,Represent its weight.According to above-mentioned adaptability unit evaluation model,Calculation
Method is
In formulaRepresent that equipment Battlefield natural environment is adapted under ith Task Action respectively
Property, electromagnetic environment adaptability, transportation environment adaptability, strike environmental suitability, the evaluation score of physical compatibility, Its weight is represented respectively.
Three, use task compatibility
Refer to combat forces using task to reach the task that the predetermined purpose of operation is undertaken, it is typically true by higher level commander
It is fixed, and assigned in the form of combat order.By type, it is divided into attack and uses task using task and defence.
(1) task compatibility evaluation index system is used
Weaponry refers to weaponry during operational exertion using task compatibility, can be in making for being continually changing
With the ability that fight integrity and lasting fight capability are kept in task.According to the key issue and its index of Operational Suitability point
Solution, weaponry is assessed using task compatibility can set up evaluation index system as shown in Figure 3.Can be from using task compatibility
Two levels carry out test assessment analysis, are that the fight integrity and lasting operation energy using required by task are completed to equipment first
Power carries out test assessment analysis respectively, followed by comprehensive fight integrity and continues the basis that fight capability test assessment is analyzed
On, to carrying out comprehensive analysis assessment using task compatibility.
(2) task compatibility unit evaluation model is used
1. execution task rate assessment models are entirely capable of
Be entirely capable of execution task rate refer to equip be able to carry out it is all as defined in usually account for equipment with the time of wartime mission
Possess the percentage of time.Being entirely capable of execution task rate assessment models is
S in formulactwRepresent that equipment is entirely capable of the evaluation score of execution task rate, fctw() represents that equipment is entirely capable of performing and appointed
The evaluation score conversion function of business rate, TctwRepresent that equipment is entirely capable of performing task time (hour), TtotalWhen representing that equipment possesses
Between (hour).
2. part can perform task rate assessment models
Part can perform task rate refer to equip be able to carry out that it accepts usually with wartime mission part (rather than
All) time of task accounts for the percentage that equipment possesses the time.Part can perform task rate assessment models and be
S in formulaptwRepresent that equipment part can perform the evaluation score of task rate, fptw() represents that equipment part can be performed and appointed
The evaluation score conversion function of business rate, TptwRepresent that equipment part can perform task time (hour).
3. task rate assessment models can be performed
Task rate can be performed and refer to that equipping the time for being able to carry out part or all of task accounts for the percentage that equipment possesses the time
Rate.Task rate assessment models, which can be performed, is
S in formulattwRepresent that equipment can perform the evaluation score of task rate, fttw() represents that equipment can perform commenting for task rate
Estimate achievement conversion function, TttwRepresent that equipment can perform task time (hour), be that equipment is entirely capable of performing task time and part
Task time sum can be performed.
4. utilization rate assessment models are equipped
Equipment utilization rate refers to be equipped in each related period (as one day or one uses duty cycle)
Working hours or work times.Equipment utilization rate assessment models can be expressed as
Or
S in formulaeurRepresent the evaluation score of equipment utilization rate, feur() represents the evaluation score conversion letter of equipment utilization rate
Number, TpworkRepresent to be equipped in daily or one using the hours worked in duty cycle, TperiodExpression be equipped in daily or
Person one uses the hours worked possessed in duty cycle, NpworkExpression is equipped in daily or one using in duty cycle
Work times, NperiodRepresent to be equipped in daily or one using the work times possessed in duty cycle.
5. mission reliability assessment models
Mission reliability refers to be equipped in the stipulated time in the defined mission duration or entered after task status
It is interior, in upstate and the probability of its predetermined function can be completed.The basis of mission reliability is that the equipment in task time can
By property, mission reliability does not consider equipment Maintainability.For the equipment with exponential failure rule, mission reliability is defined as
T is Average Task Time in formula, and MTBCF (average key time between failures) is the task necessary function of equipment
The Mean Time Between Replacement that (task necessary function is that system completes the function that task must be used) breaks down.Then there is task
Reliability Evaluation Model is
Srtw=frtw(MR) (21)
S in formulartwRepresent the evaluation score of equipment mission reliability, frtw() represent equipment mission reliability assessment into
Achievement converts function.
6. task rate assessment models are exited
Equipment exits task rate and refers to " be unable to work because one or more of task necessary function function is determined
Make ", and the time percentage that equipment is exited from accepting for task.Exiting task rate assessment models is
S in formulaqtwRepresent that equipment exits the evaluation score of task rate, fqtw() represent equipment exit the assessment of task rate into
Achievement converts function, TqtwRepresent the working time number equipped before being exited from accepting for task.
(3) task compatibility Integrated Evaluation Model is used
1. task compatibility assessment models are intended for single use
Equipped under single Task Action and be using task compatibility assessment models
Stasc=wtintStint+wtsusStsus (23)
S in formulatascRepresent that equipment uses the comprehensive assessment achievement of task compatibility, S under single Task Actiontint、StsusPoint
The evaluation score of fought using task integrity and lasting fight capability, w Biao Shi not equippedtint、wtsusIts weight is represented respectively.
Wherein using task fight integrity evaluation score StintComputation model be
Stint=wctwSctw+wptwSptw+wttwSttw (24)
W in formulactw、wptw、wttwRepresent be entirely capable of execution task rate, can partly perform task rate, task rate can be performed respectively
Etc. the weight of project.
Continue Operational Capability Assessment achievement S using tasktsusComputation model be
Stsus=weurSeur+wrtwSrtw+wqtwSqtw (25)
W in formulaeur、wrtw、wqtwRepresent equipment utilization rate, mission reliability respectively and exit the power of the projects such as task rate
Weight.
2. task compatibility Integrated Evaluation Model is used
Multiple Task Action is polymerize, equipment is using the Integrated Evaluation Model of task compatibility
S in formulataskComprehensive assessment achievement of the equipment using task compatibility is represented,Representing the equipment of ith task makes
With the evaluation score of task compatibility,Represent its weight.
Four, operational support adaptability
《Army of Chinese People's Liberation Army language》(2011 editions) point out, operational support refers to that commanding agencies at different levels of army make to meet
The guarantee for directly serving in operation that war needs and organized and implemented.Prevent including surveillance information, warning, communication, confidential, information
Shield, target, engineering, traffic, camouflage, NBC protection, mapping navigation, meteorological model, battlefield control, electromagnetic spectrum management, boat
Guarantee in terms of sea, sonar, anti-dangerous lifesaving, navigator.Weaponry operational support, then refer to those to meet weaponry
It is normal to use the various action for directly serving in equipment deployment for needing and organizing and implementing.
(1) operational support adaptability teaching index system
Weaponry operational support adaptability refers to weaponry during operational exertion, in order to keep fighting capacity to regenerate
With lasting fight capability, the ability of repairing, maintaining and the supply of ammunition materials, bag can be timely and effectively rescued
Include operation maintenance support, operational exertion protection and operational support resources protection.According to the key issue of Operational Suitability
And its index decomposition, operational support adaptability teaching can set up evaluation index system as shown in Figure 4.Operational support applicability can
Test assessment analysis is carried out from two levels, first is to ensure adaptability to operation maintenance support adaptability, operational exertion and make
Carry out test assessment analysis respectively with Support Resource adaptability, second is the basis analyzed in summary three's test assessment
On, comprehensive analysis assessment is carried out to operational support adaptability.
(2) operational support adaptability unit evaluation model
1. operation maintenance support adaptability teaching model
Operation maintenance support refers to during operational exertion, in order to keep and recover the technology status that weaponry is intact
The technology and management activity carried out, and to ensure that necessary Means of Ensuring etc., including dress are effectively implemented in these activities
Standby combat maintenance maintenance, BDAR both and its repairing mode etc..Operation maintenance support adaptability teaching model is
Smsc=wmsc-1Smsc-1+wmsc-2Smsc-2+wmsc-3Smsc-3 (27)
S in formulamscRepresent operation maintenance support adaptability teaching achievement, Smsc-1、Smsc-2And Smsc-3Represent that battlefield is robbed respectively
Repair adaptability, wartime and repair adaptability and wartime maintenance adaptability teaching achievement, wmsc-1、wmsc-2And wmsc-3Represent that it is weighed respectively
Weight.
2. operational exertion ensures adaptability teaching model
Operational exertion, which is ensured, refers to weaponry during operational exertion, in order to keep it normally to use carried out one
Series of tasks and complete Means of Ensuring needed for these work etc..Operational exertion ensures that adaptability teaching model is
Susc=wusc-1Susc-1+wusc-2Susc-2+wusc-3Susc-3+wusc-4Susc-4 (28)
S in formulauscRepresent that operational exertion ensures adaptability teaching achievement, Susc-1、Susc-2、Susc-3And Susc-4War is represented respectively
Field save oneself adaptability, ensure quantity adaptability, resource storage adaptability and battlefield conveying adaptability teaching achievement, wusc-1、
wusc-2、wusc-3And wusc-4Its weight is represented respectively.
3. operational support resources Supportability Evaluation model
Operational support resources refer to needed for ensureing that Military Equipment Battling maintenance support and operational exertion Support activity are effectively implemented
Personnel and goods and materials general designation, the main combat maintenance for including equipment and maintenance personnel, maintenance instrument, facilities and equipment
Outfit, the supply of spare part equipment, maintenance training etc..Operational support resources adaptability teaching model is
Ssoc=wsoc-1Ssoc-1+wsoc-2Ssoc-2+wsoc-3Ssoc-3+wsoc-4Ssoc-4+wsoc-5Ssoc-5 (29)
S in formulasocRepresent operational support resources adaptability teaching achievement, Ssoc-1、Ssoc-2、Ssoc-3、Ssoc-4With and Ssoc-5Point
Biao Shi not maintenance personnel, maintenance instrument, the outfit of facilities and equipment, the supply of spare part equipment, maintenance
The evaluation score of training, wsoc-1、wsoc-2、wsoc-3、wsoc-4And wsoc-5Its weight is represented respectively.
(3) operational support adaptability Integrated Evaluation Model
Operational support adaptability teaching model is equipped under single Task Action is
Soscs=wmscSmsc+wuscSusc+wsocSsoc (30)
S in formulaoscsRepresent the comprehensive assessment achievement of equipment operational support adaptability under single Task Action, wmsc、wuscWith
wsocRepresent that operation maintenance support adaptability, operational exertion ensure the weight of adaptability and operational support resources adaptability respectively.
Multiple Task Action is polymerize, the Integrated Evaluation Model of equipment operational support adaptability is
S in formulaoscThe comprehensive assessment achievement of equipment operational support adaptability is represented,Represent to fill under ith Task Action
The evaluation score of standby operational support adaptability,Represent its weight.
Five, are using weaving into adaptability
《Army of Chinese People's Liberation Army language》(2011 editions) will be defined as reaching certain purpose of operation using weaving into, by organizational system
Organic whole formed by the interior and belligerent alignment of forces attached troops to a unit.By type, it is divided into attack using weaving into and defend using weaving into;
By scale, it is divided into campaign and weaves into and combat organization;By the pattern of operation, it is divided into being used in combination and weaves into contract using weaving into;By army
The arm of the services, is divided into services using weaving into the arm of the services using weaving into.The use of weaponry is weaved into, and is mainly tied by force composition
Structure, two aspects of operational commanding relation are realized and the ability of the other key elements of combat system-of-systems are supported.New Equipments and electronic information system
System will assign new capabilities attribute for combat system-of-systems, traditional air defense, the mode of operation such as land on the island will be to air defense, electronic warfare, anti-ballistic
Develop Deng integrative operation mode, will directly trigger force composition's structure by traditional region mixed marshalling pattern, weaponry
Weave into structure using the different attribute Fire Units such as air-defense anti-missile one, information and firepower one, diversification equipment key element
Shuffling intergration model, the operational commanding relation of weaponry also must fully adapt to information-based ageing strong, operation rhythm of fighting
Fast the characteristics of.With information-based, the intelligent, architecture of weaponry, it examines demand more using the identification for weaving into adaptability
Plus it is prominent, its meaning is also more great.
(1) use and weave into adaptability teaching index system
Weaponry refers to weaponry during operational exertion using adaptability is weaved into, can be in the portion being continually changing
Team weaves into structure, operational commanding relation and keeps fight integrity and continue the ability of fight capability.According to Operational Suitability
Key issue and its index decomposition, weaponry can set up evaluation index body as shown in Figure 5 using adaptability teaching is weaved into
System.Test assessment analysis can be carried out from two levels using adaptability is weaved into, first is to fight integrity and lasting operation energy
Power carries out test assessment analysis respectively, and second is the basis in comprehensive fight integrity and lasting fight capability test assessment analysis
On, to using weave into adaptability carry out comprehensive analysis assessment.
(2) use and weave into adaptability unit evaluation model
Equipment refers to close in given force composition's structure, operational commanding using the Combat readiness weaved into adaptability
Under system, in organizational system and the armament systems attached troops to a unit put into time deployment and using and the ability that plays a role.Integrity of fighting
Metric parameter includes deployment in organizational system, interconnecting property, electrically and Electro Magnetic Compatibility, using availability and uses confidence level
Deng.The unit evaluation model related to Combat readiness has:
1. deployment property assessment models
Deployment property refers to the equipment Safeguard need using task, enemy's situation, battlefield surroundings and campaign property, pattern etc. according to army
Will, to the assessment of tasks for weaving into interior equipment support forces, the arrangement that troops organize into groups and configuration is made.Deployment property assessment models be
Sdea=wcosScos+warsSars (32)
S in formuladeaRepresent deployment property evaluation score, ScosRepresent the net assessments of the patterns of warfare under different use tasks into
Achievement, SarsRepresent the net assessment achievement of different troops' marshallings and configuration, wcos、warsIts weight is represented respectively.Wherein ScosComment
Estimating model is
In formulaThe evaluation score of equipment fielding under i-th kind of patterns of warfare is represented,I-th kind of patterns of warfare of expression
Weight, n represents the total quantity of the patterns of warfare.
SarsAssessment models be
In formulaThe evaluation score of the marshalling of jZhong troops and the lower equipment fielding of configuration is represented,Represent jZhong troops
Marshalling and the weight of configuration, m represent the total quantity of troops' marshalling and configuration.
2. interconnecting property assessment models
Interconnecting property refers to that weaponry provides the clothes such as operational instruction or information to other systems, unit or army
Other systems, unit or the similar service of army are engaged in and received, and cooperation is effectively realized based on this Exchange Service
Ability.Interconnecting property is the key index for examining weaponry to dispose performance in expected use environment, to weaponry
Design typification and equip using there is particularly important meaning, should be towards Weapon Equipment System aspect, from using task body assemblage
Examination measurement is carried out on cooperation war ability level.Its assessment models is
Siin=whinShin+witrSitr (35)
S in formulaiinRepresent the comprehensive assessment achievement of interconnecting property, ShinRepresent that weaponry is realized with other systems to interconnect
Net assessment achievement, SitrRepresent that weaponry realizes the net assessment achievement of intercommunication, w with other systemshin、witrDifference table
Show its weight.Wherein ShinAssessment models be
In formulaRepresent that weaponry realizes the evaluation score of interconnection with i-th of equipment in equipment architecture,Represent it
Weight, k represents to realize the total allowance amount of interconnection in equipment architecture with subject equipment.
SitrAssessment models be
In formulaRepresent that weaponry equips the evaluation score for realizing intercommunication with j-th in equipment architecture,Represent that it is weighed
Weight, k represents to realize the total allowance amount of intercommunication in equipment architecture with subject equipment.
3. electric compatible assessment models
Electric compatibility refers to weaponry and power supply and the matching capacity of interface, mainly including power supply type, current capacity
Type, voltage range, frequency range, physical interface etc..Its assessment models is
S in formulaelcRepresent the electric compatible evaluation score of equipment, Selc-i(i=1,2 ..., 5) represent that equipment is used respectively
Power supply type, current type, voltage range, frequency range, the evaluation score of physical interface, welc-iRepresent the power of respective item
Weight.
4. Electro Magnetic Compatibility assessment models
Electro Magnetic Compatibility is a kind of ability of system, equipment and the device of all use electromagnetic spectrum work, this ability
Ensure them under set condition of work, will not because Electromagnetic Launching or response and caused by the unacceptable or property do not predicted
It can degrade.Equipment architecture confrontation is the information equipped between main application mode, equipment, equipped between environment in modern war
Performance of the interaction to effectiveness of weapon equipment plays more and more important influence, therefore Electro Magnetic Compatibility turns into examination weaponry and existed
It is expected that in use environment performance key index.System of System Oriented aspect is answered, is examined from task body assemblage cooperation war ability level
Measurement, its design typification to equipment and is equipped using also important in inhibiting.
Electro Magnetic Compatibility generally includes electromagnetic design characteristic, anti-electromagnetic interference capability and the electromagnetic interference capability three of equipment
Aspect, its assessment models is
Semc=weldSeld+wajaSaja+wejaSeja (39)
S in formulaemcRepresent the Electro Magnetic Compatibility comprehensive assessment achievement of equipment, SeldRepresent the assessment of equipment electromagnetic design characteristic
Achievement, SajaRepresent the evaluation score of equipment anti-electromagnetic interference capability, SejaThe evaluation score of equipment electromagnetic interference capability is represented,
weld、waja、wejaIts weight is represented respectively.
The electromagnetic design characteristic of equipment mainly consider PCB design, filter design, shielding design, cable and connector design,
The factors such as power supply characteristic, its assessment models is
S in formulaelc-i(i=1,2 ..., 5) equipment PCB design, filter design, shielding design, cable are represented respectively and are patched
Part design, the evaluation score of power supply characteristic, welc-iRepresent the weight of respective item.
Anti-electromagnetic interference capability refer to be equipped in worked in expected use environment and by it is unacceptable disturb,
Performance or the degree of damage are reduced, its assessment models is
Saja=waja-1Saja-1+waja-2Saja-2+waja-3Saja-3 (41)
S in formulaaja-1、Saja-2、Saja-3Armament-related work frequency range, receiving sensitivity are represented respectively, receive characteristic (mainly
Refer to receive Out-of-band rejection, mirror image suppress and hand over intermodulation suppression) evaluation score, waja-1、waja-2、waja-3Represent respective item
Weight.
Electromagnetic interference capability refers to that equipment passes through conduction or spoke to other use electromagnetic spectrums equipment in its working environment
Emission mode produces unnecessary effect, and its assessment models is
Seja=weja-1Seja-1+weja-2Seja-2+weja-3Seja-3 (42)
S in formulaeja-1、Seja-2、Seja-3Represent that armament-related work frequency range, transmission power, emission characteristics (are referred mainly to respectively
Harmonic wave suppress and transmitting attenuation outside a channel) evaluation score, weja-1、weja-2、weja-3Represent the weight of respective item.
5. availability assessment models are used
Refer to be equipped under the force composition's structure equipped, operational commanding relation using availability, can be used in any rule
Determine the probability of purpose.It includes the intrinsic reliability of system and factor of maintainability, and relevant with the system expected life cycle
Logistics support efficiency.Its computation model is
Or
S in formulaavaRepresent the evaluation score using availability, fava() is represented using availability evaluation score conversion letter
Number, TworkRepresent up time, TtotalRepresent the total time that equipment possesses, Tshut-intRepresent average down event interval time
(average time equipped between inoperable event is caused, such as crucial or non-key failure, preventative maintenance, training, dimension
Repair and supply response etc.).In addition to intrinsic repairing and maintainability feature, the ability and availability, personnel's experience of equipment are ensured
The field condition such as grade and wheel changing shifts structure can also influence downtime.Tshut-avaAverage downtime is represented, that is, is being occurred
After down event, in order that the average time that equipment returns to fully operational state and spent.
6. Credibility Assessment model is used
Refer to be equipped under the force composition's structure equipped, operational commanding relation using credibility, be able to carry out its regulation
The probability of task.It includes the inherent reliability and factor of maintainability of equipment, and with equipping execution task and may close
All times of key failure relevant logistics support efficiency.Its computation model is
S in formuladepRepresent confidence level, fdep() represents that, using Credibility Assessment achievement conversion function, MTBCF represents task
The MTBF of necessity equipment function, critical failure not necessarily occurs in a subtask, but it will necessarily or
Task may be impacted, be reflected as the ratio of hours worked and critical failure number of times.MTTRF is that average function recovers
Time, is after occurring critical failure, in order that the average time that equipment returns to fully operational state and spent;It is included in
Critical failure administration time delay relevant with recovering function after occurring and logistic delay time, are reflected as critical failure
Reply total time and the ratio of critical failure number of times.
Equipment refers to the armament systems in organizational system and attached troops to a unit given using lasting fight capability in adaptability is weaved into
Under force composition's structure, operational commanding relation, performed according to necessary intensity and duration and use task, to reach military mesh
Target ability.Continue the function that fight capability is army, equipment and the logistics support in organizational system and attached troops to a unit, its metric parameter bag
The equipment average utilization in organizational system, infrastructure protection, Software Support, logistics reliability and commander's control is included to ensure
Property etc..The unit evaluation model related to lasting fight capability has:
1. average utilization assessment models are equipped
Equipment average utilization is used in duty cycle as defined in referring to, equips the average life span unit for performing task
Number.Its computation model is
S in formularatRepresent equipment average utilization, frat() represents equipment average utilization evaluation score conversion function,
TworkRepresent armament-related work hourage, TprocRepresent the hours worked that equipment possesses.
2. infrastructure Supportability Evaluation model
Infrastructure protection refer to maintain equipment continuous firing equipment handling and transportation characterization, infrastructure needs,
Device requirement and supply guarantee demand etc. are ensured, its assessment models is
Sinf=winf-1Sinf-1+winf-2Sinf-2+winf-3Sinf-3+winf-4Sinf-4 (47)
S in formulainfRepresent the evaluation score of equipment infrastructure protection, Sinf-1、Sinf-2、Sinf-3、Sinf-4Represent respectively
Equipment handling and transportation characterization, infrastructure needs, the evaluation score for ensureing device requirement and supply guarantee demand, winf-1、
winf-2、winf-3、winf-4Represent the weight of respective item.
3. Software Support assessment models
Software Support refers to be equipped under the force composition's structure equipped, operational commanding relation, maintains continuous firing institute
The characteristics such as the software maintenance, software maturity, software resource guarantee, the software security that need.Its assessment models is
Ssof=wsof-1Ssof-1+wsof-2Ssof-2+wsof-3Ssof-3+wsof-4Ssof-4 (48)
S in formulasofRepresent the evaluation score of equipment software protection, Ssof-1、Ssof-2、Ssof-3、Ssof-4Equipment is represented respectively
Software maintenance, software maturity, software resource guarantee, the evaluation score of software security, wsof-1、wsof-2、wsof-3、wsof-4
Represent the weight of respective item.
4. logistics Reliability Evaluation Model
Logistics degree of reiability is use of the equipment according to regulation and guarantee plan, the force composition's structure equipped,
Under operational commanding relation, the frequency for the maintenance carried out using defined logistical resources.One measurement of logistics reliability
Parameter is mean time between repairs (MTBM), i.e. all maintenance events (including planned maintenance event and unscheduled maintenance
Event) between Mean Time Between Replacement.MTBM is defined as
MTBNM represents average unscheduled maintenance interval time in formula, is reflected as hours worked and unscheduled maintenance
The ratio of event times;MTBSM represents average planned maintenance interval time, is reflected as hours worked and planned maintenance thing
The ratio of piece number.Then there is the logistics Reliability Evaluation Model to be
Slog=flog(MTBM) (50)
S in formulalogRepresent the evaluation score of equipment logistics reliability, flog() logistics reliability assessment achievement converts letter
Number.
5. commander controls Supportability Evaluation model
Commander's control protection refers to be equipped under the force composition's structure equipped, operational commanding relation, maintains to continue work
Commander's control ability needed for making, generally comprises the key element, its assessment models such as the integrality for commanding control, accuracy, ageing
For
Sccs=wccs-1Sccs-1+wccs-2Sccs-2+wccs-3Sccs-3 (51)
S in formulaccsRepresent that equipment Command controls the evaluation score of protection, Sccs-1、Sccs-2、Sccs-3Represent that equipment refers to respectively
Wave control integrality, accuracy, ageing evaluation score, wccs-1、wccs-2、wccs-3Represent the weight of respective item.
(3) use and weave into adaptability Integrated Evaluation Model
1. single Task Action assessment models
Equipment is using weaving into adaptability teaching model under single Task Action
Swovs=wintSint+wsusSsus (52)
S in formulawovsRepresent that equipment uses the comprehensive assessment achievement for weaving into adaptability, S under single Task Actionint、SsusPoint
Its evaluation score fought integrity and continue fight capability, w are not representedint、wsusIts weight is represented respectively.
Wherein fight integrity evaluation score SintComputation model be
W in formuladea、wiin、welc、wemc、wava、wdepDeployment property, electrically interconnecting property, compatibility, electromagnetism are represented respectively
Compatibility, the weight using the project such as availability and use confidence level.
Continue Operational Capability Assessment achievement SsusComputation model be
Ssus=wratSrat+winfSinf+wsofSsof+wlogSlog+wccsSccs (54)
W in formularat、winf、wsof、wlog、wccsEquipment average utilization, infrastructure protection, Software Support are represented respectively
Property, the weight of logistics reliability and commander's control project such as protection.
2. Integrated Evaluation Model
Multiple Task Action is polymerize, the Integrated Evaluation Model that adaptability is weaved into equipment use is
S in formulawovEquipment is represented using the comprehensive assessment achievement for weaving into adaptability,Represent to fill under ith Task Action
It is standby to use the evaluation score for weaving into adaptability,Represent its weight.
Claims (1)
1. a kind of electronics use the appraisal procedure of applicability, it is characterized in that:The level for setting up 5 subitem adaptability is assessed
Index system, it is assumed that be separate between the key element of each level, so the phase between the similar key element of same level is considered
On the basis of importance, the weighted sum model based on addition rule is selected to carry out the polymerization of the similar key element of same level, it is walked
It is rapid as follows:
1), human engineering adaptability, electronics human engineering adaptability refers to electronics during operational exertion, those
Combatant, including maintenance personal is influenceed to efficiently accomplish the system operatio of the task of use using electronics, using safe, man-machine
The key elements such as interface, including operational exertion security, software and hardware man-machine interface, man-computer cooperation and man-machine protection;
(1) human engineering adaptability teaching index system, according to the key issue and its index decomposition of applicability, human engineering is fitted
Answering property assess set up evaluation index system, first respectively to operational exertion security, software and hardware man-machine interface, man-computer cooperation and
Man-machine protection carries out test assessment, and comprehensive assessment is then carried out on this basis;
(2) human engineering adaptability unit evaluation model
1. operational exertion safety evaluation model, electronics operational exertion security refers to during operational exertion, electronics
Equip the energy for the accident that can effectively suppress or avoid generation from causing casualties, equipment damage or other losses
Power;Operational exertion security is mainly reflected in electronics and avoids the ability of accident and two aspects of ability of control hidden danger, because
The seriousness of this operational exertion safety evaluation dangerous possibility occurred and generation consequence during electronics use
In terms of measured, its assessment models is
Ssaf=θsaf·(wsaf-1Ssaf-1+wsaf-2Ssaf-2+wsaf-3Ssaf-3+wsaf-4Ssaf-4) (1)
S in formulasafRepresent operational exertion safety evaluation achievement, θsafRepresent factor of influence, Ssaf-1~Ssaf-4Disaster is represented respectively
The safety evaluation achievement that dangerous, the serious level of level is dangerous, slight level is dangerous, slight level is dangerous, wsaf-1~wsaf-4Represent it respectively
Weight;The possibility and the seriousness of generation consequence that the evaluation score of 4 kinds of danger classes occurs by danger carry out integrating weighing apparatus
Amount;
2. operational exertion man-computer cooperation assessment models, electronics system composition complexity, are constituted with user of service, battlefield surroundings
Typical human-machine ring system;Therefore the performance of electronics fighting efficiency, both the fight capability with electronics in itself was relevant,
The ability and quality of commanding, operating personnel are more dependent upon, the combination of personnel and equipment architecture is again by environmental condition system
About;
It is to personnel's degree of fatigue, operation convenience and in-car ring in certain use time that operational exertion man-computer cooperation, which is assessed,
Noise size, exhaust gas concentration, the synthesis of oscillation intensity in border;Operational exertion man-computer cooperation model is
Smm=θmm·(wmm-1Smm-1+wmm-2Smm-2+wmm-3Smm-3) (2)
S in formulammRepresent operational exertion man-computer cooperation evaluation score, θmmRepresent factor of influence, Smm-1、Smm-2And Smm-3Difference table
The evaluation score of the person's of leting others have a look at degree of fatigue, operation convenience and environment inside car, wmm-1、wmm-2And wmm-3Its weight is represented respectively;
3. software and hardware man-machine interface assessment models, performance of the software and hardware man-machine interface to electronics fighting efficiency has decisive
Effect, includes the property grasped, accessibility and the operation difficulty of hardware man-machine interface, and software man-machine interface friendly, strong
Strong property and operation difficulty;Software and hardware man-machine interface assessment models are
S in formulashmRepresent software and hardware man-machine interface evaluation score, Sshm-i(i=1,2, Λ, 6) represents hardware man-machine interface respectively
The property grasped, accessibility, the friendly of operation difficulty and software man-machine interface, the evaluation score of robustness and operation difficulty,
wshm-i(i=1,2, Λ, 6) represents its weight respectively;
4. man-machine Supportability Evaluation model, man-machine protection be in order to maintain manpower required for electronics continuous firing and
Personnel ensure, trained and training support, the synthesis of technical data key element;Man-machine Supportability Evaluation model is
Smms=wmms-1Smms-1+wmms-2Smms-2+wmms-3Smms-3 (4)
S in formulammsRepresent man-machine Supportability Evaluation achievement, Smms-1、Smms-2And Smms-3Represent that personnel are ensured, personnel training is protected respectively
The evaluation score that barrier and technological document are ensured, wmms-1、wmms-2And wmms-3Its weight is represented respectively;Wherein technological document guarantee is again
Will be by being checked and being evaluated in terms of the Qi Taoxing of technological document, readability, correctness, its assessment models is
In formulaDifference presentation technology document integrity, readability, the evaluation score of correctness,Its weight is represented respectively;
(3) human engineering adaptability Integrated Evaluation Model, integrates equipment human engineering adaptability under single Task Action first
Evaluation score, its model is
In formulaRepresent the evaluation score of electronics human engineering adaptability under ith Task Action, wsaf、wmm、wshm、
wmmsOperational exertion security, man-computer cooperation, software and hardware man-machine interface, the weight of man-machine protection are represented respectively;
Electronics human engineering adaptability teaching is the synthesis to electronics human engineering adaptability under multiple Task Action,
Its assessment models is
S in formulammcThe comprehensive assessment achievement of electronics human engineering adaptability is represented,Represent electricity under ith Task Action
The weight of son equipment human engineering adaptability;
2) use environments adaptability, electronics use environment adaptability refers to electronics during operational exertion, adapts to
Use environment condition and the ability that can effectively work;
(1) use environment adaptability teaching index system, use environment includes battlefield natural environment, joint fires environment, battlefield
Electromagnetic environment, battlefield transportation environment, the physical compatibility of environment;According to the key issue and its index decomposition of Operational Suitability,
Use environment adaptability teaching sets up evaluation index system;
(2) use environment adaptability unit evaluation model
1. battlefield natural environment adaptability teaching model, battlefield natural environment adaptability, refer to that weaponry is approached in different
The degree normally used is able to maintain that under the natural environmental condition of battlefield surroundings;Battlefield natural environmental condition varies, species
It is various, it is divided into ground surface environment, weather environment, hydrological environment, empty day environment;Battlefield natural environment adaptability teaching model is
S in formulanecRepresent battlefield natural environment adaptability teaching achievement, Snec-iRepresent i-th kind of typical natural environment adaptability teaching
Achievement, wnec-iThe weight of the typical natural environment in adaptability teaching is represented, n represents the total quantity of typical natural environment;
2. Battle Field Electromagnetic adaptability teaching model,
Equip intensive with frequency between ourselves and the enemy on future battlefield, the struggle of contention electromagnetic spectrum is extremely fierce and carries throughout, removes
It is difficult to the domestic electromagnetic signal of the natural electromagnetic phenomena and complexity overcome, signal of communication between ourselves and the enemy, radar signal, navigation are fixed
It is military that a variety of electromagnetic waves such as position signal constitute the new ideas such as sufficiently complex and severe Battle Field Electromagnetic, particularly electromagnetic pulse
Device is further used so that the residing Battle Field Electromagnetic of equipment more deteriorates, and various weaponrys are in whole operation
In all the time not by electromagnetic interference and destruction from itself and opponent so that the fight capability of itself is by sternness
Challenge.Therefore, the Battle Field Electromagnetic adaptability to weaponry is estimated, for improving its battlefield survivability and operation
Ability tool is of great significance;Battle Field Electromagnetic adaptability teaching can be suitable to weaponry background electromagnetic signal environment
Ying Xing, electromagnetism compacting interference environmental suitability, electromagnetic deception interference environment adaptability and electromagnetism are injured environmental suitability and entered respectively
On the basis of row is assessed, comprehensive electromagnetic environment is built by the joint effect for considering these four environment, and to weaponry
Battle Field Electromagnetic adaptability carries out net assessment, and its assessment models is
S in formulaeecRepresent Battle Field Electromagnetic adaptability teaching achievement, Seec-1、…、Seec-4Background electromagnetic hoop is represented respectively
Border, electromagnetism compacting interference environment, electromagnetic deception interference environment and electromagnetism injure the adaptability teaching achievement of environment, weec-1、…、
weec-4Its weight is represented respectively.
3. battlefield transportation environment adaptability teaching model
Battlefield transportation environment adaptability refers to weaponry in whole Campaign Process, passes through existing or plan highway, iron
The means of transportation such as road, water route and aviation implement a kind of motor-driven ability in battlefield.Battlefield transportation environment adaptability teaching model is
Stec=wtec-1Stec-1+wtec-2Stec-2+wtec-3Stec-3+wtec-4Stec-4 (10)
S in formulatecRepresent battlefield transportation environment adaptability teaching achievement, Stec-1~Stec-4Respectively represent highway, railway, water route and
The transportation environment adaptability teaching achievement such as aviation, wtec-1~wtec-4The transport rings such as highway, railway, water route and aviation are represented respectively
Weight of the border in adaptability teaching;
4. evaluation on environment adjustability model is hit in battlefield, and Strike is the main purpose of confrontation on the battlefield, and Strike includes normal
Hard destruction, soft compacting, information deception and the core biochemistry strike of rule;Hit evaluation on environment adjustability model in battlefield
Ssec=wsec-1Ssec-1+wsec-2Ssec-2 (11)
S in formulasecRepresent battlefield strike evaluation on environment adjustability achievement, Ssec-1Represent conventional Strike evaluation on environment adjustability
Achievement, wsec-1Represent its weight, Ssec-2Represent core biochemistry strike evaluation on environment adjustability achievement, wsec-2Represent its weight;
5. physical compatibility assessment models, physical compatibility is primarily referred to as the parts such as the rack of weaponry, antenna whole military
Device system meter and the matching capacity of appearance and size, weight etc. in assembling, its assessment models is
Sphc=wphc-1Sphc-1+wphc-2Sphc-2 (12)
S in formulaphcRepresent the physical compatibility evaluation score of equipment, Sphc-1Represent that the physical space size matching of equipment is assessed into
Achievement, wphc-1Represent its weight, Sphc-2Represent the weight-matched evaluation score of equipment, wphc-2Represent its weight;
(3) use environment adaptability Integrated Evaluation Model, it is to being filled under multiple Task Action that equipment use environment applicability, which is assessed,
For the synthesis of use environment applicability, its assessment models is
S in formulaoecThe comprehensive assessment achievement of equipment use environment adaptability is represented,Representing to equip under ith Task Action makes
With the evaluation score of environmental suitability,Represent its weight.According to above-mentioned adaptability unit evaluation model,Algorithm be
In formulaRepresent that equipment Battlefield natural environment is adapted under ith Task Action respectively
Property, electromagnetic environment adaptability, transportation environment adaptability, strike environmental suitability, the evaluation score of physical compatibility,Its weight is represented respectively;
3) uses task compatibility, refers to combat forces using task to reach the task that the predetermined purpose of operation is undertaken, by upper
Level commander determines, and is assigned in the form of combat order;By type, it is divided into attack and uses task using task and defence;
(1) task compatibility evaluation index system is used, weaponry refers to that weaponry makes in operation using task compatibility
During, fight integrity and the ability for continuing fight capability can be kept in the use task being continually changing;According to work
The key issue and its index decomposition for applicability of fighting, weaponry are assessed using task compatibility and set up evaluation index system;Make
Test assessment analysis is carried out from two levels with task compatibility, is that intact using the fight of required by task is completed to equipment first
Property and continue fight capability and carry out test assessment analysis respectively, followed by comprehensive fight integrity and continue fight capability experiment
On the basis of analysis and assessment, to carrying out comprehensive analysis assessment using task compatibility;
(2) task compatibility unit evaluation model is used
1. execution task rate assessment models are entirely capable of, be entirely capable of execution task rate refer to equipment be able to carry out it is all as defined in usually
The percentage that equipment possesses the time is accounted for the time of wartime mission;Being entirely capable of execution task rate assessment models is
S in formulactwRepresent that equipment is entirely capable of the evaluation score of execution task rate, fctw() represents that equipment is entirely capable of execution task rate
Evaluation score conversion function, TctwRepresent that equipment is entirely capable of performing task time (hour), TtotalRepresent that equipment possesses the time
(hour);
2. part can perform task rate assessment models, can partly perform task rate refer to equip be able to carry out that it accepts usually and
Part in wartime mission, rather than the time of whole tasks account for the percentage that equipment possesses the time;Part can perform task rate
Assessment models are
S in formulaptwRepresent that equipment part can perform the evaluation score of task rate, fptw() represents that equipment part can perform task rate
Evaluation score conversion function, TptwRepresent that equipment part can perform task time (hour);
3. task rate assessment models can be performed, task rate can be performed and refer to that equipping the time for being able to carry out part or all of task accounts for
Equipment possesses the percentage of time;Task rate assessment models, which can be performed, is
S in formulattwRepresent that equipment can perform the evaluation score of task rate, fttw() represent equipment can perform the assessment of task rate into
Achievement converts function, TttwRepresent that equipment can perform task time (hour), be that equipment is entirely capable of performing task time and can partly held
Row task time sum;
4. utilization rate assessment models are equipped, equipment utilization rate refers to be equipped in each related period, made within one day or one
With the working hours or work times in duty cycle;Equipment utilization rate assessment models are expressed as
Or
S in formulaeurRepresent the evaluation score of equipment utilization rate, feur() represents the evaluation score conversion function of equipment utilization rate,
TpworkRepresent to be equipped in daily or one using the hours worked in duty cycle, TperiodExpression be equipped in daily or
One uses the hours worked possessed in duty cycle, NpworkExpression is equipped in daily or one using in duty cycle
Work times, NperiodRepresent to be equipped in daily or one using the work times possessed in duty cycle;
5. mission reliability assessment models
Mission reliability refers to be equipped in the defined mission duration or enter in the stipulated time after task status, place
In upstate and the probability of its predetermined function can be completed;The basis of mission reliability is the equipment Reliability in task time,
Mission reliability does not consider equipment Maintainability.For the equipment with exponential failure rule, mission reliability is defined as
T is Average Task Time in formula, and MTBCF average key time between failures is the task necessary function of equipment, and task must
It is that system completes the function that task must be used, the Mean Time Between Replacement broken down to want function;Then there is mission reliability
Assessment models are
Srtw=frtw(MR) (21)
S in formulartwRepresent the evaluation score of equipment mission reliability, frtw() represents that the evaluation score of equipment mission reliability turns
Change function;
6. task rate assessment models are exited, equipment exits task rate and referred to due to one or more of task necessary function function
It is determined " can not work ", and the time percentage that equipment is exited from accepting for task.Exit task rate and assess mould
Type is
S in formulaqtwRepresent that equipment exits the evaluation score of task rate, fqtw() represents that equipment exits the evaluation score turn of task rate
Change function, TqtwRepresent the working time number equipped before being exited from accepting for task;
(3) task compatibility Integrated Evaluation Model is used
1. it is intended for single use to equip under task compatibility assessment models, single Task Action and is using task compatibility assessment models
Stasc=wtintStint+wtsusStsus (23)
S in formulatascRepresent that equipment uses the comprehensive assessment achievement of task compatibility, S under single Task Actiontint、StsusDifference table
Show that equipment uses task fight integrity and the evaluation score of lasting fight capability, wtint、wtsusIts weight is represented respectively;
Wherein using task fight integrity evaluation score StintComputation model be
Stint=wctwSctw+wptwSptw+wttwSttw (24)
W in formulactw、wptw、wttwRepresent be entirely capable of execution task rate, can partly perform task rate, task rate project can be performed respectively
Weight;
Continue Operational Capability Assessment achievement S using tasktsusComputation model be
Stsus=weurSeur+wrtwSrtw+wqtwSqtw (25)
W in formulaeur、wrtw、wqtwRepresent equipment utilization rate, mission reliability respectively and exit the weight of the projects such as task rate;
2. task compatibility Integrated Evaluation Model is used, multiple Task Action is polymerize, equipment uses task compatibility
Integrated Evaluation Model is
S in formulataskComprehensive assessment achievement of the equipment using task compatibility is represented,Represent that the equipment of ith task is used to appoint
The evaluation score for adaptability of being engaged in,Represent its weight;
4) operational supports adaptability
Operational support refers to the guarantee for directly serving in operation for meeting fight needs and organizing and implementing, including scouts feelings
Report, warning, communication, confidential, message protection, target, engineering, traffic, camouflage, NBC protection, mapping navigation, meteorological model,
Guarantee in terms of battlefield control, electromagnetic spectrum management, navigation, sonar, anti-dangerous lifesaving, navigator;Weaponry operational support, then be
Refer to those to meet the various action for directly serving in equipment deployment that weaponry is normally organized and implemented using needs;
(1) operational support adaptability teaching index system, weaponry operational support adaptability refers to that weaponry makes in operation
During, according to the key issue and its index decomposition of Operational Suitability, operational support adaptability teaching sets up evaluation index
System;Operational support applicability carries out test assessment analysis from two levels, and first is to operation maintenance support adaptability, operation
Operational support adaptability and operational support resources adaptability carry out test assessment analysis respectively, and second is in summary three examination
Test on the basis of analysis and assessment, comprehensive analysis assessment is carried out to operational support adaptability;
(2) operational support adaptability unit evaluation model
1. operation maintenance support adaptability teaching model, operation maintenance support refers to during operational exertion, in order to keep and
Recover technology and management activity that the intact technology status of weaponry is carried out, and to ensure that these activities are effectively implemented
Necessary Means of Ensuring, includes combat maintenance maintenance, BDAR both and its repairing mode of equipment;Operation maintenance support is adapted to
Property assessment models are
Smsc=wmsc-1Smsc-1+wmsc-2Smsc-2+wmsc-3Smsc-3 (27)
S in formulamscRepresent operation maintenance support adaptability teaching achievement, Smsc-1、Smsc-2And Smsc-3Represent that BDAR both is fitted respectively
Ying Xing, wartime repair adaptability and wartime maintenance adaptability teaching achievement, wmsc-1、wmsc-2And wmsc-3Its weight is represented respectively;
2. operational exertion ensures adaptability teaching model, and operational exertion ensures that adaptability teaching model is
Susc=wusc-1Susc-1+wusc-2Susc-2+wusc-3Susc-3+wusc-4Susc-4 (28)
S in formulauscRepresent that operational exertion ensures adaptability teaching achievement, Susc-1、Susc-2、Susc-3And Susc-4Battlefield is represented respectively certainly
Rescue adaptability, ensure quantity adaptability, resource storage adaptability and battlefield conveying adaptability teaching achievement, wusc-1、wusc-2、
wusc-3And wusc-4Its weight is represented respectively;
3. operational support resources Supportability Evaluation model, including combat maintenance and the maintenance personnel of equipment, maintenance instrument,
Outfit, the supply of spare part equipment, the maintenance training of facilities and equipment;Operational support resources adaptability teaching model is
Ssoc=wsoc-1Ssoc-1+wsoc-2Ssoc-2+wsoc-3Ssoc-3+wsoc-4Ssoc-4+wsoc-5Ssoc-5 (29)
S in formulasocRepresent operational support resources adaptability teaching achievement, Ssoc-1、Ssoc-2、Ssoc-3、Ssoc-4With and Ssoc-5Difference table
Show maintenance personnel, maintenance instrument, the outfit of facilities and equipment, the supply of spare part equipment, maintenance training
Evaluation score, wsoc-1、wsoc-2、wsoc-3、wsoc-4And wsoc-5Its weight is represented respectively;
(3) operational support adaptability teaching model is equipped under operational support adaptability Integrated Evaluation Model, single Task Action is
Soscs=wmscSmsc+wuscSusc+wsocSsoc (30)
S in formulaoscsRepresent the comprehensive assessment achievement of equipment operational support adaptability under single Task Action, wmsc、wuscAnd wsocPoint
Not Biao Shi operation maintenance support adaptability, operational exertion ensure the weight of adaptability and operational support resources adaptability;
Multiple Task Action is polymerize, the Integrated Evaluation Model of equipment operational support adaptability is
S in formulaoscThe comprehensive assessment achievement of equipment operational support adaptability is represented,Representing to equip under ith Task Action makes
With ensure adaptability evaluation score,Represent its weight;
5) is using weaving into adaptability, by organic whole in organizational system and formed by the belligerent alignment of forces attached troops to a unit;By type, divide
It is attack using weaving into and defend using weaving into;By scale, it is divided into campaign and weaves into and combat organization;By the pattern of operation, it is divided into connection
Close using weaving into contract using weaving into;By services and arms, it is divided into services using weaving into the arm of the services using weaving into;Weaponry makes
With weaving into, realize and the ability of the other key elements of combat system-of-systems is supported by force composition's structure, two aspects of operational commanding relation;
New Equipments and electronic information will assign new capabilities attribute for combat system-of-systems, traditional air defense, the mode of operation such as land on the island
It will develop to the integrative operation mode such as air defense, electronic warfare, anti-ballistic, and trigger force composition's structure to be mixed by traditional region by direct
Grouping formulation is closed, the structure of weaving into of weaponry uses air-defense anti-missile one, information and the integral different attribute firepower list of firepower
Member, diversification equip the shuffling intergration model of key element, and the operational commanding relation of weaponry also must fully adapt to information and be turned into
The characteristics of war is ageing by force, operation rhythm is fast;
(1) using adaptability teaching index system is weaved into, according to the key issue and its index decomposition of Operational Suitability, weapon dress
Standby use weaves into adaptability teaching and sets up evaluation index system;Divided using adaptability is weaved into from two levels progress test assessments
Analysis, first is to carry out test assessment analysis respectively to fight integrity and lasting fight capability, and second is intact in comprehensive fight
Property and on the basis of continuing the analysis of fight capability test assessment, to carrying out comprehensive analysis assessment using weaving into adaptability;
(2) using adaptability unit evaluation model is weaved into, equipment is referred to given using the Combat readiness weaved into adaptability
Force composition's structure, under operational commanding relation, puts into deployment and use in time with the armament systems attached troops to a unit in organizational system and sends out
Wave the ability of effect;The metric parameter for integrity of fighting includes the deployment in organizational system, interconnecting property, electric and electromagnetic compatibility
Property, using availability and use confidence level;The unit evaluation model related to Combat readiness has:
1. deployment property assessment models, deployment property refers to use task, enemy's situation, battlefield surroundings and campaign property, pattern according to army
Equipment Safeguard need, the arrangement to weaving into the assessment of tasks of interior equipment support forces, troops organize into groups and configuration is made.Deployment property
Assessment models be
Sdea=wcosScos+warsSars (32)
S in formuladeaRepresent deployment property evaluation score, ScosRepresent the net assessment achievement of the patterns of warfare under different use tasks, Sars
Represent the net assessment achievement of different troops' marshallings and configuration, wcos、warsIts weight is represented respectively;Wherein ScosAssessment models
For
In formulaThe evaluation score of equipment fielding under i-th kind of patterns of warfare is represented,The weight of i-th kind of patterns of warfare is represented,
N represents the total quantity of the patterns of warfare;
SarsAssessment models be
In formulaThe evaluation score of the marshalling of jZhong troops and the lower equipment fielding of configuration is represented,Represent the marshalling of jZhong troops
With the weight of configuration, m represents the total quantity of troops' marshalling and configuration;
2. interconnecting property assessment models, interconnecting property refers to that weaponry provides operation to other systems, unit or army
Instruction or information etc. service and received other systems, unit or the similar service of army, and are had based on this Exchange Service
Realize to effect the ability of cooperation;Its assessment models is
Siin=whinShin+witrSitr (35)
S in formulaiinRepresent the comprehensive assessment achievement of interconnecting property, ShinRepresent that weaponry realizes the total of interconnection with other systems
Body evaluation score, SitrRepresent that weaponry realizes the net assessment achievement of intercommunication, w with other systemshin、witrRepresent it respectively
Weight;Wherein ShinAssessment models be
In formulaRepresent that weaponry realizes the evaluation score of interconnection with i-th of equipment in equipment architecture,Represent its weight, k
Represent the total allowance amount with subject equipment realization interconnection in equipment architecture;
SitrAssessment models be
In formulaRepresent that weaponry equips the evaluation score for realizing intercommunication with j-th in equipment architecture,Represent its weight, k
Represent to equip the total allowance amount for realizing intercommunication in equipment architecture with subject;
3. electric compatible assessment models, electric compatibility refers to weaponry and power supply and the matching capacity of interface, including electricity
Source Type, current type, voltage range, frequency range, physical interface;Its assessment models is
S in formulaelcRepresent the electric compatible evaluation score of equipment, Selc-i(i=1,2, Λ, 5) represents the electricity that equipment is used respectively
Source Type, current type, voltage range, frequency range, the evaluation score of physical interface, welc-iRepresent the weight of respective item;
4. Electro Magnetic Compatibility assessment models, Electro Magnetic Compatibility is system, equipment and the device of all use electromagnetic spectrums work
A kind of ability, Electro Magnetic Compatibility generally includes electromagnetic design characteristic, anti-electromagnetic interference capability and the electromagnetic interference capability three of equipment
Individual aspect, its assessment models is
Semc=weldSeld+wajaSaja+wejaSeja (39)
S in formulaemcRepresent the Electro Magnetic Compatibility comprehensive assessment achievement of equipment, SeldRepresent equipment electromagnetic design characteristic assessment into
Achievement, SajaRepresent the evaluation score of equipment anti-electromagnetic interference capability, SejaRepresent the evaluation score of equipment electromagnetic interference capability, weld、
waja、wejaIts weight is represented respectively;
The electromagnetic design characteristic of equipment mainly considers PCB design, filter design, shielding design, cable and connector design, power supply
The factor of characteristic, its assessment models is
S in formulaelc-i(i=1,2, Λ, 5) represents that equipment PCB design, filter design, shielding design, cable and connector are set respectively
Meter, the evaluation score of power supply characteristic, welc-iRepresent the weight of respective item;
Anti-electromagnetic interference capability, which refers to be equipped in expected use environment, to work and not by unacceptable interference, reduction
Performance or the degree of damage, its assessment models is
Saja=waja-1Saja-1+waja-2Saja-2+waja-3Saja-3 (41)
S in formulaaja-1、Saja-2、Saja-3Represent that armament-related work frequency range, receiving sensitivity, reception characteristic refer to outside reception band respectively
Suppress, mirror image suppresses and hands over the evaluation score of intermodulation suppression, waja-1、waja-2、waja-3Represent the weight of respective item;
Electromagnetic interference capability refers to that equipment passes through conduction or radiation mode to other use electromagnetic spectrums equipment in its working environment
Formula produces unnecessary effect, and its assessment models is
Seja=weja-1Seja-1+weja-2Seja-2+weja-3Seja-3 (42)
S in formulaeja-1、Seja-2、Seja-3Represent respectively armament-related work frequency range, transmission power, emission characteristics refer to harmonic wave compacting and
Launch the evaluation score of attenuation outside a channel, weja-1、weja-2、weja-3Represent the weight of respective item;
5. use availability assessment models, including the intrinsic reliability of system and factor of maintainability, and with the longevity expected from system
Life cycle relevant logistics support efficiency;Its computation model is
Or
S in formulaavaRepresent the evaluation score using availability, fava() is represented using availability evaluation score conversion function, Twork
Represent up time, TtotalRepresent the total time that equipment possesses, Tshut-intAverage down event interval time is represented, that is, is made
Into the average time equipped between inoperable event, Tshut-avaAverage downtime is represented, that is, there occurs down event
Afterwards, in order that the average time that equipment returns to fully operational state and spent;
6. Credibility Assessment model is used, includes the inherent reliability and factor of maintainability of equipment, and with equipping execution task
The logistics support efficiency relevant with all times that may occur critical failure;Its computation model is
S in formuladepRepresent confidence level, fdep() represents that, using Credibility Assessment achievement conversion function, MTBCF represents that task is necessary
The MTBF of function is equipped, critical failure not necessarily occurs in a subtask, but it will necessarily or may
Task can be impacted, be reflected as the ratio of hours worked and critical failure number of times;When MTTRF is that average function recovers
Between, it is after occurring critical failure, in order that the average time that equipment returns to fully operational state and spent;It is included in pass
Key failure administration time delay relevant with recovering function after occurring and logistic delay time, are reflected as returning for critical failure
Multiple total time and the ratio of critical failure number of times;
Equipment, using the lasting fight capability weaved into adaptability, is army, equipment and the logistics support in organizational system and attached troops to a unit
Function, its metric parameter includes equipment average utilization in organizational system, infrastructure protection, Software Support, logistics can
By property and commander's control protection;The unit evaluation model related to lasting fight capability has:
1. average utilization assessment models are equipped
Equipment average utilization is used in duty cycle as defined in referring to, equips the average life span unit number for performing task;
Its computation model is
S in formularatRepresent equipment average utilization, frat() represents equipment average utilization evaluation score conversion function, TworkTable
Show armament-related work hourage, TprocRepresent the hours worked that equipment possesses;
2. infrastructure Supportability Evaluation model, its assessment models is
Sinf=winf-1Sinf-1+winf-2Sinf-2+winf-3Sinf-3+winf-4Sinf-4 (47)
S in formulainfRepresent the evaluation score of equipment infrastructure protection, Sinf-1、Sinf-2、Sinf-3、Sinf-4Equipment is represented respectively
Handling and transportation characterization, infrastructure needs, the evaluation score for ensureing device requirement and supply guarantee demand, winf-1、winf-2、
winf-3、winf-4Represent the weight of respective item;
3. Software Support assessment models refer to be equipped under the force composition's structure equipped, operational commanding relation, maintain to continue
Software maintenance, software maturity required for work, software resource guarantee, software security characteristic;Its assessment models is
Ssof=wsof-1Ssof-1+wsof-2Ssof-2+wsof-3Ssof-3+wsof-4Ssof-4 (48)
S in formulasofRepresent the evaluation score of equipment software protection, Ssof-1、Ssof-2、Ssof-3、Ssof-4Equipment software is represented respectively
Maintainability, software maturity, software resource guarantee, the evaluation score of software security, wsof-1、wsof-2、wsof-3、wsof-4Represent
The weight of respective item;
4. logistics Reliability Evaluation Model, logistics degree of reiability is use and guarantee plan of the equipment according to regulation, in row
Under force composition's structure of dress, operational commanding relation, the frequency for the maintenance carried out using defined logistical resources.Logistics
One metric parameter of reliability is mean time between repairs (MTBM), i.e. all maintenance events (including planned maintenance thing
Part and unscheduled maintenance event) between Mean Time Between Replacement.MTBM is defined as
MTBNM represents average unscheduled maintenance interval time in formula, is reflected as hours worked and unscheduled maintenance event
The ratio of number of times;MTBSM represents average planned maintenance interval time, is reflected as hours worked and planned maintenance event time
Several ratio;Then there is the logistics Reliability Evaluation Model to be
Slog=flog(MTBM) (50)
S in formulalogRepresent the evaluation score of equipment logistics reliability, flog() logistics reliability assessment achievement converts function.
5. commander controls Supportability Evaluation model
Commander's control protection refers to be equipped under the force composition's structure equipped, operational commanding relation, maintains continuous firing institute
The commander's control ability needed, generally comprises the key element such as the integrality for commanding control, accuracy, ageing, and its assessment models is
Sccs=wccs-1Sccs-1+wccs-2Sccs-2+wccs-3Sccs-3 (51)
S in formulaccsRepresent that equipment Command controls the evaluation score of protection, Sccs-1、Sccs-2、Sccs-3Equipment Command control is represented respectively
Integrality processed, accuracy, ageing evaluation score, wccs-1、wccs-2、wccs-3Represent the weight of respective item.
(3) use and weave into adaptability Integrated Evaluation Model
1. equipment is using weaving into adaptability teaching model under single Task Action assessment models, single Task Action
Swovs=wintSint+wsusSsus (52)
S in formulawovsRepresent that equipment uses the comprehensive assessment achievement for weaving into adaptability, S under single Task Actionint、SsusRepresent respectively
Its evaluation score fought integrity and continue fight capability, wint、wsusIts weight is represented respectively;
Wherein fight integrity evaluation score SintComputation model be
Sint=wdeaSdea+wiinSiin+welcSelc+
wemcSemc+wavaSava+wdepSdep (53)
W in formuladea、wiin、welc、wemc、wava、wdepDeployment property, electrically interconnecting property, compatibility, electromagnetic compatibility are represented respectively
Property, use availability and the weight using the project such as confidence level;
Continue Operational Capability Assessment achievement SsusComputation model be
Ssus=wratSrat+winfSinf+wsofSsof+wlogSlog+wccsSccs (54)
W in formularat、winf、wsof、wlog、wccsRespectively represent equipment average utilization, infrastructure protection, Software Support,
The weight of the project such as logistics reliability and commander's control protection;
2. Integrated Evaluation Model, polymerize to multiple Task Action, and the Integrated Evaluation Model that adaptability is weaved into equipment use is
S in formulawovEquipment is represented using the comprehensive assessment achievement for weaving into adaptability,Representing to equip under ith Task Action makes
With the evaluation score for weaving into adaptability,Represent its weight.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710201226.1A CN106971270A (en) | 2017-03-30 | 2017-03-30 | A kind of electronics use the appraisal procedure of applicability |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710201226.1A CN106971270A (en) | 2017-03-30 | 2017-03-30 | A kind of electronics use the appraisal procedure of applicability |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN106971270A true CN106971270A (en) | 2017-07-21 |
Family
ID=59335664
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201710201226.1A Pending CN106971270A (en) | 2017-03-30 | 2017-03-30 | A kind of electronics use the appraisal procedure of applicability |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN106971270A (en) |
Cited By (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107808242A (en) * | 2017-10-18 | 2018-03-16 | 中国人民解放军国防科技大学第六十三研究所 | Underwater Target Detection system environments adaptive detection device and evaluation method |
CN108053108A (en) * | 2017-12-07 | 2018-05-18 | 公安部第三研究所 | Decision-making management method and system are equipped in a kind of sizing based on equipment architecture state feature |
CN109815626A (en) * | 2019-02-21 | 2019-05-28 | 中国人民解放军战略支援部队航天工程大学 | A kind of equipment Safeguard characteristic evaluation system based on space mission |
CN109885933A (en) * | 2019-02-21 | 2019-06-14 | 中国人民解放军战略支援部队航天工程大学 | A kind of equipment Safeguard method of evaluating characteristic based on space mission |
CN110164539A (en) * | 2018-02-12 | 2019-08-23 | 北京绪水互联科技有限公司 | The analysis method of the scheduling of Medical Devices |
CN110310017A (en) * | 2019-06-17 | 2019-10-08 | 中国人民解放军战略支援部队航天工程大学 | A kind of human engineering appraisal procedure of equipment |
CN110309563A (en) * | 2019-06-17 | 2019-10-08 | 中国人民解放军战略支援部队航天工程大学 | A kind of use environment adaptedness appraisal procedure of equipment |
CN110472812A (en) * | 2019-06-17 | 2019-11-19 | 中国人民解放军战略支援部队航天工程大学 | A kind of mission task completion capability assessment method of equipment |
CN110726978A (en) * | 2019-11-29 | 2020-01-24 | 北京无线电测量研究所 | Radar health state maintenance method, system, medium and equipment |
CN111539628A (en) * | 2020-04-23 | 2020-08-14 | 成都众享天地网络科技有限公司 | Operator training evaluation method based on intercepted data of electronic reconnaissance equipment |
CN111800811A (en) * | 2020-09-08 | 2020-10-20 | 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 | Unsupervised detection method, unsupervised detection device, unsupervised detection equipment and storage medium for frequency spectrum abnormality |
CN111931391A (en) * | 2020-10-13 | 2020-11-13 | 中国人民解放军陆军装甲兵学院 | Equipment combat test index system construction method oriented to combat effectiveness and applicability |
CN112001582A (en) * | 2020-07-08 | 2020-11-27 | 中国兵器科学研究院 | Urban area action evaluation method, device, equipment and computer storage medium |
CN112783474A (en) * | 2020-12-31 | 2021-05-11 | 北京航空航天大学 | Software architecture adaptability evaluation method considering multiple factors |
-
2017
- 2017-03-30 CN CN201710201226.1A patent/CN106971270A/en active Pending
Cited By (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107808242A (en) * | 2017-10-18 | 2018-03-16 | 中国人民解放军国防科技大学第六十三研究所 | Underwater Target Detection system environments adaptive detection device and evaluation method |
CN108053108A (en) * | 2017-12-07 | 2018-05-18 | 公安部第三研究所 | Decision-making management method and system are equipped in a kind of sizing based on equipment architecture state feature |
CN110164539B (en) * | 2018-02-12 | 2022-04-19 | 北京绪水互联科技有限公司 | Analysis method for work schedule of medical equipment |
CN110164539A (en) * | 2018-02-12 | 2019-08-23 | 北京绪水互联科技有限公司 | The analysis method of the scheduling of Medical Devices |
CN114664426A (en) * | 2018-02-12 | 2022-06-24 | 北京绪水互联科技有限公司 | Analysis method for work schedule of medical equipment |
CN109815626A (en) * | 2019-02-21 | 2019-05-28 | 中国人民解放军战略支援部队航天工程大学 | A kind of equipment Safeguard characteristic evaluation system based on space mission |
CN109885933A (en) * | 2019-02-21 | 2019-06-14 | 中国人民解放军战略支援部队航天工程大学 | A kind of equipment Safeguard method of evaluating characteristic based on space mission |
CN109885933B (en) * | 2019-02-21 | 2023-10-13 | 中国人民解放军战略支援部队航天工程大学 | Equipment guarantee characteristic evaluation method based on aerospace task |
CN109815626B (en) * | 2019-02-21 | 2023-10-10 | 中国人民解放军战略支援部队航天工程大学 | Equipment guarantee characteristic evaluation system based on space mission |
CN110310017A (en) * | 2019-06-17 | 2019-10-08 | 中国人民解放军战略支援部队航天工程大学 | A kind of human engineering appraisal procedure of equipment |
CN110309563A (en) * | 2019-06-17 | 2019-10-08 | 中国人民解放军战略支援部队航天工程大学 | A kind of use environment adaptedness appraisal procedure of equipment |
CN110472812A (en) * | 2019-06-17 | 2019-11-19 | 中国人民解放军战略支援部队航天工程大学 | A kind of mission task completion capability assessment method of equipment |
CN110726978A (en) * | 2019-11-29 | 2020-01-24 | 北京无线电测量研究所 | Radar health state maintenance method, system, medium and equipment |
CN111539628A (en) * | 2020-04-23 | 2020-08-14 | 成都众享天地网络科技有限公司 | Operator training evaluation method based on intercepted data of electronic reconnaissance equipment |
CN112001582A (en) * | 2020-07-08 | 2020-11-27 | 中国兵器科学研究院 | Urban area action evaluation method, device, equipment and computer storage medium |
CN111800811A (en) * | 2020-09-08 | 2020-10-20 | 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 | Unsupervised detection method, unsupervised detection device, unsupervised detection equipment and storage medium for frequency spectrum abnormality |
CN111931391A (en) * | 2020-10-13 | 2020-11-13 | 中国人民解放军陆军装甲兵学院 | Equipment combat test index system construction method oriented to combat effectiveness and applicability |
CN112783474A (en) * | 2020-12-31 | 2021-05-11 | 北京航空航天大学 | Software architecture adaptability evaluation method considering multiple factors |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN106971270A (en) | A kind of electronics use the appraisal procedure of applicability | |
Said | Theory and practice of total ship survivability for ship design | |
CN114282833A (en) | Rules-based hierarchical task planning method for air-sea combined combat action | |
Park et al. | Development of damage control training scenarios of naval ships based on simplified vulnerability analysis results | |
CN110222998A (en) | A kind of ensuring operations ability appraisal procedure of equipment | |
Zraket | Strategic command, control, communications, and intelligence | |
Grange et al. | Forgotten mission: Military support to the nation | |
Bruzzone et al. | Maritime security: emerging technologies for asymmetric threats | |
Doxford et al. | Army training: the environmental gains resulting from the adoption of alternatives to traditional training methods | |
Martin et al. | Future Aircraft Carrier Options | |
Papakonstantinou et al. | Early assessment of drone fleet defence in depth capabilities for mission success | |
CN110298565A (en) | Adaptedness appraisal procedure is weaved into a kind of use of equipment | |
Davidson et al. | An Analysis of Size, Weight and Power (SWAP) for EMP Shielding of the RAAD System | |
Kumar et al. | Armed forces and disaster management in India | |
Zhang et al. | Research on Establishment Method of Index System for Weapons and Equipment Operational Test | |
Geer | Advanced damage control system | |
Davidson et al. | SYSTEMS ENGINEERING CAPSTONE REPORT | |
Lua | Systems engineering approach for conceptual design of frigate | |
None | National Nuclear Security Administration Strategic Vision Strengthening our Nation through Nuclear Security | |
JOSEPH | NBC Proliferation | |
Chen et al. | Modeling the role of CSAR team based on AML | |
Shaffer et al. | Concepts for Change: DoD’s 2014 Research and Engineering Strategy | |
Calvert et al. | A system to integrate unmanned undersea vehicles with a submarine host platform | |
Daigneault et al. | USPACOM Study Program. Chemical Warfare Analysis. SANITIZED | |
Doesburg et al. | The evolution of chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear defense and the contributions of army research and development |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20170721 |
|
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |