CN106934478A - Hlw Geological Repository site suitability method for quantitatively evaluating based on AHP - Google Patents

Hlw Geological Repository site suitability method for quantitatively evaluating based on AHP Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN106934478A
CN106934478A CN201511017812.8A CN201511017812A CN106934478A CN 106934478 A CN106934478 A CN 106934478A CN 201511017812 A CN201511017812 A CN 201511017812A CN 106934478 A CN106934478 A CN 106934478A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
site
index
suitability
geological repository
hlw
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201511017812.8A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
苏锐
周志超
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology
Original Assignee
Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology filed Critical Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology
Priority to CN201511017812.8A priority Critical patent/CN106934478A/en
Publication of CN106934478A publication Critical patent/CN106934478A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/04—Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem"
    • G06Q10/043—Optimisation of two dimensional placement, e.g. cutting of clothes or wood
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0635—Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities

Abstract

The invention belongs to the elimination of nuclear facilities and radwaste Treatment process field, and in particular to a kind of Hlw Geological Repository site suitability method for quantitatively evaluating based on AHP.The method of the present invention is comprised the following steps：Step 1. determines the index of Hlw Geological Repository site suitability quantitative assessment；Step 2. sets up Hlw Geological Repository site suitability evaluation hierarchy Model；Step 3. sets up Hlw Geological Repository site suitability evaluation hierarchy Model judgment matrix；Step 4. difference addressing scheme is integrated ordered.The present invention is solved and for step analysis law theory to be applied to the Three Difficult Issues that the suitability quantitative assessment of Hlw Geological Repository site faces, how to build hierarchy Model, how development of judgment matrix, how comprehensive and quantitative judges the superiority-inferiority of different addressing schemes, can be large-scale to Hlw Geological Repository etc., complicated and safety evaluation cycle overlength site suitability carries out quantitative evaluation.

Description

Hlw Geological Repository site suitability method for quantitatively evaluating based on AHP
Technical field
The invention belongs to the elimination of nuclear facilities and radwaste Treatment process field, and in particular to one kind is based on The Hlw Geological Repository site suitability method for quantitatively evaluating of AHP.
Background technology
The radioactivity of high radioactivity nuclear waste (abbreviation high-level waste) is strong, toxicity is big, heating, and nucleic Half-life period is extremely long, it is necessary to take reliable means that it is effectively isolated with environment for human survival.From current generation Boundary's development sees, using deep geology bury (in the deep about 500-1000 meters geologic body of earth's surface) and with The geological disposal mode of biosphere isolation is considered as a kind of disposal means effectively, safe, it has also become state Know together on border.The safe disposal of high-level waste faces a series of in terms of science, technology, humanity and sociology Great, complicated problem, its difficult point is：How to ensure that high-level waste is carried out with biosphere abundant, thorough Bottom, reliably isolate；How to ensure isolation time more than 10,000 years, even 100,000 years；It is how effectively pre- Survey reliability of isolation etc..Wherein, how to select qualified site, how to evaluate the suitable of site Property be one of the scientific and technical problem for solving high-level waste safe disposal.
China《The Law on the Prevention and Control of Radioactive Pollution》" high-level radioactive solid waste carries out collection to clear stipulaties In deep geological disposal ".According to State Council's announcement in 2011《Radwaste safety management regulations》, China mainland area is low, middle Intermediate Level Radioactive solid waste disposal facility should meet more than 300 years after closing Security isolation requirement；High-level radioactive solid waste and alpha activity solid waste depth geological disposal set Apply the security isolation requirement that more than 10,000 years should be met after closing.Thus, Hlw Geological Repository work Journey is also referred to as 10000 years engineerings, and the screening of its site and suitability evaluation are both different from general civil engineering, Also different from existing all nuclear engineerings.
China's Hlw Geological Repository sieving disposal site and appraisal are started from 1985, tentatively in the whole nation 6 big pre-selected zones and 21 key sections and 7 candidate sites, but sieving disposal site and evaluation work are screened It is still within the initial stage of whole high-level waste geology treatment research and development.Either pre-selected zone screening Or key sections and the screening of candidate site, the method for use is expert's qualitative subjective evaluation.
Quantitative evaluation is the important development direction of information age, particularly big data epoch management, It is widely used in natural science and Social Science Research, for science decision provides support.In view of height puts useless Thing geological disposal storehouse engineering has that construction condition is complicated, safe class is high, period of service limit for length (10,000 years with On) the features such as, disposal storehouse site suitability quantitative evaluation is that high-level waste geology treatment was researched and developed The inevitable requirement of site decision-making in journey.
Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) (Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP), in 20 century 70s Phase is formally proposed by U.S. scholar Thomas-Sai Di that plans strategies for.The method is a kind of combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis , systematization, the analysis method of stratification.Due to its practicality in the complicated decision problem for the treatment of And validity, paid attention in world wide quickly.The application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) throughout Economic planning and Management, energy policy and distribution, behavior science, military commanding, transport, agricultural, education, the talent, The field such as medical treatment and environment.Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is by analyzing the factor and its mutually interconnect that challenge includes System, is different key elements by PROBLEM DECOMPOSITION, and is different levels by these key element merger, so as to be formed Multilayered structure, can two-by-two be compared foundation and be sentenced by a certain specified criteria in each level to this layer of key element Disconnected matrix, by calculating the eigenvalue of maximum and corresponding orthogonalized eigenvectors of judgment matrix, draws this Layer key element calculates group of each level key element for overall goal on this basis for the weight of the criterion Close weight.It is offer foundation of choosing the best alternatives so as to draw the weights of different scenarios.
How to be commented for high radioactivity nuclear waste repository site suitability carries out quantification using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) Valency is the technical problem of the elimination of nuclear facilities and radwaste Treatment process field urgent need to resolve.
The content of the invention
The technical problem to be solved in the invention is：Propose a kind of high-level waste geology treatment based on AHP Storehouse site suitability method for quantitatively evaluating, solves and for step analysis law theory to be applied to high-level waste geology How the disposal Three Difficult Issues that face of storehouse site suitability quantitative assessment, i.e., build hierarchy Model, such as What development of judgment matrix, how comprehensive and quantitative judges the superiority-inferiority of different addressing schemes.
Technical scheme is as described below：
A kind of Hlw Geological Repository site suitability method for quantitatively evaluating based on AHP, including with Lower step：Step 1. determines the index of Hlw Geological Repository site suitability quantitative assessment；Step 2. Hlw Geological Repository site suitability evaluation hierarchy Model is set up；Step 3. is set up height and is put Waste geological disposal storehouse site suitability evaluation hierarchy Model judgment matrix；Step 4. difference addressing side Case is integrated ordered.
Index described in step 1 is divided into Site Selection stage index, Regional survey stage index and field Evaluate and the stage of recognition index location.
In step 2, according to the Hlw Geological Repository site suitability quantitative assessment that step 1 determines Index stage by stage, builds each stage site suitability quantitative assessment hierarchy Model, including destination layer, Rule layer and solution layer：Destination layer is sieving disposal site；Rule layer is divided into two-layer, and upper strata is accurate first class index Then layer, lower floor is two-level index rule layer；Solution layer is several addressing schemes.
In step 3, using first class index key element C as interpretational criteria, two-level index key element is carried out two-by-two Compare the relevant factor for determining judgment matrix, the judgment matrix form of generation is as follows：
Wherein, the element b in judgment matrix BijRepresent according to interpretational criteria C key elements BiTo BjIt is relatively important Property.
Preferably：In step 3, bijValue rule is as follows：
1) for C, BiCompare BjIt is particularly important, then bij=9；
2) for C, BiCompare BjIt is important a lot, then bij=7；
3) for C, BiCompare BjIt is important, then bij=5；
4) for C, BiCompare BjIt is slightly important, then bij=3；
5) for C, BiWith BjNo less important, then bij=1；
6) for C, BiCompare BjIt is slightly secondary, then bij=1/3；
7) for C, BiCompare BjIt is secondary, then bij=1/5；
8) for C, BiCompare BjIt is secondary a lot, then bij=1/7；
9) for C, BiCompare BjIt is extremely secondary, then bij=1/9.
In step 4, calculating process is divided into two steps：The first step, different choosings are calculated by criterion of two-level index Location scheme it is integrated ordered；Second step, compares the integrated ordered of different addressing schemes under the conditions of first class index, If the weighted value of a certain addressing scheme is bigger, show that the addressing scheme is more favourable, the suitability of site Better.
In step 4, for site criterion m first class index Cm, calculate the K choosing relative to each two-level index The weight of location scheme, the different schemes weight with each two-level index as criterion is represented with following matrix：
Wherein, dijIt is i-th two-level index for j-th score value of addressing scheme；
The integrated ordered judgment matrix of each two-level index of the different addressing schemes relative to site criterion m is represented It is as follows：
Wherein,
BjIt is j-th two-level index；
bjIt is j-th two-level index score value；
DiIt is BjFor i-th two-level index weight of addressing scheme；
By after consistency check, obtaining the comprehensive of each two-level index of the different schemes relative to site criterion m Close sequence：
Wherein,
I=1,2 ..., m, m are two-level index number；
pijIt is the weight of corresponding i-th two-level index of j-th addressing scheme；
Build Synthetic Judgement Matrix of the different addressing schemes relative to first class index：
Wherein,
PiThe integrated ordered judgment matrix of each two-level index for i-th addressing scheme relative to site criterion m；
CjIt is j-th first class index；
cjIt is j-th weight of first class index；
By after consistency check, obtaining synthesis row of the different addressing schemes relative to site criterion first class index Sequence：
Wherein, diIt is i-th weighted value of addressing scheme.
Beneficial effects of the present invention are：
(1) a kind of Hlw Geological Repository site suitability based on AHP of the invention is quantitatively commented Valency method, solves the problem of Hlw Geological Repository site suitability quantitative assessment, it is adaptable to high Put that waste geological disposal storehouse etc. is large-scale, complicated and site of safety evaluation cycle overlength (more than 10,000 years) Suitability quantitative evaluation；
(2) a kind of Hlw Geological Repository site suitability based on AHP of the invention is quantitatively commented Valency method, the different phase Hlw Geological Repository site suitability evaluation hierarchy Model of foundation, It is different indexs to realize site suitability evaluation PROBLEM DECOMPOSITION, and is difference by these index merger Level, so as to simplify the weight ratio of all kinds of indexs compared with solving step analysis law theory and be applied to height Put one of problem that the suitability quantitative assessment of waste geological disposal storehouse site is present --- how to build level knot Structure model；
(3) a kind of Hlw Geological Repository site suitability based on AHP of the invention is quantitatively commented Valency method, the Hlw Geological Repository site suitability evaluation hierarchy Model judgment matrix of foundation, Solve step analysis law theory and be applied to the suitability quantitative assessment presence of Hlw Geological Repository site One of problem --- how development of judgment matrix；
(4) a kind of Hlw Geological Repository site suitability based on AHP of the invention is quantitatively commented Valency method, the different addressing scheme integrated ranking methods of foundation, solves step analysis law theory and is applied to One of problem that suitability quantitative assessment in Hlw Geological Repository site is present --- how comprehensive and quantitative Judge the superiority-inferiority of different addressing schemes；
(5) had been completed using the method for the present invention refined to high-level waste geology treatment Xinjiang pre-selected zone The suitability evaluation and time of key sections in full Soviet Union and Tian Hu locations candidate's sieving disposal site and evaluation study project Selected scenes location is elected, and by evaluating, the integrated ordered weight in Jamin Soviet Union location is the comprehensive of 0.475, Tian Hu locations It is 0.45 to close weight order, and integrated ordered value is bigger, and the site suitability that represents is better, therefore Jamin Soviet Union location Suitability be better than Tian Hu locations.
Brief description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is the general hierarchical structure of Hlw Geological Repository site suitability quantitative assessment of the invention Model；
Fig. 2 is Site Selection stage of the invention site suitability evaluation hierarchy Model；
Fig. 3 is Regional survey stage of the invention site suitability evaluation hierarchy Model；
Fig. 4 is that site of the invention is evaluated and the stage of recognition site suitability evaluation hierarchy Model.
Specific embodiment
With reference to the accompanying drawings and examples to a kind of high-level waste geology treatment based on AHP of the invention Storehouse site suitability method for quantitatively evaluating is described in detail.
A kind of Hlw Geological Repository site suitability quantitative assessment side based on AHP of the invention Method, comprises the following steps：
Step 1. determines the index of Hlw Geological Repository site suitability quantitative assessment
The index for determining the suitability quantitative assessment of Hlw Geological Repository site is basis of the invention. For Hlw Geological Repository sieving disposal site and the laws and regulations requirement evaluated, this step operational design goes out a set of It is being consistent with research object feature, can quantitative description index.
The operation reference of this step《World's core geological sciences》Journal article " Hlw Geological Repository site The principle determined in the Preliminary study on index system of suitability quantitative evaluation " and the index system for proposing, it is determined that The index of Hlw Geological Repository site suitability quantitative assessment.Index be divided into the Site Selection stage, Regional survey stage, site are evaluated and the common three phases of the stage of recognition, by 10 first class index and 59 Two-level index is combined according to certain logical relation.Wherein, the site suitability in Site Selection stage is determined Quantitatively evaluating index is by geological conditions, following natural trend condition, geochemical conditions, environmental protection bar Part and 5 first class index such as social economy and humane condition and 15 two-level index are constituted；Regional survey The site suitability quantitative evaluation index in stage is by geological conditions, hydrogeologic condition, geochemistry bar 5 first class index and 19 two-level index such as part, environmental protection condition and social economy and humane condition Constitute；The site suitability quantitative evaluation index with the stage of recognition will be evaluated by geological conditions, future in site Natural trend, hydrogeology, geochemistry, construction and engineering specifications, mankind's activity, waste transport, 10 first class index such as environmental protection, land use, social economy and humane condition and 43 two grades refer to Mark is constituted.The first class index and two-level index syntagmatic in each stage are as shown in table 1.
The Hlw Geological Repository site suitability quantitative assessing index list of table 1
Step 2. sets up Hlw Geological Repository site suitability evaluation hierarchy Model
Hlw Geological Repository site suitability evaluation hierarchy Model is set up, the purpose is to pass through Index and its phase that analysis Hlw Geological Repository site this challenge of suitability evaluation is included Mutually contact, is different indexs by site suitability evaluation PROBLEM DECOMPOSITION, and by these index merger for not With level, so as to form multilayered structure, i.e. Hlw Geological Repository site suitability evaluation layer Secondary structural model.
According to the Hlw Geological Repository site suitability quantitative assessment sublevel that step 1 of the present invention determines Duan Zhibiao, builds each stage site suitability quantitative assessment hierarchy Model, including destination layer, criterion Layer and solution layer.The general hierarchy Model of Hlw Geological Repository site suitability quantitative assessment is such as Shown in Fig. 1, destination layer is sieving disposal site；Rule layer is divided into two-layer, and upper strata refers to for one-level described in step 1 Target first class index rule layer, lower floor is the two-level index rule layer of two-level index described in step 1；Scheme Layer is several addressing schemes.
Specifically, the site of Site Selection stage, Regional survey stage, site evaluation and the stage of recognition is fitted Suitable property quantitative assessment hierarchy Model difference is as shown in Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4.
Step 2.1. Site Selection stage site suitability evaluation hierarchy Models
Site Selection stage site suitability evaluation hierarchy Model is as shown in Figure 2.Wherein, destination layer is Recommend suitable disposal storehouse site pre-selected zone；Rule layer be divided into two-layer, i.e. first class index rule layer, two grades Index rule layer；Solution layer be emphasis pre-selected zone screening scheme, the present embodiment include Xinjiang pre-selected zone, Bei Shan Mountain pre-selected zone, Inner Mongol pre-selected zone, East China pre-selected zone, south China pre-selected zone, southwestern pre-selected zone are total to Six big pre-selected zones.
Step 2.2. Regional survey stage site suitability evaluation hierarchy Models
Regional survey stage site suitability evaluation hierarchy Model is as shown in Figure 3.Wherein, destination layer is Recommend suitable pre-selection location；Rule layer is divided into two-layer, i.e. first class index rule layer, two-level index criterion Layer；Solution layer is some pre-selection locations filtered out from six big pre-selected zones.
Evaluate and the stage of recognition site suitability evaluation hierarchy Model step 2.3. sites
Site is evaluated and the stage of recognition site suitability evaluation hierarchy Model is as shown in Figure 4.Wherein, mesh Mark layer is to recommend suitable site；Rule layer is divided into two-layer, i.e. first class index rule layer, two-level index standard Then layer；Solution layer is some candidate sites filtered out from pre-selection location.
Step 3. sets up Hlw Geological Repository site suitability evaluation hierarchy Model judgment matrix
Set up Hlw Geological Repository site suitability evaluation hierarchy Model judgment matrix, its purpose It is that this layer of key element is compared two-by-two in each level, sets up judgment matrix.
As shown in figure 1, using first class index key element C as interpretational criteria, two are carried out to two-level index key element Two compare the relevant factor for determining judgment matrix, then the judgment matrix form for generating is as follows：
Wherein, the element b in judgment matrix BijRepresent according to interpretational criteria C, key element BiTo BjIt is relatively heavy The property wanted.B in the present inventionijValue be according to data and and expert's subjective determination determine.Its value Rule is as follows：
1) for C, BiCompare BjIt is particularly important, then bij=9；
2) for C, BiCompare BjIt is important a lot, then bij=7；
3) for C, BiCompare BjIt is important, then bij=5；
4) for C, BiCompare BjIt is slightly important, then bij=3；
5) for C, BiWith BjNo less important, then bij=1；
6) for C, BiCompare BjIt is slightly secondary, then bij=1/3；
7) for C, BiCompare BjIt is secondary, then bij=1/5；
8) for C, BiCompare BjIt is secondary a lot, then bij=1/7；
9) for C, BiCompare BjIt is extremely secondary, then bij=1/9；
If 10) BiCompare BjImportance between above-mentioned adjacent modular, then bijValue is respectively 8,6, 4th, 2,1/2,1/4,1/6 and 1/8.
Step 4. difference addressing scheme is integrated ordered
Different addressing schemes are integrated ordered, the purpose is in index weights result of calculations at different levels and different schemes Two-level index parameter basis on development of judgment matrix, i.e., with two-level index be comparison between the standards difference addressing side Development of judgment matrix on the basis of case.Its calculating process can be divided into two steps：The first step, be with two-level index Criterion calculates the integrated ordered of different addressing schemes；Second step, compares different addressings under the conditions of first class index Scheme it is integrated ordered, if the weighted value of a certain addressing scheme is bigger, show that the addressing scheme has been got over Profit, the suitability of site is better.
With the site criterion m first class index C in Fig. 1mAs a example by, calculate the K choosing relative to each two-level index The weight of location scheme.Comparing two-by-two according to the data for being actual measurement for different schemes, then be with each two-level index The different schemes weight of criterion is shown with following matrix table.
Wherein, dijIt is i-th two-level index for j-th score value of addressing scheme.
The integrated ordered judgment matrix of each two-level index of the different addressing schemes relative to site criterion m is represented It is as follows：
Wherein, BjIt is j-th two-level index, bjIt is j-th two-level index score value, DiIt is BjFor i-th choosing The two-level index weight of location scheme.
Complexity due to objective factor or the one-sidedness to factor analysis, it is necessary to carry out consistency check, So as to ensure that estimator is judged many factors under same idea logic so that assisted between each judge Adjust consistent.Consistency check method refers to Electronic Industry Press's publication《Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and its application Case》, by after consistency check, if meeting condition for consistence, different schemes can be obtained relative In site criterion m each two-level index it is integrated ordered, it is assumed that judgment matrix result of calculation above is：
Wherein,
I=1,2 ..., m, m are two-level index number；
pijIt is the weight of corresponding i-th two-level index of j-th addressing scheme.
On this basis, different addressing schemes are built as follows relative to the Synthetic Judgement Matrix of first class index.
Wherein,
PiThe integrated ordered judgment matrix of each two-level index for i-th addressing scheme relative to site criterion m；
CjIt is j-th first class index；
cjIt is j-th weight of first class index.
By after consistency check, if meeting condition for consistence, different addressing schemes can be obtained relative In the integrated ordered of site criterion first class index, it is assumed that be：
Wherein, diIt is i-th weighted value of addressing scheme.
The weight of above-mentioned different schemes is different schemes suitability priority ordering, the weight of a certain addressing scheme Value shows that more greatly the addressing scheme is more favourable, and the suitability of site is better.

Claims (7)

1. a kind of Hlw Geological Repository site suitability method for quantitatively evaluating based on AHP, its It is characterised by：Comprise the following steps：
Step 1. determines the index of Hlw Geological Repository site suitability quantitative assessment；
Step 2. sets up Hlw Geological Repository site suitability evaluation hierarchy Model；
Step 3. sets up Hlw Geological Repository site suitability evaluation hierarchy Model and judges square Battle array；
Step 4. difference addressing scheme is integrated ordered.
2. a kind of Hlw Geological Repository site based on AHP according to claim 1 is fitted Suitable property method for quantitatively evaluating, it is characterised in that：Index described in step 1 be divided into Site Selection stage index, Regional survey stage index and site are evaluated and the stage of recognition index.
3. a kind of Hlw Geological Repository site based on AHP according to claim 2 is fitted Suitable property method for quantitatively evaluating, it is characterised in that：In step 2, according to the high-level waste ground that step 1 determines Matter disposal storehouse site suitability quantitative assessment index stage by stage, builds each stage site suitability quantitative assessment Hierarchy Model, including destination layer, rule layer and solution layer：Destination layer is sieving disposal site；Rule layer It is divided into two-layer, upper strata is first class index rule layer, and lower floor is two-level index rule layer；Solution layer is some Individual addressing scheme.
4. a kind of Hlw Geological Repository site based on AHP according to claim 3 is suitable Property method for quantitatively evaluating, it is characterised in that：In step 3, using first class index key element C as interpretational criteria, Compared two-level index key element the relevant factor for determining judgment matrix, the judgment matrix shape of generation two-by-two Formula is as follows：
Wherein, the element b in judgment matrix BijRepresent according to interpretational criteria C key elements BiTo BjIt is relatively important Property.
5. a kind of Hlw Geological Repository site based on AHP according to claim 4 is suitable Property method for quantitatively evaluating, it is characterised in that：In step 3, bijValue rule is as follows：
1) for C, BiCompare BjIt is particularly important, then bij=9；
2) for C, BiCompare BjIt is important a lot, then bij=7；
3) for C, BiCompare BjIt is important, then bij=5；
4) for C, BiCompare BjIt is slightly important, then bij=3；
5) for C, BiWith BjNo less important, then bij=1；
6) for C, BiCompare BjIt is slightly secondary, then bij=1/3；
7) for C, BiCompare BjIt is secondary, then bij=1/5；
8) for C, BiCompare BjIt is secondary a lot, then bij=1/7；
9) for C, BiCompare BjIt is extremely secondary, then bij=1/9.
6. a kind of Hlw Geological Repository based on AHP according to claim 4 or 5 Location suitability method for quantitatively evaluating, it is characterised in that：In step 4, calculating process is divided into two steps：First Step, the integrated ordered of different addressing schemes is calculated by criterion of two-level index；Second step, compares one-level and refers to Different addressing schemes is integrated ordered under the conditions of mark, if the weighted value of a certain addressing scheme is bigger, table The bright addressing scheme is more favourable, and the suitability of site is better.
7. a kind of Hlw Geological Repository site based on AHP according to claim 6 is suitable Property method for quantitatively evaluating, it is characterised in that：In step 4, for site criterion m first class index Cm, meter Calculate the weight of the K addressing scheme relative to each two-level index, the not Tongfang with each two-level index as criterion Case weight is represented with following matrix：
Wherein, dijIt is i-th two-level index for j-th score value of addressing scheme；
The integrated ordered judgment matrix of each two-level index of the different addressing schemes relative to site criterion m is represented It is as follows：
Wherein,
BjIt is j-th two-level index；
bjIt is j-th two-level index score value；
DiIt is BjFor i-th two-level index weight of addressing scheme；
By after consistency check, obtaining the comprehensive of each two-level index of the different schemes relative to site criterion m Close sequence：
P ‾ i = [ p i 1 , p i 2 , ... , p i k ] T
Wherein,
I=1,2 ..., m, m be two-level index number；
pijIt is the weight of corresponding i-th two-level index of j-th addressing scheme；
Build Synthetic Judgement Matrix of the different addressing schemes relative to first class index：
Wherein,
PiThe integrated ordered judgment matrix of each two-level index for i-th addressing scheme relative to site criterion m；
CjIt is j-th first class index；
cjIt is j-th weight of first class index；
By after consistency check, obtaining synthesis row of the different addressing schemes relative to site criterion first class index Sequence：
Wherein, diIt is i-th weighted value of addressing scheme.
CN201511017812.8A 2015-12-29 2015-12-29 Hlw Geological Repository site suitability method for quantitatively evaluating based on AHP Pending CN106934478A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201511017812.8A CN106934478A (en) 2015-12-29 2015-12-29 Hlw Geological Repository site suitability method for quantitatively evaluating based on AHP

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201511017812.8A CN106934478A (en) 2015-12-29 2015-12-29 Hlw Geological Repository site suitability method for quantitatively evaluating based on AHP

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN106934478A true CN106934478A (en) 2017-07-07

Family

ID=59442290

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201511017812.8A Pending CN106934478A (en) 2015-12-29 2015-12-29 Hlw Geological Repository site suitability method for quantitatively evaluating based on AHP

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN106934478A (en)

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108332696A (en) * 2018-01-27 2018-07-27 中国地质科学院探矿工艺研究所 landslide monitoring method selection method
CN109272255A (en) * 2018-10-26 2019-01-25 中国辐射防护研究院 A kind of high-level waste geology treatment environmental impact assessment data information management system
CN109345074A (en) * 2018-09-03 2019-02-15 中国辐射防护研究院 A kind of method high-level waste geology treatment public acceptance influence factor identification and evaluated
CN109447387A (en) * 2018-09-03 2019-03-08 中国辐射防护研究院 A kind of scene method for building up suitable for the evaluation of arid area high level radioactive waste repository far field
CN109740783A (en) * 2018-08-24 2019-05-10 四川海纳仁东科技有限公司 Bi-objective Programming method based on dangerous waste Treatment stations addressing
CN110458440A (en) * 2019-08-06 2019-11-15 南京信息工程大学 A kind of ecology endowment suitability quantification overall analysis system
CN110570118A (en) * 2019-09-06 2019-12-13 云南电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院 Power distribution network fault management scheme evaluation method and evaluation device
CN110852557A (en) * 2019-09-24 2020-02-28 长江大学 GIS-based refuse landfill site selection method and device
CN112434977A (en) * 2020-12-15 2021-03-02 北京建工资源循环利用投资有限公司 Method and device for evaluating impurity removal effect of intelligent sorting equipment and terminal equipment
CN112651596A (en) * 2020-12-01 2021-04-13 中国辐射防护研究院 Method for determining emergency state criterion of post-processing plant based on hierarchical analysis and processing method
CN113890043A (en) * 2021-12-06 2022-01-04 广东电网有限责任公司惠州供电局 Phase-shifting transformer site selection method, system and medium based on multi-condition constraint

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102945507A (en) * 2012-10-09 2013-02-27 东北大学 Optimal site selection method and device for distributed wind power plant based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
CN103886383A (en) * 2012-12-20 2014-06-25 核工业北京地质研究院 Granite type uranium mine target optimization method based on element geochemical abnormity
US9177269B2 (en) * 2009-05-29 2015-11-03 International Business Machines Corporation Complexity reduction of user tasks

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9177269B2 (en) * 2009-05-29 2015-11-03 International Business Machines Corporation Complexity reduction of user tasks
CN102945507A (en) * 2012-10-09 2013-02-27 东北大学 Optimal site selection method and device for distributed wind power plant based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
CN103886383A (en) * 2012-12-20 2014-06-25 核工业北京地质研究院 Granite type uranium mine target optimization method based on element geochemical abnormity

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
苏锐 等: "高放废物地质处置库场址适宜性定量化评价指标体系初探", 《世界核地质科学》 *

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108332696A (en) * 2018-01-27 2018-07-27 中国地质科学院探矿工艺研究所 landslide monitoring method selection method
CN109740783A (en) * 2018-08-24 2019-05-10 四川海纳仁东科技有限公司 Bi-objective Programming method based on dangerous waste Treatment stations addressing
CN109345074A (en) * 2018-09-03 2019-02-15 中国辐射防护研究院 A kind of method high-level waste geology treatment public acceptance influence factor identification and evaluated
CN109447387A (en) * 2018-09-03 2019-03-08 中国辐射防护研究院 A kind of scene method for building up suitable for the evaluation of arid area high level radioactive waste repository far field
CN109272255A (en) * 2018-10-26 2019-01-25 中国辐射防护研究院 A kind of high-level waste geology treatment environmental impact assessment data information management system
CN110458440A (en) * 2019-08-06 2019-11-15 南京信息工程大学 A kind of ecology endowment suitability quantification overall analysis system
CN110570118A (en) * 2019-09-06 2019-12-13 云南电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院 Power distribution network fault management scheme evaluation method and evaluation device
CN110852557A (en) * 2019-09-24 2020-02-28 长江大学 GIS-based refuse landfill site selection method and device
CN112651596A (en) * 2020-12-01 2021-04-13 中国辐射防护研究院 Method for determining emergency state criterion of post-processing plant based on hierarchical analysis and processing method
CN112434977A (en) * 2020-12-15 2021-03-02 北京建工资源循环利用投资有限公司 Method and device for evaluating impurity removal effect of intelligent sorting equipment and terminal equipment
CN113890043A (en) * 2021-12-06 2022-01-04 广东电网有限责任公司惠州供电局 Phase-shifting transformer site selection method, system and medium based on multi-condition constraint
CN113890043B (en) * 2021-12-06 2022-03-18 广东电网有限责任公司惠州供电局 Phase-shifting transformer site selection method, system and medium based on multi-condition constraint

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN106934478A (en) Hlw Geological Repository site suitability method for quantitatively evaluating based on AHP
Kondolf et al. Tools in fluvial geomorphology. Problem statement and recent practice
Frind et al. Well vulnerability: a quantitative approach for source water protection
Siddiqui et al. Landfill siting using geographic information systems: a demonstration
Abudeif et al. Multicriteria decision analysis based on analytic hierarchy process in GIS environment for siting nuclear power plant in Egypt
Zhou et al. GIS-based urban underground space resources evaluation toward three-dimensional land planning: A case study in Nantong, China
CN105069689B (en) Based on the coal seam floor water-inrush risk evaluation method that grey correlation is combined with FDAHP
CN102194056B (en) BN-GIS (Bayesian Network-Geographic Information System) method for evaluating and predicting water inrush danger of coal-seam roof and floor
CN106529738A (en) Groundwater polluted site repair technology optimization method
CN107145672B (en) Method and system for evaluating vulnerability and pollution risk of underground water in plain river network area
CN104200284B (en) Mine fault tectonic prediction technique
CN101201927A (en) Dynamic evaluation and partition early warning system for region land deterioration
CN105654236A (en) Pollution risk evaluation method for underground water type drinking water source region
CN109447493A (en) A kind of Debris Flow Hazard Assessment method after the shake based on material resource activity intensity
Ahmed Modelling spatio-temporal urban land cover growth dynamics using remote sensing and GIS techniques: A case study of Khulna City
Faulds et al. Integrated geologic and geophysical approach for establishing geothermal play fairways and discovering blind geothermal systems in the Great Basin region, western USA: A progress report
Puppala et al. Identification and analysis of barriers for harnessing geothermal energy in India
Chabuk et al. Landfill siting using GIS and AHP (analytical hierarchy process): A case study Al-Qasim Qadhaa, Babylon, Iraq
Ataei et al. A fuzzy DEMATEL based sustainable development index (FDSDI) in open pit mining–a case study
Sharma et al. Australia’s first geosequestration demonstration project—the CO2CRC Otway Basin Pilot Project
Blowers et al. Environmental responses
Eslamlou et al. Evaluation of urban resiliency in physico-structural dimension of Karaj metropolis
Li et al. Risk Assessment of Building Foundation Pit Construction Based on Fuzzy Hierarchical Comprehensive Evaluation Method
Liu et al. A web-based multicriteria evaluation of spatial trade-offs between environmental and economic implications from hydraulic fracturing in a shale gas region in Ohio
Schöniger et al. Strengthening groundwater governance by means of system-relevant indicators

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20170707