CN106651132A - DEA-based public cultural service performance evaluation method - Google Patents

DEA-based public cultural service performance evaluation method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN106651132A
CN106651132A CN201611014424.9A CN201611014424A CN106651132A CN 106651132 A CN106651132 A CN 106651132A CN 201611014424 A CN201611014424 A CN 201611014424A CN 106651132 A CN106651132 A CN 106651132A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
dmu
dea
input
output
index
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201611014424.9A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
王学杰
李彤
肖贵中
管霞
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Anhui Huabo Shengxun Information Technologies Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Anhui Huabo Shengxun Information Technologies Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Anhui Huabo Shengxun Information Technologies Co Ltd filed Critical Anhui Huabo Shengxun Information Technologies Co Ltd
Priority to CN201611014424.9A priority Critical patent/CN106651132A/en
Publication of CN106651132A publication Critical patent/CN106651132A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G06Q10/06393Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10Services
    • G06Q50/26Government or public services

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a DEA-based public cultural service performance evaluation method. The method can be used to evaluate the efficiency of multi-input multi-output decision-making units with the same type, and in a process of efficiency value operation, the method can solve difficulties caused by different dimensions of indexes in a traditional method. Based on the principles of independence, relevance, economy, and normalization, the weights of input and output indexed in the model can be calculated by constructing a mathematical programming model according to actual sample data, rather than manually setting input and output weight coefficients in advance. Thus, evaluation results are relatively more objective. When the method is used for performance evaluation, there is no need to set the specific form of an evaluation function, input and output are expressed by an implicit function. Optimal input and output functions are provided for respective decision-making units through the mathematical programming model. Function calculation is more convenient.

Description

A kind of Public Culture Service Performance Evaluation Methods based on DEA
Technical field
The present invention relates to Public Culture Service field, more particularly to a kind of Public Culture Service performance based on DEA is commented Valency method.
Background technology
In the last few years, China's cultural industry was developed rapidly, 2009《Cultural industry development is planned》Promulgation, by culture product Industry rises to national strategy industry.The comprehensive guiding of the nine ministries and commissions such as the Propaganda Department of the CPC Central Committee, the People's Bank in 2010 is strengthened to film and tv industry, new Hear publishing business, culture and arts service trade, tourist culture service trade, exhibition industry, Art Design and art and manage industry, stationery sports goods system Make the finance support dynamics that industry etc. gives priority to field.Culture and related industry value added and account for the proportion cumulative year after year of GDP. 2012, Chinese culture and the related industry gross output value broke through 4 trillion yuans, accounted for GDP proportions up to 8.5%, and total value and proportion are all obtained Further lifted.
Cultural system was gone through transition in experience from " economic construction type government " to " Service-oriented Government ", from China head in 2005 To today " culture is made the country prosperous, cultural power ", various places Public Culture Service flourishes secondary proposition " Public Culture Service ".With society Can expanding economy, Public Culture Service as service whole society member based on, by governmental input be main source of finance, no To get a profit as main purpose.But because China's national government function and financial input etc. affect, government is largest to pursue Target is turned to, rather than yield maximization is minimized as criterion to put into.Many, the government plus functional government departments' level Scale is big, and Public Culture Service unit is more and complicated, how science and accurate to carry out performance to Public Culture Service unit and comments Valency becomes the great difficult problem of functional department of the Chinese government.
Public Culture Service refers to government to be leading, relies on public sector's production or provides, and provides public to public Cultural product and service altogether, such as its to the effect that Public Culture basic facilities, product and service etc., public library, group's skill Shop, museum etc..Public Culture Service relies primarily on government finance appropriation, not for the purpose of profit, provides non-competing for society The general name of the resource distribution activity of the Public Culture product and service of property.Public Culture Service ensures that whole society citizen is enjoying text Make no exception when changing service, and the Public Culture Service that provides of public sector can allow popular quick and easy enjoy. Only in this way, just can help to meet the popular demand to culture, ensure public cultural rights, promote socialism essence The construction of refreshing civilization.
DEA is DEA, and the method is 1978 by well-known concept of the scholar in relative efficiency of planning strategies in the U.S. On the basis of a kind of efficiency rating method for developing.Because its objectivity is strong, convenient use, economic implications are remarkable, it is adaptable to The advantages of putting into many outputs more, and the concern of scholars is enjoyed, the important tool of system evaluation, and energy are had become at present Multiple different fields are enough used in, use range is extensive.
DEA models have very strong objectivity, and dimensionless.Embody other evaluation methods are just compared at the beginning of establishment Validity, this is also that the advantage of DEA is located.
Abroad, the range of application of DEA does not only extend to the aspects such as the flight of military aircraft, ground force's conscription, urban evaluation, And also obtain in the evaluation to bank, electric power enterprise or even the private business company that there is keen competition each other Success.The each hospital of North Carolina, USA carries out performance appraisal using different models, by identical data operation, uses DEA models can accurately draw returns to scale, and return production function and then show there are no returns to scale.Massachusetts, United States are imitated Rate evaluation committee member be compared DEA methods and ratio method, and DEA is tested with analogy method, finally finds, although The data that regression function is produced are conducive to the use of homing method, but result shows or DEA is more efficient.
The content of the invention
It is an object of the invention to provide a kind of Public Culture Service Performance Evaluation Methods based on DEA.
The purpose of the present invention can be achieved through the following technical solutions:
A kind of Public Culture Service Performance Evaluation Methods based on DEA, including:
Purpose is evaluated in step one, determination, before performance appraisal is carried out, it is determined that clearly evaluating purpose, evaluates purpose It is determined that the ownership that can cause performance evaluating index changes;
Step 2, trade-off decision cells D MU, all DMU decision packages are required under identical environment and have identical Input and identical output, constitute a reference set together if there is the DMU of more type difference, by they press phase With characteristic be divided into multiple subsets, then respectively DMU analyses are carried out to each subset, finally again analysis result be independently carry out and also It is comprehensive carrying out;
Step 3, structure Input and Output Indexes system, under the premise of evaluation purpose is realized, design covers index systems, so Afterwards respectively carrying out DEA analyses to each index system, and analysis result is compared, and then index system is carried out further Optimization is until finding relatively best a set of index system;
Step 4, selection DEA models, select according to input, the controllability of output-index sample data and handlability Model, is analyzed simultaneously from different types of model as far as possible, then analysis result is compared to each other;
Step 5, design and statement to work are evaluated.
Further, described step five includes:
S1, the DEA relative effectivenesses for determining each DMU;
S2, the relative size situation of Profit for analyzing each DMU;
S3, determine relative efficiency production proportions face;
S4, determine " projections " of each DMU on effective production front side;
Relation between S5, the relative effectiveness of each DMU of analysis and each Input and Output Indexes;
S6, the relation for analyzing relative effectiveness between each DMU;
The impact of S7, the different index systems of analysis to each DMU relative effectivenesses.
Beneficial effects of the present invention:
A kind of Public Culture Service Performance Evaluation Methods based on DEA provided by the present invention, the method can be used for solution Certainly multi input, the efficiency of multiple decision packages with same type of multi output are evaluated, and are being carried out efficiency value fortune During calculation, many difficulties that each index dimension difference in conventional method can be solved and brought;Public Culture Service performance is commented Valency Index module is the center of gravity for building whole Public Culture Service performance evaluation theory framework, and the index's quality quality of selection is to achievement The quality that effect is evaluated has directly impact, and the selection of evaluation index is former based on independency principle, relevance principle, economy Then, ethical rule, input, the weight of output-index can pass through to build mathematical programming model in model, then according to reality Sample data is calculated, rather than is manually set the weight coefficient of input and output in advance, makes evaluation result comparatively more Plus it is objective, when application method carries out performance appraisal, it is not necessary to set the concrete form of evaluation function, input and output adopt implicit function Form represent that the parameter in the evaluation function of different decision packages can arbitrarily change, all will pass through for each decision package The means of mathematical programming model provide the input-output function of optimum, calculate convenient hence with function.
Description of the drawings
In order to be illustrated more clearly that the embodiment of the present invention or technical scheme of the prior art, below will be to embodiment or existing The accompanying drawing to be used needed for having technology description is briefly described, it should be apparent that, drawings in the following description are only this Inventive embodiment, for those of ordinary skill in the art, on the premise of not paying creative work, can be with basis The accompanying drawing of offer obtains other accompanying drawings.
Fig. 1 is the operating principle schematic diagram of the present invention.
Specific embodiment
The core of the present invention is to provide a kind of Public Culture Service Performance Evaluation Methods based on DEA.
In order that those skilled in the art more fully understand the present invention program, below in conjunction with the embodiment of the present invention Accompanying drawing, is clearly and completely described to the technical scheme in the embodiment of the present invention, and described embodiment is only the present invention A part of embodiment, rather than the embodiment of whole.Based on the embodiment in the present invention, those of ordinary skill in the art are not having The every other embodiment obtained under the premise of creative work is made, the scope of protection of the invention is belonged to.
The invention provides a kind of Public Culture Service Performance Evaluation Methods based on DEA, the method comprises the steps:
A kind of Public Culture Service Performance Evaluation Methods based on DEA, including:
Purpose is evaluated in step one, determination, before performance appraisal is carried out, typically can all be had and clearly be evaluated purpose, is evaluated The determination of purpose can cause the ownership of performance evaluating index to change;Such as performance appraisal is carried out in national museum, if now Purpose be from input angle evaluate museum, then " expert's number " index can be used as be input into class index;If in order to evaluate The development in museum, then " expert's number " should be used as output class index;
Step 2, trade-off decision cells D MU, all DMU decision packages are required under identical environment and have identical Input and identical output, constitute a reference set together if there is the DMU of more type difference, it is now " similar Type " reflects not abundant enough, they can be divided into into multiple subsets by identical characteristic, then each subset is carried out respectively DMU is analyzed, and finally again analysis result is independently to carry out or comprehensively carry out;
Step 3, structure Input and Output Indexes system, it then follows following principle:
1) will comprehensive reflected appraisal purpose, in general, want more comprehensive reflected appraisal purpose need multi input and Multi output could be more complete description, lacking some indexs can be such that evaluation purpose embodies from complete;
2) contact between input vector, output vector is considered, it is impossible to have no logical relation input, between exporting Some vectors include in index system;
3) input, the diversity of output indicator system are considered.We can design several under the premise of evaluation purpose is realized Set index system, then respectively carrying out DEA analyses to each index system, and analysis result is compared, and then to index System carries out further optimization until finding relatively best a set of index system;
Step 4, selection DEA models, are selected according to following principle:
1) according to input, the controllability of output-index sample data and handlability selecting model;
2) due to determining whether weak effective and " throwing original invalid with the infinitesimal model of non-Archimedes Shadow " has convenience on relative efficiency face;
3) with regard to validity itself, C2R models are that the totality simultaneously for Size Portfolio and technology are effective is effective, And C2GS2Model can only assessment technique validity.Additionally, C2The production of R models may integrate as closed convex cone, and be built upon rule Under the hypothesis of mould revenue unchangeable, and C2GS2Model then reflect returns to scale it is variable in the case of, corresponding production may collect and be Convex set;
If 4) production may integrate as convex cone, input, output-index number it is more, especially because policymaker to be input into, Relative importance between output-index has defined, and this regulation has been embodied in evaluation, from wimble structure C2WH models are just relatively adapted to;
5) in order to obtain the evaluation information of not ipsilateral, may in the case of, as far as possible from different types of model simultaneously Be analyzed, then analysis result be compared to each other, make result more comprehensively, it is more deep, more accurate;
Step 5, design and statement to work are evaluated, including:
S1, the DEA relative effectivenesses for determining each DMU;
S2, the relative size situation of Profit for analyzing each DMU;
S3, determine relative efficiency production proportions face;
S4, determine " projections " of each DMU on effective production front side;
Relation between S5, the relative effectiveness of each DMU of analysis and each Input and Output Indexes;
S6, the relation for analyzing relative effectiveness between each DMU;
The impact of S7, the different index systems of analysis to each DMU relative effectivenesses.
Above content is only to present configuration example and explanation, affiliated those skilled in the art couple Described specific embodiment is made various modifications or supplements or substituted using similar mode, without departing from invention Structure surmounts scope defined in the claims, all should belong to protection scope of the present invention.

Claims (2)

1. a kind of Public Culture Service Performance Evaluation Methods based on DEA, it is characterised in that include:
Purpose is evaluated in step one, determination, before performance appraisal is carried out, it is determined that clearly evaluating purpose, evaluates the determination of purpose The ownership that performance evaluating index can be caused changes;
Step 2, trade-off decision cells D MU, all DMU decision packages are required under identical environment and have identical defeated Enter and identical output, if there is the DMU of more type difference a reference set is constituted together, they are pressed into identical Characteristic is divided into multiple subsets, then to each subset carries out DMU analyses respectively, and finally again analysis result is independently to carry out or comprehensive Conjunction is carried out;
Step 3, structure Input and Output Indexes system, under the premise of evaluation purpose is realized, design covers index systems, Ran Houfen Not carrying out DEA analyses to each index system, and analysis result is compared, and then index system is further optimized Until finding relatively best a set of index system;
Step 4, selection DEA models, according to input, the controllability of output-index sample data and handlability mould is selected Type, is analyzed simultaneously from different types of model as far as possible, then analysis result is compared to each other;
Step 5, design and statement to work are evaluated.
2. a kind of Public Culture Service Performance Evaluation Methods based on DEA according to claim 1, it is characterised in that institute The step of stating five includes:
S1, the DEA relative effectivenesses for determining each DMU;
S2, the relative size situation of Profit for analyzing each DMU;
S3, determine relative efficiency production proportions face;
S4, determine " projections " of each DMU on effective production front side;
Relation between S5, the relative effectiveness of each DMU of analysis and each Input and Output Indexes;
S6, the relation for analyzing relative effectiveness between each DMU;
The impact of S7, the different index systems of analysis to each DMU relative effectivenesses.
CN201611014424.9A 2016-11-17 2016-11-17 DEA-based public cultural service performance evaluation method Pending CN106651132A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201611014424.9A CN106651132A (en) 2016-11-17 2016-11-17 DEA-based public cultural service performance evaluation method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201611014424.9A CN106651132A (en) 2016-11-17 2016-11-17 DEA-based public cultural service performance evaluation method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN106651132A true CN106651132A (en) 2017-05-10

Family

ID=58807576

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201611014424.9A Pending CN106651132A (en) 2016-11-17 2016-11-17 DEA-based public cultural service performance evaluation method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN106651132A (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109034510A (en) * 2017-06-08 2018-12-18 上海济通信息技术有限公司 A kind of taxi Performance Evaluation Methods based on data envelope analysis
CN109272198A (en) * 2018-08-22 2019-01-25 北方民族大学 A kind of public industry performance evaluation method based on game crossing efficiency
CN111626541A (en) * 2020-03-30 2020-09-04 上海电力大学 Museum visiting effect evaluation method and system based on D-S evidence theory
CN112740305A (en) * 2018-12-27 2021-04-30 多玩国株式会社 Processing device, program, and display medium
CN113298365A (en) * 2021-05-12 2021-08-24 北京信息科技大学 LSTM-based cultural additional value assessment method

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109034510A (en) * 2017-06-08 2018-12-18 上海济通信息技术有限公司 A kind of taxi Performance Evaluation Methods based on data envelope analysis
CN109272198A (en) * 2018-08-22 2019-01-25 北方民族大学 A kind of public industry performance evaluation method based on game crossing efficiency
CN112740305A (en) * 2018-12-27 2021-04-30 多玩国株式会社 Processing device, program, and display medium
US11460728B2 (en) 2018-12-27 2022-10-04 Dwango Co, Ltd Processing device, program, and display medium
CN111626541A (en) * 2020-03-30 2020-09-04 上海电力大学 Museum visiting effect evaluation method and system based on D-S evidence theory
CN113298365A (en) * 2021-05-12 2021-08-24 北京信息科技大学 LSTM-based cultural additional value assessment method
CN113298365B (en) * 2021-05-12 2023-12-01 北京信息科技大学 Cultural additional value assessment method based on LSTM

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN106651132A (en) DEA-based public cultural service performance evaluation method
Cafieri et al. Mixed-integer nonlinear programming for aircraft conflict avoidance by sequentially applying velocity and heading angle changes
Topalli et al. Mapping the evolution of the impact of economic transition on Central and Eastern European enterprises: A co-word analysis
Oakey High-technology entrepreneurship
CN104573106A (en) Intelligent urban construction examining and approving method based on case-based reasoning technology
CN103678436A (en) Information processing system and information processing method
Melo et al. Oil, foreign direct investment and corruption
CN107545038A (en) A kind of file classification method and equipment
Alonso et al. A reactive GRASP algorithm for the container loading problem with load-bearing constraints
CN104866863A (en) Biomarker screening method
CN102799954A (en) Method and system for multi-objective optimization applied to risk assessment
Vannuccini et al. Artificial intelligence’s new clothes? From general purpose technology to large technical system
CN103678681B (en) The Multiple Kernel Learning sorting technique of the auto-adaptive parameter based on large-scale data
Li et al. Fuzzy LINMAP method for multiattribute group decision making with linguistic variables and incomplete information
An et al. Evaluation and temporal-spatial deconstruction for high-quality development of regional marine economy: A case study of China
CN105868900A (en) Enterprise pre-cooperative partner classification method based on SVM (support vector machine)
Wang et al. Research on the factors affecting the innovation performance of China’s new energy type enterprises from the perspective of industrial policy
CN106940836A (en) A kind of data analysing method and device
CN104008429B (en) Aero-engine assembly task priority ordering method
WO2023071129A1 (en) Method for identifying proportion of green assets and related product
CN103164531A (en) Two-stage instance layer data integration approach based on fuzzy priority
Weng et al. Studying weariness prediction using SMOTE and random forests
Lin et al. Report on the Innovation and Development of the Special Economic Zones in China
Hong Research on the comprehensive evaluation of sports management system with analytical hierarchy process
DeMuniz Overturning precedent: The case for judicial activism in reengineering state courts

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20170510