CN106552998B - The method of estimation of laser index carving technological parameter and laser index carving method - Google Patents
The method of estimation of laser index carving technological parameter and laser index carving method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106552998B CN106552998B CN201611020874.9A CN201611020874A CN106552998B CN 106552998 B CN106552998 B CN 106552998B CN 201611020874 A CN201611020874 A CN 201611020874A CN 106552998 B CN106552998 B CN 106552998B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- laser
- marking
- image
- process parameters
- laser marking
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 116
- 238000010330 laser marking Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 128
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 63
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 63
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 54
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 claims description 20
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000010367 cloning Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000000608 laser ablation Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 abstract description 10
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 12
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 12
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005094 computer simulation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000002679 ablation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002844 melting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008018 melting Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
- B23K26/00—Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
- B23K26/36—Removing material
- B23K26/361—Removing material for deburring or mechanical trimming
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/0002—Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
- G06T7/0004—Industrial image inspection
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2119/00—Details relating to the type or aim of the analysis or the optimisation
- G06F2119/18—Manufacturability analysis or optimisation for manufacturability
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Optics & Photonics (AREA)
- Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Laser Beam Processing (AREA)
Abstract
本发明涉及激光标刻领域,尤其涉及一种利用激光在铝锭表面标刻铝锭标识所需的激光标刻工艺参数的估计方法。为提高标刻效果以及标刻效率,本发明提出一种激光标刻工艺参数的估计方法:在待标刻铝锭上进行等水平多因素正交试验并记录多组试验数据;建立标刻图像的图像灰度值G的计算模型方程:bi(i=0、1、2、3)、b4、b5、......、b9、b10为拟合系数;根据等水平多因素正交试验的试验数据拟合得出拟合系数的值;根据目标函数G<150估计得出激光标刻工艺参数。利用该激光标刻工艺参数的估计方法可根据标刻需要的图像灰度值估计出激光标刻工艺参数可直接用于激光标刻,提高了激光标刻效果、效率以及标刻图像的自动识别率。
The invention relates to the field of laser marking, in particular to a method for estimating laser marking process parameters required for marking an aluminum ingot on the surface of an aluminum ingot by using a laser. In order to improve the marking effect and marking efficiency, the present invention proposes a method for estimating laser marking process parameters: conduct equal-level multi-factor orthogonal tests on aluminum ingots to be marked and record multiple sets of test data; establish marking images The calculation model equation of the image gray value G: b i (i=0, 1, 2, 3), b 4 , b 5 ,..., b 9 , b 10 are fitting coefficients; according to the test data fitting of equal-level multi-factor orthogonal test Obtain the value of the fitting coefficient; estimate and obtain the laser marking process parameters according to the objective function G<150. Using the estimation method of laser marking process parameters, the laser marking process parameters can be estimated according to the gray value of the image required for marking, which can be directly used for laser marking, which improves the effect and efficiency of laser marking and the automatic recognition of marked images Rate.
Description
技术领域technical field
本发明涉及激光标刻领域,尤其涉及一种利用激光在铝锭表面标刻铝锭标识所需的激光标刻工艺参数的估计方法以及利用激光在铝锭表面标刻铝锭标识的方法。The invention relates to the field of laser marking, in particular to a method for estimating laser marking process parameters required for marking an aluminum ingot on the surface of an aluminum ingot by using a laser and a method for marking an aluminum ingot on the surface of an aluminum ingot by using a laser.
背景技术Background technique
在铝锭制作完成出厂前,需在铝锭上标记铝锭标识,该铝锭标识通常采用文字、条形码和/或二维码的形式记载铝锭的生产单位、生产日期、化验信息、熔炼炉号、品位信息及重量信息等相关信息。Before the aluminum ingot is finished and leaves the factory, the aluminum ingot logo needs to be marked on the aluminum ingot. The aluminum ingot logo usually uses text, barcode and/or two-dimensional code to record the production unit, production date, laboratory information, and melting furnace of the aluminum ingot. No., grade information and weight information and other relevant information.
目前,铝锭标识通常是将打印有铝锭标识的纸质标签粘贴在铝锭上或者是利用喷墨标刻、气动标刻或激光标刻方法将铝锭标识标刻在铝锭表面上。其中,将打印有铝锭标识的纸质标签粘贴在铝锭上,费时费力,成本高,且纸质标签在铝锭运输、存储过程中易受损,影响辨识。喷墨标刻以及气动标刻得到的铝锭标识自动辨识性差,辨识不便。采用激光标刻方法在铝锭表面标刻铝锭标识时,需根据标刻需要对激光标刻工艺参数进行选择调节,但是由于铝锭表面凹凸不平,标刻背景图像复杂,导致激光标刻工艺参数选择困难,标刻效果差,标刻效率低,进而导致标刻的铝锭标识尤其是铝锭标识中的一维码以及二维码的自动识别率低。At present, aluminum ingots are marked by pasting paper labels printed with aluminum ingots on the aluminum ingots or by using inkjet marking, pneumatic marking or laser marking to mark the aluminum ingots on the surface of the aluminum ingots. Among them, pasting the paper label printed with the aluminum ingot logo on the aluminum ingot is time-consuming, laborious, and costly, and the paper label is easily damaged during the transportation and storage of the aluminum ingot, which affects the identification. The automatic identification of aluminum ingot marks obtained by inkjet marking and pneumatic marking is poor and inconvenient. When using the laser marking method to mark the aluminum ingot on the surface of the aluminum ingot, it is necessary to select and adjust the laser marking process parameters according to the marking needs. However, due to the uneven surface of the aluminum ingot and the complex marking background image, the laser marking process The selection of parameters is difficult, the marking effect is poor, and the marking efficiency is low, which leads to a low automatic recognition rate of the marked aluminum ingot marking, especially the one-dimensional code and two-dimensional code in the aluminum ingot marking.
发明内容Contents of the invention
为提高标刻效果以及标刻效率,本发明提出一种激光标刻工艺参数的估计方法,该估计方法包括如下步骤:In order to improve marking effect and marking efficiency, the present invention proposes a method for estimating laser marking process parameters, which includes the following steps:
步骤1:在待标刻铝锭上进行等水平多因素正交试验,试验过程中,调整激光标刻工艺参数以获得不同的标刻图像的图像灰度值,并记录多组试验数据,该试验数据包括激光标刻工艺参数聚焦激光束直径d、激光机Q频率f、激光扫描速度v、激光功率p和填充线间距s的值以及对应的标刻图像的图像灰度值;Step 1: Conduct an equal-level multi-factor orthogonal test on the aluminum ingot to be marked. During the test, adjust the laser marking process parameters to obtain different image gray values of the marked image, and record multiple sets of test data. The test data include laser marking process parameters focusing laser beam diameter d, laser machine Q frequency f, laser scanning speed v, laser power p, and filling line spacing s values, as well as the image gray value of the corresponding marking image;
步骤2:建立标刻图像的图像灰度值的计算模型方程:Step 2: Establish the calculation model equation of the image gray value of the marked image:
其中,in,
G表示标刻图像的图像灰度值,G represents the image gray value of the marked image,
bi(i=0、1、2、3)、b4、b5、......、b9、b10为拟合系数;b i (i=0, 1, 2, 3), b 4 , b 5 ,..., b 9 , b 10 are fitting coefficients;
步骤3:根据所述步骤1中的等水平多因素正交试验的试验数据拟合得出所述图像灰度值的计算模型方程中的拟合系数的值;Step 3: According to the test data fitting of the equal-level multi-factor orthogonal test in the step 1, obtain the value of the fitting coefficient in the calculation model equation of the gray value of the image;
步骤4:根据目标函数G<150估计得出激光标刻工艺参数激光光斑重叠次数n、聚焦激光束直径d、激光机Q频率f、激光扫描速度v、激光单脉冲能量e以及激光功率p的值。Step 4: According to the objective function G<150, estimate the laser marking process parameters laser spot overlapping times n, focused laser beam diameter d, laser machine Q frequency f, laser scanning speed v, laser single pulse energy e and laser power p value.
利用该激光标刻工艺参数的估计方法可根据标刻需要的图像灰度值估计出激光标刻工艺参数,且采用估计得到的激光标刻工艺参数标刻得到的标刻图像灰度测量值即标刻图像灰度实际值与利用估计得到的激光标刻工艺参数估计得到的标刻图像灰度估计值之间的吻合度较高。也就是说,利用估计得到的激光标刻工艺参数直接进行激光标刻得到的标刻图像的灰度值与预计得到的标刻图像的图像灰度值较为接近,因此,估计得到的激光标刻工艺参数可直接用于激光标刻,提高了激光标刻效果以及标刻效率。另外,在利用目标函数对激光标刻工艺参数进行估计时,可根据自动识别需要设定目标函数G的具体取值,从而可提高标刻图像的自动识别率。Using this estimation method of laser marking process parameters, the laser marking process parameters can be estimated according to the image gray value required for marking, and the gray value of the marking image obtained by marking with the estimated laser marking process parameters is The agreement between the actual gray value of the marked image and the estimated gray value of the marked image obtained by estimating the estimated laser marking process parameters is relatively high. That is to say, the gray value of the marking image obtained by direct laser marking using the estimated laser marking process parameters is relatively close to the expected gray value of the marking image. Therefore, the estimated laser marking The process parameters can be directly used for laser marking, which improves the laser marking effect and marking efficiency. In addition, when using the objective function to estimate the laser marking process parameters, the specific value of the objective function G can be set according to the needs of automatic identification, so that the automatic identification rate of the marked image can be improved.
优选地,在所述步骤3中,采用免疫克隆算法拟合得出所述图像灰度值的计算模型方程中的拟合系数的值。进一步地,进行拟合时,采用的亲和度优化目标函数为 Preferably, in the step 3, the value of the fitting coefficient in the calculation model equation of the gray value of the image is obtained by fitting the immune cloning algorithm. Further, when fitting, the affinity optimization objective function used is
其中,in,
N为所述步骤1中进行等水平多因素正交试验时采集到的试验数据的组数,N is the group number of the test data collected when carrying out equal level multifactorial orthogonal test in described step 1,
Gmj为一次亲和度计算中第j组试验得到的标刻图像的图像灰度估计值,G mj is the estimated image gray value of the marked image obtained from the jth group of experiments in an affinity calculation,
Gcj为一次亲和度计算中第j组试验得到的标刻图像的图像灰度测量值。G cj is the image grayscale measurement value of the marked image obtained from the jth group of experiments in an affinity calculation.
这样,可进一步提高拟合速度及拟合系数的准确度,进而可提高激光标刻工艺参数的估计精度。In this way, the fitting speed and the accuracy of the fitting coefficients can be further improved, and thus the estimation accuracy of the laser marking process parameters can be improved.
本发明还提出一种激光标刻方法,该激光标刻方法包括如下步骤:The present invention also proposes a laser marking method, which includes the following steps:
S1、利用在待标刻的铝锭的表面上烧蚀出浅色标刻背景区,且该浅色标刻背景区的灰度值方差σ2≤50,图像灰度均值M≥150;S1. A light-color marking background area is ablated on the surface of the aluminum ingot to be marked, and the gray-scale value variance σ 2 of the light-color marking background area is ≤50, and the image gray-scale average value M≥150;
S2、利用权利要求1-3中任意一项所述的激光标刻工艺参数的估计方法估计出在所述浅色标刻背景区标刻铝锭标识用的激光标刻工艺参数;S2. Using the method for estimating laser marking process parameters described in any one of claims 1-3 to estimate the laser marking process parameters for marking aluminum ingots in the light-colored marking background area;
S3、利用所述步骤S2中估计出的激光标刻工艺参数在所述浅色标刻背景区内标刻所述铝锭标识。S3. Using the laser marking process parameters estimated in step S2 to mark the aluminum ingot logo in the light-colored marking background area.
优选地,在所述步骤S1中,激光烧蚀工艺参数中填充线间距s的取值范围在0.01-0.2mm,激光扫描速度v的取值范围为500-1000mm/s,激光功率p的取值范围为10-20W,激光机Q频率f的取值范围为50-100kHz。Preferably, in the step S1, the value range of the filling line spacing s in the laser ablation process parameters is 0.01-0.2 mm, the value range of the laser scanning speed v is 500-1000 mm/s, and the value range of the laser power p is The value range is 10-20W, and the value range of the Q frequency f of the laser machine is 50-100kHz.
优选地,在所述步骤S3中,在所述浅色标刻背景区内标刻所述铝锭标识时,激光标刻工艺参数中填充线间距s的取值范围为0.01-0.1mm,激光扫描速度v的取值范围为100-200mm/s,激光功率p的取值范围为12-20W,激光机Q频率f的取值范围为20-28kHz。Preferably, in the step S3, when the aluminum ingot logo is marked in the light-colored marking background area, the value range of the filling line spacing s in the laser marking process parameter is 0.01-0.1mm, and the laser The value range of the scanning speed v is 100-200mm/s, the value range of the laser power p is 12-20W, and the value range of the Q frequency f of the laser machine is 20-28kHz.
采用该激光标刻方法在铝锭表面上标刻铝锭标识,直接采用估计得到的激光标刻工艺参数在浅色标刻背景区内标刻铝锭标识,而不用对激光标刻工艺参数进行反复调整,提高了铝锭标识的标刻效率;根据自动识别需要设定估计激光标刻工艺参数的目标函数,从而提高标刻得到的铝锭标识的自动识别率。The laser marking method is used to mark the aluminum ingot logo on the surface of the aluminum ingot, and the estimated laser marking process parameters are directly used to mark the aluminum ingot logo in the light-colored marking background area, without having to adjust the laser marking process parameters. Repeated adjustments improved the marking efficiency of aluminum ingot markings; the objective function of estimating laser marking process parameters was set according to the needs of automatic identification, thereby improving the automatic recognition rate of aluminum ingot markings obtained by marking.
附图说明Description of drawings
图1为验证激光光斑重叠次数n、激光单脉冲能量e和填充线间距s对激光标刻效果的影响进行激光标刻试验得到的激光标刻图像;Figure 1 is the laser marking image obtained from the laser marking test to verify the influence of laser spot overlapping times n, laser single pulse energy e and filling line spacing s on the laser marking effect;
图2为以激光光斑重叠次数n为变化因素进行单因素变化试验得到的标刻图像的图像灰度值的变化曲线图;Fig. 2 is the change curve of the image gray value of the marking image obtained by the single factor change test with the laser spot overlapping times n as the change factor;
图3为以激光单脉冲能量e为变化因素进行单因素变化试验得到的标刻图像的图像灰度值的变化曲线图;Fig. 3 is the change curve of the image gray value of the marking image obtained by the single factor change test with the laser single pulse energy e as the change factor;
图4为以填充线间距s为变化因素进行单因素变化试验得到的标刻图像的图像灰度值的变化曲线图;Fig. 4 is the change curve of the image gray value of the marked image obtained by the single factor change test with the filling line spacing s as the change factor;
图5为等水平多因素正交试验得到的标刻效果图;Figure 5 is the marking effect diagram obtained by equal-level multi-factor orthogonal experiment;
图6为验证试验得到的标刻效果图;Figure 6 is the marking effect diagram obtained by the verification test;
图7为标刻图像灰度估计值与验证试验得到的标刻图像灰度测量值的对比结果。Fig. 7 is the comparison result of the gray scale estimation value of the marking image and the gray scale measurement value of the marking image obtained from the verification test.
具体实施方式Detailed ways
下面结合附图对本发明激光标刻工艺参数的估计方法以及利用该估计方法估计得出的激光标刻工艺参数在铝锭表面标刻铝锭标识的激光标刻方法进行详细说明。The estimation method of the laser marking process parameters of the present invention and the laser marking method of marking the aluminum ingot on the surface of the aluminum ingot using the estimated laser marking process parameters obtained by the estimation method will be described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
根据激光烧蚀原理可知,激光标刻表面获取的能量取决于激光光斑重叠次数n和激光单脉冲能量e。其中,激光光斑重叠次数n是指在激光标刻过程中激光脉冲光斑沿直线方向移动过程中的内部区域的最大累加烧蚀次数,且在激光扫描速度v慢、Q频率f高时,激光光斑重叠次数n高,反之则反,并可表示为激光单脉冲能量e是指每个激光脉冲所包含的能量,且与激光功率P成正相关,与Q频率f成负相关,并可表示为由此推论可知,在进行激光标刻时,当激光光斑重叠次数n和激光单脉冲能量e相同时,激光标刻对材料能量输入相同,标刻得到的标刻图像的效果相同,即标刻图像的灰度值相同。为验证上述推论是否准确,发明人采用脉冲光纤激光器在材料化学成分如表1所示的牌号为Al99.7的铝块表面上进行标刻验证试验,其中,脉冲光纤激光器的聚焦激光束直径为d0,其他标刻工艺参数如表2所示。According to the principle of laser ablation, the energy obtained by the laser marking surface depends on the number of overlapping laser spots n and the single pulse energy e of the laser. Among them, the laser spot overlapping times n refers to the maximum accumulated ablation times of the inner area during the laser marking process when the laser pulse spot moves along the linear direction, and when the laser scanning speed v is slow and the Q frequency f is high, the laser spot The number of overlapping n is high, and vice versa, and can be expressed as Laser single pulse energy e refers to the energy contained in each laser pulse, and is positively correlated with laser power P and negatively correlated with Q frequency f, and can be expressed as It can be deduced from this that when laser marking is performed, when the number of overlapping laser spots n and laser single pulse energy e are the same, the energy input of laser marking to the material is the same, and the effect of the marking image obtained by marking is the same, that is, marking The grayscale values of the images are the same. In order to verify whether the above inference is correct, the inventor used a pulsed fiber laser to conduct a marking verification test on the surface of an aluminum block whose chemical composition is shown in Table 1. The focused laser beam diameter of the pulsed fiber laser is d 0 , other marking process parameters are shown in Table 2.
表1 Al99.7材料化学成分(质量分数)Table 1 Al99.7 material chemical composition (mass fraction)
表2 激光标刻工艺参数Table 2 Laser marking process parameters
其中,s为填充线间距,表示激光在烧蚀表面图形时,扫描线之间的间距。利用表2所示的激光标刻工艺参数在牌号为Al99.7的铝块表面进行标刻得到的激光标刻图像如图1所示。对应表2可知,图1中每一行中的四组标刻验证试验用的激光标刻工艺参数拥有相同的激光光斑重叠次数n、激光单脉冲能量e和填充线间距s;第2行和第3行中的标刻验证试验用的激光标刻工艺参数拥有相同的激光光斑重叠次数n和激光单脉冲能量e,不同的填充线间距s;第4行和第5行中的标刻验证试验用的激光标刻工艺参数拥有相同的激光光斑重叠次数n和激光单脉冲能量e,不同的填充线间距s;第2行和第4行中的标刻验证试验用的激光标刻工艺参数拥有相同的填充线间距s,不同的激光光斑重叠次数n和激光单脉冲能量e;第3行和第5行中的标刻验证试验用的激光标刻工艺参数拥有相同的填充线间距s,不同的激光光斑重叠次数n和激光单脉冲能量e。由此可见,除激光光斑重叠次数n和激光单脉冲能量e外,填充线间距s的取值也会对标刻得到的激光标刻图像的图像灰度值产生影响。Among them, s is the filling line spacing, which means the spacing between scanning lines when the laser ablates the surface pattern. The laser marking image obtained by marking the surface of the Al99.7 aluminum block with the laser marking process parameters shown in Table 2 is shown in Figure 1. Corresponding to Table 2, it can be seen that the laser marking process parameters for the four sets of marking verification tests in each row in Figure 1 have the same laser spot overlapping times n, laser single pulse energy e, and filling line spacing s; the second row and the second row The laser marking process parameters used in the marking verification test in row 3 have the same laser spot overlap n and laser single pulse energy e, and different filling line spacing s; the marking verification test in row 4 and row 5 The laser marking process parameters used have the same laser spot overlapping times n and laser single pulse energy e, and different filling line spacing s; the laser marking process parameters used in the marking verification test in the second row and the fourth row have The same filling line spacing s, different laser spot overlapping times n and laser single pulse energy e; the laser marking process parameters used in the marking verification test in the third row and the fifth row have the same filling line spacing s, different The laser spot overlapping times n and laser single pulse energy e. It can be seen that, in addition to the laser spot overlapping times n and laser single pulse energy e, the value of the filling line spacing s will also affect the image gray value of the laser marking image obtained by marking.
为了分别研究激光光斑重叠次数n、激光单脉冲能量e、填充线间距s对激光标刻得到激光标刻图像的图像灰度值的影响,发明人采用脉冲光纤激光器在多块规格均为150mm×150mm×10mm且牌号均为Al99.7的铝块表面上进行单因素变化激光标刻试验,且试验用脉冲光纤激光器的聚焦激光束直径为0.05mm、焦距为20cm、最大输出功率为20W、波长为1064nm、脉冲宽度为100nm。In order to study the effects of laser spot overlapping times n, laser single pulse energy e, and filling line spacing s on the image gray value of the laser marking image obtained by laser marking, the inventors used a pulsed fiber laser with multiple specifications of 150mm× 150mm×10mm and the grades of aluminum blocks are all Al99.7 on the surface of the single-factor change laser marking test, and the focused laser beam diameter of the pulsed fiber laser used for the test is 0.05mm, the focal length is 20cm, the maximum output power is 20W, the wavelength It is 1064nm, and the pulse width is 100nm.
首先,以激光光斑重叠次数n为变化因素进行三组单因素变化激光标刻试验,且该三组单因素变化激光标刻试验中激光单脉冲能量e的取值依次为0.5mJ、0.7mJ和0.9mJ,填充线间距s的取值均为0.1mm,试验标刻规格为8mm×8mm的正方形图形,并选用可避免因光照影响灰度值的扫描仪获取标刻图像的图像灰度值,且三组单因素变化激光标刻试验得到的三条图像灰度值的变化曲线如图2所示。由图2可知,在三条图像灰度值变化曲线起始位置处,图像灰度值分布不等,但随着激光光斑重叠次数n的值增大,三条图像灰度值变化曲线均呈整体下降趋势,且激光单脉冲能量e越大,下降速度越快,当激光光斑重叠次数n在5次到15次之间时,标刻图像取到最低的图像灰度值;在激光光斑重叠次数n达到一定次数后,标刻图像的图像灰度值逐渐上升,并趋于一致;在激光光斑重叠次数n超过15次后,标刻图像的图像灰度值变化缓慢,且趋于一致。Firstly, three sets of single-factor changing laser marking experiments were carried out with the number of overlapping laser spots n as the changing factor, and the values of laser single pulse energy e in the three sets of single-factor changing laser marking tests were 0.5mJ, 0.7mJ and 0.9mJ, the value of the filling line spacing s is 0.1mm, the test marking size is a square figure of 8mm×8mm, and the image gray value of the marked image is obtained by using a scanner that can avoid the gray value being affected by the light. And the change curves of three image gray values obtained from three groups of single factor change laser marking experiments are shown in Fig. 2 . It can be seen from Figure 2 that at the initial positions of the three image gray value change curves, the distribution of image gray value is not equal, but as the value of the overlapping number of laser spots n increases, the three image gray value change curves show an overall decline trend, and the greater the energy e of the laser single pulse, the faster the decline rate. When the number of laser spot overlap n is between 5 and 15 times, the marked image takes the lowest image gray value; when the number of laser spot overlap n After reaching a certain number of times, the image gray value of the marked image gradually increases and tends to be consistent; when the laser spot overlap n exceeds 15 times, the image gray value of the marked image changes slowly and tends to be consistent.
其次,以激光单脉冲能量e为变化因素进行四组单因素变化试验,且该四组单因素变化激光标刻试验中激光光斑重叠次数n的取值依次为2、6、10和15,填充线间距s的取值均为0.1mm,试验标刻规格为8mm×8mm的正方形图形,并选用可避免因光照影响灰度值的扫描仪获取标刻图像的图像灰度值,且四组单因素变化激光标刻试验得到的四条图像灰度值的变化曲线如图3所示。由图3可知,四组单因素变化激光标刻试验得到的标刻图像的图像灰度值随着激光单脉冲能量e的增加,均呈下降趋势,且在不同的激光光斑重叠次数n下,图像灰度值下降速度不同,当激光光斑重叠次数为2时,图像灰度值下降速度较慢,随着激光光斑重叠次数n增大,图像灰度值下降速度变快,如激光光斑重叠次数为10和6时;当激光光斑重叠次数n到达一定次数后,图像灰度值趋于一定值,如激光光斑重叠次数为15时。此外,当激光单脉冲能量e小于0.3时,由于能量太小,激光标刻痕迹不明显,图像不清晰。Secondly, four sets of single-factor change experiments were carried out with the laser single pulse energy e as the change factor, and the values of the overlapping times n of laser spots in the four sets of single-factor change laser marking tests were 2, 6, 10 and 15 in sequence. The value of the line spacing s is 0.1mm, and the test marking specification is a square figure of 8mm×8mm, and the image gray value of the marked image is obtained by using a scanner that can avoid the influence of light on the gray value, and the four groups of single Factor Variation The variation curves of the gray values of the four images obtained from the laser marking test are shown in Figure 3. It can be seen from Figure 3 that the image gray value of the marking image obtained from the four groups of single-factor change laser marking experiments shows a downward trend with the increase of laser single pulse energy e, and under different laser spot overlapping times n, The image gray value declines at different speeds. When the number of laser spot overlaps is 2, the image gray value decreases slowly. As the number of laser spot overlap n increases, the image gray value decreases faster. For example, the number of laser spot overlaps When the number of overlapping laser spots n reaches a certain number, the gray value of the image tends to a certain value, such as when the number of overlapping laser spots is 15. In addition, when the laser single pulse energy e is less than 0.3, the laser marking marks are not obvious and the image is not clear because the energy is too small.
最后,以填充线间距s为变化因素进行四组单因素变化试验,且该四组单因素变化激光标刻试验中激光光斑重叠次数n的取值依次为4、20、3、和10,激光单脉冲能量e的取值依次为0.3mJ、0.3mJ、0.6mJ和0.6mJ,试验标刻规格为8mm×8mm的正方形图形,并选用可避免因光照影响灰度值的扫描仪获取标刻图像的图像灰度值,且四组单因素变化激光标刻试验得到的四条图像灰度值的变化曲线如图4所示。由图4可知,四组单因素变化激光标刻试验得到的标刻图像的图像灰度值随着填充线间距s增大而逐渐增加,当填充线间距s在0.01mm到0.03mm之间变化时,图像灰度值增加明显;当填充线间距s大于0.03mm后,图像灰度值增幅较小趋于平稳;当填充线间距s超过0.1mm时,激光与铝块表面相互作用产生的热量无法影响填充线之间的铝块表面,铝块表面的灰度值几乎不发生变化,无法得到清晰的标刻图像。另外,由于填充线间距s越小,激光标刻效率越低,故,在进行激光标刻时,填充线间距s的取值一般大于0.5mm。Finally, four sets of single-factor change experiments were carried out with the filling line spacing s as the change factor, and the values of the overlapping times n of laser spots in the four sets of single-factor change laser marking tests were 4, 20, 3, and 10 in sequence. The value of the single pulse energy e is 0.3mJ, 0.3mJ, 0.6mJ and 0.6mJ in turn, the test marking size is a square pattern of 8mm×8mm, and the scanner that can avoid the gray value affected by the light is selected to obtain the marking image The gray value of the image, and the change curves of the four image gray values obtained from the four sets of single factor change laser marking experiments are shown in Figure 4. It can be seen from Figure 4 that the image gray value of the marking image obtained from the four groups of single-factor change laser marking experiments gradually increases with the increase of the filling line spacing s. When the filling line spacing s changes between 0.01mm and 0.03mm , the image gray value increases significantly; when the filling line spacing s is greater than 0.03mm, the image gray value increases slightly and tends to be stable; when the filling line spacing s exceeds 0.1mm, the heat generated by the interaction between the laser and the aluminum block surface The surface of the aluminum block between the filling lines cannot be affected, the gray value of the surface of the aluminum block hardly changes, and a clear marking image cannot be obtained. In addition, since the smaller the spacing s of the filling lines, the lower the efficiency of laser marking, the value of the spacing s of the filling lines is generally greater than 0.5 mm during laser marking.
通过上述三种单因素变化试验分析,可得出使用脉冲光纤激光器在牌号为Al99.7的铝块表面进行激光标刻时用的激光光斑重叠次数n、激光单脉冲能量e和填充线间距s的取值范围。但是,当激光光斑重叠次数n、激光单脉冲能量e和填充线间距s分别选取不同值时,脉冲光纤激光器在铝块表面进行激光标刻得到的标刻图像的图像灰度值不同,即标刻图像的颜色深度不同,当标刻图像的图像灰度值与标刻背景区的灰度值较为接近时,易导致标刻图像尤其是标刻图像中的条形码和/或二维码的自动识别率降低。Through the analysis of the above three single factor change experiments, it can be obtained that the laser spot overlap n, the laser single pulse energy e and the filling line spacing s are used for laser marking on the surface of the Al99.7 aluminum block using a pulsed fiber laser range of values. However, when the laser spot overlapping times n, laser single pulse energy e, and filling line spacing s are respectively selected to different values, the image gray value of the marking image obtained by laser marking on the surface of the aluminum block with the pulsed fiber laser is different, that is, the marking The color depth of the engraved image is different. When the image gray value of the marked image is close to the gray value of the marked background area, it is easy to cause the automatic marking of the marked image, especially the barcode and/or two-dimensional code in the marked image. The recognition rate is reduced.
为提高使用脉冲光纤激光器在铝锭表面上激光标刻得到的标刻图像的自动识别率,发明人根据上述试验结果建立标刻图像的图像灰度值的计算模型方程,从而根据该标刻图像的图像灰度值的计算模型可得出脉冲光纤激光器在铝锭表面上进行激光标刻所需的激光标刻工艺参数激光机Q频率f、激光扫描速度v以及激光功率p的值。In order to improve the automatic recognition rate of the marking image obtained by laser marking on the surface of an aluminum ingot using a pulsed fiber laser, the inventor established a calculation model equation for the image gray value of the marking image based on the above test results, so that according to the marking image The calculation model of the gray value of the image can be used to obtain the laser marking process parameters laser machine Q frequency f, laser scanning speed v and laser power p values required for laser marking on the surface of aluminum ingots by pulsed fiber lasers.
首先,根据图2中所示的激光光斑重叠次数n与标刻图像的图像灰度值之间的对应关系,将仅受激光光斑重叠次数n影响的标刻图像的图像灰度值G1的计算模型方程拟合为:First of all, according to the correspondence between the laser spot overlapping times n and the image gray value of the marking image shown in Figure 2, the image gray value G of the marking image only affected by the laser spot overlapping n The computational model equation fit is:
G1=a0+a1n+a2n2+a3n3 (1)G 1 =a 0 +a 1 n+a 2 n 2 +a 3 n 3 (1)
即 which is
其中,ai为拟合系数,i=0、1、2、3。Among them, a i is the fitting coefficient, i=0, 1, 2, 3.
其次,根据图3中所示的激光单脉冲能量e与标刻图像的图像灰度值之间的对应关系,将仅受激光单脉冲能量e影响的标刻图像的图像灰度值G'2的计算模型方程拟合为:Secondly, according to the correspondence between the laser single pulse energy e and the image gray value of the marked image shown in Figure 3, the image gray value G'2 of the marked image that is only affected by the laser single pulse energy e is The computational model equation for is fitted as:
其中,a41和a5为拟合系数。Among them, a 41 and a 5 are fitting coefficients.
接着,根据图4中所示的填充线间距s与标刻图像的图像灰度值之间的对应关系,到将仅受填充线间距s影响的标刻图像的图像灰度值G'3的计算模型方程拟合为:Then, according to the corresponding relationship between the filling line spacing s and the image gray value of the marked image shown in Figure 4, the image gray value G'3 of the marking image that will only be affected by the filling line spacing s The computational model equation fit is:
其中,a42和a8为拟合系数。Among them, a 42 and a 8 are fitting coefficients.
在对G1、G'2和G'3的计算模型方程进行拟合时,可优选采用免疫克隆算法拟合得到拟合系数的值。为提高免疫克隆算法的拟合优度,将G'2和G'3变形为G2和G3,其中,When fitting the calculation model equations of G 1 , G' 2 and G' 3 , it is preferable to use the immune cloning algorithm to fit and obtain the value of the fitting coefficient. In order to improve the goodness of fit of the immune cloning algorithm, G' 2 and G' 3 are transformed into G 2 and G 3 , where,
因为当a6=a9=0,a7=a10=1时,G'2=G2,G'3=G3,所以,在使用免疫克隆算法求G'2、G'3、G2和G3的最优解时,G'2最优值包括在G2中,G'3的最优值包括在G3中,故可得标刻图像的图像灰度值G的计算模型方程:Because when a 6 =a 9 =0, a 7 =a 10 =1, G' 2 =G 2 , G' 3 =G 3 , so when using the immune cloning algorithm to find G' 2 , G' 3 , G 2 and the optimal solution of G3 , the optimal value of G'2 is included in G2 , and the optimal value of G'3 is included in G3 , so the calculation model of the image gray value G of the marked image can be obtained equation:
G=G1×G2×G3 (7)G=G 1 ×G 2 ×G 3 (7)
其中,a4=a41+a42 Among them, a 4 =a 41 +a 42
即,which is,
由于脉冲光纤激光器的聚焦激光束直径d为不可调的工艺参数,且 故,Since the focused laser beam diameter d of the pulsed fiber laser is a non-adjustable process parameter, and Therefore,
其中,in,
bi=aidi,i=0、1、2、3,b i = a i d i , i = 0, 1, 2, 3,
b4=a4、b5=a5、b6=a6、b7=a7、b8=a8、b9=a9、b10=a10。b 4 =a 4 , b 5 =a 5 , b 6 =a 6 , b 7 =a 7 , b 8 =a 8 , b 9 =a 9 , b 10 =a 10 .
根据单因素试验得到的激光光斑重叠次数n、激光单脉冲能量e和填充线间距s的取值范围,结合激光光斑重叠次数n和激光单脉冲能量e的物理含义,设置脉冲光纤激光器的可调激光标刻工艺参数及水平如表3所示。According to the value ranges of laser spot overlapping times n, laser single pulse energy e and filling line spacing s obtained by single factor experiment, combined with the physical meaning of laser spot overlapping times n and laser single pulse energy e, the adjustable pulsed fiber laser is set The laser marking process parameters and levels are shown in Table 3.
表3 可调激光标刻工艺参数及水平Table 3 Adjustable laser marking process parameters and levels
根据表3设计等水平多因素正交试验,共获取了25组激光标刻工艺参数,采用该25组激光标刻工艺参数进行标刻得到的25个标刻图像如图5所示,并利用可避免因光照影响灰度值的扫描仪获取标刻图像的图像灰度测量值,且激光标刻工艺参数及其对应的标刻图像的图像灰度测量值如表4所示。According to Table 3, an equal-level multi-factor orthogonal experiment was designed, and a total of 25 sets of laser marking process parameters were obtained. The 25 marking images obtained by using the 25 sets of laser marking process parameters for marking are shown in Figure 5. The scanner that can prevent the gray value from being affected by light can obtain the image gray value of the marked image, and the laser marking process parameters and the corresponding image gray value of the marked image are shown in Table 4.
表4 等水平多因素正交试验的试验数据Table 4 Experimental data of equal-level multi-factor orthogonal experiment
根据上述等水平多因素正交试验的试验数据可知,激光标刻工艺参数与标刻图像的图像灰度值之间没有明显的规律性,标刻图像的图像灰度值邻域内的标刻图像对应的激光标刻工艺参数并非简单地分布在该标刻图像的图像灰度值对应的激光标刻工艺参数的邻域内,而是分布在若干个标刻图像的图像灰度值对应的激光标刻工艺参数的邻域并集之中,比如第1组、第12组、第16组、第20组和第23组试验,试验用的激光标刻工艺参数是在功率P为10~18W,Q频率f为20~28kHz,填充线间距s为0.06~0.09mm,扫描速度v为100~200mm/s取值范围内选取的不同取值的激光标刻工艺参数的进行组合,并计算得出取值不同的激光单脉冲能量e和激光光斑重叠次数n,且这些不同取值的激光标刻工艺参数组合后在铝块表面标刻出图像灰度值相近的标刻图像。但是,并非在以上取值范围之内任意选取的激光标刻工艺参数组合后都可以标刻出图像灰度值相近的标刻图像,而且不同激光标刻工艺参数组合有可能标刻出图像灰度值差异较大的标刻图像。根据以上分析可知,等水平多因素正交试验体现出不同激光标刻工艺参数组合与标刻得到标刻图像的图像灰度值之间的对应关系:多组相异的激光标刻工艺参数进行组合可标刻出图像灰度值相近的标刻图像;不同激光标刻工艺参数组合后可标刻出图像灰度值差异较大的标刻图像。因此,上述所选的等水平多因素正交试验数据代表性强,能够作为的合理数据对标刻图像的图像灰度值G的计算模型方程中的拟合系数进行拟合。According to the experimental data of the above-mentioned equal-level multi-factor orthogonal experiment, there is no obvious regularity between the laser marking process parameters and the image gray value of the marked image, and the marked image in the neighborhood of the image gray value of the marked image The corresponding laser marking process parameters are not simply distributed in the neighborhood of the laser marking process parameters corresponding to the image gray value of the marking image, but distributed in the laser marking area corresponding to the image gray value of several marking images. In the neighborhood union of engraving process parameters, such as the first group, the 12th group, the 16th group, the 20th group and the 23rd group test, the laser marking process parameters used in the test are at a power P of 10 ~ 18W, The Q frequency f is 20-28kHz, the filling line spacing s is 0.06-0.09mm, and the scanning speed v is 100-200mm/s The combination of laser marking process parameters with different values selected in the value range, and calculated Different values of laser single pulse energy e and laser spot overlapping times n, and the laser marking process parameters with different values are combined to mark the marking image with similar gray value on the surface of the aluminum block. However, not any combination of laser marking process parameters selected within the above value range can mark images with similar gray values, and different combinations of laser marking process parameters may mark gray images. Marked images with large differences in degree values. According to the above analysis, it can be seen that the equal-level multi-factor orthogonal experiment reflects the corresponding relationship between different laser marking process parameter combinations and the image gray value of the marked image obtained by marking: multiple groups of different laser marking process parameters The combination can mark images with similar gray values; the combination of different laser marking process parameters can mark images with large differences in image gray values. Therefore, the above-mentioned equal-level multi-factor orthogonal test data is highly representative and can be used as reasonable data to fit the fitting coefficient in the calculation model equation of the image gray value G of the marked image.
根据表4中的等水平多因素正交试验数据拟合得出标刻图像的图像灰度值G的回归经计算模型方程中的拟合系数bi(i=0、1、2、3)、b4、b5、b6、b7、b8、b9和b10,且在拟合过程中,拟合目标是使标刻图像的图像灰度测量值与图像灰度预测值之间的误差和的值最小。Obtain the regression of the image gray value G of the marking image according to the equal-level multi-factor orthogonal test data fitting in table 4 and calculate the fitting coefficient b i (i=0,1,2,3) in the model equation , b 4 , b 5 , b 6 , b 7 , b 8 , b 9 and b 10 . The value of the error sum between is the smallest.
为提高拟合速度及拟合准确度,优选采用免疫克隆算法作为拟合算法进行拟合。在拟合过程中,采用的亲和度优化目标函数为:In order to improve the fitting speed and fitting accuracy, the immune cloning algorithm is preferably used as the fitting algorithm for fitting. In the fitting process, the affinity optimization objective function adopted is:
其中,in,
N为水平多因素正交试验时采集到的试验数据的组数,在表4中,N=25,N is the group number of the experimental data collected when horizontal multifactorial orthogonal experiment, in table 4, N=25,
Gmj为一次亲和度计算中第j组试验得到的标刻图像的图像灰度估计值,G mj is the estimated image gray value of the marked image obtained from the jth group of experiments in an affinity calculation,
Gcj为一次亲和度计算中第j组试验得到的标刻图像的图像灰度测量值。G cj is the image grayscale measurement value of the marked image obtained from the jth group of experiments in an affinity calculation.
利用表4中的等水平多因素正交试验的试验数据拟合得出标刻图像的图像灰度值G的计算模型方程中的拟合系数b0、b1、b2、b3、b4、b5、b6、b7、b8、b9和b10后,得到的标刻图像的图像灰度值G的计算模型方程为:The fitting coefficients b 0 , b 1 , b 2 , b 3 , b in the calculation model equation of the image gray value G of the marked image are obtained by fitting the test data of the equal-level multi-factor orthogonal test in Table 4 4 , b 5 , b 6 , b 7 , b 8 , b 9 and b 10 , the calculation model equation of the image gray value G of the marked image obtained is:
为避免拟合得到的拟合系数不可信,下面利用复决定系数R2与方差分析F值来衡量标刻图像的图像灰度值G的计算模型方程对实测数据集的拟合优度以及计算模型方程的可信度,结果如下:In order to avoid the unreliable fitting coefficient obtained by fitting, the following uses the complex determination coefficient R2 and the variance analysis F value to measure the goodness of fit of the calculation model equation of the image gray value G of the marked image to the measured data set and the calculation The credibility of the model equation, the results are as follows:
其中,in,
rss为标刻图像的图像灰度测量值与图像灰度估计值之间的残差平方和,rss is the residual sum of squares between the image grayscale measurement value of the marked image and the image grayscale estimated value,
tss为标刻图像的图像灰度测量值与图像灰度估计值之间的总偏差平方和;tss is the sum of squares of the total deviation between the measured image grayscale value of the marked image and the image grayscale estimated value;
其中,in,
ess为回归平方和,ess is the regression sum of squares,
h为回归平方和的自由度,h is the degree of freedom of the regression sum of squares,
w-h-1为残差平方和的自由度。w-h-1 is the degree of freedom of the residual sum of squares.
根据上述结果可知,由于R2=0.97,接近1,拟合优度较好;查F表可知,F=51.45》F0.05(10,15)=2.54,标刻图像的图像灰度值G的计算模型方程的可信度较高。According to the above results, since R 2 =0.97, which is close to 1, the goodness of fit is good; looking up the F table, it can be seen that F=51.45》F0.05(10,15)=2.54, the image gray value of the marked image G The reliability of the calculation model equation is high.
为加深标刻图像的颜色深度,提高标刻图像的自动识别率,发明人设定激光标刻的标刻图像的图像灰度值G<150。也就是说,在利用标刻图像的图像灰度值G的计算模型方程估计得出激光标刻工艺参数时的目标函数为G<150。当然,在实际标刻过程中,用户可根据自动识别需要选取目标函数G的具体值。In order to deepen the color depth of the marked image and improve the automatic recognition rate of the marked image, the inventors set the image gray value G<150 of the marked image marked by laser marking. That is to say, the objective function when the laser marking process parameters are estimated by using the calculation model equation of the image gray value G of the marking image is G<150. Of course, in the actual marking process, the user can select the specific value of the objective function G according to the needs of automatic identification.
为验证本发明激光标刻工艺参数的估计方法的有效性,利用表5所示的25组激光标刻工艺参数在牌号为Al99.7的铝块表面进行激光标刻验证试验,标刻图像如图6所示,且采用不同激光标刻工艺参数标刻得到的标刻图像的图像灰度测量值如表5所示。In order to verify the effectiveness of the method for estimating the laser marking process parameters of the present invention, 25 groups of laser marking process parameters shown in Table 5 were used to carry out a laser marking verification test on the surface of an aluminum block with a grade of Al99.7. The marking image is as follows As shown in FIG. 6 , the image grayscale measurement values of the marked images obtained by marking with different laser marking process parameters are shown in Table 5.
表5 激光标刻验证试验的试验数据Table 5 Test data of laser marking verification test
同时,利用公式(11)可依次计算出利用表5中所示的25组激光标刻工艺参数在牌号为Al99.7的铝块表面进行激光标刻所得的标刻图像的图像灰度估计值,且该图像灰度估计值与激光标刻验证试验所得出的标刻图像的图像灰度测量值的对比结果如图7所示。由图7可知,采用本发明激光标刻工艺参数的估计方法估计得到的标刻图像的图像灰度估计值与激光标刻验证试验所得的标刻图像的图像灰度测量值的吻合度较高。At the same time, using the formula (11), the image gray value of the marking image obtained by laser marking on the surface of the Al99.7 aluminum block using the 25 sets of laser marking process parameters shown in Table 5 can be calculated in turn , and the comparison result of the image grayscale estimated value and the image grayscale measured value of the marked image obtained from the laser marking verification test is shown in FIG. 7 . It can be seen from Fig. 7 that the estimated image grayscale value of the marked image estimated by the method for estimating the laser marking process parameters of the present invention has a high degree of agreement with the measured image grayscale value of the marked image obtained from the laser marking verification test. .
下面,对结合上述激光标刻工艺参数的估计方法对待标刻铝锭上标刻铝锭标识的激光标刻方法进行详细说明,该激光标刻方法包括如下步骤:Below, the laser marking method for marking the aluminum ingot logo on the aluminum ingot to be marked will be described in detail in combination with the estimation method of the above laser marking process parameters. The laser marking method includes the following steps:
S1、利用脉冲光纤激光器在待标刻的铝锭的表面上烧蚀出浅色标刻背景区,且该浅色标刻背景区的灰度值方差σ2≤50,图像灰度均值M≥150。优选地,在待标刻的铝锭表面上烧蚀浅色标刻背景区时,激光烧蚀工艺参数中填充线间距s的取值范围在0.01-0.2mm,激光扫描速度v的取值范围为500-1000mm/s,激光功率p的取值范围为10-20W,激光机Q频率f的取值范围为50-100kHz。S1. Use a pulsed fiber laser to ablate a light-colored marking background area on the surface of the aluminum ingot to be marked, and the gray-scale value variance of the light-colored marking background area σ 2 ≤50, and the image gray-scale average value M≥ 150. Preferably, when the light-colored marking background area is ablated on the surface of the aluminum ingot to be marked, the value range of the filling line spacing s in the laser ablation process parameters is 0.01-0.2 mm, and the value range of the laser scanning speed v is 500-1000mm/s, the value range of laser power p is 10-20W, and the value range of laser machine Q frequency f is 50-100kHz.
S2、利用上述激光标刻工艺参数的估计方法估计出在浅色标刻背景区内标刻铝锭标识所需的激光标刻工艺参数;S2. Estimate the laser marking process parameters required for marking the aluminum ingots in the light-colored marking background area by using the estimation method of the above-mentioned laser marking process parameters;
S3、利用脉冲光纤激光器在浅色标刻背景区内标刻铝锭标识,且标刻用的激光标刻工艺参数为步骤S2中估计出得出的激光标刻工艺参数。优选地,在浅色标刻背景区内标刻铝锭标识时,激光标刻工艺参数中填充线间距s的取值范围为0.01-0.1mm,激光扫描速度v的取值范围为100-200mm/s,激光功率p的取值范围为12-20W,激光机Q频率f的取值范围为20-28kHz。S3. Use the pulsed fiber laser to mark the aluminum ingot logo in the light-colored marking background area, and the laser marking process parameters used for marking are the laser marking process parameters estimated in step S2. Preferably, when marking the aluminum ingot logo in the light-colored marking background area, the value range of the filling line spacing s in the laser marking process parameters is 0.01-0.1mm, and the value range of the laser scanning speed v is 100-200mm /s, the value range of laser power p is 12-20W, and the value range of laser machine Q frequency f is 20-28kHz.
Claims (6)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201611020874.9A CN106552998B (en) | 2016-11-21 | 2016-11-21 | The method of estimation of laser index carving technological parameter and laser index carving method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201611020874.9A CN106552998B (en) | 2016-11-21 | 2016-11-21 | The method of estimation of laser index carving technological parameter and laser index carving method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN106552998A CN106552998A (en) | 2017-04-05 |
CN106552998B true CN106552998B (en) | 2018-06-08 |
Family
ID=58444413
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201611020874.9A Expired - Fee Related CN106552998B (en) | 2016-11-21 | 2016-11-21 | The method of estimation of laser index carving technological parameter and laser index carving method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN106552998B (en) |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN108038297B (en) * | 2017-12-07 | 2022-03-18 | 广东正业科技股份有限公司 | Method, device and system for calculating technological parameters of laser processing system |
CN108406124B (en) * | 2018-03-28 | 2020-10-02 | 歌尔股份有限公司 | Laser marking method and system |
CN108672941A (en) * | 2018-05-03 | 2018-10-19 | 合肥江航飞机装备有限公司 | The method of laser scoring Quick Response Code |
CN114054971B (en) * | 2022-01-10 | 2022-07-12 | 武汉华工激光工程有限责任公司 | A method and system for automatic real-time GV value detection and compensation |
CN116432841A (en) * | 2023-04-03 | 2023-07-14 | 东莞理工学院 | Optimal coloring parameter determination method and system for metal laser coloring |
CN118218328B (en) * | 2024-05-21 | 2024-08-06 | 三峡金沙江云川水电开发有限公司 | DOA positioning-based laser processing method and system with programmable beam tracking and zooming functions |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102005054396A1 (en) * | 2004-11-26 | 2006-06-01 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Device and method for projection of image with multi-mirror elements, comprising tiltable individual mirrors |
CN102971109A (en) * | 2010-06-25 | 2013-03-13 | 伊雷克托科学工业股份有限公司 | Method and apparatus for reliably laser marking articles |
CN103639591A (en) * | 2013-11-21 | 2014-03-19 | 吕武全 | Laser marking method |
CN104827781A (en) * | 2015-04-30 | 2015-08-12 | 深圳市创鑫激光股份有限公司 | Laser marking method, laser marking machine and laser marking system |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP5589318B2 (en) * | 2008-08-11 | 2014-09-17 | 住友電気工業株式会社 | Laser marking method |
-
2016
- 2016-11-21 CN CN201611020874.9A patent/CN106552998B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102005054396A1 (en) * | 2004-11-26 | 2006-06-01 | Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh | Device and method for projection of image with multi-mirror elements, comprising tiltable individual mirrors |
CN102971109A (en) * | 2010-06-25 | 2013-03-13 | 伊雷克托科学工业股份有限公司 | Method and apparatus for reliably laser marking articles |
CN103639591A (en) * | 2013-11-21 | 2014-03-19 | 吕武全 | Laser marking method |
CN104827781A (en) * | 2015-04-30 | 2015-08-12 | 深圳市创鑫激光股份有限公司 | Laser marking method, laser marking machine and laser marking system |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
Title |
---|
基于二维条码质量的激光直接标刻工艺参量;李春玲 等;《中南大学学报(自然科学版)》;20151231;第46卷(第12期);第4488页至第4496页 * |
激光标刻二维条码的工艺参数组合优化;谢雷 等;《锻压装备与制造技术》;20141231(第1期);第85页至第88页 * |
激光标刻二维码工艺及最优参数域研究;李夏霜 等;《中国激光》;20140731;第41卷(第7期);第0703006-1页至第0703006-7页 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN106552998A (en) | 2017-04-05 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN106552998B (en) | The method of estimation of laser index carving technological parameter and laser index carving method | |
CN101209514B (en) | A laser online high-speed marking device based on galvanometer array | |
DE102008011808B4 (en) | Method and apparatus for removing the glass seams with polishing the seams and thereby processed glass product | |
CN105555463B (en) | With the device and method marked to ophthalmic lens with wavelength and the selected pulse laser per pulse energy | |
JP2010120844A (en) | Method of making subsurface marks in glass | |
WO2007001435A3 (en) | Adaptive machining and weld repair process | |
CN115592272B (en) | Intelligent laser engraving device and control method thereof | |
CN101183695A (en) | Method and device for forming a solar module structure | |
JP2011031388A (en) | Processing method for workpiece | |
CN105522278B (en) | Laser light transmission grid raw glass substrate Aided Machine scoring device and method | |
CN108025399A (en) | Laser processing and laser processing device | |
CN108971267A (en) | A kind of Light deformation plate with laser leveling method | |
CN104708207A (en) | Fiber laser engraving equipment and technological method for organic glass | |
JP2003318074A (en) | Chip scale marker and marking method | |
Heidrich et al. | Laser polishing and laser form correction of fused silica optics: Laserpolieren und Laserformkorrektur von Quarzglasoptiken | |
DE602005017901D1 (en) | GRID CUTTING TECHNOLOGY FOR OPHTHALMIC LENSES | |
CN107001106A (en) | The separation method of glass board material | |
CN107639862B (en) | A kind of method of laser irradiation regulation PA2200 material 3D printing part surface wettability | |
WO2016080514A1 (en) | Laser marker data creation device | |
CN201220511Y (en) | Laser mark printing machine | |
CN103921560A (en) | Laser color marking method and system | |
CN103273196B (en) | Method for processing microlens arrays by CO2 laser selective area irradiation scanning on plexiglass | |
CN110421273A (en) | Laser processing and laser cutting machine | |
Fox et al. | Development and validation of a calculation routine for the precise determination of pulse overlap and accumulated fluence in pulsed laser surface treatment | |
Heidrich et al. | Polishing and form correction with laser radiation |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20180608 |
|
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |