CN106447540B - Automatic generation method for urban and rural planning inspection surveying and mapping result - Google Patents
Automatic generation method for urban and rural planning inspection surveying and mapping result Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106447540B CN106447540B CN201610855249.XA CN201610855249A CN106447540B CN 106447540 B CN106447540 B CN 106447540B CN 201610855249 A CN201610855249 A CN 201610855249A CN 106447540 B CN106447540 B CN 106447540B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- planning
- inspection
- permission
- checking
- project
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000013439 planning Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 137
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 91
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 33
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 22
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 claims description 21
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 20
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 claims description 15
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 206010063385 Intellectualisation Diseases 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000009435 building construction Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005034 decoration Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012827 research and development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005728 strengthening Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/26—Government or public services
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/08—Construction
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides an automatic generation method of urban and rural planning, inspection and surveying results. According to the method, the field description of the project information, the inspection item and the corresponding limit difference value are obtained from an inspection rule base according to the inspection type of an object to be inspected; generating a standardized result catalog according to the input project information; obtaining the permission condition of the matching data of the object to be detected to the intelligent prejudgment planning; and combining the planning permission condition, the limit difference value and the matching data pair to automatically generate the surveying and mapping result of the object to be inspected. The invention realizes the automatic generation of the surveying and mapping result, can obviously improve the efficiency and the accuracy of the surveying and mapping result generation, reduces careless mistakes of the surveying and mapping result caused by human factors, obviously reduces the labor cost, and basically realizes the automation and the intellectualization of the production of the standardized surveying and mapping result.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of surveying and mapping, in particular to an automatic generation method for urban and rural planning, inspection and surveying and mapping results.
Background
In recent years, the administrative department for urban and rural planning in the pearl sea has innovated a planning supervision and management mechanism and basically realizes the full-flow management of the planning and supervision of the construction engineering by strengthening the process supervision of the whole life cycle (planning stage) of the construction engineering and informing the construction unit of handling the relevant procedures of the next stage in advance according to the progress condition of the engineering. The 'urban and rural planning regulations in the special area of the Zhuhai economy' issued in 2013 defines each key node of a planning inspection system and a whole life cycle (planning stage) of a series construction project, and plays an important role in ensuring the effective implementation of urban and rural planning. In the research and development process of carrying out related surveying and mapping services by taking urban and rural planning inspection surveying and mapping data as core data for urban and rural planning construction, the automatic generation method of the urban and rural planning inspection surveying and mapping result reflects the inspection result of the surveying and mapping plan, is a very important technical problem, and is a technical problem to be solved urgently.
The urban and rural planning inspection related data are various in types and complex in inspection conditions. Taking the example of building management, at least, the method comprises building construction paying-off planning inspection, building construction first standard layer planning inspection, commodity building construction project pre-sale permission planning inspection, construction land red line planning inspection, building construction site underground or semi-underground structure planning inspection, building construction paying-off planning inspection and the like, and the inspection results of various planning inspections are also complicated. Therefore, in order to obtain a relatively accurate inspection result, the requirement on the professional knowledge of an inspector is very high, and the labor cost investment is relatively large. In addition, the data volume of the surveying and mapping data is large, the specialization is strong, even surveying and mapping professionals are difficult to ensure the accuracy of all the data, and the accuracy of the data is the primary condition for generating correct surveying and mapping results. Therefore, how to apply scientific and technical means and reduce human factors in the surveying and mapping result generation process is a key content for improving the surveying and mapping result productivity.
In summary, in order to improve the efficiency and the accuracy of generating a surveying result, reduce careless mistakes of the surveying result caused by human factors, and reduce the labor cost, it is necessary to study an automatic generating method of a surveying result for urban and rural planning inspection.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to solve the technical problem, a method for automatically generating urban and rural planning, inspection and mapping results comprises the following steps:
s1, acquiring item information field description, inspection items and a limit difference value from an inspection rule base according to the inspection type of an object to be inspected;
s2, generating a standardized result catalogue according to the description of the input project information field;
s3, obtaining a matching data pair of an object to be detected and intelligently pre-judging the planning permission condition;
s4, automatically classifying according to planning permission conditions and giving a description of a standardized inspection conclusion;
and S5, automatically generating a surveying and mapping result of the object to be inspected by combining the planning permission condition, the limit difference value and the matching data pair.
Further, the inspection rule base is used for storing item information field description, inspection items and limit difference values, and different inspection types correspond to different item information field description, inspection items and limit difference values;
the check items include: outline shape, position side length and height index; the outline shape is a polygon constructed by collected peripheral characteristic points of the building; the position side length is calculated by the horizontal coordinate of each collected characteristic point of the building; the height index is a vertical index set of the building, and comprises an absolute elevation and a relative height difference;
the matching data pair of the object to be checked comprises checking feature points and permission feature points matched with the checking feature points, the matching basis is that the checking feature points and the permission feature points have the same attributes, and the attributes comprise roll names, planning and checking building layers, pipeline types and/or whether to participate in comparison; the roll call refers to a code of a feature point; the planning and checking building layer refers to a natural layer of the building where the characteristic points are located; the pipeline categories include water supply, water drainage, gas, industrial piping, power and communications; whether the attribute participating in comparison is represented by a Boolean value, if the Boolean value is true, the attribute participates in the inspection, and if the Boolean value is false, the attribute does not participate in the inspection;
the obtaining of the matching data pair of the object to be inspected and the prejudging of the planning permission condition comprise:
1) if the number of the effective checking plane coordinates is less than the number of the planning permission plane coordinates, the planning permission coordinates of the checking project are judged in advance;
2) if the number of the effective checking plane coordinates is not zero and no effective planning permission plane coordinate data exists, prejudging whether the checking project is free of planning permission coordinates;
3) if the number of the effective checking plane coordinates is larger than that of the planning permission plane coordinates and the number of the effective planning permission plane coordinates is nonzero, prejudging whether partial points of the checking item are free from planning permission coordinates;
4) if the number of the effective checking plane coordinates is not zero, no effective planning permission plane coordinates exist, and no effective planning permission side length data exists, prejudging that the checking project is not allowed to be planned;
5) if the effective inspection height index data is less than the number of the planning permission height index data, prejudging that the inspection project has the planning permission height index;
6) if the effective tested height index data is nonzero and no effective planning permission height index data exists, prejudging whether the tested project is free of planning permission height indexes;
the automatic classification and the standardized test conclusion description according to the planning permission condition comprise the following steps:
1) if the project is checked to have the planning permission coordinates, then
Calculating the comparative value of each plane check item, and comparing the comparative value with the corresponding limit difference value: if the poor values do not exceed the limit, outputting a test conclusion description that the test items conform to the planning permission; if the poor values of the parts exceed the limits, outputting the inspection item part which accords with the inspection conclusion description of the planning permission; if all the comparative difference values exceed the limit, outputting a test conclusion description that all the test items do not accord with the planning permission;
2) if the verification item does not random the allowable coordinates, then
If the verification project is allowed by planning and has an allowed side length, outputting a verification conclusion description which has the allowed side length but has no allowable coordinate for comparison; if the verification project is only allowed by planning but has no permitted side length, outputting a verification conclusion description which is only allowed by planning but not allowed by randomly planning and can be compared with the plane index;
3) if the part points of the inspection item are not planned with the allowable coordinates, outputting inspection conclusion description of local unplanned permission;
4) if the verification project is not allowed to be planned, outputting a verification conclusion description which is not allowed to be planned; if the project is checked to have the planning permission height index, then
Calculating the comparative value of each vertical check item, and comparing the comparative value with the corresponding limit difference value: if the poor values do not exceed the limits, outputting a test conclusion description which is in accordance with the planning conditions; otherwise, outputting a test conclusion description which is not in accordance with the planning condition;
if the checking project has no planning permission height index, outputting a checking conclusion description which can be compared by the random planning permission height index.
And further, a planning and inspection result report template is obtained according to the inspection type, and a standardized urban and rural planning and inspection surveying and mapping result report, an AutoCAD result graph and an EPS result graph are automatically generated by combining the project information, the matching data pair, the standardized inspection conclusion and the specific planning and inspection condition description.
The invention has the beneficial effects that:
the invention provides an automatic generation method for urban and rural planning inspection surveying and mapping results, which realizes automatic generation of surveying and mapping results, can obviously improve the efficiency and the accuracy of surveying and mapping result generation, reduce careless mistakes of surveying and mapping results caused by human factors, obviously reduce labor cost and basically realize automation and intellectualization of surveying and mapping result output.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a flowchart of an automatic generation method of urban and rural planning, inspection, surveying and mapping results provided in embodiment 1.
Detailed description of the invention
In order to make the technical solutions of the present invention better understood, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
It should be noted that the terms "comprises," "comprising," and "having," and any variations thereof, are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusions, such that a process, method, system, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of steps or elements is not necessarily limited to those steps or elements expressly listed, but may include other steps or elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.
Example 1:
an automatic generation method for urban and rural planning inspection surveying and mapping results is shown in fig. 1, and the method comprises the following steps:
s1, acquiring item information field description, inspection items and limit difference values from an inspection rule base according to the inspection type of an object to be inspected.
The inspection rule base is used for storing item information field description, inspection items and limit difference values, and different inspection types correspond to different item information field description, inspection items and limit difference values;
the check items include: outline shape, position side length and height index; the outline shape is a polygon constructed by collected peripheral characteristic points of the building; the position side length is calculated by the horizontal coordinate of each collected characteristic point of the building; the height indicator is a set of vertical indicators for the building, including absolute elevation and relative elevation difference.
And S2, generating a standardized result catalogue according to the recorded item information field description.
And S3, obtaining the matching data pair of the object to be detected and intelligently pre-judging the planning permission condition.
The matching data pair of the object to be checked comprises checking feature points and permission feature points matched with the checking feature points, the matching basis is that the checking feature points and the permission feature points have the same attributes, and the attributes comprise roll names, planning and checking building layers, pipeline types and/or whether to participate in comparison; the roll call refers to a code of a feature point; the planning and checking building layer refers to a natural layer of the building where the characteristic points are located; the pipeline categories include water supply, water drainage, gas, industrial piping, power and communications; whether the attribute participating in comparison is represented by a Boolean value, if the Boolean value is true, the attribute participates in the inspection, and if the Boolean value is false, the attribute does not participate in the inspection;
the obtaining of the matching data pair of the object to be inspected and the prejudging of the planning permission condition comprise:
1) if the number of the effective checking plane coordinates is less than the number of the planning permission plane coordinates, the planning permission coordinates of the checking project are judged in advance;
2) if the number of the effective checking plane coordinates is not zero and no effective planning permission plane coordinate data exists, prejudging whether the checking project is free of planning permission coordinates;
3) if the number of the effective checking plane coordinates is larger than that of the planning permission plane coordinates and the number of the effective planning permission plane coordinates is nonzero, prejudging whether partial points of the checking item are free from planning permission coordinates;
4) if the number of the effective checking plane coordinates is not zero, no effective planning permission plane coordinates exist, and no effective planning permission side length data exists, prejudging that the checking project is not allowed to be planned;
5) if the effective inspection height index data is less than the number of the planning permission height index data, prejudging that the inspection project has the planning permission height index;
6) if the effective tested height index data is nonzero and no effective planning permission height index data exists, prejudging that the tested project does not plan the permission height index.
And S4, automatically classifying according to the planning permission condition and giving a description of a standardized inspection conclusion.
1) If the project is checked to have the planning permission coordinates, then
Calculating the comparative value of each plane check item, and comparing the comparative value with the corresponding limit difference value: if the poor values do not exceed the limit, outputting a test conclusion description that the test items conform to the planning permission; if the poor values of the parts exceed the limits, outputting the inspection item part which accords with the inspection conclusion description of the planning permission; if all the comparative difference values exceed the limit, outputting a test conclusion description that all the test items do not accord with the planning permission;
2) if the verification item does not random the allowable coordinates, then
If the verification project is allowed by planning and has an allowed side length, outputting a verification conclusion description which has the allowed side length but has no allowable coordinate for comparison; if the verification project is only allowed by planning but has no permitted side length, outputting a verification conclusion description which is only allowed by planning but not allowed by randomly planning and can be compared with the plane index;
3) if the part points of the inspection item are not planned with the allowable coordinates, outputting inspection conclusion description of local unplanned permission;
4) if the verification project is not allowed to be planned, outputting a verification conclusion description which is not allowed to be planned; if the project is checked to have the planning permission height index, then
Calculating the comparative value of each vertical check item, and comparing the comparative value with the corresponding limit difference value: if the poor values do not exceed the limits, outputting a test conclusion description which is in accordance with the planning conditions; otherwise, outputting a test conclusion description which is not in accordance with the planning condition;
if the checking project has no planning permission height index, outputting a checking conclusion description which can be compared by the random planning permission height index.
And S5, automatically generating a surveying and mapping result of the object to be inspected by combining the planning permission condition, the limit difference value and the matching data pair.
And further, a planning and inspection result report template is obtained according to the inspection type, and a standardized urban and rural planning and inspection surveying and mapping result report, an AutoCAD result graph and an EPS result graph are automatically generated by combining the project information, the matching data pair, the standardized inspection conclusion and the specific planning and inspection condition description.
The foregoing is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, and it should be noted that, for those skilled in the art, various modifications and decorations can be made without departing from the principle of the present invention, and these modifications and decorations should also be regarded as the protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (1)
1. An automatic generation method for urban and rural planning inspection surveying and mapping results is characterized by comprising the following steps:
s1, acquiring item information field description, inspection items and a limit difference value from an inspection rule base according to the inspection type of an object to be inspected;
s2, generating a standardized result catalogue according to the description of the input project information field;
s3, obtaining a matching data pair of an object to be detected and intelligently pre-judging the planning permission condition;
s4, automatically classifying according to planning permission conditions and giving a description of a standardized inspection conclusion;
s5, automatically generating a surveying and mapping result of the object to be inspected by combining planning permission, a limit difference value and the matching data pair;
the inspection rule base is used for storing item information field description, inspection items and limit difference values, and different inspection types correspond to different item information field description, inspection items and limit difference values;
the check items include: outline shape, position side length and height index; the outline shape is a polygon constructed by collected peripheral characteristic points of the building; the position side length is calculated by the horizontal coordinate of each collected characteristic point of the building; the height index is a vertical index set of the building, and comprises an absolute elevation and a relative height difference;
the matching data pair of the object to be checked comprises checking feature points and permission feature points matched with the checking feature points, the matching basis is that the checking feature points and the permission feature points have the same attributes, and the attributes comprise roll names, planning and checking building layers, pipeline types and/or whether to participate in comparison; the roll call refers to a code of a feature point; the planning and checking building layer refers to a natural layer of the building where the characteristic points are located; the pipeline categories include water supply, water drainage, gas, industrial piping, power and communications; whether the attribute participating in comparison is represented by a Boolean value, if the Boolean value is true, the attribute participates in the inspection, and if the Boolean value is false, the attribute does not participate in the inspection;
the obtaining of the matching data pair of the object to be inspected and the prejudging of the planning permission condition comprise:
1) if the number of the effective checking plane coordinates is less than the number of the planning permission plane coordinates, the planning permission coordinates of the checking project are judged in advance;
2) if the number of the effective checking plane coordinates is not zero and no effective planning permission plane coordinate data exists, prejudging whether the checking project is free of planning permission coordinates;
3) if the number of the effective checking plane coordinates is larger than that of the planning permission plane coordinates and the number of the effective planning permission plane coordinates is nonzero, prejudging whether partial points of the checking item are free from planning permission coordinates;
4) if the number of the effective checking plane coordinates is not zero, no effective planning permission plane coordinates exist, and no effective planning permission side length data exists, prejudging that the checking project is not allowed to be planned;
5) if the effective inspection height index data is less than the number of the planning permission height index data, prejudging that the inspection project has the planning permission height index;
6) if the effective tested height index data is nonzero and no effective planning permission height index data exists, prejudging whether the tested project is free of planning permission height indexes;
the automatic classification and the standardized test conclusion description according to the planning permission condition comprise the following steps:
1) if the project is checked to have the planning permission coordinates, then
Calculating the comparative value of each plane check item, and comparing the comparative value with the corresponding limit difference value: if the poor values do not exceed the limit, outputting a test conclusion description that the test items conform to the planning permission; if the poor values of the parts exceed the limits, outputting the inspection item part which accords with the inspection conclusion description of the planning permission; if all the comparative difference values exceed the limit, outputting a test conclusion description that all the test items do not accord with the planning permission;
2) if the verification item does not random the allowable coordinates, then
If the verification project is allowed by planning and has an allowed side length, outputting a verification conclusion description which has the allowed side length but has no allowable coordinate for comparison; if the verification project is only allowed by planning but has no permitted side length, outputting a verification conclusion description which is only allowed by planning but not allowed by randomly planning and can be compared with the plane index;
3) if the part points of the inspection item are not planned with the allowable coordinates, outputting inspection conclusion description of local unplanned permission;
4) if the verification project is not allowed to be planned, outputting a verification conclusion description which is not allowed to be planned;
if the project is checked to have the planning permission height index, then
Calculating the comparative value of each vertical check item, and comparing the comparative value with the corresponding limit difference value: if the poor values do not exceed the limits, outputting a test conclusion description which is in accordance with the planning conditions; otherwise, outputting a test conclusion description which is not in accordance with the planning condition;
if the checking project has no planning permission height index, outputting a checking conclusion description which can be compared by the random planning permission height index,
and acquiring a planning and inspection result report template according to the inspection type, and automatically generating a standardized urban and rural planning and inspection surveying and mapping result report, an AutoCAD result graph and an EPS result graph by combining the project information, the matching data pair, the standardized inspection conclusion and the specific planning and inspection condition description.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610855249.XA CN106447540B (en) | 2016-09-26 | 2016-09-26 | Automatic generation method for urban and rural planning inspection surveying and mapping result |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610855249.XA CN106447540B (en) | 2016-09-26 | 2016-09-26 | Automatic generation method for urban and rural planning inspection surveying and mapping result |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN106447540A CN106447540A (en) | 2017-02-22 |
| CN106447540B true CN106447540B (en) | 2021-01-26 |
Family
ID=58170499
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610855249.XA Active CN106447540B (en) | 2016-09-26 | 2016-09-26 | Automatic generation method for urban and rural planning inspection surveying and mapping result |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN106447540B (en) |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102467691A (en) * | 2010-11-02 | 2012-05-23 | 英业达股份有限公司 | System and method for integrating checking information |
| CN104268670A (en) * | 2014-09-02 | 2015-01-07 | 司徒毅 | Highway bridge technical condition examination and evaluation system |
| CN105488019A (en) * | 2015-11-30 | 2016-04-13 | 云南电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院 | Power quality monitoring device testing report automatic generation method |
| CN105574675A (en) * | 2015-12-21 | 2016-05-11 | 珠海市测绘院 | Rule bank-based method and system for planning and supervising constructional engineering |
-
2016
- 2016-09-26 CN CN201610855249.XA patent/CN106447540B/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102467691A (en) * | 2010-11-02 | 2012-05-23 | 英业达股份有限公司 | System and method for integrating checking information |
| CN104268670A (en) * | 2014-09-02 | 2015-01-07 | 司徒毅 | Highway bridge technical condition examination and evaluation system |
| CN105488019A (en) * | 2015-11-30 | 2016-04-13 | 云南电网有限责任公司电力科学研究院 | Power quality monitoring device testing report automatic generation method |
| CN105574675A (en) * | 2015-12-21 | 2016-05-11 | 珠海市测绘院 | Rule bank-based method and system for planning and supervising constructional engineering |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 城市规划测绘成果资料自动化生成系统设计与实现;吴凯华，程相兵，黄昀鹏，谢武强;《城市勘测》;20150831(第4期);第126-128页 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN106447540A (en) | 2017-02-22 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Nishikawa et al. | Concrete crack detection by multiple sequential image filtering | |
| CN109559069B (en) | Production management method and device based on assembly type building platform and terminal equipment | |
| CN109800961A (en) | A kind of fire rescue decision-making technique, device, storage medium and terminal device | |
| US10360315B2 (en) | Construction field management method and construction field management device | |
| CN106408028B (en) | Urban and rural planning inspection surveying and mapping data processing method | |
| CN108564267B (en) | Enterprise environment risk evaluation system and method | |
| CN105574161B (en) | A kind of brand logo key element recognition methods, device and system | |
| KR101388749B1 (en) | System and method for 3d reconstruction of as-built industrial model from 3d data | |
| KR101130284B1 (en) | System and method for checking accuracy of true-orthoimage using digital map | |
| CN110276124A (en) | A kind of digitlization examines the information extracting method of mathematical model | |
| CN114005135A (en) | Intelligent construction project drawing verification method, system and device and readable storage medium | |
| JP6267307B2 (en) | Method for searching for installation space of article and computer-readable recording medium on which program is recorded | |
| US12007962B2 (en) | Data management system and management method | |
| CN111047696A (en) | Three-dimensional space planning paying-off method | |
| CN106447540B (en) | Automatic generation method for urban and rural planning inspection surveying and mapping result | |
| EP4254289A1 (en) | Data management system, management method, and management program | |
| Gibberd | Sustainability impacts of building products: An assessment methodology for developing countries | |
| CN114358462A (en) | City safety risk assessment method and system and electronic equipment | |
| Junior et al. | Reliability of the sustainability assessment | |
| CN115311396A (en) | Automatic extraction method and system for roof contour line of ultrahigh building | |
| CN114509777A (en) | Electric transmission project entity acceptance method based on Cesium platform | |
| CN111080226B (en) | Urban public security situation display method and device, storage medium and electronic equipment | |
| Gong et al. | [Retracted] Discovery and Discrimination of Bridge Engineering Safety Issues by BIM Virtual Scene Combined with Robotic Mapping | |
| KR20100117986A (en) | Method for measuring the location similarity of spatial object on digital maps and map matching using the same | |
| CN109816713A (en) | A kind of depth of water annotation precision quantitative evaluating method of non-autonomous mapping sea chart |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |