CN106445797B - Software Testability Evaluation method and device - Google Patents
Software Testability Evaluation method and device Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106445797B CN106445797B CN201510471320.XA CN201510471320A CN106445797B CN 106445797 B CN106445797 B CN 106445797B CN 201510471320 A CN201510471320 A CN 201510471320A CN 106445797 B CN106445797 B CN 106445797B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- software
- measurability
- assessed
- assessment parameter
- testability
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 67
- 230000003542 behavioural effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 74
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 39
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 36
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 claims description 45
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000009329 sexual behaviour Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 241000208340 Araliaceae Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 235000005035 Panax pseudoginseng ssp. pseudoginseng Nutrition 0.000 claims description 3
- 235000003140 Panax quinquefolius Nutrition 0.000 claims description 3
- 235000008434 ginseng Nutrition 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 claims 2
- 238000001303 quality assessment method Methods 0.000 claims 2
- 238000012854 evaluation process Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 4
- 241001269238 Data Species 0.000 description 3
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002155 anti-virotic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005192 partition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007670 refining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Stored Programmes (AREA)
- Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)
Abstract
The application provides a kind of Software Testability Evaluation method and device.Method comprises determining that at least one can reflect the assessment parameter of the measurability of software to be assessed；Classify to the measurability behavioral data of software to be assessed during the test, to obtain the corresponding measurability behavioral data of each assessment parameter at least one assessment parameter；The corresponding measurability behavioral data of each assessment parameter is measured, to obtain testability measurement result of the software to be assessed under each assessment parameter.The application can simplify evaluation process, improve quality of evaluation.
Description
[technical field]
This application involves software technology field more particularly to a kind of Software Testability Evaluation method and devices.
[background technique]
Software Testability refers under regular hour and cost reasons, carries out test design, test execution and is sent out with this
The problem of existing software, and discovery failure and the ability characteristics for being isolated, positioning its failure.In simple terms, Software Testability is exactly
Refer to the easy degree that software can be tested.
In the case where higher and higher to software quality requirement, test job amount is increasing, and test job becomes increasingly complex
Under, the software with good measurability shortens the development cycle to development investment is saved, and reduces maintenance cost etc. and suffers from weight
Big meaning.
The existing method assessed Software Testability is assessed by way of mathematical reasoning, this side
Method is excessively complicated, lacks the analysis to measurability behavior, and quality of evaluation is poor, not to the directive significance of software development and test
Greatly, bad to the improvement of software quality.It is therefore desirable to provide a kind of new Software Testability Evaluation methods.
[summary of the invention]
The many aspects of the application provide a kind of Software Testability Evaluation method and device, to simplify evaluation process, mention
High quality of evaluation.
The one side of the application provides a kind of Software Testability Evaluation method, comprising:
Determine that at least one can reflect the assessment parameter of the measurability of software to be assessed；
Classify to the measurability behavioral data of the software to be assessed during the test, to obtain described at least one
The corresponding measurability behavioral data of each assessment parameter in a assessment parameter；
The corresponding measurability behavioral data of each assessment parameter is measured, is existed with obtaining the software to be assessed
Testability measurement result under each assessment parameter.
The another aspect of the application provides a kind of Software Testability Evaluation device, comprising:
Determining module, for determining that at least one can reflect the assessment parameter of the measurability of software to be assessed；
Categorization module, for classifying to the measurability behavioral data of the software to be assessed during the test, with
Obtain the corresponding measurability behavioral data of each assessment parameter at least one described assessment parameter；
Evaluation module, for being measured to the corresponding measurability behavioral data of each assessment parameter, to obtain
State testability measurement result of the software to be assessed under each assessment parameter.
In this application, it determines the assessment parameter that can reflect the measurability of software to be assessed, software to be assessed is being surveyed
Measurability behavioral data during examination is classified, and the corresponding measurability behavioral data of each assessment parameter is obtained, to each
The corresponding measurability behavioral data of assessment parameter is measured, and measurability degree of the software to be assessed under each assessment parameter is obtained
Amount is as a result, realize the assessment to the measurability of software to be assessed.The application clearly carries out the dimension of Testability Evaluation first, that is, comments
Estimate parameter, under each assessment parameter, Testability Evaluation is carried out based on measurability behavioral data, compared with prior art, in fact
Existing relatively easy, quality of evaluation is higher, has biggish directive significance to software development and test, is conducive to improve software matter
Amount.
[Detailed description of the invention]
It in order to more clearly explain the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application, below will be to embodiment or description of the prior art
Needed in attached drawing be briefly described, it should be apparent that, the accompanying drawings in the following description is some realities of the application
Example is applied, it for those of ordinary skill in the art, without any creative labor, can also be attached according to these
Figure obtains other attached drawings.
Fig. 1 is the flow diagram for the Software Testability Evaluation method that one embodiment of the application provides；
Fig. 2 is the radar schematic diagram for the first CRM software that one embodiment of the application provides；
Fig. 3 is the radar schematic diagram for the 2nd CRM software that one embodiment of the application provides；
Fig. 4 is the radar schematic diagram for the 3rd CRM software that one embodiment of the application provides；
Fig. 5 is the structural schematic diagram for the Software Testability Evaluation device that one embodiment of the application provides；
Fig. 6 is the structural schematic diagram for the Software Testability Evaluation device that another embodiment of the application provides.
[specific embodiment]
To keep the purposes, technical schemes and advantages of the embodiment of the present application clearer, below in conjunction with the embodiment of the present application
In attached drawing, the technical scheme in the embodiment of the application is clearly and completely described, it is clear that described embodiment is
Some embodiments of the present application, instead of all the embodiments.Based on the embodiment in the application, those of ordinary skill in the art
Every other embodiment obtained without creative efforts, shall fall in the protection scope of this application.
In the prior art, the method assessed Software Testability is commented by way of mathematical reasoning
Estimate, this method is excessively complicated, lacks the analysis to measurability behavior, and quality of evaluation is poor, to the finger of software development and test
It leads and has little significance, it is bad to the improvement of software quality.For this problem, the application provides a solution, main former
Reason is: clearly carrying out the dimension of Testability Evaluation, it can the assessment parameter for reflecting the measurability of software to be assessed is commented each
Estimate under parameter, carries out carrying out Testability Evaluation to software to be assessed based on the measurability behavioral data in test process.With it is existing
Technical solution is compared, and technical scheme does not need complicated mathematical reasoning, and realization is relatively easy, in addition, present techniques
Scheme is based on measurability behavioral data and carries out Testability Evaluation, and quality of evaluation is preferable, and assessment result has software development and test
There is biggish directive significance, is conducive to improve software quality.
Fig. 1 is the flow diagram for the Software Testability Evaluation method that one embodiment of the application provides.As shown in Figure 1, should
Method includes:
101, determine that at least one can reflect the assessment parameter of the measurability of software to be assessed.
102, classify to the measurability behavioral data of software to be assessed during the test, commented with obtaining at least one
Estimate the corresponding measurability behavioral data of each assessment parameter in parameter.
103, the corresponding measurability behavioral data of each assessment parameter is measured, to obtain software to be assessed each
Assess the testability measurement result under parameter.
The present embodiment provides a kind of Software Testability Evaluation methods, can be executed by Software Testability Evaluation device.This is soft
Part Testability Evaluation device can be any equipment for being able to carry out the present embodiment method flow, for example, can be terminal device,
Server or dedicated Testability Evaluation equipment, system etc..
In the present embodiment, the software for carrying out Testability Evaluation will be needed to be known as software to be assessed, software to be assessed can be with
It is any application software, such as antivirus software, browser software, various client softwares or customer relation management (Customer
Relationship Management, CRM) class software etc..
Software Testability Evaluation device determines that at least one can reflect the assessment of the measurability of software to be assessed ginseng first
Number.Assessment dimension or angle when the assessment parameter is mainly limited to software to be assessed progress Testability Evaluation are in simple terms
Refer to from which or which dimension or angle and assess the measurability of software to be assessed, these dimensions or angle can on certain procedures
To reflect the measurability of software to be assessed.
Assessment parameter is illustrated, such as assessment parameter may include following at least one:
It is layered measurability, relies on measurability, interface service measurability, data flow architecture measurability, safe measurability.
In the present embodiment, Software Testability Evaluation device changes the way of existing Testability Evaluation method, is determining extremely
It is not directly according to identified assessment parameter progress mathematical reasoning with carry out to software to be assessed can after a few assessment parameter
The property surveyed assessment, but according to identified assessment parameter, to the measurability behavioral data of software to be assessed during the test into
Row classification, to obtain the corresponding measurability behavioral data of each assessment parameter；It in simple terms, is exactly by measurability behavioral data point
Under class to different assessment parameters.
In the present embodiment, measurability behavioral data refers to the data of the measurability behavior of description software；Measurability behavior
Refer to that software generates or existing various behaviors related with software test during the test.
For example, measurability behavior can be whether each service line for thinking deeply software in software test procedure has unified field
The behavior of model, business model, conceptual model etc..Wherein, whether each service line has unified domain model, business model or general
It reads model to a certain extent and will affect the measurability of software, if each service line has unified domain model, business model or general
Model is read, the measurability of software is all right, conversely, the measurability of software is with regard to poor.
In another example measurability behavior, which can be, thinks deeply whether system layer meets specification, frame in software test procedure
Behavior.Wherein, whether system layer, which meets specification, frame to a certain extent, will affect the measurability of software, if system layer is
Meet specification, frame, the measurability of software is all right, conversely, the measurability of software is with regard to poor.
In another example measurability behavior, which can be, thinks deeply whether reasonable, the example of software inhouse building dependence in software test procedure
Whether product code coupling condition, base business tier code change between such as each business, which can have biggish linkage, influences point
Behavior.Wherein, software inhouse building relies on the measurability that whether rationally will affect software to a certain extent, if software inhouse structure
Build dependence rationally, the measurability of software is all right, conversely, the measurability of software is with regard to poor.
In another example measurability behavior can be software test procedure consider software dependence on external supply with the presence or absence of more by force according to
Rely, relies on whether depth the behaviors such as can cut.
In another example measurability behavior can be being environmentally isolated property, the environmental factor dependence for considering software in software test procedure
Behavior.
In another example measurability behavior, which can be, considers whether software interface ease for use is preferable in software test procedure, such as
Whether interface parameters easily obtain, the behavior whether interface legibility is preferable etc..
It is worth noting that Software Testability Evaluation device can collect the measurability behavior in software test procedure in advance
Data.
After being categorized into measurability behavioral data under each assessment parameter, Software Testability Evaluation device can be to every
The corresponding measurability behavioral data of a assessment parameter is measured, to obtain software to be assessed surveying under each assessment parameter
Property measurement results.
In view of the measurability behavioral data under each assessment parameter is more, different measurability behavioral datas are commented in measurability
The effect played during estimating can be different, and the corresponding module of different assessment parameters is not also identical, therefore the present embodiment can
To be measured in the following ways to the corresponding measurability behavioral data of each assessment parameter.
Specifically, the module for each assessment parameter can be preset, which is used as to be assessed
The foundation or benchmark that measurability of the software in the case where assessing parameter is measured.To each assessment parameter, Software Testability Evaluation dress
Progress same treatment is set, it is specific to handle are as follows: the corresponding measurability behavioral data of the assessment parameter is divided into multiple groups；Configuration is every
The accounting of group measurability behavioral data, the accounting characterize every group of measurability behavioral data to the measurability institute for assessing software to be assessed
The size to work；According to the accounting of every group of measurability behavioral data and every group of measurability behavioral data, estimate to be assessed soft
Measurability of the part under the assessment parameter；Measurability according to preset module to software to be assessed under the assessment parameter
It is measured, to obtain testability measurement result of the software to be assessed under the assessment parameter.In this embodiment, to each
Measurability behavioral data under assessment parameter is grouped, and is that every group of measurability behavioral data configures accounting, is accounted for by what is configured
Than having to embody contribution of the different measurability behavioral datas to Testability Evaluation so that Testability Evaluation more tallies with the actual situation
Conducive to the authenticity and validity for improving quality of evaluation.
In an optional embodiment, Software Testability Evaluation device is in addition to obtaining software to be assessed in each assessment parameter
Under testability measurement result except, can also according to software to be assessed it is each assessment parameter under testability measurement as a result,
Obtain the whole measurability of software to be assessed.For example, a kind of simple entirety measurability method of assessing is: if software to be assessed exists
Testability measurement result under each assessment parameter is more satisfactory, then can determine the whole measurability of software to be assessed compared with
It is good；Conversely, determining that the whole measurability of software to be assessed is poor.In another example a kind of method for assessing whole measurability is: according to
Testability measurement of the software to be assessed under each assessment parameter is as a result, draw radar map, to obtain the entirety of software to be assessed
Measurability.The radar map can embody the whole measurability of software to be assessed.With software to be assessed for the first CRM software, second
CRM software and the 3rd CRM software, and the assessment parameter determined includes being layered measurability, dependence measurability, interface serviceization to survey
Property, for data flow architecture measurability and safe measurability, then the measurability according to the first CRM software under each assessment parameter
The radar map of measurement results, drafting is as shown in Figure 2；According to testability measurement knot of the 2nd CRM software under each assessment parameter
The radar map of fruit, drafting is as shown in Figure 3；According to testability measurement of the 3rd CRM software under each assessment parameter as a result, drawing
Radar map it is as shown in Figure 4.
In an optional embodiment, Software Testability Evaluation device is in addition to obtaining software to be assessed in each assessment parameter
Under testability measurement result except, can also according to software to be assessed it is each assessment parameter under testability measurement as a result,
Output improves guide data, to improve measurability of new software during one or more of development process and test process
Behavior.In this embodiment, Software Testability Evaluation device by output improve guide data, instruct respectively developer,
How tester falls on testability measurement result in specific exploitation and test job, further guidance how preferably into
Row software design, to further increase the measurability of new software.
It is worth noting that measurability behavioral data will be different, and software can be surveyed for different softwares to be assessed
Property assessment device classification is carried out to the measurability behavioral data of software during the test would also vary from, and comment each
Estimating that the corresponding measurability behavioral data of parameter is grouped also can be different.It specifically can be according to practical application request adaptation
Or setting.As shown in table 1, for Software Testability Evaluation device for CRM software setting assessment parameter, assess parameter under can
Survey sexual behaviour data and every group of measurability behavioral data accounting and for each assessment parameter module and
The example of the improvement guide data finally exported, but it is not limited to this.
Table 1
The accounting of each group measurability behavioral data under each evaluation and test parameter shown in above-mentioned table 1: soft for CRM
Part is divided into three groups in the measurability behavioral data being layered under measurability, and accounting is 30%, 40% and 30% respectively；It is relying on
Measurability behavioral data under measurability is divided into two groups, and accounting is 50% and 50% respectively；Under interface service measurability
Measurability behavioral data be divided into three groups, accounting is 40%, 30% and 30% respectively；Under data flow architecture measurability can
It surveys sexual behaviour data and is divided into three groups, accounting is 30%, 40% and 30% respectively；Measurability behavior number under safe measurability
According to being divided into two groups, accounting is 50% and 50% respectively.As it can be seen that the different measurability behavioral datas for assessing different grouping under parameters
It is not identical to the measurability role for assessing software to be assessed, it can specifically be embodied by accounting.
In the example shown in table 1, the setting for assessing parameter more meets CRM software, and the measurability to CRM software can be improved
The accuracy of assessment, and more targetedly.In addition, on the basis of assessing parameter, refining corresponding measurability row in this example
For data, carry out proportion for measurability behavioral data and different modules be set, according to preset module, accounting with
And measurability behavioral data itself carries out Testability Evaluation to CRM software, and testability measurement result is finally landed to improvement
In guide data, to improve the measurability behavior in exploitation and test process, and then improve software quality.
It should be noted that for the various method embodiments described above, for simple description, therefore, it is stated as a series of
Combination of actions, but those skilled in the art should understand that, the application is not limited by the described action sequence because
According to the application, some steps may be performed in other sequences or simultaneously.Secondly, those skilled in the art should also know
It knows, the embodiments described in the specification are all preferred embodiments, related actions and modules not necessarily the application
It is necessary.
In the above-described embodiments, it all emphasizes particularly on different fields to the description of each embodiment, there is no the portion being described in detail in some embodiment
Point, reference can be made to the related descriptions of other embodiments.
Fig. 5 is the structural schematic diagram for the Software Testability Evaluation device that one embodiment of the application provides.As shown in figure 5, should
Device comprises determining that module 51, categorization module 52 and evaluation module 53.
Determining module 51, for determining that at least one can reflect the assessment parameter of the measurability of software to be assessed.
Categorization module 52, for classifying to the measurability behavioral data of software to be assessed during the test, to obtain
The corresponding measurability behavioral data of each assessment parameter at least one the assessment parameter determined of determining module 51.
Evaluation module 53, the corresponding measurability behavioral data of each assessment parameter for obtaining to categorization module 52 carry out
Measurement, to obtain testability measurement result of the software to be assessed under each assessment parameter.
In an optional embodiment, evaluation module 53 is also used to: according to software to be assessed under each assessment parameter
Testability measurement is as a result, obtain the whole measurability of software to be assessed.
In an optional embodiment, as shown in fig. 6, the Software Testability Evaluation device further include: output module 54.
Output module 54, measurability of the software to be assessed under each assessment parameter for being obtained according to evaluation module 53
Measurement results, output improves guide data, to improve one or more processes of the new software in development process and test process
In measurability behavior.
In an optional embodiment, evaluation module 53 is corresponding in each assessment parameter for obtaining to categorization module 52
Measurability behavioral data measured, with obtain software to be assessed it is each assessment parameter under testability measurement result when,
It is specifically used for:
For each assessment parameter, the corresponding measurability behavioral data of parameter will be assessed and be divided into multiple groups；
Configure the accounting of every group of measurability behavioral data；
According to the accounting of every group of measurability behavioral data and every group of measurability behavioral data, estimate that software to be assessed is being commented
Estimate the measurability under parameter；
Measurability of the software to be assessed in the case where assessing parameter is measured according to preset module, it is to be evaluated to obtain
Estimate testability measurement result of the software in the case where assessing parameter.
In an optional embodiment, evaluation module 53 for according to software to be assessed it is each assessment parameter under can
The property surveyed measurement results, when obtaining the whole measurability of software to be assessed, are specifically used for:
According to testability measurement of the software to be assessed under each assessment parameter as a result, drafting radar map, to be evaluated to obtain
Estimate the whole measurability of software.
In an optional embodiment, at least one above-mentioned assessment parameter is comprised at least one of the following:
It is layered measurability, relies on measurability, interface service measurability, data flow architecture measurability, safe measurability.
Software Testability Evaluation device provided in this embodiment determines the assessment that can reflect the measurability of software to be assessed
Parameter classifies to the measurability behavioral data of software to be assessed during the test, and it is corresponding to obtain each assessment parameter
Measurability behavioral data measures the corresponding measurability behavioral data of each assessment parameter, obtains software to be assessed every
Testability measurement under a assessment parameter is as a result, realize the assessment to the measurability of software to be assessed.It is provided in this embodiment soft
Part Testability Evaluation device clearly carries out the dimension of Testability Evaluation first, i.e. assessment parameter is based under each assessment parameter
Measurability behavioral data carries out Testability Evaluation, and compared with prior art, realization is relatively easy, and quality of evaluation is higher, to soft
Part exploitation and test have biggish directive significance, are conducive to improve software quality.
It is apparent to those skilled in the art that for convenience and simplicity of description, the system of foregoing description,
The specific work process of device and unit, can refer to corresponding processes in the foregoing method embodiment, and details are not described herein.
In several embodiments provided herein, it should be understood that disclosed system, device and method can be with
It realizes by another way.For example, the apparatus embodiments described above are merely exemplary, for example, the unit
It divides, only a kind of logical function partition, there may be another division manner in actual implementation, such as multiple units or components
It can be combined or can be integrated into another system, or some features can be ignored or not executed.Another point, it is shown or
The mutual coupling, direct-coupling or communication connection discussed can be through some interfaces, the indirect coupling of device or unit
It closes or communicates to connect, can be electrical property, mechanical or other forms.
The unit as illustrated by the separation member may or may not be physically separated, aobvious as unit
The component shown may or may not be physical unit, it can and it is in one place, or may be distributed over multiple
In network unit.It can select some or all of unit therein according to the actual needs to realize the mesh of this embodiment scheme
's.
It, can also be in addition, each functional unit in each embodiment of the application can integrate in one processing unit
It is that each unit physically exists alone, can also be integrated in one unit with two or more units.Above-mentioned integrated list
Member both can take the form of hardware realization, can also realize in the form of hardware adds SFU software functional unit.
The above-mentioned integrated unit being realized in the form of SFU software functional unit can store and computer-readable deposit at one
In storage media.Above-mentioned SFU software functional unit is stored in a storage medium, including some instructions are used so that a computer
It is each that equipment (can be personal computer, server or the network equipment etc.) or processor (processor) execute the application
The part steps of embodiment the method.And storage medium above-mentioned includes: USB flash disk, mobile hard disk, read-only memory (Read-
Only Memory, ROM), random access memory (Random Access Memory, RAM), magnetic or disk etc. it is various
It can store the medium of program code.
Finally, it should be noted that above embodiments are only to illustrate the technical solution of the application, rather than its limitations；Although
The application is described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that: it still may be used
To modify the technical solutions described in the foregoing embodiments or equivalent replacement of some of the technical features；
And these are modified or replaceed, each embodiment technical solution of the application that it does not separate the essence of the corresponding technical solution spirit and
Range.
Claims (12)
1. a kind of Software Testability Evaluation method, which is characterized in that the method is executed by Software Testability Evaluation device, institute
It states Software Testability Evaluation device and is set to terminal device, server or dedicated quality assessment arrangement, system, the method
Include:
Determine that at least one can reflect the assessment parameter of the measurability of software to be assessed；
Classify to the measurability behavioral data of the software to be assessed during the test, to obtain the assessment determined ginseng
The corresponding measurability behavioral data of each assessment parameter in number；
The corresponding measurability behavioral data of each assessment parameter is measured, to obtain the software to be assessed described
Testability measurement result under each assessment parameter；
Wherein, measurability behavior refers to that software generates or existing behavior related with software test during the test；
The measurability behavioral data includes the data for describing following at least one Software Testability behavior:
Whether each service line that software is thought deeply in software test procedure has unified domain model, business model, conceptual model
Behavior；
The behavior whether system layer meets specification, frame is thought deeply in software test procedure；
In software test procedure think deeply software inhouse building rely on whether reasonable behavior；
Consider whether software dependence on external supply can cut out behavior with the presence or absence of relatively strong dependence, dependence depth in software test procedure；
Being environmentally isolated property, the condition depended sexual behaviour of software are considered in software test procedure；
In software test procedure consider software interface ease for use whether preferably, interface serviceization whether rationally, interface exposure chamber
Whether reasonable behavior；
Consider whether internal data construction field definition is clear in software test procedure, can be grasped with the presence or absence of field redundancies, structure
The whether reasonable behavior of the property made；
The behavior for considering whether data flow depth is reasonable in software test procedure, whether can cutting out or whether can pretend；
In software test procedure consider rely on data configuration difficulty whether rationally, with the presence or absence of the row of easy-to-use make
For；
Consider in software test procedure Pages Security with the presence or absence of loophole, database security can no there are the behaviors of loophole.
2. the method according to claim 1, wherein further include:
According to testability measurement of the software to be assessed under each assessment parameter as a result, obtaining the software to be assessed
Whole measurability.
3. the method according to claim 1, wherein described to the corresponding measurability row of each assessment parameter
It is measured for data, to obtain the software to be assessed after the testability measurement result under each assessment parameter,
Further include:
Guide data is improved as a result, exporting according to testability measurement of the software to be assessed under each assessment parameter,
To improve measurability behavior of new software during one or more of development process and test process.
4. the method according to claim 1, wherein described to the corresponding measurability row of each assessment parameter
It is measured for data, to obtain testability measurement result of the software to be assessed under each assessment parameter, comprising:
For each assessment parameter, the corresponding measurability behavioral data of the assessment parameter is divided into multiple groups；
Configure the accounting of every group of measurability behavioral data；
According to the accounting of every group of measurability behavioral data and every group of measurability behavioral data, estimate described to be assessed
Measurability of the software under the assessment parameter；
Measurability of the software to be assessed under the assessment parameter is measured according to preset module, to obtain
Testability measurement result of the software to be assessed under the assessment parameter.
5. according to the method described in claim 2, it is characterized in that, it is described according to the software to be assessed in each assessment
Testability measurement under parameter is as a result, obtain the whole measurability of the software to be assessed, comprising:
According to testability measurement of the software to be assessed under each assessment parameter as a result, radar map is drawn, to obtain
The whole measurability of the software to be assessed.
6. method according to claim 1-5, which is characterized in that the assessment parameter determined includes following
It is at least one:
It is layered measurability, relies on measurability, interface service measurability, data flow architecture measurability, safe measurability.
7. a kind of Software Testability Evaluation device, which is characterized in that the Software Testability Evaluation device be set to terminal device,
Server or dedicated quality assessment arrangement, system, described device include:
Determining module, for determining that at least one can reflect the assessment parameter of the measurability of software to be assessed；
Categorization module, for classifying to the measurability behavioral data of the software to be assessed during the test, to obtain
The corresponding measurability behavioral data of each assessment parameter in the assessment parameter that the determining module is determined；
Evaluation module, for being measured to the corresponding measurability behavioral data of each assessment parameter, with obtain it is described to
Assess testability measurement result of the software under each assessment parameter；
Wherein, measurability behavior refers to that software generates or existing behavior related with software test during the test；
The measurability behavioral data includes the data for describing following at least one Software Testability behavior:
Whether each service line that software is thought deeply in software test procedure has unified domain model, business model, conceptual model
Behavior；
The behavior whether system layer meets specification, frame is thought deeply in software test procedure；
In software test procedure think deeply software inhouse building rely on whether reasonable behavior；
Consider whether software dependence on external supply can cut out behavior with the presence or absence of relatively strong dependence, dependence depth in software test procedure；
Being environmentally isolated property, the condition depended sexual behaviour of software are considered in software test procedure；
In software test procedure consider software interface ease for use whether preferably, interface serviceization whether rationally, interface exposure chamber
Whether reasonable behavior；
Consider whether internal data construction field definition is clear in software test procedure, can be grasped with the presence or absence of field redundancies, structure
The whether reasonable behavior of the property made；
The behavior for considering whether data flow depth is reasonable in software test procedure, whether can cutting out or whether can pretend；
In software test procedure consider rely on data configuration difficulty whether rationally, with the presence or absence of the row of easy-to-use make
For；
Consider in software test procedure Pages Security with the presence or absence of loophole, database security can no there are the behaviors of loophole.
8. device according to claim 7, which is characterized in that the evaluation module is also used to:
According to testability measurement of the software to be assessed under each assessment parameter as a result, obtaining the software to be assessed
Whole measurability.
9. device according to claim 7, which is characterized in that further include:
Output module, for according to the software to be assessed it is described it is each assessment parameter under testability measurement as a result, output
Guide data is improved, to improve measurability row of new software during one or more of development process and test process
For.
10. device according to claim 7, which is characterized in that the evaluation module is specifically used for:
For each assessment parameter, the corresponding measurability behavioral data of the assessment parameter is divided into multiple groups；
Configure the accounting of every group of measurability behavioral data；
According to the accounting of every group of measurability behavioral data and every group of measurability behavioral data, estimate described to be assessed
Measurability of the software under the assessment parameter；
Measurability of the software to be assessed under the assessment parameter is measured according to preset module, to obtain
Testability measurement result of the software to be assessed under the assessment parameter.
11. device according to claim 8, which is characterized in that the evaluation module is specifically used for:
According to testability measurement of the software to be assessed under each assessment parameter as a result, radar map is drawn, to obtain
The whole measurability of the software to be assessed.
12. according to the described in any item devices of claim 7-11, which is characterized in that the assessment ginseng that the determining module is determined
Number comprises at least one of the following:
It is layered measurability, relies on measurability, interface service measurability, data flow architecture measurability, safe measurability.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510471320.XA CN106445797B (en) | 2015-08-04 | 2015-08-04 | Software Testability Evaluation method and device |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510471320.XA CN106445797B (en) | 2015-08-04 | 2015-08-04 | Software Testability Evaluation method and device |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN106445797A CN106445797A (en) | 2017-02-22 |
| CN106445797B true CN106445797B (en) | 2019-09-03 |
Family
ID=59216611
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510471320.XA Active CN106445797B (en) | 2015-08-04 | 2015-08-04 | Software Testability Evaluation method and device |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN106445797B (en) |
Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101894068A (en) * | 2010-05-31 | 2010-11-24 | 北京航空航天大学 | Embedded software reliability accelerated test method |
| CN102004642A (en) * | 2010-11-24 | 2011-04-06 | 中南大学 | Group collaborative solving software control technology |
Family Cites Families (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US8701080B2 (en) * | 2010-04-05 | 2014-04-15 | Accenture Global Services Limited | Template components having constraints representative of best practices in integration software development |
-
2015
- 2015-08-04 CN CN201510471320.XA patent/CN106445797B/en active Active
Patent Citations (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN101894068A (en) * | 2010-05-31 | 2010-11-24 | 北京航空航天大学 | Embedded software reliability accelerated test method |
| CN102004642A (en) * | 2010-11-24 | 2011-04-06 | 中南大学 | Group collaborative solving software control technology |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 软件可测试性评估框架构建;刘刚;《兵工自动化》;20140825;正文第90-92页 |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN106445797A (en) | 2017-02-22 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN108520357B (en) | Method and device for judging line loss abnormality reason and server | |
| CN105247493B (en) | Impacted test is identified from the data of static collection | |
| CN104937428B (en) | Embedded testing device | |
| US9588820B2 (en) | Cloud architecture recommender system using automated workload instrumentation | |
| CN101882105B (en) | Method for testing response time of Web page under concurrent environment | |
| US9158663B2 (en) | Evaluating performance maturity level of an application | |
| CN106502889B (en) | The method and apparatus for predicting cloud software performance | |
| CN107832231A (en) | A kind of system detection method, device and medium | |
| CN106874187A (en) | code coverage collection method and device | |
| CN103150250B (en) | Application program capacity detection system and application program capacity detection method | |
| CN104965784B (en) | Automatic test approach and device | |
| Dash et al. | Maintainability prediction of object oriented software system by using artificial neural network approach | |
| CN106803801A (en) | Using the system and method for the wireline test result data of polymerization | |
| CN108984403A (en) | The verification method and device of FPGA logical code | |
| CN108595884A (en) | Power system transient stability appraisal procedure and device | |
| TW201216048A (en) | Test system | |
| CN109697461A (en) | Disaggregated model training method and terminal device based on finite data | |
| CN105335379B (en) | The method and apparatus to sort to the combination of mutation, test case, random seed in mutation test | |
| CN108683564A (en) | A kind of network (WSN) emulation system credibility evaluation method based on Multidimensional decision-making attribute | |
| CN108153987A (en) | A kind of hydraulic pump Multiple faults diagnosis approach based on the learning machine that transfinites | |
| CN109740634A (en) | Disaggregated model training method and terminal device | |
| CN109376079A (en) | The test method and server that interface calls | |
| CN105843744B (en) | Transformation relation preference grade sort method for concurrent program metamorphic testing | |
| CN110059083A (en) | A kind of data evaluation method, apparatus and electronic equipment | |
| CN109407655A (en) | A kind of method and device for debugging chip |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| TR01 | Transfer of patent right | ||
| TR01 | Transfer of patent right |
Effective date of registration: 20240328 Address after: Singapore Patentee after: Alibaba Singapore Holdings Ltd. Country or region after: Singapore Address before: A four-storey 847 mailbox in Grand Cayman Capital Building, British Cayman Islands Patentee before: ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING Ltd. Country or region before: Cayman Islands |