CN106408211A - Deep saturated sand earthquake-induced liquefaction judgment method - Google Patents
Deep saturated sand earthquake-induced liquefaction judgment method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106408211A CN106408211A CN201610946436.9A CN201610946436A CN106408211A CN 106408211 A CN106408211 A CN 106408211A CN 201610946436 A CN201610946436 A CN 201610946436A CN 106408211 A CN106408211 A CN 106408211A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- penetration test
- standard penetration
- stress
- effective stress
- standard
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 39
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 124
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 96
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 33
- 125000004122 cyclic group Chemical group 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 claims description 18
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 claims description 16
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000010606 normalization Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000004080 punching Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000004069 differentiation Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000004744 fabric Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035800 maturation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0635—Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/08—Construction
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Investigation Of Foundation Soil And Reinforcement Of Foundation Soil By Compacting Or Drainage (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a deep saturated sand earthquake-induced liquefaction judgment method, which comprises six steps: 1) determining standard penetration numbers of a deep saturated sand layer at different positions and in different depths; 2) determining seismic cyclic shear stress ratio CSR of different standard penetration test points of the deep saturated sand layer; 3) determining actual critical overlying effective stress of standard penetration test through a hypothetical test method; 4) obtaining normalized standard penetration numbers of the different standard penetration test points at different positions and in different depths; 5) determining liquefaction-resistance cyclic shear stress ratio CRR7.5; and 6) making a comparison between the seismic cyclic shear stress ratio CSR and the liquefaction-resistance cyclic shear stress ratio CRR7.5, and carrying out earthquake-induced liquefaction judgment. The method can overcome the defect that a standard penetration number liquefaction judgment method in the current specifications cannot be applied to the soil layer, the depth of which is larger than 20m, and can enable the existing standard penetration number liquefaction judgment method to be expanded and applied to deep saturated sand earthquake-induced liquefaction judgment.
Description
Technical field
The invention belongs to geotechnological quake-resistant safety evaluates field, it is related to a kind of method differentiating buried saturated sand earthquake liquefaction.
Background technology
China's hydroelectric resources more than 80% is distributed in the west area that seismic activity is frequent and intensity is big, and this area riverbed is big
Have deep covering layer more, in deep covering layer, be commonly present soil layer or the lenticular body that sand etc. may liquefy under geological process.
With the enforcement of strategy to develop western regions, increasing earth-rock works will be built on deep covering layer, in deep covering layer
Sand or its lenticular body stability under geological process is the key issue being related to engineering safety and feasibility, but buried saturation
Sand Liquefaction differentiate be at present academicly with engineering on difficulties.Standard penetration test (SPT) is that widely used scene is former
Bit test method, is applied quite varied in engineering based on the method that standard penetration test (SPT) differentiates foundation soil liquefaction probability, but
Standard penetration test (SPT) liquefaction Judgment Method in existing specification, (overlying effective stress is substantially in 20m for the foundation soil depth that it is suitable for
Upper is 200kPa) within, the buried saturated sand foundation liquefaction more than 20m (overlying effective stress substantially 200kPa) is sentenced
Not, existing method is inapplicable.
Content of the invention
A kind of purpose of the method differentiating buried saturated sand earthquake liquefaction of the present invention is by based on standard penetration test (SPT)
Shallow soil seismic liquefaction evaluation method expansive approach is in buried saturated sand seismic liquefaction evaluation;Prior art is only applicable to shallow-layer
Sand Liquefaction differentiates, be applied to the liquefaction of soil mass more than 20m for the overlying effective stress differentiate actually lack enough according to
According to.
For achieving the above object, the present invention provides technical scheme below:
A kind of method differentiating buried saturated sand earthquake liquefaction, for the buried saturated sand foundation liquefaction more than 20m
Differentiate it is characterised in that comprising the following steps:
Step one, at the scene, according to specification, to big thickness, buried sandy soils carry out standard at different parts, different depth
Penetration test, obtain diverse location, at different depth layer of sand Standard penetration test blow count N ';
Step 2, according to standard penetration test (SPT) point stress condition, calculate standard penetration test (SPT) under certain seismic acceleration and survey
Seismic earthquake cyclic shear stress ratio CSR at pilot:
In formula:τavSeismic dynamic shear stress;amax- surface ground motion acceleration peak;G- gravity accelerates
Degree;σv0- vertical total stress;σ'v0- overlying effective stress;rdStress Stiffness degradation coefficient;
Step 3, actual critical overlying effective stress σ of determination covering layer soil body standard penetration test (SPT) 'cr, concrete steps are such as
Under:
The critical overlying effective stress that A, supposition cover layer soil body standard penetration test (SPT) is σ 'a;
B, by each standard penetration test (SPT) point overlying effective stress σ 'v0With suppose critical overlying effective stress σ 'aCompared
Relatively, if σ 'v0≤σ'a, then with formula (2), corresponding for testing site depth actual measurement Standard penetration test blow count N ' is corrected to overlying effective
Under the conditions of stress is the standard stress of 100kPa, the Standard penetration test blow count after correction is (N1)60;
Wherein, PaFor atmospheric pressure;
C, normal distribution is carried out to the Standard penetration test blow count sample data being corrected under 100kPa using hypothesis testing method
Inspection, judge empirical threshold overlying effective stress σ 'aWhether the Standard penetration test blow count sample data after lower correction meets normal state is divided
Cloth, if assay meets normal distribution, illustrate this supposition overlying effective stress σ 'aWithin the scope of application of formula (2),
Can continue to increase the critical overlying effective stress supposing, continue following steps;
D, increase the critical overlying effective stress supposing to σ 'a+ Δ σ, repeats B to C, to the standard being corrected under 100kPa
Blow number sample data carries out normal distribution-test, until under the critical overlying effective stress supposing, to the mark after correction
Quasi- blow number sample data assay do not meet normal distribution and suppose critical overlying effective stress reach 800kPa with
Till upper;
E, according under above-mentioned each empirical threshold overlying effective stress, to the Standard penetration test blow count sample being corrected under 100kPa
Data carries out the result of hypothesis testing, draw the coefficient of skewness, coefficient of kurtosis and empirical threshold overlying effective stress σ 'aRelation bent
Line, both in figures can meet U simultaneously<U0.05=1.96 can not meet U to both simultaneously<U0.05=1.96 separation is corresponding
Empirical threshold overlying effective stress as actual critical overlying effective stress σ 'cr;
Step 4, using formula (3) by the Standard penetration test blow count N ' school at buried saturation layer of sand diverse location, different depth
Under the conditions of just arriving the standard stress of 100kPa, the normalization standard of standard penetration test (SPT) point at acquisition diverse location, different depth
Blow number (N1)60:
The normalization standard of standard penetration test (SPT) point at step 5, the diverse location being determined using step 4, different depth
Blow number (N1)60, according to standard penetration test (SPT) point pair at formula (4) the buried saturated sand diverse location of calculating, different depth
The Shear stress ratio of liquefaction CRR answering7.5:
Step 6, by Shear stress ratio of liquefaction CRR7.5Be compared with earthquake cyclic shear stress ratio CSR, when CSR >=
CRR7.5, the soil body liquefies;As CSR < CRR7.5, the soil body do not liquefy.
It is further preferred that described step 3 is normalized to 100kPa phase under the conditions of described empirical threshold overlying effective stress
Carry out hypothesis testing with the Standard penetration test blow count sample data under stress condition, determine if to meet normal distribution, until
It is assumed that critical overlying effective stress under, to correction after Standard penetration test blow count sample data assay do not meet normal distribution
And till the critical overlying effective stress supposing reaches more than 800kPa, determine therefrom that meeting normal distribution divides with being unsatisfactory for normal state
The separation of cloth is the actual critical overlying effective stress of standard penetration test (SPT), and then faces according to the standard penetration test (SPT) determining is actual
Boundary's overlying effective stress, carries out seismic liquefaction evaluation to buried saturated sand.
Further, in described step one, buried saturated sand soil layer will be tested using conventional drilling tool and hole to test soil layer
At the above 15cm of absolute altitude, remove in the hole surflaes, and carry out retaining wall as needed;
Before injection, connect standard penetration test (SPT) device, tighten tool joint, penetrator is put in the hole to bottom hole, and
Avoid impact opening bottom, measurement obtains drilling depth, note the perpendicularity after keeping penetrator, drilling rod, guide post to couple;
During injection, using the punching hammer of 63.5kg, with 76cm freely fall away from, using automatic drop hammer method, by penetrator with
15~30 impacts per minute are buried after middle 15cm, then start recording often squeezes into the blow counts of 10cm, obtains the hammer of accumulative 30cm
Hit several Standard penetration test blow count N '.
Further, σ ' in described step 3aValue takes 200~300kPa.
Additionally, Δ σ value takes 5~10kPa in described step 3.
It is further preferred that described normal distribution-test carries out normal distribution-test using moments method.
Beneficial effects of the present invention:
Compared with prior art, the invention provides a kind of differentiate buried saturated sand earthquake liquefaction method, Neng Gouke
Take the defect that existing specification Plays blow number liquefaction Judgment Method is not suitable for below 20m soil layer, can be by existing standard
Blow number liquefaction Judgment Method expansive approach, in buried saturated sand seismic liquefaction evaluation, can overcome original shallow-layer sand earthquake
Liquefaction Judgment Method may not apply to the limitation of buried saturated sand, when being to build earth and rockfill dam on the deep covering layer of high seismic intensity area
Alluvial deposit foundation Seismic stability evaluation and dam body-groundsill system quake-resistant safety evaluation provide critical support.
Brief description
Fig. 1 is the actual measurement standard under the buried saturation layer of sand difference overlying effective stress involved by the specific embodiment of the invention
Blow number;
Fig. 2 is the coefficient of skewness and peak under the different empirical threshold overlying effective stresses involved by the specific embodiment of the invention
The relation schematic diagram of degree coefficient;
Fig. 3 is that the critical overlying effective stress determining in the specific embodiment of the invention is corrected to the Standard piercing after 100kPa
Hit number;
Fig. 4 is the buried saturated sand maximum liquefaction depth that the specific embodiment of the invention records.
Specific embodiment
Technological means, character of innovation, reached purpose and effect for making the present invention realize are easy to understand, below to this
The specific embodiment of invention describes in further detail.Because standard penetration test (SPT) is maturation method of the prior art, so
Its concrete process of the test is not repeated.
The major technique thinking of the present invention is:According under identical stress condition, the geotechnical testament parameter of same soil layer accords with
The principle closing normal distribution, will be effective for standard penetration test (SPT) point overlying it is assumed that the critical overlying effective stress of standard penetration test (SPT)
The Standard penetration test blow count that stress is less than at critical overlying effective stress normalizes to identical stress condition (100kPa), and then adopts
Determine whether the Standard penetration test blow count sample data after correction meets normal distribution with hypothesis testing, determine therefrom that layer of sand is actual and face
Boundary's overlying effective stress, and then further seismic liquefaction evaluation is carried out to buried saturated sand.Concrete mode is as follows:
Step one, at the scene, according to specification, preferably《Earthwork test rule》To big thickness, buried sandy soils are in different portions
Position, carry out standard penetration test (SPT) at different depth, obtain diverse location, at different depth layer of sand Standard penetration test blow count N ', this
In step, buried saturated sand soil layer will be tested using conventional drilling tool and hole to the test above 15cm of soil layer absolute altitude, remove in the hole
Surflaes, and carry out retaining wall as needed;
Before injection, connect standard penetration test (SPT) device, tighten tool joint, penetrator is put in the hole to bottom hole, and
Avoid impact opening bottom, measurement obtains drilling depth, note the perpendicularity after keeping penetrator, drilling rod, guide post to couple;
During injection, using the punching hammer of 63.5kg, with 76cm freely fall away from, using automatic drop hammer method, by penetrator with
15~30 impacts per minute are buried after middle 15cm, then start recording often squeezes into the blow counts of 10cm, obtains the hammer of accumulative 30cm
Hit several Standard penetration test blow count N '.Step 2, according to standard penetration test (SPT) point stress condition, calculate certain seismic acceleration subscript
Seismic earthquake cyclic shear stress ratio CSR at quasi- penetration test test point:
In formula:τavSeismic dynamic shear stress;amax- surface ground motion acceleration peak;G- gravity accelerates
Degree;σv0- vertical total stress;σ'v0- overlying effective stress;rdStress Stiffness degradation coefficient.
Step 3, actual critical overlying effective stress σ of determination covering layer soil body standard penetration test (SPT) 'cr, concrete steps are such as
Under:
The critical overlying effective stress that A, supposition cover layer soil body standard penetration test (SPT) is σ 'a, σ 'aTake 200~300kPa;
B, by each standard penetration test (SPT) point overlying effective stress σ 'v0With suppose critical overlying effective stress σ 'aCompared
Relatively, if σ 'v0≤σ'a, then with formula (6), corresponding for testing site depth actual measurement Standard penetration test blow count N ' is corrected to overlying effective
Under the conditions of stress is the standard stress of 100kPa, the Standard penetration test blow count after correction is (N1)60;
Wherein, Pa is atmospheric pressure.
C, normal distribution is carried out to the Standard penetration test blow count sample data being corrected under 100kPa using hypothesis testing method
Inspection (hereafter taking moments method (i.e. U method of inspection) as a example illustrating), judge empirical threshold overlying effective stress σ 'aAfter lower correction
Whether Standard penetration test blow count sample data meets normal distribution, if assay meets normal distribution (the i.e. coefficient of skewness and kurtosis
Coefficient U is satisfied by U<U0.05=1.96), then illustrate this supposition overlying effective stress σ 'aWithin the scope of application of formula (6), can
Continue to increase the critical overlying effective stress supposing, continue following steps.
D, increase the critical overlying effective stress supposing to σ 'a+ Δ σ, Δ σ can use 5~10kPa, repeat B to C, to correction
Standard penetration test blow count sample data under 100kPa carries out normal distribution-test, until in the critical overlying effective stress supposing
Under, the critical overlying that the Standard penetration test blow count sample data assay after correction is not met normal distribution and supposes has effect
Till power reaches more than 800kPa.
E, according under above-mentioned each empirical threshold overlying effective stress, to the Standard penetration test blow count sample being corrected under 100kPa
Data carries out the result of hypothesis testing, draw the coefficient of skewness, coefficient of kurtosis and empirical threshold overlying effective stress σ 'aRelation bent
Line, both in figures can meet U simultaneously<U0.05=1.96 (i.e. p>0.05) U can not be met to both simultaneously<U0.05=1.96 point
Boundary's point corresponding empirical threshold overlying effective stress as actual critical overlying effective stress σ 'cr.
According under identical stress condition in this step, the geotechnical testament parameter of same soil layer meets the former of normal distribution
Reason, to the Standard penetration test blow count sample number being normalized under the conditions of empirical threshold overlying effective stress under the identical stress condition of 100kPa
According to carrying out hypothesis testing, determine if to meet normal distribution, until under the critical overlying effective stress supposing, after correction
Standard penetration test blow count sample data assay do not meet normal distribution and suppose critical overlying effective stress reach
Till more than 800kPa, determine therefrom that meeting normal distribution with the separation being unsatisfactory for normal distribution is that standard penetration test (SPT) is actual
Critical overlying effective stress, and then according to the actual critical overlying effective stress of the standard penetration test (SPT) determining, to buried saturated sand
Soil carries out seismic liquefaction evaluation.
Step 4, using formula (7) by the Standard penetration test blow count N ' school at buried saturation layer of sand diverse location, different depth
Under the conditions of just arriving the standard stress of 100kPa, the normalization standard of standard penetration test (SPT) point at acquisition diverse location, different depth
Blow number (N1)60:
The normalization standard of standard penetration test (SPT) point at step 5, the diverse location being determined using step 4, different depth
Blow number (N1)60, according to standard penetration test (SPT) point pair at formula (8) the buried saturated sand diverse location of calculating, different depth
The Shear stress ratio of liquefaction CRR answering7.5:
Step 6, by Shear stress ratio of liquefaction CRR7.5Be compared with earthquake cyclic shear stress ratio CSR, when CSR >=
CRR7.5, the soil body liquefies;As CSR < CRR7.5, the soil body do not liquefy.
Below, to illustrate this taking Mei Le power station dam foundation covering and deep-burying saturation layer of sand seismic liquefaction evaluation as a example
The implementation process of bright method.
(1) standard penetration test (SPT) is carried out to buried saturation layer of sand, record diverse location, (different overlyings are effective for different depth
Stress) place's standard penetration test (SPT) point Standard penetration test blow count, test result is as shown in Figure 1.
(2) stress condition according to standard penetration test (SPT) point, calculates each standard penetration test (SPT) point according to formula (5) and is setting
The seismic cyclic shear stress ratio CSR causing under acceleration.
(3) suppose cover layer standard penetration test (SPT) critical overlying effective stress σ 'aFor 300kPa, will be less than in Fig. 1
Actual measurement Standard penetration test blow count N ' at the standard penetration test (SPT) point of 300kPa is corrected to 100kPa overlying according to formula (6) effect
Under the conditions of power, using moments method (i.e. U method of inspection) to the Standard penetration test blow count (N after correction1)60Carry out normal distribution-test, calculate
The coefficient of skewness and coefficient of kurtosis are respectively 0.74 and 0.8, and the coefficient of skewness and coefficient of kurtosis U are satisfied by U<U0.05=1.96 (i.e. p>
0.05) sample data after, illustrating to correct meets normal distribution.
(4) increasing the critical overlying effective stress supposing is (σ 'a+ Δ σ), Δ σ takes 10kPa, repeats (3), to being corrected to
Standard penetration test blow count sample data under 100kPa carries out normal distribution-test, calculates the corresponding coefficient of skewness and coefficient of kurtosis,
And check whether the coefficient of skewness and coefficient of kurtosis U are satisfied by U<U0.05=1.96 (i.e. p>0.05), until suppose critical on
It is covered with efficacy, the Standard penetration test blow count sample data assay after correction is not met on normal distribution and empirical threshold
It is covered with efficacy and reach more than 800kPa (this example is up to 840kPa), the degree of bias system under different empirical threshold overlying effective stresses
Number and coefficient of kurtosis are shown in Table 1.
The different corresponding coefficient of skewness of empirical threshold overlying effective stress of table 1 and coefficient of kurtosis
(5) draw the relation curve that the coefficient of skewness and coefficient of kurtosis change with empirical threshold overlying effective stress, as Fig. 2 institute
Show, (coefficient of skewness and coefficient of kurtosis U are satisfied by U to meet normal distribution according to Fig. 2 determination<U0.05=1.96) and be unsatisfactory for normal state
(coefficient of skewness and coefficient of kurtosis U can not be satisfied by U for distribution<U0.05=1.96) boundary of empirical threshold overlying effective stress
Point, this separation be actual critical overlying effective stress, as shown in Figure 2 actual critical overlying effective stress σ 'crFor 416kPa.
(6) using determine critical overlying effective stress σ 'cr=416kPa, according to formula (7) by buried saturation layer of sand not
Actual measurement Standard penetration test blow count at same position, different depth is corrected to the (N under the conditions of the overlying effective stress of 100kPa1)60, school
Standard penetration test blow count after just is as shown in Figure 3.
(7) according to (N determining1)60, using standard at formula (8) the buried saturated sand diverse location of calculating, different depth
Penetration test point corresponding Shear stress ratio of liquefaction CRR7.5.
(8) by (5) and (8) calculated earthquake shear stress ratio CSR and Shear stress ratio of liquefaction CRR7.5Compared
Relatively, if CSR >=CRR7.5, then the soil body liquefy;If CSR is < CRR7.5, the soil body do not liquefy.Fig. 4 gives using this
The reality buried saturation layer of sand maximum liquefaction depth that bright method differentiation obtains.
The foregoing is only the better embodiment of the present invention, not in order to limit the present invention, all spirit in the present invention
Within principle, any modification, equivalent substitution and improvement made etc., should be included within the scope of the present invention.
Claims (6)
1. a kind of method differentiating buried saturated sand earthquake liquefaction, sentences for the buried saturated sand foundation liquefaction more than 20m
Not it is characterised in that comprising the following steps:
Step one, at the scene, according to specification, to big thickness, buried sandy soils carry out Standard piercing at different parts, different depth
Test, obtain diverse location, at different depth layer of sand Standard penetration test blow count N ';
Step 2, according to standard penetration test (SPT) point stress condition, calculate standard penetration test (SPT) test point under certain seismic acceleration
Locate seismic earthquake cyclic shear stress ratio CSR:
In formula:τavSeismic dynamic shear stress;amax- surface ground motion acceleration peak;G- acceleration of gravity;
σv0- vertical total stress;σ'v0- overlying effective stress;rdStress Stiffness degradation coefficient;
Step 3, actual critical overlying effective stress σ of determination covering layer soil body standard penetration test (SPT) 'cr, comprise the following steps that:
The critical overlying effective stress that A, supposition cover layer soil body standard penetration test (SPT) is σ 'a;
B, by each standard penetration test (SPT) point overlying effective stress σ 'v0With the critical overlying effective stress σ ' supposingaIt is compared, if
σ'v0≤σ′a, then with formula (2), corresponding for testing site depth actual measurement Standard penetration test blow count N ' is corrected to overlying effective stress
Under the conditions of the standard stress of 100kPa, the Standard penetration test blow count after correction is (N1)60;
Wherein, PaFor atmospheric pressure;
C, normal distribution-test is carried out to the Standard penetration test blow count sample data being corrected under 100kPa using hypothesis testing method,
Judge empirical threshold overlying effective stress σ 'aWhether the Standard penetration test blow count sample data after lower correction meets normal distribution, if
Assay meets normal distribution, then illustrate this supposition overlying effective stress σ 'aWithin the scope of application of formula (2), can continue
The continuous critical overlying effective stress increasing supposition, continues following steps;
D, increase the critical overlying effective stress supposing to σ 'a+ Δ σ, repeats B to C, to the Standard piercing being corrected under 100kPa
Hit numerical example data and carry out normal distribution-test, until under the critical overlying effective stress supposing, passing through to the standard after correction
Enter to hit the critical overlying effective stress that numerical example data detection result do not meet normal distribution and suppose to reach more than 800kPa and be
Only;
E, according under above-mentioned each empirical threshold overlying effective stress, to the Standard penetration test blow count sample data being corrected under 100kPa
Carry out the result of hypothesis testing, draw the coefficient of skewness, coefficient of kurtosis and empirical threshold overlying effective stress σ 'aRelation curve,
Both in figures can meet U simultaneously<U0.05=1.96 can not meet U to both simultaneously<U0.05=1.96 corresponding supposition of separation
Critical overlying effective stress is actual critical overlying effective stress σ 'cr;
Step 4, using formula (3), the Standard penetration test blow count N ' at buried saturation layer of sand diverse location, different depth is corrected to
Under the conditions of the standard stress of 100kPa, the normalization Standard piercing of standard penetration test (SPT) point at acquisition diverse location, different depth
Hit number (N1)60:
The normalization Standard piercing of standard penetration test (SPT) point at step 5, the diverse location being determined using step 4, different depth
Hit number (N1)60, corresponding according to standard penetration test (SPT) point at formula (4) the buried saturated sand diverse location of calculating, different depth
Shear stress ratio of liquefaction CRR7.5:
Step 6, by Shear stress ratio of liquefaction CRR7.5It is compared with earthquake cyclic shear stress ratio CSR, as CSR >=CRR7.5, soil
Body liquefies;As CSR < CRR7.5, the soil body do not liquefy.
2. according to claim 1 a kind of differentiate buried saturated sand earthquake liquefaction method it is characterised in that:Described step
In rapid three, the Standard piercing being normalized under the identical stress condition of 100kPa under the conditions of described empirical threshold overlying effective stress is hit
Numerical example data carries out hypothesis testing, determines if to meet normal distribution, until under the critical overlying effective stress supposing,
Normal distribution, and the critical overlying effective stress supposing are not met to the Standard penetration test blow count sample data assay after correction
Till reaching more than 800kPa, determine therefrom that meeting normal distribution with the separation being unsatisfactory for normal distribution is standard penetration test (SPT)
Actual critical overlying effective stress, and then according to the actual critical overlying effective stress of the standard penetration test (SPT) determining, to buried full
Carry out seismic liquefaction evaluation with sand.
3. according to claim 1 a kind of differentiate buried saturated sand earthquake liquefaction method it is characterised in that:Described step
In rapid one, buried saturated sand soil layer will be tested using conventional drilling tool and hole to the test above 15cm of soil layer absolute altitude, remove in the hole
Surflaes, and carry out retaining wall as needed;
Before injection, connect standard penetration test (SPT) device, tighten tool joint, penetrator is put in the hole to bottom hole, and avoids
Impact opening bottom, measurement obtains drilling depth, the perpendicularity after keeping penetrator, drilling rod, guide post to couple;
During injection, using the punching hammer of 63.5kg, freely falling away from using automatic drop hammer method, by penetrator with every point with 76cm
15~30 impacts of clock are buried after middle 15cm, then start recording often squeezes into the blow counts of 10cm, obtains the hammering of accumulative 30cm
Number Standard penetration test blow count N '.
4. according to claim 1 a kind of differentiate buried saturated sand earthquake liquefaction method it is characterised in that:Described step
σ ' in rapid threeaValue takes 200~300kPa.
5. according to claim 1 a kind of differentiate buried saturated sand earthquake liquefaction method it is characterised in that:Described step
In rapid three, Δ σ value takes 5~10kPa.
6. the method for a kind of differentiation buried saturated sand earthquake liquefaction according to Claims 1 to 5 any one, its feature
It is:Described normal distribution-test carries out normal distribution-test using moments method.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610946436.9A CN106408211B (en) | 2016-10-26 | 2016-10-26 | A method of differentiating buried saturated sand earthquake liquefaction |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610946436.9A CN106408211B (en) | 2016-10-26 | 2016-10-26 | A method of differentiating buried saturated sand earthquake liquefaction |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN106408211A true CN106408211A (en) | 2017-02-15 |
CN106408211B CN106408211B (en) | 2019-11-22 |
Family
ID=58013712
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610946436.9A Active CN106408211B (en) | 2016-10-26 | 2016-10-26 | A method of differentiating buried saturated sand earthquake liquefaction |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN106408211B (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN111368382A (en) * | 2018-12-06 | 2020-07-03 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Method and system for determining earthquake liquefaction index |
CN111705774A (en) * | 2020-05-14 | 2020-09-25 | 西南交通建设集团股份有限公司 | Saturated sandy soil liquefaction detection method based on standard penetration test |
CN111914419A (en) * | 2020-07-31 | 2020-11-10 | 天津泰勘工程技术咨询有限公司 | Saturated silt standard penetration liquefaction judgment method |
CN113624943A (en) * | 2021-08-25 | 2021-11-09 | 中交第一航务工程勘察设计院有限公司 | Earthquake liquefaction discrimination method for coral sand field |
CN114154332A (en) * | 2021-12-06 | 2022-03-08 | 西南石油大学 | Gravel soil earthquake liquefaction evaluation method |
CN115910248A (en) * | 2022-11-22 | 2023-04-04 | 中交第四航务工程局有限公司 | Coral reef liquefaction judgment method based on in-situ test correlation indoor liquefaction resistance |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103870643A (en) * | 2014-03-05 | 2014-06-18 | 国家电网公司 | Method for determining pile spacing of anti-liquefying vibrating-impacting crushed-stone piles |
-
2016
- 2016-10-26 CN CN201610946436.9A patent/CN106408211B/en active Active
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103870643A (en) * | 2014-03-05 | 2014-06-18 | 国家电网公司 | Method for determining pile spacing of anti-liquefying vibrating-impacting crushed-stone piles |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
Title |
---|
刘启旺等: "标贯击数液化判别方法的比较", 《地震工程学报》 * |
杨正权等: "考虑深厚覆盖层结构特性的场地地震反应分析研究", 《水力发电学报》 * |
杨玉生等: "水利工程震害中土工结构低应力破坏实例分析", 《岩土力学》 * |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN111368382A (en) * | 2018-12-06 | 2020-07-03 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Method and system for determining earthquake liquefaction index |
CN111368382B (en) * | 2018-12-06 | 2022-10-04 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Method and system for determining earthquake liquefaction index |
CN111705774A (en) * | 2020-05-14 | 2020-09-25 | 西南交通建设集团股份有限公司 | Saturated sandy soil liquefaction detection method based on standard penetration test |
CN111914419A (en) * | 2020-07-31 | 2020-11-10 | 天津泰勘工程技术咨询有限公司 | Saturated silt standard penetration liquefaction judgment method |
CN111914419B (en) * | 2020-07-31 | 2022-10-04 | 天津泰勘工程技术咨询有限公司 | Saturated silt standard penetration liquefaction judgment method |
CN113624943A (en) * | 2021-08-25 | 2021-11-09 | 中交第一航务工程勘察设计院有限公司 | Earthquake liquefaction discrimination method for coral sand field |
CN113624943B (en) * | 2021-08-25 | 2023-07-25 | 中交第一航务工程勘察设计院有限公司 | Earthquake liquefaction discrimination method for coral sand field |
CN114154332A (en) * | 2021-12-06 | 2022-03-08 | 西南石油大学 | Gravel soil earthquake liquefaction evaluation method |
CN115910248A (en) * | 2022-11-22 | 2023-04-04 | 中交第四航务工程局有限公司 | Coral reef liquefaction judgment method based on in-situ test correlation indoor liquefaction resistance |
CN115910248B (en) * | 2022-11-22 | 2023-10-10 | 中交第四航务工程局有限公司 | Coral reef liquefaction judging method based on in-situ test correlation indoor liquefaction resistance |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN106408211B (en) | 2019-11-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN106408211A (en) | Deep saturated sand earthquake-induced liquefaction judgment method | |
CN104390537B (en) | A kind of side slope pre split Blasting Excavation damage control method based on blasting vibration test | |
CN106483018B (en) | Consider the method that structure effect in situ determines the fatigue resistance parameter of the deep covering layer soil body | |
CN106285646A (en) | Drilling well loss horizon recognition methods based on Multi-information acquisition | |
CN106436674B (en) | It is a kind of that the liquefied method of sand gravel layer is differentiated using standard penetration test (SPT) | |
CN102425430B (en) | Protection control method for resisting longitudinal deformation through shield tunnel structure in soft soil stratum | |
CN106917623B (en) | Method and device for predicting stability of well wall of well | |
CN106351650A (en) | Calculation method of borehole sloughing pressure applicable to the bedding fractured stratum | |
CN103469778B (en) | Standard penetration test method for dividing rock weathering degree | |
CN107102378A (en) | The method that artesian aquifer water level and head height are determined using hole pressure touching methods | |
CN106149770A (en) | Bored concrete pile pile foundation construction period synchronizes the large-section in-situ concrete pile hole wall Rock Mass Integrality detection method carried out | |
CN107169224B (en) | CPTU test-based method for analyzing driving-in performance of large-diameter ultra-long pipe pile | |
CN111581785B (en) | High hump stress surrounding rock grading method | |
CN109540738B (en) | Method for determining in-situ relative density of deep overburden soil body by considering soil layer types | |
CN107386252B (en) | A kind of Punching Borehole Cast-in-place Concrete Pile pile foundation Seines types automatic discrimination system and its working method | |
CN108536927B (en) | A method of estimation deep tunnel equivalent cross-section is prominent to gush disaster earthquake intensity | |
Chen et al. | Improving the positioning accuracy of acoustic emission events by optimizing the sensor deployment and first arrival signal picking | |
CN110952602B (en) | Method for estimating extreme side resistance of pile foundation soil by using retaining wall casing | |
CN205804425U (en) | Vibration measuring device for punching cast-in-place pile construction | |
Ghafghazi et al. | Instrumented Becker penetration test for improved characterization of gravelly deposits | |
Rollins et al. | Evaluation of dynamic cone penetration test for liquefaction assessment of gravels from case histories in Italy | |
CN109238885A (en) | The High Slope Rock elasticity modulus measuring method of blasting vibration and noise joint test | |
Chen et al. | The Development of Software for Deterministic Assessment of Seismic Soil Liquefaction | |
CN105756667B (en) | A kind of Punching Borehole Cast-in-place Concrete Pile block stamp enters the decision maker of design rock stratum | |
Maurer et al. | Towards calibrating an automatic detection system to monitor micro-seismic activity induced by geothermal projects in the Upper Rhine Graben |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |