CN106126872A - Operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management - Google Patents
Operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106126872A CN106126872A CN201510738289.1A CN201510738289A CN106126872A CN 106126872 A CN106126872 A CN 106126872A CN 201510738289 A CN201510738289 A CN 201510738289A CN 106126872 A CN106126872 A CN 106126872A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- module
- safety
- security
- evaluation
- line
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a kind of operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management, for the safety of track traffic is marked, comprise the following steps: set up the assessment models of track traffic modularization management；Assessment models is carried out module and distinguishing hierarchy；Set the safety index that assessment models is carried out quantitative Analysis；In utilizing safety index to assessment models in section seclected time, each module and each level carry out quantitative Analysis, draw safe appraisal result.Described assessment models carries out Module Division: traffic safety module, passenger traffic safety module, security against fire module, installations and facilities security module, construction operation security module, comprehensive improvement security module and external environment condition security module；Described assessment models carries out distinguishing hierarchy: single line individual security module, line security module, Regional Operating Center and operation general headquarters.Use the present invention, there is analysis objectivity, systematization, continuity, the feature of comprehensive reaction safety management level.
Description
Technical field
The invention belongs to rail transportation operation enterprise security modularity, indexation management assessment field, be specifically related to one
Operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management.
Background technology
Although Guangzhou Underground establishes operation security management system at present, it is possible to analyze safe condition in time, but
These analyze cannot objectivity, systematicness, continuity, the most truly reflect the safety management level of Guangzhou Underground.Mainly
Reason is: for significance level between evaluation object regardless of, it is impossible to the problem contrasted in length and breadth in existing evaluation methodology.
In order to promote production safety management to develop to standardization, direction scientific, information-based, Guangzhou Underground determines that research is based on operation peace
Full modularization management, it is suitable for Guangzhou Underground organizational structure and the indexation Safety Assessment System comprehensive, systemic of succession, real
Row all standing, longitudinally the most on earth, lateral to the safety in production state evaluation on limit, fill up the sky of operation security management indexization assessment
In vain, promote that management of safe operation, to the development that becomes more meticulous, is expanded thinking and the method for safety management, built Guangzhou Underground safety management
Work long-term solution, for safe operation lay a good foundation.
Summary of the invention
In order to solve the problems referred to above, it is an object of the invention to provide a kind of operation security based on track traffic modularization management
Appraisal procedure, has analysis objectivity, systematization, continuity, the feature of comprehensive reaction safety management level.
For achieving the above object, the present invention is achieved by techniques below scheme:
Operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management of the present invention, for the peace to track traffic
Entirely mark, comprise the following steps:
Set up the assessment models of track traffic modularization management；
Assessment models is carried out module and distinguishing hierarchy；
Set the safety index that assessment models is carried out quantitative Analysis；
In utilizing safety index to assessment models in section seclected time, each module and each level carry out quantitative Analysis, draw
Safe appraisal result.
Further, described assessment models carries out Module Division and is: traffic safety module, passenger traffic safety module, fire-fighting peace
Full module, installations and facilities security module, construction operation security module, comprehensive improvement security module and external environment condition security module；Described
Assessment models carries out distinguishing hierarchy: single line individual security module, line security module, Regional Operating Center and operation are total
Portion.
Further, described safety index includes the monthly peace of a certain security module of the weight of single line, single line
The monthly scoring safely of relevant evaluation factor in full scoring, module evaluation, two-level appraisement index monthly deduction of points value, single line,
The monthly safety scoring of operation security module, Regional Operating Center monthly safety scoring and operation general headquarters monthly safety scoring.
Further, the weight circular of described single line is as follows:
Wherein: T line is single line weight；Fi is the correlative factor of circuit weight；Si is correlative factor weight；N is phase
Pass factor quantity.
Further, the monthly safety scoring circular of a certain security module of described single line is as follows:
Wherein:
Qc line is the single line a certain safety evaluation monthly score of module；Di is relevant evaluation factor during module is evaluated；Tdi
Relative weighting for Di；M is module factor of evaluation amount；Vi is factor of evaluation safe pressure index；
Wherein,
Txi is the weight of factor of evaluation one-level evaluation index X；Y is two-level appraisement index monthly deduction of points value；N is that one-level is commented
The quantity of valency index X；
Wherein, Pi is the evaluation criterion of two-level appraisement index Y；Ei be two-level appraisement index Y actually occur situation.
By above formula, actually occur situation step-by-step calculation according to every evaluation index is monthly, obtained single line
The monthly scoring of individual security evaluation module.
Further, the scoring of described single line monthly safety is the weighted calculation of the total all security module scores of this circuit
And obtain, circular is as follows:
Wherein:
Q line is when bar circuit monthly safety evaluation score；Qc line i is when bar circuit each module safety score；Tci is each peace
The weight of full evaluation module；Z is safety evaluation module number.
Further, described operation security module monthly safety scoring circular is as follows:
Wherein: Qc is that operation security manages module monthly safety evaluation score；Qc line i is each same safety evaluation of bar circuit
Module score；T line i is each bar circuit weight in operation security is evaluated；N is that operation security evaluates number of, lines.
Further, the computational methods of described Regional Operating Center monthly safety scoring are as follows:
Wherein: Q center is the monthly safety scoring of compartmentalization operation centre；Q line i is the relevant of compartmentalization operation centre management
Circuit score；T line i is for when operating line weight shared by bar circuit；The number of, lines that m is managed by compartmentalization operation centre.
Further, described operation general headquarters monthly safety scoring circular is as follows:
Wherein: the monthly safety scoring of mark operation general headquarters of Q general headquarters；Q line i is the line related of compartmentalization operation centre management
Score；T line i is each bar circuit weight in operation security is evaluated.
Compared with prior art, the invention has the beneficial effects as follows:
Operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management of the present invention, distinguishes and demonstrates operation
Weight relationship between safety management module, by the computational methods of science, and by each bar line tower foundation data and dynamically
The comprehensive consideration of operation data, quantitative scoring calculated each bar circuit in seclected time section in, each module, the scoring of each level.
It controls to serve as theme, with each operation security module of each bar circuit as elementary cell, by each security module with security risk
The quantitative scoring of the factors such as important safety performance, Safety Management Measures, risk control and regulation practical situation during operation
Calculate, it is thus achieved that to circuit, the indexation security evaluation score of module, disclose the thin of operation security management by scoring contrast with reviewing
Weak link, makes Security Administration Department and personnel clearly grasp the Present Situation of Safety Production of gauze each bar circuit, be primarily present problem and
Weak link, for the follow-up offer foundation that Strengthens Safety Management.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings the detailed description of the invention of the present invention is described in further detail, wherein:
Fig. 1 be the present invention operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management according to Module Division
Assessment models；
Fig. 2 be the present invention operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management according to distinguishing hierarchy
Assessment models；
Fig. 3 be the operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management of the present invention realize flow process；
Fig. 4 be the present invention operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management in each bar line security power
Reassign table；
Fig. 5 be the present invention operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management in each module and subordinate peace
Full assessment factor weight table；
Fig. 6 be the present invention operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management in safety evaluation investigate because of
Element and standards of grading table；
Fig. 7 be the present invention operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management in each module of gauze monthly
Safety evaluation Score Lists；
Fig. 8 be the present invention operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management in gauze traffic safety obtain
Divide monthly trendgram；
Fig. 9 is that the operation security appraisal procedure center line net passenger traffic safety based on track traffic modularization management of the present invention obtains
Divide monthly trendgram；
Figure 10 be the present invention operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management in each compartmentalization operation
The trendgram of the same security module in center；
Figure 11 be the present invention operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management in each region operation in
The heart monthly score trendgram.
Detailed description of the invention
Below in conjunction with accompanying drawing, the preferred embodiments of the present invention are illustrated, it will be appreciated that preferred reality described herein
Execute example be merely to illustrate and explain the present invention, be not intended to limit the present invention.
Operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management of the present invention, is to utilize step analysis
Method, the mode feature managed in conjunction with subway compartmentalization operation and modular safety, manage module with the operation security of single line
(Fig. 1) it is basic measure unit, with the key content of safety management with show as emphasis assessment factor, designs and be applied to track
The proxy assessment system of traffic safety management.Evaluation result can be opened up from gauze, region, circuit, module four dimensions comprehensively
Existing safety management status level, instructs operation security to manage (Fig. 2).
Operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management of the present invention, is divided into four big steps:
The first step: set up the assessment models of track traffic modularization management；
Second step: assessment models is carried out module and distinguishing hierarchy；
3rd step: set the safety index that assessment models is carried out quantitative Analysis；
4th step: each module and each level carry out quantitative scoring in utilizing safety index to assessment models in section seclected time
Calculate, draw safe appraisal result.
In step 2, managing Module Division according to the current operation security of subway, safety evaluation is to gauze, each compartmentalization industry
Business center, each management module present situation carry out the design requirement of comprehensive assessment and across comparison, consider gauze, each region, peace
Entirely managing hierarchical relationship, system sufficient scalability requirement that intermodule interlocks attached, Safety Assessment System design consideration must
Must set up the evaluation of four levels, i.e. to gauze evaluation, to regional evaluation, to single line evaluation, to each safety management module
Evaluate, the most namely assessment models is carried out distinguishing hierarchy particularly as follows: single line individual security module, line security mould
Block, Regional Operating Center and operation general headquarters.Meanwhile, assessment models is carried out Module Division particularly as follows: traffic safety module, passenger traffic
Security module, security against fire module, installations and facilities security module, construction operation security module, comprehensive improvement security module and external rings
Border security module.
Design and the angle of following scalability according to analysis level are set out, and operation security evaluation determines with single line
For evaluating elementary cell, each operation security management module is evaluation points.Set according to systematicness, the construction principle of level
Meter is evaluated, by calculating the examination of the critical index data of reflection module safety present situation, it is achieved each to operation security management
The safety evaluation of individual concrete module, the weighting meter of same safety management module safety evaluation through between same line module and between circuit
Calculation obtains runing each single line and each safety management module is marked safely.Again by the weighting meter to each security module or circuit
Calculate and realize subway line net and the Comprehensive Safety Assessment at each district management center, thus realize independently being correlated with again layer by layer, push away step by step
Break and obtain the safety evaluation of comprehensive index, as shown in Figure 3.
After determining analysis level design and evaluating thinking, we design each layer evaluation and obtain by the way of weight calculation
Upper level is evaluated, thus successively realizes the safety of each evaluation layer.Determine that the method that weight is used is in safety evaluation
Apply compared with the extensively and more reliable analytic hierarchy process (AHP) of science.
The weight design of elementary cell it is evaluated again after confirming the weight of evaluation points.Due to the different every productions of circuit
The difference of basic data and the feature of circuit itself, for the science fairness evaluating design that ensures safety, setting of circuit weight
Meter can not simply use analytic hierarchy process (AHP), but should take into full account that operation practical situation shows the concrete of all kinds of indexs to safety
Impact.We are with each bar circuit operation historical data of 2012 as location base, use capital construction data and operation dynamic data
Considering, the mode of weighted calculation determines the weight of circuit.After determining each bar circuit weight in operation security,
The weight at each regional management center just can the most simply add and calculate.
Wherein, the weight circular of described single line is as follows:
Wherein: T line is single line weight；Fi is the correlative factor of circuit weight；Si is correlative factor weight；N is phase
Pass factor quantity.
Being computed, with Guangzhou Underground circuit as example, gauze line related is in weight shared by operation security management aspect such as
Form shown in Fig. 4:
Meanwhile, the determination of safety management each module relevant evaluation index is the key that appraisement system is set up, it is necessary to follow mesh
Property, systematicness, science, the Key Principles such as operability.By can intuitively reflect that operation security module management present situation, safety are raw
The typical index producing performance is constituted.As security incident event, hidden troubles removing improvement, plant maintenance quality, repairing of speedily carrying out rescue work, examination,
Early warning, all kinds of safety in production base values such as operate against regulations, successively determine mould according to the relatedness of index Yu evaluation module simultaneously
Block evaluates specific targets.Evaluation index can include as far as possible safety management module daily operation operate in all forms of expression,
Associated data, and ensure the operability of data.According to all kinds of factors of evaluation relative importance in module safety shows, really
The relative weighting of fixed all kinds of evaluation indexes, shown in form the most as shown in Figure 5.
The monthly safety scoring circular of a certain security module of described single line is as follows:
Wherein:
Qc line is the single line a certain safety evaluation monthly score of module；Di is relevant evaluation factor during module is evaluated；Tdi
Relative weighting for Di；M is module factor of evaluation amount；Vi is factor of evaluation safe pressure index；
Wherein,
Txi is the weight of factor of evaluation one-level evaluation index X；Y is two-level appraisement index monthly deduction of points value；N is that one-level is commented
The quantity of valency index X；
Wherein, Pi is the evaluation criterion of two-level appraisement index Y；Ei be two-level appraisement index Y actually occur situation.
By above formula, actually occur situation step-by-step calculation according to every evaluation index is monthly, obtained single line
The monthly scoring of individual security evaluation module.
It addition, the most important thing is the design of bottom evaluation criterion for each module correlative factor, Safety Assessment System
Evaluation criterion, according to all kinds of evaluation indexes different characteristics in actual production and safety examination, is fully considered and is examined with existing performance
The concordance of core standard, according to safety index character, checks and rates factor basic data reference value bias with safety, and examination factor is exhausted
The various ways that must grade quantity, equipment quality carries out score calculation to the basic evaluation factor.Thus form a more science
Rationally, the evaluation criterion of quantization.As a example by traffic safety module is evaluated, form as shown in Figure 6.
The monthly safety scoring of described single line obtains, specifically for the weighted calculation of the total all security module scores of this circuit
Computational methods are as follows:
Wherein:
Q line is when bar circuit monthly safety evaluation score；Qc line i is when bar circuit each module safety score；Tci is each peace
The weight of full evaluation module；Z is safety evaluation module number.
Described operation security module monthly safety scoring circular is as follows:
Wherein: Qc is that operation security manages module monthly safety evaluation score；Qc line i is each same safety evaluation of bar circuit
Module score；T line i is each bar circuit weight in operation security is evaluated；N is that operation security evaluates number of, lines.
The computational methods of described Regional Operating Center monthly safety scoring are as follows:
Wherein: Q center is the monthly safety scoring of compartmentalization operation centre；Q line i is the relevant of compartmentalization operation centre management
Circuit score；T line i is for when operating line weight shared by bar circuit；The number of, lines that m is managed by compartmentalization operation centre.
Described operation general headquarters monthly safety scoring circular is as follows:
Wherein: the monthly safety scoring of mark operation general headquarters of Q general headquarters；Q line i is the line related of compartmentalization operation centre management
Score；T line i is each bar circuit weight in operation security is evaluated.
To sum up, by above safety evaluation calculation, subway is by managing performance indicators to most basic operation security
Carry out statistics to sort out, set bottom evaluation index evaluation criterion and weight, use the mode of weighted calculation layer by layer, finally realize
To single line safety management module, single line, operation security management module, compartmentalization operation centre and operation general headquarters
Safety evaluation, it is achieved that quantize expression to operation security performance.
The design and construction of operation security appraisement system manages reality from Guangzhou Underground operation security, in conjunction with operation security
Modularization management mode, achieves the indexation to operation security production status by effective combined mathematical module and computational methods
Evaluate, intuitively react safety in production level, development trend and weak link by score and deduction of points situation, to safety before changing
Production status carries out the way to manage that empirical formula generally describes.Fig. 7 is that operation security in 2014 evaluates situation example., Fig. 8,9,
10,11 trend having reacted modules or region respectively.
By setting up evaluation criterion and assessment models, monthly carry out operation security evaluation, it is achieved that operation security is managed
The security evaluation of each dimension and multidirectional contrast, each module of safety management, circuit, administrative unit have been carried out effective knot
Close, it is achieved that from module, circuit, the safety evaluation in region to each dimension of gauze, thus it is each to reflect safety management intuitively
The present situation level of individual dimension and development trend, promote operation security management to becoming more meticulous, indexation direction is developed.Concurrently form
Between each evaluative dimension self and each dimension, horizontal, longitudinally contrast, effectively plays phase between each administrative unit, safety management module
The good action compete mutually, mutually promoted.
Safety Assessment System designs with circuit as elementary cell, has fully considered owing to new line is open-minded, and framework is reformed commenting
The impact of valency, makes evaluation possess congenital independence and independent assortment, and the most perfect, extension for day Post-evaluation System provide
Favourable conditions, also provides guarantee for carrying out the contrast management of safety in production level inside administrative unit.
The above, be only presently preferred embodiments of the present invention, and the present invention not makees any pro forma restriction, therefore
Every without departing from technical solution of the present invention content, any amendment of above example being made according to the technical spirit of the present invention,
Equivalent variations and modification, all still fall within the range of technical solution of the present invention.
Claims (9)
1. operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management, for the safety of track traffic is marked,
It is characterized in that, comprise the following steps:
Set up the assessment models of track traffic modularization management；
Assessment models is carried out module and distinguishing hierarchy；
Set the safety index that assessment models is carried out quantitative Analysis；
In utilizing safety index to assessment models in section seclected time, each module and each level carry out quantitative Analysis, draw safety
Appraisal result.
Operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management the most according to claim 1, it is characterised in that:
Described assessment models carries out Module Division: traffic safety module, passenger traffic safety module, security against fire module, equipment set
Execute security module, construction operation security module, comprehensive improvement security module and external environment condition security module；
Described assessment models carries out distinguishing hierarchy: single line individual security module, line security module, Regional Operating Center
With operation general headquarters.
Operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management the most according to claim 2, it is characterised in that:
Described safety index includes that the monthly safety scoring of a certain security module of the weight of single line, single line, module are commented
The monthly safety scoring of relevant evaluation factor in valency, two-level appraisement index monthly deduction of points value, single line, the operation security module moon
Degree safety scoring, Regional Operating Center monthly safety scoring and operation general headquarters monthly safety scoring.
Operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management the most according to claim 3, it is characterised in that:
The weight circular of described single line is as follows:
Wherein: T line is single line weight；Fi is the correlative factor of circuit weight；Si is correlative factor weight；N for relevant because of
Prime number amount.
Operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management the most according to claim 3, it is characterised in that:
The monthly safety scoring circular of a certain security module of described single line is as follows:
Wherein:
Qc line is the single line a certain safety evaluation monthly score of module；Di is relevant evaluation factor during module is evaluated；Tdi is Di
Relative weighting；M is module factor of evaluation amount；Vi is factor of evaluation safe pressure index；
Wherein,
Txi is the weight of factor of evaluation one-level evaluation index X；Y is two-level appraisement index monthly deduction of points value；N is that one-level evaluation refers to
The quantity of mark X；
Wherein, Pi is the evaluation criterion of two-level appraisement index Y；Ei be two-level appraisement index Y actually occur situation.
By above formula, actually occur situation step-by-step calculation according to every evaluation index is monthly, obtained single line single
The monthly scoring of safety evaluation module.
Operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management the most according to claim 3, it is characterised in that:
The monthly safety scoring of described single line obtains for the weighted calculation of the total all security module scores of this circuit, specifically calculates
Method is as follows:
Wherein:
Q line is when bar circuit monthly safety evaluation score；Qc line i is when bar circuit each module safety score；Tci is that each safety is commented
The weight of valency module；Z is safety evaluation module number.
Operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management the most according to claim 3, it is characterised in that:
Described operation security module monthly safety scoring circular is as follows:
Wherein: Qc is that operation security manages module monthly safety evaluation score；Qc line i is each bar circuit same safety evaluation module
Score；T line i is each bar circuit weight in operation security is evaluated；N is that operation security evaluates number of, lines.
Operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management the most according to claim 3, it is characterised in that:
The computational methods of described Regional Operating Center monthly safety scoring are as follows:
Wherein: Q center is the monthly safety scoring of compartmentalization operation centre；Q line i is the line related of compartmentalization operation centre management
Score；T line i is for when operating line weight shared by bar circuit；The number of, lines that m is managed by compartmentalization operation centre.
Operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management the most according to claim 3, it is characterised in that:
Described operation general headquarters monthly safety scoring circular is as follows:
Wherein: the monthly safety scoring of mark operation general headquarters of Q general headquarters；Q line i is the relation line rood of compartmentalization operation centre management
Point；T line i is each bar circuit weight in operation security is evaluated.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510738289.1A CN106126872B (en) | 2015-11-02 | 2015-11-02 | Operation security appraisal procedure based on rail traffic modularization management |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510738289.1A CN106126872B (en) | 2015-11-02 | 2015-11-02 | Operation security appraisal procedure based on rail traffic modularization management |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN106126872A true CN106126872A (en) | 2016-11-16 |
| CN106126872B CN106126872B (en) | 2019-07-12 |
Family
ID=57471596
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201510738289.1A Active CN106126872B (en) | 2015-11-02 | 2015-11-02 | Operation security appraisal procedure based on rail traffic modularization management |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN106126872B (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108257032A (en) * | 2017-12-14 | 2018-07-06 | 民太安财产保险公估股份有限公司 | One kind is used for insurance subject methods of risk assessment and system |
| CN110414855A (en) * | 2019-08-01 | 2019-11-05 | 广州运达智能科技有限公司 | A kind of railcar safety evaluation method based on classification |
| CN111027589A (en) * | 2019-11-07 | 2020-04-17 | 成都傅立叶电子科技有限公司 | Multi-division target detection algorithm evaluation system and method |
| CN111126867A (en) * | 2019-12-27 | 2020-05-08 | 中南大学 | Service sensitivity analysis method for multi-domain association of track system |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4124299A (en) * | 1973-08-06 | 1978-11-07 | Electrorail N.V. | Method and apparatus for surveying clearances on railway tracks |
| CN102663505A (en) * | 2012-04-10 | 2012-09-12 | 北京交通大学 | Comprehensive evaluation method for utilization performance of track circuit |
| CN102682213A (en) * | 2012-05-11 | 2012-09-19 | 广州市地下铁道总公司 | Quality assessment method of rail transit equipment |
| CN104637023A (en) * | 2013-11-14 | 2015-05-20 | 辽宁工程技术大学 | Method of evaluating railway operation status safety |
-
2015
- 2015-11-02 CN CN201510738289.1A patent/CN106126872B/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4124299A (en) * | 1973-08-06 | 1978-11-07 | Electrorail N.V. | Method and apparatus for surveying clearances on railway tracks |
| CN102663505A (en) * | 2012-04-10 | 2012-09-12 | 北京交通大学 | Comprehensive evaluation method for utilization performance of track circuit |
| CN102682213A (en) * | 2012-05-11 | 2012-09-19 | 广州市地下铁道总公司 | Quality assessment method of rail transit equipment |
| CN104637023A (en) * | 2013-11-14 | 2015-05-20 | 辽宁工程技术大学 | Method of evaluating railway operation status safety |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
| Title |
|---|
| 李曼: "《城市轨道交通运营安全综合评估模型研究》", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库工程科技Ⅱ辑》 * |
| 贾水库 等；: "《基于层次分析法地铁运营系统安全评价技术的研究》", 《中国安全科学学报》 * |
| 黄嘉迪 等；: "《城市轨道交通运营安全评估体系研究》", 《交通科技与经济》 * |
Cited By (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108257032A (en) * | 2017-12-14 | 2018-07-06 | 民太安财产保险公估股份有限公司 | One kind is used for insurance subject methods of risk assessment and system |
| CN110414855A (en) * | 2019-08-01 | 2019-11-05 | 广州运达智能科技有限公司 | A kind of railcar safety evaluation method based on classification |
| CN111027589A (en) * | 2019-11-07 | 2020-04-17 | 成都傅立叶电子科技有限公司 | Multi-division target detection algorithm evaluation system and method |
| CN111027589B (en) * | 2019-11-07 | 2023-04-18 | 成都傅立叶电子科技有限公司 | Multi-division target detection algorithm evaluation system and method |
| CN111126867A (en) * | 2019-12-27 | 2020-05-08 | 中南大学 | Service sensitivity analysis method for multi-domain association of track system |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN106126872B (en) | 2019-07-12 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Shakou et al. | Developing an innovative framework for enhancing the resilience of critical infrastructure to climate change | |
| Frangopol et al. | Reliability-based life-cycle management of highway bridges | |
| Croope et al. | Improving resilience of critical infrastructure systems postdisaster: recovery and mitigation | |
| CN106126872A (en) | Operation security appraisal procedure based on track traffic modularization management | |
| CN107193274A (en) | A kind of Power Grid Vulnerability Assessment method based on various dimensions overall target | |
| CN102708411A (en) | Method for evaluating risk of regional grid on line | |
| CN104392391A (en) | Power grid running safety risk quantification method | |
| Jiang et al. | Analysis of the impacts of different modes of governance on inland waterway transport development on the Pearl River: The Yangtze River Mode vs. the Pearl River Mode | |
| CN106934559A (en) | A kind of assessment indicator system for water project management modernization | |
| CN104299116A (en) | Quantitative evaluation method for security risk of operation of power network | |
| CN104599023A (en) | Typhoon weather transmission line time-variant reliability calculation method and risk evaluation system | |
| Rehak et al. | Indication of critical infrastructure resilience failure | |
| CN108665181A (en) | A kind of appraisal procedure and device of distribution network reliability | |
| Jiang et al. | Transportation system evaluation model based on DEA | |
| Sasidharan et al. | A review of risk management applications for railways | |
| Yianni et al. | Incorporating local environmental factors into railway bridge asset management | |
| CN105139712B (en) | On-line scheduling person's training system and its method based on real-time simulation | |
| Cao et al. | Analyzing construction safety through time series methods | |
| CN105404962A (en) | Modification strategy of electric power system relay protection device and generation system thereof | |
| CN104021501A (en) | PRA (Probabilistic Risk Assessment) based partitioning method for coordinating power-system planning with operation | |
| Kukulski et al. | Methodological aspects of risk mapping in multimode transport systems | |
| Pant | Transportation network resiliency: A study of self-annealing | |
| Roets et al. | Evaluation of railway traffic control efficiency and its determinants | |
| Matko et al. | Reducing risks to electric power infrastructure due to extreme weather events by means of spatial planning: Case studies from Slovenia | |
| CN107563608A (en) | A kind of power distribution communication net safety evaluation method |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |