CN105976351A - Central offset based three-dimensional image quality evaluation method - Google Patents
Central offset based three-dimensional image quality evaluation method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN105976351A CN105976351A CN201610202589.2A CN201610202589A CN105976351A CN 105976351 A CN105976351 A CN 105976351A CN 201610202589 A CN201610202589 A CN 201610202589A CN 105976351 A CN105976351 A CN 105976351A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- image
- sigma
- image quality
- pixel
- ssim
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 36
- 238000013441 quality evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 25
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 55
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 52
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 28
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 238000001303 quality assessment method Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- NAWXUBYGYWOOIX-SFHVURJKSA-N (2s)-2-[[4-[2-(2,4-diaminoquinazolin-6-yl)ethyl]benzoyl]amino]-4-methylidenepentanedioic acid Chemical compound C1=CC2=NC(N)=NC(N)=C2C=C1CCC1=CC=C(C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(=C)C(O)=O)C(O)=O)C=C1 NAWXUBYGYWOOIX-SFHVURJKSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000005303 weighing Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 10
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013210 evaluation model Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010606 normalization Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- HUTDUHSNJYTCAR-UHFFFAOYSA-N ancymidol Chemical compound C1=CC(OC)=CC=C1C(O)(C=1C=NC=NC=1)C1CC1 HUTDUHSNJYTCAR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002405 diagnostic procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013178 mathematical model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008447 perception Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001766 physiological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000011218 segmentation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/0002—Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F18/00—Pattern recognition
- G06F18/20—Analysing
- G06F18/22—Matching criteria, e.g. proximity measures
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T3/00—Geometric image transformations in the plane of the image
- G06T3/40—Scaling of whole images or parts thereof, e.g. expanding or contracting
- G06T3/4007—Scaling of whole images or parts thereof, e.g. expanding or contracting based on interpolation, e.g. bilinear interpolation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/10—Image acquisition modality
- G06T2207/10004—Still image; Photographic image
- G06T2207/10012—Stereo images
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/30—Subject of image; Context of image processing
- G06T2207/30168—Image quality inspection
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Computational Biology (AREA)
- Evolutionary Biology (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Image Processing (AREA)
Abstract
The invention belongs to the field of image processing, and relates to a central offset based three-dimensional image quality evaluation method which aims to enable the consistency between a result of objective evaluation and subjective evaluation to be higher and provides a new idea for three-dimensional image quality evaluation. The central offset based three-dimensional image quality evaluation method comprises the steps of 1) calculating a comparison function which refers to a right image, the brightness, the contrast and the structure of the right image by adopting a structural similarity (SSIM) algorithm, acquiring an image quality weight matrix of the SSIM, and then amplifying the image quality weight matrix to the size which is identical to that of an original image through a nearest neighbor domain interpolation algorithm; 2) carrying out weighing calculation on the SSIM image quality matrix according to a central offset characteristic so as to acquire an image quality evaluation score of the right image; and then 3) repeating the above steps, calculating an image quality evaluation score of a left viewpoint, and carrying out weighted average on the image quality evaluation score of the right image and the image quality evaluation score of the left viewpoint so as to acquire a three-dimensional image quality objective evaluation value. The method provided by the invention is manly applied to image processing.
Description
Technical field
The invention belongs to image processing field, relate to image quality evaluating method and improve and optimizate, particularly relate to a kind of based on
The objective evaluation method for quality of stereo images of central offset.
Background technology
From mankind's history of the twenties in last century, first stereoscopic motion picture " strength of love " was come out, to 3D recasting version in 2012
" Titanic " is shown, and 3D stereoscopic motion picture relies on its outstanding visual experience, viewing experience true to nature, has been obtained for more coming
The favor of the most beholders.Stereo display technique refers to be carried out the stereoscopic vision characteristic of human eye by technological means such as optics
Simulation, thus reproduce out by the steric information of space object, generate the display mode [1] with depth characteristic stereo-picture.
But stereo-picture is due to problems such as noise during shooting, image transmitting distortions, may cause left and right two width figures
The quality of picture difference, and this species diversity may result in the discomfort of beholder.Therefore, the quality of stereo-picture is commented
Valency has vital effect to the development of stereo-picture.Although the evaluation and test of stereo-picture subjectivity can be published picture in the most correct reflection
The quality of picture, but subjective evaluation and test is wasted time and energy, and for substantial amounts of image and picture, is evaluated each image being difficult in fact
Existing.Therefore, the method for objectively evaluating reasonably proposing a kind of stereo-picture has the biggest meaning.
The method for objectively evaluating of stereo-picture, according to the characteristic information of stereo-picture self, utilizes mathematical formulae or passes through structure
Build mathematical model, use computer that stereo-picture is analyzed, thus calculate the mark that represent stereo image quality, use
To describe mankind's subjective feeling for stereo-picture.
By the end of now, the method for objectively evaluating of stereo image quality is a lot, and they join complete in terms of different
Examine stereo image quality to be evaluated, below existing objective evaluation method for quality of stereo images is analyzed.
Document [2] is on the basis of reference plane image quality evaluation, by engineering evaluation methodology Y-PSNR and knot
Structure similarity combines, and uses two kinds of methods to evaluate the quality of stereo-picture left and right view respectively, then different by four kinds
Method is calculated absolute difference information for evaluating third dimension, uses the method that local combines and the overall situation combines will the most respectively
Picture quality and third dimension quality are integrated into unified stereo image quality index.Finally obatained score is averaged, as
Evaluate the index of stereo image quality.This article also demonstrates simple plane picture method for objectively evaluating and cannot be suitable for simply
Stereo image quality is evaluated, and needs to consider relief factor in stereo image quality evaluation procedure.Document [3] proposes one
Plant binocular perceived quality model, be primarily based on binocular unsymmetry segmentation stereo-picture, then zones of different arranged different
Perception weight, finally calculates stereo image quality, and the document demonstrates and combines binocular vision unsymmetry and can improve axonometric chart
As objective evaluation accuracy.Document [4] is thought, human visual system is extremely sensitive to the marginal information of stereo-picture, therefore its
Consider by marginal information, classical architecture index of similarity to be improved, it is proposed that a kind of structural similarity based on edge is commented
Valency method, uses the method to evaluate stereo-picture left and right viewing quality.Then author is by based on adaptive weighting matching algorithm
Calculate the disparity map of left and right view, by judging that distorted image disparity map calculates stereo-picture with the difference of reference picture disparity map
Third dimension index.Finally left and right viewing quality is fitted with third dimension quality, obtains evaluating combining of stereo image quality
Close index.Document [5] considers physiological property and the psychology characteristic of HVS, it is proposed that a SSIM algorithm improved.
The continuous intensification recognized HVS characteristic along with each field, incorporates more complicated and senior in objective evaluation model
Human-eye visual characteristic becomes inevitable developing direction.Vision significance, as a kind of human visual system's advanced feature, refers to
The attention intensity that image zones of different is distributed by human eye is different.Document [6] is by by the notable figure weighted image of original image
Localized distortion Quality Map, improve the performance of evaluation algorithms.Under normal circumstances, image fault can affect marked feature and accurately carries
Take.Document [6] assumes that original image is similar with the marked feature of distorted image, and it uses the notable figure of original image to figure picture element
Amount carries out objective evaluation, test result indicate that[6], when distorted image quality is higher, use the distortion map that original notable figure is carried out
As quality evaluation is effective;But, along with the continuous reduction of distorted image quality, the factor impact that some can not be ignored is notable
Property detection process, thus cause the marked feature of original image and distorted image to have obvious difference.Therefore, in experimentation
Should consider that original and distorted image marked feature evaluates the quality of distorted image more accurately simultaneously.
Owing to human visual system is from bottom to top to the observation of image, it is impossible to the content of view picture figure is seen simultaneously simultaneously
Observe, but only focus on the most attractive place in image, it is proposed that stereo image quality evaluation based on central offset
Method has the strongest theoretic support.
Summary of the invention
For overcoming the deficiencies in the prior art, it is contemplated that combine central offset characteristic stereo image quality is carried out objective
Evaluate.By central offset characteristic during eye-observation image, stereo image quality objective evaluation algorithm is optimized, makes visitor
See the result evaluated higher with the concordance of subjective evaluation and test, propose a new thinking for stereo image quality evaluation.This
Bright employed technical scheme comprise that, stereo image quality evaluation methodology based on central offset, step is as follows:
1) use structural similarity algorithm SSIM, calculate with reference to right image and the brightness of right image, contrast and structure
Comparison function, by thus draw the picture quality weight matrix of SSIM, then by nearest-neighbor interpolation algorithm by picture quality weigh
Value matrix is amplified to identical with original image size;
2) according to central offset characteristic, SSIM picture quality matrix is weighted, obtains the picture quality of right image
Evaluate score;
3) then repeat above-mentioned steps, calculate the image quality evaluation score of left view point, both weighted averages are obtained
Stereo image quality objective evaluation value.
Use structural similarity algorithm, for preventing blocking effect, the Gauss sliding window using M × M, standard deviation to be 1.5
Mouth obtains subimage block X, Y, meter to the right viewpoint of original three-dimensional image pair and the right viewpoint sampling of distortion stereo pairs respectively
Calculate their brightness, structure and contrast similarity;
Wherein:
Wherein, C1、C2、C3Representing the least normal amount, avoiding denominator is zero, and C1=(k1L)2、C2=(k2L)2、C3
=(C2/2)2;k1、k2It is the constant between [0,1] respectively;xi,yiIt is image block X respectively, the value of ith pixel point, μ in YX,μY
It is respectively image block X, the average of Y, σX,σYIt is respectively image block X, the variance of Y, σXYFor the covariance of image block X, Y, N is figure
As the pixel quantity of block X or Y, l (X, Y), c (X, Y), s (X, Y) are respectively image block X, the brightness of Y, contrast and structural parameters
Matrix;
The structural similarity of image block is defined as:
SSIM (x, y)=(l (X, Y))τ(c(X,Y))β(s(X,Y))γ (7)
Wherein τ, beta, gamma is regulation parameter, takes τ=β=γ=1, and (x, y) is the pixel of image, formula (7) calculate sliding
Structural similarity in dynamic window, SSIM (x, y) is the result that calculates behind the image upper left corner to the lower right corner of sliding window,
Its size is ((W-10) × (H-10)), and wherein W and H represents horizontal pixel and the vertical pixel number of image;For so obtain
The mass matrix Q of the right viewpoint of distortion stereo pairsR(x, y), use nearest-neighbor interpolation algorithm by SSIM (x, y) be amplified to
Original image size is identical.
Nearest-neighbor interpolation algorithm is that the gray value at target pixel points is, by this pixel of distance around this pixel
The gray value of near pixel determines, and it is not affected by other all of pixel;
(i, j), (i, j+1), (i+1, j), (i+1, j+1) be by floating-point coordinate (i+a, j+b) (i, j before interpolation respectively
The respectively integer part of denotation coordination, a, b then distinguish the fractional part of denotation coordination, and a ∈ [0,1), b ∈ [0,1)), four
Individual neighborhood, f (i, j), f (i, j+1), f (i+1, j), f (i+1, j+1) be the gray value of corresponding pixel points respectively, A, B, C, D divide
Not Biao Shi pixel f (i, j), f (i, j+1), f (i+1, j), f (i+1, j+1) constituted the upper left in region, upper right, lower-left,
Lower right area, nearest-neighbor difference arithmetic just determines that the point that aforementioned four point mid-range objectives pixel (i+a, j+b) is nearest,
Then the gray value of its closest approach is exactly the gray value of target pixel points, and nearest-neighbor algorithm below equation represents:
Finally, the right viewpoint of distortion stereo pairs that above-mentioned nearest-neighbor interpolation algorithm will be obtained is used by SSIM algorithm
Mass matrix SSIM (x, y) is amplified to original image size, and the image after now amplifying is the mass matrix Q of right viewpointR(x,
y)。
Weighted calculation SSIM mass matrix
Use the Quality Map Q of the SSIM right viewpoint of algorithm calculated distortionR(x y), uses formula (10) to obtain the right viewpoint of distortion
Objective Quality Assessment value Qr, use same method to obtain Objective Quality Assessment value Q of distortion left view pointl, finally use formula
(11), both weighted averages are obtained stereo image quality objective evaluation value,
There is the central offset (CB) that anisotropic gaussian kernel function [11] simulation attention is spread by mediad surrounding
The factor:
Wherein (x, (x, y) to central point (x y) to represent pixel for CB0,y0) offset information, (x0,y0) represent that distortion is right
The center point coordinate of viewpoint, (x y) is pixel coordinate, σhAnd σvRepresent image level direction and the standard of vertical direction respectively
Difference, takes σh=1/3W, σv=1/3H, wherein W and H represents horizontal pixel and the vertical pixel number of image.
Stereo image quality objective evaluation value: respectively obtain picture quality objective evaluation value Q of left view and right viewrWith
Ql, then can obtain stereo image quality objective evaluation value by weighted calculation:
Q=0.5 × QL+0.5×QR (11)。
The feature of the present invention and providing the benefit that:
By experimental result and data it can be seen that the PCC value of CB-SSIM algorithm is all more than 0.80, RMSE value all exists
Less than 0.64.Compared with SSIM algorithm, the property indices of the CB-SSIM algorithm introducing the central offset factor all has different journey
The raising of degree, illustrates that the central offset factor can improve the performance of stereo image quality objective evaluation;On the whole, for difference
Type of distortion, PCC, KROCC and RMSE index of CB-SSIM algorithm is superior to the objective evaluation value of SSIM, CB-SSIM algorithm
With can in certain degree improve stereo image quality objective evaluation accuracy.
Accompanying drawing illustrates:
Fig. 1 CB-SSIM theory diagram.
Fig. 2 nearest-neighbor interpolation algorithm principle.
8 width standard stereo images pair used by this algorithm of Fig. 3.In figure:
(a) source images Tree2 (b) source images " Family "
(c) source images " Girl " (d) source images " River "
(e) source images " Tree1 " (f) source images " Ox "
(g) source images " Tju " (h) source images " Woman ".
Detailed description of the invention
The invention provides a kind of objective evaluation method for quality of stereo images based on central offset characteristic, the present invention according to
Structural similarity quality weight matrix and central offset characteristic, establish the axonometric chart of reflection subjective evaluation result accurately and effectively
The objective evaluation model of picture element amount.
Below as a example by the right view of stereo-picture, basic step is as follows:
1., by structural similarity algorithm SSIM [7] using Zhou Wang to propose, calculate with reference to right image and right image
The comparison function of brightness, contrast and structure, by thus draw the picture quality weight matrix of SSIM, then pass through nearest-neighbor
Picture quality weight matrix is amplified to identical with original image size by interpolation algorithm.
2. according to central offset characteristic, SSIM picture quality matrix is weighted, obtains the picture quality of right image
Evaluate score.
The most then repeat above-mentioned steps, calculate the image quality evaluation score of left view point, both weighted averages are obtained
Stereo image quality objective evaluation value.
Each step will be carried out detailed analysis below:
1.1 structural similarity algorithms
Use the structural similarity algorithm [1] that Zhou Wang proposes.For preventing blocking effect, use M × M (M=
11), standard deviation is Gauss sliding window right viewpoint and the right side of distortion stereo pairs to original three-dimensional image pair respectively of 1.5
Viewpoint sampling obtains subimage block X and image block Y, calculates their brightness, structure and contrast similarity.
Wherein:
Wherein, C1、C2、C3Representing the least normal amount, avoiding denominator is zero, and C1=(k1L)2、C2=(k2L)2、C3
=(C2/2)2;k1、k2It is the constant between [0,1] respectively;xi,yiIt is image block X respectively, the value of ith pixel point, μ in YX,μY
It is respectively image block X, the average of Y, σX,σYIt is respectively image block X, the variance of Y, σXYFor the covariance of image block X, Y, N is figure
As the pixel quantity of block X or Y, l (X, Y), c (X, Y), s (X, Y) are respectively image block X, the brightness of Y, contrast and structural parameters
Matrix.
The structural similarity of image block is defined as:
SSIM (x, y)=(l (X, Y))τ(c(X,Y))β(s(X,Y))γ (7)
Wherein τ, beta, gamma is regulation parameter, takes τ=β=γ=1, and (x, y) is the pixel of image, formula (7) calculate sliding
Structural similarity in dynamic window, SSIM (x, y) is the result that calculates behind the image upper left corner to the lower right corner of sliding window,
Its size is ((W-10) × (H-10)), and wherein W and H represents horizontal pixel and the vertical pixel number of image.For so obtain
The mass matrix Q of the right viewpoint of distortion stereo pairsR(x, y), use nearest-neighbor interpolation algorithm by SSIM (x, y) be amplified to
Original image size is identical.
1.2 nearest-neighbor interpolation algorithms
Nearest-neighbor interpolation algorithm [9], as a kind of simplest scaling algorithm, is suitably applied designed image scaling
All spectra.Its principle is that the gray value at target pixel points is, the pixel nearest by this pixel of distance around this pixel
The gray value of point determines, and it is not affected by other all of pixel.
In Fig. 2 (i, j), (i, j+1), (i+1, j), (i+1, j+1) be by floating-point coordinate (i+a, j+b) before interpolation respectively
(integer part of i, j respectively denotation coordination, a, b denotation coordination the most respectively obtains fractional part, and a ∈ [0,1), b ∈ [0,1)),
Four neighborhoods, f (i, j), f (i, j+1), f (i+1, j), f (i+1, j+1) be the gray value of corresponding pixel points respectively.A、B、C、
D represent respectively pixel f (i, j), f (i, j+1), f (i+1, j), f (i+1, j+1) constituted the upper left in region, upper right, a left side
Under, lower right area.Nearest-neighbor difference arithmetic just determines that aforementioned four point mid-range objectives pixel (i+a, j+b) is nearest
Point, then the gray value of its closest approach is exactly the gray value of target pixel points.Nearest-neighbor algorithm can represent by below equation:
Finally, the right viewpoint of distortion stereo pairs that above-mentioned nearest-neighbor interpolation algorithm will be obtained is used by SSIM algorithm
Mass matrix SSIM (x, y) is amplified to original image size, and the image after now amplifying is the mass matrix of right viewpoint.
2.1 central offset characteristics
Central offset (Center Bias, CB) characteristic, refers to that human eye is invariably prone to the center from figure when watching image
Beginning look for visual fixations point, then its attention is successively decreased [10] by mediad surrounding.It is to say, when the coordinate position of pixel
More being in the centre position of image, this pixel is more easily subject to pay close attention to.This chapter uses has anisotropic gaussian kernel function
[11] central offset (CB) factor that simulation attention is spread by mediad surrounding:
Wherein (x, (x, y) to central point (x y) to represent pixel for CB0,y0) offset information.(x0,y0) represent that distortion is right
The center point coordinate of viewpoint, (x y) is pixel coordinate, σhAnd σvRepresent image level direction and the standard of vertical direction respectively
Difference, takes σ according to document [11]h=1/3W, σv=1/3H, wherein W and H represents horizontal pixel and the vertical pixel number of image.
2.2 weighted calculation SSIM mass matrixes
Utilizing central offset model, the higher weight of region distribution that image center of adjusting the distance is nearer, in range image
The weight that the region distribution farther out of heart point is relatively low.Use the Quality Map Q of the SSIM right viewpoint of algorithm calculated distortionR(x y), uses public affairs
Formula (10) obtains Objective Quality Assessment value Q of the right viewpoint of distortionr.Same method is used to obtain the quality of distortion left view point objective
Evaluation of estimate Ql, finally use formula (11), both weighted averages obtained stereo image quality objective evaluation value.
3. stereo image quality objective evaluation value
Picture quality objective evaluation value Q of left view and right view can be respectively obtained by said methodrAnd Ql, then
Stereo image quality objective evaluation value can be obtained by weighted calculation:
Q=0.5 × QL+0.5×QR (11)
1 algorithm of table and the performance indications of SSIM algorithm
Stereo-picture selected by the design is all from broadband wireless communications and three-dimensional imaging institute image data base.From
Stereo-picture storehouse choose containing personage, distant view, " Tree2 ", " Family ", " Girl " of close shot, " River ", " Tree1 ",
" Ox ", " Tju ", " Woman " totally 8 undistorted standard stereo images, its resolution is 1280 × 1024.Owing to solid shows
Show that equipment needs the right viewpoint of flip horizontal stereo pairs could embody third dimension, it is therefore desirable to mirror image places stereo pairs
Right viewpoint figure.The subjectivity of stereo image quality is all commented by the stereo-picture in database according to International Telecommunication Union (ITU)
Two standard: BT-500 and BT.1438-2000 of valency suggestion, are divided into 5 grades by all of stereo image quality: fabulous,
Good, general, poor, excessively poor.
In order to true simulating stereo imaging system is to the distortion of stereo-picture and the universality of verifying this algorithm, it is right to test
8 width standard stereo images process carrying out JPEG compression distortion, Gaussian Blur distortion and Gauss white noise distortion, therefore there are
260 width distortion stereo pairs.
According to ITU-R BT.1438 standard, three-dimensional to all distortions on stereoscopic display device " 3D WINDOWS-19A0 "
Image is to carrying out subjective testing, and viewing distance is 6 times of stereoscopic display device height.Test result according to all testers obtains
To average suggestion value (Mean Opinion Score, MOS).Use Min-Max method for normalizing that MOS value is carried out normalizing herein
Change processes, and expands to the scope value for [0,5]
Wherein, i represents the numbering with reference to stereo-picture, i ∈ [1,8] in the present invention.For a certain type distortion (such as
JPEG distortion, Gaussian Blur distortion, white Gaussian noise distortion), si,jRepresent with reference to the distortion stereo-picture that stereo-picture i is corresponding
The MOS value of jth kind distortion level, mi,jRepresent mi,jValue after Min-Max normalization.MiniRepresent and exist with reference to stereo-picture
In the case of certain type distortion, MOS value minimum in the MOS value of the stereo-picture of different strength of distortion.In like manner, according to above-mentioned former
Reason normalization objective evaluation value.
The concordance of experimental result with subjective evaluation result in order to weigh the method for objectively evaluating that this chapter proposes, these selected works
Take Pearson's correlation coefficient (Pearson Correlation Coefficient, PCC), Ken Deer rank order correlation coefficient
(Kendall Rank Order Correlation Coefficient, KROCC) and mean square error (Root Mean
Square Error, RMSE) three standards evaluate the concordance between evaluation result and the subjective evaluation result of objective algorithm,
Monotonicity and accuracy.Kendall correlation coefficient is primarily used to weigh between objective algorithm evaluation and subjective evaluation result
Monotonicity, this index is not to consider the relative distance between evaluation score, and weigh is the rank order between evaluation score;
Pearson correlation coefficient balance is objective assessment score and MOS value dependency each other;RMSE value evaluation is objective
Dispersion degree between evaluation score and subjective evaluation result i.e. accuracy.The absolute value of PCC and KROCC closer to 1, RMSE's
Value, closer to 0, illustrates that objective evaluation result can effectively reflect subjective evaluation result.
Below in conjunction with technical scheme process in detail:
One, obtain evaluating data sample by subjective testing, choose training sample and test sample through repetition test.
Tested include that specialty is tested and amateur tested, be respectively provided with normal parallax third dimension, totally 20 tested, respectively
In school postgraduate and undergraduate, male 11, women 9, it is engaged in tested totally 16 people of steric information treatment research, is engaged in other
Tested totally 4 people of direction research.For the ease of intuitivism apprehension the design, it is provided that stereo image quality objective evaluation block diagram, as
Shown in Fig. 1.
Two, by algorithm in this paper, distorted image and original image are carried out comparing calculation
1., by the structural similarity algorithm SSIM using Zhou Wang to propose, calculate with reference to the right figure of right image and the four diagnostic methods
The comparison function of the brightness of picture, contrast and structure, by thus draw the picture quality weight matrix of SSIM, then pass through arest neighbors
Picture quality weight matrix is amplified to identical with original image size by territory interpolation algorithm.
2. according to central offset characteristic, SSIM picture quality matrix is weighted, obtains the picture quality of right image
Evaluate score.
The most then repeat above-mentioned steps, calculate the image quality evaluation score of left view point, both weighted averages are obtained
Stereo image quality objective evaluation value.
By the data of table 1 it can be seen that the PCC value of CB-SSIM algorithm is all more than 0.80, RMSE value all 0.64 with
Under.Compared with SSIM algorithm, introducing the property indices of CB-SSIM algorithm of the central offset factor all has carrying in various degree
Height, illustrates that the central offset factor can improve the performance of stereo image quality objective evaluation;On the whole, for different distortions
Type, PCC, KROCC and RMSE index of CB-SSIM algorithm be superior to the objective evaluation value of SSIM, CB-SSIM algorithm with can be
Certain degree improves the accuracy of stereo image quality objective evaluation.
List of references
[1] Wang Qionghua .3d Display Technique and device [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2011,6~8.
[2]You J,Xing L,Perkis A,et al.Perceptual quality assessment for
stereoscopic images based on2D image quality metrics and disparity analysis
[C].Proc.of International Workshop on Video Processing and Quality Metrics
for Consumer Electronics,Scottsdale,AZ,USA.2010.
[3]Jung Y J,Kim H G,Ro Y M.Critical binocular asymmetry measure for
perceptual quality assessment of synthesized stereo 3D images in view
synthesis[J].Circuits and Systems for Video Technology,IEEE Transactions on,
2015,99 (3): 1~14
[4] Tian Haonan. stereo image quality evaluation [D] based on edge and local matching. Tianjin: University Of Tianjin, 2013.
[5]Shen L,Yang J,Zhang Z.Quality assessment of stereo images with
stereo vision[C].Image and Signal Processing,2009.CISP'09.2nd International
Congress on.IEEE,2009:1-4.
[6]Barland R,Saadane A.Blind quality metric using a perceptual
importance map for jpeg-20000compressed images[C].Image Processing,2006IEEE
International Conference on.IEEE,2006:2941-2944.
[7]Z.Wang,A.C.Bovik A,H.R.Sheikh,et al.Image Quality Assessment:From
Error Visibility to Structural Similarity[J].IEEE Transactions on Image
Processing,Vol.13,No.4,April 2004.
[8]Ciptadi A,Hermans T,Rehg J M.An in depth view of saliency[C].Eds:
T.Burghardt,D.Damen,W.Mayol-Cuevas,M.Mirmehdi,In Proceedings of the British
Machine Vision Conference(BMVC 2013).2013:9-13.
[9] Lin Yuan. Image Zooming Algorithm and FPGA realize [D]. Xiamen University, 2006.
[10]G.A.Ascoli,K.Svooboda,Y.Liu.Digital reconstruction of axonal and
Dendritic morphology DIADEM challenge, 2010:http:.www.diademchallenge.org/
[11]Lin Y,Tang Y Y,Fang B,et al.A visual-attention model using earth
mover's distance-based saliency measurement and nonlinear feature combination
[J].Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,IEEE Transactions on,2013,35
(2):314-328.
Claims (5)
1. a stereo image quality evaluation methodology based on central offset, is characterized in that, step is as follows:
1) use structural similarity algorithm SSIM, calculate with reference to right image and the comparison of the brightness of right image, contrast and structure
Function, by thus draw the picture quality weight matrix of SSIM, then by nearest-neighbor interpolation algorithm by picture quality weights square
Battle array is amplified to identical with original image size;
2) according to central offset characteristic, SSIM picture quality matrix is weighted, obtains the image quality evaluation of right image
Score;
3) then repeat above-mentioned steps, calculate the image quality evaluation score of left view point, both weighted averages are obtained solid
Picture quality objective evaluation value.
2. stereo image quality evaluation methodology based on central offset as claimed in claim 1, is characterized in that, uses structure phase
Seemingly spending algorithm, for preventing blocking effect, using M × M, standard deviation is that the Gauss sliding window of 1.5 is respectively to original stereo figure
As to right viewpoint and distortion stereo pairs right viewpoint sampling obtain subimage block X, Y, calculate their brightness, structure and
Contrast similarity:
Wherein:
Wherein, C1、C2、C3Representing the least normal amount, avoiding denominator is zero, and C1=(k1L)2、C2=(k2L)2、C3=(C2/
2)2;k1、k2It is the constant between [0,1] respectively;xi,yiIt is image block X respectively, the value of ith pixel point, μ in YX,μYRespectively
For the average of image block X, Y, σX,σYIt is respectively image block X, the variance of Y, σXYFor the covariance of image block X, Y, N is image block X
Or the pixel quantity of Y, l (X, Y), c (X, Y), s (X, Y) are respectively image block X, the brightness of Y, contrast and structural parameters matrix;
The structural similarity of image block is defined as:
SSIM (x, y)=(l (X, Y))τ(c(X,Y))β(s(X,Y))γ (7)
Wherein τ, beta, gamma is regulation parameter, takes τ=β=γ=1, and (x, y) is the pixel of image, formula (7) calculate sliding window
Structural similarity in Kou, (x, is y) result that calculates behind the image upper left corner to the lower right corner of sliding window to SSIM, and it is big
Little is ((W-10) × (H-10)), and wherein W and H represents horizontal pixel and the vertical pixel number of image;For so obtain distortion
The mass matrix Q of the right viewpoint of stereo pairsR(x, y), (x y) is amplified to and artwork by SSIM to use nearest-neighbor interpolation algorithm
As size is identical.
3. stereo image quality evaluation methodology based on central offset as claimed in claim 1, is characterized in that, nearest-neighbor is inserted
Value-based algorithm is that the gray value at target pixel points is, by the gray value of the nearest pixel of this pixel of distance around this pixel
Determine, and it is not affected by other all of pixel;
(i, j), (i, j+1), (i+1, j), (i+1, j+1) be by floating-point coordinate (i+a, j+b) before interpolation respectively (i, j be respectively
The integer part of denotation coordination, a, b then distinguish denotation coordination fractional part, and a ∈ [0,1), b ∈ [0,1)), four neighbours
Territory, f (i, j), f (i, j+1), f (i+1, j), f (i+1, j+1) be the gray value of corresponding pixel points respectively, A, B, C, D table respectively
Show pixel f (i, j), f (i, j+1), f (i+1, j), f (i+1, j+1) constituted the upper left in region, upper right, lower-left, bottom right
Region, nearest-neighbor difference arithmetic just determines that the point that aforementioned four point mid-range objectives pixel (i+a, j+b) is nearest, then its
The gray value of closest approach is exactly the gray value of target pixel points, and nearest-neighbor algorithm below equation represents:
Finally, the matter of the right viewpoint of distortion stereo pairs that above-mentioned nearest-neighbor interpolation algorithm will be obtained is used by SSIM algorithm
(x, y) is amplified to original image size to moment matrix SSIM, and the image after now amplifying is the mass matrix Q of right viewpointR(x,y)。
4. stereo image quality evaluation methodology based on central offset as claimed in claim 1, is characterized in that, uses SSIM to calculate
The Quality Map Q of the right viewpoint of method calculated distortionR(x y), uses formula (10) to obtain Objective Quality Assessment value Q of the right viewpoint of distortionr,
Same method is used to obtain Objective Quality Assessment value Q of distortion left view pointl, finally use formula (11), both weighted flat
All obtain stereo image quality objective evaluation value,
There is anisotropic gaussian kernel function [11] simulation central offset (CB) factor that spread by mediad surrounding of attention:
Wherein (x, (x, y) to central point (x y) to represent pixel for CB0,y0) offset information, (x0,y0) represent the right viewpoint of distortion
Center point coordinate, (x y) is pixel coordinate, σhAnd σvRepresent image level direction and the standard deviation of vertical direction respectively, take σh
=1/3W, σv=1/3H, wherein W and H represents horizontal pixel and the vertical pixel number of image.
5. stereo image quality evaluation methodology based on central offset as claimed in claim 1, is characterized in that, axonometric chart picture element
Amount objective evaluation value: respectively obtain picture quality objective evaluation value Q of left view and right viewrAnd Ql, then pass through weighted calculation
Can obtain stereo image quality objective evaluation value:
Q=0.5 × QL+0.5×QR (11)。
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610202589.2A CN105976351B (en) | 2016-03-31 | 2016-03-31 | Stereo image quality evaluation method based on central offset |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610202589.2A CN105976351B (en) | 2016-03-31 | 2016-03-31 | Stereo image quality evaluation method based on central offset |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN105976351A true CN105976351A (en) | 2016-09-28 |
CN105976351B CN105976351B (en) | 2019-04-12 |
Family
ID=56989359
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610202589.2A Expired - Fee Related CN105976351B (en) | 2016-03-31 | 2016-03-31 | Stereo image quality evaluation method based on central offset |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN105976351B (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107424141A (en) * | 2017-03-26 | 2017-12-01 | 天津大学 | A kind of face-image method for evaluating quality based on probability block |
CN107845087A (en) * | 2017-10-09 | 2018-03-27 | 深圳市华星光电半导体显示技术有限公司 | The detection method and system of the uneven defect of liquid crystal panel lightness |
CN108389192A (en) * | 2018-02-11 | 2018-08-10 | 天津大学 | Stereo-picture Comfort Evaluation method based on convolutional neural networks |
CN109978933A (en) * | 2019-01-03 | 2019-07-05 | 北京中科慧眼科技有限公司 | The confidence level detection method of parallax information data, device and automated driving system |
CN110211090A (en) * | 2019-04-24 | 2019-09-06 | 西安电子科技大学 | A method of for assessment design composograph quality |
CN113052821A (en) * | 2021-03-25 | 2021-06-29 | 贵州电网有限责任公司 | Quality evaluation method for power equipment inspection picture |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102170581A (en) * | 2011-05-05 | 2011-08-31 | 天津大学 | Human-visual-system (HVS)-based structural similarity (SSIM) and characteristic matching three-dimensional image quality evaluation method |
CN102982535A (en) * | 2012-11-02 | 2013-03-20 | 天津大学 | Stereo image quality evaluation method based on peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM) |
CN103152600A (en) * | 2013-03-08 | 2013-06-12 | 天津大学 | Three-dimensional video quality evaluation method |
US8879829B2 (en) * | 2012-10-23 | 2014-11-04 | Intel Corporation | Fast correlation search for stereo algorithm |
CN104994375A (en) * | 2015-07-08 | 2015-10-21 | 天津大学 | Three-dimensional image quality objective evaluation method based on three-dimensional visual saliency |
-
2016
- 2016-03-31 CN CN201610202589.2A patent/CN105976351B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102170581A (en) * | 2011-05-05 | 2011-08-31 | 天津大学 | Human-visual-system (HVS)-based structural similarity (SSIM) and characteristic matching three-dimensional image quality evaluation method |
US8879829B2 (en) * | 2012-10-23 | 2014-11-04 | Intel Corporation | Fast correlation search for stereo algorithm |
CN102982535A (en) * | 2012-11-02 | 2013-03-20 | 天津大学 | Stereo image quality evaluation method based on peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM) |
CN103152600A (en) * | 2013-03-08 | 2013-06-12 | 天津大学 | Three-dimensional video quality evaluation method |
CN104994375A (en) * | 2015-07-08 | 2015-10-21 | 天津大学 | Three-dimensional image quality objective evaluation method based on three-dimensional visual saliency |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
丁宇胜: "数字图像处理中的插值算法研究", 《电脑知识与技术》 * |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107424141A (en) * | 2017-03-26 | 2017-12-01 | 天津大学 | A kind of face-image method for evaluating quality based on probability block |
CN107424141B (en) * | 2017-03-26 | 2020-07-28 | 天津大学 | Face image quality evaluation method based on probability block |
CN107845087A (en) * | 2017-10-09 | 2018-03-27 | 深圳市华星光电半导体显示技术有限公司 | The detection method and system of the uneven defect of liquid crystal panel lightness |
CN107845087B (en) * | 2017-10-09 | 2020-07-03 | 深圳市华星光电半导体显示技术有限公司 | Method and system for detecting uneven brightness defect of liquid crystal panel |
CN108389192A (en) * | 2018-02-11 | 2018-08-10 | 天津大学 | Stereo-picture Comfort Evaluation method based on convolutional neural networks |
CN109978933A (en) * | 2019-01-03 | 2019-07-05 | 北京中科慧眼科技有限公司 | The confidence level detection method of parallax information data, device and automated driving system |
CN110211090A (en) * | 2019-04-24 | 2019-09-06 | 西安电子科技大学 | A method of for assessment design composograph quality |
CN113052821A (en) * | 2021-03-25 | 2021-06-29 | 贵州电网有限责任公司 | Quality evaluation method for power equipment inspection picture |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN105976351B (en) | 2019-04-12 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN105744256B (en) | Based on the significant objective evaluation method for quality of stereo images of collection of illustrative plates vision | |
CN105976351B (en) | Stereo image quality evaluation method based on central offset | |
CN110046673B (en) | No-reference tone mapping image quality evaluation method based on multi-feature fusion | |
Xydeas et al. | Objective pixel-level image fusion performance measure | |
CN106097327B (en) | In conjunction with the objective evaluation method for quality of stereo images of manifold feature and binocular characteristic | |
CN107396095B (en) | A kind of no reference three-dimensional image quality evaluation method | |
US8953873B2 (en) | Method for objectively evaluating quality of stereo image | |
CN109255358B (en) | 3D image quality evaluation method based on visual saliency and depth map | |
CN101562675B (en) | No-reference image quality evaluation method based on Contourlet transform | |
CN107105223B (en) | A kind of tone mapping method for objectively evaluating image quality based on global characteristics | |
CN103426173B (en) | Objective evaluation method for stereo image quality | |
CN104318545B (en) | A kind of quality evaluating method for greasy weather polarization image | |
CN107146220B (en) | A kind of universal non-reference picture quality appraisement method | |
He et al. | Image quality assessment based on S-CIELAB model | |
CN109788275A (en) | Naturality, structure and binocular asymmetry are without reference stereo image quality evaluation method | |
CN108550146A (en) | A kind of image quality evaluating method based on ROI | |
CN106934770A (en) | A kind of method and apparatus for evaluating haze image defog effect | |
Shao et al. | Binocular energy response based quality assessment of stereoscopic images | |
Hassan et al. | Color-based structural similarity image quality assessment | |
CN107292866A (en) | A kind of method for objectively evaluating image quality based on relative gradient | |
Zhang et al. | Comparison of three-dimensional datasets by using the generalized n-dimensional (nD) feature selective validation (FSV) technique | |
Bong et al. | An efficient and training-free blind image blur assessment in the spatial domain | |
CN103841411A (en) | Method for evaluating quality of stereo image based on binocular information processing | |
CN103955921B (en) | Image noise estimation method based on human eye visual features and partitioning analysis method | |
Qureshi et al. | A comprehensive performance evaluation of objective quality metrics for contrast enhancement techniques |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20190412 |
|
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |