Detailed description of the invention
Here will illustrate exemplary embodiment in detail, its example represents in the accompanying drawings.Following
When description relates to accompanying drawing, unless otherwise indicated, the same numbers in different accompanying drawings represents same or analogous
Key element.Embodiment described in following exemplary embodiment does not represent the institute consistent with the disclosure
There is embodiment.On the contrary, they only with as appended claims describes in detail, the one of the disclosure
The example of the apparatus and method that a little aspects are consistent.
The term used in the disclosure is only merely for describing the purpose of specific embodiment, and is not intended to be limiting
The disclosure." a kind of " of singulative used in disclosure and the accompanying claims book, " institute
State " and " being somebody's turn to do " be also intended to include most form, unless context clearly shows that other implications.Also should
Work as understanding, term "and/or" used herein refer to and comprise one or more be associated list item
Any or all possible combination of purpose.
Although should be appreciated that may use term first, second, third, etc. various to describe in the disclosure
Information, but these information should not necessarily be limited by these terms.These terms only be used for by same type of information that
This distinguishes.Such as, without departing from the scope of this disclosure, the first information can also be referred to as
Two information, similarly, the second information can also be referred to as the first information.Depend on linguistic context, as in this institute
Use word " if " can be construed to " and ... time " or " when ... time " or " response
In determining ".
The wavelength-division system cutover judgement method for confliction detection that disclosure embodiment provides may be used in network management system.As
Shown in Fig. 1, Fig. 1 is according to a kind of wavelength-division system cutover conflict judgement side shown in an exemplary embodiment
Method, comprises the following steps:
In a step 101, being analyzed the cutover list of the wavelength-division system in the cutover time period, acquisition is cut
Connect information.
Alternatively, described cutover information at least includes all in described cutover list treat the to be cut of cutover paragraph
Connect paragraph information and with the described fiber line automatic switchover protection device (Optical treating that cutover paragraph is corresponding
Fiber Line Auto Switch Protection Equipment, OLP) the OLP paragraph information of paragraph.
In this step, described network management system can obtain the described wavelength-division system in the described cutover time period automatically
System all described cutover list, thus obtain all of in described cutover list described in treat the to be cut of cutover paragraph
Connect paragraph information, further, in order to ensure the accuracy of cutover conflict judged result, except obtaining institute
State and treat outside cutover paragraph information, in addition it is also necessary to obtain and the described described OLP paragraph treating that cutover paragraph is corresponding
OLP paragraph information.
In a step 102, cutover conflict judged result is determined according to described cutover information.
After obtaining described cutover information, need to determine described cutover conflict according to described cutover information
Judged result.In disclosure embodiment, described cutover conflict judged result includes cutting described in being characterized in
Treat that cutover paragraph carries out whether cutover can cause the first of conflict in default aspect to described in connecing the time period
To described, cutover conflict judged result and being used for treats that cutover paragraph cuts in being characterized in the described cutover time period
Connect and whether can cause the second cutover conflict judged result conflicted with current failure.Wherein, alternatively, institute
Stating and presetting aspect described in default aspect is at least one in wavelength-division aspect, relaying aspect or circuit aspect.
How institute is determined according to described cutover information separately below for different described default aspect introductions
State cutover conflict judged result.
<wavelength-division aspect>
Described first cutover consequences of hostilities is determined, as in figure 2 it is shown, step 102 can in described wavelength-division aspect
To include:
In step 102-11, according to described cutover information judge within the described cutover time period the need of
Described in same, treat that the primary paragraph of cutover paragraph and dead section drop into row cutover simultaneously.
In this step, described network management system can treat that cutover paragraph is believed according in described cutover information
Breath, judges whether require same in same cutover list or different cutover lists within the described cutover time period
The one primary paragraph treating cutover paragraph and dead section drop into row cutover.If it is required, then perform step 102-12,
Otherwise perform step 102-13.
In step 102-12, described first cutover conflict judged result was defined as in the described cutover time
Treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and can cause conflict in described wavelength-division aspect to described in section.
In this step, if needed simultaneously to treating the described primary paragraph of cutover paragraph and described described in same
Dead section drops into row cutover, illustrates that carrying out cutover according to described cutover list in the described cutover time period can lead
Treating described in cause that described primary paragraph and the described standby paragraph of cutover paragraph all interrupt, traffic affecting is normal
Carry out, now can be defined as making in described wavelength-division aspect by described first cutover conflict judged result
Become conflict.
In step 102-13, described first cutover conflict judged result was defined as in the described cutover time
Treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and will not cause conflict in described wavelength-division aspect to described in Duan.
In disclosure embodiment, if need not simultaneously to treating described primary section of cutover paragraph described in same
Fall and described dead section drop into row cutover, then do not result in described in treat cutover paragraph breaks, it can be ensured that industry
Being normally carried out of business, now can be defined as described first cutover conflict judged result when described cutover
Between treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and will not cause conflict in described wavelength-division aspect to described in section, can be by
Cutover is carried out according to described cutover list.
Such as, the cutover time period is on 03 25th, 2016 7:00 to 9:00, the most described webmaster system
System obtains all cutover lists of wavelength-division system within this cutover time period, and determine whole treats cutover paragraph
Including paragraph 1, paragraph 2 and paragraph 3.
When the standby usage paragraph of cutover is respectively the standby paragraph of paragraph 1, the primary paragraph of paragraph 2 and section
Fall 3 primary paragraph time, illustrate that neither one paragraph needs to carry out the cutover of active and standby paragraph simultaneously, will not
The business of impact is normally carried out, and can described first cutover conflict judged result be defined as when described cutover
Between treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and will not cause conflict in described wavelength-division aspect to described in section, can be by
Cutover is carried out according to described cutover list.
When the standby usage paragraph of cutover is respectively the standby paragraph of paragraph 1, the primary paragraph of paragraph 2 and standby
With paragraph, and during the primary paragraph of paragraph 3, wherein paragraph 2 needs the primary paragraph of cutover and standby simultaneously
With paragraph, if carried out cutover, then paragraph 2 can interrupt, and the business of impact is normally carried out, therefore by described
First cutover conflict judged result is defined as within the described cutover time period treating that cutover paragraph cuts to described
Connect and can cause conflict in described wavelength-division aspect.
Wavelength-division aspect typically can use OLP protect, if described first cutover conflict judges knot
Fruit be defined as within the described cutover time period to described treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover will not be at described wavelength-division layer
When causing conflict on face, in addition it is also necessary to determine whether and the described described OLP paragraph treating that cutover paragraph is corresponding
Whether break down, so that it is determined that described second cutover conflict judged result, as it is shown on figure 3, step 102
May include that
In step 102-11 ' in, according to described cutover information and the fault of described wavelength-division system that obtains in advance
Warning information, it is judged that whether be in malfunction with the described described OLP paragraph treating that cutover paragraph is corresponding.
In this step, if described in treat that cutover paragraph is described primary paragraph, then corresponding described OLP
Paragraph is standby OLP paragraph;Treat described in if that cutover paragraph is described standby paragraph, then corresponding institute
State OLP paragraph and be primary OLP paragraph.
Described network management system obtains the fault warning information of described wavelength-division system the most in advance, then according to institute
State cutover information and described fault warning information, can judge to treat cutover paragraph with described according to correlation technique
Whether corresponding described OLP paragraph is in malfunction.If with described treat cutover paragraph corresponding described in
OLP paragraph is in malfunction, then perform step 102-12 ', otherwise perform step 102-13 '.
In step 102-12 ' in, described second cutover conflict judged result was defined as in the described cutover time
Treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and can cause with current failure and conflict to described in section.
In this step, when being in malfunction with the described described OLP paragraph corresponding until cutover paragraph,
If this is treated that cutover paragraph carries out cutover, owing to corresponding described OLP paragraph is in malfunction,
This then can be caused to treat cutover paragraph breaks, and the business of impact is normally carried out, therefore, by described second cutover punching
Prominent judged result is defined as treating that cutover paragraph carries out cutover meeting and works as within the described cutover time period to described
Prior fault causes conflict.
In step 102-13 ' in, described second cutover conflict judged result was defined as in the described cutover time
Treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and will not cause with current failure and conflict to described in section.
In disclosure embodiment, when being not in fault with the described described OLP paragraph treating that cutover paragraph is corresponding
During state, then to this when cutover paragraph carries out cutover, owing to this paragraph has described OLP paragraph to protect,
Treat cutover paragraph thus without interrupting this, now described second cutover conflict judged result can be defined as
Within the described cutover time period, described will not causing with current failure when cutover paragraph carries out cutover is conflicted,
Cutover can be carried out according to described cutover list.
Such as, the cutover time period is on 03 25th, 2016 7:00 to 9:00, the most described webmaster system
System obtains all cutover lists of wavelength-division system within this cutover time period, and determine whole treats cutover paragraph
Including paragraph 1, paragraph 2 and paragraph 3.
When the standby usage paragraph of cutover is respectively the standby paragraph of paragraph 1, the primary paragraph of paragraph 2 and section
Fall 3 primary paragraph time, corresponding OLP paragraph is respectively the primary OLP1 paragraph the most corresponding with paragraph 1,
The standby OLP2 paragraph corresponding with paragraph 2, and the standby OLP3 paragraph corresponding with paragraph 3.
If may determine that standby OLP3 according to the fault warning information that described network management system obtains in advance
Paragraph is in malfunction, then, when carrying out cutover according to described cutover list, paragraph 3 can be caused to interrupt, because of
This described second cutover conflict judged result may determine that as above-mentioned 3 paragraphs carrying out cutover meeting with standby
The current failure of OLP3 paragraph causes conflict.
If described network management system judges above-mentioned 3 according to the described fault warning information obtained in advance
OLP paragraph is the most all not in malfunction, then when carrying out cutover, and can be by above-mentioned 3 OLP paragraphs
To treating that cutover paragraph is protected accordingly, it is not result in that above-mentioned 3 are treated cutover paragraph breaks, therefore institute
State second cutover conflict judged result may determine that for when above-mentioned 3 paragraphs carry out cutover will not with currently
Fault causes conflict, can carry out cutover according to cutover list.
<relaying aspect>
Determining described first cutover consequences of hostilities in described relaying aspect, as shown in Figure 4, step 102 can
To include:
In step 102-21, according to described cutover information searching and the described relaying treating that cutover paragraph is corresponding
Trunk information.
Wherein, alternatively, described trunk information indicates whether described relaying is ring, or described relaying letter
Whether breath indicates described relaying to have and concurrently protects.
In this step, described network management system can treat that cutover paragraph is believed according in described cutover information
Breath is searched and the described relaying treating that cutover paragraph is corresponding, obtains the trunk information of described relaying.In described
The aspect of continuing can be SDH (Synchronous Digital Hierarchy, SDH) aspect,
ASON (Automatically Switched Optical Network, ASON) aspect,
Optical transfer network (OpticalTransportNetwork, OTN) aspect etc..
In step 102-22, judge to treat described within the described cutover time period according to described trunk information
Cutover paragraph carries out whether cutover can cause described relaying to interrupt.
In this step, if being ring with the described described relaying treating that cutover paragraph is corresponding, i.e. can between relaying
To transmit business datum by both direction, as shown in Figure 5A, it is assumed that treats in cutover paragraph a certain treats
Cutover paragraph correspondence relaying A directly arrives the service transmission link of relaying B, then when carrying out cutover, i.e.
Making to have interrupted relaying A and directly arrive the service transmission link of relaying B, business datum still can be by relaying A
It is transferred to again relay B by relaying D, relaying C, i.e. treats that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and will not lead to described
Cause described relaying to interrupt.Otherwise, it determines treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and can cause in described relaying to described
Disconnected.
Concurrently protect, between the most described relaying if existed with the described described relaying treating that cutover paragraph is corresponding
There is parallel two business datum link, as shown in Figure 5 B, it is assumed that treats in cutover paragraph a certain treats
The service transmission link 1 of cutover paragraph correspondence relaying A to relaying B, then when carrying out cutover, even if
Having interrupted service transmission link 1, business datum still can be transmitted by parallel service transmission link 2,
I.e. treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and is not result in that described relaying interrupts to described.Otherwise, it determines treat described
Cutover paragraph carries out cutover and described relaying can be caused to interrupt.
If treating that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and can cause a certain relaying in described relaying to described, such as
One relaying interrupts, then continue executing with step 102-23, otherwise perform step 102-24.
In step 102-23, described first cutover conflict judged result was defined as in the described cutover time
Treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and can cause conflict in described relaying aspect to described in section.
In this step, if treating that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and causes described relaying to interrupt to described, illustrate such as
Fruit in the described cutover time period described in cutover when cutover paragraph, can traffic affecting be normally carried out, this
Time can described first cutover conflict judged result be defined as can cause conflict in described relaying aspect.
In step 102-24, described first cutover conflict judged result was defined as in the described cutover time
Treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and will not cause conflict in described relaying aspect to described in Duan.
In this step, if treating that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and is not result in that described relaying interrupts, then to described
When carrying out cutover, it can be ensured that being normally carried out of business, now described first cutover conflict can be judged
Result is defined as to cause conflict in described relaying aspect.
Except considering in addition to whether described relaying aspect conflicts, in disclosure embodiment, in addition it is also necessary to consider
When carrying out cutover, whether current failure can cause described relaying to interrupt, and i.e. determines in described relaying aspect
Described second cutover consequences of hostilities, as shown in Figure 6, step 102 may include that
In step 102-21 ' in, according to the fault warning information of the described wavelength-division system obtained in advance, it is judged that
Whether current failure can cause described relaying to interrupt.
In this step, according to described cutover single pair of, treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and will not make determining
After becoming described relaying to interrupt, in addition it is also necessary to determine whether whether current failure can cause described relaying to interrupt.
If described relaying is ring, then need to judge whether current failure can cause described second relaying place
Ring interrupt.As shown in Figure 5A, it is assumed that treats in cutover paragraph a certain treats that cutover paragraph correspondence relays A
Directly arrive the service transmission link of relaying B, then need to judge another by relaying A by relaying D, in
Whether the C that continues has relaying to be in malfunction, if according to described again on the business datum link of relaying B
Fault warning information determines that relaying C is in malfunction, then, when carrying out cutover, can cause two business
Data link is all interrupted, and the business of impact is normally carried out.May determine that current failure can cause in described second
Continue place ring interrupt.If the most non-fault of above-mentioned relaying, then may determine that current failure is not result in institute
The ring stating the second relaying place interrupts.
If described relaying has parallel protection, then need to judge whether current failure can cause in described second
The concurrently protection link down of the correspondence that continues.As shown in Figure 5 B, when carrying out cutover, business datum link 1
Can interrupt, if having trunk failure on parallel business datum link 2, it is determined that this fault is described mesh
Mark fault, can cause business datum link 2 to occur interrupting, and the business of impact is normally carried out, it may be determined that when
Prior fault can cause the concurrently protection link down that described second relaying is corresponding.If business datum link 2
On the most non-fault of relaying, then may determine that current failure is not result in corresponding concurrent of described second relaying
Protection link down.
If the ring that current failure can cause described second relaying place interrupts, or current failure can cause institute
State the concurrently protection link down that the second relaying is corresponding, determine that current failure can cause in described second relaying
Disconnected, then perform step 102-22 ', otherwise perform step 102-23 '.
In step 102-22 ' in, described second cutover conflict judged result was defined as in the described cutover time
Treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and can cause with current failure and conflict to described in section.
If current failure can cause described relaying to interrupt, illustrate that, when carrying out cutover, current failure can be led
Causing to treat that two business datum links that cutover paragraph is corresponding all interrupt with this, business datum cannot be transmitted, also
Just cannot guarantee being normally carried out of business, accordingly, it is determined that described second cutover conflict judged result is for institute
State and treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and can cause with current failure and conflict.
In step 102-23 ' in, described second cutover conflict judged result was defined as in the described cutover time
Treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and will not cause with current failure and conflict to described in section.
If current failure is not result in that described relaying interrupts, illustrate, when carrying out cutover, to treat except described
Outside the business datum link that cutover paragraph is corresponding, another business datum link does not interrupts, it can be ensured that
Being normally carried out of business, accordingly, it is determined that described second cutover conflict judged result is for treat cutover section to described
Drop into row cutover to cause with current failure and conflict.
<circuit aspect>
Described circuit aspect client determines described first cutover consequences of hostilities, as it is shown in fig. 7, step
102 may include that
In step 102-31, according to described cutover information searching and the described circuit treating that cutover paragraph is corresponding
Circuit information.
Wherein, alternatively, described trunk information indicates whether described circuit has SNCP
(subnetwork connection protection, SNCP).
In this step, described network management system can treat that cutover paragraph is believed according in described cutover information
Breath is searched and the described circuit treating client that cutover paragraph is corresponding, obtains the circuit information of described circuit.
In step 102-32, judge to treat described within the described cutover time period according to described circuit information
Cutover paragraph carries out whether cutover can cause described Circuit Interrupt.
In this step, if having SNCP with the described described circuit treating that cutover paragraph is corresponding, then entering
During row cutover, having a stand-by circuit to ensure that business is normally carried out, the most described circuit will not interrupt.If
With a certain circuit in described circuit, the such as first circuit does not has SNCP, then when carrying out cutover,
Described first circuit can interrupt.
If treating that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and can cause described first Circuit Interrupt to described, then continue executing with
Step 102-33, otherwise performs step 102-34.
In step 102-33, described first cutover conflict judged result was defined as in the described cutover time
Treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and can cause conflict in described circuit aspect to described in section.
In this step, if treating that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and causes described Circuit Interrupt to described, illustrate such as
Fruit in the described cutover time period described in cutover when cutover paragraph, can traffic affecting be normally carried out, this
Time can described first cutover conflict judged result be defined as can cause conflict in described circuit aspect.
In step 102-34, described first cutover conflict judged result was defined as in the described cutover time
Treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and will not cause conflict in described circuit aspect to described in Duan.
In this step, if treating that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and is not result in described Circuit Interrupt, then to described
When carrying out cutover, it can be ensured that being normally carried out of business, now described first cutover conflict can be judged
Result is defined as to cause conflict in described circuit aspect.
Except considering in addition to whether described circuit aspect conflicts, in disclosure embodiment, in addition it is also necessary to consider
When carrying out cutover, whether current failure can cause described Circuit Interrupt, i.e. determines in described circuit aspect
Described second cutover consequences of hostilities, as shown in Figure 8, step 102 may include that
In step 102-31 ' in, according to the fault warning information of the described wavelength-division system obtained in advance, it is judged that
Whether current failure can cause described Circuit Interrupt.
In this step, according to described cutover single pair of, treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and will not make determining
After becoming described Circuit Interrupt, it is also possible to determine whether whether current failure can cause described Circuit Interrupt.
If a certain circuit determined according to described fault warning information in described circuit, such as second circuit,
The SNCP of its correspondence is in malfunction, when carrying out cutover, described second circuit can be caused to interrupt,
The business of impact is normally carried out.If the SNCP of correspondence is not in malfunction, then may determine that and will not lead
Cause described second circuit fault.
If current failure can cause described second circuit to interrupt, perform step 102-32 ', otherwise perform
Step 102-33 '.
In step 102-32 ' in, described second cutover conflict judged result was defined as in the described cutover time
Treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and can cause with current failure and conflict to described in section.
If current failure can cause a certain Circuit Interrupt in described circuit, illustrate when carrying out cutover,
Being normally carried out of business cannot be guaranteed, accordingly, it is determined that described second cutover conflict judged result is to described
Treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and can conflict with current failure.
In step 102-33 ' in, described second cutover conflict judged result was defined as in the described cutover time
Treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and will not cause with current failure and conflict to described in section.
If current failure is not result in a certain Circuit Interrupt in described circuit, illustrate when carrying out cutover
The described SNCP that described circuit is corresponding is not in malfunction, it can be ensured that being normally carried out of business, because of
This, determine described second cutover conflict judged result for described treat cutover paragraph carry out cutover will not with work as
Prior fault causes conflict.
After determining described cutover conflict judged result by the way, if described first cutover punching
There is conflict in prominent judged result instruction in described default aspect or described second cutover conflict judged result refers to
Show and treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and can cause with current failure and conflict to described within the described cutover time period,
The most described network management system can export described cutover conflict judged result, in order to attendant's Reasonable adjustment cuts
Connect the time period, provide convenient for follow-up rapid development cut-over plan.
In above-described embodiment, by all cutover lists of the wavelength-division system in the cutover time period are analyzed,
Thus obtain cutover information, described cutover information at least include all treat cutover paragraph treat that cutover paragraph is believed
Breath and with the described OLP paragraph information treating OLP paragraph that cutover paragraph is corresponding.Further, according to
Described cutover information determines cutover conflict judged result.Described cutover conflict judged result include for
It is characterized at least one default aspect of wavelength-division aspect, relaying aspect or circuit aspect and whether causes conflict
The first cutover conflict judged result and whether cause, for characterizing, the second cutover punching conflicted with current failure
Prominent judged result.Simplify the process determining cutover conflict judged result, and the aspect related to is relatively wide, from
And can quickly formulate follow-up cut-over plan.
Corresponding with preceding method embodiment, the disclosure additionally provides the embodiment of device.
Cut as it is shown in figure 9, Fig. 9 is the disclosure according to a kind of wavelength-division system shown in an exemplary embodiment
Connect conflict judgment means block diagram, including: cutover data obtaining module 210 and consequences of hostilities determine module 220.
Wherein, described cutover data obtaining module 210, for the wavelength-division system in the cutover time period
Cutover list is analyzed, and obtains cutover information, at least includes institute in described cutover list in described cutover information
Need the treating cutover paragraph information and automatically cut with the described fiber line treating that cutover paragraph is corresponding of cutover paragraph
Change the OLP paragraph information of protection device OLP paragraph;
Described consequences of hostilities determines module 220, for determining that cutover conflict judges according to described cutover information
As a result, described cutover conflict judged result includes that the first cutover conflict judged result and the second cutover conflict are sentenced
Disconnected result;
Wherein, to described in described first cutover conflict judged result is used for being characterized in the described cutover time period
Treating that cutover paragraph carries out whether cutover can cause conflict in default aspect, described default aspect is wavelength-division layer
At least one in face, relaying aspect or circuit aspect;
It is interior to described to be cut that described second cutover conflict judged result is used for being characterized in the described cutover time period
Connect paragraph to carry out cutover and whether can cause with current failure and conflict.
Alternatively, described consequences of hostilities determines that module includes:
First judges submodule, for when described default aspect is described wavelength-division aspect, cuts according to described
The information of connecing judges within the described cutover time period the need for the treatment of the primary of cutover paragraph described in same simultaneously
Paragraph and dead section drop into row cutover;
First consequences of hostilities determines submodule, if needed simultaneously to same within the described cutover time period
The described described primary paragraph treating cutover paragraph and described dead section drop into row cutover, by described first cutover
Conflict judged result is defined as within the described cutover time period treating that cutover paragraph carries out cutover meeting in institute to described
State and cause conflict in wavelength-division aspect, otherwise be defined as cutting described by described first cutover conflict judged result
Treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and will not cause conflict in described wavelength-division aspect to described in connecing the time period.
Alternatively, described consequences of hostilities determines that module also includes:
Second judges submodule, for according to described cutover information and the described wavelength-division system that obtains in advance
Fault warning information, it is judged that whether be in fault shape with the described described OLP paragraph treating that cutover paragraph is corresponding
State;
Second consequences of hostilities determines submodule, if be used for and the described described OLP treating that cutover paragraph is corresponding
Paragraph is in malfunction, is defined as described second cutover conflict judged result in the described cutover time period
In treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and can cause with current failure and conflict, otherwise by described second cutover to described
Conflict judged result be defined as within the described cutover time period to described treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover will not be with
Current failure causes conflict.
Alternatively, described consequences of hostilities determines that module includes:
First searches submodule, for when described default aspect is described relaying aspect, cuts according to described
Connect information searching and the described trunk information treating relaying that cutover paragraph is corresponding, described trunk information instruction institute
State whether relaying is ring, or described trunk information indicates whether described relaying has and concurrently protect;
3rd judges submodule, for judging within the described cutover time period institute according to described trunk information
State and treat that cutover paragraph carries out whether cutover can cause described relaying to interrupt;
3rd consequences of hostilities determines submodule, if for treating cutover to described within the described cutover time period
Paragraph carries out cutover and the first relaying in described relaying can be caused to interrupt, and described first cutover conflict is judged
Result is defined as within the described cutover time period treating that cutover paragraph carries out cutover meeting at described relay layer to described
Cause conflict on face, otherwise described first cutover conflict judged result was defined as in the described cutover time period
In treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and will not cause conflict in described relaying aspect to described.
Alternatively, the described 3rd judges that submodule includes:
First determines unit, if indicate described first relaying in described relaying for described trunk information
The most concurrently do not protect for ring and described first relaying, determine within the described cutover time period described to be cut
Connect paragraph carry out cutover can cause described first relaying interrupt.
Alternatively, described consequences of hostilities determines that module also includes:
4th judges submodule, for the fault warning information according to the described wavelength-division system obtained in advance,
Judge whether current failure can cause described relaying to interrupt;
4th consequences of hostilities determines submodule, if can cause second in described relaying for current failure
Relaying interrupts, and is defined as within the described cutover time period described second cutover conflict judged result to described
Treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and can cause with current failure and conflict, otherwise will described second cutover conflict judgement
Result be defined as within the described cutover time period to described treat cutover paragraph carry out cutover will not with current therefore
Barrier causes conflict.
Alternatively, the described 4th judges submodule, including:
First judging unit, described second relaying in indicating described relaying when described trunk information is
During ring, it is judged that whether current failure can cause the ring at described second relaying place to interrupt;
Second judging unit, is used for when described second relaying of described trunk information instruction has and concurrently protects,
Judge whether current failure can cause the concurrently protection link down that described second relaying is corresponding;
Second determines unit, if the ring at described second relaying place can be caused to interrupt for current failure,
Or current failure can cause the concurrently protection link down that described second relaying is corresponding, determine current failure meeting
Described second relaying is caused to interrupt.
Alternatively, described consequences of hostilities determines that module includes:
Second searches submodule, for when described default aspect is described circuit aspect, cuts according to described
Connect information searching and the described circuit information treating circuit that cutover paragraph is corresponding, described trunk information instruction institute
State whether circuit has SNCP SNCP;
5th judges submodule, for judging within the described cutover time period institute according to described circuit information
State and treat that cutover paragraph carries out whether cutover can cause described Circuit Interrupt;
5th consequences of hostilities determines submodule, if for treating cutover to described within the described cutover time period
Paragraph carries out cutover can cause the first Circuit Interrupt in described circuit, described first cutover conflict is judged
Result is defined as within the described cutover time period treating that cutover paragraph carries out cutover meeting at described circuit layer to described
Cause conflict on face, otherwise described first cutover conflict judged result was defined as in the described cutover time period
In treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and will not cause conflict in described circuit aspect to described.
Alternatively, the described 5th judges that submodule includes:
3rd determines unit, if indicating described first circuit in described circuit for described circuit information
There is no SNCP, determine and treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and can cause institute to described within the described cutover time period
State the first Circuit Interrupt.
Alternatively, described consequences of hostilities determines that module also includes:
6th judges submodule, for the fault warning information according to the described wavelength-division system obtained in advance,
Judge whether current failure can cause described Circuit Interrupt;
6th consequences of hostilities determines submodule, if can cause second in described circuit for current failure
Circuit Interrupt, is defined as described second cutover conflict judged result within the described cutover time period described
Treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover and can cause with current failure and conflict, otherwise will described second cutover conflict judgement
Result be defined as within the described cutover time period to described treat that cutover paragraph carries out cutover will not be with current failure
Cause conflict.
Alternatively, the described 6th judges that submodule includes:
4th determines unit, for being in event as the SNCP that the described second circuit in described circuit is corresponding
During barrier state, determine that current failure can cause described second circuit to interrupt.
For device embodiment, owing to it corresponds essentially to embodiment of the method, so relevant part sees
The part of embodiment of the method illustrates.Device embodiment described above is only schematically, wherein
The described unit illustrated as separating component can be or may not be physically separate, as unit
The parts of display can be or may not be physical location, i.e. may be located at a place, or also may be used
To be distributed on multiple NE.Some or all of module therein can be selected according to the actual needs
Realize the purpose of disclosure scheme.Those of ordinary skill in the art in the case of not paying creative work,
I.e. it is appreciated that and implements.
Those skilled in the art, after considering specification and putting into practice invention disclosed herein, will readily occur to these public affairs
Other embodiment opened.The disclosure is intended to any modification, purposes or the adaptations of the disclosure,
These modification, purposes or adaptations are followed the general principle of the disclosure and include that the disclosure is not disclosed
Common knowledge in the art or conventional techniques means.Description and embodiments is considered only as example
Property, the true scope of the disclosure and spirit are pointed out by claim below.
The foregoing is only the preferred embodiment of the disclosure, not in order to limit the disclosure, all at this
Within disclosed spirit and principle, any modification, equivalent substitution and improvement etc. done, should be included in
Within the scope of disclosure protection.