CN105741204A - Software copyright value evaluation system - Google Patents
Software copyright value evaluation system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN105741204A CN105741204A CN201610074404.4A CN201610074404A CN105741204A CN 105741204 A CN105741204 A CN 105741204A CN 201610074404 A CN201610074404 A CN 201610074404A CN 105741204 A CN105741204 A CN 105741204A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- software copyright
- software
- scoring
- accounting
- meter
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 40
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 claims description 55
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 44
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 claims description 16
- 238000013077 scoring method Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 10
- 208000011580 syndromic disease Diseases 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000012109 statistical procedure Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000006227 byproduct Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000012797 qualification Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000013589 supplement Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001502 supplementing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010200 validation analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012854 evaluation process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013139 quantization Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/18—Legal services
- G06Q50/184—Intellectual property management
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Technology Law (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Stored Programmes (AREA)
Abstract
The invention is to disclose a software copyright value evaluation system. According to the system, in combination with an actual condition of a software copyright, a basic condition and the software copyright content of the software copyright are subjected to comprehensive, detailed, stereoscopic and high-operability split evaluation; through structures such as a to-be-evaluated software copyright management module, a software copyright score setting module, a self-evaluation management module, an other-evaluation management module, a public evaluation management module, a reply communication management module, an expert library, a report management module, a publication management module and the like, live and innovative evaluation methods such as self-evaluation, other-evaluation, reply, secondary other-evaluation, secondary reply, public evaluation and the like are fully applied; and the problem that the software copyright value evaluation becomes a mere formality is to be solved.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to the field of the value assessment of software copyright, particularly relate to the system of the value assessment of a kind of centesimal software copyright.
Background technology
Software copyright is popular foundation, the basic demand of millions of people innovation and the index of quantization, and meanwhile, Ye Shi pioneering enterprise sets up the only way which must be passed of core competitiveness.Still, at present, the value assessment of software copyright, especially the value assessment of software copyright, still only has traditional assessment mode based on finance with sales achievement or prospect, so it is difficult to play itself value of software copyright, also easily the assessment of software copyright is become the assessment that software copyright is implemented company simultaneously, the value assessment of software copyright itself is professional not.
At present, the departments such as State Intellectual Property Office have also built the online rating system based on software copyright itself, but system is confined to the assessment of software copyright text itself at present for the assessment of software copyright, the combination of its market value is also made and puts in place not.
Simultaneously, at present no matter which kind of evaluation method, it is for evaluated people, or just entirely waits for information, or does not just feed back the recordable channel of meaning, cause the whole process that software copyright is evaluated, all become excessively subjective, feel it is that the value of evaluation is that trustee has the final say to people, as long as paying, not how much not all being a problem of assessment.
For the public, or shareholder, the assessment that software copyright is worth remains existence and is not desired to listen, and does not hear, the problem do not understood, market value aspect for software copyright, also it is substantially and accepts and believe the description entrusting application in software copyright assessment completely, for practical situation, still simply simply beat a folding, and not going demonstration, it has finally lacked objectivity and authority.
In software copyright value assessment report, the content of report does not list concrete evaluation process and reply process substantially yet, certainly it is also impossible to also list the evaluation sound of the public, the user of report substantially cannot understand the actual content of software copyright assessment report, and causing software copyright assessment report is a kind of pro forma legal documents.
Summary of the invention
In order to solve the problems referred to above, the present invention intends the system of openly a kind of software copyright value assessment, it is in conjunction with the practical situation of software copyright, basic condition and software copyright content to software copyright have carried out comprehensive, careful and three-dimensional workable point row are evaluated, module is managed by software copyright to be evaluated, software copyright scoring arranges module, self-appraisal management module, he comments management module, crowd comments management module, reply communication management module, experts database, the structures such as Reports Administration module and publicity management module, fully use self-appraisal, he comments, reply, secondary he comment, secondary reply and Public Appraisal etc. are lived, the evaluation methodology of innovation, intend to solve the problem that software copyright value assessment becomes a mere formality.
A kind of system of software copyright value assessment, it includes following structure:
Software copyright to be evaluated management module, software copyright scoring arrange module, self-appraisal manages module, he comments management module, crowd to comment management module, reply communication management module, experts database, Reports Administration module and publicity management module；Wherein software copyright to be evaluated management module includes software copyright basic information management submodule to be evaluated and software copyright attachment management program to be evaluated；Software copyright scoring arranges module and includes software copyright scoring item and arrange management submodule and software copyright code of points program；Self-appraisal management module includes self-appraisal management program and self-appraisal attachment management program；He comment management module include first time he comment management submodule and second time he comment management submodule；Crowd comments management module to include crowd's scoring ballot management submodule and crowd comments evidence management submodule；Reply communication management module includes addressing inquires to management submodule, replying management submodule and evidence management submodule；Experts database includes expert's basic information management module and expert's drawing manager；Reports Administration module includes scoring statistical procedure and report generation and management submodule；Publicity management module includes publicity management submodule and publicity time reckoning program.
Wherein, the software copyright scoring scoring item arranged described in module includes software copyright attribute and software copyright content two parts, and wherein software copyright attribute includes the applying date and priority date, mandate day, software copyright state, software copyright inventor, software copyright type, software copyright stability proof and software copyright item quantity；The applying date and priority date evaluation index are the software copyright protection residue time limit；Mandate day evaluation index is the prospect that software copyright converts；Whether software copyright state evaluation index was for there is transfer, and effectiveness is inferred；Software copyright inventor's evaluation index is the technical ability of inventor, educational background and technical background, and direction of assessment is the technology maturity that software copyright is implemented；Software copyright type refers to one or more combinations of product type, system type, principle type, Formula type, technological process type and material type；Software copyright stability proves to refer to that the relevant authority that State Intellectual Property Office provides proves and software copyright item quantity refers to the item number of main claim and the quantity of appurtenance item.
Wherein, software copyright scoring arranges the software copyright content of scoring item described in module and includes following content: the relation of software copyright field, software copyright layout, software copyright description and software copyright and product；Wherein software copyright field is estimated from field temperature and field city capacity two aspect；Software copyright layout describes integrity degree, the rationally distributed degree of right, length rationality and artificial division situation four aspect from technical characteristic and is estimated；Software copyright description is estimated from length rationality and open rationality two aspect；Degree of dependence two aspect of software copyright is estimated by the relation of software copyright and product from accounting size in the product and product.
Wherein, the software copyright code of points program default setting code of points ratio that software copyright scoring is arranged described in module is as follows:
Software copyright attribute accounts for 30%, and software copyright content accounts for 70%；Wherein each parameter accounting of software copyright attribute such as under:
Applying date attribute, to calculate effect duration length point third gear, total accounting is 3%, and effect duration is more long, and score accounting is more high；
Authorizing day attribute: the golden period converted with software for calculation copyright, total accounting is 3%, wherein authorizes to have counted day in 3 years and counts 3%, 4 to six years meters 2%, and 7 to nine years meters 1% are not scored for more than 10 years；
Software copyright statutory status: to speculate the reliability and stability of software copyright, total accounting is 3%, has authorized and has not externally implemented license, meter 3%, has authorized but has had and externally implement license, counted 2%, software copyright discloses and enters substantive examination state meter 1%, and other state is not scored；
Software copyright inventor: speculate technology maturity, total accounting 3%, be divided into third gear, one grade of meter 1%, two grades of meters 2%, third gear meter 3%, evaluate score class according to the following information summary of inventor:
The software copyright application quantity of inventor's same domain, especially software copyright application quantity；The relevant of the software copyright that inventor applied in 3 years；The software copyright quantity of inventor this area application accounts for the ratio of the application quantity in total field；The academic title of software copyright, technical qualification and educational background；The length of service of the length of service of inventor, especially this area；The taking social part-time job of inventor and the position of place enterprise, part-time quantity is more many, and position is more high, grades more low；
Software copyright type: total accounting is 3%, wherein a kind of meter 2% of product type, system type and principle type, a kind of meter 1% of Formula type, technological process type and material type, two kinds or two or more combinations, the basis of above-mentioned score adds meter 1%；
Software copyright stability proves: total accounting example is 3%, a kind of meter 1% of product test report, appraisal of scientific and technological achievements report and software copyright that the software copyright appraisal report in front provided of State Intellectual Property Office, other department send out is provided, two kinds of meters 2%, three kinds or above meter 3%;
Software copyright situation: account for the 12% of toatl proportion, wherein independent claims quantity 8%, independent profit requires 1 meter 5%, two meters 6%, three or count 8% above；Appended claims quantity meter ratio is 4%, wherein 6 and count 4% above, often subtracts one item missing and reduces 1%；
The total accounting of software copyright content is 70%, is specifically divided into following Score index:
Software copyright field accounting 10%, the wherein total accounting 4% of field temperature, the total accounting 6% of field city capacity, marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
Software copyright content accounting is 30%, and wherein technical characteristic describes integrity degree accounting is 10%, the total accounting 10% of the rationally distributed degree of right, and length rationality accounting is 8%, and the artificial total accounting of division situation is 2%, and marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
The total accounting of software copyright description is 10%, and wherein the total accounting of length rationality is 4%, and the open total accounting of rationality of description is 6%, and marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
The total accounting of relation of software copyright and product is 20%, wherein software copyright accounts for the scale accounting of product is 10%, 10% is counted when the full content that software copyright is product, software copyright is only the parts not played a crucial role of product, or during one of them link of multiple production technology, meter 1%, comments the situation of 2% to 9% according to practical situation meter；The dependence total accounting of degree of dependence meter of software copyright is 10% by product, and degree of dependence is more high, and meter accounting example is more high.
Wherein, software copyright to be evaluated management module, also include software copyright assessment user and manage submodule.
Wherein, crowd comments in management module, when all per capita fail provide excess syndrome to prove that its viewpoint affects stability and the reliability of software copyright time, crowd's scoring ballot management submodule will count in overall score with the proportion weighted of total accounting 5% in effectively scoring, and by the process record of public participation and arrange formation report, with self-appraisal, two-wheeled he comment, and reply overall process whole process record, be collectively forming final assessment report.
Wherein, Reports Administration module forms Final Report and puts on record, and also including system can provide papery to report, and the reliable papery report with two-dimension code anti-counterfeit code real-time query.
Wherein, scoring statistical procedure is addressed inquires to according to twice self-appraisal, two groups of experts, the chain of evidence of double plea and whole process determines to accept and believe which twice scoring, then the result of twice scoring is averaged and gets the A that finally marks, in the presence of all after scoring terminates, obtaining outstanding scoring B, program will be calculated as follows the comprehensive grading C of Final Report:
C=95%A+5%B。
Wherein, the operation principle of expert's drawing manager is as follows:
First time is randomly drawed three experts and forms first group of expert group, first group of panel member carries out randomly drawing of second group of panel member after marking and proposing inquiry, and decimation rule is as follows: experts database member carries out randomly drawing three experts and forms second group of expert group after removing three members of first group of expert group；The producing method of the 3rd group of panel member is to randomly draw three expert's compositions after removing first group of panel member and second group of panel member；The random weight that expert extracts is that 1-disregards the member of total score average mark and draws divided by 10, and Weight of Expert scoring is annual accumulative, resets after 3 years to 5 years.
A kind of method of software copyright value assessment, it comprises the steps:
Software copyright information to be assessed for step S10 prepares: user prepares to need to submit the software copyright number of software copyright of assessment, software copyright title, the software copyright applying date, software copyright publication date, software copyright mandate day, software copyright statutory status information, software copyright inventor, software copyright applicant, software copyright situation and software copyright stability data to；
Step S20 essential information typing: user is by above-mentioned ready software copyright information correspondence input system；
Step S30 shows scoring item and standard: the software copyright set by system demonstration native system is worth the standards of grading of scoring item and correspondence；
Step S41 self-appraisal: user's scoring item according to step S30 and standards of grading carry out self-appraisal, thinks that by each item rating content the score value of software copyright value of oneself carries out self evaluation；
Step S42 he comment: system is randomly drawed first three experts in experts database and is carried out contrast scoring item described in step S30 and standard is marked respectively, and then system calculates average mark respectively according to each item rating, adds up the average mark of final score simultaneously；
Step S50 intersects scoring: after completing step S41 and step S42, system by self-appraisal and he appraise appraisal result through discussion and intersect three experts being shown to outside second group of experts database first member non-, above-mentioned two groups of scorings are carried out second time scoring；
Step S61 supplements according to and replys: the expert of self-appraisal people and first time scoring according to the appraisal result of second group of expert, self-appraisal result and he comment result to carry out supplementing of foundation, and reply the problem that two groups of experts put forward in time；
Step S62 proposes to address inquires to: above-mentioned two groups of experts all can propose to address inquires to respectively, and the scope of inquiry is only limitted to the scope described in the scoring item listed by step S30；
Step S70 replies further: user carries out last discussion and demonstration according to inquiry proposed for step S62, uploads simultaneously and thinks more strong evidence；
Step S80 calculates score and forms report: after system gets rid of first group and second group of specialist crew at experts database, randomly draw three experts and form the 3rd group of expert group, 3rd group of expert group determines to accept and believe which two groups scorings according to the result of above-mentioned three scorings and the result of double plea, then accept and believe two groups of scorings are weighted average mark statistics, draw final appraisal result, after the process of three scorings and double plea being collected, form entry evaluation report simultaneously；
Step S90 reports publicity: the preliminary report formed by step S80, meets publicity automatically after the formal examination that system is arranged through system validation form and form；
Step S91 public participation is marked: during publicity, the public and relevant benefit mode are marked by system, feeding back related opinions, when the suggestion of public's feedback has excess syndrome to prove above-mentioned assessment existing problems, system will carry out reply again after return step S50 intersection scoring and evaluates simultaneously；
Step S100 forms Final Report also to be put on record: after step is fully completed, forms final report and puts on record, issue simultaneously the appraisal report of final version, self-appraisal, twice it comment result and the expert info of all participations scoring.
Wherein, scoring item described in the rapid S30 of step includes software copyright attribute and software copyright content two parts, and wherein software copyright attribute includes the applying date and priority date, mandate day, software copyright state, software copyright inventor, software copyright type, software copyright stability proof and software copyright item quantity；The applying date and priority date evaluation index are the software copyright protection residue time limit；Mandate day evaluation index is the prospect that software copyright converts；Whether software copyright state evaluation index was for there is transfer, and effectiveness is inferred；Software copyright inventor's evaluation index is the technical ability of inventor, educational background and technical background, and direction of assessment is the technology maturity that software copyright is implemented；Software copyright type refers to one or more combinations of product type, method type, principle type, Formula type, technological process type and material type；Software copyright stability proves to refer to that the relevant authority that State Intellectual Property Office provides proves and software copyright item quantity refers to the item number of main claim and the quantity of appurtenance item.
Wherein, the software copyright content of the scoring item described in step S30 includes following content: the relation of software copyright field, software copyright layout, software copyright description and software copyright and product；Wherein software copyright field is estimated from field temperature and field city capacity two aspect；Software copyright layout describes integrity degree, the rationally distributed degree of right, length rationality and artificial division situation four aspect from technical characteristic and is estimated；Software copyright description is estimated from length rationality and open rationality two aspect；Degree of dependence two aspect of software copyright is estimated by the relation of software copyright and product from accounting size in the product and product.
Wherein, the ratio of the standards of grading described in step S30 is as follows:
Software copyright attribute accounts for 30%, and software copyright content accounts for 70%；Wherein each parameter accounting of software copyright attribute such as under:
Applying date attribute, to calculate effect duration length point third gear, total accounting is 3%, and effect duration is more long, and score accounting is more high；
Authorizing day attribute: the golden period converted with software for calculation copyright, total accounting is 3%, wherein authorizes to have counted day in 3 years and counts 3%, 4 to six years meters 2%, and 7 to nine years meters 1% are not scored for more than 10 years；
Software copyright statutory status: to speculate the reliability and stability of software copyright, total accounting is 3%, has authorized and has not externally implemented license, meter 3%, has authorized but has had and externally implement license, counted 2%, software copyright discloses and enters substantive examination state meter 1%, and other state is not scored；
Software copyright inventor: speculate technology maturity, total accounting 3%, be divided into third gear, one grade of meter 1%, two grades of meters 2%, third gear meter 3%, evaluate score class according to the following information summary of inventor:
The software copyright application quantity of inventor's same domain, especially software copyright application quantity；The relevant of the software copyright that inventor applied in 3 years；The software copyright quantity of inventor this area application accounts for the ratio of the application quantity in total field；The academic title of software copyright, technical qualification and educational background；The length of service of the length of service of inventor, especially this area；The taking social part-time job of inventor and the position of place enterprise, part-time quantity is more many, and position is more high, grades more low；
Software copyright type: total accounting is 3%, wherein a kind of meter 2% of product type, method type and principle type, a kind of meter 1% of Formula type, technological process type and material type, two kinds or two or more combinations, the basis of above-mentioned score adds meter 1%；
Software copyright stability proves: total accounting example is 3%, a kind of meter 1% of product test report, appraisal of scientific and technological achievements report and software copyright that the software copyright appraisal report in front provided of State Intellectual Property Office, other department send out is provided, two kinds of meters 2%, three kinds or above meter 3%;
Software copyright situation: account for the 12% of toatl proportion, wherein independent claims quantity 8%, independent profit requires 1 meter 5%, two meters 6%, three or count 8% above；Appended claims quantity meter ratio is 4%, wherein 6 and count 4% above, often subtracts one item missing and reduces 1%.
Wherein, in the standards of grading described in step S30, the total accounting of software copyright content this 70%, be specifically divided into following Score index: software copyright field accounting 10%, wherein the total accounting 4% of field temperature, the total accounting 6% of field city capacity, marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；Software copyright content accounting is 30%, and wherein technical characteristic describes integrity degree accounting is 10%, the total accounting 10% of the rationally distributed degree of right, and length rationality accounting is 8%, and the artificial total accounting of division situation is 2%, and marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；The total accounting of software copyright description is 10%, and wherein the total accounting of length rationality is 4%, and the open total accounting of rationality of description is 6%, and marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
The total accounting of relation of software copyright and product is 20%, wherein software copyright accounts for the scale accounting of product is 10%, 10% is counted when the full content that software copyright is product, software copyright is only the parts not played a crucial role of product, or during one of them link of multiple production technology, meter 1%, comments the situation of 2% to 9% according to practical situation meter；The dependence total accounting of degree of dependence meter of software copyright is 10% by product, and degree of dependence is more high, and meter accounting example is more high.
Wherein, before performing described step S20, also include performing step S101 user and carry out registration and log in.
Wherein, in step S91 public participation scoring, when all per capita fail provide excess syndrome to prove that its viewpoint affects stability and the reliability of software copyright time, system will count in overall score with the proportion weighted of total accounting 5% in effectively scoring, and by the process record of public participation and arrange formation report, with self-appraisal, two-wheeled he comment, and reply overall process whole process record, be collectively forming final assessment report.
Wherein, step S100 forms Final Report and puts on record, and also including system can provide papery to report, and the reliable papery report with two-dimension code anti-counterfeit code real-time query.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1, the overview flow chart of a kind of method of software copyright value assessment.
Fig. 2, the overall construction drawing of the system of a kind of software copyright value assessment.
Detailed description of the invention
The overview flow chart of the method for a kind of software copyright value assessment as shown in Figure 1, a kind of method of software copyright value assessment, it comprises the steps:
Software copyright information to be assessed for step S10 prepares: user prepares to need to submit the software copyright number of software copyright of assessment, software copyright title, the software copyright applying date, software copyright publication date, software copyright mandate day, software copyright statutory status information, software copyright inventor, software copyright applicant, software copyright situation and software copyright stability data to；
Step S20 essential information typing: user is by above-mentioned ready software copyright information correspondence input system；
Step S30 shows scoring item and standard: the software copyright set by system demonstration native system is worth the standards of grading of scoring item and correspondence；
Step S41 self-appraisal: user's scoring item according to step S30 and standards of grading carry out self-appraisal, thinks that by each item rating content the score value of software copyright value of oneself carries out self evaluation；
Step S42 he comment: system is randomly drawed first three experts in experts database and is carried out contrast scoring item described in step S30 and standard is marked respectively, and then system calculates average mark respectively according to each item rating, adds up the average mark of final score simultaneously；
Step S50 intersects scoring: after completing step S41 and step S42, system by self-appraisal and he appraise appraisal result through discussion and intersect three experts being shown to outside second group of experts database first member non-, above-mentioned two groups of scorings are carried out second time scoring；
Step S61 supplements according to and replys: the expert of self-appraisal people and first time scoring according to the appraisal result of second group of expert, self-appraisal result and he comment result to carry out supplementing of foundation, and reply the problem that two groups of experts put forward in time；
Step S62 proposes to address inquires to: above-mentioned two groups of experts all can propose to address inquires to respectively, and the scope of inquiry is only limitted to the scope described in the scoring item listed by step S30；
Step S70 replies further: user carries out last discussion and demonstration according to inquiry proposed for step S62, uploads simultaneously and thinks more strong evidence；
Step S80 calculates score and forms report: after system gets rid of first group and second group of specialist crew at experts database, randomly draw three experts and form the 3rd group of expert group, 3rd group of expert group determines to accept and believe which two groups scorings according to the result of above-mentioned three scorings and the result of double plea, then accept and believe two groups of scorings are weighted average mark statistics, draw final appraisal result, after the process of three scorings and double plea being collected, form entry evaluation report simultaneously；
Step S90 reports publicity: the preliminary report formed by step S80, meets publicity automatically after the formal examination that system is arranged through system validation form and form；
Step S91 public participation is marked: during publicity, the public and relevant benefit mode are marked by system, feeding back related opinions, when the suggestion of public's feedback has excess syndrome to prove above-mentioned assessment existing problems, system will carry out reply again after return step S50 intersection scoring and evaluates simultaneously；
Step S100 forms Final Report also to be put on record: after step is fully completed, forms final report and puts on record, issue simultaneously the appraisal report of final version, self-appraisal, twice it comment result and the expert info of all participations scoring.
Wherein, scoring item described in the rapid S30 of step includes software copyright attribute and software copyright content two parts, and wherein software copyright attribute includes the applying date and priority date, mandate day, software copyright state, software copyright inventor, software copyright type, software copyright stability proof and software copyright item quantity；The applying date and priority date evaluation index are the software copyright protection residue time limit；Mandate day evaluation index is the prospect that software copyright converts；Whether software copyright state evaluation index was for there is transfer, and effectiveness is inferred；Software copyright inventor's evaluation index is the technical ability of inventor, educational background and technical background, and direction of assessment is the technology maturity that software copyright is implemented；Software copyright type refers to one or more combinations of product type, method type, principle type, Formula type, technological process type and material type；Software copyright stability proves to refer to that the relevant authority that State Intellectual Property Office provides proves and software copyright item quantity refers to the item number of main claim and the quantity of appurtenance item.
Wherein, the software copyright content of the scoring item described in step S30 includes following content: the relation of software copyright field, software copyright layout, software copyright description and software copyright and product；Wherein software copyright field is estimated from field temperature and field city capacity two aspect；Software copyright layout describes integrity degree, the rationally distributed degree of right, length rationality and artificial division situation four aspect from technical characteristic and is estimated；Software copyright description is estimated from length rationality and open rationality two aspect；Degree of dependence two aspect of software copyright is estimated by the relation of software copyright and product from accounting size in the product and product.
Wherein, the ratio of the standards of grading described in step S30 is as follows:
Total score is 100 points, and wherein software copyright attribute accounts for 30 points, and software copyright content accounts for 70 points.Wherein each parameter accounting of software copyright attribute such as under:
Applying date attribute, to calculate effect duration length point third gear, total accounting is 3 points, and effect duration is more long, and score accounting is more high；
Authorizing day attribute: the golden period converted with software for calculation copyright, total accounting is 3 points, wherein authorizes to have counted day in 3 years and counts 3 points, within 4 to six years, count 2 points, within 7 to nine years, counts 1 point, within more than 10 years, do not score；
Software copyright statutory status: to speculate the reliability and stability of software copyright, total accounting is 3 points, has authorized and has not externally implemented license, count 3 points, authorized but had and externally implement license, counted 2 points, software copyright discloses and enters substantive examination state meter 1 point, and other state is not scored；
Software copyright inventor: speculate technology maturity, total accounting 3 points, be divided into third gear, counts 1 point for one grade, counts 2 points for two grades, and third gear meter 3 points evaluates score class according to the following information summary of inventor:
The software copyright application quantity of inventor's same domain, especially software copyright application quantity；The relevant of the software copyright that inventor applied in 3 years；The software copyright quantity of inventor this area application accounts for the ratio of the application quantity in total field；The academic title of software copyright, technical qualification and educational background；The length of service of the length of service of inventor, especially this area；The taking social part-time job of inventor and the position of place enterprise, part-time quantity is more many, and position is more high, grades more low；
Software copyright type: total accounting is 3 points, wherein a kind of meter 2 points of product type, method type and principle type, a kind of meter 1 point of Formula type, technological process type and material type, two kinds or two or more combinations, the basis of above-mentioned score adds meter 1 point；
Software copyright stability proves: total accounting example is 3 points, a kind of meter 1 point of product test report, appraisal of scientific and technological achievements report and software copyright that the software copyright appraisal report in front provided of State Intellectual Property Office, other department send out is provided, count 2 points for two kinds, three kinds or above meter 3 points;
Software copyright situation: account for 12 points of toatl proportion, wherein independent claims quantity 8 points, independent profit requires that 1 is counted 5 points, counts 6 points for two, three or above meter 8 points；Appended claims quantity meter ratio is 4 points, wherein 6 and above meter 4 points, often subtracts one item missing and reduces 1 point.
The total accounting of software copyright content these 70 points, is specifically divided into following Score index:
Software copyright field accounting 10 points, the wherein total accounting of field temperature 4 points, the total accounting of field city capacity 6 points, marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
Software copyright content accounting is 30 points, and wherein technical characteristic describes integrity degree accounting is 10 points, the total accounting of the rationally distributed degree of right 10 points, and length rationality accounting is 8 points, and the artificial total accounting of division situation is 2 points, and marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
The total accounting of software copyright description is 10 points, and wherein the total accounting of length rationality is 4 points, and the open total accounting of rationality of description is 6 points, and marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
The total accounting of relation of software copyright and product is 20 points, wherein software copyright accounts for the scale accounting of product is 10 points, 10 points are counted when the full content that software copyright is product, software copyright is only the parts not played a crucial role of product, or during one of them link of multiple production technology, count 1 point, comment the situation of 2 points to 9 points according to practical situation meter；The dependence total accounting of degree of dependence meter of software copyright is 10 points by product, and degree of dependence is more high, and meter accounting example is more high.
Wherein, before performing described step S20, also include performing step S101 user and carry out registration and log in.
Wherein, in step S91 public participation scoring, when all per capita fail provide excess syndrome to prove that its viewpoint affects stability and the reliability of software copyright time, system will count in overall score with the proportion weighted of total accounting 5 points in effectively scoring, and by the process record of public participation and arrange formation report, with self-appraisal, two-wheeled he comment, and reply overall process whole process record, be collectively forming final assessment report.
Wherein, step S100 forms Final Report and puts on record, and also including system can provide papery to report, and the reliable papery report with two-dimension code anti-counterfeit code real-time query.
Such as Fig. 2, the system of a kind of software copyright value assessment, it includes following structure:
Software copyright to be evaluated management module, software copyright scoring arrange module, self-appraisal manages module, he comments management module, crowd to comment management module, reply communication management module, experts database, Reports Administration module and publicity management module；Wherein software copyright to be evaluated management module includes software copyright basic information management submodule to be evaluated and software copyright attachment management program to be evaluated；Software copyright scoring arranges module and includes software copyright scoring item and arrange management submodule and software copyright code of points program；Self-appraisal management module includes self-appraisal management program and self-appraisal attachment management program；He comment management module include first time he comment management submodule and second time he comment management submodule；Crowd comments management module to include crowd's scoring ballot management submodule and crowd comments evidence management submodule；Reply communication management module includes addressing inquires to management submodule, replying management submodule and evidence management submodule；Experts database includes expert's basic information management module and expert's drawing manager；Reports Administration module includes scoring statistical procedure and report generation and management submodule；Publicity management module includes publicity management submodule and publicity time reckoning program.
Wherein, the software copyright scoring scoring item arranged described in module includes software copyright attribute and software copyright content two parts, and wherein software copyright attribute includes the applying date and priority date, mandate day, software copyright state, software copyright inventor, software copyright type, software copyright stability proof and software copyright item quantity；The applying date and priority date evaluation index are the software copyright protection residue time limit；Mandate day evaluation index is the prospect that software copyright converts；Whether software copyright state evaluation index was for there is transfer, and effectiveness is inferred；Software copyright inventor's evaluation index is the technical ability of inventor, educational background and technical background, and direction of assessment is the technology maturity that software copyright is implemented；Software copyright type refers to one or more combinations of product type, system type, principle type, Formula type, technological process type and material type；Software copyright stability proves to refer to that the relevant authority that State Intellectual Property Office provides proves and software copyright item quantity refers to the item number of main claim and the quantity of appurtenance item.
Wherein, software copyright scoring arranges the software copyright content of scoring item described in module and includes following content: the relation of software copyright field, software copyright layout, software copyright description and software copyright and product；Wherein software copyright field is estimated from field temperature and field city capacity two aspect；Software copyright layout describes integrity degree, the rationally distributed degree of right, length rationality and artificial division situation four aspect from technical characteristic and is estimated；Software copyright description is estimated from length rationality and open rationality two aspect；Degree of dependence two aspect of software copyright is estimated by the relation of software copyright and product from accounting size in the product and product.
Wherein, the software copyright code of points program default setting code of points ratio that software copyright scoring is arranged described in module is as follows:
Software copyright attribute accounts for 30%, and software copyright content accounts for 70%；Wherein each parameter accounting of software copyright attribute such as under:
Applying date attribute, to calculate effect duration length point third gear, total accounting is 3%, and effect duration is more long, and score accounting is more high；
Authorizing day attribute: the golden period converted with software for calculation copyright, total accounting is 3%, wherein authorizes to have counted day in 3 years and counts 3%, 4 to six years meters 2%, and 7 to nine years meters 1% are not scored for more than 10 years；
Software copyright statutory status: to speculate the reliability and stability of software copyright, total accounting is 3%, has authorized and has not externally implemented license, meter 3%, has authorized but has had and externally implement license, counted 2%, software copyright discloses and enters substantive examination state meter 1%, and other state is not scored；
Software copyright inventor: speculate technology maturity, total accounting 3%, be divided into third gear, one grade of meter 1%, two grades of meters 2%, third gear meter 3%, evaluate score class according to the following information summary of inventor:
The software copyright application quantity of inventor's same domain, especially software copyright application quantity；The relevant of the software copyright that inventor applied in 3 years；The software copyright quantity of inventor this area application accounts for the ratio of the application quantity in total field；The academic title of software copyright, technical qualification and educational background；The length of service of the length of service of inventor, especially this area；The taking social part-time job of inventor and the position of place enterprise, part-time quantity is more many, and position is more high, grades more low；
Software copyright type: total accounting is 3%, wherein a kind of meter 2% of product type, system type and principle type, a kind of meter 1% of Formula type, technological process type and material type, two kinds or two or more combinations, the basis of above-mentioned score adds meter 1%；
Software copyright stability proves: total accounting example is 3%, a kind of meter 1% of product test report, appraisal of scientific and technological achievements report and software copyright that the software copyright appraisal report in front provided of State Intellectual Property Office, other department send out is provided, two kinds of meters 2%, three kinds or above meter 3%;
Software copyright situation: account for the 12% of toatl proportion, wherein independent claims quantity 8%, independent profit requires 1 meter 5%, two meters 6%, three or count 8% above；Appended claims quantity meter ratio is 4%, wherein 6 and count 4% above, often subtracts one item missing and reduces 1%；
The total accounting of software copyright content is 70%, is specifically divided into following Score index:
Software copyright field accounting 10%, the wherein total accounting 4% of field temperature, the total accounting 6% of field city capacity, marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
Software copyright content accounting is 30%, and wherein technical characteristic describes integrity degree accounting is 10%, the total accounting 10% of the rationally distributed degree of right, and length rationality accounting is 8%, and the artificial total accounting of division situation is 2%, and marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
The total accounting of software copyright description is 10%, and wherein the total accounting of length rationality is 4%, and the open total accounting of rationality of description is 6%, and marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
The total accounting of relation of software copyright and product is 20%, wherein software copyright accounts for the scale accounting of product is 10%, 10% is counted when the full content that software copyright is product, software copyright is only the parts not played a crucial role of product, or during one of them link of multiple production technology, meter 1%, comments the situation of 2% to 9% according to practical situation meter；The dependence total accounting of degree of dependence meter of software copyright is 10% by product, and degree of dependence is more high, and meter accounting example is more high.
Wherein, software copyright to be evaluated management module, also include software copyright assessment user and manage submodule.
Wherein, crowd comments in management module, when all per capita fail provide excess syndrome to prove that its viewpoint affects stability and the reliability of software copyright time, crowd's scoring ballot management submodule will count in overall score with the proportion weighted of total accounting 5% in effectively scoring, and by the process record of public participation and arrange formation report, with self-appraisal, two-wheeled he comment, and reply overall process whole process record, be collectively forming final assessment report.
Wherein, Reports Administration module forms Final Report and puts on record, and also including system can provide papery to report, and the reliable papery report with two-dimension code anti-counterfeit code real-time query.
Wherein, scoring statistical procedure is addressed inquires to according to twice self-appraisal, two groups of experts, the chain of evidence of double plea and whole process determines to accept and believe which twice scoring, then the result of twice scoring is averaged and gets the A that finally marks, in the presence of all after scoring terminates, obtaining outstanding scoring B, program will be calculated as follows the comprehensive grading C of Final Report:
C=95%*A+5%*B。
Wherein, the operation principle of expert's drawing manager is as follows:
First time is randomly drawed three experts and forms first group of expert group, first group of panel member carries out randomly drawing of second group of panel member after marking and proposing inquiry, and decimation rule is as follows: experts database member carries out randomly drawing three experts and forms second group of expert group after removing three members of first group of expert group；The producing method of the 3rd group of panel member is to randomly draw three expert's compositions after removing first group of panel member and second group of panel member；The random weight that expert extracts is that 1-disregards the member of total score average mark and draws divided by 10, and Weight of Expert scoring is annual accumulative, resets after 3 years to 5 years.
Above-mentioned is only a kind of embodiment of this software copyright, and except adopting except hundred-mark system, the present invention can also adopt thousand points of systems, very much the various ways such as system, it would however also be possible to employ variable amount of marking mode.
Claims (9)
1. the system of a software copyright value assessment, it is characterised in that it includes following structure:
Software copyright to be evaluated management module, software copyright scoring arrange module, self-appraisal manages module, he comments management module, crowd to comment management module, reply communication management module, experts database, Reports Administration module and publicity management module；Wherein software copyright to be evaluated management module includes software copyright basic information management submodule to be evaluated and software copyright attachment management program to be evaluated；Software copyright scoring arranges module and includes software copyright scoring item and arrange management submodule and software copyright code of points program；Self-appraisal management module includes self-appraisal management program and self-appraisal attachment management program；He comment management module include first time he comment management submodule and second time he comment management submodule；Crowd comments management module to include crowd's scoring ballot management submodule and crowd comments evidence management submodule；Reply communication management module includes addressing inquires to management submodule, replying management submodule and evidence management submodule；Experts database includes expert's basic information management module and expert's drawing manager；Reports Administration module includes scoring statistical procedure and report generation and management submodule；Publicity management module includes publicity management submodule and publicity time reckoning program.
2. the system of a kind of software copyright value assessment according to claim 1, it is characterized in that, the described software copyright scoring scoring item arranged described in module includes software copyright attribute and software copyright content two parts, and wherein software copyright attribute includes the applying date and priority date, mandate day, software copyright state, software copyright inventor, software copyright type, software copyright stability proof and software copyright item quantity；The applying date and priority date evaluation index are the software copyright protection residue time limit；Mandate day evaluation index is the prospect that software copyright converts；Whether software copyright state evaluation index was for there is transfer, and effectiveness is inferred；Software copyright inventor's evaluation index is the technical ability of inventor, educational background and technical background, and direction of assessment is the technology maturity that software copyright is implemented；Software copyright type refers to one or more combinations of product type, system type, principle type, Formula type, technological process type and material type；Software copyright stability proves to refer to that the relevant authority that State Intellectual Property Office provides proves and software copyright item quantity refers to the item number of main claim and the quantity of appurtenance item.
3. the system of a kind of software copyright value assessment according to claim 1 and claim 2, it is characterized in that, described software copyright scoring arranges the software copyright content of the scoring item described in module and includes following content: the relation of software copyright field, software copyright layout, software copyright description and software copyright and product；Wherein software copyright field is estimated from field temperature and field city capacity two aspect；Software copyright layout describes integrity degree, the rationally distributed degree of right, length rationality and artificial division situation four aspect from technical characteristic and is estimated；Software copyright description is estimated from length rationality and open rationality two aspect；Degree of dependence two aspect of software copyright is estimated by the relation of software copyright and product from accounting size in the product and product.
4. the system of a kind of software copyright value assessment according to claim 1-3, it is characterised in that the software copyright code of points program default setting code of points ratio that described software copyright scoring is arranged described in module is as follows:
Software copyright attribute accounts for 30%, and software copyright content accounts for 70%；Wherein each parameter accounting of software copyright attribute such as under:
Applying date attribute, to calculate effect duration length point third gear, total accounting is 3%, and effect duration is more long, and score accounting is more high；
Authorizing day attribute: the golden period converted with software for calculation copyright, total accounting is 3%, wherein authorizes to have counted day in 3 years and counts 3%, 4 to six years meters 2%, and 7 to nine years meters 1% are not scored for more than 10 years；
Software copyright statutory status: to speculate the reliability and stability of software copyright, total accounting is 3%, has authorized and has not externally implemented license, meter 3%, has authorized but has had and externally implement license, counted 2%, software copyright discloses and enters substantive examination state meter 1%, and other state is not scored；
Software copyright inventor: speculate technology maturity, total accounting 3%, be divided into third gear, one grade of meter 1%, two grades of meters 2%, third gear meter 3%, evaluate score class according to the following information summary of inventor:
The software copyright application quantity of inventor's same domain, especially software copyright application quantity；The relevant of the software copyright that inventor applied in 3 years；The software copyright quantity of inventor this area application accounts for the ratio of the application quantity in total field；The academic title of software copyright, technical qualification and educational background；The length of service of the length of service of inventor, especially this area；The taking social part-time job of inventor and the position of place enterprise, part-time quantity is more many, and position is more high, grades more low；
Software copyright type: total accounting is 3%, wherein a kind of meter 2% of product type, system type and principle type, a kind of meter 1% of Formula type, technological process type and material type, two kinds or two or more combinations, the basis of above-mentioned score adds meter 1%；
Software copyright stability proves: total accounting example is 3%, a kind of meter 1% of product test report, appraisal of scientific and technological achievements report and software copyright that the software copyright appraisal report in front provided of State Intellectual Property Office, other department send out is provided, two kinds of meters 2%, three kinds or above meter 3%;
Software copyright situation: account for the 12% of toatl proportion, wherein independent claims quantity 8%, independent profit requires 1 meter 5%, two meters 6%, three or count 8% above；Appended claims quantity meter ratio is 4%, wherein 6 and count 4% above, often subtracts one item missing and reduces 1%；
The total accounting of software copyright content is 70%, is specifically divided into following Score index:
Software copyright field accounting 10%, the wherein total accounting 4% of field temperature, the total accounting 6% of field city capacity, marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
Software copyright content accounting is 30%, and wherein technical characteristic describes integrity degree accounting is 10%, the total accounting 10% of the rationally distributed degree of right, and length rationality accounting is 8%, and the artificial total accounting of division situation is 2%, and marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
The total accounting of software copyright description is 10%, and wherein the total accounting of length rationality is 4%, and the open total accounting of rationality of description is 6%, and marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
The total accounting of relation of software copyright and product is 20%, wherein software copyright accounts for the scale accounting of product is 10%, 10% is counted when the full content that software copyright is product, software copyright is only the parts not played a crucial role of product, or during one of them link of multiple production technology, meter 1%, comments the situation of 2% to 9% according to practical situation meter；The dependence total accounting of degree of dependence meter of software copyright is 10% by product, and degree of dependence is more high, and meter accounting example is more high.
5. the system of a kind of software copyright value assessment according to claim 1, it is characterised in that described software copyright to be evaluated management module, also includes software copyright assessment user and manages submodule.
6. the system of a kind of software copyright value assessment according to claim 1, it is characterized in that, described crowd comments in management module, when all per capita fail provide excess syndrome to prove that its viewpoint affects stability and the reliability of software copyright time, crowd's scoring ballot management submodule will count in overall score with the proportion weighted of total accounting 5% in effectively scoring, and by the process record of public participation and arrange formation report, with self-appraisal, two-wheeled he comment, and reply overall process whole process record, it is collectively forming final assessment report.
7. the system of a kind of software copyright value assessment according to claim 1, it is characterized in that, described Reports Administration module forms Final Report and puts on record, and also including system can provide papery to report, and the reliable papery report with two-dimension code anti-counterfeit code real-time query.
8. the system of a kind of software copyright value assessment according to claim 1, it is characterized in that, described scoring statistical procedure is addressed inquires to according to twice self-appraisal, two groups of experts, the chain of evidence of double plea and whole process determines to accept and believe which twice scoring, then the result of twice scoring is averaged and gets the A that finally marks, in the presence of all after scoring terminates, obtaining outstanding scoring B, program will be calculated as follows the comprehensive grading C of Final Report:
C=95%A+5%B。
9. the system of a kind of software copyright value assessment according to claim 1, it is characterised in that the operation principle of described expert's drawing manager is as follows:
First time is randomly drawed three experts and forms first group of expert group, first group of panel member carries out randomly drawing of second group of panel member after marking and proposing inquiry, and decimation rule is as follows: experts database member carries out randomly drawing three experts and forms second group of expert group after removing three members of first group of expert group；The producing method of the 3rd group of panel member is to randomly draw three expert's compositions after removing first group of panel member and second group of panel member；The random weight that expert extracts is that 1-disregards the member of total score average mark and draws divided by 10, and Weight of Expert scoring is annual accumulative, resets after 3 years to 5 years.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610074404.4A CN105741204A (en) | 2016-02-03 | 2016-02-03 | Software copyright value evaluation system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610074404.4A CN105741204A (en) | 2016-02-03 | 2016-02-03 | Software copyright value evaluation system |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN105741204A true CN105741204A (en) | 2016-07-06 |
Family
ID=56245763
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610074404.4A Pending CN105741204A (en) | 2016-02-03 | 2016-02-03 | Software copyright value evaluation system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN105741204A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108021628A (en) * | 2017-11-22 | 2018-05-11 | 华南理工大学 | A kind of management system of science and technology theme |
-
2016
- 2016-02-03 CN CN201610074404.4A patent/CN105741204A/en active Pending
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108021628A (en) * | 2017-11-22 | 2018-05-11 | 华南理工大学 | A kind of management system of science and technology theme |
| CN108021628B (en) * | 2017-11-22 | 2021-12-21 | 华南理工大学 | Management system of science and technology theme |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Zhao et al. | From voids to sophistication: Institutional environment and MNC CSR crisis in emerging markets | |
| Williamson | Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives | |
| Connor | Global price fixing: Our customers are the enemy | |
| Kim et al. | Barriers to applying value management in the Vietnamese construction industry | |
| Oliviero et al. | Who’s minding the store? Global civil society and corporate responsibility | |
| CN105741203A (en) | Intellectual property value evaluation method | |
| CN105550830A (en) | Trademark value assessment system | |
| Li Ang et al. | Is the social agenda driving sustainable property development in Melbourne, Australia? | |
| CN105741202A (en) | Intellectual property value evaluation system | |
| CN105741041A (en) | Trademark value evaluation method | |
| Overdevest et al. | Experimentalism in transnational forest governance: Implementing Eu Forest Law Enforcement Governance and Trade (FLEGT) voluntary partnership agreements in Indonesia and Ghana | |
| CN105741204A (en) | Software copyright value evaluation system | |
| CN105740987A (en) | Invention patent value evaluation method | |
| CN105741207A (en) | Utility model patent value evaluation method | |
| Adams | Indigenous contractors' perceptions of the constraints on contractors' performance and development programmes required in Nigeria | |
| CN105550953A (en) | Utility model patent value assessment system | |
| CN105741205A (en) | Software copyright value evaluation method | |
| Marx | Construction industry indicators affecting contractors | |
| CN105740986A (en) | Invention patent value evaluation system | |
| CN105741040A (en) | Appearance patent value evaluation system | |
| Miller | Corporate Codes of Conduct and Working Conditions in the Global Supply Chain: Accountability Through Transparency in Private Ordering | |
| Daemmrich | The evolving basis for legitimacy of the World Trade Organization: Dispute settlement and the rebalancing of global interests | |
| CN105608651A (en) | Appearance patent value assessment method | |
| Aleithawe | Optimizing transparency and disclosure to reduce right-of-way acquisition duration for construction projects in Mississippi | |
| Espenschied | Contract drafting: Powerful prose in transactional practice |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication | ||
| WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20160706 |