CN105741203A - Intellectual property value evaluation method - Google Patents
Intellectual property value evaluation method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN105741203A CN105741203A CN201610074403.XA CN201610074403A CN105741203A CN 105741203 A CN105741203 A CN 105741203A CN 201610074403 A CN201610074403 A CN 201610074403A CN 105741203 A CN105741203 A CN 105741203A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- intellectual property
- report
- accounting
- scoring
- appraisal
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 48
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 55
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 claims description 55
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 claims description 16
- 238000013077 scoring method Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 208000011580 syndromic disease Diseases 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000006227 byproduct Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000012797 qualification Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000013589 supplement Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000001502 supplementing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000010200 validation analysis Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012854 evaluation process Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000012109 statistical procedure Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013139 quantization Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/18—Legal services
- G06Q50/184—Intellectual property management
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Technology Law (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention is to disclose an intellectual property value evaluation method. According to the method, in combination with an actual condition of an intellectual property, on the basis of taking an intellectual property stability argument of the intellectual property as a pre-evaluation process, a basic condition and the patent content of the intellectual property are subjected to comprehensive, detailed, stereoscopic and high-operability split evaluation; live and innovative evaluation methods such as self-evaluation, other-evaluation, reply, secondary other-evaluation, secondary reply, public evaluation and the like are fully applied; and the problem that the patent value evaluation becomes a mere formality is to be solved.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to the field of the value assessment of intellectual property, the method particularly relating to the Value Comprehensive Assessment of a kind of centesimal intellectual property, trade mark and software copyright.
Background technology
Intellectual property is popular foundation, the basic demand of millions of people innovation and the index of quantization, and meanwhile, Ye Shi pioneering enterprise sets up the only way which must be passed of core competitiveness.Still, at present, the value assessment of intellectual property, especially the value assessment of intellectual property, still only has traditional assessment mode based on finance with sales achievement or prospect, so it is difficult to play itself value of intellectual property, also easily the assessment of intellectual property is become the assessment that intellectual property is implemented company simultaneously, the value assessment of intellectual property itself is professional not.
At present, the department such as State Intellectual Property Office has also built the online rating system of knowledge based property right itself, but system is confined to the assessment of intellectual property text itself at present for the assessment of intellectual property, is also made for the combination of its market value and puts in place not.
Simultaneously, at present no matter which kind of evaluation method, it is for evaluated people, or just entirely waits for information, or does not just feed back the recordable channel of meaning, cause the whole process that intellectual property is evaluated, all become excessively subjective, feel it is that the value of evaluation is that trustee has the final say to people, as long as paying, not how much not all being a problem of assessment.
For the public, or shareholder, the assessment of intellectual property value remains existence and is not desired to listen, and does not hear, the problem do not understood, market value aspect for intellectual property, also it is substantially and accepts and believe the description entrusting application in intellectual property evaluation completely, for practical situation, still simply simply beat a folding, and not going demonstration, it has finally lacked objectivity and authority.
In intellectual property value assessment report, the content of report does not list concrete evaluation process and reply process substantially yet, certainly it is also impossible to also list the evaluation sound of the public, the user of report substantially cannot understand the actual content of intellectual property evaluation report, causes intellectual property evaluation report simply a kind of pro forma legal documents.
For intellectual property, in current evaluation methodology, the stability not intellectual property of intellectual property do not weighed is as the flow process of preposition demonstration；When the intellectual property of intellectual property is weighed unstable, the value of the intellectual property entrusted and estimated value are all not high, and then wasting manpower and material resources.
Summary of the invention
In order to solve the problems referred to above, the present invention intends the method for openly a kind of intellectual property value assessment, it is in conjunction with the practical situation of intellectual property, intellectual property in intellectual property is weighed on the stability demonstration basis as preposition estimation flow, basic condition and Content about Intellectual Property to intellectual property have carried out comprehensive, careful and three-dimensional workable point row and have evaluated, fully used self-appraisal, he comments, replies, secondary he comment, secondary reply and evaluation methodology that Public Appraisal etc. is lived, innovation, intend to solve that intellectual property value assesses the problem become a mere formality.
The method that the invention discloses the assessment of a kind of intellectual property value, it comprises the steps:
Intellectual property information to be assessed for step S10 prepares: user prepares to need to submit the intellectual property number of intellectual property of assessment, intellectual property title, the intellectual property applying date, intellectual property publication date, intellectual property mandate day, intellectual property law status information, intellectual property inventor, intellectual property applicant, intellectual property power situation and intellectual property power stability data to；
Step S20 essential information typing: user is by above-mentioned ready intellectual property information correspondence input system；
Step S21 uploads intellectual property appraisal report: user uploads intellectual property appraisal report, the retrieval report of intellectual property creativeness, court decision document and the relevant testimonial material provided by State Intellectual Property Office, and material is proved or quotes as proof；
The intellectual property power estimation of stability of step S22 intellectual property: system is randomly drawed three experts of intellectual property workflow management class and formed intellectual property power stability and prove expert group, the intellectual property appraisal report that step S21 is uploaded carries out manual evaluation, and draws preliminary demonstration conclusion；
Step S23 publicity also accepts public's inquiry: the suggestion of the public is openly collected in the conclusion report of proving formed by step S22, accept the public to address inquires to, reply that the expert group being simultaneously made up of step S22 carries out addressing inquires to, collect and process, when proposing the stability of intellectual property power that reliable voucher can have influence on this intellectual property, return step S21 and discussed with further continuing with the adminicle of property by applicant；
Step S24 forms the report of final stability: through above-mentioned in steps after, and when the public in step S23 remains without the qualitative opinion of the stability that the intellectual property proposing to have influence on this intellectual property is weighed after publicity expires, generate final stability report, announce；When intellectual property power qualitative for stablize time, perform each flow process after step S30, otherwise then no longer execution step S30 and follow-up flow process, the value assessment of this intellectual property terminates, and evaluated value does valueless process, and announces；
Step S30 shows scoring item and standard: intellectual property value scoring item set by system demonstration native system and the standards of grading of correspondence；
Step S41 self-appraisal: user's scoring item according to step S30 and standards of grading carry out self-appraisal, and each item rating content being felt, the score value that the intellectual property of oneself is worth carries out self evaluation；
Step S42 he comment: system is randomly drawed first three experts in experts database and is carried out contrast scoring item described in step S30 and standard is marked respectively, and then system calculates average mark respectively according to each item rating, adds up the average mark of final score simultaneously；
Step S50 intersects scoring: after completing step S41 and step S42, system by self-appraisal and he appraise appraisal result through discussion and intersect three experts being shown to outside second group of experts database first member non-, above-mentioned two groups of scorings are carried out second time scoring；
Step S61 supplements according to and replys: the expert of self-appraisal people and first time scoring according to the appraisal result of second group of expert, self-appraisal result and he comment result to carry out supplementing of foundation, and reply the problem that two groups of experts put forward in time；
Step S62 proposes to address inquires to: above-mentioned two groups of experts all can propose to address inquires to respectively, and the scope of inquiry is only limitted to the scope described in the scoring item listed by step S30；
Step S70 replies further: user carries out last discussion and demonstration according to inquiry proposed for step S62, uploads simultaneously and thinks more strong evidence；
Step S80 calculates score and forms report: after system gets rid of first group and second group of specialist crew at experts database, randomly draw three experts and form the 3rd group of expert group, 3rd group of expert group determines to accept and believe which two groups scorings according to the result of above-mentioned three scorings and the result of double plea, then accept and believe two groups of scorings are weighted average mark statistics, draw final appraisal result, after the process of three scorings and double plea being collected, form entry evaluation report simultaneously；
Step S90 reports publicity: the preliminary report formed by step S80, meets publicity automatically after the formal examination that system is arranged through system validation form and form；
Step S91 public participation is marked: during publicity, the public and relevant benefit mode are marked by system, feeding back related opinions, when the suggestion of public's feedback has excess syndrome to prove above-mentioned assessment existing problems, system will carry out reply again after return step S50 intersection scoring and evaluates simultaneously；
Step S100 forms Final Report also to be put on record: after step is fully completed, forms final report and puts on record, issue simultaneously the appraisal report of final version, self-appraisal, twice it comment result and the expert info of all participations scoring.
Wherein, scoring item described in step S30 includes intellectual property attribute and Content about Intellectual Property two parts, and wherein intellectual property attribute includes the applying date and priority date, mandate day, intellectual property state, intellectual property inventor, intellectual property type, intellectual property power stability proof and intellectual property claim quantity；The applying date and priority date evaluation index are the intellectual property power protection residue time limit；Mandate day evaluation index is the prospect that intellectual property converts；Whether intellectual property state evaluation index was for there is transfer, and effectiveness is inferred；Intellectual property inventor's evaluation index is the technical ability of inventor, educational background and technical background, and direction of assessment is the technology maturity that intellectual property is implemented；Intellectual property type refers to one or more combinations of product type and system type；Intellectual property power stability proves to refer to that the relevant authority that State Intellectual Property Office provides proves and intellectual property claim quantity refers to the item number of main claim and the quantity of appurtenance item.
Wherein, the Content about Intellectual Property of the scoring item described in step S30 includes following content: the relation of intellectual property field, intellectual property power layout, intellectual property description and intellectual property power and product；Wherein intellectual property field is estimated from field temperature and field city capacity two aspect；Intellectual property power layout describes integrity degree, the rationally distributed degree of right, length rationality and artificial division situation four aspect from technical characteristic and is estimated；Intellectual property description is estimated from length rationality and open rationality two aspect；Degree of dependence two aspect of intellectual property is estimated by the relation of intellectual property power and product from accounting size in the product and product.
Wherein, the ratio of the standards of grading described in step S30 is as follows:
Intellectual property attribute accounts for 30%, and Content about Intellectual Property accounts for 70%；Wherein each parameter accounting of intellectual property attribute such as under:
Applying date attribute, to calculate effect duration length point third gear, total accounting is 3%, and effect duration is more long, and score accounting is more high；
Authorizing day attribute: the golden period converted with calculation knowledge property right, total accounting is 3%, wherein authorizes to have counted day in 3 years and counts 3%, 4 to six years meters 2%, and 7 to nine years meters 1% are not scored for more than 10 years；
Intellectual property law state: to speculate the reliability and stability that intellectual property is weighed, total accounting is 3%, has authorized and has not externally implemented license, meter 3%, has authorized but has had and externally implement license, counted 2%, intellectual property discloses and enters substantive examination state meter 1%, and other state is not scored；
Intellectual property inventor: speculate technology maturity, total accounting 3%, be divided into third gear, one grade of meter 1%, two grades of meters 2%, third gear meter 3%, evaluate score class according to the following information summary of inventor:
The intellectual property application quantity of inventor's same domain, especially intellectual property application quantity；The relevant of the intellectual property that inventor applied in 3 years；The intellectual property quantity of inventor this area application accounts for the ratio of the application quantity in total field；The academic title of intellectual property, technical qualification and educational background；The length of service of the length of service of inventor, especially this area；The taking social part-time job of inventor and the position of place enterprise, part-time quantity is more many, and position is more high, grades more low；
Intellectual property type: total accounting is 3%, wherein a kind of meter 2% of product type type and system type, two kinds or two or more combinations, count 3%；
Intellectual property power stability proves: total accounting example is 3%, a kind of meter 1% of product test report, appraisal of scientific and technological achievements report and software copyright that the intellectual property appraisal report in front provided of State Intellectual Property Office, other department send out is provided, two kinds of meters 2%, three kinds or above meter 3%;
Intellectual property power situation: account for the 12% of toatl proportion, wherein independent claims quantity 8%, independent profit requires 1 meter 5%, two meters 6%, three or count 8% above；Appended claims quantity meter ratio is 4%, wherein 6 and count 4% above, often subtracts one item missing and reduces 1%.
Wherein, in the standards of grading described in step S30, the total accounting of Content about Intellectual Property this 70%, be specifically divided into following Score index:
Intellectual property field accounting 10%, the wherein total accounting 4% of field temperature, the total accounting 6% of field city capacity, marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
Intellectual property power content accounting is 30%, and wherein technical characteristic describes integrity degree accounting is 10%, the total accounting 10% of the rationally distributed degree of right, and length rationality accounting is 8%, and the artificial total accounting of division situation is 2%, and marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
The total accounting of intellectual property description is 10%, and wherein the total accounting of length rationality is 4%, and the open total accounting of rationality of description is 6%, and marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
The total accounting of relation of intellectual property power and product is 20%, wherein intellectual property accounts for the scale accounting of product is 10%, 10% is counted when the full content that intellectual property is product, intellectual property is only the parts not played a crucial role of product, or during one of them link of multiple production technology, meter 1%, comments the situation of 2% to 9% according to practical situation meter；The dependence total accounting of degree of dependence meter of intellectual property is 10% by product, and degree of dependence is more high, and meter accounting example is more high.
Wherein, before performing described step S20, also include performing step S101 user and carry out registration and log in.
Wherein, in step S91 public participation scoring, when all stability failing per capita to provide excess syndrome to affect intellectual property power to prove its viewpoint and reliability, system will count in overall score with the proportion weighted of total accounting 5% in effectively scoring, and by the process record of public participation and arrange formation report, with self-appraisal, two-wheeled he comment, and reply overall process whole process record, be collectively forming final assessment report.
Wherein, step S100 forms Final Report and puts on record, and also including system can provide papery to report, and the reliable papery report with two-dimension code anti-counterfeit code real-time query.
A kind of system of intellectual property value assessment, it includes following structure:
Intellectual property power stability demonstration management module, intellectual property right management module to be evaluated, intellectual property are marked and are arranged module, self-appraisal manages module, he comments management module, crowd to comment management module, reply communication management module, experts database, Reports Administration module and publicity to manage module；Wherein intellectual property right management module to be evaluated includes intellectual property basic information management submodule to be evaluated and intellectual property attachment management program to be evaluated；Intellectual property scoring arranges module and includes intellectual property scoring item and arrange management submodule and intellectual property code of points program；Self-appraisal management module includes self-appraisal management program and self-appraisal attachment management program；He comment management module include first time he comment management submodule and second time he comment management submodule；Crowd comments management module to include crowd's scoring ballot management submodule and crowd comments evidence management submodule；Reply communication management module includes addressing inquires to management submodule, replying management submodule and evidence management submodule；Experts database includes expert's basic information management module and expert's drawing manager；Reports Administration module includes scoring statistical procedure and report generation and management submodule；Publicity management module includes publicity management submodule and publicity time reckoning program；Intellectual property power stability demonstration management module includes intellectual property power stability discussion and paradox management submodule and intellectual property power stability demonstration management submodule；Wherein, intellectual property power stability demonstration management module is the preposition module of native system, this module prove result decide whether to arrange with intellectual property scoring module, self-appraisal management module, he comment management module, crowd to comment one or more module of management module, reply communication management module, experts database, Reports Administration module and publicity management module to be connected.
Wherein, the intellectual property scoring scoring item arranged described in module includes intellectual property attribute and Content about Intellectual Property two parts, and wherein intellectual property attribute includes the applying date and priority date, mandate day, intellectual property state, intellectual property inventor, intellectual property type, intellectual property power stability proof and intellectual property claim quantity；The applying date and priority date evaluation index are the intellectual property power protection residue time limit；Mandate day evaluation index is the prospect that intellectual property converts；Whether intellectual property state evaluation index was for there is transfer, and effectiveness is inferred；Intellectual property inventor's evaluation index is the technical ability of inventor, educational background and technical background, and direction of assessment is the technology maturity that intellectual property is implemented；Intellectual property type refers to one or more combinations of product type and system type；Intellectual property power stability proves to refer to that the relevant authority that State Intellectual Property Office provides proves and intellectual property claim quantity refers to the item number of main claim and the quantity of appurtenance item.
Wherein, intellectual property scoring arranges the Content about Intellectual Property of scoring item described in module and includes following content: the relation of intellectual property field, intellectual property power layout, intellectual property description and intellectual property power and product；Wherein intellectual property field is estimated from field temperature and field city capacity two aspect；Intellectual property power layout describes integrity degree, the rationally distributed degree of right, length rationality and artificial division situation four aspect from technical characteristic and is estimated；Intellectual property description is estimated from length rationality and open rationality two aspect；Degree of dependence two aspect of intellectual property is estimated by the relation of intellectual property power and product from accounting size in the product and product.
Wherein, the intellectual property code of points program default setting code of points ratio that intellectual property scoring is arranged described in module is as follows:
Intellectual property attribute accounts for 30%, and Content about Intellectual Property accounts for 70%；Wherein each parameter accounting of intellectual property attribute such as under:
Applying date attribute, to calculate effect duration length point third gear, total accounting is 3%, and effect duration is more long, and score accounting is more high；
Authorizing day attribute: the golden period converted with calculation knowledge property right, total accounting is 3%, wherein authorizes to have counted day in 3 years and counts 3%, 4 to six years meters 2%, and 7 to nine years meters 1% are not scored for more than 10 years；
Intellectual property law state: to speculate the reliability and stability that intellectual property is weighed, total accounting is 3%, has authorized and has not externally implemented license, meter 3%, has authorized but has had and externally implement license, counted 2%, intellectual property discloses and enters substantive examination state meter 1%, and other state is not scored；
Intellectual property inventor: speculate technology maturity, total accounting 3%, be divided into third gear, one grade of meter 1%, two grades of meters 2%, third gear meter 3%, evaluate score class according to the following information summary of inventor:
The intellectual property application quantity of inventor's same domain, especially intellectual property application quantity；The relevant of the intellectual property that inventor applied in 3 years；The intellectual property quantity of inventor this area application accounts for the ratio of the application quantity in total field；The academic title of intellectual property, technical qualification and educational background；The length of service of the length of service of inventor, especially this area；The taking social part-time job of inventor and the position of place enterprise, part-time quantity is more many, and position is more high, grades more low；
Intellectual property type: total accounting is 3%, wherein a kind of meter 2% of product type and system type, two kinds or two or more combinations, count 3%；
Intellectual property power stability proves: total accounting example is 3%, a kind of meter 1% of product test report, appraisal of scientific and technological achievements report and software copyright that the intellectual property appraisal report in front provided of State Intellectual Property Office, other department send out is provided, two kinds of meters 2%, three kinds or above meter 3%;
Intellectual property power situation: account for the 12% of toatl proportion, wherein independent claims quantity 8%, independent profit requires 1 meter 5%, two meters 6%, three or count 8% above；Appended claims quantity meter ratio is 4%, wherein 6 and count 4% above, often subtracts one item missing and reduces 1%；
The total accounting of Content about Intellectual Property is 70%, is specifically divided into following Score index:
Intellectual property field accounting 10%, the wherein total accounting 4% of field temperature, the total accounting 6% of field city capacity, marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
Intellectual property power content accounting is 30%, and wherein technical characteristic describes integrity degree accounting is 10%, the total accounting 10% of the rationally distributed degree of right, and length rationality accounting is 8%, and the artificial total accounting of division situation is 2%, and marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
The total accounting of intellectual property description is 10%, and wherein the total accounting of length rationality is 4%, and the open total accounting of rationality of description is 6%, and marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
The total accounting of relation of intellectual property power and product is 20%, wherein intellectual property accounts for the scale accounting of product is 10%, 10% is counted when the full content that intellectual property is product, intellectual property is only the parts not played a crucial role of product, or during one of them link of multiple production technology, meter 1%, comments the situation of 2% to 9% according to practical situation meter；The dependence total accounting of degree of dependence meter of intellectual property is 10% by product, and degree of dependence is more high, and meter accounting example is more high.
Wherein, intellectual property right management module to be evaluated, also include intellectual property evaluation user and manage submodule.
Wherein, crowd comments in management module, when all stability failing per capita to provide excess syndrome to affect intellectual property power to prove its viewpoint and reliability, crowd's scoring ballot management submodule will count in overall score with the proportion weighted of total accounting 5% in effectively scoring, and by the process record of public participation and arrange formation report, with self-appraisal, two-wheeled he comment, and reply overall process whole process record, be collectively forming final assessment report.
Wherein, Reports Administration module forms Final Report and puts on record, and also including system can provide papery to report, and the reliable papery report with two-dimension code anti-counterfeit code real-time query.
Wherein, scoring statistical procedure is addressed inquires to according to twice self-appraisal, two groups of experts, the chain of evidence of double plea and whole process determines to accept and believe which twice scoring, then the result of twice scoring is averaged and gets the A that finally marks, in the presence of all after scoring terminates, obtaining outstanding scoring B, program will be calculated as follows the comprehensive grading C of Final Report:
C=95%*A+5%*B。
Wherein, the operation principle of expert's drawing manager is as follows:
First time is randomly drawed three experts and forms first group of expert group, first group of panel member carries out randomly drawing of second group of panel member after marking and proposing inquiry, and decimation rule is as follows: experts database member carries out randomly drawing three experts and forms second group of expert group after removing three members of first group of expert group；The producing method of the 3rd group of panel member is to randomly draw three expert's compositions after removing first group of panel member and second group of panel member；The random weight that expert extracts is that 1-disregards the member of total score average mark and draws divided by 10, and Weight of Expert scoring is annual accumulative, resets after 3 years to 5 years.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1, the overview flow chart of the method for a kind of intellectual property value assessment.
Fig. 2, the overall construction drawing of the system of a kind of intellectual property value assessment.
Detailed description of the invention
The overview flow chart of the method for a kind of intellectual property value assessment as shown in Figure 1, the method for a kind of intellectual property value assessment, it comprises the steps:
Intellectual property information to be assessed for step S10 prepares: user prepares to need to submit the intellectual property number of intellectual property of assessment, intellectual property title, the intellectual property applying date, intellectual property publication date, intellectual property mandate day, intellectual property law status information, intellectual property inventor, intellectual property applicant, intellectual property power situation and intellectual property power stability data to；
Step S20 essential information typing: user is by above-mentioned ready intellectual property information correspondence input system；
Step S21 uploads intellectual property appraisal report: user uploads intellectual property appraisal report, the retrieval report of intellectual property creativeness, court decision document and the relevant testimonial material provided by State Intellectual Property Office, and material is proved or quotes as proof；
The intellectual property power estimation of stability of step S22 intellectual property: system is randomly drawed three experts of intellectual property workflow management class and formed intellectual property power stability and prove expert group, the intellectual property appraisal report that step S21 is uploaded carries out manual evaluation, and draws preliminary demonstration conclusion；
Step S23 publicity also accepts public's inquiry: the suggestion of the public is openly collected in the conclusion report of proving formed by step S22, accept the public to address inquires to, reply that the expert group being simultaneously made up of step S22 carries out addressing inquires to, collect and process, when proposing the stability of intellectual property power that reliable voucher can have influence on this intellectual property, return step S21 and discussed with further continuing with the adminicle of property by applicant；
Step S24 forms the report of final stability: through above-mentioned in steps after, and when the public in step S23 remains without the qualitative opinion of the stability that the intellectual property proposing to have influence on this intellectual property is weighed after publicity expires, generate final stability report, announce；When intellectual property power qualitative for stablize time, perform each flow process after step S30, otherwise then no longer execution step S30 and follow-up flow process, the value assessment of this intellectual property terminates, and evaluated value does valueless process, and announces；
Step S30 shows scoring item and standard: intellectual property value scoring item set by system demonstration native system and the standards of grading of correspondence；
Step S41 self-appraisal: user's scoring item according to step S30 and standards of grading carry out self-appraisal, and each item rating content being felt, the score value that the intellectual property of oneself is worth carries out self evaluation；
Step S42 he comment: system is randomly drawed first three experts in experts database and is carried out contrast scoring item described in step S30 and standard is marked respectively, and then system calculates average mark respectively according to each item rating, adds up the average mark of final score simultaneously；
Step S50 intersects scoring: after completing step S41 and step S42, system by self-appraisal and he appraise appraisal result through discussion and intersect three experts being shown to outside second group of experts database first member non-, above-mentioned two groups of scorings are carried out second time scoring；
Step S61 supplements according to and replys: the expert of self-appraisal people and first time scoring according to the appraisal result of second group of expert, self-appraisal result and he comment result to carry out supplementing of foundation, and reply the problem that two groups of experts put forward in time；
Step S62 proposes to address inquires to: above-mentioned two groups of experts all can propose to address inquires to respectively, and the scope of inquiry is only limitted to the scope described in the scoring item listed by step S30；
Step S70 replies further: user carries out last discussion and demonstration according to inquiry proposed for step S62, uploads simultaneously and thinks more strong evidence；
Step S80 calculates score and forms report: after system gets rid of first group and second group of specialist crew at experts database, randomly draw three experts and form the 3rd group of expert group, 3rd group of expert group determines to accept and believe which two groups scorings according to the result of above-mentioned three scorings and the result of double plea, then accept and believe two groups of scorings are weighted average mark statistics, draw final appraisal result, after the process of three scorings and double plea being collected, form entry evaluation report simultaneously；
Step S90 reports publicity: the preliminary report formed by step S80, meets publicity automatically after the formal examination that system is arranged through system validation form and form；
Step S91 public participation is marked: during publicity, the public and relevant benefit mode are marked by system, feeding back related opinions, when the suggestion of public's feedback has excess syndrome to prove above-mentioned assessment existing problems, system will carry out reply again after return step S50 intersection scoring and evaluates simultaneously；
Step S100 forms Final Report also to be put on record: after step is fully completed, forms final report and puts on record, issue simultaneously the appraisal report of final version, self-appraisal, twice it comment result and the expert info of all participations scoring.
Wherein, scoring item described in the rapid S30 of step includes intellectual property attribute and Content about Intellectual Property two parts, and wherein intellectual property attribute includes the applying date and priority date, mandate day, intellectual property state, intellectual property inventor, intellectual property type, intellectual property power stability proof and intellectual property claim quantity；The applying date and priority date evaluation index are the intellectual property power protection residue time limit；Mandate day evaluation index is the prospect that intellectual property converts；Whether intellectual property state evaluation index was for there is transfer, and effectiveness is inferred；Intellectual property inventor's evaluation index is the technical ability of inventor, educational background and technical background, and direction of assessment is the technology maturity that intellectual property is implemented；Intellectual property type refers to one or more combinations of product type and system type；Intellectual property power stability proves to refer to that the relevant authority that State Intellectual Property Office provides proves and intellectual property claim quantity refers to the item number of main claim and the quantity of appurtenance item.
Wherein, the Content about Intellectual Property of the scoring item described in step S30 includes following content: the relation of intellectual property field, intellectual property power layout, intellectual property description and intellectual property power and product；Wherein intellectual property field is estimated from field temperature and field city capacity two aspect；Intellectual property power layout describes integrity degree, the rationally distributed degree of right, length rationality and artificial division situation four aspect from technical characteristic and is estimated；Intellectual property description is estimated from length rationality and open rationality two aspect；Degree of dependence two aspect of intellectual property is estimated by the relation of intellectual property power and product from accounting size in the product and product.
Wherein, the ratio of the standards of grading described in step S30 is as follows:
Total score is 100 points, and wherein intellectual property attribute accounts for 30 points, and Content about Intellectual Property accounts for 70 points.Wherein each parameter accounting of intellectual property attribute such as under:
Applying date attribute, to calculate effect duration length point third gear, total accounting is 3 points, and effect duration is more long, and score accounting is more high；
Authorizing day attribute: the golden period converted with calculation knowledge property right, total accounting is 3 points, wherein authorizes to have counted day in 3 years and counts 3 points, within 4 to six years, count 2 points, within 7 to nine years, counts 1 point, within more than 10 years, do not score；
Intellectual property law state: to speculate the reliability and stability that intellectual property is weighed, total accounting is 3 points, has authorized and has not externally implemented license, count 3 points, authorized but had and externally implement license, counted 2 points, intellectual property discloses and enters substantive examination state meter 1 point, and other state is not scored；
Intellectual property inventor: speculate technology maturity, total accounting 3 points, be divided into third gear, counts 1 point for one grade, counts 2 points for two grades, and third gear meter 3 points evaluates score class according to the following information summary of inventor:
The intellectual property application quantity of inventor's same domain, especially intellectual property application quantity；The relevant of the intellectual property that inventor applied in 3 years；The intellectual property quantity of inventor this area application accounts for the ratio of the application quantity in total field；The academic title of intellectual property, technical qualification and educational background；The length of service of the length of service of inventor, especially this area；The taking social part-time job of inventor and the position of place enterprise, part-time quantity is more many, and position is more high, grades more low；
Intellectual property type: total accounting is 3 points, wherein a kind of meter 2 points of product type and system type, two kinds or two or more combinations, count 3 points；
Intellectual property power stability proves: total accounting example is 3 points, a kind of meter 1 point of product test report, appraisal of scientific and technological achievements report and software copyright that the intellectual property appraisal report in front provided of State Intellectual Property Office, other department send out is provided, count 2 points for two kinds, three kinds or above meter 3 points;
Intellectual property power situation: account for 12 points of toatl proportion, wherein independent claims quantity 8 points, independent profit requires that 1 is counted 5 points, counts 6 points for two, three or above meter 8 points；Appended claims quantity meter ratio is 4 points, wherein 6 and above meter 4 points, often subtracts one item missing and reduces 1 point.
The total accounting of Content about Intellectual Property these 70 points, is specifically divided into following Score index:
Intellectual property field accounting 10 points, the wherein total accounting of field temperature 4 points, the total accounting of field city capacity 6 points, marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
Intellectual property power content accounting is 30 points, and wherein technical characteristic describes integrity degree accounting is 10 points, the total accounting of the rationally distributed degree of right 10 points, and length rationality accounting is 8 points, and the artificial total accounting of division situation is 2 points, and marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
The total accounting of intellectual property description is 10 points, and wherein the total accounting of length rationality is 4 points, and the open total accounting of rationality of description is 6 points, and marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
The total accounting of relation of intellectual property power and product is 20 points, wherein intellectual property accounts for the scale accounting of product is 10 points, 10 points are counted when the full content that intellectual property is product, intellectual property is only the parts not played a crucial role of product, or during one of them link of multiple production technology, count 1 point, comment the situation of 2 points to 9 points according to practical situation meter；The dependence total accounting of degree of dependence meter of intellectual property is 10 points by product, and degree of dependence is more high, and meter accounting example is more high.
Wherein, before performing described step S20, also include performing step S101 user and carry out registration and log in.
Wherein, in step S91 public participation scoring, when all stability failing per capita to provide excess syndrome to affect intellectual property power to prove its viewpoint and reliability, system will count in overall score with the proportion weighted of total accounting 5 points in effectively scoring, and by the process record of public participation and arrange formation report, with self-appraisal, two-wheeled he comment, and reply overall process whole process record, be collectively forming final assessment report.
Wherein, step S100 forms Final Report and puts on record, and also including system can provide papery to report, and the reliable papery report with two-dimension code anti-counterfeit code real-time query.
Such as Fig. 2, the system of a kind of intellectual property value assessment, it includes following structure:
Intellectual property power stability demonstration management module, intellectual property right management module to be evaluated, intellectual property are marked and are arranged module, self-appraisal manages module, he comments management module, crowd to comment management module, reply communication management module, experts database, Reports Administration module and publicity to manage module；Wherein intellectual property right management module to be evaluated includes intellectual property basic information management submodule to be evaluated and intellectual property attachment management program to be evaluated；Intellectual property scoring arranges module and includes intellectual property scoring item and arrange management submodule and intellectual property code of points program；Self-appraisal management module includes self-appraisal management program and self-appraisal attachment management program；He comment management module include first time he comment management submodule and second time he comment management submodule；Crowd comments management module to include crowd's scoring ballot management submodule and crowd comments evidence management submodule；Reply communication management module includes addressing inquires to management submodule, replying management submodule and evidence management submodule；Experts database includes expert's basic information management module and expert's drawing manager；Reports Administration module includes scoring statistical procedure and report generation and management submodule；Publicity management module includes publicity management submodule and publicity time reckoning program；Intellectual property power stability demonstration management module includes intellectual property power stability discussion and paradox management submodule and intellectual property power stability demonstration management submodule；Wherein, intellectual property power stability demonstration management module is the preposition module of native system, this module prove result decide whether to arrange with intellectual property scoring module, self-appraisal management module, he comment management module, crowd to comment one or more module of management module, reply communication management module, experts database, Reports Administration module and publicity management module to be connected.
Wherein, the intellectual property scoring scoring item arranged described in module includes intellectual property attribute and Content about Intellectual Property two parts, and wherein intellectual property attribute includes the applying date and priority date, mandate day, intellectual property state, intellectual property inventor, intellectual property type, intellectual property power stability proof and intellectual property claim quantity；The applying date and priority date evaluation index are the intellectual property power protection residue time limit；Mandate day evaluation index is the prospect that intellectual property converts；Whether intellectual property state evaluation index was for there is transfer, and effectiveness is inferred；Intellectual property inventor's evaluation index is the technical ability of inventor, educational background and technical background, and direction of assessment is the technology maturity that intellectual property is implemented；Intellectual property type refers to one or more combinations of product type and system type；Intellectual property power stability proves to refer to that the relevant authority that State Intellectual Property Office provides proves and intellectual property claim quantity refers to the item number of main claim and the quantity of appurtenance item.
Wherein, intellectual property scoring arranges the Content about Intellectual Property of scoring item described in module and includes following content: the relation of intellectual property field, intellectual property power layout, intellectual property description and intellectual property power and product；Wherein intellectual property field is estimated from field temperature and field city capacity two aspect；Intellectual property power layout describes integrity degree, the rationally distributed degree of right, length rationality and artificial division situation four aspect from technical characteristic and is estimated；Intellectual property description is estimated from length rationality and open rationality two aspect；Degree of dependence two aspect of intellectual property is estimated by the relation of intellectual property power and product from accounting size in the product and product.
Wherein, the intellectual property code of points program default setting code of points ratio that intellectual property scoring is arranged described in module is as follows:
Intellectual property attribute accounts for 30%, and Content about Intellectual Property accounts for 70%；Wherein each parameter accounting of intellectual property attribute such as under:
Applying date attribute, to calculate effect duration length point third gear, total accounting is 3%, and effect duration is more long, and score accounting is more high；
Authorizing day attribute: the golden period converted with calculation knowledge property right, total accounting is 3%, wherein authorizes to have counted day in 3 years and counts 3%, 4 to six years meters 2%, and 7 to nine years meters 1% are not scored for more than 10 years；
Intellectual property law state: to speculate the reliability and stability that intellectual property is weighed, total accounting is 3%, has authorized and has not externally implemented license, meter 3%, has authorized but has had and externally implement license, counted 2%, intellectual property discloses and enters substantive examination state meter 1%, and other state is not scored；
Intellectual property inventor: speculate technology maturity, total accounting 3%, be divided into third gear, one grade of meter 1%, two grades of meters 2%, third gear meter 3%, evaluate score class according to the following information summary of inventor:
The intellectual property application quantity of inventor's same domain, especially intellectual property application quantity；The relevant of the intellectual property that inventor applied in 3 years；The intellectual property quantity of inventor this area application accounts for the ratio of the application quantity in total field；The academic title of intellectual property, technical qualification and educational background；The length of service of the length of service of inventor, especially this area；The taking social part-time job of inventor and the position of place enterprise, part-time quantity is more many, and position is more high, grades more low；
Intellectual property type: total accounting is 3%, wherein a kind of meter 2% of product type and system type, two kinds or two or more combinations, count 3%；
Intellectual property power stability proves: total accounting example is 3%, a kind of meter 1% of product test report, appraisal of scientific and technological achievements report and software copyright that the intellectual property appraisal report in front provided of State Intellectual Property Office, other department send out is provided, two kinds of meters 2%, three kinds or above meter 3%;
Intellectual property power situation: account for the 12% of toatl proportion, wherein independent claims quantity 8%, independent profit requires 1 meter 5%, two meters 6%, three or count 8% above；Appended claims quantity meter ratio is 4%, wherein 6 and count 4% above, often subtracts one item missing and reduces 1%；
The total accounting of Content about Intellectual Property is 70%, is specifically divided into following Score index:
Intellectual property field accounting 10%, the wherein total accounting 4% of field temperature, the total accounting 6% of field city capacity, marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
Intellectual property power content accounting is 30%, and wherein technical characteristic describes integrity degree accounting is 10%, the total accounting 10% of the rationally distributed degree of right, and length rationality accounting is 8%, and the artificial total accounting of division situation is 2%, and marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
The total accounting of intellectual property description is 10%, and wherein the total accounting of length rationality is 4%, and the open total accounting of rationality of description is 6%, and marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
The total accounting of relation of intellectual property power and product is 20%, wherein intellectual property accounts for the scale accounting of product is 10%, 10% is counted when the full content that intellectual property is product, intellectual property is only the parts not played a crucial role of product, or during one of them link of multiple production technology, meter 1%, comments the situation of 2% to 9% according to practical situation meter；The dependence total accounting of degree of dependence meter of intellectual property is 10% by product, and degree of dependence is more high, and meter accounting example is more high.
Wherein, intellectual property right management module to be evaluated, also include intellectual property evaluation user and manage submodule.
Wherein, crowd comments in management module, when all stability failing per capita to provide excess syndrome to affect intellectual property power to prove its viewpoint and reliability, crowd's scoring ballot management submodule will count in overall score with the proportion weighted of total accounting 5% in effectively scoring, and by the process record of public participation and arrange formation report, with self-appraisal, two-wheeled he comment, and reply overall process whole process record, be collectively forming final assessment report.
Wherein, Reports Administration module forms Final Report and puts on record, and also including system can provide papery to report, and the reliable papery report with two-dimension code anti-counterfeit code real-time query.
Wherein, scoring statistical procedure is addressed inquires to according to twice self-appraisal, two groups of experts, the chain of evidence of double plea and whole process determines to accept and believe which twice scoring, then the result of twice scoring is averaged and gets the A that finally marks, in the presence of all after scoring terminates, obtaining outstanding scoring B, program will be calculated as follows the comprehensive grading C of Final Report:
C=95%*A+5%*B。
Wherein, the operation principle of expert's drawing manager is as follows:
First time is randomly drawed three experts and forms first group of expert group, first group of panel member carries out randomly drawing of second group of panel member after marking and proposing inquiry, and decimation rule is as follows: experts database member carries out randomly drawing three experts and forms second group of expert group after removing three members of first group of expert group；The producing method of the 3rd group of panel member is to randomly draw three expert's compositions after removing first group of panel member and second group of panel member；The random weight that expert extracts is that 1-disregards the member of total score average mark and draws divided by 10, and Weight of Expert scoring is annual accumulative, resets after 3 years to 5 years.
Wherein, intellectual property power stability demonstration management module includes intellectual property power stability discussion and paradox management submodule and intellectual property power stability demonstration management submodule, wherein intellectual property power stability is discussed and paradox management submodule includes putting to the proof management program, reply communication management program and counterevidence management program, and intellectual property power stability demonstration management submodule includes evidence attachment management program and evidence and supplements, resolves and read-me.
Above-mentioned is only a kind of embodiment of this intellectual property, and except adopting except hundred-mark system, the present invention can also adopt thousand points of systems, very much the various ways such as system, it would however also be possible to employ variable amount of marking mode.
Claims (8)
1. the method for an intellectual property value assessment, it is characterised in that it comprises the steps:
Intellectual property information to be assessed for step S10 prepares: user prepares to need to submit the intellectual property number of intellectual property of assessment, intellectual property title, the intellectual property applying date, intellectual property publication date, intellectual property mandate day, intellectual property law status information, intellectual property inventor, intellectual property applicant, intellectual property situation and intellectual property stability data to；
Step S20 essential information typing: user is by above-mentioned ready intellectual property information correspondence input system；
Step S21 uploads intellectual property appraisal report: user uploads intellectual property appraisal report, the retrieval report of intellectual property creativeness, court decision document and the relevant testimonial material provided by State Intellectual Property Office, and material is proved or quotes as proof；
The intellectual property estimation of stability of step S22 intellectual property: system is randomly drawed three experts of intellectual property workflow management class and formed intellectual property stability and prove expert group, the intellectual property appraisal report that step S21 is uploaded carries out manual evaluation, and draws preliminary demonstration conclusion；
Step S23 publicity also accepts public's inquiry: the suggestion of the public is openly collected in the conclusion report of proving formed by step S22, accept the public to address inquires to, reply that the expert group being simultaneously made up of step S22 carries out addressing inquires to, collect and process, when proposing the stability of intellectual property that reliable voucher can have influence on this intellectual property, return step S21 and discussed with further continuing with the adminicle of property by applicant；
Step S24 forms the report of final stability: through above-mentioned in steps after, and when the public in step S23 remains without, after publicity expires, the qualitative opinion proposing to have influence on the stability of the intellectual property of this intellectual property, generate final stability report, announce；When intellectual property power qualitative for stablize time, perform each flow process after step S30, otherwise then no longer execution step S30 and follow-up flow process, the value assessment of this intellectual property terminates, and evaluated value does valueless process, and announces；
Step S30 shows scoring item and standard: intellectual property value scoring item set by system demonstration native system and the standards of grading of correspondence；
Step S41 self-appraisal: user's scoring item according to step S30 and standards of grading carry out self-appraisal, and each item rating content being felt, the score value that the intellectual property of oneself is worth carries out self evaluation；
Step S42 he comment: system is randomly drawed first three experts in experts database and is carried out contrast scoring item described in step S30 and standard is marked respectively, and then system calculates average mark respectively according to each item rating, adds up the average mark of final score simultaneously；
Step S50 intersects scoring: after completing step S41 and step S42, system by self-appraisal and he appraise appraisal result through discussion and intersect three experts being shown to outside second group of experts database first member non-, above-mentioned two groups of scorings are carried out second time scoring；
Step S61 supplements according to and replys: the expert of self-appraisal people and first time scoring according to the appraisal result of second group of expert, self-appraisal result and he comment result to carry out supplementing of foundation, and reply the problem that two groups of experts put forward in time；
Step S62 proposes to address inquires to: above-mentioned two groups of experts all can propose to address inquires to respectively, and the scope of inquiry is only limitted to the scope described in the scoring item listed by step S30；
Step S70 replies further: user carries out last discussion and demonstration according to inquiry proposed for step S62, uploads simultaneously and thinks more strong evidence；
Step S80 calculates score and forms report: after system gets rid of first group and second group of specialist crew at experts database, randomly draw three experts and form the 3rd group of expert group, 3rd group of expert group determines to accept and believe which two groups scorings according to the result of above-mentioned three scorings and the result of double plea, then accept and believe two groups of scorings are weighted average mark statistics, draw final appraisal result, after the process of three scorings and double plea being collected, form entry evaluation report simultaneously；
Step S90 reports publicity: the preliminary report formed by step S80, meets publicity automatically after the formal examination that system is arranged through system validation form and form；
Step S91 public participation is marked: during publicity, the public and relevant benefit mode are marked by system, feeding back related opinions, when the suggestion of public's feedback has excess syndrome to prove above-mentioned assessment existing problems, system will carry out reply again after return step S50 intersection scoring and evaluates simultaneously；
Step S100 forms Final Report also to be put on record: after step is fully completed, forms final report and puts on record, issue simultaneously the appraisal report of final version, self-appraisal, twice it comment result and the expert info of all participations scoring.
2. the method for a kind of intellectual property value according to claim 1 assessment, it is characterized in that, the described scoring item described in step S30 includes intellectual property attribute and Content about Intellectual Property two parts, and wherein intellectual property attribute includes the applying date and priority date, mandate day, intellectual property state, intellectual property inventor, intellectual property type, intellectual property stability proof and intellectual property item quantity；The applying date and priority date evaluation index are the intellectual property protection residue time limit；Mandate day evaluation index is the prospect that intellectual property converts；Whether intellectual property state evaluation index was for there is transfer, and effectiveness is inferred；Intellectual property inventor's evaluation index is the technical ability of inventor, educational background and technical background, and direction of assessment is the technology maturity that intellectual property is implemented；Intellectual property type refers to one or more combinations of product type and system type；Intellectual property stability proves to refer to that the relevant authority that State Intellectual Property Office provides proves and intellectual property item quantity refers to the item number of main claim and the quantity of appurtenance item.
3. the method for a kind of intellectual property value assessment according to claim 1 and claim 2, it is characterized in that, the Content about Intellectual Property of the described scoring item described in step S30 includes following content: the relation of intellectual property field, intellectual property layout, intellectual property description and intellectual property and product；Wherein intellectual property field is estimated from field temperature and field city capacity two aspect；Intellectual property layout describes integrity degree, the rationally distributed degree of right, length rationality and artificial division situation four aspect from technical characteristic and is estimated；Intellectual property description is estimated from length rationality and open rationality two aspect；Degree of dependence two aspect of intellectual property is estimated by the relation of intellectual property and product from accounting size in the product and product.
4. the method for a kind of intellectual property value assessment according to claim 1-3, it is characterised in that the ratio of the described standards of grading described in step S30 is as follows:
Intellectual property attribute accounts for 30%, and Content about Intellectual Property accounts for 70%；Wherein each parameter accounting of intellectual property attribute such as under:
Applying date attribute, to calculate effect duration length point third gear, total accounting is 3%, and effect duration is more long, and score accounting is more high；
Authorizing day attribute: the golden period converted with calculation knowledge property right, total accounting is 3%, wherein authorizes to have counted day in 3 years and counts 3%, 4 to six years meters 2%, and 7 to nine years meters 1% are not scored for more than 10 years；
Intellectual property law state: to speculate the reliability and stability of intellectual property, total accounting is 3%, has authorized and has not externally implemented license, meter 3%, has authorized but has had and externally implement license, counted 2%, intellectual property discloses and enters substantive examination state meter 1%, and other state is not scored；
Intellectual property inventor: speculate technology maturity, total accounting 3%, be divided into third gear, one grade of meter 1%, two grades of meters 2%, third gear meter 3%, evaluate score class according to the following information summary of inventor:
The intellectual property application quantity of inventor's same domain, especially intellectual property application quantity；The relevant of the intellectual property that inventor applied in 3 years；The intellectual property quantity of inventor this area application accounts for the ratio of the application quantity in total field；The academic title of intellectual property, technical qualification and educational background；The length of service of the length of service of inventor, especially this area；The taking social part-time job of inventor and the position of place enterprise, part-time quantity is more many, and position is more high, grades more low；
Intellectual property type: total accounting is 3%, wherein a kind of meter 2% two kind or the two or more combinations of product type and system type, counts 3%；
Intellectual property stability proves: total accounting example is 3%, a kind of meter 1% of product test report, appraisal of scientific and technological achievements report and software copyright that the intellectual property appraisal report in front provided of State Intellectual Property Office, other department send out is provided, two kinds of meters 2%, three kinds or above meter 3%;
Intellectual property situation: account for the 12% of toatl proportion, wherein independent claims quantity 8%, independent profit requires 1 meter 5%, two meters 6%, three or count 8% above；Appended claims quantity meter ratio is 4%, wherein 6 and count 4% above, often subtracts one item missing and reduces 1%.
5. according to claim 1-4 a kind of intellectual property value assessment method, it is characterised in that in the described standards of grading described in step S30, the total accounting of Content about Intellectual Property this 70%, be specifically divided into following Score index:
Intellectual property field accounting 10%, the wherein total accounting 4% of field temperature, the total accounting 6% of field city capacity, marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
Content about Intellectual Property accounting is 30%, and wherein technical characteristic describes integrity degree accounting is 10%, the total accounting 10% of the rationally distributed degree of right, and length rationality accounting is 8%, and the artificial total accounting of division situation is 2%, and marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
The total accounting of intellectual property description is 10%, and wherein the total accounting of length rationality is 4%, and the open total accounting of rationality of description is 6%, and marking mode is comprehensive scoring method；
The total accounting of relation of intellectual property and product is 20%, wherein intellectual property accounts for the scale accounting of product is 10%, 10% is counted when the full content that intellectual property is product, intellectual property is only the parts not played a crucial role of product, or during one of them link of multiple production technology, meter 1%, comments the situation of 2% to 9% according to practical situation meter；The dependence total accounting of degree of dependence meter of intellectual property is 10% by product, and degree of dependence is more high, and meter accounting example is more high.
6. the method for a kind of intellectual property value according to claim 1 assessment, it is characterised in that before performing described step S20, also includes performing step S101 user and carries out registration and log in.
7. the method for a kind of intellectual property value according to claim 1 assessment, it is characterized in that, in described step S91 public participation scoring, when all per capita fail provide excess syndrome to prove that its viewpoint affects stability and the reliability of intellectual property time, system will count in overall score with the proportion weighted of total accounting 5% in effectively scoring, and by the process record of public participation and arrange formation report, with self-appraisal, two-wheeled he comment, and reply overall process whole process record, it is collectively forming final assessment report.
8. the method for a kind of intellectual property value according to claim 1 assessment, it is characterized in that, described step S100 forms Final Report and puts on record, and also including system can provide papery to report, and the reliable papery report with two-dimension code anti-counterfeit code real-time query.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610074403.XA CN105741203A (en) | 2016-02-03 | 2016-02-03 | Intellectual property value evaluation method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610074403.XA CN105741203A (en) | 2016-02-03 | 2016-02-03 | Intellectual property value evaluation method |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN105741203A true CN105741203A (en) | 2016-07-06 |
Family
ID=56245750
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610074403.XA Pending CN105741203A (en) | 2016-02-03 | 2016-02-03 | Intellectual property value evaluation method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN105741203A (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106779580A (en) * | 2016-11-17 | 2017-05-31 | 中知厚德知识产权投资管理（天津）有限公司 | Multi-level intellectual property data system |
| CN107423266A (en) * | 2017-07-17 | 2017-12-01 | 韩继召 | Expertise management method applied to judicial expertise/forensic science mechanism |
| CN107767306A (en) * | 2017-11-09 | 2018-03-06 | 安徽律正科技信息服务有限公司 | A kind of Intellectual Property Right Protection System |
| WO2018161308A1 (en) * | 2017-03-09 | 2018-09-13 | 深圳市华第时代科技有限公司 | Automatic proposal review method and system |
-
2016
- 2016-02-03 CN CN201610074403.XA patent/CN105741203A/en active Pending
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106779580A (en) * | 2016-11-17 | 2017-05-31 | 中知厚德知识产权投资管理（天津）有限公司 | Multi-level intellectual property data system |
| WO2018161308A1 (en) * | 2017-03-09 | 2018-09-13 | 深圳市华第时代科技有限公司 | Automatic proposal review method and system |
| CN107423266A (en) * | 2017-07-17 | 2017-12-01 | 韩继召 | Expertise management method applied to judicial expertise/forensic science mechanism |
| CN107767306A (en) * | 2017-11-09 | 2018-03-06 | 安徽律正科技信息服务有限公司 | A kind of Intellectual Property Right Protection System |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Dumay et al. | Involuntary disclosure of intellectual capital: is it relevant? | |
| Zhao et al. | From voids to sophistication: Institutional environment and MNC CSR crisis in emerging markets | |
| Kim et al. | Barriers to applying value management in the Vietnamese construction industry | |
| Rostami et al. | Key risks in construction projects in Italy: contractors’ perspective | |
| CN105741203A (en) | Intellectual property value evaluation method | |
| CN105550830A (en) | Trademark value assessment system | |
| Al-Yahya et al. | Implementing e-tendering to improve the efficiency of public construction contract in Saudi Arabia | |
| Chan et al. | Preferred risk allocation in target cost contracts in construction | |
| Addison et al. | The determinants of performance appraisal systems: A note (do Brown and Heywood's results for Australia hold up for Britain?) | |
| CN105741202A (en) | Intellectual property value evaluation system | |
| CN105741041A (en) | Trademark value evaluation method | |
| Li Ang et al. | Is the social agenda driving sustainable property development in Melbourne, Australia? | |
| Hughes et al. | Assessing the “clerk of works” role in delivering quality affordable housing: a UK case study | |
| Arif et al. | Barriers and challenges for offsite construction in UK housing sector | |
| Ali et al. | Practitioner’s view of the success factors for software outsourcing partnership formation: an empirical exploration | |
| Overdevest et al. | Experimentalism in transnational forest governance: Implementing Eu Forest Law Enforcement Governance and Trade (FLEGT) voluntary partnership agreements in Indonesia and Ghana | |
| Galiano-Garrigos et al. | Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Design, Construction and Operations II | |
| CN105741207A (en) | Utility model patent value evaluation method | |
| CN105740987A (en) | Invention patent value evaluation method | |
| CN105741204A (en) | Software copyright value evaluation system | |
| CN105550953A (en) | Utility model patent value assessment system | |
| Marx | Construction industry indicators affecting contractors | |
| CN105741040A (en) | Appearance patent value evaluation system | |
| Leśniak | Reliability assessment of research into contractors’ bidding decisions | |
| CN105741205A (en) | Software copyright value evaluation method |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication | ||
| WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20160706 |