CN105701014A - Automatic testing method for railway signal computer interlocking system - Google Patents
Automatic testing method for railway signal computer interlocking system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN105701014A CN105701014A CN201610015132.0A CN201610015132A CN105701014A CN 105701014 A CN105701014 A CN 105701014A CN 201610015132 A CN201610015132 A CN 201610015132A CN 105701014 A CN105701014 A CN 105701014A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- test
- test cases
- title
- trackside equipment
- instruction
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
- G06F11/3684—Test management for test design, e.g. generating new test cases
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses an automatic testing method for a railway signal computer interlocking system. The method comprises the following steps: I, defining formats for scripts of test cases, wherein formats of XML files of the test cases adopt three-layer XML element structures; II, automatically generating all test cases: defining functions be finished by the test cases, numbers of the test cases and devices to be tested through second-layer elements, and setting test commands of third-layer elements in conjunction with the devices to be tested and correlated devices to form test instructions, and sequencing the test instructions; and III, automatically running the test cases, and generating a test result statistics table. Through adoption of the automatic testing method, the testing execution time can be shortened effectively; the testing efficiency is increased; and testing labor force is saved.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to computer interlock system, particularly relate to the automated testing method of a kind of railway signal computer interlock system。
Background technology
Safety is that railway transportation produces eternal theme, and computer interlock system is the critical system ensureing railway station train and locomotive shunting safety, so it must be tested by safety for guarantee system fully。
The checking of existing interlocking service logic adopts the mode of manual test, the behavioral test of manual test can only perform by single, cannot replicate and record, and the result correctness tested is determined only by observation, when software regression testing, all of behavioral test before can only repeat again by hand, therefore manual test existence test is insufficient, the drawback such as testing efficiency is low and labor intensity is big, and automatic test can substitute manual operation, accomplish the standardization of test, sequencing and simplification, thus improving work efficiency, shorten test period, and the error that manual operation can be eliminated and cause。
For any automatization test system, without test cases, test all cannot be normally carried out, and the research of existing interlock system automatic test lays particular emphasis on building of automatic test platform more, as it is shown in figure 1, be the schematic diagram of existing interlock system test platform；Existing interlock system test platform includes human computer conversation's layer 1, interlocking operation layer 2, I/O module 3 and monitored object layer 4。Human computer conversation's layer 1 includes test machine 5, dispatcher's supervision system machine and train new style of auto-supervisory (ATS) 6 and management maintenance machine 7；Needing to install test software 8 in test machine 5, test software 8 includes test program, test case, test output and test result。Interlocking operation layer 2 includes the computer equipped with VxWorks system and the VxWorks CPU9 of multiple mutual Hot Spare；It is connected by EPA between human computer conversation's layer 1 and interlocking operation layer 2。It is connected by CAN between interlocking operation layer 2 and I/O module 3。Trackside equipment 4 generally comprises track switch, track circuit and semaphore etc.。When interlock system is tested, test machine 5 is responsible for operation simulation intendant 6 and relevant trackside equipment 4。Testing procedure is: the test program in testing results machine 5, load test case, by Ethernet, the operational order of trackside equipment 4 is sent to interlock system and VxWorks CPU9, after interlock logic has processed, by I/O module 3, the state of output data and trackside equipment 4 being returned to test machine 5, test machine 5 provides test result according to test output。
The automatization of test cases is generated shorter mention, interlock system needs each kind equipment is performed all standing test of test scene, as each track switch carried out the operation of fixed behaviour under various operation scene, anti-behaviour, if transferring to manually to complete test cases, then time and effort consuming and easily produce mistake。In existing most computer interlock system is tested, test cases mostly is the test scene adopting natural language description, the measurand (yard) being combined reality by tester in test process converts test cases to and carries out manual test, and the result of the only test stayed。Owing to test and recording process are all manually carry out, for whether test cases has omission, whether test process meets the requirement of test scene, and whether test result is credible, all would be likely to occur problem。Further, since manually test, its efficiency is also very low。
Summary of the invention
The technical problem to be solved is to provide the automated testing method of a kind of railway signal computer interlock system, can effectively shorten the test execution time, improves testing efficiency, saves test manpower。
For solving above-mentioned technical problem, the automated testing method of railway signal computer interlock system provided by the invention comprises the steps:
Step one, the script describing test cases being carried out form definition, adopt XML file as the script describing test cases, the form of the XML file of described test cases adopts three layers XML element structure。
Ground floor XML element is root element, by including described test cases in described ground floor XML element definition XML file。
The more than one independent described test cases of second layer element definition。
The a plurality of test command of third layer element definition。
Step 2, automatically generate all test cases according to the script format of test cases of step one definition。
When automatically generating each described test cases, by the function to be done of test cases described in described second layer element definition, number and be devices under。
In conjunction with the equipment being devices under and being devices under being associated, each described test command of described third layer element is configured each bar formed needed for described test cases test instruction and testing sequence required when testing instruction described in each bar according to test lined up。
Step 3, the automatically each described test cases of operation also generate test result statistical table。
Further improving is that described ground floor XML element is<TestCase>。
Further improving is that described second layer XML element is<Case>, and<case>includes more than one, and each<case>represents an independent test cases。
Further improving is that<case>has three attributes that can be configured, and is respectively as follows:
CaseName: for describing this case for testing which kind of function of interlock system；
CaseID: the numbering of test cases；
DeviceName: the title of equipment under test。
Further improving is that the test command of described third layer element includes:
<IOFeedBack>: for setting the feedback system of the Input value of trackside equipment；
<ATSCmd>: the operational order generated for setting operation person, including the instruction of the instruction of ATS and man-machine interface (HMI)；
<SendATSCmd>: for by passing through the instruction that<ATSCmd>generates, transmitting in order and perform to interlocking machine；
<ZCCmd>: the operational order generated for setting regions controller (ZC)；
<SendZCCmd>: for by passing through the instruction that<ZCCmd>generates, transmitting in order and perform to interlocking machine；
<Wait>: be used for arranging the waiting time；
<Init>: reinitialize instruction for sending to interlocking machine；
<Set>: for setting the input dotted state of trackside equipment；
<Submit>: for using being transmitted by the input state of<Set>instruction adjustment to interlocking machine；
<CheckATSimulator>: whether consistent with the state value that test cases sets for checking that interlocking machine is sent to the internal state information of ATS or HMI；
<CheckIOSimulator>: for checking that whether trackside equipment I/O point-like state value is consistent with the state value that test cases sets。
Further improving is that<IOFeedBack>sets the feedback system of the Input value of trackside equipment by attribute " Method ":
Method=" Auto ": each trackside equipment input value changes automatically according to the change of output value；
Method=" Manual ": the change of each trackside equipment output value will not bring the change of input value。
<Set>is configured by three attributes, is respectively as follows:
DeviceName: trackside equipment title；
RelayName: the input point title of trackside equipment；
The new state of RelayValue: trackside equipment input point。
Further improving is that<ATSCmd>is configured by two attributes, is respectively as follows:
The title of CmdName:ATS or HMI instruction, title is all predefined keyword；
DeviceName: the title of the trackside equipment that instruction is targeted。
<ZCCmd>is configured by two attributes, is respectively as follows:
The title of CmdName:ZC instruction, title is all predefined keyword；
DeviceName: the title of the trackside equipment that instruction is targeted。
Further improving is that<Set>is configured by three attributes, is respectively as follows:
DeviceName: trackside equipment title；
RelayName: the input point title of trackside equipment；
The new state of RelayValue: trackside equipment input point。
Further improving is that<CheckATSimulator>is configured by four attributes, is respectively as follows:
DeviceName: trackside equipment title；
AttributeName: device attribute title；
ExpectStatus: desired property value；
WaitMaxTime: the time waited before checking above-mentioned property value, unit millisecond。
<CheckIOSimulator>is configured by four attributes, is respectively as follows:
DeviceName: trackside equipment title；
RelayName:I/O point title；
ExpectStatus: desired I/O point value；
WaitMaxTime: the time waited before checking above-mentioned I/O point value, unit millisecond。
Further improve and be, step 2 adopts C# language realize automatically generating all test cases。
Step 3 adopt C# language realize automatically running each described test cases and generating test result statistical table。
The present invention defines especially by adopting the form of the XML file script to describing test cases, this XML file is carried out the definition of three layers XML element structure, definition and the actual equipment being devices under and being associated in conjunction with three layers XML element structure are capable of the mode by software design patterns and automatically derive and be devices under corresponding test cases, and can realize test automatically by the mode of software and generate test result statistical table；Test cases just can be completed relative to existing method requires over manual method, the present invention can realize automatically generating and can repeat and the correctness of test result being detected automatically of test cases, thus effectively shortening the test execution time, improve testing efficiency, save test manpower。
The present invention can obtain a class by a class testing case is summarized and be devices under corresponding test scene。
Accompanying drawing explanation
Below in conjunction with the drawings and specific embodiments, the present invention is further detailed explanation:
Fig. 1 is the schematic diagram of existing interlock system test platform；
Fig. 2 is the flow chart of embodiment of the present invention method。
Detailed description of the invention
As in figure 2 it is shown, be the flow chart of embodiment of the present invention method。The automated testing method of embodiment of the present invention railway signal computer interlock system comprises the steps:
Step one, the script describing test cases being carried out form definition, adopt XML file as the script describing test cases, the form of the XML file of described test cases adopts three layers XML element structure。
Ground floor XML element is root element, and this root element is<TestCase>, it was shown that this XML file contains test cases；
The more than one independent described test cases of second layer element definition。In the embodiment of the present invention, described second layer XML element is<Case>, and<case>includes more than one, and each<case>represents an independent test cases。<case>has three attributes that can be configured, and is respectively as follows:
CaseName: for describing this case for testing which kind of function of interlock system。
CaseID: the numbering of test cases。
DeviceName: the title of equipment under test。
The a plurality of test command of third layer element definition。The test command of described third layer element includes:
<IOFeedBack>: for setting the feedback system of the Input value of trackside equipment。
<ATSCmd>: the operational order generated for setting operation person, including the instruction of the instruction of ATS and HMI。
<SendATSCmd>: for by passing through the instruction that<ATSCmd>generates, transmitting in order and perform to interlocking machine。
<ZCCmd>: for setting the ZC operational order generated。
<SendZCCmd>: for by passing through the instruction that<ZCCmd>generates, transmitting in order and perform to interlocking machine。
<Wait>: be used for arranging the waiting time。
<Init>: reinitialize instruction for sending to interlocking machine。
<Set>: for setting the input dotted state of trackside equipment。
<Submit>: for using being transmitted by the input state of<Set>instruction adjustment to interlocking machine。
<CheckATSimulator>: whether consistent with the state value that test cases sets for checking that interlocking machine is sent to the internal state information of ATS or HMI。
<CheckIOSimulator>: for checking that whether trackside equipment I/O point-like state value is consistent with the state value that test cases sets。
Step 2, automatically generate all test cases according to the script format of test cases of step one definition。
When automatically generating each described test cases, by the function to be done of test cases described in described second layer element definition, number and be devices under。
In conjunction with the equipment being devices under and being devices under being associated, each described test command of described third layer element is configured each bar formed needed for described test cases test instruction and testing sequence required when testing instruction described in each bar according to test lined up。
In the embodiment of the present invention, C# language is adopted to realize automatically generating all test cases。
Step 3, the automatically each described test cases of operation also generate test result statistical table。In the embodiment of the present invention, C# language is adopted to realize automatically running each described test cases and generating test result statistical table。
In the embodiment of the present invention:
<IOFeedBack>sets the feedback system of the Input value of trackside equipment by attribute " Method ":
Method=" Auto ": each trackside equipment input value changes automatically according to the change of output value；
Method=" Manual ": the change of each trackside equipment output value will not bring the change of input value。
<Set>is configured by three attributes, is respectively as follows:
DeviceName: trackside equipment title；
RelayName: the input point title of trackside equipment；
The new state of RelayValue: trackside equipment input point。
<ATSCmd>is configured by two attributes, is respectively as follows:
The title of CmdName:ATS or HMI instruction, title is all predefined keyword；
DeviceName: the title of the trackside equipment that instruction is targeted。
<ZCCmd>is configured by two attributes, is respectively as follows:
The title of CmdName:ZC instruction, title is all predefined keyword；
DeviceName: the title of the trackside equipment that instruction is targeted。
<Set>is configured by three attributes, is respectively as follows:
DeviceName: trackside equipment title；
RelayName: the input point title of trackside equipment；
The new state of RelayValue: trackside equipment input point。
<Wait>is configured by an attribute:
KeepMaxTime: waiting time, unit millisecond。
<CheckATSimulator>is configured by four attributes, is respectively as follows:
DeviceName: trackside equipment title；
AttributeName: device attribute title；
ExpectStatus: desired property value；
WaitMaxTime: the time waited before checking above-mentioned property value, unit millisecond。
<CheckIOSimulator>is configured by four attributes, is respectively as follows:
DeviceName: trackside equipment title；
RelayName:I/O point title；
ExpectStatus: desired I/O point value；
WaitMaxTime: the time waited before checking above-mentioned I/O point value, unit millisecond。
In the embodiment of the present invention,<CheckATSimulator>and<CheckIOSimulator>two test instructions, for checking whether the result of test cases meets the requirement of test cases, other instruction is used for setting fault scenes and sending test command。
In the embodiment of the present invention, DeviceName is corresponding to the device name being devices under and being devices under being associated in concrete tested yard。
Hereinafter for what formed according to embodiment of the present invention method, there is the concrete test cases guiding route function:
<CaseCaseName=" after route Gong Neng guides Jin Lu receiving route fault, Ban Li train normally enters side XALA-S1LA in signal " CaseID=" AITT_47_01_08_001_001 " DeviceName=" XALA-S1LA ">
<Init/>
<WaitKeepMaxTime=" 1000 "/>
<IOFeedBackMethod=" Auto "/>
<ATSCmdCmdName=" SetTrainRoute " DeviceName=" XALA-S1LA "/>
<SendATSCmd/>
<CheckATSimulatorDeviceName=" XA " AttributeName=" Status " ExpectStatus=" DoubleYellow " WaitMaxTime=" 10000 "/>
<SetDeviceName=" XAJG " RelayName=" GJ " RelayValue=" Low "/>
<Submit/>
<WaitKeepMaxTime=" 1000 "/>
<SetDeviceName=" XAG " RelayName=" GJ " RelayValue=" Low "/>
<Submit/>
<CheckATSimulatorDeviceName=" XA " AttributeName=" Status " ExpectStatus=" Red " WaitMaxTime=" 3000 "/>
<WaitKeepMaxTime=" 1000 "/>
<ATSCmdCmdName=" SetCallonRoute " DeviceName=" XALA-S1LA "/>
<SendATSCmd/>
<CheckATSimulatorDeviceName=" XA " AttributeName=" Status " ExpectStatus=" CallOn " WaitMaxTime=" 3000 "/>
<SetDeviceName=" XAJG " RelayName=" GJ " RelayValue=" High "/>
<Submit/>
<WaitKeepMaxTime=" 1000 "/>
<SetDeviceName=" XAG " RelayName=" GJ " RelayValue=" High "/>
<Submit/>
<WaitKeepMaxTime=" 1000 "/>
<ATSCmdCmdName=" ManualReleaseRoute " DeviceName=" XALA-S1LA "/>
<SendATSCmd/>
<CheckATSimulatorDeviceName=" XA " AttributeName=" Status " ExpectStatus=" Red " WaitMaxTime=" 2000 "/>
<CheckATSimulatorDeviceName=" XAG " AttributeName=" BlockLocking " ExpectStatus=" Unlock " WaitMaxTime=" 210000 "/>
</Case>
Above-mentioned is the test cases that<Case>is corresponding, and a plurality of test command that third layer element is defined only need to be set in this test cases the instruction that just can obtain needed for test cases, and the process forming test cases can be automatically performed by software；DeviceName in test cases is carried out different settings and can obtain the test cases that in tested yard, other equipment under test is corresponding, the equipment of tested yard includes multiple, each equipment under test and associated device title can be automatically derived by the equipment matching list of tested yard, by carrying out mating the test cases of all equipment under tests being easy to automatically derive tested yard with the XML file of embodiment of the present invention method, reaching test cases coverage rate is 100%。And be sequentially carried out can automatically test according to test instruction when testing；In automatic testing process, owing to including<CheckATSimulator>and<CheckIOSimulator>these two test instructions, it is possible to realize whether automatic discriminating test passes through, then automatically generate the statistical report form of test result。
It addition, summarized by the test cases that more than a pair type is identical to obtain the test scene that a class is devices under, it is convenient to the formation of the test cases of more yard。
Above by specific embodiment, the present invention is described in detail, but these have not been construed as limiting the invention。Without departing from the principles of the present invention, those skilled in the art it may also be made that many deformation and improvement, and these also should be regarded as protection scope of the present invention。
Claims (10)
1. the automated testing method of a railway signal computer interlock system, it is characterised in that comprise the steps:
Step one, the script describing test cases being carried out form definition, adopt XML file as the script describing test cases, the form of the XML file of described test cases adopts three layers XML element structure；
Ground floor XML element is root element, by including described test cases in described ground floor XML element definition XML file；
The more than one independent described test cases of second layer element definition；
The a plurality of test command of third layer element definition；
Step 2, automatically generate all test cases according to the script format of test cases of step one definition；
When automatically generating each described test cases, by the function to be done of test cases described in described second layer element definition, number and be devices under；
In conjunction with the equipment being devices under and being devices under being associated, each described test command of described third layer element is configured each bar formed needed for described test cases test instruction and testing sequence required when testing instruction described in each bar according to test lined up；
Step 3, the automatically each described test cases of operation also generate test result statistical table。
2. the automated testing method of railway signal computer interlock system as claimed in claim 1, it is characterised in that: described ground floor XML element is<TestCase>。
3. the automated testing method of railway signal computer interlock system as claimed in claim 1, it is characterised in that: described second layer XML element is<Case>, and<case>includes more than one, and each<case>represents an independent test cases。
4. the automated testing method of railway signal computer interlock system as claimed in claim 3, it is characterised in that:<case>has three attributes that can be configured, and is respectively as follows:
CaseName: for describing this case for testing which kind of function of interlock system；
CaseID: the numbering of test cases；
DeviceName: the title of equipment under test。
5. the automated testing method of railway signal computer interlock system as claimed in claim 1, it is characterised in that: the test command of described third layer element includes:
<IOFeedBack>: for setting the feedback system of the Input value of trackside equipment；
<ATSCmd>: the operational order generated for setting operation person, including the instruction of the instruction of ATS and HMI；
<SendATSCmd>: for by passing through the instruction that<ATSCmd>generates, transmitting in order and perform to interlocking machine；
<ZCCmd>: for setting the ZC operational order generated；
<SendZCCmd>: for by passing through the instruction that<ZCCmd>generates, transmitting in order and perform to interlocking machine；
<Wait>: be used for arranging the waiting time；
<Init>: reinitialize instruction for sending to interlocking machine；
<Set>: for setting the input dotted state of trackside equipment；
<Submit>: for using being transmitted by the input state of<Set>instruction adjustment to interlocking machine；
<CheckATSimulator>: whether consistent with the state value that test cases sets for checking that interlocking machine is sent to the internal state information of ATS or HMI；
<CheckIOSimulator>: for checking that whether trackside equipment I/O point-like state value is consistent with the state value that test cases sets。
6. the automated testing method of railway signal computer interlock system as claimed in claim 5, it is characterised in that:<IOFeedBack>sets the feedback system of the Input value of trackside equipment by attribute " Method ":
Method=" Auto ": each trackside equipment input value changes automatically according to the change of output value；
Method=" Manual ": the change of each trackside equipment output value will not bring the change of input value；
<Set>is configured by three attributes, is respectively as follows:
DeviceName: trackside equipment title；
RelayName: the input point title of trackside equipment；
The new state of RelayValue: trackside equipment input point。
7. the automated testing method of railway signal computer interlock system as claimed in claim 5, it is characterised in that:
<ATSCmd>is configured by two attributes, is respectively as follows:
The title of CmdName:ATS or HMI instruction, title is all predefined keyword；
DeviceName: the title of the trackside equipment that instruction is targeted；
<ZCCmd>is configured by two attributes, is respectively as follows:
The title of CmdName:ZC instruction, title is all predefined keyword；
DeviceName: the title of the trackside equipment that instruction is targeted。
8. the automated testing method of railway signal computer interlock system as claimed in claim 5, it is characterised in that:
<Set>is configured by three attributes, is respectively as follows:
DeviceName: trackside equipment title；
RelayName: the input point title of trackside equipment；
The new state of RelayValue: trackside equipment input point。
9. the automated testing method of railway signal computer interlock system as claimed in claim 5, it is characterised in that:<CheckATSimulator>is configured by four attributes, is respectively as follows:
DeviceName: trackside equipment title；
AttributeName: device attribute title；
ExpectStatus: desired property value；
WaitMaxTime: the time waited before checking above-mentioned property value, unit millisecond；
<CheckIOSimulator>is configured by four attributes, is respectively as follows:
DeviceName: trackside equipment title；
RelayName:I/O point title；
ExpectStatus: desired I/O point value；
WaitMaxTime: the time waited before checking above-mentioned I/O point value, unit millisecond。
10. the automated testing method of railway signal computer interlock system as claimed in claim 1, it is characterised in that: step 2 adopt C# language realize automatically generating all test cases；
Step 3 adopt C# language realize automatically running each described test cases and generating test result statistical table。
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610015132.0A CN105701014A (en) | 2016-01-11 | 2016-01-11 | Automatic testing method for railway signal computer interlocking system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610015132.0A CN105701014A (en) | 2016-01-11 | 2016-01-11 | Automatic testing method for railway signal computer interlocking system |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN105701014A true CN105701014A (en) | 2016-06-22 |
Family
ID=56227169
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610015132.0A Pending CN105701014A (en) | 2016-01-11 | 2016-01-11 | Automatic testing method for railway signal computer interlocking system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN105701014A (en) |
Cited By (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108521350A (en) * | 2018-03-16 | 2018-09-11 | 重庆邮电大学 | A kind of industrial gateway equipment automatization test method driving script based on XML |
| CN109800156A (en) * | 2018-12-20 | 2019-05-24 | 交控科技股份有限公司 | A kind of subway signal system automation test method based on profile command |
| CN111016978A (en) * | 2019-12-26 | 2020-04-17 | 天津津航计算技术研究所 | Method for realizing regional controller equipment test based on GoogleTest test framework |
| CN111858220A (en) * | 2020-08-24 | 2020-10-30 | 天津铁路信号有限责任公司 | Test bench for testing ATS system and interlocking system interface information transmission |
| CN114545896A (en) * | 2022-01-20 | 2022-05-27 | 北京全路通信信号研究设计院集团有限公司 | Computer interlocking software automatic test architecture method and system |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102547820A (en) * | 2012-02-14 | 2012-07-04 | 北京泰乐德信息技术有限公司 | Data acquisition method and system for railway signal |
| CN103092755A (en) * | 2013-01-08 | 2013-05-08 | 北京交通大学 | Automatic generation method of train control system test sequence |
| CN103838675A (en) * | 2014-03-21 | 2014-06-04 | 上海富欣智能交通控制有限公司 | Method for generating test cases for computer interlocking system automatically |
| CN103885439A (en) * | 2014-03-21 | 2014-06-25 | 上海富欣智能交通控制有限公司 | Automated testing system for railway signal computer interlocking system |
-
2016
- 2016-01-11 CN CN201610015132.0A patent/CN105701014A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102547820A (en) * | 2012-02-14 | 2012-07-04 | 北京泰乐德信息技术有限公司 | Data acquisition method and system for railway signal |
| CN103092755A (en) * | 2013-01-08 | 2013-05-08 | 北京交通大学 | Automatic generation method of train control system test sequence |
| CN103838675A (en) * | 2014-03-21 | 2014-06-04 | 上海富欣智能交通控制有限公司 | Method for generating test cases for computer interlocking system automatically |
| CN103885439A (en) * | 2014-03-21 | 2014-06-25 | 上海富欣智能交通控制有限公司 | Automated testing system for railway signal computer interlocking system |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN108521350A (en) * | 2018-03-16 | 2018-09-11 | 重庆邮电大学 | A kind of industrial gateway equipment automatization test method driving script based on XML |
| CN109800156A (en) * | 2018-12-20 | 2019-05-24 | 交控科技股份有限公司 | A kind of subway signal system automation test method based on profile command |
| CN109800156B (en) * | 2018-12-20 | 2022-05-06 | 交控科技股份有限公司 | Subway signal system automatic test method based on configuration file command |
| CN111016978A (en) * | 2019-12-26 | 2020-04-17 | 天津津航计算技术研究所 | Method for realizing regional controller equipment test based on GoogleTest test framework |
| CN111858220A (en) * | 2020-08-24 | 2020-10-30 | 天津铁路信号有限责任公司 | Test bench for testing ATS system and interlocking system interface information transmission |
| CN114545896A (en) * | 2022-01-20 | 2022-05-27 | 北京全路通信信号研究设计院集团有限公司 | Computer interlocking software automatic test architecture method and system |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN106802862B (en) | Automatic test platform for safety key software of train operation control system | |
| CN109649447A (en) | A kind of distributed autonomic station autonomous controlling machine data automatic test approach and system | |
| CN103838675B (en) | The method of the automatic generating test use case of computer interlock system | |
| US10296685B2 (en) | Failure logic modeling method for a high-speed railway train operation control on-board system | |
| CN105677568A (en) | Test scene generating method for railway signal computer interlocking system | |
| CN105701014A (en) | Automatic testing method for railway signal computer interlocking system | |
| CN108153165B (en) | Simulation test method and device for comprehensive automation system of marshalling station | |
| CN102750301B (en) | Blueprint generating method for integrated avionic system model aiming at architecture analysis and design language (AADL) description | |
| CN106155035B (en) | Method for diagnosing faults and fault diagnosis system based on repair class data | |
| CN103885439A (en) | Automated testing system for railway signal computer interlocking system | |
| US20200156678A1 (en) | Railroad track verification and signal testing system | |
| CN109086197A (en) | The acceptance testing method and system of urban track traffic CBTC system | |
| Li et al. | HAZOP study on the CTCS-3 onboard system | |
| Mongardi | Dependable computing for railway control systems | |
| CN102556120B (en) | Interlock access control method | |
| CN104691580B (en) | The method that high-speed railway temporary speed limitation is set based on CTC yards design graphic element | |
| CN110611312B (en) | On-line simulation system and method for panoramic data of substation bay level | |
| CN114706747A (en) | Automatic test system for TACS (train operation control System) | |
| Xu et al. | Parallel testing for centralized traffic control systems of intelligent railways | |
| Di Tommaso et al. | The simulation of anomalies in the functional testing of the ERTMS/ETCS trackside system | |
| CN116279703A (en) | Full-electronic interlocking test system, method and device and electronic equipment | |
| CN107038086B (en) | Safety analysis method for hot standby control logic of safety computer platform | |
| KR102401024B1 (en) | Railroad simulator for hardware and software intetration | |
| CN108228989A (en) | Failure insertion system based on external real equipment | |
| Zhou et al. | Safety requirements analysis and performance verification of hot standby system using colored Petri-net |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication |
Application publication date: 20160622 |
|
| WD01 | Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication |