CN105678595A - Brand evaluation method - Google Patents
Brand evaluation method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN105678595A CN105678595A CN201610154678.4A CN201610154678A CN105678595A CN 105678595 A CN105678595 A CN 105678595A CN 201610154678 A CN201610154678 A CN 201610154678A CN 105678595 A CN105678595 A CN 105678595A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- brand
- industry
- ranking list
- colony
- purchaser
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0201—Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a brand evaluation method, and the method comprises the steps: if an enterprise user sets a recent purchase plan in a user center of the user, the enterprise user is judged as one in a purchasing agent group, the user is made to vote the purchasing goods involved industry, so that the user can acquire recognized brand data of the purchasing agent group in the industry, brand recognition times are added, and a purchasing agent recognition ranking list is obtained; if a user is an enterprise registration user, and the voted industry of the user belongs to an industry of the enterprise or brand, the user is judges as one in a peer group, the user acquires recognized brand data of the peer group in the industry, brand recognition times are added, and a peer recognition ranking list is obtained; if a user is an individual registration user, the user is judged as one in netizen group, the user acquires brand data recognized by the netizen group, brand recognition times are added, and a netizen recognition ranking list is obtained; and all votes are added, so that a comprehensive ranking list is obtained. According to the invention, the embodiment of the invention is used for improving authenticity and value of brand evaluation.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to network communication technology field, particularly relate to a kind of brand evaluation method.
Background technology
Asymmetric due to information, user to differentiate that the good and bad of a product is a very difficult thing, they often according on the net so-called " ten famous brands " come for referencial use. But, so-called " ten famous brands " on the net is paid dues registration by enterprise, then after being announced participation in the election list by platform, ballot obtains, in general user is unwilling to participate in such ballot activity, the supply of tickets is thrown by enterprise staff, relatives and friends completely, thus causing that online " ten famous brands " is false, reference value is not high.
Summary of the invention
The embodiment of the present invention proposes a kind of brand evaluation method, it is possible to increase the verity of brand evaluation and value.
The embodiment of the present invention provides a kind of brand evaluation method, including:
The group types accessing user is detected;
If detecting, described access user sets recent procurement plan at its customer center, then judge that described access user is as purchaser colony, make it that industry belonging to product purchasing to be voted, thus obtaining the brand that described purchaser colony is approved in described industry, and the purchaser of described brand is approved that number of times is overlapped statistics, it is thus achieved that the purchaser of each industry approves ranking list;
If detecting, described access user is enterprises registration user, and its ballot industry is the industry belonging to its enterprise or brand, then judge that described access user is as colleague colony, obtain the brand that described colleague colony is approved in its industry, and the colleague of described brand is approved that number of times is overlapped statistics, it is thus achieved that the colleague of each industry approves ranking list;
If detecting, described access user is for individual registration user, then judge that described access user is as netizen colony, obtain the brand that described netizen colony is approved, and the netizen of described brand is approved that number of times is overlapped statistics, it is thus achieved that the netizen of each industry approves ranking list;
The described purchaser of each industry is approved that ranking list, described colleague approve that ranking list and described netizen approve that ranking list is overlapped processing, it is thus achieved that the comprehensive ranking list of brand of each industry.
Further, described making it that industry belonging to product purchasing to be voted, thus obtaining the brand that described purchaser colony is approved in described industry, and the purchaser of described brand being approved that number of times is overlapped statistics, the purchaser obtaining each industry approves ranking list, specifically includes:
The first ballot request is sent to purchaser colony client;
Receive the described purchaser colony client the first vote information according to described first ballot request feedback; Described first vote information includes the industry at the bought articles place of described purchaser colony and three brands in the described industry of described purchaser colony accreditation; Described three brands are different;
The purchaser of each brand in described industry is approved that number of times is overlapped statistics the location according to each brand owned enterprise, it is thus achieved that each industry purchaser in different regions approves ranking list.
Further, the brand that the described colony of going together of described acquisition is approved in its industry, and the colleague of described brand is approved that number of times is overlapped statistics, it is thus achieved that the colleague of each industry approves ranking list, specifically includes:
The second ballot request is sent to colleague colony client;
Receive the described colleague colony client the second vote information according to described second ballot request feedback; Described second vote information includes the industry at product, place or service place that described colleague colony has and three brands in the described industry of described colleague colony accreditation; Described three brands are different, and the brand not having for described colleague colony;
The colleague of each brand in described industry is approved that number of times is added up, and the location according to each brand owned enterprise, it is thus achieved that each industry colleague in different regions approves ranking list.
Further, the brand that the described netizen colony of described acquisition is approved, and the netizen of described brand is approved that number of times is overlapped statistics, it is thus achieved that the netizen of each industry approves ranking list, specifically includes:
The 3rd vote information is sent to described netizen colony client;
Receive the described netizen colony client the 3rd vote information according to described 3rd vote information feedback; Described 3rd vote information includes the industry at the product selected by described netizen colony, place or service place and the brand in the described industry approved of described netizen colony;
The netizen of each brand in described industry is approved that number of times is added up, and the location according to each brand owned enterprise, it is thus achieved that each industry netizen in different regions approves ranking list.
Further, the described described purchaser to each industry approves that ranking list, described colleague approve that ranking list and described netizen approve that ranking list is overlapped processing, it is thus achieved that the comprehensive ranking list of brand of each industry, specifically includes:
Each industry purchaser in different regions is approved, and ranking list, colleague's accreditation ranking list and netizen approve that ranking list is overlapped processing respectively, it is thus achieved that the comprehensive ranking list of each industry brand in different regions.
Further, after the described acquisition each industry comprehensive ranking list of brand in different regions, also include:
Receive the first inquiry request that described purchaser colony client sends, and approve that ranking list, colleague's accreditation ranking list, netizen approve ranking list and the comprehensive ranking list of described brand according to described first inquiry request to described purchaser colony client feedback relevant matches information, the purchaser's information being concerned and each industry purchaser in different regions.
Further, after the described acquisition each industry comprehensive ranking list of brand in different regions, also include:
Receive the second inquiry request that described colleague colony client sends, and approve that ranking list, colleague's accreditation ranking list, netizen approve ranking list and the comprehensive ranking list of brand according to described second inquiry request to described colony's each industry of client feedback purchaser in different regions that goes together.
Further, described brand evaluation method also includes:
Obtain the brand being positioned at front ten in the comprehensive ranking list of brand of each industry;
Receive the brand that the enterprise belonging to the described brand of front ten sends and describe information, and preserve described brand and describe information.
Implement the embodiment of the present invention, have the advantages that
The brand evaluation method that the embodiment of the present invention provides, user can be divided into purchaser colony, colleague colony and netizen colony, respectively the brand of its accreditation is added up, obtain purchaser and approve ranking list, colleague colony ranking list, netizen colony ranking list and the comprehensive ranking list of brand, make brand evaluation data have more verity and value; User just can be made after brand is voted by user to obtain its information wanting to check, improve the ballot consciousness of user.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is the schematic flow sheet of an embodiment of brand evaluation method provided by the invention.
Detailed description of the invention
Below in conjunction with the accompanying drawing in the embodiment of the present invention, the technical scheme in the embodiment of the present invention is clearly and completely described, it is clear that described embodiment is only a part of embodiment of the present invention, rather than whole embodiments. Based on the embodiment in the present invention, the every other embodiment that those of ordinary skill in the art obtain under not making creative work premise, broadly fall into the scope of protection of the invention.
Referring to Fig. 1, the schematic flow sheet of an embodiment of brand evaluation method provided by the invention, including:
S1, to access user group types detect;
If S2 detects that described access user sets recent procurement plan at its customer center, then judge that described access user is as purchaser colony, make it that industry belonging to product purchasing to be voted, thus obtaining the brand that described purchaser colony is approved in described industry, and the purchaser of described brand is approved that number of times is overlapped statistics, it is thus achieved that the purchaser of each industry approves ranking list;
If S3 detects that described access user is enterprises registration user, and its ballot industry is the industry belonging to its enterprise or brand, then judge that described access user is as colleague colony, obtain the brand that described colleague colony is approved in its industry, and the colleague of described brand is approved that number of times is overlapped statistics, it is thus achieved that the colleague of each industry approves ranking list;
If S4 detects that described access user is for individual registration user, then judge that described access user is as netizen colony, obtain the brand that described netizen colony is approved, and the netizen of described brand is approved that number of times is overlapped statistics, it is thus achieved that the netizen of each industry approves ranking list;
S5, described purchaser to each industry approve that ranking list, described colleague approve that ranking list and described netizen approve that ranking list is overlapped processing, it is thus achieved that the comprehensive ranking list of brand of each industry.
It should be noted that log in after successfully according to the username and password of its registration user, the group types of user can be identified according to the behavior of user, it is judged that user is purchaser colony, colleague colony or netizen colony. If detecting, described access user sets recent procurement plan at its customer center, then judge that described access user is as purchaser colony, due to buying be for enterprises service needed for raw material, equipment or articles for use, necessarily there are understanding fully in the enterprise of buying item and product and are familiar with by purchaser, therefore it is required that industry belonging to its recent procurement plan is voted by purchaser colony, the brand approved by obtaining purchaser colony makes purchaser and approves ranking list, its data reliability is high, and the rank results drawn is close to true. If detecting, described access user is enterprises registration user, and its ballot industry is the industry belonging to its enterprise or brand, then judge that described access user is as colleague colony, owing in same industry, the quality of enterprise is compare clearly each other, the particularly clear enterprise ranked in the top, therefore it is required that industry belonging to it is voted by colleague colony, the brand approved by obtaining colleague colony makes colleague's accreditation ranking list, makes ranking data reliability high. If detecting, described access user is for individual registration user, then judge that described access user is as netizen colony, owing to the understanding of enterprise or brand is recommended mainly by use, understanding, advertising impact or kith and kin and obtained by netizen colony, therefore it is required that its industry being familiar with is voted by netizen colony, the netizen that the brand approved by obtaining netizen colony makes approves that ranking list also extremely has reference value. Finally, approve that ranking list, colleague's accreditation ranking list and netizen approve that ranking list obtains the comprehensive ranking list of brand of each industry according to purchaser, make brand evaluation data have more verity and value.
Further, described making it that industry belonging to product purchasing to be voted, thus obtaining the brand that described purchaser colony is approved in described industry, and the purchaser of described brand being approved that number of times is overlapped statistics, the purchaser obtaining each industry approves ranking list, specifically includes:
The first ballot request is sent to purchaser colony client;
Receive the described purchaser colony client the first vote information according to described first ballot request feedback; Described first vote information includes the industry at the bought articles place of described purchaser colony and three brands in the described industry of described purchaser colony accreditation; Described three brands are different;
The purchaser of each brand in described industry is approved that number of times is overlapped statistics the location according to each brand owned enterprise, it is thus achieved that each industry purchaser in different regions approves ranking list.
It should be noted that user is to check the information of ranking list, need to have and check integration, and check that the ballot of the industry that it is familiar with can be obtained by integration according to user, such as, user votes every time and can obtain 5 integrations, and 5 integrations can check ranking list 5 times accordingly. It addition, user is after voting to certain industry, after the regular hour, the sector could be voted again after 90 days.
When ballot, purchaser colony is by setting the article or service thinking buying at no distant date, after obtaining the industry at article or service place, three brands in the sector of its accreditation are voted, wherein, three brands can not repeat, and can not be purchaser's Own Brand. After purchaser colony submits ballot to, the brand of purchaser colony accreditation is added up and sorted, wherein, the statistics in city, province, the whole nation can be carried out according to the location of brand owned enterprise, thus obtaining each industry purchaser in different regions to approve ranking list.
Further, the brand that the described colony of going together of described acquisition is approved in its industry, and the colleague of described brand is approved that number of times is overlapped statistics, it is thus achieved that the colleague of each industry approves ranking list, specifically includes:
The second ballot request is sent to colleague colony client;
Receive the described colleague colony client the second vote information according to described second ballot request feedback; Described second vote information includes the industry at product, place or service place that described colleague colony has and three brands in the described industry of described colleague colony accreditation; Described three brands are different, and the brand not having for described colleague colony;
The colleague of each brand in described industry is approved that number of times is added up, and the location according to each brand owned enterprise, it is thus achieved that each industry colleague in different regions approves ranking list.
It should be noted that when ballot, colleague colony is by selecting its product having, place or service, after obtaining the industry at product, place or service place, three brands in the sector of its accreditation are voted, wherein, three brands can not repeat, and can not be its Own Brand. After the ballot of colleague colony, its thrown brand is detected, for instance, it is judged that whether this brand produces the product of its selection, or whether this brand is famous brand name, if it is not, then stop the relevant look facility one-year age of this colleague colony, if, then the brand of colleague colony accreditation is added up and sorted, wherein, the statistics in city, province, the whole nation can be carried out according to the location of brand owned enterprise, thus obtaining each industry colleague in different regions to approve ranking list.
Further, the brand that the described netizen colony of described acquisition is approved, and the netizen of described brand is approved that number of times is overlapped statistics, it is thus achieved that the netizen of each industry approves ranking list, specifically includes:
The 3rd vote information is sent to described netizen colony client;
Receive the described netizen colony client the 3rd vote information according to described 3rd vote information feedback; Described 3rd vote information includes the industry at the product selected by described netizen colony, place or service place and the brand in the described industry approved of described netizen colony;
The netizen of each brand in described industry is approved that number of times is added up, and the location according to each brand owned enterprise, it is thus achieved that each industry netizen in different regions approves ranking list.
It should be noted that, when ballot, netizen colony is by selecting the classification of product, place or service, after obtaining the industry at product, place or service place, check the information of each brand in the ranking list of the sector or the sector, and the brand in the sector of its accreditation is voted. After netizen colony submits ballot to, the brand of netizen colony accreditation being added up and sorted, wherein, the statistics in city, province, the whole nation can being carried out according to the location of brand owned enterprise, thus obtaining each industry netizen in different regions to approve ranking list.
Further, the described described purchaser to each industry approves that ranking list, described colleague approve that ranking list and described netizen approve that ranking list is overlapped processing, it is thus achieved that the comprehensive ranking list of brand of each industry, specifically includes:
Each industry purchaser in different regions is approved, and ranking list, colleague's accreditation ranking list and netizen approve that ranking list is overlapped processing respectively, it is thus achieved that the comprehensive ranking list of each industry brand in different regions.
It should be noted that the total data that above three colony votes is overlapped statistics can obtain the comprehensive ranking list of brand, user can inquire the various ranking datas in this brand or this place by input brand name or place name.
Further, after the described acquisition each industry comprehensive ranking list of brand in different regions, also include:
Receive the first inquiry request that described purchaser colony client sends, and approve that ranking list, colleague's accreditation ranking list, netizen approve ranking list and the comprehensive ranking list of described brand according to described first inquiry request to described purchaser colony client feedback relevant matches information, the purchaser's information being concerned and each industry purchaser in different regions.
It should be noted that, after purchaser colony votes, can have relevant look facility, for instance check relevant matches information, pay close attention to the purchaser of this user, purchaser approves ranking list, colleague's accreditation ranking list, netizen approve ranking list and the described comprehensive ranking list of brand etc.
Further, after the described acquisition each industry comprehensive ranking list of brand in different regions, also include:
Receive the second inquiry request that described colleague colony client sends, and approve that ranking list, colleague's accreditation ranking list, netizen approve ranking list and the comprehensive ranking list of brand according to described second inquiry request to described colony's each industry of client feedback purchaser in different regions that goes together.
It should be noted that after the ballot of colleague colony, in a period of time, as, in 1 year, can repeatedly checked related data, for instance check that purchaser approves that ranking list, colleague's accreditation ranking list, netizen approve ranking list and the described comprehensive ranking list of brand etc.
Further, described brand evaluation method also includes:
Obtain the brand being positioned at front ten in the comprehensive ranking list of brand of each industry;
Receive the brand that the enterprise belonging to the described brand of front ten sends and describe information, and preserve described brand and describe information.
It should be noted that, to enter the comprehensive ranking list top ten list of brand brand belonging to enterprise, it can be invited to complete writing of the entries such as " good product standard ", " maintaining knowledge ", owing to these enterprises are approved enterprise, its entry write is comparatively objective and valuable, therefrom selects 5～6 and writes valuable entry for user's reference when consulting Related product or service.
The brand evaluation method that the embodiment of the present invention provides, user can be divided into purchaser colony, colleague colony and netizen colony, respectively the brand of its accreditation is added up, obtain purchaser and approve ranking list, colleague's colony's ranking list and netizen colony ranking list, make brand evaluation data have more verity and value; User just can be made after brand is voted by user to obtain its information wanting to check, improve the ballot consciousness of user.
The above is the preferred embodiment of the present invention; it should be pointed out that, for those skilled in the art, under the premise without departing from the principles of the invention; can also making some improvements and modifications, these improvements and modifications are also considered as protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (8)
1. a brand evaluation method, it is characterised in that including:
The group types accessing user is detected;
If detecting, described access user sets recent procurement plan at its customer center, then judge that described access user is as purchaser colony, make it that industry belonging to product purchasing to be voted, thus obtaining the brand that described purchaser colony is approved in described industry, and the purchaser of described brand is approved that number of times is overlapped statistics, it is thus achieved that the purchaser of each industry approves ranking list;
If detecting, described access user is enterprises registration user, and its ballot industry is the industry belonging to its enterprise or brand, then judge that described access user is as colleague colony, obtain the brand that described colleague colony is approved in its industry, and the colleague of described brand is approved that number of times is overlapped statistics, it is thus achieved that the colleague of each industry approves ranking list;
If detecting, described access user is for individual registration user, then judge that described access user is as netizen colony, obtain the brand that described netizen colony is approved, and the netizen of described brand is approved that number of times is overlapped statistics, it is thus achieved that the netizen of each industry approves ranking list;
The described purchaser of each industry is approved that ranking list, described colleague approve that ranking list and described netizen approve that ranking list is overlapped processing, it is thus achieved that the comprehensive ranking list of brand of each industry.
2. brand evaluation method as claimed in claim 1, it is characterized in that, described make it that industry belonging to product purchasing to be voted, thus obtaining the brand that described purchaser colony is approved in described industry, and the purchaser of described brand is approved that number of times is overlapped statistics, the purchaser obtaining each industry approves ranking list, specifically includes:
The first ballot request is sent to purchaser colony client;
Receive the described purchaser colony client the first vote information according to described first ballot request feedback; Described first vote information includes the industry at the bought articles place of described purchaser colony and three brands in the described industry of described purchaser colony accreditation; Described three brands are different;
The purchaser of each brand in described industry is approved that number of times is overlapped statistics the location according to each brand owned enterprise, it is thus achieved that each industry purchaser in different regions approves ranking list.
3. brand evaluation method as claimed in claim 2, it is characterized in that, the brand that the described colony of going together of described acquisition is approved in its industry, and the colleague of described brand is approved that number of times is overlapped statistics, the colleague obtaining each industry approves ranking list, specifically includes:
The second ballot request is sent to colleague colony client;
Receive the described colleague colony client the second vote information according to described second ballot request feedback; Described second vote information includes the industry at product, place or service place that described colleague colony has and three brands in the described industry of described colleague colony accreditation; Described three brands are different, and the brand not having for described colleague colony;
The colleague of each brand in described industry is approved that number of times is added up, and the location according to each brand owned enterprise, it is thus achieved that each industry colleague in different regions approves ranking list.
4. brand evaluation method as claimed in claim 3, it is characterised in that the brand that the described netizen colony of described acquisition is approved, and the netizen of described brand is approved that number of times is overlapped statistics, it is thus achieved that the netizen of each industry approves ranking list, specifically includes:
The 3rd vote information is sent to described netizen colony client;
Receive the described netizen colony client the 3rd vote information according to described 3rd vote information feedback; Described 3rd vote information includes the industry at the product selected by described netizen colony, place or service place and the brand in the described industry approved of described netizen colony;
The netizen of each brand in described industry is approved that number of times is added up, and the location according to each brand owned enterprise, it is thus achieved that each industry netizen in different regions approves ranking list.
5. brand evaluation method as claimed in claim 4, it is characterized in that, the described described purchaser to each industry approves that ranking list, described colleague approve that ranking list and described netizen approve that ranking list is overlapped processing, it is thus achieved that the comprehensive ranking list of brand of each industry, specifically includes:
Each industry purchaser in different regions is approved, and ranking list, colleague's accreditation ranking list and netizen approve that ranking list is overlapped processing respectively, it is thus achieved that the comprehensive ranking list of each industry brand in different regions.
6. brand evaluation method as claimed in claim 5, it is characterised in that after the described acquisition each industry comprehensive ranking list of brand in different regions, also include:
Receive the first inquiry request that described purchaser colony client sends, and approve that ranking list, colleague's accreditation ranking list, netizen approve ranking list and the comprehensive ranking list of described brand according to described first inquiry request to described purchaser colony client feedback relevant matches information, the purchaser's information being concerned and each industry purchaser in different regions.
7. brand evaluation method as claimed in claim 5, it is characterised in that after the described acquisition each industry comprehensive ranking list of brand in different regions, also include:
Receive the second inquiry request that described colleague colony client sends, and approve that ranking list, colleague's accreditation ranking list, netizen approve ranking list and the comprehensive ranking list of brand according to described second inquiry request to described colony's each industry of client feedback purchaser in different regions that goes together.
8. the brand evaluation method as described in any one of claim 1 to 7, it is characterised in that described brand evaluation method also includes:
Obtain the brand being positioned at front ten in the comprehensive ranking list of brand of each industry;
Receive the brand that the enterprise belonging to the described brand of front ten sends and describe information, and preserve described brand and describe information.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610154678.4A CN105678595A (en) | 2016-03-17 | 2016-03-17 | Brand evaluation method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610154678.4A CN105678595A (en) | 2016-03-17 | 2016-03-17 | Brand evaluation method |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN105678595A true CN105678595A (en) | 2016-06-15 |
Family
ID=56310871
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610154678.4A Pending CN105678595A (en) | 2016-03-17 | 2016-03-17 | Brand evaluation method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN105678595A (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107730370A (en) * | 2017-11-06 | 2018-02-23 | 广州亿码科技有限公司 | A kind of brand ranks method and system |
| CN108416627A (en) * | 2018-03-09 | 2018-08-17 | 北京搜狐新媒体信息技术有限公司 | A kind of brand influence force monitoring method and system based on internet data |
| CN110321373A (en) * | 2019-07-12 | 2019-10-11 | 中国农业银行股份有限公司 | A kind of query statistic method, apparatus and system |
| CN112235614A (en) * | 2020-10-14 | 2021-01-15 | 广州欢网科技有限责任公司 | Personalized recommendation method and system for ranking list data of television programs |
-
2016
- 2016-03-17 CN CN201610154678.4A patent/CN105678595A/en active Pending
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN107730370A (en) * | 2017-11-06 | 2018-02-23 | 广州亿码科技有限公司 | A kind of brand ranks method and system |
| CN108416627A (en) * | 2018-03-09 | 2018-08-17 | 北京搜狐新媒体信息技术有限公司 | A kind of brand influence force monitoring method and system based on internet data |
| CN110321373A (en) * | 2019-07-12 | 2019-10-11 | 中国农业银行股份有限公司 | A kind of query statistic method, apparatus and system |
| CN112235614A (en) * | 2020-10-14 | 2021-01-15 | 广州欢网科技有限责任公司 | Personalized recommendation method and system for ranking list data of television programs |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Garvin | Managing quality: The strategic and competitive edge | |
| Lim et al. | Detecting product review spammers using rating behaviors | |
| US8478636B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for implementing a personal “get out the vote drive” software application | |
| Kuruvilla | Private regulation of labor standards in global supply chains: Problems, progress, and prospects | |
| Bertrand et al. | Partners in crime: The effects of diversity on the longevity of cartels | |
| CN105678595A (en) | Brand evaluation method | |
| Cole et al. | Firm heterogeneity, origin of ownership and export participation | |
| Baumgartner et al. | Conventional wisdom and American elections: Exploding myths, exploring misconceptions | |
| Cajal-Grossi et al. | International buyers' sourcing and suppliers' markups in Bangladeshi garments | |
| Reshef | Smaller slices of a growing pie: The effects of entry in platform markets | |
| CN112990961A (en) | Data management method, system and storage medium for recruiting activities | |
| US10657445B1 (en) | Systems and methods for training and executing a neural network for collaborative monitoring of resource usage | |
| Schniederjans et al. | Consumer perceptions of product quality revisited: Made in China | |
| Abdulnasir | Marketing ethics practices of small businesses and their effect on consumer purchase intention: An empirical investigation from Addis Ketema sub-city | |
| Caldwell et al. | The impact of political ideology on consumer perceptions of their rights and responsibilities in the sharing economy | |
| Kondo et al. | Quality in japan | |
| Shahbaz et al. | The role of supply chain relationships in risk management by enhancing customer satisfaction | |
| Nakagawa et al. | Organizational cultural crossvergence and innovation: Evidence from Japanese multinationals in emerging markets | |
| US20160350873A1 (en) | System and method of providing business-to-business interaction | |
| Peters et al. | Online retail store community engagement and its impact on purchase intentions in the context of online reviews | |
| KR102099858B1 (en) | Apparatus for providing review of product and method thereof | |
| CN106251155A (en) | A kind of electronic commerce terminal after-sale service management software | |
| Moore et al. | Decision leadership: Empowering others to make better choices | |
| Huang et al. | Application of Kano's model and TRIZ on internet marketing for agricultural products in Taiwan | |
| Gerken | The Invisible Election: Making Policy in a World Without Data |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20160615 |