CN105350959A - Method for determining gas saturation of shale gas reservoir through well-logging lithologic density - Google Patents
Method for determining gas saturation of shale gas reservoir through well-logging lithologic density Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN105350959A CN105350959A CN201510753459.3A CN201510753459A CN105350959A CN 105350959 A CN105350959 A CN 105350959A CN 201510753459 A CN201510753459 A CN 201510753459A CN 105350959 A CN105350959 A CN 105350959A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- logging
- gas
- well
- model
- saturation
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Landscapes
- Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
Abstract
Description
技术领域technical field
本发明涉及一种由测井岩性密度确定页岩气储层含气饱和度的方法The invention relates to a method for determining the gas saturation of shale gas reservoirs by logging lithology density
背景技术Background technique
页岩气的成功开发给全球带来了新能源革命,页岩气的利用对环境保护和节能都有着重要的意义,页岩气层的寻找与发现越来越受到人们的重视,有效开发页岩气成为矿产开发的一种新常态。页岩气含气饱和度是页岩气储层、页岩气藏及页岩气选区评价的一项不可缺少的关键参数。The successful development of shale gas has brought a new energy revolution to the world. The utilization of shale gas is of great significance to environmental protection and energy saving. People pay more and more attention to the search and discovery of shale gas layers. Rock gas has become a new normal in mineral development. Shale gas gas saturation is an indispensable key parameter in the evaluation of shale gas reservoirs, shale gas pools and shale gas area selection.
传统的页岩气储层含气饱和度确定方法是采用ECS元素俘获测井法或阿尔奇法求取。目前,ECS元素俘获测井只能依赖国外测井公司服务,成本非常高。阿尔奇法求取页岩气储层含气饱和度,主要是使用页岩储层测井电阻率、孔隙度等资料。阿尔奇法求取页岩气储层含气饱和度前提条件是,仅有地层水导电,构成地层骨架的矿物成分不导电。然而,页岩气储层中多存在黄铁矿之类的导电矿物,使页岩气储层电阻率异常变小,计算得到的含气饱和度准确度较低,误差较大,该方法有一定的局限性。The traditional method for determining the gas saturation of shale gas reservoirs is to use the ECS element capture logging method or the Archie method to obtain it. At present, ECS element capture logging can only rely on the services of foreign logging companies, and the cost is very high. The Archie method is used to calculate the gas saturation of shale gas reservoirs, mainly using the logging resistivity, porosity and other data of shale gas reservoirs. The prerequisite for calculating the gas saturation of shale gas reservoirs by the Archie method is that only the formation water conducts electricity, and the mineral components constituting the formation framework do not conduct electricity. However, conductive minerals such as pyrite often exist in shale gas reservoirs, which makes the resistivity of shale gas reservoirs abnormally small, and the calculated gas saturation has low accuracy and large errors. This method has Certain limitations.
发明内容Contents of the invention
本发明的目的是针对上述技术现状,旨在依托岩心实验提供一种由岩性密度测井资料确定页岩气储层含气饱和度计算模型,能够提高含低电阻率夹层条件下的页岩气储层含气饱和度精度的方法。The purpose of the present invention is to aim at the present technical situation mentioned above, aiming at providing a kind of calculation model of determining the gas saturation of shale gas reservoir by lithological density logging data, which can improve the shale gas under the condition of low resistivity interlayer. A method for the accuracy of gas saturation in gas reservoirs.
本发明目的的实现方式为,由测井岩性密度确定页岩气储层含气饱和度的方法,具体步骤为:The realization mode of the object of the present invention is, the method for determining gas saturation of shale gas reservoir by logging lithology density, concrete steps are:
1)获取工区已知井岩心样品测试分析含气饱和度Sg、岩心体积密度ρb以及对应深度的测井自然伽马GR;选取的样品必须是同一工区,相同层系的,数量不能少于12块,井数不限;然后利用最小二乘法确定模型一Sg1=a/ρb+b、模型二Sg2=a·ρb+b·GR+c的模型系数,最终确定最佳模型;1) Obtain core samples from known wells in the work area, test and analyze the gas saturation Sg, core bulk density ρb, and log natural gamma ray GR at the corresponding depth; the selected samples must be from the same work area and the same layer series, and the number should not be less than 12 block, the number of wells is not limited; then use the least squares method to determine the model coefficients of model one Sg1=a/ρb+b, model two Sg2=a·ρb+b·GR+c, and finally determine the best model;
式中岩心体积密度ρb量纲为g/cm3,In the formula, the dimension of core bulk density ρb is g/cm 3 ,
自然伽马GR量纲为API,The dimension of natural gamma GR is API,
含气饱和度Sg量纲为%;The dimension of gas saturation Sg is %;
2)通过测井资料获取待解释井的自然伽马GR、岩性密度DEN,通过气测录井资料获取待解释井的全烃、甲烷含量,通过地质录井资料获取待解释地质录井的岩屑、岩心岩性;岩性密度DEN量纲为g/cm3;2) Obtain the natural gamma ray and lithology density DEN of the well to be interpreted through the logging data, obtain the total hydrocarbon and methane content of the well to be interpreted through the gas logging data, and obtain the geological logging data of the well to be interpreted through the geological logging data. Cuttings, core lithology; lithology density DEN dimension is g/cm 3 ;
3)通过步骤2)获取的测井和录井资料划分页岩气储层;3) dividing the shale gas reservoir by the logging and mud logging data obtained in step 2);
4)用步骤2)待解释井测井岩性密度(DEN)替代步骤1)岩心体积密度(ρb),通过确定的最佳模型和测井资料计算待解释井储层含气饱和度Sg;4) Replace step 1) core bulk density (ρb) with step 2) logging lithology density (DEN) of the well to be interpreted, and calculate the reservoir gas saturation Sg of the well to be interpreted through the determined optimal model and logging data;
5)输出计算结果。5) Output calculation results.
本发明提供了一种低阻页岩储层计算地层含气饱和度解决方案,较阿尔奇法确定页岩储层含气饱和度方法更简便,适用范围更广。The invention provides a solution for calculating the formation gas saturation of low-resistivity shale reservoirs, which is simpler and has a wider application range than the Archie method for determining the gas saturation of shale reservoirs.
本发明已在某页岩气田应用120口井使用,所计算的页岩气储层含气饱和度与岩心测试获得的页岩气层含气饱和度接近,平均误差不超过10%,能满足现场测录井储层评价和计算页岩气含气饱和度的需要。The present invention has been used in 120 wells in a certain shale gas field, and the calculated gas saturation of shale gas reservoirs is close to the gas saturation of shale gas layers obtained by core testing, with an average error of no more than 10%, which can satisfy Field logging reservoir evaluation and the need to calculate the gas saturation of shale gas.
附图说明Description of drawings
图1为本发明工作流程框图,Fig. 1 is the workflow block diagram of the present invention,
图2为本发明模型一反算饱和度与岩心饱和度交会图,Fig. 2 is the intersecting diagram of model one inverse calculation saturation and rock core saturation of the present invention,
图3为本发明模型二反算饱和度与岩心饱和度交会图,Fig. 3 is the intersecting diagram of the inverse calculation saturation and the core saturation of the second model of the present invention,
图4为本发明J页岩气田S井应用实例图。Fig. 4 is an application example diagram of well S in J shale gas field of the present invention.
具体实施方式detailed description
本申请人通过页岩气储层岩心实验研究发现,页岩气储层岩心体积密度(ρb)与其含气饱和度(Sg)存在明显定量关系,这种关系表现为含气饱和度与岩心体积密度的倒数成正相关关系,并且含气饱和度同样与岩心体积密度和对应的测井自然伽马成线性关系。测井岩性密度(DEN)与岩心体积密度在数值上是相等的,只是测量方式不同。因此,测井岩性密度同样与页岩气储层含气饱和度存在上述定量关系,利用测井密度、自然伽马(GR)资料能够定量确定页岩气储层含气饱和度(Sg)。用岩心资料的计算,使用模型一Sg=a1/ρb+b1、计算模型二Sg=a2·ρb+b2·GR+c2;基于测井资料的计算,模型一Sg=a1/DEN+b1、计算模型二Sg=a2·DEN+b2·GR+c2。Through shale gas reservoir core experiments, the applicant found that there is an obvious quantitative relationship between the shale gas reservoir core volume density (ρb) and its gas saturation (Sg), and this relationship is expressed as the gas saturation and core volume The reciprocal of the density is positively correlated, and the gas saturation is also linearly related to the core bulk density and the corresponding log natural gamma ray. The log lithology density (DEN) is numerically equal to the core bulk density, but the measurement method is different. Therefore, the above-mentioned quantitative relationship exists between the logging lithology density and the gas saturation of shale gas reservoirs, and the gas saturation (Sg) of shale gas reservoirs can be quantitatively determined by using the logging density and natural gamma ray (GR) data. . Calculation based on core data, use model one Sg=a1/ρb+b1, calculation model two Sg=a2·ρb+b2·GR+c2; calculation based on logging data, model one Sg=a1/DEN+b1, calculation Model 2 Sg=a2·DEN+b2·GR+c2.
式中a1、b1、a2、b2、c2为方程系数。In the formula, a1, b1, a2, b2, c2 are equation coefficients.
下面参照附图详述本发明。The present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
参照图1,本发明的具体步骤为:With reference to Fig. 1, concrete steps of the present invention are:
1)获取工区已知井岩心样品测试分析含气饱和度Sg、岩心体积密度ρb以及对应深度的测井自然伽马GR;选取的样品必须是同一工区,相同层系的,数量不能少于12块,井数不限;然后利用最小二乘法确定模型一Sg1=a/ρb+b、模型二Sg2=a·ρb+b·GR+c的模型系数,然后再利用模型反算得到的含气饱和度与岩心测试饱和度回归,相关系数高的为最佳模型。1) Obtain core samples from known wells in the work area, test and analyze the gas saturation Sg, core bulk density ρb, and log natural gamma ray GR at the corresponding depth; the selected samples must be from the same work area and the same layer series, and the number should not be less than 12 block, and the number of wells is not limited; then use the least squares method to determine the model coefficients of model 1 Sg1=a/ρb+b and model 2 Sg2=a·ρb+b·GR+c, and then use the model back calculation to obtain the gas-bearing Regression between saturation and core test saturation, the model with the highest correlation coefficient is the best model.
2)通过测井资料获取待解释井的自然伽马GR、岩性密度DEN,通过气测录井资料获取待解释井的全烃、甲烷含量,通过地质录井资料获取待解释地质录井的岩屑、岩心岩性;2) Obtain the natural gamma ray and lithology density DEN of the well to be interpreted through the logging data, obtain the total hydrocarbon and methane content of the well to be interpreted through the gas logging data, and obtain the geological logging data of the well to be interpreted through the geological logging data. Cuttings, core lithology;
待解释井的自然伽马GR、岩性密度DEN数据深度间隔为0.1m~1.0m,保存为wis或txt格式;气测录井全烃和甲烷含量深度间隔为1m或0.5m,保存为wis或txt格式;地质岩屑、岩心的岩性数据保存为excel或txt格式。The depth interval of natural gamma ray GR and lithology density DEN data of wells to be interpreted is 0.1m to 1.0m, saved in wis or txt format; the depth interval of gas logging full hydrocarbon and methane content is 1m or 0.5m, saved as wis or txt format; the lithology data of geological cuttings and cores are saved in excel or txt format.
3)通过步骤2)获取的测井和录井资料划分页岩气储层;3) dividing the shale gas reservoir by the logging and mud logging data obtained in step 2);
页岩气储层划分依据:岩性为页岩或泥质岩类;全烃、甲烷存在明显异常,不含重烃成分;高自然伽马、低密度。Shale gas reservoirs are classified based on: lithology is shale or argillaceous rock; there are obvious anomalies in all hydrocarbons and methane, and no heavy hydrocarbon components; high natural gamma ray and low density.
4)用步骤2)待解释井测井岩性密度(DEN)替代步骤1)岩心体积密度(ρb),通过确定的最佳模型和测井资料计算待解释井储层含气饱和度Sg;4) Replace step 1) core bulk density (ρb) with step 2) logging lithology density (DEN) of the well to be interpreted, and calculate the reservoir gas saturation Sg of the well to be interpreted through the determined optimal model and logging data;
5)输出计算结果,通常,页岩气层的含气饱和度Sg不低于0.5。5) Output the calculation results, usually, the gas saturation Sg of the shale gas layer is not less than 0.5.
下面用J页岩气田S井具体实施例详述本发明。The present invention will be described in detail below with specific examples of the S well in the J shale gas field.
1)通过J页岩气田岩心测试分析获取4口页岩井共82块页岩岩心的含气饱和度(Sg)、岩心体积密度(ρb)以及通过测井资料获取对应深度的自然伽马(GR),然后将82块页岩岩心Sg与ρb和GR,按模型一Sg=a1/ρb+b1和模型二Sg=a2·ρb+b2·GR+c2做最小二乘法回归处理,得到模型系数a1=1610.600、b1=567.240,a2=-262.896、b2=0.183、c2=768.147,即模型一Sg=1610.6/ρb+567.24、模型二Sg=-262.896·ρb-0.183·GR+768.147,再用模型一反算的含气饱和度做Y轴、岩心测试含气饱和度做X轴进行拟合,相关系数R为0.79(见图2);模型二反算含气饱和度做Y轴、岩心饱和度做X轴进行回归,相关系数R为0.81(见图3),对比模型一和模型二的相关系数,模型二相关系数高于模型一,模型二为最佳模型,选用模型二。1) The gas saturation (Sg) and core bulk density (ρb) of 82 shale cores from 4 shale wells were obtained through the core test analysis of the J shale gas field, and the natural gamma ray (GR ), then 82 pieces of shale core Sg, ρb and GR, according to the model one Sg=a1/ρb+b1 and the model two Sg=a2·ρb+b2·GR+c2 to do least squares regression processing, to obtain the model coefficient a1 =1610.600, b1=567.240, a2=-262.896, b2=0.183, c2=768.147, that is, model one Sg=1610.6/ρb+567.24, model two Sg=-262.896·ρb-0.183·GR+768.147, and then use model one The inversely calculated gas saturation is used as the Y axis, and the core test gas saturation is used as the X axis for fitting. The correlation coefficient R is 0.79 (see Figure 2); the inversely calculated gas saturation of Model 2 is used as the Y axis, and the core saturation Perform regression on the X axis, and the correlation coefficient R is 0.81 (see Figure 3). Comparing the correlation coefficients of model 1 and model 2, the correlation coefficient of model 2 is higher than that of model 1, and model 2 is the best model, so choose model 2.
2)通过测井资料获取待解释S井的自然伽马GR、岩性密度DEN,通过气测录井资料获取待解释井S井的全烃、甲烷含量,通过地质录井资料获取待解释地质录井的岩屑、岩心岩性;2) Obtain natural gamma ray and lithology density DEN of well S to be interpreted through well logging data, obtain total hydrocarbon and methane content of well S to be interpreted through gas logging data, and obtain geological Cuttings and core lithology of mud logging;
3)通过步骤2)获取的S井的自然伽马、岩性密度、全烃、甲烷和岩屑岩心的岩性划分S井页岩气储层,S井页岩气主要显示层段在2170.0~2220.0m;3) According to the natural gamma ray, lithology density, total hydrocarbon, methane and cuttings core lithology of Well S obtained in step 2), the shale gas reservoir of Well S is divided, and the shale gas of Well S mainly shows intervals at 2170.0 ~2220.0m;
4)用步骤2)利用最佳模型Sg=-262.896·ρb+0.183·GR+768.147和S井的密度和自然伽马资料计算S井储层含气饱和度Sg;4) Calculate the reservoir gas saturation Sg of Well S by using the best model Sg=-262.896 ρb+0.183 GR+768.147 and the density and natural gamma data of Well S in step 2;
5)输出计算结果,S井2170.0~2220.0m井段计算含气饱和度主要范围为50.0%~80.0%(见图4),与该井岩心饱和度测试结果对比,平均误差小于10%,能够满足页岩气储层和页岩气气藏评价需要。5) Output the calculation results. The main range of calculated gas saturation in the 2170.0-2220.0m section of Well S is 50.0%-80.0% (see Fig. 4). Compared with the core saturation test results of this well, the average error is less than 10%. Meet the needs of shale gas reservoirs and shale gas reservoir evaluation.
Claims (4)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201510753459.3A CN105350959B (en) | 2015-11-06 | 2015-11-06 | The method that shale gas reservoir gas-bearing saturation degree is determined by WELL LITHOLOGY density |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201510753459.3A CN105350959B (en) | 2015-11-06 | 2015-11-06 | The method that shale gas reservoir gas-bearing saturation degree is determined by WELL LITHOLOGY density |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN105350959A true CN105350959A (en) | 2016-02-24 |
CN105350959B CN105350959B (en) | 2018-03-16 |
Family
ID=55327005
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201510753459.3A Active CN105350959B (en) | 2015-11-06 | 2015-11-06 | The method that shale gas reservoir gas-bearing saturation degree is determined by WELL LITHOLOGY density |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN105350959B (en) |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN108561126A (en) * | 2018-03-13 | 2018-09-21 | 中石化石油工程技术服务有限公司 | A kind of simple and easy method of determining shale gas reservoir organic porosity |
CN108647417A (en) * | 2018-04-28 | 2018-10-12 | 中石化石油工程技术服务有限公司 | A kind of simple and easy method of determining shale gas reservoir gas-bearing saturation degree |
CN109063296A (en) * | 2018-07-23 | 2018-12-21 | 中国石油集团川庆钻探工程有限公司 | Shale gas content while-drilling calculation method |
CN112649858A (en) * | 2019-10-11 | 2021-04-13 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Shale brittleness prediction method and system based on core test |
CN115059451A (en) * | 2022-06-23 | 2022-09-16 | 长江大学 | Logging calculation method of biosilicon content in shale gas reservoirs based on effective photoelectric absorption cross-section index per unit volume |
CN115095319A (en) * | 2022-06-23 | 2022-09-23 | 长江大学 | Shale gas reservoir biological silicon content determination method based on lithology density logging information |
CN115749760A (en) * | 2022-11-28 | 2023-03-07 | 中海石油(中国)有限公司海南分公司 | Reservoir fluid property evaluation method based on measurement and recording combination |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101487390A (en) * | 2009-02-23 | 2009-07-22 | 大庆油田有限责任公司 | Archie mode method for confirming initial oil saturation of oil layer |
CN102748004A (en) * | 2012-06-06 | 2012-10-24 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method for determining hydrocarbon saturation of gas logging |
US8606522B2 (en) * | 2008-09-30 | 2013-12-10 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method to determine current gas saturation in a near-wellbore zone in a volatile oil formation |
CN103912269A (en) * | 2014-03-28 | 2014-07-09 | 中石化江汉石油工程有限公司测录井公司 | Method for determining formation fracture pressure gradient logging of shale gas reservoir |
CN103912268A (en) * | 2014-03-28 | 2014-07-09 | 中石化江汉石油工程有限公司测录井公司 | Determination Method of Gas Saturation in Shale Reservoir Based on TOC |
-
2015
- 2015-11-06 CN CN201510753459.3A patent/CN105350959B/en active Active
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8606522B2 (en) * | 2008-09-30 | 2013-12-10 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method to determine current gas saturation in a near-wellbore zone in a volatile oil formation |
CN101487390A (en) * | 2009-02-23 | 2009-07-22 | 大庆油田有限责任公司 | Archie mode method for confirming initial oil saturation of oil layer |
CN102748004A (en) * | 2012-06-06 | 2012-10-24 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Method for determining hydrocarbon saturation of gas logging |
CN103912269A (en) * | 2014-03-28 | 2014-07-09 | 中石化江汉石油工程有限公司测录井公司 | Method for determining formation fracture pressure gradient logging of shale gas reservoir |
CN103912268A (en) * | 2014-03-28 | 2014-07-09 | 中石化江汉石油工程有限公司测录井公司 | Determination Method of Gas Saturation in Shale Reservoir Based on TOC |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
Title |
---|
任元等: "基于TOC的页岩储层含气饱和度确定方法及应用", 《江汉石油职工大学学报》 * |
王濡岳等: "页岩气储层地球物理测井评价研究现状", 《地球物理学进展》 * |
石文睿等: "涪陵页岩气田焦石坝页岩气储层含气量测井评价", 《测井技术》 * |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN108561126A (en) * | 2018-03-13 | 2018-09-21 | 中石化石油工程技术服务有限公司 | A kind of simple and easy method of determining shale gas reservoir organic porosity |
CN108647417A (en) * | 2018-04-28 | 2018-10-12 | 中石化石油工程技术服务有限公司 | A kind of simple and easy method of determining shale gas reservoir gas-bearing saturation degree |
CN109063296A (en) * | 2018-07-23 | 2018-12-21 | 中国石油集团川庆钻探工程有限公司 | Shale gas content while-drilling calculation method |
CN112649858A (en) * | 2019-10-11 | 2021-04-13 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Shale brittleness prediction method and system based on core test |
CN115059451A (en) * | 2022-06-23 | 2022-09-16 | 长江大学 | Logging calculation method of biosilicon content in shale gas reservoirs based on effective photoelectric absorption cross-section index per unit volume |
CN115095319A (en) * | 2022-06-23 | 2022-09-23 | 长江大学 | Shale gas reservoir biological silicon content determination method based on lithology density logging information |
CN115749760A (en) * | 2022-11-28 | 2023-03-07 | 中海石油(中国)有限公司海南分公司 | Reservoir fluid property evaluation method based on measurement and recording combination |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN105350959B (en) | 2018-03-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN105350959B (en) | The method that shale gas reservoir gas-bearing saturation degree is determined by WELL LITHOLOGY density | |
CN106950347B (en) | A method of evaluation mud shale each group partial volume | |
WO2017024700A1 (en) | Device for calculating content of organic carbon in source rock | |
CN105089663B (en) | A kind of High angle/horizontal well formation resistivity anisotropy bearing calibration | |
CN107703560A (en) | A kind of fine recognition methods of mud shale petrofacies based on triple information | |
CN103912268B (en) | Shale reservoir gas-bearing saturation based on TOC determines method | |
CN103883322B (en) | Shale gas reservoirs exploration method and device | |
CN104850732B (en) | One kind is based on the statistical oil reservoir detail stratigraphic division method and device of sand body | |
CN103993871B (en) | Method and device for processing well logging information of thin interbed stratums in standardization mode | |
CN104007485B (en) | One sets up complicated hole mud shale petrophysical model method | |
CN104278991A (en) | Multivariate well logging computing method for total organic carbon and hydrocarbon generating potential of hydrocarbon source rocks in salt-lake facies | |
CN104297448B (en) | Method for determining lower limit value of organic carbon content of effective hydrocarbon source rock | |
Eivazy et al. | Modelling geomechanical heterogeneity of rock masses using direct and indirect geostatistical conditional simulation methods | |
US10552553B2 (en) | Capillary pressure analysis for petrophysical statistical modeling | |
Wang et al. | Determination of total organic carbon content in shale formations with regression analysis | |
CN107829731B (en) | Clay alteration volcanic porosity correction method | |
CN105370270B (en) | The method that shale gas reservoir gas-bearing saturation degree is determined by the dipole sonic P-wave And S time difference | |
CN108035710B (en) | The method for dividing deep layer rock geology phase based on data mining | |
CN107450108B (en) | The determination method and apparatus in dessert area | |
CN105804737A (en) | Method for solving formation porosity on basis of iterative algorithm | |
Li et al. | Classification of tight sandstone reservoirs based on NMR logging | |
CN111679318B (en) | Method and system for identifying fracture system in reservoir | |
CN110529106B (en) | Method for determining content of coal seam micro-components by using logging information | |
Wang et al. | Predicting gas content in coalbed methane reservoirs using seismic waveform indication inversion: a case study from the Upper Carboniferous Benxi Formation, eastern Ordos Basin, China | |
Wu et al. | Uncertainty analysis of shale gas simulation: consideration of basic petrophysical properties |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
TR01 | Transfer of patent right | ||
TR01 | Transfer of patent right |
Effective date of registration: 20200812 Address after: 100728 Beijing, Chaoyangmen, North Street, No. 22, No. Co-patentee after: SINOPEC OILFIELD SERVICE Corp. Patentee after: SINOPEC Group Co-patentee after: SINOPEC OILFIELD SERVICE JIANGHAN Corp. Address before: 100029, Beijing, Chaoyang District Xin Tung Street, a No. 6, Twelfth layers Co-patentee before: LOGGING COMPANY, SINOPEC OILFIELD SERVICE JIANGHAN Corp. Patentee before: SINOPEC OILFIELD SERVICE Corp. |
|
TR01 | Transfer of patent right |
Effective date of registration: 20250610 Address after: 100728 Beijing, Chaoyangmen, North Street, No. 22, No. Patentee after: SINOPEC Group Country or region after: China Patentee after: Sinopec Petroleum Engineering Technology Service Co.,Ltd. Patentee after: SINOPEC OILFIELD SERVICE JIANGHAN Corp. Patentee after: Sinopec Jingwei Co.,Ltd. Patentee after: Jianghan logging branch of Sinopec Jingwei Co.,Ltd. Address before: 100728 Beijing, Chaoyangmen, North Street, No. 22, No. Patentee before: SINOPEC Group Country or region before: China Patentee before: SINOPEC OILFIELD SERVICE Corp. Patentee before: SINOPEC OILFIELD SERVICE JIANGHAN Corp. |