CN105139119A - College teachers' current scientific research capability evaluation model and system - Google Patents

College teachers' current scientific research capability evaluation model and system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN105139119A
CN105139119A CN201510509197.6A CN201510509197A CN105139119A CN 105139119 A CN105139119 A CN 105139119A CN 201510509197 A CN201510509197 A CN 201510509197A CN 105139119 A CN105139119 A CN 105139119A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
college
scientific research
capacity
score
college teachers
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201510509197.6A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
严军荣
卢玉龙
江雅芬
叶景畅
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hangzhou Houbo Technology Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Hangzhou Houbo Technology Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hangzhou Houbo Technology Co Ltd filed Critical Hangzhou Houbo Technology Co Ltd
Priority to CN201510509197.6A priority Critical patent/CN105139119A/en
Publication of CN105139119A publication Critical patent/CN105139119A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Electrically Operated Instructional Devices (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a college teachers' current scientific research capability evaluation model and system. The system comprises 1) a college teachers' scientific research capability evaluation model establishing module, wherein the module comprises four parts: setting a college teachers' information input port, setting a college teachers' current scientific research capability evaluation index, determining the scoring rule for the college teachers' current scientific research capability evaluation indexes, and setting a weighted value input port; 2) a college teachers' information input module: inputting the college teachers' information to the college teachers' information input port of an evaluation model; 3) a user's weight setting module: the user can set the weight Omega i of each index according to the requirement; 4) a college teachers' scientific research capability evaluation model: calculating the score Si of each index of the college teachers according to the scoring standard of the model; 5) a score calculation and evaluation result display module: the calculation formula is: (as shown in the description). The college teachers' current scientific research capability evaluation model and system can solve the technical problem for performing reasonable evaluation of the college teachers' current scientific research capability.

Description

The capacity of scientific research evaluation model that a kind of College Teachers is current and system
Technical field
The invention belongs to areas of information technology, particularly relate to the current capacity of scientific research evaluation model of a kind of College Teachers and system.
Background technology
Existing College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation model adopts the analytical hierarchy process of inferring based on performance usually, this analytical hierarchy process requires according to large classification and the even less classification of little classification, enumerate out all scientific payoffss being evaluated College Teachers very in detail, to infer the power of its capacity of scientific research.This model has following three shortcomings: one is that model is very complicated, requires that the information of input is too much, causes the difficulty of information; Two is that the scientific payoffs of College Teachers depends on the external conditions such as the scientific research of seminar is accumulative, research funding to a great extent, and the quality of College Teachers itself and potentiality are not considered wherein; Three is evaluate based on the capacity of scientific research of scientific payoffs to College Teachers in past, can not reflect the capacity of scientific research that College Teachers is current.
For the problems referred to above, the present invention proposes a kind of simple evaluation model and system that can reflect the current capacity of scientific research of College Teachers, thus the capacity of scientific research current to College Teachers is more reasonably evaluated.
Summary of the invention
Technical matters to be solved by this invention is the current capacity of scientific research evaluation of College Teachers, proposes the current capacity of scientific research evaluation model of a kind of College Teachers and system.
Technical scheme of the present invention realizes by software mode (such as micro-letter public platform, mobile phone A PP and other application software etc.).
The current capacity of scientific research evaluation model of College Teachers that the present invention proposes, it mainly comprises and arranges plan college teacher's information's input port, arranges College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation index, determines the scoring rule of College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation index and arrange weighted value input port four parts.
1, plan college teacher's information's input port is set.
Plan college teacher's information's input port is set, to input plan college teacher's information.
2, College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation index is set.
The every terms of information of College Teachers is integrated into the 8 class indexs such as age, educational background, graduation universities and colleges, the deadline of academic title, recently achievement (paper, invention, teaching material and project), paper that the first authors is delivered, the patent of the first authors mandate and the project born, all kinds of index is as follows:
(1) age: 1. 2. 3. 4. less than 28 years old and more than 50 years old year of 40-50 in 35-40 year in 28-35 year;
(2) educational background: 1. post-doctor 2. doctor 3. doctor read 4. master 5. master reading 6. undergraduate course (post-doctor, doctor being read reading also to regard a kind of learning experiences as with master) herein;
(3) graduation universities and colleges: 1. external and universities and colleges of Hongkong and Macro 2. 985 universities and colleges 3. 211 universities and colleges 4. common agricultural technical;
(4) academic title: 1. senior 2. secondary senior 3. middle rank is 4. elementary;
(5) deadline of nearest achievement (paper, invention, teaching material and project): 1. within 2 years 2. in 3 years 3. in 4 years 4. in 5 years 5. more than 5 years;
(6) paper delivered of the first authors: 1. SCI 2. EI 3. one-level periodical 4. core periodical 5. common periodical;
(7) patent of the first authors mandate: 1. patent of invention 2. utility model;
(8) project born: 1. State Project 2. provincial project 3. provincial department level project 4. city-level project.
3, the scoring rule of College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation index is determined.
The score scope of indices standard is 0-100, specifically can arrange according to following situation:
(1) at the age: known by data consultation, the scientific research personnel in 28-35 year is full of vitality, experienced, has great Scientific Research Potential, and 35-40 year takes second place, and 40-50 year, the researcher of less than 28 years old and more than 50 years old was worst again;
(2) educational background: doctor and post-doctor occupy very important position in the research work of country, the difference in the scientific research visual field of bringing due to academic difference has been embodied in the middle of score;
(3) to graduate universities and colleges: external and universities and colleges of Hongkong and Macro and 985 universities and colleges have the advantages such as scientific research basis is outstanding, scientific research atmosphere is good, and the College Teachers of graduating generally accounts for critical positions in research work, and 211 universities and colleges take second place, and common agricultural technical is worst;
(4) academic title: the Scientific Research Potential that evaluation model of the present invention is directed to College Teachers is marked, think that the College Teachers of intermediate title more has research enthusiasm so give best result, associate professorship is taken second place, and again, elementary academic is worst for high title;
(5) deadline of nearest achievement (paper, invention, teaching material and project): have the College Teachers of scientific payoffs have better scientific research state and be full of potentiality in the recent period, so provide high score, time mark more remote is lower, gives minimum point in 5 years without any the College Teachers of achievement;
(6) paper delivered of the first authors: scored according to the quality of paper and quantity, wherein the score of each section of paper shows in FIG, the mark of the paper index finally obtained is the summation score (upper limit is 100 points, more than 100 points by 100 points) of its each section paper;
(7) patent of the first authors mandate: with the scoring rule of (6), according to the dissimilar score of patent, the mark of the patent index finally obtained is the summation score of its each section patent (upper limit is 100 points, more than 100 points by 100 points);
(8) project born: with the scoring rule of (6), (7), according to the dissimilar score of project, the mark of the project indicator finally obtained is the summation score of its each project (upper limit is 100 points, more than 100 points by 100 points).Complete criterion and scoring rule thereof are as shown in Figure 1.
4, weighted value input port is set.
The weighted value that indices reserved by model arranges port to user, and user arranges rule according to respective demand according to weighted value and carries out weighted value setting.Weighted value arranges rule: set indices weighted value as ω i, it should meet formula 1.
(formula 1).
So far, whole model is set up and is terminated, and the fish scale-shaped model of College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation model as shown in Figure 2.Wherein in small circle " ... " represent corresponding scoring value.
The current capacity of scientific research evaluation system of College Teachers that the present invention proposes, it comprises sets up College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation model module, input plan college teacher's information module, arranges user's weight module, evaluates College Teachers capacity of scientific research module, calculates mark and display evaluation result module.
1, College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation model module is set up: set up to comprise and plan college teacher's information's input port is set, College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation index is set, determines the scoring rule of College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation index and the College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation model of weighted value input port four parts is set.
2, plan college teacher's information's module is inputted: plan college teacher's information's input port plan college teacher's information being input to College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation model.
3, user's weight module is set: user, according to respective demand, arranges port at the weighted value of College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation model and carries out weighted value setting.
4, evaluate College Teachers capacity of scientific research module: the score standard according to model carries out mark calculating to the teacher's information be incorporated in index, that counts indices must be divided into Si, and the indices weight that user is arranged is ω i.
5, mark and display evaluation result module is calculated: final score is calculated by formula 2.
(formula 2)
Score R is the first estate more than 85 points, score R below 85 points more than 75 points be the second grade, score R below 75 points more than 60 points be the tertiary gradient, remaining is the fourth estate, and above grade is as finally evaluating display.
The system chart of whole College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation system as shown in Figure 3.
Model of the present invention and system have the following advantages.
(1) compare the College Teachers evaluation model of traditional batch time, the model that the present invention proposes is simple and be easier to realize.
(2) based on information such as age, educational background, academic title and scientific payoffs deadlines, the capacity of scientific research that College Teachers is current can be reflected, and be not only the capacity of scientific research in the past.
(3) by arranging different weighted values, to adapt to different application scenarios, such as colleges and universities' situation and enterprise's situation.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is the current capacity of scientific research evaluation index of College Teachers and score figure thereof.
Fig. 2 is the fish scale-shaped illustraton of model of the current capacity of scientific research evaluation model of College Teachers.
Fig. 3 is the system chart of the current capacity of scientific research evaluation system of College Teachers.
Fig. 4 is current capacity of scientific research evaluation index and the score figure thereof of College Teachers in example.
Fig. 5 is the current concrete shot chart of capacity of scientific research evaluation index of College Teachers in example.
Embodiment
Below the preferred embodiment of the present invention is elaborated.
This example comprises the application process of the foundation of the current capacity of scientific research evaluation model of higher education teacher and the current capacity of scientific research evaluation system of College Teachers.
The capacity of scientific research evaluation model that the College Teachers that the present invention proposes is current, its process of establishing is as follows.
1, plan college teacher's information's input port is set.
Plan college teacher's information's input port is set, to input plan college teacher's information.
2, College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation index is set.
The every terms of information of College Teachers is integrated into the 8 class indexs such as age, educational background, graduation universities and colleges, the deadline of academic title, recently achievement (paper, invention, teaching material and project), paper that the first authors is delivered, the patent of the first authors mandate and the project born, all kinds of index is as follows:
(1) age: 1. 2. 3. 4. less than 28 years old and more than 50 years old year of 40-50 in 35-40 year in 28-35 year;
(2) educational background: 1. post-doctor 2. doctor 3. doctor read 4. master 5. master reading 6. undergraduate course;
(3) graduation universities and colleges: 1. external and universities and colleges of Hongkong and Macro 2. 985 universities and colleges 3. 211 universities and colleges 4. common agricultural technical;
(4) academic title: 1. senior 2. secondary senior 3. middle rank is 4. elementary;
(5) deadline of nearest achievement (paper, invention, teaching material and project): 1. within 2 years 2. in 3 years 3. in 4 years 4. in 5 years 5. more than 5 years;
(6) paper delivered of the first authors: 1. SCI 2. EI 3. one-level periodical 4. core periodical 5. common periodical;
(7) patent of the first authors mandate: 1. patent of invention 2. utility model;
(8) project born: 1. State Project 2. provincial project 3. provincial department level project 4. city-level project.
3, the scoring rule of College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation index is determined.
The score scope of indices standard is 0-100, in this example, to the score of all standard as shown in Figure 4.
4, weighted value input port is set.
Model reserves the weight ports of indices to user, and user arranges rule according to respective demand according to weighted value and carries out weighted value setting.If indices weighted value is ω i, weighted value arranges rule and meets formula 1.
Now, the capacity of scientific research evaluation model that College Teachers is current is successfully established.
The capacity of scientific research evaluation system that College Teachers of the present invention is current, its application is as follows.
1, College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation model module is set up: set up to comprise and plan college teacher's information's input port is set, College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation index is set, determines the scoring rule of College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation index and the College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation model of weighted value input port four parts is set.
2, input College Teachers module: by from network collection to plan college teacher's information (teacher A and teacher B) be input to plan college teacher's information's input port of College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation model.
The information of College Teachers A is: 30 years old age, doctor's educational background, graduate from Southeast China University, the deadline (within 1 year) of associate professorship, recently achievement (paper, invention, teaching material and project), paper (2 sections of SCI, 1 section of EI, 4 sections of one-level periodicals, 2 sections of core periodicals) that the first authors is delivered, the patent (3 inventions, 2 utility models) of the first authors mandate and the project (State Project 1, provincial 2) born.
The information of teacher B is: 45 years old age, master's educational background, graduate from Shanghai Communications University, paper that the deadline (within 3 years) of high title, recently achievement (paper, invention, teaching material and project), the first authors are delivered (1 section of SCI, 2 sections of one-level periodicals, 3 sections of core periodicals, 5 sections common), the patent (2 inventions) of the first authors mandate and the project (provincial 1, provincial department level project 1, city-level project 4) born.
3, user's weight module is set: user, according to respective demand, arranges port at the weighted value of College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation model and carries out weighted value setting.Such as, indices weight arranges as follows: the patent 0.1 of deadline 0.15 of age 0.15, educational background 0.2, graduation universities and colleges 0.1, academic title 0.1, recently achievement (paper, invention, teaching material and project), paper 0.1 that the first authors is delivered, the first authors mandate, the project 0.1 born.
4, College Teachers capacity of scientific research module is evaluated: the score standard according to model carries out mark calculating to the teacher's information be incorporated in index, and the final score of teacher A and teacher B indices as shown in Figure 5.
5, mark and display evaluation result module is calculated: the mark of indices is multiplied by the summation of respective weight for final scoring.
A scoring RA=0.15*100+0.2*100+0.1*100+0.1*90+0.15*100+0.1*100+0.1* 70+0.1*70=93; B scoring RB=0.15*70+0.2*60+0.1*100+0.1*80+0.15*80+0.1*70+0.1*40+0 .1*50=68.5.Then mark teacher A at the first estate, teacher B scoring shows in this result of the tertiary gradient.
Certainly; those of ordinary skill in the art will be appreciated that, it is of the present invention that above embodiment is only used to explanation, and not as limitation of the invention; as long as within the scope of the invention, all will protection scope of the present invention be fallen into the change of above embodiment, modification.

Claims (6)

1. the capacity of scientific research evaluation model that College Teachers is current, is characterized in that: comprise and arrange plan college teacher's information's input port, arrange College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation index, determine the scoring rule of College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation index and arrange weighted value input port.
2. model as claimed in claim 1, is characterized in that: arrange plan college teacher's information's input port: for arranging plan college teacher's information's input port, input for plan college teacher's information.
3. model as claimed in claim 1, is characterized in that: arrange College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation index: for the every terms of information of College Teachers being integrated into 8 indexs such as age, educational background, graduation universities and colleges, the deadline of academic title, recently achievement (paper, invention, teaching material and project), paper that the first authors is delivered, the patent of the first authors mandate and the project born; Determine that the criteria for classification of indices is as follows:
(1) age: 1. 2. 3. 4. less than 28 years old and more than 50 years old year of 40-50 in 35-40 year in 28-35 year;
(2) educational background: 1. post-doctor 2. doctor 3. doctor read 4. master 5. master reading 6. undergraduate course (post-doctor, doctor being read reading also to regard a kind of learning experiences as with master) herein;
(3) graduation universities and colleges: 1. external and universities and colleges of Hongkong and Macro 2. 985 universities and colleges 3. 211 universities and colleges 4. common agricultural technical;
(4) academic title: 1. senior 2. secondary senior 3. middle rank is 4. elementary;
(5) deadline of nearest achievement (paper, invention, teaching material and project): 1. within 2 years 2. in 3 years 3. in 4 years 4. in 5 years 5. more than 5 years;
(6) paper delivered of the first authors: 1. SCI 2. EI 3. one-level periodical 4. core periodical 5. common periodical;
(7) patent of the first authors mandate: 1. patent of invention 2. utility model;
(8) project born: 1. State Project 2. provincial project 3. provincial department level project 4. city-level project.
4. model as claimed in claim 1, it is characterized in that: the scoring rule determining College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation index: for providing the score of indices standard, score scope is 0-100, and concrete score can be arranged according to concrete condition:
(1) age: the score in age bracket 28-35 year, 35-40 year, 40-50 year, less than 28 years old or more than 50 years old successively by height on earth;
(2) educational background: doctor and post-doctor, doctor reading, master, the score of master reading, below undergraduate course and undergraduate course successively by height on earth;
(3) to graduate universities and colleges: the score of external and universities and colleges of Hongkong and Macro and 985 universities and colleges, 211 universities and colleges, common agricultural technical successively by height on earth;
(4) academic title: intermediate title, associate professorship, high title, the score of elementary academic is successively by height on earth;
(5) deadline of nearest achievement (paper, invention, teaching material and project): the time, nearlyer score was higher, time mark far away is lower, gives minimum point in 5 years without any the College Teachers of achievement;
(6) paper delivered of the first authors: scored according to the quality of paper and quantity, the mark of paper index is the summation score of its each section paper (upper limit is 100 points, more than 100 points by 100 points);
(7) patent of the first authors mandate: with the scoring rule of (6), the mark of patent index is the summation score of its all kinds of patent (upper limit is 100 points, more than 100 points by 100 points);
(8) project born: with the scoring rule of (6), (7), according to the dissimilar score of project, the mark of the project indicator finally obtained is the summation score of its each project (upper limit is 100 points, more than 100 points by 100 points).
5. model as claimed in claim 1, it is characterized in that: weighted value input port is set: the weighted value that indices reserved by model arranges port to user, user arranges rule according to respective demand according to weighted value and carries out weighted value setting, if indices weighted value is ω i, arranging rule is: .
6. the capacity of scientific research evaluation system that College Teachers is current, is characterized in that comprising and sets up College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation model module, input plan college teacher's information module, arranges user's weight module, evaluates College Teachers capacity of scientific research module, calculates mark and display evaluation result module;
Set up College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation model module: plan college teacher's information's input port is set for setting up to comprise, College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation index is set, determines the scoring rule of College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation index and the College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation model of weighted value input port four parts is set;
Input plan college teacher's information module: for plan college teacher's information being input to plan college teacher's information's input port of College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation model;
User's weight module is set: for user according to respective demand, port is set at the weighted value of College Teachers capacity of scientific research evaluation model and carries out weighted value setting;
Evaluate College Teachers capacity of scientific research module: carry out mark calculating for the score standard according to model to the teacher's information be incorporated in index, that counts indices must be divided into Si, and the indices weight that user is arranged is ω i;
Calculate mark and display evaluation result module: final score calculating formula is: , score R is the first estate more than 85 points, score R below 85 points more than 75 points be the second grade, score R below 75 points more than 60 points be the tertiary gradient, remaining is the fourth estate, and above grade shows as final appraisal results.
CN201510509197.6A 2015-08-18 2015-08-18 College teachers' current scientific research capability evaluation model and system Pending CN105139119A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201510509197.6A CN105139119A (en) 2015-08-18 2015-08-18 College teachers' current scientific research capability evaluation model and system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201510509197.6A CN105139119A (en) 2015-08-18 2015-08-18 College teachers' current scientific research capability evaluation model and system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN105139119A true CN105139119A (en) 2015-12-09

Family

ID=54724459

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201510509197.6A Pending CN105139119A (en) 2015-08-18 2015-08-18 College teachers' current scientific research capability evaluation model and system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN105139119A (en)

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106651167A (en) * 2016-12-16 2017-05-10 成都生命基线科技有限公司 Biological information engineer skill rating system
CN106651687A (en) * 2016-09-28 2017-05-10 杭州电子科技大学 School student performance evaluation model and system
CN107480936A (en) * 2017-07-11 2017-12-15 杭州电子科技大学 A kind of talent ability depicting method based on scientific achievement data
CN107644301A (en) * 2017-10-13 2018-01-30 温志强 Computer based talent assessment method and system
CN107742188A (en) * 2017-11-06 2018-02-27 承德医学院 A kind of College Teachers teaching and scientific research feedback on performance management system
CN107767065A (en) * 2017-10-31 2018-03-06 语联网(武汉)信息技术有限公司 A kind of interpreter's multidimensional aptitude tests apparatus for evaluating and methods of marking
CN108171402A (en) * 2017-12-11 2018-06-15 中国科学院大学 Item recommendation method and device
CN108171401A (en) * 2017-12-11 2018-06-15 中国科学院大学 A kind of recommendation method and system of scientific research personnel
WO2019084863A1 (en) * 2017-11-02 2019-05-09 刘莉 Electronic medical record evaluation system
WO2019084864A1 (en) * 2017-11-02 2019-05-09 刘莉 Method and apparatus for evaluating electronic medical record
CN110046807A (en) * 2019-03-29 2019-07-23 成都乐陪信息科技有限公司 Teachers'Growth evaluation method and system based on electronic record appraisal management
CN110298774A (en) * 2019-06-27 2019-10-01 上海瑞涯信息科技有限公司 A kind of calculation method for bearing index for quantifying teachers' instruction
CN110852722A (en) * 2019-11-18 2020-02-28 江苏苏伦大数据科技研究院有限公司 Information matching system for introducing high-level talents
CN110991924A (en) * 2019-12-13 2020-04-10 电子科技大学 Structural equation model-based high-level thesis publication number influence factor evaluation method
CN111008809A (en) * 2019-07-18 2020-04-14 宁波大学 Scientific research project application intelligent matching pushing method based on scientific research capability data
CN113642821A (en) * 2021-01-29 2021-11-12 武汉威尔莱博科技有限公司 Intelligent analysis ranking system for subject construction

Cited By (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106651687A (en) * 2016-09-28 2017-05-10 杭州电子科技大学 School student performance evaluation model and system
CN106651167A (en) * 2016-12-16 2017-05-10 成都生命基线科技有限公司 Biological information engineer skill rating system
CN107480936A (en) * 2017-07-11 2017-12-15 杭州电子科技大学 A kind of talent ability depicting method based on scientific achievement data
CN107644301A (en) * 2017-10-13 2018-01-30 温志强 Computer based talent assessment method and system
CN107767065A (en) * 2017-10-31 2018-03-06 语联网(武汉)信息技术有限公司 A kind of interpreter's multidimensional aptitude tests apparatus for evaluating and methods of marking
WO2019084863A1 (en) * 2017-11-02 2019-05-09 刘莉 Electronic medical record evaluation system
WO2019084864A1 (en) * 2017-11-02 2019-05-09 刘莉 Method and apparatus for evaluating electronic medical record
CN107742188A (en) * 2017-11-06 2018-02-27 承德医学院 A kind of College Teachers teaching and scientific research feedback on performance management system
CN108171401A (en) * 2017-12-11 2018-06-15 中国科学院大学 A kind of recommendation method and system of scientific research personnel
CN108171402A (en) * 2017-12-11 2018-06-15 中国科学院大学 Item recommendation method and device
CN110046807A (en) * 2019-03-29 2019-07-23 成都乐陪信息科技有限公司 Teachers'Growth evaluation method and system based on electronic record appraisal management
CN110298774A (en) * 2019-06-27 2019-10-01 上海瑞涯信息科技有限公司 A kind of calculation method for bearing index for quantifying teachers' instruction
CN111008809A (en) * 2019-07-18 2020-04-14 宁波大学 Scientific research project application intelligent matching pushing method based on scientific research capability data
CN111008809B (en) * 2019-07-18 2023-04-18 宁波大学 Scientific research project application intelligent matching pushing method based on scientific research capability data
CN110852722A (en) * 2019-11-18 2020-02-28 江苏苏伦大数据科技研究院有限公司 Information matching system for introducing high-level talents
CN110991924A (en) * 2019-12-13 2020-04-10 电子科技大学 Structural equation model-based high-level thesis publication number influence factor evaluation method
CN113642821A (en) * 2021-01-29 2021-11-12 武汉威尔莱博科技有限公司 Intelligent analysis ranking system for subject construction

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN105139119A (en) College teachers' current scientific research capability evaluation model and system
Bason Design-led innovation in government
Hao Cumulative causation of rural migration and initial peri-urbanization in China
Morton et al. Virtual city models: Avoidance of obsolescence
CN107564391A (en) Public administration method and training platform based on simulation sand table
CN109064360A (en) A kind of course recommended method based on student's preference degree
Xie et al. Study on Multi-Objective Optimization of Sponge Facilities Combination at Urban Block Level: A Residential Complex Case Study in Nanjing, China
CN107798638A (en) Method is recommended based on the curricula-variable for improving radar map
CN107403238A (en) The optimization method of county domain Balanced Development of Compulsory Education based on population
Thangavelu et al. Skills and human capital development policies of ASEAN
CN108664539A (en) A kind of course project matching process and system
Wang et al. Mountainous village relocation planning with 3D GIS virtual imaging space model and neural network
Hilyer Higher education in the Northwest Territories
CN109815374A (en) Low-voltage distribution network platform region title similarity matching methods and matching system
Westmore et al. Public policy reforms to further improve Portuguese export performance
Ding et al. ANALYSIS REPORT ON TALENT DEMAND IN SMART CITIES
Csizmazia Comparison of economic and education development in Singapore and South Korea
CN206907418U (en) A kind of combined type Talent-cultivating Quality analysis plates
Abdin Service Sector of Bangladesh Deserves Extra Care
Snow Towards an urban design agenda for Queensland? The role of the UDAL
Edgington Japanese Approaches to Technology Clusters: Implications for British Columbia
Yuechao How Local Undergraduate Colleges Build the Occupation Education in the Cloud Economy
Mikkelsen Formation of an industrial labour force in Kenya: experiences of labour training in the metal manufacturing industries
CN113496443A (en) Task issuing system for realizing intelligent reading in school
Yingkang The examination system in China: The case of Zhongkao mathematics

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
WD01 Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication
WD01 Invention patent application deemed withdrawn after publication

Application publication date: 20151209