CN104715159A - Multi-hierarchy analysis method for risk assessment of linear engineering geological hazards - Google Patents

Multi-hierarchy analysis method for risk assessment of linear engineering geological hazards Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN104715159A
CN104715159A CN201510151500.XA CN201510151500A CN104715159A CN 104715159 A CN104715159 A CN 104715159A CN 201510151500 A CN201510151500 A CN 201510151500A CN 104715159 A CN104715159 A CN 104715159A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
factor
matrix
hazard
centerdot
sentencing
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201510151500.XA
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
孔纪名
田述军
崔云
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment IMHE of CAS
Original Assignee
Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment IMHE of CAS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment IMHE of CAS filed Critical Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment IMHE of CAS
Priority to CN201510151500.XA priority Critical patent/CN104715159A/en
Publication of CN104715159A publication Critical patent/CN104715159A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a multi-hierarchy analysis method for risk assessment of linear engineering geological hazards. The method comprises the following steps: (1) collecting data of an assessment area; (2) dividing risk assessment segments of the linear engineering geological hazards; (3) establishing a geological hazard multi-hierarchy comprehensive discrimination model factor set; (4) determining a geological hazard multi-hierarchy comprehensive discrimination model weight set; (5) determining a geological hazard multi-hierarchy comprehensive discrimination matrix; and (6) determining the geological hazard risk assessment grades of the segments. According to the method disclosed by the invention, the segment division is performed according to linear engineering characteristics aiming at the defects of an existing linear engineering geological hazard risk assessment method, a geological hazard occurrence principle is combined to divide the factors influencing the hazard occurrence into environmental background factors and trigger factors, and geological hazard risk grade assessment of each segment in the linear engineering is realized by establishing a base layer, a criterion layer and a target layer of the geological hazard risk assessment.

Description

A kind of multi-hierarchy analytic method of linear engineering Risk Evaluation of Geological Hazard
Technical field
The present invention relates to the method for a kind of geological exploration assessment, be specifically related to a kind of multi-hierarchy analytic method of linear engineering Risk Evaluation of Geological Hazard.
Background technology
Two global seismic zones are crossed over by China.Under the impact of circum-Pacific seismic zone and Mediterranean-Himalaya seismic zone, China becomes the area that global continental earthquake is the most concentrated, activity is the highest.Meanwhile, China is man of Shi Yigeduo mountain country also, and mountain region area accounts for 2/3rds of area.Under such geology and landforms background, China becomes affects one of the most serious country by geologic hazard in the world, according to the statistical study of " the Chinese Geological environment publication " since two thousand one announced Ministry of Land and Resources, the death toll that China causes because of geologic hazard is every year all more than 300 people, and direct economic loss is huge.
Geologic hazard is environmental exact details factor and the coefficient result of triggering factors.Environmental exact details factor comprises again that slope is high, the gradient, engineering geology rock group, bank slope structure, hydrogeological condition, River function geologic function, soft stratum situation, complexity of structures, ground deformation situation, existing dynamic geological, vegetation development situation, rock-mass quality, discontinuities array situation etc., these environmental exact details factors are internal factors of geologic hazard generation and development and evolution.Triggering factors mainly comprises heavy rain, earthquake, Human dried bloodstains etc., and these factors are the transient causes promoting that geologic hazard occurs.Breeding the environmental exact details factor that geologic hazard occurs is the necessary condition of causing disaster, and triggering factors is the adequate condition that geologic hazard occurs, and geologic hazard needs just can occur under the acting in conjunction of certain environmental exact details factor and triggering factors.
Along with Chinese society and expanding economy, the propelling of development of the West Regions, the wire engineering construction fast developments such as high-speed railway, highway, oil and natural gas pipeline.Due to China's geology and geomorphologic conditions complexity, these wire engineerings all face the threat of geologic hazard at its mountain segment.In recent years, in the wire engineering construction of mountain area, such as the slope project accident of landslide, avalanche, falling rocks, rubble flow etc. frequently occurs, and causes great harm to engineering construction and local economic development, people's lives.Such as, have high slope and nearly more than 200, landslide in the section 300krn of Jingzhu Highway In Dawu North Guangdong, harnessing landslide and Reinforcing High Slope increase nearly 800,000,000 yuan of investment.Yuanjiang to grind black highway landslide and high side slope expense reach more than 600,000,000 yuan.Nanning to Kunming railway eight crosses landslide, station, volume 500,000 m 3, control expense is up to 9,000 ten thousand yuan.
Summary of the invention
(1) goal of the invention
The deficiency of linear Geological Hazard risk assessment method, according to the feature of linear engineering, carry out section partition, and be divided into environmental exact details factor and triggering factors in conjunction with geologic hazard genetis method principle by affecting its factor occurred, by setting up the basal layer of Risk Evaluation of Geological Hazard, rule layer and destination layer respectively, realize linear engineering each section geological hazard dangerous level evaluation.
(2) technical scheme
A kind of multi-hierarchy analytic method of linear engineering Risk Evaluation of Geological Hazard, by general investigation and data collection, on the basis of geologize Disasters Type and plague law, section partition is carried out to linear engineering, set up the basal layer of geologic hazard Multi-level Evaluation, rule layer and destination layer respectively, its concrete steps comprise:
(1) district's Data acquisition, is assessed: taking a broad survey and collecting on the basis of wire engineering data, sum up wire line of project Geographical Environment Background and engineering geological condition, conclude geologic hazard type and engineering characteristic, trigger reason and influence factor, developmental condition and the regularity of distribution, hazard level and development trend;
(2) linear engineering Risk Evaluation of Geological Hazard section partition: according to linear engineering geographical environment along the line feature or the demand of engineering construction own, section partition is carried out to linear engineering, arrange and conclude type and the feature of each section varying environment factor of background and triggering factors, for the step analysis carrying out Risk Evaluation of Geological Hazard lays the foundation and condition;
(3) set up geologic hazard multi-level comprehensive discrimination factor of a model collection: each factor of risk assessment classified, set up dangerous comprehensive discrimination factor of a model collection; The set that comprehensive discrimination factor of a model collection (U) is made up of n the factor affecting geologic hazard, is expressed as U={u 1, u 2, u 3..., u n, element u ibe i-th factor set, can be specifically given according to the factor affecting geologic hazard, each factor set comprises m factor, i.e. U i={ u i1, u i2, u i3..., u im;
(4) geologic hazard multi-level comprehensive discrimination Model Weight collection is determined: adopt analytical hierarchy process, determine weight allocation matrix w i={ w 1, w 2, w 3..., w n, build the potentiality number of degrees according to influence factor and quantize the weight of criterion and be normalized; Set up recursive hierarchy structure evaluation model according to classification factor, set up to compare based on this and sentence knowledge matrix; Weight vector computation is determined by eigenvalue method usually, for ensureing accuracy and the confidence level of sentencing knowledge matrix, completes sentencing the consistency check knowing matrix simultaneously;
A () Factor Weight vector calculation: the importance ranking of influence factor weight vectors and factor of evaluation, adopts eigenvalue method to calculate; If sentencing the Maximum characteristic root knowing matrix is λ max, proper vector is w, adopts root approximate solution, then the weight w of i-th influence factor iknow matrix Maximum characteristic root λ with sentencing maxcomputing formula be: to vector do normalized, namely then A={a 1, a 2..., a m} tfor required proper vector, sentence the characteristic root knowing matrix wherein (TA) ifor of vector T A iindividual element,
TA = ( TA ) 1 ( TA ) 2 ( TA ) 3 ( TA ) 4 = b 11 b 12 L b 1 n b 21 b 22 L b 2 n . . . . . . . . . . . . b n 1 b n 2 L b nn · a 1 a 2 . . . a n ;
B () sentences the consistency check of knowledge matrix index: in order to for avoiding other factors to sentence to the interference and guarantee of sentencing knowledge matrix the confidence level and accuracy of knowing matrix sort, require that sentencing knowledge matrix meets consistance, needs to carry out consistency check to sentencing knowledge matrix;
Test rating and coincident indicator are:
C &CenterDot; R &CenterDot; = C &CenterDot; I &CenterDot; R &CenterDot; I &CenterDot; C &CenterDot; I &CenterDot; = 1 n - 1 ( &lambda; max - n ) , Wherein CR knows matrix Consistency Ratio for sentencing, as CR < 0.1, think that sentencing knowledge matrix has good consistance, otherwise the value sentenced and know matrix element should be adjusted, CI knows matrix coincident indicator for sentencing, and RI sentences the Aver-age Random Consistency Index knowing matrix;
(5) the multi-level comprehensive discrimination matrix of geologic hazard: establish then the weight vector reflecting each Factor Weight, and meet normalizing condition; By B ~ = W &CenterDot; R = ( b 1 , b 2 , . . . , b n ) (0≤b j≤1), b j = &Sigma; i = 1 n w i &CenterDot; r ij Weighted average calculation model composite calulation, is subordinate to criterion according to maximum, namely for jth kind judges sentencing the status of knowing in model;
then the weight vector reflecting each Factor Weight, and meet normalizing condition, by B ~ = W &CenterDot; R = ( b 1 , b 2 , . . . , b n ) (0≤b j≤1), b j = &Sigma; i = 1 n w i &CenterDot; r ij Weighted average calculation model composite calulation, is subordinate to criterion according to maximum, namely for jth kind judges sentencing the status of knowing in model;
(6) determination of section Risk Evaluation of Geological Hazard grade: according to the result of multi-level comprehensive discrimination matrix, for the ease of evaluating the Hazard rank of geologic hazard, utilize semantics scale, be that geologic hazard incidence is high by geologic hazard grade classification five rank: I in potential geologic hazard multi-level comprehensive discrimination model, II is that geologic hazard incidence is high, III is that geologic hazard incidence is medium, and IV geologic hazard incidence is low, and V is for geologic hazard can not occur; For the ease of calculating, the semantics scale of subjective assessment quantizes by we, and assignment is 10,9,8 successively ... 2,1.
(3) beneficial effect
Compared with prior art, it has following beneficial effect in the present invention: the present invention is compared to traditional PROCESS FOR TREATMENT a lot of advantages: as equipment is simple, floor area is few, and plant maintenance is simple; And the sludge quantity produced is few, and the water percentage of mud is low, is easy to process; Mud as farmland organic fertilizer, can also do a recycling.Operation of the present invention is fairly simple, has flow process short, the plurality of advantages such as operating cost is low, and load is little, successful.What also can be applicable to high concentration can the process of biochemical, organic wastewater that can not be biochemical.Collecting methane system also can do combustion gas use the biogas collected in addition.And adsorb the objectionable impuritiess such as the free molecule in waste water through active carbon filter, also eliminate the peculiar smell in waste water.Waste water after process is recycled.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is one-piece construction schematic diagram of the present invention.
Embodiment
As shown in Figure 1, plant the multi-hierarchy analytic method of linear engineering Risk Evaluation of Geological Hazard, by general investigation and data collection, on the basis of geologize Disasters Type and plague law, section partition is carried out to linear engineering, set up the basal layer of geologic hazard Multi-level Evaluation, rule layer and destination layer respectively, its concrete steps comprise:
(1) district's Data acquisition, is assessed: taking a broad survey and collecting on the basis of wire engineering data, sum up wire line of project Geographical Environment Background and engineering geological condition, conclude geologic hazard type and engineering characteristic, trigger reason and influence factor, developmental condition and the regularity of distribution, hazard level and development trend.
(2) linear engineering Risk Evaluation of Geological Hazard section partition: according to linear engineering geographical environment along the line feature or the demand of engineering construction own, section partition is carried out to linear engineering, arrange and conclude type and the feature of each section varying environment factor of background and triggering factors, for the step analysis carrying out Risk Evaluation of Geological Hazard lays the foundation and condition.
(3) set up geologic hazard multi-level comprehensive discrimination factor of a model collection: each factor of risk assessment classified, set up dangerous comprehensive discrimination factor of a model collection.The set that comprehensive discrimination factor of a model collection (U) is made up of n the factor affecting geologic hazard, is expressed as U={u 1, u 2, u 3..., u n, element u ibe i-th factor set, can be specifically given according to the factor affecting geologic hazard, each factor set comprises m factor, i.e. U i={ u i1, u i2, u i3,..., u im.
(4) geologic hazard multi-level comprehensive discrimination Model Weight collection is determined: adopt analytical hierarchy process, determine weight allocation matrix w i={ w 1, w 2, w 3..., w n, build the potentiality number of degrees according to influence factor and quantize the weight of criterion and be normalized.Set up recursive hierarchy structure evaluation model according to classification factor, set up to compare based on this and sentence knowledge matrix.Weight vector computation is determined by eigenvalue method usually, for ensureing accuracy and the confidence level of sentencing knowledge matrix, completes sentencing the consistency check knowing matrix simultaneously.
A () Factor Weight vector calculation: the importance ranking of influence factor weight vectors and factor of evaluation, adopts eigenvalue method to calculate.If sentencing the Maximum characteristic root knowing matrix is λ max, proper vector is w, adopts root approximate solution, then the weight w of i-th influence factor iknow matrix Maximum characteristic root λ with sentencing maxcomputing formula be: to vector do normalized, namely then A={a 1, a 2..., a m} tfor required proper vector, sentence the characteristic root knowing matrix wherein (TA) ifor i-th element of vector T A,
TA = ( TA ) 1 ( TA ) 2 ( TA ) 3 ( TA ) 4 = b 11 b 12 L b 1 n b 21 b 22 L b 2 n . . . . . . . . . . . . b n 1 b n 2 L b nn &CenterDot; a 1 a 2 . . . a n
B () sentences the consistency check of knowledge matrix index: in order to for avoiding other factors to sentence to the interference and guarantee of sentencing knowledge matrix the confidence level and accuracy of knowing matrix sort, require that sentencing knowledge matrix meets consistance, needs to carry out consistency check to sentencing knowledge matrix.
Test rating and coincident indicator are:
C &CenterDot; R &CenterDot; = C &CenterDot; I &CenterDot; R &CenterDot; I &CenterDot; C &CenterDot; I &CenterDot; = 1 n - 1 ( &lambda; max - n ) , Wherein CR knows matrix Consistency Ratio for sentencing, as CR < 0.1, think that sentencing knowledge matrix has good consistance, otherwise the value sentenced and know matrix element should be adjusted, CI knows matrix coincident indicator for sentencing, and RI sentences the Aver-age Random Consistency Index knowing matrix.
(5) the multi-level comprehensive discrimination matrix of geologic hazard: establish then the weight vector reflecting each Factor Weight, and meet normalizing condition.By B ~ = W &CenterDot; R = ( b 1 , b 2 , . . . , b n ) (0≤b j≤1), b j = &Sigma; i = 1 n w i &CenterDot; r ij Weighted average calculation model composite calulation, is subordinate to criterion according to maximum, namely for jth kind judges sentencing the status of knowing in model.
then the weight vector reflecting each Factor Weight, and meet normalizing condition.By B ~ = W &CenterDot; R = ( b 1 , b 2 , . . . , b n ) (0≤b j≤1), b j = &Sigma; i = 1 n w i &CenterDot; r ij Weighted average calculation model composite calulation, is subordinate to criterion according to maximum, namely for jth kind judges sentencing the status of knowing in model.
(6) determination of section Risk Evaluation of Geological Hazard grade: according to the result of multi-level comprehensive discrimination matrix, for the ease of evaluating the Hazard rank of geologic hazard, utilize semantics scale, be that geologic hazard incidence is high by geologic hazard grade classification five rank: I in potential geologic hazard multi-level comprehensive discrimination model, II is that geologic hazard incidence is high, III is that geologic hazard incidence is medium, and IV geologic hazard incidence is low, and V is for geologic hazard can not occur.For the ease of calculating, the semantics scale of subjective assessment quantizes by we, and assignment is 10,9,8 successively ... 2,1.Geological hazard dangerous evaluation criteria part table 1.
Table 1 Geological Hazards Risk Evaluation quantitative classification standard
Embodiment recited above is only be described the preferred embodiment of the present invention, not limits the spirit and scope of the present invention.Under the prerequisite not departing from design concept of the present invention; the various modification that this area ordinary person makes technical scheme of the present invention and improvement; all should drop into protection scope of the present invention, the technology contents of request protection of the present invention, all records in detail in the claims.

Claims (1)

1. the multi-hierarchy analytic method of a linear engineering Risk Evaluation of Geological Hazard, by general investigation and data collection, on the basis of geologize Disasters Type and plague law, section partition is carried out to linear engineering, set up the basal layer of geologic hazard Multi-level Evaluation, rule layer and destination layer respectively, its concrete steps comprise:
(1) district's Data acquisition, is assessed: taking a broad survey and collecting on the basis of wire engineering data, sum up wire line of project Geographical Environment Background and engineering geological condition, conclude geologic hazard type and engineering characteristic, trigger reason and influence factor, developmental condition and the regularity of distribution, hazard level and development trend;
(2) linear engineering Risk Evaluation of Geological Hazard section partition: according to linear engineering geographical environment along the line feature or the demand of engineering construction own, section partition is carried out to linear engineering, arrange and conclude type and the feature of each section varying environment factor of background and triggering factors, for the step analysis carrying out Risk Evaluation of Geological Hazard lays the foundation and condition;
(3) set up geologic hazard multi-level comprehensive discrimination factor of a model collection: each factor of risk assessment classified, set up dangerous comprehensive discrimination factor of a model collection; The set that comprehensive discrimination factor of a model collection (U) is made up of n the factor affecting geologic hazard, is expressed as U={u 1, u 2, u 3..., u n, element u ibe i-th factor set, can be specifically given according to the factor affecting geologic hazard, each factor set comprises m factor, i.e. U i={ u i1, u i2, u i3..., u im;
(4) geologic hazard multi-level comprehensive discrimination Model Weight collection is determined: adopt analytical hierarchy process, determine weight allocation matrix w i={ w 1, w 2, w 3..., w n, build the potentiality number of degrees according to influence factor and quantize the weight of criterion and be normalized; Set up recursive hierarchy structure evaluation model according to classification factor, set up to compare based on this and sentence knowledge matrix; Weight vector computation is determined by eigenvalue method usually, for ensureing accuracy and the confidence level of sentencing knowledge matrix, completes sentencing the consistency check knowing matrix simultaneously;
A () Factor Weight vector calculation: the importance ranking of influence factor weight vectors and factor of evaluation, adopts eigenvalue method to calculate; If sentencing the Maximum characteristic root knowing matrix is λ max, proper vector is w, adopts root approximate solution, then the weight w of i-th influence factor iknow matrix Maximum characteristic root λ with sentencing maxcomputing formula be: to vector do normalized, namely then A={a 1, a 2..., a m} tfor required proper vector, sentence the characteristic root knowing matrix wherein (TA) ifor of vector T A iindividual element,
TA = ( TA ) 1 ( TA ) 2 ( TA ) 3 ( TA ) 4 b 11 b 12 L b 1 n b 21 b 22 L b 2 n . . . . . . . . . . . . b n 1 b n 2 L b nn &CenterDot; a 1 a 2 . . . a n ;
B () sentences the consistency check of knowledge matrix index: in order to for avoiding other factors to sentence to the interference and guarantee of sentencing knowledge matrix the confidence level and accuracy of knowing matrix sort, require that sentencing knowledge matrix meets consistance, needs to carry out consistency check to sentencing knowledge matrix;
Test rating and coincident indicator are:
C &CenterDot; R &CenterDot; = C &CenterDot; I &CenterDot; R &CenterDot; I &CenterDot; C &CenterDot; I &CenterDot; = 1 n - 1 ( &lambda; max - n ) , Wherein CR knows matrix Consistency Ratio for sentencing, as CR < 0.1, think that sentencing knowledge matrix has good consistance, otherwise the value sentenced and know matrix element should be adjusted, CI knows matrix coincident indicator for sentencing, and RI sentences the Aver-age Random Consistency Index knowing matrix;
(5) the multi-level comprehensive discrimination matrix of geologic hazard: establish then the weight vector reflecting each Factor Weight, and meet normalizing condition; By B ~ = W &CenterDot; R = ( b 1 , b 2 , . . . , b n ) ( 0 &le; b j &le; 1 ) , b j = &Sigma; i = 1 n w i &CenterDot; r ij Weighted average calculation model composite calulation, is subordinate to criterion according to maximum, namely for jth kind judges sentencing the status of knowing in model;
then the weight vector reflecting each Factor Weight, and meet normalizing condition, by B ~ = W &CenterDot; R = ( b 1 , b 2 , . . . , b n ) ( 0 &le; b j &le; 1 ) , b j = &Sigma; i = 1 n w i &CenterDot; r ij Weighted average calculation model composite calulation, is subordinate to criterion according to maximum, namely for jth kind judges sentencing the status of knowing in model;
(6) determination of section Risk Evaluation of Geological Hazard grade: according to the result of multi-level comprehensive discrimination matrix, for the ease of evaluating the Hazard rank of geologic hazard, utilize semantics scale, be that geologic hazard incidence is high by geologic hazard grade classification five rank: I in potential geologic hazard multi-level comprehensive discrimination model, II is that geologic hazard incidence is high, III is that geologic hazard incidence is medium, and IV geologic hazard incidence is low, and V is for geologic hazard can not occur; For the ease of calculating, the semantics scale of subjective assessment quantizes by we, and assignment is 10,9,8 successively ... 2,1.
CN201510151500.XA 2015-04-01 2015-04-01 Multi-hierarchy analysis method for risk assessment of linear engineering geological hazards Pending CN104715159A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201510151500.XA CN104715159A (en) 2015-04-01 2015-04-01 Multi-hierarchy analysis method for risk assessment of linear engineering geological hazards

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201510151500.XA CN104715159A (en) 2015-04-01 2015-04-01 Multi-hierarchy analysis method for risk assessment of linear engineering geological hazards

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN104715159A true CN104715159A (en) 2015-06-17

Family

ID=53414482

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201510151500.XA Pending CN104715159A (en) 2015-04-01 2015-04-01 Multi-hierarchy analysis method for risk assessment of linear engineering geological hazards

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN104715159A (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106815790A (en) * 2016-08-29 2017-06-09 中国辐射防护研究院 A kind of geological disposal site preselects location integrated evaluating method
CN107943880A (en) * 2017-11-15 2018-04-20 国网四川省电力公司经济技术研究院 A kind of susceptibility of geological hazards based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) improves appraisal procedure
CN108332696A (en) * 2018-01-27 2018-07-27 中国地质科学院探矿工艺研究所 landslide monitoring method selection method
CN108345972A (en) * 2017-01-24 2018-07-31 上海中信信息发展股份有限公司 Electronic record long-term preservation reliability comprehensive estimation method under multifactor complex environment
CN111144761A (en) * 2019-12-27 2020-05-12 成都理工大学 Railway route selection method based on typical underground geological disaster risk evaluation
CN111160644A (en) * 2019-12-27 2020-05-15 成都理工大学 Railway route selection method and device based on geological disaster risk assessment
CN112465356A (en) * 2020-11-30 2021-03-09 国网四川省电力公司电力科学研究院 Improved quantitative evaluation method and system for material vulnerability of landslide geological disaster
CN112561297A (en) * 2020-12-09 2021-03-26 中南大学 Geological disaster risk evaluation method for neighborhood influence under different terrains

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104134093A (en) * 2014-04-02 2014-11-05 贵州省交通规划勘察设计研究院股份有限公司 Surface line and point multilayer integrated forecasting method for highway geological hazards

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104134093A (en) * 2014-04-02 2014-11-05 贵州省交通规划勘察设计研究院股份有限公司 Surface line and point multilayer integrated forecasting method for highway geological hazards

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
刘莉等: "层次分析-模糊综合评价法在滑坡工程中的应用", 《三峡大学学报(自然科学版)》 *
孔纪名等: "基于地球多传感器网络信息的潜在滑坡判识模型", 《地球科学与环境学报》 *
戴建玲等: "线性工程岩溶塌陷危险性评价研究", 《中国岩溶》 *
焦赟等: "滑坡发育潜势度的层次-模糊综合评判", 《甘肃科学学报》 *

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106815790A (en) * 2016-08-29 2017-06-09 中国辐射防护研究院 A kind of geological disposal site preselects location integrated evaluating method
CN108345972A (en) * 2017-01-24 2018-07-31 上海中信信息发展股份有限公司 Electronic record long-term preservation reliability comprehensive estimation method under multifactor complex environment
CN107943880A (en) * 2017-11-15 2018-04-20 国网四川省电力公司经济技术研究院 A kind of susceptibility of geological hazards based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) improves appraisal procedure
CN107943880B (en) * 2017-11-15 2022-04-01 国网四川省电力公司经济技术研究院 Geological disaster susceptibility improvement and evaluation method based on analytic hierarchy process
CN108332696A (en) * 2018-01-27 2018-07-27 中国地质科学院探矿工艺研究所 landslide monitoring method selection method
CN111144761A (en) * 2019-12-27 2020-05-12 成都理工大学 Railway route selection method based on typical underground geological disaster risk evaluation
CN111160644A (en) * 2019-12-27 2020-05-15 成都理工大学 Railway route selection method and device based on geological disaster risk assessment
CN112465356A (en) * 2020-11-30 2021-03-09 国网四川省电力公司电力科学研究院 Improved quantitative evaluation method and system for material vulnerability of landslide geological disaster
CN112465356B (en) * 2020-11-30 2023-05-23 国网四川省电力公司电力科学研究院 Improved quantitative evaluation method and system for vulnerability of collapse geological disaster substance
CN112561297A (en) * 2020-12-09 2021-03-26 中南大学 Geological disaster risk evaluation method for neighborhood influence under different terrains

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN104715159A (en) Multi-hierarchy analysis method for risk assessment of linear engineering geological hazards
Li et al. Unascertained measure model of water and mud inrush risk evaluation in karst tunnels and its engineering application
Xue et al. Prediction of rock burst in underground caverns based on rough set and extensible comprehensive evaluation
CN106296475B (en) Tunnels and underground engineering is dashed forward discharge disaster polymorphic type combining evidences appraisal procedure
CN109447493B (en) Post-earthquake debris flow risk evaluation method based on source activity intensity
CN105044774A (en) Side slope stability prediction method under earthquake effect
CN106205060A (en) For outdoor pit Tailings Dam slope and land slide early alarming and forecasting method
Li et al. Risk assessment of floor water inrush using entropy weight and variation coefficient model
CN113570226A (en) Method for evaluating occurrence probability grade of tunnel water inrush disaster in fault fracture zone
CN111339486A (en) Deep foundation pit blasting vibration velocity risk level big data evaluation method
Li Comparison of empirical structural vulnerability rapid prediction models considering typical earthquakes
CN111160794A (en) Geological environment bearing capacity analysis method based on AHP-GIS coupling analysis
Ma et al. Evaluation of landslide susceptibility based on the occurrence mechanism of landslide: a case study in Yuan'an county, China
CN111507539A (en) Debris flow danger level evaluation method and system based on analytic hierarchy process
Liu et al. Risk assessment of debris flow in Ya’an city based on BP neural network
Cao et al. Landslide susceptibility assessment in Western Henan Province based on a comparison of conventional and ensemble machine learning
Guo et al. Application of an improved cloud model and distance discrimination to evaluate slope stability
He et al. Analysis on Spatio-Temporal Dynamic Evolution of Relative Resource Carrying Capacity of Coal Cities Based on PLE-EM-CPM Model.
Peng et al. Risk prediction of tunnel water or mud inrush based on disaster forewarning grading
Wu et al. Rock mass quality evaluation based on unascertained measure and intuitionistic fuzzy sets
Bian et al. Study on the natural mineral water resource bearing capacity and its driving factors in Fusong County, Changbai Mountain Area, Jilin Province of China
Wu et al. Relationship between landslides and lithology in the Three Gorges Reservoir area based on GIS and information value model
He et al. Prediction model of collapse risk based on information entropy and distance discriminant analysis method
Yu et al. Research on site classification method based on BP neural network
Zhang et al. Mine geological disaster risk assessment and management based on multisensor information fusion

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
EXSB Decision made by sipo to initiate substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20150617

RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication