CN104660391B - Interference elimination method between distributing cell in orthogonal frequency-time multiple access network - Google Patents

Interference elimination method between distributing cell in orthogonal frequency-time multiple access network Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN104660391B
CN104660391B CN201510096950.3A CN201510096950A CN104660391B CN 104660391 B CN104660391 B CN 104660391B CN 201510096950 A CN201510096950 A CN 201510096950A CN 104660391 B CN104660391 B CN 104660391B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
base station
user
power
interference
coordination
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
CN201510096950.3A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN104660391A (en
Inventor
蔡跃明
郑建超
林志
吴丹
杨文东
曲君跃
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
PLA University of Science and Technology
Original Assignee
PLA University of Science and Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by PLA University of Science and Technology filed Critical PLA University of Science and Technology
Priority to CN201510096950.3A priority Critical patent/CN104660391B/en
Publication of CN104660391A publication Critical patent/CN104660391A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN104660391B publication Critical patent/CN104660391B/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L5/00Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
    • H04L5/0001Arrangements for dividing the transmission path
    • H04L5/0003Two-dimensional division
    • H04L5/0005Time-frequency
    • H04L5/0007Time-frequency the frequencies being orthogonal, e.g. OFDM(A), DMT
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/01Protocols
    • H04L67/10Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W72/00Local resource management
    • H04W72/50Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources
    • H04W72/54Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources based on quality criteria
    • H04W72/541Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources based on quality criteria using the level of interference
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02DCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES [ICT], I.E. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AIMING AT THE REDUCTION OF THEIR OWN ENERGY USE
    • Y02D30/00Reducing energy consumption in communication networks
    • Y02D30/70Reducing energy consumption in communication networks in wireless communication networks

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)

Abstract

Interference elimination method between a kind of distributing cell in orthogonal frequency-time multiple access network.Its core concept is to use channeling technology so that the interference signal source distance between neighbor cell reaches the effect for improving transmission quality, raising cell and its edge user throughput as far as possible, and using the interference of power control techniques suppression neighbor cell.In view of the algorithm of centralization needs substantial amounts of information exchange expense and algorithm complex, the present invention is dispatched using distributed method to study the optimal power allocation of inter-cell coordination and user(Channeling)Scheme.Each base station by realizing that system and speed maximize with its neighbor base stations cooperation, the value of utility of each base station be defined as its own traffic rate and adjacent cell speed and.Each new value of utility for coordinating base station and calculating its current value of utility and strategy being surveyed based on examination, according to Boltzmann probability updatings rule and optimal response policy update rule, carries out the renewal of interference coordination strategy in a manner of iteration adjustment.

Description

Interference elimination method between distributing cell in orthogonal frequency-time multiple access network
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of distribution of distributed joint Power and user's scheduling for maximizing system transfer rate Method is specifically a kind of suitable for being based on orthogonal frequency-time multiple access (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access, OFDMA) interference elimination method between distributing cell in network.
Background technology
With the rapid development of the communication technology, to meet the needs of mobile subscriber is to high speed business, next generation wireless network Middle frequency duplex factor as one reaches 1, that is to say, that each individually cell base station can use whole system band resource.OFDMA As the multiple access technique of Next generation cellular GSM, overall available band system band is divided into multiple narrow by it And mutually orthogonal frequency band.Therefore, it is not present between multiple users in same cell same in intersymbol interference and cell Frequency disturbs.However, the deployment of mobile network's reality is all multi-cell environment, and in such a scenario, the interference (Inter- of minizone Cell Interference, ICI) just exist all the time, significantly reduce the performance of edge customer.More accurately say, when same When the frequency resource of sample is by adjacent cell reuse, the multi cell cellular system based on OFDMA technologies will produce ICI, cause Network communication quality declines, and especially causes to be that Cell Edge User service quality is poor, handling capacity is relatively low.Therefore eliminate ICI, carry Handling capacity, balance cell edge region and the communication quality difference of central area of high cell edge user, turns into honeybee of future generation Cellular mobile communication system key issue urgently to be resolved hurrily.
In order to solve the problems, such as OFDMA network ICI, Inter-Cell Interference Coordination technology passes through rationally effective to Radio Resource progress Management, in the state of the interference level between cell is maintained at into controllable.Its core concept is to use channeling skill Art so that the distance of the interference signal source between neighbor cell as far as possible, and suppresses neighbor cell using power control techniques Interference, reach the effect for improving transmission quality, improving cell and its edge user throughput.Inter-Cell Interference Coordination technology sheet It is to realize multiple cell radio resource management functions in matter, by managing Radio Resource (mainly time/frequency source block and transmitting work( Rate) ICI is controlled, it needs to consider following information from multiple cells simultaneously:Resource using status, traffic load situation with Number of users etc..Because the distance of each user distance base station is different, so the channel bar of each user on different sub-channels Part also differs.Moreover, the continuous change with space over time, the channel condition of each user also become constantly Change, the diversity of this channel condition, be the basis for carrying out adaptive wireless resource management and distribution.In next generation communication system Radio resource allocation for multi-user's situation design, mainly including time/frequency source block, transmission power combined optimization distribution.This The overall goal of one allocative decision is according to the instantaneous fading characteristic of user, the disturbed condition of minizone and the service of active user Grade and quality requirement, using optimized algorithm or quiet/dynamic adjusting method, it is determined which subchannel distributed for each user And the size of transmission power level is distributed in these subchannels, so as to mitigate or even eliminate ICI, improve handling up for edge customer Amount and systematic function.
Meanwhile understanding of each cell for network global information is very limited in multi cell cellular network, therefore concentrate The algorithm of formula is difficult to carry out.Although provide what enough information was possible to each honeycomb by back haul link, so The congestion of back haul link can be caused.In addition, the algorithm of centralization can bring very big computation complexity, especially in cell number In the case that mesh is a lot.So distributed algorithm is very heavy for the Inter-Cell Interference Coordination of multi-cell OFDMA system Want.It there is now a variety of theoretical distributed resource managements for being applied to wireless communication system.And game theory is used extensively as a kind of To solve the theoretical rigorous mathematical modeling of conflict of interests in real world, it has also become solve the problems, such as the important of optimally in distributed mode Method.Game theory is also known as " game theory ", is to study decision-making when the behavior of each decision-maker influences each other and its equilibrium is asked A kind of important mathematical tool of topic.It can effectively solve the problems, such as to collide with each other and cooperation between the policymaker of rationality.Game bag Branch containing Liang great, i.e. non-cooperative game and cooperative game, the invention mainly relates to the former.Non-cooperative game is it is emphasised that personal row To analyze each rationality and what kind of decision-making the participant of selfishness can make, and what the result that game most probable occurs is. It has been widely used wireless communication field at present, is the participant for portraying and studying " selfishness " in distributed resource allocation problem Between the conflict of interest that has and competition provide complete theoretical tool.Specifically, it is by designing different utility functions With cost mechanism, followed by optimization reaches the desired performance of system with causing each user " automatic ", i.e., a kind of Relatively stable equilibrium state " Nash Equilibrium ".
The content of the invention
For existing interference management techniques in performances such as system transfer rate, algorithm complex, control information interaction expenses The deficiency of aspect, the present invention provide point in the orthogonal frequency-time multiple access network of the optimal low complex degree of a kind of system and speed Cloth inter-cell downlink interference elimination method.
Realize that the technical solution of the object of the invention is as follows:
Interference elimination method between a kind of distributing cell in orthogonal frequency-time multiple access network, if:Iteration time slot t=1, 2 ..., T (T is maximum iteration), useWithRepresent that base station i adjusts in the transimission power of t iteration time slots and user respectively Degree strategy, i ∈ N, N={ 1,2 ..., N } represent collection of base stations, and N is total number of base,
Step 1, Initialize installation:Iteration time slot t is made equal to 1, its user's scheduling strategy of each Base station initialization, each base station Subcarrier is randomly assigned to any one communication user of its service respectively, then, each base station random initializtion is respective Transmit power.One different adjustment priority λ is set at random to each base stationi, λiBase station i adjustment priority is represented,
Step 2, according to interference indexOrder from big to small, the B base stations to base station i interference effects maximum before taking Interference index for base station j to base station i interference effects, j ∈ N { i }, N { i } represent set N and the difference set of set { i }, BiFor base station i interference neighbors set, index is disturbedCalculation formula beWherein CiThe communication user set of base station i services is represented, | Ci| represent communication user set CiIn element Number, n ∈ CiAnd n be base station i service any one communication user sequence number, gj,nFor from base station j to communication user n letter Road power gain, gi,nFor from base station i to communication user n channel power gain,
Step 3, respectively by the priority of each base station in the interference neighbors set of the priority of each base station and each base station It is compared, if the priority of base station is higher than the priority of each base station in the interference neighbors set of base station, by the base station It is classified as coordinating base station k, k ∈ Lt, LtCoordination base station k set is represented, carries out interference coordination processing;Otherwise, without interference coordination Operation,
Step 4, each base station i ∈ N calculate its rate of information throughput in iteration time slot t using shannon formulaWherein W represents channel width, Represent t-th of iteration time slot When base station i Signal to Interference plus Noise Ratio, N0For noise power, n ∈ CiThe user serviced by base station i, then calculate each coordination base station k ∈LtValue of utilityAnd Coordinate base station k ∈ LtInterference neighbors base station l ∈ BkInformation transfer speed Rate and by its report give coordinate base station k, BkFor base station k interference neighbors set,
Step 5, power level examination is surveyed and corresponding value of utility calculates:
Step 5.1, in t≤T/2, each coordination base station k ∈ LtGeneral one examination of random selection such as the probability with 1/M is surveyed Power level Here Pk,maxFor base station k maximum transmission power, M is power The number of level, η1=0, ηM=1, and η12<...<ηM, each base station i ∈ N, which are calculated, is based on examination power scale levelMost Excellent user's scheduling strategyAnd subcarrier is given into rate of information throughput highest service user,Table Show the user n that base station i ∈ N are serviced based on examination power scale levelThe rate of information throughput, then calculate each coordination base station k ∈LtExamination power scale levelCorresponding value of utilityAnd enter step 6.1,
Step 5.2, in t>In T/2, each coordination base station k ∈ LtAll power levels are surveyed in examination successivelyHere Pk,maxFor base station k maximum transmission power, M is the number of power level, η1 =0, ηM=1, and η12<...<ηM, based on examination power scale levelEach base station i ∈ N perform optimal user and dispatch plan SlightlyAnd subcarrier is given into the most fast service user of the rate of information throughput,Represent that base station i ∈ N are taken User's n rates of information throughput of business, then calculate each coordination base station k ∈ LtExamination power scale levelCorresponding value of utilityAnd enter step 6.2,
Step 6, transimission power and the renewal of user's scheduling strategy:
Step 6.1, equally distributed random number θ between random generation one [0,1], ifIt is then next Timeslot power-levelsIt is updated to try power scale levelOtherwise, ifThen next timeslot power-levels are protected Hold it is constant i.e.Whereinβ is a coefficient and β>0,To coordinate base station k ∈ Lt Examination power scale levelCorresponding value of utility, after the completion of renewal, by all coordination base station k ∈ LtPriority reduce by 1 grade, no Carry out interference coordination operation base station w ∈ N LtPriority keep constant, while new priority is reported to adjacent base station; Then, each base station i ∈ N calculate the best user's scheduling scheme of next time slot based on the power level after renewalAnd subcarrier is given into rate of information throughput highest service user, whereinRepresent base station i ∈ N The user n serviced next gap information transmission rate based on the power level after renewal, is transferred to step 7,
Step 6.2, each coordination base station k ∈ LtCompare all examination power scale level { η1Pk,max2Pk,max,...,ηMPk,maxCorresponding to value of utility size, choose transimission power of the power level as next time slot corresponding to highest value of utility, After the completion of renewal, by all coordination base station k ∈ LtPriority reduce by 1 grade, without interference coordination operation base station w ∈ N Lt Priority keep constant, while new priority is reported to adjacent base station;Then, each base station i ∈ N are calculated based on renewal The best user's scheduling scheme of next time slot of power level afterwardsAnd subcarrier is given into information transfer speed Rate highest service user, whereinRepresent the user n that are serviced of base station i ∈ N based under the power level after renewal The one time slot rate of information throughput, is transferred to step 7,
Step 7, algorithm end condition judges:If algorithm performs reach maximum iteration T, algorithm terminates;Otherwise, t is made =t+1 simultaneously goes to step 3.
It is of the invention significantly the advantages of be:1) present invention is a kind of distributed embodiment, and each base station is as independent Individual, autonomous carry out computing and interference coordination Developing Tactics, it is not necessary to which the master controller of a wide area carries out centralized Control And calculating, this distributed operation cause system architecture flattening, avoid the system crash brought by single point failure, system is more Steadily and surely;2) local (local) information exchange is only needed, each base station only needs to carry out with adjacent base station during interference coordination Necessary information exchange, because being connected between adjacent base station by wired optical fiber, the communication between them is very easy;3) divide The embodiment of cloth shares arithmetic operation does distributed variable-frequencypump and calculating in each base station, each base station, has phase Than in the lower computation complexity of centralized algorithm;4) in step 6, when iteration time slot t is not more than T/2, using Boltzmann Probability updating rule (parameter beta is similar to the temperature parameter in simulated annealing), if the value of utility that examination power scale level obtains More than value of utility corresponding to current power strategy, then next time slot will be used as using larger probability selection examination survey level by coordinating base station Transimission power, deny with greater probability its power policy being kept constant.But that more preferable, poor plan of whichever strategy Slightly still there is certain probability to be selected to, this may be such that local optimum is easily jumped out in each base station compared to greedy optimizing algorithm Interference coordination strategy and the interference coordination strategy for finding global optimum, reach system and speed maximizes;5) in step 6, when repeatedly When being not more than T/2 for time slot t, the Boltzmann probability updating rules of use make algorithm jump out locally optimal solution and search the overall situation It is optimal;And when iteration time slot t is more than T/2, using optimal response policy update rule, the selection determined in each iteration is best Strategy, convergence of algorithm speed can be accelerated.
Brief description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is the system model of the inventive method;
Fig. 2 is the flow chart of the inventive method;
Fig. 3 be the inventive method system and speed with algorithm iteration number change curve;
Fig. 4 be the inventive method system and speed with cooperation neighbor base stations number change curve;
Embodiment
Interference elimination method between a kind of distributing cell in orthogonal frequency-time multiple access network, it is characterised in that set:Repeatedly For time slot t=1,2 ..., T (T is maximum iteration), useWithTransmission of the base station i in t iteration time slots is represented respectively Power and user's scheduling strategy, i ∈ N, N={ 1,2 ..., N } represent collection of base stations, and N is total number of base,
Step 1, Initialize installation:Iteration time slot t is made equal to 1, its user's scheduling strategy of each Base station initialization, each base station Subcarrier is randomly assigned to any one communication user of its service respectively, then, each base station random initializtion is respective Transmit power, in addition, in order to determine the precedence of each base station policy update, different to the random setting one in each base station Adjust priority λi, λiBase station i adjustment priority is represented,
Step 2, according to interference indexOrder from big to small, the B base stations to base station i interference effects maximum before taking Interference index for base station j to base station i interference effects, j ∈ N { i }, N { i } represent set N and the difference set of set { i }, BiFor base station i interference neighbors set, index is disturbedCalculation formula beWherein CiThe communication user set of base station i services is represented, | Ci| represent communication user set CiIn member Plain number, n ∈ CiAnd n be base station i service any one communication user sequence number, gj,nFor from base station j to communication user n's Channel power gain, gi,nFor from base station i to communication user n channel power gain,
Step 3, respectively by the priority of each base station in the interference neighbors set of the priority of each base station and each base station It is compared, if the priority of base station is higher than the priority of each base station in the interference neighbors set of base station, by the base station It is classified as coordinating base station k ∈ Lt, LtCoordination base station k set is represented, carries out interference coordination processing;Otherwise, grasped without interference coordination Make,
Step 4, each base station i ∈ N calculate its rate of information throughput in iteration time slot t using shannon formulaWherein W represents channel width, Represent t-th of iteration time slot When base station i Signal to Interference plus Noise Ratio, N0For noise power, n ∈ CiThe user serviced by base station i, then calculate each coordination base station k ∈LtValue of utilityAnd Coordinate base station k ∈ LtInterference neighbors base station l ∈ BkInformation transfer speed Rate and by its report give coordinate base station k, BkFor base station k interference neighbors set, it can be seen that by formula, each effect for coordinating base station WithThe transmission rate sum of the transmission rate of its own and interference neighbors base station is defined as, therefore each coordination base station is in root It can both consider its own when carrying out policy update according to its effectiveness, can also consider interference neighbors base station.Thus, the effectiveness design method Embody the thought cooperated with each other, set BkSize embody the number of cooperation base station, and from step 2 | Bk|=B,
Step 5, power level examination is surveyed and corresponding value of utility calculates:
Step 5.1, in t≤T/2, each coordination base station k ∈ LtGeneral one examination of random selection such as the probability with 1/M is surveyed Power level Here Pk,maxFor base station k maximum transmission power, M is power The number of level, η1=0, ηM=1, and η12<...<ηM, each base station i ∈ N, which are calculated, is based on examination power scale levelMost Excellent user's scheduling strategyAnd subcarrier is given into rate of information throughput highest service user,Table Show the user n that base station i ∈ N are serviced based on examination power scale levelThe rate of information throughput, then calculate each coordination base station k ∈LtExamination power scale levelCorresponding value of utilityAnd enter step 6.1,
Step 5.2, in t>In T/2, each coordination base station k ∈ LtAll power levels are surveyed in examination successivelyHere Pk,maxFor base station k maximum transmission power, M is the number of power level, η1 =0, ηM=1, and η12<...<ηM, based on examination power scale levelEach base station i ∈ N perform optimal user and dispatch plan SlightlyAnd subcarrier is given into the most fast service user of the rate of information throughput,Represent that base station i ∈ N are taken User's n rates of information throughput of business, then calculate each coordination base station k ∈ LtExamination power scale levelCorresponding value of utilityAnd enter step 6.2,
Step 6, transimission power and the renewal of user's scheduling strategy:
Step 6.1, equally distributed random number θ between random generation one [0,1], ifIt is then next Timeslot power-levelsIt is updated to try power scale levelOtherwise, ifThen next timeslot power-levels are protected Hold it is constant i.e.Whereinβ is a coefficient and β>0,To coordinate base station k ∈ Lt Examination power scale levelCorresponding value of utility, after the completion of renewal, by all coordination base station k ∈ LtPriority reduce by 1 grade, no Carry out interference coordination operation base station w ∈ N LtPriority keep constant, while new priority is reported to adjacent base station; Then, each base station i ∈ N calculate the best user's scheduling scheme of next time slot based on the power level after renewalAnd subcarrier is given into rate of information throughput highest service user, whereinRepresent base station i ∈ N The user n serviced next gap information transmission rate based on the power level after renewal, is transferred to step 7,
Step 6.2, each coordination base station k ∈ LtCompare all examination power scale level { η1Pk,max2Pk,max,...,ηMPk,maxCorresponding to value of utility size, choose transimission power of the power level as next time slot corresponding to highest value of utility, After the completion of renewal, by all coordination base station k ∈ LtPriority reduce by 1 grade, without interference coordination operation base station w ∈ N Lt Priority keep constant, while new priority is reported to adjacent base station;Then, each base station i ∈ N are calculated based on renewal The best user's scheduling scheme of next time slot of power level afterwardsAnd subcarrier is given into information transfer speed Rate highest service user, whereinRepresent the user n that are serviced of base station i ∈ N based under the power level after renewal The one time slot rate of information throughput, is transferred to step 7,
Step 7, algorithm end condition judges:If algorithm performs reach maximum iteration T, algorithm terminates;Otherwise, t is made =t+1 simultaneously goes to step 3, in view of the interference index in step 2It is to evaluate base station j for the flat of the base station i all users serviced Equal interference effect, interference coordination strategy change is not influenceed the interference relationships analysis in step 2 during by algorithm iteration, therefore Iterative process is transferred to step 3 by step 7.
The present invention is described in further detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Referring to Fig. 1, the inventive method system is provided with the OFDMA system of 49 cells, and each radius of society is set to 1000 meters, Each center of housing estate is provided with a base station, and random distribution has 8 communication users in each cell.Band system band is divided into 16 sons Channel, each a width of 200KHz of sub-channel.The maximum transmission power of base station46dBm is set to, and is distributed evenly over its son On channel.Power level number is set to M=2,4,8.There is identical noise variance σ on each communication link2=-130dBm. Channel gain model is hi=A/di α, wherein involved parameter is set to:A=0.097, α=3.The greatest iteration of algorithm Number is set to 400.As Fig. 2, the implementation process of whole example are as follows:
Step 1, Initialize installation:Its subchannel (subcarrier) is randomly assigned to the logical of its service by t=1, each base station Credit household, it need to ensure only to be taken by a communication user per sub-channels in each cell.Then, each base station of random initializtion Transmit power on each sub-channels,Hereafter, assisted for all subchannels using following scheme Adjust the transimission power and user's scheduling strategy between base station.Assuming that each sub-channels are completely orthogonal, therefore on each sub-channels Interference coordination schemes be separate.In addition, in order to determine the precedence of each base station policy update, to each base station One different coordination priority λ of setting at randomi∈ [1,2 ..., 49], i ∈ N, N are base station set.
Step 2, interference relationships analysis and interference neighbors set determine:By taking the i ∈ N of any one base station as an example, pass through calculating Disturb indexCome evaluate other base station j ∈ N { i } to base station i interference effect, wherein N { i } represent set N with gathering The difference set of { i }.Disturb indexCalculation formula beWherein CiRepresent cell i (base station i service area Domain) in communication user set, | Ci| represent set CiIn element number, n ∈ CiFor a base station i service user, gj,n For from base station j to user n channel power gain.WillArrange, obtain from big to smallWhereinRepresent the base station of the interference big to base station i generations b.More strongly disturbing preceding B base station will be produced to base station i and be defined as one Interference neighbors set,
Step 3, the base station set L that can coordinate simultaneously is determined in a distributed fashiont, ensure mutually strongly disturbing adjacent base station Interference coordination is asynchronously carried out, i.e.,AndSpecific implementation method is each base station i ∈ N ratios Compared with the priority of its own and its adjacent base station BiPriority.Have if there is an adjacent base station than it higher preferential Level, then the base station operates without interference coordination.Otherwise, interference coordination is carried out.
Step 4, each base station i ∈ N calculate its information rate in iteration time slot t using shannon formulaWherein W=200KHz represents channel width,Represent Signal to Interference plus Noise Ratio, N0For noise power, n ∈ CiThe user serviced by base station i.Each coordination base station k ∈ LtPass through base station l ∈ B adjacent theretok's Communication obtains its rate of information throughputAnd thus calculate value of utilityWherein BkIt is adjacent for base station k interference Occupy set.It can be seen that by formula, each effectiveness for coordinating base stationIt is defined as the transmission rate of its own and interference neighbors base station Transmission rate sum, therefore it is each coordination base station according to its effectiveness carry out policy update when can both consider its own, also can Consider interference neighbors base station.Thus, the effectiveness design method embodies the thought cooperated with each other, set BkSize embody conjunction Make the number of base station, and from step 2 | Bk|=B.
Step 5, power level examination is surveyed and corresponding value of utility calculates:
If 1) t≤T/2:Each coordination base station k ∈ LtGeneral one examination power scale level of random selection such as the probability with 1/MHereFor base station k maximum transmission power, M is power level Number (being set to 2,4,8), η1=0, ηM=1, and η12<...<ηM.Hereafter, based on examination power scale levelIt is each Base station i ∈ N it is autonomous determine its optimal user's scheduling strategyWhereinRepresent user n be scheduled into The information rate of row communication.Then, repeat step 4, each coordination base station k ∈ LtCalculate examination power scale levelCorresponding effectiveness Value
If 2) t>T/2:Each coordination base station k ∈ LtAll power levels are surveyed in examination successively HereFor base station k maximum transmission power, M is the number (being set to 2,4,8) of power level, η1=0, ηM =1, and η12<...<ηM.Hereafter, based on examination power scale levelEach base station i ∈ N it is autonomous determine its optimal use Family scheduling strategyWhereinRepresent the scheduled information rates to be communicated of user n.Then, repeat to walk Rapid 4, each coordination base station k ∈ LtCalculate examination power scale levelCorresponding value of utility
Step 6, transimission power and the renewal of user's scheduling strategy:
If 1) t>T/2:Each coordination base station k ∈ LtIt is lower for the moment that it is updated according to the following Boltzmann rule of probabilitys The power level of gap
Whereinβ=t/10 is a positive parameter developed with iteration time,Represent next timeslot power-levelsIt is updated to try power scale levelProbability,Represent Next timeslot power-levels keep constant probability.Equally distributed random number θ between random generation one [0,1], ifThen next timeslot power-levelsIt is updated to try power scale levelOtherwise, if Then next timeslot power-levels holding is constant i.e.In addition, remaining non-coordinating base station w ∈ N LtIt is kept to launch work( Rate is constant, i.e.,Then, its best user is recalculated based on the power level after renewal, each base station i ∈ N Scheduling schemeWhereinRepresent the scheduled information rates to be communicated of user n.Completed in renewal Afterwards, all coordination base station k ∈ LtReduce its priority (non-coordinating base station w ∈ N LtPriority keep constant), it is and its is preferential Level, which is reported, gives its adjacent base station.
If 2) t>T/2:Each coordination base station k ∈ LtCompare all examination power scale level { η1Pk,max2Pk,max,...,ηMPk,maxCorresponding to value of utility size, choose transimission power of the power level as next time slot for obtaining highest value of utility, i.e.,
In addition, remaining non-coordinating base station w ∈ N LtKeep its transmission power constant, i.e.,Then, based on more Power level after new, each base station i ∈ N recalculate its best user's scheduling schemeWhereinRepresent the scheduled information rates to be communicated of user n.After the completion of renewal, all coordination base station k ∈ LtIt is preferential to reduce its Level (non-coordinating base station w ∈ N LtPriority keep constant), and its priority is reported and gives its adjacent base station.
Step 7, algorithm end condition judges:If algorithm performs reach maximum iteration T (T=400), algorithm terminates; Otherwise, make t=t+1 and go to step 3.
Fig. 3 show the change curve of system of the invention and rate capability with algorithm iteration number.Depict and work as in figure The change curve of inventive energy when number of power levels M is respectively 2,4,8 three kinds of schemes.For three kinds of schemes, specifically return One change power level be respectively { 0,1 }, { 0,1/4,1/2,1 },From figure As can be seen that the increase of the performance of several schemes all iterationses and improve, and algorithm is restrained after about 150 iteration.I It is also found that when power level number is more, the performance that the present invention reaches is more excellent.Because more power level numbers Corresponding to wider array of search solution space, and solution space when solution space during M=8 includes M=4, solution space during M=4 is again Solution space during comprising M=2.In addition, simulation curve shows power level number by 2 to 4, system and speed have larger carry Rise, level book further then is brought up into 8 will not bring very big raising.
Fig. 4 show the change curve of system of the invention and speed with cooperation neighbor base stations number B.Depict and work as in figure The change curve of inventive energy when number of power levels M is respectively 2,4,8 three kinds of schemes.It can be seen that several sides The performance of case all improves with the increase of cooperation neighbor base stations number.It can be appreciated that cooperation neighbor base stations number is more, interference association The efficiency of tune is also higher, and the conflict brought each other by independent decision-making is also just smaller.But when cooperation number reaches 8, it is System and rate capability no longer have a distinct increment.Because general (6-8) base station that only made a circle to week of single base station produce compared with Big interference, therefore coordinate the neighbouring base station effect of surrounding than more significant.Also it correspond to preferably in addition, power level number is more more Systematic function.

Claims (1)

1. interference elimination method between the distributing cell in a kind of orthogonal frequency-time multiple access network, it is characterised in that set:Iteration Time slot t=1,2 ..., T, T be maximum iteration, useWithTransimission powers of the base station i in t iteration time slots is represented respectively With user's scheduling strategy,Collection of base stations is represented, N is total number of base,
Step 1, Initialize installation:Iteration time slot t is made to be equal to 1, its user's scheduling strategy of each Base station initialization, each base station is distinguished Subcarrier is randomly assigned to any one communication user of its service, then, each respective transmission of base station random initializtion Power, a different adjustment priority λ is set at random to each base stationi, λiBase station i adjustment priority is represented,
Step 2, according to interference indexOrder from big to small, the B base stations to base station i interference effects maximum before taking Interference index for base station j to base station i interference effects, Represent set Difference set with gathering { i },For base station i interference neighbors set, index is disturbedCalculation formula be WhereinThe communication user set of base station i services is represented,Represent communication user setIn element number,And n is The sequence number of any one communication user of base station i services, gj,nFor from base station j to communication user n channel power gain, gi,nFor From base station i to communication user n channel power gain,
Step 3, the priority of each base station in the interference neighbors set of the priority of each base station and each base station is carried out respectively Compare, if the base station is classified as by the priority of base station higher than the priority of each base station in the interference neighbors set of base station Coordinate base station k, Coordination base station k set is represented, carries out interference coordination processing;Otherwise, grasped without interference coordination Make,
Step 4, each base stationIts rate of information throughput in iteration time slot t is calculated using shannon formulaWherein W represents channel width, When representing t-th of iteration time slot Base station i Signal to Interference plus Noise Ratio, N0For noise power,The user serviced by base station i, then calculate each coordination base stationValue of utilityAnd Coordinate base stationInterference neighbors base stationInformation transfer speed Rate and by its report give coordinate base station k,For base station k interference neighbors set,
Step 5, power level examination is surveyed and corresponding value of utility calculates:
Step 5.1, in t≤T2, each coordination base stationGeneral one examination power scale electricity of random selection such as the probability with 1M It is flat Here Pk,maxFor base station k maximum transmission power, M is power level Number, η1=0, ηM=1, and η1< η2< ... < ηM, each base stationCalculate based on examination power scale levelIt is optimal User's scheduling strategyAnd subcarrier is given into rate of information throughput highest service user,Represent base StandThe user n serviced based on examination power scale levelThe rate of information throughput, then calculate each coordination base station Examination power scale levelCorresponding value of utilityAnd enter step 6.1,
Step 5.2, in t > T2, each coordination base stationAll power levels are surveyed in examination successivelyHere Pk,maxFor base station k maximum transmission power, M is the number of power level, η1 =0, ηM=1, and η1< η2< ... < ηM, based on examination power scale levelEach base stationOptimal user is performed to adjust Degree strategyAnd subcarrier is given into the most fast service user of the rate of information throughput, whereinRepresent base stationThe user's n rates of information throughput serviced, then calculate each coordination base stationExamination power scale levelCorresponding effect With valueAnd enter step 6.2,
Step 6, transimission power and the renewal of user's scheduling strategy:
Step 6.1, equally distributed random number θ between random generation one [0,1], ifThen next time slot work( Rate levelIt is updated to try power scale levelOtherwise, ifThen next timeslot power-levels are kept constant I.e.Whereinβ is a coefficient and β > 0,To coordinate base stationExamination survey Power levelCorresponding value of utility, after the completion of renewal, by all coordination base stationsPriority reduce by 1 grade, without dry Disturb the base station of coordinated manipulationPriority keep constant, while new priority is reported to adjacent base station;Then, Each base stationCalculate the best user's scheduling scheme of next time slot based on the power level after renewalAnd subcarrier is given into rate of information throughput highest service user, whereinRepresent base station The user n serviced next gap information transmission rate based on the power level after renewal, is transferred to step 7,
Step 6.2, each coordination base stationCompare all examination power scale level { η1Pk,max2Pk,max,...,ηMPk,maxRight The value of utility size answered, chooses transimission power of the power level corresponding to highest value of utility as next time slot, and renewal is completed Afterwards, by all coordination base stationsPriority reduce by 1 grade, without interference coordination operate base stationIt is preferential Level keeps constant, while new priority is reported to adjacent base station;Then, each base stationAfter calculating based on renewal The best user's scheduling scheme of next time slot of power levelAnd subcarrier is given into the rate of information throughput most High service user, whereinRepresent base stationThe user n serviced lower a period of time based on the power level after renewal The gap rate of information throughput, is transferred to step 7,
Step 7, algorithm end condition judges:If algorithm performs reach maximum iteration T, algorithm terminates;Otherwise, t=t+1 is made And go to step 3.
CN201510096950.3A 2015-03-04 2015-03-04 Interference elimination method between distributing cell in orthogonal frequency-time multiple access network Expired - Fee Related CN104660391B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201510096950.3A CN104660391B (en) 2015-03-04 2015-03-04 Interference elimination method between distributing cell in orthogonal frequency-time multiple access network

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201510096950.3A CN104660391B (en) 2015-03-04 2015-03-04 Interference elimination method between distributing cell in orthogonal frequency-time multiple access network

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN104660391A CN104660391A (en) 2015-05-27
CN104660391B true CN104660391B (en) 2017-11-17

Family

ID=53251129

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201510096950.3A Expired - Fee Related CN104660391B (en) 2015-03-04 2015-03-04 Interference elimination method between distributing cell in orthogonal frequency-time multiple access network

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN104660391B (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108449150B (en) * 2018-02-01 2022-06-28 中国电子科技集团公司电子科学研究院 Satellite-ground interference coordination method, device and equipment based on radio map information

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101009541A (en) * 2006-01-23 2007-08-01 华为技术有限公司 Disturbance coordination method and device of OFDMA system
CN101155170A (en) * 2006-09-28 2008-04-02 阿尔卡特朗讯 Method for improving inter cell interference cancellation in an cellular radio communication system and corresponding base station and subscriber station
WO2008119216A1 (en) * 2007-04-03 2008-10-09 Zte Corporation A common frequency interference suppression method in a wireless communication system
CN101810020A (en) * 2007-09-28 2010-08-18 高通股份有限公司 Scheduling based on effective target load with interference cancellation in a wireless communication system
CN102014507A (en) * 2009-09-04 2011-04-13 普天信息技术研究院有限公司 User uplink resource scheduling method in HSUPA system
CN102769861A (en) * 2012-06-27 2012-11-07 华为技术有限公司 User attribute determining method, inter-cell interference coordination method and base station

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101009541A (en) * 2006-01-23 2007-08-01 华为技术有限公司 Disturbance coordination method and device of OFDMA system
CN101155170A (en) * 2006-09-28 2008-04-02 阿尔卡特朗讯 Method for improving inter cell interference cancellation in an cellular radio communication system and corresponding base station and subscriber station
WO2008119216A1 (en) * 2007-04-03 2008-10-09 Zte Corporation A common frequency interference suppression method in a wireless communication system
CN101810020A (en) * 2007-09-28 2010-08-18 高通股份有限公司 Scheduling based on effective target load with interference cancellation in a wireless communication system
CN102014507A (en) * 2009-09-04 2011-04-13 普天信息技术研究院有限公司 User uplink resource scheduling method in HSUPA system
CN102769861A (en) * 2012-06-27 2012-11-07 华为技术有限公司 User attribute determining method, inter-cell interference coordination method and base station

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
OFDMA系统小区间干扰调度协调算法;付少忠;《西安电子科技大学学报》;20100228;第37卷(第1期);第8-12页 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN104660391A (en) 2015-05-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Wang et al. Joint downlink cell association and bandwidth allocation for wireless backhauling in two-tier HetNets with large-scale antenna arrays
Hande et al. Distributed uplink power control for optimal SIR assignment in cellular data networks
JP5496203B2 (en) Method for changing transmit power pattern in a multi-cell environment
Hao et al. On the energy and spectral efficiency tradeoff in massive MIMO-enabled HetNets with capacity-constrained backhaul links
Weeraddana et al. Multicell MISO downlink weighted sum-rate maximization: A distributed approach
CN107613555A (en) Non-orthogonal multiple accesses honeycomb and terminal direct connection dense network resource management-control method
Ali et al. Joint RRH-association, sub-channel assignment and power allocation in multi-tier 5G C-RANs
Huang et al. Joint spectrum and power allocation for multi-node cooperative wireless systems
Abdelhakam et al. A cooperation strategy based on bargaining game for fair user-centric clustering in cloud-RAN
CN104412647B (en) The method for being used to help solve the cluster optimization of the border issue in communication system
Wang et al. User association in non-orthogonal multiple access networks
Gemici et al. Resource allocation for NOMA downlink systems: Genetic algorithm approach
Guo et al. QoS-aware user grouping strategy for downlink multi-cell NOMA systems
Sun et al. Resource allocation for D2D communication using particle swarm optimization in LTE networks
Hao et al. Interference-aware resource optimization for device-to-device communications in 5G networks
Zhang et al. Dynamic user-centric clustering for uplink cooperation in multi-cell wireless networks
CN106027214A (en) Pilot distribution method of multi-cell large-scale MIMO system
Hassan et al. Joint throughput-power optimization of fog-RAN using rate-splitting multiple access and reinforcement-learning based user clustering
Yin et al. Decentralized federated reinforcement learning for user-centric dynamic TFDD control
Azoulay et al. Transmission power control using deep neural networks in TDMA-based ad-hoc network clusters
Al-Obiedollah et al. Self-sustainable multi-IRS-aided wireless powered hybrid TDMA-NOMA system
Cai et al. A joint game-theoretic interference coordination approach in uplink multi-cell OFDMA networks
CN104660391B (en) Interference elimination method between distributing cell in orthogonal frequency-time multiple access network
CN105611640B (en) A kind of adjustable CoMP downlink user dispatching method of equitable degree
Li et al. Reinforcement learning power control algorithm based on graph signal processing for ultra-dense mobile networks

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
C53 Correction of patent of invention or patent application
CB03 Change of inventor or designer information

Inventor after: Cai Yueming

Inventor after: Zheng Jianchao

Inventor after: Lin Zhi

Inventor after: Wu Dan

Inventor after: Yang Wendong

Inventor after: Qu Junyue

Inventor before: Cai Yueming

Inventor before: Zheng Jianchao

Inventor before: Wu Dan

Inventor before: Yang Wendong

Inventor before: Qu Junyue

COR Change of bibliographic data

Free format text: CORRECT: INVENTOR; FROM: CAI YUEMING ZHENG JIANCHAO WU DAN YANG WENDONG QU JUNYUE TO: CAI YUEMING ZHENG JIANCHAO LIN ZHI WU DAN YANG WENDONG QU JUNYUE

GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee

Granted publication date: 20171117

Termination date: 20190304