CN104406623A - Method for determining dynamic stability coefficient of side slope based on underground water level and displacement monitoring - Google Patents
Method for determining dynamic stability coefficient of side slope based on underground water level and displacement monitoring Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN104406623A CN104406623A CN201410351222.8A CN201410351222A CN104406623A CN 104406623 A CN104406623 A CN 104406623A CN 201410351222 A CN201410351222 A CN 201410351222A CN 104406623 A CN104406623 A CN 104406623A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- displacement
- slope
- landslide
- unloading
- monitoring
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 106
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 81
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 32
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title claims description 30
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 79
- 239000003673 groundwater Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 63
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 26
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 claims description 31
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 claims description 15
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 abstract description 6
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 3
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000000691 measurement method Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 230000008450 motivation Effects 0.000 abstract 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000013210 evaluation model Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012806 monitoring device Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009395 breeding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001488 breeding effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004927 clay Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008278 dynamic mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005312 nonlinear dynamic Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007781 pre-processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011158 quantitative evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012731 temporal analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000700 time series analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Pit Excavations, Shoring, Fill Or Stabilisation Of Slopes (AREA)
- Testing Or Calibration Of Command Recording Devices (AREA)
Abstract
本发明公开了一种基于地下水位变化和位移监测数据,测定该类边坡动态稳定性系数的方法与技术,将滑坡形成的动因和机理与位移响应信息变化及其评价方法进行耦合交叉,通过建立非线性卸加载响应比参数预测模型进而建立一种基于地下水位与位移变化的边坡稳定性系数测定方法,该滑坡位移预测方法改变了传统位移时序预测法仅仅选取滑坡位移或位移速率作为监测和评价参数的思路,提出将滑坡地下水位与位移或位移速率进行同时监测和整合,以此确定滑坡地下水位与位移或位移速率的耦合集成动力预测参数与评价方法;该方法不仅可克服静态极限力学评价法无法分析和评价边坡稳定性随时间的变化规律的局限,同时又可克服传统位移时序预测方法无法分析和评价滑坡形成机理与动因的弊端。
The invention discloses a method and technology for measuring the dynamic stability coefficient of this type of slope based on the groundwater level change and displacement monitoring data, coupling and crossing the cause and mechanism of landslide formation with the change of displacement response information and its evaluation method, through Establish a nonlinear unloading load-response ratio parameter prediction model and then establish a slope stability coefficient measurement method based on groundwater level and displacement changes. This landslide displacement prediction method has changed the traditional displacement time-series prediction method that only selects landslide displacement or displacement rate as monitoring. Based on the idea of evaluating parameters, it is proposed to monitor and integrate the landslide groundwater level and displacement or displacement rate at the same time, so as to determine the coupled integrated dynamic prediction parameters and evaluation method of landslide groundwater level and displacement or displacement rate; this method can not only overcome the static limit The limitation that the mechanical evaluation method cannot analyze and evaluate the change law of slope stability over time, and at the same time, it can overcome the disadvantages that the traditional displacement time series prediction method cannot analyze and evaluate the formation mechanism and motivation of landslides.
Description
技术领域 technical field
本发明属于水诱发型滑坡动态稳定性定量评价与防治领域,具体涉及一种基于地下水位变化和位移监测数据,测定该类边坡动态稳定性系数的方法与技术。 The invention belongs to the field of quantitative evaluation and prevention of water-induced landslide dynamic stability, and in particular relates to a method and technology for measuring the dynamic stability coefficient of this type of slope based on groundwater level change and displacement monitoring data. the
背景技术 Background technique
滑坡是当前自然灾害与环境科学领域中的重要研究内容,从地质灾害的角度看,滑坡是一种常见频发、分布广泛且具有极大危害的地质灾害,常常给国民经济建设和人民生命财产都带来巨大的损失。众所周知,地下水环境变化是触发滑坡的最主要形成机理与动因。据统计,由降雨引起地下水环境变化诱发的滑坡占滑坡总数的70%。近年来,随着水利工程的发展,特别是长江三峡工程的建设与蓄水,库水位的变化引起地下水环境变化而形成的滑坡也备受关注,因此,如何科学有效对该类水诱发型边坡进行准确的稳定性评价及预警将具有重要的科学意义和工程应用价值。 Landslides are an important research content in the field of natural disasters and environmental science. From the perspective of geological disasters, landslides are common and frequently occurring, widely distributed and extremely harmful geological disasters, which often threaten national economic construction and people's lives and property. All brought huge losses. As we all know, the change of groundwater environment is the most important formation mechanism and cause of landslides. According to statistics, landslides induced by changes in the groundwater environment caused by rainfall account for 70% of the total number of landslides. In recent years, with the development of water conservancy projects, especially the construction and water storage of the Three Gorges Project on the Yangtze River, landslides caused by changes in the reservoir water level caused by changes in the groundwater environment have also attracted much attention. Therefore, how to scientifically and effectively induce landslides for such water Accurate stability evaluation and early warning of slope will have important scientific significance and engineering application value. the
边坡稳定性评价的核心问题是评价方法的选取与稳定性判据的确定。目前,在边坡稳定性评价和滑坡地质灾害监测预警与防治方法中,最广泛采用的预测评价方法为极限平衡力学评价法和位移时序预测法。极限平衡评价方法是建立在边坡失稳机理与受力条件清晰明确基础上的力学评价模型,具有明确的失稳判据,即稳定系数Fs=1,用边坡实际稳定系数是否大于等于1或大于1的程度来判别边坡是否稳定和稳定程度。但极限平衡的评价方法所建立的模型是无时间参数的静态评价模型,而且该类方法需要首先准确确定各种物理力学参数与滑移边界条件,因此无法运用静态评价方法对降雨型滑坡的稳定性进行动态评价与监测预警,而且在边坡稳定性评价中,特别在大型复杂坡体结构与物质组成的边坡稳定性评价中要准确量测出这些物理力学参数与滑移边界条件还存在很大困难,或者根本做不到,从而易使其评价结果失真或引起误判。与极限平衡评价法相比,位移时序预测方法是以滑坡位移监测为基础、以位移参数(位移、位移速率、位移加速率)及其变化作为边坡稳定与否和稳定程度的预测参数与评价准则。其位移(变形)监测具有精度高、易实施,且反映边坡稳定性状态综合直观等优点,所以该类方法在某种程度克服了极限平衡力学法的不足与局限,并已在我国重大工程滑坡区域得到了广泛的应用且发挥了重要作用。但位移时序预测方法反映了滑坡变形随时间的变化趋势与规律,多数是基于数理统计规律的位移表观数学评价模型,所 以该类评价模型一般只能解释滑坡变形位移过程与规律,而解释不了引起滑坡的变形与失稳的形成机理与力学动因,且没有稳定统一的失稳判据,虽有成功监测的案例,但由于时间序列分析的所得规律不是基于机理,其预测结果往往带有很大的或然性。 The core issues of slope stability evaluation are the selection of evaluation methods and the determination of stability criteria. At present, in slope stability evaluation and landslide geological disaster monitoring, early warning and prevention methods, the most widely used prediction and evaluation methods are limit equilibrium mechanics evaluation method and displacement time series prediction method. The limit equilibrium evaluation method is a mechanical evaluation model based on the clear and definite mechanism of slope instability and stress conditions. Or greater than 1 to judge whether the slope is stable or not. However, the model established by the limit equilibrium evaluation method is a static evaluation model without time parameters, and this type of method needs to first accurately determine various physical and mechanical parameters and slip boundary conditions, so the static evaluation method cannot be used for the stability of rainfall landslides. In addition, in slope stability evaluation, especially in the slope stability evaluation of large complex slope structure and material composition, it is necessary to accurately measure these physical and mechanical parameters and slip boundary conditions. It is very difficult, or impossible to do it at all, so it is easy to distort the evaluation results or cause misjudgment. Compared with the limit equilibrium evaluation method, the displacement time series prediction method is based on the monitoring of landslide displacement, and uses displacement parameters (displacement, displacement rate, displacement acceleration rate) and their changes as the prediction parameters and evaluation criteria for slope stability and stability. . Its displacement (deformation) monitoring has the advantages of high precision, easy implementation, and comprehensive and intuitive reflection of the slope stability state. Therefore, this type of method overcomes the shortcomings and limitations of the limit equilibrium mechanics method to a certain extent, and has been used in major projects in my country. Landslide areas are widely used and play an important role. However, the displacement time-series prediction method reflects the trend and law of landslide deformation over time, and most of them are displacement apparent mathematical evaluation models based on mathematical statistics. The formation mechanism and mechanical dynamics of the deformation and instability of the landslide are unknown, and there is no stable and unified instability criterion. Although there are successful monitoring cases, because the law obtained by time series analysis is not based on the mechanism, the prediction results often have Great probability. the
发明内容 Contents of the invention
为了克服现有技术领域存在的上述问题,本发明的目的在于,提供一种基于地下水位与位移监测的边坡动态稳定性系数测定方法,特提出将滑坡地下水位与位移或位移速率进行同时监测和整合,以此确定和建立滑坡地下水位与位移或位移速率的耦合集成动力预测参数,并运用损伤力学的基本原理,找到该动力预测参数与传统稳定性评价方法中稳定性系数的定量关系。 In order to overcome the above-mentioned problems existing in the prior art, the object of the present invention is to provide a method for determining the dynamic stability coefficient of a slope based on groundwater level and displacement monitoring. In order to determine and establish the coupled integrated dynamic prediction parameters of landslide groundwater level and displacement or displacement rate, and use the basic principles of damage mechanics to find the quantitative relationship between the dynamic prediction parameters and the stability coefficient in the traditional stability evaluation method. the
本发明提供的一种基于地下水位与位移监测的边坡动态稳定性系数测定方法,它包括以下具体步骤: A kind of slope dynamic stability coefficient determination method based on groundwater level and displacement monitoring provided by the invention, it comprises the following concrete steps:
(1)监测边坡地下水位与位移基本数据 (1) Monitor the basic data of slope groundwater level and displacement
①监测仪器:地下水位监测设备:a、压力式水位计,b、气压补偿装置;边坡位移监测设备:无线GPS位移监测设备(见图2); ① Monitoring instruments: groundwater level monitoring equipment: a, pressure water level gauge, b, air pressure compensation device; slope displacement monitoring equipment: wireless GPS displacement monitoring equipment (see Figure 2);
②在监测边坡的主滑面对应坡面布置监测点,按照坡面实际地形在后缘破裂壁到前缘剪出口坡面等距离布设坡面位移变化的N个监测点,N为大于或等于1的整数;在监测滑坡体以外稳定的基岩或无变形的区域布置位移监测基准点,不少于3个,形成控制网; ② Arrange monitoring points on the main sliding surface of the monitoring slope corresponding to the slope surface, and arrange N monitoring points for slope displacement changes at equal distances from the trailing edge rupture wall to the leading edge shear outlet slope according to the actual terrain of the slope surface, where N is greater than Or an integer equal to 1; Displacement monitoring reference points shall be arranged in stable bedrock or non-deformed areas outside the monitoring landslide mass, no less than 3 to form a control network;
③地下水位监测方法:在边坡选定的监测点位置进行钻孔,钻孔深度应到达基岩面或者历年地下水位以下,在钻孔底部设置压力式水位计,并在坡面上同时设置额外的气压补偿装置,共同监测地下水位的变化; ③Groundwater level monitoring method: Drill holes at the selected monitoring points on the slope. The depth of the drill holes should reach the bedrock surface or below the groundwater level in previous years. Additional air pressure compensation device to jointly monitor the change of groundwater level;
④边坡位移监测方法:在位移监测基准点位置和边坡钻孔监测点位置布设无线GPS位移监测设备;保证埋设的边坡位移变化监测设备与滑坡体表层紧密结合,对监测点水平、垂直位移变化值进行监测; ④Slope displacement monitoring method: Arrange wireless GPS displacement monitoring equipment at the positions of displacement monitoring reference points and slope drilling monitoring points; ensure that the buried slope displacement change monitoring equipment is closely integrated with the surface of the landslide body, and the monitoring points are monitored horizontally and vertically. Monitor the displacement change value;
⑤以一定时间间隔精度对滑坡地下水位与位移进行实时监测,同时记录地下水位与位移监测数据,并通过边坡场地数据信号收集器对监测数据传输到远程监测室,对监测数据进行分类预处理。 ⑤Real-time monitoring of the groundwater level and displacement of the landslide with a certain time interval accuracy, and record the monitoring data of the groundwater level and displacement at the same time, and transmit the monitoring data to the remote monitoring room through the slope site data signal collector, and classify and preprocess the monitoring data . the
(2)滑坡地下水动力卸加载参数和位移响应参数的确定 (2) Determination of landslide groundwater dynamic unloading parameters and displacement response parameters
①地下水位卸加载参数的确定 ① Determination of groundwater level unloading parameters
根据监测数据确定滑坡的统计分析与预测周期,并以统计分析与预测周期为基础预测单位统 计滑坡某月地下水位Hi和前月地下水位Hi-1的差值ΔH: According to the monitoring data, the statistical analysis and prediction cycle of the landslide is determined, and based on the statistical analysis and prediction cycle, the difference ΔH between the groundwater level H i of the landslide in a certain month and the ground water level H i-1 of the previous month is calculated:
ΔH=Hi-Hi-1 公式(1) ΔH=H i -Hi -1 formula (1)
将公式(1)中ΔH作为水动力卸加载标准。当ΔH>0时,判定对滑坡是加载;当ΔH<0时,判定对滑坡是卸载;将ΔH分别按每个卸加载周期的卸加载正负值进行统计并取其平均值,可分别得到卸加载序列的地下水位卸加载参数和. ΔH in formula (1) is used as the standard of hydrodynamic unloading load. When ΔH > 0, it is determined that the landslide is loaded; when ΔH < 0, it is determined that the landslide is unloaded; the ΔH is counted according to the positive and negative values of the unloading load of each unloading cycle, and the average value can be obtained respectively. Groundwater table unloading parameters for the unloading sequence and.
②位移卸加载响应参数的确定 ②Determination of displacement and unloading response parameters
在单位统计分析与预测周期内,其滑坡的卸加载位移响应参数则是以位移加速度a等于零为基准,小于零的为卸载响应值,大于零为加载响应值,将边坡位移加速度分别按卸加载响应正负值进行统计并取均值,可得到卸加载序列的位移加速度响应均值和 In the unit statistical analysis and prediction cycle, the unloading displacement response parameters of the landslide are based on the displacement acceleration a equal to zero, the value less than zero is the unloading response value, and the value greater than zero is the loading response value. The positive and negative values of the loading response are counted and averaged, and the average value of the displacement acceleration response of the unloading sequence can be obtained and
(3)滑坡地下水动力卸加载位移响应比参数的确定 (3) Determination of the parameters of the landslide groundwater dynamic unloading load-displacement response ratio
①滑坡卸加载响应率的确定 ① Determination of response rate of landslide unloading
基于现代非线性科学理论,将边坡位移加速度卸载响应均值与其相应的地下水位卸载均值之比确定为边坡动力卸载位移响应率χ-,将边坡位移加速度加载响应均值与其相应的地下水位加载均值之比确定为边坡动力加载位移响应率χ+,即: Based on modern nonlinear scientific theory, the mean value of slope displacement acceleration unloading response The corresponding groundwater level unloading average The ratio is determined as the slope dynamic unloading displacement response rate χ - , and the mean value of the slope displacement acceleration loading response The corresponding groundwater table loading mean The ratio of is determined as the slope dynamic loading displacement response rate χ + , namely:
②滑坡地下水动力卸加载位移响应比参数的确定 ② Determination of the parameters of the landslide groundwater dynamic unloading load-displacement response ratio
根据公式(2)和公式(3)及卸加载响应比的定义,可确定边坡地下水位动力卸加载位移响应比参数为: According to formula (2) and formula (3) and the definition of unloading load-response ratio, the parameters of slope groundwater level dynamic unloading-displacement response ratio can be determined as:
(4)水诱发型滑坡动态稳定性系数的确定 (4) Determination of dynamic stability coefficient of water-induced landslide
①边坡损伤变量与卸加载响应比参数定量关系的确定 ① Determination of the quantitative relationship between slope damage variables and unloading load response ratio parameters
依据本发明原理(2),其损伤变量D和卸加载响应比参数的定量关系如下: According to principle of the present invention (2), the quantitative relation of its damage variable D and unloading load-response ratio parameter is as follows:
Dt=1-γt 公式(5) D t = 1-γ t formula (5)
公式(5)表明岩土体材料的卸加载响应比γ与其损伤变量D之间存在一一对应的定量关 系。 Formula (5) shows that there is a one-to-one quantitative relationship between the unloading load response ratio γ of rock and soil materials and its damage variable D. the
②水诱发型滑坡动态稳定性系数的确定 ② Determination of dynamic stability coefficient of water-induced landslide
根据边坡工程中损伤变量与极限平衡评价法确定的稳定性系数的定量关系和公式 Quantitative relationship between damage variables and stability coefficient determined by limit equilibrium evaluation method in slope engineering and the formula
(5)可以确定水诱发型滑坡动态稳定性系数为: (5) The dynamic stability coefficient of water-induced landslide can be determined as:
式(6)表明,卸加载响应比与边坡稳定系数之间存在着一一的对应关系。 Equation (6) shows that there is a one-to-one correspondence between the unloading load response ratio and the slope stability coefficient. the
(5)水诱发型滑坡失稳预警判据的确定 (5) Determination of early warning criteria for water-induced landslide instability
在滑坡防治及其工程勘察设计的实际工作中,通常给稳定性系数设定一个安全储备得到一个安全系数K作为其稳定性与否的判据。依据边坡稳定性重要程度和边坡地质条件复杂程度及《地质灾害防治工程勘察规范》(DB50/143-2003)和《水利水电工程边坡设计规范》(SL386-2007)等规范,可综合确定坡的稳定性安全系数K,如K=1.3、1.25、1.15等;通过对上述步骤中确定的边坡动态稳定性系数Ft与传统安全系数K比较,可以快速、准确的对水诱发型边坡进行稳定性的动态预警评价和治理设计,即当Ft≥K时,边坡处于稳定状态;当Ft≤k时,边坡处于不稳定状态。 In the actual work of landslide prevention and engineering investigation and design, a safety reserve is usually set for the stability factor to obtain a safety factor K as the criterion of its stability. According to the importance of slope stability and the complexity of slope geological conditions, as well as the "Code for Geological Hazard Prevention Engineering Survey" (DB50/143-2003) and "Code for Slope Design of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering" (SL386-2007), it can be integrated Determine the slope stability safety factor K, such as K=1.3, 1.25, 1.15, etc.; by comparing the dynamic stability factor F t of the slope determined in the above steps with the traditional safety factor K, the water-induced type can be quickly and accurately The dynamic early warning evaluation and treatment design of the slope stability, that is, when F t ≥ K, the slope is in a stable state; when F t ≤ k, the slope is in an unstable state.
本发明的基本原理如下: Basic principle of the present invention is as follows:
1、卸加载响应比参数的定义 1. Definition of unloading load-response ratio parameters
现代非线性科学理论认为,同一事物,处于不同的发展演化阶段,其对外界扰动的响应是不一样的。如果将滑坡发展演化过程中可能遭受的各种外界因素,如降雨、库水位变动、人类工程活动等通称为广义荷载作用,并用M来表示;将斜坡经受广义荷载作用后所产生的响应(如位移、应变、声发射等状态变量)定义为R,则广义荷载与系统响应之间的关系见附图3。设荷载增量为ΔM时,所对应的响应增量为ΔR,定义响应率χ为: Modern nonlinear scientific theory holds that the same thing, at different stages of development and evolution, responds differently to external disturbances. If the various external factors that may be encountered during the development and evolution of the landslide, such as rainfall, reservoir water level changes, and human engineering activities, are commonly referred to as generalized loads, and M is used to represent them; the response of the slope after being subjected to generalized loads (such as Displacement, strain, acoustic emission and other state variables) are defined as R, and the relationship between generalized load and system response is shown in Figure 3. When the load increment is ΔM, the corresponding response increment is ΔR, and the response rate χ is defined as:
令χ-与χ+分别代表卸载与加载响应率。荷载很小时系统处于稳定状态,这时其R和M之间为线性或近似线性关系,加载时的响应率χ+与卸载时的响应率χ-基本相等;如果荷载不断增大,逐渐接近临界值Mcr,即系统趋于不稳定时,其响应率随荷载增大而不断增大;当系统失稳时,X+→∞。这说明,当系统临近失稳时,即使是极其微小的荷载作用都会使系统 产生剧烈的响应。因此对非线性系统进行加载即使荷载增量保持不变由于系统的稳定状态不一样其响应率也会有很大差别,响应率越大系统越接近失稳。为了找出更一般的规律,定义卸加载响应比: Let χ - and χ + denote unloading and loading response rates, respectively. When the load is very small, the system is in a stable state. At this time, the relationship between R and M is linear or approximately linear, and the response rate χ + during loading is basically equal to the response rate χ- during unloading; if the load continues to increase, it will gradually approach the critical Value Mcr, that is, when the system tends to be unstable, its response rate increases continuously with the increase of load; when the system is unstable, X +→∞ . This shows that when the system is on the verge of instability, even a very small load will cause the system to respond violently. Therefore, even if the load increment remains unchanged, the response rate of the nonlinear system will vary greatly due to the different stable states of the system. The greater the response rate, the closer the system is to instability. In order to find out more general rules, define the unloading load-response ratio:
式中:ΔR-和ΔR+分别为卸载响应增量和加载响应增量;ΔM-和ΔM+分别为卸载增量和加载增量。对于弹性系统,χ+=χ-=c,所以γ=1;但对于非线性系统,γ值则随系统稳定状态不同而变化。当系统处于稳定状态时,γ=1;当系统偏离稳态时,γ<1;当系统失稳时,γ→0。因此γ值可以定量的刻画非线性系统的稳定性程度,也可以作为非线性系统失稳预报的判据。 In the formula: ΔR - and ΔR + are unloading response increments and loading response increments, respectively; ΔM - and ΔM + are unloading increments and loading increments, respectively. For an elastic system, χ + =χ - =c, so γ=1; but for a nonlinear system, the value of γ varies with the stable state of the system. When the system is in a stable state, γ=1; when the system deviates from the steady state, γ<1; when the system is unstable, γ→0. Therefore, the γ value can quantitatively describe the degree of stability of the nonlinear system, and can also be used as a criterion for predicting the instability of the nonlinear system.
2、损伤变量与卸加载响应比参数的定量关系从损伤力学的角度看,滑坡的孕育过程就是坡体材料的损伤演化过程。在损伤力学中,损伤过程与损伤程度可以运用损伤变量D来定量刻画与描述,其大小被定义为材料的变形模量E的变化率,即: 2. Quantitative relationship between damage variable and unloading load response ratio parameter From the perspective of damage mechanics, the breeding process of landslide is the damage evolution process of slope material. In damage mechanics, the damage process and damage degree can be quantitatively described and described by using the damage variable D, which is defined as the change rate of the deformation modulus E of the material, namely:
式中E0为初始状态(未损伤)的模量,E为受损伤的模量。材料未损伤时,E=E0,D=0;材料完全破坏时,E=0,D=1。 In the formula, E0 is the modulus of the initial state (undamaged), and E is the modulus of damage. When the material is not damaged, E=E 0 , D=0; when the material is completely destroyed, E=0, D=1.
本发明运用的卸加载响应比即是卸载阶段坡体的应变和应力之比与加载阶段坡体的应变和应力之比的比值。即 The unloading load response ratio used in the present invention is the ratio of the ratio of strain and stress of the slope body in the unloading stage to the ratio of strain and stress of the slope body in the loading stage. Right now
考虑到材料在卸载时的模量一般近似等于初始弹性模量E0,即E-=E0,而E+=E,于是有: Considering that the modulus of the material when it is unloaded is generally approximately equal to the initial elastic modulus E 0 , that is, E - =E 0 , and E + =E, then:
当γ=1时,D=0;说明材料未受损伤,处于稳定状态;当γ→0时,D=1;说明材料完全损伤。 When γ=1, D=0; indicating that the material is not damaged and in a stable state; when γ→0, D=1; indicating that the material is completely damaged. the
3、损伤变量与稳定性系数的定量关系 边坡岩土体的剪切破坏实质上是岩土体的结构损伤导致其力学性质变化的最终形式,在对边坡岩土体损伤过程的研究中抗剪强度是比较敏感且易测量的因素。当部分岩土体达到其抗剪强度时,即发生部分破坏而整体表现稳定;当边坡岩土体完全达到其抗剪强度时,坡体发生完全破坏。因此,可以从岩土体强度破坏意义上定义损伤变量D,为边坡潜在滑移面上岩土体的剪切应力大于抗剪强度时的破坏概率,描述的是边坡岩土体的破坏程度。在边坡稳定性极限平衡法评价中,稳定性系数通常被定义为边坡潜在滑移面上的抗滑力与下滑力之比,描述的是边坡的稳定性程度。因此,在边坡工程中边坡稳定性系数可定义为极限损伤变量Dlim与边坡任意时刻损伤变量Dt之比,即: 3. Quantitative relationship between damage variable and stability coefficient The shear failure of slope rock and soil is essentially the final form of the structural damage of rock and soil that leads to the change of its mechanical properties. In the study of the damage process of slope rock and soil Shear strength is a sensitive and easily measured factor. When part of the rock-soil mass reaches its shear strength, partial failure occurs and the overall performance is stable; when the rock-soil mass of the slope fully reaches its shear strength, the slope body is completely destroyed. Therefore, the damage variable D can be defined in the sense of rock and soil strength failure, which is the failure probability when the shear stress of the rock and soil on the potential slip surface of the slope is greater than the shear strength, which describes the failure of the slope rock and soil degree. In the evaluation of slope stability limit equilibrium method, the stability coefficient is usually defined as the ratio of the anti-sliding force on the potential slip surface of the slope to the sliding force, which describes the degree of stability of the slope. Therefore, in slope engineering, the slope stability coefficient can be defined as the ratio of the limit damage variable D lim to the slope damage variable D t at any time, namely:
式(12)中:Dt为t时刻的损伤变量,Dlim为极限损伤变量取1。 In formula (12): D t is the damage variable at time t, D lim is the limit damage variable and takes 1.
本发明提供的一种基于地下水位与位移监测的边坡动态稳定性系数测定方法,其有益效果在于,将滑坡地下水位的变化与滑坡位移响应信息变化及其评价方法进行了有机耦合,有效合理的确定了边坡的动态稳定性系数,并依此可对边坡动态稳定性演化规律进行合理的分析与评价,既克服了传统极限平衡力学评价法很难准确确定滑坡物理力学参数与边界条件等而带来误判或错判,同时又解决了传统位移时序预测方法无法定量描述滑坡动力作用机理且无稳定统一失稳判据等问题。 A method for determining the dynamic stability coefficient of a slope based on groundwater level and displacement monitoring provided by the present invention has the beneficial effect of organically coupling the change in groundwater level of the landslide with the change in the response information of the landslide displacement and its evaluation method, which is effective and reasonable The dynamic stability coefficient of the slope is accurately determined, and based on this, the evolution law of the dynamic stability of the slope can be reasonably analyzed and evaluated, which overcomes the difficulty of accurately determining the physical and mechanical parameters and boundary conditions of the landslide by the traditional limit equilibrium mechanics evaluation method At the same time, it solves the problems that the traditional displacement time series prediction method cannot quantitatively describe the dynamic mechanism of the landslide and has no stable and unified instability criterion. the
附图说明 Description of drawings
图1是本发明的边坡动态稳定性系数确定流程图; Fig. 1 is a determination flow chart of slope dynamic stability coefficient of the present invention;
图2是本发明的边坡地下水和位移监测点及监测收集处理设备示意图,其中1为压力式水位计,2为气压补偿装置,3为位移监测点,4为位移变化监测设备,5为监测基准点及设备,6为数据采集设备,7为远程监测室; Fig. 2 is the schematic diagram of slope groundwater and displacement monitoring points and monitoring collection and processing equipment of the present invention, wherein 1 is a pressure water level gauge, 2 is an air pressure compensation device, 3 is a displacement monitoring point, 4 is a displacement change monitoring device, and 5 is a monitoring Reference points and equipment, 6 is the data acquisition equipment, 7 is the remote monitoring room;
图3是本发明的边坡演化过程中广义荷载与系统响应的关系图; Fig. 3 is the relation diagram of generalized load and system response in the slope evolution process of the present invention;
图4是本发明实施例的某边坡及其监测点示意图; Fig. 4 is a certain side slope and monitoring point schematic diagram thereof of the embodiment of the present invention;
图5是本发明实施例的某边坡F点卸加载响应比曲线图; Fig. 5 is a certain side slope F point unloading load-response ratio curve figure of the embodiment of the present invention;
图6是本发明实施例的某边坡F点稳定性系数曲线图。 Fig. 6 is a curve diagram of the stability coefficient of point F of a certain slope according to an embodiment of the present invention. the
具体实施方式 Detailed ways
下面参照附图,结合实施例,对本发明提供的基于地下水位与位移监测的边坡动态稳定性系数测定方法,进行详细的说明。 Referring to the accompanying drawings, the method for determining the dynamic stability coefficient of a slope based on groundwater level and displacement monitoring provided by the present invention will be described in detail below in conjunction with embodiments. the
实施例 Example
为了更好地阐述本发明,下面结合附图以某水诱发型堆积层滑坡为实施例进一步详细说明,该堆积层滑坡的滑坡面积为0.73km2,体积约3×107m3,堆积物以崩(坡)积碎块石夹粘土为主,下伏基岩面为志留系砂、页岩,形态比较复杂,在地下水环境变化的作用下于1985年6月12日发生了破坏。本实施例滑坡的监测时间为1978年1月至滑坡失稳破坏,本发明的边坡动态稳定性系数确定流程如图1所示,具体实施步骤如下: In order to better illustrate the present invention, a water-induced accumulative landslide will be taken as an example in further detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings . It is dominated by collapsing (slope) debris and clay, and the underlying bedrock surface is Silurian sand and shale, with complex shapes. It was destroyed on June 12, 1985 under the influence of groundwater environment changes. The monitoring time of the landslide in this embodiment is from January, 1978 to the destruction of the landslide instability. The determination process of the slope dynamic stability coefficient of the present invention is as shown in Figure 1, and the specific implementation steps are as follows:
第一步:监测边坡地下水位与位移基本数据 Step 1: Monitor the basic data of slope groundwater level and displacement
①监测仪器:地下水位监测设备:a、压力式水位计,b、气压补偿装置;边坡位移监测设备:无线GPS位移监测设备(见图2); ① Monitoring instruments: groundwater level monitoring equipment: a, pressure water level gauge, b, air pressure compensation device; slope displacement monitoring equipment: wireless GPS displacement monitoring equipment (see Figure 2);
②根据该滑坡主滑区及后缘拉张裂缝、剪出口等关键位置与特征以及滑坡带状分布与基岩出露于两侧的情况,在坡体上选取F点,(见图4),F点作为分析目标监测点并设置位移基准点。 ② According to the key positions and characteristics of the landslide’s main sliding area, tensile cracks and shear outlets at the rear edge, as well as the zonal distribution of the landslide and the exposed bedrock on both sides, select point F on the slope (see Figure 4), Point F is used as the analysis target monitoring point and sets the displacement reference point. the
③在滑坡选定的监测点F位置的钻孔底部设置压力式水位计,监测地下水位的变化;在位移监测基准点位置和边坡钻孔监测点位置布设无线GPS位移监测设备,监测基准点的滑坡位移速率。 ③A pressure water level gauge is installed at the bottom of the borehole at the selected monitoring point F of the landslide to monitor the change of the groundwater level; a wireless GPS displacement monitoring device is arranged at the position of the displacement monitoring reference point and the slope drilling monitoring point to monitor the reference point the landslide displacement rate. the
④以月为时间间隔同步同周期通过边坡场地数据信号收集器对滑坡的位移和地下水监测数据进行数据传输到远程监测室,在监测室每隔一段时间用Excel等批处理软件进行监测数据的预处理,得到地下水位值(见表1)、边坡位移速率值和加速度值(见表2-3)。 ④ The monthly time interval is used to transmit the data of landslide displacement and groundwater monitoring data to the remote monitoring room through the data signal collector of the slope site at the same cycle, and batch processing software such as Excel is used for monitoring data in the monitoring room at regular intervals. After preprocessing, the groundwater level value (see Table 1), slope displacement rate value and acceleration value (see Table 2-3) are obtained. the
第二步:确定滑坡地下水动力卸加载参数和位移响应参数 Step 2: Determine the groundwater dynamic unloading parameters and displacement response parameters of the landslide
1)地下水位卸加载参数的确定 1) Determination of groundwater level unloading parameters
根据上述该滑坡区地下水位的监测资料,确定滑坡的统计分析与预测周期为一年,以一个卸加载周期的某月地下水位Hi和前月地下水位Hi-1的差值ΔH为依据,当ΔH<0时判定为卸载,ΔH>0时判定为加载,因此就得到了一个地下水作用周期的卸加载月份和卸加载区间,根据水动力卸加载区间,将ΔH分别按每个卸加载周期年的卸加载正负值统计并取其均值,可分别的到地下水位的卸加载序列和 (见表4)。 According to the above-mentioned monitoring data of the groundwater level in the landslide area, the statistical analysis and prediction cycle of the landslide is determined to be one year, based on the difference ΔH between the groundwater level H i of a certain month and the ground water level H i-1 of the previous month in an unloading cycle, When ΔH < 0, it is judged as unloading, and when ΔH > 0, it is judged as loading. Therefore, the unloading month and unloading interval of a groundwater action cycle are obtained. According to the hydrodynamic unloading interval, ΔH is divided into Statistics of the positive and negative values of the unloading load of the year and take the average value, which can be used to obtain the unloading load sequence of the groundwater level and (See Table 4).
2)位移卸加载响应参数的确定 2) Determination of displacement and unloading response parameters
在单位统计分析与预测周期内,其滑坡的卸加载位移响应参数则是以位移加速度a等于零为基准,小于零的为卸载响应值,大于零为加载响应值。将边坡位移加速度分别按卸加载响应正负值进行统计并取均值,可得到卸加载序列的位移加速度响应均值和 (见表4)。 In the unit statistical analysis and prediction cycle, the unloading displacement response parameters of the landslide are based on the displacement acceleration a equal to zero, the unloading response value is less than zero, and the loading response value is greater than zero. The slope displacement acceleration is counted according to the positive and negative values of the unloading response and the mean value is taken to obtain the mean value of the displacement acceleration response of the unloading sequence and (See Table 4).
表1某滑坡地下水位数据表(单位:mm) Table 1 The groundwater level data table of a certain landslide (unit: mm)
表2某滑坡F点月位移速率(单位:mm/s) Table 2 Monthly displacement rate of point F of a landslide (unit: mm/s)
表3某滑坡F点月位移加速率(单位:mm/s2) Table 3 Monthly displacement acceleration rate of point F of a landslide (unit: mm/s2)
表4某滑坡F点的卸加载参数和卸加载响应参数 Table 4 Unloading parameters and unloading response parameters of a landslide point F
注:卸加载参数单位为mm;位移响应值单位为mm/月2。 Note: The unit of the unloading parameter is mm; the unit of the displacement response value is mm/month2. the
第三步:滑坡地下水动力卸加载位移响应比参数的确定 Step 3: Determination of the parameters of the landslide groundwater dynamic unloading load-displacement response ratio
将表4中序列代入堆积层滑坡卸加载响应比预测模型公式(4)中,得到新滩滑坡监测点F的卸加载响应比时间序列(见表5)及卸加载响应比时间曲线图(见图5)。 In Table 4 Substituting the sequence into the accumulation landslide unloading load response ratio prediction model formula (4), the unloading load response ratio time series (see Table 5) and the unloading load response ratio time curve (see Figure 5) of Xintan landslide monitoring point F are obtained.
表5某滑坡F点的卸加载响应比值 Table 5 The unloading load response ratio of a certain landslide point F
第四步:滑坡动态稳定性系数的确定 Step 4: Determination of landslide dynamic stability coefficient
1)边坡损伤变量与卸加载响应比参数定量关系的确定 1) Determination of the quantitative relationship between slope damage variables and unloading load response ratio parameters
依据步骤二中边坡的卸加载响应比参数及边坡损伤变量D和卸加载响应比参数的定量关系Dt=1-γt可以得到边坡的损失变量如表6: According to the unloading load-response ratio parameter of the slope in step 2 and the quantitative relationship between the slope damage variable D and the unloading load-response ratio parameter D t = 1-γ t , the slope loss variable can be obtained as shown in Table 6:
表6:某滑坡F点的损伤变量值 Table 6: Damage variable values of point F of a landslide
2)水诱发型滑坡动态稳定性系数的确定 2) Determination of dynamic stability coefficient of water-induced landslide
根据边坡工程中损伤变量与稳定性系数的定量关系(见原理3)和公式(5)可以确定水诱发型滑坡动态稳定性系数的大小(见表7)及稳定性系数时序曲线图(见图6): According to the quantitative relationship between damage variable and stability coefficient in slope engineering (see principle 3) and formula (5) can determine the size of the water-induced landslide dynamic stability coefficient (see Table 7) and the time series curve of the stability coefficient (see Figure 6):
表7:某滑坡F点的稳定性系数 Table 7: Stability coefficient of point F of a landslide
第五步:水诱发型滑坡失稳预警判据的确定在滑坡防治及其工程勘察设计的实际工作中,通常给稳定性系数设定一个安全储备得到一个安全系数K作为其稳定性与否的判据。依据边坡稳定性重要程度和边坡地质条件复杂程度及《地质灾害防治工程勘察规范》(DB50/143-2003)和《水利水电工程边坡设计规范》(SL386-2007)等规范,可综合确定坡的稳定性安全系数K=1.25。通过对上述步骤中确定的边坡动态稳定性系数Ft与传统安全系数K=1.25比较,可以快速、准确的对水诱发型边坡进行稳定性的动态预警评价和治理设计。 Step 5: Determination of early warning criteria for water-induced landslide instability In the actual work of landslide prevention and engineering survey and design, a safety reserve is usually set for the stability factor to obtain a safety factor K as the criterion for its stability. criterion. According to the importance of slope stability and the complexity of slope geological conditions, as well as the "Code for Geological Hazard Prevention Engineering Survey" (DB50/143-2003) and "Code for Slope Design of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering" (SL386-2007), it can be integrated Determine the slope stability safety factor K = 1.25. By comparing the dynamic stability factor F t of the slope determined in the above steps with the traditional safety factor K=1.25, the dynamic early warning evaluation and treatment design of the stability of the water-induced slope can be quickly and accurately carried out.
根据步骤四中求出的F点边坡稳定性系数可以得出:该边坡在1978年到1984年期间稳定性系数逐渐降低,但均大于边坡设计安全系数K=1.25,说明该边坡稳定性一直降低但处于稳定状态;1984年到1985年期间边坡的稳定性系数突然降低且小于设计安全系数K=1.25,说明该边坡此期间发生了较大的损伤破坏并最终破坏失稳。上述对该实际边坡稳定性系数的计算分析结果与边坡实际位移和失稳规律基本吻合,表明运用该非线性动力卸加载响应比参数所确定的边坡稳定性系数和失稳预警判据是行之有效的,具有较强的预测预报功能和实用价值。 According to the slope stability coefficient at F point obtained in step 4, it can be concluded that the slope stability coefficient gradually decreased from 1978 to 1984, but they were all greater than the slope design safety factor K=1.25, indicating that the slope The stability has been decreasing but in a stable state; the stability factor of the slope dropped suddenly from 1984 to 1985 and was less than the design safety factor K=1.25, indicating that the slope suffered a large damage during this period and eventually became unstable . The above calculation and analysis results of the actual slope stability coefficient are basically consistent with the actual slope displacement and instability law, which shows that the slope stability coefficient and instability early warning criterion determined by using the nonlinear dynamic unloading load-response ratio parameter It is effective and has strong forecasting function and practical value. the
Claims (1)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410351222.8A CN104406623B (en) | 2014-07-23 | 2014-07-23 | Method for determining dynamic stability coefficient of side slope based on underground water level and displacement monitoring |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410351222.8A CN104406623B (en) | 2014-07-23 | 2014-07-23 | Method for determining dynamic stability coefficient of side slope based on underground water level and displacement monitoring |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN104406623A true CN104406623A (en) | 2015-03-11 |
CN104406623B CN104406623B (en) | 2017-08-25 |
Family
ID=52644270
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410351222.8A Active CN104406623B (en) | 2014-07-23 | 2014-07-23 | Method for determining dynamic stability coefficient of side slope based on underground water level and displacement monitoring |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN104406623B (en) |
Cited By (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104833392A (en) * | 2015-04-30 | 2015-08-12 | 广西大学 | Device and method for measuring soil displacement and moisture content of slope |
CN104931095A (en) * | 2015-05-27 | 2015-09-23 | 李德威 | Underground hot fluid associated abnormal flow monitoring system |
CN106205060A (en) * | 2016-08-19 | 2016-12-07 | 临沂大学 | For outdoor pit Tailings Dam slope and land slide early alarming and forecasting method |
CN106198922A (en) * | 2016-06-23 | 2016-12-07 | 青岛理工大学 | Method for determining rainfall capacity of critical start of rainfall type landslide and instability early warning time |
CN106405675A (en) * | 2016-08-25 | 2017-02-15 | 山东科技大学 | Dynamic monitoring system and method for early warning against slope slide of tailing pond of strip mining pit |
CN107655444A (en) * | 2017-09-08 | 2018-02-02 | 广西交通科学研究院有限公司 | With reference to monitoring with finite element amendment with determine slope sliding face change method |
CN107727830A (en) * | 2017-09-27 | 2018-02-23 | 三峡大学 | A kind of device and method for simulating air-cushion type landslide |
CN109490950A (en) * | 2018-11-30 | 2019-03-19 | 中国地震台网中心 | Earthquake prediction method and system |
CN109597119A (en) * | 2018-11-30 | 2019-04-09 | 中国地震台网中心 | Loading ami deloading response ratio calculation method and system |
CN109680669A (en) * | 2018-12-18 | 2019-04-26 | 青岛理工大学 | Foundation pit stability monitoring and early warning method based on underground water dynamic loading |
CN109740108A (en) * | 2019-01-25 | 2019-05-10 | 北京科技大学 | A Stability Evaluation Method for Flat-Push Landslide Considering Step Settlement |
CN109785584A (en) * | 2019-01-29 | 2019-05-21 | 青岛理工大学 | Method for predicting stability of composite hydrodynamic reservoir bank slope |
CN111542819A (en) * | 2017-09-26 | 2020-08-14 | 地质探索系统公司 | Apparatus and method for improved subsurface data processing system |
CN111982004A (en) * | 2020-09-09 | 2020-11-24 | 中国五冶集团有限公司 | High and steep slope geological disaster monitoring and early warning structure and early warning method |
CN112085921A (en) * | 2020-08-20 | 2020-12-15 | 青岛地质工程勘察院(青岛地质勘查开发局) | Landslide comprehensive monitoring and early warning method based on displacement and power multi-parameter |
CN112102588A (en) * | 2020-09-22 | 2020-12-18 | 温州大学 | Self-powered highway side slope monitoring and early warning system |
CN113216219A (en) * | 2021-04-09 | 2021-08-06 | 中国电建集团西北勘测设计研究院有限公司 | Method for controlling slope deformation by limiting reservoir water level lifting rate |
CN114137601A (en) * | 2021-11-26 | 2022-03-04 | 华北水利水电大学 | Wedge stability evaluation method |
CN115050163A (en) * | 2022-06-15 | 2022-09-13 | 中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司 | Slope monitoring and early warning system |
CN117291349A (en) * | 2023-11-24 | 2023-12-26 | 济宁御龙源水务有限公司 | Groundwater level restoration prediction method and system |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020026293A1 (en) * | 2000-08-28 | 2002-02-28 | Toshiba Engineering Corporation | Method and apparatus for generating measurement data |
CN103150871A (en) * | 2013-01-31 | 2013-06-12 | 青岛理工大学 | Landslide prediction method utilizing underground water level and displacement real-time monitoring |
CN103198619A (en) * | 2013-03-08 | 2013-07-10 | 青岛理工大学 | Dynamic monitoring and early warning method for rock mass landslide |
CN103558360A (en) * | 2013-11-11 | 2014-02-05 | 青岛理工大学 | Method for measuring rainfall capacity of critical unstable starting of rainfall type landslide |
CN103646181A (en) * | 2013-12-20 | 2014-03-19 | 青岛理工大学 | Determination method for stability coefficient and early warning criterion of creeping type artificial slope |
CN103792593A (en) * | 2014-01-13 | 2014-05-14 | 青岛理工大学 | Reservoir bank slope stability determination method based on reservoir water level and displacement monitoring |
-
2014
- 2014-07-23 CN CN201410351222.8A patent/CN104406623B/en active Active
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020026293A1 (en) * | 2000-08-28 | 2002-02-28 | Toshiba Engineering Corporation | Method and apparatus for generating measurement data |
CN103150871A (en) * | 2013-01-31 | 2013-06-12 | 青岛理工大学 | Landslide prediction method utilizing underground water level and displacement real-time monitoring |
CN103198619A (en) * | 2013-03-08 | 2013-07-10 | 青岛理工大学 | Dynamic monitoring and early warning method for rock mass landslide |
CN103558360A (en) * | 2013-11-11 | 2014-02-05 | 青岛理工大学 | Method for measuring rainfall capacity of critical unstable starting of rainfall type landslide |
CN103646181A (en) * | 2013-12-20 | 2014-03-19 | 青岛理工大学 | Determination method for stability coefficient and early warning criterion of creeping type artificial slope |
CN103792593A (en) * | 2014-01-13 | 2014-05-14 | 青岛理工大学 | Reservoir bank slope stability determination method based on reservoir water level and displacement monitoring |
Cited By (28)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104833392A (en) * | 2015-04-30 | 2015-08-12 | 广西大学 | Device and method for measuring soil displacement and moisture content of slope |
CN104931095A (en) * | 2015-05-27 | 2015-09-23 | 李德威 | Underground hot fluid associated abnormal flow monitoring system |
CN104931095B (en) * | 2015-05-27 | 2017-10-10 | 中国地质大学(武汉) | Underground heat fluid communication abnormal flow monitoring system |
CN106198922A (en) * | 2016-06-23 | 2016-12-07 | 青岛理工大学 | Method for determining rainfall capacity of critical start of rainfall type landslide and instability early warning time |
CN106198922B (en) * | 2016-06-23 | 2018-07-06 | 青岛理工大学 | Method for determining rainfall capacity of critical start of rainfall type landslide and instability early warning time |
CN106205060A (en) * | 2016-08-19 | 2016-12-07 | 临沂大学 | For outdoor pit Tailings Dam slope and land slide early alarming and forecasting method |
CN106405675A (en) * | 2016-08-25 | 2017-02-15 | 山东科技大学 | Dynamic monitoring system and method for early warning against slope slide of tailing pond of strip mining pit |
CN107655444A (en) * | 2017-09-08 | 2018-02-02 | 广西交通科学研究院有限公司 | With reference to monitoring with finite element amendment with determine slope sliding face change method |
CN111542819A (en) * | 2017-09-26 | 2020-08-14 | 地质探索系统公司 | Apparatus and method for improved subsurface data processing system |
US12026222B2 (en) | 2017-09-26 | 2024-07-02 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Apparatus and methods for improved subsurface data processing systems |
CN111542819B (en) * | 2017-09-26 | 2024-05-31 | 地质探索系统公司 | Apparatus and method for an improved subsurface data processing system |
CN107727830A (en) * | 2017-09-27 | 2018-02-23 | 三峡大学 | A kind of device and method for simulating air-cushion type landslide |
CN109597119A (en) * | 2018-11-30 | 2019-04-09 | 中国地震台网中心 | Loading ami deloading response ratio calculation method and system |
CN109490950A (en) * | 2018-11-30 | 2019-03-19 | 中国地震台网中心 | Earthquake prediction method and system |
CN109680669A (en) * | 2018-12-18 | 2019-04-26 | 青岛理工大学 | Foundation pit stability monitoring and early warning method based on underground water dynamic loading |
CN109740108A (en) * | 2019-01-25 | 2019-05-10 | 北京科技大学 | A Stability Evaluation Method for Flat-Push Landslide Considering Step Settlement |
CN109785584A (en) * | 2019-01-29 | 2019-05-21 | 青岛理工大学 | Method for predicting stability of composite hydrodynamic reservoir bank slope |
CN112085921A (en) * | 2020-08-20 | 2020-12-15 | 青岛地质工程勘察院(青岛地质勘查开发局) | Landslide comprehensive monitoring and early warning method based on displacement and power multi-parameter |
CN112085921B (en) * | 2020-08-20 | 2022-11-11 | 青岛地质工程勘察院(青岛地质勘查开发局) | A landslide comprehensive monitoring and early warning method based on displacement and dynamic multi-parameters |
CN111982004A (en) * | 2020-09-09 | 2020-11-24 | 中国五冶集团有限公司 | High and steep slope geological disaster monitoring and early warning structure and early warning method |
CN112102588A (en) * | 2020-09-22 | 2020-12-18 | 温州大学 | Self-powered highway side slope monitoring and early warning system |
CN113216219A (en) * | 2021-04-09 | 2021-08-06 | 中国电建集团西北勘测设计研究院有限公司 | Method for controlling slope deformation by limiting reservoir water level lifting rate |
CN113216219B (en) * | 2021-04-09 | 2023-03-07 | 中国电建集团西北勘测设计研究院有限公司 | Method for controlling slope deformation by limiting reservoir water level lifting rate |
CN114137601A (en) * | 2021-11-26 | 2022-03-04 | 华北水利水电大学 | Wedge stability evaluation method |
CN115050163A (en) * | 2022-06-15 | 2022-09-13 | 中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司 | Slope monitoring and early warning system |
CN115050163B (en) * | 2022-06-15 | 2023-10-03 | 中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司 | Slope monitoring and early warning system |
CN117291349B (en) * | 2023-11-24 | 2024-03-19 | 济宁御龙源水务有限公司 | Groundwater level restoration prediction method and system |
CN117291349A (en) * | 2023-11-24 | 2023-12-26 | 济宁御龙源水务有限公司 | Groundwater level restoration prediction method and system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN104406623B (en) | 2017-08-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN104406623B (en) | Method for determining dynamic stability coefficient of side slope based on underground water level and displacement monitoring | |
CN103150871B (en) | Landslide prediction method utilizing underground water level and displacement real-time monitoring | |
CN103558360A (en) | Method for measuring rainfall capacity of critical unstable starting of rainfall type landslide | |
Miao et al. | A novel seepage device and ring-shear test on slip zone soils of landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir area | |
CN106120878B (en) | Load test determination method for limited bearing capacity and allowable bearing capacity of foundation electrode | |
CN103886176B (en) | Method for determining dynamic stability coefficient of creeping slope | |
CN108538026A (en) | Multi-index comprehensive evaluation and early warning method for slope stability | |
CN104989456B (en) | Large-span underground engineering surrounding rock excavation stability monitoring and early warning method | |
CN104318103B (en) | A kind of landslide disaster monitoring and warning rainfall threshold determination method | |
CN104501766B (en) | Deep foundation pit excavation slope vertical displacement vector angle monitoring parameter and early warning method | |
CN104535346B (en) | Anti-slip stability detection method for concrete gravity dangerous dam | |
CN103792593B (en) | Reservoir bank slope stability determination method based on reservoir water level and displacement monitoring | |
CN110132218B (en) | Multi-level early warning determination method based on slope stability monitoring | |
CN114333249A (en) | Landslide warning method and device | |
CN105606063B (en) | Soil layer slope stability determination method based on orthogonal strain ratio | |
CN106198922B (en) | Method for determining rainfall capacity of critical start of rainfall type landslide and instability early warning time | |
CN104452836A (en) | Stability detection early warning method for deep foundation pit supporting structure | |
CN103512631B (en) | Method for determining critical drainage water level line of slope based on monitoring | |
CN112085921A (en) | Landslide comprehensive monitoring and early warning method based on displacement and power multi-parameter | |
CN101021570A (en) | Non-contact mine ground pressure observing and estimating method | |
CN106595576A (en) | Method for monitoring and evaluating ground subsidence | |
CN110160435A (en) | Landslide water content load-increasing response ratio prediction parameter and method | |
CN118644091B (en) | Geological hazard risk assessment platform and method based on big data | |
CN104196024B (en) | The loss of prestress computational methods coupled with Rock And Soil creep are lost based on prestressd anchor cable | |
CN119147051A (en) | Rock stability analysis device and method in mining process |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
CB03 | Change of inventor or designer information |
Inventor after: He Keqiang Inventor after: Yang Debing Inventor after: Liang Yunpei Inventor after: Zhang Yongjun Inventor after: Zhang Jiaxin Inventor after: Li Jing Inventor before: He Keqiang Inventor before: Yang Debing Inventor before: Zhang Jiaxin Inventor before: Li Jing |
|
CB03 | Change of inventor or designer information | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |