CN104181092A - Method for quantitatively expressing carbonate rock pore evolution contribution - Google Patents
Method for quantitatively expressing carbonate rock pore evolution contribution Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN104181092A CN104181092A CN201410444443.XA CN201410444443A CN104181092A CN 104181092 A CN104181092 A CN 104181092A CN 201410444443 A CN201410444443 A CN 201410444443A CN 104181092 A CN104181092 A CN 104181092A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- porosity
- factor
- loss
- original
- oolith
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Abstract
The invention discloses a method for quantitatively expressing the carbonate rock pore evolution contribution, comprising the following steps: firstly, predicting the original porosity; secondly, solving the porosity lost by cementation; thirdly, solving the porosity lost by intergranular pressure solution; fourthly, solving the porosity lost by mechanical compaction; and fifthly, repeating steps 1-4, and calculating the contribution value of the carbonate rock mechanical compaction, the intergranular pressure solution and the cementation at different positions to reduction of the porosity. Compared with the prior art, the method has the advantage of providing a new thought for the aspects of pore evolution of the carbonate rock, the volume of the carbonate rock corroded by intergranular pressure solution and the number of cements provided for flow of the carbonate rock dissolved to underground fluid, so as to seek for high-porosity areas from pore evolution contribution and explore a high quality reserve stratum in the carbonate rock.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to the method for Compaction, particle pressolution and the cementation relative scale to factor of porosity reduction, relate in particular to a kind of method of quantitatively characterizing evolution of carbonate rock's pore contribution.
Background technology
The pore evolution of sandstone is generally taken as the leading factor by Compaction, then adds a certain amount of cementation.By contrast, the pore evolution of carbonatite develops and wants complicated a lot of compared with sandstone pores, affect hole effect except above-mentioned two kinds, particle pressolution has occupied indispensable status on evolution of carbonate rock's pore, and multifactor impact the quantitatively characterizing that evolution of carbonate rock's pore causes the contribution of its pore evolution and just become difficulty relatively.
Carbonate porosity degree successively decreases with degree of depth exponentially.The reduction of factor of porosity is Compaction, intergranular pressolution (IPS) and the coefficient result of cementation.Compaction refers to the increase due to burden pressure, and skeleton particle rearranges and the volume of voids that causes reduces; Intergranular pressolution refers between pressure inducement contact particle corrosion occurs, the volume of voids minimizing causing; Hypothesis and controlling factor forefathers that pressolution exists have done excessive quantity research (Weyl, 1959; Tada and Siever, 1986; Houseknecht and Hathon, 1987; Moore, 1989; Bathurst, 1995;
, 1996), no longer describe in detail herein.Cementation refers to the precipitating action that mineral occur in pore space.
What attempt the earliest quantitative examination limestone porosity evolution process is Coogan (1970), the compaction that application pack density and filling index are measured carbonatite, although the compaction that application pack density and filling index have been measured carbonatite, does not distinguish the relative intensity that Compaction, intergranular pressolution and cementation act on respectively.
Rittenhouse (1971) improves research method, and Manus and Coogan (1974) have calculated because particle causes volume to reduce the factor of porosity causing by square and rhomboid filling arrangement and reduced.
It is a kind of to the most comprehensively computing method of coarse particle carbonatite compacting that Coogan and Manus (1975) provides, and three kinds of factors controlling factor of porosity are tested out: (1) dynamic factor (overlying formation pressure, temperature, the duration of fossil pressure, pore-fluid pressure and pore fluid); (2) internal factor (grain size, particle shape, the sorting of particle, the filling of particle and mineralogical composition); (3) damper (burying front cementing).
Vinopal and Coogan (1978) have calculated the volume of the limestone of difformity particle composition.
Meyers and Hill (nineteen eighty-three) have studied the porosity evolution process on New Mexico lake valley stratum, think that the loss of 38% original porosity is subject to compaction control, remaining are subject to cementation control.
Moore (1989) by public data and the theoretic sample labor of Rittenhouse (1971) Compaction, intergranular pressolution and cementation role in factor of porosity reduction process.
The research that the division of Gregg etc. (1993) by the diagenetic stage is quantitative the dolomitic porosity evolution in Bonneterre area.
Although forefathers have carried out a large amount of research, the quantitatively characterizing that Compaction, intergranular pressolution and cementation are reduced at carbonate porosity degree is the blank in research also.
Summary of the invention
The present invention is in order to solve above-mentioned deficiency, and a kind of method of quantitatively characterizing evolution of carbonate rock's pore contribution is provided.
Above-mentioned purpose of the present invention realizes by following technical scheme: a kind of method of quantitatively characterizing evolution of carbonate rock's pore contribution,
The first, prediction original porosity;
The second, ask for the factor of porosity that cementation is lost;
The 3rd, ask for the factor of porosity that intergranular pressolution loses;
The 4th, ask for the factor of porosity that Compaction loses;
The 5th, repeating step 1~4, the amount that carbonatite Compaction, intergranular particle pressolution and the cementation at calculating diverse location place reduces factor of porosity.
Total losses amount (the PL of hole
tOT) be Compaction loss amount (PL
mC), intergranular pressolution loss amount (PL
iPS) and cementation loss amount (PL
cEM) sum.
PL
TOT=PL
MC+PL
IPS+PL
CEM (1)
Total porosity (the PL of loss
tOT) should equal original porosity (PO) with residual porosity sum:
PO=PL
MC+PL
IPS+PL
CEM+P
LO (2)
Wherein, P
lOresidue interparticle porosity.
Specifically comprise the following steps:
Step 1: prediction original porosity (PO)
In order quantitatively to calculate PL
mC, PL
iPSand PL
cEM, need to estimate an original porosity value; The good spheric grain of sorting is respectively 47%, 40%, 40%, 29%, 26% and 26% with the original porosity of square, the oblique square of I type, the oblique square of II type, square, I type triangular form, the filling of II type triangular form mode, and its original porosity of the spheric grain of random alignment is about 40%;
Step 2: the factor of porosity (PL that asks for cementation loss
cEM)
Factor of porosity loss (the PL that cementation causes
cEM) a calculating utilization note point method measure, and it equals the percentage of grain-to-grain cementation thing; Specific practice is, under thin slice, find at random and observe 3-5 the visual field, drive thin slice rotation by rotatable stage, printing opacity has the cementing matter that is of significant change, record respectively each area S1~Sn of cementing matter within sweep of the eye, wherein S1~Sn represents respectively 1~n the area of cementing matter within sweep of the eye, records the area S in FOV (Field of View); That is:
Step 3: the factor of porosity (PL that asks for the loss of intergranular pressolution
iPS)
Mitra and Beard (1980) have proposed the method for quantitative calculating intergranular pressolution loss factor of porosity (PLIPS); Mitra and Beard be the intergranular pressolution owing to spheric grain by the loss factor of porosity calculating in theory;
V
IPS=nπh
2(3r-h)/3 (4)
V
iPSfor the volume on pressure solution ball top, n is the number (be generally 2, the top of spheroid and bottom are divided) on ball top, and h is corrosion height, and r is the original radius of spheric grain;
The original radius r of corrosion height h and particle is determined according to the particle size of the petrographic thin section microphoto of choosing, specific practice is: select continuously at random n oolith that lives through vertical compression, taking the maximum radius of each oolith as original radius r, utilize compasses to draw to each oolith the prototype structure that circle has been rebuild oolith, measure the original radius r of particle of each oolith, the least radius of each oolith is intergranular pressolution remaining particle radius rh afterwards, i.e. corrosion amount h=r-rh;
For the oolith of i vertical compression, i=1,2 ... n;
Factor of porosity P1 before corrosion
ican be expressed as
P1
i=[(2r)
3-4/3πr
3]/(2r)
3 (5)
Factor of porosity P2 after corrosion
ican be expressed as:
P2
i=[(2r)
2*(2*rh)-(4/3πr
3-V
IPS)]/[(2r)
2*(2*rh)] (6)
Factor of porosity (the PL of the oolith pressolution loss of i vertical compression
iPSi) be:
PL
IPSi=P1
i-P2
i (7)
Step 4: the factor of porosity (PL that asks for Compaction loss
mC)
Granular limestone factor of porosity is P now
lO(by core porosity measuring), the factor of porosity (PL of mechanical ramming loss
mC) can utilize the distortion of formula 2 to calculate, suppose that original porosity is 40%;
PL
MC=0.4-P
LO-(PL
IPS+PL
CEM) (9)
Step 5: repeating step 1~4, the amount that carbonatite Compaction, intergranular particle pressolution and the cementation at calculating diverse location place reduces factor of porosity.
The above-mentioned quantitatively characterizing of determining Compaction, intergranular pressolution and cementation in carbonatite of discussing.
The present invention's advantage is compared with prior art: the pore evolution that method of the present invention is carbonatite, the aspects such as the cementing matter quantity that the carbonatite volume of intergranular pressolution corrosion and dissolution of carbonate rock provide for underground fluid flows provide new thinking, be intended to find high hole district from pore evolution contribution, seek the High-quality Reservoir in carbonatite.
Brief description of the drawings
Fig. 1 is a kind of process flow diagram of method of quantitatively characterizing evolution of carbonate rock's pore.
Fig. 2 is general phosgene field, Sichuan P6Jing Changxing group limestone sample particle type and intergranular pressure solution contact relation figure.Wherein (A) sample (5350.4m) is inserted cementing; (B) sample (5307m) by spheric grain, micrite and bituminization before calcareous cement form; (C) sample (5281m) by micrite and bituminization after calcareous cement form; (D) sample (5251m) by spheric grain, a large amount of sphere marine facies cementing matter and bituminization before calcareous cement form.
Fig. 3 is the model of the factor of porosity of intergranular pressolution loss.
The vertical reduction measuring method of Fig. 4 Sichuan general phosgene field P6Jing Changxing group limestone sample (5350.4m) carbonate formation schematic diagram; (A) being photo under the mirror of 20 sample label ooliths, is (B) oolith original boundaries in estimation (A).
Fig. 5 is mechanical ramming, intergranular pressolution and cementation factor of porosity loss amount accumulative histogram.
Embodiment
Below in conjunction with embodiment, the present invention is described in further detail:
P6Jing Changxing, general gloss oil field, river the Northeast group limestone is the ideal area of quantitative examination Compaction, intergranular pressolution and cementation, reason have following some: they are made up of (1) spherical particle, make to rebuild the border of primary granule and the particle volume of counting loss is achieved; (2) emerging group of this head of district lacks the influential siliceous petroclastic rock particle of compaction tool and clay mineral; (3) this stratum has experienced relatively simple porosity evolution, crack agensis, and P6 well (5350.4m) factor of porosity is 2.3% (Fig. 2).
Although some particle is crystallite, the skin of most of particles all shows radial concentric structure.For all grain types, its prototype structure has all obtained preservation.Spherical structure and original kalzit mineral composition make mineralogical composition and particle shape drop to minimum on the impact of porosity evolution.
Concrete implementation step is:
Step 1: the prediction (PO) of original porosity
The good spheric grain of local area sorting is respectively 47%, 40%, 40%, 29%, 26% and 26% with the original porosity of square, the oblique square of I type, the oblique square of II type, square, I type triangular form, the filling of II type triangular form mode.The original porosity identical best (40%) of the carbonatite that the original porosity under oblique side's filling method and separation condition are good, lower original porosity too low (being respectively 30% and 25%) is arranged in square and triangular form filling, therefore select oblique square, original porosity is 40%.
Step 2: the factor of porosity (PL of cementation loss
cEM)
Factor of porosity loss (the PL that cementation causes
cEM) utilize note point method to measure, it equals the percentage of grain-to-grain cementation thing.Specific practice is, under thin slice, find at random and observe 5 visuals field, drive thin slice rotation by rotatable stage, printing opacity has the cementing matter that is of significant change, record respectively each area S1~S5 of cementing matter within sweep of the eye, wherein S1~S5 represents respectively 1~5 area of cementing matter within sweep of the eye, records the area S in FOV (Field of View).
Step 3: the factor of porosity (PL of intergranular pressolution loss
cEM)
According to particle size, in same position, P6 well (5350.4m) is selected 20 points of microphoto of the oolith that lives through vertical compression.Utilize compasses to draw to each oolith the prototype structure that circle has been rebuild oolith; taking the maximum radius of each oolith as original radius r; utilize compasses to draw to each oolith the prototype structure that circle has been rebuild oolith; measure the original radius r of particle of each oolith; the least radius of each oolith is intergranular pressolution remaining particle radius rh afterwards, i.e. corrosion amount h=r-rh.
New particle volume equals primary granule volume and deducts the volume (V that corrosion ball pushes up
cEM)
To scheme in (4) No. 1 point as example, its r=1.39cm, rh=0.88cm, i.e. h=r-rh=0.51cm, the factor of porosity P1 before corrosion
1can be expressed as
P1
1=[(2r)
3-4/3πr
3]/(2r)
3=47.6% (11)
Factor of porosity P2 after corrosion
1can be expressed as
P2
1={(2r)
2(2×rh)-[4/3πr
3-n/3πh
2(3r-h)]}/(2r)
2(2×rh)=31.95% (12)
Factor of porosity (the PL of pressolution loss
iPS1) be:
PL
IPS1=P1
1-P2
1=15.69% (13)
These 20 sampling points are asked in PL
iPSiscope be 9.4%-24.1%, PL
iPSirepresent the factor of porosity of the pressolution loss of i sampling point, the factor of porosity (PL of whole well depth point pressolution loss
iPS) be:
Step 4: the factor of porosity (PL of Compaction loss
mC)
Due to P6 well (5350.4m) now granular limestone factor of porosity be 2.3%, the factor of porosity (PL of mechanical ramming loss
mC) can utilize the distortion of formula 2 to calculate, suppose that original porosity is 40%:
PL
MC=0.4-P
LO-(PL
IPS+PL
CEM) (15)
Result shows the factor of porosity (PL of mechanical ramming loss
mC) loss average pore be 13.6%.
Step 5: repeating step 1~3, the relative scale that carbonatite Compaction, intergranular particle pressolution and the cementation at calculating diverse location place reduces factor of porosity, is shown in Fig. 4.
The foregoing is only embodiments of the invention; not thereby limit the scope of the claims of the present invention; every equivalent structure or conversion of equivalent flow process that utilizes instructions of the present invention to do, or be directly or indirectly used in other relevant technical fields, be all in like manner included in scope of patent protection of the present invention.
Claims (1)
1. a method for quantitatively characterizing evolution of carbonate rock's pore contribution, is characterized in that: comprise the following steps:
Step 1: prediction original porosity (PO)
In order quantitatively to calculate PL
mC, PL
iPSand PL
cEM, need to estimate an original porosity value; The good spheric grain of sorting is respectively 47%, 40%, 40%, 29%, 26% and 26% with the original porosity of square, the oblique square of I type, the oblique square of II type, square, I type triangular form, the filling of II type triangular form mode, and its original porosity of the spheric grain of random alignment is about 40%;
Step 2: the factor of porosity (PL that asks for cementation loss
cEM)
Factor of porosity loss (the PL that cementation causes
cEM) a calculating utilization note point method measure, and it equals the percentage of grain-to-grain cementation thing; Specific practice is, under thin slice, find at random and observe 3-5 the visual field, drive thin slice rotation by rotatable stage, printing opacity has the cementing matter that is of significant change, record respectively each area S1~Sn of cementing matter within sweep of the eye, wherein S1~Sn represents respectively 1~n the area of cementing matter within sweep of the eye, records the area S in FOV (Field of View); That is:
Step 3: the factor of porosity (PL that asks for the loss of intergranular pressolution
iPS)
Mitra and Beard (1980) have proposed the method for quantitative calculating intergranular pressolution loss factor of porosity (PLIPS); Mitra and Beard be the intergranular pressolution owing to spheric grain by the loss factor of porosity calculating in theory;
V
IPS=nπh
2(3r-h)/3 (4)
V
iPSfor the volume on pressure solution ball top, n is the number (be generally 2, the top of spheroid and bottom are divided) on ball top, and h is corrosion height, and r is the original radius of spheric grain;
The original radius r of corrosion height h and particle is determined according to the particle size of the petrographic thin section microphoto of choosing, specific practice is: select continuously at random n oolith that lives through vertical compression, taking the maximum radius of each oolith as original radius r, utilize compasses to draw to each oolith the prototype structure that circle has been rebuild oolith, measure the original radius r of each oolith particle, the least radius of each oolith is intergranular pressolution remaining particle radius rh afterwards, i.e. corrosion amount h=r-rh;
For the oolith of i vertical compression, i=1,2 ... n;
Factor of porosity P1 before corrosion
ican be expressed as
P1
i=[(2r)
3-4/3πr
3]/(2r)
3 (5)
Factor of porosity P2 after corrosion
ican be expressed as:
P2
i=[(2r)
2*(2*rh)-(4/3πr
3-V
IPS)]/[(2r)
2*(2*rh)] (6)
Factor of porosity (the PL of the oolith pressolution loss of i vertical compression
iPSi) be:
PL
IPSi=P1
i-P2
i (7)
Step 4: the factor of porosity (PL that asks for Compaction loss
mC)
Granular limestone factor of porosity is P now
lO(by core porosity measuring), the factor of porosity (PL of mechanical ramming loss
mC) can utilize the distortion of formula 2 to calculate, suppose that original porosity is 40%;
PL
MC=0.4-P
LO-(PL
IPS+PL
CEM) (9)
Step 5: repeating step 1~4, the amount that carbonatite Compaction, intergranular particle pressolution and the cementation at calculating diverse location place reduces factor of porosity.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410444443.XA CN104181092B (en) | 2014-09-03 | 2014-09-03 | Method for quantitatively expressing carbonate rock pore evolution contribution |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410444443.XA CN104181092B (en) | 2014-09-03 | 2014-09-03 | Method for quantitatively expressing carbonate rock pore evolution contribution |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN104181092A true CN104181092A (en) | 2014-12-03 |
CN104181092B CN104181092B (en) | 2017-01-25 |
Family
ID=51962317
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201410444443.XA Expired - Fee Related CN104181092B (en) | 2014-09-03 | 2014-09-03 | Method for quantitatively expressing carbonate rock pore evolution contribution |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN104181092B (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104634295A (en) * | 2015-02-10 | 2015-05-20 | 西南石油大学 | Carbonate rocks cave-type reservoir active volume estimation method |
CN105334149A (en) * | 2015-11-24 | 2016-02-17 | 中国石油大学(北京) | Micro-pore structure evaluation and reservoir classification method for tight reservoirs |
CN106841001A (en) * | 2017-01-17 | 2017-06-13 | 西南石油大学 | A kind of tight sand porosity based on reservoir quality Analysis The Main Control Factor, Permeability Prediction method |
CN107228816A (en) * | 2017-06-01 | 2017-10-03 | 中国石油大学(华东) | Different type pore evolution evaluation method in a kind of mud shale |
CN108344854A (en) * | 2018-02-06 | 2018-07-31 | 长江大学 | The cementing quantitative forecasting technique for subtracting hole amount of clastic reservoir rock based on diagenetic process |
CN113049471A (en) * | 2021-03-23 | 2021-06-29 | 中国石油大学(北京) | Recovery method for porosity evolution process of carbonate rock sequence stratum |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103344541A (en) * | 2013-07-08 | 2013-10-09 | 中国石油大学(华东) | Method for measuring total porosity of shale |
CN103512838A (en) * | 2013-09-18 | 2014-01-15 | 中国石油大学(华东) | Method for determining contribution of pores with different apertures in shale reservoir stratum to porosity |
-
2014
- 2014-09-03 CN CN201410444443.XA patent/CN104181092B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103344541A (en) * | 2013-07-08 | 2013-10-09 | 中国石油大学(华东) | Method for measuring total porosity of shale |
CN103512838A (en) * | 2013-09-18 | 2014-01-15 | 中国石油大学(华东) | Method for determining contribution of pores with different apertures in shale reservoir stratum to porosity |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
Title |
---|
WANG RUIFEI ET AL.: "《Diagenesis of deep sandstone reservoirs and a quantitative model of porosity evolution: Taking the third member of Shahejie Formation in the Wendong Oilfield, Dongpu Sag, as an example》", 《PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT》 * |
操应长 等.: "《冀中坳陷廊固凹陷河西务构造带古近系沙河街组四段储集层孔隙度演化定量研究》", 《古地理学报》 * |
梁晓伟 等.: "《特低渗透储集层成岩作用及孔隙演化定量表征》", 《新疆石油地质》 * |
Cited By (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104634295A (en) * | 2015-02-10 | 2015-05-20 | 西南石油大学 | Carbonate rocks cave-type reservoir active volume estimation method |
CN104634295B (en) * | 2015-02-10 | 2017-08-25 | 西南石油大学 | Carbonate rock cave type reservoir effective volume evaluation method |
CN105334149A (en) * | 2015-11-24 | 2016-02-17 | 中国石油大学(北京) | Micro-pore structure evaluation and reservoir classification method for tight reservoirs |
CN106841001A (en) * | 2017-01-17 | 2017-06-13 | 西南石油大学 | A kind of tight sand porosity based on reservoir quality Analysis The Main Control Factor, Permeability Prediction method |
CN106841001B (en) * | 2017-01-17 | 2020-03-10 | 重庆科技学院 | Compact sandstone porosity and permeability prediction method based on reservoir quality master control factor analysis |
CN107228816A (en) * | 2017-06-01 | 2017-10-03 | 中国石油大学(华东) | Different type pore evolution evaluation method in a kind of mud shale |
CN107228816B (en) * | 2017-06-01 | 2018-11-13 | 中国石油大学(华东) | Different type pore evolution evaluation method in a kind of mud shale |
CN108344854A (en) * | 2018-02-06 | 2018-07-31 | 长江大学 | The cementing quantitative forecasting technique for subtracting hole amount of clastic reservoir rock based on diagenetic process |
CN108344854B (en) * | 2018-02-06 | 2021-01-08 | 长江大学 | Quantitative prediction method for clastic rock reservoir cementation pore-reducing amount based on diagenesis process |
CN113049471A (en) * | 2021-03-23 | 2021-06-29 | 中国石油大学(北京) | Recovery method for porosity evolution process of carbonate rock sequence stratum |
CN113049471B (en) * | 2021-03-23 | 2021-10-08 | 中国石油大学(北京) | Recovery method for porosity evolution process of carbonate rock sequence stratum |
US11487045B2 (en) | 2021-03-23 | 2022-11-01 | China University Of Petroleum-Beijing | Method for recovering porosity evolution process of sequence stratigraphy of carbonate rocks |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN104181092B (en) | 2017-01-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN104181092A (en) | Method for quantitatively expressing carbonate rock pore evolution contribution | |
Krumbein | Measurement and geological significance of shape and roundness of sedimentary particles | |
CN105551004A (en) | Core CT image processing-based remaining oil micro-occurrence representing method | |
Thovert et al. | Percolation in three-dimensional fracture networks for arbitrary size and shape distributions | |
CN103122762A (en) | Detection method and device for effective fractured intervals in unconventional shale oil and gas reservoir | |
CN103995947A (en) | Improved coal seam floor water inrush vulnerability evaluation method | |
Liu et al. | A new method for threshold determination of gray image | |
CN105425280A (en) | Prediction method for mineral modulus and pore structure | |
Mehta et al. | An investigation on the particle breakage of Indian River sands | |
CN105654482B (en) | Based on the determination method of the soil-rock mixture characterization unit body scale of Digital image technology | |
JP6805449B2 (en) | Soil quality control method and soil quality monitoring system | |
CN102312669A (en) | Method (Ip) for evaluating properties of reservoir based on gas survey logging data | |
CN111272631A (en) | Improved sandstone reservoir pore structure quantitative characterization method | |
Rodriguez | Importance of the particle shape on mechanical properties of soil materials | |
CN105114065A (en) | Method for simulating hydraulic fracturing fracture extension process | |
CN105257284B (en) | A kind of logged well using element capture spectra determines the method and device of tufaceous content | |
Sweeney et al. | Pore size distributions calculated from 3-D images of DEM-simulated powder compacts | |
Wang et al. | Pore Structure and Fractal Characteristics of Tight Sandstones Based on Nuclear Magnetic Resonance: A Case Study in the Triassic Yanchang Formation of the Ordos Basin, China | |
CN102587888A (en) | Method for determining migration velocity of displacement front in CO2 miscible displacement physical simulation | |
CN112489735B (en) | Carbonate cement content calculating method based on logging and linear particle swarm optimization | |
Goehring | On the scaling and ordering of columnar joints | |
CN112906319A (en) | Tailings pond dam break mud evolution simulation method based on unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing and three-dimensional SPH | |
Guo et al. | Evaluation of boundary effects in simple shear tests using discrete element modelling | |
CN102472690A (en) | Method for predicting a physical interaction effect between a tire and a surface course | |
CN103077556B (en) | The Three-dimension Numerical Model method for designing of sand production |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
C14 | Grant of patent or utility model | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee | ||
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20170125 Termination date: 20170903 |