CN103499438B - Based on the material Adaptability Evaluation Method of residual life - Google Patents

Based on the material Adaptability Evaluation Method of residual life Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN103499438B
CN103499438B CN201310439843.7A CN201310439843A CN103499438B CN 103499438 B CN103499438 B CN 103499438B CN 201310439843 A CN201310439843 A CN 201310439843A CN 103499438 B CN103499438 B CN 103499438B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
residual life
life
evaluation method
residual
adaptability evaluation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201310439843.7A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN103499438A (en
Inventor
刘学军
王辉
李斌
张军强
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nanjing Tech University
Original Assignee
Nanjing Tech University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nanjing Tech University filed Critical Nanjing Tech University
Priority to CN201310439843.7A priority Critical patent/CN103499438B/en
Publication of CN103499438A publication Critical patent/CN103499438A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN103499438B publication Critical patent/CN103499438B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Abstract

The invention discloses a kind of material Adaptability Evaluation Method based on residual life, the first step: the residual life of predict device; Second step: the residual life of prediction was compared with the life-span of expectation; 3rd step: residual life is less than the life-span that user expects, reports to the police, and analyzes corrosion rate further; 4th step: corrosion rate exceedes value of setting up defences, and proposed materials is upgraded.For the deficiency of present material environmental suitability evaluation method, proposing and residual life impact introduced in existing material environment Adaptability Evaluation Method, is to existing methodical important supplement and perfect.It is also proposed a kind of method for predicting residual useful life of practicality, for the material environment Adaptability Evaluation realizing the life-cycle is laid a good foundation.

Description

Based on the material Adaptability Evaluation Method of residual life
Technical field
The invention belongs to landification equipment safety assessment technique field, be specifically related to predicting residual useful life and the adaptability for materials evaluation of petrochemical equipment.
Background technology
Oil variety day by day variation causes the sulphur content cloth in oil product and the continuous change of acid distribution, and petrochemical equipment because of material and incompatible equipment corrosion, erosion, the coking situation brought of its environment of being on active service day by day serious, the principal risk that becoming affect petrochemical equipment even running is originated.Therefore, petrochemical equipment existing military service material and current equipment refine crude oil adaptability problem just become very important, if material can not meet current Service Environment requirement, so will carry out necessary upgrading to existing material, so not only be conducive to the safety of support equipment, and can effectively prevent unplanned property from stopping work, reduce costs, extension device serviceable life.
Current material upgrading principle is mainly evaluated its adaptability for materials problem by the corrosion mechanism to petrochemical equipment internal corrosion media variations situation and corresponding bearing device after crude oil in poor quality, corrosion rate situation of change.By exceeding the material of value of setting up defences to corrosion rate, provide the suggestion of upgrading, the corrosion of the equipment in whole device can be made to consume after material upgrading and substantially be in same level line, thus eliminate the weak link in device.
Although it is the adaptive key character of reflection material environment that corrosion rate exceeds standard, the residual life of equipment more can reflect the possibility of equipment failure, therefore, is another key character of evaluating material environmental suitability.But current material environment Adaptability Evaluation Method does not all consider the residual life impact of equipment.
Summary of the invention
Residual life is a reflection material environment adaptive key character, and residual life impact is introduced in existing material environment Adaptability Evaluation Method by the present invention, is to existing methodical important supplement and perfect.
The process of put forward the methods of the present invention is as follows: on the basis of damage mechanism analysis, according to evaluation, the rating scale of e-quipment and pipe design standards, damage, formulates the residual life assessment method based on uniform corrosion and local corrosion.If residual life is less than the life-span that user expects, report to the police, analyze corrosion rate further and whether exceed value of setting up defences, if exceeded standard, judge that material can not meet environmental suitability, material upgrading is carried out in suggestion, otherwise, only provide the prompting of residual life deficiency.
Pipeline residual Life Calculation subelement carries out, i.e. straight tube, elbow, threeway, reduced pipe; Container residual Life Calculation divides tower, spherical tank, horizontal vessel, vertical vessel.(as GB/T20801.3, GB/T19624, JB4732, GB50316) is calculated by concerned countries, industry standard, undertaken by elastic failure criterion and plastic failure criterion respectively, as long as meet one of them criterion namely to think and do not lose efficacy, safe handling can be continued.
Whether predicting residual useful life process is as follows: lost efficacy by current actual measurement wall thickness calculate, if lost efficacy, wall thickness was subtracted year corrosion rate and calculate as new wall thickness (namely a year after calculated wall thickness) and whether lost efficacy, so repeatedly, until lost efficacy, calculated and terminated.There is last computation wall thickness when losing efficacy and safe wall thickness, cycle index and the residual life time limit.Above-mentioned computation process is realized by software systems, avoids artificial complicated calculations.
The invention has the beneficial effects as follows: for the deficiency of present material environmental suitability evaluation method, propose and residual life impact introduced in existing material environment Adaptability Evaluation Method, is to existing methodical important supplement and perfect.It is also proposed a kind of method for predicting residual useful life of practicality, for the material environment Adaptability Evaluation realizing the life-cycle is laid a good foundation.
Embodiment
To be specifically described implementation process of the present invention at three catalytic unit P-206 pipeline straight lengths of certain petroleum chemical enterprise and D-102 spherical tank uniform corrosion.By manually to calculate or software systems realize predicting residual useful life process.
Embodiment one
Based on the material Adaptability Evaluation Method of the residual life of pipeline straight tube uniform corrosion
Step 1: obtaining corrosion rate according to corrosion monitoring (spot thickness measurement or on-line corrosion monitoring) or corrosion analysis is 0.5mm/.
Step 2: select tubular type to be " straight tube ", elastic failure criterion presses GB/T20801.3-2006 " pressure pipeline specification industrial pipeline the 3rd part: project navigator " criterion calculation, and plastic failure criterion presses JB4732-95 " Steel Pressure Vessels analysis and designation standard " criterion calculation.
Step 3: input calculating parameter, the 4 years serviceable life of expectation of this straight tube.
By straight tube correlation parameter as table 1, bring in the standard in step 2, calculate, calculation procedure is as follows:
Elastic failure criterion: p ( D o - 2 Yt ) 2 t Φ L ≤ S - - - ( 1 )
Plastic failure criterion, circumference stress is checked: p ≤ P L 0 1.8 - - - ( 2 )
Plastic failure criterion, axial stress is checked: ( p P Lo ) 2 + ( M A M Lo ) 2 ≤ 0.44 - - - ( 3 )
Wherein:
P---on-stream pressure, MPa;
D o---pipe fitting overall diameter, mm;
T---pipe fitting calculated wall thickness, mm;
S---tube material permissible stress under operating temperature, MPa;
Φ l---pipe fitting longitudinal seam welding coefficient: weld pipe 100%RT detects or solid drawn tube gets 1.0, and weld pipe does not detect or inspects by random samples gets 0.80;
Φ c---pipe fitting girth joint welding coefficient: 100%RT detects and then gets 1.0, does not detect or inspects by random samples, getting 0.80
CA---corrosion allowance, mm, if without these data, then by project engineering practice, stainless steel gets 0, and other steel get 1.6
T n---pipe fitting nominal thickness, mm;
Y---design factor, dimensionless, wherein D i=D o-2t;
---flow stress, Mpa, for alloy steel for mild carbon steel wherein Φ=min (Φ l, Φ c);
P l0---pressure in zero defect pipeline plastic limit, MPa, computing formula:
wherein R o=D o/ 2, R i=R o-t=D o/ 2-t;
M l0---the plastic limit bending moment under Based on Pure Bending Moment, Nmm, computing formula:
wherein R o=D o/ 2, R i=R o-t=D o/ 2-t;
M a---long-time load moment of flexure, Nmm, computing formula:
M A = S [ Φ C - Φ L · D o × max ( 0.9 t n - CA - 0.5 , t X ) 2 [ D o - 2 Y · max ( 0.9 t n - CA - 0.5 , t X ) ] × ( 0.9 t n - CA ) ] × π D o 3 32 ( 1 - α 4 )
Wherein α=D i/ D o; D i=D o-2t; t x---the shaping minimum permission thickness of pipeline, carbon steel and low alloy steel are 3mm, and high-alloy steel (as stainless steel) is 2mm.
Whether lost efficacy by current wall thickness calculate, and if result of calculation does not meet formula (1), also do not meet formula (2) or (3) simultaneously, namely think and there occurs inefficacy.
If result of calculation meets formula (1), then think and lost efficacy.
If result of calculation meets formula (2) and (3), then think and lost efficacy.
If lost efficacy, then carry out step 4.
Table 1 calculates input calculating parameter when whether losing efficacy
Step 4: start prediction and calculation, deducts average annual etching extent (i.e. year corrosion rate) by actual measurement wall thickness, repeat the 3rd step, determine whether to lose efficacy, until lost efficacy, and calculating end, cycle index and the residual life time limit.
The present embodiment obtains residual life 2.5 years, is less than and expects 4 years serviceable life, carry out upgrade of material warning;
Step 5: corrosion rate is drawn by step 1.Due in the present embodiment, corrosion rate 0.5mm/ exceedes user preset value (this example gets 0.35mm/) and residual life is less than and expects serviceable life, suggestion customer upgrade material.
Embodiment two
Based on the material Adaptability Evaluation Method of the residual life of spherical tank uniform corrosion
Step 1: obtaining corrosion rate according to corrosion monitoring (spot thickness measurement or on-line corrosion monitoring) or corrosion analysis is 0.3mm/.
Step 2: select Container Type to be " spherical tank ", elastic failure criterion presses GB12337-1998 " steel-made ball storage tank " criterion calculation, plastic failure criterion presses GB19624-2004 " with containing defect Safty Evaluation of Pressure Vessels " criterion calculation.
Step 3: input calculating parameter as table 2, the 4 years serviceable life of expectation of this spherical tank.
By the correlation parameter of spherical tank, bring in the standard in step 2, calculate:
Elastic failure criterion: p ( D o - t ) 4 tΦ ≤ S - - - ( 3 )
Plastic failure criterion: p ≤ P L 0 1.8 - - - ( 4 )
Wherein:
P---on-stream pressure, MPa;
D o---spherical tank (shell) overall diameter, mm;
T---spherical shell calculated wall thickness, mm;
S---material permissible stress under operating temperature, Mpa;
Φ---double-welded butt joint and be equivalent to the complete penetraction and fusion in welding open joint of welding by both sides: 100% Non-Destructive Testing is got 1.00 local Non-Destructive Testings and got 0.85;
---flow stress, Mpa, for alloy steel for mild carbon steel σ ‾ ′ = 0.5 Φ ( σ s + σ b ) ;
P l0---pressure in zero defect cylindrical shell plastic limit, MPa, computing formula:
wherein R o=D o/ 2, R i=R o-t=D o/ 2-t
Whether lost efficacy by current wall thickness calculate, and if result of calculation does not meet formula (3), also do not meet formula (4), namely think and there occurs inefficacy.
If result of calculation meets formula (3), then think and lost efficacy.
If result of calculation meets formula (4), then think and lost efficacy.
Lost efficacy, then carry out step 4.
Step 4: start prediction and calculation, actual measurement wall thickness is deducted average annual etching extent, repeats the 3rd step, determines whether to lose efficacy, until lost efficacy, calculated and terminated, cycle index and the residual life time limit, this example obtains residual life 3 years, is less than and expects 4 years serviceable life, carry out upgrade of material warning.
Step 5: corrosion rate is drawn by step 1.Because the corrosion rate in the present embodiment is that 0.3mm/ exceedes user preset value (this example gets 0.25mm/) and residual life is less than and expects serviceable life, suggestion customer upgrade material.
Table 2 inputs calculating parameter

Claims (3)

1., based on the material Adaptability Evaluation Method of residual life, it is characterized in that:
The first step: the residual life of predict device;
Second step: the residual life of prediction was compared with the life-span of expectation;
3rd step: residual life is less than the life-span that user expects, reports to the police, and analyzes corrosion rate further;
4th step: corrosion rate exceedes value of setting up defences, and proposed materials is upgraded;
The forecasting process of residual life is as follows:
The first step: the wall thickness of measuring equipment;
Second step: whether lost efficacy by current actual measurement wall thickness calculate, above-mentioned calculating adopts national standard, industry standard, calculates respectively by elastic failure criterion and plastic failure criterion;
3rd step: the inefficacy carried out according to elastic failure criterion and plastic failure criterion calculates, as long as one of them lost efficacy, then judges not lose efficacy; Do not lose efficacy, carried out the 4th step;
4th step: actual measurement wall thickness is deducted average annual etching extent, repeats second step, the 3rd step, determines whether to lose efficacy;
5th step: repeat the 4th step, until lost efficacy, calculated and terminated, cycle index and the residual life time limit.
2. the material Adaptability Evaluation Method based on residual life according to claim 1, is characterized in that: pipeline residual Life Calculation is by element: straight tube, elbow, threeway, reduced pipe calculate respectively.
3. the material Adaptability Evaluation Method based on residual life according to claim 1, is characterized in that: container residual Life Calculation calculates respectively by tower, spherical tank, horizontal vessel, vertical vessel.
CN201310439843.7A 2013-09-25 2013-09-25 Based on the material Adaptability Evaluation Method of residual life Active CN103499438B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201310439843.7A CN103499438B (en) 2013-09-25 2013-09-25 Based on the material Adaptability Evaluation Method of residual life

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201310439843.7A CN103499438B (en) 2013-09-25 2013-09-25 Based on the material Adaptability Evaluation Method of residual life

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN103499438A CN103499438A (en) 2014-01-08
CN103499438B true CN103499438B (en) 2016-01-20

Family

ID=49864669

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201310439843.7A Active CN103499438B (en) 2013-09-25 2013-09-25 Based on the material Adaptability Evaluation Method of residual life

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN103499438B (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105676807A (en) * 2015-12-29 2016-06-15 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Optimization system and optimization method for refining device equipment integrity operation window
CN107229806B (en) * 2017-06-26 2019-11-12 福州大学 A kind of historic building structure remaining life Predicting Reliability method suitable for corrosive environment
CN113762651B (en) * 2020-05-28 2024-03-29 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Method for evaluating residual strength of wellhead device
CN112014303A (en) * 2020-08-28 2020-12-01 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Equipment part corrosion early warning method and device

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101071098A (en) * 2007-06-19 2007-11-14 广州市煤气公司 Underground steel gas pipe network pipeline corrosion prediction system
CN101915728A (en) * 2010-07-27 2010-12-15 沈阳建筑大学 Testing method for predicting residual service life of buried metal water supply pipeline
CN102590459A (en) * 2012-03-09 2012-07-18 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 System and method for detecting and evaluating corrosion of buried pipeline

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003090506A (en) * 2001-09-13 2003-03-28 Babcock Hitachi Kk Method and device to diagnose damage of boiler heat transfer pipe different material joint welding part
JP2010191494A (en) * 2009-02-16 2010-09-02 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd System and method for diagnosing remaining life of high temperature plant equipment

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101071098A (en) * 2007-06-19 2007-11-14 广州市煤气公司 Underground steel gas pipe network pipeline corrosion prediction system
CN101915728A (en) * 2010-07-27 2010-12-15 沈阳建筑大学 Testing method for predicting residual service life of buried metal water supply pipeline
CN102590459A (en) * 2012-03-09 2012-07-18 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 System and method for detecting and evaluating corrosion of buried pipeline

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
油气长输腐蚀管道剩余寿命(体积型)评价研究;油气长输腐蚀管道剩余寿命(体积型)评价研究;《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库 工程科技I辑》;20070115(第1期);B019-161 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN103499438A (en) 2014-01-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN103499438B (en) Based on the material Adaptability Evaluation Method of residual life
CN104122196B (en) Oil-gas pipeline high-strength steel DC stray current corrosion evaluation method under stress condition
Ayala-Uraga et al. Fatigue reliability-based assessment of welded joints applying consistent fracture mechanics formulations
Zhang et al. Failure assessment on offshore girth welded pipelines due to corrosion defects
Karami Review of corrosion role in gas pipeline and some methods for preventing it
Fessler Pipeline corrosion
Otegui Challenges to the integrity of old pipelines buried in stable ground
Velázquez et al. Failure pressure estimation for an aged and corroded oil and gas pipeline: A finite element study
Zelmati et al. A probabilistic approach to estimate the remaining life and reliability of corroded pipelines
Stepova et al. Calculation of steel pipeline corrosion depth at the galvanic corrosive element operation
Hopkins Assessing the significance of corrosion in onshore oil and gas pipelines
Bai Mechanism analysis, anti-corrosion techniques and numerical modeling of corrosion in energy industry
Shirazi et al. A review on current understanding of pipeline circumferential stress corrosion cracking in near-neutral PH environment
Cosham et al. Best practice in pipeline defect assessment
CN104462806A (en) Non-metallic pipe life prediction method
Sun et al. Comparison of the creep and damage failure prediction of the new, service-aged and repaired thick-walled circumferential CrMoV pipe welds using material properties at 640° C
Samal et al. A finite element program for on-line life assessment of critical plant components
Rombado et al. Corrosion-Fatigue Crack Growth Performance of Titanium Grade 29 Welds in Tapered Stress Joints
Salina Farini Bahaman et al. Integrity of API 5L X56 Offshore Pipeline Subjected to Girth Weld Anomalies and Corrosion Using Probabilistic Methods
Cai et al. Discussion on New Evaluation Technology of Non-Metallic Composite Continuous Pipe for Oil and Gas Field
Jaske Life assessment of hot reheat steam pipe
Aljaroudi et al. Probabilistic methods for predicting the remaining life of offshore pipelines
Purwidyasari et al. Estimating Remaining Life and Fitness-For-Services Evaluation of Fuel Piping Systems
Paulin Jr et al. Economic Impact of Current SIF, Flexibility, Inspection and Manufacturing Changes As They Relate to the B31 Piping Codes
Kusner arise with high consequences, the operator does not have insurance to cover losses and the federal government does not have to reimburse the state. My understanding is

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
C14 Grant of patent or utility model
GR01 Patent grant